Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/09/08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 8th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cus it has amogus referece ok Amorgosfan (talk) 21:28, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:32, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is sexual 65.246.71.66 00:23, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim (talk) 06:27, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad copy 65.246.71.66 00:23, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim (talk) 06:30, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image depicts proprietary software from Microsoft. Mfcallahan (talk) 04:23, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:41, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

when the impostefdfdf 65.246.71.66 00:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 06:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

am1huhdu 65.246.71.66 00:25, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't a reason given for the proposed deletion. It might be the case that the individual is objecting to there being two similar capital I's. This is the case because in the work What Katy Did, in most instances the letter is printed the correct way up, but there is at least one instance where it is printed upside down. Therefore, I don't think this item needs to be deleted.Chrisguise (talk) 04:34, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 06:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Kishlay RF (talk) 03:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Another test request by an Android app user who couldn't resist. --Achim (talk) 10:10, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Kleuske (talk) 09:07, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:17, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Kleuske (talk) 09:08, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:18, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Kleuske (talk) 09:08, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:17, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fantasy diagrams are out of project scope, see c:Commons:Project_scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:52, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:41, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Whose that monkey ? Tonton Bernardo (talk) 14:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The 504th clueless deletion request, as it seems is better to try to destroy instead of improving. Lemures are primates but not monkeys Tm (talk) 21:21, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 14:57, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Whose the Lemur ? May I also post my holiday pics ? Tonton Bernardo (talk) 13:22, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:33, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

publicity Tonton Bernardo (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What FP concern. There is nothing copyrightable in the image and if it was the text in is totally de minimis and the shourt phrase "Orange Solidarité Madagascar Orange" is uncopyrightable. Tm (talk) 05:22, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 15:01, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality + publicity Tonton Bernardo (talk) 13:25, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: All frivolous nominations by this user. --King of ♥ 01:44, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mauro, problems to hold the camera straight ? Tonton Bernardo (talk) 13:26, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: All frivolous nominations by this user. --King of ♥ 01:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing to see Tonton Bernardo (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 14:57, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nothing to see (sea) spots on lense, Tonton Bernardo (talk) 13:27, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: All frivolous nominations by this user. --King of ♥ 01:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unsharp, no place stated, showing only the sea. This is a "nothing image" 41.213.235.225 07:50, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Again? Darwin Ahoy! 14:17, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Kept: no new reason, 2 previous kept. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Where the hell is it ? Tonton Bernardo (talk) 13:28, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Madagascar Andy Dingley (talk) 17:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: All frivolous nominations by this user. --King of ♥ 01:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who does it show ? Ca montre qui ? Tonton Bernardo (talk) 13:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: All frivolous nominations by this user. --King of ♥ 01:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Again, who's it ? Needs description or can go away Tonton Bernardo (talk) 13:34, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: All frivolous nominations by this user. --King of ♥ 01:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nice holiday pic, but what flower is it ? Unidentified it's useless. Tonton Bernardo (talk) 13:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep "Not yet identified" is no reason for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:44, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This is why we have Category:Unidentified flowers. People with botanical knowledge may identify such images at any given time so we don't delete them just because we don't know the species. De728631 (talk) 22:32, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: All frivolous nominations by this user. --King of ♥ 01:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is it?? Tonton Bernardo (talk) 15:22, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Info It’s what it says it is in the description. Now my turn: What is this? It’s a troll who decided to leave back in 2012 and seems to be back to only to file annoying DRs. -- Tuválkin 15:47, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not a policy driven rationale. --Missvain (talk) 22:28, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What's it ? a overthrown frog ? Tonton Bernardo (talk) 13:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. I think this wins the prize for the strangest deletion rationale I've seen. In all seriousness though, I think this photograph has educational value. It's not visually interesting, but that's to be expected for a close-up of a salt flat. There are surprisingly few halite close-ups of this kind on Commons. I also don't think that there is a frog in the image. I think that's just a salt crystal of slightly different shape and color. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per nom. No one likes "overthrown frogs" .... Wait how do you overthrow a frog ? .... Why would you even throw a frog in the first place ?, Anywho I agree with the nominator and their non-trolling non-for-teh-lulz 100% serious DR. –Davey2010Talk 01:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: All frivolous nominations by this user. --King of ♥ 01:46, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Violation. Image downloaded from Instagram. Eevee01 (talk) 09:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 19:27, 8 September 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: Image ripped off from Instagram --Krdbot 02:17, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (original version - vertical).png Vie souy (talk) 01:54, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism, no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 02:47, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (original version).png Vie souy (talk) 01:54, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep No reason given to delete.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 02:44, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism, no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 02:48, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

china... 12.127.157.242 23:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 07:04, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

241627719272972 12.127.157.242 23:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 07:05, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

city looks jawsomee 12.127.157.242 23:58, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 07:06, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ewwwwwwwwwwwww 12.127.157.242 23:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 07:08, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ladies are kissing 12.127.157.242 23:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 07:08, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bridgeee 12.127.157.242 00:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 07:09, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This illustration can be found elsewhere on the internet prior to being uploaded here (e.g. [2] p12). The illustration might date from the Elizabethan era but it could also be modern. -M.nelson (talk) 20:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Withdrawn / kept - thank you Lord Belbury for identifying the source and PD status. -M.nelson (talk) 07:41, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicato Depascali.angelo (talk) 17:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 09:28, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicato Depascali.angelo (talk) 17:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 09:26, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicato Depascali.angelo (talk) 17:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: deleted and redirected the other. --JuTa 09:23, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicato Depascali.angelo (talk) 18:02, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: deleted and redirected the other. --JuTa 09:23, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicato Depascali.angelo (talk) 18:03, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 09:29, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicato Depascali.angelo (talk) 18:04, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 09:29, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicato Depascali.angelo (talk) 18:10, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 09:27, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicato Depascali.angelo (talk) 18:10, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: deleted and redirected the other as younger upload. --JuTa 09:22, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication of File:Flag of Wales.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:55, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:48, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is such a bad SVG coat of arms that it should be deleted 180.214.233.19 12:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: In use on 14 projects. --Achim (talk) 12:44, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: "This is such a bad SVG coat of arms that it should be deleted" → Really? Need I say more? --Thom.lanaud (talk) 16:30, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: It is not a bad SVG coat of arms. False allegation. Faqu (talk) 00:01, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --Achim (talk) 19:39, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exif suggests that this is a scaled down version of another photo, suggesting that the uploader found the smaller file somewhere on the internet to upload here, rather than the photo being uploaded directly by the photographer. The uploader entering "Author = Farmington Country Club" rather than Own Work also suggests that they aren't the photographer. Their other upload was nominated for deletion here. -M.nelson (talk) 22:55, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:09, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Manuexiri

[edit]

As noted in the metadata of the first file it is a picture released to AP by the photographer. Need permission from the original photographer. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:30, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:07, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie photo, with no educational purpose, only used for self promotion and spam on idwiki 182.2.69.173 23:34, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal photo by non-contributor, oos. --Wdwd (talk) 12:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, need to know where it comes from. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:42, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader suggests they are the person in the picture. Need permission from the person who took the picture, which might be the person noted in the metadata. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:43, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal photo by non-contributor, oos. --Wdwd (talk) 12:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the Broken SVG Coat of Arms that will be Deleted. 180.214.232.86 23:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:00, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flags ("for my fictional country"); violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". 180.214.232.86 23:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; File is in (multiple) use -> in scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:00, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusual personal photos. Out of the project scope —MdsShakil (talk) 04:52, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 00:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusual personal photos. Out of the project scope —MdsShakil (talk) 05:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 00:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source given Hoyanova (talk) 10:30, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 00:45, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 00:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 00:50, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 00:51, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 00:52, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 00:58, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned, replaced by File:Biosintesi L-homoserina.jpg by the same uploader. Leyo 13:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, orphaned, better alternatives in Category:Homoserine. Leyo 13:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photograph - IndrajitDas 08:51, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by JuTa at 23:51, 19 September 2021 UTC: No permission since 8 September 2021 --Krdbot 07:48, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo subido como prueba.Documentacion LABNL (talk) 19:35, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Already deleted by JuTa. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Many images are skewed, the shooting angle is very bad and there are other options

POS78 (talk) 09:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Indiscriminate nomination of perfectly fine images. --King of ♥ 03:36, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a non-notable individual so out of scope (see rejected draft en:Draft:Karin Achtelstetter). It seems unlikely that the uploader is the photographer. Related to COM:Deletion requests/File:Rev. Karin Achtelstetter.jpg. -M.nelson (talk) 22:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 03:40, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Strubbl (talk) 22:26, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept per above (and while the file size is small, it is not "blurry") -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:03, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Strubbl (talk) 22:42, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. In use. (Photo adequate to illustrate topic; while better quality photos of the subject are desirable I am not aware of such here on Commons and nominator has offered no alternative illustrations.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of copyright. See this images and videos of this site: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzFJ9ZkjYpxWTSqX9cVXj4g Villalaso (talk) 02:34, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination. -sasha- (talk) 21:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nominationIvanbetanco43 (talk) 21:39, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a YouTube video, need to know the license of the actual video Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:15, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted DW, no info on license status of original image. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:13, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by SpanishSnake as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Probably above TOO. Previously deleted, then restoration requested at COM:UNDEL. IMO sufficiently borderline to be ineligible for speedy deletion, opening a DR now. King of ♥ 04:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Lookong at this case, I think that the cup itself is complex enough to be copyrighted in US. BTW, I think, that while Oracle is the copyright holder of the logo, they are not the author as this logo is only slightly different to the original Sun Microsystems Java logo and the difference itself is below TOO. Ankry (talk) 06:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
From the information I got from the U.S. Copyright Office, the cup logo was designed by Mark Anderson as work for hire for Sun Microsystems. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:08, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted per above-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:14, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of compatible license on the source website provided -- DaxServer (talk) 12:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]




Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Citing as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Globally blocked sock/hoaxer regularly contributing modified copyrighted material King of ♥ 05:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted No info on actual source; no way to determine copyright status. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:18, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Citing as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: globally blocked hoaxer regularly uploads modified copyrighted content King of ♥ 05:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted False claims, false license, lacking factual source info. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:20, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by VR0 as Fair use (fair use). The COM:TOO angle should be discussed. King of ♥ 05:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted no evidence of free license status; not used. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:21, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Citing as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Globally blocked hoaxer regularly uploading copyrighted images https://www.alamy.com/old-vintage-indian-girls-in-traditional-dress-looking-at-camera-kerala-image9190515.html?irclickid=WrNx4cx0pxyIRh%3AyY4X8ZS%3AyUkBTat0yEV3hTw0&irgwc=1&utm_source=77643. Should be evaluated for PD status with respect to COM:INDIA. King of ♥ 05:55, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • If this ends up being a PD image please note that the image as uploaded has an incorrect description. The stock image linked describes it as "old vintage Indian girls in traditional dress looking at camera Kerala India 1940s". Citing (talk) 16:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted false license claim, false description. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:19, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:NSDL official logo.jpg. Does it pass COM:TOO India? -- DaxServer (talk) 07:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted False license -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:16, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

продубльовано Eldar Sarakhman (talk) 20:08, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:{{subst:delete2|image=File:Чернівецький некрополь. Найбільший у Європі єврейський цвинтар.webm]]


Kept: there was a mistake in the description, it was sorted out --アンタナナ 20:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Namakuriki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional posters. Out of scope.

··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 08:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Citing as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: globally blocked hoaxer regularly uploads modified copyrighted content King of ♥ 05:52, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is not own work. And as the uploader is globally locked as sockpuppet, we never know correct source. License is unclear as well. Taivo (talk) 15:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE -- Nutshinou Talk! 14:23, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:15, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication of File:Flag of the Soviet Union.svg. Fry1989 eh? 14:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:15, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication of File:Flag of the Soviet Union.svg. Fry1989 eh? 14:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:15, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joshkid NBA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotional art, outside project scope

Ytoyoda (talk) 15:51, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:18, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is a much larger facebook image. Commons blocks direct facebook links so please just google search it and see it as first one! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:44, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete, there is insufficient data to prove that the shipper is the copyright holder, and there are several versions on the internet without mentioning him. Apparently it looks like it was a single-purpose upload to Wikipedia. — EdwardFP7(talk) 00:29, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:15, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

School portraits are not "own work." Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:45, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:18, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At this size and lack of quality, not likely to be own work, it seems to be copied (see metadata) from a published source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:47, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:18, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook size and quality, unlikely own work. Also from same time File:เที่ยวพัทยา.jpg also nominated for same reason. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:18, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook size and quality, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:18, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook size and quality, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:18, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Document that does not seem to be in project scope with very little context identifying it. Also there is not reason to assume this would actually be under a Creative Commons licence. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:07, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Didym at 16:53, 11 October 2021 UTC: No permission since 18 September 2021 --Krdbot 19:43, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Taken from source indicated, and attributed to the proper photographer. However, there is no cc-by-sa-4.0 license nor is there any other license compatible with Commons licensing requirement. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 00:20, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:16, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashing - just a cropped version of this. Эlcobbola talk 02:23, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom, PCP.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:47, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • You give a link to a source image, but just as a bare image file, no context. What's the licensing on that version?
You dismiss the Flickr version and its licence as "Flickrwashing". On what basis? Given that the Flickr account uploading this appears to be a commercial promotion agency, it seems a very tenuous claim to dismiss their work as fraudulent like this.
You've also blocked the Commons account who uploaded this image, evidently for their culpability in this claimed "Flickrwashing". Yet this was uploaded to Flickr 8 years ago and uploaded here only recently. Even if your unsupported claims of Flickrwashing were true, it's ludicrous to then claim that a very recent Commons account was involved. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:43, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Andy Dingley: None of these potential sources has a free license: [3] [4] [5] [6] [7].   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:58, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not to mention it was here April 2013, before the May 2013 Flickr upload. Эlcobbola talk 16:12, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The only question here is whether we trust the reliability of that Flickr account.
Eight years ago, that Flickr accont uploaded a smaller crop of an image and gave it a free licence. They may be entitled to do so, they might not. We can argue that point, but neither of us really have any strong evidence one way or the other. It seems like a kosher Flickr account, AFAICS.
The existence of other versions of that image, uncropped, makes zero difference. It is entirely plausible (it's damned common) for images to be released through different channels with both non-free and free licences. The vagaries of promotional campaigns encourage this – especially where the free one is a heavy crop, or just smaller.
All that RoyalKnights3000 has done here is to AGF of a Flickr account. We can hardly blame them for that and certainly shouldn't block them. You might see the Flickr account as Flickrwashing (but there is no strong evidence either way). You might take an issue with other uploads by RoyalKnights3000, where they rely on an OTRS claim (which I can't see). There is no credible chance though that RoyalKnights3000 was involved in Flickrwashing eight years ago, and so we should not punish them as if they are. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:22, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:15, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Joe Renzetti

[edit]

Uploader suggests he is the person in the photos, and states "own work", but there is an author and copyright holder in the metadata, the photos are more likely his work and we need his permission to license them. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 02:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; by Rob Attinello, not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 12:14, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, photo of photo. Depicted photo has unknown copyright status. Taivo (talk) 08:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: requires permission from the heirs of the sculptor Ernst Neizvestny, who died in 2016. No freedom of panorama in Turkmenistan, see COM:FOP Turkmenistan. Verbcatcher (talk) 12:15, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Can be restored in 2067. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:15, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohdafshar2000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not original works by {{Mehr}}. Received from third-parties.

4nn1l2 (talk) 12:51, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not D. Luís bridge. https://www.google.com/maps/@41.1424823,-8.6001127,2a,75y,165.66h,87.91t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s2xvo7bulZN-KBkysZPgFwA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 Dannyps (talk) 13:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: looks like a broken redirect. --Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free logo (grand theft auto v) Nutshinou Talk! 14:26, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Failed to find Creative Commons license Giko G (talk) 14:27, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:03, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality duplicate of File:안드로이드 12 홈화면.png -- Nutshinou Talk! 14:32, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Wikipedia screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:55, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:55, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From Twitter per description. Likely copyvio. Larry Hockett (talk) 15:43, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nonfree, taken from website, no permission Vacant0 (talk) 15:49, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Timtrent (talk) 15:52, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. the uploader could be a learner . being that the subject is notable we could live it up and working — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 14.254.251.153 (talk) 11:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says "Milton Graham" and "all rights reserved" Ytoyoda (talk) 15:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screenshot and from a professional photoshoot. Please help verify the source info. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KovalAnastassiyaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Metadata has name of artist that has no possible connection to name of uploader. Suggest these two large files are not own work of uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has no connection to name of uploader, has overprinting and is credited to Adikhan Ilyassov without OTRS permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is credited to Leyla Kabdi, without OTRS permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is credited to Leyla Kabdi, without OTRS permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems as if the original is at https://vlast.kz/inside/25931-vnutri-gatob-im-abaa.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, wrong license Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have tons of quality images from the region, and this one is too dark to be useful. Nanahuatl (talk) 18:13, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:37, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation; own work newspaper writing claim, but not inherently compatible with commons. Sennecaster (talk) 18:26, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:37, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Sahaib3005 (talk) 18:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is NOT a copyrighted picture. It is from a Sri Lankan army war crime trophy picture, which was freely distributed virally by Sri Lankan army soldiers. It has been published freely in multiple news and human rights reports, and is not subject to copyright restrictions. This particular version was edited by me to censor the nudity. It should not be deleted.Oz364b (talk) 19:02, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; distributed freely is not the same as copyright free. --Gbawden (talk) 11:37, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted comes from http://bedfordcf2van.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-bedford-world-van.html Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:16, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no information. Cannot tell what it is. Krok6kola (talk) 19:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:35, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The game is copyrighted Trade (talk) 19:45, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:34, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern packaging with copyrighted elements - see com:packaging 68.193.211.254 20:35, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:34, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:47, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:31, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source image has been deleted. This image should be deleted for same reason SecretName101 (talk) 20:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flawed nomination. The template specifically says "The source image was deleted for reasons that do not affect this image". Banana Republic (talk) 13:18, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Already deleted. If the source image is deleted the crop will be deleted for the same reasons. --Gbawden (talk) 11:32, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus CC claim (source site says "©2021City of Bloomington MN. All Rights Reserved.") Logo appears above TOO. Эlcobbola talk 21:17, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:31, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Heidihoocienta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photographs of a non-notable musician. Images are out of project scope. Images also seem to have been taken by a photographer who is not the uploader.

IronGargoyle (talk) 21:18, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and dubious claim of own work. --Gbawden (talk) 11:31, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor-quality map that is redundant to push-pin map template SounderBruce 21:22, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:31, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skąpe998 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files found elsewhere before upload date: Solaris lublin.jpg

Iveco Crossway.jpg

R (1).jpg

Man lion's city.jpg

Fotob-2847.jpg

File:Solaris urbino linii T5.jpg and File:Pesa twist przy katedrze.jpg assumed to also be copyvio although I can't find the source.

TFerenczy (talk) 21:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:30, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorly framed and composed general view that has no educational value and is unused. Out of scope for Commons Timtrent (talk) 22:17, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious licence, the source site seems to use a lot of copyrghted mages with false licences. FunkMonk (talk) 22:34, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am the image contributor. Oh my god, I didn't know that. I thought I could trust the license notation.
I don't know enough about it to make a judgment, but here is a list of image files I got from the same page as this one. Please refer to them.
If you look through the uploader's "public domain" images on that site, some of them even have watermarks:[8] They all seem to be production stills taken during the making of the Primeval series, hardly the work of one person, or that uploader. FunkMonk (talk) 07:25, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for teaching me. Sorry, I've forgot this.--ノボホショコロトソ (talk) 01:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Added.--ノボホショコロトソ (talk) 01:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Spokane Ball yt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Poor quality and redundant to infobox push-pin maps.

Elli (talk) 22:51, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:19, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low Quality PNG Image. 180.214.232.86 23:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Strubbl (talk) 22:23, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not Own Work. Taken form this website. [9] Librero2109 (talk) 00:17, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


  • Hi! I don't take the photo from that web site. Camila Zárate send me the photo and gave it to me for up loaded the picture to her page on wikipedia. I'm almost journalist and i work for her. I thought that will not be problems if she gave me the rights. She send me the photo by e-mail and whatsapp. ¿How can i prove it? I'll be happy of hear you! User:AlexDixonF.
@User:AlexDixonF Tell her to send an email to VRT or that she complete this form. Librero2109 (talk) 19:15, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


  • By the moment, i can say that the file of the web site "Olca.cl" has 500x750 pixels, but my file has 1200x800 pixels. My file has more quality than the one marked as original User:AlexDixonF.

Deleted: First, as a general rule, the subject does not have the right to freely license her image -- that right belongs to the photographer. Second, Commons and Wikipedia images must be free for any use anywhere by anybody, not just for use on Wikipedia. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://thbt.vn/tin-tuc/tin-trong-tinh/truyen-hinh-ben-tre-40-nam-hinh-thanh-va-phat-trien DHN (talk) 00:58, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination -- Copyright © 2013. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original source is https://reliefweb.int/map/uganda/facilities-map-lobule-settlement-koboko-district-uganda-24-october-2018. The document indicates that map data was sourced from OpenStreetMap and a few other sources. While the base OpenStreetMap data is freely licensed under the ODbL, the ODbL places no requirements on the license of maps generated from the data. The file states "For Humanitarian Use Only", and the site Terms say "personal non-commercial use only". AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:18, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1960. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. See same request Микола Василечко (talk) 03:49, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leo16th1989 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded for promotional purposes: en:Draft:Daria Ginadona Lamakina and perhaps also intended for addition to en:داریا گینادِونا لاماکینا (both of which I deleted as advertisements). No imaginable encyclopedic application; out of scope.

Hoary (talk) 04:34, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image was uploaded for a sole purpose of self-promotion at en-wiki w:en:User:Vincy Viswanathan page (now deleted) and is unlikely to be used again. CiaPan (talk) 07:22, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image was uploaded for a sole purpose of self-promotion at en-wiki w:en:User:Vincy Viswanathan page (now deleted) and is unlikely to be used again. CiaPan (talk) 07:22, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image was uploaded for a sole purpose of self-promotion at en-wiki w:en:User:Vincy Viswanathan page (now deleted) and is unlikely to be used again. CiaPan (talk) 07:22, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work claim, album cover art ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work claim, Logo of political origanisation. (w:File:New Azerbaijan Party Logo.png is non-free) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:43, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PR issue. This image is uproaded to promote the company Reiro (talk) 07:43, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user takes screenshots from different pages and uploads them as his/her own. By the way, there are sources mentioned in the title of the pictures. Beko (talk) 07:46, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user takes screenshots from different pages and uploads them as his/her own. By the way, there are sources mentioned in the title of the pictures. Beko (talk) 07:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user takes screenshots from different pages and uploads them as his/her own. By the way, there are sources mentioned in the title of the pictures. Beko (talk) 07:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user takes screenshots from different pages and uploads them as his/her own. By the way, there are sources mentioned in the title of the pictures. Beko (talk) 07:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user takes screenshots from different pages and uploads them as his/her own. By the way, there are sources mentioned in the title of the pictures. Beko (talk) 07:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly photoshopped and cropped. However I was not able to find the original -- DaxServer (talk) 07:51, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is my creation. Hence the deletion request is not valid. If you have no evidence of original image then random deletion request is not rightful I hope. Thanks Mainakchatterjee.tech (talk) 20:17, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The EXIF data clearly shows it is photoshopped. -- DaxServer (talk) 12:27, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But that does not indicate its not my own creation. As said earlier its my own photography. If you have evidence of original version please showcase the same. Mainakchatterjee.tech (talk) 15:39, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I should also mention to other people commenting on this, but the uploader seems to have a history with copyvios as you can see at Special:PermaLink/574784378 and Special:PermaLink/589599955, with all of them later removed. SHB2000 (talk) 11:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That can never justify the deletion of this file. Unless you can show proper evidence of the copyright violation and show the source of the file this file should not be deleted I hope. If you want to counter me on my statement of I am the creator of the image you should the original version.
I would also like to bring attention to the people commenting here that the user @SHB2000 has history of unnecessary file move and misuse of administrative privileges'. Which was undone by other admin team and he apologized latter. Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#SHB2000 and unnecessary moves Further details in this regard is also mentioned in his talk page. Mainakchatterjee.tech (talk) 17:00, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That was taken care of, and also note that I did have a valid reason to move the file (the name of the harbour of Victoria Harbour in British Columbia was Victoria Harbour, which I renamed so a) correct spelling, and b) Search Engine Optimisation. Now why people opposed it was that there harbor here wasn't used as a place name, and I accept that. Now that is wholly and completely irrelevant to copyvios, which are illegal to do and you could be in legal trouble for this. Unnecessary file moves won't land you in legal trouble.
Also, I'm not an admin and I never was. I don't think I ever will. SHB2000 (talk) 23:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok in that case my apology for calling you an admin. Mainakchatterjee.tech (talk) 12:07, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Please send a copy of the original, before your photoshopping and with full original EXIF at full camera resolution to VRT and request restoration there. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly photoshopped and cropped, not an own work -- DaxServer (talk) 07:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is my creation. Hence the deletion request is not valid. If you have no evidence of original image then random deletion request is not rightful I hope. Thanks Mainakchatterjee.tech (talk) 20:17, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The EXIF data clearly shows it is photoshopped. -- DaxServer (talk) 12:27, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But that does not indicate its not my own creation. As said earlier its my own photography. If you have evidence of original version please showcase the same Mainakchatterjee.tech (talk) 15:41, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I should also mention to other people commenting on this, but the uploader seems to have a history with copyvios as you can see at Special:PermaLink/574784378 and Special:PermaLink/589599955, with all of them later removed. SHB2000 (talk) 11:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That can never justify the deletion of this file. Unless you can show proper evidence of the copyright violation and show the source of the file this file should not be deleted I hope. If you want to counter me on my statement of I am the creator of the image you should the original version.
I would also like to bring attention to the people commenting here that the user @SHB2000 has history of unnecessary file move and misuse of administrative privileges'. Which was undone by other admin team and he apologized latter. Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#SHB2000 and unnecessary moves Further details in this regard is also mentioned in his talk page.
Mainakchatterjee.tech (talk) 17:30, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That was taken care of, and also note that I did have a valid reason to move the file (the name of the harbour of Victoria Harbour in British Columbia was Victoria Harbour, which I renamed so a) correct spelling, and b) Search Engine Optimisation. Now why people opposed it was that there harbor here wasn't used as a place name, and I accept that. Now that is wholly and completely irrelevant to copyvios, which are illegal to do and you could be in legal trouble for this. Unnecessary file moves won't land you in legal trouble.
Also, I'm not an admin and I never was. I don't think I ever will. SHB2000 (talk) 23:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Then my apology to call you an admin. Mainakchatterjee.tech (talk) 12:19, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Please send a copy of the original, before your photoshopping and with full original EXIF at full camera resolution to VRT and request restoration there. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work claim, Organisational or Brand logo - English Wikipedia attributes "OMF International " ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:58, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a simple logo and doubtful own claim, (w:File:Oddbods logo.png is non-free) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These images are variously derived from journal issues between 1968 and 1980, As renewal for US periodicals and serials in this period was automatic, these can only be "free from restrictions" if the original periodical in which these appeared contained no copyright notice, or was never registered in the first place. Has anyone checked for this?

References

  1. Volume 32, no. 9. “Copyright 1968 by Comor Publishers.”
  2. Volume 32, no. 10. “Copyright 1968 by Comor Publishers.”
  3. a b Volume 38, no. 4. “Copyright 1972 by Pilgrim Publishers.”
  4. Volume 38, no. 12. “Copyright 1972 by Pilgrim Publishers.”
  5. Volume 37, no. 6. “Copyright 1972 by Pilgrim Publishers.”
  6. Volume 38, no. 2. “Copyright 1972 by Pilgrim Publishers.”
  7. Volume 39, no. 10. “Copyright 1974 by Pilgrim Publishers.”
  8. a b Volume 39, no. 9. “Copyright 1974 by Pilgrim Publishers.”
  9. Volume 40, no. 2. “Copyright 1975 by Pilgrim Publishers.”
  10. a b Volume 40, no. 5. “Copyright 1975 by Pilgrim Publishers.”
  11. Volume 40, no. 6. “Copyright 1975 by Pilgrim Publishers.”
  12. Volume 39, no. 11. “Copyright 1974 by Pilgrim Publishers.”
  13. Volume 40, no. 3. “Copyright 1975 by Pilgrim Publishers.”
  14. Volume 42, no. 2. “Copyright 1976 by Pilgrim Publishers.”
  15. Volume 43, no. 4. “Copyright 1977 by Pilgrim Publishers.”
  16. Volume 43, no. 7. “Copyright 1977 by Pilgrim Publishers.”
  17. Volume 43, no. 9. “Copyright 1977 by Pilgrim Publishers.”
  18. Volume 44, no. 12. “Copyright 1977 by Pilgrim Publishers.”
  19. Volume 43, no. 6. “Copyright 1979 by Taylor Publishing.”
  20. a b Volume 43, no. 9. “Copyright 1979 by Taylor Publishing.”
  21. Volume 43, no. 7. “Copyright 1979 by Taylor Publishing.”
  22. Volume 43, no. 1. “Copyright 1979 by Taylor Publishing.”
  23. Volume 43, no. 8. “Copyright 1979 by Taylor Publishing.”
  24. Volume 43, no. 2. “Copyright 1979 by Taylor Publishing.”
  25. Volume 43, no. 5. “Copyright 1979 by Taylor Publishing.”

These images are variously derived from journal issues between 1980 and 1986, Post 1978 works don't necessarily require a notice to be protected by copyright, so I fail to see how these could be "free from restrictions".

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:51, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Very different cases, please renominate to separated DRs. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cranberries; - the national cranberry magazine (1982) (20520589258).jpg and the previous nomination. Neither are any of the works in this categroy works of US Gov.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:14, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - The files kept are all no-notice ads with no editorial content. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominating for deletion as sourced to a PDf, tagged for copyvio as it contained a clear copyright notice.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:34, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:41, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not necessarily a PD-US gov work, It was prepared by a State level program/aegncy for the BLM.

List of files

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

بی‌کیفیت بودن و وجود جایگزین

POS78 (talk) 11:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - quality is entirely usable. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to Document containing statement "(C) The Natural History Museum, 1998" , As this publication is in the UK, I fail to see how these are public domain, irrespective of what the IA or Flikr Metadata claims.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:02, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:52, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely own work. Seems to be of a size and quality that is easily copied from web. Subject has draft page, but no apparent notability. Possibly promotionalism. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:53, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same picture as File:Small Boy nuclear test 1962.jpg which depicts Small Boy (1962, Nevada), not Gerboise Bleue (1960, Algeria). This page from the US government proves it. Hr. Satz 18:30, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:54, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Sahaib3005 (talk) 18:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is NOT a copyrighted picture. It is from a Sri Lankan army war crime trophy picture, which was freely distributed virally by Sri Lankan army soldiers. It has been published freely in multiple news and human rights reports, and is not subject to copyright restrictions. It should not be deleted.Oz364b (talk) 19:04, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Reply
Even if it was distributed by the Army. It still cannot be used without an adequate license or permission from the SL army.YaSiRu11 (talk) 03:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Sri Lankan army soldiers who raped and killed her, were freely distributing the picture with no restriction. They never publicly claimed copyright on it, in fact they denied they did the crime because it made them look bad. Oz346 (talk) 07:04, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To add to this, the rape victim did not give her consent for the picture, nor did she give consent to be bound, raped, tortured or executed. So talking about the Sri Lankan Army rapists right to supposed copyright over an image which violated the rights of the subject person in the images is problematic. The perpetrators of these crimes and their sympathisers in Sri Lanka have tried to cover up these crimes, after they reached the international media. Oz346 (talk) 07:15, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - On order for this image to be PD as claimed, the actual photographer would have had to provide a written declaration. That obviously does not exist. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tartan357 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.antecedentia.com/2017/10/an-english-king-in-apeldoorn/
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image should be old enough to be in the public domain and therefore might be o.k. per PD-Art. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:20, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:02, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tartan357 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.royal.uk/william-and-mary
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image should be old enough to be in the public domain and therefore might be o.k. per PD-Art. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:20, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:02, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tartan357 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://spartacus-educational.com/TUDtheatre.htm
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image should be old enough to be in the public domain and therefore might be o.k. per PD-Art. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:20, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:03, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

El jugador no desea tener su foto en la wikipedia (The player does not want to have his photo on wikipedia) -- Unnika (talk) 21:09, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Widely used, the license is irrevocable. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:04, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF data states "all rights reserved". In addition there is no reason to assume that the text of the plaque is in the public domain (there is no freedom of panorama for sculptural or 2D work in the US). IronGargoyle (talk) 21:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm OK with deletion but historic plaques from town sources would seem to be designed for public consumption and reproduction. I relinquish "all rights reserved' on this photo taken by me if accepted for Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:8800:6880:E70:191F:FA2C:719F:684 (talk) 22:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just because something is designed for public consumption doesn't mean that it is free from copyright. If a licence allows reproduction and modification (which it must if we are to have it on Commons) that needs to be stated somewhere explicitly. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:31, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - If the plaque is pre-1989, it is PD no notice, but that must be proven. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:06, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work claim , English Wikipedia attributes: Покрет обнове Краљевине Србије, http://poks.rs/ ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:14, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a simple logo ( Mountain grpahics center) , (w:File:New Times (Armenia) Party Logo.png) is non-free.) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:44, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:15, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Medlitz 1 Rattelsdorf 20210221 002.jpg caused by errors in pattypan Tilman2007 (talk) 14:44, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:33, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:34, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pretty sure this is above the ToO for a UK logo. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, same uploader uploaded two of these. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work. plicit 13:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DeeTeller, inc. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. Look like a photo shoot. No exif. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 14:17, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source given, possible privacy issues as well Hoyanova (talk) 10:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Well, it's claimed "own work", but there is no context, no information on the people in the picture, it seems out of scope to me, also the file size and lack of Exif make the own work at least doubtful. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:45, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope. Bodhisattwa (talk) 12:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It's a screenshot of a photograph on Commons as a PDF - not in use and hard to imagine what it should be useful for, looks rather like some kind of mistake by the uploader. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:49, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tineye finds this back in 2018. Professional quality photo with no exif, think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 14:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:06, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chinmayajailwala (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots of some app. Probably Out of scope and advertising

Gbawden (talk) 11:45, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Psiĥedelisto: Point taken but in the case of File:Navi Logo.png this is not own work as claimed and although in use this is a complex logo and complex logos need permission in order to keep Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Gbawden: Nope…it's two shapes and text forming the word "NAVI". Is the typeface of the text unique-looking? Sure, but it's still obviously OK per my reading of Commons:Threshold_of_originality#United_States. I removed the fraudulent tag and tagged it {{PD-textlogo}}. Psiĥedelisto (talkcontribs) please always ping! 13:18, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 3 per nomination; kept 1 per above. --P 1 9 9   01:01, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad Data, Low Quality Map, and Out of Scope. 180.214.233.19 12:27, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Blason ville fr Gex (Ain).svg. 180.214.233.19 12:42, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9   01:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

same:File:الممثل الشاب المصرى احمد محمد.jpg Nehaoua (talk) 20:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:09, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Staffelsee alte Karte (retouched to remove modern additions)

moderne Additionen von 2014 scheinen neuen urheberrechtlichen Schutz zu begründen Ratzer (talk) 13:25, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Es wird an der Entfernung, sowie ggf. zumindest teilweisen eigenen Neuerstellung der modernen Additionen, gearbeitet. Für die dermaßen angepasste Karte sollte es keinen Löschgrund mehr geben. Bis dahin bitte nicht löschen, danke.--Ratzer (talk) 13:27, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The original uploader seems to be worried that the superimposed modern lettering and underlining as well as the borderline between Obersee, Untersee and Steg might be protected by copyright. Thus I removed the modern additons. However, I do not think that addding the superimposed information required a "creative step" such as a scientific survey, and thus I recommend to keep both versions. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 17:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
+1. In fact, the superimposed modern lettering is no new information, but only a transcription of the original map creator's handwritten explanations, for easier legibility.--Ratzer (talk) 07:08, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 13:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not necessarily a PD-US Gov work as it was prepared by a third party institute. There is a "Copyright 1947" statemtn in the front matter of the PDF.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:41, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Commons has a set of PDF CCE volumes. Alterntively theres a series of resources at:- "http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/cce/"
I'm minded to withdraw this assuming no evidence of a renewed copyright or registration is found.

Operation Crossroads was a highly significant military weapons test. It's likely the photo itself may have been taken by serving personell, but given the highly secure and sensitive nature of Operation Crossroads, I am not sure if that person would have been openly named. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:11, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Bombs_at_Bikini;_the_official_report_of_Operation_Crossroads_(IA_bombsatbikinioff00unit).pdf&page=12 says only some photos are not from the "Joint Task Force" . ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:26, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In checking through the CCE volumes I've not yet located a renewal. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:44, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept - Lincense updated. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Whilst a 1911 publication may be PD in the US, this is written in Catalan, suggesting a Spanish or South American origin. As 1952 would be to recent to apply a 70 p.m.a term, I am regeretablly nominating this for DR, based on the language and place of publication.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree Sorry, it was my fault to upload the DjVu file to Commons (in 2009 I didn't know the death year of the author). I've uploaded it to ca.wikisource where it is used, because the policies there allow files that are PD in USA (pre-1926 works) but not-PD in Spain/Andorra/etc. The Pdf file is identical to the DjVu but a blank page, and both files came from the same IA scan. Best regards. -Aleator (talk) 23:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 06:31, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW The election poster is the main object in this photo. FOP does not apply. 85.212.178.206 16:09, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 06:32, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work claim, This is a Corporate logo for "NortonLifeLock" ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:50, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per {{PD-textlogo}}. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:06, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ue3lman as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/recent-portrait-of-mengistu-haile-mariam-president-of-the-news-photo/515983096. Should be discussed, given the date of the upload (2008 at hewiki). Note that the Getty link refers to Bettmann Archive. We will need a hewiki admin to dig up the old file page for any clues. King of ♥ 05:45, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I concur.
(This photograph may have been bought by Bettman when he acquired the United Press International collection long before Getty Images acquired any rights. Have Getty Images been contacted to ask whether they would donate the image to Wikimedia ? --BushelCandle (talk) 07:46, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That would be a fruitless endeavor. The reason I ask for a review, is to find out who created the image, and who is the copyright holder now. -- King of ♥ 16:10, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am the admin who transfered from he.wiki. The description says "taken in Adis abbeba museum". This might not be sufficent. matanya talk 17:13, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion and per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 08:54, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [10]. Yann (talk) 09:27, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wallu2 as Logo. Should be discussed, given that what we Westerners call "complex shapes" may just be stylized writing in one of those scripts. King of ♥ 05:50, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, nobody with knowledge of the script is interested to discuss this file. --Ellywa (talk) 08:55, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hungarikusz Firkász as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Vitatom, hogy a feltöltő lenne a szerzője ennek a több mint 80 éves képnek. Should be evaluated for potential PD given the age of the image (1940). King of ♥ 05:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Időközben a feltöltő átírta a szerzőt Bende Mártára. A licenc szerint azonban még mindig a feltöltő a szerző. Voxfax egyértelműen nem Bende Márta. Ráadásul a megadott forrás szerint a szerző 2021-ben még életben van, tehát nem közkincs régi a festmény. Egyébként ha valóban a képen látható hölgy a festmény készítője, akkor a festmény 1940-es elkészülte is erősen kétségbe vonható. A képen látható, festőnőművésznek megjelölt hölgy nyilvánvalóan nem festhette 1940-ben vagy az előtt a festményt. A fájl mindenképpen  Delete Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 05:42, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and remark. Taken from facebook according exif data. --Ellywa (talk) 08:56, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dountful own work claim, English Wikipedia attributes: My Indo Airlines ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per COM:TOO Indonesia, Indonesia's threshold of originality is reportedly low. I consider this logo above threshold. --Ellywa (talk) 08:58, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a simple logo ( Football element bottom center). (w:File:New York Jets logo.svg is non-free) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:46, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 08:58, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a simple logo ( Stylized shadowed 1 - left), (w:File:Nippon Ishin no Kai.png is non-free) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:47, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 08:59, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work claim, English Wikipedia attributes : " Nitro Software Inc. " ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:47, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 08:58, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per:- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cranberries; - the national cranberry magazine (1982) (20520589258).jpg and not covered by previous related DR's. These are also not works of PD-US-Gov.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:32, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The following images per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_States (95 years of copyright for 1964-77 / 1978-89 range with notices:
  • 20706305175 is from June 1972 - copyright notice page 5 Not PD until 2068
  • 20520368399 is from July 1973 - copyright notice on page 5 Not PD until 2069
  • 20713255201 from August 1974 copyright notice page 5 Not PD until 2070
  • 20713695121 from February 1975 - copyright notice page 5 Not PD until 2071
  • 20519086838 from May 1975, 20084599454 is from July 1975 - both with copyright notice on page 1 neither PD until 2071
  • 20086179363 from January 1980 - copyright notice page 5 Not PD until 2076
  • 20085008524 from August 1980 - copyright notice page 5 Not PD until 2076. I think the article's author is not the photographer.
  • 20699372462 from September 1982 - copyright notice page 5 Not PD until 2078. I don't think the article's author is the photographer.
 Delete 20085051914 from September 1979 as it credits Michael Couture and has copyright notice page 5. Couture was alive at least up to 1985. I'm not sure if Couture died since then. In any case, it's too early to pass PD as this photo is 70 years PMA of copyright. Unknown year of PD --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 09:00, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Dipish mot

[edit]

Non-trivial design. All files are taken from https://votesmart.appspot.com/ However, there is no mention of the Creative Commons license on the site. --Khinkali (talk) 09:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and discussion. @Dipish mot: please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder to publish the image on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 13:11, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not neccesarily entirely PD-US Gov Contains contributions from a State level agency in Montana, Does Montana publish state level works under a free license?

List of files

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:46, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

there is some information that Montata state work are free. rubin16 (talk) 12:41, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. No proof that these files can be published with a PD licence. --Ellywa (talk) 13:14, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Datei soll mit korrektem Dateinamen erneut hochgeladen werden VSchagow (talk) 19:43, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Datei muss nicht gelöscht, sondern kann verschoben werden... das kann ich gern machen --Z thomas 06:46, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File was moved --Z thomas 09:09, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: was solved by renaming the file in the meantime. --Rosenzweig τ 11:29, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

بی‌کیفیت بودن و وجود جایگزین

POS78 (talk) 12:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. @POS78: please show for each file separately why the image is redundant per COM:REDUNDANT and show the alternative. Some images are used on the projects and should be replaced for they can be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 13:17, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

بی‌کیفیت بودن و وجود جایگزین

POS78 (talk) 12:02, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: poor quality is not a valid reason for deletion. no valid reason for deletion. @POS78: please show for each file separately why the image is redundant per COM:REDUNDANT and show the alternative. Some images are used on the projects and should be replaced for they can be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 13:18, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an original work by {{Tasnim}}. Look at the watermark at the upper left corner. 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

4nn1l2 (talk) 12:49, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of these images. --Ellywa (talk) 13:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work: logo, see here Bradipo Lento (talk) 13:46, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Not a simple logo per COM:TOO, so cannot be maintained on that basis as well. --Ellywa (talk) 13:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Benclare (talk · contribs)

[edit]

author Richard Davenport / The Other Richard per exif. Needs OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 14:14, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Exif shows name of photographer. --Ellywa (talk) 13:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is obvisouly not a selfie Culex (talk) 15:28, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello , I need to delete this picture, it is our private picture Lapin89 (talk) 04:11, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, Bulle Ogier, souhaite supprimer cette photo comme demandé le 8 septembre ?? pouvez-vous m'aider à le faire? merci 86.195.92.19 12:06, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Attribution issue : it's not a selfie... --> Delete - Bzh-99 (talk) 16:50, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 13:24, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to 1995 publication, (Post 1978 issues fo which have already been removed from Commons) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:50, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This is from a 1995 copyrighted article per here. With Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_States, 1995 works with known authors are copyrighted for 70 years after death. If the authors died in 1995, this would be way too early to pass PD in the USA in 2022. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:42, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination and remark,. --Ellywa (talk) 13:25, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to 1994 issues of a publication for which previous post 1978 issues have been removed either for copyvio or following DR's.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:51, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete All of them are from 1994 copyrighted articles in the US. See here for 20429439081 and here for the remaining five photos. Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_States, these are in copyright for 95 years after publication for anonymous authors, making this PD in 2090. these are in copyright for 70 years after the author's death. I'm persuming they're by the same authors as the articles as they are from research journals. In any case, if the authors died in 1994 this would be way too early to pass PD. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination and remark. --Ellywa (talk) 13:31, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ersetz durch gelichnamige svg-Datei Petflo2000 16:19, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. File is not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 13:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not clear to me from the live link or from the archival link that this is licenced as stated. That said, I have not joined Vimeo in order to watch the video: the video being labeled mature content it is not visible on Vimeo without an account. Associated question: if the file is kept should it have a "personality rights" template added to it? An identical file has been deleted twice. SashiRolls (talk) 18:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I dont understand your nomination. It is clearly in the source labeled as CC-BY, I just checked. Before the upload I removed the sound as the music was copyrighted. It was also checked by the licensebot after the upload was made. Please trust the bot and the uploader, or create an account on Vimeo to check this. This video was uploaded as we don't have many video material about the dance style twerking, so please reconsider this deletion request. You are free to add additional templates if you wish. --Hannolans (talk) 19:47, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Mature content... not visible without an account does not belong on Commons. SashiRolls (talk) 20:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Content behind a paywall or login can be hosted on commons as long as the content has a valid license. --Hannolans (talk) 07:08, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious internal contradiction: you say you had to remove the copyright music from a video you say was validly labeled as CC-BY and yet maintain that we should trust the "license" anyway (even without being able to see it)? Hmm... anyway, as mentioned above the same file has already been deemed "out of scope" by consensus. (here) SashiRolls (talk) 09:17, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No that is not a contradiction, Creative Commons might be applied by the original author to the material they created in a video, while it isnt applicable for the elements you don't have created (third party content). On Wikimedia Commons we are not allowed to have copyrighted elements in material with Creative Commons license, while in Youtube your are allowed to upload creative commons licensed video mixed with copyrighted or free music. Only if it is de minimis but that is not the case in this situation. In the video they marked the music as third party content: "YG – She A Model (KiD KOBRA TWERK REMIX)". Best practice is to mark third party content. More info content: https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/Marking/Creators/Marking_third_party_content And the file itself is not out of scope, there was only a mass deletion with where it was mentioned as out of scope because of 'Lots of penises and porn with no educational value'. That is not the case in this video, this is a dance video. We don't have a lot of them. Dance styles are in scope in an encyclopedy. --Hannolans (talk) 17:55, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Hannolans. I checked the source, and the licencing appears CC-BY-SA3.0 unported. So film can be maintained on commons. --Ellywa (talk) 13:39, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no source provided. Liquidizer3 (talk) 19:19, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of these images. --Ellywa (talk) 13:40, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ermanon as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: CCV PIC WIKIPEDIA 2018.jpg
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (PNG -> JPEG). -- Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Renamed the duplicate into File:CCV PIC WIKIPEDIA 2018 - Christian Javier Cruz Villegas.jpg. --Ellywa (talk) 13:44, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not use and there is an sg version of this map 2A02:1812:1128:9D00:C0B:93C7:FD80:2705 20:10, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: after a quick search I did not find a duplicate. Please nominate again and provide a link to the other version. --Ellywa (talk) 13:46, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not use and there is an sg version of this map 2A02:1812:1128:9D00:C0B:93C7:FD80:2705 20:10, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: after a quick search I did not find a duplicate. Please nominate again and provide a link to the other version. --Ellywa (talk) 13:46, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the design is likely in the public domain per {{PD-Iran}}, this seems to be a photograph of a 3D object (a matchbox) and the licence for that photograph is unclear. It may be possible to crop the image so that only the 2D element is included in the photo. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: cropped the image and deleted the copyrighted version. --Ellywa (talk) 13:49, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of license; this is a UN agency's logo. The text on Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United Nations makes me think this is copyright infringing. Psiĥedelisto (talkcontribs) please always ping! 21:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United Nations. Logos may not be used unlimited according to the text on that page. --Ellywa (talk) 13:51, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not expired or work of an agency that would make it PD, 1977 publication by " South African Museum" and of South African origin, I fail to see how this could be 'free from restrictions.".

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:24, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: 1898 work - copyright term expired. --Anatoliy (talk) 18:59, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re-opening due to additional concerns, See Also: User_talk:Ahonc#Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Annals_of_the_South_African_Museum._Annale_van_die_Suid-Afrikaanse_Museum_(1977)
The IA sourced metadata for some publications (erroneously) uses the date of the first issue of the entire publication as the date field, not the actual date of any specific issue. In some instances this (erronous) date has apparently propagated across to the images on the relevant Flikr stream. During a process of attempting to harmonize the Flikr sourced images against the PDF's being upload as part of the IA books project, these anomalies in dating were uncovered.
As this is a 1977 work determined reading title and related pages in the PDF itself for the specific issue is from 1977, It is NOT out of copyright.
Images from a 1977 work would also not necessarily be out of copyright, and based on a precautionary principle, should be considered as being of contemporaneous date to the issues publication, unless there is strong evidence to suggest that they were published at an earlier date. ( I am however prepared to concede to keeping such earlier published images if evidence of their non-copyright status can be shown/proved.)
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete At least some portion is from 1977 (the publication itself and much of the text and other content, though not necessarily all underlying photography). COM:South Africa seems to say publish+50 years for published works, so this could be undeleted in 2028? -M.nelson (talk) 18:54, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. As M.Nelson states, the photographs can be undeleted 51 years after 1977 so in 2028 HOWEVER THE PDF file can POSSIBLY NOT be undeleted.. --Ellywa (talk) 13:56, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]