Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/04/27
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
{{Copyvio |1=Copyrighted render from the Land Transport Authority of Singapore. Only usable in 2090, 70 years after publication. |source=https://www.sgtrains.com/train-r151.html }} Edgar Searle (talk) 08:18, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 12:50, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
{{Copyvio |1=Copyrighted render from the Land Transport Authority of Singapore. Only usable in 2090, 70 years after publication. |source=https://www.sgtrains.com/train-r151.html }} Edgar Searle (talk) 08:19, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 12:50, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
{{Copyvio |1=Copyrighted render from the Land Transport Authority of Singapore. Only usable in 2090, 70 years after publication. |source=https://www.sgtrains.com/train-r151.html }} Edgar Searle (talk) 08:20, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 12:51, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
{{Copyvio |1=Copyrighted render from the Land Transport Authority of Singapore. Only usable in 2090, 70 years after publication. |source=https://www.sgtrains.com/train-r151.html }} Edgar Searle (talk) 08:23, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 12:51, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
{{Copyvio |1=Copyrighted render from the Land Transport Authority of Singapore. Only usable in 2090, 70 years after publication. |source=https://www.sgtrains.com/train-r151.html }} Edgar Searle (talk) 08:27, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 12:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
{{Copyvio |1=Copyrighted render from the Land Transport Authority of Singapore. Only usable in 2090, 70 years after publication. |source=https://www.sgtrains.com/train-c851e.html }} Edgar Searle (talk) 08:31, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 12:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
This logo is eligible for copyright per COM:TOO Japan. Xasley (talk) 04:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Comment: Other files with the same logo:
- en:File:Bandai_Namco_Entertainment_logo.svg (exactly the same file, but on the English Wikipedia)
- File:Namco_Bandai_Games_logo.png (uploaded in 2009, deleted in 2011, undeleted in 2022)
- File:Namco_Bandai_Games_logo.svg (uploaded in 2010, deleted in 2010, reuploaded and deleted in 2020, undeleted in 2022)
- File:Bandai_Namco_Holdings_logo_(2005-2022).svg (uploaded in 2022)
- File:Bandai_Namco_Holdings_logo.svg (uploaded in 2020, deleted in 2022)
- File:Bandai Namco Pictures Logo.png (uploaded in 2021, deletion request since 1 April 2022)
- Note that both "Namco Bandai Games logo" files have been undeleted ten days ago for being below the threshold of originality.
- Pinging @(Oinkers42), Jameslwoodward, Yann for being involved in the undeletion of "Namco Bandai Games logo". TilmannR (talk) 15:57, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Pinging @King of Hearts, Kadı, Taivo for being involved in the deletion of "Bandai Namco Holdings logo". TilmannR (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Pinging @Stylez995 for being inolved in the deletion request of "Bandai Namco Pictures Logo". TilmannR (talk) 16:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Speedy keep - COM:TOO Japan states that "Logos composed merely of geometric shapes and texts are also not copyrightable in general." These logos qualify fully under that description. Also, these files were literally just undeleted within the past two weeks. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:42, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused image of no value, possibly a copyvio. This, that and the other (talk) 09:29, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:53, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Not own work - appears to be taken from a game called goat simulator! https://www.twitch.tv/directory/game/Goat%20Simulator Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused image. Subject's consent for posting of image not clear HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 20:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --Gbawden (talk) 15:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
No free: https://www.semana.com/semana-tv/semana-el-debate/articulo/elecciones-2022-carlos-cuartas-aprender-a-vivir-por-las-ideas-y-dejar-de-morir-por-ellas/202230/ Lord Maximoff (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:57, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
No free: https://www.noticiasrcn.com/elecciones/candidatos-a-la-presidencia-y-vicepresidencia-de-colombia-2022-409919 Lord Maximoff (talk) 18:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:58, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
No free: https://www.eltiempo.com/unidad-investigativa/juan-jose-esparza-por-que-salio-del-ejercito-heroe-de-operacion-jaque-619174 Lord Maximoff (talk) 18:30, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:59, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Urheber falsch angegeben MquadratDD (talk) 07:19, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Ticket:2022042610007931 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 08:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:53, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:05, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:53, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:05, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:SCOPE. --Xasley (talk) 04:50, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Source website has "All rights reserved" copyright statement. MKFI (talk) 06:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Of no practical use. Shawn à Montréal (talk) 21:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- I agree. Sorry for this. Sturm (talk) 22:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- No problem. BTW this is a very nice shot and I've added some categories. Thanks! Shawn à Montréal (talk) 22:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
This photo was taken from a Congolese news website which gives no indication that it falls under creative commons licensing. It is probably copyrighted. Indy beetle (talk) 21:53, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Likely screen capture of a https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5xCPMJkgMo from unknown copyright status. Pierre cb (talk) 22:13, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Out-of-scope : Flag of a non-existant country. Pierre cb (talk) 22:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
This is likely an example of Commons:License laundering/Flickr washing. This appears to be a somewhat modified version of a Sankara photo that can be found elsewhere on the internet with its background ([1]). It's not clear who the original rights holder is, but I strongly doubt a modern day reggae label from Brazil has the original rights to the photo of a Burkinabe political figure who was killed in the 1980s. Indy beetle (talk) 22:22, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Uploader's name, User:Nicole AVRIL, is the same as this personality (Nicole Avril). If this is indeed this person, that would mean this is a self-portrait. But we haven't any proof this user is indeed this personnality.
If this isn't a self-portrait, we need the photographer's name. In any case, an authorization is needed. See in French: Aide:Republication/Image. Titlutin (talk) 22:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Low quality due to incorrect file format, replaced by File:Nickel cyclam perchlorate.png. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 12:44, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nom. {{BadJPG}} & there's a high-quality PNG version available. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 09:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Image is uncited composite in mis-matched style, and structure does not match title chemical name. If someone has need for either what this image represents or its name, easy enough to draw with proper license/source and sane style. DMacks (talk) 13:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry for the mistake please remove the image! Ériugena (talk) 11:41, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 09:10, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Ambiguous stereochemisry (per dispute-tag), replaceable by File:3-hydroxyaspartic acid.svg that is unambiguous. DMacks (talk) 13:47, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Stereobonds between two stereocenters are ambiguous and should be avoided whenever possible. File:3-hydroxyaspartic acid.svg is a better representation. Marbletan (talk) 15:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 09:10, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
3D-geometry mistake (top and bottom rings should be parallel sandwhiching the Fe, not both behind), per tagging. Have File:Fv2Fe2.svg as replacement. DMacks (talk) 13:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. The way this is drawn incorrectly implies that the iron atoms are above both ring systems, rather than between them. Marbletan (talk) 15:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Per nominator. File:Fv2Fe2.svg as replacement. --Leiem (talk) 16:57, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 09:11, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Weird gray shadows in the middle. Have File:But-2-ynedioic acid 200.svg among several alts. DMacks (talk) 14:31, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 09:11, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Analgous to Commons:Deletion requests/File:1,1'-Biferrocenylene.png, this has incorrect geometry of the two sets of rings. Replaced by File:Fv2Fe2+.svg DMacks (talk) 17:46, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. The way this is drawn incorrectly implies that the iron atoms are above both ring systems, rather than between them. Marbletan (talk) 12:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 09:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AnantKumarVivek (talk · contribs)
[edit]SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
JopkeB (talk) 19:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 09:44, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Neither CC-BY-SA, nor public domain. Source: https://tvtecjundiai.com.br/news/2020/01/22/prefeitura-de-franco-da-rocha-abre-42-vagas-em-concurso-publico/ Py4nf (talk) 20:42, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:53, 4 May 2022 UTC: No permission since 26 April 2022 --Krdbot 14:01, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Darrelljon (talk) 21:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
The licensing information is wrong; the article clearly states that this is a United Press International (wirepress) photo. Thus there is a strong likelihood it is under copyright. Indy beetle (talk) 21:50, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
The licensing information given is false. This is a still from a TV broadcast uploaded to youtube by a private channel not affiliated with the original broadcaster. It was not uploaded under a CC license, as is claimed here. According to Congolese copyright law, "Radio and television broadcasts and television programs are artistic activities protected by law". Even if this is to be considered a photographic work published in the Congo (protected for 25 years) in 1975, it would still be copyrighted as of the URAA date in 1996 and thus be copyrighted in the US and not allowed on commons. Indy beetle (talk) 22:03, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
It appears to be a high threshold of originality, also it is locally uploaded on Wikipedia (en:File:MediaFire logo.svg). Xasley (talk) 23:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
No free: https://eltabloide.com.co/regional/hay-recursos-para-las-mypimes/ Lord Maximoff (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:19, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 07:19, 11 May 2022 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 13:18, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 07:19, 11 May 2022 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 13:18, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 09:34, 13 May 2022 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 13:18, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 09:34, 13 May 2022 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 13:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 09:34, 13 May 2022 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 13:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 09:34, 13 May 2022 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 13:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 09:34, 13 May 2022 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 13:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 09:34, 13 May 2022 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 13:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 09:34, 13 May 2022 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 13:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictitious symbols of questionable notability
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: all files already deleted by others. --Rosenzweig τ 11:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Claimed to be painted by someone called Ғази Әхмәд, without date of his death to justify PD from it (by my own search, the name found only in uploads to different sites with the same description) or permission if he is alive. Tatewaki (talk) 11:17, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation, the painter died in 2017. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:36, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Self promote — Sojol Rana Talk 15:51, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: personal photo of non-user. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Self promote — Sojol Rana Talk 15:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: personal photo of non-user. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Self promote — Sojol Rana Talk 15:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: personal photo of non-user. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Нарушение авторских прав - обложка книг согласно законодательству Российской Федерации охраняется авторским правом. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 20:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: back cover of a book published in 2003. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:57, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Нарушение авторских прав, так как данные речей и их перевод из буклета. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 20:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Нужно ли отныне перестать загружать фотографии любых печатных материалов? Касается ли это фотографий текстов, высеченных на памятниках, разных табличек и вывесок? Стоит ли то же самое требование распространять на записанные мною/коллегами и опубликованные видеоматериалы с каких-либо публичных событий? Заранее благодарю за разъяснение. Frhdkazan (talk) 10:32, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Фотокопии чужих произведений (текстов) никогда нельзя было публиковать без разрешения исходных авторов. Вопрос про видеоматериалы непонятен. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:27, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Публикация текста речи Лаврова — это уже нарушение законодательства Российской Федерации? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Очевидно, что Лавров автор своей речи, то есть владеет авторскими правами на неё. Если это было служебное произведение и он сочинил её по заданию своего министерства, значит, владельцем прав является министерство. Но такого случая, чтобы произведение было без автора и без владельца — это редчайший случай, с живыми такое не бывает. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:26, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- То есть фото уже подлежит удалению, если буклет не распространяется по Creative Commons? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Как и любая фотокопия несвободного произведения. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Чем ограничивается круг объектов, подпадающих под данное правило? Касается ли это людей, автомобилей, вывесок и прочих феноменов, свободный статус которых не оформлен каким-то исчерпывающим образом? Frhdkazan (talk) 20:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Насколько я помню, Верховный суд РФ требовал доказать, что произведение не создано творческим трудом (пункт 80). В частности, отсутствие оригинальности не снимает охрану. Кроме того, попробуйте посмотреть на Викискладе практику и обсуждения по поводу масштабных моделей. Всё то, что производят на игрушечных фабриках и выставляют в технических музеях. Там есть интересное различие между моделью, которая выточена руками, и такой же моделью, которая выточена станком. Первая произведение и охраняется, второе не вполне произведение и не вполне охраняется. Прошу прощения, что не даю ссылок, потому что не помню точных ссылок. Теперь по вашей конкретике. Вывеска это же рисунок или шрифт, рисунки все охраняются, а шрифты не охраняются. Люди это не произведения, а одежда людей может быть произведением, если специально сделана модельером, а не массовым пошивом. Автомобиль обычно мёртвый товар, но если это какой-то особенный автомобиль, сделанный авторским творческим трудом, тогда он может охраняться. Наверное, вы хотели бы узнать не просто мои рассуждения, а практические выводы? Эти практические выводы определяет судебная практика, и здесь я ничего подсказать не могу. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Чем ограничивается круг объектов, подпадающих под данное правило? Касается ли это людей, автомобилей, вывесок и прочих феноменов, свободный статус которых не оформлен каким-то исчерпывающим образом? Frhdkazan (talk) 20:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Как и любая фотокопия несвободного произведения. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- То есть фото уже подлежит удалению, если буклет не распространяется по Creative Commons? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Очевидно, что Лавров автор своей речи, то есть владеет авторскими правами на неё. Если это было служебное произведение и он сочинил её по заданию своего министерства, значит, владельцем прав является министерство. Но такого случая, чтобы произведение было без автора и без владельца — это редчайший случай, с живыми такое не бывает. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:26, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Публикация текста речи Лаврова — это уже нарушение законодательства Российской Федерации? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Фотокопии чужих произведений (текстов) никогда нельзя было публиковать без разрешения исходных авторов. Вопрос про видеоматериалы непонятен. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:27, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted. And anyway, it is just a photograph of the verbal text, so it is out of scop of Commons. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:59, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (also dubious own work). --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:46, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. Amzzm75 (talk) 01:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 21:06, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
request by uploader Gminky (talk) 10:38, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: unfortunately, courtesy deletion can be applied only for requests within 1 week from upload. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hiculd as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: license in exif which translates to "Free of charge - only for this show including social media when mentioning ZDF and Ben Knabe." not compatible with CC BY sk (talk) 20:36, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Das File wurde im Auftrag von Herr Scobel vom User:ZDF Terra X Redaktion hochgeladen. Die korrekte Lizenzierung muss noch per OTRS nachgetragen werden. Ich informiere User:ZDF Terra X Redaktion gleich mal darüber per Mail. @Wikiolo: Zur Info für dich. --sk (talk) 20:44, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: permision via COM:VRTS received. --Wdwd (talk) 14:15, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
out-of-scope selfy. Pierre cb (talk) 13:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Potential copyright violation. Not in use. (Advertisement? Out of scope?). Illegible description, Category:Gardens and lack of other contributions by uploader imply spam. TilmannR (talk) 19:51, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The uploader has admitted that he took this from a magazine. see the confession in the edit history here: https://id.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dorce_Gamalama&oldid=21037222 84.195.101.120 19:36, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 14:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FlagNerdGreen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non-educational and out of scope: Fictional map of an Italian-occupied southern France and assorted flags and CoAs.
- File:EU-Valentia.png
- File:ValentianCoatOfArms.png
- File:FlagOfValentia.png
- File:FlagOfHradina.png
- File:VodstriaFlag.png
- File:CarstvotoCOA.png
- File:Carstvoto Flag.png
Enyavar (talk) 00:18, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:09, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FlagNerdGreen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Media related to fictional country with no educational value; unused.
- File:SerbstanFlag.png
- File:VenerisAlt3.png
- File:VenerisAlternate2Flag.png
- File:VenerisAlternateFlag.png
- File:Map of federal subjects of Veneris 2022.png
- File:FlagOfTheUEC.png
- File:FictionalFlagOFTheUAL.png
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:10, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
agreed: Delete --Enyavar (talk) 14:20, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:53, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
unused file Sortilegus (talk) 02:18, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate of file:Azerbaijan-Saatly.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
The uploader was blocked on the English Wikipedia in 2011 for repeatedly uploading copyright violations. As a result, the precautionary principle should be applied to their remaining "own work" claims.
- File:Alexandra Burke 3 (Jingle Bell Ball).jpg
- File:Alexandra Burke 2 (Jingle Bell Ball).jpg
- File:Alexandra Burke 1 (Jingle Bell Ball).jpg
✗plicit 03:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. See also en:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 April 27. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:59, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:25, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
photo is overexposed. will be uploading a newer version later once it's fixed TourismPhilippines (talk) 06:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:26, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mountaineagle01 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Subjects are small children, around 4 years old based on en:Draft:Heyansh Kumar (Mountaineer). While such images are not forbidden I am worried how it fits with Commons:Personality rights. I am also not certain if the images are in COM:Scope; the draft is very unlikely to be accepted.
MKFI (talk) 06:53, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:28, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:PRP and this DR. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 07:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio https://www.eluniversal.com.mx/tiempo-de-relojes/marcas/asi-sera-de-bethune-20 Culex (talk) 08:09, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, published in 2018, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio https://www.eluniversal.com.mx/tiempo-de-relojes/marcas/asi-sera-de-bethune-20 Culex (talk) 08:10, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, published in 2018, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, complex logo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:13, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:13, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
I am the original uploader and would like to get this deleted due to poor image quality. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 08:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, cette image provient directement de la base de données de De Bethune et a également été publié sur le site officiel de De Bethune. Étant stagiaire chez eux, l'autorisation de l'utiliser est approuvé par la marque et propriétaire de la photo. ceci résout-il le problème de licence libre ou non? merci de votre aide, cordialement. De bethune (talk) 13:33, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission needs to be granted by the copyright owner via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:43, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, cette image provient directement de la base de données de De Bethune et a également été publié sur le site officiel de De Bethune. Étant stagiaire chez eux, l'autorisation de l'utiliser est approuvé par la marque et propriétaire de la photo. ceci résout-il le problème de licence libre ou non? merci de votre aide, cordialement. De bethune (talk) 13:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission needs to be granted by the copyright owner via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:43, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, cette image provient directement de la base de données de De Bethune et a également été publié sur le site officiel de De Bethune. Étant stagiaire chez eux, l'autorisation de l'utiliser est approuvé par la marque et propriétaire de la photo. ceci résout-il le problème de licence libre ou non? merci de votre aide, cordialement. De bethune (talk) 13:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment le savoir ? Cette image apparaît sur quantité de sites en ligne. Culex (talk) 07:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission needs to be granted by the copyright owner via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:43, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, cette image provient directement de la base de données de De Bethune et a également été publié sur le site officiel de De Bethune. Étant stagiaire chez eux, l'autorisation de l'utiliser est approuvé par la marque et propriétaire de la photo. ceci résout-il le problème de licence libre ou non? merci de votre aide, cordialement. De bethune (talk) 13:31, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Concernant cette photo et plusieurs autres du même style je ne comprends pas comment résoudre le problème, pourriez vous m'indiquer plus en détail le souci svp? Faut-il que je demande à mes collègues travaillant sur le site officiel de de bethune de les uploader en licence libre sur le site? De bethune (talk) 09:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission needs to be granted by the copyright owner via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:43, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
File:DB28 Kind of Blue Tourbillon, "Best Tourbillon Watch" award, 2016, Middle East magazine MPP.jpg
[edit]Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, cette image provient directement de la base de données de De Bethune et a également été publié sur le site officiel de De Bethune. Étant stagiaire chez eux, l'autorisation de l'utiliser est approuvé par la marque et propriétaire de la photo. ceci résout-il le problème de licence libre ou non? merci de votre aide, cordialement. De bethune (talk) 13:31, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission needs to be granted by the copyright owner via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:30, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation https://www.debethune.ch/en/inside-manufacture/about-us Culex (talk) 08:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, cette image provient directement de la base de données de De Bethune et a également été publié sur le site officiel de De Bethune. Étant stagiaire chez eux, l'autorisation de l'utiliser est approuvé par la marque et propriétaire de la photo. ceci résout-il le problème de licence libre ou non? merci de votre aide, cordialement. De bethune (talk) 13:30, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission needs to be granted by the copyright owner via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:33, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:33, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, cette image provient directement de la base de données de De Bethune et a également été publié sur le site officiel de De Bethune. Étant stagiaire chez eux, l'autorisation de l'utiliser est approuvé par la marque et propriétaire de la photo. ceci résout-il le problème de licence libre ou non? merci de votre aide, cordialement. De bethune (talk) 13:30, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission needs to be granted by the copyright owner via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:33, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, cette image provient directement de la base de données de De Bethune et a également été publié sur le site officiel de De Bethune. Étant stagiaire chez eux, l'autorisation de l'utiliser est approuvé par la marque et propriétaire de la photo. ceci résout-il le problème de licence libre ou non? merci de votre aide, cordialement. De bethune (talk) 13:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission needs to be granted by the copyright owner via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:35, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, cette image provient directement de la base de données de De Bethune et a également été publié sur le site officiel de De Bethune. Étant stagiaire chez eux, l'autorisation de l'utiliser est approuvé par la marque et propriétaire de la photo. ceci résout-il le problème de licence libre ou non? merci de votre aide, cordialement. De bethune (talk) 13:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission needs to be granted by the copyright owner via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Laut Impressum ist eine Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers erforderlich. 2003:DE:706:EC4D:29E8:98F4:33A4:95D8 08:37, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no free license at source. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:38, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, cette image provient directement de la base de données de De Bethune et a également été publié sur le site officiel de De Bethune. Étant stagiaire chez eux, l'autorisation de l'utiliser est approuvé par la marque et propriétaire de la photo. ceci résout-il le problème de licence libre ou non? merci de votre aide, cordialement. De bethune (talk) 13:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission needs to be granted by the copyright owner via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Is this "own work"? The metadata mention © Jorrit Lousberg. It is the only contribution of the user. Wouter (talk) 08:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, cette image provient directement de la base de données de De Bethune et a également été publié sur le site officiel de De Bethune. Étant stagiaire chez eux, l'autorisation de l'utiliser est approuvé par la marque et propriétaire de la photo. ceci résout-il le problème de licence libre ou non? merci de votre aide, cordialement. De bethune (talk) 13:27, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission needs to be granted by the copyright owner via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, cette image provient directement de la base de données de De Bethune et a également été publié sur le site officiel de De Bethune. Étant stagiaire chez eux, l'autorisation de l'utiliser est approuvé par la marque et propriétaire de la photo. ceci résout-il le problème de licence libre ou non? merci de votre aide, cordialement. De bethune (talk) 13:27, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission needs to be granted by the copyright owner via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
File:DW5 Cempasúchil, "Best Custom Watch" award, 2020, Alexander vetrov and Chronoscope TV.jpg
[edit]Copyright violation Culex (talk) 08:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, cette image provient directement de la base de données de De Bethune et a également été publié sur le site officiel de De Bethune car je suis stagiaire chez eux, de ce fait l'autorisation de l'utiliser est approuvé par la marque et propriétaire de la photo. ceci résout-il le problème de licence libre ou non? merci de votre aide, cordialement. De bethune (talk) 13:26, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission needs to be granted by the copyright owner via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation https://www.debethune.ch/en/inside-manufacture/about-us Culex (talk) 08:42, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- bonjour, cette image provient directement de la base de données de De Bethune et a également été publié sur le site officiel de De Bethune car je suis stagiaire chez eux, de ce fait l'autorisation de l'utiliser est approuvé par la marque et propriétaire de la photo. ceci résout-il le problème de licence libre ou non? merci de votre aide, cordialement. De bethune (talk) 13:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Le site d'où provient la photo ne donne aucune indication de licence. Donc par défaut, c'est considéré sous copyright. Culex (talk) 07:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission needs to be granted by the copyright owner via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation https://www.debethune.ch/en/inside-manufacture/about-us Culex (talk) 08:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour Culex,
- cette image provient directement de la base de données de De Bethune et a également été publié sur le site officiel de De Bethune car je suis stagiaire chez eux, de ce fait l'autorisation de l'utiliser est approuvé par la marque et propriétaire de la photo. ceci résout-il le problème de licence libre ou non? merci de votre aide, cordialement. De bethune (talk) 13:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Le site d'où provient la photo ne donne aucune indication de licence. Donc par défaut, c'est considéré sous copyright. Culex (talk) 07:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Cela signifie que si je demande à mes collègues s'occupant du site web de changer les photos avec la licence CC-BY-SA ce serait réglé? De bethune (talk) 08:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Le site d'où provient la photo ne donne aucune indication de licence. Donc par défaut, c'est considéré sous copyright. Culex (talk) 07:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission needs to be granted by the copyright owner via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
The file has no proper source. No evidence of anonymous publication is given. Taivo (talk) 09:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:45, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Land registry documents with no confirmable source, just a claim to be the "own work" of a user who uploaded these four images and nothing else.
- File:Land Registry Vitaly Malkin4.jpg
- File:Land Registry Vitaly Malkin3.jpg
- File:Land Registry Vitaly Malkin2.jpg
- File:Land Registry Vitaly Malkin.jpg
Lord Belbury (talk) 10:02, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and text only, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:46, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
falsch. Das ist der mond 91.249.179.114 10:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - This is obviously the Earth and not the Moon, considering the Moon has no clouds, lightning, or...meaningful atmosphere. — Huntster (t @ c) 19:48, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy close: per Huntster. A09090091 (talk) 20:41, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:47, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Google photo. 91.249.179.114 10:38, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Keep: No evidence provided, and nothing found during search. — Huntster (t @ c) 19:48, 27 April 2022 (UTC)- Speedy keep baseless claim, no valid reason to delete. Dronebogus (talk) 06:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:47, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality copy of File:Bautil_18_-_U_373_uu.png Macuser (talk) 10:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and redirected. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
non trivial advertising logo, no educational use. Drakosh (talk) 11:01, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
"Found on internet in 2012, author unknown" does not justify PD content (can be retained if proven to be a photo of start of 20th century) Tatewaki (talk) 11:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of a presumably copyrighted drawing on the NetWare Lite box. Rosenzweig τ 11:20, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:52, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
COM:FANART of https://simpsons.fandom.com/wiki/Mr._Sparkle_(mascot) Lord Belbury (talk) 11:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Delete --Микола Василечко (talk) 18:25, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
And also
- File:Papa Draculaura (7708299870).jpg
- File:Papa as Draculaura (7708300110).jpg
- File:Kate as Monster High's Draculaura at the homeschooling conference costume party (7707981106).jpg
- File:My own live (or dead) Draculaura. (8016507719).jpg
What is the purpose of this file?
And see other uploaded this user. --Микола Василечко (talk) 18:29, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:53, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
All images very poor quality and can be found anywhere on Internet, likely copy-vios.
- File:Lễ khởi công tổ hợp các xưởng may tỉnh Trà Vinh.jpg
- File:Đội ngũ công nhân xây dựng Tập đoàn Phúc Đạt Phát.jpg
- File:Lễ khởi công dự án đường 911B.jpg
- File:Phucdatphat logo.png
- File:Sơ đồ khu dân cư Khang An.jpg
- File:Mặt tiền đường khu dân cư Khang An.jpg
- File:Một góc khu dân cư Khang An.jpg
- File:Biệt thự sân vườn trong khu dân cư Khang An.jpg
- File:Biệt thự đơn lập trong khu dân cư Khang An.jpg
- File:Dãy biệt thự trong khu dân cư Khang An.jpg
- File:Biệt thự trong khu dân cư Khang An.jpg
- File:Nhà phố trong khu dân cư Khang An.jpg
- File:Khu dân cư Khang An.jpg
- File:Mặt tiền đường khu dân cư Phú Hữu.jpg
- File:Một góc của khu dân cư Phú Hữu.jpg
- File:Khu Dân Cư Phú Hữu nhìn từ trên cao.jpg
- File:Cổng chào Khu Dân Cư Phú Hữu.jpg
- File:Khu Dân Cư Phú Hữu.jpg
- File:Dự án khu dân cư Phú Hữu.jpg
- File:Dự án căn hộ Sky9.jpg
minhhuy (talk) 11:51, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:55, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:00000DIOUNDIOU-DE-KIMPARANAWIKI2021-03.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 13:02, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:58, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:00000EDC-WIKI2021-03.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 13:05, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:58, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:00000EDC WIKI2021 04.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 13:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:58, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:00004GROUPE-SCOLAIRE-YANFOLILA-WIKIMALI-2021-01.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 13:15, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:58, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Uploader (company account) is not copyright holder. 217.239.0.68 13:19, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Bitte löschen, das Foto wird unter dem Namen csm_Ge_01b_ea56ed9f19.jpg nochmals eingesetzt. Der Urheber hat die Einverständniserklärung für Bild/Foto-Freigaben ausgefüllt und am 3.5.22 an permissions-de@wikimedia.org gesendet. HEAD acoustics (talk) 06:54, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:00, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Logos of a private company likely copyrighted (https://www.jaguar-network.com/). No proof of permission ownership by uploader. Pierre cb (talk) 13:19, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:00, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Obvious photo editing work (look at the lighting, cropping, and text). Possible copyvio of the face due to the usage of the face of the subject depicted being edited onto an official Indonesian government portrait. Also has a better alternative in an official portrait at File:Mayor of Depok Mohammad Idris.jpg. Roniius (talk) 13:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:00, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:00004GROUPE-SCOLAIRE-YANFOLILA-WIKIMALI-2021-02.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 13:26, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:01, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
non-free image (publicity shot? movie still?) Hiro (talk) 13:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:01, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
non free image https://nypost.com/2017/02/07/playboy-club-and-its-bunnies-are-making-a-comeback-in-nyc/ Hiro (talk) 13:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:02, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:00004GROUPE-SCOLAIRE-YANFOLILA-WIKIMALI-2021-03.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 14:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:03, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:00004GROUPE-SCOLAIRE-YANFOLILA-WIKIMALI-2021-04.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 14:30, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:03, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:00004GROUPE-SCOLAIRE-YANFOLILA-WIKIMALI-2021-05.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 14:38, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:03, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:00004GROUPE-SCOLAIRE-YANFOLILA-WIKIMALI-2021-06.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 14:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:03, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:00004GROUPE-SCOLAIRE-YANFOLILA-WIKIMALI-2021-07.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 14:49, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:03, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
bug: no picture. Cjp24 (talk) 15:19, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Kept, it's now OK. --Cjp24 (talk) 15:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:04, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:04, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:04, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Unnotable person, out of commons scope Migebert (talk) 15:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Very low quality; bad colour balance: out of Commons scope as no concievable use MPF (talk) 15:58, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Low-res. No educational value. 62.216.210.8 16:03, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
thumb-sized version of File:Kepler-452b System.jpg Lithopsian (talk) 16:14, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:06, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
low-quality cutout of a larger old map, was previously used to illustrate a question on a talk page. Issue was resolved, file serves no educational purpose Enyavar (talk) 16:39, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:06, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE; self portrait of non relevant person Stego (talk) 17:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:06, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Recent art, I can't believe it's free of coypright. Extract from the book Fès Ville de Lumière, 2008 (ISBN 9782912865083) Hyméros --}-≽ ♥ Yes ? 17:14, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:06, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheAmeliaMay (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope: fictional party logos
- File:National Labor Party Disc.svg
- File:Progressive Party Disc.svg
- File:Patriot Party Disc.svg
- File:Liberal Party Disc.svg
- File:Christian List Disc.svg
- File:Moderate Party Disc.svg
Enyavar (talk) 17:42, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:07, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
no permission, copyvio Hoyanova (talk) 17:56, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:07, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be a photoshopped copy of a news photograph. Blatant hoax. The original image, from the LA Times, can be seen in this 2020 retrospective: <https://www.latimes.com/projects/chicano-moratorium/east-la-protest-gave-voice-chicano-movement/>. Geoff Who, me? 18:13, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:08, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be a photoshopped copy of a news photograph. Blatant hoax. The original image may be seen in this 2015 publication, which includes a copy of the oirginal image: <https://www.news.ucsb.edu/2015/015740/chicano-generation> Geoff Who, me? 18:14, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:08, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Very low res, no EXIF, uploaded by LTA sock - COM:PRP issue Эlcobbola talk 18:27, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:08, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
come from Popsugar who credited Getty Image https://www.popsugar.com/beauty/selena-gomez-hair-makeup-critics-choice-awards-48750845/amp AwkwardChester (talk) 18:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:09, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
come from Popsugar who credited Getty Image https://www.popsugar.com/beauty/selena-gomez-hair-makeup-critics-choice-awards-48750845/amp AwkwardChester (talk) 18:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:09, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
come from Popsugar who credited Getty Image https://www.popsugar.com/beauty/selena-gomez-hair-makeup-critics-choice-awards-48750845/amp AwkwardChester (talk) 18:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:09, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:00004GROUPE-SCOLAIRE-YANFOLILA-WIKIMALI-2021-08.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 18:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:07, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:00004GROUPE-SCOLAIRE-YANFOLILA-WIKIMALI-2021-09.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 19:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:07, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:00004GROUPE-SCOLAIRE-YANFOLILA-WIKIMALI-2021-11.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 19:13, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:07, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
No free: https://twitter.com/guyzoducamer/status/1268516513155297281 Lord Maximoff (talk) 19:14, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:09, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
No free: https://www.alairelibre.cl/noticias/deportes/fuera-de-juego/los-memes-se-burlaron-de-piero-maza-y-del-tropiezo-de-universidad/2018-10-27/141733_16.html Lord Maximoff (talk) 19:14, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:09, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
No free: https://www.vavel.com/mx/futbol-internacional/2022/01/19/1098801-guinea-bisau-vs-nigeria-en-vivo-como-y-donde-ver-transmision-en-directo-online-por-copa-africana.html Lord Maximoff (talk) 19:15, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:09, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation (also on https://soundcloud.com/user-334476520 and no VRT ticket) + SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 19:19, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:09, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Only non commercial use of photos is allowed (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), that is not compatible with Commons. JopkeB (talk) 19:33, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, I didn't know that. Sorry! Ario1234 (talk) 21:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:09, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Marius Olteanu5555 and User:Jhonni Brav
[edit]Out of scope (low quality scribbles):
- File:Paprika logo.svg
- File:Sucks.svg
- File:Vimeo HSTS.svg
- File:Videos.svg
- File:Tramvaiul 148.svg
- File:Stop Video.svg
- File:MoveOTVCarsIN.svg
- File:Dailymotion.svg
- File:VREV345V534.svg
- File:Google Play Videos logo 2017.svg
Potential copyvio marked as "own work":
- File:Lt56535239 quantized-ANIMATION.gif
- File:Google Play Game Google Play Games logo.svg
- File:Google Play Filmler ve TV Google Play Movies & TV logo.svg
- File:Firefox Sport logo 2017.svg
- File:No Camera.svg
I'd love to know why most of these are in Category:Gardens. :) TilmannR (talk) 19:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
There is a violation in these files, so delete Артём 13327 (talk) 18:59, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Its junk file IQBAL Hasan JCD (talk) 20:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:00004GROUPE-SCOLAIRE-YANFOLILA-WIKIMALI-2021-12.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 20:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:00004GROUPE-SCOLAIRE-YANFOLILA-WIKIMALI-2021-13.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 20:14, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:00004GROUPE-SCOLAIRE-YANFOLILA-WIKIMALI-2021-14.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 20:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: Not educationally useful. There has never been a flag for such region in Brazil. There is not any source that might support such claim. Py4nf (talk) 20:55, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:12, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:20, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- I am the creator of this logo, developer of this game as well as the owner of the company Woody's Games. Do you need the proof? HongyuShen (talk) 22:30, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Company website: http://woodysgames.com/
- Developer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/hongyushen/
- Developer Medium: https://gameofwoody.medium.com/
- Look at those carefully and do not do not mistake it. HongyuShen (talk) 22:55, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:12, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:12, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- Derived image: File:SamYorty (1).jpg
No indication of copyright status from source, so COM:PCP applies. —howcheng {chat} 23:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:13, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Neither CC-BY-SA, nor public domain. Source: https://www.ibge.gov.br/ Py4nf (talk) 13:02, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Please provide a link to the map that was supposedly copied. Uploader claimed "own work", and provided the source of the data as the IBGE. Myself I made a map based on Eurostat data, according to numbers from a government agency which I also linked to. That was still my own map!
- That said, it's a poor map, using absolute numbers to show area-to-pop relations. Amateur work, no decent cartographer would produce that. --Enyavar (talk) 06:57, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- I thought that the source of the map itself was www.ibge.gov.br but after reading your explanation I now understand that the data, not the map, was taken from that website. If this is the case, my deletion request should be denied. Py4nf (talk) 19:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- I myself created this map, with the population of the municipalities of Amazonas, based on the IBGE source referenced in the Wiki page itself. I just want to contribute, I'm new to the wiki but I'm a Geographer and a mapmaker. I thought the page could have a figure to support the list. My apologies. Williamferreiraam (talk) 18:23, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. Unreliable uploader, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Williamferreiraam. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:14, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
This has been pending for permission since january and i have doubt that the uploader has permission to upload it. The uploader also blocked now. Delete it and restore it if we received permission. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:38, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 04:57, 21 August 2022 UTC: No ticket permission achieved for more than 30 days --Krdbot 06:29, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO China --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- User:Minorax: China? Isn’t this a French work? Besides, I think this isn’t original: merely an unstylized letter with a color gradient applied. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 00:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Whoops. Probably meant for another file.
I withdraw my nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:11, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Whoops. Probably meant for another file.
Kept: withdrawing. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:01, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). My personal opinion for the time being is keep (PD-Anonymous-EU), but I need some time to find the original photographer. Vysotsky (talk) 12:37, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-EU-no author disclosure --RAN (talk) 13:13, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Name of the photographer not found after extensive search (RKD, municipal archives, architecture archives). So, most likely: {{Anonymous-EU}}{{PD-old-70}}. Vysotsky (talk) 11:51, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The memorial article in Rotterdams Jaarboekje 1983 holds a different photograph. Vysotsky (talk) 11:59, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:34, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi
this is Dominik, brand ambassador at Truphone.
This is our old logo and we'd like to request the deletion of this file.
The new Truphone logo has already been uploaded to Wikipedia Commons and can be found here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Truphone_logo_primary.svg
Thanks in advance Dominik — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 31.121.30.114 (talk) 13:56, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:38, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
The logo is outdated and shouldn't be used anymore Dominik.birkel (talk) 15:24, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Logo of a UK company, very likely above the very low COM:TOO UK. --Rosenzweig τ 20:44, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Foto aus https://www.paarbalance.de/prof-dr-ludwig-schindler/ herauskopiert, ohne Nennung des Urhebers (Fotografen) Jbergner (talk) 13:54, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Das hochgeladene Foto von Prof. Dr. Ludwig Schindler wird auch auf seiner Profil Website verwendet. Genau darum habe ich eben diese auch zu den weiterführenden Informationen zu ihm als Quelle verlinkt. Selbstverständlich liegt die Einverständnis von ihm vor. Was genau ist denn das Problem, warum das Bild jetzt gelöscht werden soll? Es stellt Ludwig Schindler dar, den ich vor 19 Jahren in seiner Praxis kennenlernen durfte, und der mit der Nutzung des Bildes hier einverstanden ist. Beste Grüße, Tobias Ziegler It-founder (talk) 14:15, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:NETCOPYVIO, would need a COM:VRT permission by author or rights holder to keep this. --Rosenzweig τ 12:23, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Bangladesh Air Force doesn't have any flickr account. This was COM:Flickrwash. Right now this file is copyvio and we need permission in order to use. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom —MdsShakil (talk) 10:56, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Bangladesh Armed Forces doesn't have any flickr account. This was COM:Flickrwash. Right now this file is copyvio and we need permission in order to use. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:33, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:Flickrwash, Uploader also globally locked as an LTA —MdsShakil (talk) 17:18, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nomination. Yahya (talk) 20:14, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, Per nomination, downloaded from here (the official website of the Bangladesh Army). — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 119.30.45.139 (talk) 14:17, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Source image found in only two locations, despite extensive search:
and
Avitopia source claims Public Domain "To the best of [their] knowledge", and claims the image is by J. Smit in 1873, but provides no source or evidence for this; they add "It is the obligation of the user, to verify the absence of any right reservations under his/her jurisdiction".
Posterprints provides no source details at all.
This user has failed to verify the absence of any right reservations, as advised by Avitopia. A search of literature from the period and containing Smit images failed to find any copy of this image, yet other known Smit illustrations are generally easily found in image searches and from sources like BHL. Its attribution to J. Smit, and to being in the Public Domain, must therefore be considered unproven, and doubtful. MPF (talk) 14:07, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Smit is correct. From an 1865 book, compare British Library on Flickr. --Rosenzweig τ 09:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
yet another copyvio (unless the uploader is the photographer who works for the party, but I highly doubt it) Schwede66 01:59, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, found on the web from before its upload here. --Rosenzweig τ 22:05, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
No evidence given for who this car might belong to, it doesn't appear to be a famous licence plate. Lord Belbury (talk) 09:59, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also upload of a globally locked account. --Rosenzweig τ 21:33, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Non-free icons included; e.g. old Safari browser logo. YuriNikolai (talk) 06:22, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP; I have doubts that the whole image is own work (that monitor and browser logos can also be found with other contents on the screen); plus this OSW3 OS doesn't seem to be terribly notable. --Rosenzweig τ 19:10, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Free in the US, but not in it's home country, the UK (COM:TOO UK). – Pbrks (t • c) 19:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 00:13, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama of in South Korea. No evidence that the text on this information board is freely licensed. ✗plicit 02:26, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 17:31, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama of in South Korea. No evidence that the artwork or text on this information board is freely licensed. ✗plicit 02:27, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 17:31, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
The date of the author's death is needed to clarify the copyright status. 188.123.231.23 04:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Dear colleague Ivtorov, would you be so kind to clarify who was С. С. Ильин and why do you believe his images are not copyrighted? Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:31, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, it may be copyrighted, because S. Ilyin (1881-1965). But may be Sergey Markin (1903-1942) was author of this photo, because it come from his archive. Could we change the author? --Inst-Soil (talk) 08:49, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. It is not clear who was the photographer of this work, so it is not known if it is in PD already. --Ellywa (talk) 17:33, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Seems no evidence of OGL license permission, including some parts are protected by Crown copyright. Xasley (talk) 04:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I am a friend of the deceased User:Rodhullandemu and executor of his estate. We worked closely together on legal copyright issues in the the United Kingdom. His view would have been, and mine is, that this is not a copyrightable item within the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, Secton 1 of which states that "Copyright is a property right which subsists in accordance with this Part in the following descriptions of work—
(a) original literary, dramatic, musical or artistic works...". A letter setting out facts and opinions from a UK Government Department is not "literary" in the sense of having any creative input. Neither is it "original" since it merely sets out an existing policy position. There may be some elements within the layout of the document that are copyright, but they are also "de minimis". This is a misguided nomination which has nothing to do the the OGL due to lack of creative input. Meanwhile, please feel free to grieve for the loss of Rod. 94.174.111.230 23:48, 14 May 2022 (UTC)This IP address is blocked for ban evasion. --2001:4451:8216:1700:8198:F528:D57C:9EE 15:02, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deceased? Instead of global banned? interesting. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 15:08, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 17:34, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Description does not justify PD Tatewaki (talk) 11:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Compare to File:Gheni batur.jpg lisenced as {{PD-China}}, it might be also correct for this image considering biography of the person (see en:Gheni Batur). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, deleted this version and made a redirect to the same image, File:Gheni batur1.jpg. --Ellywa (talk) 17:36, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Загружена более качественная версия логотипа - File:Yandex_Question_Logo_2021.jpg. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 20:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 17:38, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
This is a photo from a film, which according to the Copyright Ordinance in Hong Kong, was based on the death of the director, screenwriter and composer. The director of the film, who was the last surviving among three, died in 2007. Hence, the photo was still copyright in Hong Kong until 2057 and in the US until 2052. Billytanghh (talk) 12:27, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Hong Kong. Can be undeleted in 2057. .. --Ellywa (talk) 10:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wcam as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Complex logo per COM:TOO Hong Kong Ankry (talk) 10:29, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
- See also this discussion in COM:UDR. Ankry (talk) 10:33, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
- https://www.nwsc.org.hk/desktop/images/logo.jpg
- All simple text, not eligible for copyright. I dont think the curvature was intential for artistic purposes, nor is it creative enough for copyright. Chinese calligraphy doesnt work like this. It's rather probably a result of rusty conversion to computer graphics. Their website doesnt explain how it was designed or what it might symbolise either.--Roy17 (talk) 10:41, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
- What you said about this logo also holds true for the EDGE logo in COM:TOO UK, maybe even more so, and yet it is copyrighted. The TOO level is very low. --Wcam (talk) 02:21, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep My guess was correct. The logo employed nothing but a typical computer typeface 中国龙古印体: http://www.fonts.net.cn/font-31135349786.html?previewText=%E8%A1%97%E5%9D%8A%E5%B7%A5%E5%8F%8B%E6%9C%8D%E5%8B%99%E8%99%95 .--Roy17 (talk) 17:30, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
- The link you provided indicates it is a propiretary typeface. --Wcam (talk) 18:52, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
- What you said about this logo also holds true for the EDGE logo in COM:TOO UK, maybe even more so, and yet it is copyrighted. The TOO level is very low. --Wcam (talk) 02:21, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Roy17 and {{PD-font}}. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- @P199: With all due respect, I believe this is an incorrect decision to keep this file without considering the very low TOO of Honk Kong, as {{PD-font}} only concerns copyright in the United States, not the source country; in spite of that, {{PD-font}} clearly states that vector format images of fonts (such as SVG which is the case of the image in question) may be copyrighted in the United States. Furthermore on this page: "若您要将该字体用于商业用途，请与权属方联系并取得书面授权，该授权可能需要您支付相应的版权费用。" (translation: If you want to use this font for commercial purposes, please contact the owner and obtain a written authorization, which may require you to pay the corresponding copyright fees.) --Wcam (talk) 12:19, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted as per additional explanation by User:Wcam above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:10, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
NWSC was formed in 1985, and the threshold of originality in Hong Kong is very low. Billytanghh (talk) 12:33, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: closing admin should also consider the 2 undeletion rationales before simply deleting the file: Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2019-08#File:Logo of the Neighbourhood and Worker's Service Centre.svg and Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2020-03#File:Logo of the Neighbourhood and Worker's Service Centre.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:24, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per the discussion at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2020-03#File:Logo of the Neighbourhood and Worker's Service Centre.svg. --Rosenzweig τ 19:19, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
This is a photo from a film, which according to the Copyright Ordinance in Hong Kong, was based on the death of the director, screenwriter and composer. The director of the film, who was the last surviving among three, died in 2007. Hence, the photo was still copyright in Hong Kong until 2057 and in the US until 2052. Billytanghh (talk) 12:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Hong Kong. Can be undeleted in 2057. .. --Ellywa (talk) 21:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Summons Leicester Magistrates' Court private prosecution District Judge Fudge Russell Finlay.jpg
[edit]This is a British legal notice and is thus under Crown copyright -- how can it be under CC-BY-SA? Also, the redaction of personal information is very incomplete. 49.204.128.79 12:30, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Documents of this nature would be covered by the Open Government Licence (https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/).
- Personal information should however be removed as this is explicitly excluded from the OGL. Theesem (talk) 21:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per remark of Theesem. If you do not agree with my decision to delete the file(s), please ask for undeletion on COM:UNDELETE. If you do so, formulate your motivation why this image (or these images) can be maintained very clearly and base your motivation on the Commons policies. After that, another administrator will take a decision.. --Ellywa (talk) 21:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Although this video is licensed under Creative Commons, this image is a derivative work of a newspaper. MBC can not license this portion under a free license and Commons can not host it. ✗plicit 13:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:43, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
This logo uploaded without permission from insitution HUMAS IPDN (talk) 13:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
not from Hong Kong Fact Sheet, but from a leaflet from the Education Bureau. Copyright protected. Billytanghh (talk) 13:55, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The source website does not exist any more. The current Education Bureau says on their website Copyright © 2018. Education Bureau All rights reserved."'. --Ellywa (talk) 21:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Central Bank of Iraq
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in Iraq for commercial exploitations of copyrighted works in public spaces. This building in particular was completed in 1985 and designed by Dissing+Weitling, a Danish architectural firm, still within the 50 years copyright term from the publication of Dissing+Weitling's architectural œuvre (fails {{PD-Iraq}} as a result).
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:31, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- As for File:Baghdad-bank-hires.jpg - is the building really the subject of the photo? It's rather a photo of the soldiers and the tank. --Botev (talk) 17:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Botev: as for that, I can say it is the intentional subject. Large part of the building is shown while the soldiers and the tank became accessories of the image, so I doubt it can be dismissed as "incidental." Note that it is being used in several language editions of the article of the architectural firm itself, thus invalidating its de minimis eligibility. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- The mere fact that the image is used in articles about the architectural firm cannot affect copyright in any way. An image is either copyrighted or not - regardless of its actual use. And I'm still not convinced that the author would have taken this picture in this way in order to depict the building itself. --Botev (talk) 21:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Botev: as for that, I can say it is the intentional subject. Large part of the building is shown while the soldiers and the tank became accessories of the image, so I doubt it can be dismissed as "incidental." Note that it is being used in several language editions of the article of the architectural firm itself, thus invalidating its de minimis eligibility. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- As for File:Baghdad-bank-hires.jpg - is the building really the subject of the photo? It's rather a photo of the soldiers and the tank. --Botev (talk) 17:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Please include File:Central Bank of Iraq Tower.jpg in the listing. Thanks. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:12, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Adeletron 3030 that is a more different building. While more recent, it can be argued that it doesn't yet show the actual appearance of the building as it is in construction stages (ref. COM:Deletion requests/Images of Burj Khalifa). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:25, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Makes sense, thanks for clarifying. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:28, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Adeletron 3030 that is a more different building. While more recent, it can be argued that it doesn't yet show the actual appearance of the building as it is in construction stages (ref. COM:Deletion requests/Images of Burj Khalifa). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:25, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination'and discussion. If somebody wants to crop the soldiers and tank from the first image, please ask for temporary undeletion on my talk page. --Ellywa (talk) 21:49, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
tüttürmek 88.230.242.210 14:50, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Jelican9 (talk) 09:20, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. tüttürmek means smoke according to google translate. So no reason to delete this image. --Ellywa (talk) 21:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyviol from https://www.araldicacivica.it/comune/portofino/ GJo (talk) 16:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you! I reset it to official coat of arms, so it shows or is part of official act published and distributed by the Italian State or Italian public administration. According to Italian copyright law, this work is in the public domain in Italy unless the copyright has been reserved explicitly. – Doc Taxon
Disk. • 16:46, 27. Apr 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, but for italian law civic coat of arms are not free, see: Commons:Deletion requests/Italian CoA.—GJo (talk) 20:56, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- No, http://www.araldicacivica.it is not the copyright owner of the actual version of coat of arms. Admin, please delete the former versions of this coat of arms. In Italian laws there's not an explicit exception of very official coat of arms from works of public administrations. – Doc Taxon Disk. • 05:10, 28. Apr 2022 (UTC)
- Under Italian law, the coat of arms of the Municipality is protected like the surname of the persons and therefore is not free.—GJo (talk) 08:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- What a surname? What persons are you meaning? And by which article of the laws is a coat of arms protected? – Doc Taxon Disk. • 15:30, 28. Apr 2022 (UTC)
- See, for example, (in Italian, of course): Utilizzo non autorizzato dello stemma comunale da parte di un'associazione (Unauthorized use of the municipal coat of arms by an association).—GJo (talk) 08:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- What a surname? What persons are you meaning? And by which article of the laws is a coat of arms protected? – Doc Taxon
- Under Italian law, the coat of arms of the Municipality is protected like the surname of the persons and therefore is not free.—GJo (talk) 08:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- No, http://www.araldicacivica.it is not the copyright owner of the actual version of coat of arms. Admin, please delete the former versions of this coat of arms. In Italian laws there's not an explicit exception of very official coat of arms from works of public administrations. – Doc Taxon
- Sorry, but for italian law civic coat of arms are not free, see: Commons:Deletion requests/Italian CoA.—GJo (talk) 20:56, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
,_Christophoruskirche,_Bärmig-Orgel.jpg){kind=link}
;1,4,8,11-tetrazacyclotetradecane;diperchlorate.jpg){kind=link}
![69 File:DB15 "Best of the Best" award, 2005, Robb Report.jpg](#File:DB15_"Best_of_the_Best"_award,_2005,_Robb_Report.jpg){kind=link}
![75 File:DB25 Mayan Underworld "Best of the Best" award, 2013, Robb Report..jpg](#File:DB25_Mayan_Underworld_"Best_of_the_Best"_award,_2013,_Robb_Report..jpg){kind=link}
![77 File:DB28 Maxichrono, "Best Chronograph" prize, 2016, Luxemburg Watch Fair.jpg](#File:DB28_Maxichrono,_"Best_Chronograph"_prize,_2016,_Luxemburg_Watch_Fair.jpg){kind=link}
![78 File:DB28 Tourbillon Black Gold, "Marca en Ascenso" prize, 2013, SIAR.jpg](#File:DB28_Tourbillon_Black_Gold,_"Marca_en_Ascenso"_prize,_2013,_SIAR.jpg){kind=link}
![79 File:DB Kind of Two, "Tourbillon Watch" prize, 2021, GPHG..jpg](#File:DB_Kind_of_Two,_"Tourbillon_Watch"_prize,_2021,_GPHG..jpg){kind=link}
![80 File:DB25 Starry Varius, "Chronometry" prize, 2018, GPHG.jpg](#File:DB25_Starry_Varius,_"Chronometry"_prize,_2018,_GPHG.jpg){kind=link}
![81 File:DB28 Kind of Blue Tourbillon, "Best Tourbillon Watch" award, 2016, Middle East magazine MPP.jpg](#File:DB28_Kind_of_Blue_Tourbillon,_"Best_Tourbillon_Watch"_award,_2016,_Middle_East_magazine_MPP.jpg){kind=link}
![82 File:DW1 "Best of the Best" award, 2009, Robb Report..png](#File:DW1_"Best_of_the_Best"_award,_2009,_Robb_Report..png){kind=link}
![83 File:DB29 Maxichrono Tourbillon, "Best of The Best" award, 2015, Robb Report.jpg](#File:DB29_Maxichrono_Tourbillon,_"Best_of_The_Best"_award,_2015,_Robb_Report.jpg){kind=link}
![84 File:DB28 Grand Bleu "Best Sport Watch" prize, 2019, SIAR.jpg](#File:DB28_Grand_Bleu_"Best_Sport_Watch"_prize,_2019,_SIAR.jpg){kind=link}
![85 File:DB21 Maxichrono "Best Men's Watch" prize, 2006, Revolution Watch Magazine.png](#File:DB21_Maxichrono_"Best_Men's_Watch"_prize,_2006,_Revolution_Watch_Magazine.png){kind=link}
![86 File:DB28 Kind of Blue Tourbillon "Best Design" award, 2016, Revolution Watch Magazine.jpg](#File:DB28_Kind_of_Blue_Tourbillon_"Best_Design"_award,_2016,_Revolution_Watch_Magazine.jpg){kind=link}
![87 File:DB28 "Aiguilles d'Or", "Best Timepiece of the Year" awards, 2011, GPHG.jpg](#File:DB28_"Aiguilles_d'Or",_"Best_Timepiece_of_the_Year"_awards,_2011,_GPHG.jpg){kind=link}
![88 File:DW5 "Best Design & Concept Watch" prize, 2014, Spiral Magazine.jpg](#File:DW5_"Best_Design_&_Concept_Watch"_prize,_2014,_Spiral_Magazine.jpg){kind=link}
![89 File:DB Kind of Two Tourbillon, "Best of the Best" award, 2021, Robb Report.jpg](#File:DB_Kind_of_Two_Tourbillon,_"Best_of_the_Best"_award,_2021,_Robb_Report.jpg){kind=link}
![91 File:DB29 Maxichrono, "Reloj Chronografo" prize, 2014, SIAR.jpg](#File:DB29_Maxichrono,_"Reloj_Chronografo"_prize,_2014,_SIAR.jpg){kind=link}
![93 File:DB28 Maxichrono "Best Chronograph Watch" award, 2014, Middle East Magazine MPP.jpg](#File:DB28_Maxichrono_"Best_Chronograph_Watch"_award,_2014,_Middle_East_Magazine_MPP.jpg){kind=link}
![94 File:DB29 Maxichrono Tourbillon, "Chronograph Prize", 2014, GPHG.jpg](#File:DB29_Maxichrono_Tourbillon,_"Chronograph_Prize",_2014,_GPHG.jpg){kind=link}
![95 File:DW5 Cempasúchil, "Best Custom Watch" award, 2020, Alexander vetrov and Chronoscope TV.jpg](#File:DW5_Cempasúchil,_"Best_Custom_Watch"_award,_2020,_Alexander_vetrov_and_Chronoscope_TV.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_2021.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
,_Christophoruskirche,_B%C3%A4rmig-Orgel.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Christophoruskirche,_B%C3%A4rmig-Orgel.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_Christophoruskirche,_Bärmig-Orgel.jpg){kind=link}
,_Christophoruskirche,_Bärmig-Orgel.jpg){kind=link}
;1,4,8,11-tetrazacyclotetradecane;diperchlorate.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
;1,4,8,11-tetrazacyclotetradecane;diperchlorate.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
;1,4,8,11-tetrazacyclotetradecane;diperchlorate.jpg){kind=link}
;1,4,8,11-tetrazacyclotetradecane;diperchlorate.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![08:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-Culex-2022-04-27T08:08:00.000Z-File:DB15_"Best_of_the_Best"_award,_2005,_Robb_Report.jpg){kind=link}
![01:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-P199-2022-06-16T01:37:00.000Z-File:DB15_"Best_of_the_Best"_award,_2005,_Robb_Report.jpg){kind=link}
![08:13, 27 April 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-Culex-2022-04-27T08:13:00.000Z-File:DB25_Mayan_Underworld_"Best_of_the_Best"_award,_2013,_Robb_Report..jpg){kind=link}
![01:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-P199-2022-06-16T01:37:00.000Z-File:DB25_Mayan_Underworld_"Best_of_the_Best"_award,_2013,_Robb_Report..jpg){kind=link}
![08:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-Culex-2022-04-27T08:28:00.000Z-File:DB28_Maxichrono,_"Best_Chronograph"_prize,_2016,_Luxemburg_Watch_Fair.jpg){kind=link}
![01:43, 16 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-P199-2022-06-16T01:43:00.000Z-File:DB28_Maxichrono,_"Best_Chronograph"_prize,_2016,_Luxemburg_Watch_Fair.jpg){kind=link}
![08:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-Culex-2022-04-27T08:28:00.000Z-File:DB28_Tourbillon_Black_Gold,_"Marca_en_Ascenso"_prize,_2013,_SIAR.jpg){kind=link}
![01:43, 16 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-P199-2022-06-16T01:43:00.000Z-File:DB28_Tourbillon_Black_Gold,_"Marca_en_Ascenso"_prize,_2013,_SIAR.jpg){kind=link}
![08:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-Culex-2022-04-27T08:28:00.000Z-File:DB_Kind_of_Two,_"Tourbillon_Watch"_prize,_2021,_GPHG..jpg){kind=link}
![01:43, 16 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-P199-2022-06-16T01:43:00.000Z-File:DB_Kind_of_Two,_"Tourbillon_Watch"_prize,_2021,_GPHG..jpg){kind=link}
![08:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-Culex-2022-04-27T08:29:00.000Z-File:DB25_Starry_Varius,_"Chronometry"_prize,_2018,_GPHG.jpg){kind=link}
![01:43, 16 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-P199-2022-06-16T01:43:00.000Z-File:DB25_Starry_Varius,_"Chronometry"_prize,_2018,_GPHG.jpg){kind=link}
![08:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-Culex-2022-04-27T08:29:00.000Z-File:DW1_"Best_of_the_Best"_award,_2009,_Robb_Report..png){kind=link}
![01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-P199-2022-06-16T01:42:00.000Z-File:DW1_"Best_of_the_Best"_award,_2009,_Robb_Report..png){kind=link}
![08:30, 27 April 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-Culex-2022-04-27T08:30:00.000Z-File:DB29_Maxichrono_Tourbillon,_"Best_of_The_Best"_award,_2015,_Robb_Report.jpg){kind=link}
![01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-P199-2022-06-16T01:42:00.000Z-File:DB29_Maxichrono_Tourbillon,_"Best_of_The_Best"_award,_2015,_Robb_Report.jpg){kind=link}
![08:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-Culex-2022-04-27T08:32:00.000Z-File:DB28_Grand_Bleu_"Best_Sport_Watch"_prize,_2019,_SIAR.jpg){kind=link}
![01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-P199-2022-06-16T01:42:00.000Z-File:DB28_Grand_Bleu_"Best_Sport_Watch"_prize,_2019,_SIAR.jpg){kind=link}
![08:33, 27 April 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-Culex-2022-04-27T08:33:00.000Z-File:DB28_"Aiguilles_d'Or",_"Best_Timepiece_of_the_Year"_awards,_2011,_GPHG.jpg){kind=link}
![01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-P199-2022-06-16T01:42:00.000Z-File:DB28_"Aiguilles_d'Or",_"Best_Timepiece_of_the_Year"_awards,_2011,_GPHG.jpg){kind=link}
![08:33, 27 April 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-Culex-2022-04-27T08:33:00.000Z-File:DW5_"Best_Design_&_Concept_Watch"_prize,_2014,_Spiral_Magazine.jpg){kind=link}
![01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-P199-2022-06-16T01:42:00.000Z-File:DW5_"Best_Design_&_Concept_Watch"_prize,_2014,_Spiral_Magazine.jpg){kind=link}
![08:35, 27 April 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-Culex-2022-04-27T08:35:00.000Z-File:DB_Kind_of_Two_Tourbillon,_"Best_of_the_Best"_award,_2021,_Robb_Report.jpg){kind=link}
![01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-P199-2022-06-16T01:42:00.000Z-File:DB_Kind_of_Two_Tourbillon,_"Best_of_the_Best"_award,_2021,_Robb_Report.jpg){kind=link}
![08:38, 27 April 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-Culex-2022-04-27T08:38:00.000Z-File:DB29_Maxichrono,_"Reloj_Chronografo"_prize,_2014,_SIAR.jpg){kind=link}
![01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-P199-2022-06-16T01:42:00.000Z-File:DB29_Maxichrono,_"Reloj_Chronografo"_prize,_2014,_SIAR.jpg){kind=link}
![08:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-Culex-2022-04-27T08:41:00.000Z-File:DB29_Maxichrono_Tourbillon,_"Chronograph_Prize",_2014,_GPHG.jpg){kind=link}
![01:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/27#c-P199-2022-06-16T01:42:00.000Z-File:DB29_Maxichrono_Tourbillon,_"Chronograph_Prize",_2014,_GPHG.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Draculaura._(8016507719).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_2021.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_2021.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_2021.jpg){kind=link}
,_2021.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:Italy, where it is stated "Works made for the public administration or for non-profit organisations have 20 years of copyright protection before being in the public domain". The age of this CoA is unknown, so it has to be deleted for now. --Ellywa (talk) 21:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Wrong redirect from a wrong renaming that needs to be reverted. Thanks! Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 16:31, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, the link now leads to the djvu file. --Ellywa (talk) 21:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Missing EXIF data, unlikely own work NoonIcarus (talk) 20:05, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Although missing EXIF is not a reason for deletion, but uploader – who was notified about this request and active after this DR was created – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 21:58, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Отсутствует разрешение от Вакиля Шайхетдинова MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 20:24, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- In fact, all the paintings at Category:Vakil Shaykhetdinov need OTRS permission although I personally can believe that User:Sha-vakil is Vakil Shaykhetdinov himself. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- То есть получается удалять не надо? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 16:43, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @Sha-vakil: please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 22:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
