Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/04/07

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 7th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deleted YeadHosen (talk) 03:57, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Selfie F10, uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 08:06, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete again, unnecessary. 181.43.5.243 14:31, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:26, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tgbf vd v 213.82.54.222 12:02, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim55 (talk) 12:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Renvoy as no permission (No permission since). Image taken from Twitter (non-free source). Multiple copyvio by the same uploader. BrightRaven (talk) 12:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted: Image taken from Twitter (non-free source). Multiple copyvio by the same uploader. --BrightRaven (talk) 12:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Melanggar Hak Cipta Rei Fell (talk) 05:02, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Mhhossein at 05:51, 7 April 2022 UTC: Fair use material is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons (COM:CSD#F2) --Krdbot 13:49, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don’t want it anymore Bajiemyr (talk) 14:06, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Own user space. --Achim55 (talk) 14:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{SD|F10|This is a personal photo uploaded by mistake.Please delete it.}} TaronAleks (talk) 17:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 17:35, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушение авторских прав - права на программу Вести недели принадлежат ВГТРК MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 14:55, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:11, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to file:BayernetsGmbH-Logo-RGB.png; no reason to have an additional GIF-compressed version. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Duplicate. --Yann (talk) 08:57, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NayeliVerse (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal YouTube profile pictures (as stated in filenames) with no educational value; out of COM:SCOPE and might not be own work (though statement of being an animator on enwiki userpage could validate authorship claim).

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:42, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:57, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot without any context; uploaded by vandal blocked on en.wiki. Nate (chatter) 22:48, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 08:41, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Vio? BlinxTheKitty (talk) 05:59, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: No fair use on Commons. --Achim55 (talk) 11:00, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No fair use & missing license & reupload. --Achim55 (talk) 12:09, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also encompassing File:Andrew Halcro reads from Sarah Palin's "Going Rogue".jpg

Uploader's activites on this site center on scavenging YouTube for CC-licensed videos with which to illustrate Wikipedia articles on current elections and political figures. I've witnessed a ton of questionable behavior from them lately. Since the admins on this site appear more interested in scolding newbies for failing to sign their posts than they are in dealing with problematic content and users, and since this is a siloed micro-discussion focused on one tiny little thing (in the context of the site hosting tens of millions of files), I won't hold my breath expecting any acknowledgement of the bigger problem.

As to these two files, they came from the YouTube stream of the Anchorage Daily News. The source video was produced by the Alaska Dispatch years before they purchased the ADN. The video lacks the standard CC licensing notice found on YT. As an aside, one of the frequent problems created by the uploader is claiming their uploads are licensed under CC-BY-SA 3.0, when the standard YT licensing notice shows that those videos are actually licensed under CC-BY 3.0 (see here). The CC licensing notice present in this video appears to pertain to the background music rather than the video as a whole, which is customarily expected of anyone reusing CC-licensed content. A random browsing of videos in the ADN's stream revealed no evidence of other CC-licensed videos, including other earlier videos produced by the Alaska Dispatch. It's highly unlikely that a news organization this size would license its content under CC. RadioKAOS (talk) 19:34, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A DR isn't the right place to generally discuss other editor's behaviour. Anyway, the video from which the nominated image is sourced, is under a Commons-compatible CC-BY 3.0 license on Youtube.[1] If we don't assume the "Anchorage Daily News"-YT channel[2] to be hacked, we should rely on their licensing. The second file has already been deleted per request of the uploader (G7). --Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (nominated the file for speedy deletion). Taivo (talk) 12:36, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test, No educational use CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven at 15:03, 11 April 2022 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 20:03, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Duplicator of
Jakub T. Jankiewicz (talk) 14:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:09, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small with uneven border; Category:Peroxynitric acid has a few SVG alts. DMacks (talk) 07:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 15:53, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:55, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism and promotional Wyffiowanna talk? 23:19, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by User:EugeneZelenko. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

WMC is not your personal web host Dronebogus (talk) 03:02, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:37, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pedro2188 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal crap

Dronebogus (talk) 03:03, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:36, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OOS and bad quality Dronebogus (talk) 03:05, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:37, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense Dronebogus (talk) 03:06, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:38, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio + WTF Dronebogus (talk) 03:08, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:38, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Worthless nonsense Dronebogus (talk) 03:09, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:38, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality + no source Dronebogus (talk) 03:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:39, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this is extremely wholesome it’s also oos Dronebogus (talk) 03:35, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:40, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense Dronebogus (talk) 03:36, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:40, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was an idiot. This was a photo I found online. This photo is not owned by me. Hansen033 (talk) 06:29, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:41, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OOS/nonsense Dronebogus (talk) 06:39, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:42, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Christianideas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OOS nonsense

Dronebogus (talk) 06:40, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:42, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

processed ham product (spam) Dronebogus (talk) 06:48, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:43, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

|Because of the spelling error in the file name. Once deleted, I will re-upload with the the correct spelling which will be less confusing. Richard everard (talk) 08:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:45, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private usage. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 09:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:46, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private usage. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 09:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private usage. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 09:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rizkylazuardito (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:48, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saifur Rahman7243 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photo.

Larryasou (talk) 12:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:56, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyrighted product packaging, "webp" format suggests this is a download, not an original photo Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:56, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The first reactant should be benzaldehyde, not phenol. The Leuckart reaction uses a ketone or aldehyde as the starting material. Marbletan (talk) 17:04, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:57, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The reduction of benzamide to benzylamine does not take place by reaction with sodium hydroxide. It requires a hydride reducing agent, for example. Sodium carbonate is not a byproduct. Marbletan (talk) 17:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom. Unused chemical equation containing factual mistakes.

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:57, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Foto ist veraltet, Ralf Gustke ist kaum sichtbar. Porträtfoto erwünscht 217.254.6.84 21:49, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Where is his portrait photograph under Creative Commons license ? Anyway, your suggestion seems not meet the deletion request. --Clusternote (talk) 00:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:59, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Not really useful for educational purposes. Also, the first image in the secuence is non-free ZebaX2010 (talk) 23:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is free? 191.125.14.203 01:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is free? 191.125.14.203 01:31, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is free? 191.125.14.203 01:31, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is free? 191.125.14.203 01:31, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is free? 191.125.14.203 01:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is free? 191.125.14.203 01:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is free? 191.125.14.203 01:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is free? 191.125.14.203 01:38, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, there is no commercial FOP in Turkmenistan. This building according to w:Ertuğrul Gazi Mosque was completed in 1998 and designed by architect Hilmi Şenalp. Ornate interior architecture, mosaics, and stained-glass artworks are also included here.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:01, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Delete as per nom. Zoozaz1 (talk) 03:05, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:24, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TinEye detected the mother file, File:مسجد أرطغل غازي .jpg, as coming from now-deleted file File:Ertugrul Gazi Mosque in Ashgabat, Turkmenistan.jpg (deleted with proper deletion request) The uploader (I don't know if he/she is the photographer of the deleted file) apparently saved a thumbnail of it and reuploaded it here (via cross-wiki upload from Arabic Wikipedia). The croppped version File:Ertuğrul Gazi Mosque.jpg is a derivative of this. The uploader of "مسجد أرطغل غازي .jpg" must be warned not to violate architect's copyright by doing this.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:43, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 06:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out, damned spam! Dronebogus (talk) 06:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder WATANDA PHOTOGRAPHY 0773251340 191.125.14.203 01:34, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Minorax at 11:46, 15 April 2022 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 19:39, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder WATANDA PHOTOGRAPHY 0773251340 191.125.14.203 01:34, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Minorax at 11:46, 15 April 2022 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 19:39, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is free? 191.125.14.203 01:35, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Minorax at 11:46, 15 April 2022 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 19:39, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork without educational usage, OOS. Stang 02:49, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a picture I have for a special purpose, please don't delete it, thanks!Uncle Ranger 16:05, 7 April 2022 (UTC+8)


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 15:29, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously spam for some not notable dude Dronebogus (talk) 07:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 16:02, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[withdrawn]

Dronebogus (talk) 07:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @User:Dronebogus, I just got a notification about File:Lil Huddy (cropped).jpg, which is one I cropped to use on an article. I am not very familiar with the terms you use (what is OOS?), and also I don't think it is copyright violation, as its licence is "Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0)". Is that ok? If not, please go ahead with deletion. Cheers AdrianHObradors (talk) 10:16, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, removed Dronebogus (talk) 10:19, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Nocommentchick.png is a screenshot of a Youtube CC-BY video, so it is NOT a copyvio. Get rid of it. HumanxAnthro (talk) 14:38, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Rid of it from this nomination, I mean HumanxAnthro (talk) 14:39, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, this list of files is too varied to be considered as a group, and no deletion rationale is given for the individual files. It is an abuse of the deletion process to bulk-nominate files in this way and then challenge others to find a reason for them to be kept. I have checked a few of these, but it is the nominator's responsibility to make detailed checks on nominated files unless there is a 'smoking gun'. Many social influencers are sufficiently noteworthy for Commons, although not everyone who describes themself as a social influencer is one. Anyone can add a file to a category. At first glance, few of these are obvious copyright violations.
Verbcatcher (talk) 14:46, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawing due to technical complaints per Verbcatcher. Dronebogus (talk) 06:26, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per nominator's withdrawal of this mass request and per Verbcatcher: kept all for the time being, except some where a specific reason for deletion was already given in the discussion. You can nominate individual files from the category again if there are valid individual reasons for deletion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:59, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is hardly readable and we have this. Julius Senegal (talk) 19:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 19:07, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nothing from the uploader to state they own the image Lugnuts (talk) 08:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 07:10, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OOS garbage obviously stolen from some YouTube channel Dronebogus (talk) 06:38, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 14:28, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sebastián Quevedo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Collection of personal photos.

Smooth O (talk) 14:22, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 14:28, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kadı as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: personal photos of non-contributors
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image is well suitable as a stock-image of a happy little girl. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:17, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 14:29, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation, duplicate of file deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Гетьман Сагайдачний потоплений.jpg. Crop of a tweeted image.[21] Verbcatcher (talk) 19:34, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification: this file was uploaded on the same day that the referenced Tweet was made. The timestamp on the Tweet is earlier, although this could be a time zone issue. The original upload was the full uncropped image in the Tweet, it has since been cropped here. However, the uncropped image has the watermark "ABALI'S PHONE", which does match the uploader's username. As the nominator I still think that the 'Own work' claim is unreliable. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:10, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obando Church and Museum files by Obandoeño12345 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Assorted COM:Derivative works. Copyright violations!

Several are literary works (like decrees or commemorative messages/texts) and photographs installed in museum spaces, but there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines.

Church decree dated January 30, 2021
Deriavtive work of a map
Informational text with indicated authors "Mr. Ernesto 'Aris' C. Bagtas" and "Bro. Kendrick Ivan B. Panganiban," needs commercial license from these two authors via COM:VRTS correspondence
Comemmorative letter dated 2020
Assorted photographs, the details on descriptions of some photographs are too blurry to be read
Church letters dated 2020
Comemmorative message dated 2004

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:06, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:WEBHOSTING-only content by a suspected sock of Judgefloro (talk · contribs). The first three files have misleading titles and meant to bypass COM:SCOPE allegations (not of construction machines but of people with their pets, in which we already have existing images). The rest are near-duplicates: only two are to be kept (File:Perched Ardea alba standing on power lines 04.jpg and File:Perched Ardea alba standing on power lines 11.jpg) out of more than 10 near-duplicates, two of which seem to focus more on the random river and not the bird.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:31, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:48, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of non-notable person. out of scope. Larryasou (talk) 04:26, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:39, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some not notable person Dronebogus (talk) 07:06, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description says this picture is "child penis". Child pornography. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 09:55, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 12:27, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If it is as written in the explanation, it corresponds to child pornography. Tail furry (talk) 10:27, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 12:27, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

この資料には誤った情報が含まれている、すべて投稿者本人による、依頼である。資料及び写真の修整を行います 翔之介 (talk) 22:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

翔之介 (talk) 23:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

|間違えて投稿された資料です、 翔之介 (talk) 18:40, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 12:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. No evidence of being uploader’s own work. Film Enthusiast (talk) 17:26, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Vera (talk) 08:35, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be from a single-purpose, possibly license laundering Flickr account: https://www.flickr.com/photos/195290607@N03/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:22, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 11:48, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible COM:FLICKRWASH, from a single-purpose Flickr account and the claim that the photographer has been dead for 70 years seems ridiculous. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:27, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 11:48, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicado / Double as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logomarca_do_Partido_Agir.png Sr. Freak (talk) 00:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 07:19, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 09:44, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as no permission (No permission since). Many Ukrainian government websites are CC, check this one? King of ♥ 03:29, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 07:32, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 09:44, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:56, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TrumNamDinh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without metadata, user blocked for sockpupettry, unlikely to be own works. See also [22].

Yann (talk) 17:58, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:49, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As Kazakhastan has no freedom-of-panorama exception for public works of art, it needs to be evaluated whether this statue is really out of copyright. Otherwise, a permission by the sculptor is necessary. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Same problem with: File:Молдабай палуан.jpg


Deleted: per nomination. Probably not own picture anyway. --Yann (talk) 14:07, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image likely a screenshot, per watermark and caption. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:05, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:10, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another apparent copyvio from this uploader, see prior deletion nominations. Also uploader continues to upload copyright violations after receiving DNs and speedy notices. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:48, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:09, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creator request ItzSelenux (talk) 17:06, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

creator request ItzSelenux (talk) 21:13, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

creator request 189.217.67.41 21:26, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

creator request 189.217.67.41 21:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:01, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheber ist nicht der Fotograf Dirk Lenke (talk) 14:22, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Der Fotograf (bzw. der korrekte Credit) ist "SZ" (Süddeutsche Zeitung). Diese Fotografie wurde Christiane Schlötzer für die Verwendung im Zusammenhang mit dem Namen "Christiane Schlötzer" für darstellerische Zwecke unter Nennung des Credits "SZ" zur Verfügung gestellt. Sie hat es mir mit der Bitte zum Austausch in ihrem Wikipedia-Eintrag digital zur Verfügung gestellt. Martin Geiger (talk) 15:22, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Author Jörg Buschmann — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.126.139.91 (talk) 20:09, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Copyvio from Süddeutsche Zeitung. Photo was taken by Jörg Buschmann. --Wikijunkie (talk) 03:00, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jörg Buschmann hat dieses Foto Christiane Schlötzer zur Nutzung überlassen. Die Rechte liegen bei Christiane SChlötzer Martin Geiger (talk) 06:00, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Urheberrechte lassen sich nicht "überlassen".... Für Wikipedia sind nicht die Nutzungsrechte entscheidend, sondern die Urheberrechte. Nur die Urheber können Bilder freigeben unter einer freien Lizenz, niemand anderes. --Wikijunkie (talk) 08:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. If there is some kind of permission, please have it verified by e-mail through the proper channels. See Commons:Volunteer Response Team. --Rosenzweig τ 15:18, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheber ist nicht der Fotograf Dirk Lenke (talk) 14:28, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Der Fotograf lässt sich nicht mehr ermitteln. Das Foto ist im Besitz von Achim Sydow und wurde mir für diesen Eintrag zur Verfügung gestellt. Martin Geiger (talk) 15:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, not enough information to be able to determine the copyright status of this photo. As it is presumably not yet 70 years old, it's presumably also still copyrighted. There is no evidence of a free license either. --Rosenzweig τ 15:20, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheber ist nicht der Fotograf Dirk Lenke (talk) 14:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Der Fotograf lässt sich nicht mehr ermitteln, auch aufgrund des vor-digitalen Zeitpunktes. Achim Sydow (Gegenstand des Wikipedia-Eintrages) hat es mir für den Eintrag zur Verfügung gestellt. Er ist der Besitzer der analogen Fotografie und hat laut seinen Aussagen die Rechte an diesem Foto. Martin Geiger (talk) 15:20, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. If there is some kind of permission, please have it verified by e-mail through the proper channels. See Commons:Volunteer Response Team. --Rosenzweig τ 15:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cryw 9 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I fail to see the value of these personal works of fiction. They seem out of scope to me.

TommyG (talk) 06:21, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (also, yikes). --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:01, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 06:56, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:20, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 06:58, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:13, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 07:00, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope self-made file Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 16:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused signature Lymantria (talk) 05:21, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marubio12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of educational scope: Personal fantasy pictures

Enyavar (talk) 05:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, no use BlinxTheKitty (talk) 05:58, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality PNG version of File:Muslim-Byzantine troop movement (635-636).svg Enyavar (talk) 05:58, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE, processed as a dup. --Gbawden (talk) 12:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam garbage Dronebogus (talk) 06:42, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:49, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatantly spam Dronebogus (talk) 06:43, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful Dronebogus (talk) 06:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:49, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be spam, and anyway we don’t need a low quality image of something as common as boobs. Dronebogus (talk) 06:45, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:48, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Go Up Again! (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obviously spam

Dronebogus (talk) 06:46, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; G10 next time. --Gbawden (talk) 12:49, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No copyright info Dronebogus (talk) 06:48, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Goddamn spam Dronebogus (talk) 06:49, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:48, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of encyclopedic usefulness Dronebogus (talk) 06:50, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:48, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 06:57, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam crap Dronebogus (talk) 06:58, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam spam Dronebogus (talk) 06:59, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 07:01, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Usable at w:Brianne West. Not sure about the copyright status, though. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:15, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
PD-text Dronebogus (talk) 19:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Worthless broken spam file Dronebogus (talk) 07:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Specifying "Google" as source is not enough to be sure about copyright Wouter (talk) 07:27, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:46, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Specifying "Google" as source is not enough to be sure about copyright Wouter (talk) 07:27, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies for other files of the user.

File:Jaw Plant.jpg
File:Nightbrother Archer.png
File:Slyyyg.jpg
File:Gorgara, a chirodactyl.jpg
File:Splox.jpg
File:Scazz.jpg
File:Phillak.png
File:Jotaz.jpg
File:Flame Beetle.jpg
File:Wyyyschokk.jpg
File:Saava.png
File:Mykal.png
File:Shyyyo Bird.jpg
File:Lesser Nydak.png
File:Bane Back Spider.jpg
File:Nightbrother Warrior.png

Wouter (talk) 07:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:46, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt this is really an own work. It is small size and published on interent since 2016 [23][24]. Possible copyvio. C messier (talk) 10:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Vujcic as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: I just noticed that I accidentally uploaded this duplicate of a copyrighted photo.
Converted to DR by me for procedural reasons, as this file was uploaded >3 years ago. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused, com:PRP Alan (talk) 12:57, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:44, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP Russia for artworks. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:17, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:44, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advert is key part of image and protected by copyright; no COM:FOP Russia for artworks. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:17, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:44, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advert is protected by copyright; no COM:FOP Russia for artworks.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advert is copyrighted and key part of image; no COM:FOP Russia for artworks. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:19, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advert is protected by copyright; no COM:FOP Russia for artworks. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:19, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely a capture/screenshot from movie. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear resolution 2600:100C:A212:9AA7:3905:5538:258E:9AA1 12:35, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • We don't usually delete a picture just for low quality. Yes, this is indeed one of the worst pictures I ever uploaded. However, it's the best one I got, my real camera having exhausted its battery, so it's the best one we have of this school. I hope to return to this part of Brooklyn and get a better shot, but I figure we still ought to illustrate the article, however poorly. Jim.henderson (talk) 13:36, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a web photo, HQ version at https://dzballon.com/2022/03/02/encore-un-clean-sheet-pour-gaya-merbah-avec-le-raja/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:42, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pornographie Valferry (talk) 12:49, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:42, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One off, pornograph image, clearly of personal use, with no additional encyclopedic value (we have plenty of other similar media that are more educational) Sadads (talk) 13:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a high-quality image. Zanahary (talk) 08:07, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no consenus to delete, on Commons since 2015. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pornographie Valferry (talk) 12:55, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We don't censor commons. --Gbawden (talk) 12:42, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, can hardly tell what’s going on. Whether or not it’s “porn” is irrelevant. Dronebogus (talk) 07:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:57, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not my own work. I chose "Own work" for the "Source" by accident. H5r2n (talk) 13:26, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio, see metadata. Uploader is not identical with photographer and copyright holder. 217.239.2.12 13:58, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too low quality image of an insect; better images can be found at Category:Mosquitos Enyavar (talk) 14:16, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Enyavar Thank yfor the alert. Though it's off low quality but the focus is on how bigger breeds of the mosquitoes are in some communities in Ghana feasting on innocent souls. That was the biggest mosquitoe I have seen in my whole life and so I decided to share so that others could appreciate the saying that if you think you are too small to a difference, then try sleeping in a room with a mosquito Dnshitobu (talk) 16:43, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SebThomas08 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a meme pic: https://www.reddit.com/r/memes/comments/mkg9ho/not_stonks/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:03, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files may be deleted. I have received the files from reliable sources. Since it is not taken by me it may be deleted. --சத்திரத்தான் (talk) 00:28, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo copyrighted (https://www.candicenechitchbookcomediens.com/), probably found here : https://www.instagram.com/p/BpmKW-xhXhN/ Hyméros --}-≽ Yes ? 15:19, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:39, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free copyrighted picture. File's metadata claims "Copyright 2016 The Associated Press". Since uploader has also appears to have uploaded other copyrighted pictures that the uploader had claimed to be self-published, uploader's other works need to be checked for copyright infringement. 96.64.134.61 16:45, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality Finncle (talk) 17:20, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, no use for this. Finncle (talk) 17:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional use on eswiki. Deleted and blocked page. MexTDT (talk) 18:15, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted on it.wiki. Melquíades (talk) 18:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same image dating to 2018 at https://eaa932.org/gallery/kelch-aviation-museum/1040-welch-ow5/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As a collage, both photos need to be uploaded separately and licensed correctly. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encyclopedic use, board of management of an unknown firm or association CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: screenshot of a software CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and scope. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mobius6 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <게시자의 삭제 요청>
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as images were uploaded >1 year ago. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:57, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same situation with:


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

غير مطابق Ahmed moder (talk) 20:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is the reason of the deletion request Ahmed ? Anthere (talk) 00:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image improperly uploaded to Commons 204.128.192.32 22:11, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image improperly uploaded to Commons 204.128.192.32 22:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Timtrent as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: from https://tribuneonlineng.com/27-year-old-abideen-to-represent-nigeria-at-un-corruption-summit/ (slow to load, patience is required)

I was mistaken. It appears that the paper may have used this image. However it has no camera details. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 22:36, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UPloader has suggested on my talk page that they may have permission for use. I have aimed them again at COM:VRT in order to present that permission. My view is that no presentation of permission means that no permission exists in reality
The file is unused 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 17:33, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; no exif, unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Racist filth with no real use anywhere; uploaded by a vandal blocked on en.wiki. Nate (chatter) 22:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File appears to be completely transparent. No educational value; possibly test upload (see description). 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyright violation - taken from here FOX 52 (talk) 23:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque ya cree el archivo real sobre mi artista Nt24Music (talk) 23:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation taken from here FOX 52 (talk) 23:21, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this image that apparently comes from the subject of the photo, a private college in the U.S., has released this under a CC license ElKevbo (talk) 02:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this image that apparently comes from the subject of the photo, a private college in the U.S., has released this under a CC license ElKevbo (talk) 02:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmeds3d12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OOS garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 02:58, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Crazy hat royal as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ 03:16, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:19, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Turkmenistan. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Türkmenbaşy Ruhy Mosque. Needs commercial license from the architect of this 2004 building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:04, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:19, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright vio, image from television show BlinxTheKitty (talk) 06:04, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No copyright info Dronebogus (talk) 06:50, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio logo of some no notable company Dronebogus (talk) 06:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear clipart source (can be found on many sites with vague terms, such as https://www.onlinewebfonts.com/icon/222151), not own work. Uploaded with a description of "testtesttesttesttest" so... perhaps only a test. Lord Belbury (talk) 08:22, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a derivative work that offers no encyclopedic value. It resembles an internet meme. Deadrat (talk) 08:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No checkable source given for photograph. Larryasou (talk) 09:36, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation. I can't find a free licence at the source, and I think this map (especially the colour selection and the icons) is above TOO. bjh21 (talk) 10:57, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Key part of image is protected by copyright; no COM:FOP Russia. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:08, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advert is protected by copyright; no COM:FOP Russia. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advert is protected by copyright; no COM:FOP Russia. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:11, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advert is protected by copyright; no COM:FOP Russia. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:11, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advert is protected by copyright; no COM:FOP Russia for artworks. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advert is key part of image and protected by copyright; no COM:FOP Russia for artworks. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:13, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advert is protected by copyright; no COM:FOP Russia for artworks. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advert is protected by copyright; no COM:FOP Russia for artworks. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advert is key part of image and protected by copyright; no COM:FOP Russia for artworks. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information about the author; probable copyright violation Vodolaz (talk) 12:27, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • There is no evidence that this photo is already in the public domain. There is no reliable information either about the author or about the year of shooting. The photo has already been published many times on the Internet before (without a free license of course). For example: [25], [26], [27].--Kursant504 (talk) 08:41, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Martin Sg. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.ernst-scheidegger-archiv.org/de/fotos-von-kuenstlern/wilfried-moser/?id=186
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as our version has far higher resolution than external hit. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:28, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

La Fondation Wilfrid Moser a autorisation pour l'utilisation de cette image. 92.184.112.6 13:22, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; please send permission from Stiftung Ernst Scheidegger-Archiv to OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cannot find the source video on the website, and the website makes no mention of a CC-BY-SA license anyways. The cited website is for a private defense contractor, not the Brazilian Navy. It's possible they used a Brazilian Navy video, but there is no proof that the video was licensed -- I don't think the Brazilian Navy website has an automatic CC-BY-SA license either, although they do upload many works to Flickr under that license. Unless we can find a source which explicitly states the given license, don't think we can keep it. Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:08, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Object depicted is not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mexicumbia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Gallery of no-metadata images of various sizes, styles, white balance. One seems to be a drawing, the others are photos of lower to Facebook quality and size suggesting collection from internet rather than own creation.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; highly unlikely that these are own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in the Russian Federation covered buildings only 218.250.38.227 16:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What? What did you wrote has no sence. Please, argue more accurate. FOP for what? SergioOren (talk) 19:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment{{Non-free graffiti}}? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:40, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per COM:FOP Russia, Also sticker≠graffiti. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:46, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: derivative work with no permission. --rubin16 (talk) 10:39, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creator request ItzSelenux (talk) 17:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

se creo sin permiso del autor original 190.157.102.247 02:27, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

se creo sin permisos del autor original 189.217.67.41 21:04, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused logo. --P 1 9 9   14:20, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this book cover is copyrighted and i have corrected this issue, this file no longer needs to exist Simpme4 (talk) 01:04, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   17:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, resize not needed --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:42, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:37, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

いたずら目的。Wikipedia iOS アプリ版にて全く関係のない記事のヘッダ画像として表示されてしまう[https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%82%A4%E3%82%AF%E3%83%8E%E3%83%87%E3%82%A3%E3%82%AF%E3%82%BF%E3%82%B9 Average34 (talk) 01:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   17:38, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Minorax as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ 03:17, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no guidance on COM:VENEZUELA, possibly above TOO, therefore deleted as COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9   17:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Crazy hat royal as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ 03:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --P 1 9 9   17:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No copyright info Dronebogus (talk) 06:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: taken from FB. --P 1 9 9   17:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information about the original photograph that has been taken in 1945. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9   17:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not encyclopedic Dronebogus (talk) 06:55, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted billboard, FOP in USA includes buildings only 219.78.190.11 07:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:46, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uh, copyvio? Dronebogus (talk) 09:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:47, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo may have been deleted before. Source 404s Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map is unlikey to be used as no article exists for use as the 2019 ABU Song Contest was never held. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:06, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map is unlikey to be used as no article exists for use as the 2020 ABU Song Contest was never held. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:06, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No own work Rots61 (talk) 19:27, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

added source. should hopefully be okay now. Anhalter Almanach (talk) 19:29, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: over 120 years old, PD-old-assumed. --P 1 9 9   17:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These information panels are copyrighted Tangopaso (talk) 19:27, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-text. --P 1 9 9   17:57, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of non-notable company (page on frwiki deleted) with no educational value; out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:31, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:57, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that this is a free use file. It has been lifted off the internet. Also, the "image" itself is actually a screenshot taken from a video of the subject's interrogation. Mar4d (talk) 02:09, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image hosted on Government of India's website https://newsonair.gov.in/News?title=Pakistan%26%2339%3Bs-National-Assembly-approves-bill-allowing-Kulbhushan-Jadhav-to-appeal-his-conviction-in-high-courts&id=419371 is covered under Template:GODL-India, even if from a video interrogation, it would have been provided to the Govt. of India without any license restrictions (as not highlighted on the website) and therefore the screenshot also qualifies under GODL-India. User4edits (talk) 02:22, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The video was released by Pakistan, not India. It wasn't "provided" to anyone, and as such, the Indian government isn't the source. Mar4d (talk) 08:02, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above; no confirmation of claimed license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:54, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file should be NETCOPYVIO, but can it be considered a 2D object, as it's only the face of the stele that is represented? Ruthven (msg) 11:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, dubious license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:52, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Black and white image. Doubtful if this is self-photographed by Nwabu2010 (talk · contribs). The subject, as per w:ig:Chinwe Chukwuogo-Roy, lived 1952–2012. Source and photographer of the old photo must be determined if this really passes {{PD-Nigeria}}. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not think this is licensed or dated correctly. It looks a lot older than 2011 but perhaps if there was more information about it, we could understand it. It doesn't look like own work it has reproduction artefacts. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I must say that after the nomination, the author simply inserted the public domain, although the source did not mention this. Kazman322 (talk) 17:53, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Issues seem resolved; 18th century PD work. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:50, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

80s club's official logo, not an "own" work — danyele 23:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:49, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{speedydelete|Auf Wunsch des Uploaders bitte Datei löschen, da Fehler im Video enthalten ist.}} ZDF Terra X Redaktion (talk) 10:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=File%3AInterview+mit+Holocaust-%C3%9Cberlebender+Margot+Friedl%C3%A4nder.webm --Wikiolo (talk) 18:52, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: was deleted and replaced with a new upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:18, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hulged as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio. PD-medical? King of ♥ 03:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The website states,
Creative Commons License
You don't need to ask permission to use these images provided:
you attribute the contributing user
the use is non-commercial
you do not copyright the material
The author is credited, I have not used it for commercial purposes nor copyrighted the material.
I may be wrong correct me if, I am. 511KeV (talk) 04:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
511KeV, Special:Diff/647341939. Hulged (talk) 15:59, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - NC licenses are not acceptable on Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:11, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hulged as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio. PD-medical? King of ♥ 03:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@King of Hearts, The website states,
Creative Commons License
You don't need to ask permission to use these images provided:
  • you attribute the contributing user
  • the use is non-commercial
  • you do not copyright the material
The author is credited, I have not used it for commercial purposes nor copyrighted the material. 511KeV (talk) 04:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
511KeV, CC-BY-NC licences are not allowed on Wikimedia commons, see COM:L. You may not have used it for the commercial purposes, but someone else might use it. The question here is whether {{PD-medical}} would apply or not and same goes about your other upload. Hulged (talk) 15:58, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - NC licenses are not acceptable on Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:12, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krzyszczyk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I doubt that these files are PD-Poland (and very probably no URAA in 1996). What we know about the date is that they are pre-1950. Maybe a double check from a Polish speaker will help.

Ruthven (msg) 12:07, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:12, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: stamps issued prior to 1989, copyright expires 70 years after publication. This stamp was issued on 10-4-1975, so less than 70 years ago. JopkeB (talk) 14:26, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:12, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Этот файл должен быть удалён потому что он не соответствует авторскому праву в проекте викитека Пётр Тарасьев (talk) 07:08, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:34, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Uploaded from a single use account. This image appears on different web pages like BBC but on a later date. Need to be discussed which one is the original source. According to the file description the original work may be from the MIT with an unknown license. (Web sources are: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20210616-how-the-forgotten-tricks-of-letterlocking-shaped-history , https://twitter.com/letterlocking , https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/03/locked-for-300-years-virtual-unfolding-has-now-revealed-this-letters-secrets/ , http://letterlocking.org/ , https://kottke.org/21/03/digitally-reading-17-century-locked-letters) In my opinion we should kept this image only with a valid ticket from COM:VRTS, otherwise a deletion per COM:PCP should apply. Wdwd (talk) 10:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TinEye found the first copy in 2014 on techtv.mit.edu and video.mit.edu probably as a still image of a video. So i think the image is from letterlocking at MIT and we need VTRS. --Migebert (talk) 09:41, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Help_desk#CC-Lizenz_eines_Fotos might be relevant here. One version of this image appears here] (March 2021) with a CC-BY-NC 4.0 license. I can't check the live version of the oldest tineye match (http://techtv.mit.edu/ , walled) but 4 days before the tineye hit it was a 301 redirect to http://techtv.mit.edu/collections/www, which was an empty collection at that time. The next archived version is after the commons upload date (but still empty). On Jul 24, 2014 tineye found it here. (archived version from the 29th, which still contains the image). The T&C of video.mit.edu at that time states that They are a video aggregator and merely provide access to videos hosted elsewhere. The video where this image appeared was this, which is listed as being from a channel named "MIT Libraries", but has no indication of a free license. Since commons assumes web content to be copyrighted unless there is evidence to the contrary, we need VRT intervention here. Victor Schmidt (talk) 10:48, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:35, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Evadeluge (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This is stated to be the work of one Marilla North who may or may not be the uploader. While there is no requirement for anyone to out themselves it is awkward to see a claim of "Own Work" under these circumstances. My view is that COM:PCP is important unless and until COM:VRT has regularised the licencing

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 17:00, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:36, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

je ne suis pas du tout expert dans le domaine, mais j'ai l'intime conviction que le panneau dans le coin supérieur gauche "nem leszünk gyarmat" est un trucage.

I am not at all an expert in fake photography, but I have the intimate conviction that the panel in the upper left corner "nem leszünk gyarmat" is a trick.

Egyáltalán nem vagyok szakértő a fényképék világjában, de majdnem biztos vagyok, hogy a bal felső sarokban lévő "nem leszünk gyarmat" panel egy trükk. Fée Steve (talk) 06:43, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --MB-one (talk) 18:15, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Этот файл должен быть удалён потому что он не соответствует авторскому праву в проекте викитека Пётр Тарасьев (talk) 07:08, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 18:17, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Vietnam for 2-D artworks 219.78.190.11 07:50, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 18:18, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]