Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/09/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Mongolian_Baiti.png){kind=link}
diboron.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_IA_.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope globally blocked user Lotje (talk) 04:41, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:16, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
照片來自私人地方—麥花臣匯
Photo from private residence, Mong Kok Macpherson — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.75.83.59 (talk) 02:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Keep, no valid reason for deletion. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --A.Savin 09:42, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
wrong image TheLightgrabber (talk) 13:15, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per G7. — Tulsi 24x7 14:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate image- same size and type as this file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Simultaneous_eruptions_of_Beehive_and_Lion_geysers_(15211054335).jpg Ooligan (talk) 00:49, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, exact duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:16, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Delete We have better-quality photos of similar views without people in them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:44, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
and File:Homer Simpson 01.jpg
Commons:Derivative works from copyrighted character. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:50, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
This chemical structure image is missing key stereochemical information. It is also a low quality image in a non-ideal file format. We have File:Asiatic acid.svg that is a correct and high quality alternative that can be used instead. Marbletan (talk) 15:22, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Bastianconcho (talk) 17:30, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:49, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Bastiancoso (talk) 17:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:49, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Likely a copyright violation (or wrong license). There is a non-free black and white variant (File:Aline-Gubri.jpg) taken from [1]. EdTre (talk) 20:59, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:08, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
unused low quality image Ske (talk) 05:46, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio books covers and out of scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:56, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
No source for the background image. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:07, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio and promotional only. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:12, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- All of the files that are updated by the user are similar...--Nanahuatl (talk) 06:12, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- everyone uploads of this User is nominated for deletion too --George Chernilevsky talk 14:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:00, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Lack of source for the photo of the person. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio and promotional only, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:02, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo of a non-notable organization. No educational value, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:27, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:03, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo of a non-notable organization. No educational value, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:28, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, promo of non-notable site. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo of a non-notable organization. No educational value, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:28, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Zeniris (talk) 20:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:28, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Mayrasito (talk) 22:07, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 05:46, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Does not appear to be the work of the uploader. MB (talk) 23:47, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 01:23, 7 September 2022 UTC: Commons:Licensing: promo/press photo --Krdbot 07:29, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Doe not appear to be own work of uploader MB (talk) 23:49, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 01:23, 7 September 2022 UTC: Commons:Licensing: promo/press photo --Krdbot 07:29, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: Apparently a personal fiction of this user and User:Orania24
Enyavar (talk) 12:36, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:36, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: Apparently a personal fiction of this user and User:Rol4464
- File:LOGOHJ.jpg
- File:Parlamento de Orania.png
- File:Escaños CCAA.png
- File:Senado orania.png
- File:Parlamento de Orania elecciones 1D 2017.png
Enyavar (talk) 12:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:37, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MarianoVaccari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:54, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MarianoVaccari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used.
- File:Telefono v2.png
- File:Mail v2.png
- File:Graphic designer v2.png
- File:Mariano v2.png
- File:X background.png
- File:Numero telefono.png
- File:Mariano vaccari.png
- File:Indirizzo mail.png
- File:Graphic designer.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, promotional SPAM. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:39, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MarianoVaccari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial designs. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:58, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shreks Mine (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Fictional country. There is a CopyVio of Pixar in one of these.
- File:Shrekslandmap3.png
- File:ShrekslandMap2.png
- File:Zabaikalie.jpg
- File:ShreksLandMap.jpg
- File:ShreksLand.photos.jpg
- File:ShreksLand.png
Enyavar (talk) 14:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:41, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
poor quality, unused Ske (talk) 19:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Too small to be useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:58, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:43, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
total useless foto with persons LigaDue (talk) 20:07, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:43, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The license on Flickr is "All rights reserved". File/licence wasn't checked since upload. GeorgHH • talk 21:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree Flickr license: https://flickr.com/photos/98371718@N04/14312404043 is licensed under All Rights Reserved. --Wdwd (talk) 11:37, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Carnitine has a negative charge on the oxygen, not a radical. There are plenty of correction options in Category:Carnitine that can be used instead. Marbletan (talk) 15:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 14:41, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio. This photo is credited to Jeff Curry for USA Today Sports and there is nothing to support the purported CC 4.0 license. Denniscabrams (talk) 00:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of a free license at source. --Strakhov (talk) 00:36, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal diagram, can easily be created with Wikipedia formats. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:39, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. This is an Arabic version of File:Ibn arabi judgement day.svg, which is used in w:Ibn Arabi, so it's useful, and it's certainly not a simple image that we should require people to recreate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:56, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep:The claim made by user regarding deletion is poorly articulated as though an informal conversation or a chat, this art work attempts to preserve legacy of Ibn Arabi`s works from his book , this image is of very high quality svg that tries to improve the quality of the article. SPQR10 (talk) 15:03, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 00:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: Crystal ball doing election maps Enyavar (talk) 08:03, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 00:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 10:56, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of a free license at source. --Strakhov (talk) 00:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
low quality, copyright?? Xocolatl (talk) 11:01, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of a free license at source. --Strakhov (talk) 00:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by أحمد محمد صفوت (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: unused private photos of non-notable person. Self-promotion only
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت - تاريخنا الحافل.png
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت 012.png
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت تيك توك.png
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت - انستجرام.png
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت 09.png
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت - الغزو الأمريكي للعراق عام 2003م.png
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت - دونالد ترامب أسرار وكوارث.png
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت - الأزمة الروسية الأوكرانية.png
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت - تاريخنا الحافل - يوتيوب.png
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت - تاريخنا الحافل يوتيوب.jpg
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت 010.png
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت 011.jpg
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت 09.jpg
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت 06.png
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت 07.png
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت 08.jpg
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت 05.png
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت 04.png
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت 02.png
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت 001.jpg
- File:أحمد محمد صفوت.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 14:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work (not selfies). --Strakhov (talk) 00:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Because it is Nonsense Basavaraj M (talk) 17:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Invalid nomination with no comprehensible rationale for it. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:06, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Obviously in scope; frivolous nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:00, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 00:51, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 18:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 00:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Still copyrighted; artwork by de:Hermann Pfeiffer (Künstler) (1883-1964). Jergen (talk) 18:56, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, undelete in 2035. --Strakhov (talk) 00:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
No aporta nada . Baja calidad Irrista2 (talk) 20:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: not that bad, not so many pictures of this person in Commons. --Strakhov (talk) 00:55, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amin2565825658 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: unused private photos of non-notable person
- File:Esmaeil mohammadpour in office.jpg
- File:Esmaeil mohammadpour in festival.jpg
- File:Picture 12 from esmaeil mohammadpour.jpg
- File:Pic 1 from esmaeil.jpg
- File:Picesmaeilmohammadpour.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 09:09, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/193984786@N02
[edit]Suspected flickrwashing. 0 followers, 7 photos.
- File:Рахим Абрамов.jpg
- File:Александр Миронов, скульптор.jpg
- File:Марина Жигалова.png
- File:Марина Жигалова.jpg
- File:Хайруллин, Фарид Миндиярович.jpg
- File:Otnicka.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Archivo Gospel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work. 2 appear to be scans. None have exif
- File:Puerto seguro conviccion.jpg
- File:Puerto 2021.jpg
- File:Otro Color.jpg
- File:Puerto 2010.jpg
- File:Puerto-seguro-400x1881.jpg
- File:Tanto Amor.png
- File:Daniel Alvarez .jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused non-notable logos
George Chernilevsky talk 09:25, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Botones Creativos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: unused private photos of non-notable persons
- File:Jorge Díaz.jpg
- File:Rodrígo Díaz.jpg
- File:Jorge Díaz y Rodrígo Díaz.jpg
- File:Jorge Díaz y Rodrigo Díaz 03.JPG
- File:Jorge Díaz y Rodrigo Díaz 02.jpg
- File:Jorge Díaz y Rodrigo Díaz 01.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 12:11, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 12:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi 24x7 07:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 12:04, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi 24x7 07:04, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 12:06, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi 24x7 07:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused self-promo banner. Probably copyvio George Chernilevsky talk 12:08, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi 24x7 07:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 12:13, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi 24x7 07:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: promotional only image George Chernilevsky talk 12:15, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, even if it's not for what I think it is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:21, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi 24x7 07:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 12:16, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi 24x7 07:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: promotional only image, unused George Chernilevsky talk 12:21, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi 24x7 07:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
_Mongolian_Baiti.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Mongolian_Baiti.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This Mongolian script is incorrect. Enkhjargal.b (talk) 00:07, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
_Mongolian_Baiti.png){kind=link}
- Delete As it's importer by bot. JackPotte (talk) 06:47, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:51, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
_Mongolian_Baiti.png){kind=link}
Unused logo of a non-notable organization. No educational value, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:27, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:55, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo of a non-notable organization. No educational value, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:28, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:56, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Lack of educational value, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:56, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal image (a non-notable person as far as I can see). Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:57, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PhoreLeren12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]own artwok? "Kersoner Productions" is not a company. Not used, not in scope.
Avron (talk) 22:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:2-Isopropoxyethanol-2D-structure.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:34, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 18:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mister Platipus (talk · contribs)
[edit]The Depp image made me suspicious, I felt I knew it. Then I took a look at the rest of the users upload. Different times, differen quality, often images from a view, it is only possible to take as accriditated photograph. But never there are Exif data. And often it is not the highest resolution. Not all, but some of the images can be found at the WWW, so just for example File:Lisa Surihani 2022.jpg here or File:Lim Chong King at 2022 BATC.jpg here and there. All in all I don't belive, the uploader is the photographer (as he clearly claims) and so he has no right to upload them and put them under a free license.
- File:Johnny depp early 30.jpg
- File:Misbun Sidek.jpg
- File:Jalani Sidek Interview.jpg
- File:Rashid Sidek in 2022.jpg
- File:Aaron Chia.jpg
- File:Lisa Surihani 2022.jpg
- File:Gabriel Gilbert Daim.jpg
- File:Andre Anura Anuar.png
- File:Mohammad Nasuha 2013.jpg
- File:Lim Chong King at 2022 BATC.jpg
- File:Roslin Hashim 1998 Thomas Cup.jpg
- File:Hafiz Hashim Purple League.jpg
- File:Iman in 2019.jpg
- File:Alex Lanier at the Estonian International.jpg
Marcus Cyron (talk) 05:17, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:10, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
All of the carboxylic acid groups are drawn incorrectly in this image: double bond to OH and single bond to O, when it should be the opposite. The image is unused. Marbletan (talk) 15:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 11:10, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
diboron.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
diboron.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Chemical structures are incorrect. The pinacol groups are missing two methyls each. I have created File:6-bromo-1-hexanol + bis(pinacolato)diboron.svg as a replacement. Innerstream (talk) 23:33, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
diboron.svg){kind=link}
diboron.png){kind=link}
- Delete. Per nominator. --Leiem (talk) 02:16, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 11:09, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
diboron.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Francky Duflos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person, self-promo only
George Chernilevsky talk 05:02, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 05:15, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: text only George Chernilevsky talk 05:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Most likely no own work, original at https://www.flickr.com/photos/91937413@N05/13889077254/ Fl.schmitt (talk) 05:28, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 05:30, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of project scope: unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 05:34, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of project scope: unused photo with promo of non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 05:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Benswarbricks23 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: unused private images and sign of non-notable person
- File:Louis Wright - Collecting Gold Duke Of Edinburgh Award.png
- File:Louis Wright's Signature.png
- File:Screen Shot 1.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 05:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Louisfire123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: unused non-notable logo
George Chernilevsky talk 05:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: non-notable logo, used only in abandoned since 2017 User's talk page George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: small unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Non-trivial logo is not own work by uploader, similar image can be found on en:File:Laos national football team crest.png WindEwriX (talk) 05:54, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused promo image. Also probably copyvio George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused non-notable screenshot George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chasan ali (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope due to the poor quality. We have many alternatives for pictures of similar food
George Chernilevsky talk 06:03, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused non-notable logo, also probably copyvio George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 06:08, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio, randomly taken from the Internet. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:09, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused downsampled duplicate of File:دکتر یوسف نجفی.jpg George Chernilevsky talk 06:14, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person. Self-promotion only George Chernilevsky talk 06:16, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private artwork George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Suspected copyvio - the author claims he took this photo, and that must have been some 40 years (1982-1986) ago, but does not provide any details. Just want someone with more experience to look into the matter. Thanks. WikiHannibal (talk) 06:21, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: text only George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:Lukisan Syeh abdul karim banten.jpg
- File:Eyang Hasan Maulani.jpg
- File:Sketsa Lukisan eyang Hasan Maulani.jpg
- File:Lukisan Syeh Abdul Qodir Al-Jaelani.jpg
- File:Syeh abdul karim banten.jpg
Unused personal image with no educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Contains copyrighted material. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:42, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 06:47, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
copyvio see metadata "Copyright status Copyright Gregor Servais www.gregorservais.nl" Hoyanova (talk) 07:04, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:09, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:11, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
copyvio see metadata "Copyright holder Sadik Yildiz Photography" Hoyanova (talk) 08:09, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photos of non-notable person
George Chernilevsky talk 08:09, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Comment Good photos. Not sure about his notability. Does https://promodj.com/tpaul mean anything? I'm unfamiliar with the site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 08:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 08:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 08:27, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by S U L De S Wijeratne (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: unused non-notable logos
George Chernilevsky talk 08:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 08:35, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
no source no permission Hoyanova (talk) 08:36, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: text only math formula. Could be created with TeX if needed George Chernilevsky talk 08:38, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Artur Cracker (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: unused non-notable artwork / joke / logo
George Chernilevsky talk 08:41, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused non-notable logo, SPAM promo George Chernilevsky talk 08:42, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oscar Cordova Hernandez (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal photos out of scope
— Draceane talkcontrib. 08:46, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The first one has the most interesting backdrop, but it's poor-quality and the people are obtrusive in the photo. I wouldn't mind if all of these were deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:30, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Valentin Danel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: unused non-notable logo
- File:Affiche du réseau unluckies.jpg
- File:Bannière du réseau unluckies de 2013 à 2016.png
- File:Bannière du réseau unluckies 2017.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 08:47, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private artwork George Chernilevsky talk 08:49, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
COM:TOY: copyrighted Lego toy George Chernilevsky talk 08:54, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 08:57, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The view is not devoid of interest, but the image quality is not that good and the person is more obtrusive than in the Indian(?) photo I commented on below. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:28, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 08:59, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 09:01, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Nice photo, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:25, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 09:03, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Per FBMD... in beginning of special instructions field of metadata, the photo is previously published in Facebook. All previously published images must have evidence of free license, for example VRT-permission. Uploader has been thrice blocked for copyvios. Taivo (talk) 09:05, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private document of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 09:06, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 09:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 09:21, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 09:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 09:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 09:36, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Nayan j Nath (talk) 11:53, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Nayan j Nath (talk) 11:54, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Disputing the {{PD-textlogo}} license. This group is based in the UK, which has an incredibly low threshold of originality. ✗plicit 12:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: small unused screenshot with barely readable text. Not useful without a detailed description. Copyright status unknown George Chernilevsky talk 14:57, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:06, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: small unused avatars. Copyright status unknown
George Chernilevsky talk 15:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:06, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
A mirrored version of deleted images of the same actress uploaded by the same user.
Based on the very small resolution and file format, it doesn't seem likely that the uplaoder is the photographer, and the original seems to be the actress' Twitter profile photo: https://twitter.com/msk_423_/photo. If the uploader is the owner, they should upload a higher quality version and provide more verifiable source information. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:06, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- CC @EugeneZelenko, who I think deleted the images mentioned above. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:11, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, It's photo that i took from my iphone. Stop do things that you don't know.
- The rough quality of the picture is because it was taken with a filter application. Your actions are disturbing.
- The image is mirrored because the last time it was impossible to post the same image due to someone who deleted it without asking any questions, without any confirmation, and without asking permission. 物知博士ノノマン (talk) 04:28, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Also, no wonder she is using that photo on Twitter. I took it for her. Why don't you DM her on Twitter to confirm? 物知博士ノノマン (talk) 04:29, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- @物知博士ノノマン As the uploader, you’re responsible for providing complete source information so other users can verify that the license information is correct. Images that have been published elsewhere require verification through COM:VRT.
- Also, your explanation about the image quality doesn’t make sense because the Twitter JPEG is higher quality.
- Finally, if you disagree with a deletion, please go through COM:REFUND, not re-upload the same photo. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 10:56, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Also, no wonder she is using that photo on Twitter. I took it for her. Why don't you DM her on Twitter to confirm? 物知博士ノノマン (talk) 04:29, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:06, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
source is not a video under freely-available license Evaders99 (talk) 20:16, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 02:59, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
source is not a video under freely-available license Evaders99 (talk) 20:17, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 02:59, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
source is not a video under freely-available license Evaders99 (talk) 20:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 02:58, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused small text artwork George Chernilevsky talk 14:43, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 23:20, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 23:20, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AndreaANLA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright infringement, all pictures are taken from various sites that are protected by copyright. Used only in User's sub-page abandoned since 2017.
- File:Asokpoda.jpg
- File:PASKDSDSA.jpg
- Keep This one is by Albrecht Dürer! -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 08:35, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:Idealismo.-Ilustración.png
- File:El-realismo-samuel-y-gonzalo-1-728.jpg
- File:Relativismo.jpg
- File:Sujetivismo radical.jpg
- File:Teoria-del-conocimiento.jpg
- File:Posibilidad de nuestro conocimiento.jpg
- File:Andreaanla.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 05:08, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 10:59, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable persons George Chernilevsky talk 06:47, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The picture of the uniform might be useful if it can be identified and the categories are cleaned up, so I wouldn't delete too quickly. Ada orang Indonesia yang kenal uniform ini? Ini uniform apa organizasi? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:52, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:01, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 08:11, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I think this one is good enough to keep and categorize as a portrait, if we trust its license. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:35, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:02, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
_IA_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_IA_.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 09:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
_IA_.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Might be worth keeping and categorizing for the other 90+% of the photo that doesn't consist of the person and is pretty interesting, especially but not only if someone can identify the location. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:02, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
_IA_.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Bakı Fond Birjası (BSE) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low quality duplicates of File:BFB logo yeni.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 09:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep at least File:Bakı Fond Birjası.jpg, but both are bigger than File:BFB logo yeni.jpg. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:02, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 6000easthill (talk · contribs)
[edit]Taken from https://www.bernard-riley.com/ which has "All rights reserved" copyright disclaimer. Additionally the artworks are by Bernard Riley who died in 1984 and are thus copyrighted until 2055.
- File:Fullrt.jpg
- File:019 bridgeport lib mural.jpg
- File:Man 01.jpg
- File:Bernard riley pic.png
- File:071 j street.jpg
MKFI (talk) 12:35, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:03, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation : file is under "© CNES/Distribution Airbus DS, 2019 " copyright and only available for "Publication Presse, Scientifique, Educative et Pédagogique.", i.e. not commercial use. See https://phototheque.cnes.fr/cnes/media/66523 Skimel (talk) 14:05, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:04, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Commons:Derivative works from copyrighted characters. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:04, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Published to Pexels after 2018, does not have a Commons-compatible free license: https://www.pexels.com/photo/photo-of-cannabis-flowers-on-glass-container-7773107/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio, Photgraph of a band or use of Commons as personal space CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:09, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:06, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
promotional image - copyright SM Entertainment, https://twitter.com/nctsmtown_dream/status/1414837873694576657 Evaders99 (talk) 21:15, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:06, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Indication of copyright embedded in the image Hektor (talk) 02:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, credit in EXIF watermark not matching the uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:09, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Image of unidentified subject, perhaps it is a corrupted file? Translated description indicates it is not uploader's own work. ➔Bottom line, is it isn't educationally useful. And not used by any WMF project. Senator2029 10:54, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:14, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Uploader is not the photographer - see Comment https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Berthold_Kuhn&type=revision&diff=224424137&oldid=224373903&diffmode=source Bahnmoeller (talk) 12:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:16, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons scope. Only used on un-approved ENWP draft - RichT|C|E-Mail 13:03, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: (1) This photo is quite good enough to keep as a portrait, even if it was of Joanne Schmo. (2) I don't know whether en.wp will approve the draft, but she sure looks notable enough to me for us not to delete her photo. See for example https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/stocks/news/we-have-seen-sharp-resurgence-in-demand-in-us-uk-markets-dipali-goenka/videoshow/82707052.cms, https://www.businesstoday.in/specials/most-powerful-women-in-business/story/dipali-goenka-unstoppable-tycoon-315145-2021-12-10, https://www.bloomberg.com/profile/person/16311653, https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/trends/features/if-you-want-the-nation-to-progress-then-you-need-to-empower-women-dipali-goenka-ceo-and-joint-md-welspun-india-6871561.html. And that's not exhaustive. I'd consider this a slam-dunk, not a close case. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:19, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: We need permission via COM:VRT from 'ZALA UJASSINH' as mentioned on the file's Metadata. Kind regards, — Tulsi 24x7 07:11, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment OK, understood. So my vote to keep should be understood to include that caveat. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:59, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:16, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
copyrighted screenshot Ske (talk) 13:04, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:16, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Combination of artwork and photograph, authorship and date of both are unknown. Artwork might be old enough to be in public domain, but there is not enough information to know. MKFI (talk) 13:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Mohkum Din Serani is one of my ancestors, there were no photographs back in his era. Therefore, this portrait was created based on the description of his looks from the book "Sahib-ul-Sair". I have listed that book on the wiki page submission I did.
- The reason why there is no author or date listed, because the author requested to remain anonymous while submitting his work as a donation to the shrine of Mohkum Din Serani.
- As for why this has not been in public domain, is because of the fact that the area this personality is from is now getting up to speed with all the technical advancements the world has done. That is why you can find this portrait in physical books but not on the web.
- This is an attempt being made by myself to bring this great personality out of the old ages of regional books into the real world that is now globally connected through the power of the web.
- Hope I have answered your concerns. Muawaisi (talk) 19:36, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Muawaisi: I am afraid this does not answer my concerns. You have uploaded this image as your own work, created this year. However based on the above it is actually an older work by an anonymous artist. This means you can't give permission to use it since it is not yours. If the artwork has been donated to a temple then the temple might be able to give the permission to use the image, although this would depend on whether the temple has just the physical artwork or also the copyrights of it. "en:Public domain" is a legal concept on whether something is no longer protected by copyright; it does not refer to web or books as such. MKFI (talk) 13:09, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, clearly taken from some website as per watermark. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:18, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Fabricated results map for an election that hasn't yet happened. Delete as out of scope. Eureka Lott 14:15, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Elli (talk) 04:43, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:18, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Redundant against File:Max Payne Logo.svg; unused. IceWelder [✉] 14:56, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:22, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Unsplash image published after 2017, does not have a Commons-compatible free license: https://unsplash.com/photos/mArY6c8uG3g Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:27, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:22, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright Verletzung: Rechteinhaber Shutterstock / foto-select. 31.17.16.132 16:06, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
https://www.shutterstock.com/de/image-photo/warehouse-district-speicherstadt-hamburg-germany-dusk-721752376 31.17.16.132 16:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:24, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
I don't think that is free, with the drawing of the bird. Andr€a (talk) 16:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: DM. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:24, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
I don't think that is free, with this stylisation of the letters. Andr€a (talk) 16:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-font. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:27, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted book cover. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:13, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. The photo illustrates the topic of the article. Besides the description is correctly issued, even coordinates are added. Emenrigen (talk) 10:16, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- That is beside the point of this discussion. None of this is relevant to the copyright status of the work. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:27, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Unclear about the origin, but appears to be a repost of a zombie spider pic that's around on the internet: https://pin.it/7vsQB6l Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:19, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work. Unclear if original would be PD-text? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:48, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: can't see how this simple text-based screenshot shows anything proprietary or copyrightable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:21, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
total useless foto with persons recognizable LigaDue (talk) 20:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Dunno. The photo could be called and categorized as "tourists in Siena". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:56, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- You must be joking. They are tourists or students? Or inhabitans? No one will ever use such a picture. Please remember project scope. LigaDue (talk) 20:32, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- What about scope? This is a repository of images that could be used for any Wikimedia project. That scope is tremendous. And by the way, look at Category:Tourists. As usual, featured picture search isn't working, but I recall we featured a picture of tourists in, I believe Italy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:06, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- By the way, I didn't actually vote to keep this photo, but I'd point out that there is absolutely no rule that a photo has to be in use not to be deleted, and I'm simply offering an argument that could be used to keep this photo if that's the decision an admin makes. My bias is that when a photo doesn't clearly have no value even under the widest possible imagination, only then does it have to be deleted. Therefore, I look for reasons to possibly keep a photo, knowing that an admin will make a decision, not me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:12, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copied from https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=481584557308295&set=a.481584530641631 Ske (talk) 20:30, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hölderlinuhr
[edit]Per [2], the illustrations are by an artist based in Tübingen, Andreas Härlin [3]. We'd need a VRT permission to host these files.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 20:30, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:29, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Please delete the uncropped 1st version of the file. I had actually intended to simply load a cropped version but I made a slip and have loaded a full image and cropped it. The uncropped image contains an identifier and should therefore ideally be deleted. Deirge Ó Dhaoinebeaga(a)talk 21:59, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Please delete all versions of this file. I just realised flicking back through my uploads this is a duplicate of File:Ballymote Courthouse and Meditation Centre (1975c).jpg. I have taken the useful information from location/description to the other file. It is also invalid for the WLM though that was useful in indicating this was not linked to the Wikidata item so there has been some benefit. The name of this file is also unhelpful anyway. Apologies for the inconvenience. Thankyou. -- Deirge Ó Dhaoinebeaga(a)talk 22:56, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:30, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Capture of website https://president.gov.by/ru on copyright unknown. Pierre cb (talk) 22:05, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:30, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Historical photo of USSR of unknown origin and copyright status. Pierre cb (talk) 22:07, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Historical photo of USSR of unknown origin and copyright status Pierre cb (talk) 22:08, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Historical photo of USSR of unknown origin and copyright status Pierre cb (talk) 22:09, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Thumb image unlikely from uploader as no META and small size. Pierre cb (talk) 22:11, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, crop from unknown source. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lee Sergic (talk · contribs)
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Italy, permission from the artist is required.
- File:L'Arte è come un elefante che vola nei sogni di una bambina.jpg
- File:Continuate a sognare.jpg
- File:Gaetano 2.0.jpg
- File:Lobotomized 3.jpg
- File:Santa Maria Pietà 2015.jpg
- File:Treedom Santa Maria della Pietà.jpg
- File:Lobotomized 2.jpg
- File:Lobotomizzato - Progetto GAU 2018.jpg
- File:La voce del corpo.jpg
- File:Maestro Manzi.jpg
- File:Street Dancer 2.jpg
- File:Street Dancer.jpg
- File:Gaetano vende sogni.jpg
- File:Differenza come elemento di Vita.jpg
- File:Differenza come elemento di vita.jpg
- File:Drago e Farfalla 2015.jpg
- File:LC9,23-24.jpg
- File:La Divina Accoglienza.jpg
- File:Enter the mystical garden.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Rwanda A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Not sure whether FOP exists in the source country or not A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:03, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
This is a sticker art, not graffiti, and no FOP for "graphic works" in UK A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:GRAFFITI this is illegal street poster art , an act of vandalism is not copyrighted! See: Sticker art (subcategory of graffiti) on Wikipedia, "Sticker art (also known as sticker bombing, sticker slapping, slap tagging, and sticker tagging) is a form of street art in which an image or message is publicly displayed using stickers. These stickers may promote a political agenda, comment on a policy or issue, or comprise a subcategory of graffiti." Please, see articles about famous Banksy ("Banksy Is Losing Copyright - Copyright House Office"), illegal (anonymous) graffiti, stencil graffiti, stickers, posters are not copyrighted in the UK.--Daniel Naczk (talk) 15:41, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:03, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE. The Burj Al-Arab is now become too prominent that fails de minimis A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Leaning towards Delete: the de minimis claim has been dispelled by its use in an article of Dubai (edit by Lacipetom (talk · contribs)), captioned specifically as Burj al-Arab. Hence there is a chance for this photo to represent the copyrighted architectural work. It is also the only significant element of the photo; no other taller buildings are seen here except the dull desert. Since Dubai kingdom has no clear de minimis jurisprudence or clause in its law, the triviality concept can be applied. In this case, the Burj is not trivial or unimportant element. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:25, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:04, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
The building was completed in 2010 by Adrian Smith. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates, permission from him is required A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:04, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jumeirah Mosque
[edit]The mosque was completed in 1979. There is no freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates, permission from the architect is needed.
- File:Dubai UAE Jumeirah Mosque 1301200712683.jpg
- File:Dubai UAE Jumeirah Mosque 1301200712687.jpg
- File:Jumeira 1 - Dubai - United Arab Emirates - panoramio.jpg
- File:Jumeirah Mosque - Interior.jpg
- File:Jumeirah Mosque - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Jumeirah Mosque - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Mesquita Jumeirah (4128588527).jpg
- File:Moschea Jumeirah.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jumeirah Mosque
[edit]The mosque was completed in 1979. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates, permission from the architect is needed.
- File:Dub-jum-mos2.jpg
- File:Jumeirah Mosque (48393328697).jpg
- File:Jumeirah Mosque - panoramio.jpg
- File:Jumeriah Mosque - panoramio.jpg
- File:Mosque in Dubai (DSCF0876) (4621819381).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
_(4621819381).jpg){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:04, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Modern building, no freedom of panorama in UAE A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:04, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vinch~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images are a series of art and some photos. All are facebook or smaller size, not own work due to metadata and art.
- File:Laurent garnier.jpg
- File:Akos Biro et Cocteau.jpg
- File:Paint brushes and fruits.jpg
- File:Courge citron.jpg
- File:Akos Biro - Les Sardines.jpg
- File:Kovacs Klara.jpg
- File:Biro arpad.jpg
- File:Akos biro 1999.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:39, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep File:Akos Biro et Cocteau.jpg the license at the source matches the one here. --RAN (talk) 15:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- We have no idea if that website has rights. There's no photographer name or date on the image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:27, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - In the cited case, it is very unlikely the source site actually has the right to freely license the image. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:06, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:12, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Sri Lanka A1Cafel (talk) 07:14, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, why delete the photo? 112.134.157.7 09:28, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Because photographing the building is considered as a derivative work. Unless you get the permission from the copyright holder (architect), you cannot upload it to Commons because you violate the copyright of the architect. Freedom of panorama is so-called the exemption of the above permission. Unfortunately, Sri Lankan law does not provide any freedom of panorama clause. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Sri Lanka A1Cafel (talk) 07:15, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Sri Lanka A1Cafel (talk) 07:16, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Sri Lanka A1Cafel (talk) 07:17, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Sri Lanka A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Sri Lanka A1Cafel (talk) 07:19, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Senegal A1Cafel (talk) 07:21, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Senegal A1Cafel (talk) 07:22, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:13, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Senegal A1Cafel (talk) 07:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:13, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Palace of the Parliament of Romania 1
[edit]No FoP in Romania - this palace was designed by a team of architects led by Anca Petrescu (died in 2013) - construction was begun in 1980 and finished in 1997
- File:Palace of the Parliament (world's largest civilian building ) Bucharest, Roamnia, Southeastern Europe.jpg
- File:20140701 Bucureşti 08.jpg
- File:20140816 București 116.jpg
- File:20140816 București 118.jpg
- File:20140816 București 119.jpg
- File:20140816 București 120.jpg
- File:20140816 București 122.jpg
- File:20140816 București 172.jpg
- File:20140816 București 179.jpg
- File:20140816 București 181.jpg
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 02.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 03.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 04.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 05.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 07.jpg
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 08.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 09.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 12.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 13.jpg
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 16.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 17.jpg
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 18.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 19.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 20.jpg
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 26.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 29.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 30.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 40.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 47.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 48.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 49.jpg
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 50.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 51.jpg
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 52.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 53.JPG
- File:Bucarest, Palazzo del Parlamento di notte 03.JPG
- File:Bucarest, Palazzo del Parlamento di notte 04.JPG
- File:Bucharest - Palace of Parliament (14696884403).jpg
- File:Bukareŝto, parlamentejo de sudo 1 retuŝita.jpeg
- File:Casa Poporului, Romania's House of Parliament.jpg
- File:Ceauşescu's Palace of the Parliament.jpg
- File:EPP Congress 1831 (8096486583).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 1837 (8096486337).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 1841 (8096494034).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 1842 (8096493958).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 1844 (8096493862).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094574447).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094574579).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094574691).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094574781).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094574951).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094580084).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094580922).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094581040).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094600194).jpg
- File:Largest structure in Europe and second in the World after The Pentagon - Palace of the Parliament (11321680666).jpg
- File:Palace of Parliament (941185367).jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament Bucharest.jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament of Romania (1518113141).jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament of Romania (8003910699).jpg
- File:Palace of the parliament, Bucharest (7969980610).jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament.JPG
- File:Palace of the Parliament.jpg
- File:Palais du Parlement Bucarest 1.JPG
- File:Palatul Parlamentului 1.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului 1a.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului 1b.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului b.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului Palace of Parliament at night Bucharest Bucuresti Romania.JPG
- File:Palatul Parlamentului Palace of Parliament Bucharest Bucuresti Romania 3.JPG
- File:Palatul Parlamentului Palace of Parliament Bucharest Bucuresti Romania.JPG
- File:Palatul Parlamentului schuh001.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului schuh002.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului schuh004.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului și Bulevardul Unirii, Zilele Bucureștiului 2014.JPG
- File:Palatul Parlamentului, Zilele Bucureștiului 2014.JPG
- File:Parliament (2477764893).jpg
- File:Parliament of Romania (8839005789).jpg
- File:Peoples Palace (6653232757).jpg
- File:Romania-002.jpg
- File:Romania-1181 - Palace of the Parliament (7557753382).jpg
- File:Romanian parlamenttitalo.jpg
_Bucharest,_Roamnia,_Southeastern_Europe.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
INeverCry 08:09, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Keep the following, as having the palace as a secondary subject (which is acceptable for the Romanian law): File:EPP Congress 1831 (8096486583).jpg, File:EPP Congress 1837 (8096486337).jpg, File:EPP Congress 1841 (8096494034).jpg, File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094574447).jpg, File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094574579).jpg, File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094574691).jpg, File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094574781).jpg, File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094580084).jpg, File:Palatul Parlamentului 1.jpg, File:Palatul Parlamentului schuh001.jpg, File:Palatul Parlamentului și Bulevardul Unirii, Zilele Bucureștiului 2014.JPG--Strainu (talk) 09:18, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- Having a few people standing around, or some blue signs hung about doesn't make the Palace, which takes up the majority of the frame in all of these, a "secondary subject". These should be deleted. INeverCry 09:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- You're generalizing. In some of these picture the palace is blurred, in others only the base of the column is visible and in others yet the palace takes only a fraction of the picture. These cannot be considered as having the palace as main subject.--Strainu (talk) 10:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- I was told that images which showed multiple buildings, so that no one particular building was the primary subject of the photo, did not violate Romanian FOP. I looked at Strainu's list, above, and it seemed to me only the following two images meet that criteria. File:Palatul Parlamentului 1.jpg and File:Palatul Parlamentului și Bulevardul Unirii, Zilele Bucureștiului 2014.JPG Geo Swan (talk) 12:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- You're generalizing. In some of these picture the palace is blurred, in others only the base of the column is visible and in others yet the palace takes only a fraction of the picture. These cannot be considered as having the palace as main subject.--Strainu (talk) 10:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment When I uploaded File:Casa Poporului, Romania's House of Parliament.jpg about six years ago, together with several dozen other Romanian images, I wasn't aware of Romanian FOP restrictions. When one of those images was challenged, I found FOP restrictions deeply counter-intuitive, and confusing. I prepared a list of the other Romanian images I uploaded that night.
I still find FOP counter-intuitive. FOP is sometimes interpreted surprisingly leniently for images from France, with contributors arguing it only applies to building with designs that have a "creative" element, which I find odd, as even the most utilitarian garden shed has some creative elements. Anyhow, if this image should go, some of the other images in the list of images I uploaded at the same time should go too. Geo Swan (talk) 12:33, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Most uploaders don't know FOP restrictions exist, find them absurd when they hear about it, and protest in good faith when the deletion of their pictures is requested. The French community being particularly vociferous on the matter, many French admins (including myself) have studied FOP case law, which mitigates the absence of FOP in French law – hence the perceived leniency. My knowledge of Romanian case law is almost non-existent, but we generally apply the De Minimis rule, which encompasses both the building being shown as a secondary subject and the building being shown as part of a general landscape. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 17:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- There are two different de minimis situations in copyright law:
- The work is not the main subject. For example, article 24.2 of the Danish copyright law states that artworks permanently installed in public places may be depicted if they are not the main subject of the depiction, but other artworks do not qualify for this kind of de minimis under Danish copyright law. I would say that no building is the main subject of File:Palatul Parlamentului 1.jpg, so that picture seems to satisfy this de minimis situation.
- The work is irrelevant to the context. This essentially means that removing the work from the picture wouldn't cause any harm. For example, article 23.3 of the Danish copyright law tells that published artworks and copies of artworks which the author has transferred to others may be reproduced in newspapers, magazines, film and television if the artwork is contextually irrelevant. This Danish exception covers virtually all artworks, but it is more difficult to find a situation where an artwork is contextually irrelevant, so there are fewer cases where this situation applies. The purpose of this picture appears to be to display pictures of houses in a city, so this version of de minimis doesn't seem to apply.
- France seems to have chosen to use something similar to Danish article 24.2 with respect to works permanently installed in public places. I'm not sure which version of de minimis Romania uses, though. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:24, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. Romanian law acknowledges a limitation to copyright for the reproduction "of the image of an architectural work (...) permanently located in a public place, except where the image of the work is the principal subject (subiectul principal) of such reproduction", so that would be your 24.2 (French case law acknowledges both 24.2 and 23.3 meanings). Unfortunately I can't find any case law on the matter. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:35, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Jastrow, I think your interpretation is quite narrow; if the work is irrelevant in the context (such as here and in some other EPP pictures, both inside and outside the palace), how can it be considered the main subject of the picture?--Strainu (talk) 14:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Also probably need to delete File:20140816 București 153.jpg, File:20140816 București 155.jpg, which I just placed in the category. I think File:Bucharest (14161334433).jpg (which I also recently categorized) is arguably OK because it is de minimis, the main focal subject is a fountain that I think is itself below any threshold for copyright. - Jmabel ! talk 00:00, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Also File:Bucharest (13954606099).jpg. - Jmabel ! talk 03:15, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
19 more:
- File:Bucharest Day 2 - Parlamentului (9335139611).jpg
- File:Bucharest Day 2 - Parlamentului (9337924696).jpg
- File:Bucharest Day 2 - Parlamentului (9337925234).jpg
- File:Bucharest Day 2 - Parlamentului (9337925722).jpg
- File:Bucharest Day 2 - Parlamentului (9337927882).jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament (façade).jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament Bucharest, Romania (16438450396).jpg
- File:20140819 București 29.jpg
- File:Bucharest (11375435065).jpg
- File:20140816 București 105.jpg
- File:20140816 București 128.jpg
- File:20140816 București 135.jpg
- File:20140816 București 136.jpg
- File:20140816 București 139.jpg
- File:20140816 București 145.jpg
- File:20140816 București 146.jpg
- File:20140816 București 166.jpg
- File:Palace Parliament Romania Bucharest.jpg
- File:20140816 București 230.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Jmabel 16:51, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
I think File:Palatul Parlamentului Palace of Parliament from University Square Bucharest Bucuresti Romania.JPG (not listed above but also in the category) is OK. Despite being mentioned in the name of the photo, the Palace is barely visible, in little enough detail that I suspect no copyright problem arises. I'm not nominating it for deletion, but someone else may want to. - Jmabel ! talk 02:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted (most pictures): per the nominator: the building is still copyrighted, no freedom of panorama in Romania. Were kept:
- pictures thought to be part of a larger urban landscape, i.e. File:Palatul Parlamentului 1.jpg and more tentatively File:Palatul Parlamentului b.jpg
- pictures representing an event which happens to take place at the Palace, in this case the 2012 EPP Congress in Bucharest.
However, I deleted some pictures of the EPP series which looked more like the Palace with some tiny blue banners on it. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 19:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Palace of the Parliament of Romania 2
[edit]No FOP in Romania.
- File:Bucurestiul meu - panoramio.jpg
- File:Casa Poporului - Palatul Parlamentului - Romania - panoramio.jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament in Bucharest - panoramio.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului - Bulevardul Unirii (25154814949).jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kulmalukko (talk) 17:18, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Palace of the Parliament of Romania 3
[edit]No Freedom Of Panorama in Romania.
- File:Bucharest - Union Square (28505857291).jpg
- File:Crop exterior shot of Palace of the Parliament in Bucharest Romania.jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament in Bucharest Romania in June 2017.jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament.jpg
- File:Parcul Izvor (1).jpg
- File:Parcul Izvor.jpg
- File:Parlement de Bucarest.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kulmalukko (talk) 12:38, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep for File:Parcul Izvor (1).jpg, because it is more about the park than the building in the background. Razvan Socol (talk) 18:11, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Palace of the Parliament of Romania 4
[edit]No FOP in Romania.
- File:Bucharest, Palace of the Parliament, 01-08-2004.jpg
- File:Bucuresti, Romania. Cladirea Parlamentului Roman (Fosta Casa a Poporului).jpg
- File:Bucureşti The Presidential Palace. May 1996 (3993876724).jpg
- File:Bukareszt - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:House of the People (20151230 103941 1PS) (24126610366).jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament (Bucharest) (30856720786).jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament - panoramio.jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament in Bucharest (AP4M1788) (7211710170).jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament in Bucharest (AP4M1788) (7211710648).jpg
- File:Palata parlamenta - panoramio.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului Häuser des Parlament Bukarest c.jpg
- File:Romanian Parliamentary Palace - panoramio.jpg
- File:Romanya'nın 5 bin odalı muhteşem yapısı ve katledilen çavuşesku ailesi by ismail soytekinoğlu - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(24126610366).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(30856720786).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(7211710170).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(7211710648).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kulmalukko (talk) 19:42, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep File:Bucureşti The Presidential Palace. May 1996 (3993876724).jpg as the palace does not hold the central place in the picture (as required by Romanian copyright law) and the cars themselves are relevant for Bucharest at the time.--Strainu (talk) 10:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (except one kept). --Green Giant (talk) 21:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Palace of the Parliament of Romania 5
[edit]This building was designed by Anca Petrescu, d. 2013. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for a certain period of time after the death of the creator (be it the last-surviving architect, engineer, designer, sculptor, engraver, or painter). An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception Commons:Freedom of panorama (FoP). Sadly, Romania has no Commons-acceptable FoP. Its FOP is limited only to noncommercial, not compatible with Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses. The selected images fail COM:DM, as the main focus and intent of the images is the building itself.
- File:2004 in Romania (65).jpg
- File:2004 in Romania (66).jpg
- File:2004 in Romania (67).jpg
- File:2004 in Romania (68).jpg
- File:2004 in Romania (71).jpg
- File:2004 in Romania (72).jpg
- File:2004 in Romania (73).jpg
- File:Bucharest 007.jpg
- File:Bucharest 035.jpg
- File:Bucharest 037.jpg
- File:Bucharest 038.jpg
- File:Bucuresti, Romania. Casa Poporului (Palatul Parlamentului) 2 Iunie 2018. (5).jpg
- File:Bucuresti, Romania. Casa Poporului (Palatul Parlamentului) 2 Iunie 2018. (6).jpg
- File:Bucuresti, Romania. Casa Poporului (Palatul Parlamentului) 2 Iunie 2018.jpg
- File:Bucuresti, Romania. Casa Poporului (Palatul Parlamentului). 2 Iunie 2018. (3).jpg
- File:Bucureşti June 1996 (3407051287).jpg
- File:Bucureşti The Presidential Palace. May 1996 (3993876724).jpg
- File:DSC09310 (15048479080).jpg
- File:Palace of Parliament (37522982520).jpg
- File:Palace of Parliament.jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament Bucharest.jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament of Romania 20180226-1.jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament of Romania 20180226-2.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului Häuser des Parlament Bukarest b.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului-Bucuresti.jpg
- File:Palatul Parliamentului 1990.jpg
- File:Parlamentspalast - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Pałac Parlamentu.jpg
- File:PMadia 000277 NA NA.jpg
- File:Romania-1193 - Union Square (7557758988).jpg
- File:Romanian Parliament Palace colorfully lit at night (4329909380).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2_Iunie_2018._(5).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2_Iunie_2018._(6).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2_Iunie_2018.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._2_Iunie_2018._(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Keep the following, for the reasons mentioned in the previous discussions in this page:
- File:Bucureşti The Presidential Palace. May 1996 (3993876724).jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament Bucharest.jpg
Razvan Socol (talk) 01:31, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
The building was completed in 1997 by Anca Petrescu (1949–2013). Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright term in Romania lasted for 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2084.
- File:Bucarest - Palau del Parlament.png
- File:Bucharest Parliament Palace.jpg
- File:Bucharest, May 2018. 56713.jpg
- File:Bukarest este a parlament épületével.jpg
- The main object is not the building of the parliament. This is a city scape. You can't take any photo of this boulevard without the building in the background. --Regasterios (talk) 16:12, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:Ceausescu Palace (43095103491).jpg
- The main focus is the boulevard in this picture.--Dhyana b (talk) 01:35, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:Palace of Parliament (27450816555).jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament of Romania 1.jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament of Romania 2.jpg
- File:Palacio del Parlamento Rumano 01.jpg
- File:Palacio del Parlamento Rumano 02.jpg
- I say the focus is the street. Parliament is in background. --Dhyana b (talk) 01:44, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:Palacio del Parlamento Rumano 03.jpg
- File:Palacio del Parlamento Rumano 04.jpg
- File:Parliament Ro. Bucharest.jpg
- File:Peoples House Unirii Bvd.jpg
- I would like to argue here that it is a picture of the boulevard, with the building towering in the background. It's not necessarily the main focus. --Dhyana b (talk) 01:30, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:Romania Parliament at night.jpg
- Main attraction is the light artwork. --Dhyana b (talk) 01:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:Romania-1181 - Palace of the Parliament (7557753382).jpg
- This picture has already been proposed for deletion several times, but passed inspection... --Dhyana b (talk) 01:50, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:The Parliament Palace, in Bucharest.jpg
- I say it's the exact same case as the pic above. A very similar perspective. If "File:Romania-1181 - Palace of the Parliament (7557753382).jpg" passes, this has to pass as well. --Dhyana b (talk) 01:53, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 07:34, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The several claims of de minimis are absurd. The palace overwhelms the images -- the only thing in the image beside the palace is an street that could be anywhere. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Lithuania. A1Cafel (talk) 07:44, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Lithuania. A1Cafel (talk) 07:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
This is 1971 bridge, but there is no freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia per {{NoFoP-Saudi Arabia}}. The photo violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:08, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Syria ({{NoFoP-Syria}}) and the sculptures look like modern. I suspect sculptors' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Is not used anymore Tajala (talk) 18:37, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 12:02, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Tjala's opinion: The file "Fabricage van smeltgeblazen non-woven doek.png" is redundant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tajala (talk • contribs) 13:46, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
It is redundant. Tajala (talk) 09:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:Fabricage van smeltgeblazen non-woven doek v2.png is smaller, though closer cropped. Could you elaborate on how this file is redundant? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- The file "Fabricage van smeltgeblazen non-woven doek.png" is redundant. Tajala (talk) 13:44, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- You're repeating yourself. In what way is it redundant? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:48, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of superseded graphic. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:14, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Personal Photograph, out of scope of Wiki education -
IndrajitDas 14:48, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep photo of cadet in uniform. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:05, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:18, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Personal Photograph, out of scope of Wiki education.
- File:10 mp.jpg
- File:Cadet and rain at red fort.jpg
- File:Cadet bike.jpg
- File:Cadet biking.jpg
- File:Cadet parade.jpg
- File:Cadets at red fort.jpg
- File:Cadets in rain.jpg
- File:Cadets of 10 mp bn ncc ujjain.jpg
- File:Cadets using bike.jpg
- File:Dg ncc by suraj verma of mp cg dte.jpg
- File:Dg ncc by suraj verma.jpg
- File:Dg ncc.jpg
- File:India gate full.jpg
- File:India gate half.jpg
- File:Iron pillar by suraj verma.jpg
- File:Jantar mantar by suraj verma.jpg
- File:Jantar mantar mini by suraj verma.jpg
- File:Kid between two small domes on the mosque terrace.jpg
- File:Kutumbh minar.jpg
- File:Lotus green.jpg
- File:Mp cg dte.jpg
- File:National cadet corps by suraj verma.jpg
- File:National cadet corps india.jpg
- File:National cadet corps mp and cg dte.jpg
- File:National cadet corps uniform.jpg
- File:National cadet corps.jpg
- File:National cadets corps bike.jpg
- File:National cadets.jpg
- File:National war memorial main.jpg
- File:Ncc cadets at red fort by suraj verma.jpg
- File:Ncc cadets at red fort.jpg
- File:Ncc parade.jpg
- File:Ncc under officer.jpg
- File:Ncc under officers.jpg
- File:New delhi railway station by suraj verma.jpg
- File:Raining at cadets.jpg
- File:Red fort cadets.jpg
- File:Red fort ladakh.jpg
- File:Red fort maharastra.jpg
- File:Red fort punjab.jpg
- File:Shinde Chhatri Steps.jpg
- File:Stone steps of temple.jpg
- File:Ten mp bn ncc ujjain.jpg
- File:Under officer.jpg
- File:War memorial arm force.jpg
- File:War memorial titile.jpg
- File:Web Developer Suraj.png
IndrajitDas 14:51, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- I haven't looked at all the photos in this excessively long nomination, but Keep photos of cadets. Photos of the man in civilian clothes standing in front of monuments can be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:27, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was uploaded by the daughter of Zoe Lowenthal Brown with the incorrect license. It is not her own work, but she does not know who the photographer who made the image was. She has asked that it be deleted here:[4], and here:[5] Netherzone (talk) 16:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Invalid license: the {GODL-India} license is only applicable to some works of the central government of India, and not to works by the Goa state assembly, see COM:TAG India Rejoy2003 (talk) 18:39, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep nic.in site where this is hosted is a Government of India site. The picture is produced by Goa Assembly using public money.Hence GODL-India license applies. The picture should not be deleted. No reason to believe the copyright is held by a private entity. Venkat TL (talk) 18:43, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, Venkat TL I thought the same, you can check Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shri-Viresh-Borkar.jpg wherein I uploaded alot of files which were deleted, the same can be confirmed and asked by Verbcatcher. Rejoy2003 (talk)
- Comment See the discussion at Commons:Deletion_requests/Photographs_from_the_Goa_Legislative_Assembly_Website_uploaded_by_User:Rejoy2003 which has a few other comments. That request concerns files uploaded from the same source as this request. Ravensfire (talk) 15:19, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: No license review and the source site is no longer there. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Invalid license: the GODL-India license is only applicable to some works of the central government of India, and not to works by the Goa state assembly, see COM:TAG India Rejoy2003 (talk) 18:43, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep nic.in is a Government of India site. The picture is produced by Goa Assembly using public money.Hence GODL-India license applies. The picture should not be deleted. No reason to believe the copyright is held by a private entity. Venkat TL (talk) 18:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- If this file is kept it'll be biased to the other files which were uploaded and deleted here, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shri-Viresh-Borkar.jpg. Although I don't know if this license is actually suitable or not. Rejoy2003 (talk)
- Comment See the discussion at Commons:Deletion_requests/Photographs_from_the_Goa_Legislative_Assembly_Website_uploaded_by_User:Rejoy2003 which has a few other comments. That request concerns files uploaded from the same source. Ravensfire (talk) 15:10, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: No license review and the source site is no longer there. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Logo of a UK company, uploaded with a CC license tag which I doubt is correct. The logo is very likely above the very low COM:TOO UK. Rosenzweig τ 20:46, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Francis Picabia died in 1953, copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:CD36:8569:C6F6:711E 21:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Small size thumb without META data, unlikely from uploader. Pierre cb (talk) 22:12, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Looks like the uploader wasn't aware that it is it possible to upload a new version but uploaded a new file: File:Schema MFO c.gif Avron (talk) 22:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- This is my work, why you are requesting for deletion? This is street art! Lee Sergic (talk) 13:34, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- You mean, this artwork is created by yourself? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:49, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:54, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Modern building, no freedom of panorama in UAE A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: I would be happy for this image to be moved to Wikipedia with the Licencing info {{FoP-USonly|the United Arab Emirates}}. —Jpbowen (talk) 22:50, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; reuploaded as w:en:File:InterContinental Dubai Festival City at night local.jpg. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:38, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- This is graffiti done in an area where it is known to be tolerated Keep per COM:GRAFFITI This should be in a Graffiti/Street art related Category rather than Murals but the nominator added that Category Oxyman (talk) 11:42, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:26, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- This is graffiti done in an area where it is known to be tolerated Keep per COM:GRAFFITI This should be in a Graffiti/Street art related Category rather than Murals but the nominator added that Category and removed the Street art Category Oxyman (talk) 11:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:26, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- This is graffiti done in an area where it is known to be tolerated Keep per COM:GRAFFITI This should be in a Graffiti/Street art related Category rather than Murals but the nominator added that Category and removed the Street art Category Oxyman (talk) 11:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:26, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Please check logo for threshold of originality / copyvio. 217.239.13.125 14:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:25, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Modern building, no freedom of panorama in UAE A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: I would be happy for this image to be moved to Wikipedia with the Licencing info {{FoP-USonly|the United Arab Emirates}}. —Jpbowen (talk) 22:48, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:19, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Likely copyrighted logo from https://www.kamvol.by/ Pierre cb (talk) 22:14, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:16, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
copied from internet without mention of authorization Ske (talk) 10:08, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:51, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation Vladimir.tuchkevich (talk) 11:53, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:09, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Without META data, unlikely from uploader. Pierre cb (talk) 22:13, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:10, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 79.184.118.22 as Speedy (ek) and the most recent rationale was: Quest from the Dąbrowska's manager
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep This file is freely-licenced, compatible wth COM:L. Michalg95 (talk) 15:33, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:03, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Fake license: the logo can't be own or free Bilderling (talk) 11:43, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. By fake, I assume Bilderling refers to the "own work" part. It is lacking permission. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:57, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unlikely to be own work. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:23, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio, no CC licensing anywhere in sight. 217.239.13.125 14:06, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:25, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
certainly not a own work, possibly possible as a simple form plus text Nordprinz (talk) 15:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely over COM:TOO France. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:26, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
There is no proof that the book is PD. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. The uploader is the same name as the publisher/author so this could be solved by permission as well. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:55, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Needs COM:VRT to verify that the uploader is authorized to license this work, otherwise it's a COM:PRP delete. --Xover (talk) 07:38, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:14, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
No detailed information about why it's a PD. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:13, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- It is PD-Pakistan because of its age. --RAN (talk) 14:59, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. If the date is accurate (and that I'm not sure about) then it definitely would be PD-Pakistan as a pre-1947 photograph. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:54, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep and note that this is probably {{PD-Saudi Arabia}} instead of {{PD-Pakistan}} given where the subject lived for most of his life. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per RAN and IronGargoyle. --Xover (talk) 20:24, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:13, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nanahuatl as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Copyvio
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. The image may be old. Who did create it? -- Túrelio (talk) 07:22, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- From https://www.dailysabah.com/feature/2015/04/24/fatima-alsamarqandi-an-influential-female-scholar-skilled-calligrapher: "Born in the 12th century in Samarkand, an important center of the Islamic world at the time, Fatima al-Samarqandi is a prominent female figure of Islamic history who was an expert in Islamic law and also a skilled calligrapher." But the question is when the representation of her and others on that page dates from. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:04, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Oppose The uploader named the author as JANE LOUISE KANDUR. Google articles present her as a journalist, not a painter, but PCP requires that we assume she holds the copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:12, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete There's no reason to assume the journalist is the artist just because the image was used as an illustration in something she wrote. It might as well have been added by an editor as the writer. But neither is it a 12th-century artwork. TinEye finds very little and those could easily have been copied from the referenced article. The bottom line is therefore that we do not know who created this image or when, and thus cannot tell whether it has any plausible path to PD or compatible licensing, and have to delete it per COM:PRP. --Xover (talk) 07:59, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:14, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
It has been stated at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hermann_Glauert&diff=1108709267&oldid=1003993656 that "The photo of Hermann is not public domain, the original is (c) the National Portrait Gallery who commissioned it in 1932 https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/portrait/mw221899/Hermann-Glauert" — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 10:48, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Unlike most NPG copyright claims, this one has merit. The photo was taken by Walter Stoneman (1876-1958), giving a pma. 70 term that lasts until 2029. And due to COM:COMM UK the copyright vested in the NPG as the comissioner, but did not change its term. So… Copyright owned by the NPG until 2029 and no sign of compatible licensing, so… delete as copyvio. --Xover (talk) 08:09, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:14, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
linked with copyright on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cari_Cari Flexman (talk) 19:58, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Link now moved to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cari_Cari&oldid=1101873789 since I deleted the picture from the article. The problem is, that the picture was added to the article with copyright information and that information did not match to the name of the uploading account. Please check the link if you are not sure what this is about. - Flexman (talk) 22:57, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The copyright claim added to w:Cari Cari in this edit is by an apparent third party, albeit with the name of what appears to be a creative professional (i.e. could very well be the photographer). The image was uploaded much earlier by Cari Cari, which is plausible enough as an upload by the duo or someone affiliated with them (i.e. it's conceivable it was authorized). But in any case there is insufficient verification without COM:VRT so it has to go per COM:PRP. --Xover (talk) 20:06, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:14, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
The book doesn't indicate that it's a PD, as far as I can see. Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- You can see this page, on the last paragraph the autor said this book free copyright. I think this book is available under public domain. Empat Tilda (talk) 12:21, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per Google translate, "Copyright Not Protected By Law. Please reproduce without written permission from the author". —howcheng {chat} 20:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
(croped version:File:Kemi Badenoch MP (cropped).jpg) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 112.118.57.99 (talk) 21:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
This image was not taken from gov.uk. Image resolution should be 960x640 or lower. --112.118.57.99 21:39, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I don't really see what resolution has got to do with anything. Either the photo is released under OGL3 (and usable at any resolution) or it should be deleted from commons. Cakelot1 (talk) 00:15, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Cakelot1: on this page, it says "[i]mage credit: UK Parliament. Used under Creative Commons, and links to a cc by 3.0 license. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 22:00, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Matr1x-101 am I missing something. The image on that .gov page is File:Kemi Badenoch MP as Minister for Equalities and Levelling Up Communities.jpg and not the image that is being discussed (File:Kemi Badenoch MP.jpg) Cakelot1 (talk) 23:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- I seem to have muddled things up! I assumed the source in the information field had the same picture as the file, but that is clearly not the case. Ignore what I said. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 23:16, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Matr1x-101 am I missing something. The image on that .gov page is File:Kemi Badenoch MP as Minister for Equalities and Levelling Up Communities.jpg and not the image that is being discussed (File:Kemi Badenoch MP.jpg) Cakelot1 (talk) 23:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Cakelot1: on this page, it says "[i]mage credit: UK Parliament. Used under Creative Commons, and links to a cc by 3.0 license. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 22:00, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, instances of the cropped version replaced with File:Kemi Badenoch October 2022 official Cabinet portrait.jpg. —howcheng {chat} 20:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Данный шеврон неправильно отображал статус бригады и её знаки отличия (см.Орден Суворова) (см.Орден Кутузова), поэтому являлся ошибочным. Для того, чтобы не вводить читателей в заблуждение, предлагаю удалить данный файл, при том, что правильный вектор уже загружен. Спасибо! ArtSmir (talk) 21:51, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion@ArtSmir: you could consider to add {{Fact disputed}} to the file page, or one of the other more applicable warning templates listed on the template description. If more appropriate you may ask for renaming of the file or add a correct description. --Ellywa (talk) 22:03, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
