Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/10/24
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
{{speedydelete|G7}} Chromaticity91 (talk) 03:20, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: , speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 08:34, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
No source, no author, no anything; highly doubt the uploader can release this as PD User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 08:24, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:04, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Gabinete_1.jpg. May be undeleted 50 years after publication, i.e. 2032, as it is probably a governement work. Yann (talk) 10:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
This is a test image NOSdƎ (talk) 07:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 13:44, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
No more picture Navigator84 (talk) 10:55, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no image uploadewd. --Túrelio (talk) 12:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Masavi does not exist, fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:40, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Masavi does not exist, fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:40, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Masavi does not exist, fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:40, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Fatansy diagram (Gallia ? Ingot/Ordolian Factions ?) out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:33, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
2027 is in the future, this election did not happen, fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:14, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
no country stated, does not seem to correspond to an existing election, unused file, fantasy diagram : out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:18, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:40, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
How can a file from 2002 even be PD? PD (public domain) would be a picture of train from 1892. A09090091 (talk) 19:37, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:41, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 1
[edit]Out of scope files, created by a sockpuppet (Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 94#Emperor1991z is uploading, disruptive editing, account creation forming massive sockpuppeting for Yuiyui2001). If these are based on copyrighted logos, then possible derivative work copyvios too.
- File:Ladies and Gentlemen (HK PlayStation).png
- File:Ladies and Gentlemen (TW PlayStation).png
- File:Ladies and Gentlemen (CN PlayStation).png
- File:Ladies and Gentlemen (KR Xbox).png
- File:Ladies and Gentlemen (FR Xbox).png
- File:Ladies and Gentlemen (UK Xbox).png
- File:Ladies and Gentlemen (JP Nintendo).png
- File:Ladies and Gentlemen (US Nintendo).png
- File:Gentlemen (VN PlayStation).png
- File:Gentlemen (SG PlayStation).png
- File:Gentlemen (TH PlayStation).png
- File:Gentlemen (PH Steam).png
- File:Gentlemen (MY PlayStation).png
- File:Gentlemen (ID PlayStation).png
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:43, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:58, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]More contributions by a now-blocked sockpuppet. The maps themselves seem to be original research works with no references to back up the information presented by the maps.
- File:Ph fil IBC.png
- File:Ph fil PTV.png
- File:Ph fil RPN.png
- File:Ph fil GMA.png
- File:Ph fil GMA Regional TV.png
- File:Ph fil TV5.png
- File:Ph fil Regional5.png
- File:Ph fil ABS-CBN Regional.png
- File:Ph fil ABS-CBN.png
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:53, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 3
[edit]Out of scope, COM:NOTUSED. Unused "super maps" created by a now-blocked sockpuppet.
- File:PH Super Map.png
- File:Visayas Red (Super Version).png
- File:Mindanao Red (Super Version).png
- File:Luzon Island Red (Super Version).png
- File:BlankMap-Philippines-Detail Super Version.png
- File:BlankMap-Philippines-2010-17-10-2 Super Version.png
- File:Blank-map PHMunicipalities Super Version.png
- File:BlankMap-Philippines-noborders Super Version.png
- File:BlankMap-Philippines-regions Super Version.png
- File:BlankMap-Philippines-ProvinceBorders Super Version.png
- File:Filipinas Super Version.png
- File:BlankMap-Philippines Super Version.png
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:59, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 4
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE (unused maps), created by a now-blocked sockpuppet.
- File:IBC 10-DXSI Cagayan de Oro coverage area.png
- File:IBC 13-DXML Davao coverage area.png
- File:IBC 13-DYLA Cebu coverage area.png
- File:IBC 12-DYBQ Iloilo coverage area.png
- File:IBC DYRG Kalibo coverage area.png
- File:IBC DYSJ Antique coverage area.png
- File:IBC 2-DYJJ Roxas coverage area.png
- File:IBC 13 Laoag.png
- File:IBC 13 Manila coverage area.png
- File:IBC 6 Baguio coverage area.png
- File:RPN DXKS Surigao coverage area.png
- File:RPN DXDX GenSan coverage area.png
- File:RPN9-DXKT Davao coverage area.png
- File:RPN5-DXKO CDO coverage area.png
- File:RPN DXKP Pagadian coverage area.png
- File:RPN DXKD Dipolog coverage area.png
- File:RPN5-DXXX Zamboanga coverage area.png
- File:RPN9-DYKC Cebu coverage area.png
- File:RPN8-DYKB Bacolod coverage area.png
- File:RPN10-DZKI Iriga coverage area.png
- File:RPN DZTG Tuguegarao coverage area.png
- File:RPN12-DZBS Baguio coverage area.png
- File:RPN DZRL Batac coverage area.png
- File:RPN9 Manila coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Manila coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Caraga coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Bangsamoro coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Soccsksargen coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Northern Mindanao coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Davao coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Zamboanga Peninsula coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Eastern Visayas coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Central Visayas coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Western Visayas coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Bicol coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Mimaropa coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Calabarzon coverage area.png
- File:PTV Central Luzon coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Cordillera coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Ilocos coverage area.png
- File:PTV-PBS Cagayan Valley coverage area.png
- File:TV5 Caraga coverage area.png
- File:TV5 South Central Mindanao coverage area.png
- File:TV5 North Mindanao coverage area.png
- File:TV5 South Mindanao coverage area.png
- File:TV5 West Mindanao coverage area.png
- File:TV5 Central Visayas Coverage area.png
- File:TV5 East Visayas coverage area.png
- File:TV5 Negros coverage area.png
- File:TV5 Panay coverage area.png
- File:TV5 Bicol coverage area.png
- File:TV5 North Luzon coverage area.png
- File:TV5 South Luzon coverage area.png
- File:TV5 Central Luzon coverage area.png
- File:TV5 Ilocos coverage area.png
- File:TV5 Manila coverage area.png
- File:GMA Eastern Visayas coverage area.png
- File:GMA Palawan coverage area.png
- File:GMA Batangas coverage area.png
- File:GMA Tuguegarao coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Manila coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Cotabato coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Butuan coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Gensan coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Davao coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Pagadian coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Zamboanga coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN CDO coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Tacloban coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Bacolod coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Iloilo coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Cebu coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Palawan coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Naga coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Batangas coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Isabela coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Pampanga coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Dagupan coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Baguio coverage area.png
- File:ABS-CBN Laoag coverage area.png
- File:BBC (Radio Network).png
- File:IBC (Radio Network).png
- File:RPN (Radio Network).png
- File:PBS (Radio Network).png
- File:PH Public (Radio Network) Blank.png
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 5
[edit]Unused graphics of "test cards" (categorized under Category:Formula One). What is the purpose and how are they educationally-useful? On top of that these were contributed by a now-blocked sockpuppet.
- File:F1 Test Card (Qatar).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Chinese Taipei).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Philippines).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Indonesia).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Germany).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Thailand).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Morocco).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Australia).png
- File:F1 Test Card (India).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Vietnam).png
- File:F1 Test Card (South Africa).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Singapore).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Korea).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Malaysia).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Saudi Arabia).png
- File:F1 Test Card (UAE).png
- File:F1 Test Card (China).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Switzerland).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Sweden).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Turkey).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Portugal).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Spain).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Russia).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Monaco, San Marino and Luxembourg).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Hungary).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Italy).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Netherlands).png
- File:F1 Test Card (UK).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Azerbaijan).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Austria).png
- File:F1 Test Card (France).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Belgium).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Argentina).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Brazil).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Canada).png
- File:F1 Test Card (USA).png
- File:F1 Test Card (Mexico).png
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 6
[edit]Copyrighted logos. Not simple enough to not pass COM:TOO. Also, the IBC logo has a similar equivalent (in different hue) at enwiki under fair use: en:File:IBC-13 2011 logo.png.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 7
[edit]Same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Emperor1991z#Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 4: unused "station coverage" maps by a now-blocked sockpuppet.
- File:MBC Map (Radio Network).png
- File:Radyo5 Map (Radio Network).png
- File:ABS-CBN Map (Radio Network).png
- File:GMA Map (Radio Network).png
- File:PH Commercial (Radio Network).png
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:04, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 8
[edit]Unused maps that show historical borders or future borders of Philippine administrative divisions (but all of these maps are contributions by a now-blocked sockpuppet who had a history of vandalizing existing maps). Maps showing future borders may also violate en:WP:CRYSTAL.
- File:Ph Bangsamoro Autonomous Region 2022.png
- File:Ph Bangsasug.png
- File:BlankMap-Philippines-2021-12-06.svg
- File:PH cordillera autonomus region.png
- File:Ph cordillera historical.png
- File:PH samar.png
- File:Ph eastern visayas historical.png
- File:Ph central visayas historical.png
- File:Ph western visayas historical.png
- File:Ph negros island region.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 1935-1945.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 1945-1950.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 1952.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 1956.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 1960.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 1965.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 2007.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 1998.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 2015.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 1987.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 1981.png
- File:PH administrative map blank 1992.png
- File:PH Map (Mayo 9, 2022).png
- File:PH Map (May 9, 2022).png
- File:Old Analog (Philippine Map).png
- File:Region VI (Historical).png
- File:Region IV (Southern Tagalog).png
- File:Region IV-B (Mimaro).png
- File:Region III (Historical).png
- File:Region I (Historical).png
- File:Region II (Historical).png
- File:Region IX (Western Mindanao).png
- File:Region IX (Historical).png
- File:Region XII (Historical 1).png
- File:Region XII (Central Mindanao).png
- File:Region XII (Historical 2).png
- File:Region XI (Historical 2).png
- File:Region XI (Historical 1).png
- File:Region XI (Southern Mindanao).png
- File:ARMM (Historical).png
- File:Region X (Historical 1).png
- File:Region X (Historical 2).png
- File:Region XII (Soccsksargen Historical).png
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- "Police maps" by Emperoro1991z
These two files are unused "police maps" which I doubt are usable either on -wiki or off-wiki.
_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:17, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:20, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 9
[edit]Unused regional maps contributed by a notorious sockpuppet who regularly vandalizes existing Philippine maps and contributing out of scope and sometimes copyvio files. There are newer versions in each of these files, but almost all are contributed by Emperor1991z himself. For others, their socks.
- File:NCR (National Capital Region).png
- File:CAR (Cordillera Administrative Region).png
- File:Region II (Cagayan Valley).png
- File:Region I (Ilocos).png
- File:Region III (Central Luzon).png
- File:Region IV-A (Calabarzon).png
- File:Mimaropa (Southwestern Tagalog).png
- File:Region V (Bicol).png
- File:Region VII (Central Visayas).png
- File:Region VIII (Eastern Visayas).png
- File:Region VI (Western Visayas).png
- File:Region XI (Davao).png
- File:Region IX (Zamboanga Peninsula).png
- File:Region XII (Soccsksargen).png
- File:Region X (Northern Mindanao).png
- File:BARMM (Bangsamoro).png
- File:Region XIII (Caraga).png
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:47, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 10
[edit]Here are some of the last-remaining maps uploaded of Emperor1991z, a now-blocked sockpuppet. All are unused maps with little to no evidence of educational and real-life utility (perhaps other than the contributor's own enjoyment). Some of the files have newer versions contributed by one of their sockpuppets.
- File:Region VI (Panay).png
- File:NIR (Negros Island Region).png
- File:Region VII (Cebu).png
- File:ARMM (Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao).png
- File:BlankMap-Philippines-noborders Digital Version.png
- File:New Digital (Philippine Map).png
- File:PH Administrative Map Blank 3.png
- File:Largest Regions (23) in the Philippines (official).png
- File:JP Administrative map blank.png
- File:23 Regional Flag maps of the Philippines.png
- File:CAR-1 (Cordillera Administrative Region).png
- File:CAR-2 (Cordillera Autonomus Region).png
- File:Region VIII (Leyte).png
- File:SAR (Samar Administrative Region).png
- File:BARMM-1 (Bangsamoro Autonomous Region).png
- File:BARMM-2 (Bangsasug Autonomous Region).png
- File:Map of the Philippines (17 Regions).svg
- File:Philippines (Regions and Provinces).png
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:05, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Info an anonymous IP (likely from the sockpuppet) removed the deletion notice tags on these files in question. I only reverted some, but cannot revert the others (as I suspect the sockpuppet may return and remove the boilerplate notice tags again, which can be time-consuming). Their removals (like this) won't affect this deletion request, however. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:46, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright Violation https://www.instagram.com/p/CSUcNktlbm8/ Emojiwiki (talk) 10:57, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 04:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Without a use. Only used for self-promotion. Gymnicus (talk) 16:42, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 10:56, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Would like to upload a copy without watermark. Angelina Suzuki (talk) 08:45, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Would like to upload a copy without watermark. Angelina Suzuki (talk) 06:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 12:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
There is no Flickr profile of the owner anymore; this source for this image doesn't seem to be reliable, though the owner may have allowed permission to use this image. Lil' Jimmy Da Crinja Ninja (talk) 07:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Keep The original (uncropped) file has passed licence review; I do not see what the problem is. Brianjd (talk) 09:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Original file passed file review and about "though the owner may have allowed permission to use this image", if you have any doubt why don't you ask the original photographer Gage Skidmore or in Wikimedia Commons user:Gage? Tm (talk) 12:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I took this photo and released it under the license listed on the photo. Gage (talk) 13:40, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the prompt answer and confirmation, besides the already flickr licnese review. As your identity is pretty well established, i thinks this can be speedy closed as a slam dunk even by an non-administrator. Tm (talk) 14:45, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn by nominator; no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) Brianjd (talk) 14:54, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
COM:CSD#F1: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation. Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 20:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:11, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wagner-h%C3%B6henberg_paying_his_dues.jpg I missed that I had uploaded a higher res version a few years ago, oops! Falcorian (talk) 17:24, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Added Speedy G7 for this page instead. --Falcorian (talk) 22:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Falcorian: There is no speedy deletion tag on this file. In any case, CSD G7 does not apply here as it has been longer (much longer, actually) than 7 days.
- If you mean that the deletion request page should be deleted under CSD G7, I do not think that is valid, as it is not "unused". But you can {{Withdraw}} your request, allowing it to be closed early. Brianjd (talk) 14:10, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: That's because it's all fixed now! The page (File:Josef Wagner-Höhenberg Paying his dues.jpg) got speedied under G7 and redirected (to File:Wagner-höhenberg paying his dues.jpg), which is why the above link now points to the old one. See here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Josef_Wagner-H%C3%B6henberg_Paying_his_dues.jpg&redirect=no I'll leave it someone better versed in AFD to figure out what to do with this section here, but I suspect we can just remove it. --Falcorian (talk) 23:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Procedural close: Duplicate file already replaced with redirect. (non-admin closure) Brianjd (talk) 09:04, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
The subject of this logo was speedy deleted in three hours at Spanish Wikipedia. Not in use today. Thuresson (talk) 21:37, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Jameslwoodward at 14:28, 26 October 2021 UTC: Recreation of content deleted per community consensus (G4) --Krdbot 19:44, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
The top number indeed contains an error. Also, this image was replaced with a new high-resolution vector alternative. Jooja (talk) 07:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: COM:CSD#G7. --4nn1l2 (talk) 19:20, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samuelle Santiago (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploaded for promotion; see w:es:Usuario:Samuelle Santiago (CentralAuth), and also sockpuppet w:es:Usuario:Aras Samuelle (CentralAuth). Not within scope.
Tol (talk | contribs) @ 20:40, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily. Personal photos by non-contributor (F10); Files and pages created as advertisements (G10). —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:42, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownership claim: higher resolution on official website, colour version largely availaible on google Gyrostat (talk) 09:59, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:37, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:19, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 02:33, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:20, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 02:29, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:20, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 02:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:20, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 02:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:22, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 02:32, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:22, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 02:34, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:23, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 02:34, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
unclear source / DW — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:24, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 02:34, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:33, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 02:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
google maps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 01:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 13:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Lots of copies of this on net - see https://www.google.com/search?tbs=simg:CAQS_1gEJwWvPJ57oAlAa8gELEKjU2AQaAghCDAsQsIynCBo7CjkIBBIU0jGOIs07wyiiHYE2zDbtG4ME9CIaG7_1UgzfpZy7W0FswGz26RsZ1fmaL24xXxgfYVSAFMAQMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgQcUaS8DAsQne3BCRqGAQoXCgNmdW7apYj2AwwKCi9tLzBkczk5bGgKGAoGdG9uZ3Vl2qWI9gMKCggvbS8wZmprdAoZCgZ6aXBwZXLapYj2AwsKCS9tLzAxczB2YwoXCgRob29k2qWI9gMLCgkvbS8wMmg5YmYKHQoJc2NyZWFtaW5n2qWI9gMMCgovbS8wM3FjOXpyDA&q=tommyinnit+room&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjklI3y0s_vAhXaZs0KHSy9CQ4Q2A4oAXoECAEQMg&biw=1020&bih=880&dpr=2 Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:41, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Copyvio. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 01:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. It appears that the uploader does not hold the copyright to this image. gobonobo + c 00:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 00:33, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Repost of an image that has been deleted twice under this same name - image sourced and attributed from Google Images. DrawWikiped (talk) 01:58, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. On a side note, each time, a different photo was uploaded under the same name. --Ahmadtalk 13:32, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Likely out of COM:SCOPE as it seems to be a personal image. Also the claimed uploader is the subject in the photo itself, means the photographer is not the uploader. Needs COM:VRT correspondence of authorization for commercial license from the photographer. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:37, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 14:06, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Two issues:
- File is likely out of COM:SCOPE as it is an unused personal image.
- Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for works previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRT#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the original image overwrite this FB-derived image, if the image is truly self-photographed work of the uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:55, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Looks like its a copyvio. It's most likely a professional agency photo. Doubt it is own work. Image can be seen on lots of websites: [1] [2] — Dudek1337 (talk) 18:49, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete Taken from https://www.lequipe.fr/Football/Actualites/Mondial-des-clubs-l-esperance-de-tunis-ecrase-al-sadd-et-termine-5e/1091183 or http://www.carthagepost.net/post/%D9%85%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%A8%D9%84%D8%A9-%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A9-%D8%B6%D8%AF-%D9%85%D8%B5%D8%B1-%D8%AF%D8%B9%D9%88%D8%A9-%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF%D9%88-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%87%D9%88%D9%86%D9%8A-%D9%88-%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF-%D8%B5%D9%88%D9%84%D9%87-%D9%84%D9%84%D9%85%D9%86%D8%AA%D8%AE%D8%A8-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%A8%D9%8A%C2%A0. First link given cites Reuters as author. A09090091 (talk) 11:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:24, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo, above COM:ToO. OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 09:56, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:17, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:32, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
google maps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 01:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:33, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Not public domain; photographer François Antoine Vizzavona died in 1961 HotaniKG (talk) 01:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Il s'agit d'une photographie officielle d'un cardinal pour laquelle le photographe a été rémunéré et n'a plus aucun droit. Cette photo appartient au cardinal Verdier qui est mort en 1940 : la photo est donc dans le domaine public.Robert Valette (talk) 10:10, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:32, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Strange original location transmission code "6bD1wwFuK-LQ4zcInnIQ" (but no other metadata) indicates it must have come from a type of social media platform. Likely previously published elsewhere. No results on TinEye and reverse Google Image search though. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:41, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:31, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal image per COM:SELFIE: Actor is not notable, a Google search doesn't return favourable results. —Oscitare (talk | contribs) 05:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:31, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation: author's life, Paul Strähle, ended 1985. Owner of the current copyrights of Paul-Strähle-fotos is http://www.straehle-luftbild.de/ Markus Wolter (talk) 07:04, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Architectural drawing or concept image. OTRS permission from artist needed. MKFI (talk) 09:57, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:28, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jowcha2003 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All images appear to be webgrabs, I quickly found the following: https://mondo.ba/Info/Politika/a961210/Bivsi-pjevac-Bijelog-dugmeta-ulazi-u-politiku.html, https://www.discogs.com/artist/1106564-Vladimir-Petrovski-Karter?type=Credits&subtype=Vocals&filter_anv=0, https://www.kurir.rs/stars/1677610/video-sest-sati-do-neba-dokumentarac-posvecen-tosetu-proeskom, https://popara.mk/2020/jovan-jovanov-nominiran-za-najdobar-producent-na-sad-po-trite-nagradi-za-filmska-muzika-ova-e-ogromna-chest/, https://www.amazon.fr/Prada-Cavalli-Krmak-featuring-Balcano/dp/B01MZX2UGN.
- File:Vladan Vojnovic.jpg
- File:Panta-Džambazoski.jpg
- File:Aleksandar-Mitevski.jpg
- File:Elvir-Mekić.jpg
- File:Jovan-Jovanov.jpg
- File:Grigor-Koprov.jpg
- File:Petrovski playing guitar.jpg
- File:IMG-Alen-Islamović.jpg
- File:Goran-Žižak-DJ-Krmak.jpg
MKFI (talk) 10:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:27, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Googlemaps Copyvio Enyavar (talk) 11:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
unused uncategorized artsy flickr photo - out of scope Pibwl (talk) 11:16, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
This photo was taken from the Twitter account of that politician. I don't see the CC license the file was uploaded under there, and I also don't see why the United States House of Representatives would be the author as claimed. So the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle unless it is conclusively shown that it is either in the PD or under a free license. Rosenzweig τ 11:17, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
blurred photo of an unidentified location — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:28, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:25, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 福田 Futian 深圳會展中心 SZCEC Convention & Exhibition Center July 2019 SSG 65.jpg
[edit]Unused low-quality personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 11:42, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:25, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Low quality photographs of unidentified persons. Unlikely to be useful. Last 2 remaining images from a batch uploaded by me about a year ago.
- File:NTNU´s Internationalization Conference 2018-217 (44047950100).jpg
- File:PhdKonferanse-443 (33595692762).jpg
TommyG (talk) 12:35, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:24, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
nothing to show this is the user's own work. looks like a professional photo Lugnuts (talk) 12:50, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:23, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Because of some confusion on their website, I uploaded that image believing the author was O. Tinto, but he told me he was not. He will send me tomorrow another picture to replace this one. Sorry, and thanks for deleting this one. Vmagnin (talk) 13:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
I have replaced that file by: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Velocity_and_sea_surface_temperature_in_the_oceans.png in the Fortran wikipedia pages (French and English). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vmagnin (talk • contribs) 17:04, 26 October 2021 (UTC) Vmagnin (talk) 17:04, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Uploader request within 7 days; not in use. Brianjd (talk) 09:52, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:23, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:22, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Galifrax184 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Monumento a monzon los cerrillos.jpg
- File:Entrada calchines.jpg
- File:Iglesias calchines.jpg
- File:Letrasycruzcalchines.jpg
- File:Parroquiaycapilacalchines.jpg
- File:Parroquia calchines.jpg
- File:Cruz calchines.jpg
- File:Aérea calchines.jpg
- File:Letras calchines.jpg
- File:Capilla calchines.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:22, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AlessanderGuimaraes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability.
- File:Subtarefas Projeto.jpg
- File:TAP Planejamento Responsáveis.jpg
- File:TAP Outras Informações.jpg
- File:TAP Informações Gerais.jpg
- File:Ação de TIC - Fluxo de Trabalho.png
- File:Processo GP.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blankenhornmesstechnik (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity sandbox. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohammed Abbas Naqvi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Syed Mohammed Abbas Naqvi, addressing a Majlis during Muharram.png
- File:B612 20181128 235010 860.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:18, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by خالد محمد خالد إبراهيم (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:18, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
I don't see any educational value with this photo. Out of project scope. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:57, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 11:06, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:15, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:37, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:37, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Taken at least from http://www.quarterly-review.org/middle-earth-v-duniverse/ A09090091 (talk) 11:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused graph of questionable utility. Out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:59, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Text only. Out of scope. Should be in Wikitext within Wikipedia(s) if relevant. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Screenshot of Zoom class about Informatics ... Doesn't satisfy COM:PS. A09090091 (talk) 11:03, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- "Out of scope" is never a valid argument for speedy deletion. Nevertheless, it is not clear what its use is. Its description seems to be nonsense, and it is in the seemingly-inappropriate category Tibet. Brianjd (talk) 14:13, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
derivative work of unclear copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
In-image caption text and poorly-positioned "NH2" over its bond. Have a few PNG and SVG in Category:Homoarginine DMacks (talk) 18:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. We have File:L-homoarginine.svg as appropriate replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:25, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio from https://www.mobilnidum.eu/, due to a photo of the same object on https://www.mobilnidum.eu/mobilheimy-celorocni-pouzite/ MIGORMCZ (talk) 18:28, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
per COM:BOOK. If useful, file should be uploaded to dewiki localy. A09090091 (talk) 18:29, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
File:St. Mary’s Sugar Creek Mission, St. Philippine Duchesne Memorial Park, Centerville, Kansas.png
[edit]Two problems here, the description says " Photo by Dolores Grizzel" who is not the uploader and the text is or was copyrighted. It may be PD-no notice, but that remains to be proven. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:10, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
" foto Nickerie.net" -- not the uploader . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 11:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:10, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marketing Doc Soluções
[edit]Unlikely own work; these files seem to be advertisements:
- File:Logo-certa-Doc.fw.png
- File:1. Doc - Logo 200x120.png
- File:Sede da Doc soluções em 2004.png
- File:Doc Info - 180x125.png
- File:Selo-acacci.png
- File:Sede da Doc soluções em 2021.jpg
- File:Selo-verde.png
- File:Sede da Doc soluções em 2008.jpg
- File:Sede da Doc soluções em 2002.jpg
- File:Logo Selo Verde - Horizontal 01.png
- File:Sede da Doc soluções em 2006.jpg
Francisco (talk) 18:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:09, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of unknown software Atomicdragon136 (talk) 19:22, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:09, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DoctorShoeb (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal file collection, out of scope.
GeorgHH • talk 19:40, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:08, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
no evidence of commons licensing SecretName101 (talk) 20:16, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:06, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
unlogische Lizenzierung: "Der Urheber dieses Werks ist 1946 gestorben". Das ist leider wenig hilfreich bei einem unbekannten Urheber. Goesseln (talk) 21:38, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:05, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Clear copyright infringement, Guardian did not license this under CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. LivelyRatification (talk) 21:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom. Next time use {{Copyvio}} A09090091 (talk) 10:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete I have seen this image many times. Following the link to the Guardian article confirmed my first thought: The Guardian did not take this image, and likely does not own the copyright to begin with (and is likely relying on fair dealing). Brianjd (talk) 14:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:05, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Berlywedding (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images of Skip Colflesh (1951 – 2020) and his jewellery works. Several of these jewels are intricate enough to likely qualify as artworks above COM:ToO. I doubt the photographs are own work either, a few have been published previously: https://www.mindat.org/gallery-26413.html, http://www.palagems.com/gem-news-2014-04. OTRS permission from Colflesh heirs and photographer(s) needed.
- File:Tjb-ring-2.jpg
- File:TOURMALINE-AND-JADE-FLOWER-tjb.jpg
- File:Ring-tjb-fireopal.jpg
- File:Heiniepins-tjb.jpg
- File:TJB-ring-cab.jpg
- File:PICK-UP-STICKS-tjb.jpg
- File:TJB-estate-pendant.jpg
- File:TJB-opal-apatite.jpg
- File:BEACH-tjb-pin.jpg
- File:BH-ring-tjb.jpg
- File:Butterfly-pin-tjb.jpg
- File:Gents-BH-tjb.jpg
- File:Black-opal-tjb.jpg
- File:Quartz-pendant-tjb.jpg
- File:Superman-ring.jpg
- File:Sapphire-scatter-ring.jpg
- File:FOULB-tjb.jpg
- File:Tjb-wg-2.jpg
- File:Tjb-opal-pendant.jpg
- File:Gale-remake.jpg
- File:Theresa-ring-tjb.jpg
- File:MOUSEpin.jpg
- File:4904417 orig.jpg
- File:Calcite-york.jpg
- File:Skip-colflesh-collector.jpg
- File:32575-orig-Tanzanite.jpg
- File:Ruizite-cornwall-2015.jpg
- File:Campgrounds x-country trip PSU 1972.jpg
- File:Top of the World PSU 1972.jpg
- File:Skip-colflesh-youth.jpg
- File:Lightning - pendant designed by Skip Colflesh.png
- File:Skip Colflesh.jpg
MKFI (talk) 10:15, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:36, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
from instagram. Cited as from instagram in photo description RedPatch (talk) 23:34, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Apologies, I have received permission from the photographer. That request has gone via email. Should this photo be posted elsewhere? KGlife (talk) 04:03, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- @KGlife: I tagged your image as needing permission. All instructions are on COM:OTRS. A09090091 (talk) 10:57, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
The photographer has emailed permissions-commons and released the photo. KGlife (talk) 16:26, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:00, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Because the image is inaccurate and not clear to the viewer, and because the background lighting and the image are not clear Redfox6600 (talk) 18:34, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 14:57, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
This picture should be deleted because it is not clear the photography and the background lighting of the picture is not good and because this picture is not educational 2001:1670:8:ED5A:D4E3:6ED9:FFBA:BCA8 06:35, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
The image is not clear due to the reflection of the shooting light on the camera 2001:1670:C:FEBD:A9BD:25F9:A601:C75 16:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept per previous keep. Better quality than most "penis selfies". -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:19, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
I request to delete this image because it is not clear and it is in my previous account, which I do not use and I have new images on my new account, which is Redfox2003 Redfox2003 (talk) 09:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep Quality issues were addressed in the previous requests; the fact that it was uploaded by an old account is not a valid reason. Brianjd (talk) 09:55, 24 October 2021 (UTC)- For what it's worth, even the uploader admitted that the image is useful and of good quality. Brianjd (talk) 09:59, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep This image was previously kept twice and has good quality. Tm (talk) 12:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:58, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The picture is not appropriate because it belongs to the penis of a teenager who has not reached the legal age 2001:1670:8:67FA:14EC:8A8A:4924:AD32 19:35, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- A startling claim suggesting anon either is the subject of the photo or has intimate knowledge about them. I suggest you present your specific evidence proving this allegation privately, email as detailed at COM:VRT. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete COM:PORN at any rate Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:13, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
I created the file but given the discussions and analysis on Wikipedia articles have no use for it anywhere. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:15, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:59, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. Seemingly a corporate profile picture (see https://www.kochandhoos.com/about2). Unlikely to be own work as claimed. mattbr 08:29, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:47, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. A seemingly cropped and lightened version of the same image was published in 2016 at https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2026127/why-are-recent-chinese-immigrants-supporting-trump crediting SCMP Pictures. Unlikely to be own work as claimed. mattbr 08:35, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:47, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
There is no FoP for maps in the Netherlands. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:43, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate file Sahaib3005 (talk) 20:22, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:43, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
zero education value Kotofey2016 (talk) 21:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:43, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:35, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nickpolisinsiluanzambi (talk · contribs)
[edit]copie de https://www.presselibre.net/tag/christophe-kisolokele/
Habertix (talk) 21:37, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
READ... Covid-19 Update ate YULA
[edit]Screenshot of an email, assumed to be non-free. Also likely out of COM:SCOPE text content.
- File:READ... Covid-19 Update ate YULA 1.png
- File:READ... Covid-19 Update ate YULA 2.png
- File:READ... Covid-19 Update ate YULA 3.png
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:56, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete—those slipped my mind, definitely should be deleted. Theleekycauldron (talk) 22:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
spelling in name, replaced by correct file Pawelmb (talk) 22:09, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Comment: @Pawelmb: Next time use {{Move}} A09090091 (talk) 10:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)- Speedy delete Uploader request within 7 days; not in use. Brianjd (talk) 14:25, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Presumably the copyright is held by the artist, Antonio Romoleroux. Evidence of permission is needed.
- File:Niño huaorani cubista, óleo sobre tela, 95 x 70 cm.jpg
- File:Depresión, óleo sobre tela, 180 x 140 cm. 1990.jpg
- File:El mensaje de las modelos, grafito , 42x 30 com.jpg
- File:Natem, papel de abacá y cobre grabado, 200x150 cm. Premio Mariano Aguilera 1995.jpg
- File:La naturaleza y el yo,óleo, 70x50 cm.jpg
- File:Jaguares detalle.jpg
Hoary (talk) 04:10, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Permission has yet to be provided. If it is provided via COMMONS:VRTS we can undelete. --Missvain (talk) 21:34, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Too small to be of any use MPF (talk) 00:15, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:52, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/portal/en/legal-notice, compare Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ramona Manescu.jpg Icodense 02:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused file, redundant to File:Coat of arms of Lesotho.svg ColorfulSmoke (talk) 04:36, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:54, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
redundant to File:Flag-map of Lesotho.svg ColorfulSmoke (talk) 05:36, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:54, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Does not fit in the profile I am aiming for. Angelina Suzuki (talk) 06:51, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
I don't like this photo in my submissions. Angelina Suzuki (talk) 06:57, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Per an old deletion request of the same logo: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Crowdsource_By_Google_Icono.png. As well, source cited in file desc. is a non-free image at en.wiki. —Oscitare (talk | contribs) 09:14, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 19:59, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:City Gate Towers
[edit]The files are images of the City Gate Towers in Bucharest, Romania, which is completed in 2009. According to COM:FOP Romania, there is no free freedom of panorama for Romanian buildings. As Romanian copyright protects copyright for 70 years pma, the building itself won't enter Romanian public domain before 2079 (2009+70). The files are therefore locally copyrightable and unfree.
- File:Bucharest - City Gate Towers 2012 - panoramio.jpg
- File:BucharestCityGates.jpg
- File:Bucureşti - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:BucvharestCityGates3.JPG
- File:City Gate - Turn Sud.jpg
- File:City Gate Towers Bucharest.jpg
- File:City Gate Towers in Bucharest.jpg
- File:City Gate Towers in May 2010.jpg
- File:City Gate Towers.jpg
- File:City-Gates-Towers-Bucharest-2.jpg
- File:City-Gates-Towers-Bucharest-3.jpg
- File:City-Gates-Towers-Bucharest-4.jpg
- File:Let it rain and wash away the pain (14112058158).jpg
- File:Romtelecom - panoramio.jpg
- File:Sediul Romtelecom - panoramio.jpg
廣九直通車 (talk) 09:24, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 20:00, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; artwork by Antonin Kloúda (Prague), 1983 (see https://www.ursulinenkloster-erfurt.de/chronik/ ); no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 10:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 20:00, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No more picture Navigator84 (talk) 10:55, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Sorry, but "No more picture" is not a rationale for deletion. Please provide a policy-based raitonale or a better explanation on why this image should be deleted. Thanks. --Missvain (talk) 20:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Redundant against File:2K 2018 Logo.svg (of higher quality); unused. IceWelder [✉] 13:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 20:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP Guinea, modern building, according to fr:Mosquée Fayçal constructed between 1979 and 1981. Architect not known to me. Please see other DRs of this building, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Grand mosque of Conakry,Guinea.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Grande Mosquee.jpg Elly (talk) 15:24, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 20:03, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
I am the owner of the photo and I have already uploaded a better version of this photo. Maoileann (talk) 16:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @Maoileann: Next time use {{Speedy delete}}. A09090091 (talk) 11:11, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Uploader request within 7 days; not in use. Brianjd (talk) 14:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 20:03, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
no reliable source for the boundaries Abu aamir (talk) 16:07, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep @Abu aamir: Boundaries were simplified. On File:Arabian peninsula definition.PNG (which is given as source), you can see them stretching out from SA for a bit. A09090091 (talk) 11:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello @A09090091: thanks for your input it it was said in the original file "Inspired" by Image:Central Asia borders.png for Central Asia, inspirations cannot be a reliable source, we need to have this map boundaries cited, and even when we find a source, we would have to say “Arabian peninsula boundaries” according to the scholar who defined them, the part in question is only the northern, because the east is arabian gulf and west is red sea and the south is the Arabian sea, the controversial boundary is the north. and in brief this map needs a source says explicitly that only GCC countries plus Yemen form the Arabian peninsula othewise, the name of this file will have to be moved to boundaries of GCC countries plus Yemen, that exactly the name that fits the content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abu aamir (talk • contribs) 08:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC) --Abu aamir (talk) 08:33, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:04, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hello @Missvain:
what is invalid? can you please elaborate? the request is either to delete or to correct the name to fit the content?.--Abu aamir (talk) 14:25, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
The caption read “التعريف السياسي” which means “political definition”, there is no such thing as “political definition” for Arabian peninsula Abu aamir (talk) 13:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE. You can argue about the file on its talk page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: If this map is factually incorrect, then get it fixed. If that's not possible, you need consensus in ar-WP (where it's used) that it shouldn't be included in articles. —holly {chat} 17:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Unnecessary user page. Ox1997cow (talk) 16:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per CSD U1. A09090091 (talk) 11:08, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:04, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
See same reguest Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pam-zhertvam-Chornobylskoi-trahedii-7439.jpg Микола Василечко (talk) 17:34, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
@Ellywa: Also this file. --Микола Василечко (talk) 17:36, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. No Fop in Ukraine. Elly (talk) 17:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 20:05, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
These are all from the 1930s or later, which is far too recent to assume that the illustrator has been dead for 70 years.
- File:Echt Lezen, leesmethode, vanaf 1944, Drukkerij R.K. Jongensweeshuis, Tilburg.jpg
- File:Puk en Muk en Moortje naar Amerika, Drukkerij R.K. Jongensweeshuis, Tilburg (1940; 1e druk 1938).jpg
- File:Puk en Muk Thuis, Uitgeverij Zwijsen, Tilburg (1958 of later; 1e druk 1940).jpg
- File:Echt Lezen (1944), Drukkerij R.K. Jongensweeshuis, Tilburg.jpg
- File:Puk en Muk door Afrika, deel 1, Uitgeverij Zwijsen, Tilburg (1958 of later; 1e druk 1937).jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:24, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 20:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
(late) request by uploader; meanwhile unused; inferior to File:Optical-illusion-checkerboard-twisted-cord.svg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:37, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for assuming good faith on this closure. If you disagree with this decision, please bring it up at Commons:Undeletion requests rather than my talk page. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 20:10, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Likely copyvio (see here).
— Racconish 💬 09:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- La légende sur Commons indique "By Courtesy of David Dawson (Wiltshire Museum)" mais la photo elle-même est réalisée par Chris McNulty cf. [3], les droits d'auteur ne semblent pas respectés. Cordialement, --Pierrette13 (talk) 10:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:56, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, watermarked Gampe (talk) 06:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:58, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Added from talk page of uploader - apperently omitted on DR:
- File:Ota-bubenicek--akvarel-1892.jpg
- File:Ota-bubenicek.jpg
- File:Ota Bubeníček - Jhočeska-vesnička v predjaří.jpg
- File:Ota Bubeníček - Velká Lipka - rybník.jpg
- File:Ota Bubeníček - Vožická kaplička - lípa.jpg
- File:Ota Bubeníček -pohlednice.jpg
Gampe (talk) 06:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: - Images of copyrighted paintings. Painter died in 1962. The images will be in PD 71 years after this year and can be undeleted in 2033. Ellywa (talk) 06:23, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Данный рисунок не соответствует историческому гербу Владимирской губернии. Этот рисунок современная интерпритация неимеющая никакого отношения к настоящему гербу Владимирской губернии. Распростроняя ложное изображение история Владимирской земли будет искажена. 94.158.119.158 08:09, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
This drawing does not correspond to the historical coat of arms of the Vladimir province. This drawing is a modern interpretation that has nothing to do with the real coat of arms of the Vladimir province. By spreading a false image, the history of the Vladimir land will be distorted. 94.158.119.158 08:10, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
This drawing does not correspond to the heraldic description of the coat of arms of the Vladimir province - the crown on the lion leopard is incorrectly depicted. According to the description, the coat of arms is "an image of a golden lion leopard in an iron crown decorated with gold and colored stones, holding a long silver cross in a scarlet field in its right paw. The shield is crowned with an imperial crown and surrounded by golden oak leaves, connected by a St. Andrew's ribbon." There are no colored stones on the crown, symbolizing the unification of inheritances and the overcoming of fragmentation. Therefore, this drawing should be removed or replaced with the forged historical coat of arms of the Vladimir province. 94.158.119.158 08:17, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Данный рисунок не соответствует геральдическому описанию герба Владимирской губернии - неправильно изображена корона на львином леопарде. Согласно описанию герб представляет собой "изображение золотого львиного леопарда в железной, украшенной золотом и цветными камнями, короне, держащий в правой лапе длинный серебряный крест в червлённом поле. Щит увенчан императорскою короною и окружён золотыми дубовыми листьями, соединёнными Андреевскою лентою". На короне отсутствуют цветные камни, символизирующие объединение уделов и преодоление раздробленности. Поэтому данный рисунок должен быть удален или заменен на подленный исторический герб Владимирской губернии. 94.158.119.158 08:18, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Comment
.png)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_na_renovatie_1996.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Blank.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_the_Philippines_(official).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&diff=prev&oldid=610078775&diffmode=source){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_na_renovatie_1996.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_na_renovatie_1996.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_na_renovatie_1996.jpg){kind=link}
_na_renovatie_1996.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Drukkerij_R.K._Jongensweeshuis,_Tilburg.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Keep
Ru: Кроме цвета камней в короне льва всё остальное точно соответствует описанию. Ни в одном из приведённых изображений нет цветных камней. В описании цвет камней не указан, поэтому любой цвет камне может быть оспорен. Данное изображение полностью соответствует историческим.
En: Apart from the color of the stones in the lion's crown, everything else exactly matches the description. None of the above images contain colored stones. The color of the stones is not specified in the description, so any color of the stone can be disputed. This figure is fully consistent with the historical images. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 11:10, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Это неправильный исторический герб! И описанию не соответствует! 84.53.206.113 06:34, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
This is the wrong historical coat of arms! And it doesn't match the description! 84.53.206.113 06:35, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- This is your personal point of view. In File:Coat of Arms of Vladimir gubernia 1856.svg the colors clearly correspond to the historical depictions of the coat of arms of the Vladimir Governorate – drawing 1, drawing 2. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 08:07, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Can you link to the correct image? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 08:08, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:18, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
social issues - Photographs of identifiable people, Not educationally useful - Private party, Other licensing/copyright issues - violates the licensing in some other way than a clear copyright violation, Courtesy Deletion - Commons Courtesy 94.105.96.252 15:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Nominator is strongly involved with the article on NL Wikipedia about the subject and "does not want this photo". Permission for publication has been received through VRT. Elly (talk) 15:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Biased, no reason but ramblings. --Achim (talk) 15:43, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Of course we are involved, that is the reason why we don't want this picture, it is our full right to deny a picture of our family memeber! That's the whole point. It is illegal! That's the whole point of having rights, right?--Lamaisondanslinfini (talk) 19:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Mr Boeckstael is public person and as he was pictured in gallery (public place). A09090091 (talk) 11:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Comment Strong involvement is not important. Even bias is not important -only arguments count. Belgian copyright is instrumental. In this case, two things matter. (1) Who was the photographer? Until otherwise proven, we have to assume User:Gavots took this photograph, and there thus seems to be no copyright violation. (2) The second argument is about supposed claims on portrait rights. (Dutch: portretrecht. As this photo was taken in Belgium, Belgian copyright law prevails. Art. XI.174. 1 De auteur of de eigenaar van een portret dan wel enige andere persoon die een portret bezit of voorhanden heeft, heeft niet het recht het te reproduceren of aan het publiek mede te delen zonder toestemming van de geportretteerde of, gedurende twintig jaar na diens overlijden, zonder toestemming van zijn rechtverkrijgenden. In English (my translation): consent from the portrayed person has to be obtained, or, until 20 years after his death, from the heirs. Bockstael died in 1989, so this right expired 31 Dec. 2009. The photograph is therefore not "illegal". Vysotsky (talk) 15:03, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Als een geportretteerde meer dan 20 jaar is overleden, dan geldt er geen “portretrecht” meer, maar kunnen de erfgenamen of familieleden eventueel beroep doen op een ruimer familiaal persoonlijkheidsrecht om de nagedachtenis van de overledene te beschermen. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 94.105.96.252 (talk) 19:16, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 06:48, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BalukuBrian (talk · contribs)
[edit]Proposing two of this editor's uploads for deletion with the request that the admin reviewing this proposal looks at the remainder which look very similar, yet have camera details. The two proposed have none. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation.
IN addition the Photo of Baluku Brian is of the uploader. No evidence that this image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright).
Timtrent (talk) 07:54, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:31, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BalukuBrian (talk · contribs)
[edit]Headshots claimed as own work, PCP
- File:Photo of Namuganza Persis Princess.jpg
- File:Photo of Ndamira Atwakiire.jpg
- File:Photo of Everlyn Chemutai.jpg
- File:Photo of Robina Gureme Rwakoojo.jpg
- File:Photo of Baguma Spelanza Muhenda.jpg
- File:Photo of Catherine-Ndamira.jpg
- File:Photo of Ndamira Catherine Atwakiire.jpg
- File:Photo of Anne Mary Kobugabe Tumwine.jpg
- File:Photo of Moriku Joyce Kaducu.jpg
- File:Photo of Tubo Christine Nakwang.jpg
- File:Photo of Babungi Josephine Bebona.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:31, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:06, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BalukuBrian (talk · contribs)
[edit]These appear to be photographs of copyright items. I have created a full discussion in order that an expert look at them with a view to making a correct determination.
- File:Oburungi bwankole sculptors and artists front 04.jpg
- File:Oburungi bwankole side view front 01.jpg
- File:Oburungi bwankole side view front 03.jpg
- File:Oburungi bwankole side view front 02.jpg
- File:Amahembe Gente (bull) closer view.jpg
_closer_view.jpg){kind=link}
Timtrent (talk) 14:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: I think {{FoP-Uganda}} applies here. --Rosenzweig τ 21:25, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
this file is outdated, the svg version is better because it contains better descriptions. I also removed the remaining useage from wikipedia articles Biggerj1 (talk) 16:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- I don't agree. This is the original version of the svg file and should be preserved. Keep. Contributers2020Talk to me here 02:58, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Contributers2020. --Rosenzweig τ 11:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
It's a Duplicate Yoanna Stoichkova (talk) 12:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yoanna Stoichkova - Please link to the duplicate. I won't delete this image without proof of its duplicate. Thanks. Missvain (talk) 20:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Missvain, I am attaching the link to the original image
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:View_to_Golo_Bardo_mountain.JPG
- Regards,
- Yoanna Yoanna Stoichkova (talk) 08:35, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload; also a duplicate of File:View to Golo Bardo mountain.JPG uploaded by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 22:04, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution version of File:1213184v2xbmbiU.jpg Enyavar (talk) 00:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Is the latter file really just 6 400 identical pixels, as it appears to be? If not, this nomination may not be valid. If so, surely both that file and this file are ineligible for copyright (rather than CC0 and CC BY-SA, as the current licence notices indicate). Brianjd (talk) 09:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- This is not a copyright issue, it's the 1-pixel issue. Low resolution stuff is eligible for deletion. I see no educational purpose in a 1x1 size image, whether it's red, white, transparent or beige. I have dutifully categorized blue, orange and green circles 5 pixels in diameter, recently, but 1 pixel images are ridiculous. Do we go for "Category:Red squares" here? Or is this actually a lil circle? A dot? Should we start producing 1-pixel images all across the the color wheel in order to fill this category? (I just searched for it and its existence blows my mind. So, this is not my hill to die on, keep the red pixel there if you see fit.) But see, there is a already a duplicate of the pixel here, so it can be deleted as unnecessary duplicate. --Enyavar (talk) 20:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. of no educational value and therefore out of COM:SCOPE. It is not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 15:44, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Edge3 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Musical performance by Lady Gaga is copyrighted. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 16:21, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Lady Gaga was hired by the US federal government to perform at the inauguration. Since this is a US government work, her performance is not protected by copyright. The arrangement used originates with this performance as well and is not from a separate copyrighted arrangement. Of course, other performances and works of hers remain copyrighted. But the situation here is just like that of other artists hired to produce works for the US government, e.g., through the WPA. This work is in the public domain just as those are. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 16:28, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- @D. Benjamin Miller: What is "WPA"? To respond to your other points, Lady Gaga was not an "officer or employee" of the federal government, therefore her works are not in the public domain. See w:Copyright status of works by the federal government of the United States. (stating that public domain applies only to "a work prepared by an officer or employee" of the federal government "as part of that person's official duties.") Edge3 (talk) 16:54, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- The WPA was the en:Works Progress Administration, which provided temporary employment to artists e.g. through the en:Federal Art Project. Although those artists' other works may be copyrighted, those which were done when hired by the US government are not. Besides that, there are many other PD works for hire by the US gov't by artists whose other works were copyrighted, e.g., File:"Freedom From Want" - NARA - 513539.jpg. Many of these people who created works for the US government were not full-time employees of the federal government, but instead acted only to produce that particular work. Moreover, the item at hand here is a video recording made by a US government employee (of the full time variety) acting in an official capacity. Lady Gaga didn't produce this recording. The recording is definitely not copyrighted. The singing itself is not the object of copyright; it's a public performance. The recording is what can be copyrighted, but it isn't, because it's a US government work, made by employees of the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies. (Likewise, if you record me singing "The Star-Spangled Banner" on a street corner, the copyright holder for that recording is not me; it's you.) D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 19:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- It's not clear that Lady Gaga was "hired" as an "employee" of the US government. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States states that public domain does not extend to "works commissioned by the US Government, but produced by contractors." And, File:"Freedom From Want" - NARA - 513539.jpg is in the public domain not because it was created by a US government employee, but because it was published between 1926 and 1977 without a copyright notice. Edge3 (talk) 20:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Even then, though, Lady Gaga did not produce the recording. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 20:20, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- It's not clear that Lady Gaga was "hired" as an "employee" of the US government. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States states that public domain does not extend to "works commissioned by the US Government, but produced by contractors." And, File:"Freedom From Want" - NARA - 513539.jpg is in the public domain not because it was created by a US government employee, but because it was published between 1926 and 1977 without a copyright notice. Edge3 (talk) 20:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- The WPA was the en:Works Progress Administration, which provided temporary employment to artists e.g. through the en:Federal Art Project. Although those artists' other works may be copyrighted, those which were done when hired by the US government are not. Besides that, there are many other PD works for hire by the US gov't by artists whose other works were copyrighted, e.g., File:"Freedom From Want" - NARA - 513539.jpg. Many of these people who created works for the US government were not full-time employees of the federal government, but instead acted only to produce that particular work. Moreover, the item at hand here is a video recording made by a US government employee (of the full time variety) acting in an official capacity. Lady Gaga didn't produce this recording. The recording is definitely not copyrighted. The singing itself is not the object of copyright; it's a public performance. The recording is what can be copyrighted, but it isn't, because it's a US government work, made by employees of the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies. (Likewise, if you record me singing "The Star-Spangled Banner" on a street corner, the copyright holder for that recording is not me; it's you.) D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 19:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- The recording appears to be a work of the United States Congress, and therefore public-domain. The song itself is a public-domain work. SecretName101 (talk) 03:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- @D. Benjamin Miller: What is "WPA"? To respond to your other points, Lady Gaga was not an "officer or employee" of the federal government, therefore her works are not in the public domain. See w:Copyright status of works by the federal government of the United States. (stating that public domain applies only to "a work prepared by an officer or employee" of the federal government "as part of that person's official duties.") Edge3 (talk) 16:54, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 15:53, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Odessa Music Comedy Theater
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine, per COM:FOP Ukraine. The architect, Топуз Генріх Володимирович, died 1999. So the building is copyrighted until the end of 2069, these images of interior and exterior can be undeleted in 2070.
File:Odessa International Film Festival 2015 - Festival Palace.jpgFile:OIFF 2021 Festival Palace 01.jpgFile:OIFF 2021 Festival Palace 02.jpgFile:OIFF-2019 Festival Palace 1.jpg- File:Будівля театру музичної комедії ввечері.jpg
- File:Будівля театру музичної комедії перед прем'єрою.jpg
- File:Будівля театру музичної комедії.jpg
- File:Вул. Пантелеймонівська, 1 Театр музичної комедії P1250339.jpg
- File:Зал театру музичної комедії.jpg
- File:МузКомедия - panoramio.jpg
- File:Скульптурна композиція "Муза" перед театром музичної комедії.jpg
- File:Театр муз.комедії ім. Водяного 02.jpg
- File:Театр музичної комедії ім. Водяного.jpg
Elly (talk) 15:42, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- First 4 photos were made during current events and fall under law exception, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Odessa International Film Festival 2015 - Festival Palace.jpg - kept.--Anatoliy (talk) 17:43, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Imho that is a kind of press exemption, and not valid in general, for instance after 10 years... In addition, the communication has a 'mandatory indication of the author's name" (as stated in COM:FOP Ukraine. And that was not done in these uploads. Elly (talk) 18:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- I added the authors to comply with the law. Also, nothing in the law says that this exemption applies only to "press" or within a certain time period:
..it shall be permitted without the consent of the author (or other copyright holder) and with mandatory indication of the author's name and of the source of borrowing: ... to reproduce, in order to highlight current events by means of photography or cinematography, to carry out public notification or other public communication of the works seen or heard in the course of such events to the extent justified by the informational purpose
- I added the authors to comply with the law. Also, nothing in the law says that this exemption applies only to "press" or within a certain time period:
- Imho that is a kind of press exemption, and not valid in general, for instance after 10 years... In addition, the communication has a 'mandatory indication of the author's name" (as stated in COM:FOP Ukraine. And that was not done in these uploads. Elly (talk) 18:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- I believe, the exemptions is clearly valid in this case, as we were covering the film festival, not the building itself. --Amakuha (talk) 07:10, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- How can we interprete the sentence "in order to highlight current events" if somebody uses this image on a general website or Wikipedia article about buildings for instance. This does not comply with our licensing policy imho. Elly (talk) 09:53, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- I believe, the exemptions is clearly valid in this case, as we were covering the film festival, not the building itself. --Amakuha (talk) 07:10, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- My point is, Ukrainian law allows these photos to be used by Wikipedia. Therefore, I don't see a reason to delete them.
- If you are concerned that somebody might copy it from Commons and use inappropriately, we can add an additional disclaimer mentioning those additional restrictions. (Just like we have photos and images of logos, which definitely don't comply with CC BY-SA.) --Amakuha (talk) 16:39, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- As I nominated these files for deletion, could another admin please consider the discussion and close this old DR, for instance @Rubin16: , thanks, Ellywa (talk) 15:48, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: the remaining files after the first four, per nomination, except one that had already been deleted with Commons:Deletion requests/File:МузКомедия - panoramio.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 16:30, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Upon the request of Mr. Nima Bank himself, a new photo was uploaded and later verified by wikimedia. This photo is very old and doesn't represent Mr. Bank anymore. The name of the file is also wrong and has spelled Mr. Bank's last name wrong which has caused problems when Nima Bank is searched on google and other search engines. Rooz1370 (talk) 16:38, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Rooz1370 (talk · contribs) None of your arguments ain't acceptable! We don't delete pictures just because they are about past stages of individuals lives. Furthermore if you check the source link in Farsi Wikipedia, you see the reason for deleting that image: <<تصویر موجود در ویکیانبار: با نام Nima Banki.jpg>> that means the image is repetitive since there is a version of it on commons.wikimedia. Hence, you can't delete this picture since an admin deleted it before. At last, if you think its title is not appropriate, you can rename it or if you don't know how to rename it, ask one of the users or even me.Gire 3pich2005 (talk) 19:35, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Gire 3pich2005 (talk · contribs) Thank you for your interest and contribution. As your suggestion, I have requested a rename for the file and since Nima Bank.jpg was taken, I suggested Nima Bank2.jpg. Thank you again. Rooz1370 (talk) 19:48, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 16:45, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
These colors were never used by the Romanian Royal Air Force. Whoever interpreted the black and white photo as such did not have any notion about the ortochromatic photography. Alex:D (talk) 20:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Delete per nomination. There is no evidence for the use of this roundel, other than the wrong interpretation of black and white photos. P.S. between 1913-1915 there was no Romanian Air Force, there was the Serviciul Aeronautic, until 1915 when the Air/Aviation Corps (Corpul de Aviație) was established. Alin2808 (talk) 16:45, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- I should point out that there are two sources for this image, the infobox-linked Drareg.nl and FOTW which cites Cochrane & Elliott (1998). That does not mean that both sources aren't mistaken, but it should be taken into consideration. Fry1989 eh? 00:42, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Alright, looking at the first source, apparently while it mentions the "1913 - 1915" time period, it also says that this roundel was used in "1947 - 1985" (though I think it's just an editing mistake). Looking at the photos from the same source: first photo shows a crashed Potez XV, a plane that was produced between 1923-1926; all the other photos are WW1 aircraft, however the lightest color of the markings was blue, not yellow. It was the same blue as on the French markings, and it appeared light gray or even white in black and white photos, check here theaerodrome.com. To add a bit to this source, it also gets the colors of the Romanian flag wrong on more than one occasion (blue at the flagpole is correct, not red as shown). I can't talk about the second source as I don't have access to it. And finally, another argument to make is that the roundel has the colors of the National Cockade of Romania, a cockade that was adopted well before the aviation existed, would be odd to choose a very different color placement for the aviation roundel. Alin2808 (talk) 00:51, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Image has no educational value and is therefore out of COM:SCOPE. It is not in use on the projects and should therefore be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:07, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}