Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/12/17
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Picture taken from the internet. See here. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 01:15, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:49, 17 December 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: Picture taken from the internet. See here. --Krdbot 14:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
My concern is the painting - it appears to be an original work and de minimus doesn't fly in this photo. No, my blurring skills aren't that great - but if someone wants to give it a go, I'm all about it. But, due to the nature of the original work that doesn't apperar old enough to be in the PD, I think we have to consider deletion of this photo. Missvain (talk) 02:51, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Missvain: This painting is already shared by creator on CC-BY-ALL license. --Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 11:46, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Wojsław Brożyna - Sincerely appreciate this vital information. I did not notice that mentioned in the file description for the altar. Might be a good idea to mention it. I'll withdraw and close. Missvain (talk) 15:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Missvain (talk) 15:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
usless test file, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:40, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:43, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
usless test file, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
The file contains some display errors Jack Slyra (talk) 19:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:10, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
I did not realise that educational use only was not covered by the licence under which I uploaded this. This is not my work. JacobSa (talk) 23:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 08:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Spam. Username is the same as the blog where this writer posts his work. MexTDT (talk) 20:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: published at https://www.laraizinvertida.com/detalle-2127-david-saturno-donatti- in 2017, no OTRS provided. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:37, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of project scope: promotional images of a non-notable person
- File:Yaseryazdaniiii.jpg
- File:Yaseryazdaniii.jpg
- File:Yaseryazdanii.jpg
- File:Yaseryazdani.jpg
- File:Yaser yazdani.jpg
4nn1l2 (talk) 16:15, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 20:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 19:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 20:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 19:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 20:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request. --Boylarva99 (talk) 20:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 21:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request.
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 21:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request.
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 21:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 19:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 21:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 19:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 21:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request --Boylarva99 (talk) 19:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 21:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 20:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 21:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 19:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 21:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 19:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 21:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 19:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 21:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 19:51, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 21:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 19:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 20:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request. --Boylarva99 (talk) 20:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 20:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 20:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 20:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request. --Boylarva99 (talk) 20:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.
Mitte27 (talk) 13:51, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:35, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:41, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of project scope: promotional
- File:Logo-kwc-iran.jpg
- File:Hamayesh-halghehayekalaghyat.jpg
- File:Ghorfe-bartar-7tom.jpg
- File:Bargoozideh-tarh-sepaas.jpg
- File:Karafarin-bartar-konfrans-karafarini.jpg
- File:Neshan-keifyat-bartar.jpg
- File:Neshan-bargozide-noaavari.jpg
- File:Vahed-nemone-sanati-markazi.jpg
- File:Rotbe-10-jashnvare-10-sherkat.jpg
- File:Nemoone-sanati-samt-92.jpg
4nn1l2 (talk) 17:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:04, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Duanemorse (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal and low quality images, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:ADUANEMORSENY.JPG
- File:DUANEMORSENY.jpg
- File:Duanejmorseny.JPG
- File:Duanejmorseny (7).JPG
- File:MORSE.jpg
- File:Duane Morse.jpg
- File:Spooky morse.JPG
- File:Duane morse ny.JPG
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:48, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CharlesOG Udes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Text diagrams and formulas, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits.
- File:Ex1b2.png
- File:Graph ex1B2.png
- File:MatriceD.png
- File:Centrerb.png
- File:Centrer1.png
- File:Ex1b.png
- File:Graph ex1B.png
- File:Reposition2.png
- File:Reposition.png
- File:Graph ex1.png
- File:Graph Dimensions.png
- File:Reduction distance.png
- File:Vecteur.png
- File:Vecteur milieu.png
- File:Rappel math.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:07, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Doesn’t look like this image is free to use, seems like it’s just a screen cap of a twitch stream -2407:7000:9C6A:DB00:A155:866B:E7DA:90F6 13:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete Clear copyvio, even the source linked in the file description is not freely licensed. No evidence that this streamer's Twitch streams are released as CC-BY-SA-4.0. 69.174.144.79 13:28, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Strakhov (talk) 11:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Uploader does not have rights to image MB (talk) 03:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: source = "newsis". --Strakhov (talk) 11:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
As per description, it is taken from a movie and also watermark is visible near the bottom of face is present Arjunaraoc (talk) 05:18, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 11:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
First, this does not appear to be a selfie, so the subject is not the photographer and cannot freely license the image. Second, the subject is both not notable and a non-contributor, so it is a personal image and therefore out of scope. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom Herby talk thyme 14:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely own work, COM:PRP. --Strakhov (talk) 11:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Album graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: album cover, COM:VRT needed https://www.olx.com.co/item/grupo-hoja-de-parra-el-viento-de-america-lp-vinilo-acetato-bambuco-iid-1110520307. --Strakhov (talk) 11:56, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused text image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 11:59, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
uploaded by a serial copyright violator, FBMD in metadata, probably grabbed from Facebook 188.123.231.55 21:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. I added another version due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 13:10, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 12:00, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
This is not a copyright-free image. The user badly photoshopped out the DPA watermark on this photo. 2A02:8109:8280:EA0:0:0:0:408 23:25, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: By DPA, not own work, can be found @ getty's. --Achim55 (talk) 08:19, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 12:01, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tamara0510 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low-res diagrams without clear purpose little educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Skywokerinfo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:51, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by مراد الشركسي (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope
--Alaa :)..! 21:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Binoy chowdhury (talk · contribs)
[edit]No Permission
- File:Home dailynewsti (1).png
- File:Home dailynewsti.png
- File:Newstimes.png
- File:Exploring Educational Excellence d.png
Afifa Afrin (talk) 13:09, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:54, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Binoy chowdhury (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal files with no educational use. Out of project scope.
- File:BINOY CHOWDHURYBINOY.jpg
- File:BINOY CHOWDHUR.jpg
- File:BINOY CHOWDH.jpg
- File:BINOY CHOWDHURYBINOY CHOWDHURY.jpg
- File:BINOY CHOW.jpg
- File:BINOY CHOWDHURY.jpg
- File:BINOY CHOWDHURY BINOY CHOWDHURY.jpg
- File:BSD CHOWD.jpg
- File:BINOYBINOY CHOWDHURY.jpg
- File:BINOY.jpg
BRP ever 21:26, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Toby The Goat
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Susmuffin as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10
- File:Toby The Goat.png
- File:Toby The Goat 1.png
- File:Toby The Goat 2.png
- File:Toby The Goat 3.png
- File:Toby The Goat 4.png
- File:Toby The Goat 5.png
- File:Toby The Goat 6.png
- File:Toby The Goat 7.png
- File:Toby The Goat 8.png
- File:Toby The Goat 9.png
- File:Toby The Goat 10.png
- File:Toby The Goat 11.png
- File:Toby The Goat 12.png
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:21, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Matlin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Art installation inside museum. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:48, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:21, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
non-free logo (should be on each wikipedia) LeFnake (talk) 07:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:40, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:07, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:40, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:08, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:40, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:09, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:40, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:11, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:40, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:12, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:40, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:12, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:40, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:08, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic in PDF format. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:10, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:13, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:14, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Outdated flag of micronation, flag not used by Micronation and is therefore misleading — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aniq Sufyan (talk • contribs) 12:17, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom of uploader. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:57, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:16, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:19, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:22, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:24, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:25, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:31, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Also File:Logo oficial de Grupo Jumigibe.jpg and File:Logo oficial.jpg. mattbr 15:43, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:46, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:48, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:53, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:53, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:54, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:54, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Poor quality logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pandoratres (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:50, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:50, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from book covers. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:50, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused blurry image, out of scope. Leonel Sohns 16:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:50, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Florian Dobmeier (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:50, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Francesco de leo 91 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:43, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kingdomofburdette (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictitious symbols of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:50, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:53, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
This picture has a lot of personal details about the subject of the photograph. Not sure where this falls but it doesn't feel to me like this should be hosted on Commons. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
The DeviantArt page of the artist in the watermark (https://www.deviantart.com/pahkomoreno/art/Brown-Jenkin-673354001) does not CC licence this image, instead saying "© 2017 - 2021 PahkoMoreno". If the uploader Espantofest is Pahko Moreno then it's odd that this contradicts, and also that the artist decided to put his full name on the watermark, but not on the "Author" field of the upload. If the uploader is not the artist, then this is a straight copyright violation. Lord Belbury (talk) 17:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:07, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Office jemec (talk · contribs)
[edit]No COM:FU alloved on Commons or COM:VRT is required.
A09090091 (talk) 17:18, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 18:26, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:48, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 18:27, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 18:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 18:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 18:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Дед-инсайдик (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.
Mitte27 (talk) 18:33, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 18:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 18:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:46, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 18:53, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:46, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 18:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:46, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 18:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:46, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 18:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:46, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stained glass windows in Kalkar
[edit]copyright violation; contemporary artworks (artist born in 1948); no freedom of panorama.
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:57, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Objection to deletion. Since permissions seem to be correctly retrieved and conform the rules stated on the page, this deletion request has no solid ground to stand on. Page states: "For the church windows: VRT Wikimedia. Toestemming van de rechthebbenden voor het gebruik van dit werk volgens de op de bestandspagina vermelde licentie is geverifieerd en gearchiveerd via het VRT-systeem." Peli (talk) 19:40, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- I do agree, error. Martin Sg. (talk) 02:18, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:46, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 18:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:46, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
no encylopedic value,as this seems to be a users singular classification of race, and is not based on any historical work. Atavoidturk (talk) 19:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, little educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Failed SVG image, superseded by File:Resolution Chart (Small Scale).png. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused stats image (no sources - how reliable is this anyway?), COM:WEBHOST, little educational use, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:46, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res diagram without clear purpose, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:46, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrabs. Also no clear purpose, out of scope.
- File:Base station connect to i-RTK.png
- File:Pixhawk-optional-peripherals with i-rtk.jpg
- File:I-rtk 3d mode.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jdrhodes27 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low-res diagrams without context, little educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot snippet, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Failed COM:LR, image not found at link, no indication of free licenses at link (using Google Translate). P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrabs, DW photo of photo and logo.
- File:Prof. Long M Nguyen.jpg
- File:Chủ nhiệm khoa Lê Thanh Sơn..jpg
- File:Faculty of Chemistry KHTN.jpg
- File:Khoa hóa học Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội..jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Text diagram, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. Only used on sandbox page of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:12, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:16, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused promotional product images, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope and COM:DW.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:17, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Moldir Tazhibekova (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused text formulas, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:18, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused text diagram, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ChristianMcCarthy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Previously published, unclear if uploader has the rights to publish them here, needs COM:VRT. And promotional as well.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused tiny logo, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:24, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Small size, low resolution, and still no valid OTRS/VRT permission even after nearly 6 months, so unlikely to be an original work of the uploading user. User also has a history of uploading copyvios.
Wcam (talk) 20:24, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
School logo, so likely not own work and no indication that uploader would have the rights to publish it on Commons. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:25, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused tiny logo, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own work: all over the internet - published before upload to Commons. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:30, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable event, no context/location, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:30, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data. File:FB 20160226 23 39 21 Saved Picture(2).jpg title seems to indicate image was saved from FB. Unreliable.
- File:Ryuji-Harada-Libertad-Torneo-Argentino CLAIMA20140115 0138 28.jpg
- File:FB 20160226 23 39 21 Saved Picture(2).jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:33, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused low quality photo of nondescript vegetation, no context, little educational use, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
duplicate Xocolatl (talk) 18:12, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: No description, category, useless title, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 15:59, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Unused promotional image, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. And likely not own work but screengrab. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal sketch/artwork, COM:WEBHOST, little educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own work: movie poster. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:54, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Historical images, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. Failed COM:LR.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused promotional image, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. And likely not own work: many versions of this all over the internet. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal computer artwork, COM:WEBHOST, little educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused derivative work, COM:WEBHOST, little educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Voiceofyouth123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images with FB and transmission code in EXIF data. And one personal image. All unused.
- File:Ronaldo with Dr. AS Kiran Kumar.jpg
- File:Ronaldo with Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam.jpg
- File:Ronaldo Laishram.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
No indication that the user took the image. Image found here: https://www.maxraskin.com/interviews/interview-with-tucker-carlson Jauerbackdude?/dude. 21:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
low quality Xocolatl (talk) 21:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:42, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:53, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:42, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:54, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:42, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:42, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:42, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:42, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:42, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:07, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:09, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:11, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:11, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:13, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
No free license at source. Yann (talk) 22:24, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamedmohamadi1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
- File:Hamidreza.Saeedikhah.jpg
- File:Hamidreza-Saeedikhah.jpg
- File:Hamidreza Saeedikhah 1.jpg
- File:Hamidreza Saeedi khah.jpg
- File:Hamid reza Saeedikhah.jpg
- File:Hamidreza Saeedikhah.jpg
Didym (talk) 22:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:40, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of Turkey.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:13, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 00:47, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Self-made original images. None are actually official flags or representative of data. Hoax/fancraft and they are not in use. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:40, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Self-portrait used for promotion on eswiki. Re-uploiad of deleted content. 189.217.95.105 01:18, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:17, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:17, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:18, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:19, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:22, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:30, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:31, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:40, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:43, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unreferenced term paper, out of Project scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:07, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:24, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:33, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:43, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Images from the "Pigsel" NFT project at https://mint.pigsels.art, unspecified copyright status. Lord Belbury (talk) 09:46, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:48, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:50, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Company software screenshot and logo (complex enough to be over COM:Threshold of originality). VRT permission needed.
MKFI (talk) 10:54, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Broken version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ottoman_Tulip_.jpg Andrei (talk) 11:07, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Muhammad.nezarat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: promotional, and copyright issues as well per User:Elcobbola/Awards
4nn1l2 (talk) 11:18, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
The description here reads like an advertisement to me and so would be outside our scope. Herby talk thyme 11:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
PNG format image superseded by File:Grupo Globo logo.svg. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 12:08, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Not own work but cropped from unknown source. And low-res, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:27, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:46, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:08, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:46, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:09, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:46, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by GRuban as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Posted to source as All Rights Reserved. Only free files are allowed on Commons. At the end of the video, the narrator states it is under a "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license", but does not mention a license version. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:51, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Keep Thank you, User:AntiCompositeNumber! I admit, I was doing Commons:License review and didn't watch to the end, I merely went to the source page, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldl0m-5zLz4, and notices it does not bear the standard YouTube Creative Commons Attribution license label (as neither did several Internet Archive versions). But now I see you are right, at 8:55, the narrator does say it is under a "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license". That should be good enough. We should change the license from Template:YouTube CC-BY to just Template:Cc-by-sa-1.0+, and we can keep it. --GRuban (talk) 03:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- A CC release without a license version number isn't a valid release. However, I did find where the video was originally shared at https://digitalbazaar.com/2008/rdfa-basics/ and https://web.archive.org/web/20080119123350/https://wiki.digitalbazaar.com/en/rdfa-basics, which indicate that the correct license is {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}. So it's a Keep from me now unless someone can think of a reason not to trust those sites. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:26, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- A CC release without a license version number isn't a valid release. However, I did find where the video was originally shared at https://digitalbazaar.com/2008/rdfa-basics/ and https://web.archive.org/web/20080119123350/https://wiki.digitalbazaar.com/en/rdfa-basics, which indicate that the correct license is {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}. So it's a
Kept: Withdrawn. --Missvain (talk) 18:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sleeps-Darkly as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: While the application is freeware, there's nothing found at a source that can confirm that logo can be shared under CC-SA-BY-4.0 AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:16, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
mauvais format Dorian87620 (talk) 01:19, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Not seeing an alternative offered... file is in use. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
While the video uploader may have marked this CC, South Korea lacks Freedom of Panorama, so this would be a derivative image. Masem (talk) 01:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:36, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for images previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites.
For email template, see COM:VRTS#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the original image overwrite this FB-derived image, if the image is truly self-photographed work of the uploader.
This image file is the sole contribution of MindanaoWanderer (talk · contribs).
_JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:36, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted design. FunkMonk (talk) 03:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:36, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Under copyright in Chile. Work by the Comando del Sí. Bedivere (talk) 03:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:37, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Scam file CzarJobKhaya (talk) 04:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:37, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Image didn't use anywhere and author has the same image that he really use: File:Ледник Караугом.jpg Kursant504 (talk) 04:57, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:37, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
The page is no longer available at archive, possible copyright violation Arjunaraoc (talk) 05:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Keeping for now. This file is in use and this uploader has a good history of uploading trustworthy files. Folks are welcome to reach out to the Internet Archive for additional assistance. The book is likely on their servers still from my experience. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:38, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
previous reason to keep was "uploader has a good history of uploading trustworthy files" which is 1) not evidence and 2) incorrect Hekerui (talk) 09:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per the precautionary principle. We're not given a proper artist's name, no year of death, no year and place of publication, so we cannot determine the copyright status of this work of art. --Rosenzweig τ 07:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tampa Bay Rays logos
[edit]Dubious application of {{PD-textlogo}}, the design of the devil ray is clearly far above the threshold of originality.
✗plicit 06:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:39, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
copied from [1] Gahukuro (talk) 07:16, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:39, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
non free image ChongDae (talk) 07:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:39, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:BOOK A09090091 (talk) 07:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Se strinjamo, nehotena napaka. --Hladnikm (talk) 08:48, 17 December 2021 (UTC) v imenu razreda
Comment Proceed with deletion, file was locally uploaded. A09090091 (talk) 20:08, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:39, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of Carrefour Group
[edit]Not too simple for copyright. See Commons:Deletion requests/Carrefour logo.
- File:Crf180x35 1.jpg
- File:Carrefour Express.png
- File:Carrefour City Café logo.png
- File:Carrefour GB logo 2009.png
- File:Carrefour Planet logo.png
- File:Carrefour Poland logo.svg
- File:Carrefour-planet 1.jpg
- File:Groupe Carrefour 2009.gif
- File:Groupe Carrefour logo.svg
- File:Logo Carrefour Express.svg
- File:Logo Carrefour Market.svg
- File:Logo carrefour planet 2.jpg
- File:Logo Carrefour sans texte.png
- File:LogoCarrefourMóvil.png
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- File:Logo Carrefour sans texte.png is the right group logo. --Swaf75 (talk) 21:58, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Speedy keep. Carrefour logo is above the Threshold of originality in the US. Similar images are below the threshold of originality required for copyright protection. Especially the Subway and Nikken logos are good examples. The Carrefour logo is just a square of red and blue colors with a transparent "C" letter. It's not complicated enough to be above the US standards.
Comparison This logo Logos below the Threshold of Originality in the United States -
The Carrefour logo is just a square of red and blue colors with a transparent "C" letter.I added description. --Rezonansowy
-
.svg){kind=logo}
- Rezonansowy (talk) 16:29, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- I updated my comment to include a comparison. --Rezonansowy (talk) 16:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- I don't see a section under TOO for the country of Spain. So your keep rationale does not apply. Also, "speedy" means you are attempting to censor the discussion by having it closed prematurely; we only do that for bad faith nominations. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:04, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- I updated my comment to include a comparison. --Rezonansowy (talk) 16:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- The design of all works listed above bases on File:Logo Carrefour sans texte.png, which is the original logo and trademark of Carrefour. Carrefour S.A. is a company which bases in France. Country of origin of the Carrefour logo is France then.
- According to Commons:Copyright rules policy: Files uploaded to Commons should be free both in the country of origin (as defined by the Berne Convention) and in the United States of America. Other juridical territories are not involved in the creation of the work.
- According to Commons:Threshold of originality policy, the examples of the Threshold of originality in the United States given above are: OK to upload to Commons, because they are below the threshold of originality required for copyright protection and are judged ineligible for copyright protection by a court or similar authority.
- According to Commons:Threshold of originality policy, the Threshold of originality in the France: asserts that a work is copyrightable when it bears the "imprint of the personality of the author" and In practice, it depends on the work in question, but this has left the bar quite low for many works where an artistic intent can be shown.
- The logo of Carrefour Group presents the design of the same nature which was already judged by the United States Copyright Office as ineligible to be copyrighted. In addition, the logo of Carrefour Group does not show the personality of the author or the artistic intent as required by the French law. Therefore, the copyright for the logo of Carrefour Group does not exist.
- Your deletion rationale was a statement Not too simple for copyright. and a link reference to another Deletion Request – Commons:Deletion requests/Carrefour logo.
- The contents of the above reference also consist only of votes and personal opinions without expressing any arguments of legal nature. The above Deletion Request authored by Taivo with a rationale: I think, that the logo surpasses threshold of originality. and that statement on the previous similar case on Commons that in my opinion the result was incorrect. The request was closed by Natuur12 with a rationale I agree with Taivo, non basic shapes.
- As a response to the above, I posted my vote of speedy keep for this work as I did not see a right rationale to contest the copyright status of this logo just by relying on personal votes. Unlike yours unfortunately, my vote has a rationale with a legal basis.
- Regarding the legal jurisdiction of the Carrefour Group headquarters it is difficult for me to understand why you provided Spain as a country which is binding in Threshold of originality to the logo of Carrefour Group. Spain was not the source country of this work and/or the country originally involved in its initial creation or first publication.
- If believe that you should include Spain in the copyright scope of the work and did not find information you were interested then you should rather apply the rule of assuming the copyright good status of the file. You just provide as your rationale a statement that I don't see a section under TOO for the country of Spain.
- You responded that So your keep rationale does not apply. Regarding the above this is not right.
- Your deletion rationale does not conform to a Community standards of Wikimedia Commons which are described under Commons:Deletion policy#Reasons for deletion.
- You answered me that "speedy" means you are attempting to censor the discussion by having it closed prematurely; we only do that for bad faith nominations. First, as I stated above I voted speedy keep because your deletion request seems to be likely invalid as it does not contain any specific rationale. By simply stating Not too simple for copyright you do not start the discussion. Also, who is we? General statements that we do that or we do not that which lack any specific disclosure are very misleading, especially when it is written by an admin. You should not do that. Please be more specific and direct. This is also described in Commons:Deletion requests.Added a reference.--Rezonansowy (talk) 17:40, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- In addition, by saying to me that by expressing my vote you are attempting to censor the discussion is likely against my freedom of speech and expression and also against the Community standards and policies like Commons:Assume good faith which says about the assuming good faith standard. Even if you did not intend to you actually did me feel like this. I and everyone else have a right to express any vote or opinion which does not hurt anyone or is not against the law.
- @Magog the Ogre, Natuur12, and Taivo: I really appreciate your service as admins on Commons but guys, what are you doing? You seem to completely ignore any standards of merit discussion which always shall include legal and material arguments. You replaced these standards with a showcase of personal opinions and agreements. Such practice lead to performing a wrong decisions and they harm everyone at Wikimedia Commons. I am very tired of dealing with such crap. When even admins do it, it is enough. Pleas stop it and start respecting the Community standards and official policies by relying on merit arguments (like providing the legal basis).
- Again, I appreciate your work and service (all of you guys!) and know that you have your own lives but please pay attention to the above...
Yours in Community,
--Rezonansowy (talk) 15:09, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- When creating previous request, I did not realize, that this is big white C on blue and red background. Writing big white C into square in such way, that I do not understand, that this is C in square, clearly shows personality of the author and artistic intent. I agree now, that the logo is too simple for copyright in USA, but probably not in source country France. Taivo (talk) 16:21, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Thank you for your response and legal analysis. Towards France, the thing is the the work is assigned to a company and companies cannot have a personality. They can express their services through logo but not personality. This work was created for marketing purposes not artistic so there is no direct artistic intent, even you or some other individual finds it interesting in an aesthetic sense. --Rezonansowy (talk) 17:46, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- I do not agree with your conclusion, that logos of companies of France cannot be copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 17:52, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Again, please reread the Commons:Deletion requests#Overview on how to express an opinion on Wikimedia Commons. I can understand the need to research the case more closely, but you cannot just say that you agree or not with something. --Rezonansowy (talk) 00:25, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- I do not agree with your conclusion, that logos of companies of France cannot be copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 17:52, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Thank you for your response and legal analysis. Towards France, the thing is the the work is assigned to a company and companies cannot have a personality. They can express their services through logo but not personality. This work was created for marketing purposes not artistic so there is no direct artistic intent, even you or some other individual finds it interesting in an aesthetic sense. --Rezonansowy (talk) 17:46, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete all. According to com:TOO the threshold for France seems to be "imprint of the personality of the author" and one cannot deny that such a threshold is met with those logo's. Also it’s required that a work is free in the source country and the US. Therefor the US examples are irrelevant. I would also note that fonts can be copyrighted in Europe. Therefor the “it’s just a C-argument” has little merit. I would find it funny to read that company’s cannot hold a copyright over their logo’s but it’s just plain sad honestly. I would recommend that Rezonansowy takes an introduction course about copyright before they accuse others off “completely ignore any standards of merit discussion”. Natuur12 (talk) 13:46, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, the logo has artistic intent and therefore is copyrighted in source country France. Taivo (talk) 18:48, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of Carrefour Group
[edit]The logo's of Carrefour are copyrighted. The design is above threshold of originality per COM:TOO France. Therefore these files cannot be hosted on Commons with one of the free licences.
- File:Bandera Carrefour San Pablo, Sevilla, España, 2015.gif
- File:Carrefour 1966.svg
- File:Carrefour C.svg
- File:Carrefour Douliou Store 20140726.jpg
- File:Logo Carrefour 1966.svg
Ellywa (talk) 09:54, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:39, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of Carrefour Group
[edit]Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of Carrefour Group. The country of origin of the logo is France where the threshold of originality is too low.
- File:1992 10 años.svg
- File:1992 Carrefour.svg
- File:1992 EPMB 2.svg
- File:1992 EPMB 4.svg
- File:1992 EPMB 5.svg
- File:1992 EPMB 6.svg
- File:1992 EPMB.svg
- File:Carrefour (Unternehmen) 2021 logo.svg
- File:Carrefour 1984-1986.svg
- File:Carrefour 1988.svg
- File:Carrefour 1991 1.svg
- File:Carrefour 1991 2.svg
- File:Carrefour 1991 3.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 1.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 10.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 11.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 12.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 13.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 2.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 3.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 4.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 5.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 6.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 7.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 8.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 9.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 1.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 2.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 3.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 4.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 5.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 6.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995 7.svg
- File:Carrefour 1995.svg
- File:Carrefour 1997 (1).svg
- File:Carrefour 1997 (2).svg
- File:Carrefour 1997 (3).svg
- File:Carrefour 1997 (4).svg
- File:Carrefour 1997 (5).svg
- File:Carrefour 1997 (6).svg
- File:Carrefour ar -g4938.svg
- File:Carrefour ar -g5900.svg
- File:Carrefour ar -g5927.svg
- File:Carrefour ar -g5954.svg
- File:Carrefour ar -g5980.svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (1).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (2).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (3).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (4).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (5).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (6).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (7).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (8).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte (9).svg
- File:Carrefour Arte 1992.svg
- File:Carrefour bio logo.svg
- File:Carrefour city logo.svg
- File:Carrefour contact logo.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo.svg
- File:Carrefour express logo.svg
- File:Carrefour Lingostiere Logo.png
- File:Carrefour logo.svg
- File:Carrefour Market logo.svg
- File:Carrefour market logo.svg
- File:Carrefour Maxi Cacheuta 16-11-2023.svg
- File:Carrefour Sempre O Menor Preço 1.svg
- File:Carrefour Sempre O Menor Preço.svg
- File:Carrefour-Banque 2016.jpg
- File:Carrefour-express.jpg
- File:Carrefour-Logo.svg
- File:Carrefour.svg
- File:Grupo Carrefour Brasil logo.png
- File:La Letra C De Carrefour.svg
- File:Logo Fblanc Express.jpg
- File:Productos Carrefour 2023.svg
- File:Servicios Financieros Carrefour.png
- File:Su -g11107.svg
- File:Su -g11262.svg
Günther Frager (talk) 17:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 00:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of Carrefour Group
[edit]The country of origin of the logo is France where the threshold of originality is too low. See previous DR on these category.
- File:Carrefour 1990-1992 (1).svg
- File:Carrefour 1990-1992 (2).svg
- File:Carrefour 1990-1992 (3).svg
- File:Carrefour 1990-1992 (4).svg
- File:Carrefour 1990-1992 (5).svg
- File:Carrefour 1990-1992 (6).svg
Günther Frager (talk) 22:52, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of Carrefour Group
[edit]Per above DRs, this logo of the letter C in a rhombus with slightly rounded corners is above COM:TOO France, somehow
- File:Carrefour 09-12-1995.svg
- File:Carrefour 11-06-1995.svg
- File:Carrefour 15-12-1995.svg
- File:Carrefour 1985-1987.svg
- File:Carrefour 1987.svg
- File:Carrefour 1988.svg
- File:Carrefour 1989-1992 1.svg
- File:Carrefour 1989-1992.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (1).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (2).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (3).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (4).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (5).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (6).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (7).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (8).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992 Logos Imagenes (9).svg
- File:Carrefour 1992-1994.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992-1995 2.svg
- File:Carrefour 1992-1995.svg-g30196-499.png
- File:Carrefour 1992-1995.svg-g30196-810.png
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 1.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 10.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 11.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 1992 1.png
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 1992.png
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 2.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 3.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 4.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 5.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 6.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 7.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 8.svg
- File:Carrefour El Precio Mas Bajo 9.svg
- File:Carrefour Express logo green.svg
- File:Carrefour montagne logo.svg
- File:Carrefour Paginas 4.svg
- File:Carrefour Planet.jpg
- File:Carrefour Telecom.png
- File:CarrefourSA.jpg
- File:Logo Carrefour Express (naranja).svg
- File:Logo Carrefour-Bon-App.svg
- File:Logo-rueducommerce-carrefour.png
Nutshinou Talk! 17:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination (and previous ones). Threshold of originality in France is too low. Günther Frager (talk) 17:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- This logo is also original here in Spain, although its origin is French, I understand. In all the integrated food chains of petrol stations, there are many of these logos. This is the problem. Autopistero20502020 (talk) 17:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep the file File:Logo Carrefour Express (naranja).svg should not be deleted because it is placed in several articles on motorways and highways as part of a CEPSA service area or petrol station integrated with Carrefour Express. The problem is not the rights of the author, but, the problem is that the icon has to appear for the transparency to the drivers. There are several logos of other food chains that are integrated in the petrol station and for this reason, please do not delete the file.
- I hope you understand me well in English.
- Thank you very much and best regards. Autopistero20502020 (talk) 17:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Carrefour 1988.svg was previously deleted (note the blue link among the long list of red links above). I don’t know whether the file’s contents are the same as before, but the file’s log suggests that the original uploader may have returned under a different name. Brianjd (talk) 02:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Brianjd, this file File:Logo Carrefour Express (naranja).svg does not come from this file File:Carrefour 1988.svg, it comes from another site, just so you know. I think the original may come from the Carrefour logo (red and blue color, the original, not the old). Autopistero20502020 (talk) 08:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and previous decisions. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Porque ha sido sustituido por otro Tramacastilla (talk) 10:11, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Still in use on es:Vicente Blanco Gaspar. --Achim55 (talk) 11:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:40, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
This looks like repost of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Benjamin Bloom.jpg. Same uploader, same person, "own work", dated 2016, but the man depicted died in 1999. WindEwriX (talk) 10:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:40, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Düzen Tekkal, Friede Springer, Mathias Döpfner, Kai Diekmann, and Julian Reichelt, June 2019.jpg
[edit]Rather than full deletion: Would it be possible to edit Düzen Tekkal out of this image? This is a request by Düzen Tekkal herself. Kutschkum (talk) 10:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: No rationale as to why photo should be deleted. Wikimedia doesn't oversee edits of images. Feel free to handle that. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:41, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation, crop of an image that was posted to Instagram before the upload here.[2] Verbcatcher (talk) 10:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:42, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
The name of the author: Matteo Scarpellini, does not match the uploader's username: KafaKonforu. No indication that the two are the same person or that permission was given. The photo metadata shows Matteo Scarpellini as the author. Google image search using this photo's URL return no hits. I have nominated the uploader's other three photos for deletion for more obvious issues. The article this photo was displayed on, en:Bruno Cianci has been deleted. Adakiko (talk) 11:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:42, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyviol Giacomo Alessandroni What's up! 12:10, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: No, it's not really a copyright violation but it's unused and out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:42, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
La foto potrebbe essere suscettibile di violazione del copyright da parte di terzi. ManES2021 (talk) 12:18, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: I agree, as photographs of 3D items are often copyrighted regardless of age of the object. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:43, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
La foto potrebbe esere suscettibili per la violazione di copyright da parte di terzi. ManES2021 (talk) 12:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree, as photographs of 3D items are often copyrighted regardless of age of the object. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:43, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
La foto potrebbe essere suscettibile di violazione di copyright da parte di terzi. ManES2021 (talk) 12:22, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree, as photographs of 3D items are often copyrighted regardless of age of the object. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:43, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Photo from 1974, unknown author, unknown source. Can not be own work of 2021. Drakosh (talk) 12:43, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:43, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
No Alps in Russia — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2a02:21b0:644f:d29c:64c0:418c:f64c:a241 (talk) 08:08, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- And at the same time Russia has alpine meadows in Caucasus, Altay and even Ural mountains. IDK why have you deleted all the pictures from category and all categories over it. Красный wanna talk? 16:25, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:44, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
TASS press photo from September 1971 (not 1970), no evidence that it had been ever released under a free license. Google search showed high traffic of takedown notices. Retired electrician (talk) 13:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:44, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation: no FoP in Greece, architect died in 1961
- File:Archeological museum of Kos, Greece.jpg
- File:Kos città, piazza eleftherias, edificio razionalista 2.JPG
- File:Kos museum ex01.JPG
- File:Kos-Eleftherias Square (Piazza)-Archaelogical Museum-01ASD.jpg
- File:Kos-Eleftherias Square (Piazza)-Archaelogical Museum-03ASD.jpg
- Category:Building of Kos Archaeological Museum (once it is emptied)
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Wie schon in der Bildbeschreibung angeführt, zeigen die Bilder: File:Kos-Eleftherias Square (Piazza)-Archaelogical Museum-01ASD.jpg und File:Kos-Eleftherias Square (Piazza)-Archaelogical Museum-03ASD.jpg einen Teil des Eleftherias Platz (in griechisch auch: Πλατεία Ελευθερίας, Platía Eleftherías, Turkish: Hürriyet Meydanı, Platz der Freiheit) und auch einige dort befindliche Gebäude. Mehr muss zu diesem Löschantrag auf meine Bilder nicht gesagt werden. SG, Asurnipal (talk) 14:53, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:44, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Youtube video listed as source does not have anything to indicate it has been marked as CC-BY, and in fact says "All Copyright Reserved © 2018 " Ravensfire (talk) 13:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:45, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a screenshot from a film. As the name of the film and release date are not mentioned, the copyright of CC-BY-SA is suspect. It should be PD-India if it is old film Arjunaraoc (talk) 14:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:45, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Missing license information Geoprofi Lars (talk) 14:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope personal artwork. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:46, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
L’auteur de ce blason déposé en son temps à la Spadem estLOIC ERMOY et non Tretinville. 2A01:CB08:8811:6800:159E:E1CB:FAA5:AAE2 15:33, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. Not convinced by rationale. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:46, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
pixelated. likely to be a DW of a screen --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:46, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Angaben passen nicht zur Quelle: "Eigenes Werk" Dirk Lenke (talk) 15:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Angaben passen nicht zur Quelle: "Eigenes Werk" Dirk Lenke (talk) 16:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Angaben passen nicht zur Quelle: "Eigenes Werk" Dirk Lenke (talk) 16:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Angaben passen nicht zur Quelle: "Eigenes Werk" Dirk Lenke (talk) 16:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-free derivative work (from de minimis, but it isn't minimis here). Lesless (talk) 16:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BhanuDudhat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from modern art.
- File:BULL POWER SCROLL PAINTING 15-METER-LONG 42 INCH BROAD ON CANVAS -1.jpg
- File:History-Of-Haven (1).jpg
- File:Mahatma Gandhi Jeevan Darshan.jpg
- File:Ramayan (4).jpg
- File:Ramayana-Scroll-Painting.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Not own work at all. No valid license. No permission. Dn@lor_01 (talk) 17:54, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Copyright violation: the file is a TV screenshot: ORF2 HD (orf.at)! --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 09:38, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Borrar la File:Gaby Konrad.jpg también por favor. Author THOMAS RAMSTORFER! Esta frau no es un hombre ni es el fotografo original. Una farsante sin escrupulos...
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:48, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Not own work at all. No valid license. No permission Dn@lor_01 (talk) 17:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Copyright violation: the file is a TV screenshot: ORF2 HD (orf.at)! --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 09:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Borrar la File:Gaby Konrad.jpg también por favor. Author THOMAS RAMSTORFER! Esta frau no es un hombre ni es el fotografo original. Una farsante sin escrupulos...
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:48, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by I dream of horses as no permission (No permission since) RAN (talk) 18:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep PD-IsraelGov EL-AL was owned by the government in 1949. --RAN (talk) 18:44, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- @I dream of horses According to Israel's copyright statute of 2007, effective starting 2008, a work is released to the public domain on 1 January of the 71st year after the author's death (paragraph 38 of the 2007 statute), but with the following exceptions:
- · A photograph taken on 24 May 2008 or earlier — the old British Mandate law applies, i.e. on 1 January of the 51st year after the creation of the photograph (paragraph 78(i) of the 2007 statute, and paragraph 21 of the old British Mandate act).
- · If the copyrights are owned by the State, not acquired from a private person, and there is no special agreement between the State and the author — on 1 January of the 51st year after the creation of the work (paragraphs 36 and 42 in the 2007 statute).
- For further information on the 2007 Israeli statute, see the attached article. Because these two images of Sam/EL AL were in all likelihood created in Israel, and certainly more than 51 years ago, it appears that any copyright on them has expired. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/KtbxLthZkGqqXtxtQWzLQxTWgccZqxkPDV?projector=1&messagePartId=0.1 Shewriteshistory (talk) 22:13, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Please ignore my previous link. Instead, check the following link to learn about the Israeli copyright law: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pfaMuq9VSCkJdV4571auXC0XhbbwgdQ5/view?usp=sharing
- The EL AL photos of Sam Lewis were taken in 1950. Back then, EL AL was a company that belonged to the Israeli government. In Israel, the government copyright is for 50 years. Since this photo -
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sam_Lewis_first_Chief_Pilot_of_EL_AL.jpg
- and another photo of Sam, which I uploaded - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sam_Lewis_in_early_EL_AL_publicity_shot_1950.jpg
- - were taken during his EL AL service, more than 50 years old, there are no copyright on them. Anyone could use these photos. Shewriteshistory (talk) 01:16, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per keeps - Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:50, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Teresa Trovato at the premiere of Favourite People List in Vancouver in 2009 (3234803183) (cropped).jpg
[edit]This is a photo of me that I do not consent to publishing. Please remove file immediately. 2001:569:7D22:9100:9103:22A5:C8B0:4F4D 18:48, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- User:2001:569:7D22:9100:9103:22A5:C8B0:4F4D, Greetings!
May I make a couple of points?
- You made this comment using an anonymous IP address. The wikipedia, and its related projects, like the wikimedia commons, have had an ongoing problem with trolling, from third party wise-guys, who represent themselves as the subject of wikipedia articles, or commons images. In my opinion we should always make sure third parties, like yourself, follow certain steps to confirm their identities. May I request you confirm your real life identity? This protects third parties. I'll give the details for how to safely and discretely confirm your identity at the end of this note.
- I think this image is properly licensed. We will consider requests to delete properly licensed images, as a courtesy. We don't always do so.
- Teresa Trovato was at an Industry event, and someone took a photo of her, which they indentified by name, which implies they thought Ms Trovato was a notable attendee at that event.
- How to confirm your identity, while still protecting the privacy of your email address? We have a committee of trusted insiders to whom we delegate the confirmation of the real world identity of third parties, like yourself. This committee opens a confidential "ticket" for each third party. Only the trusted individuals have access to these tickets, and can access your real world email. You send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org as described in Commons:OTRS.
What happens once you confirm your identity? (1) Someone from that committee should leave a note here; (2) then we should discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the justification to delete this image; (3a) if the consensus is to honor your request, the image will be deleted; (3b) if the consensus it that the justification for your request falls short, or that your image is ineligible for courtesy deletion, we will, respectfully, keep the image.
- With regard to your justification, that you are Ms Trovato, and you did not consent to having the image published. I am not a lawyer, but I think the photographer did not require your permission to publish an image of you taken at a public event.
- This image would be ineligible for courtesy deletion if an article on a wikipedia used it as an illustration. That is not the case, so this image is eligible to be considered for courtesy deletion.
- This image was snapped by a flickr.com contributor named Raj Taneja. We can see from Category:Files from Raj Taneja Flickr stream that they seem to be a dedicated volunteer, who attends public events, like film premieres, and snaps photos industry figures, like actors, directors, and yes publicists, like Ms Trovato.
Ms Trovato has a website. Its about page says she has been a professional publicist for 22 years.
I don't mean to be mean about this, but the main page of her site has 16 images of her clients... https://www.teresatrovato.com/ That page has a broad claim that she owns the copyright to those 16 image, which, however, look like the work of professional photographers. People on the internet, generally, are much more casual about intellectual property rights than we are here. I wouldn't dream of shaming Ms Trovato for claiming copyright on images of Ms Carol Burnett, and 15 other celebrities, that they had taken by professional photographers. If Ms Burnett, and those other 15 celebrities, gave Ms Trovato permission to use the images, she could say something like "the images on this page are all used with permission of the principals, who retain all IP rights." I will question whether it is consistent for Ms Trovato to challenge whether this image is being published with permission of the copyright holder, when there is no reason to assume her own site has permission to use the images of these celebrities.
- User:2001:569:7D22:9100:9103:22A5:C8B0:4F4D, if you are Ms Trovato, please know that if we have mutliple images of an individual we will use the most flattering mainstream image. If your underlying concern is that this image is not as flattering as the image you use on your website, would it reassure you that if you were to release that image to use under a free license, we would happily use that image instead of this image.
- User:2001:569:7D22:9100:9103:22A5:C8B0:4F4D, if you are Ms Trovato, and you follow our procedures to confirm your identity, I would voice a delete opinion here. Otherwise, my opinion is a keep. Geo Swan (talk) 03:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello - this is Teresa Trovato and I kindly request for this photo to be taken down. It has been recently used and posted without my permission. TeeTee2021 (talk) 05:14, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- I left a reply on User_talk:TeeTee2021... Geo Swan (talk) 00:37, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- I left out a sentence from my original reply.
- You didn't leave a note on the original image description at https://www.flickr.com/photos/urbanmixer/3234803183/. Just so you know, if you got the original photographer to delete that image, or change its license to something more restrictive, anyone who downloaded it, prior to the license change, would be legally entitled to continue to use it - so long as their use complies with the creative commons license it was under when first put on flickr. We have a robot that confirms images from flickr are under a license that allows them to be freely re-used. We trust that robot, and will continue to use images that are subsequently deleted from flickr, or have their license changed.
- You said the image was recently used? Did that recent re-use point here? If that recent re-use did not explicitly say it was used under the CC license, then their use of the image would not be legally valid. Geo Swan (talk) 00:52, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hi there,
- Thank you for getting back to me.
- This photo was taken at a party in 2009, but has recently resurfaced on Wikipedia without my permission. I have nominated the file for deletion and kindly asked for the photo to be taken down. It is not an approved publicity image of me.
- If you need a publicity image of me, I’m happy to supply one, but this particular image of me with this other individual is not a proper or approved publicity image. It was a photo taken at an event over 10 years ago, so I’m puzzled as to why it would even surface now.
- Please let me know what other steps I can take to have this photo removed from Wikipedia. TeeTee2021 (talk) 01:27, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Ticket:2021121910000331 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 02:00, 20 December 2021 (UTC)- Delete I said I would support deletion if Ms Trovato opened an OTRS ticket.
Ms Trovato, thanks for that!
You don't have to supply your preferred alternate image. But, if you were to do so, you would have to be prepared to release it under a "free license", like "creative commons share alike". I think your OTRS contact can explain that more fully.
Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 03:24, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hello again,
- Yes, I followed your instructions and opened a ticket. Thank you.
- Has the file I nominated for deletion been deleted?
- Please let me know. TeeTee2021 (talk) 17:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment If this is courtesy deletion request, please note taht anyone can request undeletion of such photo if they need to use it. So we need to ensure that the photo is unused before deletion to avoid ping-pong requests. Moreover, as the photo is available in Flickr, anyone can legally upload this or a similar crop after deletion. Ankry (talk) 15:02, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hello,
- The photo is from 2009 so it is not and should not be in use.
- Has the request for deletion been approved? TeeTee2021 (talk) 19:45, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I'm assuming good faith - I'd be pretty peeved if this photo was circulating of me on the internet. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:57, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Museum Kurhaus Kleve
[edit]copyright violation; Contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.
==================================
[edit]- File:Franz Gertsch - Opening Kleve PM14.jpg
- File:Guido de Werd PM1701.jpg
- File:Museum Kurhaus Kleve - Friedrich-Wilhelm-Bad PM15.JPG
- File:Museum Kurhaus Kleve PM15-02.JPG
- File:Museum Kurhaus Kleve PM15-08.jpg
- File:Museum Kurhaus Kleve PM15-15.jpg
- File:Museum Kurhaus Kleve PM15-16.jpg
- File:Museum Kurhaus Kleve PM17-01 Lee Eun Young.jpg
- File:Museum Kurhaus Kleve PM17-02 Lee Eun Young.jpg
- File:Museum Kurhaus Kleve PM17-03 Lee Eun Young.jpg
- File:Richard Long - Midsummer Flint Line (detail).JPG
- File:Richard Long - Midsummer Flint Line, Kleve PM15.jpg
- File:Richard Long - Midsummer Flint Line, Kleve.JPG
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:08, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Incorrect, this photo has freedom of panaorama see list;
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_panorama#/media/File:Freedom_of_Panorama_world_map.svg
- Unsigned response about file 1 by [BabiBandung] 18 dec 2021 20:49.
- Commented images by Peli
-
Not a banal copy of an artwork but an impression of an important event, a moment in time, a cultural highlight of the museum season 2014 in Kleve. In Dec 2021 the house rules state NOTHING about photography.
-
Long anticipated portrait of a notable Dutch museum director in Kleve standing on a spot he picked. The art he stands for. The picture was taken in mutual understanding and agreement as a portrait for Wikipedia. The art-quote in the background should be considered 'de minimis'. Long is a friend of the House. A general NO (automatic) FOP in interiors does not apply since owners / managers of the house can always make specific exceptions. The picture was made for illustrating his lemma on DUTCH wikipedia written by me. not a "theft copy", not a "panorama". -
No artwork was harmed in documenting this moment in time, the photo documents the compartimentation of the rooms on the 1st floor of the Friedrich-Wilhelm-Bad. Beiwerk / de minimis
-
The photo itself documents that Freedom of Photography existed at that point in time
-
Roomview: Ok another one of this series to go, the series has been under attack and damaged earlier, nothing new here
-
Roomview: Absolutly impossible to make commercially lucrative derivates of the individual artworks in this picture, so decline it as a copyright violation is an error
-
Idem, the image is carefully composed to show just the dimensions of the works in the room with no technical possiblity to make illegal derivates of individual artworks.
-
Consent was retrieved by e-mail contact before publishing, the wiki article about the artist would not exist without this image and writing about art can not make sense without any images -
Consent was retrieved before publishing, the wiki article about the artist would not exist without this image and can not make any sense without images -
Consent was retrieved electronically before publishing, het proces met de moeilijke naam met de engelse afkorting AKA "Passport bitte!!!" kan onmiddellijk opgang worden gezet. -
No animals were harmed. I think this flat photo is not a "copy" of the 3d sculpture ...
-
Idem, but Ok return copyrights to the intellectual owner of the image. Grüß Gott.
-
Ok return copyrights to the intellectual owner of the image, thank you. I had decresed resolution on this one for a good reason. I't's an excellent image. NOTE: These works were made especially for commons to accompany the portrait I had made of this artist to which he had happilly agreed.
Deleted: I deleted most of these images as they fail COM:FOP Germany. To pass FOP in Germany, the space must be photographed either from a public space (i.e. you take a photograph through the window of a museum while you are standing in a public place i.e. street, sidewalk, park) or the artwork is located in in a public space permanently - i.e. a mural on a piece of the Berlin Wall in a public park. This has nothing to do with “house rules” or the rules of the museum or venue. It’s about Germany’s law. The country law. You are welcome to blur out the artworks if you wish to assist with de minimus. But, to ensure we do not violate copyright law, we must delete these. I cropped the portrait of Guido de Werd to lessen the copyrighted artwork behind him. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:09, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; Contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Auferstehungskirche Kleve-Kellen PM18-04.jpg
- File:Auferstehungskirche Kleve-Kellen PM18-05.jpg
- File:Auferstehungskirche Kleve-Kellen PM18-06.jpg
- File:Auferstehungskirche Kleve-Kellen PM18-07.jpg
- File:Auferstehungskirche Kleve-Kellen PM18-08.jpg
- File:Auferstehungskirche Kleve-Kellen PM18-09.jpg
- File:Auferstehungskirche Kleve-Kellen PM18-10.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:10, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
General offense -> general defense: I was explicitely invited in by the houseowne to take pictures as I obviously wished. They drove their car aside for me to take better images of the housefront and opened the doors for me. They were friendly and considerate. Here IMO specific houserules will always override general estimations. A general and standard and redundant "NO FOP (indoors)" does not apply here. "copyrightvio" to me could mean I STOLE these images from another photograper and I can assure that this is not the case. This series was made in full awareness of copyright laws in place and copyright freaks at peek. No individual work was depicted in a way that enables copytheft. The category page of this series portrays the church as a whole, pulling out one or more images will seriously damage my intent and my intellectual property of this conceptual artwork that has to be seen as a complete series of a moment in time. Just (cheerfully) doing a "job of visual conservation of cultural heritage" for the benefit of all, for the profit of none, that the gouverment has shamelessly neclected until today. Btw the scope of this series is far broader than just "glass windows" or "contemporary art to delete". The sccpe is "Kellen", and "Churches in Kleve". Subscopes: churches of the 50's etc. In this broader concept a red or a blue pixel is just Beiwerk to me, but also the essential 'juice' that makes it all worthwile. And which if missing would falsify the overall impression of the topic. AND PLUS another thing is that WE all payed for this, it is our collective treasure and anyone should be able to enjoy it online, now that this church has been desecularized the series is of all the more value for educating the neighbourhood about their cultural heritage and giving them prolongued (virtual) access to it. Plus there is a huge difference between copy vio in case of flat art and legal terms in case of sculptures that is not taken in account by nominator. Peli (talk) 12:36, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per COM:FOP Germany. Again, this is about state law. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:10, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; Contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:31, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Objection to deletion : Poor quality jpg (not suitable for pirated reprints), but a high quality topic (POP in Germany, Culture in Emmerich am Rhein) and a good representation of an arttist at a certain place at a certain moment in time. What better artists' portrait and what more obvious sign of mutual consent could one possibly wish for than the artist posing in front of his own work? (Btw. This not a "panorama" so the reasons for deletion above are incorrect and or incomplete. Also possible exceptions by a house owner on a case to case basis are not taken into account. imo Such images should be promoted as a Valued Images, due to their singularity. I really thought for more than a decennium that there would be no problem with this file. Everyone seemed happy with it. It was the core around which to write the lemma about the artist, as I did for Dutch Wikipedia. Deleting this file would damage that lemma and its other language versions. Who would clean them up and gets them illustrated again the proper way? Peli (talk) 04:13, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: I cropped out the artwork and uploaded a new version. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:12, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Emmerich-Liebfrauenkirche 03.png
- File:Emmerich-Liebfrauenkirche 04.png
- File:Emmerich-Liebfrauenkirche 06 Waldemar Kuhn.png
- File:Emmerich-Liebfrauenkirche PM15-06.jpg
- File:Emmerich-Liebfrauenkirche PM15-07.jpg
- File:Emmerich-Liebfrauenkirche PM15-08.jpg
- File:Emmerich-Liebfrauenkirche PM15-10.jpg
- File:Emmerich-Liebfrauenkirche PM15-12.jpg
- File:Emmerich-Liebfrauenkirche PM15-15.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
-
Emmerich-Liebfrauenkirche 03 -
Emmerich-Liebfrauenkirche 04 -
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
SignatureNB.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
'_--_Greenwich_Village_(NY)_April_2106_(27292637445).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
SignatureNB.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
SignatureNB.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
SignatureNB.jpg){kind=link}
SignatureNB.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2021_logo.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-Archaelogical_Museum-01ASD.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-Archaelogical_Museum-03ASD.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-2021-12-17T18:42:00.000Z-File:Sam_Lewis_first_Chief_Pilot_of_EL_AL.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&diff=615007665&oldid=615007169){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Die Sache wurde hier schon mal ausführlich besprochen und die anfangs dieses Jahres vorgeschlagenen Löschungen Emmerich-Liebfrauenkirche 03 und 04 wurden vom Moderator wegen nicht erkennbarkeit der Kunst abgelehnt. Hat sich irgendwas in der Rechtslage verschoben seitdem? Diese wiederholte Löschanträge innerhalb eines Jahres grenzen an reine Belästigung. Keines dieser Bilder wurde angefertigt um Raubkopien zu ermöglichen. Ich protestiere gegen verletzung meiner Serien aus nichtige Gründe. Dieses Kulturgut gehört uns allen und alle sollen es bewundern dürfen, nah oder weit, direct oder electronisch vermittelt, der Tür ist 'immer' auf, aber nicht für Banausen. Peli (talk) 03:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I deleted some, I kept some. Again, just like the last reviewer, it all comes down to COM:FOP Germany. Don't take it out on us volunteers, take it out on the federal government of Germany. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:PAN Kunstforum Niederrhein
[edit]copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.
- File:PAN Kunstforum, Emmerich 01.JPG
- File:PAN Kunstforum, Emmerich 02.JPG
- File:PAN Kunstforum, Emmerich 03.JPG
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:FOP Germany - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:43, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
What a joke. He tries to delete this one twice.
Deleted: COM:FOP Germany - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:17, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:44, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
7000 x "löschen" Peli (talk) 19:19, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I love Joseph Beuys...but he's gotta go! COM:FOP Germany - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:18, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
"löschen" Peli (talk) 19:18, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:FOP Germany - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:18, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Interior of Schloss Moyland
[edit]copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Schloss Moyland Fenster PM18-01.jpg Von der öffentlichkeit fernhalten. Sehr gefährliche Kunst.
- File:Schloss Moyland Innenansicht PM19-02.jpg Hier is no protected artwork in view. Dies ist ein Pausenraum mit Aussicht. Schöpfungshöhe nicht erreicht
- File:Slot Moyland Kapel PM16.jpg Von der öffentlichkeit fernhalten. Sehr gefährliches Bild.
- File:Slot Moyland Kapel PM16b.jpg Von der öffentlichkeit fernhalten. Sehr gefährliche Kunst.
- File:Slot Moyland Kapel PM16c.jpg Von der öffentlichkeit fernhalten. Sehr gefährliche Kunst.
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:FOP Germany - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:18, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:ArToll
[edit]copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.
- File:ArToll Labor maart07 PM07.jpg
- File:ArToll Labor maart09 PM07.jpg
- File:Artoll Labor PM15 04.jpg
- File:Artoll Labor PM15 05.jpg
- File:Artoll Labor PM15 06.jpg
- File:Artoll Labor PM15 07.jpg
- File:Artoll Labor PM15 08.jpg
- File:Artoll Labor PM15 09.jpg
- File:Artoll Labor PM15 10.jpg
- File:Artoll Labor PM15 11.jpg
- File:Artoll Labor PM15 13.jpg
- File:Artoll Labor PM15 14.jpg
- File:Artoll Labor PM15 15.jpg
- File:Artoll Labor PM15 16.jpg
- File:Artoll Labor PM15 17.jpg
- File:Artoll Labor PM15 18.jpg
- File:Artoll Labor PM15 20.jpg
- File:Stencilmachine mimeograph KNUST Nijmegen.JPG
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:51, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
-
Stencilmachine mimeograph KNUST Nijmegen
General deletion request -> general objection. ArToll is a place where artists are encouraged to do their artistic thing without any restrictions. (Es gibt hier kein Fotografierverbot, das ist augedachter Quatsch) My "thing" was giving an impression of the livelyness and diversity of this cultural event by making a carefully picked and composed series. Take some 'words' out of this 'sentence' and the context and meaning of the rest wont be the same. Hence my intellectual rights would be offended. To see the mimeograph, printer tool of the acknowledged art company KNUST extrapool, Nijmegen, as a copyvio (because of an anonymous unrecognizable two-penny print?) is too bizar and too sad for words, since the photo might equally well apply for status of valued image, as it symbolzes artistic freedom, freedom of speach and freedom of press, as well as culture of Nijmegen and some historical notions of History of Nijmegen. None of these impressions of artworks made in the projectweek were taken in such a way as to encourage the large scale & lucrative reproduction of copy-thefted facsimiles. Peli (talk) 02:09, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:FOP Germany - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:FOP Germany - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:20, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
صفحه به اشتباه ایجاد شده است Boostan112 (talk) 19:10, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COurtesy - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:18, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
به اشتباه ایجاد شده است Boostan112 (talk) 19:12, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:18, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
صفحه بهه شاتباه ایجاد شده است Boostan112 (talk) 19:11, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:18, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Keith Haring's Signature for 'Self-Portrait (1989)' -- Greenwich Village (NY) April 2106 (27292637445).jpg
[edit]%27_--_Greenwich_Village_(NY)_April_2106_(27292637445).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%27_--_Greenwich_Village_(NY)_April_2106_(27292637445).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
F3. Derivative work of non-free artwork. Wikicommons only accepts free content. DanielPenfield (talk) 19:17, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The symbol, stand, signature, etc aren't necessarily copyrighted as they are just writing. I'm not convinced we need to consider this a DR - it's not showing the full artwork.Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Keith Haring's Signature for 'Self-Portrait (1989)' -- Greenwich Village (NY) April 2106 (27292637445).jpg
[edit]%27_--_Greenwich_Village_(NY)_April_2106_(27292637445).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
F3. Derivative work of non-free artwork. Wikicommons only accepts free content. The last deletion request was declined using the justification "The symbol, stand, signature, etc aren't necessarily copyrighted as they are just writing". This appears to be a hamfisted attempt to invoke the "Titles, names, short phrases, and slogans; familiar symbols or designs; and mere variations of typographic ornamentation, lettering, or coloring" principle. However, the photograph is primarily of the author's signature and is incorporated into an artwork that is not in the public domain as opposed to a signature from a document or an autograph. DanielPenfield (talk) 00:18, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, looks artistic enough for me, even if it is not the complete artwork. Haring died in 1990, so the file can be restored in 2061. --Rosenzweig τ 13:13, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:20, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res image of random sign, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:48, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- I disagree this is a historical record of the sign of the Dumfries and Galloway Regional Council (1974-1996) It is not a random sign to those who know what it is and see it with the other signs on the page. And sorry but do not know what you mean by 'out of scope'! 77.107.171.244 22:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Categorized, not copyrighted...works for now. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:20, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: More context - we can undelete perhaps. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:22, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
no evidence of licence claimed PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
May or may not be a PD-Old photo, but uploader's claim of authorship and license seem very dubious (uploader made similar claim to photo of H. P. Lovecraft) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:16, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:26, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
If this is recent, a permission from the author is needed. If it is old, please provide the date of first publication. Yann (talk) 21:50, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Published 1909 - Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:29, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Very low quality, many hundreds of better images of same topic MPF (talk) 22:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep We do not have "hundreds of better images" depicting the vignetting experienced when a scope is used for digital photography by birders. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:03, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment@Pigsonthewing: - we probably do (or did), it's just that vignetting tends to get cropped off as an improvement to photos requested in the photo workshop. This pic really is VERY low quality, just 17 kilobytes (typically, anything below 100 KB is rubbish quality), and part of the pic is cropped, too. It isn't even a good example of vignetting. If you want some better examples on vignetting I can probably dig out some from my pre-camera days. - MPF (talk) 22:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Keeping for now per Andy. Feel free to also categorize this accordingly. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unclear if this is actually a work by Tasnim; the photo lacks Tasnim's watermark. Per {{Tasnim}} and this discussion, "all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license". Ahmadtalk 22:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:52, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
And File:Ram King Hypernova croped.jpg
Source: "This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by kingraam." Yann (talk) 22:30, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:52, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
It doesn't have any educational not encyclopedic value. "A guy sellinf stuff" could be educational only if we could see the action, but like this it's just a personal picture of a person, with no value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:13, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:52, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Lack of source, therefore not a reliable map. No educational value. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:24, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:53, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
- File:Flag of Anatolia.svg
- File:Flag of the Aleutian Islands.svg
- File:Proposed flag of Austronesia.jpg
- File:Proposed flag of the Austronesian people.jpg
- File:Proposed flag of the Austronesian people v2.jpg
- File:Flag of the United Kingdom of Baltic States (fictional).jpg
- File:Flag of the Black Sea (fictional).png
- File:Map of countries and territories who joined Miss Intergalactical 2021 (fanmade).png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Fictional and unused flags, fanmade maps... Nanahuatl (talk) 23:33, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Comment Shouldn't all of these files be tagged for deletion? Liz (talk) 00:57, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Liz: Yes. I'm also working on an SPI report for en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/I_Nyoman_Gede_Anila, who I think this account is. EvergreenFir (talk) 02:00, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:53, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
copyright violation; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Agree to speedy deletion. Rationale for upload was: This is an artwork explicitlely intended to be permanently displayed in a public space in Büderich. At least the doors are 24/7 visible from the public street. This capture documents an important moment in the biography of both this artwork and this artspace, Wandelhalle Kurhaus Kleve. The artwork was created nextdoor in the 1950's in his atelier and after decades of service and a recent restauration it had a brief reappearance at it's place of origin. IMO No pixilated photography can be claimed to be a "copy" of the real thing. Photography restrictions were not enforced by the house owner. If hosting this image severely harms the goals of Commons instead of serving it as intended, I will be more than happy to take it back, for private use only. thank you. For specific reasons a speedy deletion seems most safe and advicable to me now, just on this specific file. Peli (talk) 03:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:48, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pelikana as no license (No license since) Peli (talk) 03:07, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:48, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- Fix. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:27, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Shiraz
[edit]COM:DW of artworks whose copyright status is unclear.
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 03.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 04.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 06.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 07.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 08.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 09.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 10.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 11.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 12.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 13.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 14.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 15.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 16.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 17.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 18.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 19.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 20.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 21.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 22.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 23.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 24.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 25.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 26.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 27.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 28.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 29.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 30.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 31.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 32.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 33.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 34.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 37.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 38.jpg
- File:خانه گالری یزدی -شیراز 39.jpg
[[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 17:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Modern Sciences: Wait, you added {{Delh}} above, is this meaning you decide to withdraw your request? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:30, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
@Liuxinyu970226: i corrected .[[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 23:08, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Low quality photograph of a full moon. We have many photographs of full moons that we can use to illustrate this subject. I can't see how this specific one will be educational in value. It is currently not in use. Missvain (talk) 01:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
per ragioni di copyright l, auore è morto nel 1952, quindi non ancora 70 anniVilma.bono (talk) 14:46, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Lithographie - mm. 354 x 252 - F. Perrin - Extrait du journal "Il Diavolo", septembre 1866 Emplacement : Estampes - 110— Preceding unsigned comment added by Vilma.bono (talk • contribs) 09:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I think the deleter believes it is by the Australian painter of botanical pictures: Florence Jean Perrin (1883-1952), but this artist appears to be the Italian lithographer Ferdinando Perrin who died in 1904. --RAN (talk) 07:13, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- errore morto nel 1904 Vilma.bono (talk) 14:14, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Missvain (talk) 18:45, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
High resolution of the painting of unknown author on the right. Cjp24 (talk) 18:15, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RootOfAllLight (talk · contribs)
[edit]The uploader claims to be the author and copyright holder of these drawings, which have been previously published at http://www.thomas-scharnowski.de/wappen/WappenFellbach.htm. There is no evidence to support the authorship and copyright claims and no sign of any free licensing at the source site. The uploader blanked out the {{no permission since}} problem tags.
—LX (talk, contribs) 16:34, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @LX: In that case, just restore the template tags (or use the Lrw instead) and if vandalism continues, write a note to the admins. THanks. Ruthven (msg) 07:27, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RootOfAllLight (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flags; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".
- File:New flag of the Soviet Union.svg
- File:Flag of the USSR (Alternate).svg
- File:Flag of the Chinese Communist Party (Alternate).svg
- File:Flag of the Soviet Union (Alternate).svg
- File:African Soviet Flag.svg
- File:Hammer and Keyboard.svg
- File:Keyboard and Mouse.svg
- File:War Ensign of Germany (Eisernes Kreuz ).svg
- File:Red Gold Dragon China Flag.png
- File:War Ensign of Germany (1938-1945) Alternative.svg
- File:War Ensign of Germany (1935–1938) Alternative.svg
- File:Reichskriegsflagge Alternative.svg
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Alternative.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Alternative.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
GPinkerton (talk) 23:20, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RootOfAllLight (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploaded as "simplelogos", these logos clearly are complex enough to be above ToO.
Ruthven (msg) 09:17, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:13, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RootOfAllLight (talk · contribs)
[edit]Various authors mentioned, so obviously not own works. The source doesn't clearly mention a free license. The copyright status should be clarified, either with a Creative Commons license at the source, or by email via COM:VRT.
- File:Phallus.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Arms Spear.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Insect Bee.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Bodypart Hand of Benediction.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Bodypart Hand with Middle Finger Extended.svg
- File:Hotei icon.svg
- File:Purple Hotei Icon.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Owl.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Moor's Head.svg
- File:Baltic Flower Snowflake.svg
- File:Gelfling Clans.png
- File:Ancient Greek Swastika Shield.png
- File:Firefighter St. Florian Cross.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Double-Headed Eagle.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Unicorn Passant.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Hydra Passant.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Horse Passant.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Cock.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Hen.svg
- File:Death's head.svg
- File:Alabama-Coushatta Symbol.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Elephant with Tower.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Elephant.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Polypus.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Calamarie.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Griffin.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Ouroboros.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Ark of the Covenant.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Insect Dragonfly.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Insect Snail.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Crab.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Insect Scorpion.svg
- File:Chucky Voodoo Knife Symbols.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animals East Asian Dragon.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Crossbones.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Whale.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Insect Spider.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Insect Butterfly.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Cross Gringoly.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Human Skull.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Death's Head.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Apple Slipped and Leaved.svg
- File:Fleur-de-lis Seashell.png
- File:Fleur de lis seashell.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Caduceus.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Rod of Asclepius.svg
- File:Ciel Phantomhive Brand.svg
- File:Los Illuminados logo.png
- File:Kipling Elephant Swastika.png
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Two Serpents Entwined.svg
- File:Chinese Longevity and Prosperity Symbols.svg
- File:Join, or Die (Massachusetts Spy).svg
- File:Proud Boys Rooster Logo.svg
- File:Neo-Nazi Black Sun Flag.png
- File:Frog Foot.svg
- File:Rosa Camuna Swastika 3.svg
- File:Rosa Camuna Swastika 2.svg
- File:Vanguard America Logo.svg
- File:Vanguard America.jpg
- File:Patriot Front Flag.png
- File:Kipling Elephant Swastika 2.svg
- File:Kipling Elephant Swastika.svg
- File:Wufu (Five Blessings).svg
- File:SS-Ehrenring und Heilszeichen.svg
- File:Viking Wolf Cross.svg
- File:Scythian Horse Head Swastika.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Bat.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Plant Lily 1.svg
- File:Ancient Greek Triskelion.svg
- File:New Order Knights of the Ku Klux Klan Flag.png
- File:QAnon Gadsden Flag.jpg
- File:Brotherhood of Steel.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Sea Wolf.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Sea Lion.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Planet Sun v2.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Salamander Couchant Regardant.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Salamander.svg
- File:Illuminati Eye.svg
- File:Neo-Nazi Mjölnir Flag.svg
- File:Green Chinese Dragon.svg
- File:Red Chinese Dragon.svg
- File:Mjöllnir Necklace.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Serpent Entwined About A Pillar.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Sea Horse.svg
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 21:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- On the website it says, "Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) license. No attribution is required for heraldic or artistic use by members of the SCA." RootOfAllLight (talk) 18:59, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- @RootOfAllLight: Where is that mention? I didn't see it. Did I miss something? Yann (talk) 19:33, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- @RootOfAllLight - Can you please provide that website link? It is not listed here. Also, please provide a source link on *every* one of the files you upload - if you can please do that I would appreciate it. If the sourcing can't be provided, I will have to delete. Thank you. Missvain (talk) 20:33, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- It's here. http://heraldicart.org/viking-answer-lady-svg-images-for-heralds/ At the top of the page. RootOfAllLight (talk) 20:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The source book as a whole is clearly NC, as can be seen on the copyrights page. The CC-BY-SA license cited at the bottom applies only to one creator of many. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Die Eheleute haben es mir erlaubt und sich bei mir bedankt für meine Mühe. Soll ich die denn jetzt noch um eine notariell beeidigter Erklärung bitten oder was? Peli (talk) 20:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ticket:2021122210003269 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; still no OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 11:29, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama (no permanent exhibit. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Die haben es mir dieses Jahr noch mal mündlich erlaubt. Als ich das Ehepar sprach und explicit erzählte das ich die Arbeiten und Schaufenster und das Portrait fotografiert habe für Wikipedia, haben sie es mir münlich genehmigt und sich herzlich bei mir bedankt. Ich protestiere gegen die unsensibele paushale Lösch-Feldzüge dieses Nominators, da Sie zu viel unnötige Unruhe verursachen und dem Projektziel im Algemeinen mehr Schaden zufügen dann Gutes tun. Peli (talk) 20:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ticket:2021122210003269 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; still no OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 11:29, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hein Driessen
[edit]copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama (no permanent exhibit.
- File:Hein Driessen Schaufenster PM16-01.jpg comment photographer below
- File:Hein Driessen Schaufenster PM16-04.jpg
- File:Hein Driessen Schaufenster PM16-05.jpg
- File:Hein Driessen Schaufenster PM16-06.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
-
Die Ausstellung (hier Aussenaufname, Straßenseite) war zirka 20 Jahre am gleichen Ort bis Sie abgehängt wurde. Diese Photoserie ist seitdem ein historisches Zeitdokument. Erlaubnis mündlich erhalten.
-
Die Ausstellung (hier Aussenaufname, Straßenseite) war zirka 20 Jahre am gleichen Ort bis Sie abgehängt wurde. Diese Photoserie ist seitdem ein historisches Zeitdokument. Erlaubnis mündlich erhalten.
-
die niedrige technische Qualität verhindert kommerzielle Wiederverwendung, die Spiegelungen im Fenster sind mit Absicht da, kein Zufall. Erlaubnis mündlich erhalten.
-
Dieses bild dukumentiert nur das es dort mal eine Kunstvitrine gab, Erlaubnis mündlich erhalten.
-
Wo ist hier denn Kunst zu erkennen? Welcher Missbrauch muss man hier befürchten? Erlaubnis mündlich erhalten.
-
Dieses Schaufenster ist nicht am Bahnhof. Erlaubnis mündlich erhalten.
Die Eheleute Driessen haben es mir dieses Jahr noch mal mündlich erlaubt. Als ich sie sprach und explicit erzählte das ich die Arbeiten und Schaufenster und das Portrait fotografiert habe für Wikipedia, haben sie es mir mündlich genehmigt und sich herzlich bei mir bedankt. Soll ich die denn jetzt noch mal wegen 'notarell beglaubigter' sprich schriftlicher Zustimmung belästigen? Ich protestiere gegen die pauschale und unnuancierte Lösch-Feldzüge dieses nominators, da Sie unnötige Unruhe verursachen und dem Projekt mehr Schaden zufügen dann Gutes tun. Es gibt oft weitaus mehr Ermessungsspielraum als nur der abgegriffene Begründung 'kein FOP' und es gibt auch andere Wege darüber zu sprechen mit mir dann 'mit dem Messer auf dem Tisch'. Peli (talk) 20:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ticket:2021122210003269 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- There is an VRTS email received for “File:Hein Driessen Schaufenster PM16-06.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021122210003269. --Missvain (talk) 20:17, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Still no OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 11:37, 8 March 2022 (UTC)