Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/09/08
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
![19 File:"Damn, Daniel!".png](#File:"Damn,_Daniel!".png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_The_Real_book.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.VALIDÉ.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(13743681195).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_2668088.jpg){kind=link}
..jpg){kind=link}
..jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_headquarter.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
because nobody cares aboot tis guy 216.87.230.71 06:14, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: (non-admin) no valid reason for deletion. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:41, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Foi enviado errado Prvieira2 (talk) 00:33, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 10:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Muhammednaseefkp (talk) 05:54, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Keep No, your deletion request is nonsense. Read the file description, and if you don't understand it, hesitate before starting a deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:23, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 11:16, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Because it is A selfie Muhammednaseefkp (talk) 05:55, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep In use. Please check whether a file is in use before you start a deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:22, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 11:18, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Advertising, uploader is apparently the subject, photographer unknown. MKFI (talk) 07:24, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:49, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:47, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
No educational purpose apparent. Joschi71 (talk) 08:27, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:50, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
No educational purpose apparent. copy vio Joschi71 (talk) 08:27, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
No educational purpose apparent. copy vio Joschi71 (talk) 08:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
No educational purpose apparent. copy vio Joschi71 (talk) 08:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
No educational purpose apparent. copy vio Joschi71 (talk) 08:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
No educational purpose apparent. copy vio Joschi71 (talk) 08:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
No educational purpose apparent. Joschi71 (talk) 08:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
No educational purpose apparent. copy vio Joschi71 (talk) 08:30, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:58, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I've uploaded a better version of this image, so this one is not needed now 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 10:07, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
- 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆, link it, please. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
- Thanks. Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:38, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks.
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Lê Tuấn Trung (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seems obvious the user is claiming web photos and screenshots as their own.
- File:Duy Hưng Garage Hạnh phúc.jpg
- File:Tiến Linh 2020.jpg
- File:Bae Ji-won 2022.jpg
- File:Chun Jae-ho.jpg
- File:Nguyễn Hữu Thắng SEA Games 29.jpg
- File:Khai mac sea games 31.jpg
- File:Khaccuong2010.jpg
- File:Việt Khuê 2021 Sôi động Euro 2020.jpg
- File:Biencuong2014.webp
- File:Ông Sang Thương ngày nắng về.jpg
- File:Bà Hiền Thương ngày nắng về.jpg
- File:Ông Long.jpg
- File:Duynam.jpg
- File:NSNDMinhHoà.jpg
- File:Ngọc Huyền Thương ngày nắng về.jpg
- File:Nam-Dinh.jpg
- File:CamphaQNinh.jpg
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:25, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope: personal (hate)fantasy map Enyavar (talk) 07:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I got one laugh out of this (and I love France), but delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:48, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:13, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded for w:Angela Stone. No other use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:13, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:54, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Gower (talk) 13:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:54, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope, headless photo of an unknown individual Oaktree b (talk) 17:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
![17:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/09/08#c-Oaktree_b-20220908172900-File:"Damn,_Daniel!".png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
![05:52, 9 September 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/09/08#c-George_Chernilevsky-20220909055200-File:"Damn,_Daniel!".png){kind=link}
Out of scope Trade (talk) 17:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
non-notable individual, unused photo, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 17:40, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
non-notable singer, unused in any wiki Oaktree b (talk) 17:44, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused photo, out of scope, non-notable individual Oaktree b (talk) 17:46, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
_The_Real_book.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_The_Real_book.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal file. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 17:53, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
_The_Real_book.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
_The_Real_book.jpg){kind=link}
promotional, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 17:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
This bit of personal advice on choosing a wedding dress is outside COM:SCOPE. If any of this text were needed anywhere, it should be text not a PDF file. Marbletan (talk) 18:38, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
No educational or encyclopedic use; deletion also appears to have been requested by the person portraited. Encycloon (talk) 20:54, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This photo reveals a private location. Thyj (talk) 07:30, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Does not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:47, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination: The photo EXIF has no specific location. Thyj (talk) 11:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Withdrawn by nominator.(non-admin closure) --A1Cafel (talk) 10:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
I'm the owner, file was downloaded, postprocessed and published without my permission. If necessary, you may contact me via Flickr. 2A01:598:A12F:AF03:2CE7:B1E4:FA7C:38F1 18:38, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- After a short visual comparison I am not totally convinced about this claim. "Our" version has better technical quality/resolution and in the lower part of the image there are quite some differences between the images. --Túrelio (talk) 19:26, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- I took a film photo in 1982. This synagogue, weakened by an earthquake, was demolished in 1985. Later the image circulated, including on the internet, as far as Hong Kong. Later still I uploaded this to Commons. In the meantime I have made "enemies" on the internet, on the one hand because my written contributions do not align enough with the nationalist or communist positions which dominate in the historiography of the countries of Eastern Europe, and on the other hand because I openly challenged the No-FOP and also, not the copyright rules, but their application to ineligible images, or "free of rights" according to the laws of several countries. As a result, a part of my contributions and images became suspicious in the eyes of a few contributors (mainly Romanian and Russian), and many of them were deleted, even when they were not found anywhere else, and even when they were well cited elsewhere as coming from me (an example here [1]). That's life. That's past. I am retired now. Wishes, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 12:09, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:15, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Wrong details and everything, its false Lukako1234 (talk) 23:51, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. COM:CSD#G7 applies. Uploader's request, recently created unused content. Marbletan (talk) 13:07, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:14, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump/Copyright&oldid=687377703#twitter.com/10downingstreet_photos it appears that this file sadly needs to be deleted (also applies to other images from this source - what is the proper way to request mass-deletion?) Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:59, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Files in Browse archived Twitter channels. You can see at the bottom "All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0, except where otherwise stated"--A1Cafel (talk) 14:10, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
{{Vd}}, they didn't archive the photo, as https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/https://twitter.com/10DowningStreet/status/1201551602152329221/photo/1 is 404-compliant (and so are https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/https://twitter.com/10DowningStreet/status/1201551602152329221/ and https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/https://twitter.com/10DowningStreet/status/1201551602152329221 ).— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Comment They're located at here--A1Cafel (talk) 16:40, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep then. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Does it mean that Commons:Deletion requests/File:Downing Street, Earth Hour 2021.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Red in No. 10 Downing Street.jpg should be undeleted? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 09:55, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Mateusz Konieczny: If you can find those photos on https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/twitter/10DowningStreet sure. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:34, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- I assume "Red in No. 10" is https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/twitter/10DowningStreet?year_from=2018&year_to=2018&amount=90&sort=date_newest&from=90 ("Downing Street is lit up in red to mark #AntiSlaveryDay and joins others around the UK calling to end modern slavery.") and from memory "Earth Hour" is https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/twitter/10DowningStreet?year_from=2021&year_to=2021&amount=90&sort=date_newest&from=560 ("Tonight we joined millions across the globe in switching off our lights"). I'll request undeletion. --Lord Belbury (talk) 11:00, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Mateusz Konieczny: If you can find those photos on https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/twitter/10DowningStreet sure. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:34, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:49, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:20, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Likely not own work and not-notable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:48, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:21, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:Scope: text-only PDF, attempt to create a Wikipedia article by uploading a PDF. MKFI (talk) 08:44, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:22, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 12:17, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:26, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Taken by Franziska Krug in 2019: https://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/tina-turner-during-the-premiere-of-the-musical-tina-nachrichtenfoto/1128577244 FoolInLove (talk) 00:07, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Copyright violated. Thyj (talk) 17:46, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Copyright violation. Marbletan (talk) 13:13, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tina Turner in 2022.webp. Marbletan (talk) 13:13, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 16:48, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a crop of an image that is credited to "Darkroom/Interscope Records". There is no evidence that Darkroom/Interscope Records has licensed this photo under CC-BY-SA 4.0, so this file should be deleted as presumably non-free. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:51, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 16:48, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
It is an outdated logo not in use by the festival anymore Hchrist10 (talk) 02:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Then it's historical. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 16:50, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Author copyright 2010 John Kish IV". VRT permission from John Kish IV needed. MKFI (talk) 07:26, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Frangopol photo 10-inch format.jpg” under ticket:2022091410012877. --Ww2censor (talk) 21:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: permission provided. --Strakhov (talk) 16:52, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Poorly photoshopped image used as a one-off gag in a discussion. Ilovemydoodle (talk) 11:40, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep being used once is still in use. Project-related humor is not required to meet any artistic standard. It’s also a userbox illustration and is on one of my userpages. Dronebogus (talk) 13:50, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Llwyld: Ilovemydoodle (talk) 08:08, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Strakhov (talk) 16:57, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Martilstelli (talk · contribs)
[edit]René Crevel died in 1971. Copyright violation.
- File:(0719) René Crevel. Papier peint.jpg
- File:(5 A) René Crevel. Vase porcelaine, Sèvres 1926.jpg
- File:(5 P) René Crevel Vase porcelaine Sèvres.jpg
- File:(1 D) René Crevel. Menu Bénédictine.jpg
- File:(1 B) René Crevel. Programme de la Semaine de l'Aviation de Rouen.jpg
- File:(2368) René Crevel. Maison La Rurale Française.jpg
- File:(2012) René Crevel Publicité panneau décoratif.jpg
- File:(2001) René Crevel Maquette du Centre de l'Artisanat.jpg
- File:(1947) René Crevel. Revêtement émaux de grand feu.jpg
- File:(1912) René Crevel. Bas-relief Cité ouvrière, Garches.jpg
- File:(1902) René Crevel. Chaise montable.jpg
- File:(1656) René Crevel. Projet abri routier.jpg
- File:(1538) René Crevel. Aménagement Rive de Saint-Cloud, Musée.jpg
- File:(1536) René Crevel. Projet de stade.jpg
- File:(1533) René Crevel Palais de l'Artisanat, variante.jpg
- File:(1503) René Crevel. Salon en rotin.jpg
- File:(1499) René Crevel Modèle de salle à manger.jpg
- File:(1460) René Crevel. Meubles montables SOS.jpg
- File:(1388) René Crevel Projet de château d'eau.jpg
- File:(1378) René Crevel Projet d'hôtel.jpg
- File:(1374) René Crevel. Maison Idées de France.jpg
- File:(1371) René Crevel. Maison d'artiste.jpg
- File:(5 C) René Crevel. Vitrail profane.jpg
- File:(5 B) René Crevel. Vitrail commémoratif.jpg
- File:(4 F) René Crevel. Service à café.jpg
- File:(4 C) René Crevel. Papier peint.jpg
- File:(4 B) René Crevel. Antichambre Ambassade Française.jpg
- File:(3 N) René Crevel. Siège bois laqué.jpg
- File:(3 M) René Crevel. Buffet-vitrine.jpg
- File:(3 L) René Crevel. Ma future maison.jpg
- File:(3 J) René Crevel. Cabinet de travail.jpg
- File:(3 I) René Crevel. Maisons sur le port.jpg
- File:(3 H) René Crevel. Affiche bal masqué.jpg
- File:(1364) René Crevel Palais de l'Artisanat.jpg
- File:(1362) René Crevel. Maison de France.jpg
- File:(0998) René Crevel Femmes aux oiseaux.jpg
- File:(0962) René Crevel Antilope bondissant.jpg
- File:(0703) René Crevel. Papier peint.jpg
- File:(0693) René Crevel. Papier peint.jpg
- File:(5 ZR) René Crevel. Tapisserie La Chasse.jpg
- File:(5 ZQ) René Crevel. Chambre de Madame.jpg
- File:(5 ZN) René Crevel. Dans un jardin.jpg
- File:(5 ZM) René Crevel. Port-en-Bessin.jpg
- File:(5 ZL) René Crevel. Les Cribleurs.jpg
- File:(5 ZK) René Crevel. Fécamp, Chalutiers au sec.jpg
- File:(5 ZI) René Crevel. Le Cavalier à l'oiseau.jpg
- File:(5 ZH) René Crevel. Fécamp, Marins assis sur la jetée nord.jpg
- File:(5 ZG) René Crevel. Fécamp, vue du port.jpg
- File:(5 ZF) René Crevel. Paysage avec baigneur.jpg
- File:(5 ZE) René Crevel Trois Femmes dans un jardin.jpg
- File:(5 ZD) René Crevel. Bar Técalémit.jpg
- File:(5 ZC) René Crevel. Façade Frigéco.jpg
- File:(5 ZB) René Crevel. Dressoir lumineux.jpg
- File:(5 ZA) René Crevel. Projet Autos-Relais.jpg
- File:(5 Z) René Crevel. Meuble à hauteur d'appui.jpg
- File:(5 X) René Crevel. Petit fauteuil à pans coupés.jpg
- File:(5 W) René Crevel. Modèle de buffet.jpg
- File:(5 V) René Crevel. Modèle de buffet.jpg
- File:(5 U) René Crevel. Modèles de sièges.jpg
- File:(5 S) René Crevel Modèle de chaise.jpg
- File:(5 R) René Crevel Projet coiffeuse.jpg
- File:(5 Q) René Crevel Coupe émail.jpg
- File:(5 O) René Crevel Service à thé.jpg
- File:(5 L) René Crevel Assiette porcelaine.jpg
- File:(5 K) René Crevel Assiette porcelaine.jpg
- File:(5 H) René Crevel. Tapis.jpg
- File:(5 D) René Crevel Tapis au point noué.jpg
- File:(3 G) René Crevel. Décor de scène.jpg
- File:(3 F) René Crevel. Costume de théâtre.jpg
- File:(3 E) René Crevel. Costume de scène.jpg
- File:(3 A) René Crevel. décor de théâtre.jpg
- File:(2 J) René Crevel. Fécamp, la Côte de la Vierge.jpg
- File:(2 H) René Crevel. La Valleuse, Senneville.jpg
- File:(2 F) René Crevel. Triel, l'Église.jpg
- File:René Crevel Décor de trumeau.jpg
- File:René Crevel, tableau.jpg
- File:(1 F) René Crevel Affiche Fécamp casino bains de varech.jpg
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Papier_peint.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Vase_porcelaine,_S%C3%A8vres_1926.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel_Vase_porcelaine_S%C3%A8vres.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Menu_B%C3%A9n%C3%A9dictine.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Programme_de_la_Semaine_de_l%27Aviation_de_Rouen.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Maison_La_Rurale_Fran%C3%A7aise.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel_Publicit%C3%A9_panneau_d%C3%A9coratif.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel_Maquette_du_Centre_de_l%27Artisanat.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Rev%C3%AAtement_%C3%A9maux_de_grand_feu.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Bas-relief_Cit%C3%A9_ouvri%C3%A8re,_Garches.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Chaise_montable.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Projet_abri_routier.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Am%C3%A9nagement_Rive_de_Saint-Cloud,_Mus%C3%A9e.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Projet_de_stade.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel_Palais_de_l%27Artisanat,_variante.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Salon_en_rotin.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel_Mod%C3%A8le_de_salle_%C3%A0_manger.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Meubles_montables_SOS.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel_Projet_de_ch%C3%A2teau_d%27eau.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel_Projet_d%27h%C3%B4tel.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Maison_Id%C3%A9es_de_France.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Maison_d%27artiste.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Vitrail_profane.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Vitrail_comm%C3%A9moratif.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Service_%C3%A0_caf%C3%A9.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Papier_peint.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Antichambre_Ambassade_Fran%C3%A7aise.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Si%C3%A8ge_bois_laqu%C3%A9.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Buffet-vitrine.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Ma_future_maison.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Cabinet_de_travail.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Maisons_sur_le_port.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Affiche_bal_masqu%C3%A9.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel_Palais_de_l%27Artisanat.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Maison_de_France.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel_Femmes_aux_oiseaux.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel_Antilope_bondissant.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Papier_peint.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Papier_peint.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Tapisserie_La_Chasse.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Chambre_de_Madame.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Dans_un_jardin.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Port-en-Bessin.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Les_Cribleurs.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._F%C3%A9camp,_Chalutiers_au_sec.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Le_Cavalier_%C3%A0_l%27oiseau.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._F%C3%A9camp,_Marins_assis_sur_la_jet%C3%A9e_nord.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._F%C3%A9camp,_vue_du_port.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Paysage_avec_baigneur.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel_Trois_Femmes_dans_un_jardin.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Bar_T%C3%A9cal%C3%A9mit.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Fa%C3%A7ade_Frig%C3%A9co.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Dressoir_lumineux.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Projet_Autos-Relais.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Meuble_%C3%A0_hauteur_d%27appui.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Petit_fauteuil_%C3%A0_pans_coup%C3%A9s.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Mod%C3%A8le_de_buffet.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Mod%C3%A8le_de_buffet.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Mod%C3%A8les_de_si%C3%A8ges.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel_Mod%C3%A8le_de_chaise.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel_Projet_coiffeuse.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel_Coupe_%C3%A9mail.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel_Service_%C3%A0_th%C3%A9.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel_Assiette_porcelaine.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel_Assiette_porcelaine.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Tapis.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel_Tapis_au_point_nou%C3%A9.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._D%C3%A9cor_de_sc%C3%A8ne.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Costume_de_th%C3%A9%C3%A2tre.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Costume_de_sc%C3%A8ne.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._d%C3%A9cor_de_th%C3%A9%C3%A2tre.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._F%C3%A9camp,_la_C%C3%B4te_de_la_Vierge.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._La_Valleuse,_Senneville.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel._Triel,_l%27%C3%89glise.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ren%C3%A9_Crevel_Affiche_F%C3%A9camp_casino_bains_de_varech.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Chassipress (talk) 13:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:24, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
promotional album art not under freely-available license Evaders99 (talk) 16:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of a free license. --Strakhov (talk) 16:58, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Rough draft for new book (Wattpad novelhd ) Multiverse coillded worlds (original story) The Real Book.pdf
[edit]Out of scope personal project. Commons is not a free web host. Johnj1995 (talk) 17:55, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 16:59, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
.VALID%C3%89.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.VALID%C3%89.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
likely copyvio Oaktree b (talk) 18:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.VALIDÉ.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: unlikely to be own work, COM:VRT needed. --Strakhov (talk) 17:00, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
.VALIDÉ.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Arasustudio (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files are promoting a wedding photography studio named Arasu Studio, matching the uploader's username. All files are watermarked with contact information (obnoxiously so, in most cases) including website and/or phone number, which makes them essentially unusable on Wikimedia projects. Some of the uploader's files have already been speedily deleted as advertisements; these remaining ones should be deleted too.
- File:Wedding-Photography-Team-Trichy (4).jpg
- File:Wedding-Photography-Trichy (17).jpg
- File:Wedding-Photography-Trichy (18).jpg
- File:Wedding-Photography-Trichy (16).jpg
- File:Wedding-Photography-Trichy (14).jpg
- File:Wedding-Photography-Trichy (15).jpg
- File:Wedding-Photography-Trichy (13).jpg
- File:Wedding-Photography-Trichy (12).jpg
- File:Wedding-Photography-Trichy (11).jpg
- File:Wedding-Photography-Trichy (9).jpg
- File:Wedding-Photography-Trichy (10).jpg
- File:Wedding-Photography-Trichy (7).jpg
- File:Wedding-Photography-Trichy (6).jpg
- File:Wedding-Photography-Trichy (5).jpg
- File:Wedding-Photography-Trichy (4).jpg
- File:Wedding-Photography-Trichy (3).jpg
- File:Wedding-Photography-Trichy (2).jpg
- File:Candid-Wedding-Photographers-Trichy (11).jpg
- File:Candid-Wedding-Photographers-Trichy (10).jpg
- File:Wedding-Photography-Trichy (1).jpg
- File:Candid-Wedding-Photographers-Trichy (9).jpg
- File:Candid-Wedding-Photographers-Trichy (7).jpg
- File:Candid-Wedding-Photographers-Trichy (6).jpg
- File:Candid-Wedding-Photographers-Trichy (4).jpg
- File:Candid-Wedding-Photographers-Trichy (5).jpg
- File:Candid-Wedding-Photographers-Trichy (2).jpg
- File:Candid-Wedding-Photographers-Trichy (1).jpg
- File:Candid-Wedding-Photographers-Trichy (3).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Marbletan (talk) 19:12, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:27, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Weehonk350 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: widely disparate styles and sizes, inconsistent or missing EXIF data, several taken from FB. Unreliable uploader (other images with watermarks already deleted as copyvios).
- File:PNR Colloge Station May 2022.jpg
- File:PNR Los Baños Station 11-20-21.jpg
- File:IRRI Switch 07-02-2021.jpg
- File:IRRI Flagstop 07-02-2021.jpg
- File:MRR Los Banos Station circa 1909 1920.jpg
- File:PNR Kiha350 Set 3 approaching Los Baños station.png
- File:PNR College Station, Los Baños.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:16, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:24, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: promotional images of non-notable cartoon. As well as a high probability of copyright infringement
- File:Poster image of Yo, Ciinco.jpg
- File:Winterfort Flaggg.jpg
- File:Ciinco.jpg
- File:Justinnn.jpg
- File:Rileyyyaaa.jpg
- File:Fiveieeeasdsacccvandfive.jpg
- File:Lexiiaaa.jpg
- File:Lexiib.jpg
- File:Branden.jpg
- File:Thomas Finley Williams.jpg
- File:Winterfort map.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 12:15, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:26, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vietnamesepresident (talk · contribs)
[edit]See Special:Uploads/Vietnamesepresident. All files have been superseded. Unused.
- File:Huan chuong chien si giai phong 1.png
- File:Huan chuong chien si giai phong 2.png
- File:Huan chuong chien si giai phong 3.png
- File:Huan chuong giai phong.png
- File:Huan chuong chien cong giai phong.png
- File:Huan chuong quyet thang.png
- File:Huan chuong thanh dong.png
- File:Huan chuong to quoc.png
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:36, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:26, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Licence non respected Floflo62 (talk) 12:07, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Obvious copyright violation. Sebleouf (talk) 19:53, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work, no evidence of a free license provided. --Strakhov (talk) 16:49, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation (non free copyright picture) AideDésintéressée (talk) 02:27, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: see above. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot of a copyrighted website. MKFI (talk) 07:27, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:06, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:15, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
https://www.hazarapeople.com/2010/10/page/4/ Nooritahir433215 (talk) 02:43, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Copyright violation. Marbletan (talk) 13:17, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 23:20, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope, promotional SPAM George Chernilevsky talk 11:48, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 23:20, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
promotional, likely copy vio Oaktree b (talk) 17:47, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 23:20, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
And also: File:Licinius or Constantius Chlorus.png, which is a just a cropped version. --Stegop (talk) 02:02, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
One of the images was deleted 10 years ago Tintero21 (talk) 03:46, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Was it deleted for violation of the photographer's copyright? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:27, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment DR of the deleted image as reference. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:14, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. Ergo, yes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:24, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Support. It was me who created the collage and I agree that if one of the images used in it was deleted, the derivative work (the collage) should also be deleted. --Stegop (talk) 01:09, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- I added to this discussion File:Licinius or Constantius Chlorus.png. --Stegop (talk) 02:02, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
@Stegop: I just noticed that you uploaded a similar picture a few days ago. Maybe we could merge the two? It would save us the effort of replacing this image on all articles that use it. Tintero21 (talk) 07:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & comments. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:56, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality, no encyclopedic use, TOS vio. I would also like to mention that this is only used on the creator's user page on enwiki (not even on commons, only enwiki, and as a userbox). Ilovemydoodle (talk) 11:33, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Joesom333: Thoughts? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 11:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Weak delete I would’ve nominated it for deletion already if it wasn’t in a userbox, but don’t really care if it is deleted. I debate how this is a TOS vio but even I’ll admit this isn’t well drawn and has no real use. Also why are you canvassing some random user to this discussion? Dronebogus (talk) 13:43, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Not canvassing, just pinging a user that recently participated in some similar discussions. – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 23:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Dronebogus, not that this gives me authority, but I think that Ilovemydoodle pinged me because I recognized vandalism several days ago and had it deleted.
- Delete I think that this is a reference to the cartoon from The New Yorker that appeared in the 90s called "On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog", but it is too poorly drawn and amateurish for here. Joesom333 (talk) 20:55, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- I still have no idea why you’d be pinged for wholly irrelevant discussions but thanks for the hypothesis anyway. And yes you’re right about the reference. Dronebogus (talk) 21:09, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- I do not understand too why the topiсstarter gathers people here who are not related to the issue under consideration. I would also understand the ping to the administrator. About the picture - there is no valid reason to delete. Lesless (talk) 21:40, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Delete No educational value. Considerations about quality not relevant. Llwyld (talk) 07:16, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. No educational value whatsoever, Commons is not deviantart. AshFriday (talk) 02:20, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, poor quality. If the drawing would be better, then outcome of the request could be different. Taivo (talk) 15:07, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio : Uploader is not the author of the photo Culex (talk) 13:26, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- OK pour le texte pouvant générer un doute sur l'auteur de la photo. J'ai simplement souhaité rendre hommage et remercier les 2 personnes qui m'ont facilité l'accès au campanile, projeté depuis le début des travaux, pour enfin prendre cette cloche en photo en toute sécurité, en plein accord avec le propriétaire et un spécialiste de l'histoire locale, comme vous. S'il était possible de rectifier cette erreur, je le ferai dès que possible, afin de finaliser cet article à l'intention des lecteurs d'ici ou ailleurs. Je compte sur vous pour comprendre que cette erreur n'est pas du vandalisme, mais de l'ignorance de l'extrême rigueur de Wikipédia dans les Pyrénées Orientales. L'erreur est humaine. En l'occurrence, il n'y a pas mort d'homme, mais l'occasion de vous manifester comme un authentique patrouilleur parfois compréhensif, pour une bonne cause. Damusmedia (talk) 09:05, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- I fixed the file, as per the uploader [2] who is an inexperienced user don't know how to fix it, and they confirm to be the photographer. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:58, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: as per my comment above. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:27, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
https://www.hazarapeople.com/2010/10/page/4/ Nooritahir433215 (talk) 02:43, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. This filename is currently a redirect, but the target is a copyright violation. Marbletan (talk) 13:18, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
This image contains a copyright notice and is a work that was published in the United States c. 1984. This appears to be over the threshold of originality in the United States, as the star pattern seems to contain substantial authorship. The copyright on the relevant part is held by the LA Olympic Organizing Committee, rather than the state of California, and there is record of the logo being registered by the copyright office (see: VAu000053954 and VAu000016081). Additionally, the uploader does not appear to have the authorization to release this plate under the CC-BY-SA 4.0 license that they claim to have released this under. As such, this work is non-free in the United States and should be deleted. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:40, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- This is my original scan of my own license plate, exactly like the low-res image that it was uploaded to replace. There should be no copyright violation here. If I should re-upload it using some other license, please let me know. Mazdapickup89 (talk) 05:10, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Are you the creator of the design of your own license plate? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 13:56, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- I encourage you to look at all the license plates seen on Wikipedia. None of the uploaders have designed them. Mazdapickup89 (talk) 07:36, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Are you the creator of the design of your own license plate? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 13:56, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, inclusion of copyrighted logo with clear copyright notice. (Many similar license plates with simple text and geometry would not be copyright, but not the case for this one.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:43, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
This image contains a copyright notice and is a work that was published in the United States c. 1984. This appears to be over the threshold of originality in the United States, as the star pattern seems to contain substantial authorship. The copyright on the relevant part is held by the LA Olympic Organizing Committee, rather than the state of California, and there is record of the logo being registered by the copyright office (see: VAu000053954 and VAu000016081). Additionally, the uploader does not appear to have the authorization to release this plate under the CC-BY-SA 4.0 license that they claim to have released this under. As such, this work is non-free in the United States and should be deleted. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:44, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- This is simply the same exact image that was already in the Vehicle registration plates of California article, except with higher contrast and better cropping to match the rest of the images. It was even uploaded using the same license as the original uploader, and the original uploader was credited. Mazdapickup89 (talk) 05:12, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Sorry, COM:DW of the copyrighted Olympics logo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:44, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Where is the images of this collage image? source? why aren't they uploaded here in commons? Rohalamin (talk) 04:49, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, collage of unsourced photos. (Too bad was in use in multiple projects). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:45, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Modern commercial mural; copyright remains with artist unless other status is documented. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:49, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States. Artist David Loewenstein in alive/has not been dead for 70 years A1Cafel (talk) 05:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. [3] shows that the mural was commissioned by the Spencer Museum of Art, not the US Federal Gov't, so copyright tag is incorrect. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:53, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
no description and no category, just a test, unused, useless, etc F (talk) 06:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:54, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: found also as Linkedin profile picture: https://af.linkedin.com/in/usmanaryan789 MKFI (talk) 07:25, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:56, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Author Jacopo Salvi Copyright holder Foto Shop Professional di Jacopo Salvi". VRT permission from Jacopi Salvi needed. MKFI (talk) 07:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:56, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
A completely fictitious flag with no educational value, besides, some of its elements are of a disgusting quality. 95.52.115.241 07:45, 8 September 2022 (UTC) Bro, look at this: https://www.reddit.com/r/vexillology/comments/ti13rf/some_sort_of_islamicrussian_nationalist_flag/ KittenBroEeev (talk) 12:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- This does not negate the fact that some elements of this flag are of a disgusting quality. If you can't reconstruct well, don't reconstruct at all. 95.52.115.241 18:34, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- bro lol, it seems like you just want to offend someone, that is all. not to help the wikipedia. It is just not possible to correctly reconstruct this symbol, because not see what it actually is. Maybe, better thing that you can do, found this symbol in good quality? KittenBroEeev (talk) 09:45, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Somone considering something "disgusting" is not a reason for deletion. Fictional flag with no evident in-scope usefulness is a reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:59, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
COM:OOS: This is what I used to be bored to shoot. Thyj (talk) 07:50, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The scope of Commons is very broad, and this seems in scope to me. Why wouldn't it be? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:44, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Because it doesn't look educational and it's poorly shot. Thyj (talk) 11:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- I think you are not being imaginative enough. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:37, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, in scope. Whilst Commons has many pictures of burning candles in art, this is one of the very few pictures we have of artwork made from burning candles. Chiolite (talk) 09:09, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Free licensed, no consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:08, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio, screengrab from CNN Oaktree b (talk) 17:58, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:32, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Invalid authorship claim and license, undeclared derivative work based on File:Physicist Stephen Hawking in Zero Gravity NASA.jpg. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:03, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Also delete File:Hawkingzerogravity.jpg, the same image without the overlaid text. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:04, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- The file information could be fixed to correct the authorship and licensing with a link to the original file. However, these files would be out of scope because they add nothing useful to the original file. Verbcatcher (talk) 11:02, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:31, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
graphics taken from commercial journal "Sterne und Weltraum", no indication of free license, no permission Polarlys (talk) 21:18, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Based on the black bars at the top and bottom and file EXIF "User comments Screenshot" I suspect this is a video screencap. Original source and copyright status unknown. MKFI (talk) 08:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:24, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover. Uploader may be the author, but VRT permission is needed to verify copyright, including the copyright of the cover image. MKFI (talk) 08:45, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:24, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover. Uploader may be the author, but VRT permission is needed to verify copyright, including the copyright of the cover image. MKFI (talk) 08:45, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:24, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:Scope: unused low resolution selfie of the uploader. MKFI (talk) 08:46, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:24, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: not useful, promotional. The description in Dutch refers to a site which offers lawyer (advocaat) services. This image is also used on that site. Henxter (talk) 08:51, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The image itself doesn't appear promotional, but it's not great, either. If we keep it, the promotional text would have to be removed, but the promotional link would have to remain, which is problematic. On the whole, I guess I support deletion per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:40, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:25, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tropicalkitty as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G3|2=Vandalism. Not a vandalism, but own work is not sure. Small collage, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Not sure if it’s of any use for the other projects. I might have been a bit too harsh with tagging. Tropicalkitty (talk) 09:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, I shouldn’t have tagged it and just moved on to the next change in the queue. I wasn’t thinking clearly at that time, just seeing the text “from my masturbation” is what triggered it from me. I know our projects are not censored, but occasionally forget that it’s for educational use. Tropicalkitty (talk) 10:26, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Gross to me but yes, educational for someone, and probably selfies. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:38, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Human sexuality is within project scope; no consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:26, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Djaafar TAKI (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Highly suspect flag designs, irredentist maps and flag maps designs, apparently all invented by the uploader. They are either unused, or were inserted into the arabian articles to replace maps that displayed smaller areas of influence, thus "increasing the power" of these former kingdoms. (without reading Arab, it's not possible to remove these "usages" from the unverified changes in the respective articles).
For example, the "Souss Map flag" shows an oversized area of Souss, even if the flag is correct (which I can't verify). I don't get why you'd use the flag of Israel in the outlines of Morrocco. The "Numidian flag" is entirely speculative. The "Tunisian flag" seems to be intended as an insult? The Zayyanid and Zirid maps are over-exaggerating the areas of influence. I don't think "Greater Algeria" is a concept within the area of this specific flag map. The "divided flag map of Morocco" would be okay, if it didn't have Rif included. The "Flag map of the Rif" also covers too large an area. And so on.
Djaafar: Please provide sources to convince me otherwise.
- File:(Flag Map Of Greater Algeria (Fatimid Caliphate.png
- File:Flag of Tunisia2.jpg
- File:Souss Map Flag.png
- File:Morocco Map Flag Israel.png
- File:خريطة الدولة الزيانية في اقصى اتساع لها.jpg
- File:Kingdom of Numidia Flag.jpg
- File:Zirid Dynasty Map.jpg
- File:ايالة الجزائر سنة 1695.jpg
- File:Republic Of Rif Map Flag.png
- File:Chaouia Flag Map.png
- File:Flag Map Of Greater Algeria.png
- File:Morocco map with divided flag.jpg
- File:علم المغرب.png
Enyavar (talk) 09:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Edit: Many thanks at the User:باسم. Mr Fulaisil helpfully removed the offending maps in the arab articles. --Enyavar (talk) 11:03, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frq ltc (talk • contribs) 12:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:28, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Image maybe taken from Facebook withput permission (see EXIF data) Wdwd (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
DW, not own work. Missing permission for original photo Wdwd (talk) 09:59, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
DW, not own work. Missing permission for original photo Wdwd (talk) 10:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trofeo_CONI.png#file Loredana Spagnuolo (talk) 10:03, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment No deletion reason, apparently? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Claimed license unsupported by source. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:30, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Not in public domain, and author did not consent Gejyspa (talk) 11:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Discussion on this deletion request is also located on the discussion page for the image, under the section "Not Public Domain"[1]
- Below is, in one post, my distilled and organized reasoning for why the image is likely be public domain:
- How The Art Was Made
- In this case Jason Allen provided a prompt to the Midjourney algorithm, received images, selected the next generation of images to feed the algorithm, modified the prompt, and repeated this process hundreds of times over several weeks before upscaling and editing the final result. (The upscaling was done with Gigapixel A.I. while manual edits were made with Photoshop to "remove visual artifacts")[2]
- US Copyright Office & Algorithmically Created Art.
- Under United States copyright law artwork originating from text prompts are technically not subject to copyright protection. Only "original works of authorship" are considered. "To qualify as a work of 'authorship' a work must be created by a human being." This is according to a US Copyright Office's report.[3][4][5] Therefore the process of sending in a prompt, receiving an output of images, then refeeding the algorithm with those images and a modified prompt would likely not meet the threshold for the final outputted work to have copyright protection. (As you are only modifying the prompt, and refeeding previously outputted images into the algorithm.)
- The Manual Edits
- The extent of the manual edits made by Jason Allen to the algorithmically created art will determine if this work of art is within the Public Domain. The Wikimedia Foundation holds that faithful reproduction of two-dimensional public domain work is still within the public domain. As previously cited the manual work done was to "remove visual artifacts". The question is if "removing visual artifacts" would falls under a "faithful reproduction" and therefore remain within the public domain in the eyes of the Wikimedia Foundation, or if these edits are more in-depth and would qualify as a derivative work that is protected by copyright.
- The Legal Information Institute, in determining if something is a derivative work or not, notes the following: "Overall, one cannot simply change a few words in a written work for example to create a derivative work; one must substantially change the content of the work. Along the same lines, a work must incorporate enough of the original work that it obviously stems from the original." Therefore its copyrighted status hinges on if the extent of these manual edits. Given they were noted as efforts to "remove visual artifacts" then there is a good chance that these kinds of edits are not substantial enough to be qualified as a derivative work, and thus ineligible for copyright protection. ALittleLighter (talk) 22:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
The problem is that this has not been tested in a court of law. What we DO know from the case cited is that the copyright cannot belong to an AI. But that is not the case there. Mr Allen is the owner. While it cannot be denied that an AI created the artwork based on the prompt of Mr. Allen, it was not just some single prompt. He worked with the bot over the course of many weeks, refining his prompt almost one thousand times, and using variations of previous results, to get the result he wanted. This was not some simple throwaway two minute thing that the original uploader tries to assert here. The law here is at best ambiguous, and cannot be presumed to be in the public domain. Gejyspa (talk) 01:45, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. (I will post this as well in the other thread to keep both updated)
- First and foremost I am not trying to assert that Mr. Allen got this output in a matter of "two minutes". I make it clear in my previous post, under the "How The Art Was Made" section if you are viewing this under the deletion request, that the process took at least several weeks.
- Secondly, as you have confirmed in your reply, this this piece of art was designed by the Midjourney based off a extensive text prompts provided by Mr. Allen. You have stated that he has refined his prompt "thousands of times" and used variations of the past results, provided by Midjourney, to fine-tune the results from the Midjourney algorithm. The length of time that it took for this process, as well as the subsequent text prompt revisions, are irrelevant in the eyes of the US Copyright Office when determining if a work is eligible for copyright protection.
- As stated above, and reposted here for clarity along with its sources: Under United States copyright law artwork originating from text prompts are technically not subject to copyright protection. Only "original works of authorship" are considered. "To qualify as a work of 'authorship' a work must be created by a human being." This is according to a US Copyright Office's report.[6][7][8]
- Therefore the process of sending in a text prompt to an algorithm, receiving an output of images from that algorithm, then refeeding said algorithm with those past images along with any modifications to the text prompt would not meet the "Human Authorship" requirements for copyright protection as set out by the US Copyright Office (As the final outputted work itself is still algorithmically created). The length of time spent refining the algorithm's outputs, in and of itself, does not change the fact that the final outputted work still lacks the required "Human Authorship" for copyright protection as set out by the US Copyright Office. (As again to qualify as a work of 'authorship', in the eyes of the US Copyright Office, the work itself must be created by a human being.)
- For the reasons listed above I believe that it is a safe presumption to consider this work as public domain, due to the final work lacking the required "Human Authorship" as defined by the US Copyright Office (Which in turn makes it ineligible for copyright protection). ALittleLighter (talk) 09:31, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- The US copyright office apparently thinks that AI works from midjourney are copyrightable: https://twitter.com/technollama/status/1573003225564938243?s=46&t=rxvqhKITAMto5FhEbTjETA Gejyspa (talk) 22:07, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply.
- The claim put forth that the US Copyright Office thinks that AI works from midjourney are copyrightable, with the source you cited, is misleading at best. Mainly as the registration details for the cited work you provided clearly note that the source of authorship was attributed to the submitter and noted it as being a "comic book" (Censored out private information.)[9] A comic book using artwork from Midjourney does meet the necessary "human authorship" as set out by the US Copyright Office as a human being added in their own text, story elements, literary expression, etc. and mixed them in with the algorithmically created art made by Midjourney. In doing so this produced a derivative work, in which for reasons listed above, qualifies for copyright registration and protection as it meets the "human authorship" requirement as set out by the US Copyright Office.
- The work of art here, for reasons posted in my previous reply, does not meet the required "human authorship" as set out by the US Copyright Office for copyright registration. As such I still believe there is a strong case that it should be considered public domain. ALittleLighter (talk) 18:50, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, (here was a mention that in the French law, there is no copyright for works generated without the intervention of a human, but I realized the source was not trustable, so I'll look for a good one for me, it doesn't really matter, here)
- In essence, agree with @ALittleLighter that for now (and according to the explanation in the US Copyright Office & Algorithmically Created Art. part, above), nothing justifies that this work is NOT in the public domain. Daehan (talk) 12:59, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- The US copyright office apparently thinks that AI works from midjourney are copyrightable: https://twitter.com/technollama/status/1573003225564938243?s=46&t=rxvqhKITAMto5FhEbTjETA Gejyspa (talk) 22:07, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:33, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Ununsed and no educational purpose, hence out of scope Azimut (talk) 11:26, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Why on earth do you think a photo of a Porsche Carrera GT minicar has no educational purpose? Please use your imagination more. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:NOTHOST.--Azimut (talk) 22:33, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Free licensed, no consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:35, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
New upload of an image previously deleted. The copyright for this image is unclear. Also is it a real picture or CGI ? Hektor (talk) 11:27, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, HAMILTON DE OLIVEIRA/MEFR. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:40, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
License laundering suspected. Youtube channel description: "No copyright [infringement] Intended" Timk70 (talk) 11:38, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:41, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
This work is not under the public domain. Dhaka North City Corporation was founded on 2011 so it didn't pass 60 years rule, see COM:BANGLADESH for details —MdsShakil (talk) 11:47, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, given the uploader's track record. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:55, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:41, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of copyright banners A1Cafel (talk) 11:56, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, DW by Flickr photographer. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:44, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyvio, see metadata: Certainly not "own work" by the subject himself. 217.239.13.53 15:07, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: I see no support for anon's claims of copyvio and not own work. The EXIF states it was taken with Canon EOS M50; I fail to see anything suspicious. Currently in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:58, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Filtered image with no EXIF, user is anonymous, their other upload File:Blaž Lužar Shooting.jpg was a copyvio of a photo by Blaž Weindorfer. Lord Belbury (talk) 15:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; dubious, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:00, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Poster for a concert CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:03, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not impossible that uploader might have been the creator of the poster, but unused and no evident notability. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:02, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
no freely-available license for photo shared on social media Evaders99 (talk) 16:10, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
no freely-available license for photo shared on Naver blog Evaders99 (talk) 16:15, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
copyright promotional image - Double H - https://twitter.com/seongayu/status/1540981976026456065?s=20&t=tdodxYdxt9dhv5SPhHJtrA Evaders99 (talk) 16:22, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
A CGI of an under construction church in Greece. The full size is here. Possible copyvio. C messier (talk) 16:30, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Small, low res, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:16, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
This image contains a copyright notice and is a work that was published in the United States c. 1984. This appears to be over the threshold of originality in the United States, as the star pattern seems to contain substantial authorship. The copyright on the relevant part is held by the LA Olympic Organizing Committee, rather than the state of California, and there is record of the logo being registered by the copyright office (see: VAu000053954 and VAu000016081). Additionally, the uploader does not appear to have the authorization to release this plate under the CC-BY-SA 4.0 license that they claim to have released this under. As such, this work is non-free in the United States and should be deleted. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 13:53, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:16, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
EXIF says "Copyright© Francesco Lastrucci 2022 . All Rights Reserved.", does not match author name given in summary. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:16, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
LIkely not own work: full-color uncropped version available online and first published in 2017. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:17, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Self-portrait. COIN, has tried to advertise himself on eswiki on several occasions. MexTDT (talk) 21:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:18, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
著作権に触れているため Komoro no kaze (talk) 00:18, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Speedy keep already under discussion in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Isao Uchibori. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 16:12, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Isao Uchibori. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
著作権に触れているため Komoro no kaze (talk) 00:18, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep already under discussion in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Isao Uchibori. duplicate request. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 16:13, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Isao Uchibori. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mussklprozz as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The french "société des Auteurs dans les Arts Graphiques et Plastiques (ADAGP)" claims per Ticket:2022083010006721 that the photo is made by Yseult Digan and not by the ploader. Mussklprozz (talk) 08:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Taking a closer look at the file, there are doubts that the french organization's claim ist justified:
- The file contains extensive metadata, which indicates that the uploader is in possession of the original file.
- Several parameters in the metadata (the ratio of exposure time to sensitivity, the relatively wide open aperture) speak against the photo having been taken by a professional.
- So far there is no proof from the French organization that it is a photo of Yseult Digan. I have now asked them for one on behalf of the support team.
- --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- If it had been taken by a professional I woud expect to see copyright information in the metadata, though I appreciate it is possibe to edit that out. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 09:43, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Delete The organization has now precised its point: It is not about the photo, but about the artwork above the tunnel entrance. It is proven to be made by Yseult Digan. Freedom of panorama in France is limited to noncommercial use, hence incompatible with Wikipedia licensing. The artist has the right for the image to be removed. --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:25, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- De minimis in context? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:43, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- en:De minimis does not apply to the graphic artwork, if that is what you mean. It is sufficiently prominent. Mussklprozz (talk) 11:19, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Image currently in use to illustrate articles on "Channel Tunnel" and "Eurotunnel Shuttle", neither of which are dependent on the visible artwork. Possibly the mural could be blurred? Looking for alternative images, I notice the mural is much more prominently seen in File:Fresque 25 ans Eurotunnel.jpg; if inclusion of mural necessitates deletion of this image, that image should be deleted as well. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:14, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- I have made a request for a modified version removing or blurring the mural at Commons:Graphics village pump. I suggest waiting a few days to see if anyone there thinks it a practical and worthwhile project and volunteers to do so. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:20, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above; no progress on creating new version seen. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Finland A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- De minimis may apply to this photograph. No individual work of art is the leading motive of the picture. See also COM:CRT/Finland#Freedom of panorama. ––Apalsola t • c 15:23, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Similar case: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eduskuntavaalijulisteita.jpg. ––Apalsola t • c 16:01, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussions. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
This is a photograph by Bob Dean, who died in 2004, and is not the own work of the uploader. Original newspaper clipping with caption: https://judygarlandnews.com/2018/09/01/on-this-day-in-judy-garlands-life-and-career-september-1/#jp-carousel-10415 Johnj1995 (talk) 02:30, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
COM:POSTER are temporarily display. cannot benefit from FOP. 1990s posters are still protected by copyright A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
COM:POSTER are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:04, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:POSTER are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Fake SVG with zero value. Has a proper SVG alternative without generic text below. This file has only been used in the Template:Kh.dsns.gov.ua and is now replaced. VileGecko (talk) 08:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:17, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
User page that are no longer used Thyj (talk) 08:12, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:10, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Higher resolution can be found here. What about the copyright? It is the only contribution of the user. Wouter (talk) 15:07, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Blurry. We have better photos about that in category:Interior views of the rose window of Santa Maria del Mar. Taivo (talk) 17:13, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I cropped it before a better image (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Maju_Varghese,_White_House.jpg) was available. Please delete at my request CzarJobKhaya (talk) 22:42, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(13743681195).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(13743681195).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Ukraine (see FOP in Ukraine). Kulmalukko (talk) 09:44, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
_(13743681195).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
_(13743681195).jpg){kind=link}
_(13743681195).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Violation of sculptor's copyright considering Ukraine does not have freedom of panorama, if this is the same Flickr import as the deleted import. According to Category:Founders of Kyiv fountain Maidan Nezalezhnosti, "a sculpture of Anatolij Kuschtsch created in 2001." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as in the last DR. uk:Кущ Анатолій Васильович / de:Anatolij Kuschtsch, born in 1945, is apparently alive, so the file can be restored 70 years after his death. --Rosenzweig τ 12:35, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Commercially-licensed photos violate sculptor's copyright; freedom of panorama does not exist in Ukraine. According to Category:Founders of Kyiv fountain Maidan Nezalezhnosti: "a sculpture of Anatolij Kuschtsch created in 2001." None of the photos show the copyrighted public monument in an incidental or trivial way.
- File:Founders of Kyiv fountain Maidan Nezalezhnosti - panoramio - roadmap (11).jpg
- File:KiewMajdanNesaleschnostiBrunnenDerStadtgründer.jpg
- File:Kijów - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Kijów - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Кий, Щек,Хорив та сестра їхня Либідь.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:05, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. uk:Кущ Анатолій Васильович / de:Anatolij Kuschtsch, born in 1945, is apparently alive, so the file can be restored 70 years after his death. --Rosenzweig τ 12:40, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
This photo reveals a private location. Thyj (talk) 07:05, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment In use. What's the private location? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:22, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Because this photo was taken at my friend's house, it is still requested to be deleted for privacy. Thyj (talk) 07:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Privacy is not a valid reason for deletion. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:56, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Shows the location information of EXIF. Thyj (talk) 16:26, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
This photo reveals a private location. Thyj (talk) 07:30, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Looks like a public location, and it's in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- The shooting location is a small temple where my friend lives. Thyj (talk) 02:53, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Privacy is not a valid reason for deletion. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:56, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Shows the location information of EXIF. Thyj (talk) 16:19, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- You should have thought of that when you uploaded the file. 5 years later, it's up to an admin whether to grant a courtesy deletion to you or not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:28, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This photo reveals a private location. Thyj (talk) 07:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion. Many alternatives available in its category. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:00, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This photo reveals a private location. Thyj (talk) 07:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- No, it reveals fish only. Fish have no rights to privacy. Your requests are overbroad. Please focus your deletion requests to photos where they're reasonable; otherwise, I would argue to keep all the photos you've nominated for deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:47, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason for deletion: Because the summary and EXIF of the photo show the specific shooting location. Thyj (talk) 11:36, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- True about the EXIF. Your mistake. Perhaps an admin will do a courtesy deletion of this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:10, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Privacy is not a valid reason for deletion. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:56, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. Many alternatives available in its category. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:00, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This photo reveals a private location. Thyj (talk) 07:42, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Question Did almost every photo you took reveal a private location? I hope you now ask permission before uploading photos that violate someone's privacy. All of these photos really violate privacy?? I'd say this one surely does not. There's nothing distinctive about that interior that could be identified. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:45, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- The photos that were requested to be deleted were taken in my own home and friends' homes Thyj (talk) 11:27, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- But they don't violate anyone's privacy. You should nominate only those which show anything distinctive enough to be recognized; otherwise, your requests for courtesy deletions after 5 or 6 years aren't likely to be granted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:36, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- This photo was taken in my home, and the privacy is in the background of the shot. Thyj (talk) 12:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Your home in this view looks like so many other people's homes that it's impossible for your privacy to be violated by this picture. Don't you understand that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- This photo is not only a privacy issue, but also my own request to delete it. I don't want this photo anymore. Thyj (talk) 02:31, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- It's to the discretion of an admin whether to grant you a courtesy deletion years after you agreed to give this a Creative Commons license forever. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:12, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- Your home in this view looks like so many other people's homes that it's impossible for your privacy to be violated by this picture. Don't you understand that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- But they don't violate anyone's privacy. You should nominate only those which show anything distinctive enough to be recognized; otherwise, your requests for courtesy deletions after 5 or 6 years aren't likely to be granted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:36, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep no valid reason for deletion. --A1Cafel (talk) 11:47, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- The uploader of the photo is myself and I requested the delete. Thyj (talk) 11:58, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: I had a conflict with my family because of this photo. Thyj (talk) 07:09, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of photo with little educational purpose. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
This photo reveals a private location. Thyj (talk) 07:51, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Does not and is in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete the history versions and revisions of this photo, only upload from PawełMM are kept (background removed). Thyj (talk) 02:44, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Privacy is not a valid reason for deletion. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
This photo reveals a private location. Thyj (talk) 07:56, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. Many alternatives available in its category. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
COM:POSTER are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:45, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 02:36, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in Tanzania. Image focus too much on the modern buildings, not a general skyline view A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Question De minimis for any individual building? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:38, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: sorry but there is no such thing as European-style de minimis concept in Tanzania despite being a former British colony. Without some legal jurisprudence there, and considering they did not follow British FOP — restricting FOP to only use in moving-images-media like TV, videos, and movies — we may need to assume the use of American concept of de minimis (trivial presence) instead of the European "incidental/accessory" concept. Besides the buildings seem to be a part of a single complex. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- OK. Thanks for the reply. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Tanzania A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Tanzania A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Modern building, no freedom of panorama in Tanzania A1Cafel (talk) 02:42, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Mozambique A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Mozambique A1Cafel (talk) 02:46, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Photo/scan of old photo, missing essential info. Unreliable uploader, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Veinnill. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:49, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_2668088.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_2668088.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:54, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_2668088.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_2668088.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted poster A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Modern building, no freedom of panorama in Libya A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Libya A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Not sure whether FOP exists in the source country or not A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment It seems like the user was based in Finland. If it is the case, there is no freedom of panorama for 2-dimensional artworks in Finland. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:16, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Modern building, no freedom of panorama in UAE A1Cafel (talk) 04:02, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
..jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
..jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
..jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
..jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
..jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
..jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 04:18, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 04:18, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE. Image focus too much on the modern buildings, not a general skyline view A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Modern building, no freedom of panorama in UAE A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Modern building, no freedom of panorama in UAE A1Cafel (talk) 04:23, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Modern building, no freedom of panorama in UAE A1Cafel (talk) 04:23, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
The library was completed in 2012 by Rem Koolhaas (1944–). There is no freedom of panorama in Qatar, thus permission from him is required A1Cafel (talk) 04:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
The library was completed in 2012 by Rem Koolhaas (1944–). There is no freedom of panorama in Qatar, thus permission from him is required A1Cafel (talk) 04:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:03, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Qatar. Architect I. M. Pei died in 2019, still within the 50 p.m.a. of the country A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete I see a carefully-crafted window design and patterns of exterior walls. A change in Qatari copyright law that would allow free use of copyrighted public works is the only eternal solution. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:30, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Modern building, no freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Modern building, no freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Bahrain A1Cafel (talk) 04:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bahrain A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bahrain A1Cafel (talk) 04:37, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bahrain A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
_headquarter.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_headquarter.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Kuwait A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
_headquarter.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
_headquarter.jpg){kind=link}
Modern building, no freedom of panorama in Kuwait A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Europa Tower
[edit]The building was completed in 2004 by Audrius Ambrasas (1962–). There is no freedom of panorama in Lithuania, thus permission from him is required.
- File:Europa center in Vilnius (8175881771).jpg
- File:Europa tower and Vilnius muyncipality.jpg
- File:Europa Tower during a rainy day.png
- File:Europa Tower Vilnius in October 2017.png
- File:Europa Tower.jpg
- File:Happy Wedding ? (Vilnius) (7661000414).jpg
- File:Vilnius D Tower.jpg
- File:Vilnius, Konstitucijos prospektas vakare, Vilnius, Constitution Avenue in the evening - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(7661000414).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 04:48, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 05:09, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 05:09, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The building was completed in 2007 by Meeli Truu (1946–2013). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Estonia. The copyright term of the country lasted for 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2084. A1Cafel (talk) 05:12, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Lithuania A1Cafel (talk) 05:14, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Lithuania A1Cafel (talk) 05:16, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 05:16, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 05:18, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 05:19, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Lithuania A1Cafel (talk) 05:20, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Lithuania A1Cafel (talk) 05:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Lithuania A1Cafel (talk) 05:22, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Iceland A1Cafel (talk) 05:23, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 05:26, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 05:26, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete, intentionally angled to the modern building. With no jurisprudence, assume that Ukraine de minimis is based on common sense like U.S. de minimis (trivial/incidental appearance). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:33, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Question Why would you assume Ukrainian law is like American law, rather than like Soviet law? What was Soviet law on de minimis? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:24, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Neutral I'm not sure what is the main topic of this image. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:10, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 05:38, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
File:San José por Raúl Berzosa.png RottenApple777 (talk) 01:04, 11 April 2022 (UTC) Deleting this request as this was added by an error.--RottenApple777 (talk) 05:09, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Achim55 (talk) 10:06, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
copyvio. the entry within lyrics "こちら、幸福安心委員会です。". the song was published 2012. oldid from 687376808 to 687376930. I want to revision deletion. eien20 (talk) 17:30, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete copyvio. I think this user's edit is need delete too. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 16:20, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: I don't think you wanted to delete the Japanese village pump. Have another try. --Achim55 (talk) 17:45, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 11:53, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Changing my vote looking at image again - Copyviol not for reasons of FOP but for reason of Commons:Derivative works - the faces seem based on photos, no indication the original photos were free licensed. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. There is no legal distinction between murals and graffiti, in terms of copyright; absent a license, the work, such as it is, is copyrighted. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 04:18, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Per Commons case discussions, there certainly is a legal difference between murals and graffiti in terms of copyright; see Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Graffiti; the latter, as used in such cases, is a crime, and illegible for copyright protection in many places. (Note: I changed my vote from "keep" to "delete" because of DW concerns, unrelated to TE(æ)A,ea.'s claim here.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely derivative works. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:23, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Still under copyright Culex (talk) 13:25, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:25, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
неверное оформление лицензии, нарушение авторских прав 46.0.93.33 10:25, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:13, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
(Image uploaded for Wikimedia Commons University Project on Wikimedia Digital Capabilities, learning to upload, edit and delete.) Protolanguage1 (talk) 12:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- A better way to do this, if you are the uploader, is to add {{SD|G7}} to the file page, and the file will be deleted fairly speedily. A regular deletion procedure can take weeks or months. TommyG (talk) 12:41, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:COURTESY, albeit a bit late. Not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 21:05, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Implausible design: shows a line in tunnel crossing a bridge over a river. (Valid icons are 
(exhKRZWae) and 
(extKRZW).) Useddenim (talk) 04:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: I think the file can be kept because there is a bridge (60 years of Victory bridge) with a completely covered and unused metro line in Omsk, Russia, and I think it is an icon of best fit to describe the layout in Omsk Metro. --Minoa (talk) 02:34, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file is in use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:01, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Zunda Towers
[edit]The building was completed in 2016 by Helmut Jahn (1940–2021). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Latvia. The copyright term of the country lasted for 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2092.
- File:3Q Z-Towers facade .jpg
- File:Daugavgrivas iela (5).jpg
- File:Riga - 35433614493.jpg
- File:Riga - 35433614863.jpg
- File:Riga 37 (34881403526).jpg
- File:Z-Towers (2).jpg
- File:Z-Towers .jpg
- File:Z-Towers Riga.jpg
- File:Zunda krastmala (2).jpg
- File:Zunda krastmala (3).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Zunda Towers is the highest modern building in Riga, so it can be watched from very different places and becomes a part of photo images, unless not these towers are main subject of photo. May be some photos can be left, if damage (crop) the part of these towers on the photo? — Olgerts V (talk) 07:05, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:50, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
This is a tighter crop of the image on the Ashley Avis official page, http://www.ashleyavis.com/about.html - so that one could not be a crop of this one - and that page does not say the image is released under a free license. If the uploader, User:Winter.cat, is a representative of Ashley Avis or of the photographer they need to either modify the official page to say the image is released, or write as much to permissions-commons@wikimedia.com, as otherwise we need to assume this is a copyright violation. Sorry. GRuban (talk) 21:14, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
I just started an article on the artist and would love to use this, but it doesn't look PD. It wasn't created by an employee of the federal government; it was commissioned and painted by someone who doesn't work for the government. — Rhododendrites talk | 14:24, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Possibly you know more about this painting than I was able to find out in a quick search? By artist Sharon Sprung, mentioned on her website in this list, "United States House of Representatives, Washington, DC - (Portrait of Jeannette Rankin - First Congresswoman)". Who commissioned the portrait? If it was commissioned by the US Federal Gov't, would artist Sprung be considered an employee of the Gov't while working on the portrait? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:53, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: Currently in use in multiple projects. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:52, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_States#Works_by_the_US_Government - This also does not include works commissioned by the US Government, but produced by contractors; in this case, the copyright may have been assigned to the US Government (for instance, the copyright of the official Ada programming language manual was assigned to the US Department of Defense).. (We'd need documentation that copyright were transferred, which seems unlikely). — Rhododendrites talk | 00:15, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. Sounds like this needs to be deleted (unless some evidence that copyright was transferred to Fed Gov or otherwise was free licensed). -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_States#Works_by_the_US_Government - This also does not include works commissioned by the US Government, but produced by contractors; in this case, the copyright may have been assigned to the US Government (for instance, the copyright of the official Ada programming language manual was assigned to the US Department of Defense).. (We'd need documentation that copyright were transferred, which seems unlikely). — Rhododendrites talk | 00:15, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per Rhododendrites. --Gbawden (talk) 15:26, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of early enough publication to meet COM:Russia. Xunks (talk) 04:58, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:35, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Urheber wohl nicht der Fotograf (Selbstauslöser?) Dirk Lenke (talk) 16:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion contested at COM:UNDEL: Special:Permalink/687438291#File:Lermontova.jpg. Converting to DR for further discussion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:46, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Keep So now, should I state the source somewhere on the filepage to unDel it?
Considering it was uploaded on a free resource Wikimapia by the author himself (Serghi Gorinov), it can be distributed under free license unless it is edited somehow or removed from the free source, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlbertHog (talk • contribs) 20:22, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- @AlbertHog: Please state the source on the file description, yes. And you might want to change your vote from {{s}} to {{vk}} (i.e. "keep") to make it less confusing, because "support" on a DR usually means support for deleting the file. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:10, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- @AlbertHog @King of Hearts: Found the source and fixed the details. –JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 08:49, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- @AlbertHog @King of Hearts: Thank you both for your help! It seems to be alright now.
Kept: License issue resolved. --Gbawden (talk) 18:23, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of permission Dronebogus (talk) 14:04, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as {{PD-US-not renewed}}. I can find no evidence for renewal, either of the magazine or the subject generally. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:36, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 21:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Infringe derechos de autor http://fallerasmayoresvalencia.blogspot.com/2015/07/ 88.6.183.49 18:05, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- There is no place at the blog where it states that any of the pictures shown belong to the blogger. Not the one denounced here by the anonymous IP 88.6.183.49 (I do not know with what intention) neither any of the other pictures associated at the interviews. The issue of a picture appering in a blog without any mention to the authorship only proves that the blogger is using a picture of unknown origin. The common procedure of bloggers when they make an interview is to ask people with rights on the images to send them to him so they can illustrate their posts. Most of the pictures in that blog are previous to the digital era, paper printed and scanned. If you tell me a reasonable way to accredit the ownership of that picture, I will try to accomplish. Or maybe IP 88.6.183.49 can talk with the blogger or bring the copyright himself as he is the one dennouncing and making the deletion request without any prove.
- By the way, the picture is uploaded from my computer, and the capture date is 2008 quite before that blog existed. I do not know if you can check that. Thank you for your attention. MorenaClara (talk) 23:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- We expect permission from the photographer per Ticket:2022112210015685. Esperamos la autorización del fotógrafo por Ticket:2022112210015685. Mussklprozz (talk) 08:58, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
- The photographer, Ramón Peris, died in 2011 (http://www.cendradigital.com/2011/12/02/ha-faltado-el-fotografo-ramon-peris-pavia), I have tried to find his descendant but I could not contact them. The picture is part of 14 album made in 1988 by Mr. Peris (DEP), paid by my family and with all the rights to use them included. Internet was not so familiar then and there where not such clasuses in contracts. It is me the girl in the picture, and from that particular one there were made more than 400 copies to distribuite during that year 1988 and it is the one I send to press or blogs when they still ask for one, and it has been published and use during the last 32 years without a problem. Like the one in the blog (2008) the dennouncer linked to harassme (once more) knowing perfectly the blog had nothing to do with the picture rights. It has been one more of the many wikihounding this man (88.6.183.49/kbemcap) has made against me through Wikipedia and Wikimedia. I uploaded the picture to make it easier the public use and avoid having to contact me every time someone asks for a picture. New times, new facilities. But if this is a problem, just delete it. I can do little more. Thank you. MorenaClara (talk) 14:57, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- We expect permission from the photographer per Ticket:2022112210015685. Esperamos la autorización del fotógrafo por Ticket:2022112210015685. Mussklprozz (talk) 08:58, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Sorry @MorenaClara: , even if your family were given rights to do anything with the image, it does not mean that anyone can do so, which is what is required for upload here. We would need a statement from Sr. Peris's family. —howcheng {chat} 21:27, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
"Works by the government, governmental organisations and international organisations are subject to copyright for 50 years after publication:" Botev (talk) 10:30, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:Malaysia, ‘’Copyright in works of the Government, Government organizations and international bodies subsists for 50 years from the year in which the work was first published’’. As it is not known from what date this design of VISA originated, the copyrighted status is unclear. This image of a Visa dates from 2014, so it is too recent in in itself. Therefore, the image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 22:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- ↑ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Th%C3%A9%C3%A2tre_D%E2%80%99op%C3%A9ra_Spatial.jpg
- ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/09/02/midjourney-artificial-intelligence-state-fair-colorado/
- ↑ https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/14/ai_digital_artwork_copyright/
- ↑ https://www.copyright.gov/comp3/chap300/ch300-copyrightable-authorship.pdf
- ↑ https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/14/ai_digital_artwork_copyright
- ↑ https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/14/ai_digital_artwork_copyright/
- ↑ https://www.copyright.gov/comp3/chap300/ch300-copyrightable-authorship.pdf
- ↑ https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/14/ai_digital_artwork_copyright
- ↑ https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FdcNyNcXEAArhDM?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
