Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/07/20
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Main_Street_Buildings_Numbers_1,_2,_3,_3a,_4,_6,_7,_8,_17_And_26.jpg){kind=link}
![124 File:Arte do Single "Causa e Efeito".jpg](#File:Arte_do_Single_"Causa_e_Efeito".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Screenshot from a music video. So probably copyvio unless the uploader can provide evidence the original video is PD. Adamant1 (talk) 07:41, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Better to do a batch DR. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Doubtful this is the uploaders own work and even if it is the images they chopped together are probably otherwise copyrighted. I don't think the image could be kept based on a fan art or similar rational either. Adamant1 (talk) 07:45, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Better to do a batch DR. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Image of a modern album cover that is questionably the uploaders own work. So the image should be deleted as copyvio unless we have COM:VRT permission on file from the original creator. Adamant1 (talk) 07:47, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Better to do a batch DR. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
multiple Google Images hits going back before the Commons Upload Rosenzweig τ 11:22, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
https://www.elcaribe.com.do/panorama/pais/apostamos-a-la-eficiencia-de-la-inversion-en-salud-y-educacion/# from June 2020 Rosenzweig τ 11:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Rosenzweig at 11:05, 20 July 2022 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Agustin AP.jpg: https://www.elcaribe.com.do/panorama/pais/apostamos-a-la-eficiencia-de-la-inversion-en-salud-y-educacion/# from June 2020 --Krdbot 13:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Victoria Greene, Director of the Archives of Permaculture Executives (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal documents of non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth CEO Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr Bethune-Cookman University Bachelor of Science in Business Administration.jpg
- File:Hendrith Smith Stanford University Stanford Online Certification Essentials of Program Strategy and Evaluation.jpg
Marbletan (talk) 18:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Comment. See also the related deletion discussions: Marbletan (talk) 18:17, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by The Permaculture Economics Foundation
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Rubennichea
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Permaculture Design Club
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Paul Gelsinger, The Singapore International Corporate Investigatory Agency
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Daisaku Akio, Alexandria Permaculture Fund
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sonalrodriguez
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Celene Rodriguez, TFGV Magazine
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The Permaculture Economics Foundation (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional materials for a company. Outside of COM:SCOPE.
- File:16 Principles of Permaculture Economics set forth by Mayflower-Plymouth and its CEO Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr.jpg
- File:The 16 Principles of Permaculture Economics set forth by Mayflower-Plymouth and its CEO Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr.jpg
- File:The Principles of Permaculture Economics set forth by Mayflower-Plymouth and its CEO Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr.jpg
- File:A Quote by CEO of Mayflower-Plymouth and the father of Permaculture Economics, Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr.jpg
- File:Principles of Permaculture Economics set forth by Mayflower-Plymouth and its CEO, Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr.jpg
- File:Business Quote by CEO of Mayflower-Plymouth and the father of Permaculture Economics, Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr.jpg
- File:A Business Quote by CEO of Mayflower-Plymouth and the father of Permaculture Economics, Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr.jpg
- File:An Economics Quote by CEO of Mayflower-Plymouth and the father of Permaculture Economics, Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr.jpg
- File:Quote by CEO of Mayflower-Plymouth and the father of Permaculture Economics, Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth, pioneer of Permaculture Economics; mycorrhizae.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth, a pioneer of Permaculture Economics.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth, pioneer of Permaculture Economics; garden.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth, pioneer of Permaculture Economics.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth, the company pioneering Permaculture Economics with Fungi; mycelium mushrooms.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth, the company pioneering Permaculture Economics; fungi.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth, the company pioneering Permaculture Economics; tree mushrooms.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth, the company pioneering Permaculture Economics; wildflowers.jpg
Marbletan (talk) 18:10, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. See also the related deletion discussions: Marbletan (talk) 18:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Victoria Greene, Director of the Archives of Permaculture Executives
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Rubennichea
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Permaculture Design Club
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Paul Gelsinger, The Singapore International Corporate Investigatory Agency
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Daisaku Akio, Alexandria Permaculture Fund
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sonalrodriguez
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Celene Rodriguez, TFGV Magazine
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rubennichea (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal family photos. Outside of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr, CEO of Mayflower-Plymouth Capital LLC with daughters.jpg
- File:Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr, CEO of Mayflower-Plymouth Capital LLC with wife Natalie S.jpg
- File:Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr, CEO of Mayflower-Plymouth Capital LLC with wife Natalie.jpg
- File:Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr, CEO of Mayflower-Plymouth Capital LLC with wife & daughter.jpg
- File:Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr, CEO of Mayflower-Plymouth Capital LLC.jpg
- File:Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr, CEO of Mayflower-Plymouth Capital LLC with wife & daughters.jpg
- File:Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr, CEO of Mayflower-Plymouth Capital LLC with wife Natalie Smith.jpg
Marbletan (talk) 18:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. See also the related deletion discussions: Marbletan (talk) 18:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Victoria Greene, Director of the Archives of Permaculture Executives
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by The Permaculture Economics Foundation
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Permaculture Design Club
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Paul Gelsinger, The Singapore International Corporate Investigatory Agency
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Daisaku Akio, Alexandria Permaculture Fund
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sonalrodriguez
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Celene Rodriguez, TFGV Magazine
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:08, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Permaculture Design Club (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional materials for a company. Outside of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth Tribute 14 by The Permaculture Design Club of Panama.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth Tribute 16 by The Permaculture Design Club of Panama.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth Tribute 13 by The Permaculture Design Club of Panama.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth Tribute 12 by The Permaculture Design Club of Panama.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth Tribute 10 by The Permaculture Design Club of Panama.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth Tribute 11 by The Permaculture Design Club of Panama.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth Tribute 7 by The Permaculture Design Club of Panama.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth Tribute 9 by The Permaculture Design Club of Panama.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth Tribute 8 by The Permaculture Design Club of Panama.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth Tribute 4 by The Permaculture Design Club of Panama.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth Tribute 6 by The Permaculture Design Club of Panama.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth Tribute 5 by The Permaculture Design Club of Panama.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth Tribute 3 by The Permaculture Design Club of Panama.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth Tribute 1 by The Permaculture Design Club of Panama.jpg
- File:Mayflower-Plymouth Tribute 2 by The Permaculture Design Club of Panama.jpg
Marbletan (talk) 18:21, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. See also the related deletion discussions: Marbletan (talk) 18:17, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by The Permaculture Economics Foundation
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Rubennichea
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Victoria Greene, Director of the Archives of Permaculture Executives
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Paul Gelsinger, The Singapore International Corporate Investigatory Agency
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Daisaku Akio, Alexandria Permaculture Fund
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sonalrodriguez
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Celene Rodriguez, TFGV Magazine
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Celene Rodriguez, TFGV Magazine (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal family photos. Outside of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr with daughter and Parents.jpg
- File:Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr as Howard University MSW Graduate Student.jpg
- File:Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr with daughter Chaya.jpg
- File:CEO of Mayflower-Plymouth, Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr with wife and step-daughter.jpg
- File:CEO of Mayflower-Plymouth, Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr with his daughter at Louisiana Museum.jpg
- File:Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr with daughter Chaya Ari Smith 2019 at Monument of States Kissimmee Florida.jpg
- File:Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr with daughter Chaya Ari Smith in field of Sunflowers.jpg
- File:Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr, CEO of Mayflower-Plymouth shoot for MachFive Car Rentals.jpg
Marbletan (talk) 18:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. See also the related deletion discussions: Marbletan (talk) 18:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Victoria Greene, Director of the Archives of Permaculture Executives
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by The Permaculture Economics Foundation
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Permaculture Design Club
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Rubennichea
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Paul Gelsinger, The Singapore International Corporate Investigatory Agency
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Daisaku Akio, Alexandria Permaculture Fund
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sonalrodriguez
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:10, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paul Gelsinger, The Singapore International Corporate Investigatory Agency (talk · contribs)
[edit]Outside of COM:SCOPE.
- File:DNB 2021 Annual Report for Mayflower-Plymouth.pdf
- File:2021 Public Corporate Data for Mayflower-Plymouth Capital LLC, led by CEO Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr — June 2022 Webpage Capture from Dun and Bradstreet Reporting Agency.jpg
- File:2021 Public Corporate Data for Mayflower-Plymouth Capital LLC, led by CEO Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr; June 2022 Webpage Capture from Dun and Bradstreet Reporting Agency.jpg
Marbletan (talk) 18:28, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. See also the related deletion discussions: Marbletan (talk) 18:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Victoria Greene, Director of the Archives of Permaculture Executives
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by The Permaculture Economics Foundation
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Permaculture Design Club
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Rubennichea
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Daisaku Akio, Alexandria Permaculture Fund
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sonalrodriguez
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:09, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daisaku Akio, Alexandria Permaculture Fund (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos and promotional materials. Outside of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr, CEO of Mayflower-Plymouth with grandparents.jpg
- File:Mayflower Logo, 2022 V2.png
- File:Mayflowers Permaculture Design Principles for Business by Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr.png
Marbletan (talk) 18:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. See also the related deletion discussions: Marbletan (talk) 18:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Victoria Greene, Director of the Archives of Permaculture Executives
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by The Permaculture Economics Foundation
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Permaculture Design Club
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Rubennichea
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Paul Gelsinger, The Singapore International Corporate Investigatory Agency
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sonalrodriguez
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:09, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sonalrodriguez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, outside of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr - CEO of Mayflower-Plymouth speaking at conference in 2015.jpg
- File:Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr - CEO of Mayflower-Plymouth - meetings - 2015.jpg
- File:Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr - CEO of Mayflower-Plymouth - meetings2 - 2015.jpg
Marbletan (talk) 18:31, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. See also the related deletion discussions: Marbletan (talk) 18:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Victoria Greene, Director of the Archives of Permaculture Executives
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by The Permaculture Economics Foundation
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Permaculture Design Club
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Rubennichea
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Paul Gelsinger, The Singapore International Corporate Investigatory Agency
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Daisaku Akio, Alexandria Permaculture Fund
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:09, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused promotional image of a non-notable person. So OOS. Adamant1 (talk) 01:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Wutsje at 01:55, 21 July 2022 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 07:31, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
muốn xóa
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 07:49, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Brief "biography" of a non-notable individual. If this text is actually needed anywhere, it should be text not a PDF file. Marbletan (talk) 13:57, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Wutsje at 01:53, 21 July 2022 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 07:32, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
PDF copy of a deleted draft article from English Wikipedia. Uploader indefinitely blocked as a spam/advertising account. This file is therefore outside COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 14:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Wutsje at 02:01, 21 July 2022 UTC: Content created as advertisement (G10) --Krdbot 07:32, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Not uploaders work. See TinEye GeorgHH • talk 21:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Wutsje at 03:11, 21 July 2022 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 07:33, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Is copyrighted to chess photographer Amruta Mokal, no indication the uploader is this person Pawnkingthree (talk) 14:29, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete - Image is explicitly copyrighted. The uploader appears to be just claiming everything uploaded as own work and copyright holder. For example, they claimed File:Karpov in 1979. png.jpg as their own work but it is in fact a low res crop of File:Anatoly Karpov 1979.jpg. Claim to being the copyright holder isn't at all plausible.-- Whpq (talk) 17:12, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- This is not my work and should be deleted. I apologize for my mistake. I will not commit this mistake again. -- Ps103ankit (talk) 3:40, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 15:11, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Personal files without permission Commons:SCOPE. Leonaardog (talk) 18:58, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Delete. Self-promotion while abusing multiple accounts. See Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Rubennichea. Marbletan (talk) 12:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:52, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
File:Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr as a child - Sawyers Studio photo in Freeport Bahamas, approx. 1998.jpg
[edit]
Personal files without permission Commons:SCOPE. Leonaardog (talk) 18:58, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Self-promotion while abusing multiple accounts. See Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Rubennichea. Marbletan (talk) 12:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:52, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
File:Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr at High School Graduation Ceremony; Potomac High School, 2007.jpg
[edit]
Personal files without permission Commons:SCOPE. Leonaardog (talk) 18:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Self-promotion while abusing multiple accounts. See Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Rubennichea. Marbletan (talk) 12:22, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:53, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
File:Hendrith Vanlon Smith Jr in Early Twenties with his Grandfather; Bahamian Author Prince G Smith.jpg
[edit]
Personal files without permission Commons:SCOPE. Leonaardog (talk) 18:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Self-promotion while abusing multiple accounts. See Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Rubennichea. Marbletan (talk) 12:22, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The source (website) of the file states Copyright ©2021 Ada Derana. indicating that it is not CC 4.0 and not under free license. 171.49.221.197 20:32, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 14:38, 21 July 2022 UTC: Copyright violation. The source (website) of the file states Copyright ©2021 Ada Derana. indicating that it is not CC 4.0 and not under free license. --Krdbot 19:31, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Ankry (talk) 17:49, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Source is not accurate, only website given and no evidence for CC-BY-SA is provided. Maybe some public domain should be applied but it is not clear without direct source for the photo WindEwriX (talk) 06:39, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment, I think that we need to ask to the original website for which is the license of this file. According with {{PD-Portugal-URAA}} and {{PD-Portugal-photo}}, only photographs taken before July 1970 are PD. This image, according with its information, is dated 1974, so it's still copyrighted in Portugal. We need to verify if the Museum of the Presidence of the Portuguese Republic allows the use of this photograph under a free license. Also, I would be able to inform that the uploader of this file, Ser.Silv., is treating to remove the deletion notice from the file and altering the source –see [1] and [2]– after being informed by me two days ago that this is not appropiate.
81.41.189.179 18:32, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AFotografia_oficial_do_Presidente_da_Rep%C3%BAblica_Francisco_da_Costa_Gomes.jpg&type=revision&diff=676042167&oldid=675970546){kind=link}
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AFotografia_oficial_do_Presidente_da_Rep%C3%BAblica_Francisco_da_Costa_Gomes.jpg&type=revision&diff=676364965&oldid=676059981){kind=link}
Deleted per nom. -- 32X (talk) 17:20, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be public domain. Seems to have a watermark from a book or something like that. Natg 19 (talk) 00:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Keep The website shows multiple copies of this image that were in circulation in 1920. This appears to have been his promotional image. --RAN (talk) 01:43, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Coyne died in 1921 so this must be from 1921 or earlier. "Watermark from a book or something" would have no effect on public domain status. Polycarpa aurata (talk) 03:40, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Watermarks added to files are forbidden; watermarks physically put onto the frame or print by a library or by the historic photo studio (for example) do not have to be cloned out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:08, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion . Public domain by age per US law. Watermark (in this case looks to be an old ink stamp) do not affect underlying copyright status. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:23, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
I contacted the author asking for permission about using the image. He agreed, but said that the image was not available to be used in commercial products or otherwise, as requested by Wikimedia Commons. Therefore, it should be deleted. Sepguilherme (talk) 01:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
I contacted the author asking for permission about using the image. He agreed, but said that the image was not available to be used in commercial products or otherwise, as requested by Wikimedia Commons. Therefore, it should be deleted. Sepguilherme (talk) 01:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
I contacted the author asking for permission about using the image. He agreed, but said that the image was not available to be used in commercial products or otherwise, as requested by Wikimedia Commons. Therefore, it should be deleted. Sepguilherme (talk) 01:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
I contacted the author asking for permission about using the image. He agreed, but said that the image was not available to be used in commercial products or otherwise, as requested by Wikimedia Commons. Therefore, it should be deleted. Sepguilherme (talk) 01:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
I contacted the author asking for permission about using the image. He agreed, but said that the image was not available to be used in commercial products or otherwise, as requested by Wikimedia Commons. Therefore, it should be deleted. Sepguilherme (talk) 01:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:26, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
I contacted the author asking for permission about using the image. He agreed, but said that the image was not available to be used in commercial products or otherwise, as requested by Wikimedia Commons. Therefore, it should be deleted. Sepguilherme (talk) 01:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:26, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
I contacted the author asking for permission about using the image. He agreed, but said that the image was not available to be used in commercial products or otherwise, as requested by Wikimedia Commons. Therefore, it should be deleted. Sepguilherme (talk) 01:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:26, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
I contacted the author asking for permission about using the image. He agreed, but said that the image was not available to be used in commercial products or otherwise, as requested by Wikimedia Commons. Therefore, it should be deleted. Sepguilherme (talk) 01:10, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:26, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
According to the Exif information the image comes from Facebook. So it's likely copyvio. Plus it's OOS anyway. Adamant1 (talk) 01:14, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:27, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
It's a lyric video for a copyrighted song by Maroon 5. reppoptalk 02:02, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:28, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted audio by Maroon 5; audio taken from the video of "Sugar." reppoptalk 02:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:29, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 07:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:30, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Not own work, taken from https://www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-Spassky Pawnkingthree (talk) 15:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as a low-res crop of File:Eerste ronde IBM-schaaktoernooi, Boris Spasski, Bestanddeelnr 926-5523.jpg and is not used anywhere. If a crop is needed, a much better quality one could be created. -- Whpq (talk) 17:22, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- This is not my work and should be deleted. I apologize for my mistake. I will not commit this mistake again. -- Ps103ankit (talk) 3:42, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:35, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
No indication of free licence from source Dl2000 (talk) 23:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
disruptive edits TheWikiPro0099 (talk) 10:03, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 14:52, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused image of a non-notable person uploaded for the purpose of advertising. So OOS. Commons isn't a personal file host. Adamant1 (talk) 01:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 15:56, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Self-promotional SPAM image of a non-notable person that zero educational value. So OOS. Adamant1 (talk) 01:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 15:56, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Bad quality photo of someone that isn't notable. So OOS. Adamant1 (talk) 01:37, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 15:57, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Obviously a non-free image. Engr. Smitty (talk) 02:02, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 15:57, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused low quality image of someone that isn't notable. So OOS. Commons isn't a personal file host. Adamant1 (talk) 02:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 15:58, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Low quality unused image of someone that isn't notable. So OOS. Plus it looks like the image was taken as part of a photoshoot for an album cover or something. So likely COPYVIO to boot. Adamant1 (talk) 02:11, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 15:59, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Artwork from an album cover. So likely COPYVIO. Adamant1 (talk) 02:19, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 15:59, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Cover of modern hip-hop album that isn't the uploaders own work. So likely copyvio. Adamant1 (talk) 02:42, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 15:59, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Cover of a modern hip-hop album that isn't the uploaders own work and comes from a commercial website. So likely copyvio. Adamant1 (talk) 02:43, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 15:59, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amirjacksonmusic (talk · contribs)
[edit]There are two issues here: 1) Copyright status. These images are either photos of the subject, which require permission from the photographer, or album covers, which require permission from the designer, to be sent to COM:VRT. 2) COM:SCOPE. The images are not in use on any Wikimedia projects, and it is unclear whether there is any educational use for them since the subject does not appear to be notable.
- File:Amir Jackson Basketball at Playhaus.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson in store.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson Slapwoods Big Slap.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson at Playhaus.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson Playhaus.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson Pose.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson Basketball Playhaus.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson Covers Face.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson Rose Gold Cover Art.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson Tint Cover Art.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson He Man Cover Art.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson Nada Performance.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson Nada.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson 432 Cover Art.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson wearing Commodi Goat Sweater.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson "F U".png
- File:Amir Jackson.png
- File:Amir Jackson "Rose Gold Session".jpg
- File:Amir Jackson Moses Photoshoot.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson Commodi Photoshoot.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson Rose Gold Session.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson Mid Summer Vibes.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson Mid Summer Capture.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson Do Sumn.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson April 10th video grab.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson April 10th.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson April 10th Freestyle Music Video.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson in a Slapwoods Shirt.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson B&W.jpg
- File:The Truth Cover Art.jpg
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The album covers are clearly copyvio along with the images, a lot of which are screenshots from copyrighted YouTube videos. Plus all the files are OOS anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:09, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 02:07, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AshKashStraughn2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is neither your personal free web host nor a vehicle to promote yourself. No contributions to wm projects, edits on wikidata are already deleted.
Achim55 (talk) 20:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 02:09, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo of a non-notable rapper. So OOS. Commons isn't a personal file host. Adamant1 (talk) 07:57, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:41, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
It's my personal photo please delete 43.228.94.37 21:58, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:41, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted this photo its personal photo of mine 43.228.94.37 09:54, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Sure. Personal photo not in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:59, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Strakhov (talk) 15:07, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Private personal photo of non-notable kids, uploaded solely to illustrate a sandbox page about an unverifiable "film" that's been deleted as a hoax. No potential for reuse in any real article about any real topic exists. Bearcat (talk) 18:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:42, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:42, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused image of a non-notable person so OOS. Also probably copyvio due to the lack of Exif information and the fact that it looks like a scan from a print magazine or something. Adamant1 (talk) 01:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:13, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
The image has already been deleted twice for being OOS and nothing has changed since then. Commons still isn't a personal file host. Adamant1 (talk) 01:31, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:13, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
The (unused) picture is not a rank insignia - as User:Cadet kid123 used to upload - but an unsuccessful attempt from a graphics program. No educational value, unusable, out of scope. COM:SPAM Feyth (talk) 02:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:14, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused low quality image of a non-notable person. So OOS. Adamant1 (talk) 02:57, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:14, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
A people picture Aashirvad8059 (talk) 03:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:15, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused image of a non-notable person. So OOS. Adamant1 (talk) 06:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:15, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Not educationally useful: photo is watermarked, taken from awkward angle, does not depict whole vehicle. Upload by account that was later globally locked for sockpuppetry, presumably to pad their contribution count. 2406:3003:2077:1E60:C998:20C6:8CCF:5730 07:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:16, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE 양념파닭 (talk) 12:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:17, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE 양념파닭 (talk) 12:25, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:18, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE 양념파닭 (talk) 12:25, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:18, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE 양념파닭 (talk) 12:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:18, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE 양념파닭 (talk) 12:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:19, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE 양념파닭 (talk) 12:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:19, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE 양념파닭 (talk) 12:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:19, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE 양념파닭 (talk) 12:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE 양념파닭 (talk) 12:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE 양념파닭 (talk) 12:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE 양념파닭 (talk) 12:28, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE 양념파닭 (talk) 12:28, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:21, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE 양념파닭 (talk) 12:35, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:21, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE. This is just a PDF copy of the self-promotional page at w:en:User:DannyKayfilmcrtic/sandbox Marbletan (talk) 14:14, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pluglabels (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE: Business documents (Charter and amendment) for a non-notable business.
Marbletan (talk) 14:29, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:23, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:23, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Head from a Minecraft skin (probably), out of scope, unused Nutshinou Talk! 15:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:23, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Minecraft skin render, out of scope, unused Nutshinou Talk! 15:12, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:24, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Surveypublisher (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused promo materials of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:24, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused very low quality photo of nondescript road, no educational use, indistinguishable, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:25, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE. Horrible quality makes it essentially useless anyway. Marbletan (talk) 18:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:25, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Yet another COM:PENIS we don’t need Dronebogus (talk) 23:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:27, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Cover of modern rap album. So clearly copyrighted unless we have a COM:VRT permission on file from the original creator. Adamant1 (talk) 07:40, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Better to do a batch DR. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Cover of modern rap album. So clearly copyrighted unless we have a COM:VRT permission on file from the original creator. I'm also nominating the following files for deletion due to the same reason.
- File:Amir Jackson April 10th video grab.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson Slapwoods Big Slap.jpg
- File:Amir Jackson He Man Cover Art.jpg Adamant1 (talk) 08:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
All were deleted by administrators. --186.172.118.33 23:48, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
The image looks like a crop of a record label or album cover. So likely copyvio. Adamant1 (talk) 01:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 07:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
This looks like a screenshot or crop from a video or something. So likely copyvio. Adamant1 (talk) 06:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 07:29, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation, image has been crudely modified from https://theyogainstitute.org/understanding-ashtanga-yoga/ Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 07:36, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. Source is claimed to be subject's Facebook but no free license is indicated at said location. Uploader has repeatedly uploaded copyright violations; sanctions are recommended. Kinu (talk) 09:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by De728631 at 17:48, 28 July 2022 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Malik Shakeel Awan with Shebaz Sharif.jpg: No evidence of permission. Source is claimed to be subject's Facebook but no free license is indicated at said location. Uploader has repeatedly uploaded copyright violations; sanctions are recommended. --Krdbot 01:22, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No evidence of permission. Source is not specific. Uploader has repeatedly uploaded copyright violations; sanctions are recommended. Kinu (talk) 09:17, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by De728631 at 17:49, 28 July 2022 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nawaz Sharif with Malik Shakeel Awan (right).jpg: No evidence of permission. Source is not specific. Uploader has repeatedly uploaded copyright violations; sanctions are recommended. --Krdbot 01:22, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
No evidence of permission. Source is not specific. Uploader has repeatedly uploaded copyright violations; sanctions are recommended. Kinu (talk) 09:17, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by De728631 at 17:49, 28 July 2022 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Malik Shakeel Awan early 1990s.jpg: No evidence of permission. Source is not specific. Uploader has repeatedly uploaded copyright violations; sanctions are recommended. --Krdbot 01:22, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Unless the user posted this on behalf of the publisher, this is copyright infringement Dajasj (talk) 10:47, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 00:36, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING —Granger (talk · contribs) 13:17, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 00:38, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque 1
[edit]Unfortunately no Freedom of Panorama in Lebanon and it was built just 2007.
- File:3133 (5)Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque.JPG
- File:BeirutAlOmari.jpg
- File:By the Al-Amin Mosque.jpg
- File:Mohammad al-amin mosque at night.jpg
- File:Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque Beirut.jpg
- File:Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque from north.jpg
- File:Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque.2010.jpg
- File:Mohammad al-Amin Mosque.jpg
- File:Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque.JPG
- File:Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque2009b.JPG
- File:Mohammed al-Amin Mosque 1.jpg
- File:Mohammed al-Amin Mosque.jpg
Mohammad_Al-Amin_Mosque.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
—Wuzur 16:27, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- I nominated my own image once, but this is what I got: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:3133_%285%29Mohammad_Al-Amin_Mosque.JPG FunkMonk (talk) 20:42, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- --Vladan Radmilović (talk) 12:00, 22 April 2012 (UTC)I fail to see how the quoted article of Lebanese law forbids usage of images listed on Wikimedia. In fact, it explicitly states that images of public works are allowed to be published in the media without authorization or compensation of the original author. Also, the link to the relevant article is dead.
- Please note that Commons only accepts image which are free to use by anyone, anytime, for any purpose. It is not sufficient for images that Wikimedia is allowed to use them. —Wuzur 13:30, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- I would think the legislator here introduced this clause with the idea that it would be deemed a FOP clause. It's meant to ease restrictions, and although the choice of "media" arguably limits the scope of that easing, I would think that if the scope were meant to be restricted it would be commercial media that would be restricted not non-commercial users. Your position, WUZUR, must be that commercial media can take these photos but private citizens cannot and I think this is odd enough that your interpretation is prima facie doubtful. One only gets a restriction on the scope of this clause by drawing an inference which is logically and linguistically possible but not necessary in the context of the apparent legislative intent and the fact there's limited evidence that the English or even non-English legislation here is meant to be interpreted so precisely.--Brian Dell (talk) 07:37, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- I would like to draw your attention to the discussion which led to the rule which is now in force on Wikimedia Commons. According to WMF's licensing policy which refers to the Definition of Free Cultural Works ("freedoms should be available to anyone, anywhere, anytime") no restrictions whatsoever on the possible user is allowed for media files hosted here. I know no definition of "media" which includes every possible use-case (in that case the legislator could have written "anyone" which is done in other articles of the same law). Note that a) the French translation is more restricted to "news media" (unfortunately I don't know any Arabic to read the original) and b) the Berne convention also defines possible exceptions for news media only. As long as the Commons' policy remains these images have to be deleted. To change the policy you need to prove that the accepted interpretation of this law in the Lebanon is less restrictive than ours. —Wuzur 13:00, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for that clarifying that. --Vladan Radmilović (talk) 02:11, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- I would like to draw your attention to the discussion which led to the rule which is now in force on Wikimedia Commons. According to WMF's licensing policy which refers to the Definition of Free Cultural Works ("freedoms should be available to anyone, anywhere, anytime") no restrictions whatsoever on the possible user is allowed for media files hosted here. I know no definition of "media" which includes every possible use-case (in that case the legislator could have written "anyone" which is done in other articles of the same law). Note that a) the French translation is more restricted to "news media" (unfortunately I don't know any Arabic to read the original) and b) the Berne convention also defines possible exceptions for news media only. As long as the Commons' policy remains these images have to be deleted. To change the policy you need to prove that the accepted interpretation of this law in the Lebanon is less restrictive than ours. —Wuzur 13:00, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- I would think the legislator here introduced this clause with the idea that it would be deemed a FOP clause. It's meant to ease restrictions, and although the choice of "media" arguably limits the scope of that easing, I would think that if the scope were meant to be restricted it would be commercial media that would be restricted not non-commercial users. Your position, WUZUR, must be that commercial media can take these photos but private citizens cannot and I think this is odd enough that your interpretation is prima facie doubtful. One only gets a restriction on the scope of this clause by drawing an inference which is logically and linguistically possible but not necessary in the context of the apparent legislative intent and the fact there's limited evidence that the English or even non-English legislation here is meant to be interpreted so precisely.--Brian Dell (talk) 07:37, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- Please note that Commons only accepts image which are free to use by anyone, anytime, for any purpose. It is not sufficient for images that Wikimedia is allowed to use them. —Wuzur 13:30, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: It is well established on Commons that a license for "use in the media" does not allow many uses -- text books, for example. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque 2
[edit]There is no acceptable freedom of panorama in Lebanon. Legally-binding free uses of public works and art in Lebanon are for mass media only (i.e., mainstream media + TV media + movies, not new/digital media as well as content creators' media). Therefore, all these commercially-licensed images violate architect Azmi Fakhouri's copyright. The building was incepted in 2008 according to the English Wikipedia article. All images do not show the work in an incidental (de minimis) way.
- File:2004 Beirut 77933125.jpg
- File:A church and a mosque in Beirut Lebanon.jpg
- File:A very small mosque - panoramio.jpg
- File:Al Amin Mosque, Beirut.jpg
- File:Al Amine Mosque.jpg
- File:Ancient Beirut and new centers of worship (4694174679).jpg
- File:Bcd4.jpg
- File:Beirut, Mohammed al-Amin Mosque (6822615915).jpg
- File:Beyrouth (9861264186).jpg
- File:Beyrouth (9861426744).jpg
- File:Beyrouth (9861430944).jpg
- File:Beyrouth (9861541583).jpg
- File:Beyrouth Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque 622.jpg
- File:Beyrouth Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque 624.jpg
- File:Beyrouth Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque 79.jpg
- File:Beyrouth Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque 83.jpg
- File:Beyrouth Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque 98 (cropped).jpg
- File:Beyrouth Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque 98.jpg
- File:Blue domed mosque near place d'etoile.jpg
- File:GHH 0230 kl.jpg
- File:Grand Mosque in Beirut 2.jpg
- File:Grand Mosque in Beirut 3.jpg
- File:Grand Mosque in Beirut.jpg
- File:Grand Théâtre in Beirut, Lebanon (cropped).jpg
- File:IMG-20191005-WA0101.jpg
- File:Khatem Al Anbiyaa Mosque Detail.jpg
- File:Mohamed Al Amin Mosque Beirut.jpg
- File:Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque (4414696952).jpg
- File:Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque - Nov 23, 2017 (02).jpg
- File:Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque - Nov 23, 2017.jpg
- File:Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque outer.JPG
- File:Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque, Beirut 2016 1.jpg
- File:Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque, Beirut 2016 2.jpg
- File:Mohammed al-Amin Detail (48706386).jpg
- File:Mohammed-al-amin-moschee und maronitische st-georgs-kathedrale.jpg
- File:Mosquée Muhammad Al Amin.JPG
- File:New Mosque (4694175497).jpg
- File:Rafic Hariri Mosque.jpg
- File:The Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque 2.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 00:42, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
COM:PENIS and spam Dronebogus (talk) 23:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 00:37, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Longlinbs109 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:PORN; very low quality throughout
- File:Male orgasm leading to ejaculation.webm
- File:Globe and Nude; human body in movement movie.webm
- File:A slow motion sequence of orgasm & ejaculation.webm
- File:Sequence showing five stages of ejaculation.png
- File:Orgasm and ejaculation.webm
- File:Ejaculation of sperm.jpg
- File:A healthy erect human penis.jpg
- File:Human male desire; and sexuality.webm
Dronebogus (talk) 23:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Very bad lighting throughout the series, blurriness, partially low resolution: this is low quality and outside of COM:SCOPE. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:37, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't add anything significant to the current stock of images. Herby talk thyme 09:51, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
collapsing as mostly just barely relevant complaining and whataboutism; tldr uploader objects to the “PORN” label which I have redacted, but that doesn’t excuse the bad quality Dronebogus (talk) 19:46, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
|
|---|
 Moved from Commons:Help desk Hello I have only just joined commons and have contributed half dozen items. Now, I have chosen to add material to human body, content which I know is always controversial at most times.. however the video excerpts were put into the correct categories, and text descriptions were added, which I believe are appropriate to subject. In fact the descriptions are brief well written descriptions, of medical terminology, which should give credibility. This should therefore fit well the remit on educational focus for commons. I know this topic is always a talking point in human society ( even these days!) But I wish it to be know I did not just put on ( as has been suddenly hinted at) "porn".. which it is NOT. I placed on edited, cropped transcripts of real life biological processes, on male body, in a way which I believe fits in with existing material on commons. I note also that the site has many sexual items on already, and when I was considering placing items on myself, I took into account these other items; but then decided that there was a space for my own editions too. My videos deal with natural sexual functions in a direct but well filmed manner; they are clear, edited, described, and partially cropped to protect the male models identity as well. I do have editing experience and media knowledge also; so I should know what I am doing. They are short educational mini films, not based in a studio with arc lamps, filters, nor glamour models.. instead a real body really seen as it is. I note many other sexual images on site; which I find much more offensive..I shall not name the page; for example a male dropping his trousers and relieving himself in a public park, by a lake ! Do you call that educational? Or what of the many other more dubious subjects currently on the pages? Some I would say are barely legal. And besides.. much more genuinely pornographic than anything I could have imagined. And yet my half dozen productions are deemed so awfully rude, they are apparently now PORN ! This I find grossly insulting; to be made out as the odd one out in the equation. In fact i find the comments discriminatory in the normal sense of the word. But what difference will it make if my few items are deleted? Because the rest of the genuine porn on commons will remain .. and if a certain immunity has built up for them alone; and the rest? Heaven knows ! Finaly I again restate my objections to be made out as having put PORN on this site. That is an objectionable thought, and I would ask that remark is immediately removed Please leave the few items on site; there is (by page views) a need for people to see and learn from them, as they already do on all the other categories too. I trust the (imagined) democratic process will leave ultimate decision on this matter in the hands of more than ONE administrator? But as with most democracies; I hold little hope ! Please reply to my concerns swiftly. Yours hopefully; Dissappointed User longlinbs109 Possibly soon to be exiting Commons? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Longlinbs109 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 23 July 2022 (UTC) |
- If I count correctly, we have less than a hundred files in Category:Videos of male ejaculation and relevant subcategories. I didn't do any thorough check, but it seems the ones discussed here aren't the most typical ones. With such a low number, it is obvious that we don't have the diversity that we'd want to have, so these are redundant only if they are near-identical to some of better quality. I also think that "quality" here may be a misleading quality. These files do not compete with professionally done ones suitable on their own, but rather as one in a collection.
I agree that these are a bit odd and not that well done, but please link to specific files these are redundant with. They are different, so the redundancy needs to be shown file by file; I might agree for some of them, I didn't take a look but of a few.
–LPfi (talk) 17:11, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- when you have seen one ejaculation, you have seen them all. 44 is still a lot, but the number isn’t the point; we have enough files to successfully illustrate the topic. “Diversity” is irrelevant excuse-making; why not upload files in a category that actually needs them like Category:Phone sex? Dronebogus (talk) 17:42, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- Not true, which should be obvious. For phone sex: if you don't do that, it is difficult to create media fitting the category. [removed rant, as asked for]. –LPfi (talk) 10:06, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- This isn’t quality media; it may be in good faith but it’s blurry and badly lit. File:Globe and Nude; human body in movement movie.webm is also totally useless educationally and should be deleted as such separate from the others. Your complaint about the category system seems irrelevant to this particular point, please don’t make people slog through paragraphs of side commentary. Dronebogus (talk) 19:37, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry for the rant, I now removed it. Neither I understand what the globe could be used for (at least it would need a category and description putting it in some sensible context). I assume also some other images are useless or redundant, such as Sequence showing five stages of ejaculation.png (we have much better media on that), but I don't want to wade through Category:Erect human penis to find one similar to A healthy erect human penis.jpg, although I assume it is redundant. –LPfi (talk) 07:32, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
- This isn’t quality media; it may be in good faith but it’s blurry and badly lit. File:Globe and Nude; human body in movement movie.webm is also totally useless educationally and should be deleted as such separate from the others. Your complaint about the category system seems irrelevant to this particular point, please don’t make people slog through paragraphs of side commentary. Dronebogus (talk) 19:37, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- Not true, which should be obvious. For phone sex: if you don't do that, it is difficult to create media fitting the category. [removed rant, as asked for]. –LPfi (talk) 10:06, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Unnecessary and way out of scope. Born2bgratis (talk) 13:03, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 00:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bigblock427ZZ (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Male Ejaculation with cumshot.gif
- File:Small adult male penis with mature beard of pubic hair.jpg
- File:Pubic hair growth.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 23:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 00:43, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio. Хоббит (talk) 19:12, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:37, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
More than dubious "own work": These are professional press images, one even from within the White House. 146.60.73.96 17:40, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
More than dubious "own work": These are professional press images, one even from within the White House. 146.60.73.96 17:40, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
More than dubious "own work": These are professional press images, one even from within the White House. 146.60.73.96 17:41, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
More than dubious "own work": These are professional press images, one even from within the White House. 146.60.73.96 17:41, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
More than dubious "own work": These are professional press images, one even from within the White House. 146.60.73.96 17:41, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
More than dubious "own work": These are professional press images, one even from within the White House. 146.60.73.96 17:41, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
More than dubious "own work": These are professional press images, one even from within the White House. 146.60.73.96 17:41, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
More than dubious "own work": These are professional press images, one even from within the White House. 146.60.73.96 17:42, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Фото явно скопипащено со страницы https://saratov.gov.ru/governor/ Jim Hokins (talk) 15:19, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 21:04, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
From http://www.phys.aoyama.ac.jp/~w3-nishio/old/individual/boss/index2.html, no evidence to support the PD claim. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 11:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:15, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Pornographic 96.231.134.169 22:27, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Is not all age apropiate. Many kids use wikis to learn in a “safe” and open space for sharing. Is not necesary…like using a porn pic in the wiki for porn…but there isnt. Dont understand why this is… 190.104.119.106 22:21, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep In use on several projects. Parents need to tell their kids that Wikimedia is for adults and supervise their websurfing. Wikimedia doesn't censor porn pics that are in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:41, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, Is it match any reason in Commons:Deletion_policy? It is used by several files as a modified original version, and is used to describe what is "Hentai". ( No "Not educationally useful" ) This affects the authorization basis for other modified versions if this file is deleted. PS. If you want your kids to receive a healthy educational environment, you can show them this (File:Hentai_censorship.jpg), or seriously tell them what sex is, and welcome to the fxxking real world. --Cwek (talk) 09:58, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: as above. --Yasu (talk) 15:18, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
This is my photograph, I wish to remove it and upload a version where I have created a Creative Commons license properly (I am new at this...) Vizsfe (talk) 17:50, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Question Do you want to upload an edited version of this photo, or a different photo of this motif? If it's an edited version of this photo, just click "Upload a new version of this file" on the file page and upload it. But the "missing evidence of permission" tag needs to be resolved. User:Didym, did you find this file on any other websites, uploaded before it was uploaded to Commons? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:48, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Didym. --Rosenzweig τ 11:19, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Romania. Stifle (talk) 07:54, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Question "Copyright protection expires 70 years after the death of the original author." Do you know who the architect was and was their year of death (if already dead) was? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:03, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
The Wiki page which is using the image has a subsection titled "Copyrights over the building's image" explaining this topic found here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palace_of_the_Parliament#After_1989 VIOLENTRULER (talk) 05:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Thanks. Anca Petrescu died in 2013, so Commons can start hosting images of this building in 2083, if it still exists then, but for now, all such images (if not de minimis) need to be deleted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:49, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2084. --Rosenzweig τ 10:01, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Saya mengunggahnya secara tidak sengaja Pinaplee (talk) 15:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by upolader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:05, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The Clothespin is a copyright work by Claes Oldenburg and US has no FoP. See note at Category:Clothespin (Claes Oldenburg) William Avery (talk) 18:21, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2093. --Rosenzweig τ 10:09, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Guardbridge, Paper Mill (former), Main Street Buildings Numbers 1, 2, 3, 3a, 4, 6, 7, 8, 17 And 26.jpg
[edit],_Main_Street_Buildings_Numbers_1,_2,_3,_3a,_4,_6,_7,_8,_17_And_26.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Main_Street_Buildings_Numbers_1,_2,_3,_3a,_4,_6,_7,_8,_17_And_26.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Mistaken upload that clearly isn't of the tagged location. Please accept my apologies. Drkirstyross (talk) 22:28, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by upolader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:10, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation (signature on the photo is different from the uploader + small size photo) LeFnake (talk) 13:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:30, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation (signature on the photo is different from the uploader + small size photo) LeFnake (talk) 13:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:31, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:32, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
The uploader is the subject depicted in these photos, requires COM:VRT permission from original photographer(s).
- File:Kalai mathee grad.jpg
- File:Graduation UUM 2011.jpg
- File:Vani nurse group 2.jpg
- File:Vani nurse new.jpg
- File:Vani school new.jpg
- File:Vani nurse group.jpg
- File:Kaalaivani nurse image.jpg
- File:Kalaivani childhood image.jpg
- File:Kalaivani kaliaperumal 2.jpg
- File:Vani image 1.jpg
✗plicit 01:11, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. GeorgHH • talk 18:58, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator unless the original photographer can provide VRT permission. Commons isn't a personal file host either. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:37, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:47, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Image from an album cover. So likely copyvio. I'm also nominating the following files for deletion due to the same reason.
![01:21, 20 July 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/07/20#c-Adamant1-20220720012100-File:Arte_do_Single_"Causa_e_Efeito".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
![02:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/07/20#c-P199-20220908025200-File:Arte_do_Single_"Causa_e_Efeito".jpg){kind=link}
No EXIF data and the thin black bar atop the image suggests this is cropped from someone and is not uploader's own work. COM:PCP applies. ✗plicit 01:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:53, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Unsplash Terms of Use licenses are no longer accepted on Commons as of 2017 and the image was uploaded in 2021. So this is clearly copyvio. Adamant1 (talk) 01:57, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Unsplash's Terms of Use license is no longer compatible with Commons as of 2017 and the image was uploaded in 2021. So this is clearly copyvio. Adamant1 (talk) 02:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Young Krater Dropped A New Single Titled Gangland,Explaining The Town He Grew Up And What He Been All Two Decades Through His Music.Youtuber @YoungKrater.png
[edit]
Album cover from Facebook. So likely copyvio. Adamant1 (talk) 02:54, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
The image appears to be from a photoshoot by Applxphotography and is used on various commercial websites. So it requires COM:VRT permission from original photographer to be hosted on Commons. Adamant1 (talk) 03:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
The image is a mirrored and automatically editted variation of [3], [4]. The author did not show any own creativity in making this edit. The image was first used commercially no later than 1995. Thus, the copyright remains with Kevin Cummins/Getty Images. AzureDiamond (talk) 03:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:55, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
The image doesn't have Exif information originally came from www.mp3tunes.tk. So it's likely copyvio. Adamant1 (talk) 03:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination Contribuine34 (talk) 12:14, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:56, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
No proof of permission, or ownership, claims of Own Work cannot be trusted by this user. See en:Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Hary1mo Sennecaster (talk) 05:36, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:58, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
No proof of permission, own work claims cannot be trusted by this user. No idea on the original but other copies can be found here. see en:Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Hary1mo Sennecaster (talk) 05:38, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:59, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
No proof of permission; there is absolutely no information to be found on this image. No information on its age or publication is given. Uploaded by a socker with an enwiki CCI. Sennecaster (talk) 05:39, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:59, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
The image is a mugshot from Arizona, which is a state that doesn't have PD laws for works created by government employees. So this is likely copyvio. Adamant1 (talk) 06:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Image of a modern rap album cover. So likely copyvio. Adamant1 (talk) 06:28, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by StartOkayStop as Logo (above threshold of originality |source=https://pbskids.org/rosiesrules). Should be discussed (COM:TOO). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:44, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:01, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Probably above the threshold of originality and based on the Exif information it's not clear the uploader is also the creator. Probably they copied it from a blog or something. So the image should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Adamant1 (talk) 08:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:02, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
The image looks like a screenshot of a television show or something. So likely not the uploaders own work and therefore copyvio. Adamant1 (talk) 08:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:03, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Because it's not a good flag. ThePartOfLife123 (talk) 08:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:03, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Because it's not a good flag. ThePartOfLife123 (talk) 08:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:04, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung, laut Metadaten Copyright: Ulrich Metz, kein Hinweis auf Personenidentität mit Hochlader Lutheraner (talk) 09:14, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:05, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
No evidence that David Lena was a US govt employee - see https://www.facebook.com/David.Lena.Photography/ - appears to be a commercial photographer whose work was used by the govt Gbawden (talk) 10:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no permission (No permission since). PD-Italy? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:36, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Possibly, we need at least a date and a source. Yann (talk) 11:38, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: missing all essential info to determine copyright status. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no permission (No permission since). PD-Italy? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:36, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Possibly, we need at least a date and a source. Yann (talk) 11:38, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: missing all essential info to determine copyright status. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Author Oluwaloseyi Michael Copyright holder LiCCng". VRT permission from Oluwaloseyi Michael / LiCCng needed. MKFI (talk) 10:54, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Copyright holder People In This City | Photography". VRT permission from photography studio needed. MKFI (talk) 11:02, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Uploader is apparently the subject. Photographer(s) unknown.
MKFI (talk) 11:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:09, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Hello ! Its a picture I've taken and I would like to remove it from wikipedia or at least remove my name from the comments Jjotajjota (talk) 11:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep The original Unsplash page for the image and author have been removed over there, and I think we can keep the image as an "anonymous" work. On that note, there is no legal pretence to delete the image because you waived all your rights to the image when you posted it at Unsplash a few years ago. However, with the recent changes applied to the Commons version, I think there is no visible profile of yours left, unless people care to dig into the file history. De728631 (talk) 14:19, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- It looks like all name information has already been removed. Seems resolved, Keep as confirmed free license anon work. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:34, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files found with Special:Search/Wessin
[edit]This is the only remaining upload of User:Ips 20 (+ one derivative file), I've deleted all the others as COM:NETCOPYVIOs. I could not find this file online at a date before it was uploaded to Commons, but given the circumstances, I strongly suspect this one is a copyvio too. It should therefore be deleted per the precautionary principle.
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 12:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
The morrocan map is cut off. 196.75.202.22 12:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No. Somalia is cropped, not Morocco. But I agree with the complaint in the file description: "Unuseable map due to the lack of any explanation for the different colours." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:54, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:13, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Watermarked "JPM913", unlikely to be own work. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:20, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Watermark is a sufficient reason to delete, regardless of anything else. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:53, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:13, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Watermarked @JPM913 | PETERC (?), unlikely to be own work Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:21, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Watermark is a sufficient reason to delete, regardless of anything else. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:52, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:16, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Found elsewhere before local upload. No permission. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:14, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:16, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wucftvkristin (talk · contribs)
[edit]These appear to be stills and a title card from the PBS show Central Florida Roadtrip. They would be copyrighted to PBS.
- File:Marineland Dolphin.png
- File:UCF Picture.png
- File:Fantasy of Flight.png
- File:Silver Springs Logo.png
- File:Phil at VAB.png
- File:Phil in Winter Garden.png
- File:Kissimmee's Monument of States.png
- File:At Home Edition.jpg
- File:Florida Road Trip Poster.jpg
Lord Belbury (talk) 15:28, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Also:
--Lord Belbury (talk) 15:57, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:17, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright- I think this is a screenshot from a film Cgl02 (talk) 15:38, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:18, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Superceded and replaced by File:CI Dep of SSU.png VileGecko (talk) 15:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:19, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded for w:Livstry World Company. No other use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:19, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
From https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2022/03/777202/rmaf-chief-retire-monday-krueger-pass-baton-gunjiz, no evidence for license Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:09, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:20, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ps103ankit (talk · contribs)
[edit]Claim of being the copyright holder is not credible given all the other uploads have been copyright violations or unattributed crops from freely licensed images. No reason to believe this image is under a free license.
Whpq (talk) 17:32, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Edit - I now see this conversation on English Wikipedia making it pretty clear these are not the uploader's works. -- Whpq (talk) 17:35, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- This is not my work and should be deleted. I apologize for my mistake. I will not commit this mistake again. -- Ps103ankit (talk) 3:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and admission by uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:26, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shenzhiming88 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dates of creation and publication are unknown thus unable to determine if {{PD-China}} and {{PD-1996}} apply. The uploader must provide such essential info per COM:EVID.
Wcam (talk) 21:45, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Since the Guangde riots took place between 1929 and 1931, and the houses appear to be from that period, I deduce that it was 50 years ago. --Shenzhiming88 (talk) 15:03, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- It is entirely possible that these photos were taken years after the riot. Wcam (talk) 16:10, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Shenzhiming88 (talk) 14:49, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- It is entirely possible that these photos were taken years after the riot. Wcam (talk) 16:10, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing all essential info to determine copyright status. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:27, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shenzhiming88 (talk · contribs)
[edit]LR failed: Only text on source webpage should be considered as CC-licensed work, all images appear on that website were provided by "CEL洋装设计". Authorization letter needed.
- File:Kimura Yu in Lolita (9).jpg
- File:Kimura Yu in Lolita (8).jpg
- File:Kimura Yu in Lolita (7).jpg
- File:Kimura Yu in Lolita (6).jpg
- File:Kimura Yu in Lolita (4).jpg
- File:Kimura Yu in Lolita (5).jpg
- File:Kimura Yu in Lolita (3).jpg
- File:Kimura Yu in Lolita (2).jpg
- File:Kimura Yu in Lolita (1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Stang★ 18:39, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I take this nomination at face value, so no comment on that, but I'd like to know what "LR failed" means. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:17, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- Failed to pass License Review. Stang★ 21:53, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:39, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Stang: May I ask why? Do you mean that the license authorization above is invalid? Shenzhiming88 (talk) 15:08, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:22, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Metadata credits Roy Ng Adeletron 3030 (talk) 22:08, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:25, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE photo of a non-notable person (ro:Ana-Maria Gheorghe) Gikü (talk) 22:37, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Question That's a good argument, but is the user entitled to use this photo on their own user page? They are after all a new user. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:36, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- I'd say COM:PARTYPICS clears it up. Uploading a photo or two on one's own userpage is allowed by Commons:User pages#Images and other content about the user, but when the user doesn't have valid contributions the images are not in scope. See a number of precedents here. Cheers. Gikü (talk) 13:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- Understood. Thanks for the links and explanation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:23, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Image can be found on multiple commercial websites like Shazam and Apple Music. So likely copyvio. Adamant1 (talk) 05:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, I own the copyright of the artist. Atakhanli (talk) 06:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hello. Can you file a ticket with the Volunteer Response Team to prove it? As a side to that, it looks like you've also uploaded a bunch of this persons album covers, which are probably copyrighted. It might be good to provide the Volunteer Response Team with evidence that you own the copyright to them also as well. Otherwise, they might be deleted along with this image. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:12, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- hello, I informed the volunteer group about the album cover and it was approved. Atakhanli (talk) 07:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- I saw the message on my talk page about it. Thanks for informing them. I'm not sure how long it takes for them to add the permission to the file, but I'm sure this won't be deleted in the meantime. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:46, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- hello, I informed the volunteer group about the album cover and it was approved. Atakhanli (talk) 07:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hello. Can you file a ticket with the Volunteer Response Team to prove it? As a side to that, it looks like you've also uploaded a bunch of this persons album covers, which are probably copyrighted. It might be good to provide the Volunteer Response Team with evidence that you own the copyright to them also as well. Otherwise, they might be deleted along with this image. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:12, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Ticket:2022072210002778 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 06:00, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Interior architecture. For the authorship information of this architectural work (architect and year of completion), refer to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque#Files in Category:Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque 2. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:22, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:30, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Interior architecture. For the authorship info of this architectural work, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque#Files in Category:Mohammad Al-Amin Mosque 2. Also, the chandelier may be copyrighted by its designer too. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
It is conflicting with a biography I'm trying to create and want to use this picture Semico1 (talk) 22:32, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I don't understand your argument, but a quick web search shows that Richard Harvey is notable enough to keep this photo and add categories to it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:39, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- No argument. I'm new to Wikipedia. This is my photo and I'm trying to use it on a new profile https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Richard_Harvey_(Drummer) however I get an error message saying This file is a duplicate of the following file:File:Richard Harvey Profile.jpg Semico1 (talk) 03:19, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- If you're trying to use it on Wikipedia, you should just use a thumbnail. Just put the filename in double square brackets followed by "|thumb" and then if you like "|[caption]" -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:06, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument of the hand
[edit]Per COM:FOP Greece, photos of this 1990 monument in Chania, Creta, Greece are not ok and should be deleted. Artwork is by Antonia Papatzanaki, born in 1960 and still alive. The files can be restored 70 years pma of the artist.
- File:9627 hand-monument.jpg
- File:9628 hand-monument.jpg
- File:Chania monument of the hand.jpg
- File:Chania shipwreck monument.JPG
- File:Chania shipwreck monument1.jpg
- File:Monument of the Hand.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 09:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Photo source is Sports Illustrated, source credits ownership of the photo to the subject, so it appears to be a privately owned photo published well after 1977. https://www.si.com/mlb/2020/05/13/scott-boras-baseball-career There may be a fair use claim to be made for this photo but it doesn't appear to be PD and eligible for Commons. WGFinley (talk) 15:54, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
COPYVIO. The four files from 2011 are marked {own}, but this is unlikely. The date given is the upload date, but the fotos are actually much older. Exif is short and strange. Two of the images from 2018 are very small with strange Exif. The two newest may be authentic, but have been taken in the night by exif data, but without flash. Naming scheme follows that of the copyvio images. Maybe the author can elaborate.
- File:Paysandisia archon 19.07.17 Bernard P-J.jpg
- File:Tircis sur ceanothus. NR PJ.Bernard.jpg
- File:Moro sphinx en vol - PJ. Bernard.jpg
- File:PAPILIO MACHAON sur centranthe rouge Bernard pj.jpg
- File:Ruines hélleniques - Marseille place de la bourse 1967.jpg
- File:Tribu des Nouvelles- Hebrides (Espiritu santo) 1957.jpg
- File:Saga pedo - corps.jpg
- File:Pilu-pilu ou Pilou-pilou.1957 île de Lifou - Nouvelle-Calédonie - Le sol tremble pendant cette danse !.jpg
_1957.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
C.Suthorn (talk) 17:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Je donne une traduction en français pour @BERNARD13 : "Violation de copyright. Les quatre fichiers de 2011 sont marqués comme {travail personnel}, mais cela est improbable. La date donnée est la date à laquelle les fichiers ont été téléversés, mais les photos sont bien plus anciennes. L'Exif des photos est court et étrange. Deux images de 2018 sont très petites avec un Exif étonnant. Les deux photos les plus récentes pourraient être authentiques, mais ont été prises la nuit d'après les données Exif, mais sans flash. Le nommage des fichiers suit celui des images violant le copyright. Peut-être que leur auteur peut fournir des explications". Skimel (talk) 21:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Superfluous with File:EuroGales.svg Olou (talk) 10:51, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Oppose. File:EuroGales.svg was created for unknown reasons today, when File:EuroWales.svg exist and used in articles (till this moment) already since 2014. I don't know why you maked new duplicate, Olou. But you can use or overwright existed File:EuroWales.svg instead of creating new separated file. To admins: Delete File:EuroGales.svg as duplicate. ← Alex Great talkrus? 12:29, 15 December 2020 (UTC)- Oppose As per Alex Great. I think Olou did a better job positioning the dragon, but that's no reason to make a duplicate. Also, if following the usual Spanish-language naming scheme that we have for most of Category:SVG Heart-flags of Eurovision is a concern, then moving File:EuroWales.svg to File:EuroGales.svg is also an option. That way, we can keep the edit history of the file. For now, I am voting to Delete File:EuroGales.svg, but I invite Olou to overwrite File:EuroWales.svg if he likes. — Andreyyshore (talk) 09:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept - Regarding copyright no reason to delete. Currently, both images are used on many articles of the projects. Anybody of you, @Alex Great: , @Andreyyshore: or @Olou: can overwrite the oldest image with the newer version and delete the nominated image on the projects. But please consider the guidelines of Commons:Overwriting existing files. Elly (talk) 22:47, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:EuroGales.svg Sims2aholic8 (talk) 16:14, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- False. Read the discussion above. Andreyyshore 🆃︎ 🅲︎ 17:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:03, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
This is the logo of a Northern Ireland bus service (e.g. [5]) which exceeds COM:TOO UK. -M.nelson (talk) 08:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:28, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Fake licensing ? EEIM (talk) 03:50, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
I upload the logo but was delete. Commons:Deletion requests/File:OnlyFans text.svg . --EEIM (talk) 03:54, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:00, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Saya mengunggahnya secara tidak sengaja Pinaplee (talk) 15:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:48, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Saya mengunggahnya secara tidak sengaja Pinaplee (talk) 15:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:48, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work as the uploader has tried several times to upload pictures of the same person without a proper license. -Chien (talk) 11:08, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:48, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not own: https://www.businessinsider.com/adam-rainer-was-both-a-dwarf-and-a-giant-2015-1. Subject lived 1899-1950, PD-US? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" There is no photo credit at businessinsider that they took the image, it is from 1930 and there are at least a half-dozen versions cropped differently online. --RAN (talk) 17:31, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per de:Adam Rainer the subject lived in Austria and died in Graz. So it is highly probable this photo was made in Austria. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Austria a photo which is published anonymously more then 70 years ago is in PD. So the image can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 21:53, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Posiada niewłaściwy opis. Jest to kaplica grobowa z Poddębic. Gorofil (talk) 08:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. File has been renamed and description has been corrected. --Ellywa (talk) 21:56, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This version was uploaded by the uploader as their version of the flag where there no evidence has been provided that it is the correct version. There was a consensus on the talk page if the Wikipedia article that the version 'Flag of the Isle of Man.svg' is likely to be correct as a supporting reference was available. 86.131.235.171 12:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Even if the positioning of the triskelion were correct, the flag is still incorrect as the back part of the three legs are grey on the real flag not white as shown. 86.131.235.171 12:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep This is obvious retaliation by the IP because of my reverting their vandalism on Road signs in the United Kingdom. This file and File:Flag of the Isle of Man.svg are both sourced in regards to their alignments of the triskelion, and co-exist. I therefore ask that this be speedily closed. Fry1989 eh? 15:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- No, I was reverting your vandalism because you kept making a claim without providing any evidence for doing so. You only provided evidence on your third revert. 109.155.148.172 17:35, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- I inserted no claims one way or the other into the article, my revision simply explained the meaning of the signs. It was your revision which added a statement that exception plates could not be used with these two signs, a statement which was not true. You did not become interested in this image until after our interaction on Road signs in the United Kingdom. The two topics are entirely unrelated, which leaves me no other alternative than to view this as retaliation. Fry1989 eh? 17:49, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- No, I was reverting your vandalism because you kept making a claim without providing any evidence for doing so. You only provided evidence on your third revert. 109.155.148.172 17:35, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- That's just pure bullshit. My point was (and still is) in the legislation. You contradicted the legislation without evidence in your first two reverts. That's vandalism.
- Your edit history exists for a reason. It is so that your contributions can be scrutinised. Seeing that you were making claims without proof, I (and anyone else) is free to scrutinise your edits. That scrutiny turned up this debacle as a further example where you have completely made the flag up without valid evidence (and you are not alone). 109.155.148.172 13:08, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Anyway to the subject. This image should be deleted because it is completely wrong. I e-mailed the Isle of Man government yesterday and to my astonishment, I received a reply this morning. They referred me to their official flag makers, the Flag Institute, who are apparently the authority for flags all over the world and anyone who makes flags is supposed to be a member of this organisation. (who knew that vexillology is the study of flags?)
They kindly sent me a dimensioned picture, which as an IP, I cannot upload (it has a copyright message on it anyway). However the pertinent information shows that both this and [File:Flag of the Isle of Man.svg] are totally incorrect.
The correct flag has an aspect ratio of 3:5 (not 2:1) as both images are currently. For a flag width of 100 units and a height of 60 units, the centre of the yellow 'Y' at the centre of the triskelion is 32 units from the bottom edge of the flag (or 53.5% of the height) - this means that the triskelion is neither equidistant from the top and bottom nor is the circumscribing circle centred. The man flag is approx 51% and mann version just over 55.5%, both wrong. The next issue is that the Isle of Man flag is a five colour flag not a four. The backs of the three legs along with bottom the three feet are grey not white. To complete, the triskelion should be orientated such that the legs point clockwise and the tip of the right hand foot is level with the tip of the junction between the grey and white part of the left hand foot. The triskelion in this flag is not only rotated incorrectly but bears only superficial resemblance to the correct one. 109.155.148.172 17:35, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- The flag institute have a web site and I found the flag illustrated here. We cannot upload their image because of the copyright message (is the flag itself copyright?). 109.155.148.172 17:48, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- Does it not matter at all that the flag you linked isn't flown anywhere on the island itself? The government building in Douglas ("wedding cake") flies a 4-coloured flag, which is the same as the one flown over Castle Rushen and all along multiple promenades. Both the "...man.svg" and "...mann.svg" variants are flown, along with other variants, but never the one linked and rarely a 5-coloured version.
- In any case, I hardly thing it's right to depend on a website run by a British charity when a simple look at the nearest flag actually flown on the island could tell you that, at the very least, the de facto flag is different to that which they display. Most flags flown here show the one currently on the article, so it should be left alone. 178.16.6.216 20:37, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
- As far as Wikipedia is concerned (where the image is used), looking at a flag flown anywhere is regarded as original research which is not permitted. Wikipedia goes by reliable sources, and a source identified by the Isle on Man government must be regarded as reliable. Funny how the Flag Institute has accurate relative dimensions and positioning whereas, if you are to be believed, the Isle of Man itself flies any old piece of rag. Practically every other country in the world is very particular about what gets flown as a national flag. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 109.155.148.172 (talk) 12:41, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Sounds like it may depend on the flag makers there. That triskelion looks tricky to get just right, so while one flag maker does it one way, another does it a different way, and so on. People are just flying what they buy and may not notice the difference. At this point it's difficult to accept any source as reliable, because apparently the flag makers are not synchronized with the gov-backed source. If editors don't know which flag on Commons is correct, then it makes sense to me to keep them until we find out. And finding out seems to be the rub, eh? P. I. Ellsworth, ed. put'r there 10:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. After reading all the pertinent discussions about this flag and the one at File:Flag of the Isle of Man.svg, one cannot say for certain which flag, or possibly some other version that centers the triskelion somewhere between this flag version and the other version I linked, is the correct and official flag of the Isle of Man. At this point even the colors are in question (are there four colors, or five?), as well as the spelling of "Man" (is it "Mann"?) Honestly don't know what the correct way to go is in this case, I'm just sure that we don't want to go and delete what might be the correct version. I'd say we need expert help with this issue. P. I. Ellsworth, ed. put'r there 01:40, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The file is currently in use on the projects, even on en:Wikipedia, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 22:03, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Я передумал. Больше не хочу чтобы было доступным публично Arkady2512 (talk) 12:39, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per COM:COURTESY a more detailed reason to delete the file should be given then "Я передумал. Больше не хочу чтобы было доступным публично". So User:Arkady2512 please provide your motivation to delete this image considering the various guidelines on Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 22:16, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
In UkWiki: Надано Пуйдою В.Я. Вперше опубліковано: http://lvovpc.ho.ua/files/ 『白猫』Обг. 15:36, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, possibly copyrighted, although the link given cannot be accessed today. --Ellywa (talk) 22:18, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Masoud bukani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images with widely disparate quality and styles, missing or inconsistent EXIF data, and one taken from FB (File:Sardar-bukan- (fc).jpg).
- File:Iran Bukan Saheli Park.jpg
- File:Sadebukan.jpg
- File:Sardar-bukan- (fc).jpg
- File:Dolme.jpg
- File:Torshi bukan.jpg
- File:Khaneqashamsburhan.jpg
- File:Hsalahsoran.jpg
- File:Masjed Jame Bukan.jpg
- File:Sardar dome in bukan (iran) (7).jpg
- File:Sardar dome in bukan (iran) (6).jpg
- File:Sardar dome in bukan (iran) (5).jpg
- File:Sardar dome in bukan (iran) (4).jpg
- File:Sardar dome in bukan (iran) (3).jpg
- File:Bukan West Azarbijan.jpg
- File:Izerta-zertu (Qalachi Bukan)Iran.jpg
- File:Taraghe.jpg
- File:Saheli park.jpg
- File:Och bukan1381.jpg
- File:Bukan-kurdistan.jpg
- File:Sahlipark in bukan.jpg
- File:Sardaars dome.jpg
- File:H-2014-hammiyan.jpg
- File:Bukan in autumn.jpg
- File:Iran-Bukan-City-2015.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(7).jpg){kind=link}
_(6).jpg){kind=link}
_(5).jpg){kind=link}
_(4).jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
Iran.jpg){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Mosty Keep because I believe most of material is indeed uploader's own work, including one at stadium, he has been uploading photos from his city for more than 15 years. Some images aren't small-sized at all. Also, I'm careful before opening new cats so I remember that I was searching possible CR violation for File:Masjed Jame Bukan.jpg (sole photo here), but I couldn't find anything. On the other hand, File:Och bukan1381.jpg is likely for Delete because it's from some scholarly article, as uploader himself stated. --Orijentolog (talk) 21:20, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Keep @P199 I have uploaded these images years ago. Do you remove them as candidates for no reason?? Some images are of good quality. Please stop deleting images in bulk!! Masoud bukani (talk) 09:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
My documents: https://ibb.co/C804spY https://ibb.co/mNRKrp8 Masoud bukani (talk) 09:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- It is obvious that several images are not your own work (such as File:Sardar-bukan- (fc).jpg from FB, File:Och bukan1381.jpg as stated, and File:Hsalahsoran.jpg is a screengrab). So your credibility is shot. Maybe some are indeed your own, but these nominated images don't have that hallmark, so you will need to provide better proof than just claiming own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:32, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Yes. Some of the images are not mine and the license is wrong. But this is not a reason for you to remove a group of them as candidates! Images that have been uploaded for 10 to 15 years. I respect you and if there are any problems with the images, we would like to resolve them. These images have been used in many articles. Removing them will not help Wikipedia. Masoud bukani (talk) 20:29, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Info Please, one of the administrators will check.
If you suspect these images (Sardar-bukan- (fc).jpg , Och bukan1381.jpg, Hsalahsoran.jpg), why did you nominate other images? I submitted the documents. I remove the meta data to reduce the size of the images. This is not a good reason to delete photos/imgs! Masoud bukani (talk) 20:18, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Keep the images are of good quality. be keeped. Zartoshtkurd (talk) 05:30, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Keep All are old works of art.--Sefer azeri (talk) 17:31, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, deleted the images which had a smaller resolution then 1000 px (one of the sides). Kept the larger images, because I believe the uploader he has made several images themselves. One of the deleted images had exif data showing it was copied from facebook. I assume the other images were made by the uploader, although various camera's were used. If some of my deletions are not justified, please upload the original versions including the exif data. --Ellywa (talk) 22:32, 4 December 2022 (UTC)