Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/06/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
it has no value as an image nor as an entry to Wiki Loves Earth MargaretRDonald (talk) 03:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:17, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
天城越えの歌詞転載、画像がNHKからの転載 尾張の人 (talk) 10:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Accidentally created DR doesn't refer to user's tp. --Achim55 (talk) 13:19, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
https://m.facebook.com/EmilyCarrU/posts/curious-to-know-what-its-like-to-be-on-our-campus-take-this-360-virtual-tour-for/10157445414572602/ is wider perspective DMacks (talk) 07:07, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by DMacks at 07:07, 9 June 2022 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Emily Carr University Library.jpg: https://m.facebook.com/EmilyCarrU/posts/curious-to-know-what-its-like-to-be-on-our-campus-take-this-360-virtual-tour-for/10157445414572602/ is wider perspective --Krdbot 13:29, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
leider aus unwissen hochgeladen, dass diese art fotos nicht erlaubt sind, bitte sla. danke! Donna Gedenk (talk) 08:32, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Raymond at 08:48, 9 June 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 13:29, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Strong doubt that PD-textlogo is applicable to this logo, especially considering the middle strip connecting M and U. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- I followed the copyright notices used on UnivOfTokyo logo.svg and UnivOfTokyo mark.svg (no idea how to link it without the actual image displaying). I removed the PD-textlogo on the logo svg as it's just the actual logo without any text. Metafysika (talk) 07:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- It's not about formality. The logos of Musashino and UoT are different. It needs to be discussed whether this logo is really below threshold of originality. --Túrelio (talk) 07:54, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Same problem with: File:Musashino University logo.svg
Deleted: Non-trivial logo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
I was told it was the wrong file type plus this is original research Professor6000 (talk) 10:32, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 17:15, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
This table was a .png file and needed to recreated in wikitable Professor6000 (talk) 10:39, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 17:17, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
This File should not be deleted because It was taken from a public page with no copyright on it. Gian222 (talk) 16:11, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio https://mobile.twitter.com/LaMarchesina__/photo. --Captain-tucker (talk) 16:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Dubious provenance - close vantage of notable person, uploaded with three blatant copyvios of this subject, all other user uploads copyvios, may be part of this set. PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 14:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Nevermind; found it. Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1),. --Эlcobbola talk 19:31, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
This is shown as being a new London Bridge on the Wikipedia page for London Bridge in London, England. This is in Lake Havasu City, Arizona. 209.2.20.17 17:37, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 18:20, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by King of Hearts as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F6|Not evidence in the source page to be {{PD-UkGov}} King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, this user, of which I suspect is a sockpuppet of A3cb1, gives chairish.com as source but, in that website, which this a commercial busisness industry which offers photographic reproductions of artworks, doesn¡t have any credit that this artwork is alvailable under {{PD-UKGov}} license. So, with the author deceased in 1996, 70 years from his death did not passed yet (which is the period in which a work is protected in the United Kingdom), the artwork is still under copyright in its source country and, for that, a case of license laundering and of copyright violation.
- I request the intervention of @DrKay to confirm this. 83.61.237.190 07:48, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with 83.61.. Cuneo died in 1996 and his works outside wartime are still copyrighted. This isn't a UK Government work. It's owned by Lloyd's of London and the original is displayed on the 11th floor of the Lloyd's building in London. DrKay (talk) 08:56, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Bad dick pic spam
- File:Male masturbating during orgasm.gif
- File:Male masturbation orgasm.gif
- File:Male starting to masturbate.gif
- File:Male masturbating pre orgasm.gif
- File:Penis masturbation.png
- File:Male masturbating.png
- File:Male penis picture.jpg
- File:Male masturbation.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 11:36, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:14, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
This File should not be deleted because It was taken from a public page with no copyright on it. Gian222 (talk) 16:12, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 18:20, 9 June 2022 UTC: Commons:Licensing: promo/press photo --Krdbot 01:28, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
This File should not be deleted because It was taken from a public page with no copyright on it. Gian222 (talk) 16:12, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 18:20, 9 June 2022 UTC: Commons:Licensing: promo/press photo --Krdbot 01:28, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
This File should not be deleted because It was taken from a public page with no copyright on it. Gian222 (talk) 16:12, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 18:20, 9 June 2022 UTC: Commons:Licensing: promo/press photo --Krdbot 01:28, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Typical bad quality exhibitionistic garbage Dronebogus (talk) 11:36, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Pi.1415926535 at 04:14, 10 June 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Cnpz12345 --Krdbot 07:30, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pbrks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Taken from https://www.christopherconsultants.com/project/gainesville-high-school/ Yann (talk) 21:55, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann: This image is a clear copyvio; it was taken from https://www.christopherconsultants.com/project/gainesville-high-school/ (https://www.christopherconsultants.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/IMG_5333-scaled.jpg). Why was this sent to standard deletion requests? – Pbrks (t • c) 23:08, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:28, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Photographs by Derek Hatfield
[edit]Unused personal vacation photos, non-notable people, out of scope.
- File:Antigua (3419067307).jpg
- File:Antigua (3419067549).jpg
- File:Antigua (3419067637).jpg
- File:Antigua (3419067717).jpg
- File:Antigua (3419068203).jpg
- File:Antigua (3419068377).jpg
- File:Antigua (3419068571).jpg
- File:Antigua (3419280819).jpg
- File:Antigua (3419282035).jpg
- File:Antigua (3419875874).jpg
- File:Antigua (3419876602).jpg
- File:Antigua (3419876698).jpg
- File:Antigua (3419876810).jpg
- File:Antigua (3419876882).jpg
- File:Antigua (3419877120).jpg
- File:Antigua (3420088084).jpg
- File:Antigua (3420091326).jpg
- File:Aziel (100783596).jpg
- File:Aziel and Kodiak (100783776).jpg
- File:Aziel and Minneapolis (234868222).jpg
- File:Aziel First Morning (2736095125).jpg
- File:Aziel in Duluth (100783601).jpg
- File:Aziel in mouth (234869046).jpg
- File:Aziel looking impressed (234868062).jpg
- File:Barbados (3419883286).jpg
- File:Butterfly Farm St. Maarten (3419219203).jpg
- File:Butterfly Farm St. Maarten (3420030248).jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:56, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:03, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Photographs by Derek Hatfield 2
[edit]Unused personal vacation photos, non-notable people, out of scope.
- File:Antigua (3419281057).jpg
- File:Antigua (3419281145).jpg
- File:Antigua (3419284061).jpg
- File:Barbados (3419069869).jpg
- File:Barbados (3419069945).jpg
- File:Barbados (3419070011).jpg
- File:Barbados (3419073243).jpg
- File:Barbados (3419354243).jpg
- File:Barbados (3419880076).jpg
- File:Barbados (3419881806).jpg
- File:Castle Danger - Duluth - Spring 2008 (2601408469).jpg
- File:Castle Danger - Duluth - Spring 2008 (2602230678).jpg
- File:Castle Danger - Duluth - Spring 2008 (2602236240).jpg
- File:CRW 0700 RJ (100783608).jpg
- File:Dad Resting at our First Hotel (175757106).jpg
- File:Delorean (175759194).jpg
- File:Derek @ Gargantua (99791679).jpg
- File:Derek on Turtle (234869031).jpg
- File:Dinnertime (510053223).jpg
- File:Drinking, Resting at Magic Kingdom (175757304).jpg
- File:DSC00083 (175765731).jpg
- File:DSC00117 (175767564).jpg
- File:DSC00118 (175767619).jpg
- File:Ferry to Magic Kingdom (175758370).jpg
- File:Fresh Fish! (510050467).jpg
- File:German Guy (1871526399).jpg
- File:Getting Ready (1871518251).jpg
- File:Getting Water for Tea (1871541257).jpg
- File:Glenn "Chip" Burt (510034368).jpg
- File:Glenn & the M&Ms (510050195).jpg
- File:Goof Shot (100783634).jpg
- File:Greatest Dad (5774002854).jpg
- File:Hiking Club Guy (1871527265).jpg
- File:It's Hot (175756596).jpg
- File:Jan Eating (510030290).jpg
- File:Jaws (175761107).jpg
- File:Jaws (175761160).jpg
- File:Kid's Playground (175759450).jpg
- File:Kristin, Kev and Aziel (510027832).jpg
- File:Last day Cruise (3419371423).jpg
- File:Lilly (510033340).jpg
- File:Lunchtime (510031210).jpg
- File:Lunchtime (510035678).jpg
- File:Me & Aziel in the Solarium (3420037784).jpg
- File:Me (234868281).jpg
- File:Me @ Gargantua Harbour Lookout (99792002).jpg
- File:Me, Again (234868261).jpg
- File:Megan & Kristin (510051425).jpg
- File:Mel's Diner Happy Days (175759595).jpg
- File:Mickey's Living Room (175767243).jpg
- File:Minneapolis Queen (234868396).jpg
- File:Minneapolis Queen take 2 (234868360).jpg
- File:Minnesota 0677 (100783687).jpg
- File:Minnesota 0678 (100783691).jpg
- File:Mmm, food (510056781).jpg
- File:Mom and Magic Kingdom (175758239).jpg
- File:NASA Space Shuttle (175766305).jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as out of scope. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 14:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:32, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Photographs by Derek Hatfield 3
[edit]And more unused personal vacation photos, non-notable people, out of scope.
- File:Nice Day (2688564691).jpg
- File:Packing up (510056511).jpg
- File:Pluto (175767059).jpg
- File:Princess Caribbean Cruise - Day 3 (2415832377).jpg
- File:Princess Caribbean Cruise - Day 4 (2415848657).jpg
- File:Princess Caribbean Cruise - Day 5 (2415872487).jpg
- File:Princess Caribbean Cruise - Day 5 (2415872687).jpg
- File:Princess Caribbean Cruise - Day 5 (2416693246).jpg
- File:Princess Caribbean Cruise - Day 5 (2416693312).jpg
- File:Princess Caribbean Cruise - Day 5 (2416697586).jpg
- File:Princess Caribbean Cruise - Day 5 (2416699144).jpg
- File:Princess Caribbean Cruise - Day 5 (2416699230).jpg
- File:Princess Caribbean Cruise - Day 6 (2415895645).jpg
- File:Princess Caribbean Cruise - Day 6 (2415895699).jpg
- File:Princess Caribbean Cruise - Day 7 (2416733396).jpg
- File:Princess Caribbean Cruise - Day 7 (2416733866).jpg
- File:Princess Caribbean Cruise - Day 7 (2416734014).jpg
- File:Princess Caribbean Cruise - Day 7 (2416734340).jpg
- File:Princess Caribbean Cruise - Day 7 (2416734630).jpg
- File:Princess Caribbean Cruise - Day 7 (2416735056).jpg
- File:Princess Caribbean Cruise - Day 7 (2416735846).jpg
- File:Princess Caribbean Cruise - Day 8 (2416752112).jpg
- File:Randy (510028904).jpg
- File:Randy (510051503).jpg
- File:Ryan "Mr. Flip Flops" Sitch (510049451).jpg
- File:Ryan and Lilly (510055483).jpg
- File:Ryan Hatfield (510054441).jpg
- File:Ryan Takes a Picture (510055149).jpg
- File:Sea Lion (1871524445).jpg
- File:Sea Lion (1871525437).jpg
- File:Sea Lion (1871536113).jpg
- File:Sea Lion Area (1872348760).jpg
- File:Segway (175761924).jpg
- File:Self Portrait (175757422).jpg
- File:Serenade of the Seas (3419157045).jpg
- File:St. Maarten St. Martin (3420056018).jpg
- File:St. Maarten St. Martin (3420056176).jpg
- File:St. Thomas (3419179855).jpg
- File:St. Thomas (3419180929).jpg
- File:St. Thomas (3419181941).jpg
- File:Still Snow (132992395).jpg
- File:Sunset (510033792).jpg
- File:Sunset (510034058).jpg
- File:Sunset (510034220).jpg
- File:Todd (510029522).jpg
- File:Tuesday Ultimate - Just Disc League (28745200887).jpg
- File:Tuesday Ultimate - Just Disc League (42728790155).jpg
- File:Tuesday Ultimate - Just Disc League (42728790965).jpg
- File:Tuesday vs Honey Badgers (29932790908).jpg
- File:Tuesday vs Honey Badgers (29932791338).jpg
- File:Tuesday vs Honey Badgers (29932802838).jpg
- File:Tuesday vs Honey Badgers (42899038485).jpg
- File:Tuesday vs Honey Badgers (42899042645).jpg
- File:Tuesday vs Honey Badgers (42899049465).jpg
- File:Where are we? (175756489).jpg
- File:Where are we? (510036072).jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:45, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sculptures in Drammen
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Norway, except for buildings. Copyright expires 70 years after the artist's death. All of the nominated files contains artwork by artists who is living or died after 1952.
- File:22. juli minnesmerke Drammen 2014.jpg
- File:Bragernes strand Hengebuksvin.png
- File:Bragernes strand Spor av Kjersi Wexelsen Goksøyr.png
- File:Båt skulptur ved Skutebrygga på Bragernes01.png
- File:De syv tårn 4.png
- File:Drammen - no-nb digifoto 20150624 00243 NB MIT FNR 27835.jpg
- File:Drammen skulptur Blomsterpike.png
- File:Drammen skulptur livshjulet.png
- File:Drammen skulptur Stage Stone.png
- File:Drammen skulptur Tid.png
- File:Drammen skulptur Turbinen.png
- File:Drammen skulptur Turbinen2.jpg
- File:Drammen skulptur Ung stående kvinne.png
- File:Elveharpen sculpture in Drammen, Norway.jpg
- File:Flukt skulptur.jpg
- File:Folen skulp.png
- File:Fru Justitia1.png
- File:Gutt med fugl utenfor Aass bryggeri2.png
- File:Gutt på sykkel drammensbiblioteket5.png
- File:Herman Wildenvey statue Mjøndalen2.png
- File:Holmenokken.jpg
- File:Håndballspilleren Marienlyst Drammen.png
- File:Klatrende bjørn skulptur.png
- File:Kløende bjørn.png
- File:Laks i garn 1963 Svein Tollefsen og Karin Phil2.png
- File:Laksen i Pølsesvingen.png
- File:Lazy days chair Bragernes strand01.png
- File:Naken fiolinist skulptur.png
- File:Per Sivle statue.png
- File:Pike med eplekurv.png
- File:Pike med eplekurv2.jpg
- File:Pike med fisk.png
- File:Pike på stranden Aass bryggeri Drammen2.png
- File:Sigurd Christiansen byste.png
- File:Sitte på elefantryggen.png
- File:Situsva Bragernes strand4.png
- File:Sjøen kvinne med fullrigger løftet over hodet.png
- File:Skulp på søyle e.png
- File:Skulp på søyle3.png
- File:Skulptur Kjærlighetsbenken.png
- File:Skulptur Nøkken.png
- File:Skulptur Ung 79.png
- File:Skulpturen by og land.png
- File:Skulpturen Imagination.png
- File:Skulpturen Noravind ved Fylkeshuset i Drammen i 2005.jpg
- File:Termisk tidsprosjekt i Drammen.png
- File:The Spirit of Nokken.jpg
- File:Thorleif Haug statue Drammen.jpg
- File:Tiur skulptur i Drammene.png
- File:Tømmerfløteren drammen.png
- File:Ved min side Drammen.png
- File:Vertikal spiral Mjøndalen.png
4ing (talk) 08:17, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:47, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Per Ung
[edit]The artist, en:Per Ung, died in 2013, and his artwork is copyrighted until 2084 (70 years). No freedom of panorama in Norway, except for buildings.
- File:Arve Tellefsen statue.jpg
- File:Cornelius Cruys statue in Stavanger, Norway.JPG
- File:Kirkenes Denkmal.jpg
- File:Salome in Bergen.jpg
- File:Statue - panoramio (16).jpg
- File:Statue of Johanne Dybwads, Oslo, 21.08.2016.jpg
- File:Statue of Wenche Foss, Oslo, 21.08.2016.jpg
- File:Wenche Foss i roser.jpg
4ing (talk) 08:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:47, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joe young yu (talk · contribs)
[edit]We are not a host to mirror DeviantArt fan drawings, and drawings are COM:DWs of cartoon characters that copy expression from originals
- File:Pokemon Trainer Leaf fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Sans fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Palutena fan art by Andy-roo78.jpg
- File:Meta Knight fan art by Andy-roo78.jpg
- File:King Dedede fan art by Andy-roo78.jpg
- File:Zero Suit Samus fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Samus Aran fan art by Andy-roo78.jpg
- File:Dark Samus fan art by Andy-roo78.jpg
- File:Sheik fan art by Andy-roo78.jpg
- File:Young Link fan art by Andy-roo78.jpg
- File:Toon Link fan art by Andy-roo78.jpg
- File:Ganondorf fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Piranha Plant fan art by Andy-roo78.jpg
- File:Fox fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Diddy Kong fan art by Andy-roo78.jpg
- File:Bowser Jr. and Koopalings fan art by Andy-roo78.jpg
- File:Daisy fan art by Andy-roo78.jpg
- File:Mario fan art by Andy-roo78.jpg
- File:Dr. Mario fan art by Andy-roo78.jpg
- File:Miles Tails Prower Fan Art by Nancy Hebert.jpg
- File:Miles "Tails" Prower Fan Art by Aaronn.jpg
- File:Byleth fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Jigllypuff fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Pikachu fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Wolf fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Terry Bogard fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Eleven fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Falco fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Pichu fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Incineroar fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Roy fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Lucas fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Chrom fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Ness fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Shulk fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Min Min fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Minecraft Characters fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Marth fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Ice Climbers fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Lucina fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Ike fan art by Andy-roo78.jpg
- File:Pyra and Mythra fan art by Andy-roo78.png
- File:Robin fan art by Andy-roo78.jpg
- File:Dark Pit fan art by Andy-roo78.jpg
- File:Corrin (Male) fan art by Andy-roo78.jpg
- File:Robin (Female) fan art by Andy-roo78.jpg
- File:Smash ultimate 38 sonic by andy roo78 dezuf3k-fullview.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 14:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all as copyvio's. I noted one of these when it was uploaded, but didn't have time to do anything about it at the time. Regardless of the DW issue, the source pages state "All rights reserved" and there is no evidence of permission. Voice of Clam 09:10, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree with the arguments. The pictures are too similar to the original characters. --ZebaX2010 (talk) 21:27, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:48, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 66LordVader66 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality (blurry, or animal too far away, little discernable) random images of animals that are already well represented on Commons with higher quality images, no educational value, out of scope. All unused and unusable.
- File:Swan Egg.jpg
- File:Bird Swimming.jpg
- File:Seagull Rock 4.jpg
- File:Merganser Duck.jpg
- File:Common Grackle Rock.jpg
- File:Redwing Blackbird 3.jpg
- File:Redwing Blackbird 2.jpg
- File:Marsh Stream.jpg
- File:Squirrel Rock.jpg
- File:Flying Seagull 8.jpg
- File:Flying Seagull 7.jpg
- File:Flying Seagull 6.jpg
- File:Flying Seagull 5.jpg
- File:Flying Seagull 4.jpg
- File:Seagull Rock.jpg
- File:Flying Seagull 2.jpg
- File:Flying Seagull 3.jpg
- File:Flying Seagull.jpg
- File:Rocky Lake.jpg
- File:Canadian Beaver 3.jpg
- File:Butterfly Monarch 3.jpg
- File:Butterfly Monarch.jpg
- File:Butterfly Monarch 2.jpg
- File:Canadian Robin.jpg
- File:Canadian Beach 2.jpg
- File:Ducks in the Swamp.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:30, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amirrezapo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIOs - low res, no EXIF, elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:Mazaheri Sepahan.jpg is here; File:Shariyar Sepahan.jpg is here; File:Farshad Sepahan.jpg is here; etc.) - Duck/PRP
- File:Mazaheri Sepahan.jpg
- File:Jahani Sepahan.jpg
- File:Gvelesiani Sepahan.jpg
- File:Sedghi Sepahan.jpg
- File:Omid Sepahan.jpg
- File:Jalal sep.jpg
- File:Ali keykhosravi.jpg
- File:Farshad Sepahan.jpg
- File:Shariyar Sepahan.jpg
- File:Christopher Knett.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 18:36, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:52, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
La Gare de Méréville est maintenant une propriété privée et aucun droit n'a été donné pour cette photo. La Gare de Méréville (talk) 09:08, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Info The photo does not seem to be made from private area. However, it is unused and without geolocation data it is unlikely to be usefull. Ankry (talk) 22:19, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Ankry it is a closed train station and the location can be found here. Also we have received a deletion request via VRT. Probably we should keep it but I do not know, I am just here to share information. Bencemac (talk) 07:02, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Could it be possible to ear the legitimate request of the homeowner to obtain the deletion of this unapropriate and unauthaurized photo. La Gare de Méréville (talk) 18:55, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- @La Gare de Méréville: In order to keep image of your property private you need to make it not visible from public space. You cannot restrict use of public space in the way you are trying to. Ankry (talk) 22:35, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Could it be possible to ear the legitimate request of the homeowner to obtain the deletion of this unapropriate and unauthaurized photo. La Gare de Méréville (talk) 18:55, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, we are here to confirm that this photo's scene is a private area with car parked. The deletion is legitimate. Best regards. La Gare de Méréville (talk) 18:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Can you prove that the photographer position was in private area where trespassing was not allowed? Ankry (talk) 22:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Ankry it is a closed train station and the location can be found here. Also we have received a deletion request via VRT. Probably we should keep it but I do not know, I am just here to share information. Bencemac (talk) 07:02, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- -
Keep - Sory, I have a not enought good english level - Bonjour, Le problème est ardu car entre obligations légales et respect des sensibilités particulières c'est difficile d'établir des règles. Ce qui est sûr c'est que la reproduction d'une architecture originale dont le créateur est mort depuis moins de 70 ans est interdite sur Commons. Votre maison ne semble pas avoir une quelconque originalité sauf d'être une ancienne gare, elle doit peut-être figurer sur des cartes postales des années 1900 qui sont elles dans le domaine public. Un litige ancien dont je me souviens : une maison aux volets bleus très typique (en Bretagne ?) figurant comme sujet principal sur des cartes postales des années 1990 contre l'avis du propriétaire a eu raison en justice contre l'éditeur (si je me souviens, à vérifier). Maintenant, si pour tous les villages de France où l'on voit une maison il fallait avoir l'autorisation des propriétaires (voir des locataires) actuels, on n'en sortirai pas. Être une ancienne gare est un élément assez particulier qui fait partie de l'histoire du lieu, la personne qui a fait la photo n'avait sans doute que ce motif en tête. Votre nom ne figure pas sur la photo, le bâtiment est ainsi anonyme, je pencherai plutôt pour un maintien de la photo. Bien cordialement - Siren-Com (talk) 10:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, en tant que propriétaires de cette maison, nous réitérons notre demande de suppression et vous remercions d'y souscrire. La suggestion que nous apportons d'apporter la preuve des autorisations n'est en soit pas dénuée de sens. Il y a une grande différence entre prendre un cliché pour son cercle privé ou le publier sur le net. Cette différence est de taille et mérite réflexion. L'ancienne Gare de Méréville est connue, le bâtiment n'est donc pas anonyme puisqu'on y aperçoit nettement le nom de Méréville sur le fronton. Nous ne souhaitons pas que cette photo inutile montant une voiture garée à l'arrière demeure sur le site. Merci de votre compréhension. Cordialement. La Gare de Méréville (talk) 19:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- - Delete d'architecture non originale, ce bâtiment faisant partie de l'ancienne gare a aussi subit depuis de grosses transformations et on ne voit pas l'intérêt de garder cette photo (pour illustrer cette ancienne gare) qui de plus fait apparaitre une arrière cour privative et une voiture... Une carte postale de l'époque serait plus parlante et appropriée --Thor19 (talk) 14:07, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, vous avez vraiment vu juste et vos propos rejoignent les nôtres. Merci pour votre action. Cordialement. La Gare de Méréville (talk) 19:17, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, je ne connais pas Méréville mais si j'en croit GoogleMaps ici signalé par Bencemac, il y a possibilité de faire une photo plus “neutre” de cette ancienne gare. Il vous suffira de la télécharger et je pense que l'on ne s'opposera pas à la suppression de cette photo qui vous dérange. Je vois aussi l'annonce d'une brocante dans cette ancienne gare le dimanche 03 Juillet 2022... --Thor19 (talk) 20:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, vous avez vraiment vu juste et vos propos rejoignent les nôtres. Merci pour votre action. Cordialement. La Gare de Méréville (talk) 19:17, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Importée il y a deux ans, aucune raison valable pour la suppression. / Uploaded 2 years ago, no valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 14:21, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, peu importe l'ancienneté du cliché, puisqu'en tant que propriétaire des lieux, nous découvrons cette photo inappropriée et que nous vous faisons part de notre souhait de la faire supprimer, merci à vous d'y apporter une écoute bienveillante et d'y souscrire. Cordialement La Gare de Méréville (talk) 19:16, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Etre propriétaire du bâtiment ne vous donne pas de droits sur son image. Cette image respecte la vie privée, il n'y a personne sur la photo. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 20:40, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, peu importe l'ancienneté du cliché, puisqu'en tant que propriétaire des lieux, nous découvrons cette photo inappropriée et que nous vous faisons part de notre souhait de la faire supprimer, merci à vous d'y apporter une écoute bienveillante et d'y souscrire. Cordialement La Gare de Méréville (talk) 19:16, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Neutral for now. While I see no privacy issue here, the photo is poor and I would support its deletion per courtesy if we have a better photo of this object. But we have not. Ankry (talk) 22:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- I would also support deletion if we have another, better image of this building. Yann (talk) 09:46, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pyb (talk) 18:32, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
画像がNHKからの転載 尾張の人 (talk) 10:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Google-transl. "Image reprinted from NHK". What is NHK? --Túrelio (talk) 10:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- en:NHK. --Achim55 (talk) 11:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Nhk is a Japanese sumo wrestling organization, which is an abbreviation of the Japanese abbreviation of "Japan Hakuho Association". Furthermore, this image is part of the animation video made in 1940, so there is no copyright.(日本語訳: Nhkとは、日本の大相撲組織で、「日本白鵬協会」の日本語の略のローマ字です。 さらに、この画像は1940年に作られたアニメの映像の一部なので、著作権はありません。)
秋に枯葉が冬に摂津きり丸 (talk) 12:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted by Yann. --Yasu (talk) 15:30, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Ybsone (talk) 16:57, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete Almost certainly a copyright violation considering the image size, resolution, lack of metadata, and uploader's history. --Sable232 (talk) 14:31, 3 July 2022 (UTC)- Speedy delete Obviously a copyvio - this is a professionally produced marketing image, not an own work photograph. If you go to the website for this van, https://www.fiatprofessional.com/doblo/new-doblo and scroll down to the "packs" section you can see this image in use. The website is clearly marked "all rights reserved". 192.76.8.85 14:35, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Copyvio. --Achim55 (talk) 16:30, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Ybsone (talk) 16:58, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Obvious manufacturer promotional image. --Sable232 (talk) 14:28, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Copyvio. --Achim55 (talk) 16:33, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Ybsone (talk) 16:58, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Obvious manufacturer promotional image. --Sable232 (talk) 14:29, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as a copyvio. Obviously not an own work image - these are professionally produced publicity shots. If you go to the website for this van (https://www.fiatprofessional.com/doblo/new-doblo), which clearly states "all rights reserved", you can see these shots in use. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 192.76.8.85 (talk) 14:39, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 16:37, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Pornography 91.189.34.29 08:07, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- This does not seem like a proper reason. --Trade (talk) 17:14, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete COM:PORN is a valid reason; this serves no educational purpose unless we have a project page somewhere involving nude old men with erect penises wearing cowboy accessories. Keep in valid use, previous does not apply. We don’t really have many well-taken erotic shots of elderly men so no real reason to delete. Dronebogus (talk) 11:48, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: speedy keep, bad-faith driveby nomination, in use. Dronebogus (talk) 02:46, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
No evidence at source (Facebook) that image is available under a Commons-compatible license. This uploader has uploaded this image numerous times; see their talk page. Sanctions are recommended. Kinu (talk) 16:43, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 04:39, 15 July 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Promo/press photo --Krdbot 06:59, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Artist died in 1984, copyright expires 70 years after the artist's death. no freedom of panorama in Norway (except for buildings). 4ing (talk) 08:09, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- I was not aware of copyright restrictions when I uploaded this one many years ago. So I guess we have to delete. Erik den yngre (talk) 11:56, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Xover (talk) 13:04, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:41, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Artist died in 2013, copyright expires 70 years after the artist's death. No freedom of panorama in norway (except for buildings) 4ing (talk) 08:12, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Vinguru (talk) 09:58, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Xover (talk) 13:04, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:41, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Scope? What is this? Dronebogus (talk) 11:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unused and uncategorized drawing of unclear purpose. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:43, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Because it is A selfie, Blurry, Nonsense Lampada centenaria (talk) 19:10, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Lampada centenaria: I can't stop laughing. Pasztilla (talk) 20:38, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep It is a picture on an open-air statue, our colleague is only making fun. Pasztilla (talk) 20:40, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: neither a selfie nor blurry, perfectly acceptable photo of a statue in Hungary (which, by the way, also has freedom of panorama, so no potential issues there either). --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:46, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The depicted graffito is above threshold of originality and thereby copyrightable. Regrettably, France has no freedom-of-panorama exception for public works. This deletion-request was opened also to discuss whether there are any other exception-rules in France that might allow us to keep it legally.-- Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello ! What is meant by above threshold of originality and thereby copyrightable ? It is not a work of art, like a fresco or a trompe-l'oeil made by an artist. This graffiti is not signed, in an alley without passage (or almost) and is probably the work of an enlightened graffiti artist... Now if you erase it because it's too beautiful... so much the worse! =>
Sg7438 discuter, c'est ici ! 09:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC) - I also took a general picture, you can see the graffiti there => [1]. If this photo is deleted, you should also aim for the general one (attached here), thanks! => Sg7438 discuter, c'est ici ! 09:40, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- In the overview-image the graffiti is de minimis, i.e. not relevant wrt copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 10:19, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- "threshold of originality" is explained on the page which is linked at my first mention of the term. --Túrelio (talk) 20:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ok thank you : I discover but I disaprove : how that graffiti could be copyrightable when it bears the "imprint of the personality of the author ? The author is unknown (as well as generally the authors of graffiti ?) - Nothing allows to identify the creator, it is an ephemeral work. You tell me that this image is illegal, and suggest to remove it. What amazes me is that you still import it to wiki:de (here=: how can you do that ? I mean, assuming my share doesn't meet the rules, then its sharing license is not compliant and you can't use it on wiki:de (while I can't leave it on Commons or on Wiki:fr) - how's that? In any case I disapprove of it (too) and if my picture should be deleted here I ask you to delete it from wiki:de too... I will share it in another photo bank of my choice! Thanks! => Sg7438 discuter, c'est ici ! 05:05, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- The reason why it is considered o.k. on :de, is the en:Lex_loci#Lex_loci_protectionis_(Schutzlandprinzip), as Austria, Germany and Switzerland have freedom-of-panorama exception, as opposed to France. Commons has slightly different rules (usually more narrow) as single Wikipedia-versions, which are mainly bound by local laws.
- It is sad that you do not agree to have the image on :de, but it's your choice. I will now request it for deletion, because it is either without your approval or unnecessary anyway. --Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- we misunderstood each other: i am for sharing photos. But if this one can't be used on Commons (according to you), nor on Wiki:fr, there is no reason for you to export it and for it to be used on Wiki:de (I have nothing against German speakers): a photo located in France should be first
- usable by this community before anything else, right? In any case, if my photo violates the rules, which is why you nominated it, I consider that its export/duplication violates the sharing rules... => Sg7438 discuter, c'est ici ! 08:03, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- No, it does not, as explained above. And exporting it to :de would allow its use at least on this project. Anyway, per your expressed wish I've filed it for deletion on :de, where it has already been deleted[2]. --Túrelio (talk) 08:20, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello to you... after one month can you tell me if my photo will be deleted or kept? Thanks in advance! => Sg7438 discuter, c'est ici ! 06:53, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- It will likely be deleted. However, as I opened this DR, it wouldn't be good style, if I also decided/closed it. Feel free to ask another admin to close/decide it. --Túrelio (talk) 08:52, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hello to you... after one month can you tell me if my photo will be deleted or kept? Thanks in advance! =>
- No, it does not, as explained above. And exporting it to :de would allow its use at least on this project. Anyway, per your expressed wish I've filed it for deletion on :de, where it has already been deleted[2]. --Túrelio (talk) 08:20, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ok thank you : I discover but I disaprove : how that graffiti could be copyrightable when it bears the "imprint of the personality of the author ? The author is unknown (as well as generally the authors of graffiti ?) - Nothing allows to identify the creator, it is an ephemeral work. You tell me that this image is illegal, and suggest to remove it. What amazes me is that you still import it to wiki:de (here=: how can you do that ? I mean, assuming my share doesn't meet the rules, then its sharing license is not compliant and you can't use it on wiki:de (while I can't leave it on Commons or on Wiki:fr) - how's that? In any case I disapprove of it (too) and if my picture should be deleted here I ask you to delete it from wiki:de too... I will share it in another photo bank of my choice! Thanks! =>
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![13 File:Serena marchese Balletto di Roma "Spettacolo Astor".jpg](#File:Serena_marchese_Balletto_di_Roma_"Spettacolo_Astor".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(taft_ave.,_ermita,_manila;_2014-10-20).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![16:12, 9 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/06/09#c-Gian222-2022-06-09T16:12:00.000Z-File:Serena_marchese_Balletto_di_Roma_"Spettacolo_Astor".jpg){kind=link}
![01:28, 10 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/06/09#c-Krdbot-2022-06-10T01:28:00.000Z-File:Serena_marchese_Balletto_di_Roma_"Spettacolo_Astor".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_fan_art_by_Andy-roo78.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_fan_art_by_Andy-roo78.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:B%C3%A2timent_rue_du_Th%C3%A9%C3%A2tre_(Charleville-M%C3%A9zi%C3%A8res).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[2]](https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Graffiti_Araign%C3%A9e_(rue_du_Th%C3%A9%C3%A2tre_-_Charleville-M%C3%A9zi%C3%A8res).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:14, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Obviously another sock of the habitual copyright offender on cricket pages (Special:Contributions/Qilhri et al). This one copyright Getty Images: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/58510142 David Biddulph (talk) 08:44, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 15:18, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
nothing from the uploader to state they own the image Lugnuts (talk) 07:19, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose I have never claimed to own this image. It is owned by the Afganistan Cricket Boards’s Youtube channel which I have stated. They have uploaded their video under a commons license. Hamza Ali Shah (talk) 15:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:34, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
nothing from the uploader to show they own the image Lugnuts (talk) 07:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose I have never claimed to own this image. It is owned by the Afganistan Cricket Boards’s Youtube channel which I have stated. They have uploaded their video under a commons license. Hamza Ali Shah (talk) 15:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:33, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DMacks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Nonfree creative logo Yann (talk) 21:58, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/File:20thcenturystudios.svg. No evidence of Fox releasing its logos under a free license. DMacks (talk) 11:00, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 12:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DMacks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Nonfree creative logo Yann (talk) 21:58, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/File:20thcenturystudios.svg. No evidence of Fox releasing its logos under a free license. DMacks (talk) 11:00, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 12:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
No confirmation of free license in given source Kamolan (talk) 11:36, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Should be copyvio eligible per the website's permission information.廣九直通車 (talk) 03:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted (non-admin closure): Speedily deleted for copyright violation by Túrelio.廣九直通車 (talk) 04:38, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
File:National bureau of investigation (nbi compound) (taft ave., ermita, manila; 2014-10-20).jpg
[edit]_(taft_ave.,_ermita,_manila;_2014-10-20).jpg){kind=link}
_(taft_ave.,_ermita,_manila;_2014-10-20).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 廣九直通車 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as non-uploader G7-mistagged it, when they meant possible derivative-problem due to missing FoP-exception. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: I'm the one who uploaded the file to Commons through FileImporter (see this edit record on English Wikipedia), so I think it is legitimate for me to apply CSD G7 on this file.廣九直通車 (talk) 07:04, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- G7 is valid for up to 7 days after upload. This one was uploaded in 2017. Focus on the derivative-aspect instead. --Túrelio (talk) 07:08, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- @廣九直通車 the CSD criteria (for user requests) is valid only for the original uploader and not the importer. Nevertheless avoid transferring Patrick Roque's photos of buildings for a while as majority of the buildings he photographed are unfree. You may want to ask me or @Howdy.carabao: if you are unsure about the architectural background of a particular Philippine building (we just want to avoid needless deletion requests). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:55, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Info take note, Category:National Bureau of Investigation Main Office (Ermita, Manila) (for anyone's information). I haven't made some research over who is the designer/architect of this work, however (due to my personal/real life schedules). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:39, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Leaning towards Keep, apparently reached the {{PD-Philippines-FoP work}} cut-off time. As per this 2019 article by the Philippine Star, "NBI spokesman Ferdinand Lavin said the bureau is looking at transferring to a new location by the end of the year after the 49-year-old building was condemned by the Department of Public Works and Highways as early as 2015." (with regards to possible demolition and its replacement because of the building's decaying structure). Subtracting from the article year, 2019-49=1970. So still reached pre-December 1972 cut-off time. For anyone's information, this public building is an œuvre or artwork of w:nl:Otilio Arellano (source, refer to page 5 of the document). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:42, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Wow, thanks for your careful inquiry. Then it seems that the file can be safely kept per your information.廣九直通車 (talk) 05:37, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
_(taft_ave.,_ermita,_manila;_2014-10-20).jpg&diff=1092258741&oldid=771034233){kind=link}
Kept: PD. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Self-promotion —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2a01:cb10:446:ae00:7911:4872:cc1e:5472 (talk) 14:58, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: User page image of a contributor on fr:wp. --Achim (talk) 15:16, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Valid user across wikis. --Gbawden (talk) 11:50, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Car je suis le droit d'auteur, et je ne veux pas que quelqu'un réutilise ma photo Maxime Régnier (talk) 13:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lotte World Tower
[edit]This sort of blackout might be OK for a rectangular building, but not this one. The shape of the tower is unusual and, therefore, covered by the copyright, so these images infringe on the copyright for the tower design.
.jpg){kind=link}
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:42, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Shape of the tower is simple enough. Yann (talk) 21:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As Yann. The shape is too simple. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:31, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Please read this discussion. Ox1997cow (talk) 03:59, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I don't think an architectural copyright would give you right to prevent other buildings from being made in that basic shape. Would need to be more of an explicit copy than that, I think. File:Lotte world tower (censored).jpg is borderline being a photo of a wider scene, as well, and maybe not needing the censoring in the first place (though close). Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:08, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Clindberg:
Comment Please read this discussion. Lotte World Tower is too prominent, so it's censored. Ox1997cow (talk) 19:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Well, that wasn't the question being asked in the related court cases -- the question is if the tower is an accessory to a larger scene, then the photo is not a derivative work. Granted, court cases in other countries, but we also have no court cases anywhere else where copyright owners even complain about stuff like this. If the photo is focusing on the copyrighted work in particular, that is when issues begin to arise, it seems. Or if something is intentionally included which did not need to be there. Carl Lindberg (talk) 20:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Clindberg:
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:54, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
part of a series here, where all other maps are free to use (the entire series is also on Commons).However, this one might be an exception as it's property of Bing Maps (Microsoft) and I don't know of an agreement that would make it free to use here. Enyavar (talk) 10:30, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:12, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Verónica Rodríguez 2016
[edit]I cannot confirm the cc license - no cc license at source
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 11:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. The photo is from a YouTube video, which is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported. The link to the video is provided in the summary. Sweethavxn (talk) 13:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Sweethavxn: I did exactly that. On youtube I clicked Show More and there is no CC license mentioned, hence the DR Gbawden (talk) 14:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: confirm there is no CC license at source. --Эlcobbola talk 18:16, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Image still protected by copyright in USA under URAA. This image is uploaded after 2012, shouldn't be allowed on Commons 219.78.191.240 03:08, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: According with this page, "a mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion [of that file]". 83.61.243.178 16:35, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:55, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Image still protected by copyright in USA under URAA. This image is uploaded after 2012, shouldn't be allowed on Commons 219.78.191.240 03:09, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:58, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image still protected by copyright in USA under URAA. This image is uploaded after 2012, shouldn't be allowed on Commons 219.78.191.240 03:09, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:58, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image still protected by copyright in USA under URAA. This image is uploaded after 2012, shouldn't be allowed on Commons 219.78.191.240 03:09, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: According with this page, "a mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion [of that file]". 83.61.243.178 16:34, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:58, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Image still protected by copyright in USA under URAA. This image is uploaded after 2012, shouldn't be allowed on Commons 219.78.191.240 03:09, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: According with this page, "a mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion [of that file]". 83.61.243.178 16:34, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:58, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Image still protected by copyright in USA under URAA. This image is uploaded after 2012, shouldn't be allowed on Commons 219.78.191.240 03:09, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: According with this page, "a mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion [of that file]". 83.61.243.178 16:33, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:58, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Image still protected by copyright in USA under URAA. This image is uploaded after 2012, shouldn't be allowed on Commons 219.78.191.240 03:10, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: URAA can't be the sole reason for deletion. 83.61.243.178 15:56, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:58, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image still protected by copyright in USA under URAA. This image is uploaded after 2012, shouldn't be allowed on Commons 219.78.191.240 03:10, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: According with this page, "a mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion [of that file]". 83.61.243.178 16:33, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:58, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image still protected by copyright in USA under URAA. This image is uploaded after 2012, shouldn't be allowed on Commons 219.78.191.240 03:10, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: According with this page, "a mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion [of that file]". 83.61.243.178 16:33, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:58, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Image still protected by copyright in USA under URAA. This image is uploaded after 2012, shouldn't be allowed on Commons 219.78.191.240 06:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Image still protected by copyright in USA under URAA. This image is uploaded after 2012, shouldn't be allowed on Commons 219.78.191.240 06:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: According with this page, "a mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion [of that file]". 83.61.243.178 16:29, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Image still protected by copyright in USA under URAA. This image is uploaded after 2012, shouldn't be allowed on Commons 219.78.191.240 06:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: According with this page, "a mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion [of that file]". 83.61.243.178 16:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Image still protected by copyright in USA under URAA. This image is uploaded after 2012, shouldn't be allowed on Commons 219.78.191.240 06:51, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: According with this page, "a mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion [of that file]". 83.61.243.178 16:30, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Portrait of Wallis Simpson taken in the gown she wore when presented at court in the 1930s.jpg
[edit]
Image still protected by copyright in USA under URAA. This image is uploaded after 2012, shouldn't be allowed on Commons 219.78.191.240 06:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: According with this page, "a mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion [of that file]". 83.61.243.178 16:28, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Image still protected by copyright in USA under URAA. This image is uploaded after 2012, shouldn't be allowed on Commons 219.78.191.240 06:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: According with this page, "a mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion [of that file]". 83.61.243.178 16:29, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Image still protected by copyright in USA under URAA. This image is uploaded after 2012, shouldn't be allowed on Commons 219.78.191.240 06:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: According with this page, "a mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion [of that file]". 83.61.243.178 16:28, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
It's not clear that this is a work of the US Government. Seems likely that Nina produced this photo herself since she tweeted it out. Nweil (talk) 22:51, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Speedy keep Let's not be ridiculous. She refers to it as her "official portrait" in the tweet. Do you really expect us to believe that immediately after getting a DHS job, she 1) falsified an government document, and 2) lied about it? Come on. If you really need more evidence, The Guardian gives the credit "Photograph: United States Department of Homeland Security". ― Tartan357 Talk 01:13, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Im not claiming she falsified anything. I'm saying she hired a photographer to take a professional portrait. That's a pretty common occurrence, probably happens the majority of the time. Thus not public domain. Isnt the standard to be cautious rather than presumptuous? Nweil (talk) 02:42, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- i think the fact that the guardian said Photograph: United States Department of Homeland Security is good enough verification Cononsense (talk) 02:58, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- I would also think a government official’s statement was sufficient. Innisfree987 (talk) 04:33, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- She used the term "official portrait" in the context of her DHS position, which means this photo is officially associated with the department. And it certainly appears to match the style of other DHS official portraits, such as File:Secretary Mayorkas Official Photo.jpg, which has an identical background. I think it is much more likely that this is in fact official rather than a photo she privately had taken to mimic the exact conditions of an official government photo. Being cautious does not require disregarding the obvious in favor of hypotheticals. We are not presuming anything, there is clear evidence here of who made this. ― Tartan357 Talk 03:37, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Look I'm not going to fight this one to the death but a few points to consider. We're not trying to figure out if it has the conferred title of "official" or not. We're trying to figure out if a federal employee took the picture. The fact that secretary Mayorkas's photo looks similar to Nina's is more of an indication that this was taken by a private photographer since the secretary of all people wants to look his best. Regarding the Guardian, I personally doubt they fact-checked anything? But it's a fair point. I could find the picture used in two other news outlets and both sourced it back to Twitter, not DHS. Finally if "mimicking the exact conditions of an official government photo" means putting two flags in the background, it's not very difficult. Ok I'm probably done with replying here. Thanks Nweil (talk) 15:05, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- "[Mayorkas's photo] was taken by a private photographer since the secretary of all people wants to look his best." Umm, what? Mayorkas's photo is obviously an official government one. There is metadata on that file crediting "DHS photo by Zachary Hupp". I do not agree at all that cabinet secretaries do not get photos taken by the government, this is a long-established practice and you are making this rather bizarre claim to the contrary without any evidence. ― Tartan357 Talk 19:53, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Look I'm not going to fight this one to the death but a few points to consider. We're not trying to figure out if it has the conferred title of "official" or not. We're trying to figure out if a federal employee took the picture. The fact that secretary Mayorkas's photo looks similar to Nina's is more of an indication that this was taken by a private photographer since the secretary of all people wants to look his best. Regarding the Guardian, I personally doubt they fact-checked anything? But it's a fair point. I could find the picture used in two other news outlets and both sourced it back to Twitter, not DHS. Finally if "mimicking the exact conditions of an official government photo" means putting two flags in the background, it's not very difficult. Ok I'm probably done with replying here. Thanks Nweil (talk) 15:05, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- i think the fact that the guardian said Photograph: United States Department of Homeland Security is good enough verification Cononsense (talk) 02:58, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Im not claiming she falsified anything. I'm saying she hired a photographer to take a professional portrait. That's a pretty common occurrence, probably happens the majority of the time. Thus not public domain. Isnt the standard to be cautious rather than presumptuous? Nweil (talk) 02:42, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Unsplash images are non-free after June 2017 219.78.191.240 07:18, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:45, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
filename is not adequate for reference in Wikidata BWenk (talk) 09:30, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: you don't need to delete a file just to give it another name. I'll move the file to another name without the brackets; feel free to apply for File renaming if a file name is off for some reason. --Rosenzweig τ 06:48, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I uploaded it by accident Dovaere (talk) 10:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:50, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Artist is en:Knut Steen (+ 2011). Copyrighted until 2082, no freedom of panorama in Norway (except for buildings). 4ing (talk) 12:37, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2082. --Rosenzweig τ 06:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Did Naterez71 actually obtain the permission of David Nicholson before uploading this image? (See http://www.15q.net/disc.html) With all due respect, if an image is uploaded to Commons from a personal site, and the owner of that personal site makes clear that they do not allow use of that image elsewhere without their permission, then I feel that if that permission has *not* been obtained the image should be deleted from Commons there and then, before the personal site owner decides to take legal action. Klondike53226 (talk) 01:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Clear copyright violation. As the original author's disclaimer page indicates, some images may have been retouched for illustrative purposes. There is no reason to risk keeping this nor any other image stolen from that website. --Sable232 (talk) 14:56, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:18, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Did Naterez71 actually obtain the permission of David Nicholson before uploading this image? (See http://www.15q.net/disc.html) With all due respect, if an image is uploaded to Commons from a personal site, and the owner of that personal site makes clear that they do not allow use of that image elsewhere without their permission, then I feel that if that permission has *not* been obtained the image should be deleted from Commons there and then, before the personal site owner decides to take legal action. Klondike53226 (talk) 01:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Clear copyright violation. As the original author's disclaimer page indicates, some images may have been retouched for illustrative purposes. There is no reason to risk keeping this nor any other image stolen from that website. --Sable232 (talk) 14:57, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:18, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Did Naterez71 actually obtain the permission of David Nicholson before uploading this image? (See http://www.15q.net/disc.html) With all due respect, if an image is uploaded to Commons from a personal site, and the owner of that personal site makes clear that they do not allow use of that image elsewhere without their permission, then I feel that if that permission has *not* been obtained the image should be deleted from Commons there and then, before the personal site owner decides to take legal action. Klondike53226 (talk) 01:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see enough creativity to award copyright protection. PD-ineligible would be the correct license. --RAN (talk) 05:55, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Clear copyright violation. As the original author's disclaimer page indicates, some images may have been retouched for illustrative purposes. There is no reason to risk keeping this nor any other image stolen from that website. --Sable232 (talk) 14:58, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. True, the license plate itself is simple and can be freely photographed, but we can't take photos of others and assume they are free. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:18, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Did Naterez71 actually obtain the permission of David Nicholson before uploading this image? (See http://www.15q.net/disc.html) With all due respect, if an image is uploaded to Commons from a personal site, and the owner of that personal site makes clear that they do not allow use of that image elsewhere without their permission, then I feel that if that permission has *not* been obtained the image should be deleted from Commons there and then, before the personal site owner decides to take legal action. Klondike53226 (talk) 01:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Clear copyright violation. As the original author's disclaimer page indicates, some images may have been retouched for illustrative purposes. There is no reason to risk keeping this nor any other image stolen from that website. --Sable232 (talk) 14:58, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
OOS CRSP Dronebogus (talk) 01:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No meaningful edits. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:16, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Did Naterez71 actually obtain the permission of David Nicholson before uploading this image? (See http://www.15q.net/disc.html) With all due respect, if an image is uploaded to Commons from a personal site, and the owner of that personal site makes clear that they do not allow use of that image elsewhere without their permission, then I feel that if that permission has *not* been obtained the image should be deleted from Commons there and then, before the personal site owner decides to take legal action. Klondike53226 (talk) 01:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Clear copyright violation. As the original author's disclaimer page indicates, some images may have been retouched for illustrative purposes. There is no reason to risk keeping this nor any other image stolen from that website. --Sable232 (talk) 14:59, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Did Naterez71 actually obtain the permission of David Nicholson before uploading this image? (See http://www.15q.net/disc.html) With all due respect, if an image is uploaded to Commons from a personal site, and the owner of that personal site makes clear that they do not allow use of that image elsewhere without their permission, then I feel that if that permission has *not* been obtained the image should be deleted from Commons there and then, before the personal site owner decides to take legal action. Klondike53226 (talk) 01:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Clear copyright violation. As the original author's disclaimer page indicates, some images may have been retouched for illustrative purposes. There is no reason to risk keeping this nor any other image stolen from that website. --Sable232 (talk) 14:59, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Did Naterez71 actually obtain the permission of David Nicholson before uploading this image? (See http://www.15q.net/disc.html) With all due respect, if an image is uploaded to Commons from a personal site, and the owner of that personal site makes clear that they do not allow use of that image elsewhere without their permission, then I feel that if that permission has *not* been obtained the image should be deleted from Commons there and then, before the personal site owner decides to take legal action. Klondike53226 (talk) 01:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Clear copyright violation. As the original author's disclaimer page indicates, some images may have been retouched for illustrative purposes. There is no reason to risk keeping this nor any other image stolen from that website. --Sable232 (talk) 14:59, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Did Naterez71 actually obtain the permission of David Nicholson before uploading this image? (See http://www.15q.net/disc.html) With all due respect, if an image is uploaded to Commons from a personal site, and the owner of that personal site makes clear that they do not allow use of that image elsewhere without their permission, then I feel that if that permission has *not* been obtained the image should be deleted from Commons there and then, before the personal site owner decides to take legal action. Klondike53226 (talk) 01:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Clear copyright violation. As the original author's disclaimer page indicates, some images may have been retouched for illustrative purposes. There is no reason to risk keeping this nor any other image stolen from that website. --Sable232 (talk) 14:59, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Did Naterez71 actually obtain the permission of David Nicholson before uploading this image? (See http://www.15q.net/disc.html) With all due respect, if an image is uploaded to Commons from a personal site, and the owner of that personal site makes clear that they do not allow use of that image elsewhere without their permission, then I feel that if that permission has *not* been obtained the image should be deleted from Commons there and then, before the personal site owner decides to take legal action. Klondike53226 (talk) 01:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Clear copyright violation. As the original author's disclaimer page indicates, some images may have been retouched for illustrative purposes. There is no reason to risk keeping this nor any other image stolen from that website. --Sable232 (talk) 15:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Did Naterez71 actually obtain the permission of David Nicholson before uploading this image? (See http://www.15q.net/disc.html) With all due respect, if an image is uploaded to Commons from a personal site, and the owner of that personal site makes clear that they do not allow use of that image elsewhere without their permission, then I feel that if that permission has *not* been obtained the image should be deleted from Commons there and then, before the personal site owner decides to take legal action. Klondike53226 (talk) 01:27, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Clear copyright violation. As the original author's disclaimer page indicates, some images may have been retouched for illustrative purposes. There is no reason to risk keeping this nor any other image stolen from that website. --Sable232 (talk) 15:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Did Naterez71 actually obtain the permission of David Nicholson before uploading this image? (See http://www.15q.net/disc.html) With all due respect, if an image is uploaded to Commons from a personal site, and the owner of that personal site makes clear that they do not allow use of that image elsewhere without their permission, then I feel that if that permission has *not* been obtained the image should be deleted from Commons there and then, before the personal site owner decides to take legal action. Klondike53226 (talk) 01:27, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Clear copyright violation. As the original author's disclaimer page indicates, some images may have been retouched for illustrative purposes. There is no reason to risk keeping this nor any other image stolen from that website. --Sable232 (talk) 15:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Picture taken by Ulf Karlsson in 1986 (see http://www.itdemokrati.nu/page60.html). Bbx (talk) 01:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:19, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright infringement of Via Quatro https://exame.com/brasil/e-mails-mostram-indicios-de-superfaturamento-na-linha-4-do-metro/ Sorocabano 32 (talk) 03:14, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:21, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Tagged by DMacks as copyvio. The captions say (in Korean) "Heavenbot 01", "Heavenbot 02", and "Heaven 3"; is this own work? Regardless, as an unidentified musical composition this is probably out of scope.
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:40, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
EXIF says "John Lee Images"; most other uploads by this editor have been copyvio (typically from Emily Carr's websites) DMacks (talk) 07:09, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Likewise:
DMacks (talk) 07:10, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
EXIF says "Ema Peter"; most other uploads by this editor have been copyvio (typically from Emily Carr's websites) DMacks (talk) 07:13, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Q: I work for ECU and have uploaded this image from our stock image library. This image has full marketing permissions released, with no need for credit. As we (the university) retain the rights, are we able to use it in this way? Gmco1 (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Gnco1: In that case please send a COM:VRT permission by e-mail to verify the license. --Rosenzweig τ 17:15, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete if ever permission has been received. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:23, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
belongs to Agence France-Presse Bar (talk to me) 08:43, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:25, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Works by Jacques Bony
[edit]Artist died in 2003, so his art works are not in the public domain yet. The photos were uploaded by Pascal Jacques Bony, probably a son or another family member. A month ago I asked for a VRT ticket, see Category talk:Works by Jacques Bony, but there was no reaction. See also File talk:Jacques Bony Ile St Louis 1953 001.jpg for the preceding.
- File:Adoration des bergers Jacques Bony 1944 s.jpg
- File:Jacques Bony Rosace 1989 s.jpg
- File:Vitrail de la Vierge Immac Boulogne.jpg
JopkeB (talk) 09:10, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:26, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Murals in Fort Smith, Arkansas
[edit]No freedom of panorama in the United States for 2D works, per COM:FOP US. Needs permission from mural artists via COM:VRT.
- File:Unexpected Fort Smith Mural by Ana Maria (2).JPG
- File:Unexpected Fort Smith Mural by ANA MARIA.JPG
- File:Unexpected Fort Smith Mural by ASKEW.JPG
- File:Unexpected Fort Smith Mural by BICICLETA SEM FREIO.JPG
- File:Unexpected Fort Smith Mural by D*FACE.JPG
- File:Unexpected Fort Smith Mural by MASER.JPG
- File:Unexpected Fort Smith Mural by ROA (2).JPG
- File:Unexpected Fort Smith Mural by ROA.JPG
- File:Unexpected Fort Smith Mural by UAFS.JPG
- File:Unexpected Fort Smith Mural by VHILS.JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 09:13, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:26, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Two files in Category:Jacques Bony
[edit]No VRT ticket for two photos that were not made by the uploader. Photo 1 was made by the mother of the uploader, who did not die 70+ years ago (the photo is made in 1953). Photo 2 is an extract of photo 1. On File talk:Jacques Bony Ile St Louis 1953 001.jpg the uploader gave his consent also on behalf of his brothers and sisters; I asked for a VRT request, but he did not answer.
JopkeB (talk) 09:19, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:27, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Flickrwashing, acc only has this photo, which has FB MD in exif Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:27, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
food ITSIST (talk) 10:05, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PACKAGING. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:29, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
copyvio; image appears to be taken from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/surat/ukai-dam-has-sufficient-water-to-meet-demand-until-july/articleshow/68650564.cms, it looks really sharp and wrongly upscaled while the image from the article does not Nutshinou Talk! 10:18, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:29, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Random image I uploaded of myself for comedic effect years ago, has no real value being on here Balrogzx90 (talk) 11:06, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:30, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
El usuario que ha subido la foto no es el autor de la misma Ontzak 
(Bilbo ta Bizkai guztia) 10:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
El usuario que ha subido la foto no es el autor de la misma Ontzak (Bilbo ta Bizkai guztia) 10:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Photo of existing photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:59, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
El usuario que ha subido la foto no es el autor de la misma Ontzak (Bilbo ta Bizkai guztia) 10:03, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:59, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Peronal photo without educational use. Non-notable manager. Drakosh (talk) 11:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:31, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
This coat of arms is only a proposal and hasn't been officially adopted, and is most likely under copyright. https://kauno.diena.lt/naujienos/klaipeda/miesto-pulsas/del-mazosios-lietuvos-herbo-kreipesi-i-prezidenta-1022411 Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 11:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:31, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Looks like a copyvio Dronebogus (talk) 11:48, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, scrrengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
OOS GARBAGE CRAP JUNK CRAP Dronebogus (talk) 11:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not a contributor. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:33, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 11:53, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:33, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Nobody cares, oos spam garbage Dronebogus (talk) 11:54, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:34, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
No copyright info Dronebogus (talk) 11:56, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Dobrý den, zdroj fotografie byl řádně ocitován. Viki80 (talk) 17:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No free license at source website. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:34, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright info? Dronebogus (talk) 12:00, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:35, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Instagram garbage Dronebogus (talk) 12:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:35, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 12:08, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:35, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a vandal edit on Wikipedia, so unlikely to be a freely licenced photo taken by the uploader themselves. May not even be of the person it's claiming. Lord Belbury (talk) 12:15, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:36, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sylwina Spiess
[edit]Screenshots, at least one is taken from https://www.flughafenregion.ch/video/ - not own work as claimed and Category:Sylwina Spiess as it will then be empty
Gbawden (talk) 12:16, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:37, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Bad quality Liuxingy (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:38, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
File corrupted. Unable to play. Liuxingy (talk) 12:47, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:38, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Not owned by the uploader. Widely published on the internet prior to upload to Commons. See [3] as an example.. WikiDan61 (talk) 12:55, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:39, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, protected logo - see http://wearepicky.com/ Hoyanova (talk) 13:56, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:39, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Wrong format, please upload photos in jpg format per Commons:Deletion requests/File:প্রাকৃতির ছবি.pdf. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:31, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. And no context/location, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:40, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution among copyright violations. I suspect again copyvio. Look also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Galoše.šťastia.1986.1080p.HDTV.x264.SK(by.Marecek).mkv 001086640.png. Taivo (talk) 14:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
.mkv_001086640.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; taken from FB as per EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:41, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal file, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:36, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:41, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
This image was uploaded three months ago and the uploader claims to be the copyright owner. However, en:File:De HarvenMD.gif was uploaded in 2011 with the follow description: "The photograph belongs to Etienne de Harven, MD. With the permission of the owner, Andrew D. Mandrioli (Milikguay) uploads it. For more information, contact yourself with Etienne de Harven, MD.: pitou.deharven@orange.fr". Requires COM:VRT permission from whoever the actual copyright holder is. ✗plicit 14:42, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:43, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Low res, no camera EXIF, alternative versions elsewhere before upload (e.g., second image here), etc. PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 15:06, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Артём 13327 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Contains non-free content. Is it really copyrightable? Discussion is needed. Taivo (talk) 15:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Included wallpapers from Windows 10. And they are copyrighted Артём 13327 (talk) 17:59, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, serves no purpose. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:46, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project scope. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:54, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:45, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Per Commons:PRP. The author of this image is listed as Erik Schullstrom, who is also its subject. It is unlikely that Erik Schullstrom took a black-and-white self portrait in his Minnesota Twins uniform (which looks suspiciously like an official MLB headshot) and then uploaded it to the Commons 25 years later under the username "Thezim44." Denniscabrams (talk) 17:00, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- I am the uploader and an acquaintance of the subject. I received the image directly from photo from him for the purpose of updating the entry. Checking with him on the photo authorship... Thezim44 (talk) 16:01, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:49, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
not own work Gampe (talk) 17:31, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:49, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
I created this page for a school project and would like it DELETED NOW, thank you Ashleyjoost (talk) 17:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
DELETE NOW Ashleyjoost (talk) 17:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmed11224 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All of these photos are copyrighted (Clear copyright violation)
--Karim talk me :)..! 23:02, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Likely Flickrwashing, poorly screenshotted images uploaded to own Flickr account
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:40, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nomination. --Karim talk me :)..! 12:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmed11224 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Flickr washing. May be PD for some reasons, but real source, correct license and rationale must be provided.
- File:أول-هيئة-بالإسماعيلية.png
- File:الشيخ حسن أحمد البنا.png
- File:البنا وابنه.png
- File:عبدالرحمن السندي.png
- File:سيارة غنمها الإخوان.png
- File:عبد-الحكيم-عابدين.png
- File:حسن-البنا-خطيب.png
- File:الشيخ حسن البنا.png
- File:حسن البنا مع شباب الإخوان.png
Yann (talk) 18:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmed11224 (talk · contribs)
[edit]User blocked. Either wrong license, or plain copyvios.
- File:وجدي غنيم.png
- File:Freemasonry Masonic Blue Lodge Logo.png
- File:الشيخ عبداللطيف ابو قورة الاردن.jpg
- File:الشيخ مصطفى السباعي.jpg
- File:حسن البنا بعض الشباب الذين ألفوا إحدي شعب الإخوان بقري مدينة الشرقية.png
- File:حسن-البنا-يسمع-لأحد-الإخوان.png
- File:حسن البنا يخطب.png
- File:عبد اللطيف أبو قورة.jpg
- File:الحجاب.jpg
- File:الحجاب قديمًا.jpg
- File:صالح عشماوي.jpg
- File:Standard compressed mzawahiri.jpg
- File:محمد فرغلي أحد قادة الإخوان.jpg
- File:مذبحة سجن ليمان طرة 1954م.gif
- File:حسن البنا مع بعض الشباب الذين ألفوا إحدي الشعب بالشرقية.jpg
- File:سيد قطب خلف القضبان في المحكمة.jpg
- File:سيد قطب خلال محاكمته.jpg
- File:أحمد شفيق.jpg
- File:دور النظام الخاص بالإخوان في حرب 48.jpg
- File:الاخوان المسلمون في حرب فلسطين.jpg
- File:مقاتل من كتائب الإخوان المسلمين في حرب 48.jpg
- File:الإخوان في حرب 48.jpg
- File:أبو الأعلى المودودي وعبدالله العقيل.jpg
- File:حسن البنا ووفد أندونيسي.jpg
- File:سيد قطب يشرب خلال محاكمته.png
- File:سيد قطب يكتب في السجن.jpg
- File:حسن البنا يقابل وفد أندونيسي.jpg
- File:حسن البنا 2.jpg
- File:حسن البنا مؤسس جماعة الإخوان المسلمين.png
- File:حسن البنا يرتدي معطف.jpg
- File:حسن البنا وابنه.jpg
- File:الشيخ حسن البنا يخطب.jpg
- File:حسن البنا يكتب.jpg
- File:كمال السنانيرى.png
- File:عطا ابو الرشتة.jpg
- File:الإخوان في حرب فلسطين.jpg
- File:أول هيئة تأسيسية لجماعة الإخوان المسلمين.jpg
- File:حسن البنا يتحدث.jpg
- File:حرق مقر الإخوان عام 1954م.webp
- File:حسن-البنا-عند-تخرجه من دار العلوم.png
- File:الاخوان في السودان.jpg
- File:عبدالناصر يحيي جماهيره.jpg
- File:مبارك قائد القوات الجوية.webp
- File:مبارك والسادات.webp
- File:حسني مبارك في شبابه.webp
- File:اللواء طيار أركان حرب محمد حسني مبارك.webp
- File:جمال عبدالناصر يصافح مبارك خلال تعيينه مديرًا للكلية الجوية.jpg
- File:مصطفي السباعي.jpg
- File:حسن البنا مؤسس الإخوان المسلمين.png
- File:حسن البنا مع كتائب الإخوان المسلمين فى فلسطين.jpg
- File:زينب جبارة.png
- File:محمود عبدالحليم-modified.png
- File:محمود عزت في شبابه.png
- File:الملك فاروق وعائلته في إيطاليا.jpg
- File:بنان الطنطاوي.jpg
- File:مجموعة من الإخوان أعلنوا التطوع للجهاد في حرب فلسطين 1948م.png
- File:حسن البنا وسط جوالة الإخوان.jpg
- File:الإخوان والجوالة.png
- File:محمد بديع في الثانوية.png
- File:محمد بديع في شبابه.png
- File:سيد سابق.jpg
- File:حسن البنا مع صالح العشماوي.jpg
- File:عبدالرحمن البنا.png
- File:حسن البنا مؤسس الإخوان المسلمين.jpg
- File:الشيخ حسن البنا.jpg
- File:اللواء طيار محمد حسني مبارك قائد القوات الجوية.jpg
- File:محمود عبدالحليم.jpg
- File:سعيد رمضان.jpg
- File:علي خامنئي في شبابه.png
- File:شكري مصطفي أمير جماعة التكفير والهجرة.png
- File:حسن البنا وسط الزعامات السياسية.png
- File:جوالة الإخوان يرفعون راية الجماعة شرق القاهرة.png
- File:سيد قطب مع الشيخ البشير الإبراهيمي وعلي الطنطاوي ومحمد محمود الصواف.jpg
- File:سيد قطب في المحكمة.jpg
- File:حسن البنا يحفز أنصاره ومؤيديه.png
- File:حسن البنا يخطب ويحفز أنصاره ومؤيديه.png
- File:حسن البنا في أحد معسكرات الإخوان.jpg
- File:حسن البنا في المسجد.png
- File:حسن-البنا-عند-تخرجه.png
- File:الضباط الاحرار.jpg
- File:حسن البنا يخطب في الناس.png
- File:سيد قطب في تنظيم 65.jpg
- File:سيد قطب في السجن الحربي.png
- File:سيد قطب بالقفطان.jpg
- File:سيد قطب شابا.jpg
- File:سيد قطب.png
- File:سيد قطب.jpg
- File:حسن البنا في الحج.png
- File:أم السعد صقر.jpg
- File:الخديوي توفيق والماسونية.jpg
- File:حسن البنا قبل أغتياله.jpg
- File:حسن البنا.png
- File:حسن البنا في السويس.png
- File:المركز العام للإخوان المسلمين في الحلمية.png
- File:حسن البنا يرتدي زي الجوالة.jpg
- File:حسن البنا يخطب في الناس.webp
- File:سيد قطب في شبابه.png
- File:الامام البنا في الجامع الازهر.png
- File:حسن البنا يخطب في الجماهير خلال حديث الثلاثاء من كل أسبوع.jpg
- File:الإخوان المسلمون.png
Yann (talk) 19:13, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Some of these are colorizations File:حسن البنا يخطب في الجماهير خلال حديث الثلاثاء من كل أسبوع.jpg, some aren't.
- Firstly the non-colorizations. AFAIK, these are invalid licences. In which case, delete.
- The colorizations are a problem because they've been uploaded to overwrite their original sources. That needs to be reverted. But otherwise there's no reason to delete them. I'd be happy to see them kept, but split into separate files and identified as derivatives – if anyone has the enthusiasm to do that. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:45, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete invalid licenses and randomly upload, most of them are (anonymous author) and copyright law in Egypt : Other works that are either anonymous or pseudonymous (published prior to 1946) to be expired in USA, all of files published after 1946 and that mean it are not free. Ibrahim.ID ✪ 22:13, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete both colorisations and the non-colorisations – don't trust any of these licenses, many of which seem to be invalid. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:19, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Wrong pronunciation OtuNwachinemere (talk) 18:11, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Upload new file or overwrite this one if necessary. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:01, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
File is credited to Emma Marie Jenkins, but there is not sufficient evidence that user Egoist44 has rights to post it under a Commons-compatible licence. WikiDan61 (talk) 19:20, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Wrong pronunciation OtuNwachinemere (talk) 19:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Upload new file or overwrite this one if necessary. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work. Copyrighted. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:29, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Not Igbo name OtuNwachinemere (talk) 19:39, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Upload new file or overwrite this one if necessary. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Not Igbo language OtuNwachinemere (talk) 20:51, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Upload new file or overwrite this one if necessary. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:05, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
wrong pronunciation OtuNwachinemere (talk) 21:09, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Upload new file or overwrite this one if necessary. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:06, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Empty recording OtuNwachinemere (talk) 21:13, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:06, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
The images on the bottle, as well as the brand's logo, are very likely copyrighted. Veverve (talk) 21:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:55, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AafiOnMobile as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: can't be own work, not a selfie, that's to say someone else clicked this image and not the one who uploaded it [the one in the image] Yann (talk) 21:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per my CSD rationale. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 07:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- HR with EXIF data, used on a user page, so proper DR is better. Yann (talk) 08:34, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yann, I completely agree with you. I should've brought it to DR but my CSD rationale isn't invalidated. The user claims the image to be theirs, and also says it is own work - in this case, it can be a selfie only which is own work of any user on the encyclopedia, but this image isn't a selfie so definitely not an own work of the editor. This image is clicked by someone else. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 17:09, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:07, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
blurred image, many excellent alternatives Judithcomm (talk) 22:05, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:56, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
mauvais rendu WikipSQ (talk) 23:31, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:57, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted Image (https://www.instagram.com/p/COoW9FxHpq4/?hl=pt-br) Original source content can be found on the singer's official Instagram account and in several other Google searches example that the file is not the author's own work as they say. LeonaardoG (talk) 23:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:58, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Support It is a copyrighted image that must be deleted. Lopezsuarez (talk) 13:17, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: The watermark says ©José Guerrero, while the uploader is User:José Guerrero Rodrríguez. So presumably the same person. --Rosenzweig τ 13:49, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Artist died in 2013, copyrighted until 2084. 4ing (talk) 08:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Also affects File:Johan Halvorsen memorial in Oslo (cropped).jpg. --Xover (talk) 13:03, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Artist is no:Per Ung, and the files can be restored in 2084. --Rosenzweig τ 16:17, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
This pic is coming from the same photoshoot, which make the autorship claim dubious. Gyrostat (talk) 20:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP; likely copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 13:35, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Architect Jože Plečnik died 1957; his works have not been in public domain yet. Lsarlah (talk) 17:58, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no fop in Slovenia. The file can be restored in 2028. --Rosenzweig τ 10:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused poor quality image of squirrel (not chipmunk), unusable and superseded by numerous better alternatives already on Commons. Also added:
- File:Chipmunk (2688528857).jpg
- File:Chipmunk (2689339388).jpg
- File:Chipmunk (99791482).jpg
- File:Chipmunks were all over (132992079).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:16, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete File:Chipmunk (99791482).jpg; Keep and rename the rest, which are not so great but not deletion worthy— the first two, for example, at least are good pictures of some wood that happens to have a squirrelmunk thing on them. Dronebogus (talk) 03:39, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- All poor, unusable compositions. We also have numerous better wood images already... --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:23, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination deleted 3 images because they are of no educational use due to bad quality and therefore out of COM:SCOPE. Kept the two images per Dronebogus, as they can be included in Category:Split trees. --Ellywa (talk) 08:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Sign seems to be created by a private entity, rather than by the federal government. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:11, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- I believe this sign could potentially fall under the Ohio MUTCD Section 2D-56 as either marker M8-H3 or M8-H3P as it refers to a specific Ohio Byway? I was unable to find any other information on the copyright holder. The OMUTCD additionally states in its introduction that "Any traffic control device design or application provision contained in this Manual shall be considered to be in the public domain. Traffic control devices contained in this Manual shall not be
- protected by a patent, trademark, or copyright, except for the Interstate Shield and any items owned by FHWA." I've updated the copyright information to refer to the OMUTCD rather than the federal government should that be the correct tag. Gshoemaker2002 (talk) 19:58, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- The M8-H3 sign as defined in the Ohio MUTCD is File:Ohio Byway sign.svg, and the M8-H3P is just a standard green plaque with the byway name. Unfortunately, it appears that this specific sign is not in the Ohio MUTCD, and is still privately created and thus copyrighted. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- I've spent several hours trying to find anything related to potential authorship for the marker design here and have come up completely empty so feel free to change the tag or delete the file or whatever the protocol would be there. Have a good one. Gshoemaker2002 (talk) 00:20, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- The M8-H3 sign as defined in the Ohio MUTCD is File:Ohio Byway sign.svg, and the M8-H3P is just a standard green plaque with the byway name. Unfortunately, it appears that this specific sign is not in the Ohio MUTCD, and is still privately created and thus copyrighted. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Per COM:EVID, no evidence this image can be licenced with a free licencing or is in PD. --Ellywa (talk) 08:55, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the user's last remaining uploaded photo, not yet nominated for deletion. I suspect again copyvio. Taivo (talk) 14:54, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. --SCP-2000 16:16, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 08:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
De fichier est un doublon du fichier https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lettre_d%27Ambroise_Comarmond_%C3%A0_Anatole_de_Barth%C3%A9lemy_du_27_d%C3%A9cembre_1849.pdf dont la date est, en plus, incorrecte ArkéoTopia (talk) 16:42, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, deleted and made a redirect to the remaining version, as it appears to be used on wikisource. --Ellywa (talk) 08:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
I suspect this claim to CC BY SA by the author credited is false and this is a copyvio - it appears to be a still frame from the Yes Live In Chile 1994 concert film (see this video at 00:50:36 for a comparable frame - identical lighting and camera angle, I just can't find the exact frame!) MIDI (talk) 19:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, rather convincing argument of MIDI, deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:17, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DMacks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Youtube profile pic Yann (talk) 21:53, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: the file has a larger resolution then a profile picture and metadata showing the camera. No reason to suspect the uploader did not make this photo, so decided to keep. --Ellywa (talk) 09:07, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DMacks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Nonfree creative logo Yann (talk) 21:57, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/File:20thcenturystudios.svg. No evidence of Fox releasing its logos under a free license. DMacks (talk) 11:00, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- It is quite possible that the logo felt out of copyright due to lack of notice or renewal. See File:Again in 1939 ... 20th Century Fox.jpg or File:20th Century-Fox fanfare 1947.webm. BTW if that's the case en:File:20th Century Studios.svg could be imported on Commons. Yann (talk) 14:24, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- While that's possibly the case for this logo, we'd need to know information about the original publication of it, not just that it's been found on google recently in a form drawn from scratch. DMacks (talk) 15:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- It is quite possible that the logo felt out of copyright due to lack of notice or renewal. See File:Again in 1939 ... 20th Century Fox.jpg or File:20th Century-Fox fanfare 1947.webm. BTW if that's the case en:File:20th Century Studios.svg could be imported on Commons. Yann (talk) 14:24, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Any logos before 1989 often did fall out of copyright, but we'd probably have to see this one in particular -- such as the particular drawing of the searchlights seen here, etc. While it may be very similar to old logos, extra expression like that means newer logos can be derivative works. Carl Lindberg (talk) 06:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: As Yann showed, this is a derivative of older images which are in PD. Imho this would not introduce a new copyright, when looking at the low TOO in the USA. Therefore decided to keep the logo. --Ellywa (talk) 09:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted Asset, Not own work of the uploader. TAC PlazaMaster (talk) 23:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Are you refering to the photo itself as the copyrighted asset, or that the motive i.e. the building and sign?Jonteemil (talk) 09:04, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no reason to beleive the uploader not make this photo. Therefore decided to keep. --Ellywa (talk) 09:12, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Wrong pronunciation OtuNwachinemere (talk) 18:12, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 13:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate Pronunciation OtuNwachinemere (talk) 18:16, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 13:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate Pronunciation OtuNwachinemere (talk) 18:17, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 13:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate Pronunciation OtuNwachinemere (talk) 19:05, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 13:43, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Not Igbo language OtuNwachinemere (talk) 19:37, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 13:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Not Igbo name OtuNwachinemere (talk) 19:39, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 13:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate recording OtuNwachinemere (talk) 20:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 13:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate recording OtuNwachinemere (talk) 20:08, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 13:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate recording OtuNwachinemere (talk) 20:11, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 13:43, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Wrong pronunciation OtuNwachinemere (talk) 20:19, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 13:43, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate recording OtuNwachinemere (talk) 20:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 13:43, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
wrong pronunciation OtuNwachinemere (talk) 20:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 13:43, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Wrong pronunciation OtuNwachinemere (talk) 21:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 13:43, 1 November 2022 (UTC)