Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/01/21
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
Copyright infringement Nathanielrose (talk) 09:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- copied from https://normanno.com/attualita/messina-ordinanza-1-maggio-de-luca-non-posso-sopportare-festival-imbecillita/, tagged accordingly as speedy --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 11:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:38, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
When uploading the image I did not know how to do it and I made a mistake in the authorship, I uploaded it again putting the authorship and the page where it came from, but I did not know how to delete the image that broke the rules. Maguica86 (talk) 23:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 09:43, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploader is not the original author. Source: https://www.funda.nl/koop/verkocht/apeldoorn/appartement-42496475-loolaan-41-105/ Phoropter99 (talk) 16:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted obvious copyright violation. Multichill (talk) 21:23, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Periodicobarranquilla (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal promotional images that are outside the scope of this project. Commons is not a web hosting platform
- File:Periodicobarranquilla.original.jpg
- File:Artista Barranquillero SAMY MUS1C.jpg
- File:SAMY MUS1C Artist.jpg
Herby talk thyme 08:28, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:50, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ruth Aaliyah Allen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Collection of personal photos.
- File:Black Queen Ali.jpg
- File:Sleepin hotel.jpg
- File:Queen Guyanese.jpg
- File:Queen in an interview.jpg
- File:Queen red.jpg
- File:Guyanese queen.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 09:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:51, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Satria Sukma Sejati (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Collection of personal photos of non-contributor (no edits), used only on his user page.
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati-1.jpg
- File:Rudi Tyyanda-6.jpg
- File:Aldo Muziana-19.jpg
- File:Rudi Tyyanda-5.jpg
- File:Wawat Rosmawati.jpg
- File:Toto Muhtar Saepuloh.jpg
- File:Aldo Muziana-16.jpg
- File:Aldo Muziana-15.jpg
- File:Aldo Muziana-14.jpg
- File:Aldo Muziana-13.jpg
- File:Aldo Muziana-12.jpg
- File:Aldo Muziana-11.jpg
- File:Aldo Muziana-10.jpg
- File:Aldo Muziana-9.jpg
- File:Aldo Muziana-8.jpg
- File:Aldo Muziana-7.jpg
- File:Aldo Muziana-6.jpg
- File:Aldo Muziana-5.jpg
- File:Aldo Muziana-4.jpg
- File:Aldo Muziana-3.jpg
- File:Aldo Muziana-2.jpg
- File:Aldo Muziana-1.jpg
- File:Aldo Muziana.jpg
- File:Rudi Tyyanda-4.jpg
- File:Rudi Tyyanda-3.jpg
- File:Rudi Tyyanda-2.jpg
- File:Rudi Tyyanda-1.jpg
- File:Rudi Tyyanda.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Martial Arts.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Smile Pict.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child-11.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child-10.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child-9.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child-8.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child-7.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child-6.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child-5.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child-4.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child-3.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child-2.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child-1.jpg
- File:BAJA JIWA By Satria Sukma Sejati.jpg
- File:Melawan Diri Sendiri By Satria Sukma Sejati.jpg
- File:Ordinary World By Satria Sukma Sejati.jpg
- File:Don't Surprise to Face Your Game By Satria Sukma Sejati.jpg
- File:Don't Fear to Face Your Game By Satria Sukma Sejati.jpg
- File:Apa Itu Freelancer By Satria Sukma Sejati.jpg
- File:Book of Satria Sukma Sejati.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-23.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-22.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-21.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-20.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-19.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-18.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-17.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-16.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-15.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-14.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-13.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-12.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-11.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-10.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-9.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-8.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-7.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-6.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-5.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-4.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-3.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-2.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done-1.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Child Junior High School Done.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati 18Thn.png
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Zaman Lebay Haha -D.png
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Old Times.png
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Doing Stupid Thing.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma S Cute version.png
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Split.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma S.jpg
- File:Satria satria.jpg
- File:Satria Satria.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati at "Seminar IT".jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati Tech.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati "Teknisi".jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati "Technician".jpg
- File:Satrio & Satria.jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati ID Steam "Outlaws98".jpg
- File:Satria Sukma Sejati.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 12:13, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:54, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Xayahrainie43 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Created by an LTA with no usage on any other projects, out of project scope.
- File:Dozenal 12-digit calculator.jpeg
- File:Duodecimal calculator.jpeg
- File:Dozenal calculator.jpeg
- File:Number of stable nuclide.png
Stang★ 15:23, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:56, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ivanmolinares18 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Arboles tipicos de la ciudad.webp
- File:Roble morado.webp
- File:Trebol amarillo.webp
- File:Jardin botanico de barranquilla.webp
- File:Ciudad aborizada.webp
- File:Ciudad verde.webp
- File:Cisne lago.webp
- File:Ciudad vista.webp
- File:Casona republica.webp
- File:Casa prado.webp
- File:Iglesia-san-roque-.webp
- File:Intendendia-2.svg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:57, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
According to Tineye, this image was first found on Ann Linde's twitter profile on May 4, 2014 (i.e. 3 month prior to upload here on Commons). This has been confirmed when checking an archived version of the profile https://web.archive.org/web/20140326065039/https://twitter.com/AnnLinde from March 2014. No EXIF metadata. Unlikely own work as claimed. Would require copyright holder to contact COM:VRT. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:08, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
he 27-year-old had a net worth of $355 million as of 2018, according to Business Insider. Combined estimated net worth over $1 billion 191.125.155.69 01:55, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Project scope. --Polarlys (talk) 21:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Source is mentioned as Deccan chronicle newspaper, hence can not be released under copy left license Arjunaraoc (talk) 06:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Photo of a copyrighted painting. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:07, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
COM:Screenshot of Google web app. While the drawing is own work, the UI elements are copyrighted. MKFI (talk) 07:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:11, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:13, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded a better version at GuercinoSelfPortrait.jpg. Sorry for the trouble HotaniKG (talk) 07:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
empty gallery Stuchka (talk) 07:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thumbnailwiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Image of a logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 07:57, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Logos / graphics. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Jane Nation logo St. John & Partners.jpg
- File:SJ&P watermark 730.jpg
- File:SJP watermark K.jpg
- File:SJP LOGO 4C NoTag.jpg
mattbr 08:03, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:10, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope. Artwork without educational use. SCP-2000 08:10, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:11, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:13, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Iberia is not a country, Spain and Portugal are. There is no Senate, the community of Madrid is unicameral. In 1963 Franco was still in power, there was no opposition parties. Misleading diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:18, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Iberia is not a country, Spain and Portugal are. There is no Senate, the community of Madrid is unicameral. In 1963 Franco was still in power, there was no opposition parties. Misleading diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:18, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:TriveUK Display Logo.jpg
- File:Cover - Transparent - Helosia logo.png
- File:Default - Transparent - Helosia logo.png
- File:Profile - Translucent - Helosia logo.png
- File:Default - Translucent - Helosia logo.png
- File:Profile - Transparent - Helosia logo.png
- File:Cover - Translucent - Helosia logo.png
mattbr 08:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 08:24, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo for a British company claimed as 'own work' but missing VRT permission for public domain release. The threshold of originality is very low for UK works, see COM:TOO UK. The logo includes a graphic element, comprising interlocking, differently coloured and variable width circles. Sufficient effort (from a UK perspective) is likely to have been expended and the logo is potentially sufficiently original to qualify for copyright protection in its country of origin (the UK). For public domain works Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work. mattbr 08:27, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Polarlys (talk) 21:05, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal image by non-contributor. Out of commons scope. Yahya (talk) 08:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:05, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Not own work, appears widely online as a userpic or similar, such as https://soundcloud.com/user-486386729-865283893/kokobandz-in-my-bag-prod-eli - if public domain clipart, this isn't claimed and I can't find evidence of it. Lord Belbury (talk) 09:18, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:05, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MINERVA LABS GC (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE. Unused company logo of questionable notability.
- File:Collagen-Superdose Logo.png
- File:Gold-Collagen Logo.png
- File:LOGO SUPERDOSE.jpg
- File:Logo gold collagen Magenta Tab (1).jpg
Netora (talk) 11:27, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:05, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
matches with book cover in http://www.emescobooks.com/readmore.php?more=1124, which is copyrighted Arjunaraoc (talk) 11:28, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
WRONG FILE NAME PhatRabbitnoni (talk) 11:36, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused and redundant to File:RLL-Logo Graphic FullCMYK.png. Jonteemil (talk) 11:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Collection of photos that are unlikely to be own work (Screenshots) and images out of scope per COM:NUDITY. Not in use, and user is already blocked on two wikis.
- File:Éjaculation féminine ; squirt.jpg
- File:Sextoy*.jpg
- File:Seins.jpg
- File:Éjaculation féminine.jpg
- File:Érection du pénis.jpg
- File:Vulve en phase d'excitation.jpg
- File:Dildo + squirt.jpg
- File:Sextoy.jpg
- File:Vagin.jpg
- File:Vagin 2.jpg
- File:* Sécrétion vaginale *.jpg
- File:Étapes de l'érection d'un pénis.jpg
- File:Sécrétion vaginale.jpg
- File:* Liquide pré-éjaculatoire *.jpg
- File:Liquide pré-éjaculatoire.jpg
- File:Liquide séminal masculin 2.jpg
- File:Liquide séminal masculin 3.jpg
- File:Liquide séminal masculin 1.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 12:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:07, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
not used, not needed Alabasterstein (talk) 12:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:07, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carlos Simpson (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.
- File:Carlos Simpson.jpg
- File:Carlos Simpson (Author, Musician, Designer).jpg
- File:Carlos Simpson Fashion.jpg
- File:Carlos Simpson.png
en:Carlos simpson has been deleted per en:WP:CCS. Achim55 (talk) 12:14, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, I strongly disagree with your action on this, it's sad to you know the same as I KNOW that there are thousands of fake pages here on Wikimedia and you simply create this situation arguing that it's for self-promotion instead of recognizing and creating the page for such amazing and talented artist?
- I strongly disagree with the delitation. Carlos Simpson (talk) 13:30, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi James,
- Thank you for your attention on, would be possible to help me to fix this please.
- Below I have attached the link of the photographer and owner of the images.
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/194864960@N04/51836493829/
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/194864960@N04/51836252883/in/photostream/
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/194864960@N04/51836493759/in/photostream/
- This file should be deleted is was added by error: File:Carlos Simpson (Author, Musician, Designer).jpg Carlos Simpson (talk) 18:03, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Delete The nomination describes the situation perfectly. Commons does not allow non-contributors to have personal images. If you were a serious contributor, you might be allowed one or, perhaps, two.
I also note that the first and second appear to be identical.
Finally, in each case, you claim to be the photographer. Since none of them appear to be selfies, we could not keep[ them without a free license from the actual photographer. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:07, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
File EXIF shows "Author Piqant Photography Copyright holder www.piqant.si". VRT permission from Piqant Photography needed. MKFI (talk) 12:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:08, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
probably same case as File:Torjubeeeeeel.jpg: looks like the pic of a professional photographer and not like own work of a random editor doing his first edits Albinfo (talk) 12:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:08, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
This old photo, taken prior to 1955, is unlikely to be the uploader's own work. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:30, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps Copyvio Enyavar (talk) 15:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio AND out-of-scope personal fantasy kingdom Enyavar (talk) 15:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- First of all, yes it is google MY maps, second of all, REPUBLIC, and finally, yes, this can be deleted Midwestern Railway (talk) 22:02, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
own work doubtful; this appears to be a GoogleMaps Screenshot (color scheme and road signature) Enyavar (talk) 15:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Previous DR was more concerned about the identity of the depicted person. Nominated again because this is not own work, clearly an upsized scan or screengrab. There is no evidence that this is an old historic image; it could easily be a modern image made to look old. In short: missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- support as per previous DR, Delete. --Enyavar (talk) 23:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nabor Jr2150 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Casco Cuervos.jpg
- File:Coach Escualo & Coach Javier.jpg
- File:HC coach.jpg
- File:Staff.jpg
- File:Jugadora 99.jpg
- File:Campo cuervos.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Cascastel-les-Corbières Vignobles.jpg
- File:Max-SAURY-Président-Les-Maîtres-Vignerons-de-Cascastel.jpg
- File:Richard Anderson concept artist.jpg
- File:Château de Cascastel.jpg
- File:Cascastel des corbieres vieux pont.jpg
- File:Cascastel des corbieres vignes.jpg
- File:Cascastel des corbieres colines.png
- File:Cascastel des corbieres.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ZhangHeoftheWest (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
The uploader may have added info to the map, but the original one is likely not own work. It is a crop from somewhere else (see the cut off names in the top left corner). This user has previous DR's with copyvio maps. Also added:
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manoel Garcia Neto (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:Sucesso no combate ao coronavírus.png
- File:Coreia do Sul- um exemplo de sucesso no combate ao coronavírus South Korea- an example of success in fighting coronavirus.png
- File:Curva de casos acumulados.png
- File:Casos acumulados .png
- File:Modelagem de casos de Coronavírus .png
- File:Growth curve an intelligent life history described by a mathematical model.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:16, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arianrasoli (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hassanvahedi1981 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are all personal images with dubious educational value. In addition, many of these images appear to be taken from a television news program, so are probably not own work like they are marked.
- File:Football report at François Hariri Stadium by Abdul Samad Khoshnav.jpg
- File:Appreciation of Abdul Samad Khoshnav.jpg
- File:Welcoming Abdul Samad Khoshnav.jpg
- File:Abdulsamad xoshnaw in k24.jpg
- File:Abdulsamad khoshnaw in Football stadium.jpg
- File:Abdulsamad xoshnaw in kurdistan 24 tv.jpg
- File:Abdulsamad xoshnaw in bein sport with hafid famous Sports commentators.jpg
- File:Abdulsamad xoshnaw in bein sport from 2019.jpg
- File:Abdulsamad xoshnaw in bein sport when he win in aloo bein.jpg
- File:Abdulsamad xoshnaw - Sports commentators in stadium.jpg
- File:Abdulsamad xoshnaw in bein sport.jpg
- File:Abdulsamad xoshnaw from kurdistan.jpg
- File:Abdul Samad Khoshnaw.jpg
- File:Abdulsamad Abdulstar Hamad.jpg
- File:Abdulsamad xoshnaw.jpg
- File:Hassan vahedi.jpg
- File:AbdulSamad Khoshnaw, the reporter of the Kurdistan Road.jpg
- File:عبدالصمد خۆشناو بێژەری کوردی.jpg
Tol (talk | contribs) @ 17:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- The uploader has also engaged in cross-wiki promotion; some of this is documented at w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hassanvahedi1981. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 17:03, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hash king music (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal content, unused used, out of scope.
GeorgHH • talk 19:16, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:14, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hash king music (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]More unused personal or promotional images, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:18, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arthashastra007 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:NETCOPYVIOs - low res, no EXIF, elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:Gandhinagar, Dharwad.jpg here in 2014; File:Karnataka College Dharwad (KCD).jpg here in 2017, File:Dharwad-City-Stn.jpg here; File:Dharwad-City Stn02.jpg here; etc.)
- File:Dharwad collage.jpg
- File:Dharwad montage.png
- File:Dharwad-Infosys.jpg
- File:Karnataka University Dharwad (KUD)2.jpg
- File:Gandhinagar, Dharwad.jpg
- File:K.C.C Bank Dharwad.png
- File:Karnataka College Dharwad (KCD).jpg
- File:Karnataka University Dharwad (KUD).jpg
- File:Dharwad Infosys.jpg
- File:Dharwad-City Stn02.jpg
- File:Dharwad-City-Stn.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 17:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:18, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely that uploader is creator and copyright holder of these images. Images contain no camera exif data, one of them has Facebook metadata.
Njd-de (talk) 18:28, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Palanja1198 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely claims of own work on kawaii art and blinking eye gif.
- File:Faires of the Seasons.jpg
- File:Web Layer Humanized.png
- File:Easterball.png
- File:Peruballs.png
- File:2balls.png
- File:Blinking eye.gif
- File:Sets of numbers in mathematics as humans.png
- File:Palanja.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/194849628@N03
[edit]Flickrwashing: account created this year, 0 followers, 1 following. Images have recently been uploaded by Akooseo and deleted as they could be found on Chart's website e.g. File:Justin Chart - 1979.jpg on https://justinchart.com/gallery/: "Copyright © 2022 Justin Chart. All Rights Reserved."
- File:Justin Chart live in Los Angeles (2015).jpg
- File:Justin Chart - 1979.jpg
- File:Justin Chart - 1979.tif
Njd-de (talk) 19:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- This is Justin Chart's Official Flickr account and he had made them available copy-right free.
- What evidence do you need> Corporation Solutions (talk) 20:36, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- How can you be sure of that? Also, how are you aware of that Flickr account when it was only created today?
- Regarding copyright: it's unlikely that he is the original copyright holder as he is not the creator of these images. Of course if he is allowed to relicense them, then he can do so. That is in absolute contrast to the copyright info on his website though.Njd-de (talk) 23:04, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/194849628@N03
[edit]Conflicting copyright declarations:
- Flickr: CC0, "Justin Chart is the original owner of this photographic content and has enlisted it as copyright-free for all to use."
- Website top and specific image: "All images are free for use without license or royalty for educational and non-commercial purposes only. Justin Chart © reserves the right to revoke Free Use at any time."
- Website bottom: "Copyright © 2022 Justin Chart. All Rights Reserved."
Free use and non-commercial usage only are incompatible with Commons licensing.
Njd-de (talk) 00:18, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden already as part of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Justin Chart - 1979.jpg. Njd-de (talk) 22:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Redoanahammed222 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo
Afifa Afrin (talk) 19:21, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:16, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Japan Carlit logo.svg which was sourced directly from the company and originally uploaded on the same day. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 19:31, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:16, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 19:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:15, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:15, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:15, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Don't see Creative Commons license on this video — Dudek1337 (talk) 19:43, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- My fault. Sorry. --INS Pirat (talk) 19:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:15, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - unused, low quality, non-notable person (related article es:Joseito Maestre (José Gregorio Maestre Daza) deleted) - also likely copyvio: very low res, no EXIF, uploader's only other image a blatant copyvio, etc. PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 19:51, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:11, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/File:Jasmin-logo
[edit]Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 19:55, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:15, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:11, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
https://open.spotify.com/artist/5bIONi1B7DWN1Y090pLegMk - copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 20:07, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:11, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:11, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
There is no information about the author and the date of publication of the drawing. There is no evidence that the drawing is not copyrighted. GAndy (talk) 20:36, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:11, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:46, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:11, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Logo Adidas.png. Jonteemil (talk) 21:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:11, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Logo NIKE.png. Jonteemil (talk) 21:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:11, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Fila logo.svg. Jonteemil (talk) 21:10, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:11, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Not "own work"; says: getty images 2A02:A45C:B875:1:612B:892F:2DB4:E059 21:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Tagged as incorrect; replaced by File:Gladiolin structure.svg. Leyo 22:23, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Incorrect chemical structure. Innerstream (talk) 02:05, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
COM:NOTHOST. The photo of an unknown men cannot be used for educational purposes. GAndy (talk) 22:29, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Doesn't seem like a valid structure of cobalt(II) cyanide. Wostr (talk) 23:28, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. The English Wikipedia article w:Cobalt(II) cyanide says "it is coordination polymer", which seems more likely that what's shown in this image, but that statement is unreferenced in the article. In any case, this image has dubious accuracy, is low quality, and is unused. Marbletan (talk) 14:48, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. I just added a ref for it being a coordination polymer (doi:10.1002/anie.196303962). DMacks (talk) 09:49, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Source does not specify which satellite is the source for this image. It mentions Gaofen-1 and WorldView-2, but there is no indication imagry from either satellite is released under a free license. — Huntster (t @ c) 23:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as per nominator HurricaneEdgar 00:04, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
promotional contenet, forbes connection could not be verrified Isderion (talk) 23:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Very low quality diagram; replaced by File:Lithium iron phosphate.svg. Wostr (talk) 23:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Very low quality diagram, not used, replacement: File:1,2,4-Triiodobenzene.svg. Wostr (talk) 23:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Very low quality diagram; not used; replacement: File:1,2,4-Triiodobenzene.svg. Wostr (talk) 23:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
duplicate file Kavotu (talk) 01:38, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination using {{Duplicate}}. Now redirecting. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect use of E/Z nomenclature. Content itself (with correct use of cis/trans nomenclature) is already covered File:Beschreibung des ersten Teils der Biosynthese.png and by other images in Category:Nepetalactone DMacks (talk) 15:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 16:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Promotional photos of Slovak TV series en:Oteckovia (found on the internet, e.g. https://www.omediach.com/strucne/12273-kto-je-kto-v-seriali-oteckovia-foto) are used in these family trees. The uploader had many copyright issues in last year.
- File:Oteckovia - rod. Veselá.svg
- File:Oteckovia - rod. Smreková.svg
- File:Oteckovia - rod. Oravcová.svg
- File:Oteckovia - rod. Hlavatá.svg
- File:Oteckovia - rod. Bieliková.svg
- File:Oteckovia - rod. Beckerová.svg
- File:Oteckovia - rod. Bobulová.svg
Harold (talk) 10:28, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Harold: Zdravím. Pokial viem, viete po česky. Takže hádam nevadí, ak s Vami budem komunikovať po slovensky. Bolo by možné opraviť tieto obrázky tak, že odstránim fotografie hercov? Mohlo by to byť v tom stave (bez fotografií hercov) zverejnené? Vďaka. Gateshebe (talk) 11:20, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Gateshebe: Ahoj. Pokud je design rodokmenu vlastním dílem, tak by verze bez fotek možná byla. Pokud je design převzatý z nějakého genealogického programu, mohl by to stále být problém (ale nejsem zase takový odborník, abych v takovém případě kategoricky zastával ano/ne; to by asi bylo na konzultaci s Commons:Threshold of originality). --Harold (talk) 14:36, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Harold: Tá druhá verzia tohoto obrázka, ktorú som nahral je v poriadku alebo ešte stále ne? Gateshebe (talk) 21:47, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Tato verze obsahuje jen text a prosté geometrické tvary bez nějakého tvůrčího přispění, které by bylo možné autorskoprávně chránit, takže se domnívám, že je v pořádku. --Harold (talk) 22:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Harold: Tá druhá verzia tohoto obrázka, ktorú som nahral je v poriadku alebo ešte stále ne? Gateshebe (talk) 21:47, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Gateshebe: Ahoj. Pokud je design rodokmenu vlastním dílem, tak by verze bez fotek možná byla. Pokud je design převzatý z nějakého genealogického programu, mohl by to stále být problém (ale nejsem zase takový odborník, abych v takovém případě kategoricky zastával ano/ne; to by asi bylo na konzultaci s Commons:Threshold of originality). --Harold (talk) 14:36, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, by Túrelio on 22nd of January. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:33, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope
- File:Animated Gifs Bouncing Breasts Girls 030.gif
- File:VintBigTitSplitBeaver 113931764 BIGIV14 123 37lo.jpg
- File:Amateur 1 0WTZHNgKVk6nITdaJlY lbWB6sbG5gQ fPxcWHxt54.jpg
- File:LINDA GORDON 04035 1 1 123 764lo 2.jpg
- File:Big areolas 01 936 1000.jpg
- File:Torpedo Tits tumblr ohbfapHjCJ1vpikk6o1 1280.pdf
Pppery (talk) 05:31, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: No comment on scope issue; these are all blatant Copyright violations elsewhere on web (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 19:35, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
not acceptable Finance.finest (talk) 17:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Not in use, Delete by courtesy. --Achim55 (talk) 17:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Please delete this picture, as it not relevant for content. Finance.finest (talk) 21:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
not acceptable Finance.finest (talk) 19:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Por supuesto, porqué no es trabajo propio.
Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 13:18, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FORESTHILL OFFICIAL (talk · contribs)
[edit]Only used for promotional purposes
- File:Forest-Hill-Flyer-Full.jpg
- File:The-jardin-forest-hill-3-4.jpg
- File:The-jardin-forest-hill-1-2.jpg
··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. See COM:ADVERT RaFaDa20631 (talk) 06:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 17:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the author, nomite this own user page for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 13:23, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio. -- CptViraj (talk) 17:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the author, nomite this own user discussion page for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 13:24, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Generally user talk pages aren't deleted, you can blank or archive it. -- CptViraj (talk) 17:24, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
usless picture, OUT OF SCOPE Bestalex (talk) 15:04, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination, test upload. -- CptViraj (talk) 17:26, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
内容を誤記した。別の画像で再アップロードした為。 Takehiko Fujisawa (talk) 02:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, replaced by File:Femme nue dans la forêt.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Used in vanity Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator; file being used to perpetuate cross-wiki spam. DanCherek (talk) 15:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete agree with the nominator. Run n Fly (talk) 15:49, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also judged non-notable on :en[1]. --Túrelio (talk) 08:58, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
There is no country known as Turkish republik of north cyprus. The cyprus republic exists and includes the whole island. Both the greek ans the turkish speeking part. The north part is occupied by the illegal turkish military troups but it still remains part of the Cyprus republic. 134.76.103.230 13:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Keep: No valid reason for deletion. This is not a content-related arbitration board. --Achim55 (talk) 13:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- This is an incorrect map. That depicts a country that doesn't exist. 134.76.2.32 14:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep There is no indication in this map that there is an independent (and recognized) country in the northern part. It is not incorrect to show that the Republic of Cyprus has no control over the northern part of the island. NNW 16:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. Just one political point of view among many. Lencer (talk) 13:55, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: COM:NPOV. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:48, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Mindmatrix 14:41, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:48, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Personal CV, falls outside of Commons scope, uploader has no other contributions here, no COM:EDUSE for this file. Marbletan (talk) 14:41, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:48, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Personal CV, falls outside of Commons scope, uploader has no other contributions here, no COM:EDUSE for this file. Marbletan (talk) 14:42, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Personal CV, falls outside of Commons scope, uploader has no other contributions here, no COM:EDUSE for this file. Marbletan (talk) 14:44, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Personal CV, falls outside of Commons scope, no COM:EDUSE for this file. Marbletan (talk) 14:49, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Personal CV, falls outside of Commons scope, uploader has no other contributions here, no COM:EDUSE for this file. Marbletan (talk) 14:51, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Likely a copyrighted logo Pierre cb (talk) 14:56, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: As with other Amazon logos on Commons, this would fall under {{Pd-textlogo}}. The only non-text element is a simple curved arrow. --Lord Belbury (talk) 12:35, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO UK --Minorax«¦talk¦» 23:57, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Sufficient effort (from a UK perspective) is likely to have been expended as the logo includes graphic elements (the 'ribbon') and the logo is potentially sufficiently original to qualify for copyright protection in its country of origin (the UK). mattbr 17:52, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:53, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement Таллархо (talk) 00:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Collage missing source info. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:55, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot of Gboard may be non-free. See COM:SS Arjunaraoc (talk) 00:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Arquivo duplicado Kavotu (talk) 01:36, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Kelly Olson, Dept of Classical Studies 191.125.155.69 01:47, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion given. In use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Official picture of Elliott Olson 191.125.155.69 01:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Taylor Olson on the set of Bone Cage (2020) 191.125.155.69 01:51, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:39, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Author Jennifer Smith-Mayo 191.125.155.69 01:53, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion given. In use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:39, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Italian Deejay & Producer 191.125.155.69 01:54, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:40, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Matthew Chen 191.125.155.69 01:57, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:40, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be my own work 191.125.155.69 01:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, visual characteristics suggest screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:41, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be my own work 191.125.155.69 02:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, found elsewhere online. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:42, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright holder GIULIO MOLFESE 191.125.155.69 02:03, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be my own work 191.125.155.69 02:06, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion, not found elsewhere using TinEye and Google Images. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:44, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 02:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 02:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 02:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 02:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 02:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 02:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Skymediaproduction (talk · contribs)
[edit]File description pages blanked by original uploader, assuming to be a request for deletion. Not in use, uploaded last month.
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
License removed by original uploader, assuming to be a request for deletion. Unlikely to be own work/CC as originally claimed, appears to be a screenshot of something. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:28, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: appears to be a screenshot. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:46, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Author is kai, not uploader shizhao (talk) 03:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:46, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
{{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}/own work removed by {{user| Xocolatl}} with comment das kann nicht sein.
Unlikely to be own work as claimed. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:51, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:47, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
CC-BY-SA-3.0/own work removed by N1234567 (talk · contribs) with comment Though Author claims to be his own but this has been copied from here (https://in.pinterest.com/pin/30047522493269866/). And even the character's name is not correct. That's Parshuram ji and Karna not 'Bhanumati'.
May be a historic image, but I don't know the source. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:03, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:48, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
{{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} removed by Redboston (talk · contribs) without comment. Unlikely to be own work, needs a better source/license. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:42, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- its not own work.— Redboston 10:34, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:48, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/axumawit
[edit]Propaganda. 33 files uploaded as Wikipedia:Tigray War propaganda includes: misleading filenames and descriptions; incorrect dates, source, author and copyright information; no metadata, sockpuppetry, advocacy/propaganda for a current war; and inserted into an article most of the images do not apply to. I propose that all 33 files be deleted.
Details, evidence, etc.
|
|---|
|
These 33 files are numbered in the same order in which they were uploaded to Wikimedia commons:
|
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ተጋሩ ፩ ሓደ Historic Center of Tegaru.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ወያነ ፬ ኣርባዕተ Historic Center of Woyane.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ወያነ ፫ ሰለስተ Historic Center of Woyane.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል መቀለ ፰ ስምንት Historic Center Mekelle.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ወያነ ፱ ትሽዓተ Historic Center of Woyane.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ትግራይ ፮ ሽድሽተ Historic Center of Tigrai.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ወያነ ፰ ሸሞንተ Historic Center of Woyane.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ትግራይ ፭ ሓሙሽት Historic Center of Tigrai.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ትግራይ ፯ ሸውዓተ Historic Center of Tigrai.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ትግራይ ፱ ትሽዓተ Historic Center of Tigrai.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ተጋሩ ፪ ክልተ Historic Center of Tegaru.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ተጋሩ ፫ ሰለስተ Historic Center of Tegaru.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ወያነ ፪ ክልተ Historic Center of Woyane.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ተጋሩ ፬ ኣርባዕተ Historic Center of Tegaru.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ትግራይ ፬ ኣርባዕተ Historic Center of Tigrai.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል መቀለ ፲ አሥር Historic Center Mekelle.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ትግራይ ፫ ሰለስተ Historic Center of Tigrai.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ወያነ ፯ ሸውዓተ Historic Center of Woyane.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ትግራይ ፩ ሓደ Historic Center of Tigrai.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ወያነ ፭ ሓሙሽት Historic Center of Woyane.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ወያነ ፩ ሓደ Historic Center of Woyane.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ትግራይ ፰ ሸሞንተ Historic Center of Tigrai.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል መቀለ ፲፩ አስራ አንድ Historic Center Mekelle.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል መቀለ ፱ ዘጠኝ Historic Center Mekelle.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ትግራይ ፪ ክልተ Historic Center of Tigrai.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል ወያነ ፮ ሽድሽተ Historic Center of Woyane.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል መቀለ ፪ ሁለት Historic Center of Mekele.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል መቀለ ፭ አምስት Historic Center of Mekele.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል መቀለ ፬ አራት Historic Center of Mekele.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል መቀለ ፩ አንድ Historic Center of Mekele.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል መቀለ ፫ ሶስት Historic Center of Mekele.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል መቀለ ፯ ሰባት Historic Center of Mekele.jpg
- File:ታሪካዊ መህል መቀለ ፮ ስድስት Historic Center of Mekele.jpg
Platonk (talk) 04:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete 8, 11, 12, 17, 18, 21, 24, 25, 28, 30, 31, as for those photos OP has been unable to identify the subject of the photos, and/or date of creation and likly copyright status. For the remainder, OP has identified the subject and likely origin of some of them. Thus it is theoretically possible to correct the image descriptions and copyright statuses and then those photos would be in scope. However someone would have to keep a watch on them to prevent them being used for propaganda. I do think it is better that they be deleted to send a message about using Commons and Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects for propaganda purposes.ONUnicorn (talk) 15:45, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- @ONUnicorn: Though I may have identified the subject within some of the images, that doesn't mean I have identified the author, source, date, or copyright status of any of them. And for instance in the case of 9, 15, 16, 19, 20 (a house), it was identified by a professor I contacted (who had researched Ethiopian architecture and recognized that building), and we have no use for these in the present Wikipedia. Even if some were 'corrected', the war propaganda would remain in the edit history. And those few which I could safely attest to the provenance as being from Mussolini's photography machine, the quality of the photos is so poor, and why would we even use them anyway? Just because we can find a photo in a historic archive, does that mean we need a copy of it in Wikipedia/Commons? Aren't we 'not a catalog'? Platonk (talk) 16:47, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Good detective work. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 15:57, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. There may be more info at the English Wikipedia help desk. Not sure how much if there is. Skarmory (talk) 16:44, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- You are referring to this thread: Wikipedia:Help desk#33 images added as war propaganda. Platonk (talk) 16:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Images were uploaded for advocacy. --Ue3lman (talk) 02:51, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:50, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope. Hulged (talk) 05:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- It is the only proof that proof that File:TheoTown Preview.jpg can exist. If this is deleted, this will cause a chain reaction. User:Anpang01 05:40, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Have the owner follow the instructions at Commons:Volunteer Response Team. An off-hand portion of a chat message (or whatever this is) is out of scope. There is no proof that the person who posted that is the actual creator of the game and specifically knows what they are agreeing to. The chain reaction doesn't matter. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:41, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Ricky81682. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:58, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
생각이 바뀌어서 더 이상 공개하고 싶지 않습니다 Shilcat.lee (talk) 08:51, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: likely not own work, found online. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio, probably Dronebogus (talk) 10:54, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Errores en el diseño P.d V (talk) 11:40, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Not taken in 2022, this appears to be a scan or a photograph-of-photograph. Original author and date unknown. MKFI (talk) 12:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Copied from talk page: This photo was taken in the early 1990's by Paule Antonelli (all rights have been transferred to myself, Michael A. Antonelli, with her permission). If still not acceptable for some reason, I can try another photo. Thanks for the help!
- @Mastadblg: I presume this was you? You should change image author to Paule Antonelli and change the date to original date (you can give an estimate). When you say that all rights have been transferred to you, do you mean by inheritance or an agreed transfer or copyrights? MKFI (talk) 17:31, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
The existence of photos of this person on commons makes it easier for user to create the respective article on ptwiki, already deleted four times. Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 12:51, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Image has been previously published (https://www.saem.org/detail-pages/person/nathan-kuppermann-md-mph). VRT permission needed. MKFI (talk) 12:52, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:53, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free photo. Not de minimis as the printed non-free photo is the prominent part of the photo (i.e. the purpose this photo was taken), without it the photo is almost useless. Wcam (talk) 13:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:54, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
File:J H Speke Monument On Footpath To Lents Green, About 250 Metres North North West Of Wormwood Farmhouse 8.jpg
[edit]Uploaded twice, in error Chris debian (talk) 13:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Of low quality and resolution. Has been globally replaced by File:HOME Logo.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 13:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Undated map without meaningful description; possibly about the history of Baden-Württemberg. Only used in a fake-article about some 2019 elections. Enyavar (talk) 15:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:57, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fantasy flag Enyavar (talk) 15:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- I hate you Midwestern Railway (talk) 22:02, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Midwestern Railway: please don't take it personally, I find the design of this one aesthetically pleasing, for example. It is still not within Commons:Scope, please understand. I have requested the deletion of some hundreds of similar files like yours, in only half a year by now, and those are only the ones I find. After a while, they all look the same, these flags and CoAs and maps of Fort Woodchuck and the Empire of Tyrinaria and the Republic of Gunghonople with all its twelve fake party logos and the Nation of Zerlantia and the Realm of Rorschach and the Kingdom of Kerflufflia and the Thalassocracy of Y and the Despocy of Aeo'lia'uy-kop'qum and ... you get the point? The made-up stuff that only interests some shrinks unless you actually make it a successful fantasy novel series? I certainly created extensive maps and ship designs for my Empires in my time, but that was games I played on my own paper. I was not scribbling into the books of the public library, which is what you did here, essentially. --Enyavar (talk) 18:38, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- But aren't there already multiply micronational articles on Wikipedia already?
- Also you keep count? 97.64.236.178 20:39, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Micronations may gain notability due to drawing lots of media attention and publicity stunts. Getting covered on national TV some times, and printing own stamps or being located at interesting spots in "unclaimed" territories or on oil drilling platforms, etc. Zeeland and Liberland, etc. Those that aren't notable, are fair game. I checked yours and couldn't find mention outside of Reddit and MicroNations.
- Don't keep count, but there might be a way to get the count them? .... Hm, I found the number of ~680, which seems a bit on the low end somehow? Well, it's less important than the number of "unidentified maps" which is currently ~4500 and needs to be ~0. That is the main objective here - making useful map collections. --Enyavar (talk) 23:59, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Midwestern Railway: please don't take it personally, I find the design of this one aesthetically pleasing, for example. It is still not within Commons:Scope, please understand. I have requested the deletion of some hundreds of similar files like yours, in only half a year by now, and those are only the ones I find. After a while, they all look the same, these flags and CoAs and maps of Fort Woodchuck and the Empire of Tyrinaria and the Republic of Gunghonople with all its twelve fake party logos and the Nation of Zerlantia and the Realm of Rorschach and the Kingdom of Kerflufflia and the Thalassocracy of Y and the Despocy of Aeo'lia'uy-kop'qum and ... you get the point? The made-up stuff that only interests some shrinks unless you actually make it a successful fantasy novel series? I certainly created extensive maps and ship designs for my Empires in my time, but that was games I played on my own paper. I was not scribbling into the books of the public library, which is what you did here, essentially. --Enyavar (talk) 18:38, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fantasy flag Enyavar (talk) 15:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- okay sure this can be deleted but nobody still likes you Midwestern Railway (talk) 22:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:45, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
out of scope: map of personal fantasy Kingdom Enyavar (talk) 15:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Also delete this, still hate you though Midwestern Railway (talk) 22:03, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:45, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fantasy coatofarms Enyavar (talk) 15:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:45, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fantasy flag Enyavar (talk) 15:36, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:45, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fantasy flag Enyavar (talk) 15:36, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:45, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fantasy flag Enyavar (talk) 15:36, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:45, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fantasy flag Enyavar (talk) 15:36, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- No, it not Midwestern Railway (talk) 21:31, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- I am ready to be convinced otherwise, actually. Is that thing in use outside your household? --08:09, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:45, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
out of scope: personal fantasy coat of arms Enyavar (talk) 15:36, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Nobody likes you Midwestern Railway (talk) 21:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Edit: This one can go, the other one stays Midwestern Railway (talk) 22:05, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:45, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation. The Date given in the Description is clearly not correct. If you look at the Wikipedia article where this photo is "used" then it refers to the 1981 Gang of the Island protests. That would seem more correct. In which case it is still within Coyyright, in my opinion according to Dutch law. Furthermore MyHeritage is a family history website. I doubt therefore it has been "colorized" by MyHistory but may well have been copied from the website. Headlock0225 (talk) 16:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Orville -- Wutsje 04:14, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:50, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Sadly this specific image isn't in Creative Commons. See: esa.int. Erick Soares3 (talk) 16:30, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Incompatible license at source. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:51, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright issues, this was taken from his social media and there's no indication it is public domain or purposely for free and fair use for wikipedia OTRS https://www.instagram.com/dynamo__gaming/p/CLtDPEznFSP/ AngusWOOF (talk) 16:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Please don't delete this image. It was taken from Instagram and the image is digitally signed by Dynamo Gaming (Aaditya Sawant). Amd he is also credited well.JaggaDaaku (talk) 17:01, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi JaggaDaaku, what do you mean of "digitally signed", is it means copyright info is written inside metadata (EXIF)? Stang★ 17:08, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
I meant to say you say see in the image, @DynamoGaming is written there. You may check it through the link provided. Can't it be considered as digitally signed? Just asking... JaggaDaaku (talk) 08:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, it's Dynamo's picture, it's more the equivalent of a watermark, which implies he wants to hold rights over it, rather than release it to the public. AngusWOOF (talk) 20:51, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:52, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Since we know nothing about this artist, I don't see the need to have a Creator template. Only used on 2 files, just replace if with {{Unknown author}}. Yann (talk) 17:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: and replaced per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:58, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
This photo is taken from the building's nomination form for the National Register of Historic Places. It is doubtful that it is the uploaders own work, and therefore a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 17:52, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
nothing from the uploader to show they took the image or own the copyright. looks like a professional post-match pic Lugnuts (talk) 17:56, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Licence review has failed. I have no reason to suspect that it wasn't available under a free licence at the time of upload, but there is not archive available, the channel is also gone. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 18:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:05, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
This is NOT an accurate image of Viet Pham. This is not Viet Pham 73.241.193.158 18:29, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:01, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Fake SVG}} superseded by File:Kreisbote Logo alt.png. Jonteemil (talk) 18:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:06, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
out of Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 18:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:06, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
out of Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 18:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:06, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
out of Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 18:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:06, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Claimed to be own work, uploaded with {{PD-old-100}} which is clearly invalid. Convert to {{PD-self}}? AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: I think the uploader meant that the building is over 100 years old. So in effect this is an image without license, which normally gets deleted seven days after the upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:11, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the author of this image, nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2014, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
This is own work. I don't want it to be present on this project, so therefore requesting deletion. JNB45 (talk) 14:39, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:13, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
I the author of this image nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:49, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2014, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
This is own work. I don't want it to be present on this project, so therefore requesting deletion. JNB45 (talk) 14:38, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
I the author of this image nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:49, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2014, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
This is own work. I don't want it to be present on this project, so therefore requesting deletion. JNB45 (talk) 14:38, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:15, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
I the author of this image nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:49, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2014, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:29, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
This is own work. I don't want it to be present on this project, so therefore requesting deletion. JNB45 (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
I the author of this image nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:49, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2014, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:29, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
This is own work. I don't want it to be present on this project, so therefore requesting deletion. JNB45 (talk) 14:38, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
I the author of this image nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2014, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:29, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I the author of this image nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2014, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:29, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
This is own work. I don't want it to be present on this project, so therefore requesting deletion. JNB45 (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
I the author of this image nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2014, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:29, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I the author of this image nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:51, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2014, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:29, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
This is own work. I don't want it to be present on this project, so therefore requesting deletion. JNB45 (talk) 14:38, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
I the author of this image nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:51, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2014, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
This is own work. I don't want it to be present on this project, so therefore requesting deletion. JNB45 (talk) 14:38, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:25, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
I the author of this image nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:51, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2014, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I the author of this image nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:51, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2014, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I the author of this image nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:51, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2014, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I the author of this image nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:52, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2014, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
This is own work. I don't want it to be present on this project, so therefore requesting deletion. JNB45 (talk) 14:39, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
I the author of this image nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:52, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2014, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
This is own work. I don't want it to be present on this project, so therefore requesting deletion. JNB45 (talk) 14:39, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Commons licenses are irrevocable. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
I, the author of this image, nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:53, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaded in 2014, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
This is own work. I don't want it to be present on this project, so therefore requesting deletion. JNB45 (talk) 14:39, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:18, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
I, the author of this image, nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:53, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2012, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the author of this image, nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:54, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2012, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the author of this image, nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:54, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2012, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the author of this image, nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:54, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2012, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the author of this image, nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:55, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2012, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the author of this derivative work, nomite this for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:56, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the author of this image, nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:57, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2013, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the uploader of this image, nomite this unknown work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 13:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2015, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. PD-old. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the uploader of this image, nomite this unknown work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 13:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. PD-old. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the uploader of this image, nomite this unknown work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 13:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. From 1901, so old enough. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the uploader of this image, nomite this unknown work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 13:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No valid rationale for deletion. --RAN (talk) 19:23, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): The image is copied from a book and it is in violation of the author rights, so that's the main reason I requested the deletion to comply with the publisher of the book. -- JNB45 (talk) 14:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: old enough for PD. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the uploader of this image, nomite this unknown work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 13:04, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the uploader of this image, nomite this unknown work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 13:06, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No valid rationale for deletion. --RAN (talk) 19:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): The image is copied from a book and it is in violation of the author rights, so that's the main reason I requested the deletion to comply with the publisher of the book. -- JNB45 (talk) 14:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- The license appears to be correct. The website LostBulgaria is not the original copyright holder, it is a website republishing historic PD images made available to the public more than 70 years old. --RAN (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): I assume you didn't read the reference to the image. It doesn't come from LostBularia. Nevertheless, I don't want my wiki name to be used as uploader. If u want u can upload the images under your name. Thank you! -- JNB45 (talk) 13:12, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- You are correct, this one comes from bg.gabrovowiki.com, but it still is PD based on its age. --RAN (talk) 19:09, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:RAN. And in use. Unfortunately "I don't want my wiki name to be used" is not a deletion reason. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the uploader of this image, nomite this unknown work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 13:07, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The license looks fine to me. --RAN (talk) 19:13, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): The image is copied from a book and it is in violation of the author rights, so that's the main reason I requested the deletion to comply with the publisher of the book. -- JNB45 (talk) 14:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- The license appears to be correct. The website LostBulgaria is not the original copyright holder, it is a website republishing historic PD images more than 70 years old. --RAN (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:RAN. And in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the uploader of this image, nomite this unknown work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 13:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use and PD, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the uploader of this image, nomite this unknown work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 13:14, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Why? We have a dozen images from this era of Bulgaria and it has a proper license.
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): The image is copied from a book and it is in violation of the author rights, so that's the main reason I requested the deletion to comply with the publisher of the book. -- JNB45 (talk) 14:03, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- The license appears to be correct. The website LostBulgaria is not the original copyright holder, it is a website republishing historic PD images more than 70 years old. --RAN (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. And PD. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:42, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the uploader of this image, nomite this unknown work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 13:14, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: not enough info to determine copyright status. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the uploader of this image, nomite this unknown work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 13:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. And PD. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the uploader of this image, nomite this unknown work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 13:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No valid rationale. --RAN (talk) 20:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): The image is copied from a book and it is in violation of the author rights, so that's the main reason I requested the deletion to comply with the publisher of the book. -- JNB45 (talk) 14:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- The license appears to be correct. The website LostBulgaria is not the original copyright holder, it is a website republishing historic PD images more than 70 years old. --RAN (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. And PD. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
I, the uploader of this image, nomite this unknown work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 13:16, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep what is the rationale for deletion? --RAN (talk) 18:36, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): The image is copied from a book and it is in violation of the author rights, so that's the main reason I requested the deletion to comply with the publisher of the book. -- JNB45 (talk) 14:03, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- The license appears to be correct. The website LostBulgaria is not the original copyright holder, it is a website republishing historic PD images made available to the public more than 70 years old. --RAN (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. And PD. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:45, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Likely Copyvio of Amazon Pierre cb (talk) 14:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:48, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
image used only in draft deleted off enwiki for being too promotional DS (talk) 15:23, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Also applies to File:Page1.png. And, given the nature of the uploader's content, I find myself dubious about the legitimacy of the licensing on File:Dailyquiz.png. DS (talk) 15:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Where is the original image from? Is there copyright? Xocolatl (talk) 19:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep We already have several copies of this image before the AI restoration. See for example File:Reza Shah Pahlavi after abdication in South Africa.jpg --RAN (talk) 20:08, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- What exactly is this image needed for? --Polarlys (talk) 21:15, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:RAN. DW of free image. The person is obviously in scope, therefore a restored photo of him is also in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to versions in Category:Umbro graphic design logos. Jonteemil (talk) 21:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}/own work removed by N1234567 (talk · contribs) with comment Again it is non-orphaned free images. It's copied from "https://www.mygodpictures.com/beautiful-picture-shri-danta-ji-2/" and the character's name is Shree Rama not Karna
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete -- DaxServer (talk) 08:51, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:18, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Likely above COM:TOO Hong Kong. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:38, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep This is literally plain lettering in a square box. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:52, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:King of Hearts, I can't see how this is above any TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
own/cc0 claim removed by Xocolatl (talk · contribs) with comment das kann nicht stimmen...
. The version at https://indramayu1.blogspot.com/2010/10/foto-bupati-indramayu.html is smaller, but identifies the subject as "R. Rolat (Purbadinegara II) (1900 - 1917)". AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Statue copyrighted. The US has no FoP for statues. The plaque says (at the bottom) that the statue was installed in 2008, which is also does not qualify as PD. Uploader blocked on enwiki for large copyright violations. EpicPupper (talk) 18:13, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Sennecaster (talk) 04:59, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:09, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
I, the author of this image, nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:53, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Uploaded in 2014, in use. --Rosenzweig τ 18:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
I, the author of this image, nomite this own work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:53, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Uploaded in 2014, in use. --Rosenzweig τ 18:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The sculpture is most likely copyrighted. Artwork is not under FoP. There is also no evidence of the structure being placed before 1977, so I don't think this is PD either. The original uploader, Billy Hathorn, was blocked on enwiki for large copyright violations. Additionally, the subject claimed does not seem to be depicted in this image; the image used on his article seems to depict someone entirely different and the clothing and facial hair do not match up with the period. I suggest presumptive deletion. EpicPupper (talk) 04:54, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, whe're not even told where the photo was taken. --Rosenzweig τ 09:39, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hermann Anschütz-Kaempfe
[edit]Unknown author but work is less than 120 years old, might still be copyrighted in Germany. Also, this photos probably has a photoshopped background, see this version for a more natural-looking version.
Discostu (talk) 07:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:47, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
File:1901 Nederlandse Elektrische auto van NMF (Nederlandse Metaalwaren Fabriek) te Amsterdam.jpg
[edit]This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). 1901 photo, could be public domain in the Netherlands. Would 1974 as the earliest known publication be an issue? Abzeronow (talk) 17:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep It now has been properly licensed. --RAN (talk) 18:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: with {{PD-old-assumed}} because the photo is declared to be from 1901. --Rosenzweig τ 11:38, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
License removed by Kun Kipcsak (talk · contribs) with comment Unknown publisher
. Unlikely to be own work/{{CC-BY-SA-4.0}} as claimed. 1934 is not old enough for a PD-old-assumed claim, but it may be covered by {{PD-RO-photo}}. There is no FOP in Romania, architect was Arghir Culina (d. 1972). AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:44, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: the architecture is protected until the end of 2042, and with no FoP in Romania, this has to be deleted. The file could be restored when the building's copyright expires in 2043, but I'd want some explanation when and where (was it even in Romania?) this photograph was first published. Apparently this photo has been floating around Internet forums etc. for quite some time, but I couldn't find any details about when it was taken, let alone published, who the photographer was and where it was first published. I also don't know where the claimed date 1934-06-02 comes from. Basically the only thing I'm halfway certain of is that I found it in forums dated 2011, so based on that we could restore it with PD-old-assumed in 2132 (!). --Rosenzweig τ 15:11, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Stratocaster47 as Fair use (Non-free) and the most recent rationale was: logo|image has rationale=yes|auto=yes
Not eligible for speedy deletion, in use on en:wp and below TOO. Achim55 (talk) 11:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-textlogo}}. --Rosenzweig τ 15:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
File:José Simeón Cañas, diputado electo por el distrito de Chimaltenango (Guatemala), solicita que la Asamblea Nacional Constituyente decrete la liberación de esclavos. Centroamérica fue el segundo Estado americano que la abolió.jpg
[edit]Not own work, missing essential info: original author, source, date (and permission if not old enough). I couldn't find a source... P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:40, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Per [27], it's a painting by Chilean painter es:Luis Vergara Ahumada, who died in 1987. The file can be restored in 2058. --Rosenzweig τ 15:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Likely Copyvio of Radio network Pierre cb (talk) 14:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 17:21, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Likely not own works: low-res web-sized images with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data or credit to someone else (File:Congreso-nacional.jpg is credited to Author ORLANDO SIERRA, Copyright holder AFP ImageForum). Unreliable uploader.
- File:Cah.jpg
- File:Congressfacadehere (1).jpg
- File:Elvinernesto.jpg
- File:Congreso-nacional.jpg
- File:CAMARADELPALACIO.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as above. DrKay (talk) 17:57, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- But I should Keep for File:Cah.jpg. The Lazy Boners (talk) 05:22, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- There is no proper source and author, therefore no proof that {{PD-USGov}} applies. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:15, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: most, per nomination, kept File:Cah.jpg with {{PD-USGov-DOS}} because it was apparently taken in the US embassy in Honduras (compare [28]) and was on the embassy's website [29]. --Rosenzweig τ 17:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. The stated license is definitely incorrect. Given that the school has been around since 1878, it's possible that the seal could have fallen into public domain if it's old enough. I couldn't find any info about the seal's history with a quick Google search, and it looks like a relatively modern design so I'd be surprised if it is old enough. IagoQnsi (talk) 00:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 19:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
нет доказательства даты смерти автора 1941 год + 70 лет Wasa Kawasaker (talk) 01:40, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Лицензию уточнил. См. п. 3. Фотография из экспозиции Мурманского краеведческого музея (перефотографирована мной). Автор не установлен до сих пор и вряд ли будет установлен. Insider (talk) 15:55, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence that this image is in PD in Russia. Uploader(s) did not provide a source to show when this image was published for the first time. The author is also unknown. Therefore, Template:PD-Russia template is not valid in this case. Per community voting of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template and Template:PD-old-assumed a photo which is older than 120 years can be maintained. Therefore this photo must be deleted but it can be undeleted 121 years after 1941 - in 2062 .. --Ellywa (talk) 07:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
нет доказательства смерти автора 1942 год + 70 лет Wasa Kawasaker (talk) 01:41, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Лицензию уточнил. См. п. 3. Одна из наиболее известных фотографий трагического пожара после бомбёжки 1942 года. Однако, в отличие от двух других известных фотографий Халдея, автор этой фотографии не установлен до сих пор и вряд ли будет установлен [30] [31] [32]. Insider (talk) 16:32, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence that this image is in PD in Russia. Uploader(s) did not provide a source to show when this image was published for the first time. The photographer is also unknown. Therefore, Template:PD-Russia template is not valid in this case. Per community voting of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template and Template:PD-old-assumed a photo which is older than 120 years can be maintained. Therefore this photo must be deleted but it can be undeleted 121 years after 1942 - in 2063 .. --Ellywa (talk) 07:20, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
нет доказательства смерти автора 1940 год + 70 лет Wasa Kawasaker (talk) 01:42, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Лицензию уточнил. См. п. 3. Фотография из экспозиции Мурманского краеведческого музея. Автор не установлен до сих пор и вряд ли будет установлен. Insider (talk) 15:51, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No evidence that this image is in PD in Russia. Uploader(s) did not provide a source to show when this image was published for the first time. The photographer is also unknown. Therefore, Template:PD-Russia template is not valid in this case. Per community voting of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template and Template:PD-old-assumed a photo which is older than 120 years can be maintained. Therefore this photo must be deleted but it can be undeleted 121 years after 1940 - in 2061 .. --Ellywa (talk) 07:26, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Flag without any reference. Lack of credibility, and educational value. Out of project scope. Local hero (talk) 05:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. I think I’ve seen this flag used somewhere before so I’ll add references when I find them. I will also add this to my flag vectorization wishlist as I am a skilled flag editor and designer. As per the spirit of Wikipedia, I hope people do not use nationalist bias for deleting flag files they disagree with. Centralismo (talk) 13:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Not sure why you would passively accuse me of a nationalistic bias, as per the spirit of Wikipedia. Also not sure why you would vote to keep before you provided any sources backing the flag. As it stands, this flag appears to be simply made up. Local hero (talk) 02:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Flag is used by the self-proclaimed "Republic of Ilirida". Source: [33]
- PS @Centralismo: I have already vectorised it:
. --Argean (talk) 22:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- PS @Centralismo: I have already vectorised it:
_painting.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_cyanide_(generated_by_WebMO).png){kind=link}
_13.52.20.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_te_Amsterdam.jpg){kind=link}
,_solicita_que_la_Asamblea_Nacional_Constituyente_decrete_la_liberación_de_esclavos._Centroamérica_fue_el_segundo_Estado_americano_que_la_abolió.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_painting.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_painting.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_painting.JPG){kind=link}
_painting.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_cyanide_(generated_by_WebMO).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_cyanide_(generated_by_WebMO).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_cyanide_(generated_by_WebMO).png){kind=link}
_cyanide_(generated_by_WebMO).png){kind=link}
_13.52.20.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_13.52.20.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_13.52.20.png){kind=link}
_13.52.20.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_te_Amsterdam.jpg){kind=link}
_te_Amsterdam.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_solicita_que_la_Asamblea_Nacional_Constituyente_decrete_la_liberaci%C3%B3n_de_esclavos._Centroam%C3%A9rica_fue_el_segundo_Estado_americano_que_la_aboli%C3%B3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- This twitter account is not affiliated with the "Republic of Ilirida". One individual has ever proclaimed this "republic" and he does not run this twitter account. Reliable sources, please. Local hero (talk) 22:46, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Centralismo's rationale.Ahmet Q. (talk) 07:37, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- The rationale which is completely unbacked by any reliable sourcing, OK. Local hero (talk) 14:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The file is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 07:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Flag without any reference. Lack of credibility, and educational value. Out of project scope. Local hero (talk) 05:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The image is clearly out of COM:SCOPE. Veverve (talk) 17:31, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Source added. It's a flag of a self-proclaimed republic and Commons has multiple similar files. Interestingly there are actual photos of the flag on Commons: [34], [35]. Wikipedia has a descriptive purpose and this is a depiction of a flag that does exist and used by some people so it's educationally purposeful to keep the file. The deletion request is totally unjustified. --Argean (talk) 02:45, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
![[34]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Republic_of_Ilirida.jpg){kind=link}
![[35]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_the_Republic_of_Ilirida.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment. Yes I can request any type of flag I can think of to be created by some factory in China via Alibaba. This does not make it a legitimate flag in any way. Local hero (talk) 03:41, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Being legitimate is irrelevant to the purposes of Commons. The importance is factuality and this is a factual flag used by somebody for some specific purpose. You can request that the page Ilirida should be deleted by Wikipedia because it describes an entity that is not legitimate but that doesn't mean it should also happen. -- Argean (talk) 22:51, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- As far as I am concerned, flags which should be kept on WCommons and use {{Fictitious flag}} should only be certain flags of fictitious countries (e.g. File:The Man in the High Castle (Ridley Scott's series).svg) - i.e. fictitious flags which exist in media (e.g. w:Molvanîa's flag) or in real life (e.g. File:003 Protest gegen Acta in Munich.JPG) - or fictitious flags created by users who are COM:INUSE (e.g. File:Flag of the Facebook United States.svg) or serve some Wikipedian humorous purposes among the community (e.g. File:Drapeau franglais.svg, see also Category:Wikipedia humor). Veverve (talk) 04:38, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Being legitimate is irrelevant to the purposes of Commons. The importance is factuality and this is a factual flag used by somebody for some specific purpose. You can request that the page Ilirida should be deleted by Wikipedia because it describes an entity that is not legitimate but that doesn't mean it should also happen. -- Argean (talk) 22:51, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. Yes I can request any type of flag I can think of to be created by some factory in China via Alibaba. This does not make it a legitimate flag in any way. Local hero (talk) 03:41, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Bes-ARTTalk 08:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The file is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 07:29, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I, the uploader of this image, nomite this unknown work for deletion. DenisWasRight (talk) 12:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, too late to delete by COM:COURTESY. In addition, DenisWasRight is a different user name then the uploader user name. --Ellywa (talk) 07:31, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated flags, unused duplicates of pre-existing flags, and one or two culled indiscriminately from personal blogs; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".
- File:Bandeira do orgulho Demigênero.png
- File:Bandeira do orgulho Trigênero.png
- File:Bandeira do orgulho Pangênero.png
- File:Bandeira do orgulho Andrógine.png
- File:Bandeira do orgulho Assexual.png
- File:Bandeira do orgulho Escoliossexual.png
GPinkerton (talk) 13:14, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Keep they are simple geometry flags, just uncopyrightable stripes with colors. Not a big deal--Iunan (talk) 22:52, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- And what exactly do we need just uncopyrightable stripes with colors for, prithee? GPinkerton (talk) 03:42, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Comment You seem to be throwing everything but the kitchen sink at these files. Can you be more specific about which ones you want to delete as "unused duplicates", and which ones you think are lacking "realistic educational purpose"? --Brainy J (talk) 21:35, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- They are all unused. I would say they are all equally (and separately) unusable. GPinkerton (talk) 12:24, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Keep LoL. They're unused only because you removed them from where they were used. MikutoH (talk) 22:55, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Oh wow that's really playing dirty. 136.49.236.110 04:43, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Keep per MikutoH's observation, GPinkerton did actually go and remove all these from where they were used, then came to Commons and declared them "unused". That's foul play if ever I saw it.--Brainy J (talk) 05:23, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Brainy J: "foul play"? Wikipedia has sources for verification. Removing unsourced self-promotional material inserted by single-purpose accounts is necessary, not "foul play" ... GPinkerton (talk) 11:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- You seriously think that queer pride flags, even such well-known ones as the asexual flag, are "self-promotional material". Lordy. I'll wait and see what closing admins think. Brainy J (talk) 13:40, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- I don't know where you're getting that inference from. All I removed was a file. GPinkerton (talk) 15:37, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, these are files, and these are files depicting various queer pride flags, and these are files that you said should be removed because they're "self-promotional material". I'm not inferring anything I'm just stating the obvious omg lol. Brainy J (talk) 19:42, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- I don't know where you're getting that inference from. All I removed was a file. GPinkerton (talk) 15:37, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- You seriously think that queer pride flags, even such well-known ones as the asexual flag, are "self-promotional material". Lordy. I'll wait and see what closing admins think. Brainy J (talk) 13:40, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Comment The weird thing about File:Bandeira do orgulho Trigênero.png specifically is that the colors are very "off" from how the trigender flag usually is. Compare to the other files in Category:Trigender symbols, or to the trigender stripes in the Blue's Clues Pride Parade video (Screenshot here: https://i.imgur.com/rsTfoAN.png). File:Bandeira do orgulho Assexual.png is slightly off in color as well. --Brainy J (talk) 22:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Keep Again, and as I mentioned on the discussion for Учхљёная’s uploads, I'm concerned (as might other WMLGBT+ User Group members be) at the repeated mass deletion requests affecting LGBTQ+ Pride flags. Removing them from articles before listing them for deletion feels like foul play to me — if you want to list files for deletion, it is more usual to leave them in the articles until they are deleted; removing them first feels like misdirection, whether intentionally so or not. — OwenBlacker (talk; please ping me in replies) 18:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: these flags do not show copyright problems. There is no consensus for deletion, therefore decided to keep. --Ellywa (talk) 19:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated flags; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".
GPinkerton (talk) 13:16, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Not out of scope, these have forseeable educational usage. Category:Bigender symbols and Category:Trigender symbols exist and not for no reason. Unless you think these two nominated flags are of much poorer quality than the others, or maybe you just want to delete those categories altogether... On another note, invoking both COM:SELFIE and COM:EV is misleading, as those both link to the exact same part of Commons policy.--Brainy J (talk) 20:16, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Sources on these pride flags being "real":
- https://www.dailycamera.com/2020/11/08/lafayette-teen-makes-balloon-pride-flags-to-celebrate-lgbtq-history-month/
- https://queerintheworld.com/trigender-pride-flag/
- https://mygenderisx.com/read/non-binary-gender-identity-flags
- https://www.gaystarnews.com/article/pride-flags-the-biggest-guide-to-lgbt-rainbow-flags-and-what-they-all-mean/
- http://www.thelgbtsentinel.com/gender-identification-flags-know-pride-season/
- https://www.verywellhealth.com/what-is-genderqueer-5085085 (See bigender flag in graphic partway down page)
--Brainy J (talk) 20:50, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: these flags do not show copyright problems. There is no consensus for deletion, therefore decided to keep. --Ellywa (talk) 19:22, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
not a PD US Navy photo but "COPYRIGHT ©2018 THE BOEING COMPANY ● ALL RIGHTS RESERVED" Marc Lacoste (talk) 06:55, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Keep It's a USN navy photo provided by Boeing (U.S. Navy photo courtesy of The Boeing Co.). Streamline8988 (talk) 07:05, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: See Commons:User:Fæ/email/DoD. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
This is not a US Navy image, but an image by Boeing that the US Navy uses on some of its web pages. There is no reason why not indication that this is in the Public Domain. Rama (talk) 13:17, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Participants may wish to review the previously closed DR nomination. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:51, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: images are free, per User:Fæ/email/DoD. --Ellywa (talk) 19:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abbasmilani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyvio. Not own work as claimed. Photographs taken with iPhone from older photographs. The copyright of the original photographs should be respected.
- File:Ennismore Gardens.jpg
- File:Buckingham Palace 1957.jpg
- File:With General Franco.jpg
- File:Nahid and Shah.jpg
- File:Nusrat ol Mulk.jpg
- File:Mossadegh and Amirteymour.jpg
- File:Shah and Soraya.jpg
- File:Nahid Begum with Aga Khan.jpg
- File:Nahid Begum with Aga Khan IV.jpg
Henxter (talk) 16:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep for File:Nusrat ol Mulk.jpg and others are PD-Iran despite noob error of "own work". --RAN (talk) 19:41, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete File:Buckingham Palace 1957.jpg created in England so still under active copyright.
Comment We have a slightly better version of File:Nusrat ol Mulk.jpg, namely File:Nusrat Ol Molk.jpg. Can someone read what is written there at the bottom in (presumably) Persian?
Delete all the others, those are photographed off of a screen, we don't know when they were published and don't even know for all of them where they were taken (some in the UK and Spain apparently, one in Iran). --Rosenzweig τ 17:35, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion, deleted all except Nusrat ol Mulk, which is in PD. --Ellywa (talk) 19:34, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Empat Tilda (talk · contribs)
[edit]S.A. Reitsma died in 1958, not public domain in Indonesia yet.
- File:Bahagian Berglijn dan Atjehtrem, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 30.jpg
- File:Boogbrug besar melintasi sungai Anai, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 30.jpg
- File:Stasiun tanjung karang dari lampung, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 28.jpg
- File:Stasiun di Muara Enim, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 28.jpg
- File:Pembukaan Jalan Trem Makassar-Takalar, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 32.jpg
- File:Djalan Kereta api di Aneikloof, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 29.jpg
- File:Loket penjualan karcis stasiun cirebon, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 26.jpg
- File:J. RADERSMA, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 13.png
- File:Ir. M. H. DAMME, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 13.jpg
- File:Ir. W. R. STAARGAARD, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 13.jpg
- File:Ir. J.C.F. VAN SANDICK, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p.13.jpg
- File:Ir. F. E. VAN HENNEKELER, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 13.png
- File:Ir. F. B. H. ASSELBERGS, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 13.png
- File:Ir. H.F. VAN STIPRIAAN, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p.13.jpg
- File:D. maarschalk, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 12.jpg
- File:S. A. SCHAAFSMA Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 12.jpg
- File:J. W. Th. van schaik, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 12.jpg
- File:Ir. Th. A. M. RUIJS, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 12.jpg
- File:J. k. kempees, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 12.jpg
- File:Ir. D.R.J. BARON VAN, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 12.jpg
- File:Ir. R.H.J. SPANJAARD, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 12.jpg
- File:H.g.derx Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 12.jpg
- File:Prof. Dr. ir. J. H. A. HAARMAN Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 10.jpg
- File:L.R. MIDDELBERG. c. i. Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 10.jpg
- File:J.M. Sloos, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 10.jpg
- File:Ir. J. F. Van Welderen, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 10.jpg
- File:Ir. W. F. STAARGAARD, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 10.jpg
- File:Mr. Directeur.jpg
- File:Tremwegen.jpg
- File:Mr. D Pock, Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925, p. 5.jpg
Abzeronow (talk) 17:13, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep S.A. Reitsma authored the text, he is not credited as the photographer. The images would be "PD-EU-no author disclosure". --RAN (talk) 19:18, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep for all photographs (not graphics) taken directly from the book. The book wa published by the Topografische Inrichting Weltevreden in Batavia (the city known today as Jakarta). Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Indonesia, photographs are protected by copyright in Indonesia for a term of 50 years after publication. So if we take Indonesia as the source country for that 1925 publication (and I don't see why not, even if it was still a Dutch colony then), any photographs (but not drawings) taken directly from the book should be ok to keep with {{PD-IDOld-Art59}}, regardless of the actual photographer. --Rosenzweig τ 16:06, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Boekoe Peringatan dari Staatsspoor-en Tramwegen di Hindia-Belanda 1875-1925 for another bunch of files (mostly photographs) extracted from that book. --Rosenzweig τ 16:06, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: The source of this file is this book, written in the local language (not in Dutch), although the author is probably from the Netherlands and possibly returned to the Netherlands after WWII or earlier. So we can safely assume the Indonesian copyright is applicable to this file. From Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Indonesia it appears that “for photographs, portraits, cinematographic works, derived works and collected works, copyright lasts for 50 years from publication”. One image File:Tremwegen.jpg is not a photo, but a sort of logo. This can be seen as applied art. For this protection lasts for 25 years since the first publication. As this book dates from 1925, all images can be maintained and all images are in PD since 1975, well before the URAA date, so they are in PD in the USA as well. The text however, will be copyrighted in Indonesia 70 years p.m.a. These files do not contain text. So all can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 12:05, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Includes the guitar, replica which I think counts as public installed artwork. The US has no FoP for such works. Uploader banned on enwiki for large copyright violations. EpicPupper (talk) 18:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:FOP USA. --Ellywa (talk) 11:43, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Stylization of the text and the cutoff oval seems too unique for this image to not be eligible for copyright in the United States. Steel1943 (talk) 18:54, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 11:44, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
{{PD-anon-80}} removed by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk · contribs) with comment {{Not-PD-US-URAA|country=AU}}
. Published in Australia without a named human author in 1934, became free in Australia in 2005 (after the URAA date). Free in the US in 2030. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- The nominator has just tagged another scan from the same source as
{{PD-1996|country=au}}Why does that not apply here? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:10, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, {{PD-Australia}} and {{PD-1996|country=au}}, Australian copyright law explains that "Published editions –ie., they means the typographical arrangement and layout of a published work. eg. newsprint– (except photographs and artistic works), that were first published after more than 25 years ago are in the Public Domain. This scan was published on 15 April 1934 so by 1996 there have passed more than 25 years from publication (precisely 61 years, later registered as 62 on 1 January 1997).
- --83.61.237.190 11:27, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- No. You are referring to a "typographical copyright" like the one that exists in the UK (COM:UK#Typographical copyright). That is a type of copyright intended for editions of works that are already in the public domain, to give the publishers of such editions at least some limited time of protection against immediate reprints by others. It does not apply to the content, just to the typographical arrangement and layout, and it does not mean that any content published over 25 years ago is in the public domain. --Rosenzweig τ 21:39, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, the Australian copyright term was 50 years until 2005/2008. The term extension to 70 years was not retroactive, which means an anonymous 1934 publication entered the PD in 1985, well before the URAA date. --Rosenzweig τ 21:39, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 11:46, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
It's a copyrighted logo's recreation (which is also auto-traced too). Soglasun (talk) 21:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:TOO Russia. Even simple designs are protected by copyright. --Ellywa (talk) 12:28, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
{{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} removed by Микола Василечко (talk · contribs) with comment фальшиві дані
. Unlikely to be own work as originally claimed, not old enough for PD-old-assumed. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 12:31, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
