Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/01/10

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 10th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prince Turki bin Bander Al Saud.jpg

[edit]

No evidence in the source website that files published in it are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. Vaishakh1234 (talk) 08:11, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 09:28, 10 January 2022 UTC: No evidence in the source website that files published in it are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. --Krdbot 14:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FARDIS.jpg

[edit]

Selfie without educational use. Deleted in ruwiki, amateur musician, not notable. Drakosh (talk) 08:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Rubin16 at 09:47, 10 January 2022 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 14:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thyssenkrupp Schulte Logistik-Center Rotenburg.jpg

[edit]

Ich habe das Bild selbst hochgeladen, möchte aber ein anderes Foto verwenden. Lea Jacobi (talk) 14:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 15:10, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sanya SEX.jpg

[edit]

Не несёт никакой информационной ценности и был загружен ради проверки LordUA (talk) 17:11, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 17:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cookseiko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be user's own work, possibly copyvio

Stang★ 17:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination + vandalism. --Herby talk thyme 17:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CHARLOT Jean, Súperpoema Bolchevique en 5 cantos, 24 de julio de 1924.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since). Jean Charlot died in 1979, and since country of origin appears to be Mexico, this wouldn't be free until 2080. Abzeronow (talk) 17:26, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:09, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:How the Whale Got His Throat.jpg

[edit]

copyvio, Getty Images James R.D. Scott, see for example https://www.thoughtco.com/sperm-whale-facts-4706520 Seb az86556 (talk) 17:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 18:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mowgli's Brothers (1976).jpg

[edit]

copyvio, owned by CBS Seb az86556 (talk) 17:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 18:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Doug from Regular Show.jpg

[edit]

no source indicated, unlikely own work (see uploaders talkpage...) Seb az86556 (talk) 17:50, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 18:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Universal Cartoon Studios logo.png

[edit]

non-free logos are not allowed on commons Seb az86556 (talk) 17:51, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 18:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Warner Bros. Television Animation logo.png

[edit]

non-free logo, not allowed on commons Seb az86556 (talk) 17:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 18:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Margaret from Regular show.jpg

[edit]

no source indcated, unlikely own work (see uploaders multiple previous violations and blocks) Seb az86556 (talk) 17:54, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 18:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Crab That Played with the Sea back cover.jpg

[edit]

copyvio from walmart page https://www.walmart.com/ip/Alpha-Group-Spongebob-Squarepants-Mini-Plush-6-Mr-Krabs/443000215 Seb az86556 (talk) 18:03, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 18:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MediaResearchOresund presskonf Sydnytt Jesper Falkheimer 20121212 0058F (8267227785).jpg

[edit]

This is a screenshot from Swedish Television and Copyright is likely not held by News Øresund. Belteshassar (talk) 20:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Derivative work of non-free content (F3). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MediaResearchOresund presskonf Sydnytt Mark Orsten 20121212 0034F (8267223471).jpg

[edit]

This is a screenshot from Swedish Television and Copyright is likely not held by News Øresund. Belteshassar (talk) 20:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Derivative work of non-free content (F3). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MediaResearchOresund presskonf Sydnytt Veselinka Mollerstrom 20121212 0049F (8267219727).jpg

[edit]

This is a screenshot from Swedish Television and Copyright is likely not held by News Øresund. Belteshassar (talk) 20:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Derivative work of non-free content (F3). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cadet Robert "Bob" Ashby.jpg

[edit]

Not the uploader's own work. I found their other photo of File:Cpt. Robert "Bob" Ashby.jpg (also originally claimed as own work) at https://www.luke.af.mil/News/Photos/igphoto/2000897956/, but not this one. Lord Belbury (talk) 18:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 22:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AndrewJacksonn123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fictional maps about an election that hasn't yet occurred. No educational value. User has a history of similar uploads, which were deleted previously.

Eureka Lott 23:46, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete will become misleading after the 2024 US presidential election. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:23, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:42, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AndrewJacksonn123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fantasy maps for an election that hasn't happened yet, Out of Scope

Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:43, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AndrewJacksonn123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

More misleading maps of an election that hasn't yet happened. Delete all as out of scope.

Eureka Lott 18:22, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:07, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Deletion requests/Fantasy maps by AndrewJacksonn123. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:50, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Petro Allahovich (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded file was used for vandalism in ukwiki.

--Kanzat (talk) 20:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by King of Hearts at 04:43, 11 January 2022 UTC: Copyright violation: Derivative of https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/amazing-exotic-island-beautiful-tall-palm-198067643 --Krdbot 08:09, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hamid Motahari2.jpg

[edit]

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Timtrent (talk) 21:00, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment While a different image of the same individual, the closing rationale from @Missvain at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hamid Motahari.jpg is interesting, and relevant Timtrent (talk) 22:42, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, unused personal photo, out of project scope. I blocked the uploader indefinitely as sockpuppet of self-promotional person. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aleumana12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:57, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bochum, Johanneskiche, Innenraum.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation; painting in pd 2046 Martin Sg. (talk) 16:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:56, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:St. Stephan (Brühl, Rheinland)

[edit]

copyvio; artist died in 2021; no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 16:08, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Schwanenkirche Roes

[edit]

copyright violation; artist of stained glass windows Karl Peter Böhr died in 2017; no freedom of panorama. (see http://www.glasmalerei-ev.net/pages/b9119/b9119.shtml)

Martin Sg. (talk) 16:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ChristlicheVersammlungen.JPG

[edit]

As the author, I do not agree to the publication on the Wikimedia Commons. FolkertM (talk) 16:27, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:55, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NeuApoKircheBorkum.JPG

[edit]

As the author, I do not agree to the publication on the Wikimedia Commons. FolkertM (talk) 16:28, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:53, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kirchturm-Ev.-Luth.Kirche-Borkum.JPG

[edit]

As the author, I do not agree to the publication on the Wikimedia Commons. FolkertM (talk) 16:28, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Info The file was uploaded at de:wp and was transferred to Commons. NNW 17:05, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:55, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Montage of Bogor.svg

[edit]

Strange to use svg format for such photograph, and it has much larger file size. Stang★ 16:28, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete yes it should be deleted, it's inappropriate because its so strange to see -thanks :) hclUSA (talk)

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:55, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kath.KircheBorkum.JPG

[edit]

As the author, I do not agree to the publication on the Wikimedia Commons. FolkertM (talk) 16:29, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This file is under a free license. You can't prevent publishing it as long as the license requirement is fullfilled, which is the case here. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:51, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:54, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Notiforma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:59, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Roebuck Company, RRV Group.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation. It is not Open Government Licence v3.0. Crown Copyright still applies to Ministry of Defence images on the The National Archives UK Government Web Archive see https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/webarchive/information/ see Guidance Ministry of Defence copyright licensing information (Updated 1 December 2021) https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mod-copyright-licensing-information/ministry-of-defence-copyright-licensing-information.Melbguy05 (talk) 07:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator: has re-read section "Legal Information" of the "How to use the web archive" by the National Archives and the Ministry of Defence copyright licensing information and is now of the view that there was not a copyright violation. Also, that the Open Government Licence v3.0. applies. Notwithstanding, that it "..does not allow the re-use of imagery containing personal data". However, in this instance whilst the photo depicts individuals it is of such a low quality that the individuals are not identifiable.--Melbguy05 (talk) 11:59, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept - Open Government Licence v3.0. applies (withdrawn by Nominator)--Melbguy05 (talk) 12:06, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Roebuck Company, RRV Group.jpg

[edit]

Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: according to the source, this file is licenced with Crown Copyright. According to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_Kingdom#Crown_copyright it cannot be maintained on Commons and is not compitable with the licencing on the file, OGL. --Ellywa (talk) 08:51, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Atanu Poddar 2019.jpg

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:22, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:00, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Atanu Poddar 2019.jpg

[edit]

File page without file. Leonel Sohns 15:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 16:22, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi logo.svg

[edit]

uploader request Jelican9 (talk) 21:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is the official logo of Istanbul Bilgi University, and it has been correctly classified as non-copyrightable. --Gnom (talk) 22:22, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Gnom, how can we be sure that it is not copyrighted? It is patented by the Turkish Trademark Institution. Jelican9 (talk) 22:23, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Trademark law is separate from copyright law. We only need to consider copyright law here. Gnom (talk) 22:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah thanks. According to the Turkish Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works (Art. 1/B (a)), the originality of the relevant work must be found.  Keep --Jelican9 (talk) 22:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Gnom. @Taivo, hello. I think the discussion can be closed. Kadıköylü (talk) 16:16, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, the nomination is withdrawn, the logo has correct license. Taivo (talk) 16:21, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Autohistorical1999.jpg

[edit]

appears to be the work of w:Collective:Unconscious, likely copyvio, dubious own work claim FASTILY 00:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AutoMate AM-250 Induction Sealer.jpg

[edit]

promotional image of some sort (appears to be scanned from a magazine/ad), dubious own work claim FASTILY 00:45, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, unless the uploader clarifies the source of the image. This is a composite image that includes an image on the manufacturer's website without a free license.[1] Verbcatcher (talk) 19:13, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pokigamer56 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PENIS. Low quality, does not offer anything new to the existing images of penises.

✗plicit 04:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HawaiBombai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Posters and book covers, all need permission

Gbawden (talk) 08:08, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DerÖsterreicher1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faranhasani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:SCOPE, personal photos not used on Wikipedia

Ytoyoda (talk) 21:05, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree  Delete --JopkeB (talk) 16:25, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faranhasani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to any wm project.

Achim55 (talk) 10:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree  Delete --JopkeB (talk) 16:26, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mina Merzek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope

--Alaa :)..! 22:13, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kamorik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Collection of personal photos.

Smooth O (talk) 10:34, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YENI DEL CARMEN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ZR Saimun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Blatant self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contribs to wm projects, blocked on en:wp for self-promotion, simple:ZR Saimun was deleted twice, simple:Zr saimun three times.

Achim55 (talk) 16:50, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Also note that all of these are claimed to be Own Work. Since none of them appear to be selfies, that it is extremely unlikely, so they infringe on the copyright(s) belonging to the actual photographer(s)..     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wasd9181 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No realistic educational use. These are all flags and emblems of fictitious micronations described on [2] and [3].

bjh21 (talk) 21:54, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Antgulnbsd.jpg

[edit]

out of Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 22:20, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vargrd.jpg

[edit]

out of Commons:Project scope, certainly not own work Polarlys (talk) 22:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Variowesa.jpg

[edit]

out of Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 22:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Informacionnbp.png

[edit]

Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 22:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antoniog777 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daniel koinov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gabriel Garcia Bastos de Almeida (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JoshuaEstrada (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rohit S.King (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I originally nominated these for F10, but then decided that that criterion didn't apply because of the files' high resolution (thus making them not low-to-medium quality). They're still unused personal images by a user with no other global edits, and thus out of scope.

Pppery (talk) 01:28, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Губанов Назар возле своего дома, 2021 год.jpg

[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 06:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Д. А. Фарсаданян.jpg

[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 14:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Демченков Ярослав Сергійович.jpg

[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 14:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pchelkazuzu22888 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 14:53, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ольга Дубровина (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 14:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Дмитрий-Валерьевич-300x225.jpg

[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 15:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Данил Иванов.jpg

[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 15:10, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Renault Scala India (front view) 06.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo "Envy me, I'm a rich boy". Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:30, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Драгун.jpg

[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 15:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:José Aristides de Lucena Ferreira.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo; out of the project scope. Francisco (talk) 17:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Warsaw park (3323422893).jpg

[edit]

poor quality Botev (talk) 10:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree Out of scope. No educational value. Krok6kola (talk) 12:38, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Masur (talk) 22:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User talk:Nicolás Orona

[edit]

Porque no me gustan esas pendejadas Nicolás Orona (talk) 00:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

caguense culeros pendejos de mierda Nicolás Orona (talk) 17:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 08:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Isopren-1-ol.png

[edit]

Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:Isoprenol-2D-structure.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:08, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:16, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mompi.jpg

[edit]

Private photo of a party, bad quality Juanman (talk) 12:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Internet Watch Foundation logo.png

[edit]

As a logo of an UK organization, I am kind of doubtful that this would not meet the UK's infamously low TOO Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:31, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep this logo is too simple for copyright, including IWF's globe logo. --Aesthetic Writer (talk) 23:26, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Iraq War montage.png

[edit]

One of the images in this montage has been deleted. A user edited and blocked the deleted image, but the previous version is still visible. I think it's better if we just delete this whole montage. FutureTrillionaire (talk) 00:03, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I could shift the images around a bit to fill the frame. Captions/alttext wherever this is transcluded would then need to be updated, which I may be able to do myself. My long-term idea is to replace the image with an entirely new montage (I'm taking image suggestions on my talk page if you want to help.) Schierbecker (talk) 00:10, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep and swap in a new image for the removed one, it is a montage in heavy use. --RAN (talk) 00:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Right now, if you go to the image page, and scroll down to the file history, you can still see the previous version of the montage, which contains the deleted image. Surely, we need to at least delete the previous version? I'm not sure if it's possible to delete a specific version, and if it's not, we'd need to delete the whole montage.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 16:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The image revision with the deleted image suppressed as admin. Therefor no reason the delete the photomontage as a lot of wikis are using it. --Raymond 08:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Etherealsmoke (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely that these are the own work of the uploader, as claimed. It appears that they can actually be attributed to several photographers. I don't think we can keep these without additional evidence that these photos are freely licensed by the copyright holder (usually the photographer), either via COM:VRT or a with a link to the photo's free license (particularly since these mostly appear to have been previously published elsewhere with non-free licenses).

—RP88 (talk) 00:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:【高登爆料】 香港人網受薪打手月入過萬.png

[edit]

Out of COM:Scope? Jonteemil (talk) 01:28, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Emma-Bitec.jpg

[edit]

I don’t believe this user on their copyright claim considering their upload history, description and category of “asasasad” and deceptive username. Dronebogus (talk) 02:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:23, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by E. Ghiraldini

[edit]

It's unclear who are all these people but the pictures don't look like an own work. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:35, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brigadier David Neal.jpg

[edit]

Copyright sourced from a non-government website https://www.redcap70.net. It is not Open Government Licence v3.0 - from the National Archives. Melbguy05 (talk) 07:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator changed to Speedy Delete copyright violation Melbguy05 (talk)

Deleted: file already deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/"self-portrait-with-famous-photographers"

[edit]

Credited to Irving Penn on the wordpress source. Penn died in 2009. No indication of PD or free license

Gbawden (talk) 07:39, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:25, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HMS Tamar Dazzle.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation. Sourced from a non-government website https://www.forces.net. It is not Open Government Licence v3.0 - from the National Archives. Melbguy05 (talk) 07:50, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: is this fixable by putting the correct licence information/fair use rationale (if it exists) on the image? GraemeLeggett (talk) 08:06, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Unfortunately this cannot be fixed by adding another free licence since the BFBS charity allows only personal use of their website content. Fair use is not an option at Wikimedia Commons, nor may you apply a fair use rationale for a local upload at the English Wikipedia, because there are other free images of this ship. De728631 (talk) 18:39, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:25, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Edinburgh Garrison Badge.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation. Sourced from a Twitter account. It is not Open Government Licence v3.0 - from the National Archives. Melbguy05 (talk) 07:53, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:33, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kathy M. Sheehan.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation "All content © 2006-2022". No Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license. Melbguy05 (talk) 07:56, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alicia M. Purdy.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation. Taken from Facebook account. No Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license. Melbguy05 (talk) 07:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Driving to Saint Matthew's Monastery from Erbil.jpg

[edit]

Doesn't have any educational value, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Passerelle Cage aux Ours.jpg

[edit]

hjghghfghfghfgh Vincent Eisfeld (talk) 09:28, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I hope I don't have to bring arguments against "hjghghfghfghfgh". Of course, deleting this beautiful picture would be a shame... AK Kennedy (talk) 11:27, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: looks like an accidental nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:36, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Charity Kase after makeup.jpg

[edit]

No Youtube license available at the source to check if this video is free. Leoboudv (talk) 09:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep You can see the license archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20211112233935/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBN4NCmqHMw --GRuban (talk) 13:35, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: license archived. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:36, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Latest government jobs.jpg

[edit]

Single upload, unlikely to be own work. Probably stock photo. Smooth O (talk) 10:20, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:46, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dr. Mahmoud Elfiky.jpg

[edit]

Looks like a copyvio with https://www.wofaps.org/teachers/mahmoud-elfiky/, but I'm not 100% sure on that. Skarmory (talk) 10:25, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is the same person. He is surgeon at the association. We are trying to create an association page, a biography page for dr mahmoud and the rest, Seem all are removed. We kindly request you help us approve them all. Pianzaco (talk) 15:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is not a matter of "approval". The owner, presumably someone at WOFAPS needs to send permission to Commons:Volunteer Response Team. SVTCobra 04:54, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:46, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hydrogen Bomb Drawing.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Stang as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Out of project scope - Commons is not a place for mail collection. Wdwd (talk) 10:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that I clicked the wrong button on the navbar. Stang★ 12:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Added:

Stang★ 12:30, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:49, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Red hood $$2.jpg

[edit]

Copyright DC Comics (character of Red Hood). Fair use not allowed on Commons. Tylwyth Eldar (talk) 11:53, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:49, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Red hood.jpg

[edit]

Copyright DC Comics (character of Red Hood). Fair use not allowed on Commons. Tylwyth Eldar (talk) 11:54, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:49, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Batı Avusturalya.png

[edit]

Low resolution PNG copy of File:Australia Western Australia location map.svg, unlikely to be of any practical use Calistemon (talk) 12:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:49, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jnuhim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE. Unused logo of questionable notability.

Netora (talk) 12:39, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prabesh Aryal in 2020.jpg

[edit]

Privacy Issues — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prabesh Aryal (talk • contribs) 18:21, 10 January 2022‎ (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion of personal photo. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:59, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shiva Raichandani.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely that is the own work of the uploader, as claimed. EXIF indicates that the photographer is Darius Shu. Before it was uploaded to Commons it was previously published without a free license (see [16], etc.). —RP88 (talk) 00:00, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:00, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Joggers in tervasaari helsinki.jpg

[edit]

This is Getty Images rights-controlled photo ID #515864802 by Joel Carillet. Also at iStockPhoto since March 17, 2016 by Joel Carillet. If the uploader (Veeti Davidsson) is the same person as Joel Carillet, then as a work previously published without a free license before it was uploaded here we need confirmation of permission via COM:VRT. —RP88 (talk) 00:30, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:00, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zhao Gao.jpg

[edit]

Drawing of unknown provenance, PD-OLD can't possibly apply since the character for Zhao is simplified Chinese Yinweiaiqing (talk) 00:29, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:00, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo ArquiWHAT.gif

[edit]

Probably to simple to be copyrighted so can't be considered a copyvio. It is however unused I can't really find what the logo is for. Becaue of this lack of notability it must be out of COM:Scope. Jonteemil (talk) 01:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:01, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KPPO LOGO (3).tif

[edit]

This version does not seem to render correctly. Redundant to File:KPPO LOGO (3) merged.jpg. Jonteemil (talk) 01:54, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:02, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Spiti-valley-wanderon.jpg

[edit]

Watermarked with the copyright sign. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Marked as "all rights reserved", incompatible with Commons licensing. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dom-eduardo-malaspina.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely to be "own work". This image is available at various sites on the internet. Py4nf (talk) 02:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Not an original upload, but cropped from an unknown source. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:04, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FB IMG عبدالله شعيب.jpg

[edit]

Facebook 191.119.182.135 02:26, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:05, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:زيزو الاصيل.jpg

[edit]

Zeyad Hany 191.119.182.135 02:27, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:05, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IMG عبدالله شعيب.jpg

[edit]

Don nadie? 191.119.182.135 02:29, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:04, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Magnolia Network Logo - Wide Stacked.svg

[edit]

Error rendering and replaced by another file File:Magnolia Network.svg Bacon Noodles (talk) 02:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: rendering error fixed. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:07, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Magnolia Network Logo.png

[edit]

Superseded by an SVG file, depicting the same image. File:Magnolia Network.svg Bacon Noodles (talk) 02:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused version of File:Magnolia Network Logo - Wide Stacked.svg. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:08, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:بدون اسم.png

[edit]

Out of scope of the project. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:57, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Weak keep actually this phrase is so popular that it would be reasonable to have a file dedicated to it. I would prefer for that file to be SVG, perhaps. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 11:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:09, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Care UK logo rgb.png

[edit]

This is certainly uploaded under an incorrect license, but I did not want to change it to Template:PD-Textlogo because of the low threshold of Commons:TOO UK SVTCobra 03:26, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Above TOO in UK. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:09, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PiM's biscuits.jpg

[edit]

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work. ✗plicit 03:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:10, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NJPatch.png

[edit]

This is "Fan art that closely resembles copyrighted material" (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules). This file is the copyrighted New Jersey Wing Civil Air Patrol logo modified only by the numbers on this file replacing the authentic ones. Et0048 (talk) 05:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The circle, the shape of the state, and the text are too simple to be copyrighted. The wings can potentially be, but I think that they are way too simple as well. Of course, if the user has traced those wings, then we should delete, but I believe that it can be a creation of the user. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 11:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Recreation of copyrighted work is COM:DW. And not useful anyway as a imitation look-alike. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:15, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Oakland Körfezi köprüsü (Auckland Harbour Bridge) San Francisco, California.jpg

[edit]

Has a copyright notice on the photo, also the author has not justified why the work by the International Engineering Company is CC-BY or public domain. Prosperosity (talk) 05:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:16, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Doedel 1 NEW.jpg

[edit]

Subject died in 1980, spent 43 years in prison, and the image looks very old. [17] contains an identical image attributed to an "FNV" (most likely en:Federation of Dutch Trade Unions). While the photo is potentially PD, having been taken no later than 1937, the licensing information will need to be corrected. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:31, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:17, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Seyhun əsədli 2002.jpg

[edit]

Seyhun əsədli 2002.jpg Seyhun Seyyuboğlu (talk) 06:03, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:17, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Darwin Cubs.jpg

[edit]

This is a non-free sports logo (from an albeit defunct team) so it shouldn't live on Commons. Gibbsyspin (talk) 06:13, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:17, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NGC976 - HST - Potw2202a.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Fabian RRRR (talk) 06:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Informations added —Fabian RRRR (talk) 06:22, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:21, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Janet Morris and UVM Christine.JPG

[edit]

Challenging proposed deletion - This file was initially tagged by Masur as no permission. My understanding is that PD-self images do not require OTRS verification, and thus this should not be deleted.. Schierbecker (talk) 06:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Common sense would indicate me that User:Ubter=Chris Morris, but you tell me. Schierbecker (talk) 08:07, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say so, but File:Chris Morris author D3R4593.jpg also says Source=Chris Morris and Author=Chris Morris but depicts C. Morris himself. Therefore, I have doubts that the uploader is him really. Masur (talk) 06:33, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per comments by User:Masur; very doubtful indeed that User:Ubter is the photographer. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:25, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IMG-20211217-WA0009.jpg

[edit]

This picture seems to be copied as it appears (credited!) in several places on the web (such as this and this one). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 06:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Filename indicates it was received via WhatsApp. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:26, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: see ticket:2022020710003975. Yann (talk) 17:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Фотография Максима.jpg

[edit]

Selfie without educational use. Deleted in ruwiki, amateur musician, not notable. Drakosh (talk) 07:03, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:26, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Scottish Army Cadet Force Badge.png

[edit]

2022 Crown Copyright clearly visible. It is also not licensed by the MINISTRY OF DEFENCE ILLUSTRATION LICENCE as it was not sourced from the Defence Brand Portal website https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk see Guidance Ministry of Defence copyright licensing information (Updated 1 December 2021) https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mod-copyright-licensing-information/ministry-of-defence-copyright-licensing-information Melbguy05 (talk) 07:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:27, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brigadier Vivienne Wendy Buck.jpg

[edit]

Copyright Ministry of Defence (MOD). Sourced from an official MOD Facebook page. It is not Open Government Licence v3.0 - from the National Archives. Melbguy05 (talk) 07:27, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:28, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RMP Policemen Training.jpg

[edit]

2022 Crown Copyright clearly visible. It is not Open Government Licence v3.0 - from the National Archives. It cannot be licensed by the MINISTRY OF DEFENCE ILLUSTRATION LICENCE as it was not sourced from the Defence Brand Portal website https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk see Guidance Ministry of Defence copyright licensing information (Updated 1 December 2021) https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mod-copyright-licensing-information/ministry-of-defence-copyright-licensing-information Melbguy05 (talk) 07:31, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:28, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RMP Marching.jpg

[edit]

2022 Crown Copyright clearly visible. It is not Open Government Licence v3.0 - from the National Archives. It is also cannot be licensed by the MINISTRY OF DEFENCE ILLUSTRATION LICENCE as it was not sourced from the Defence Brand Portal website https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk see Guidance Ministry of Defence copyright licensing information (Updated 1 December 2021) https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mod-copyright-licensing-information/ministry-of-defence-copyright-licensing-information Melbguy05 (talk) 07:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:28, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ПифаСтотель.jpg

[edit]

COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 07:39, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:28, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WoodridgeNZ.jpg

[edit]

Reasons for deletion request -Vaibhav265 (talk) 07:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC) Uploader request[reply]

Uploader request Vaibhav265 (talk) 07:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, in scope and in use. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:30, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WoodridgeNZ.jpg

[edit]

File moved, redirection is unnecessary Vaibhav265 (talk) 22:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I don't know why the uploader is trying so hard to obscure and remove relevant info, including the object coords (there is nothing personal about this info!). This filename is valid for the depicted location. In fact, this filename is better than the new name because it is specific, whereas the new name (HillsideSuburbWN) is generic, meaningless! --P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:16, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, redirect from previous name of renamed file. --Rosenzweig τ 20:51, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Seton Nossiter Park.jpg

[edit]

Reasons for deletion request -Vaibhav265 (talk) 07:42, 10 January 2022 (UTC) Uploader request[reply]

Uploader request Vaibhav265 (talk) 07:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader request Vaibhav265 (talk) 07:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, in scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:31, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Seton Nossiter Park.jpg

[edit]

File moved, redirection is unnecessary Vaibhav265 (talk) 22:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I don't know why the uploader is trying so hard to remove relevant info, including the object coords (there is nothing personal about this info!). This filename is valid for the depicted location. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:11, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: we usually keep redirects. --Rosenzweig τ 13:45, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:VuwHunterBlg.jpg

[edit]

Reasons for deletion request -Vaibhav265 (talk) 07:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC) Uploader request[reply]

Uploader request Vaibhav265 (talk) 07:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, in scope and in use. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:32, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Greg J. Aidala.webp

[edit]

Copyright violation. "© 2021 NEW YORK STATE WRITERS INSTITUTE" https://www.nyswritersinstitute.org/. It is not Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license. Melbguy05 (talk) 08:05, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:34, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sympozium ve sklárně Annín (116).jpg

[edit]

blurred duplicate of File:Sympozium ve sklárně Annín (115).jpg — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Art Jarka (talk) 10:29, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:34, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:王惕吾.jpg

[edit]

The file is a portrait of Wang Tiwu, in which TinEye found that there are two hits of the image that are published before 2018-11-14. The websites are this (published on 2006-12-01) and this (last archived on 2014-12-05), and contains dead images related to the person depicted in this portrait.

Given by these evidence, it is likely that the file is taken from the Internet, and is copyrighted by other people else. 廣九直通車 (talk) 08:27, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:34, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ebenen Misogynie.jpg

[edit]

Self-created artwork not present in academic literature, private theory i.e. original research. (the pyramid scheme) The author even admitted it: "Kommen aber wohl eher aus der Praxis, nicht so sehr aus wissenschaftlichen Publikationen." ("But comes from practice, not so much from scientific publications.") [18] TheRandomIP (talk) 09:00, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:36, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JeffreyGKitingan.jpg

[edit]

No evidence of a free license. Source says: "© Copyright Parti Solidariti Tanah AirKu Starsabah. Hak Cipta Terpelihara" Leoboudv (talk) 09:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:36, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ТЕХколледж Исфара.jpg

[edit]

Author's request. Unused outdated low-res photo. Radbardur (talk) 09:38, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Small thumbnail, likely not even own work. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:37, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Charity Kase before makeup.jpg

[edit]

No Youtube license available at the source to check if this video is free. Leoboudv (talk) 09:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep You can see the license archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20211112233935/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBN4NCmqHMw --GRuban (talk) 13:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:38, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ДК Исфара.JPG

[edit]

Author's request. Unused, outdated photo Radbardur (talk) 09:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Strong keep Nothing is violating the personality rights. After a day or so, we could delete, but after 7 years it is against the licence to delete the file. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 11:23, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. Doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:40, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Парк ИСФАРА.JPG

[edit]

Author's request. Unused outdated photo Radbardur (talk) 09:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, in scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:41, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Исфаринка.jpg

[edit]

Author's request. Unused outdated low-res photo. Radbardur (talk) 09:51, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Tiny thumbnail, likely not even own work. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:42, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Карта Музея Калининского фронта.xcf

[edit]

Not "own work", see copyright marks in lower right corner, logo of AHDEKC Enyavar (talk) 10:11, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thats screenshot from en:Yandex_Maps, copyrighted. Delete. --Drakosh (talk) 11:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:42, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wellington-management-logo.PNG

[edit]

Old logo. No longer in use Imcdc (talk) 12:05, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Old logos still have a realistic educational purpose in historically representing brands.  Mysterymanblue  12:09, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:45, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Olivier Ratsi.png

[edit]

Pas la bonne licence (Copyvio) : Olivier Ratsi ([19]) est un artiste contemporain français qui n'est pas dans le Domaine Public ; liberté de Panorama interdite en France ; et Fair Use non accepté sur Commons. Aucune autoisation OTRS fournie. Tylwyth Eldar (talk) 12:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:46, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Olivier Ratsi, Frame Perspective (2019) .jpg

[edit]

Pas la bonne licence (Copyvio) : Olivier Ratsi ([20]) est un artiste contemporain français qui n'est pas dans le Domaine Public ; liberté de Panorama interdite en France ; et Fair Use non accepté sur Commons. Aucune autoisation OTRS fournie. Tylwyth Eldar (talk) 12:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:46, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Roots (Hamburg).jpg

[edit]

(lower-res version) can be found on the architect's website https://roots-hamburg.de/highlights/services; needs explicit permission imo Magnus (talk) 12:38, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Roots Hamburg.jpg. --Gnom (talk) 15:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Official Logo.png

[edit]

Wikimedia Commons is not a place to advertise, out of scope. Stang★ 12:56, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This page is created for the soul purpose of publishing the website and educate user about our Official logo.
The website Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals is also listed on Stock markets and India. So this page is not for advertising but to educate the audience with the right information on wikipedia and other notable platforms. Louis1908 (talk) 13:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: I cleaned up the file desc, so it might be kept. There are article pages on en:wp, de:wp and fa:wp. --Achim55 (talk) 13:42, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, As the page/logo talks about the official website can you please remove the deletion request for this file. It would really help our brand audience to get themselves educated with the right information. Louis1908 (talk) 09:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and admission above, this is uploaded for advertising only; out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:52, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Davide-Locatelli.jpg

[edit]

not own work: previously published here: https://www.lofficielitalia.com/musica/davide-locatelli-pianista-rock-this-is-dave-album-chi-e-biografia (see this file) Bradipo Lento (talk) 13:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:53, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Tobu 50090 series

[edit]

Nearly identical photos with slightly different cropping. I suggest keeping File:Tobu50090 ltd.jpg, which is in use on ja-wiki and deleting the other two.

Ytoyoda (talk) 13:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and Kept one per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:54, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Windows server% 202016.tif

[edit]

Unused bitmap image with vector version available. Leonel Sohns 14:05, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:55, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Football player tabriz.jpg

[edit]

Outside project COM:SCOPE, not used on Wikipedia Ytoyoda (talk) 14:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:55, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tommaso de‘ Cavalieri.jpg

[edit]

Copy-violation: file has been copy-pasted as an image from a tumblr blog-page without a valid license. If Michelangelo drew the image, he would be the creator and the date would be in the 1530s. Mathsci (talk) 14:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

fixed! Thank you for the hint! No need for deletion Chip-chip-2020 (talk) 15:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The tumblr image copied without permission from the internet is the problem: an obvious copy-violation. French users have legally worked out how to upload images from the Bonnat Museum. A properly sourced image is here, fairly high-res and cropped, following 2008 WMF rules. Deletion discussions occur on the file talk page, which has multiple references; they contradict User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )'s edits here and on wikidata. Mathsci (talk) 11:00, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Only the copyright status for a 500 year old image matters and it is PD, it doesn't violate international copyright law because it was downloaded from Tumblr. Uploading a PD image to Tumblr doesn't restart the copyright clock. Or are you changing your argument for deletion that we don't need it, we already have a copy? --RAN (talk) 13:55, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Magog the Ogre, PD image. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ДўмнезэїєЎ.png

[edit]

COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 14:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:04, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zettai ryōiki - Bologna Motorshow 2012.jpg

[edit]

A creep shot of a woman scratching her butt has little educational value, as there are much better images in Category:Zettai ryōiki to illustrate the concept. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion, and in use. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:05, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Juninho Los Hermanos.jpg

[edit]

Taken from google Otávio Astor Vaz Costa (talk) 15:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio: Author KAROLINE BARRETO/CMBH. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:06, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo-magicserv.jpg

[edit]

Unused logo of a non-notable organization; also, promo (see ro:MagicServ). Gikü (talk) 15:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is the logo of the company, part of its identity. have a nice day ;) MagicServ (talk) 21:36, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:06, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Orlen logo.svg

[edit]

Assuming that this is the same logo as the one deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Orlenlogo.svg it should be deleted as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:34, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not the same, but not notable anyway, out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:09, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Baglieto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:10, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Baglieto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:South Carolina Gubernatorial Election Results by County, 2010.svg

[edit]

Blank map that never got filled in (filled in version: File:South Carolina Governor Election Results by County, 2010.svg); useless under this title and redundant generally. Elli (talk) 15:51, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:11, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Joakim Karlberg 2004.jpg

[edit]

eftersom tillhörande artikel inte finns kvar , den plockades bort av er. / since the associated article is no longer there, it was removed by you. Joakim Karlberg AB (talk) 15:56, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope and not own work. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Joakim Karlberg 2008.jpg

[edit]

eftersom tillhörande artikel inte finns kvar , den plockades bort av er. / since the associated article is no longer there, it was removed by you. Joakim Karlberg AB (talk) 15:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Joakim Karlberg.jpg

[edit]

eftersom tillhörande artikel inte finns kvar , den plockades bort av er. / since the associated article is no longer there, it was removed by you. Joakim Karlberg AB (talk) 16:00, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Комарова Ксения, 3 класс.jpg

[edit]

размещен ошибочно Nikeza21 (talk) 16:23, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:14, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Camus la scimmia.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Low quality. Mask has enough images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:14, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ciaobellodizio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:14, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CampusSanVincenzo.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:40, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:15, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Canadian Law Chart.png

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:15, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Canadian Law Chart v2.png

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:15, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bangladesh taking on Pakistan during the 2011 SAFF Championship.png

[edit]

I initially tagged as derivative work with missing source, since the letterboxing, image quality, and strange cropping indicated this was a screenshot and not an original work. An uncropped version of this image appears here and is the cover image for this video. Perviously published images require verification through COM:VRT. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:53, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The user frequently upload copyrighted file, i don't think they have permission to upload here on commons. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 17:29, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:15, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Canadian Vowel Shift Chartimg.. 2329.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:53, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:16, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Canal top 10.png

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:54, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:16, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DaniLoc1978 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:56, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:16, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lunar Eclipse 2018.webm

[edit]

This is a great video, but unfortunately it has been removed, and the earliest I can find it on archive.org is 2019-12-13, when it was already down. This means that the licence review cannot be complete. We should figure out when to undelete it. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:19, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lunar Eclipse July 2018 in CORSICA.webm

[edit]

Great video, but now has been removed the licence review cannot be done. However, I do see that the person still has CC-BY videos on their channel, so it is not very likely that they have been upset that somebody has used their video on Commons. Therefore, I would suggest that COM:OTRS process is followed. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:09, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, failed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:19, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ali Ruei Al-Fakri.jpg

[edit]

Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:20, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tristan Lake Leabu.jpg

[edit]

Questionable own work claim, looks like professionally made promotional image Denniss (talk) 18:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. Not found online prior to upload to Commons. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:24, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by User:Olga28 28

[edit]

Uploads by new user, all photos were made by different cameras, some of them has authors in metadata. I've googled few of them and they were published in different places before the upload to Commons. Also list includes 2 3d-renders of a new bridge in Cherepovets. Most likely all of images are a copyright violation. --Красный wanna talk? 18:31, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:27, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Erwinen vor 1945 024.jpg

[edit]

If the picture was taken before 1945, it is not from 2017. And is the information about the author correct? Xocolatl (talk) 18:42, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The was taken bevor 1945. In 2017 it was digitalized. But it should be deleted, because its nor mor needed 89.182.34.211 09:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:27, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Apple M1 Mac Mini back pannel.jpg

[edit]

Non-free promotional image, see e.g. https://www.macworld.com/article/230292/mac-mini-features-specifications-prices-faq.html (even has the same compression artefacts) Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 18:45, 10 January 2022 (UTC) Delete, sorry for uploading this. It is not mine. Wingwatchers (talk) 19:29, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:27, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fear the Hammer.jpg

[edit]

copyright violation Theroadislong (talk) 19:10, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unlikely to be own work of the uploader. Apparently sourced from @DCook05 twitter account, where it was published without a free license. —RP88 (talk) 19:25, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:28, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nicole d-b 267 (1).jpg

[edit]

Can be found published online before it was uploaded here[21]. EXIF data suggests the copyright (2015) belongs to Jason Berger of New York Headshots. Probably needs COM:VRT permission to be kept. —Granger (talk  · contribs) 19:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Photo by Jason Berger of New York Headshots. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiwi876 (talk • contribs) 17:24, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Kiwi876: If Jason Berger has released the photo under a CC-BY-SA license, could you please send proof of this through the COM:VRT system? —Granger (talk  · contribs) 17:26, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:28, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bienvenidos.jpg.png

[edit]

The uploader states that this file was released under a free CC license. However, there is no evidence of this on the homepage that was given as the source: see here - "Todos los Derechos Reservados © 2020". In my view this drawing is too complex for PD-simple or PD-text Mosbatho (talk) 19:29, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:29, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by D cook 12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely that these are the own work of the uploader, as claimed. These photos lack the Exif metadata that would normally be expected in original photos. I don't think we can keep these without additional evidence that these photos are freely licensed by the copyright holder (usually the photographer), either via COM:VRT or a with a link to the photo's free license (particularly since these mostly appear to have been previously published elsewhere with non-free licenses).

—RP88 (talk) 19:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all There is no educational use for these, they are personal vanity photos. Reywas92 (talk) 16:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per above. --Kinu (talk) 20:49, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Vanity photos uploaded for use in multiple attempts at creating a page about Desmond Cook - all now deleted and salted on en-wiki as non-notable. Nick Moyes (talk) 17:43, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:30, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Corona-Treatment.gif

[edit]

Not uploaders work, unsourced. See 130+ TinEye matches GeorgHH • talk   19:56, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:30, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Niclas Lehman .webp

[edit]

Appears to be from https://www.uycas.at/news/segeln/newsdetails.html?tx_news_pi1%5Bnews%5D=1923&tx_news_pi1%5Bcontroller%5D=News&tx_news_pi1%5Baction%5D=detail&cHash=72770882746aedfed5a2663f5a3b2c6f Ytoyoda (talk) 20:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:30, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Limestone Creek Drainage Basin.png

[edit]

Public domain doubtful: This map seems to have two layers, one provided by USGS (free!), but the basemap is provided by "Maptech, Inc." which appears to be non-free Enyavar (talk) 20:08, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:31, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flint River Watershed.png

[edit]

Public domain doubtful: This map seems to have two layers, one provided by USGS (free!), but the basemap is provided by "Maptech, Inc." which appears to be non-free Enyavar (talk) 20:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:31, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:South Sauty Creek Basin Map 01.jpg

[edit]

Public domain doubtful: This map seems to have two layers, one provided by USGS (free!), but the basemap is provided by "Maptech, Inc." which appears to be non-free Enyavar (talk) 20:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:31, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shalimov-650x650-1.jpg

[edit]

Probably fake license and copyright violation from https://lavkapisateley.spb.ru/enciklopediya/sh/shalimov- Wikisaurus (talk) 20:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:32, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kuressaare linnastaadion.jpg

[edit]

Photo has a very low quality. 5anco5s (talk) 20:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion. Alternatives available. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:33, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Invented It Baby Keem.png

[edit]

Copyright unclear if this is a photo of an album cover. Liz (talk) 21:35, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's a cover for "Invented It", a single by Baby Keem; it is used in a Draft article because i need to improve it. Borteddd (talk) 23:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Then it needs permission from the copyright owners before it can be put on Commons Headlock0225 (talk) 13:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:35, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Landsteiner Mühle (3).jpg

[edit]

I don't think this intentionally damaged version of File:Landsteiner Mühle (2).JPG makes any sense. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:45, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:35, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dimitri Despotides .jpg

[edit]

It does not look like an own work. The portrayed person was born in 1925 and died in 2014. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:07, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Scanned image, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:36, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Theinvinciblearmy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo and annotated images / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 22:11, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:37, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Carolyn J Elmore.jpg

[edit]

© Copyright September 29, 2015 Maryland State Archives Polarlys (talk) 22:13, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:38, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rdtoto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo and low resolution, promotional composite image claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 22:13, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:38, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Garabato gr.jpg

[edit]

No sou info, looks like a screenshot of a TV show Dronebogus (talk) 22:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:39, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brenda Lee Banks.jpg

[edit]

certainly not own work Polarlys (talk) 22:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This photograph has been published before on 19 March 2020, see [26] and [27]. And on 25 October 2018: [28] and [29]. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:39, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Invogue.jpg

[edit]

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:39, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wu Jing Portrait.jpg

[edit]

No sabía que sería visible públicamente Maestro Galdós (talk) 22:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:40, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:China Elections 2020.png

[edit]

Lo subí por error Maestro Galdós (talk) 22:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:40, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alvaro meguiñia .jpg

[edit]

Looks like a screenshot from a copyrighted TV show Dronebogus (talk) 22:20, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:40, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Directores del liceo.jpg

[edit]

out of Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 22:20, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:40, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Invoque-24.png

[edit]

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:20, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:41, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Invu-logo.jpg

[edit]

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:22, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:41, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pagina web de Frecuencia Latina en el 2004.png

[edit]

No permission info for website Dronebogus (talk) 22:23, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:41, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Web de Frecuencia Latina en 1996.png

[edit]

No permission info Dronebogus (talk) 22:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:42, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jeanete.jpg

[edit]

Not convincing that this is own work Dronebogus (talk) 22:26, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (cropped from unknown source) and not in scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:42, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Iodex logo.png

[edit]

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:30, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:43, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IOEP.png

[edit]

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:31, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:43, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ioix01.jpg

[edit]

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:39, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:43, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20180401 113900-min-576x1024 (2).jpg

[edit]

There is no confirmation that the uploader is the author of the medal. — Redboston 22:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:43, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GuillermoBrito (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 22:42, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:43, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ИсламМанишев (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These appear to be scans from a book, unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Some files like File:Природное районирование РБ.png have colouring suggesting CMYK printing. Most have faint wording or images (e.g. maps, charts) on top of the main image, which could be the other side of the page in the scanner, or some ink having rubbed off of the opposite page.

-M.nelson (talk) 22:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:48, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Noisy Smithsonian Castle.jpg

[edit]

Bad quality //LevandeMänniska (talk), 23:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, this file is used to illustrate image noise, so it is really reasonable to have "bad quality". Stang★ 02:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed it, unfortunately too late. The explanation for my negligence: My visual impairment. //LevandeMänniska (talk), 09:52, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Stang. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Super Mario Bros World 1-1 2021-12-26.gif

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by 49.98.62.85 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3. Per Thuresson at COM:UNDEL: "Nintendo does not have a copyright on the concept of platform games." However, Jameslwoodward has raised the question of COM:SCOPE. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:03, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete I believe it very much is in scope. However, I still believe this is a copyright violation even though there is't direct "copy-and-trace" copyright infringement here. I'd argue that this still is some kind of infringement of intellectual property. I could take up examples in regards to en:idea–expression distinction, but I think the best analogy is fake Gucci bags - they may not be a straight copy-pastes, but stil infringements. Nintendo does not have copyright of "platforming", but any one with eyes can tell that is trying to display level 1-1 of Mario Bros. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:57, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is pretty difficult, trying to find the point of the idea-expression divide, as mentioned. It does not look like any particular graphics are copied, which is the usual obvious way to copy expression in video games. The main question is if there is a "selection and arrangement" copyright on the general game layout, of which this may represent a copy. That is a possibility, though that can depend on the number of elements being arranged. If you count the particular squares in any particular level as individual elements, maybe that is enough. It's dancing around the edge. I'm not sure this really violates a character copyright; I think enough details have been removed. Whether there is a copyright on particular aspects of the game play, or a game's particular physics, is a much grayer area -- does that count as expression in a fixed medium, etc. There might be trademark or trade dress issues, but unless hosting the work here is actually a violation (which would get into the question of trademark fair use), don't think that would matter. I don't think there are any scope issues -- if File:World 1-1 obstacle schematic.PNG is widely used (and therefore automatically in scope here), I can't imagine there would be scope issues with this. We can't use "some form of intellectual property" as a deletion rationale though -- we have to ground the arguments strictly in copyright. If the Gucci knockoff did not copy any actual expression, then they may still be guilty of trademark issues, but not copyright infringement. Illustrating such a knockoff would be OK here. But, if this was used in a competing game, the question is could they claim copyright infringement. If it is only OK because of its educational context, then it may be an issue. It's certainly dancing around the edge, to me. This article goes into a couple of different methodologies that courts have used to try and determine infringement at this level -- one of them, as long as the level design isn't copied, is much less likely to result in infringement. The other approach would not be as likely. I think Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions Inc. v. McDonald's Corp. is one of the cases mentioned; that combined extrinsic and intrinsic tests of "substantial similarly" (which is the major ingredient of copyright infringement). The extrinsic test looks at specific elements that were copied, i.e. the "selection and arrangement" I mentioned, or the level design. The intrinsic test would be if an "ordinary reasonable person" would think they were substantially similar. That is likely the aspect which @Josve05a: finds problematic. Roth Greeting Cards v. United Card Co. is another of the cases mentioned. All the above is strictly U.S. law of course; these types of boundaries can be different elsewhere, increasing the uncertainty. Copying the level design, combined with some of the aspects of game play, may make this problematic, despite all the expression that has been removed. I'm really not sure though. Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:12, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete it's a copy/remake of the famous gameplay with slight modifications. Yes I checked COM:FAN but it's a "I know it if I see it" kind of thing. Derivative! Hekerui (talk) 09:20, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination. This is a borderline case, but the arrangement of elements and gameplay are pretty clearly derivative of Super Mario Brothers (even if you ignore the file title). --Kaldari (talk) 01:11, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Forrest Griffin with fans - UFC 100 Fan Expo - Mandalay Bay Casino, Las Vegas.jpg

[edit]

Not in use. No longer needed. Imcdc (talk) 03:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. But in my opinion the photo has educational value. Taivo (talk) 13:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per Taivo. One of the few free licensed photos we have of someone with articles about them in 9 projects. In scope, usefully categorized. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stamp of India - 2020 - Colnect 992948 - Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Temple Ayodhya.jpeg

[edit]

Nominated for speedy deletion as "Not compatible https://colnect.com/en/help/collecting/terms_of_service 5.A" ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 11:09, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Terms of service have nothing to do with copyright. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 11:10, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Since there was no indication of license on the source page [30], I referred to their terms of service which included the copyright clause. @Gone Postal Would you be able to find the license terms? Or is there another policy on commons related to stamps (in relation to GODL-India) ? -- DaxServer (talk) 11:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The licence terms are on the file's page right now. The stamp itself is licenced by Indian government, and the scan of a 2D work holds no additional copyright. Therefore, it is completely irrelevant what Colnect says. You cannot simply put a free file on your site, and claim copyright on it, that's not how it works. I understand your confusion, and I hope that at some future time there will be penalty for claiming copyright for a work that you do not have copyright for. Unfortunately it seems like we are moving in the opposite direction, the USA Copyright Office is having a Request For Comment the possibility to actually issue the copyright registration, until the time the evaluation is requested by the applicant. If you live in the United States, keep an eye on that. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 11:34, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the clarification! -- DaxServer (talk) 09:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: Indian copyright applies. Colnect's claim, like so many other museum, gallery and other organisation's website claims are simple copyfraud. The only problem with this images is its poor quality. Ww2censor (talk) 14:56, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination -- DaxServer (talk) 09:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Closed as Kept per above -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:23, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Roots Hamburg.jpg

[edit]

I am sorry but this computer-generated architecture rendering is protected by copyright and we do not have the necessary release from the author to use it under a free license. Gnom (talk) 14:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Roots (Hamburg).jpg. --Gnom (talk) 15:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:25, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Christian Dior Toile, Made in Paris, 1954. Image from the V&A Collections».jpg

[edit]

This image was not released by the V&A into the public domain. Source is https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O117679/la-ligne-h-toile-christian-dior/ which offers this image for licensing, but definitely not released for free use Mabalu (talk) 15:42, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abraham Lincoln's appearance (1889) (14760962421).jpg

[edit]

Like this deletion discussion, this is not an 1889 publication but I assume a portion of a collection with this being dated 1936. I don't know about Lincoln Lore and its copyright status but it isn't public domain. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keep I nominated other files from a similar collection for deletion, too, but I think this one might be actually in the public domain, as I don't see a copyright notice. Per the Hirtle chart, works first published in the U.S. from 1927 through 1977 without a copyright notice are in the public domain, the fitting template then would be {{PD-US-no notice}}. It seems that the Lincoln Lore periodical was (always? usually?) published without copyright notice, though in this case, the source collection doesn't seem to contain the whole issue, only the first page, so I can't say it for sure in this case. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:31, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep What is claimed to be protected by copyright here? Given the age of it and it being a USA document, is copyright applicable to any of it? Andy Dingley (talk) 21:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Andy Dingley and Gestumblindi: I don't know anything about the periodical. It could be a multi-page one with a copyright notice somewhere else? I was just being conservative about it but upon further review, it seems fine. I'll withdraw this. I see that it is still active today so I'll keep watch of the time period. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:30, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:3kilt.jpg

[edit]

Unused image with no realistic encyclopedic value. AshFriday (talk) 00:54, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 03:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:3kilt.jpg 2

[edit]

inappropriate 209.55.74.16 21:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per above -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:32, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tienda Tim (Claro) en Spetiembre 2003.png

[edit]

Tiny to the point of uselessness Dronebogus (talk) 22:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Keep (at least until a larger image is available). In use. Llwyld (talk) 02:31, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per Llwyld. Regrettably small/low res, but is in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Works by Paul Corazolla

[edit]

copyvio; pd in 2088; no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The files can be restored in 2089. --Rosenzweig τ 21:13, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LA SAD (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Martin SG.,
First of all, I am new ans this is my very first article, so I am glad to get informatons, if something went wrong. I have uploaded further pictures too. Now I am not sure, why these pictures are not discussed.
All the pictures I will use in this article are made by my brother. We both are the sons of Peter Mayer, so there is no copyright issue.
Best Regards
Florian LA SAD (talk) 09:10, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Lieber Florian, Danke für die Beiträge und die Nachfrage. Es geht um den urheberrechtlichen Schutz der abgebildeten Kunstwerke, der ja bis 70 Jahre nach dem Tod ihres Urhebers greift. Da Ihr aber wohl die Rechtsnachfolger und -inhaber seid, ist eine gültige Freigabe für die gemeinfreie Publikation hier wohl zu erlangen resp. durch Euch zu erteilen, siehe Commons:VRT/de. Beste Grüße, Martin Sg. (talk) 12:21, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, insufficient permission. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:38, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LA SAD (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Copyright holder Clemens Mayer - which was revealed as the brother of the uploader in the previous DR. Needs COM:VRT.

P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:40, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Systems01.jpg

[edit]

Screenshot of a copyrighted program. MKFI (talk) 09:08, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:13, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Храм I.jpg

[edit]

I don't know if this is an older work (possibly originally color) or a recent work by a netizen. I asked at Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Humanities/2022_January_8#Commons_image_File%3AХрам_I.jpg but nobody found anything useful that hinted this is a pic we should have. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:57, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I note that the uploader User:Ariely has had other problematic contributions. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:13, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:19, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dalesteyn.JPG

[edit]

Screenshot from a televised cricket match. Jonny Nixon (talk) 19:10, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rachilde et le Mercure de France IMG 4445.jpg

[edit]

Derivative work, and no FoP in France. Yann (talk) 22:30, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is absolutely crazy! Who will ever complain about the copyrights of Parisian information panels? Jesus! 2A02:A03F:6480:9E00:B579:4A5B:B4F9:FDC2 01:57, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Question Who is the argued copyright holder in this case? JC Decaux? Philippe Starck? Ville de Paris?--Labattblueboy (talk) 23:37, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Probably the city of Paris. --Yann (talk) 07:20, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:13, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Turbo (film)

[edit]

3-D sculptures of a contemporary movie character. In my opinion, this fails COM:FOP for the United States. However, I'm not as familiar with cartoon and toy policies as other contributors to Commons - sculptures are my specialty! So, I'm bringing these two images for community review. In my opinion, they are copyrighted as 3D works of art and ineligible for inclusion at this time.

Missvain (talk) 02:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the Turbo sculpture is a marketing prop, placed at the museum specifically to be taken photos by visitors, to encourage them to watch the film and series, and buy toys, clothing and other merchandising. In my opinion, the museum is explicitly authorising people to take photos of it. NaBUru38 (talk) 16:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 12:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Escudo Familia Niño.jpg

[edit]

Este escudo NO es el de la familia Niño de Moguer, es el del Condado de Buelna. Dejo enlace a referencia que lo demuestra: https://books.google.es/books?id=Vs0WAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA209&lpg=PA209&dq=escudo+familia+ni%C3%B1o+buelna&source=bl&ots=Dc785HTH2l&sig=ACfU3U2T-15mQ1CqIiAs5qmhvc2_cYsKrg&hl=es&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwipxr-j9ab1AhUTnBQKHV2DAMQQ6AF6BAgCEAM#v=onepage&q=escudo%20familia%20ni%C3%B1o%20buelna&f=false Miguel Ángel "fotógrafo" (talk) 10:13, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alegaciones: Ya le he dado referencias concretas sobre el escudo de los Hermanos_Niño, un enlace a un libro sobre genealogías de personajes en Nueva Granada (Colombia), entre los que se encontraban los descendientes de los Niño en la ciudad de Tunja, con la definición del escudo de armas de los mismos. Además se menciona en otras publicaciones, e iba a formar parte del monumento que Ayuntamiento de Moguer iba a realizar a la familia Niño como homenaje. Su referencia a los Niño de Buelna, no hace mas que reforzar el escudo de armas en los múltiples descendientes de los niños que habitaron por múltiples lugares, usando el escudo concedido tras la reclamación a los reyes. La cita sobre el escudo de armas incluida en la referencia dice claramente "son Niño en campo de oro, fiete flores de azul". Reitero que no hay que demostrar conexión con su referencia, ya que esta por si sola deja claro cual es el escudo de armas de los descendientes de los Niño en Tunja, descendientes directos de Pedro Alonso Niño, como Juan Nepomuceno Niño, entre otros. (Referencia: En este enlace.--Vodahome1 (talk) 14:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Respecto a la referencia dada por Miguel, decir que he investigado un poco y resulta que el condado de Buelna fué concedido a Pero Niño en el año 1431, sin embargo no llegó a establecerse como mayorazgo de un linaje, ya que fue vendido en 1462 a Juan Fernández Manrique de Lara, II conde de Castañeda, del que formo parte en las sucesivas generaciones. El propio Pero Niño lo mantuvo entre 1431-1454.

Por otro lado denunciar el acoso y derribo de este señor a cualquier edición en los artículos que no se ciñan a su particular versión de la historia, no hace falta recordar que ni el ni yo somo historiadores, y que las fuentes son contradictorias respecto a los hechos del descubrimiento, sobre todo porque los primero historiadores del descubrimiento confundieron ambos municipios solapandolos en el erroneo "Palos de Moguer", por lo que muchos acontecimientos y personajes fueron asignados a ese erroneo "Palos de Moguer". Por ello no podemos dar credibilidad a unas versiones y negar las otras por sistema, sino que se deben exponer ambas versiones como posibles y referenciadas. Ello ha motivado un pequeño conflicto que este señor pretende cortar acallando a todo aquel que defiende una versión de los hechos del descubrimiento diferente a la suya utilizado todo tipo de tretas.--Vodahome1 (talk) 16:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aumento la denuncia a que la imagen no está libre de derechos, está bajada de una página de internet de heráldica. saludos, Miguel Ángel "fotógrafo" (talk) 22:10, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Otra treta más. Enlaza la página en cuestión.--Vodahome1 (talk) 07:12, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tras una lectura detenida de la referencia dada por mi, debo RECONOCER, que el verdadero escudo de armas de los niños, descendientes de los Hermnanos Niño de Moguer es campo de oro con 5 flores de lis. La descripción dada de 7 flores de lis se refiere a los señores de la pagina anterior, relacionados con el condado de Buelna. Por tanto ruego disculpas, y solicito el borrado de este escudo INCORRECTO. El correcto tiene 5 flores de lis. Así mismo pediré disculpas a Miguel por el error en su página personal.--Vodahome1 (talk) 12:27, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Acabo de ver la discusión, y según veo todos parecen de acuerdo sobre que el escudo es erróneo. Tras analizar ambas referencias parece claro que el verdadero escudo de la familia Niño descendiente de los Hermanos Niño de Moguer es dorado con 5 flores de lis. Me ofrezco a realizar una imagen con esas características que sustituya el actual, y que deje el escudo con la forma correcta.--LugColPatrimH (talk) 13:43, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep He elaborado, con un programa grafico, el nuevo escudo de los Niño descendientes de los Hermanos Niño de Moguer, para ello me baso en las referencia aportadas en el "Libro segundo de las geneaologias del Nueuo Reyno de Granada" (año 1676), así como en una imagen de una labra heráldica del escudo en una casa de Tunja, que también aporto como referencia en la descripción del escudo. Pasaré a subir la nueva versión elaborada, sustituyendo el anterior escudo. --LugColPatrimH (talk) 11:31, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ya puesto, he elaborado el escudo original usado por los Niño de Toledo y Valladolid, Fernando Niño (presidente de la Real Chancilleria de Granada), otros Niño de Herrera, Portugal y PERO NIÑO, Conde de Buelna y señor de Cigales, descendiente de Juan Niño, caballero francés de la casa real de Francia (Esto explicaría el porque de la flor de lis en el escudo). Paso a subirlo como escudo diferenciado, usado por los linajes de estos lugares (File:Escudo Familia Niño Buelna.jpg).--LugColPatrimH (talk) 07:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paso a eliminar etiqueta de borrado, una vez superadas la discrepancias y corregido el escudo.--LugColPatrimH (talk) 17:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: A corrected CoA was uploaded as a result of the discussion, it seems everything is in order now. At least there have been no new complaints for several months now. --Rosenzweig τ 11:51, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abraham Lincoln's appearance (1889) (14577448340).jpg

[edit]

Like this discussion, this is a portion of a collection which is not from 1889. This image is an image of something from 2010 which may or may not be copyrighted. There is too little information to be certain. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:23, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Older parts of the collection might be in the public domain due to a lack of copyright notice back then, but for a 2010 photograph with no other information, I think copyright protection should be assumed. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:35, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 11:53, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abraham Lincoln's appearance (1889) (14577505208).jpg

[edit]

Like this discussion, this is a portion of a collection which is not from 1889. This image is of a letter from 1962 which may or may not be copyrighted. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per the precautionary principle. This is a 1962 US letter, but I don't know when it was first published (since letter are not automatically published like magazines or so). Perhaps not before 2010, because it was part of a conglomerate with documents from that year. --Rosenzweig τ 12:09, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ann Elizabeth Fowler Hodges.jpg

[edit]

This famous photo of Ann Hodges after being struck by a meteorite is tagged with the {{PD-US-no notice}} license and an author of "Anônimo" (i.e. Anonymous). However Smithsonian Magazine says that the author of this photo is Jay Leviton, and the photo is from The LIFE Images Collection. It seems unlikely this photo was published with the copyright owner's permission without a copyright notice — and I certainly think we need an actual citation to the work in which it was published without a copyright notice if we want to keep this photo. —RP88 (talk) 02:08, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think the correct license would be PD-US-not renewed. I am looking through the 28th year renewals and two years beyond and cannot find a renewal for a photo by this description or one by Jay Leviton. While Life magazine renewed this issue, it wouldn't cover photographs taken by outside parties but published in Life. The renewal would cover unnamed employee photographers of Life magazine. You can look through the renewals, it is tedious but I may have missed it. However, we in the past have respected Getty/Corbis when they claim an active copyright to an historical image unless someone like the LOC makes a counterclaim that the image is PD. --RAN (talk) 06:22, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What publication and date are you talking about when you say "Life magazine renewed this issue"? With regards to searching the renewal database, first we need to identify where this photo was first published with the permission of the photographer. Prior to the 1976 copyright act, for a composite work (such as a periodical) the publisher's copyright notice, registration, and renewal is sufficient for all of the works first published in that issue (except for advertisements) — each individual work does not need its own notice, registration, and renewal. This applies whether or not the author is an employee, work-for-hire, or independent — however an independent has the option of separately registering and renewing their work, if they wish, although they are not required to do so unless their contribution to the composite work carried its own copyright notice. When a publisher renews the copyright to a periodical, it extends the copyright term of all of the individual contributions first published in that issue, unless a contribution is separately registered by the author / copyright owner (see Circular 6A and section 2126 of the Copyright Compendium). —RP88 (talk) 07:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 20:23, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Display Schematic.jpg

[edit]

Screenshot of a copyrighted program. MKFI (talk) 09:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is simply an example display constructed using ACS functionality. It is not copyrighted. It is analogous to drawing a sample picture with Paint or some other drawing application. The picture would not be copyrighted. Gerryrkirk (talk) 17:20, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Gerryrkirk: Software user interface components (icons etc.) may also be copyrighted. In this case are the visible icons and menus from some remote connection software and not part of the actual ACS program? If so then the image should be cropped to remove them. If the ACS program itself relies on line graphics they might be below the threshold of originality.
Creating a sample drawing in paint very likely would be copyrighted depending on complexity. For an industrial control program sample I am not quite certain. MKFI (talk) 09:32, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ACS software provides a powerful display facility enabling users to create color graphic displays of their own creation. The display schematic shown is simply a sample to demonstrate ACS operator ease-of-use and process control simulation capability. Gerryrkirk (talk) 22:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Crown Prince Akihito & Michiko Shoda Wedding 1959-4.jpg

[edit]

no evidence that the picture is in the public domain in the United States Hekerui (talk) 12:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is PD in Japan, not PD in USA, in 2022. BUT same photo is published on The Imperial Household Agency website([31]).I think this photo can use on Wikimediacommons by the Government of Japan Standard Terms of Use (Ver.2.0). Rekishi-JAPAN (talk) 01:53, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. It needs to be either PD in the US or licensed for reuse. We are probably looking at up to 2054 before Commons can host it. [24Cr][talk] 21:44, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Modena-italy-diana-spencer.jpg

[edit]

Not PD in the US because of URAA, see the warning below 220.246.145.24 15:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

None of those terms apply to this photograph because there is no evidence that it was registered for copyright in the US. Thus, it is most probably in public domain in both countries. Keivan.fTalk 16:08, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Based on the COM:Hirtle chart, the first place to look is the line under "Works Published Abroad After 1 January 1978", which says:

  • 1 January 1978 or later - Published either with or without copyright notice, and not in the public domain in its home country as of URAA date.
    • Use the US publication chart to determine duration. Since it was created in 1995 and we assume published not long afterwards, the only one that fits is:
  • 1 March 1989 through 2002 - Created after 1977
    • Other works: 95 years from publication OR 120 years from creation, whichever expires first.

Thus the photo is unlikely to be PD in the US until about 2090. [24Cr][talk] 22:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Modena-italy-diana-spencer (cropped).jpg

[edit]

Not PD in the US because of URAA, see the warning below 220.246.145.24 15:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Based on the COM:Hirtle chart, the first place to look is the line under "Works Published Abroad After 1 January 1978", which says:

  • 1 January 1978 or later - Published either with or without copyright notice, and not in the public domain in its home country as of URAA date.
    • Use the US publication chart to determine duration. Since it was created in 1995 and we assume published not long afterwards, the only one that fits is:
  • 1 March 1989 through 2002 - Created after 1977
    • Other works: 95 years from publication OR 120 years from creation, whichever expires first.

Thus the photo is unlikely to be PD in the US until about 2090. [24Cr][talk] 22:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:C-SPAN Bus Philadelphia July 2016.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP for artwork in the United States. The images on the side of the bus are largely unobstructed and an integral part of the focus of the image, so de minimis cannot reasonably apply.  Mysterymanblue  09:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Largely unobstructed? Around 50% of the side of the bus is blocked, either by the canopy (with a below-TOO logo) or by the booth with people in front of it. This should be thought of as a booth at a fair, rather than an artwork on the side of a bus (COM:DM #3). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:08, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I will note that the photograph of the White House, a copyrighted work, is highly recognizable on the side of the bus and it not really obstructed by the booth. The bus is also entirely in focus. If we take the "booth" as the main focus - which is a bit arguable because the "booth" part is not centered and takes up a relatively small part of the image - we still have to contend with the fact that the bus, and its copyrightable decal, takes up a large portion of the image.
    From a totally different perspective, the Ninth circuit recently clarified the use of de minimis in Bell v. Wilmott Storage Services.

    ...the de minimis doctrine acts as a threshold question to actionable copying. Any copying, to be actionable, must be substantially similar to the registered work. A use can only be de minimis if it is not substantially similar to the work.

    — https://cdas.com/ninth-circuit-corrects-the-record-on-de-minimis-use-in-photograph-dispute/
  • Essentially, according to the ninth circuit, whether copying is de minimis depends only on the degree of copying - not the degree of use. So when a work is reproduced exactly, a violation has occurred, even if the work was used in a minor way. Following the ninth circuit's opinion, which may be contrary to that of other circuits, the photograph of the White House is substantially reproduced in this photograph, so it may not matter that it is not the main focus of the image - the degree of copying may be so substantial that de minimis cannot apply.  Mysterymanblue  17:42, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    It depends on what you want to consider to be the copyrighted work in question. If it's the whole side of the bus, then large parts of it are obscured. If it's just the White House photo, then it takes up only a small portion of the image, similar to other examples in COM:DM #3. Your logic, taken to its logical conclusion, would imply that a 800 x 400 px billboard on a 20,000 x 10,000 px cityscape is copyright infringement, which is against pretty much all Commons precedent. Legal scholars often have differing opinions, and if you look hard enough you can always find some argument in support of a particular view. What's important is to be consistent here on Commons.
    Just to clarify, my first use of the "booth" is referring to the literal booth, but my second use ("booth at a fair") refers to the scene as a whole. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:11, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In German, there's a saying: "Two jurists, three opinions". There are probably more opinions about this particular problem if you look around a bit. Until some judge comes along and makes an actually binding decision, some admin here will have to decide this DR, and I'll go with Infrogmation here. --Rosenzweig τ 21:06, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dancejapan BBG New York April 2019.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP for artwork in USA. The background display is a part of the performance and cannot reasonably be considered de minimis.  Mysterymanblue  09:30, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The background was used for all performances on the Cherry Esplanade Stage that day, including comedy, dance, music, etc., and thus cannot be considered an integral part of this act. It is merely an incidental piece, very different from a background used in a play or musical which was specifically designed to complement the performer. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:56, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Per m:Wikilegal/De Minimis Use of Protected Works under US Copyright Law:

    If a copyrighted work is particularly unique (Davis v. Gap), reproduced fully (Hirsch), is used in the exact manner it is supposed to be used (Ringgold), or is prominent or quite visible in the background, then de minimis may not succeed. However, copyrighted work that truly is minimal in nature (Vault Corp.), obscured or in the background (LMNOPI; Gayle), then it seems likely that de minimis would apply.

  • The mural appears to be unique, almost fully reproduced, and used in the manner it was meant for (serving as a backdrop to all performances of that day). It spans the entire width of the image. The mural also bears a copyright symbol.

    In two cases involving public art, murals and graffiti, courts found that de minimis applies because the art in both cases appeared fleetingly and, most importantly, was in the background, obstructed, and not in focus.

  • While the mural does appear in the background, its appearance is not fleeting, it is largely unobstructed, and it is in focus.
    There are a variety of opinions on when de minimis should apply. In this case, the work is so prominent in the background that I think it is difficult to argue that, under any interpretation, the amount or degree of copying is insignificant. The work takes up a far greater portion of the image compared to the subject.  Mysterymanblue  17:13, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I think you are interpreting some of the words without considering the context in which they were used. I don't think "unique" means "above TOO" here, but rather "noticeably different from alternatives that would fundamentally change the final work". Since the purpose of the photo is to capture the performer, any background would do, and there is nothing unique about this background. This is why I drew the comparison to a theatre set, where changing the background would greatly reduce the meaning of the final image. Per COM:DM #4, the background is "not essential to the subject (blacking it out would not make the file useless)". Also, it is not "almost fully reproduced"; half of it is cut off at the left. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:00, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Since the background is apparently not a part of the performance here, I'll consider it de minimis. --Rosenzweig τ 14:20, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DJ Sashimi BBG New York April 2019.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP for artwork in USA. The background display is a part of the performance and cannot reasonably be considered de minimis.  Mysterymanblue  09:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If a copyrighted work is particularly unique (Davis v. Gap), reproduced fully (Hirsch), is used in the exact manner it is supposed to be used (Ringgold), or is prominent or quite visible in the background, then de minimis may not succeed. However, copyrighted work that truly is minimal in nature (Vault Corp.), obscured or in the background (LMNOPI; Gayle), then it seems likely that de minimis would apply.

The mural appears to be unique, with a significant portion reproduced in this image, and used in the manner it was meant for (serving as a backdrop to all performances of that day). It spans the entire width of the image.

In two cases involving public art, murals and graffiti, courts found that de minimis applies because the art in both cases appeared fleetingly and, most importantly, was in the background, obstructed, and not in focus.

While the mural does appear in the background, its appearance is not fleeting, it is largely unobstructed, and it is in focus.
There are a variety of opinions on when de minimis should apply. In this case, the work is so prominent in the background that I think it is difficult to argue that, under any interpretation, the amount or degree of copying is insignificant. The work takes up a far greater portion of the image compared to the subject.  Mysterymanblue  17:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think you are interpreting some of the words without considering the context in which they were used. I don't think "unique" means "above TOO" here, but rather "noticeably different from alternatives that would fundamentally change the final work". Since the purpose of the photo is to capture the performer, any background would do, and there is nothing unique about this background. This is why I drew the comparison to a theatre set, where changing the background would greatly reduce the meaning of the final image. Per COM:DM #4, the background is "not essential to the subject (blacking it out would not make the file useless)". Also, it is not "largely unobstructed"; the banner is covered up in all places by the table, piano, electrical equipment, performers, etc. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:00, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Since the background is apparently not a part of the performance here, I'll consider it de minimis. --Rosenzweig τ 14:20, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Social-media-ads.png

[edit]

Twitter logo is not free --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Twitter logo licensed with Apache 2. Turk ansiklopedici ☎️ 18:07, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh damn! It can be noticed that I've been away for 6 months, never would I think that they would have gone and freely licensed it since then, but shame on me. However, Apache 2 is not compatible to be relicensed to CC as in this work. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:10, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Jonatan Svensson Glad because of license incompatibility. Relicensing could probably solve this, but I can't do that for the author, who hasn't been active here (or on fr.wp) since 2019. If anyone wants to create a derivative version without the Twitter logo, ask for a temporary undeletion please. --Rosenzweig τ 14:15, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Flag of the Patujú flower

[edit]

The design of the flower is copyrighted and this is a derivative work of the original flag design. See https://static.eldeber.com.bo//Files/Sizes/2019/11/13/386232610_1140x520.jpg and https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/800/cpsprodpb/D707/production/_109674055_boris.jpg.webp. The TOO of Bolivia is not described in detail, but it is supposedly low, per COM:TOO Andean Community. Please also note Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bandera de la flor de patujú.svg Therefore these files have to be deleted imho.

Ellywa (talk) 15:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

La bandera de Flor de Patujú nunca fue registrada bajo derechos de Autor es una bandera de uso popular de parte de pueblos indigenas, si bien el gobierno boliviano la terminó adoptando, tampoco fue registrada bajo derechos de autor por el Gobierno Bodoque9903 (talk) 19:45, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the reply above. The flag was a originally a general symbol of popular usage among western Bolivians and, though the government adopted it for official use, it was never copyrighted.
Further, based on its composition, it should quite easily fall under pd-shape. It's a visual reproduction of a flower and, even if the flag was copyrighted, I highly doubt that you can copyright a literal peace of nature.
IMO, the original file should never have been deleted. Its nomination page has only one reply and it's a dissent.
Keep all nominated images and undelete the original. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 21:50, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A favor que se mantenga la bandera, no deberia haber sido borrada la imagen original. Bajo el argumento que como era una bandera gubernamental tiene derechos de autor, sin ninguna fuente, es como querer borrar la misma Bandera de Bolivia, puesto que es una bandera gubernamental.--Fernando6718 (talk) 15:16, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree , the Patuju flag should be reinstalled, mainly because it does not have any kind of copyrighted law upon this by the Bolivian government. Also the image was an own work by the original poster. (Concuerdo, la bandera del Patuju debe quedarse y no ser borrada, mayormente porque no tiene una ley de derechos de autor por el gobierno boliviano que la reglamente. Además, la imagen es un trabajo propio del usuario que la publicó originalmente. --Superbrian19 (talk) 00:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It's a borderline case, but I think if the LOST saturn logo is below the TOO in the Andean community (as per COM:TOO Andean Community), we can say these stylized flowers are too. --Rosenzweig τ 18:22, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: retracted my nomination based on this discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 22:22, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Original file that had been deleted has been undeleted per discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 20:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/01/10&oldid=671070436"