Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/09/26
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_duc_de_Normandie.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:WEBHOST and COM:NOTSOCIAL ~AntanO4task (talk) 13:55, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Yann (talk) 15:07, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:WEBHOST and COM:NOTSOCIAL ~AntanO4task (talk) 13:55, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Yann (talk) 15:07, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyright discussion https://www.flickr.com/photos/governodabahia/50278214006/in/photolist-2jAUZmJ-2jZUbuk-2jAWK2Y-2jZPHuC-2jATgZp-2jARHXA-2jAVaXJ-2jAVYMm-2jARxh2-2jAVN16-2jAXmgg-2jAUZjp-2jAVNe2-2jAVN3A-2jAWxLS-2jAUZ9K-2jAVN5z-2jAVMWt-2jAUZ6d-YK9paX-2jAUZq1-XJ4BTt-2jARHVw-YK9p7k-2jAUZg3-YK9piT-YK9peK-YKfKbr-2jZUaKu-2jZTrem-2jZPJjP-ZVpYhw-2jZUccT-2jZTrMa-2jZTqyZ-2jZTqF7-CS5R2u-2jZTrqy-ZVrnoE-ZYaMpP-ZVqxws-ZYbhCi-ZTqT9E-ZYccKR-G2xxqB-2jZTr9X-pk2Xh5-ZYc7q2-ZYbgv8-YTvnHS Somehelp (talk) 14:21, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:15, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
There is no evidence that this contract is released under that CC license. Robin van der Vliet (talk) 14:36, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Robin, this file is sourced to https://www.jonathangabel.com/archive/2012/artworks_lipu-lawa-pi-esun-kama.html, and clicking "© 2020" at the page bottom takes you straight to the license of the entire web site. Love —LiliCharlie (talk) 15:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, I missed that! But the license mentioned on that page is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons: "Media licensed exclusively under non-commercial only licenses (like CC BY-NC-SA) are not accepted either." Robin van der Vliet (talk) 15:51, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: ONLY published under a license that does not allow unrestricted commercial use. --Yann (talk) 16:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Undeleted license on source website is changed to ccbysa. Elly (talk) 05:04, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope ; 2031 is in the far future Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:15, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope ; 2031 is in the far future Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:15, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:15, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:43, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:14, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:41, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:14, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:15, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Yogapriya Rajalingam (talk) 16:10, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- It's not nonsense - it's a birthday card for Polish Wikipedia, part of the Wikimedia 20th celebration in Poland. The cards contain birthday wishes from readers and contributors of plwiki. Natalia Szafran-Kozakowska (WMPL) (talk) 18:59, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Did you understand a single word from it? I seriously doubt it. Don't touch things you haven't the slightest idea of and the life will get better. Yours and ours. Kicior99 (talk) 21:06, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Yogapriya Rajalingam: can you explain your words? any substantive reasons? why don't you like our celebrations in Poland? Wieralee (talk) 21:07, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy kept per COM:INUSE. --Ankry (talk) 21:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Bio.modibokeita (talk) 22:13, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 18:34, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flag of a Hoax Nation. ThomasFan707 (talk) 01:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- This is not a "hoax nation", it's a fictional country from a notable series of children's books that has coverage on several projects. Mysterymanblue 09:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, this is as described a flag from an extremely successful series of children's books, and it's in use on Wikipedia. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:46, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Keep as indeed relevant to Babar (although the design could certainly be improved). GPinkerton (talk) 08:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Poor GIF File, But already exists in Higher Quality SVG Image: Please See File:Wiki letter w.svg. ThomasFan707 (talk) 01:49, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with the deletion but at least make sure before the deletion, any page (uk.wikipedia.org) using the image need to be redirected to the better svg version of the image, thanks. Ivan Akira (talk) 02:04, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, superseded files shouldn't be deleted merely because "a better quality image exists". As the inferior quality images might be more suitable for certain off-wiki tasks. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 01:12, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Just like almost every other fantasy flag deletion, this claim comes without merit. The project scope does not exclude depictions of fantasy, and the nominator has not clearly articulated a reason why this file falls out of the project scope (citing several policies without explanation is not a reason). This flag, in fact, is not just the random creation of some user but represents a real, unrecognized, notable micronation: the Aerican Empire. The flag therefore has illustrative value to depict the Aerican Empire and should be kept. Mysterymanblue 10:52, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, the Wikimedia Commons is not an arbiter of truth and this user registered 6 (six) days ago, their user page reads "Hello There, Thomas the Tank Engine is the Best." And almost all of their edits include proposing the deletion of flags with the same summary. A careless admin would delete this and unfortunately we have too many careless admins "helping out" with DR's, so I propose closing this request as invalid and possible vandalism. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
This is a fantasy flag for a made up micronation supposedly called "Aerica." Although the image is used on a couple of Wikipedia talk pages, but I'd argue the usage doesn't qualify as good faithed considering the images fictional nature. Regardless, there's nothing educational about this and I'd put it in the same category of similar images of fantasy flags for made up micronations that all seem to have been deleted in the past. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 21:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 01:14, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep COM:INUSE. clpo13(talk) 03:19, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Just like almost every other fantasy flag deletion, this claim comes without merit. The project scope does not exclude depictions of fantasy, and the nominator has not clearly articulated a reason why this file falls out of the project scope (citing several policies without explanation is not a reason). This flag, in fact, is not just the random creation of some user but represents a real, unrecognized, notable micronation: the Aerican Empire. The flag therefore has illustrative value to depict the Aerican Empire, and it is being used on several Wikimedia projects to that end. Mysterymanblue 10:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, per "COM:INUSE", the Wikimedia Commons is not an arbiter of truth and this user registered 6 (six) days ago, their user page reads "Hello There, Thomas the Tank Engine is the Best." And almost all of their edits include proposing the deletion of flags with the same summary. A careless admin would delete this and unfortunately we have too many careless admins "helping out" with DR's, so I propose closing this request as invalid and possible vandalism. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Azeem 1020 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most of the uploader's other contrinutions are copyvio. These are low-res images with no evidence of ownership.
Ytoyoda (talk) 16:54, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Delete Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Azeem 1020 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Sport images of various provenance and dates (1979 to present), obviously not own works, no evidence of a free license.
- File:Pakistan hockey 2019.png
- File:Mansoor Ahmed 1994.png
- File:Netherlands hockey 1990.jpg
- File:Ties Kruize 1982.png
- File:PAK48.png
- File:PAK68.png
- File:NED68.png
- File:Ron Steens 1979.png
- File:Pakistan hockey 2003.jpg
- File:Pakistan hockey 2004.jpg
- File:Hassan Sardar 1984 Olympics.png
- File:Pakistan hockey 1978.png
- File:Pakistan hockey 1968.png
- File:Pakistan hockey 1948.png
- File:Azlan Shah Cup 1987.png
- File:Sohail Abbas (2004).jpg
- File:Waseem Ahmed.png
- File:Sohail Abbas 2012 (2).png
- File:Sohail Abbas 2012.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 15:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake 918kaya.tech (talk) 14:03, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Done, courtesy deletion, nominated by uploader a few days after upload. Thuresson (talk) 20:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Inappropriate Anjan9620 (talk) 09:18, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Inappropriate 103.76.82.40 18:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
this is fake 103.76.82.40 23:23, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request, not in use. --Achim (talk) 07:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nicopuntadeleste (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright holder : Departamento de Fotografía del Parlamento del Uruguay, no evidence of a free license.
- File:Diputado (S) Nicolas De Modena Uruguay.jpg
- File:Diputado ( S) Nicolas De Modena.jpg
- File:Diputado (S) Nicolas De Modena.jpg
- File:Nicolas De Modena Dip ( S) Uy.jpg
- File:Nicolas De Modena.jpg
- File:Sesión Parlamento.jpg
- File:Plenario, sesion.jpg
- File:Parlamento Uy.jpg
- File:Png 08.06.21 - Sesión CRR Cit Nº 84 0018.png
- File:Diputado (S) , Partido Colorado, votando.jpg
- File:Diputado (S) , Partido Colorado, Despacho Elinger.jpg
- File:Diputado (S) , Partido Colorado, Uy.jpg
- File:Diputado (S) , Partido Colorado , con el diputado titular Eduardo Elinger.jpg
- File:Diputado (S) , Partido Colorado, Reunión comisión.jpg
- File:Diputado (S) , Partido Colorado Uy.jpg
- File:Diputado (S) , Partido Colorado , en comisión.jpg
- File:Diputado (S) , Partido Colorado Uruguay.jpg
- File:Diputado (S) , Partido Colorado, Despacho.jpg
- File:Diputado (S) , Partido Colorado, votando en sesion.jpg
- File:Diputado (S) , Partido Colorado, plenario, sesion.jpg
- File:Diputado (S) , Partido Colorado.jpg
_Nicolas_De_Modena_Uruguay.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Nicolas_De_Modena.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Nicolas_De_Modena.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Uy.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_,_Partido_Colorado,_votando.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_,_Partido_Colorado,_Despacho_Elinger.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_,_Partido_Colorado,_Uy.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_,_Partido_Colorado_,_con_el_diputado_titular_Eduardo_Elinger.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_,_Partido_Colorado,_Reuni%C3%B3n_comisi%C3%B3n.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_,_Partido_Colorado_Uy.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_,_Partido_Colorado_,_en_comisi%C3%B3n.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_,_Partido_Colorado_Uruguay.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_,_Partido_Colorado,_Despacho.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_,_Partido_Colorado,_votando_en_sesion.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_,_Partido_Colorado,_plenario,_sesion.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_,_Partido_Colorado.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 07:23, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bilquisuabdullah (talk · contribs)
[edit]album/magazine covers, not own work as claimed
- File:DSC 4081-Edit-Edit (1).jpg
- File:INEZ ALBUM EC.png
- File:CityPaper Cover x Jared Wickerham.jpg
- File:INEZ Voicemails and Conversations Album Cover jpeg.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 09:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
High quality images with EXIF, but this user pretends to be several different people.
- File:Hard Rock Hotel and Casino (Biloxi).jpg
- File:Thunder Valley Casino Resort Panorama.jpg
- File:Thunder Valley Casino Resort Exterior.jpg
- File:Thunder Valley Casino Resort Center Bar.jpg
- File:The Resort at Summerlin (interior).jpg
- File:The Resort at Summerlin Pool (Aerial).JPG
- File:Harrah's Tunica Hotel and Casino.jpg
- File:Hard Rock Biloxi Hotel and Casino Exterior.jpg
- File:Grand Lobby.jpg
- File:Greektown Grand lobby.jpg
- File:Greektown Casino Hotel At Night.jpg
- File:Desert Inn.JPG
- File:Cannes High Limit Area.jpg
- File:Cactus Petes - Exterior.JPG
- File:Cannes Lounge.jpg
- File:Galaxy VIP room.jpg
- File:Galaxy Sky room.jpg
- File:Rincon Spa.jpg
- File:Rincon Cabana Cove.jpg
- File:Genting Group.jpg
- File:Harrahs Rincon.jpg
- File:Galaxy VIP.jpg
- File:Galaxy Sky Lobby.jpg
- File:Galaxy Sky.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 15:23, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:26, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
We have File:NH3 ammonia.png that has consistent use of lone-pair on N, which makes these two diagrams self-consistent, in-use at uk:Аміак. Without that detail, it's a composite of unrelated styles with different types of details and we already have a ton of hiqh-quality individual styles at Category:Ammonia--not a clear COM:EDUSE for this image.. DMacks (talk) 15:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete both the nominated file and File:NH3 ammonia.png. Both are incorrect Lewis dot structures of ammonia - there are too many electrons (dots) in the bonds. I replaced the one use of NH3 ammonia.png with File:Ammonia_Lewis_structure.jpg which, despite being low image quality, is at least correct. Marbletan (talk) 17:56, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oooh, good catch about the N–H bonding mistakes. Definitely delete both. DMacks (talk) 18:45, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete both per Marbletan. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:30, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 08:04, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lastidiot1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused file. Not notable. Only (remaining) uploading by this user.
Estopedist1 (talk) 18:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 12:37, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Horrible resolution. We have a ton of Category:Ammonia structures DMacks (talk) 14:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, see also Special:ListFiles/Maitane mocoroa ehu. --Leyo 11:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:11, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:00, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Renato borlaza (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal files that are not useful on Commons.
- File:077 PH1.jpg
- File:076 PH1.jpg
- File:075 PH1.jpg
- File:074 PH1.jpg
- File:073 PH1.jpg
- File:072 PH1.jpg
- File:071 PH1.jpg
- File:070 PH1.jpg
- File:069 PH1.jpg
- File:068 PH1.jpg
- File:066 PH1.jpg
- File:067 PH1.jpg
- File:065 PH1.jpg
- File:063 PH1.jpg
- File:064 PH1.jpg
- File:062 PH1.jpg
- File:060 PH1.jpg
- File:061 PH1.jpg
- File:059 PH1.jpg
- File:057 PH1.jpg
- File:058 PH1.jpg
- File:056 PH1.jpg
- File:054 PH1.jpg
- File:055 PH1.jpg
- File:001 PH33.jpg
- File:001 PH32.jpg
- File:001 PH31.jpg
- File:001 PH30.jpg
- File:001 PH29.jpg
- File:001 PH28.jpg
- File:001 PH27.jpg
- File:001 PH26.jpg
- File:001 PH25.jpg
- File:001 PH24.jpg
- File:001 PH23.jpg
- File:001 PH22.jpg
- File:001 PH21.jpg
- File:001 PH20.jpg
- File:001 PH19.jpg
- File:001 PH18.jpg
- File:001 PH16.jpg
- File:001 PH17.jpg
- File:001 PH15.jpg
- File:001 PH13.jpg
- File:001 PH14.jpg
- File:001 PH11.jpg
- File:001 PH12.jpg
- File:001 PH10.jpg
- File:001 PH9.jpg
- File:001 PH8.jpg
- File:001 PH7.jpg
- File:001 PH4.jpg
- File:001 PH5.jpg
- File:001 PH6.jpg
- File:001 PH1.jpg
- File:001 PH3.jpg
- File:001 PH2.jpg
Orizan (talk) 01:18, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 05:19, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lidsmanthestar (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository
Estopedist1 (talk) 07:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kdx music ofc (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user.
Estopedist1 (talk) 07:36, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arewa Thinker (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Estopedist1 (talk) 07:44, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 07:46, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE undeclared user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". 沈澄心✉ 11:25, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE undeclared user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". 沈澄心✉ 11:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:17, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:50, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:17, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:53, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 14:47, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictitious symbols of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Wikipedia screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:20, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marketing.pal-robotics (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:REEM C.jpg
- File:TIAGO ++.jpg
- File:STOCKBOT.jpg
- File:TALOS.jpg
- File:Logo PAL Robotics high res (1).jpg
- File:TIAGO.jpg
- File:TIAGO BASE.jpg
- File:ARI SOCIAL ROBOT.jpg
- File:Tiago-Base-models-PAL-Robotics.jpg
- File:REEM.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:22, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:22, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:23, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:24, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Очищаю свои персонадльные данные из интернета Иван Глинкин (talk) 15:41, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in unapproved draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, doesn't convey any useful information, no educational value Fl.schmitt (talk) 16:44, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:03, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, doesn't convey any useful information, no educational value Fl.schmitt (talk) 16:44, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:03, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal pic without educational value Fl.schmitt (talk) 17:20, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:04, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Clear my personal data from the internet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Иван Глинкин (talk • contribs) 15:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Selfie by a non-contributor. --Achim (talk) 17:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:04, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal file, out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 17:51, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:05, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal / promotional picture, no educational value. Fl.schmitt (talk) 18:01, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:05, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal / promotional picture, no educational value. Fl.schmitt (talk) 18:01, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:05, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal / promotional picture, no educational value. Fl.schmitt (talk) 18:02, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:06, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal pic, no educational value. Fl.schmitt (talk) 18:07, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:06, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 18:12, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:06, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amit singh rewa 532 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album
- File:Amitsinghrewa532 amitsinghpolice amitsinghpolice532.jpg
- File:Amitsinghrewa532 amitsinghpolice amitsinghpolice532 amitsinghpolice amit singh 532.jpg
—MdsShakil (talk) 18:16, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 18:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:16, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 18:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:16, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 18:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:19, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 18:35, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:20, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prantoroy08 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album
—MdsShakil (talk) 18:38, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:23, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Кисельова Ангеліна (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused and uncategorized. Lacks of EV. Likely out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:52, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:24, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Previously found at https://www.facebook.com/ALTLimited007/photos/a.201017823583276/1438796159805430/ (credits: Franz Landayan, dated June 9, 2021) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oops, I tapped the wrong selection "Nominate for deletion", but I was supposed to tag it for speedy deletion (
Speedy delete) since it is an obvious copyvio. To admins please close this as speedy deleted image. Thanks. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete It's clearly {{Copyvio}}. Ox1997cow (talk) 18:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oops, I tapped the wrong selection "Nominate for deletion", but I was supposed to tag it for speedy deletion (
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Esta foto é explícita imprópria e provocante, e desrespeito ao personagem (Víuva Negra) em si! Esta foto deve ser apagada do Commons! Flashification20 (talk) 13:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Эlcobbola talk 16:42, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Wrong license. Could it be PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 15:16, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted dubious -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:44, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
there is a version of it Trangmai150809 (talk) 07:01, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:17, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
file claims to be frpm subject's instagram content. file has no metadata. 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 18:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Didym at 18:12, 12 October 2021 UTC: No permission since 25 September 2021 --Krdbot 01:37, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
I'll upload a better one. Anna Maltela (talk) 13:48, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete copyvio. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0095460/mediaviewer/rm3443223040/. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:14, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
No reason offered why 1953 publication should be under creative commons license; Might or might not be free licensed for some other reason but better source info would be needed to make that determination. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:54, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- This is probably a scan from a 1953 article by Brian O'Brien (1922-1982) in a NZ magazine (Sports Digest ?). The photograph might be anonymous (the name of the photographer does not appear in the scan, but it was maybe mentioned elsewhere in the magazine). So the text is not in the PD in New Zealand (the author died after 1971). The photograph might be in the PD if anonymous (see {{PD-New Zealand}}). BrightRaven (talk) 07:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Image is a combination of text and photograph; User:BrightRaven notes that at least one is not PD in country of origin (both would need to be for the image as a whole to be out of copyright). False Creative Commons license claim from uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:34, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copy-Vio https://www.forum.se/forfattare/47050/sofia-lundberg/ Skivsamlare (talk) 11:19, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 06:59, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
to replace ii with a better picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sophie in Sydney (talk • contribs) 09:44, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Better quality replacement 203.206.242.84 03:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete me 203.206.242.84 03:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: On the file page, the uploader stated Yoochan Kim wants it removed from his page and wiki commons - to replace ii with a better picture. (diff). --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:21, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:02, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
_duc_de_Normandie.jpg){kind=link}
cette photo n est pas la personne concerné, la personne qui a installé cette photo est fausse Olivier.bretagne (talk) 16:02, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Cropped from facebook. --Achim (talk) 17:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Darwin Ahoy! 15:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
_duc_de_Normandie.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_duc_de_Normandie.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Prince Michel Henri de Bourbon Naundorff, duc de Normandie.jpg. 
mauvaises photo Olivier.bretagne (talk) 16:38, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
_duc_de_Normandie.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. -- Darwin Ahoy! 15:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
_duc_de_Normandie.jpg){kind=link}
this is copy of my another file Futurolog21 (talk) 02:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:LadySlimDragQueen.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Small crop can be done in original pic. Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 02:54, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Improper license claim. Slywriter (talk) 02:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable tiny thumbnail. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Official photo found all over websites like IMDB - https://www.imdb.com/name/nm7195971/mediaviewer/rm2165111553/ AAhelifan (talk) 06:57, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:56, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot from OpenStreetMap from 2017. No usage on Wikimedia projects. Embedded mapping can be used or the image can easily be recreated using current data if required. mattbr 07:03, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thijin William Deng (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository
Estopedist1 (talk) 07:28, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Image of text, seemingly in Spanish. Does it have an educational use? No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 07:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded this flag without enough knowledge about Copyright. I used a logo on the municipality's page which apparently contains Copyright, so I recognize my mistake by asking for its deletion. Akhnati (talk) 06:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:44, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LegendaryLim (talk · contribs)
[edit]Works by the Malaysian government are not in public domain as per COM:CRT/Malaysia. They are copyright-protected.
- File:PM Muhyiddin receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.jpg
- File:JKJAV logo.png
- File:The National COVID-19 Immunisation Programme banner.png
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:48, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LegendaryLim (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be self-photographed images, given the uploader's other problematic uploads.
- File:PNB118 in 2016.png
- File:PNB118 in September 2021.jpg – Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for works previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRT#Email message template for release of rights to a file.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:41, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I found original image. Ox1997cow (talk) 08:37, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:47, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Uploads by Rodrigopoletto
[edit]- File:Rodrigopoletto1.jpg
- File:Rodrigopoletto2.jpg
- File:Rodrigopoletto3.jpg
- File:Rodrigopoletto4.jpg
- File:Rodrigopoletto5.jpg
- File:Rodrigopoletto6.jpg
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. Uploads by Rodrigopoletto (talk · contribs). The uploader's other contribution, File:Rodrigopoletto7.jpg, is a copyright violation. All images are comparatively low resolution and missing meaningful metadata. All dated as the upload date. Unlikely to be own work as claimed. mattbr 08:51, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, FB and transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Asmaa nabiel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Taken from handbook - needs OTRS
- File:PREVENTION OF HAZARD.png
- File:EFFECT OF FIRE.png
- File:SOURCES OF WORK PLACE FIRE HAZARD.png
- File:Types of industrial hazardes.png
- File:Industrial hazard.png
- File:Industrial hazards.png
Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Not own work, as the description says that it is from the archive of Fenice Europa Roniius (talk) 10:19, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
L'archivio Fenice Europa è di propietà mia — Preceding unsigned comment added by NeroMonterosa (talk • contribs) 07:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Not own work, as description says it is from an archive Roniius (talk) 10:19, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: dubious licensing information; certainly not "own work". --K.e.coffman (talk) 12:50, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Description says it's from the private archive of Léon Degrelle and now the archive of Fenice Europa, so not own work Roniius (talk) 10:20, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:53, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Blurry, unusable image uploaded by an SPA and obviously not generated from real-world data; probably a hoax as the "sources" cited do not provide any support for the image and have probably been falsified to disguise the hoax. GPinkerton (talk) 21:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Your accusations are baseless. This image has no problem.--Əbazər (talk) 23:59, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. --Orijentolog (talk) 18:23, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 09:07, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded by a since-blocked sockpuppet of a LTA; only use was inserted by that sockpuppet, still a worthless fantasy without possibility of educational use. @Krd: kept file previously because of this one use. The file is no-longer in use. GPinkerton (talk) 10:36, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and redirected to File:Idioma azerí.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:55, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Mistake, not useful photo Matlin (talk) 10:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:55, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
An unnecessary POV fork of File:Idioma azerí.png; this is the only file uploaded by a SPA. GPinkerton (talk) 10:38, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:56, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
http://works.promo/ からの無断転載 こんせ (talk) 10:58, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Holiday snapof no educational value. 62.216.207.137 11:16, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE undeclared user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". 沈澄心✉ 11:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Commons is not a place to store such private flag proposals. Use Flickr or similar websites. Antemister (talk) 11:18, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Unfortunately that's not really what the standing de facto policy has been on Commons. There are many hundreds of "special or fictional" flag images here, and they're not usually deleted just for being "special or fictional" alone, but only if there's some additional aggravating factor (such as being hoaxing or hatemongering). I don't really see what harm this image does -- it's not official, but it doesn't claim to be official, and it's based on well-known historical symbols. You seem to have a bee in your bonnet about "original research", but it's been painstakingly explained to you several times already that Commons in fact does not have a "no original research policy". AnonMoos (talk) 15:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per Anonmoos. Fry1989 eh? 17:07, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yes we have several such flags here, but they are clearly out of scope. A flag designed by the uploader without any source is private artwork, which is out of scope. AnonMoos seems to be the only one here who really wants to keep them here.--Antemister (talk) 19:40, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- As opposed to all the other private artwork we host here? This is an image repository, not Wikipedia. You seem to have a slant. Fry1989 eh? 19:43, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- Antemister -- why did you say that I'm the only one who wanted to keep them right after Fry1989 voted "keep"???? That comes across more as a desperate denial of basic reality than a smooth rhetorical maneuver or effective debating trick. In any case, there are not a "few" special/fictional/unofficially-proposed flags and coats of arms on Commons -- there are in fact hundreds of them here (very possibly thousands), and you've conspicuously failed to show any reason why this file is worse than most of the others (in fact it's not). If you want the standing de facto Commons policy on special/fictional/unofficially-proposed emblems to be changed, then you should really start a discussion on the matter at an appropriate prominent centralized location (such as Village Pump), because sniping at a few semi-randomly chosen individual images with deletion nominations won't really do the job. However, if you do start such a centralized discussion, you would probably be wise not to insist on your own personal interpretation of original research, because that line of argument hasn't led to any useful insight as to what should be kept and not kept on Commons. AnonMoos (talk) 02:12, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Keep In scope. Per others. Tm (talk) 18:38, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- @AnonMoos: Yes there are hundreds of such flags. Any of them is out of scope. I'll start a DR on that whole category at some time, once I've gathered some supporters.--Antemister (talk) 19:14, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Don't waste your time. You now admit you're on a hunt to get rid of these flags, and as soon as you start that mass DR we'll just quote you here. It's incredibly transparent what you are trying to do and you have been told enough times that Commons does not have such limitations. Get over it and move on. Fry1989 eh? 20:30, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- @Fry: Yes, I know that I am "on a hunt to get rid of these flags", cleaning COmmons from such strange out of scope images.--Antemister (talk) 08:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- You're not cleaning up anything, you're just trying to get rid of things you don't like. I Don't Like It applies. Stop wasting your time and go do something productive, or perhaps Anonmoos and I will have to take your personal bend to a wider forum of discussion. Fry1989 eh? 18:22, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- @Fry: Yes, I know that I am "on a hunt to get rid of these flags", cleaning COmmons from such strange out of scope images.--Antemister (talk) 08:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Don't waste your time. You now admit you're on a hunt to get rid of these flags, and as soon as you start that mass DR we'll just quote you here. It's incredibly transparent what you are trying to do and you have been told enough times that Commons does not have such limitations. Get over it and move on. Fry1989 eh? 20:30, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Keep per COM:PS, "by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page on a Wikimedia Foundation project is allowed." File is displayed on User:R-41, the contributor's user page. Rybec (talk) 01:30, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
I dont know if we make an exception for flags, but this is original art by a currently nonnotable wikimedian, and thus is beyond our scope. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 16:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Have you read the discussion above? There are many hundreds of proposed / "special or fictional" flag images on Commons, and traditionally they have not usually been deleted just for being "special or fictional" alone, but only if there's some additional aggravating factor (such as being hoaxing or hatemongering)... AnonMoos (talk) 18:31, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- There are hundreds of such flags - and everyone is one to much. Such fictional flags are out of scope and confusing for users.--Antemister (talk) 19:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- I really don't think that that's anywhere near the highest priority for improving Commons now. You seem to spend a lot of effort on agitating various pedantical semi-non-issues which have very little effect or results when it comes to improving Commons. P.S. It's spelled "too"... AnonMoos (talk) 02:50, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- Commons:NPOV has since its first revision given "that flag does not exist" as an example of a dispute that should not be raised on this site. This particular flag is no longer shown on R41's user page, and the files in Category:Special or fictional flags typically aren't especially informative or likely to be reused, in my opinion. Rybec (talk) 20:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment sorry, i missed the above discussion, having not checked the talk page. I disagree that the only mitigating factor should be some inappropriate usage. i tried to get a clearly racist file deleted here, and the ONLY criteria by which it could be deleted was that it was original art by a nonnotable wikipedian (ie someone not known publicly for their artwork), and thus out of scope. no one successfully argued that it could be deleted as hate mongering. Im not going to belabor the point, and I Withdraw my request. The commons has a problem: where do we draw the line with postings of original art? if we are not a free webhosting service, then why is this work here? we also have thousands of images of commercial products whose packaging is under copyright. saying "we have them now" is not a rationale for keeping them. however, this problem will not be solved here, and i guess i dont even want to address it here if there is strong support for keeping such images. PS i thought at first this was a flag proposal from a legitimate source, so i was briefly fooled, and afterwards confused: if an uploader doesnt specifically say in the description of their fictional flag its relation to reality, anyone could assume its a legitimate proposal. I do understand having some personal files uploaded for our user page, though.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:58, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- OK, thanks, but I'm not sure how legitimately confusing the image description page can be, when User:R41's username is included in the filename, and template {{Fictitious flag}} is displaying a big red box... AnonMoos (talk) 02:56, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Same as previous DR. Fry1989 eh? 17:35, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep This is none of anyone's business to tell me what I can or cannot upload here. Have I threatened anyone or agitated for violence? No. Have I produced fraud? No. I clearly indicated that it is a fictional flag. Now if this claim has "withdrawed", why is it still open. CLOSE IT. This is really frustrating. I find the rhetoric by Antemister here to be the most condescending and snotty behaviour that I have ever encountered here. The other users, particularly Fry1989 are completely correct, this is not Wikipedia, but Antemister treats it like Wikipedia and is on some crusade to delete original artwork from here. That is censorship, and I hope he fails in his petty crusade.--R-41 (talk) 22:44, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete self-created artwork, no educational use and is therefore out of COM:SCOPE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LGA (talk • contribs) 22:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- That's nice; however, that traditionally has not been the only thing considered in this particular area. AnonMoos (talk) 10:34, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
kept: While I think that we should get rid of all those fictional flags nominating random flags is not the way to do so. Please start a general discussion about this subject and reach some consensus for deletion concidering these personal artworks. Natuur12 (talk) 11:04, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE. This file is no longer used on user pages. 沈澄心✉ 11:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, per previous discussions, in fact I find it kind of odd that this flag, which was previously widely used on user pages, has disappeared from them. This flag is not misleading as it's properly tagged as being a proposal. my issue with the deletion of these false files comes down to two things: 1. (One) Fundamentally, I believe that Wikimedia Commons should be home to all (non-heinous) free media. Free culture isn't just about educational content - it's about making all sorts of intellectual property free to use. It should not be gatekept to a certain type of media. If there were another free media repository out there that was hosting non-educational free media, I would be fine with the Wikimedia Commons closing its doors to somethings. But honestly, we're pretty much all there is, so we have a responsibility to keep free media alive by embracing all of its diversity. 2. (Two) Even without a scope change, I believe that the Wikimedia Commons' "educational purpose" should be interpreted to include cultural and artistic education, not just "the transfer of knowledge". And when I say culture, I mean all culture, not just cultures and subcultures we subjectively label as "worthy". So I oppose these DR's on the basis of my interpretation of this policy—depictions of fantasy and fanart are, broadly speaking, culturally educational. Note how this flags integrates various cultural iconography from Chinese history based on the Five (5) Races Flag.
- Of course, the above would be "a broad view" of educational that this flag is "artistically educational", but it's better than a narrow view of the word as there is no policy specifically against these and the topic remains controversial, with most of these DR's being closed based on the personal beliefs of the closing admin regarding the interpretation of the educational value of such images. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. As it is now, such images are generally considered out of scope. Commons does not serve as a repository for any and all free image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
this edits suggests that the uploader is not the photographer; a permission sent to VRT is needed. Ankry (talk) 12:14, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Invalid licensing information. Source is a dead link, and no indications that the image has been released into public domain. K.e.coffman (talk) 13:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- I can access the source link [1]. It has a "Copyright" watermark and seems credited to w:en:RTBF. I can't tell who the author and/or original copyright holder are. Kusma (talk) 20:14, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- A non-watermarked version is here, with the note "rights reserved". Kusma (talk) 21:47, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. I hate image copyright. –Vami IV (talk) 17:15, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:53, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Photo published also at https://www.pirkanmaanvihreat.fi/portfolio/piila-paalanen/ (2019 Finnish parliamentary election candidates of Green League). Author or permission should be verified via VRTS. Htm (talk) 13:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:43, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
very old picture will u[pdate new picture with full of intro. Miana394 (talk) 14:23, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of personal photo, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
very old picture will u[pdate new picture with full of intro. Miana394 (talk) 14:24, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
very old picture will u[pdate new picture with full of intro. Miana394 (talk) 14:25, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Promo image, no EXIF data, unlikely to be free. Yann (talk) 15:01, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:58, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:58, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Couple of issues:
- No freedom of panorama in Italy. Photographs of copyrighted three-dimensional works of art cannot be freely licensed.
It's likely that the photograph comes from krazart.com, where the artist's other sculptures can be found shot in similar style and shown at similar quality: [2], [3] and [4].- File is most likely from here: http://www.sculturacarrara.it/opere_marmo_metafore.htm Ytoyoda (talk) 04:51, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Likely not the uploader's own work High Contrast (talk) 10:52, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in irrelevant content in Wiktionary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:59, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, doesn't convey any useful information, no educational value Fl.schmitt (talk) 16:43, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use at fr.wikiversity.org. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:42, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Not own work. Random images without original sources and permissions.
- File:R49857760470.jpg
- File:Fayne.jpg
- File:Gen. Lazarevic.jpg
- File:Zhihong.jpg
- File:Saudi-serial-killer-capture.jpg
- File:Rdeb46c0307fff1dcdc5528ed6c7189e5.jpg
- File:Ershov Vadim.png
- File:Ronald Dominique.jpg
- File:Nebojša Pavković.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 16:57, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Random file Danakt (talk) 17:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Image has been previously published (https://www.somethinghaute.com/pakistan-super-league-6-anthem-to-feature-aima-baig-naseebo-lal/), OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 17:14, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Uploader is apparently one of the subjects, photographer unknown. Also the artwork would likely not be covered by COM:FOP US, so OTRS permission from co-artist Marco Rosichelli is also needed. MKFI (talk) 17:17, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
At the World Archery website stated that all rights reserved. I didn't find any CC license there. Voltmetro 17:23, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
low-res duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Re-vistited_Globales_Nachkommentreffen_Hohenemser_Juden_1998.jpg FMSky (talk) 17:38, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Wunsch des Hochladenden, eventuelle Urherberrechtsverletzung (Banner) - siehe auch Ticket#2021092510004778
Deleted: 04:46, 26 September 2021, by Krd. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Uploader not same as photographer, COM:OTRS is needed. A09090091 (talk) 18:01, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:03, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Copymarked by Google; Copyright infringement. Enyavar (talk) 18:08, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:03, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Created by East Bay Regional Park District, probably still copyrighted. Is this {{PD-CAGov}}? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:16, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: https://www.ebparks.org/ has had "© East Bay Regional Park District" and "All rights reserved" at the bottom for many years. Surely, someone would have called them out on that if it was illegal. It does not grant a "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license." — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- On COM:VPC, we had a recent discussion where we decided that works of the CA DMV were public domain despite any copyright notices to the contrary. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:55, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: 07:29, 7 October 2021, by Yann - Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:04, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Fantasy map of a super-huge New Kingdom of the Amarna period. Enyavar (talk) 18:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hhhhhhh Bro
- This map is not in the Amarna period at all. You have a problem with the dates. The date is written on the map in the period of Thutmose III and it is not imaginary at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmed88z (talk • contribs) 18:43, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- en:Amarna period is certainly close enough. The point is, neither in 1500 BC nor in 1435 BC nor in 1380 BC: Ancient Egypt's Kings did never rule all that area marked in your map. Thutmose received some gifts from Cyprus, he waged a war against Mitanni, he did some temporary conquests in Syria, he went into Nubia but not beyond 4th cataract. Egypt had hardly much influence over the red sea, in that period, and certainly didn't control Axum. I never heard of Egyptian rulers in Cyrenaica before the Ptolemy dynasty. Your map, however, suggests he subjugated not only Cyrenaica/Libya, but also Babylon, Mittanni, Axum and conquered half of the Hittite realm. That is what I call definitely a fantasy map. Best, --Enyavar (talk) 19:25, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:05, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Copymarked by Google; copyvio from Googlemaps. Enyavar (talk) 18:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:18, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Copymarked by Google; copyvio from Googlemaps Enyavar (talk) 18:38, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:18, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Copymarked by Google; copyvio from Googlemaps Enyavar (talk) 18:40, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:18, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
I think I spot a GoogleMaps background. If so, copyvio. Enyavar (talk) 18:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:18, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete Photo of no encyclopedic value. Uploaded by the user in order to be used in the promotional article (probably on themself) w:el:Χρήστος Μπουτάτος, deleted from el/WP for lacking notability (cf. the deletion descussion [in Greek]). Commons is not Instagram, or a platform to upload personal photos and selfies ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 19:19, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:19, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete Item of no encyclopedic value. Personal corresponcence uploaded by the user in order to be used as "source" in the promotional article (probably on themself) w:el:Χρήστος Μπουτάτος, deleted from el/WP for lacking notability (cf. the deletion descussion [in Greek]). Commons is not a platform to upload personal documents of no interest and of no encyclopedic content. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 19:25, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete Item of no encyclopedic value. Personal corresponcence uploaded by the user in order to be used as a "source" (for reference) in the promotional article (probably on themself) w:el:Χρήστος Μπουτάτος, deleted from el/WP for lacking notability (cf. the deletion descussion [in Greek]). Commons is not a platform to upload documents from a person's archive that are of no interest and of no encyclopedic content. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 19:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete Item of no encyclopedic value. Personal corresponcence uploaded by the user in order to be used as a "source" (for reference) in the promotional article (probably on themself) w:el:Χρήστος Μπουτάτος, deleted from el/WP for lacking notability (cf. the deletion descussion [in Greek]). Commons is not a platform to upload documents from a person's archive that are of no interest and of no encyclopedic content. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 19:28, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete Item of no encyclopedic value. Personal corresponcence uploaded by the user in order to be used as a "source" (for reference) in the promotional article (probably on themself) w:el:Χρήστος Μπουτάτος, deleted from el/WP for lacking notability (cf. the deletion descussion [in Greek]). Commons is not a platform to upload documents from a person's archive that are of no interest and of no encyclopedic content. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 19:28, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
pretty sure I spot a Google Map here. If so, copyvio. Enyavar (talk) 19:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete Item of no encyclopedic value. Personal corresponcence uploaded by the user in order to be used as a "source" (for reference) in the promotional article (probably on themself) w:el:Χρήστος Μπουτάτος, deleted from el/WP for lacking notability (cf. the deletion descussion [in Greek]). Commons is not a platform to upload documents from a person's archive that are of no interest and of no encyclopedic content. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 19:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete Item of no encyclopedic value. Personal corresponcence uploaded by the user in order to be used as a "source" (for reference) in the promotional article (probably on themself) w:el:Χρήστος Μπουτάτος, deleted from el/WP for lacking notability (cf. the deletion descussion [in Greek]). Commons is not a platform to upload documents from a person's archive that are of no interest and of no encyclopedic content. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 19:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:22, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete Item of no encyclopedic value. Personal corresponcence uploaded by the user in order to be used as a "source" (for reference) in the promotional article (probably on themself) w:el:Χρήστος Μπουτάτος, deleted from el/WP for lacking notability (cf. the deletion descussion [in Greek]). Commons is not a platform to upload documents from a person's archive that are of no interest and of no encyclopedic content. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 19:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:22, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete Item of no encyclopedic value. Personal corresponcence uploaded by the user in order to be used as a "source" (for reference) in the promotional article (probably on themself) w:el:Χρήστος Μπουτάτος, deleted from el/WP for lacking notability (cf. the deletion descussion [in Greek]). Commons is not a platform to upload documents from a person's archive that are of no interest and of no encyclopedic content. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 19:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:22, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Selfie; promotional content with no educational value GreaterPonce665 (talk) 19:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete Photo of no encyclopedic content or value. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 19:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:22, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete Photo of no encyclopedic value. It's the user's gradpa uploaded bythemself in order to be used in theself-promotional article w:el:Χρήστος Μπουτάτος, deleted from el/WP for lacking notability (cf. the deletion descussion [in Greek]). Commons is not a family photo album. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 19:40, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and historical image missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:22, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete Item of no encyclopedic value. It's the user's grandparents marriage certificate uploaded by the user in order to be used as a "source" (for reference) in the self-promotional article w:el:Χρήστος Μπουτάτος, deleted from el/WP for lacking notability (cf. the deletion descussion [in Greek]). Commons is not a platform to upload family documents from a user's archive that are of no interest and of no encyclopedic content. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 19:44, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:22, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Users Walter Camacho Marin and Walter Camacho 5654
[edit]- File:Rodrigo Carazo Odio q.jpg
- File:Ricardo Jimenez Oreamuno.jpg
- File:Alfredo Gonzalez Flores 1.jpg
- File:Federico Tinoco.jpg
- File:Otilio Ulate.jpg
- File:Rafael Yglesias.jpg
- File:Jose Joaquin Rodriguez.jpg
- File:Bernardo Soto.jpg
- File:Carlos Durán.jpg
- File:Prospero Fernadez.jpg
- File:Aniceto Esquivel.jpg
- File:Saturnino Lizano.jpg
- File:Tomas Guardia Gutierrez.jpg
- File:Jesus Jimenez Zamora.jpg
- File:Bruno Carranza.jpg
- File:Jose Maria Montealegre.jpg
- File:José Maria Castro Madriz.jpg
- File:Juan Mora Porras.jpg
- File:Ascensión Esquivel Ibarra.jpg
- File:Cleto Gonzales Viquez.jpg
In particular the above files are generated images by the FaceApp mobile application which go against their copyright terms of use, specifically section 6 at: FaceApp Terms of Use Agreement. Also, most, if not all, of the images uploaded by Special:Contributions/Walter_Camacho_Marin and Special:Contributions/Walter Camacho 5654 seem to be just copied from elsewhere. --Roqz (talk) 19:58, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:38, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
this looks like a Google Map screenshot. If so, it's a copyvio. Enyavar (talk) 20:01, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
this appears to be a GoogleMap? If so, copyvio. Enyavar (talk) 20:02, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
This appears to be a GoogleMap. If so, copyvio. Enyavar (talk) 20:03, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Watermarked Google Satellite screenshot: Copyvio. Enyavar (talk) 20:03, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Personal, and Redundant Information is on the picture Pburghfan37352 (talk) 20:15, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. I suggest to overwrite it with a cropped version. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:34, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Personal Information is on the image Pburghfan37352 (talk) 20:16, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Personal Information is on the Image Pburghfan37352 (talk) 20:16, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. I suggest to overwrite it with a cropped version. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:34, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Personal Information is on the Image Pburghfan37352 (talk) 20:17, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. I suggest to overwrite it with a cropped version. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:34, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Personal Information is on the image Pburghfan37352 (talk) 20:18, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. I suggest to overwrite it with a cropped version. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:34, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Inaccurate information, and personal information is on the image Pburghfan37352 (talk) 20:18, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. I suggest to overwrite it with a cropped version. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:34, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Inaccurate information, and Personal information is on the image Pburghfan37352 (talk) 20:19, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. I suggest to overwrite it with a cropped version. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:34, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Personal Information is on the image Pburghfan37352 (talk) 20:20, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. I suggest to overwrite it with a cropped version. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:34, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
not used anymore, non-official flag (was created as an 'icon'), and SVG was already available before this file was created Roqz (talk) 21:04, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Lo subí por error DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 21:19, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:35, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted image - available on social media Evaders99 (talk) 21:38, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:35, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation Hyju (talk) 22:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:36, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JohnPatton10 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images all appear to be promotional and are not used in any articles. It appears that the uploader submitted them here in order to spam the links in the description.
- File:Modafinil Provigil.png
- File:Prostate adenoma visualisation.png
- File:Traditional ukranian food.png
- File:Pure Green.png
- File:Explainer Video.png
- File:Review point.png
- File:Hard Drive Recovery.png
- File:Pillintrip logo.png
Ixfd64 (talk) 23:28, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from game artwork/characters.
- File:CBT Игра2.jpg
- File:CBT Игра.jpg
- File:Ares mini.jpg
- File:Aki mini.jpg
- File:Roc protomech.jpg
- File:Zeus x.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:07, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:12, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
nata a Torino 06/08/1976 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.19.41.106 (talk) 4 November 2021 14:26 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:07, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
No FOP. Per w:List of statues of Elvis Presley, 1996 statue by Ed Dwight. Stefan2 (talk) 19:08, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in the United States. Per w:List of statues of Elvis Presley, 1997 statue by Andrea Lugar. Stefan2 (talk) 19:09, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Denmark. According to w:List of statues of Elvis Presley, the statue is from 2012. Stefan2 (talk) 19:12, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
File was produced by the State of Minnesota, which does not release images under a free license. — Huntster (t @ c) 19:49, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Les image svg se sont mal téléchargée. J'ai téléversé une image en png qui est correcte pour remplacer les images svg. Ces images svg ne sont pas utilisables Goelette Cardabela (talk) 16:59, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:59, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the user's own work. Possible press photos used on many other websites, most of which are cropped versions of this. JalenFolf (talk) 04:57, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 07:06, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:14, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Seems like an official portrait, no exif, "own work" very unlikely Titlutin (talk) 09:55, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; pcp. --Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mirosław Mielczarek (talk · contribs)
[edit]While the auploader may be a heir of the author, per policy we need a written free license permission and confirmation of the uploader status (that they are authorized to grant a license) via email following instructions at VRT.
- File:Struktura pejzażu XII.jpg
- File:Z cyklu "Człowieczy los", zapomniane portrety IV.jpg
- File:Hokeiści.jpg
- File:Zapiski II, z cyklu "Zapomniane pejzaże".jpg
- File:Struktura pejzażu. Krajobraz egzotyczny II.jpg
- File:Bieg ku słońcu.jpg
- File:Epitafium, rys. prof. Andrzeja Niekrasza.jpg
- File:Plac apelowy, z cyklu "Okropności wojny".jpg
Ankry (talk) 11:57, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Badges from Banglasdesh, no evidence of a free license.
- File:Custom BAF EMBLEM.png
- File:Custom emblem for BAF.jpg
- File:Para Comando Badge.png
- File:Project 11b.png
- File:Custom Emblem for BAF 2.jpg
- File:Baf custom emblem.png
- File:BAF-Badge.png
- File:Bangladesh Aviator badge.png
- File:BAF Aviator Badge.jpg
- File:Official Badge of BAF.jpg
Yann (talk) 15:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; custom badges may also mean out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 11:10, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Huntster as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Release under a free license is not evident on either the ESA or DLR websites. It's possible I made a mistake when originally uploading. Yann (talk) 15:14, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no evidence of a free license. --Gbawden (talk) 11:10, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
File tagged with {{Cc-by-3.0}} but no such license is found from the source, rather "Copyright © Cornell Capa". Wcam (talk) 21:57, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. The source contains a fragment of the full speech. Possible copyright holders are indicated in the full version. Maxinvestigator (talk) 04:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Οἶδα (talk) 10:36, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Low quality image 2600:1700:551:EED0:5DB9:DF5F:4FAD:513B 06:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- (1) Keep. Low quality? Are you sure you are nominating the right image? You'd have to have really blurred eye sight to consider this image low res. HumanxAnthro (talk) 12:28, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Low quality - and we have got enough good quality pictures showing this person. --Xocolatl (talk) 18:07, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Comment You can always upload a higher quality screenshot to supersede this version as the video is still under CC license. Realistically, you can delete this and re-upload a JPG file instead as it's low quality enough to probably not need retouching. — BriefEdits (talk) 04:02, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Inform me what's "low" quality about this, people. Did you all fail to take a trip to the eye doctor this year? HumanxAnthro (talk) 12:44, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- While the source material is 1080p, for me, it's the fact that it's a screenshot of the subject mid motion that makes it low quality. Also, the subject takes up relatively very little space with poor lighting, so after cropping, there's not a lot of detail anyways. It could be worse but that doesn't make it good. I don't believe it's "low quality" enough to delete because it's still usable despite its flaws (and some wiki users prefer a photo of the subject without the microphone), but if we are to keep a copy of this image, I'd prefer it to be a jpg for thumbnail purposes (per Commons:File types). — BriefEdits (talk) 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Inform me what's "low" quality about this, people. Did you all fail to take a trip to the eye doctor this year? HumanxAnthro (talk) 12:44, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Not terrible quality, but it is a bit on the blurry side, though. However, not enough reaon to delete. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Filetime as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: User has repeatedly upload photos taken by others with "own work" listed as the source. The lack of metadata on this one makes it an ostensible case of that King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:14, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
This is a one of a kind image, doesn't exist on the internet and its in my possession as well. I am not sure how this came up as a concern? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cocoablini (talk • contribs) 18:38, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Cocoablini: Are you the photographer? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:55, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Owning a copy of an image and owning the copyright of it is not the same thing.
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). → 
Deleted: per nomination. Requires COM:VRT permission. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Is this license valid? Yann (talk) 07:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Oppose i see no reason--Renvoy (talk) 22:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Renvoy: Could you please explain what you mean? Do you oppose the deletion, or do you oppose the license? Thanks, Yann (talk) 22:48, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Yann: , I see no reason why this file should be deleted--Renvoy (talk) 22:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Renvoy: Could you please explain what you mean? Do you oppose the deletion, or do you oppose the license? Thanks, Yann (talk) 22:48, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- In the past this template was a custom license template and was adding CC-BY template to the files. I wasn't looking template-doc, when imported file. It's all.--『白猫』Обг. 20:44, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: License seems okay. I checked that the file is located on the source. --MGA73 (talk) 13:59, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Laut http://www.navsource.org/archives/09/06/0617.htm hieß das Schiff erst ab 1957 "Tortuga", der Urheber kann also noch keine 70 Jahre tot sein. Xocolatl (talk) 13:48, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The uploader changed the license from {{PD-old}} to {{PD-USGov-Military-Navy}} which seems to be applicable if this is from the US Navy Bureau of Ships. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:39, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not enough information to determine the copyright status of this image. As for that "US Navy Bureau of Ships" business: The source website says that this image shows "Ex-Antigua (AF-17) in Swedish merchant service as the Salen Lines SS Tortuga, moored pierside, date and location unknown." Why would such an image be made by a "US Navy Bureau of Ships" anyway?. --Rosenzweig τ 22:00, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Das Bild stammt offenbar von http://www.navsource.org/archives/09/06/0621.htm, wo man auch nachlesen kann, dass das Schiff erst seit 1964 Sinaloa hieß. Die Datums- und Quellenangabe sowie die Lizensierung sind also falsch. Der Urheber kann noch keine 70 Jahre tot sein. Xocolatl (talk) 13:59, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Der Uploader hat inzwischen einige Angaben verändert, auf der von ihm verlinkten Seite steht aber: "Images contained on this site that are donated from private sources are © copyrighted by the respective owner. Images credited to the National Archives (NA, NARA); Naval History & Heritage Command (NHHC), formerly Naval Historical Center (NHC); and U.S. Navy (USN) are believed to be in the public domain. Some images credited to the United States Naval Institute (USNI) are from © copyrighted collections, the rest are believed to be in the public domain." Und auf der von mir verlinkten Seite steht, dass das Bild von Gerhard Mueller-Debus kommt. Über den Urheber sagt das nichts aus, denke ich. Und das Datum ist auch nicht "unknown", denn wenn ein Schiff 1964 umbenannt und 1965 zerlegt wurde, ist das ein recht enger Zeitrahmen. --Xocolatl (talk) 19:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not enough information to be able to determine the copyright status of this image. Claims that this is from a "US Navy Bureau of Ships" appear to be rather phony. --Rosenzweig τ 22:02, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Auf der Ursprungsseite ist deutlich nachzulesen, dass das Schiff erst 1959 in "Samala" umbenannt wurde. Der Fotograf kann also noch keine 70 Jahre tot sein. Xocolatl (talk) 14:04, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not enough information to be able to determine the copyright status of this image. Claims that this is somehow from the US Navy appear to be rather phony. --Rosenzweig τ 22:04, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Das Bild ist auf http://www.navsource.org/archives/09/06/0613.htm zu finden und wohl kaum, wie vom Uploader behauptet, ein eigenes Werk. Eventuell verwendbar, aber dann müssten die richtigen Daten und Lizenzen gewählt werden. Xocolatl (talk) 14:10, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: accd. to the source website, this one actually is "a US Navy Bureau of Ships photo". It's dated 1941-06-06, but the uploader didn't even manage to fill in the date in the information field. --Rosenzweig τ 22:07, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
falsche Quellenangabe, falsches Datum. Das Bild findet man auf http://www.navsource.org/archives/09/06/0615.htm und es wurde laut dieser Seite zwischen 1946 und 1969 aufgenommen. Der Urheber wird also wohl noch keine 70 Jahre tot sein. Xocolatl (talk) 14:16, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted: per nomination, not enough information to be able to determine the copyright status of this image. Claims that this is somehow from the US Navy appear to be rather phony. --Rosenzweig τ 22:12, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. Similar to File:Rudolf Kirchschlager.png and as mention in this former SD request: "This is an official photo of the former Austrian president Rudolf Kirchschläger, who became president in 1974. It is quite unlikely that the image was first published in India. It is not a work of the Indian government. Source link is dangling." Additional: wrong date, Krichschläger died in 2000. Wdwd (talk) 08:47, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
photo non libre Pierrette13 (talk) 07:09, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It’s PD. A09090091 (talk) 20:45, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment It's a copy of a now PD manuscript with some simple text laid on it. Clearly PD in the US, but French standards are something different.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:59, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep new text on PD background does not seem to bear the "imprint of the personality of the author" as required for COM:TOO France. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:24, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:10, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Bridge over the Grand River at Elora, Ontario.png
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (JPEG -> PNG) and as the JPEG-version looks sharper than the PNG. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:54, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I don't care which version is kept. If all other things are equal I nominate the most recent version, but if the newer version is superior that is a good reason to keep it, instead. Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 13:35, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion: deleted and redirected the PNG to JPG. version. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:14, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Sicher nicht, wie behauptet, ein "eigenes Werk". Man findet das Bild auf http://www.navsource.org/archives/09/06/0612.htm Xocolatl (talk) 14:13, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No permission for original photograph (derivate work). While the photograph from which the image was extracted may fall under de minimis (not sure, but this is another question) the zoom in which was done in this case is a copyright violation. See Commons:De_minimis#An_example. Wdwd (talk) 17:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Version .png téléversée par erreur à la place du .jpg de même nom et de résolution supérieure. Fanfwah (talk) 00:02, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination, superseded by File:Cathédrale Notre-Dame-du-Bourguet.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
One other upload by Paesh (talk · contribs), who is likely a problematic uploader. Their other upload, File:Exchange 106.png, has been tagged by me as candidate for speedy deletion as it was a screen capture of point 4:05 of this YouTube video. Therefore, this other upload by them, while seemingly decent (but no EXIF metadata), is put into question too. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:59, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: This might very well be an own photo of the uploader. I do not see a reason to delete it by suspicion only. --Ellywa (talk) 09:53, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No indication that this is indeed {{Tasnim}}'s own work 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:53, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader copied the file in good faith from the source website, but there is a possibilty they do not own the copyright of this artistic image. --Ellywa (talk) 09:57, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Japanese calligraphy. Probably surpasses COM:TOO#Japan Sakretsu (talk) 10:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 09:58, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Probably surpasses COM:TOO#Japan due to the characters お and ん creatively shaped Sakretsu (talk) 10:58, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 09:58, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Probably surpasses COM:TOO#Japan Sakretsu (talk) 11:10, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 09:59, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Filetime as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: User has repeatedly upload photos taken by others with "own work" listed as the source. The lack of metadata on this one makes it an ostensible case of this. Heavily used pre-1989 US photo, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:17, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
This and other images are from my private slides, why is this being cited as a violation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cocoablini (talk • contribs) 18:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Cocoablini: Are you the photographer? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:55, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Who knows-probably? This was a camera in the office all the time. Everyone grabbed it and took photos on it. This particular image was taken of Ed looking at the professional photographer for Harvard, but not part of the photoshoot. The camera was there for office images and everyone took images for fun.Cocoablini (talk) 23:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)cocoablini
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Cocoablini did not give COM:EVID they made the photo themselfves. --Ellywa (talk) 10:00, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Photograph of a 2D copyrighted image, not subject to right of panorama under UK law Hchc2009 (talk) 19:22, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
I don't understand the reason for the deletion request. Sheila1988 claims it's her own work and it is an image of a 3D original, not 2D as stated in the DR. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 19:57, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- It's a 2D image, painted onto the back of the ship. If the photograph focused on the ship as a whole, we'd be fine (UK de minimis law would apply), but otherwise it's in the same category as a 2D image painted onto the side of building, or onto a shop window - copyright persists with the original artist, not the photographer. Hchc2009 (talk) 20:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Good point. I'm not sure when it was done. I have photographic evidence to show it wasn't on the ship when she was displayed at Tower Pier in 1974, shortly before her first transatlatic voyage. I suspect it was added when she was laid up at her present location in 1996. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 07:19, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Per COM:FOP UK, this might be a work of artistic craftmanship, but the examples do not list an object like this. --Ellywa (talk) 10:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
