Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/06/22
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_Abril_Rock_93_-_Chico_Science_&_Nação_Zumbi_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Uploader request Crcolas (talk) 07:49, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 10:30, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Clear copyright violation from here: https://www.facebook.com/intaffci/photos/d41d8cd9/1694339440863815/ Betty Logan (talk) 11:16, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Didym at 12:19, 22 June 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
_Abril_Rock_93_-_Chico_Science_%26_Na%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Zumbi_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Abril_Rock_93_-_Chico_Science_%26_Na%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Zumbi_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate files not necessary for Commons. LeonaardoG (talk) 23:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
_Abril_Rock_93_-_Chico_Science_&_Nação_Zumbi_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 04:39, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
_Abril_Rock_93_-_Chico_Science_&_Nação_Zumbi_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Cut files but it will not be necessary because the original is the most used this model will not be used in any duplicate article. LeonaardoG (talk) 23:12, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 04:36, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
I'm the originator of this file. This file is outdated and must be deleted. Thanks. Stalderstalder (talk) 10:59, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
It's me on this image and it's outdated. 84.226.64.45 10:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 11:52, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
no permission of depicted person! Maimaid (talk) 21:16, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Ra'ike at 06:21, 23 June 2022 UTC: uploaded without permission of depicted person! --Krdbot 14:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
no permission of depicted person! Maimaid (talk) 21:19, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Ra'ike at 06:22, 23 June 2022 UTC: uploaded without permission of depicted person! --Krdbot 14:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright problem Sujon Ahmed Model (talk) 14:10, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete: F10 --Achim55 (talk) 16:49, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The uploader claims that this is "own work", but he is also the subject, and it does not appear to be a selfie, so we can't keep it unless the actual photographer sends a free license using VRT. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:31, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:10, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Who is ? 191.125.13.130 00:30, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 22:10, 27 June 2022 UTC: as per COM:SPEEDY. --Krdbot 07:23, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Unused raw-text images, out of scope. All uses replaced with plain text.
- File:Lake Erie vertical header.png
- File:Lake Huron vertical header.png
- File:Lake Michigan vertical header.png
- File:Lake Ontario vertical header.png
- File:Lake Superior vertical header.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:49, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
No objection: I created them and concur as they are obsolete. Drdpw (talk) 12:04, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:51, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Various film stills and promo shots of Italian actor Ciccio Ingrassia, with sources like "immagine google". All presumably copyrighted.
- File:Renatocestie.jpg
- File:Laviadelcibo.jpg
- File:Viaggiodamore.jpg
- File:Giovaniebelli96.jpg
- File:Effettidunsognointerrotto.jpg
- File:Cicciopremiato.jpg
- File:Franco franchi pubblicità.jpg
- File:Ciccio ingrassia teatro.jpg
- File:Ciccio ingrassia 1985.jpg
- File:Teatro.it-giampiero-ingrassia-intervista.jpg
- File:Screenshot 20220612-132351 Facebook.jpg
- File:Ciccio-ingrassia-1024x640.jpg
- File:Ciccio Ingrassia 1996.jpg
Lord Belbury (talk) 15:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:41, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Further stills from Italian films and actor promo shots, uploaded as own work.
- File:Nino terzo.jpg
- File:Totonno-Chiappetta.jpg
- File:Il-flauto-totonno-chiappetta-in-una-scena.jpg
- File:DeRossi chiappetta.jpg
- File:L'Esorciccio.jpg
- File:Elioveltri.jpg
- File:Tiberio.jpg
- File:Voncenzoandronico 1998.jpg
- File:Mondaini franchi ingrassia.jpg
- File:Lisi franchi ingrassia.jpg
- File:Ciccio raimondo franco.jpg
- File:Schiaffino ingrassia franchi.jpg
- File:Ciccio ingrassia 1975.jpg
- File:Ciccioingrassia.jpg
- File:Franco franchi 1990.jpg
- File:Marco giallino.jpg
- File:Terapia-roosevelt.jpg
- File:Giampiero Ingrassia-2.jpg
- File:Ciccio e giampiero.jpg
- File:Giampiero Ingrassia.jpg
- File:Ok il prezzo è giusto.jpg
- File:L'ingorgo.jpg
- File:Ingrassia santuccio.jpg
- File:Canzonissima7172.jpg
- File:Canzonissima71.jpg
- File:Lavolpe di luigicomencini.jpg
- File:Ciccio-ingrassia-da-piccolo.jpg
- File:Ciccio e rosaria.jpg
- File:Ilgamberetto rairadio.png
- File:Ilgamberetto radio.jpg
- File:Massimo-giletti-rai.jpg
- File:Francoeciccio anni80.jpg
- File:Paoloilfreddo.jpg
- File:Boheme1987.png
Lord Belbury (talk) 19:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Esthappanos Bar Geevarghese (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works: disparate sizes, quality, and styles, missing EXIF data or FB code. Many derivative works and photos of existing photos.
- File:Porunnedom Jose.jpg
- File:Bishop Thomas Elavanal.jpg
- File:Bosco Puthur.jpg
- File:Bishop Bosco Puthur.jpg
- File:Tomb of Bishop.jpg
- File:Mathew Anikuzhikattil.jpg
- File:Mathew Arackal.jpg
- File:Archbishop Thoomkuzhy.jpg
- File:Mar Jacob Thoomkuzhy.jpg
- File:Jacob Thoomkuzhy.jpg
- File:George Njaralakkatt.jpg
- File:Mar Andrews Thazhath.jpg
- File:Andrews Thazhath.jpg
- File:Sebastian Adayanthrath.jpg
- File:Mar Jose Porunnedom.jpg
- File:Jose Porunnedom.jpg
- File:Tomb of Mar Joseph Kariyatti.jpg
- File:Marth Mariyam.jpg
- File:Fr. Vettath CMI.jpg
- File:Syro Malabar Church.jpg
- File:Alangad Sleeva.jpg
- File:Mar Joseph Kariyatti.jpg
- File:Joseph Kariyatti.jpg
- File:Paremmakkal Toma Kathanar.jpg
- File:Pauly Kannookadan.jpg
- File:Kothamangalam diocese.jpg
- File:Sebastian Pozholiparambil.jpg
- File:Mar Raphael Thattil.jpg
- File:Raphael Thattil.jpg
- File:Bishop Tharayil.jpg
- File:Mar Tharayil.jpg
- File:Tharayil Mar Toma Metran.jpg
- File:Mar Powathil.jpg
- File:Archbishop Powathil.jpg
- File:Powathil Joseph.jpg
- File:Mar Joseph Powathil 2.jpg
- File:Powathil Joseph Metropolitan.jpg
- File:Archbishop Joseph Powathil.jpg
- File:Joseph Powathil.jpg
- File:Remigiose Inchananiyil.jpg
- File:Mar Jacob Angadiath.jpg
- File:Jacob angadiath.jpg
- File:Cardinal George Alencherry.jpg
- File:Alencherry George Cardinal.jpg
- File:George Alencherry Metropolitan.jpg
- File:Perumthottam Mar Joseph Metropolitan.jpg
- File:Mar Joseph Perumthottam.jpg
- File:Archbishop Joseph Perumthottam.jpg
- File:Fr. Vettath Emilian CMI.jpg
- File:Joseph Srampickal Metran.jpg
- File:Srampickal Mar Joseph Episcopa.jpg
- File:Joseph Srampickal Episcopa.jpg
- File:Srampickal Mar Joseph.jpg
- File:Mar Joseph Srampickal.jpg
- File:Joseph Srampickal.jpg
- File:Mar Toma Episcopa.jpg
- File:Tharayil Mar Toma.jpg
- File:Thomas Tharayil.jpg
- File:Alencherry George.jpg
- File:Joseph Kallarangatt.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:20, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Esthappanos Bar Geevarghese (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work as images lack exif data, have wrong source information or are clear copyvios. Some of the images have been deleted in the past already under the same rationality. The uploader cannot be trusted.
- File:Nidhiry Mani Kathanar 2.jpg
- File:Nidhiry Mani Kathanar.jpg
- File:Joseph Srampickal 13.jpg
- File:Joseph Srampickal 12.jpg
- File:Mathew Kavukattu.jpg
- File:Saint Mariam Thresia.jpg
- File:Saint Euphrasia.jpg
- File:Saint Alphonsa.jpg
- File:Joseph Kallarangatt 4.jpg
- File:Joseph Kallarangatt 3.jpg
- File:Jacob Muricken 4.jpg
- File:Jacob Muricken 3.jpg
- File:Jacob Muricken 2.jpg
- File:Joseph Kollamparambil.jpg
- File:Pauly Kannookadan.jpg
- File:Jacob Muricken.jpg
- File:Raphael Thattil.jpg
- File:Jacob Angadiyath.jpg
- File:Joseph Kallarangatt 2.jpg
- File:George Alencherry 11.jpg
- File:Joseph Srampickal 11.jpg
- File:Joseph Srampickal 10.jpg
- File:Joseph Srampickal 9.jpg
- File:Joseph Srampickal 8.jpg
- File:Joseph Srampickal 7.jpg
- File:Joseph Srampickal 6.jpg
- File:Joseph Kallarangatt coA.jpg
- File:Joseph Srampickal coA.jpg
- File:Joseph Perumthottam coA.png
- File:Thomas Tharayil coA.png
- File:Thomas Tharayil 5.jpg
- File:Thomas Tharayil 4.jpg
- File:Thomas Tharayil 3.jpg
- File:Thomas Tharayil 2.jpg
- File:Thomas Tharayil.jpg
- File:George Alencherry 10.jpg
- File:George Alencherry 9.jpg
- File:George Alencherry 8.jpg
- File:George Alencherry 7.jpg
- File:George Alencherry 6.jpg
- File:George Alencherry 5.jpg
- File:George Alencherry 4.jpg
- File:George Alencherry 3.jpg
- File:George Alencherry 2.jpg
- File:Episcopal ordination.jpg
- File:Syro Malabar bishops.jpg
- File:Joseph Perumthottam 4.jpg
- File:Joseph Perumthottam 3.jpg
- File:Joseph Perumthottam 2.jpg
- File:Consecration of shamsabad cathedral.jpg
- File:Election of bishop.jpg
- File:Joseph Perumthottam.jpg
- File:Sebastian Adayanthrath.jpg
- File:Jose Porunnedom.jpg
- File:Bosco Puthur.jpg
- File:Andrews thazhath.jpg
- File:George njaralakkatt.jpg
- File:യൗസേപ്പ് സ്രാമ്പിക്കൽ.jpg
- File:ജോസഫ് സ്രാമ്പിക്കൽ.jpg
- File:Anthoni Kathanar kudakkachira.jpg
- File:Pamplany Joseph.jpg
- File:Joseph Pamplani.jpg
- File:Bishop Joseph Srampickal.jpg
- File:Remigiose Inchananiyil 2.jpg
- File:Remigiose Inchananiyil.jpg
- File:Joseph Srampickal 5.jpg
- File:Joseph Srampickal 4.jpg
- File:Joseph Srampickal 3.jpg
- File:Joseph Srampickal 2.jpg
- File:Yawsep Srampickal.jpg
- File:Srampickal Joseph.jpg
- File:Joseph Kallarangatt.jpg
- File:Yawsep Metran.jpg
- File:Joseph Srampickal.jpg
- File:Srampickal Yawsep Metran.jpg
- File:Mar Andrews Thazhath.jpg
- File:Mar Raphael Thattil.jpg
- File:Mar Joseph Perumthottam.jpg
Njd-de (talk) 20:58, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete participated in discussion regarding this editor's paid behavior on En Wikipedia. Editor admitted to publishing photos here as a paid employee of the church most of these images depict. ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Concur that uploader is not sufficiently credible. For example, File:Joseph Kallarangatt.jpg nominated here and uploaded by Esthappanos Bar Geevarghese as their own work was previously uploaded as File:BP Joseph Kallarangatt.jpg by Kepha Bar Mathayi, who also claimed it to be their own work. Either Esthappanos Bar Geevarghese is requestor's undisclosed alternative account or one (or both--image is clearly professionally posed and shot) of you are lying about authorship. Many (all?) of these images have also appeared elsewhere (e.g., File:Pauly Kannookadan.jpg is here; File:Mar Andrews Thazhath.jpg is here; File:Joseph Perumthottam 2.jpg is here (direct); etc.); PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 16:32, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:54, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Katie Britt Campaign.jpg and extracted images
[edit]
PD-USGov only applies to official photos released by the Government. It doesn't apply to campaign photos, especially those released by a political candidate or those working for them or their campaign. Thus, there should be evidence that the image is under a free license or in the public domain.
- File:Katie Britt Campaign (cropped) (cropped).jpg
- File:Katie Britt Campaign (cropped).jpg
- File:Katie Britt Campaign.jpg
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Twotwofourtysix (talk) 02:30, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:28, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
no permission copyvio see metadata "THUG-027– Amandla Stenberg stars in Twentieth Century Fox’s THE HATE U GIVE. Photo Credit: Erika Doss." Hoyanova (talk) 07:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright holder TM&© 2018 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Not for sale or duplication. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.125.128.76 (talk) 00:26, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted The file's already been deleted. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:04, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
특정 인물에 대한 모욕성 그림 기나ㅏㄴ (talk) 07:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
This file meet the criteria for speedy deletion.--Bluehill (talk) 02:05, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted --Adamant1 (talk) 00:07, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
著作権侵害のため。と同時に、肖像権の侵害のため、権利者として削除依頼します。 118.238.203.218 03:42, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Keep this image has been successfully reviewed (archive.is), and CC license is not revocable. and the person is public figure and the image does not harm the person's privacy. --Puramyun31 (talk) 04:12, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --INeverCry 00:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Deleted with the permission of Yuka Terasaki ( https://mobile.twitter.com/terachan0804/status/833358423353815040?p=v ） 14.0.180.121 01:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Translation of the tweet: the subject doesn't like the picture and find it embarassing. I wouldn't mind a courtesy deletion per COM:PIP. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- It seems to me that she abhorred this picture appeared on her all wikipedia pages ([1]，[2]). Please delete it. -- 14.0.180.121 03:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per the result of previous discussion. also there is currently no alternative image on Commons. --Puramyun31 (talk) 09:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Strong oppose That are not the reasons why the picture can be kept. And Yuka Terasaki had already expressed her stance obviously, you can take her photos at some events like "NISSAN あ、安部礼司〜BEYOND THE AVERAGE" の コラボ企画 if you need. Please respect her feelings first. -- 14.0.180.121 12:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)- As Terasaki Yuka speaks twitter, she is shy about this picture and hopes to be deleted. Also, she is in trouble. As she is reflected in her photographs, her feelings should be taken into consideration to the utmost and I will positively tell you to delete it.--218.47.209.169 13:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
deleting the file because of simple reason such as "I don't like it" could negatively affect independency and NPOV status of wikimedia sites. so I disagree this threat. --Puramyun31 (talk) 15:37, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- In fact, the picture does not only belong to you. And Yuka Terasaki had showed her thought, everyone can represent her in order to delete the "unauthorized" picture. If you get an authentic permission of Yuka Terasaki, you can use it freely. Otherwise, you should respect her choice, putting yourself in her shoes. That is not only the problem of Wikimedia Commons. -- 14.0.180.121 16:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. LTA account. --Yann (talk) 18:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
The video cannot find on Youtube. It means the license may be wrong. 221.77.64.167 01:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- This link [3] is difficult to prove that the photo came from this video. -- 14.0.180.87 01:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Per two previous deletion request. As said before ithis image was freely licensed in youtube "(archive.is), and CC license is not revocable. and the person is public figure and the image does not harm the person's privacy." Also this file has been successfully reviewed by a license reviewer in 2015 as having a free CC license, AKA someone that saw the video and saw the same image. Also i think that this IPs are only SPA. That last deletion request was closed as keep, yestarday, so dont try to gamble the system. Tm (talk) 01:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Strong oppose Someone is not everyone, the source and the photo should support mutually, but it cannot check now, so the license becomes invalid. -- 14.0.180.87 01:59, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment No, your wrong or trying to subvert the true. The source was reviewed by Thibaut120094, a license reviewer in October 25 2015 as having CC-BY 3.0 license, as can be seen in the page. So dont try to make other fools or subvert the fact that the license was, is and will always be valid. Tm (talk) 02:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. LTA account. --Yann (talk) 13:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-4){kind=link}
画像に映っている寺崎裕香が、この動画の一時停止の写真を「消してほしい」と繰り返しTwitterアカウントで訴えているため。映る本人はこのキャプチャの写真を許可していないため。人格権・肖像権の侵害です。 トマトうどん (talk) 11:09, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Per previous deletion requests. As said before this image was freely licensed in youtube "(archive.is), and CC license is not revocable. and the person is public figure and the image does not harm the person's privacy." Also there is no alternative CC-licensed image on Commons. Puramyun31 (talk) 10:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
p.s. this image uploaded as an alternative by the nominator, is not licensed under CC license (Template:YouTube CC-BY) . if someone really want to upload a better image of her in order to depict the voice actress at the Wikipedia article about her, the image should be freely-licensed. Puramyun31 (talk) 10:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC)- 「Template:YouTube CC-BY」の件を教えていただきありがとうございました。以後、画像を投稿する際に気をつけます。 トマトうどん (talk) 11:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Puramyun31, @Yann: Could you please close this again? --Thibaut (talk) 13:06, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: the image has survived multiple DRs already and there's still no valid reason for deletion. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Two of the source images, https://www.flickr.com/photos/anitagould/28155118541 and https://www.flickr.com/photos/matthewpaulson/28110453944, do not allow commercial use and therefore incompatible with Commons. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:30, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Obviously unfree images. Danyess (talk) 15:12, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: --Adamant1 (talk) 00:14, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Non-free media: Emoji movie, sonic, etc. Fehufanga (talk) 22:23, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- I think I used the wrong tool, sorry, I meant to use the copyright violation link. Fehufanga (talk) 02:08, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: --Adamant1 (talk) 00:15, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Goggle Maps Copy Vio Enyavar (talk) 00:05, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete As clearly copy vio. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:29, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:57, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Original author and uploader requests deletion, because this image is useless. Ib 01:55, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no evident in-scope usefulness. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:59, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A cropped version of this image: https://www.johngilesformayor.com/meet-john-giles no proof of cc license Putitonamap98 (talk) 02:03, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete the images description says it was originally published in the East Valley Tribune. So I highly doubt Commons has permission to host the file. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:03, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:59, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyright but cc? https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZivt8JTL0KMCvZjkRJ2h9RlVtfFtC9w8PlwlnxPFpVuSatQ5uuJ2U_1tnsnyKBMCuUNhAnZAIXiWmW_1Tv1s7Pnd4Mr9ZQbWY4bINA9ECdTTYHgfy0qapy5jQbyQvD6gRLQn3Jyu8UlrIKKSOYznCSaUWc-mnXyg looks to be a image taken from another website Putitonamap98 (talk) 02:28, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete as the image is clearly a copyright violation. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:59, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright but cc? https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZivt8JTL0KMCvZjkRJ2h9RlVtfFtC9w8PlwlnxPFpVuSatQ5uuJ2U_1tnsnyKBMCuUNhAnZAIXiWmW_1Tv1s7Pnd4Mr9ZQbWY4bINA9ECdTTYHgfy0qapy5jQbyQvD6gRLQn3Jyu8UlrIKKSOYznCSaUWc-mnXyg looks to be a image taken from another website Putitonamap98 (talk) 02:29, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete as clearly COPYVIO. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:59, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
not own work: see metadata Bradipo Lento (talk) 11:01, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete per the nominator. This clearly isn't the uploaders own work. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:39, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hinesbrothersjetpunk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: logos of an organization with dubious relevance; unused
- File:The Real Great Fork Gang.png
- File:This is the Logo of the one and only Fork Gang that avoids using spoons at all costs.png
Enyavar (talk) 07:42, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete I could be wrong but I think images of MS Paint's interface would also be copyrighted. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:29, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:55, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: Flags of a fictional state
Enyavar (talk) 07:51, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:55, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
File was created for a hoax article at en.wiki. No possible encyclopedic usage. Also applies to File:Deer of Davenport 2.png, File:Deer of Davenport 3.png. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:03, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:54, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:51, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: Map of a fictional/fantasy state Enyavar (talk) 16:01, 22 June 2022 (UTC) هذا مصدري، الطبعة السادسة، صفحة 163 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aziz911q8 (talk • contribs) 17:32, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:50, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
File not found in source; source provided doesn't have statement of copyright status of the website Frodar (talk) 16:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:50, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: Map of fictional island Enyavar (talk) 16:12, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:49, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, no educational value Politheory1983 (talk) 20:00, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- I'm in favor of deleting, because the image has no use. Neriah (talk) 16:47, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
I in favour to deleting this. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:ED0:53D2:3A00:4539:DB2D:45DE:9DB5 (talk) 16:02, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unused personal photo, no other contributions by uploader, from 4 years ago. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:48, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, no educational value --2A02:ED0:53D2:3A00:F0D2:22B:29FA:9F5 15:56, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:49, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, no educational value --2A02:ED0:53D2:3A00:F0D2:22B:29FA:9F5 16:04, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:48, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation; image was created by a Washington DC-based photographer (Kirth Bob) and appears in a promotional article published by Deloitte: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/about-deloitte/articles/uncensored-stories-of-black-professionals-tamika-tremaglio.html Volcom95 (talk) 20:59, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:45, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
useless screenshot of textual informations Ske (talk) 21:14, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:44, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
According to te description LGAKFDNDCURMXIQKFNXE it seems to be a test upload. Achim55 (talk) 21:40, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:43, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File:PeinetaPanameña(3).jpg is my picture . please delete 190.219.8.101 22:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; request by anon ip; image in use, no problem evident. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:43, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This photograph, taken in Central Park, New York (original text: Central Park, Nova Iorque), it is an US work, not a Brazilian work 83.61.237.190 22:07, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The source of the image cannot be traced. The pic is originally from flickr, but currently unavailable. The indicated source "1992-02-27 Chico Science no Central Park, Nova Iorque" doesn't belong to the author "Prefeitura do Recife". It's the flickr acount of Leonardo Silva, probably it's the uploader LeonaardoG. Nemracc (talk) 13:27, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Appears to have been flickrwashed by Leonardo and then inexplicably removed from view or deleted on Flickr after having been laundered by the family of Chico Science and the city of Recife. Part of a series of photos with murky provenance used to decorate articles on Chico Science on nine Wikipedias. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:17, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- I apologize to all of you my intention was not that the image is from the Pernambuco State Government website so I thought the license fit the "PD-Brazil-Photo"-- LeonaardoG (talk) 03:25, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:41, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
This photograph appears to be taken after 1998, so it still may be copyrighted. Also, it comes from this website. 83.61.237.190 22:42, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Appears to have been flickrwashed by Leonardo and then inexplicably removed from view or deleted on Flickr after having been laundered by the family of Chico Science and the city of Recife. Part of a series of photos with murky provenance used to decorate articles on Chico Science on nine Wikipedias. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:15, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:40, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Page from a copyrighted book. Johnj1995 (talk) 23:23, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete the only thing that might qualify this as PD is it was incidental, and it's clearly not. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:51, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:40, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Small JPG, replaceable by File:Aspirin synthesis.png (high-quality raster in same level of detail) and File:Aspirin synthesis.svg (vector equivalent to the PNG). DMacks (talk) 05:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 09:15, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Cinnamyl nitrile can't be made from cinnamyl bromide like this. The product would have one more carbon atom than cinnanyl nitrile. Marbletan (talk) 14:36, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom as obvious chemical mistake.
Ordinarily I'd say "rename to match actual target", but the quality here is so low (possibly even license-fail, per uploader's usual behavior), that if someone wanted it it would be trivial to redraw in a proper way.DMacks (talk) 20:34, 22 June 2022 (UTC)- Realized it's not just a mis-named product (filename mistake) but an actual wrong number of carbons in the diagram for the reagents. DMacks (talk) 13:39, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per chemical mistake & extremely poor-quality image. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:12, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 13:06, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Lower res cropped version of image taken from here https://allergan-web-us-prod.azurewebsites.net/investors/corporate-governance/executive-officers-and-directors Putitonamap98 (talk) 03:59, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Fitindia at 10:12, 6 July 2022 UTC: No permission since 28 June 2022 --Krdbot 13:30, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused photo of non-notable persons with no explanatory description, no educational value, out of scope; COM:SPAM Feyth (talk) 00:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:59, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicated file: Serpent Column, under restoration Istanbul (52121653364).jpg Kurmanbek (talk) 00:06, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete As pointless duplicate. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:30, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:58, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Own work no. Escope tampoco 191.125.13.130 01:06, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:59, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copy vio Wiki Farazi (talk) 01:09, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:59, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Foto vieja que puede ser de dominio publico pero no de trabajo propio. 191.125.13.130 01:42, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:00, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
DW of copyrighted character 218.250.155.41 02:57, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, since closed Flickr account, DW by Flickr photographer in unidentifed country, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted poster, unsure if FOP applies 218.250.155.41 02:58, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete IMO the poster takes up to much of the image to qualify it as FOP. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:06, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted poster, unsure if FOP applies 218.250.155.41 03:00, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; photo has no purpose other than reproducing DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:03, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Proprietary logo, fake license. Now the file is not needed, since the promo article in the Russian Wikipedia has been deleted Khinkali (talk) 05:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:04, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Fake. This is Christ Church in Oxford, and not the building in which the Swiss International Institute Lausanne is supposedly located Khinkali (talk) 05:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, apparent hoax/troll. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:04, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
reupload of non-free image used for cross wiki person promotion no source and no permission Hoyanova (talk) 05:33, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:06, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
File:IRZqDgXL3qtJwHl59NuN8j6e VDKATQpnMCpedOf-tkRQFXF5TyH9l6LRppbZxjETyJ48MphMwqeDa-3kZeTuC5M.jpg
[edit]
non trivial logo. Copyright status? Original source? Drakosh (talk) 05:37, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:06, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
the logo of the young esports team, the article in the wiki has been deleted Khinkali (talk) 05:44, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:15, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
DW of copyrighted portrait of Andrzej Duda 218.250.155.41 05:46, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:15, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Cropped from something, very low quality, unlikely to be own work. Uploader has a history of copyvios. PCP Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:16, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
copyrighted photo HHH Pedrigree (talk) 07:35, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:16, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio (the background map!) Enyavar (talk) 10:32, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete I think you mean Google Earth. The image is clearly copyrighted either way though. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:36, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:22, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation Clump (talk) 11:29, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- see: this image site for the original — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clump (talk • contribs) 11:32, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete This file does indeed appear to be falsely claimed as own work. Marbletan (talk) 16:46, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:22, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Rejected from enwiki, looks like original research. If no source is provided, I think this is a misleading map. Gikü (talk) 13:28, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:23, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
copyvio no permission see metadata - Author Rien Boonstoppel Fotografie Copyright holder Copyright Rien Boonstoppel, 2019 Hoyanova (talk) 14:49, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:24, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
WW2 Panther II image from the production line. Hardly possible that the uploader took this image back in the early 1940ies and uploaded to Commons in 2022. Additionally, we do not have sufficient info for keeping this image under some PD license. Mosbatho (talk) 15:45, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; lacking information to determine source & copyright. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:25, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
It's a copyright violation. This picture is a picture of me and was taken by me. I never give any authorisation to anyone to publish it... Please could you delete it ? Thank you so much Emmanuel Cloix (talk) 17:42, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yes sorry, I uploaded it has a test... It should not be there... Manou404 (talk) 20:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:50, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
File:De kemiska strukturerna för verkningsmedlen i Sativex®, THC (överst) och CBD (nederst)..pdf
[edit]Needs to be cropped. The uploader has already done this, but uploaded it as a separate file, File:Sativex®, THC (överst) och CBD (nederst).pdf. This unused inferior version is no longer needed. Marbletan (talk) 12:58, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete both as uncited derivative works. These are each embedded bitmaps that have jpeg and/or other rescaling artifacts. We have a bunch of 3D images in Category:Tetrahydrocannabinol and Category:Cannabidiol if someone wants them (note that the nom'ed files aren't in the same style as each other...use-case is purely decorative). DMacks (talk) 01:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- ...so I replaced that use (sv:Nabiximols) with standard-style images. DMacks (talk) 09:39, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete both files. Besides the reasons stated by DMacks, PDF is not an acceptable file format for images/chemical structures. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:07, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:23, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Book is not accept 191.125.13.130 00:33, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:26, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Copied from https://www.okayama-kanko.jp/photo/448. According to guide page, credits such as 「©岡山県観光連盟」「写真提供：岡山県観光連盟」「岡山県観光連盟提供」 are necessary. そらみみ (talk) 09:33, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Info File:足湯2.jpg is also a copy of https://www.okayama-kanko.jp/photo/449, and File:ホタル.jpg is https://www.okayama-kanko.jp/photo/1244. --そらみみ (talk) 09:45, 22 June 2022 (UTC) correcting--そらみみ (talk) 09:46, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: source says images are non transferrable, so they are not freely usable. --Yasu (talk) 15:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Het beeld is gemaakt door Naoki Tominaga (1913 - 2006) in 1995.[1] Omdat er in Japan geen panoramavrijheid is, de afbeelding kan niet worden gehost op Commons. --トトト (talk) 12:51, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete COM:FOP Japan doesn't include 3D artworks. The sculptor hasn't been dead for 70 years. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: not in PD. --Yasu (talk) 15:26, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
credited to someone else here https://www.instagram.com/p/CaHkyO1MWwQ/?hl=en -- think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:08, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
File:Voyager 2 spacecraft wide angle camera through colors Orange, Green, and Violet filters spectacular spectrometer send picture of planet Jupiter before in 1977.jpg
[edit]
Page from a copyrighted book. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 23:25, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Pi.1415926535 at 06:39, 27 July 2022 UTC: Nonsense images, false claims of own work, etc --Krdbot 13:04, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Brokes the templates like Template:Motd/2022-09-15 (en) and others... Brateevsky {talk} 06:32, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 12:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Is scope? 191.125.13.130 01:40, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete Probably not. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Orang tolol (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Unused logos and flags of unidentified (likely fantasy) countries
Enyavar (talk) 11:06, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: Excluded educational material Headlock0225 (talk) 11:42, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
See COM:SCOPE, personal photo Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:36, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:07, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, unclear encyclopedic purpose Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:36, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:07, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:07, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, Out of Scope Captain-tucker (talk) 19:10, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Lower res cropped version of image taken from here https://allergan-web-us-prod.azurewebsites.net/investors/corporate-governance/executive-officers-and-directors Putitonamap98 (talk) 03:59, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleting. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.125.27.152 (talk) 22:51, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: by Storkk. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
badname Parpan05 (talk) 13:04, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps Copyright violations
- File:Kuala Pembuang2 Map.jpg
- File:Kuala Pembuang1 Map.jpg
- File:Persil Raya Village Maps.jpg
- File:Sungai Undang Village Map.jpg
- File:Sungai Bakau Village Map.jpg
Enyavar (talk) 16:33, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete Blatant copyvio. There should really be a warning on Category:Maps not to upload images from Google Maps/Earth since it's a recurring problem. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:58, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DerkMahen12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality photographs of non-notable people that are likely outside COM:SCOPE
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:52, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DerkMahen12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Globally blocked user with untrustworthy claims of own work, taken in different countries on different cameras.
- File:Kid Doing Online Class.jpg
- File:2013 Los Angeles Equality Awards.jpg
- File:Old Phones.jpg
- File:Toward the harbor.jpg
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 05:50, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. None in use, some clear copyright viols. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, Out of Scope Captain-tucker (talk) 16:53, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Page from a copyrighted book. Johnj1995 (talk) 23:24, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nominator. The image is clearly copyrighted. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:53, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: by Pi.1415926535. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Own no . 191.125.13.130 00:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep I'm usually against people treating Commons like a personal file host. In this case though the guy has a Wikidata entry and Wikipedia articles about him, which I added the image to. So I think it's worth keeping. The nominator might want to do the same next time, instead of just having an image deleted when it might be useful somewhere. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: likely not own work but crop/reworked image from unknown source. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:58, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Is own and scope? 191.125.13.130 00:36, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Personal image of nothing in particular, out of scope for commons as not educational. Zero context as to location. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 05:21, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete The image in category Rajasthan. So claiming there's no context about the location is wrong. That said, I don't it's probably out of scope anyway consider half the image is to dark to make out and the rest isn't much better. I'm not sure what the rule of thumb for night photos is, but I image that there should still be something visible in the image for it to qualify as having educational value and IMO half visible clouds alone don't cut it. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:11, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, minimal context, but still. Rajasthan is 342,239 sq. km, just saying the name isn't exactly illuminating :P Premeditated Chaos (talk) 22:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. No context/location to make it usable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
no permission Hoyanova (talk) 05:34, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Waarom komt deze afbeelding in aanmerking voor verwijdering? mag niet worden verwijderd 5.197.236.164 15:24, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Omdat de toestemming van de fotograaf ontbreekt. --Achim55 (talk) 16:54, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Election posters are non-permanent display and cannot be covered by FOP 218.250.155.41 05:47, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:12, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Image is wrong, it *should* say: With 5 districts, 2 green and 3 yellow, yellow wins -- the incorrect legend says the reverse. Peter NYC (talk) 06:14, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yikes! The image is so confusing, I got turned around on the nomination page!
- The legend should say: With 5 districts, 3 green and 2 yellow, green wins. Peter NYC (talk) 06:20, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; correct version is File:How To Steal An Election.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Collages need source and license for every used image. In addition, the collage has bad quality. Taivo (talk) 06:53, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep: I can give faith that all the photos are mine and I decided to realease them in the public domain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DogeGamer2015MZT (talk • contribs)
- Quality is still too bad. Taivo (talk) 06:57, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Poor quality collage, including at least 2 photos of so low quality as to be useless. Uploader is welcome to upload full resolution originals of any of their photos of the event that are not badly blurred nor too dark to be visible. I can see no potential in-scope usefulness for this collage. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:02, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above, unusable, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
See exif: All rights reserved. XenonX3 (talk) 09:38, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep EXIF notice name matches (with variation) uploader user name, so from all indications photographer and uploader are the same, and they specifically authorized a free license on this photo of theirs, no matter what their default EXIF setting says. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:18, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Infrogmation. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:14, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
See exif: All rights reserved. XenonX3 (talk) 09:38, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:DJI 0165 Hl. Geist von oben © 2021 Ludger Büskens.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:15, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Not in use. Creator templates are meant for people who did create something like artwork or literature. Achim55 (talk) 10:10, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete per the nominator. BTW, you could have just had it speedy deleted. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:40, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:15, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by অদৃশ্য মানব (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:23, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by অদৃশ্য মানব (talk · contribs)
[edit]No permission, taken from various website
- File:President Md. Abdul Hamid revealing the cover of Upakhyan, written by Rasheq Rahman.jpg
- File:Reliable Commodities Exchange Co Chairman national cricketer Shakib Al Hasan with QRiUS Managing Director Kalpan S Hossain at QRiUS' Banani outlet.jpg
- File:Rasheq Rahman.jpg
- File:Prof. Dr. Mamun Al Mahtab in 2021.jpg
Afifa Afrin (talk) 17:24, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:16, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted poster, unsure if FOP applies 218.250.155.41 03:01, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete IMO the poster takes up to much of the image to qualify it as FOP. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:07, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
no permission copyrighted picture see metadata © Bart van Overbeeke, 2020 Hoyanova (talk) 14:48, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
no permission copyvio see metadata - Rien Boonstoppel Fotografie Copyright holder Copyright Rien Boonstoppel, 2019 Hoyanova (talk) 14:50, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Who is the author? Not smit1678 - see https://github.com/MissingMaps/missingmaps.github.io/commits/e32f57f7f8b1b9cc098823c770e3e3f3bd3b5a04/img/learn.png?browsing_rename_history=true&new_path=app/assets/graphics/meta/MissingMapsLogo-Solo.svg&original_branch=e32f57f7f8b1b9cc098823c770e3e3f3bd3b5a04 (they just renamed file - see https://github.com/MissingMaps/missingmaps.github.io/commits/e32f57f7f8b1b9cc098823c770e3e3f3bd3b5a04/app/assets/graphics/meta/MissingMapsLogo-Solo.svg stated as source).
Given CC license we must credit actual author.
Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 20:54, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Please, see the history of cloned repository (
git show e32f57f7f8b1b9cc098823c770e3e3f3bd3b5a04) whereMissingMapsLogo-Solo.svgis new file andimg/learn.pngis renamed toapp/assets/graphics/old/map_begin.png. - Moreover,
img/learn.pngis completely different fromMissingMapsLogo-Solo.svg(again, see the images in the historygit checkout e32f57f7f8b1b9cc098823c770e3e3f3bd3b5a04^), including the image type. - I have added the author with the best knowledge from the public (git) history.
- Side note is that I have no clue why GitHub does something like that. Qeef (talk) 21:28, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, you are right. Sorry for mess. Can I just undo deletion nomination? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 16:35, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Mateusz, you can by simply writing {{Withdraw}}. --Achim55 (talk) 19:09, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, you are right. Sorry for mess. Can I just undo deletion nomination? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 16:35, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination and sorry for a confusion Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:08, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:52, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Kürschner (talk) 06:36, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: {tl|PD-text}}. --Rosenzweig τ 13:00, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
WW2 Panther II image from the production line. Hardly possible that the uploader took this image back in the early 1940ies and uploaded to Commons in 2022. Additionally, we do not have sufficient info for keeping this image under some PD license. Mosbatho (talk) 15:45, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:55, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
WW2 Panther II image from the production. Hardly possible that the uploader took this image back in the early 1940ies and uploaded to Commons in 2022. Additionally, we do not have sufficient info for keeping this image under some PD license. Mosbatho (talk) 15:46, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:59, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
WW2 Panther II image from the production. Hardly possible that the uploader took this image back in the early 1940ies and uploaded to Commons in 2022. Additionally, we do not have sufficient info for keeping this image under some PD license. Mosbatho (talk) 15:46, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:59, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Luis Scola
[edit]Files are likely to come from a flickrwashing account. The credited author in the exif is "Brenda Staples Photography". See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Atone Movie Still 5 (12058602695).jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Britanny Kelly LPGA Futures Tour (6889832409).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Luis Scola by Brenda Staples Photography (cropped).jpg
- File:Luis Scola by Brenda Staples Photography.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
QTHCCAN (talk) 19:09, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Geo Swan, I just found this other case QTHCCAN (talk) 19:15, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- I'm the original uploader. I'm fine with deleting them. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:26, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Thanks QTHCCAN. I checked all the images from flickr contributor TownePost [4].
- The very first one, File:Jack's Donuts.jpg, first uploaded to flickr in 2013, uploaded here in 2015, and widely re-used, from here, seems to be copied from [5] I got a 403 from the actual URL, but google-cache has the original, with a higher resolution image than what TownePost provided. (version at archive.org)
- Second one, File:スナップを利かせる (9774004952).jpg, is also problematic, as the original caption explicitly credits another photographer, but without any link to the page where the original photographer released the image undere a CC license....
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 05:18, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Atone Movie Still 5 (12058602695).jpg. It seems at least half this flickr users uploads are flickr-washing. I think they belong on the problematic flickr user blacklist. Geo Swan (talk) 05:53, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
File:PaulGeorge.jpg is also credited to Brenda Staples Photography and should be deleted. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:26, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, I created a DR. Commons:Deletion_requests/File:PaulGeorge.jpg QTHCCAN (talk) 17:25, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted all per nomination and discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 16:31, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Cropped version of this image on this page with © Terathopius | Flickr.com Wouter (talk) 13:58, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Cropped version of this image on this page with © Terathopius | Flickr.com Wouter (talk) 14:00, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Logo of company Ckkumar (talk) 10:45, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep logos of companies are allowed to be hosted on Commons. So there's no reason to delete this, at least not due to the rational given by the nominator. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:38, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
original uploaders request Emirhandr (talk) 12:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Uploaded under irrevocable free license in 2019, far too long ago to be deleted by request with no reason; in use in 2 projects. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:02, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
original uploaders request Emirhandr (talk) 12:28, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cuilomerto
[edit]- File:Bronce 1.png
- File:Mujer sentada 1.png
- File:Mujer en rojo.png
- File:Guerra de Castas Palacio de Gobierno Mérida Yucatán.png - Keep as explained below Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:34, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- File:Popol Vuh, Oriente.png
- File:Mural 2 Palacio de Gobierno Mérida Yucatán.png - Keep Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:34, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- File:Mural 1 Palacio de Gobierno Mérida Yucatán.png - Keep Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:34, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- File:Maíz fragmento byn.png
- File:Suplicio Jacinto Canek 2.png - Keep Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:48, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- File:Poniente.png
- File:Norte, Sur y Centro.png
- File:Las Manos del Cortador.png
- File:Nachi Cocom.png
- File:La conquista.png
- File:La Lucha Eterna de México.png
- File:El Hombre en Marcha.png
- File:Traza-de-la-Ciudad.jpg
- File:Triunfo-de-la-República.jpg
- File:Guerra-de-Reforma.jpg
- File:Conin-en-la-Cañada.jpg
- File:Corregidora-de-Querétaro.jpg
- File:Colonialismo-Injusto.jpg
- File:Batalla-de-Sangremal.jpg
All files are copyrighted paintings by Fernando Castro Pacheco. --Renvoy (talk) 17:40, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Any mobile freestanding paintings would still be under copyright, but permanently installed murals in Mexico would be allowed under Mexico FOP. Many examples seem to be the latter, and OK. I have deleted the photo of a sculpture apparently in a gallery not a public place. Some of the murals "Palacio de Gobierno Mérida Yucatán" are permanently installed and may be kept. Likely others would be ok if situation/location were identified. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:34, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- Per description at es:w [6], I have deleted two more described as "caballete" (easel, ie freestanding canvas paintings). The others appear to be murals permanently installed in public buildings in Mexico, so Keep -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:41, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- Per description at es:w [6], I have deleted two more described as "caballete" (easel, ie freestanding canvas paintings). The others appear to be murals permanently installed in public buildings in Mexico, so
Kept: per infrogmation. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:TOO United Kingdom Sahaib (talk) 22:56, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep I highly doubt this is above the threshold of originality per BASIC or whatever the rule is that says images of basic shapes and colors can't be copyrighted. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:49, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: below even TOO UK imo. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Embedded photo is copyrighted by NATO. It is a crop of this photo: https://www.nato.int/structur/medialib/database/caption/t00457.htm NATO's content use policies only allow their photos to be used under fair use, therefore we cannot use them. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/68162.htm Thespoondragon (talk) 23:48, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Veverve as no license (No license since) ~ R.T.G 09:42, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- speedy keep, licensing information available here in archive or here directly. ~ R.T.G 09:43, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- @RTG: I have added the licence; I assumed it was the same as all other image at Category:Files from the Government of the Republic of Northern Macedonia Flickr stream. Veverve (talk) 09:49, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep COM:PDM is now accepted on Commons. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:46, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:24, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Logo. COM:TOO?
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:36, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: above TOO in my opinion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced photo looks like from a print source, original description "English: Jsjsjslcıöxıxmmdıdııs". Strongly doubt it is uploader's own work; no actual source info Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:26, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:05, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
no permission Hoyanova (talk) 13:19, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Exif metadata indicates image is copyrighted, uploader ((Killim)) is clarifying who owns copyright, request to delete until clarified. Killim (talk) 17:45, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Parece un hombre simpatico pero quién es? 191.125.13.130 01:38, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete I'm not sure if I agree with the nominators delete rational since I don't speak Spanish, but the image appears to be OSS and therefore should be deleted anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Qué significa OSS? Operations support system? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.126.135.19 (talk) 00:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 18:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
duplicate recording OtuNwachinemere (talk) 12:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- @OtuNwachinemere: What is the file it duplicates? - Jmabel ! talk 14:45, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 18:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
duplicate recording OtuNwachinemere (talk) 13:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- @OtuNwachinemere: What is the file it duplicates? - Jmabel ! talk 14:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 18:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
duplicate recording OtuNwachinemere (talk) 13:14, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- @OtuNwachinemere: What is the file it duplicates? - Jmabel ! talk 14:43, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 18:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
{VK}} most images on here aren't currently being used. There's a pretty good chance that this one will be at some point though. So I don't it's worth deleting. Especially given the fact that the creator gave Commons permission to host the image.
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 17:44, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MiguelAlanCS as Screenshot. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:22, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Photo of a copyrighted material. --Kadı Message 17:46, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Useless photo, the eyes see down, maybe it is an accidental shot, no article use this photo. --StomboyCarGeek (talk) 18:11, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 01:37, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
while interesting and novel, these two maps are also violations of GoogleMaps copyright. Please try again using a free source as the base map, for example OpenStreetMap
Enyavar (talk) 14:42, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:58, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be taken from https://www.andrericks.com/pages/experience Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:39, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Sent for deletion Mk00325 (talk) 20:35, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Not relevant Mk00325 (talk) 20:22, 18 July 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:55, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
{VK}} most images on here aren't currently being used. There's a pretty good chance that this one will be at some point though. So I don't it's worth deleting. Especially given the fact that the creator gave Commons permission to host the image.
kept. old TAV College SA logo, as seen in https://www.instagram.com/p/B2t-vLmgxz0/ .--RZuo (talk) 19:24, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
EXIF metadata is missing, probably another downloaded photo without free license, like File:Queens-Platinum-Jubilee-celebrations-Drone-Show.jpg from Reuters Timk70 (talk) 01:16, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Metadata removed by using <https://www.verexif.com/en/> before the upload to protect self-identifiable information. Amr vignesh (talk) 01:54, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Amr vignesh: Can you upload a version with full EXIF Metadata for our reference? --A1Cafel (talk) 06:29, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:46, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Philip Davis (01-09-2016).jpg
[edit]Credited as BIS Photo/Patrick Hanna, so not covered by Template:PD-USGov
- File:Robin Dunnigan & Philip Davis (01-09-2016).jpg
- File:Филип Дэвис (01-09-2016) (cropped).jpg
- File:Филип Дэвис (01-09-2016).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Joofjoof (talk) 03:55, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- This photo is a copyvio of a Bahamas Government photo (full press release). Joofjoof (talk) 10:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. BIS is Bahamas Information Services. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:32, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The Person in the Picture wants the File to be deleted. Jan Hafner (talk) 21:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
The Person in the Picture wants the File to be deleted. Jan Hafner (talk) 16:33, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Jan Hafner: courtesy deletions may be requested for unused files; this one is used in this Wikidata ithem. What replacement image do you suggest? Ankry (talk) 18:05, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- PS. if you are not the photographer, that you cannot license the image on-wiki and it may be copyright violation. Ankry (talk) 18:05, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Ankry, I got the task to upload the picture in 2018 and now to delete the picture. Jan Hafner (talk) 12:40, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The OP blanked d:Q96207580, removing the image and other claims. I have restored the item and warned the user. Bovlb (talk) 12:48, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The license is irrevocable and beyond the courtesy clawback period, downstream users may have already republished it and need the evidence of the license it was released under. A devious person may have the image and license deleted then threaten to sue downstream republishers. --RAN (talk) 14:22, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:38, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Laut Metadaten liegen die Urheberrechte bei © Lina Kaiser - kein ausreichender Hinweis, dass Hochlader berechtigt ist, das Foto untter eine CC-Lizenz zu stellen Lutheraner (talk) 15:26, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:53, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Photographs published on government websites of Bosnia and Herzegovina don't fall within PD-BH-exempt template. Smooth O (talk) 07:17, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I would need to not agree with you on this. Based on PD-BH Exempt it states “There is no copyright protection for: ideas, concepts, procedures, work methods, mathematical operations; official texts in the domain of legislation, administration and judiciary (laws, regulations, decisions, reports, minutes, judgments and alike); political speeches and speeches made at court hearings; daily news or miscellaneous information having the character of mere items of press information; folk literary and artistic creations.[2010 Article 8]” (emphasis is mine in bold). Since it has the character of a news article (I.e. press release) it would fall under this exemption IMO especially since right at the top of the page it’s say “News - Highlights” PotsdamLamb (talk) 08:41, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment In my opinion, this paragraph is related only for text in press information, and not for photographs. Better translation from original text should be: "daily news or miscellaneous information having the character of short news contained in a press release", but anyhow we will see other opinions and maybe raise issue on Commons:Village pump/Copyright. --Smooth O (talk) 09:20, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Smooth O It doesn't say text of. It says having the character mere items of a press. This was also not put on the board, so I will link to it right after I post this. PotsdamLamb (talk) 16:57, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:04, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bonjour. Cette photo recadrée comme le fichier original sont sous copyright. Je ne le savais pas au moment du dépôt. Menerbes (talk) 13:23, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:05, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Bonjour. Cette photo recadrée comme le fichier original sont sous copyright. Je ne le savais pas au moment du dépôt. Menerbes (talk) 13:24, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:05, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Image copied from the book mentioned in the description. What about the copyright? Who was the photographer? Wouter (talk) 13:45, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
The same applies for File:Mcoronatus.png, File:Cdurus.png, File:Philothamnus irregularis.png and File:Dasypeltis confusa.png.Wouter (talk) 14:11, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:06, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
je suis lecrivaine jouda darwish et je demande la suppression svp de cette ancienne photo de moi Huda darwish (talk) 14:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:08, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused text-only logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:20, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep most images on here aren't currently being used. There's a pretty good chance that this one will be at some point though. So I don't it's worth deleting. Especially given the fact that the creator gave Commons permission to host the image. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:55, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:08, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:DW, missing original author, source, date, and permission. No FOP of posters in Canada.
- File:Lisa Marie Young Missing sign - Nanaimo.png
- File:Lisa Marie Young Missing poster 5.png
- File:Lisa Marie Young Billboard - Nanoose Bay.png
- File:Lisa Marie Young Missing RCMP poster.png
- File:Lisa Marie Young Missing poster 4.png
- File:Lisa Marie Young Missing poster 2.png
- File:Lisa Marie Young Missing poster 3.png
- File:Lisa Marie Young Missing poster 1.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:37, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- With the exception of the poster from the RCMP, these posters (related to, and for potential inclusion in, Wikipedia: Disappearance of Lisa Marie Young) were made by various unknown locals and the victim's family members, with thousands of copies then distributed in public areas, and I understand them to fall under the definition of public domain as they were never subject to copyright. Furthermore I am 100% sure that nobody who cared enough to produce these posters will be requesting removal since they were (obviously) intended to be distributed to as wide an audience as possible. ArielMais (talk) 13:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- That is not how copyright works. A wide distribution of an image doesn't remove the rights or makes it PD. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete all. Except for File:Lisa Marie Young Missing RCMP poster.png since it appears to have been published by the Canadian government. BTW, I don't think FOP would even work if Canada had it since most of these aren't permanent. Nor public art. That said, they aren't PD anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:33, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Adamant1: I'm not sure being published by the Canadian government is relevant so long a it remains a derivative work of the photograph. GMGtalk 15:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- True. I was thinking maybe the rest of the poster would push it over into being an original work, but your probably right that it's still a derivative. But, if you got rid of the image would it drastically change the poster? Not really. So you claim it's de minimis, but it's not like there's a bright line there though and I don't really care enough about it to argue her picture doesn't really matter to the composition of larger poster. So whatever. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:47, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Adamant1: I'm not sure being published by the Canadian government is relevant so long a it remains a derivative work of the photograph. GMGtalk 15:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:09, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover and non-free picture https://www.alamy.com/captured-german-despairs-image7116619.html?irclickid=U51wPAVPqxyIWbqWnxRHNSLaUkDztu1NnzycyU0&irgwc=1 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:44, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:09, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Personality rights of the depicted persons according to Austrian law. The uploader has not made any edits since 2019 so it seems useless to ask him to provide their consent. 217.239.0.38 18:21, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no evidence that personality rights are in question. --Krd 16:10, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Matlin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: "ktoś" (pol. someone) in author in file desc. 2009 upload, converting to DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:39, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:09, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Not a work by Tasnim HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:47, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:10, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Extremely bad image quality. Wrong exposure, Photo background too light. No description. Nemracc (talk) 20:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete but extremely weakly. A lot of images of Brazil are of questionable quality and I don't think they are worth deleting because of it, but this one is exceptionally bad. Some could argue the image should be kept because the lower quality just comes with the turf though. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:43, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep low quality is not criteria for deletion, period.
- Adamant1, I did not get your point, why endorse this deletion?
- "Extremely bad image quality. Wrong exposure, Photo background too light" - nothing in this sentence is correct, nothing.
- And this is a 2013 photo, for educational purposes, we do not delete photos just because the technology was not quite as good as today.
- Sturm, I think this is the Prédio São Francisco, can you please search for it and confirm?
- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 08:54, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- We do not delete photos just because the technology was not quite as good as today. I can't speak for the nominator but I could really care less what camera the photograph was taken with. I don't think it's with the projects scope to host images that can serve an educational purpose to host every photograph taken by every amateur photographer in the history of the medium. In this case the top half of the image is extremely degraded by the sun. Including the building, which is obviously washed out. So it doesn't really serve a useful purpose. For instance, no one is going to use it in a slide show and I doubt it will ever be used on any other Wikimedia project. Of course you can disagree. BTW, maybe a cropped version would work. I don't have the time to find out, but if you want the image kept cropping it might deal with the other problems. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:31, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Adamant1,
- We can have a register of time if we allow more photos of more people, I do not have photos of this building, i.e.
- And we do not know about the future, for example:Category:Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida by luck we had a lot of "amateur" photographers taking pictures of the building before its collapse, otherwise we could not have photos of it here.
- Yes, it could be in a slide, if this is the only free photo.
- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 06:06, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- for example:Category:Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida by luck we had a lot of "amateur" photographers taking pictures of the building before its collapse. Sure but we know what that building is and none of those images are washed out. So it's not a relevant comparison. Same goes for the comment that it could be used in a slide. There's zero reason it would be used in a slide when it's just a random building and there's much better images of Category:Buildings in São Paulo (state) in the meantime. No one is going to go with this image over the hundreds, if not thousands, of vastly superior and locatable images in that category. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:29, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep it identifies a specific building. comparing to google maps, it might even be the courtyard side.
- the colours of the photo also reminds me of old, unmaintained commie blocks with bare cement surfaces in china. RZuo (talk) 18:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 16:11, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Dummy was made in the 1900s but this is clearly a modern photograph of it. Copyright belongs to the website that took the photo. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:25, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- https://ventriloquistcentralblog.com/william-wood-worlds-greatest-ventriloquist-circa-1900-1910/ Xdude gamer (talk) 18:01, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Xdude gamer: If that link is intended as proof that the image has been freely licenced, a statement of "You may use this blog article provided you run it with the bio box intact" on that page doesn't meet Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses. --Lord Belbury (talk) 18:39, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Makes sense. My bad. Xdude gamer (talk) 13:22, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Xdude gamer: If that link is intended as proof that the image has been freely licenced, a statement of "You may use this blog article provided you run it with the bio box intact" on that page doesn't meet Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses. --Lord Belbury (talk) 18:39, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:54, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
The user of the this file author just wants some users to help upload new file and refresh the File:Coat of arms of Malacca.svg and delete this file. see at the archive help desk here.---Guest278 (talk) 14:04, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no need for deletions, various redirects have been made. The file is currently in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 09:49, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
