Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/11/08
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_5_(31829689828).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
jpg.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_dit_Charles_XII.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![199 File:La Memoria de Nuestra Tierra "Our Land has Memory" mural Denver International Airport.jpg](#File:La_Memoria_de_Nuestra_Tierra_"Our_Land_has_Memory"_mural_Denver_International_Airport.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![222 File:Главная дорога сквера "Болгарского".jpg](#File:Главная_дорога_сквера_"Болгарского".jpg){kind=link}
![223 File:Бульвар "Болгарский".jpg](#File:Бульвар_"Болгарский".jpg){kind=link}
![224 File:Фонтан в сквере "Болгарском".jpg](#File:Фонтан_в_сквере_"Болгарском".jpg){kind=link}
![225 File:Сквер "Болгарский".jpg](#File:Сквер_"Болгарский".jpg){kind=link}
![227 File:Одна из дорожек сквера "Болгарского".jpg](#File:Одна_из_дорожек_сквера_"Болгарского".jpg){kind=link}
Extremely low quality unuseful drawing created by a user. Wikimedia Commons is not a repository for children drawings. High quality versions of the same symbol are already available. 223.255.225.69 05:16, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep In use. Again, please stop insulting other users. Brianjd (talk) 12:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
hex usernames are unreliable, use bin. 0b1010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010 (talk) 13:36, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedily kept. The nomination has no relevance to this image. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
間違えてアップしたため 千ちゃん (talk) 08:24, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 15:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
It's a wrong file. If this file is duplicated, request deletion. Takuyakoz (talk) 12:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 15:00, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Lo subí por error Norelkys del valle Medina Valera (talk) 12:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 17:38, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Lo subí por error Norelkys del valle Medina Valera (talk) 12:16, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 17:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
OMAR FADEL HADI Omar Fadel Hadi (talk) 14:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 17:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
wrong upload ManuM1999 1 (talk) 18:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request and lack of COM:EDUSE. --Achim55 (talk) 19:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
بیکیفیت بودن و وجود جایگزین
POS78 (talk) 12:17, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Close as Kept, seems properly sourced; existence of other montages of subject not a reason to delete this one. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:54, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
No year of photo publication
{{User|POS78}} talk 19:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --4nn1l2 (talk) 19:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Photos of random people, no educational use.
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 37.jpg
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 38.jpg
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 35.jpg
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 30.jpg
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 28.jpg
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 23.jpg
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 17.jpg
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 14.jpg
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 12.jpg
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 10.jpg
- File:Isfahan2024-03-22 9.jpg
- File:Naqsh-i Jahan Square2024-03-23 28.jpg
- File:Naqsh-i Jahan Square2024-03-23 27.jpg
- File:Naqsh-i Jahan Square2024-03-23 3.jpg
- File:Eram Garden2024-03-25 42.jpg
- File:Eram Garden2024-03-25 30.jpg
- File:Eram Garden2024-03-25 10.jpg
- File:Eram Garden2024-03-25 8.jpg
- File:Eram Garden2024-03-25 4.jpg
- File:Eram Garden2024-03-25 25.jpg
0x0a (talk) 09:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Please see this category! Also this category! I do not agree with you. @Orijentolog: What do you think? I tagged you because you are active in these categories (Category:People in buildings). {{User|POS78}} talk 10:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- This has nothing to do with categorizing. I don't care about that. 0x0a (talk) 10:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- @0x0a Unlike you, I see many images like this filling these categories. Like File:2018 Christmas at the Vank Cathedral 09.jpg! And the uploader is the image of User:Hanooz and User:Christian Ferrer did not see any problem in this picture! If you don't understand somewhere, forgive me; My English is really poor. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 10:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the "whataboutism." Please see COM:PS and explain the educational value of them. 0x0a (talk) 11:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Most of the images are recorded in historical buildings and there are people from a city in the pictures. For example, I am a person from Germany, I want to know what the people of Isfahan look like, what clothes they wear? I use the Category:People of Isfahan and I see this picture. So this is an educational goal of the culture and coverage of the people of a city or country. If there is no educational use of these images, why did a famous news agency in Iran publish them?[1][2] {{User|POS78}} talk 11:55, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the "whataboutism." Please see COM:PS and explain the educational value of them. 0x0a (talk) 11:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- @0x0a Unlike you, I see many images like this filling these categories. Like File:2018 Christmas at the Vank Cathedral 09.jpg! And the uploader is the image of User:Hanooz and User:Christian Ferrer did not see any problem in this picture! If you don't understand somewhere, forgive me; My English is really poor. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 10:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- This has nothing to do with categorizing. I don't care about that. 0x0a (talk) 10:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- I would say
Keep as regard to COM:PS, , I quote: "The expression "educational" is to be understood according to its broad meaning of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative"." It is impossible to deny that the photos provides anthropologic and cultural knowledge, the photos (though without big resolutions) have pro-like qualities, and at first view within relevant categories. However I'm not a specialist of Commons:Photographs of identifiable people and I'm 
Neutral regarding that. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC) - I would also say Keep as they show both architectural details and people's fashion. --Orijentolog (talk) 19:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. These photos purely focus on unknown, non-notable, random people. Commons has long-held precedent that such photos are out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
because I forget change my photo details, and I should to change it. please accept it, till I can upload it again with correct detail Archpeg (talk) 04:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, prompt uploader request. (I'm not sure what the problem is; nice looking photo, I hope you'll share another version.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
because I forget change my photo details, and I should to change it. please accept it, till I can upload it again with correct detail Archpeg (talk) 04:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
because I forget change my photo details, and I should to change it. please accept it, till I can upload it again with correct detail Archpeg (talk) 04:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of non-free content 61.120.241.72 08:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, DW by Flickr photographer -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright see www.faberge.com Wouter (talk) 10:18, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Copyviol; claimed free license unsupported by source. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:24, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyright see www.faberge.com Wouter (talk) 10:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Copyviol; claimed free license unsupported by source. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyright see www.faberge.com Wouter (talk) 10:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Copyviol; claimed free license unsupported by source. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyright see www.faberge.com Wouter (talk) 10:20, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Copyviol; claimed free license unsupported by source. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
the painting is the main object on the photo and is protected by copyright, painter died in 1999 and therefore the painting is not in the public domain Geerestein3 (talk) 11:52, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, COM:DW, painting by recent artist; work still undercopyright by heirs of artist. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
https://www.xtars.com/news/xtars-live-%E5%A4%A7%E8%A6%8F%E6%A8%A1%E6%AD%8C%E5%94%B1%E8%B3%BD%E4%BA%8B%E9%81%B8%E6%8B%94%E6%AD%A3%E5%BC%8F%E8%B5%B7%E8%B7%91%EF%BC%81/ GY Fan★ 05:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:57, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Source says "© 1971 - 2005 Hartmut Josi Bennöhr", no permission from the artist. Yann (talk) 22:10, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This image has been transferred (by me) from de:wikipedia in 2005. The author as indicated on the file page is Hartmut Josi Bennöhr, D 25791 Linden. The author of the image now links to someone now called Josi~commonswiki, renamed from Josi in 2015. On the user page it is stated "Hartmut Josi Bennöhr, Eichenweg 2, D 25791 Linden" and references are made to the Bennoehr.com website. The source website on the file page still exists and is part of that website e.g. http://www.bennoehr.com/bild/1971/. This has page title "Josi's Bilder 1971". On German Wikipedia de:Benutzer:Josi-sh added the image to an article about water color by this edit: https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aquarell&diff=373312&oldid=373308&diffmode=source. In addition Josi-sh has the same links to the source website on their user page. My conclusion: I am convinced that the original "Josi-sh" is the same person as "Hartmut Josi Bennöhr" and published this image they created with the CC-BY-SA licence. Ellywa (talk) 11:20, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: OK, thanks for the information. If you have any more information, please complete Category:Hartmut Josi Bennöhr. --Yann (talk) 11:35, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Slučajno sam je postavio/la Ometala (talk) 22:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 09:32, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:46, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Private picture 2409:4071:E14:C4FA:D184:BF6E:334E:B813 10:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Private family picture Raqesh Thimmaiah (talk) 10:27, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:COURTESY. --Ellywa (talk) 23:42, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Non-free material 61.120.241.72 16:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 20:18, 9 November 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 08:48, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
now i dont want to delete this picture. how i can do it? Arman mehdizadeh (talk) 15:32, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. The comment above is by the uploader and nominator. (non-admin closure) Brianjd (talk) 04:37, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kamyar Asadi (talk · contribs)
[edit]None of these have exif and are unlikely to be own work. Probably from Insta etc. All by a new user who joined 29/10 - PCP
- File:IMG kimiya hosseini 78675kimia hosseini 771.jpg
- File:Kimiya hosseini 20211030kimia hosseini 015849 664.jpg
- File:IMG 11kimiya hosseini030kimia hosseini91.jpg
- File:-kimiya hosseini665kimia hosseini46184actress22 model121.jpg
- File:-604kimiya hosseini61actress8450kimia hosseini11model121.jpg
- File:-66kimia hosseini54125kimiya hosseini121.jpg
- File:-546seperation1845kimia hosseini01117kimiya hosseini121.jpg
- File:-kimiya hosseini665separation8kimia hosseini121.jpg
- File:-kimia hosseini5461model84501kimiya hosseini116actress 121.jpg
- File:-60kimia hosseini4386654kimiya hosseini618450actress111model2 121.jpg
- File:-65kimiya ho46184501107kimia hosseini99model99121.jpg
- File:-604386kimia hosseini65445model105kimiya hosseini121actress.jpg
- File:-kimiya hosseini Actress18450model1104kimia hosseini.jpg
- File:-60438kimiya hosseini6654603 121.jpg
- File:-6043866kimiya hosseini5461841.jpg
- File:-604386kimia hosseini119 121kimiya hosseini.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:01, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Not sure about scope but all are copyvios. Some taken from FB, others have author info in exif eg Amy Rizzuto Photography - not own work as claimed
- File:John Henry Isemann John Mayer.jpg
- File:John Henry Isemann Headshot 7.png
- File:John Henry Isemann Headshot 6.jpg
- File:John Henry Isemann Headshot 5.jpg
- File:John Henry Isemann Headshot Guatemala 4.jpg
- File:John Henry Isemann Headshot Guatemala 3.jpg
- File:John Henry Isemann Headshot Guatemala.png
- File:John Henry Isemann Headshot Guatemala 2.jpg
- File:John Henry Isemann Headshot 4.jpg
- File:John Henry Isemann Headshot Family.jpg
- File:John Henry Isemann Headshot Church.jpg
- File:John Henry Isemann Headshot 3.jpg
- File:John Henry Isemann Headshot 2.jpg
- File:John Henry Isemann Headshot 1.png
Gbawden (talk) 10:44, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:02, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kintab Artists Group
[edit]COM:DW, missing original author, source, date, and permission.
- File:Eleno de Dios III at In Bloom exhibit in Naga City.jpg
- File:Harold Gomez at In Bloom exhibit in Naga City.jpg
- File:In Bloom exhibit in Naga City 01.jpg
- File:In Bloom exhibit in Naga City 04.jpg
- File:Kintab Artists Group during Kurit Kape coffee workshop outputs.jpg
- File:Kurit Aki Art Exhibit 2019 artworks of Anthony Diaz.jpg
- File:Kurit Aki Art Exhibit 2019 artworks of Irvin Sto. Tomas.jpg
- File:Participants during Wiki Loves Art Mural Painting at Manapao Elementary School.jpg
- File:Richard Cruz at In Bloom exhibit in Naga City 01.jpg
- File:Richard Cruz at In Bloom exhibit in Naga City.jpg
- File:Saranggola and Bangkang Papel by Harold Gomez.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Recent artworks without permission. User not active in Commons since 2009. Do we need a formal written permission, like we usually do now? In addition, unused files are probably out of scope.
- File:Botman.gif
- File:Piolindlaciebie.jpeg
- File:Geimfyglið 5 janúar 2007.png
- File:SoleteRayos.gif
- File:AnimaPiolinmarcianocolor.gif
- File:Al mérito.jpg
- File:Animalibrí.gif
- File:SoleteRayosÑajo.gif
- File:Dainsyng.gif
- File:El cascabel al león.gif
- File:Smiley-Estrella de Mar-te pequeña.png
- File:Blush.png
- File:Wikipegata.jpg
- File:Primer vuelo (para E.) - Transp.gif
- File:Image-Primer vuelo (Álbum de fotos).jpg
- File:Primer vuelo (Recortable).jpg
- File:Primer vuelo (para E.).gif
- File:Piolintroglífax.jpg
- File:Piolinkoha.jpg
- File:Piolinmarciano.jpg
- File:PioKocka.jpg
- File:Piolinbibliotecaria2.jpeg
- File:Mapa genético o cariograma.jpeg
- File:Piolinemigrante.jpeg
- File:Piolinmarcianocolor.jpeg
- File:Piolinpapalotochtlicolor2.jpeg
_-_Transp.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 20:57, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- File:Al mérito.jpg was created by me. It was created shortly after File:Solete.jpg, just changing the text.
- --ecelan (talk) 15:42, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:06, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- One Restored, as per [3]. Yann (talk) 14:34, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=607566428#File:Mapa_gen%C3%A9tico_o_cariograma.jpeg){kind=link}
- @Yann and Fitinidia: File:Primer vuelo still.gif is a screenshot of File:Primer vuelo (para E.) - Transp.gif. I believe it needs to be deleted as well. Solon 26.125 07:56, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of Scope, self-promotional picture. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 00:07, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 22:35, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
low resolution, just uploaded a better one Contaminadas (talk) 21:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:41, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Possible Copyright Violation Born of Iron (talk) 03:11, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RoadMan Italy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful. Unused or used in promotional Wikidata items.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RoadMan Italy (talk · contribs)
[edit]il motivo della cancellazione sono motivi legali.
- File:Nave Laura Bassi.jpg
- File:Via Cavana.jpg
- File:Arco Riccardo.jpg
- File:Metropolitana Toledo Napoli.jpg
- File:Giardini Marchesan Grado.jpg
- File:Viadotto della SS 202.jpg
- File:Bancale ichnusa non filtrata.jpg
- File:Interno bus 953 Trieste.jpg
- File:Bus 1930 Trieste Trasporti.jpg
- File:Bus 10 di Trieste al Capolinea in Piazzale Valmaura.jpg
- File:Svincolo Valmaura SS202.jpg
- File:Johny Rockets.png
- File:Caddy's logo.png
- File:Lampione sule rive di Trieste, davanti al Magazzino Vini.jpg
- File:Lampione sule rive di Trieste, davanti al Salone degli Incanti.jpg
- File:Tergesteo.jpg
- File:Marina di Capodistria.jpg
- File:Trieste, Galleria San Vito.jpg
- File:San Luigi Trieste.jpg
- File:Mario Toniutti.png
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 23.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 24.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 22.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 50.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 49.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 48.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 47.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 46.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 45.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 44.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 43.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 42.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 41.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 40.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 39.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 38.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 37.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 36.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 35.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 34.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 33.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 32.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 31.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 30.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 29.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 28.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 27.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 49.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 48.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 24.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 26.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 25.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 47.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 46.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 23.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 44.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 45.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 22.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 21.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 43.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 42.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 41.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 20.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 19.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 18.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 40.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 39.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 38.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 17.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 16.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 15.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 37.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 36.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 35.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 14.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 13.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 32.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 33.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 12.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 11.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 10.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 31.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 30.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 29.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 08.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 09.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 07.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 28.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 25.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 05.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 26.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 27.jpg
- File:149 (il sito dei futuri tunnel principali L.V.) 06.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 21.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 20.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 19.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 17.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 18.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 16.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 15.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 13.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 14.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 11.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 12.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 10.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 09.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 07.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 08.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 06.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 05.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 04.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 02.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 01.jpg
- File:051 (l'area sopra i futuri tunnel di Cattinara) 03.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 50.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 49.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 48.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 47.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 46.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 45.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 44.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 43.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 42.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 41.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 40.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 39.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 38.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 37.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 36.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 35.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 34.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 33.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 32.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 31.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 29.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 30.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 28.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 27.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 26.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 25.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 24.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 23.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 22.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 21.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 19.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 20.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 18.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 17.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 16.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 15.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 14.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 11.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 13.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 12.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 08.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 10.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 09.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 07.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 06.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 04.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 05.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 01.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 03.jpg
- File:001 (la valle di Longera dalla via De Marchesetti) 02.jpg
_23.jpg){kind=link}
_24.jpg){kind=link}
_22.jpg){kind=link}
_50.jpg){kind=link}
_49.jpg){kind=link}
_48.jpg){kind=link}
_47.jpg){kind=link}
_46.jpg){kind=link}
_45.jpg){kind=link}
_44.jpg){kind=link}
_43.jpg){kind=link}
_42.jpg){kind=link}
_41.jpg){kind=link}
_40.jpg){kind=link}
_39.jpg){kind=link}
_38.jpg){kind=link}
_37.jpg){kind=link}
_36.jpg){kind=link}
_35.jpg){kind=link}
_34.jpg){kind=link}
_33.jpg){kind=link}
_32.jpg){kind=link}
_31.jpg){kind=link}
_30.jpg){kind=link}
_29.jpg){kind=link}
_28.jpg){kind=link}
_27.jpg){kind=link}
_49.jpg){kind=link}
_48.jpg){kind=link}
_24.jpg){kind=link}
_26.jpg){kind=link}
_25.jpg){kind=link}
_47.jpg){kind=link}
_46.jpg){kind=link}
_23.jpg){kind=link}
_44.jpg){kind=link}
_45.jpg){kind=link}
_22.jpg){kind=link}
_21.jpg){kind=link}
_43.jpg){kind=link}
_42.jpg){kind=link}
_41.jpg){kind=link}
_20.jpg){kind=link}
_19.jpg){kind=link}
_18.jpg){kind=link}
_40.jpg){kind=link}
_39.jpg){kind=link}
_38.jpg){kind=link}
_17.jpg){kind=link}
_16.jpg){kind=link}
_15.jpg){kind=link}
_37.jpg){kind=link}
_36.jpg){kind=link}
_35.jpg){kind=link}
_14.jpg){kind=link}
_13.jpg){kind=link}
_32.jpg){kind=link}
_33.jpg){kind=link}
_12.jpg){kind=link}
_11.jpg){kind=link}
_10.jpg){kind=link}
_31.jpg){kind=link}
_30.jpg){kind=link}
_29.jpg){kind=link}
_08.jpg){kind=link}
_09.jpg){kind=link}
_07.jpg){kind=link}
_28.jpg){kind=link}
_25.jpg){kind=link}
_05.jpg){kind=link}
_26.jpg){kind=link}
_27.jpg){kind=link}
_06.jpg){kind=link}
_21.jpg){kind=link}
_20.jpg){kind=link}
_19.jpg){kind=link}
_17.jpg){kind=link}
_18.jpg){kind=link}
_16.jpg){kind=link}
_15.jpg){kind=link}
_13.jpg){kind=link}
_14.jpg){kind=link}
_11.jpg){kind=link}
_12.jpg){kind=link}
_10.jpg){kind=link}
_09.jpg){kind=link}
_07.jpg){kind=link}
_08.jpg){kind=link}
_06.jpg){kind=link}
_05.jpg){kind=link}
_04.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
_50.jpg){kind=link}
_49.jpg){kind=link}
_48.jpg){kind=link}
_47.jpg){kind=link}
_46.jpg){kind=link}
_45.jpg){kind=link}
_44.jpg){kind=link}
_43.jpg){kind=link}
_42.jpg){kind=link}
_41.jpg){kind=link}
_40.jpg){kind=link}
_39.jpg){kind=link}
_38.jpg){kind=link}
_37.jpg){kind=link}
_36.jpg){kind=link}
_35.jpg){kind=link}
_34.jpg){kind=link}
_33.jpg){kind=link}
_32.jpg){kind=link}
_31.jpg){kind=link}
_29.jpg){kind=link}
_30.jpg){kind=link}
_28.jpg){kind=link}
_27.jpg){kind=link}
_26.jpg){kind=link}
_25.jpg){kind=link}
_24.jpg){kind=link}
_23.jpg){kind=link}
_22.jpg){kind=link}
_21.jpg){kind=link}
_19.jpg){kind=link}
_20.jpg){kind=link}
_18.jpg){kind=link}
_17.jpg){kind=link}
_16.jpg){kind=link}
_15.jpg){kind=link}
_14.jpg){kind=link}
_11.jpg){kind=link}
_13.jpg){kind=link}
_12.jpg){kind=link}
_08.jpg){kind=link}
_10.jpg){kind=link}
_09.jpg){kind=link}
_07.jpg){kind=link}
_06.jpg){kind=link}
_04.jpg){kind=link}
_05.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
RoadMan Italy (talk) 15:21, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Can you please cite your "legal reason" that these must be deleted? --RAN (talk) 18:27, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- At the beginning I did not know well the differences between the various copiryght options and so I was probably wrong and I would like to eliminate for safety to avoid complaints etc ...
- Also I'd like to delete all the photos and then close my messy account to recreate one dedicated to my passion. RoadMan Italy (talk) 17:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- As far as I can understand, the only files that can be speedily deleted are:
- File:Johny Rockets.png, because it's a scaled-down version of File:Johnny Rockets logo.png
- File:Caddy's logo.png, because is a copyrighted logo and I think it goes over the threshold of originality
- File:Mario Toniutti.png, because it's copyvio, and was tagged accordingly.
- All other photos are sufficiently legitimate at first glance. Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 16:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Comment I'm afraid that all files listed here are suitable for deletion due to a usually no-go problem. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:52, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Procedural close. Specific files should be nominated for specific reasons. — Racconish 💬 11:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [4]. Yann (talk) 19:29, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=618587754#File:Health_Affairs_Journal_Logo.png){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Proposed by deletion by User:Ellywa because of unclear source Vysotsky (talk) 13:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Please give me some time to trace & contact the original source. Vysotsky (talk) 13:15, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- My original note on this file: "please see my comment here. The given youtube source says this film is a copy from facebook, so it is copyrighted by someone else, not the youtube channel owner. ". I hope the quest of Vysotsky will be succesful. Ellywa (talk) 19:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Contacted source, but no answer as yet. Vysotsky (talk) 20:31, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- No answer. Vysotsky (talk) 11:01, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Vysotsky: . Do you expect an answer within a reasonable timeframe, or can this DR be closed? Ellywa (talk) 14:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Close please, if possible. Vysotsky (talk) 15:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Vysotsky: . Do you expect an answer within a reasonable timeframe, or can this DR be closed? Ellywa (talk) 14:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- No answer. Vysotsky (talk) 11:01, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Contacted source, but no answer as yet. Vysotsky (talk) 20:31, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- My original note on this file: "please see my comment here. The given youtube source says this film is a copy from facebook, so it is copyrighted by someone else, not the youtube channel owner. ". I hope the quest of Vysotsky will be succesful. Ellywa (talk) 19:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 15:14, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:51, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused JPEG logo, out of scope, should be SVG if useful. Yann (talk) 22:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:34, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Selected files show probably recent texts: one informational board and two informational boards. Needs COM:VRT corrsspondence for commercial license authorization from authors of those texts.
- File:4296Bacoor West City Cavite Landmarks Roads 34.jpg (informational text likely from 2008 as the final paragraph states [in English] "Today, the church of Saint Michael the Archangel Parish remains standing on its site for 256 years and continues to worship and give glory to God." The indicated year of foundation is 1752, so 1752+256=2008).
- File:4296Bacoor West City Cavite Landmarks Roads 47.jpg (*text from 2008)
- File:4296Bacoor West City Cavite Landmarks Roads 48.jpg (**text from 2002)
- File:BacoorChurchjf0085 03.JPG (*ditto)
- File:Bacoorjf0078 05.JPG (**ditto)
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:39, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Siegfried Wehrhoff möchte diese Datei doch nicht veröffentlichen. <censored>, Siegfried Wehrhoff (talk) 18:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Zudem finden sich persönliche Daten drin->schnelllöschen! --Berlinschneid (talk) 17:35, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 16:45, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Description reads Photograph taken by Josh Ryan. Released under Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license. Non-commercial licensing is incompatible with Commons. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:10, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hi - can you tell me how to upload this image properly? We own the image and have a signed photo release from the photographer. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A58m6j4 (talk • contribs) 18:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @A58m6j4: You don't need to re-upload the image, If you have a release from the photographer, please have the photographer submit a copyright statement or submit the the document yourself through COM:VRT (the steps are described at the link). Ytoyoda (talk) 18:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
There is an VRTS email received for “File:Hope Dworaczyk Smith- Founder and CEO of MUTHA.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021112210006857. —MdsShakil (talk) 15:58, 22 November 2021 (UTC)- Since the VRTS release was added to the image can this deletion request be closed?
- Pinging @MdsShakil, Ytoyoda can either of you tell me how to get this discussion closed? A58m6j4 (talk) 19:46, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- @A58m6j4 I can withdraw my nomination, though that seems pretty academic at this point. It won't actually do anything and you don't have to worry about this image being deleted. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:53, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept, per ticket —MdsShakil (talk) 19:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Media uploaded to Pixabay in 2021, after the site abandoned CC licensing and switched to a more restrictive license in January 2019. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:34, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nomination. Brianjd (talk) 12:07, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:26, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Not own work, it is a fair use image CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 03:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Obviously not own work as a screenshot. This is from the Ap Store listing of the game and copyright New Star Games. -2pou (talk) 18:18, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Not own work, fair use image CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 03:24, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Obviously not own work as a screenshot. This is from the Ap Store listing of the game and copyright New Star Games. -2pou (talk) 18:23, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Seems above TOO (formerly hosted on enwiki tagged as non-free). Compared to File:1987-1993 Fox B&W logo.svg that is just a few lines, this has more detail of recognizeable spotlights, etc. DMacks (talk) 03:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom. License claim is certainly false. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)- Delete per nom. Newfiebluejay (talk) 16:18, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:30, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of project scope. Unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 01:50, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of project scope. Unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 01:50, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
An advert not used or usable in any article. Out of project scope. — Yerpo Eh? 08:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use. Non-notable blogger deleted in ruwiki. Drakosh (talk) 08:22, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use. Non-notable blogger deleted in ruwiki. Drakosh (talk) 08:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karate0002222 (talk · contribs)
[edit]High quality professional photo but no exif, unlikely to be own work. PCP
Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Seems to come from World of Warcraft CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
google maps copy vio Enyavar (talk) 13:59, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 14:00, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused logos with unofficial wordmarks, out of scope. Leonel Sohns 14:21, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused unofficial logo, out of scope. Leonel Sohns 14:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps, copyright violation Enyavar (talk) 14:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Enyavar: It was uploaded in the first month I'm here and did not know that Screen capture is not allowed. Be free to delete it. Leemyongpak (talk) 17:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- It's not because of a screenshot (screenshots from the public-domain OSM.org would be okay!), it's because it was a google map. Google has database copyrights here, and I trained to spot them. Found ten others today :-D. But yeah, I don't think other users will be mad at you, as long as you don't deliberately upload copyrighted stuff. Cheers, and have fun contributing to the wiki-verse! --Enyavar (talk) 20:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps, Copyvio Enyavar (talk) 14:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Enyavar: It was uploaded in the first month I'm here and did not know that Screen capture is not allowed. Be free to delete it. Leemyongpak (talk) 17:07, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Please delete the file too. It is a wrong version of my own. Leemyongpak (talk) 17:07, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Googlemaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 14:53, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
google maps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 15:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 15:10, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 15:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 15:38, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
googlemaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 15:38, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 15:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 15:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 15:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 15:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:03, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 15:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:03, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 15:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:03, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 15:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:03, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 15:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:03, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
GoogleMaps vopyvio Enyavar (talk) 16:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:03, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Kotofey2016 (talk) 17:14, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oahidullah Kawsar (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:PS and COM:WEBHOST.
- File:ToFi Logo.png
- File:TFi Al Towfiq.gif
- File:Logo ToFi.gif
- File:Muhammad Al Towfiq Sultan IBN Abdul Karim.jpg
- File:মুহাম্মদ আল তৌফিক সুলতান.jpg
- File:Muhammad Al Towfiq Sultan Logo.gif
- File:Muhammad Al Towfiq Sultan IBN Abdul Karim Logo.gif
- File:Muhammad Al Towfiq Sultan IBN Muhammad Abdul Karim Logo.jpg
- File:Muhammad Al Towfiq Sultan Logo.png
- File:Al Islamia Darul Quran.jpg
- File:Welftion Human Welfare Association Logo.jpg
- File:Welftion Flag.png
A09090091 (talk) 19:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:03, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
A09090091 (talk) 19:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:03, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused promotional photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:34, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:03, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Permission from Eric Garault / Pascoandco needed via COM:OTRS/COM:VRT. Habertix (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:04, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 22:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:04, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- Restored: per VRT. -- Geagea (talk) 23:19, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 22:46, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:03, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- Restored: per VRT. -- Geagea (talk) 23:21, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Very low quality, no conceivable use MPF (talk) 00:27, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:51, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by You867 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 — billinghurst sDrewth 01:20, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:53, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MiguelAlanCS as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 — billinghurst sDrewth 01:20, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Unused web-res scan of black & white photo without info needed to determine actual source and copyright status. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per Infrogmation of New Orleans. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:53, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MiguelAlanCS as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 — billinghurst sDrewth 01:20, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused web-res scan of black & white photo without info needed to determine actual source and copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:54, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of a release under the given free license. Copyright is held by the Communist Party of Canada. CentreLeftRight ✉ 01:51, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:54, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright Violation: Video clip is from Philippine Railways as you can see from the watermark and I saw that all videos from that channel are using the YouTube Standard License; which is actually an equivalent to fair use. Jairus is doing... 🎮🦜📷 01:52, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Comment And also that clip is from here: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ACZ_Igqj5Io Jairus is doing... 🎮🦜📷 02:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork. FunkMonk (talk) 01:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
_5_(31829689828).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_5_(31829689828).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Artwork in the US which does nor have freedom of panorama. FunkMonk (talk) 01:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Artwork in the US which does nor have freedom of panorama. FunkMonk (talk) 01:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:58, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Same as File:CheetahHunt.jpg but not properly attributed and uploaded later — Le Loy (talk) 02:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:59, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by DMacks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free creative logo. Borderline enough to be worth a COM:TOO discussion IMO. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Borderline enough to be deleted as precaution, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Disney_Junior.svg somewhat similar is not free. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Duplicate: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:JMC_Class_1950s_in_color.png Jairus is doing... 🎮🦜📷 02:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:38, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
No FOP in Saudi Arabia Caehlla2357 (talk) 06:22, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete building is copyrighted by SL Rasch GmbH and Dar Al-Handasah Architects, its designers. See COM:FOP Saudi Arabia for reason to delete this. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:26, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:38, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Official photos, unlikely to be own work as claimed
- File:!!!Pas Foto Resmi Wabup 2021.jpg
- File:!!!Pas Foto Resmi Bupati 2021.jpg
- File:!Pas Foto Resmi Bupati 2021.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:38, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Filename out of sequence. RevDanielElisAxelrod (talk) 17:25, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use {{Rename}}. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
RevDanielElisAxelrod (talk) 06:53, 8 November 2021 (UTC) {{speedy|Out of scope, Not educationally useful. Maintenance, Redundant/bad quality}}
- Speedy keep Boilerplate arguments which are all not applicable. Uploader, please use {{Rename}} if you want to rename this file. 69.174.144.79 13:59, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Photo available in numerous sites. Unlikely to be own work. ( https://www.viki.com/celebrities/23335pr-desmond-tan?locale=en ) Vaishakh1234 (talk) 08:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jordi as no permission (No permission since)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. Same image found at http://www.diocesivolterra.org/pls/volterra/v3_s2ew_consultazione.mostra_pagina?id_pagina=83, but without date-stamp and regrettably archive.org has no snapshot of that URL. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. PCP. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, likely copied from Facebook or Instagram per metadata. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:00, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
No exif, found on the web incl here https://impactentrepreneur.com/product/regenerative-economics-and-finance-with-john-fullerton/ - think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Screen capture from unknown source and was not used by any article. Tomchiukc (talk) 11:24, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal art by non-contributor. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
io penso che debba essere coonservato\ e' un MIO files un MIO DISEGNO e VOGLIO CHE SIA IL MIO AVATAR
e non vorrei che opinioni esterne facciano si che venga eliminato
fatemi il favore
lasciamo questo disegno e NON SE NE PARLA PIU' PUNTO E BASTA
GRAZIE
QUESTO E' IL MIIIIO AVATAR (FOTO DEL PROFILO) E' MIO DIRITTO INALIENABILE CHE STIA NELLA FOTO DEL PROFILO DECIDERE SE CANCELLARLO O NO SPETTA SOLTANTO A ME !!!!!
QUESTO MIO AVATAR DEEEEVEEE ESSERCI ! PUNTO E BASTA !
finiamola con queste commissioni che decidono sulle cose MIE !
L AVATAR E' INNOQUO E NON VOGLIO SENTIRE RAGIONI !!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alessio Amoretti (talk • contribs) 14:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
AL — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alessio Amoretti (talk • contribs) 13:52, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
(Alessio Amoretti (talk) 13:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC))
- There is an overprinted copyright mark to "AlquiladeKremlino" (?). COM:VRT permission needed. (or simply Delete if the file is unused) --Ruthven (msg) 15:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: I don't see COM:EDUSE. --Achim55 (talk) 17:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Files on Lea Myren
[edit]Suspected COM:FLICKRWASH. They're sourced to what appears to be the uploader's own Flickr account created in November 2021, with just two images. One is missing EXIF data and the other is credited to "HAMANAKA". Since these appear to be previously published, I suggest going through COM:VRT. Related DRs at Commons:Deletion requests/Files on Lea Myren.
Ytoyoda (talk) 15:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright marked in the lower left: HERE group and Garmin are proprietary map data providers. (Possibly a greyed-out GoogleMaps?) Enyavar (talk) 15:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CarlosLazoG (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution, no EXIF, only uploads by this user. Probably copyvio stills taken from a propaganda video like this.
Darwin Ahoy! 15:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Serendipitymarina (talk · contribs)
[edit]Publicly displayed art in the United States where there is no freedom of panorama, and photographs of copyrighted art are protected by copyright.
- File:The Origins of Gay Rights Judy Baca.jpg
- File:Judy Baca Jewish Achievements in Arts and Science.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 18:18, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ytoyoda as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Operation Open Heart (10711472275).jpg
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion as per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (PNG -> JPEG). -- Túrelio (talk) 18:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per COM:File types, the image already exists on Commons as File:Operation Open Heart (10711472275).jpg. There's no gain from converting a JPEG original to a PNG as the uploader did here, since the PNG only produces a larger file with loss in sharpness. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:52, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal file, out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 18:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
A rotated alternative exists: File:Germania1648(3)JPG.JPG —AlphaMikeOmega (talk) 18:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
JPG.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted and not your own work Sahaib3005 (talk) 20:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
out of scope. strange logo with a strange slogan Bestalex (talk) 20:34, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:34, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Flickr account is by Harry Olden, not the artist. Permission needed. Yann (talk) 22:07, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unusable without context, no location given - URL indicates advertising purposes Fl.schmitt (talk) 22:18, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Low quality photo taken with a mobile phone and a high quality alternative exists, File:Johan Wilhelm Palmstruch.jpg. Not in use today. Thuresson (talk) 22:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
UK logo, likely above COM:TOO UK. Comparable originality to the EDGE logo. AntiCompositeNumber talk 23:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 78.190.156.148 as Speedy (Sil) Yann (talk) 23:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
I would like to remove this picture Erdti (talk) 20:40, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 78.190.156.148 as Speedy (Sil) Yann (talk) 23:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
I would like to remove this picture Erdti (talk) 20:43, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Susmuffin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: There is a clear copyright notice at -2:06. It seems that the wrong copyright tag was used. {{PD-US-no notice}} is not applicable per the nominator's rationale, but the link in the "Permission" section suggests {{PD-US-not renewed}}. A search should be performed to see if this trailer has been separately renewed. (As explained by the link, COM:CHARACTER does not apply since the trailer was published before the film.) King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Y'all all this Disney stuff is generally copyrighted - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 182.239.89.6 as Screenshot. Is {{EC-Audiovisual Center}} valid here? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete I have doubts that this licence is free enough for our purposes. In particular it is silent on reuse, derivatives, perpetuity and commercial use, all of which are required and cannot be assumed from silence. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:32, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment see Túrelio's comment in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jacques Chirac, 1974.jpg. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 01:51, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per comments and nom - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Minister of Culture, Sports and Tourism Hwang Hee giving a speech at the Opening Ceremony for ‘Korea-China Year of Cultural Exchanges’.jpg
[edit]
License on Flickr page is Cc-by-nc-sa 2.0, which doesn't match with Template:Korea.net, wondering if the permission ticket allowed Flickr image marked as NC/ND to be uploaded 175.45.62.250 04:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Permissions needed via COM:VRT - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
License on Flickr page is Cc-by-nc-sa 2.0, which doesn't match with Template:Korea.net, wondering if the permission ticket allowed Flickr image marked as NC/ND to be uploaded 175.45.62.250 04:32, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Incorrect licensing - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
License on Flickr page is Cc-by-nc-sa 2.0, which doesn't match with Template:Korea.net, wondering if the permission ticket allowed Flickr image marked as NC/ND to be uploaded 175.45.62.250 04:32, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Incorrect licensing - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
License on Flickr page is Cc-by-nc-sa 2.0, which doesn't match with Template:Korea.net, wondering if the permission ticket allowed Flickr image marked as NC/ND to be uploaded 175.45.62.250 04:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Incorrect licensing - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
License on Flickr page is Cc-by-nc-sa 2.0, which doesn't match with Template:Korea.net, wondering if the permission ticket allowed Flickr image marked as NC/ND to be uploaded 175.45.62.250 04:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Incorrect licensing - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
License on Flickr page is Cc-by-nc-sa 2.0, which doesn't match with Template:Korea.net, wondering if the permission ticket allowed Flickr image marked as NC/ND to be uploaded 175.45.62.250 04:34, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Incorrect licensing - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
License on Flickr page is Cc-by-nc-sa 2.0, which doesn't match with Template:Korea.net, wondering if the permission ticket allowed Flickr image marked as NC/ND to be uploaded 175.45.62.250 04:34, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Incorrect licensing - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Depicted software items are copyrighted and not freely usable GriffintheFolf (talk) 05:36, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
I would delete it myself but I can NOT HubertFiguiere (talk) 15:00, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Depicted software items are copyrighted and not freely usable GriffintheFolf (talk) 05:36, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
I would delete it myself but I can NOT HubertFiguiere (talk) 14:59, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
found elsewhere https://www.memoiresdeguerre.com/article-golitsyne-anatoliy-123147150.html Jmax (talk) 07:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- This photograph is present in David Wise's book Molehunt, saying it's a previously unpublished photo of Golitsyn and with copyright David Wise. So... rob1bureau (talk) 17:44, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Not own work. Copied from Okayama University Site[5] 61.120.241.72 08:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-free material. See source. 61.120.241.72 08:29, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-free material. See source. 61.120.241.72 08:29, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
In my opinion main object here is a copyrighted banner, but there is no freedom of panorama in Philippines. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
blur and unused picture *angys* (talk) 08:47, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - I am sorry for using a blurry picture. My mistake: as its uploader, I will not do that again. PulauKakatua19 (talk) 08:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @PulauKakatua19: This looks like it could have been a good picture, but it is very blurred. If you have similar pictures without the blur, you should upload them. Brianjd (talk) 12:22, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: I understand. I have several more pictures in the way, and none of them are blurred, so they are good enough. PulauKakatua19 (talk) 13:00, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @PulauKakatua19: This looks like it could have been a good picture, but it is very blurred. If you have similar pictures without the blur, you should upload them. Brianjd (talk) 12:22, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - I am sorry for using a blurry picture. My mistake: as its uploader, I will not do that again. PulauKakatua19 (talk) 08:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Virtually un-useful photograph - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Blurry and unused, candidate for vandal usage Ithinkiplaygames (talk) 09:16, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Not sure how this is more of a "candidate for vandal usage" than similar images on Commons. Agree that it is blurry and unused. Brianjd (talk) 12:27, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Blurry poor quality image, but seems to be our only image of condom usage in anal sex; lean keep until we have some decently photographed alternatives. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:14, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Poor quality, unusable for educational purposes - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
As the author and subject I'd like to remove this picture. Willb2016 (talk) 15:20, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, in use -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:25, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- File is no longer in use Willb2016 (talk) 09:29, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging @Infrogmation. Regarding courtesy deletion, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Human penis with foreskin.jpg. Brianjd (talk) 11:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion. - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, but Italy has no freedom-of-panorama exception. So, as the portrait is likely still in copyright, a permission from its creator is required. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
jpg.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
jpg.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is clearly a promotional shot, not the author's own work, and not available as free-use. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Esteban ocon.jpg is also of interest as it appears to be the same shot, just cropped differently. SSSB (talk) 10:50, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
jpg.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Copyright violation - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
jpg.png){kind=link}
Derivative work of non-free content -61.120.241.72 11:29, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- "観察モニターに映る画面を撮影しており" mean "Taking a picture of the screen on the observation monitor." in description. ---61.120.241.72 11:34, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free content. -61.120.241.72 11:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- "観察モニターに映る画面を撮影しており" mean "Taking a picture of the screen on the observation monitor." in description. ---61.120.241.72 11:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jordi as no permission (No permission since)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion and more research. I've found no external hits for our un-watermarked version of this image. However, a watermarked version of the same photography has been uploaded earlier, July 2021, to the Facebook account of the Arcidiocesi di Gaeta. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Hard to believe the uploaded took this photograph. Permissions required via COM:VRT. Copyright violation - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:20, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: picture from the website bollywoodhungama.com, where there is a copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:20, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
this picture has the wrong licensing and is therefore a potential copyright violent. discriptention states that the photographer is not the uploader and cannot be considered own work Geerestein3 (talk) 11:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
his picture has the wrong licensing and is therefore a potential copyright violent. discriptention states that the photographer is not the uploader and cannot be considered own work Geerestein3 (talk) 11:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/signal for help
[edit]Original image (as well as File:SFH 1080x1080.jpg) was uploaded by someone identifying themselves at User talk:Josh Burleton as "Communications Manager at Juniper Park\TBWA, the agency that worked with the Canadian Women's Foundation to create Signal for Help and have permission/rights to use these files.", but I'm informed that this isn't sufficient if they didn't go through COM:VRT.
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Since the deletion of File:SFH 1080x1080.jpg wasn't noticed for over a month, last year, leaving the article on the English Wikipedia without an illustration, I've made a free version of the image at File:Signal for Help gestures.png and pre-emptively replaced the above images with this, across Wikipedia projects. Lord Belbury (talk) 12:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted work, found on social media Dark-World25 (talk) 12:44, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination = Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: A file with questionable education value. Mys_721tx (talk) 17:21, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:17, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Pasarela de alta Costura en Córdoba Foto pertenece a Azahar e Incienso 191.116.120.187 12:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Redundant gallery page. Just two photos, the same as in the category. JopkeB (talk) 13:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: No contesting - no expansion - deleting. - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Redundant gallery page. Just two photos, the same as in the category. JopkeB (talk) 13:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- I can increase more pictures and all needed information if that is the case of deletion. Muddyb (talk) 09:01, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Back to basics: Gallery pages exist to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media found here on Wikimedia Commons. Usually, they are created to give a sample or overview of all the media on a given topic. (source: Commons:Galleries). When a topic/category only exists of two photos, then there is no need to make/have a gallery page, the category is sufficient and enough. If you still want to keep the gallery page and make it have extra value next to the category, then you should add many more pictures to the category (all being legal, that is: made by you or accompied by a VRT permission for publication) and make a selection to create a meaningful gallery page. And yes, more information would help also, therefor you can use the Wikidata Infobox. But not enough information is no reason to delete a gallery page. --JopkeB (talk) 11:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Redundant gallery page. Just two photos, the category has only three JopkeB (talk) 13:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Either the map is Public Domain (then that needs to be documented), or Gary Gygax is an Undead and he published his own map posthumously 13 years after his death; OR this is a Copyright violation. Enyavar (talk) 13:21, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete unless source map can be shown to be PD. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:29, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Higher resolution versions of these photos exist elsewhere, without the watermarks or any sign of the watermarks having been removed. For example, http://sc01.alicdn.com/kf/HTB1phdRKFXXXXbjXXXXq6xXFXXXD/4687920/HTB1phdRKFXXXXbjXXXXq6xXFXXXD.jpg
- File:ZYD-A Series Double-Stage Vacuum Automation Insulation Oil Purifier.jpg
- File:Supply Double-Stage Vacuum Automation Insulation Oil Purifier.jpg
- File:Supply Double-Stage Vacuum Insulating Oil Regeneration Purifier.jpg
Lord Belbury (talk) 13:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of a comic book cover https://comicvine.gamespot.com/spirit-of-the-tao-7/4000-119616/ published by Image imprint Top Cow TFerenczy (talk) 13:32, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
"Source from the author": please have Katrin Klimova send permission to OTRS to verify a free license. MKFI (talk) 13:46, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
https://www.katrinkaklimova.ru/ Изображения по лицензии Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.Олег Черкасский (talk) 08:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep source website has CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. MKFI (talk) 09:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per USER:MKFI - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Happy holidays.--Missvain (talk) 16:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Crop of photo previously published at https://www.instagram.com/p/CVz4g3uP-ka/?utm_medium=copy_link. Please submit license statement via COM:VRT. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:38, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Copy vio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Windows 8.1 logo and wordmark.svg Leonel Sohns 15:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. Used in promotional Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Logo replaced with svg file at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bergen-Bysykkel-Logo.svg
-> WikiData has been updated as well. This png file can safely be removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathiash98 (talk • contribs) 18:10, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: IN use - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Happy holidays.--Missvain (talk) 16:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:26, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:26, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation (see Crédits : https://www.franceculture.fr/emissions/par-les-temps-qui-courent/par-les-temps-qui-courent-emission-du-mardi-01-decembre-2020 Arnaud Delrue JohnNewton8 (talk) 15:37, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:26, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Used in promotional Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:26, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own works: some photos without EXIF data and some credited to "Michal Heller/OIFP", whereas deleted image File:Widownia OiFP.JPG from this uploader was credited to "Fot. Wojciech Oksztol" (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Widownia OiFP.JPG). Unreliable uploader. Needs COM:VRT.
- File:Opera i filharmonia podlaska 1.jpg
- File:Opera i filharmonia podlaska.jpg
- File:Liberiusz, musical Doktor Żywago, OiFP, fot. M. Heller.jpg
- File:Komarowski i Żywago, musical Doktor Żywago, OiFP, fot. M. Heller.jpg
- File:Scena ślubu Lary i Paszy.jpg
- File:EmilianaatHalfway.jpg
- File:Jaś i Małgosia na Scenie Kameralnej.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
_dit_Charles_XII.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_dit_Charles_XII.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low resolution, no EXIF, probably a copyvio like the rest of this user uploads Darwin Ahoy! 15:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
_dit_Charles_XII.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Screenshot - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
_dit_Charles_XII.jpg){kind=link}
Low resolution, no EXIF, only upload by this user. Doubtfully own work. Darwin Ahoy! 15:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Screenshot, copyvio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused image. Barely an image, just text. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:00, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Portion of a ampaign ad from a notable presidential campaign. SecretName101 (talk) 19:22, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Some other files in the category Newt Gingrich presidential campaign, 2012 in New Hampshire are also primarily text but deserve to be kept for the same reason. Brianjd (talk) 04:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 16:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Erich A. Bardon died 1957 - still under copyright 79.216.38.168 16:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Erich A. Bardon died 1957 - still under copyright 79.216.38.168 16:10, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Erich A. Bardon died 1957 - still under copyright 79.216.38.168 16:11, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Erich A. Bardon died 1957 - still under copyright 79.216.38.168 16:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Erich A. Bardon died 1957 - still under copyright 79.216.38.168 16:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:28, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
As User:Barro3000 uploaded many works of Erich A. Bardon died 1957 - still under copyright my AGF is not there anymore 79.216.38.168 16:14, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:28, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:28, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Banjosound (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:28, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. This is a redraw based on the book cover. Also see the image on the memorial plaque. Maxinvestigator (talk) 16:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:28, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted, no evidence of permission Sahaib3005 (talk) 16:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:NOTHOST - unused, poor quality personal drawing. Nonsense descriptions of "World War 2 is a big war created by Hitler" and " This Evil tank is based on World War 2", further, seem telling. Эlcobbola talk 16:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
highly questionable own work claim, that looks liek an official portrait/publicity image by this actress Denniss (talk) 16:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Can be undeleted if COM:VRT is provided. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claim. It's a promotional photo for the group. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 16:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Can be undeleted if COM:VRT is submitted and accepted. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
File from Unsplash, uploaded there on 26 June 2018. Commons don't allow files to be published here which were published on Unsplash from 5 June 2017 onwards. Hulged (talk) 17:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
totally useless quality - there is slightly better version File:Baltyk d.jpg, and several better similar views of this ship. Pibwl (talk) 17:07, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Hurts my eyes. Per nom - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright image hosted on Commons 2600:1012:B1B9:7F09:BDF5:D0CE:2C07:67D5 17:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. Can be uploaded to Wikipedia. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Not uploaders work. Original source and author unknown. See TinEye GeorgHH • talk 17:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright vio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LucyMaryy002 (talk · contribs)
[edit]probably two copyvios (low resolution and no exif)
Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 17:38, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Driss Sans-Arcidet is born born in 1960. No freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:FC37:E2D9:861B:E9E2 17:52, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
File:La Memoria de Nuestra Tierra "Our Land has Memory" mural Denver International Airport.jpg
[edit]
There is no freedom of panorama in the United States. Works of art displayed in public are considered copyrighted. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:17, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The user-generated Alchetron website has no image-specific license, merely crediting text of the article to Wikipedia via CC BY-SA, and indeed states "This image may be subject to copyright." Original image on GitHub (static jpg) seems to have no evidence of free license. --Animalparty (talk) 18:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
wrong size upload ManuM1999 1 (talk) 18:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 16:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
wrong upload ManuM1999 1 (talk) 19:17, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 16:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
On a larger version [6] of this picture, the watermark indicates it was taken by the Multnomah County Sheriff and not the New Jersey Department of Homeland Security. The county sheriff's website indicates "All rights reserved." Ixfd64 (talk) 19:29, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom. The alleged source document appears to have been produced with no consideration for copyright. This photo appears on PDF page 21, internal page 17. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:54, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom. Contributers2020Talk to me here 14:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Ya'll can ping me when you need things speedy deleted . Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Sign above threshold of originality, no indication it is released under a free license, and clear focus of image so des minimis does not apply. (Part of an enwiki CCI) — Berrely • T∕C 19:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Very poor quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: We have other versions of these coins - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused and likely unfree logo of non-notable organization. Out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Image uploaded to Pixabay after 2019, does not have a sufficiently free license Ytoyoda (talk) 20:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
This is not your own work, the summary says "credit: Stina Stjernkvist". Sahaib3005 (talk) 20:27, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: If permission can be sent to COM:VRT and accepted we can undelete. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Not your own work Sahaib3005 (talk) 20:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: It's just text. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Used as a gallery of personal photos for self-promotion. All photos have been deleted. MexTDT (talk) 15:28, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - now its like a regular userpage. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:34, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Globally blocked user due to the attempt of using several versions of Wikipedia and sister projects for self-promotion using multiple sock puppets. MexTDT (talk) 22:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I also salted it. --Missvain (talk) 16:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Looks like a software ad/datasheet? It seems unlikely the uploader is the author. B (talk) 22:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays! --Missvain (talk) 16:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of the "help" command from a Windows command prompt. Clearly there is sufficient creative text here to demonstrate a spark of creativity and make this subject to copyright. B (talk) 22:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Microsoft Windows 95 Version 4.00.1111 command.com MS-DOS Prompt 492x259.png Brianjd (talk) 04:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Freedom of panorama in Hong Kong only covers buildings and sculptures - not 2D art. The artwork depicted seems to go far beyond de minimis and so this should likely be deleted as a copyvio/derivative work. B (talk) 22:17, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [7]. Yann (talk) 20:02, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
![[7]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=648033239#File%CB%90ATENU770_KMB_109_04-11-2021.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
low-quality duplicate Antemister (talk) 09:55, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 06:32, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Unused file, redundant to File:Flag of Ethiopia (1897–1974).svg ColorfulSmoke (talk) 00:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep — As before, the existence of a new and superior vector version to an old low-quality raster version, does not render the old version redundant and worthy of deletion. --Oren neu dag (talk) 12:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - As a reviewer, I tend to delete crappy resolution images when they're replaced with better quality. But, I can't touch this one until ColorfulSmoke replaces its use on all projects. Ping me when you do. Thanks! Missvain (talk) 16:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
use the svg Antemister (talk) 21:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: speedy kept, still in use. also no need to delete an old png version Denniss (talk) 22:14, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Redirect it to File:Flag of Ethiopia (1996–2009).svg ColorfulSmoke (talk) 00:36, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Comment -- ColorfulSmoke - This file is in use across many projects and a simple redirect won't fix that. Please replace it before nominating or requesting deletion. We can consider deletion when it's replaced. Also, redirects can be handled via COMMONS:REDIRECT, not on DR. Thanks! Missvain (talk) 16:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 73.134.231.246 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Data in this map is nonsense: Average corn yield for the farms in 2015 to 2019 was 8.63 metric tons per hectare, not 1,2 tons — billinghurst sDrewth 03:21, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
The picture involves multiple protected works. Mbazri (talk) 06:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: De minimus doesn't work here - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:15, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
пункт 7. По желанию автора или человека, загрузившего изображение Dipish mot (talk) 19:07, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
пункт 7. По желанию автора или человека, загрузившего изображение Dipish mot (talk) 19:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
![19:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/11/08#c-Dipish_mot-2021-11-08T19:08:00.000Z-File:Главная_дорога_сквера_"Болгарского".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
![18:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/11/08#c-Missvain-2021-12-19T18:16:00.000Z-File:Главная_дорога_сквера_"Болгарского".jpg){kind=link}
пункт 7. По желанию автора или человека, загрузившего изображение Dipish mot (talk) 19:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
![19:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/11/08#c-Dipish_mot-2021-11-08T19:08:00.000Z-File:Бульвар_"Болгарский".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
![18:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/11/08#c-Missvain-2021-12-19T18:16:00.000Z-File:Бульвар_"Болгарский".jpg){kind=link}
пункт 7. По желанию автора или человека, загрузившего изображение Dipish mot (talk) 19:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
![19:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/11/08#c-Dipish_mot-2021-11-08T19:09:00.000Z-File:Фонтан_в_сквере_"Болгарском".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
![18:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/11/08#c-Missvain-2021-12-19T18:16:00.000Z-File:Фонтан_в_сквере_"Болгарском".jpg){kind=link}
пункт 7. По желанию автора или человека, загрузившего изображение Dipish mot (talk) 19:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
![19:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/11/08#c-Dipish_mot-2021-11-08T19:09:00.000Z-File:Сквер_"Болгарский".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
![18:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/11/08#c-Missvain-2021-12-19T18:16:00.000Z-File:Сквер_"Болгарский".jpg){kind=link}
пункт 7. По желанию автора или человека, загрузившего изображение Dipish mot (talk) 19:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
пункт 7. По желанию автора или человека, загрузившего изображение Dipish mot (talk) 19:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
![19:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/11/08#c-Dipish_mot-2021-11-08T19:09:00.000Z-File:Одна_из_дорожек_сквера_"Болгарского".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
![18:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/11/08#c-Missvain-2021-12-19T18:16:00.000Z-File:Одна_из_дорожек_сквера_"Болгарского".jpg){kind=link}
Unused bitmap image with vector version available. Leonel Sohns 14:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - Hi. I can't review this properly without being provided the vector version for review, thanks Leonel Sohns. Missvain (talk) 16:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant to File:Android Jelly Bean Logo.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Some elements of MS-DOS and Windows 95 were partially protected by copyright 2001:4452:458:800:989E:5C2D:F3F3:385C 09:39, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Your argument is very vague. While the command.com software as part of MS-DOS and Windows 95 certainly is copyrighted, this screenshot cannot be. As noted in the Licensing section of the file, the depicted text is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it is not a “literary work” or other protected type in sense of the local copyright law. Facts, data, and unoriginal information which is common property without sufficiently creative authorship in a general typeface or basic handwriting, and simple geometric shapes are not protected by copyright. Ghettoblaster (talk) 20:19, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- KEEP. Actually, the only potentially MS-copyright affected part of this particular image would be the artistic design of the MS-DOS icon, however its appearance in a screenshot of the product itself would seem to be fair use (at least where the screenshot image is used for reporting, commenting and criticism on the surrounding Microsoft software). Jbohmdk (talk) 12:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 15:40, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
The comments in the previous DR were completely irrelevant and the DR was wrongly decided. The issue is whether the work depicted demonstrates a "spark of creativity". Clearly this much text goes beyond a mere listing of facts.
If two people came to you, showed you a copy of some factual data list (like the New England Patriots' 2021 schedule or some such thing), and both said "I created this", they might both be telling the truth - it simply isn't a creative work. But if two people both came to you with the text in this image and said, "I wrote this", one of them must be lying because they wouldn't independently come up with it.
If this were merely a screenshot of the possible parameters of the command with no descriptive text, then it might NOT be copyrightable. (That's debatable. A recent court case held that the API is "fair use", but we don't accept that here. But it's debatable whether a single command and its parameters would be copyrightable.)
But with the descriptive text, there's no question - it's clearly copyrightable. --B (talk) 21:59, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Certainly this comment was very disturbing:
- however its appearance in a screenshot of the product itself would seem to be fair use (at least where the screenshot image is used for reporting, commenting and criticism on the surrounding Microsoft software)
- Fair use is not allowed on Commons! Given the nature of this screenshot, it seems difficult to argue COM:DM. So the question remains whether the icon is copyrighted. Pinging @Jbohmdk. Brianjd (talk) 04:44, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: - this logo - File:Msdos-icon.svg? Microsoft has published that logo under the MIT license - see https://github.com/Microsoft/MS-DOS - so that's not an issue as far as our acceptance of the image. The only issue is whether the text is copyrightable (which of course it is). (As a side note, unfortunately, the text is very very different from the text that was in MS DOS 2.0 - which is available under the MIT license. You can see the MIT-licensed text starting at line 43 of [8].) --B (talk) 12:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- @B: I guess that should be fine, as long as the description includes an MIT licence notice, which it does not. While I was checking that, I was shocked to find it does include {{De minimis}}. Which element could possibly be considered de minimis? Brianjd (talk) 12:37, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Right, but the logo isn't the issue. That is either (a) PD-ineligible anyway, (b) MIT licensed, or (c) de minimis. Take your pick because probably all three apply here. (And certainly (b) applies.) The issue is the text on the screen - not the logo. The text on the screen is what is copyrighted and, as far as I can tell, has never been published under a license compatible with Wikimedia projects. --B (talk) 19:00, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Microsoft also released the MS-DOS operating system including command.com including the help text under MIT Licence. I'll add the MIT Licence info to the list as was suggested. I think this should fix it. Ghettoblaster (talk) 20:44, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ghettoblaster As far as I am aware, only much older versions have been released under the MIT licence; this was covered above. Brianjd (talk) 04:52, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ghettoblaster I removed {{MIT}} after reading your last comment, which suggested it applies to the text. Perhaps I was a little hasty; the logo file linked above has an MIT tag. But if you add it back, you must make it clear what it does (and does not) apply to. Brianjd (talk) 06:44, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ghettoblaster (re revision 609799710) To make it perfectly clear, it is OK to apply {{MIT}} to the logo (because this has already been done in the other file, and no one objects here), but it is not OK to apply it to the text.
- If you believe the text has been released under MIT, please provide evidence of this. B has already stated that the text is very different to the text included in the GitHub repository, and therefore the MIT licence stated there does not apply. Brianjd (talk) 06:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ghettoblaster Also, having been involved in both DRs, you should be aware that these changes are controversial; please don't mark them as "minor". Brianjd (talk) 06:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- And please provide a relevant edit summary with such edits. Brianjd (talk) 06:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- Correct, only MS DOS 1.25 and 2.0 have been released under the MIT license, as far as I know. But this screenshot is version MS DOS 4. It's the same logo, so for the logo, we're covered - but that's not the problem. The problem is the text - the text in the MIT-licensed version bears no resemblance to the text in this screenshot. So that's the copyright problem - the text is copyrighted and Microsoft has not, as far as I can tell, granted any sort of license to this text that we would accept. --B (talk) 11:59, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- Does it help when we blurr the majority of text and keep the parameters? Ghettoblaster (talk) 14:15, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- As far as copyright? That's more debatable I guess ... but I don't see how it would be beneficial to do so even if we could. I looked at the places that the image is in use and I don't see how a blurred image of the command prompt text is appropriate for any of them. I think this image should be deleted and, if someone finds a blurred image useful, we could have a separate discussion about that, but I don't think it makes sense to change an in-use image to be something different than what it previously was. --B (talk) 16:57, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- @B You are saying that we should not overwrite this image, because then the places that use it would not make sense. I think this is an obvious argument, but I have tried making this argument before and I was ignored. Brianjd (talk) 04:46, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- I think it would still make sense in these articles even with out the text. Ghettoblaster (talk) 11:40, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- As far as copyright? That's more debatable I guess ... but I don't see how it would be beneficial to do so even if we could. I looked at the places that the image is in use and I don't see how a blurred image of the command prompt text is appropriate for any of them. I think this image should be deleted and, if someone finds a blurred image useful, we could have a separate discussion about that, but I don't think it makes sense to change an in-use image to be something different than what it previously was. --B (talk) 16:57, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- @B This is not MS-DOS 4. It is MS-DOS 7, which is even worse. Brianjd (talk) 04:48, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- You're absolutely right - I was going off of the filename - I didn't even notice it said "Windows 95". I don't know if it's "worse" - it can't get any more copyrighted ;) --B (talk) 02:21, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- The text did not change, though. Ghettoblaster (talk) 11:40, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ghettoblaster I don't know if the text changed from MS-DOS 4 to MS-DOS 7 (I would expect it did), but that is not the point. It definitely changed from MS-DOS 2 to MS-DOS 7. Brianjd (talk) 11:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- The text did not change, though. Ghettoblaster (talk) 11:40, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- You're absolutely right - I was going off of the filename - I didn't even notice it said "Windows 95". I don't know if it's "worse" - it can't get any more copyrighted ;) --B (talk) 02:21, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- Does it help when we blurr the majority of text and keep the parameters? Ghettoblaster (talk) 14:15, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- Correct, only MS DOS 1.25 and 2.0 have been released under the MIT license, as far as I know. But this screenshot is version MS DOS 4. It's the same logo, so for the logo, we're covered - but that's not the problem. The problem is the text - the text in the MIT-licensed version bears no resemblance to the text in this screenshot. So that's the copyright problem - the text is copyrighted and Microsoft has not, as far as I can tell, granted any sort of license to this text that we would accept. --B (talk) 11:59, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ghettoblaster I'm going to remove {{MIT}} again. Please don't add it back without a consensus here. There are two problems with this template:
- It does not seem to apply to the help text, contrary to what you stated.
- It says:
- This file is licensed under the Expat License, sometimes known as the MIT License
- But this licence does not apply to this file. It only applies to part of it. I don't know how to solve this problem. Brianjd (talk) 05:11, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- How about adding all licences that apply to various parts? Parts of a GNU/Linux distribution are also under different licenses. The MS-DOS logo is definately under MIT License. Ghettoblaster (talk) 11:11, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ghettoblaster I do want to add a note about the logo being licenced under MIT, but using a licence tag that starts with "This file" is the wrong way of doing it.
- But I must concede that there may not be a better way of doing it. When I tried to find an example of licence notices done right, all I found were more examples of them being done wrong. For example, KDE Nynorsk.png combines {{MIT}} with several other licence tags!
- @B: Do you have any ideas? Brianjd (talk) 11:39, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- I asked for help at Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Applying a licence tag to part of a file. Brianjd (talk) 11:59, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what problem you are trying to solve. The text is copyrighted and unlicensed - no amount of tagging the page is going to solve that. If you want to upload an image that contains only the logo and no other copyrighted content, or if you want to upload a screenshot from MS DOS 2, then you are free to do so and tag as MIT. But no amount of tagging this image is going to solve the copyright problem. --B (talk) 21:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- I asked for help at Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Applying a licence tag to part of a file. Brianjd (talk) 11:59, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- How about adding all licences that apply to various parts? Parts of a GNU/Linux distribution are also under different licenses. The MS-DOS logo is definately under MIT License. Ghettoblaster (talk) 11:11, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ghettoblaster As far as I am aware, only much older versions have been released under the MIT licence; this was covered above. Brianjd (talk) 04:52, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Microsoft also released the MS-DOS operating system including command.com including the help text under MIT Licence. I'll add the MIT Licence info to the list as was suggested. I think this should fix it. Ghettoblaster (talk) 20:44, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Right, but the logo isn't the issue. That is either (a) PD-ineligible anyway, (b) MIT licensed, or (c) de minimis. Take your pick because probably all three apply here. (And certainly (b) applies.) The issue is the text on the screen - not the logo. The text on the screen is what is copyrighted and, as far as I can tell, has never been published under a license compatible with Wikimedia projects. --B (talk) 19:00, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- @B: I guess that should be fine, as long as the description includes an MIT licence notice, which it does not. While I was checking that, I was shocked to find it does include {{De minimis}}. Which element could possibly be considered de minimis? Brianjd (talk) 12:37, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: - this logo - File:Msdos-icon.svg? Microsoft has published that logo under the MIT license - see https://github.com/Microsoft/MS-DOS - so that's not an issue as far as our acceptance of the image. The only issue is whether the text is copyrightable (which of course it is). (As a side note, unfortunately, the text is very very different from the text that was in MS DOS 2.0 - which is available under the MIT license. You can see the MIT-licensed text starting at line 43 of [8].) --B (talk) 12:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: I don't agree that the text is above the threshold of originality, it's just a collection of very basic descriptions of the type "does A and then B (requires C)". The MS-DOS logo is MIT licensed as mentioned (no attribution really necessary with that license). That leaves the icons. Taking a look at the examples at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States#Threshold of originality, I dont' think they are above the threshold of originality. I could be wrong in that assessment, basically you'd need a court decision, something from the Copyright Office or similar to determine that. As long as we don't have any of that, I'll go with my assessment. --Rosenzweig τ 21:45, 1 May 2022 (UTC)