Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/06/12
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
File:EyJidWNrZXQiOiJhcnRsYW5kLXVwbG9hZHMiLCJrZXkiOiJnYWxsZXJpZXMvY2s4aDM2MnBhNmdjbTA3ODJpOGRtZTg3My9zaG93cy9ja25pbXAwZ2wwMDA0MmUwZ2Z4c3plaDV3L2ltYWdlLTRhNTIxNjZiLTY3ZWEtNDVjNi1hY2UzLTQxNGE3NjUxNjQ4ZC5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJqcGVnIjp7InF1YWxpdHk.webp
[edit]copyright violation, lacking description Xocolatl (talk) 20:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio[1]. --Túrelio (talk) 07:06, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
© 2019 Jean Plattner - All rights reserved 191.126.153.157 01:22, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:VRT from Jean Plattner apparently needed. --Strakhov (talk) 08:09, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This photo looks like it has been taken from a screen, a tv or website. So the photo might be taken by the uploader, but the screen was not made by him/her. JopkeB (talk) 02:23, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP, unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 08:12, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, not reusable JopkeB (talk) 03:03, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 08:13, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
YuiOpyuI’m go 2001:8F8:1473:3780:B486:2AC6:17FE:7D5 06:57, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Please elaborate. --Achim55 (talk) 17:38, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep Nonsense nomination. Tm (talk) 19:43, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Makes no sense. --John B123 (talk) 22:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Not a serious nomination. // Liftarn (talk) 07:06, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 08:14, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Not free. Screenshot from a Tv show Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 09:48, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 08:15, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, https://blackcab.bandcamp.com/album/rotslers-rules, COM:VRT needed from copyright owner. --Strakhov (talk) 08:17, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Author is Cen Long, copyrighted shizhao (talk) 11:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:VRT permission needed from artist. --Strakhov (talk) 08:19, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Fictional map for the future. The election will be November 8, 2022 Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 11:53, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, fantasy map, out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 08:18, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Fictional map for the future. The election will be November 8, 2022 Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 11:54, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, fantasy map, out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 08:18, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 11:54, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, fantasy map. --Strakhov (talk) 08:17, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 11:55, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, fantasy map, out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 08:19, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Brines, Gallego y Marrodán en la inauguración del curso 2007-2008 con nuevo Logo del ATENEO.jpg
[edit]Gente conocida? 191.126.153.157 12:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. By the way, yes: es:Francisco Brines, es:María José Marrodán Gironés,. --Strakhov (talk) 08:21, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
The watermark gives "copyright andreu guiuc". Is this person the same as the user? No metadata. Wouter (talk) 14:17, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 08:30, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: advertising, the image as well as the description JopkeB (talk) 14:55, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope advertising. --Strakhov (talk) 08:31, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Absolute nonsense Dronebogus (talk) 19:48, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope map. --Strakhov (talk) 08:36, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Claimed license not seen at source Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:35, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 08:37, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CHANDRAKALA BACHHAR (talk · contribs)
[edit]SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
JopkeB (talk) 02:16, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:25, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mehrshadkooeinezhad (talk · contribs)
[edit]SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
JopkeB (talk) 03:10, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:25, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cristina Alicia Vargas Vásquez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, personal photos by non-contributors
- File:Estudio croma.jpg
- File:Perro husky bebé.jpg
- File:Moda casual de verano.jpg
- File:Energía en las pirámides de Teotihuacán.jpg
- File:Xochimilco montañoso.jpg
- File:Perrito sabe que poseo cámara en mis manos.jpg
- File:Lo mejor de una foto al aire libre.jpg
- File:Mi cámara en las piedras de la montaña.jpg
- File:Peludos mis acompañantes en el bosque.jpg
JopkeB (talk) 03:21, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:25, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:RepScan
[edit]Out of scope logos and images, not used on any pages
- File:Fundadores de RepScan Nota de Prensa Lanzamiento Mundial.jpg
- File:Logo RepScan BN.svg
- File:RepScan fundadores Nota de Prensa Lanzamiento Mundial.jpg
- File:RepScan Simbolo BN.svg
- File:RepScan Simbolo color.svg
- File:Team-web-nosotros-1024x683.jpg
Yeeno (talk) 04:46, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:25, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fotoreklama (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope images, not used on any project. Likely from a shopping website.
- File:Fotoreklama.lt užsakymas.png
- File:Fotoreklama.lt medžiaga.png
- File:Fotoreklama.lt porėmiai.jpg
- File:Fotoreklama.lt dažai.jpg
Yeeno (talk) 04:50, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:26, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Icantpaymybills (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope images of invoices and stock lists
- File:Topboss Plastic 34 IMG 9287.jpg
- File:Topboss Plastic 34 IMG 9286.jpg
- File:Topboss Plastic 34 IMG 9252.jpg
- File:Topboss Plastic 34 IMG 9227.jpg
- File:Topboss Plastic 34 IMG 9226.jpg
- File:Topboss Plastic 34 IMG 9225.jpg
- File:Topboss Plastic 34 IMG 9224.jpg
- File:Topboss Plastic 34 IMG 9223.jpg
- File:Topboss Plastic 34 IMG 9222.jpg
- File:Topboss Plastic 34 IMG 9219.jpg
- File:Topboss Plastic 34 IMG 9220.jpg
- File:Topboss Plastic 34 IMG 9218.jpg
- File:Topboss Plastic 34 IMG 9216.jpg
- File:Topboss Plastic 34 IMG 9217.jpg
- File:Topboss Plastic 34 IMG 9144.jpg
- File:Topboss Plastic 34 IMG 9145.jpg
- File:Topboss Plastic 34 IMG 9215.jpg
Yeeno (talk) 05:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:26, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope screenshots of emails and project plans
- File:Table plan.png
- File:Hmmdklndkfnlr;p-.png
- File:Gmail Image.png
- File:Gmail - Thanks for the great service!.png
- File:Email 8.png
- File:Email 4.png
- File:Email 3.png
- File:Email 2.png
- File:Email 1.png
Yeeno (talk) 05:04, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:26, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by اشکان حسینی (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope images, not used on any pages
Yeeno (talk) 06:42, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:27, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: promotional/personal pictures.
Lymantria (talk) 09:42, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:27, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lino Uruñuela (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: personal/promotional pictures.
- File:Lino Uruñuela en el Products Expert Google.jpg
- File:Lino Uruñuela in 2007.png
- File:LinoUruñuela-sob.png
- File:Mokoamargo.gif
Lymantria (talk) 09:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:28, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Contributors ko.png
- File:This is not an article.png
- File:(*^^)v.jpg
- File:ドット ハート.png
- File:六角アイコン 桃.png
- File:六角アイコン 紫.png
- File:六角アイコン 水.png
- File:六角アイコン 青.png
- File:六角アイコン 緑.png
- File:六角アイコン 橙.png
- File:六角アイコン 赤.png
- File:六角アイコン 黄.png
- File:Konbo Ren icon HEX'A'GONE.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry. We apologize for the inconvenience, but we ask that it be removed. Konbo Ren (talk) 07:40, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 20:06, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Patty poo
[edit]- File:NsKO9aT.png
- File:VrYK4YZ.png
- File:ZW1Fr2b.png
- File:YB6ys6B.png
- File:EF1xrji.png
- File:New Mexico Presidential Election Results 2020.png
- File:New Jersey Presidential Election Results 2020.png
- File:S586ULO.png
- File:Xsea5SN.png
- File:Nebraska Presidential Election Results 2020.png
- File:OHUhQA9.png
- File:Missouri Presidential Election Results 2020.png
- File:0RBQ28S.png
- File:Gsukikq.png
- File:Ds2gQVD.png
- File:Massachusetts Presidential Election Results 2020.png
- File:TL8NT0u.png
- File:RFmjiHe.png
- File:Louisiana Presidential Election Results 2020.png
- File:2020 election in Kentucky.png
- File:IUMpKuJ.png
- File:Zkjf6Py.png
- File:Indiana Presidential Election Results 2020.png
- File:Illinois Presidential Election Results 2020.png
- File:Idaho Presidential Election Results 2020.png
- File:Hawaii Presidential Election Results 2020.png
- File:Georgia Presidential Election Results 2020.png
- File:Florida Presidential Election Results 2020.png
- File:Colorado Presidential Election Results 2020.png
- File:2020 election in California.png
- File:2020 election in Arkansas.png
- File:2020 election in Arizona.png
- File:2020 election in Alabama.png
- File:Delaware Presidential Election Results 2020.png
- File:Connecticut Presidential Election Results but Biden improves by 15% 2020.png
- File:Connecticut Presidential Election Results 2020.svg (1).png
- File:Connecticut Presidential Election Results 2020.svg(2).png
Files by User:Patty poo. Faked maps with slightly changed results blended in with real data. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. In my opinion fake election maps are just inviting embarrassing mistakes by unsuspecting users. Examples:
--Jahobr (talk) 17:32, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 20:08, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
out of scope, only text Ezarateesteban 22:51, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:30, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Ainara Rorolan
[edit]- File:Navarra por Santa Maria.jpg
- File:Actuaciones de las Secciones Femeninas.png
- File:Escudo de Muthiko Alaiak.jpg
- File:Himno del muthiko.jpg
- File:Grupo de requetés de Olite, Beire y San Martín de Unx en Tolosa, el 15 de agosto de 1936, horas después de la entrada de la Columna Tutor en la localidad..jpg
- File:Mujeres carlistas en la Plaza del Casti-llo en Pamplona. Después fueron a repartir tabaco entre los combatientes heridos.jpg
- File:Un grupo de niños de Leiza alrededor de la lápida del requeté Joaquín Muruzábal..jpg
- File:Margaritas' de Navarra, en 1939, en el monumento del Cerro de los Ángeles de Getafe, volado por los republicanos..jpg
- File:Requetés del Tercio Lácar y 'margaritas' enfermeras bailando la jota navarra en Alcora (Valencia) en 1938..jpg
- File:Romerias Navarras Balztena.jpg
- File:La casa Baleztena.jpg
- File:Museo Histórico de Pamplona. Temas Españoles.jpg
- File:Cancionero Popular Carlista.jpg
- File:Detalle familia Arraiza 1.jpg
- File:Gerra librua.jpg
- File:Casa Baleztena (Iruñea, Paza del Castillo).jpg
- File:Dolores Baleztena Ascárate.jpg
- File:Dolores Baleztena.jpg
Old photos and documents most from about 1940, caimed to be "own work" and "Creative Commons". I doubt that. They are not old enough to be PD-old. Ether authors, dates and licences are provided correctly or we should delete them. --Jahobr (talk) 16:10, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:21, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elkady2210 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo for non-wikipedian: Out of scope
--Alaa :)..! 20:48, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:54, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
I created it accidently. I meant to overwrite the original. User-duck (talk) 01:16, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- @User-duck: I have reverted your overwriting in the original. IMHO it does not comply with COM:OVERWRITE. Strakhov (talk) 08:07, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Strakhov: IMHO this is a "minor" crop to enlarge the relative size of the entrance. The greenery to the sides and the paved foreground do not add to the content of the image. The article I was editing used this picture in a goouping of several other entrances. These entrances were a larger portion in their pictures. Cropping this one made it more similar to the others and IMHO improved the article layout. You reverted the crop I had intended for the original because "it does not comply with COM:OVERWRITE", no specific reason, I assume because you feel this is a "radical" crop. If that is the case then this version should be retained. I requested the deletion because this would have been a duplicate image. User-duck (talk) 11:37, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Comment @User-duck: Maybe not radical but certainly not minor (IMHO): When cropping 29 % horizontally, 23 % vertically (~46 % of the total area) of a photograph, the upload should generally not overwrite the original, unless you were the original uploader (you aren't). Regards. Strakhov (talk) 13:15, 20 June 2022 (UTC)- Comment @Strakhov: COM:OVERWRITE is a typical guideline, to vague to be really useful. This sentence fragment better explains my opinion: "and similar things where the essential composition is not altered." Deletion of the cropped image is warranted if it is essentially the same as the original. Since in your opinion it is not, it should not be deleted. Maybe this is not clear, I am arguing for the retention of the cropped image, I have no objection to the reversion of the original. I was explaining why I overwrote it. User-duck (talk) 13:55, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. @User-duck: : feel free to use this cropping instead of the original photograph in Wikipedia and so on. --Strakhov (talk) 13:58, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hans Kristiansen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Media about fictional micronation
Enyavar (talk) 01:37, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:42, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rakshan rakshan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope flag of non-notable organization
Yeeno (talk) 04:56, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:44, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Historical photos and maps. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Али-Хаджи.png
- File:Карта 1848.png
- File:"интерьер.jpg".png
- File:"мавзолей.jpg".png
- File:"надгробие.jpg".png
- File:Каба-Дарго.jpg
- File:Дарго.jpg
- File:Сюрга.jpg
- File:Даргинцы.jpg
- File:Даргинцы из Губдена.jpg
- File:Муртузали Бутринский.jpg
- File:Орден Шамиля.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:46, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:47, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by נועה עברון (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:העיר או הגדרת האורבניות.pdf
- File:הרצאה נקיה הגדרת האורבניזם pdf.pdf
- File:Planing.pdf
- File:HaIr Urban Definitions.pdf
- File:"העיר", והגדרת האורבניות הבעיה המרכזית של התכנון.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:47, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jelican9 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted Jelican9 (talk) 21:39, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:39, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- And also File:Shy'm Live.jpg
Likely Flickrwashed, comes from a fan Flickr page Adeletron 3030 (talk) 22:06, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- DELETE per the nomination, this image is actually copyrighted; the source being listed as Bestimage, who are a photo agency. The photographer is Christophe Aubert. The image is published in magazines and online, bearing a clear (C) mark and the name of both the agency and photographer, as seen on this page: https://www.purepeople.com/media/shy-m-confie-ses-joies-et-ses-peines-de_m6444793. DaneGeld (talk) 08:56, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:35, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Alois Irlmaier died 1959. The picture can't be taken in 2021. What about the author and the source? Xocolatl (talk) 22:39, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Xocolatl:
- The date (16 October 2021), it is the date I posted the picture on Wikimedia Commons. This picture has been copied from a German web site named PNP (see watermark on the right hand corner of the picture) from the following article (no date given for the photo) :
- (please scroll down)
- Alois Irlmaier is very well known by Germans, Austrians and Swiss people. His photos are to be found everywhere : books, newspapers, web articles as well as in Youtube videos. Three instances :
- Regards,
Deleted: copyvio; @Finis1 see COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 18:34, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, it seems these five files are based on GoogleEarth Screenshots which makes them CopyVios; compare GoogleMaps.
- File:Neighborhoods of Xico.jpg
- File:Xico II map.jpg
- File:Xico map.jpg
- File:Desembocadura Arroyo Artículo 123.jpg
- File:Territorial limit of Xico Leyva.jpg
Enyavar (talk) 23:08, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images or small crops from an unknown source, missing essential source info.
- File:Ney González Sánchez (IB).jpg
- File:Antonio Echevarría Domínguez (IB).jpg
- File:Roberto Sandoval Castañeda (IB).jpg
- File:Miguel Ángel Navarro Quintero, (IB).jpg
- File:Antonio Echevarría García (IB).jpg
- File:Edgar Veytia Cambero (ID).jpg
- File:Miguel Ángel Navarro Quintero, desfile 16-09-22.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Not own works as stated:, screenshots missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. (Many more uploads by this user look suspicious...)
- File:Casa de Gobierno del Nayar.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Rosamorada.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Del Nayar.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Jala.jpg
- File:Presidencia Municipal de Ixtlán del Río.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Xalisco.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de San Blas.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Ruiz.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de San Pedro Lagunillas.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de La Yesca.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Santa María del Oro.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Valle de Banderas.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Tuxpan.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Tecuala.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Tepic.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal de Santiago Ixcuintla.jpg
- File:Embotelladora Coca-Cola del Nayar.jpg
- File:Embajada mexicana en Ucrania.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
no educational value, pictures of kids, unnecessary for documenting the place Scann (talk) 23:23, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo/F10. --Wdwd (talk) 18:17, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Very poor quality, not used, no useful category, out of scope. Yann (talk) 13:30, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 11:35, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Saya mengunggahnya secara tidak sengaja Myturtlejustmine (talk) 23:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused file, recently uploaded, deleted by uploader's request. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
From facebook page; unsupported license claim Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:03, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:17, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Unverifiable through RS, most likely a hoax (given the user history), and therefore COM:OOS. The user has posted the image in several wikipedias to "prove" it's authenticity. Nacaru (talk) 00:12, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: This might be all the case. However, as this image is still in use at vi:Oranjestad, Sint Eustatius it is still considered to be within COM:SCOPE and thereby to be kept. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:12, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
No evidence that this is real. No sign on the government website or local history society that it's real, and the uploader has created 7 articles which have all been deleted as hoaxes. Blythwood (talk) 00:30, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Delete I agree, the user has been adding fictitious/hoax content to other wikipedias (most of which has already been removed), so I believe the rationale for keeping it that the admin raised in the last deletion request would not apply here as the users' actions could be interpreted as a case of meta:Do not disrupt projects to make a point. Nacaru (talk) 08:47, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope flag created as a hoax. Flagvisioner (talk) (contribs)
02:59, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope flag created as a hoax. Flagvisioner (talk) (contribs)
- Delete as a hoax. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_NICOLAS_CHIAPPARA_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_with_Crimea.png){kind=link}
![110 File:"+arya+" desa Ujungberung Majalengka 2021.jpg](#File:"+arya+"_desa_Ujungberung_Majalengka_2021.jpg){kind=link}
![142 File:"Inferno".jpg](#File:"Inferno".jpg){kind=link}
![143 File:" صورة الرسالة التي بعثها عبد السلام الوزاني الى الحاكم الفرنسي ".jpg](#File:"_صورة_الرسالة_التي_بعثها_عبد_السلام_الوزاني_الى_الحاكم_الفرنسي_".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![161 File:"უნიონის" ხელმძღვანელები 1926.jpg](#File:"უნიონის"_ხელმძღვანელები_1926.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_©_Maurice_Maillard.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
v.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_en_1938..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_NICOLAS_CHIAPPARA_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_NICOLAS_CHIAPPARA_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:36, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rob bottom (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a amateur porn site / private photo bucket
//LevandeMänniska (talk), 00:16, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and there are also serious concerns in regard to COM:PEOPLE. We do not know whether the depicted person consented to this. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Commons is not an amateur porn site. //LevandeMänniska (talk), 00:25, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: As nominated and as there are serious concerns in regard to consent in the context of COM:PEOPLE. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:18, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Domino's pizza world map.PNG. Heraldrist (talk) 01:57, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Domino's pizza world map.PNG. Heraldrist (talk) 01:58, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Various film stills and promo shots of Italian actor Ciccio Ingrassia, with sources like "immagine google". All presumably copyrighted.
- File:Renatocestie.jpg
- File:Laviadelcibo.jpg
- File:Viaggiodamore.jpg
- File:Giovaniebelli96.jpg
- File:Effettidunsognointerrotto.jpg
- File:Cicciopremiato.jpg
- File:Franco franchi pubblicità.jpg
- File:Ciccio ingrassia teatro.jpg
- File:Ciccio ingrassia 1985.jpg
- File:Teatro.it-giampiero-ingrassia-intervista.jpg
- File:Screenshot 20220612-132351 Facebook.jpg
- File:Ciccio-ingrassia-1024x640.jpg
- File:Ciccio Ingrassia 1996.jpg
Lord Belbury (talk) 15:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:41, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Further stills from Italian films and actor promo shots, uploaded as own work.
- File:Nino terzo.jpg
- File:Totonno-Chiappetta.jpg
- File:Il-flauto-totonno-chiappetta-in-una-scena.jpg
- File:DeRossi chiappetta.jpg
- File:L'Esorciccio.jpg
- File:Elioveltri.jpg
- File:Tiberio.jpg
- File:Voncenzoandronico 1998.jpg
- File:Mondaini franchi ingrassia.jpg
- File:Lisi franchi ingrassia.jpg
- File:Ciccio raimondo franco.jpg
- File:Schiaffino ingrassia franchi.jpg
- File:Ciccio ingrassia 1975.jpg
- File:Ciccioingrassia.jpg
- File:Franco franchi 1990.jpg
- File:Marco giallino.jpg
- File:Terapia-roosevelt.jpg
- File:Giampiero Ingrassia-2.jpg
- File:Ciccio e giampiero.jpg
- File:Giampiero Ingrassia.jpg
- File:Ok il prezzo è giusto.jpg
- File:L'ingorgo.jpg
- File:Ingrassia santuccio.jpg
- File:Canzonissima7172.jpg
- File:Canzonissima71.jpg
- File:Lavolpe di luigicomencini.jpg
- File:Ciccio-ingrassia-da-piccolo.jpg
- File:Ciccio e rosaria.jpg
- File:Ilgamberetto rairadio.png
- File:Ilgamberetto radio.jpg
- File:Massimo-giletti-rai.jpg
- File:Francoeciccio anni80.jpg
- File:Paoloilfreddo.jpg
- File:Boheme1987.png
Lord Belbury (talk) 19:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
copyvio from https://www.hit.com.au/story/abbie-to-host-hot-nights-with-abbie-chatfield-across-the-hit-network-191013 61.69.240.15 12:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, see https://www.justjaredjr.com/2022/01/04/alli-simpson-reveals-major-injury-from-new-years-eve/ 61.69.240.15 12:09, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Commons is not your web host Dronebogus (talk) 19:22, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 19:17, 1 July 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Holbenilord --Krdbot 01:09, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
This ZEN 3 logo and three related files are above TOO. The ZEN 3 text is not protected (even with the stylish E). The brush stroke is not a simple shape, so I believe it has minimal protection. We are not allowed to copy this precise brush stroke.
- File:Zen-3-logo.jpg (Also under speedy delete)
- File:Zen3-logo-transprent-2020-inverted.png
- File:Zen3-logo-transparent-2020-inverted.svg
Glrx (talk) 16:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete @Glrx: Thanks, I already had declared that it has to be reuploaded to en.wiki under fair use, see Commons:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop. I already had informed the user@Wikiinger: , that the picture will be deleted on commons. @Glrx: Feel free to ping me again in 7days that I finally delete it. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 01:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:AMD Retail Box Ryzen 3600.jpg Glrx (talk) 03:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Carnby: Please move File:Zen3-logo-transparent-2020-inverted.svg to en:File:Zen3-logo-transparent-2020-inverted.svg under fair use and embedd it on en:Zen_3, otherwise the file will be lost. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:04, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- @JoKalliauer:
Done--Carnby (talk) 07:07, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- @JoKalliauer:
Deleted: per nomination, above COM:TOO. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 10:48, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Skocznia_narciarska_Agrykola_1956.jpg Panek (talk) 13:16, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Masur (talk) 06:48, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
per COM:PENIS and possibly COM:OOS. Commons already have a wide coverage of the topic.
- File:Fashion trend , wearing your Willy on the outside.jpg
- File:Willy outdoors.jpg
- File:Life modelling for art class.jpg
- File:Summer time lol.jpg
- File:Nude freedom.JPG
- File:Nudist in the supermarket.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:43, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. AshFriday (talk) 00:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:PORN, images have no educational value
Yeeno (talk) 22:13, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- File:Nude beach pic.jpg
- File:Normalising nudity.jpg
- File:Classic example of a penis frenulum and penis head.jpg
//LevandeMänniska (talk), 00:30, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete Commons isn't a porn host and these clearly don't serve any education purpose. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:13, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:55, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Immature exhibitionistic nonsense
- File:Willy out at ice cream Van.jpg
- File:Example of the human willy.jpg
- File:Nude beach pic.jpg
- File:Normalising nudity.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 13:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete per the nominator. Commons isn't a porn host. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:55, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:56, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
COM:NUDE and no educational value
LevandeMänniska (talk), 06:48, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete; one is COM:INUSE but doesn’t need to be because I don’t know how a naked man in a telephone booth taken by an exhibitionistic man child tells anyone anything about Cap d'Agde Dronebogus (talk) 11:27, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete exactly i was going to talk about it it's weird i just waited to translate it to make sure i hope someone know this language would be able to make a case and put it on administrators notice board i think this user act on bad faith 197.54.17.205 12:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:47, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Fake, useless and also offensively imperialistic Dronebogus (talk) 19:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Looks like it was taken from another website: https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZisF-_1enG_1nDWfKhATrOKgi8E2Eif15pZ1YUDOZeE4UEORcbVoJsPyoxd-T0ge5XDLnuBZK4xQkSuUW3BDaWygC9Acwbp_1Z6KPiu6A_1vi2Muup7j0ZQxwC5gWCFkSDjhkBqpbhLL8s43rKw7cFTdO4d728Ocwg https://www.dailylocal.com/2022/02/26/ciarrocchi-takes-aim-at-houlahans-seat/ Putitonamap98 (talk) 19:52, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Fitindia at 10:12, 6 July 2022 UTC: No permission since 28 June 2022 --Krdbot 13:21, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Namu wiki website copyright infringement, namu wiki has a different license. source: https://namu.wiki/jump/XMN7jtf2Sl5QzQLE7f2t8lZgfGonnUaJcYrJI7oh6ch%2F2px%2Fhxm%2FyocdART2Vi1yTDdbfo9m60wrrsbPU%2Bw4jeJ8Unz8xkt%2BaENZSfXSjWqNkzFwfL1Z0GiQHHimuSHH Goondae (talk) 11:19, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 16:09, 14 July 2022 UTC: No permission since 6 July 2022 --Krdbot 19:03, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Speedy U1 Pascal666 (talk) 19:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close, was already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:03, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Speedy U1 Pascal666 (talk) 19:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Pascal666: Tag the page with {{SD|U1}} instead and it will be speedily deleted.Jonteemil (talk) 16:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close, was already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:04, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
What even is this Dronebogus (talk) 19:25, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: It's the logo of en:Vagos Motorcycle Club superimposed over a map of the United States. That logo is used in English Wikipedia as a non-free fair use image, so it's not acceptable on Commons. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
No obvious use Dronebogus (talk) 19:25, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The logo of a motorcycle club superimposed over a map of the US. Probably non-free. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:10, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Not notable Dronebogus (talk) 19:30, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:16, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Not notable Dronebogus (talk) 19:31, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Not notable Dronebogus (talk) 19:32, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Personal project, oos Dronebogus (talk) 19:32, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Old version of file, new version uploaded here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coat_of_arms_of_Rolando_Octavus_Joven_Tria_Tirona_as_Bishop_of_Malolos.svg GiovanniYosh12 (talk) 14:32, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 11:42, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
What is this and how is it useful Dronebogus (talk) 19:43, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - See also Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Republic_of_Semih_Flag.jpg - Best regards --Enyavar (talk) 14:18, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: aleady deleted by George Chernilevsky. --Rosenzweig τ 11:47, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This is a professional photograph, my guess is that the (professional) photographer will not have this photo on Commons. This photo is also on http://active-food.be/en/gallery and https://www.irna.ir/news/82775291/%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%83%DB%8C%D8%AF-%D9%88%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%AA-%D9%83%D8%B4%D8%A7%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%B2%DB%8C-%D8%A8%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%AF-%D8%A8%D9%88%D8%AF%D9%86-%D8%A2%D8%B1%D8%AF-%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%88%D8%A7%DB%8C%DB%8C-%D9%87%D8%A7 (and many other sites). I do not see a VRT ticket. JopkeB (talk) 15:24, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 13:26, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Commons is not an amateur porn site Dronebogus (talk) 20:19, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- How do I delete it! ZAK2021 (talk) 20:40, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Tell an admin Dronebogus (talk) 20:52, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- I don't know how ZAK2021 (talk) 21:01, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Tell an admin Dronebogus (talk) 20:52, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:12, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Error in upload ZAK2021 (talk) 21:04, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:12, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
The source website says the article was republished under a CC license; original source is [2]. There it says at [3] that they use the CC-BY-ND-4.0 license, plus you have to confirm if you're permitted to re-use any images. Both are not compatible with the requirements of Commons, so this file should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 00:29, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. The logo is not made from simple geometrical figures. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep It seems like a simple logo to me. That said, I can see where other people might disagree and think it should be deleted though, but the only "complex" element is that the leaf is chopped up. Which I don't think is enough to say PD-Shape wouldn't apply. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:18, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:03, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Australia. In this image, Australian banknotes are too prominent, so this image cannot be applied de minimis. Ox1997cow (talk) 13:53, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep I'm not sure how the banknotes are to prominent when you can't even see the designs or even tell that they are Australian banknotes just by looking at the image. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:21, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Adamant. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:04, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
COM:FANART of the videogame Among Us. Lord Belbury (talk) 15:26, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, actual image comes from here, which in turn is a transparent version of this image, which in turn is an edited version of this comic by Stonetoss. reppoptalk 02:16, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Eaaaaugh (talk) 17:41, 24 August 2022 (UTC) Same as above.
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:05, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
what do others think, can it be qualified as trivial enough? The picture on the top confuses me rubin16 (talk) 18:30, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Weak delete Although the logo looks simple, considering Germany's view of the threshold of originality COM:TOO Germany, I think it might be wise to err towards deleting the picture. Aimarekin (talk) 22:55, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete I doubt the top part is below the threshold of originality. Especially in Germany. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:29, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:06, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
unencyclopedic Canton Viaduct (talk) 19:16, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
unencyclopedic Canton Viaduct (talk) 19:16, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
unencyclopedic Canton Viaduct (talk) 19:16, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
unencyclopedic Canton Viaduct (talk) 19:17, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
unencyclopedic Canton Viaduct (talk) 19:17, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
unencyclopedic Canton Viaduct (talk) 19:17, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
unencyclopedic Canton Viaduct (talk) 19:18, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
unencyclopedic Canton Viaduct (talk) 19:18, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
unencyclopedic Canton Viaduct (talk) 19:18, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
unencyclopedic Canton Viaduct (talk) 19:19, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
unencyclopedic Canton Viaduct (talk) 19:19, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
unencyclopedic Canton Viaduct (talk) 19:19, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
unencyclopedic Canton Viaduct (talk) 19:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be someone’s doodle of an imaginary state, OOS Dronebogus (talk) 19:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:09, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
unencyclopedic Canton Viaduct (talk) 19:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
unencyclopedic Canton Viaduct (talk) 19:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Wikimedia Commons isn't exclusively a repository for Wikipedia. I presume you mean that this file is "Out of Scope" (More specifically not being educationally useful) of Wikimedia commons, and is thus a candidate for deletion? Mbrickn (talk) 06:15, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- I worded that poorly. I'm basically pitching a relevant reason for deletion in case it helps your request. I probably should have led with that. Mbrickn (talk) 06:19, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
_with_Crimea.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_with_Crimea.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not useful especially with current events Dronebogus (talk) 19:35, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
_with_Crimea.png){kind=link}
- Category:Greater Russia would be appropriate for such a map, but this is a classic case of "How my country looks in the FUTURE" - definitely Delete, Commons is not a crystal ball. --Enyavar (talk) 12:31, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
_with_Crimea.png){kind=link}
Useless also amusing that mexico is apparently just a big rectangle Dronebogus (talk) 19:37, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Fake map, useless Dronebogus (talk) 19:40, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Croatia entered the UNSC in 2008; which is displayed in File:Security Council 2008.png. So, support and Delete. --Enyavar (talk) 16:22, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
i upscaled the image without having a proper grasp of the community guidelines regarding what is allowed to be used to overwrite existing images. the mistake I made back there is embarrassing and I would like to erase it Jeremy (talk) 20:39, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: reverted to original. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:11, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
i upscaled the image without having a proper grasp of the community guidelines regarding what is allowed to be used to overwrite existing images. the mistake I made back there is embarrassing and I would like to erase it Jeremy (talk) 20:40, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: reverted to original. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:11, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
i upscaled the image without having a proper grasp of the community guidelines regarding what is allowed to be used to overwrite existing images. the mistake I made back there is embarrassing and I would like to erase it Jeremy (talk) 20:40, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: reverted to original. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:11, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
i upscaled the image without having a proper grasp of the community guidelines regarding what is allowed to be used to overwrite existing images. the mistake I made back there is embarrassing and I would like to erase it Jeremy (talk) 20:40, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
![20:40, 12 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/06/12#c-Original.jeremy.g-2022-06-12T20:40:00.000Z-File:"+arya+"_desa_Ujungberung_Majalengka_2021.jpg){kind=link}
- Why don't you overwrite back to original version? @Original.jeremy.g: Aris riyanto (talk) 00:32, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: reverted to original. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:11, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
![15:11, 22 October 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/06/12#c-Mdaniels5757-20221022151100-File:"+arya+"_desa_Ujungberung_Majalengka_2021.jpg){kind=link}
i upscaled the image without having a proper grasp of the community guidelines regarding what is allowed to be used to overwrite existing images. the mistake I made back there is embarrassing and I would like to erase it Jeremy (talk) 20:40, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
The upscaling is fine with me. Ir enhances the quality if this Image.
Kept: reverted to original. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:11, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
i upscaled the image without having a proper grasp of the community guidelines regarding what is allowed to be used to overwrite existing images. the mistake I made back there is embarrassing and I would like to erase it Jeremy (talk) 20:40, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: reverted to original. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:11, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
This file has not been deleted since April 2022. HippopotamusMelonCat (talk) 20:41, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:14, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
derivative of non-free work. Don't think it could be considered DM as it the only meaningful component of the image rubin16 (talk) 18:34, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Честно говоря, мне совершенно параллельна судьба этой фотки. Но я счастлив, что административный ресурс занят нужным делом - удалением фоток 2008 года с "несвободным дядькой на экране за мутным стеклом". Спасибо, что делаете WikiCommons лучше! --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:46, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Артём 13327 (talk) 11:01, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arnaldo 80 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional images from a TV station. (I meant to speedy delete these as obvious copyvio, must have clicked the wrong sidebar link.)
- File:Mara-Maionchi-Sandra-Milo-e-Orietta-Berti-in-partenza-per-Quelle-Brave-Ragazze-in-arrivo-su-Sky-e-in.jpg
- File:Quelle-brave-ragazze-sky-uno.jpg
Lord Belbury (talk) 12:28, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:07, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Spam spam Dronebogus (talk) 06:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unlikely own work. --GPSLeo (talk) 14:09, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
No copyright info, probably OOS Dronebogus (talk) 06:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 14:09, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WeaponizingArchitecture (talk · contribs)
[edit]Both of these images were created to disrupt another project. One of them arguably has a death threat in its name. The other demands that the user be unbanned from the semi-official Wikipedia Discord server. Neither of these files has any potential to be used in a non-disruptive way.
Susmuffin (talk) 01:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Susmuffin: instead of outright deleting the first image, how about we rename it. It was NEVER supposed to be a death threat. I was going to use that image on my Userpage. Please move it to "File:WikiSistersRobloxManFace.png" or something like that, For the second one, I put it there as a stupid joke i thought was funny. Im starting to get fed up with 60 bazillion talk page messages about files i was using on my userpage. WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 03:10, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep and Rename the “die etc.” one— it’s just the Wiki-sisters with goofy faces edited on them, nothing offensive or disruptive about that. Just call it “wikisisters kuso” or something relatively innocuous like that. Delete on the other since it’s blatantly disruptive and a misuse of the format (text-only image) Dronebogus (talk) 12:27, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep 1, Delete 2. File 1 could be renamed to WikiSisters, file 2 should prob be deleted. I see it grossly inappropriate to, even out of frustration, write on your user page that you were banned from Wikimedia Discord. It implies that the user's sole purpose might be to cause disruption. I get it is out of frustration as well (see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:WeaponizingArchitecture/Userboxes/Discord - Wikipedia), but, and I apologize if I sound blunt, if a user got banned or blocked from a Wikimedia or Wikimedia-affiliated platform (whether on or off wiki), and they do not understand why so they can submit an appeal, then it is an indicator that they are prob not ready to participate in that specific Wikimedia/Wikimedia-affiliated platform. Aasim 15:10, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment If i was only here to cause disruption, i wouldn't be going out to random cities for skyline shots. WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 06:21, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- I’ve requested renaming the wikisisters image. Dronebogus (talk) 18:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Renamed, though under criterion 2 (meaningless name) rather than 5. --bjh21 (talk) 21:06, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: file#1, deleted file#2; per user:Dronebogus. --Wdwd (talk) 10:44, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WeaponizingArchitecture (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Fictional US state
- File:Seal of Michiana (Sandbox).svg
- File:Flag of Michiana (Sandbox).svg
- File:Michiana Map (Sandbox).png
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Enyavar (talk) 01:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep These files are for a specific sandbox of mine. In fact it literally says in the file names "Sandbox". It's also worth asking why are they being requested now? I uploaded them in August of 2021, and they seemed to have been okay. I haven't added anything to the sandbox in ages, but I don't understand why they suddenly need to be deleted.
- WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 04:28, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Media that just pretends to be regular encyclopedical content is sooner or later detected as a hoax and subsequently deleted. In this case, you left the files uncategorized. Someone slapped the map into the "unidentified maps" category. And while I am trying to sort the stuff that was thrown into that "lucky bucket", what I encounter constantly are series of the weirdest fantasy maps usually with assorted heraldry (from the 2094 US elections over Minecraft kingdoms up to Great Caribbean Pirate Empires). Frankly, fictional heraldry+maps are not within Commons:Scope unless there is some educational angle to them, so this is one of my standard approaches. I'd suggest you should categorize all your made-up stuff under Category:User page images and put disclaimers that they are made up. That doesn't magically bring them into scope, but every contributing user is allowed to have a few personal or meta files flying around as long as they are clearly marked as such and don't go overboard. --Enyavar (talk) 14:46, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- I don’t think you get the point that these files were never used, or intended to be encyclopedic content. There are plenty of files on Commons like, say Personal CoAs that are used on stuff like Userpages. Should those be deleted? No of course not. Don’t request their deletion when it comes down to Categories of all things. WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 18:11, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think you got my point either. Files used on your own userpage? Often okay, just not always. Here I don't see how a sandbox counts as your user page. IMO users are responsible to rigorously keep fictional POV or personal files from circulating in the main, encyclopedic parts of Commons. You may feel singled out, but I'd apply these standards to anyone else's stuff when I notice it. You may view my user page, too :-) --Enyavar (talk) 22:34, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- My guy they aren't circulating the encyclopedic parts of commons. Again, this apparently came down to Categories, so i guess ill add them. At this rate I really dont give a damn if they're deleted. WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 17:50, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think you got my point either. Files used on your own userpage? Often okay, just not always. Here I don't see how a sandbox counts as your user page. IMO users are responsible to rigorously keep fictional POV or personal files from circulating in the main, encyclopedic parts of Commons. You may feel singled out, but I'd apply these standards to anyone else's stuff when I notice it. You may view my user page, too :-) --Enyavar (talk) 22:34, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- I don’t think you get the point that these files were never used, or intended to be encyclopedic content. There are plenty of files on Commons like, say Personal CoAs that are used on stuff like Userpages. Should those be deleted? No of course not. Don’t request their deletion when it comes down to Categories of all things. WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 18:11, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Media that just pretends to be regular encyclopedical content is sooner or later detected as a hoax and subsequently deleted. In this case, you left the files uncategorized. Someone slapped the map into the "unidentified maps" category. And while I am trying to sort the stuff that was thrown into that "lucky bucket", what I encounter constantly are series of the weirdest fantasy maps usually with assorted heraldry (from the 2094 US elections over Minecraft kingdoms up to Great Caribbean Pirate Empires). Frankly, fictional heraldry+maps are not within Commons:Scope unless there is some educational angle to them, so this is one of my standard approaches. I'd suggest you should categorize all your made-up stuff under Category:User page images and put disclaimers that they are made up. That doesn't magically bring them into scope, but every contributing user is allowed to have a few personal or meta files flying around as long as they are clearly marked as such and don't go overboard. --Enyavar (talk) 14:46, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete no educational value → out of scope. --Jahobr (talk) 14:57, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete not educational, notable, or related to any Wikimedia project. Wikipedia isn’t for things made up one day and neither is commons. Creating occasional nonsense in userspace is fine but uploading personal junk solely for that reason isn’t. Dronebogus (talk) 19:12, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 18:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
This image is a copy of the preexisting File:Maison Cirice-Têtu, 25, avenue Sainte-Geneviève, Québec rez-de-chaussée, l'ancienne salle de réception 11-d.na.civile-80-4697.jpg LaTerreACotta (talk) 00:51, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:16, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Promo... 191.126.153.157 01:16, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:16, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
No EXIF, no location, unlikely own work. Solomon203 (talk) 01:17, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:18, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Turismo y Facebook 191.126.153.157 01:19, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:18, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Ver Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pretty ethnic girl - Photographer Jean Plattner.jpg Este usuario es un mentiroso. 191.126.153.157 01:23, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:19, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
No EXIF, no location, unlikely own work. Solomon203 (talk) 01:28, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:18, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
False "Own work" claims; this is obviously the screenshot of some online map service, likely non-free. Enyavar (talk) 01:32, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: Private building plan, unused Enyavar (talk) 01:40, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope logo, not used on any pages Yeeno (talk) 04:48, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
out of scope podcast logo Yeeno (talk) 05:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete I don't think it's out of scope, but it is probably above the threshold of originality. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:14, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
OOS GARBAGE Dronebogus (talk) 06:43, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal image where the uploader has not made substantive contributions globally. Anarchyte (talk) 09:42, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Blurry, lower quality to and superseded by File:PSP-3000-Model.png, not used anywhere of note on Wikipedia. Also, the gameplay image on screen is arguably not free use since it's a screenshot of a copyrighted game. Zxcvbnm (talk) 10:22, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Seemingly unnecessary photo edit that has no use for an encyclopedia. File:Dreamcast (top view).jpg is a significantly higher quality image for reference purposes of a top-down view of the console. Image is also used nowhere on Wikipedia. Zxcvbnm (talk) 10:36, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: sufficient quality and in scope of Category:Sega Dreamcast consoles. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:23, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Greatly inferior quality, blurry image completely superseded by File:PlayStation-Vita-1101-FR.jpg and not used anywhere on Wikipedia. Zxcvbnm (talk) 10:53, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible opyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Image is of low quality with questionable educational value. Also looks like a reproduction of another work. Wcam (talk) 20:17, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Used in several Wikimedia projects. Thuresson (talk) 12:23, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
This also looks like a photo of a drawing, and is likely a derivative work of non-free work. --Wcam (talk) 22:39, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 21:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Poor quality sketch, superseded by File:Nintendo Switch Lite representation.png. No longer used in any Wikipedia projects, has been replaced by the higher-quality photo in question. Zxcvbnm (talk) 11:19, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
No EXIF to proof this is yours. RaFaDa20631 (talk) 11:21, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:26, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
OTRS VRT 191.126.153.157 12:46, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Copyright holder Macksfilms. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Permiso? 191.126.153.157 12:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Copyright holder Macksfilms. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Permiso? 191.126.153.157 12:48, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Copyright holder Macksfilms. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Historical publication. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
![14:36, 12 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/06/12#c-EugeneZelenko-2022-06-12T14:36:00.000Z-File:"Inferno".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
![22:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/06/12#c-P199-20221031222800-File:"Inferno".jpg){kind=link}
Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Σωτήριος Δογάνης (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Ποίημα "Εις τον ερχομόν Ελευθερίου Νουφράκη, Αρχιμανδρίτου".jpg
- File:"Mούσα" Ποίημα "εις τον ερχομόν Ελευθερίου Νουφράκη, Αρχιμανδρίου (Σεπτ. 1918).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Thronjahr 1996-97 Andre Wilke
[edit]Unknown author and "from private archive" is not possible with {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} licence, please read COM:L.
- File:Baron Gregor mit Dorothee.jpg
- File:Fürst Christoph mit Petra.jpg
- File:Graf Bernhard mit Anja.jpg
- File:Herzog Thomas mit Susanne.jpg
- File:König Andre mit Königin Gerda.jpg
- File:Königspaar mit Ministern 1.jpg
- File:Königspaar mit Ministern.jpg
- File:Schützenkönig Andre Wilke 1996.jpg
Ras67 (talk) 14:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted by the developers of the game (Fight Crab) Nutshinou Talk! 11:55, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:35, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted advertisement in Taipei. Yann (talk) 12:10, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete does not fall under Taiwanese freedom of panorama. It is not meant for "long-term basis." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:12, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:35, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Photograph taken in the 1960s, no suggestion why it would now be public domain. The source page doesn't have a clear licence statement and says "Not all content on this site is actually owned by us". Lord Belbury (talk) 13:14, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:35, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
This was indeed once posted on the NIH website ([4]), but it does not say there it is an NIH photo. And it is not: per [5], it's a news agency photo by "JON ROEMER, AP". So the file is a copyvio and should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 13:32, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and redirected for the many incoming links. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:36, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright? The user mentions "own work" and as source "INS Vescomtat". On this page the photo is given and also "© Institut Vescomtat de Cabrera · Hostalric". Wouter (talk) 14:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
The background image, minus the letters, is all over the Internet (Twitter, Pinterest, wallpaper websites like here and many more), often in much higher resolution. So while this particular image may be indeed an "own work", it was made using that background image and is therefore a derivative work of that presumably copyrighted work and also a copyright violation. The file should be deleted unless it is conclusively shown that the original image is in the public domain or under a free license. Rosenzweig τ 14:10, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:39, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
No images shown, black /corrupted images Encik Tekateki (talk) 15:43, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused private image of a non-contributor, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 16:23, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Just some nonsense Dronebogus (talk) 19:26, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, advertising. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Unclear notability Dronebogus (talk) 19:27, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, advertising. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Keep it on your own wiki then, this is not a webhost Dronebogus (talk) 19:36, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:32, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Dronebogus (talk) 19:41, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Not useful Dronebogus (talk) 19:43, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:34, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Obviously just nonsense Dronebogus (talk) 19:43, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:34, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Quality is far too blurry to be of any use, enyclopedic or otherwise. Redundant with File:PlayStation 4 Slim video game console.jpg Zxcvbnm (talk) 20:06, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:34, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
![15:07, 12 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/06/12#c-EugeneZelenko-2022-06-12T15:07:00.000Z-File:"უნიონის"_ხელმძღვანელები_1926.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:12, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
![00:12, 1 November 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/06/12#c-P199-20221101001200-File:"უნიონის"_ხელმძღვანელები_1926.jpg){kind=link}
to replace the old one Pixabay (talk) 15:21, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:14, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Robin Roland 94 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The source website saying "2 pictures for free to use" isn't sufficiently clear for the purposes of Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses. File:For site 2.jpg also isn't one of those two free-to-use images.
Lord Belbury (talk) 15:30, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:17, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Per Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Product packaging, as design of package seems to be above COM:TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:42, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I believe the brush stroke is above TOO. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Zen-3-logo-inverted.png Glrx (talk) 17:15, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:46, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Much smaller, lower quality and superseded by File:PlayStation-Vita-1101-FL.png, not used in any article space locations in Wikipedia. Zxcvbnm (talk) 15:52, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The file has been around for 10 years, so keep to preserve possible external links. Glrx (talk) 16:55, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Glrx: See COM:NOTHOST and COM:NOTUSED. Commons is not obligated to maintain images as a web host, people should be uploading an image onto their own image site or server. This image falls under "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality." Otherwise, you didn't offer any valid keep arguments. Zxcvbnm (talk) 17:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:21, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: Twitter banner CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:10, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete Derivative work. It uses the 2010 Twitter logo. The more recent logo carries strict limitations about how it can be used, and I would expect that Twitter would apply similar limitations to its 2010 logo. If it were the recent logo, it would violate Twitter's clear field requirement because the bird is partially obscured. Glrx (talk) 17:10, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Twitter Brand Guidelines allows the use of the logo, but the guidelines impose many restrictions including:
- Spacing
- Give our bird some room to breathe.
- The empty space around the logo should be at least 150% of the width of the logo.
- Don’t go any smaller than 16 pixels wide
- Give our bird some room to breathe.
- Spacing
- The logo is not a free image. The file at issue here violates those restrictions, so it violates the license, and thus is a clear copyright violation that could be a speedy. Glrx (talk) 18:40, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- Twitter Brand Guidelines allows the use of the logo, but the guidelines impose many restrictions including:
- Delete Per Glrx. Clearly copyvio. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:30, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:24, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Low resolution image without being used by any wikimedia project, also can be replaced by many alternatives in the category 219.78.191.43 16:56, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:25, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Very low-res image with JPG compression. Superseded by far higher quality images like File:Sega-Dreamcast-VMU.png. No clear additional encyclopedic value and not used anywhere on Wikipedia. Zxcvbnm (talk) 17:17, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:28, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Very low-res image with JPG compression. Superseded by far higher quality images like File:Dreamcast-Jump-Pack.png. No clear additional encyclopedic value and not used anywhere on Wikipedia. Zxcvbnm (talk) 17:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:29, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
It appears to have been taken from a website. Sahaib (talk) 17:26, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:29, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Low-quality and with JPG compression. Superseded by File:Xbox-360-Wireless-Controller-White.png and offers no additional enyclopedic value. Unused on any public facing Wikipedia pages. Zxcvbnm (talk) 17:37, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:47, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Exposition Volupté de l'ombre Maurice Maillard (musée de Honfleur) © Maurice Maillard.png
[edit]_%C2%A9_Maurice_Maillard.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%C2%A9_Maurice_Maillard.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file (a poster) is under copyright law gpesenti (talk) 17:51, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:33, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
copy right violation and fake license https://vakiltop.com/blog/%D8%A7%D9%83%D8%A8%D8%B1-%D8%B7%D8%A8%D8%B1%DB%8C/ Luckie Luke (talk) 17:55, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:36, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Image changed by "Golden Wreath 3D.svg" Marco M. (talk) 18:24, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: not quite the same; OK to have variety in Commons. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
this image comes from the official website of the pictured politician and is likely copyrighted, cf http://zeljanazovko.eu/en/zovko-upcoming-eu-us-summit-shows-mutualcommitment-successful-transatlantic-partnership Dans (talk) 18:39, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wizly-08 as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Jante Alpine GTA Le Mans.png
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as per Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates (JPEG -> PNG). -- Túrelio (talk) 20:12, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:46, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No FOP in Abu Dhabi/UAE! 219.78.191.43 09:24, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Alas the author, Architect Xavier Cartron,[6][7] is alive. So this public building of UAE is off-limits here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:18, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 13:37, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
The artist does want this photo to represent her. It is not an officiel photo and the photo was upload by a user that is now banned from Wikipedia. Timothee.rousselot (talk) 19:23, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep This is not Wikipedia. So their status there is irrelevant.
- The status of a user is not usually relevant to the content they upload. We certainly don't revisit previous uploads and delete them, just because of any unrelated sanctions on a user.
- You claim to know and to represent the wishes of the subject. Yet you give no evidence for this. Why should we believe you? COM:VRTS would be the way to handle that, not an unevidenced DR.
- The photo is maybe not a studio portrait, but it's obviously far from some grabbed paparazzi snap. There's no obviously contentious or intrusive reason to delete it.
- Your own upload of the same subject, File:Cynthiaphotolapresse.jpg, is up for deletion as it's not your own work and there's no indication of a licence for it issued by the author.
- The fact that you have an image of the same subject simultaneously up for deletion does not influence a separate deletion, like this. But it's not a good sign either. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:22, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The Wikimedia projects, including Commons, do not succumb to personal preferences of the subjects of articles or the images which portray them. While the subject may object to this image, it is, however, notable that the uploader was banned (not blocked and thus a more severe sanction) on Wikipedia. Nevertheless, on Commons, the uploader seems to show a solid history of uploads of images from Quebec. If Timothee.rousselot can show that Bull-Doser did not author the image, that is another matter. One cannot request an image be deleted just because one doesn't like it. And a note to Timothee, if you work for or with Cynthia Girard-Renard, you better disclose that on Wikipedia. Conflicts of interest are taken very seriously there. --SVTCobra 02:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Per Commons:Photographs of identifiable people#Removal requests and the photo is in use. --SCP-2000 16:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 14:34, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BCTCarmenMalaga (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical document and symbol. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:34, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of first publication or authorship to ascertain copyright. CC0 license is inaccurate as the author is unknown. czar 04:53, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The photo was made in 1933, most probably in Spain. It is not known whether the photo has been published. So therefore it must be assumed the photo is copyright until 70 years after the death of the unknown author, per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Spain. Per community voting of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template and Template:PD-old-assumed a photo which is older than 120 years can be maintained. Therefore this photo must be deleted but it can be undeleted 121 years after 1933 - in 2054.. --Ellywa (talk) 19:40, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Lower resolution but uncropped version of photo appears at https://p1-tt.byteimg.com/origin/tos-cn-i-qvj2lq49k0/f7a8177fd574422bb00405413033eb3c.jpg, with a watermark in the top left, outside of the Commons photo's boundaries. All eleven other uploads from this user have been copyvio images, mostly of this one actress, from around the web. Lord Belbury (talk) 08:51, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. Therefore – due to insufficient of information like source, author, publication status and creation date – this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 19:42, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Taivo: is it really "complex"? Cf. Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Daniel.9 too for an other logo of the same company. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 13:40, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Simple logos are made from simple geometrical figures. Try to explain, which geometrical figures the flying object is made of. I can't, for me the logo is complex. Taivo (talk) 13:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Taivo: « a curvy < » seems like a good description, plus as mentionned on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Daniel.9 it may be good per COM:TOO Italy (and finally I see that this logo can be as old as 1948, thus maybe also PD-anon). Plus, we should be consistent and keep/delete all or none of the six files: Category:Diadora logos. I don't have a strong opinion either way, we lack information and "complex" is really subjective here for a rationale. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 14:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- "Curvy <" is not a geometrical figure, so the logo is not made of simple geometrical figures. Taivo (talk) 17:35, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Taivo: « a curvy < » seems like a good description, plus as mentionned on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Daniel.9 it may be good per COM:TOO Italy (and finally I see that this logo can be as old as 1948, thus maybe also PD-anon). Plus, we should be consistent and keep/delete all or none of the six files: Category:Diadora logos. I don't have a strong opinion either way, we lack information and "complex" is really subjective here for a rationale. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 14:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Simple logos are made from simple geometrical figures. Try to explain, which geometrical figures the flying object is made of. I can't, for me the logo is complex. Taivo (talk) 13:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per COM:TOO Italy “the threshold for an industrial design product to enjoy copyright protection is still quite high and even famous industrial design products have been denied such protection by Italian Courts”. To determine whether a design is below TOO is always a bit subjective. I consider this logo below the high TOO of Italy and decided it can be kept on Commons. (Besides, there are many similar logos as Vigneron pointed out). --Ellywa (talk) 19:50, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. For stamps of the Netherlands issued prior to 1989, copyright expires 70 years after publication, see Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Netherlands#Stamps JopkeB (talk) 11:43, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Undelete in 2029. Vysotsky (talk) 12:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep. Publication here fits this rule: 'Publicatie van een ontwerp van een postzegel of postzegel zelf kan zonder toestemming van de auteursrechthebbende worden gerealiseerd als het gaat om een aankondiging (publicatie in een nieuwsblad van nieuwe postzegels), een beoordeling (recensie), polemiek of wetenschappelijke verhandeling. De reproducties moeten door grootte (in druk maximaal 2/3 of minimaal 1 1/2 maal de ware grootte) worden afgebeeld, zodat ze een duidelijk verschil tonen met het origineel.' https://nl.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Beleid_voor_gebruik_van_media/Postzegels
The size of the stamps on commons is different, and Anefo published the picture as an announcement for new stamps. As such it meets the conditions needed for publication here. Regards, Jeff5102 (talk) 19:07, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- And as what kind of allowed publication does a Commons publication fits in? That Anefo published the picture as an announcement for new stamps, does not mean it may be copied to Commons. The publication on Commons is not an announcement in a specialized newspaper, a review nor a scientific article. So my conclusion still is: delete. --JopkeB (talk) 04:06, 13 June 2022 (UTC).
ːːCommons is merely copying the image from the announcement; that's all. I had a similar discussion here. As the Nationaal Archief (which is the source of the this image) says under the "Direct Download"-button: "'You can use or re-use this image free of charge" and that is what we did. See here If there is some problem with the copyrights, the stamps publisher should contact the Nationaal Archief, and ask to remove this text and the download button. We can have a discussion around this file on Commons after that happened. And, as the closing administrator said in the other discussionː We have many photos from the Anefo collection and I see no reason ti doubt these. And I agree.
ˑAs a side-noteː back in the day I was editing Wikipedia, I was told that seriously analyzing Reliable Sources was a no-go, because thinking that a bunch of random idiots on the internet are supposed to be 'better' than professional scientists and professional historians and professional reporters who operate under professional editorial management, and that random internet idiots are to pass judgement over and overrule the majority-mainstream-Reliable sources was dangerous. And now, you are here overruling those Reliable expert views of the Nationaal Archief-experts? Ironic.--Jeff5102 (talk) 08:36, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- I indeed am not an expert on copyright rules. But I have learned a lot about this subject over the years as a volunteer at Commons. For instance:
- Commons has it's own responsibilities, sets it's own rules, policies and guidelines, acts independently and makes it's own decisions.
- For copyright rules in the Netherlands I rely on:
- Auteurswet
- Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Netherlands, in this case the part about stamps. So if you think this file is an exception to the rule that stamps of the Netherlands younger than 70 years are not in the public domain, you have to change this part.
- I agree that the Nationaal Archief is indeed a realible source. But even they may make mistakes. In this case I wonder whether the permission to reuse the photo is for both the photo and the stamps. I think that the permission is only for the photo part, because the copyrights of the photo have been transferred from the photographer to the Nationaal Archief; I doubt whether the PTT (or PostNL as his successor) has given permission for the stamps part. I have experienced before that a depicted artwork on a released photo (in this case of RCE, another well respected Dutch organization) was not in the public domain and the photo was removed from Commons because of copyright violations of the artist.
- On Commons we protect not only the copyrights of photographers (as Nationaal Archief, RCE and many other archives do) but also of artists whose work is depicted in photos. Even if it looks like an artist has uploaded photos of his/her own artworks, we still ask for a VRT ticket, because we want to be sure that the artist releases the photos of his/her works for commercial purposes and adaptation. In this case I do not see proof ot that.
- So I still think this is copyright violation and this photo should be removed from Commons. --JopkeB (talk) 03:23, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- I indeed am not an expert on copyright rules. But I have learned a lot about this subject over the years as a volunteer at Commons. For instance:
Now, those are reasonable points too. Let's see what the administrator thinks. Regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 07:10, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. Can be undeleted 71 years after 1958, in 2029.. --Ellywa (talk) 20:09, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Also
- File:Farion at the Detroit Opera House 2008.jpg
- File:Marko Farion playing a Starosvitska bandura 2017.jpg
- File:Marko Farion performing with the Detroit Concert Choir 1996.jpg
- File:Farion with mentor Hryhory Kytasty 1976.jpg
- File:Marko Farion UBC President.jpg
Uploaded by Markofarion - on photos this person — Marko Farion. Not own images false own work claim. Scanned images. Bogus license. See also same request Микола Василечко (talk) 14:06, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- These are all photos I personally own and have uploaded onto Commons. 2 photos professionally taken (UBC President taken by Pieronek Studios, Farion at Detroit Opera House taken by Karpov) but I own the images (of myself) 216.255.206.116 23:34, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- I now logged in and will repeat and attest to my personal ownership of these photos. Marko Farion Markofarion (talk) 23:35, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Please read and send permissions from photographers. --Микола Василечко (talk) 15:02, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- I now logged in and will repeat and attest to my personal ownership of these photos. Marko Farion Markofarion (talk) 23:35, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @Markofarion: , please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holders/photographers to publish these files on Commons with a free license. If successful, the files can be undeleted. Please note: If you own the prints of the photos you do not automatically own the copyright. --Ellywa (talk) 20:12, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The Story of Marjaan (talk · contribs)
[edit]I have now identied four uploads of this user as copyvio screenshots of Youtube videos, one of them I deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasur city from top.jpg, the other three were speedy deletions. There were more copyvios by this uploaders as evidenced by the comments in the DR and the notes on the user talk page. So it should be clear that this is not a reliable uploader, but someone who either lies, does not understand copyright and copyright violations, or both.
Tracing those screenshots to the videos they were taken from is time-consuming, so I won't do it for the rest of the photos uploaded by this user, but instead will nominate all of them claimed as own work (except for collages of other photos which seem to be ok) to be nominated under the precautionary principle. File:Milton,ON.jpg even has the word Screenshot in the Exif data.
This user also uploaded several drawings/illustrations, some calligraphy files and some sound files. Two of these I have nominated separately, the others will still have to be checked if they are ok.
- File:Outskirts of Kasur.jpg
- File:Milton,ON.jpg
- File:Ishpatina Ridge.png
- File:Islamabad night.png
- File:Gwadar Flag Pole, Pakistan.jpg
- File:Kasur drone view.jpg
- File:A Punjabi Couple from Pakistan.png
- File:Tomb of Kamal Chishti.jpg
- File:Aerial Kasur.jpg
- File:Jamia Mosque Bulleh Shah.jpg
- File:Bulleh Shah aerial.png
Rosenzweig τ 14:32, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Question to User:Rosenzweig
[edit]I have noticed that over the past couple of months you have been trying so hard blood and sweat to distort the glorious image of Kasur. I'm not sure as to why you are constantly trying to delete these images as no other user on Wikipedia has tried so hard before to get rid of my contributed files. I admire the time you spend everyday constantly trying to find whether the images I've uploaded are copyright or not, I wish to see other users on Wikipedia with the same ambition.
But I advice you with all due respect, even if they were or weren't YouTube screenshotted videos, there are countless uploads I have seen on Wikimedia Commons that are also screenshots from YouTube videos. With all due respect, those images have not gotten any notice and I don't see the reason as to why some are more favoured than others.
I highly suggest you take some time out to have a look, if not, at least a glance at such files. Just a note, Wikimedia Commons is not a platform on which prejudice should be shown, favouring some uploads than others. Maybe it's just a coincidence or an attempt to tarnish the image of eastern cities and nations, while unfree content from western nations can be uploaded at ease. I think the latter of my statement is something no one wants and I wish you the best.
Looking forward to your reply
User:The Story of Marjaan User talk:The Story of Marjaan 17:49, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- I had actually never heard about Kasur until a few days ago. I delete these files and file deletion requests for them because they are copyright violations. That we undoubtedly have many more files here at Wikimedia Commons that violate copyright is not a reason to keep these, just like the fact that some thieves were not punished yet is no reason for a caught thief to demand also not to be punished. Your actions and uploads, and also this thinly veiled allegation of some kind of racism (or whatever it is supposed to be) have utterly destroyed any assumption of good faith in your actions on my side, and I must now assume that everything you have uploaded is not ok unless specifically proven to be ok. That's all there is to say. --Rosenzweig τ 22:15, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Rosenzweig,
- I have just read your message and I must say that I was utterly astonished reading to your reply. I wanted to clarify my stance as I feel it was misrepresented. If any of my uploads are copyright violations, they deserve to be removed from Commons. I did not opine at all that I wanted Wikimedia to consist of copyrighted images, nor did I mean to throw any allegations at you. I clearly stated that I hope that "prejudice" and "favoritism" is not the case on this encyclopedia. Your confusion may have occurred when misreading my response. Please note that all copyright aside, any work not found to be copyrighted is solely a credit of my work. This means that you have no right to doubt my intentions based on images identified as copyright violations. All calligraphy files that I have uploaded are my personal work, end of statement. Stating this, I am not obliged to "specifically prove" that my personal work (e.g. calligraphy files) is okay to you nor do I have to provide anymore information than the amount given. The source I have provided in the summaries for my calligraphic files are sufficient. That said, if any image happens to be proven as a copyright violation (this includes evidence), the images can be removed, with all due respect.
- I highly recommend that you read "The Misleading Mind" by Kaurana Cayton, as it highlights common issues revolving around the notion of creating our own problems. It is a masterpiece I must say, and it fits perfectly into this scenario of habitual reactions.
- Good day to you! The Story of Marjaan (talk) 15:11, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader – who was notified about this request and commented on this DR – did not explain the authorship and copyright situation of these images. The uploader even confessed more or less that at least some of these are stills from youtube films. Therefore – due to insufficient of information like source, author, publication status and creation date – these images must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:18, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Historical document and publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Aláí12.jpg
- File:Pecsé12.jpg
- File:Herald1.jpg
- File:Címerkép.jpg
- File:Jékei.jpg
- File:Szigno.jpg
- File:Ágh aláírás.jpg
- File:Pecsét.jpg
- File:"Tar László levele.jpg".jpg
- File:"Faggyas István könyvében a Tar címerként megjelölt címer.png".png
- File:"Tar címer.jpg".jpg
- File:"Faggyas István művében a Szuhay címerként megjelölt Tar címer.jpg".jpg
- File:"a pecsét felnagyított képe".jpg
- File:"Ladislaus Tar levele 1760-ból és rajta a címerpecsét".jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Why are images of a wax seal from 1813 not in the public domain? --RAN (talk) 05:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: kept most per RAN, assuming the uploader made the photos of the seals themselves. Deleted 3 shields, at least one of these was copied from a book dated 1988. The others per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 20:25, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cultura Tocantinópolis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and symbols. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Brasão do Bispo Dom Giovane,Criando em 2009, Tocantinópolis, Diocesse..png
- File:"Velorio do Padre João,1947,jpge".jpg
- File:"Padre João de Sousa Lima,jpeg".jpg
- File:"Imagem de Dom Cornélio Chizzini,Tocantinopolis, em 1960.jpg".jpg
- File:Brasão da Diocese de Tocantinopolis.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Brazil-Photo, images were not given protection until 19 June 1998. I have no opinion concerning: File:Brasão da Diocese de Tocantinopolis.png and File:Brasão do Bispo Dom Giovane,Criando em 2009, Tocantinópolis, Diocesse..png --RAN (talk) 20:39, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: kept three old non-artistic photos per {{PD-Brazil-Photo}} and per RAN. Deleted two images of unknown age and authorship, one was taken from facebook. --Ellywa (talk) 20:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Любов Станкевич 2021 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine.
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:35, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Любов Станкевич 2021
[edit]No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Любов Станкевич 2021 (talk) 10:42, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:34, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Not free : https://cottonwood.tv/about-us Hyméros --}-≽ ♥ Yes ? 17:58, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:31, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Looks to be a cropped image from another website: https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZisF-_1enG_1nDWfKhATrOKgi8E2Eif15pZ1YUDOZeE4UEORcbVoJsPyoxd-T0ge5XDLnuBZK4xQkSuUW3BDaWygC9Acwbp_1Z6KPiu6A_1vi2Muup7j0ZQxwC5gWCFkSDjhkBqpbhLL8s43rKw7cFTdO4d728Ocwg https://www.dailylocal.com/2022/02/26/ciarrocchi-takes-aim-at-houlahans-seat/ Putitonamap98 (talk) 19:51, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:32, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}