Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/07/19

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 19th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Il s'agit d'un ancien logo. Le nouveau est mis à jour sur Wikipédia. 46.140.185.98 07:32, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use File:Logo Swissmetal Industries SA.png instead. --Achim (talk) 13:23, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the person who uploaded this photo yet I am not sure it belongs to the Archives of Morroco (Archives du Maroc) Hanawamiro (talk) 10:45, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:38, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicates uploader request Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 16:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:37, 20 July 2021 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 14:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

perchè una inutile prova Bagnardi52 (talk) 16:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 07:23, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo subí por error Bmmederos (talk) 00:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 01:08, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 04:10, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 05:43, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by A.B.Kocher (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All from ejot.de, all need OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 11:41, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:08, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

بی‌کیفیت بودن و وجود جایگزین

POS78 (talk) 20:00, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ehsanco (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparent bulk COM:NETCOPYVIO - all but one low res with no EXIF, elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:BahmanFC 2.jpg is here; File:ShamsCar2.jpg is here; File:ShamsCar1.jpg is here), etc. Duck/COM:PRP

Эlcobbola talk 21:13, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

بی‌کیفیت بودن و وجود جایگزین

POS78 (talk) 21:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata transmission code suggests Facebook or Instagram. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:34, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:58, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be more than a simple logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, too complex to be PD-logo and no indication that the "own work" and CC-BY-SA claims are actually valid. Seraphimblade (talk) 01:48, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:57, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wyattmearp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Gallery of images, many with FBMD in the metadata, all seem to be photo album pictures, not encyclopedic.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:00, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:56, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:China Expwy G2 sign with name.svg, no longer having local uses. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:China Expwy G3 sign with name.svg, no longer having local uses. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:China Expwy G4 sign with name.svg, no longer having local uses. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:China Expwy G5 sign with name.svg, no longer having local uses. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:China Expwy G6 sign with name.svg, no longer having local uses. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:China Expwy G7 sign with name.svg, no longer having local uses. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:China Expwy G92 sign with name.svg, no longer having local uses. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:21, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:China_Expwy_G15W_sign_with_name.svg, no longer having local uses. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:22, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:China Expwy G72 sign with name.svg, no longer having local uses. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:26, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in the country as of today. The new city hall was incepted in 2017. This article from Caloocan's official website indicates that the design comes from an architect who won through bidding. This means the city hall architecture falls under COM:COMM Philippines, which means architectural copyright is still retained by the architect. Without COM:VRT authorization from him, these files infringe his exclusive rights on distribution. Undelete when FOP is introduced here if VRT permission cannot be achieved.

The building itself
Sculptures of what appear to be foo dogs, unknown author but likely recent (almost same age as that of the new city hall)

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:40, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:02, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a government-commissioned tarpaulin. Missing COM:VRT authorization from the tarpaulin creator. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:48, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:02, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a tarpaulin showing candidates of Miss Caloocan 2018. Obviously not a government work, but a commissioned work. Missing COM:VRT permissions from the author of this graphic work.

Also

_JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:02, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:02, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 05:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:04, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gtmines (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal unused pics outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:04, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising and promotion. Faisal talk 05:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:04, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising and promotion. Faisal talk 05:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:04, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo for non wikipedian. Faisal talk 05:31, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:04, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo for non wikipedian. Faisal talk 05:32, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:04, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising and promotion. Faisal talk 06:01, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:04, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo for non wikipedian. Faisal talk 06:10, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:04, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 07:12, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:04, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 칼빈500 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Several of the files that are claimed to be the uploader's own creations clearly aren't. Several of the files have references to CC BY-NC-SA that contradict the stated licenses. Others lack any form of verifiable source information.

LX (talk, contribs) 10:39, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I changed all pictures into CC-BY-SA. I am not sure it is correct or not. --칼빈500 (talk) 06:24, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure either. To name a few of the questions just for the first three files listed above:
  1. You say that you personally created File:왕길지(이상규).jpg. It looks like a book cover featuring a portrait painting/photograph. Did you really create that book cover yourself?
  2. You say that File:Dr. Yung Jae Kim(김영재).jpg depicts Yung Jae Kim and that the author of the photo is Yung Jae Kim, but it does not appear to be a selfie. Was the photo really created by the subject? You also link the supposed author's name to your own user page. So are you Yung Jae Kim?
  3. You say that the source of File:김관주목사.jpg is 김명혁 허락 ("Kim Myung Hye's permission" according to Google) and that the author is 김명혁 ("Kim"). That'll need verified permission from the legitimate copyright holder, assuming the photograph is still protected by copyright. You say that it was created in 2013, but it appears that's just when the reproduction was made. The original photograph appears to be much older.
LX (talk, contribs) 15:44, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
본인이 저작권을 가지지 않은 (=본인이 직접 촬영하지 않은) 저작물에 대해 저작권을 주장해서는 안 됩니다. 몇몇 사진은 본인이 촬영하지 않았다는 것이 명백하거나 타인이 저작하셨다고 입력하셨습니다. 본인이 촬영하지 않은 사진에 대해서는 OTRS 팀에 저작권자가 저작권 선언을 발송하여야 합니다. — regards, Revi 01:41, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
잘 알겠습니다. 사진에 대해서 혼동을 일으켰네요. 정확한 명기를 하겠습니다. 주로 제가 찍은 것도 처리를 잘못하였네요. 감사합니다. 칼빈500--칼빈500 (talk) 05:39, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:05, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 칼빈500 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A mix of issues here. 1) Headshots claimed as own work but without meaningful exif and a number have FB MD in exif indicating they came from Facebook. 2) Photos of photos, we need permission from the original photographer or evidence of PD status

Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 19 July 2021 (UTC) === requests === I made those following, Please do not remove them.[reply]

  • File:노윤석목사(PFAMJ).jpg - Photo of a photo
  • File:신사훈박사(AMJ).jpg
  • File:이갑득김영선(AMJ).png
  • File:이갑득(AMJ).jpg
  • File:노윤석목사(AMJ).jpg
  • File:전칠홍목사(AMJ55).jpg
  • File:박태수.jpg
  • File:전칠홍목사(AMJ).jpg
  • File:김병철전국대학생모의UN총회.jpg
  • File:4.19혁명리더들.jpg
  • File:한국의 칼빈주의자들.png
  • File:SeunggooLee.jpg
  • File:박윤선박사1967(YSP AMJ).jpg
  • File:IRTIUtrech(AMJ).jpg
  • File:CalvinCongressSeoul(AMJ).jpg
  • File:한부선교수1958(AMJ).jpg
  • File:조덕영(AMJ).png

Thank you for your checking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 칼빈500 (talk • contribs)


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:06, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files Uploaded by Rachelharrisla

[edit]

Most of these files are taken from https://www.facebook.com/pg/officialvst/photos/ and while File:VST Awit Awards.jpg is not in there, it seems that this is also a CopyVio. - 49.147.76.81 20:32, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete does really seem credible that Rachelharrisla is the copyright holder of all of these photos as declared. Permission required from true copyright holder or delete--Headlock0225 (talk) 12:21, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:08, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

irrelevant shopfront 62.216.207.224 20:44, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 13:08, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

irrelevant shopfront 62.216.207.224 20:45, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 13:08, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nothing depicted 62.216.207.224 20:45, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Actually I like it. Taivo (talk) 11:11, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 13:08, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

y Bmmederos (talk) 22:01, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 13:08, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Assorted derivative work violations. See COM:Derivative works.

Informational board greeting Valentine's Day, with heart graphics
Advertising leaflet with underlying photographs of the cakes
Heart-shaped glass wall advertisement with underlying photo of cake, ©️Goldilocks
Menu advertisement
Vertical advertisement or advertising stands
Realme ads, while at close-range backgound fails COM:De minimis as there is intentional focus or inclusion
Tarpaulin/s with underlying illustrations
Miniature stuffed toys, some of them are Hello Kitty
Contains life-sized toy (more like a statue) of stereotypical British royal guard, unfortunately no COM:FOP Philippines for anything including 3D works
Various COM:PACKAGING

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:16, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:10, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Well as the category name intends. All of these violate COM:TOYS. All are obviously recent balloon designs: File:7498Baliuag and Pulilan Bulacan during General Community Quarantine 27.jpg in particular includes a Hello Kitty balloon. COM:Derivative works.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:46, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:10, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT, out of COM:SCOPE. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:55, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:10, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising/Promotion - links and social media handles  A S U K I T E  15:34, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 04:26, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These anime characters are copyrighted. Ox1997cow (talk) 22:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, these are not real characters made by any human artist, they are fake images generated by an artificial intelligence. They do not represent any characters from any existing anime franchises. Works created by computer algorithms and artificial intelligences are not copyrightable; see Template:PD-algorithm. Di (they-them) (talk) 23:43, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Di (they-them): I misunderstood. I'm sorry... Ox1997cow (talk) 15:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep on the basis that they are algorithm generated. Ox1997cow, you are entitled to withdraw this nomination by making a simple statement that you withdraw it, if you wish. Timtrent (talk) 08:07, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by the nominator himself (non-admin closure) Ox1997cow (talk) 18:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Andel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Those icons clearly contains original authorship.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 10:27, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Andel: I blurred now all icons that are not open license. Is there any icon left which I missed? Or do you wish a stronger blur? Or should I add the author-information of notepad++,Gimp,Inkscape,Firefox,Thunderbid,owncloud-client? Or do you mean the photo of myself? Please be more specific. I think a Revision deletion should be enough.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 10:33, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JoKalliauer: I guess it's legally ok like this, you've blurred all the icons I thought about and even some more. Adding some more information about the authors of the still visible icons would be great, but effort-wise a bit of an overkill; I still can't really see how this image is "realistically useful for an educational purpose" and how it could be used other than in a purely illustrative use, but since it is in active use by the German Wikipedia, I have no further objections to its existence on Wikimedia Commons. Cheers and thanks --Andel (talk) 16:45, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Andel: (Reply in German, see Commons:Guide_to_adminship#Multilinguality, [No language should be prioritised over any other])
  • Ich habe die alte Dateiversion versionsgelöscht
  • Ich hab bei den open-source-Icons die Homepages angegeben, dies entspricht zwar nicht ganz den Lizenzbestimmungen, aber bei den meisten Wikiversums-logos ist das auch falsch.
  • Ich habe das Bild auch in der Spanischen, Französischen, Hindischen, Kroatischen, Ungarischen, Italienischen und in der einfachen-englischen (simple.wikipedia) Wikipedia eingefügt. Es ist in allen Wikipedien üblich einen Screenshot zum Betriessystem zur Verfügung zu stellen, daher sehe ich es als in-scope an selbst wenn es durch ein anderes Bild ersetzt würde und nicht COM:INUSE wäre. [Aber das ist ein bisschen hätti wari. ]
 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 14:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep --Andel (talk) 16:14, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: agreement to keep the blured version.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 19:41, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Chubit as Screenshot however everything under copyright is blurred  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 06:54, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per previous DR - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 15:58, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license. --JuTa 20:14, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

perchè una inutile prova Bagnardi52 (talk) 16:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license. --JuTa 20:19, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

perchè una inutile prova Bagnardi52 (talk) 16:53, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license. --JuTa 20:16, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

perchè una inutile prova Bagnardi52 (talk) 16:53, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license. --JuTa 20:17, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

perchè una inutile prova Bagnardi52 (talk) 16:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license. --JuTa 20:16, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violaton and out of scope. Eaaaaugh (talk) 21:09, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license. --JuTa 20:33, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo subí por error Bmmederos (talk) 21:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by JuTa at 01:38, 3 August 2021 UTC: No permission since 23 July 2021 --Krdbot 08:03, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

flag of a non-existing nation (discord joke) Esprit Fugace (talk) 03:04, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by JuTa at 06:48, 3 August 2021 UTC: No license since 25 July 2021 --Krdbot 14:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrihvio Hedestad (talk) 02:14, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP France isn't acceptable by Commons, see also Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Canadian_National_Vimy_Memorial Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:43, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: de minimis. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:21, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Image of a copyrighted movie poster. No reason to believe the original poster was created by the uploader. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 13:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This a film poster, the uploader is not the author as claimed and it is unlikely that the production company would release the file under this license. Aspects (talk) 02:19, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:26, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Image of a copyrighted movie poster. No reason to believe the original poster was created by the uploader. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 13:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This a film poster, the uploader is not the author as claimed and it is unlikely that the production company would release the file under this license. Aspects (talk) 02:20, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:26, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Image of a copyrighted movie poster. No reason to believe the original poster was created by the uploader. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 13:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This a film poster, the uploader is not the author as claimed and it is unlikely that the production company would release the file under this license. Aspects (talk) 02:21, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:26, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Image of a copyrighted movie poster. No reason to believe the original poster was created by the uploader. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 13:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This a film poster, the uploader is not the author as claimed and it is unlikely that the production company would release the file under this license. Aspects (talk) 02:19, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:26, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP France, there is no freedom of panorama in France. This wax statue was displayed in Paris. plicit 13:38, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:27, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is an identical but with much less resolution of "File:Damien 2020-02-08 0619Z.jpg". The uploader is new and thought he was uploading it from English Wikipedia to Commons, never noticing it was already there. This "png" file should not therefore be in Commons and should be deleted. Pierre cb (talk) 14:46, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, for reasons of the resolutions (425 vs. 6000 wide), not the format. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:23, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:27, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
 Info: Still available at https://www.flickr.com/photos/45936609@N05/5845061676. --Achim (talk) 15:56, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We rarely delete images at the request of the subject and never when an anonymous user asks us to. Such requests can be vandalism. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete this picture of me. It was taken and published without my consent. It is now also deleted at flickr. 178.6.250.223 10:20, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could you please kindly remove this picture of me. It is a very close up picture of my face that was taken and published without my consent. It was taken at a festival many years ago and I was minor and did not notice I was photographed. I already managed to get to deleted on Flickr and Facebook. But unfortunately I really don't know what I need to do so that it can get deleted on here. 178.6.248.230 15:16, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep No proof of this being the depicted person, this is clearly not a minor and this was taken in Wave-Gotik-Treffen festival, so a public place, so no expectation of privacy. Tm (talk) 00:33, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tm. --Green Giant (talk) 21:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could you please finally remove this picture of me. It is a very close up picture of my face that was taken and published without my consent. It was taken at a festival many years ago and I was still underage and did not notice I was photographed. I did not give my consent to being photographed or published. I already managed to get it deleted on Flickr and Facebook. But unfortunately I really don't know what I need to do so that it can get deleted on here. I tried to contact the one who took the photo but he does not seem to be active anymore. 2001:16B8:FC3:600:B9CA:12C9:4E06:91F8 14:50, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:29, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pronunciation for the word is cutted in the middle of pronouncing Bicolino34 (talk) 18:26, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete.--Cinemantique (talk) 04:57, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:33, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of Moyai (ja:モヤイ像) at en:Shibuya Station (ja:渋谷駅) was created by Yuichi Daigo (ja:大後友市) in 1980. The year of his death is 2010. [1] No FoP in Japan for 3D works. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Moyai Statue.jpg.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:53, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 08:19, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of Moyai (ja:モヤイ像) at en:Kamata Station (Tokyo) (ja:蒲田駅) was erected in 1984. [2] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:04, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 08:19, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of Moyai (ja:モヤイ像) at Odaiba Marine Park (ja:お台場海浜公園) was erected in 平成24年 (=2012). [3] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 19:05, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 08:19, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collage: Each picture needs to be uploaded and licensed correctly. Also please notice watermark which suggests this is also a copy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:34, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:08, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused image, not well explained and possibly (size/quality) not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:59, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:09, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I didn't find the 4.0 license at source given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:10, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:11, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:11, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per nomination Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:12, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:11, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:12, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:11, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The title is no apropriate Monicanorma (talk) 01:14, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 05:11, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this facebook sized image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:13, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation, the author name in the metadata does not match the uploader's user name + on the college's homepage.[4] Verbcatcher (talk) 01:21, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:14, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Risk of copyright violation, on the college's homepage.[5] + no camera metadata + other questionable uploads by this new user. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:25, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:14, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A translation of this file gives me "Allah Muhammad", but from doing a little bit of research here, this isn't related to the topic and is thus out of scope. This was also created by a user who is banned on meta. SHB2000 (talk) 01:44, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:15, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:16, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashing - see Commons:Deletion_requests/File:LJ6A2101.jpg and watermarked to someone else Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:17, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source details are not specific enough to verify claimed CC-BY-SA licence, therefore possible copyright violation. GeoWriter (talk) 14:59, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:18, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The bar at the bottom of the photo indicates it is copyrighted. — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 15:23, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:19, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this image for personal use with Wikipedia. However, I am not the original owner and am unaware of licences on this image. Therefore it should not be made publicly available, and I request a deletion Nathan29006781 (talk) 15:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:19, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope. Vera (talk) 18:07, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:40, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art by Martin Creed, temporary exhibition in an indoor space, so presumably copyrighted by Creed, I don't see freedom of panorama or something similar as applicable; permission by the artist would be required Gestumblindi (talk) 18:52, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:22, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted logo not in public domain. also, file is out of date, see updated version on Goldman_Sachs wikipedia page Gs-design (talk) 19:02, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Protected by {{PD-Text}}, below the threshold of originality and keep as a historical record of previous logo. Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly below the threshold of originality. JBchrch (talk) 20:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Logos are trademarked, not copyrighted. The file itself might be copyrighted depending on its provenance. Having said that, I've always questioned the wisdom of maintaining logos on commons and why to commons the only intellectual property protection that matters is copyright. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 06:51, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-textlogo. --King of ♥ 05:22, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have done a little bit better foto))) Vaija (talk) 19:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Blurry image. --King of ♥ 05:40, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private nude photo, out of scope. Kotivalo (talk) 19:45, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:39, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, blurry photograph of the Reno Arch and an entrance at the old Harrah's. We have better quality photographs that supercede this image. See the category here. Thank you! Missvain (talk) 20:01, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:39, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mid res; no EXIF; description "taken by Nigel Ipinson" where Nigel Ipinson ≠ uploader Leo Aanholt; uploaded with blatant copyvio of this subject (see File:Ipinson perform.jpg ), etc. Duck/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 20:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete very likely not the uploader's own work. --Mosbatho (talk) 06:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:22, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res, no EXIF, uploaded with blatant copyvio of this subject (see File:Siddharthavig.jpg), user history of copyvios, etc. Duck/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 21:02, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:22, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, along with the filename and the rage face. Eaaaaugh (talk) 21:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:23, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, IMage of hamster being grasoed by human hand is unkwon. Eaaaaugh (talk) 21:04, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:23, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope for commons, please red https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/COM:SCOPE for more details. Also copyright violation with the rage comic face. Eaaaaugh (talk) 21:06, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:23, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader's account is the stage name of the subject of the picture. No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 21:09, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:39, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Missvain as no permission (No permission since) Ikan Kekek

  • Delete - Single use account that uploaded a copyrighted photograph. If you do a TinEye, you find it's a promo photo from the casino used in press releases, etc. You can find it here. If the uploader truly has copyright permissions for this photo they will provide permissions from GSR. Missvain (talk) 21:16, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why didn't you say so in the deletion nomination notice? If you had, I wouldn't have challenged the speedy deletion nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Missvain, TinEye could not read that image from the URL. Did you upload the image to TinEye? Better yet, why not provide a URL of another page with this photo on it that would seem to show this photo was probably stolen from x or y website (rather than used there because they took it from Commons)? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:01, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there! I like to keep things civil, so please assume good faith. Here is my TinEye search. A perfect example of how this image is unlikely to be owned by the uploader is this press release put out by the casino resort. I took another minute and found the same image available for media download on the GSR's media website. I do not see any statements that this is a freely licensed image. Perhaps the uploader can provide permissions, but, based on their edit history I do not expect that to happen. Cheers and thanks for your contributions to Wikimedia Commons. Missvain (talk) 23:29, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I also like to assume good faith with uploaders - perhaps they are affiliated with the casino and will get an email saying they need to provide permissions and they'll do so. Hence why I requested permissions rather than immediately deleting it, which I could have done as an admin. Ah well! Patience is a virtue. Missvain (talk) 23:32, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot, I appreciate your links, which certainly satisfy me in  Supporting the deletion nomination. But the reason I asked is that it doesn't seem to be possible to link your TinEye search results successfully. The text that shows up is "It's time for a refresh. We're sorry but these search results have expired. Please try your search again to get updated results." All the best, Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:22, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:39, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jbanguela (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uoloader's name os the stage name of the subject. No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright).

Timtrent (talk) 21:12, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:38, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NOTHOST - unused, low quality, no evident educational utility Эlcobbola talk 21:16, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:37, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus self-claim. Logo possibly above TOO. Discussion needed. Эlcobbola talk 21:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:37, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

He edited my photo which I was uploaded on commons as File:M. H..jpg which I was deleted and made me creepy. This was my photo I look so good but he edited and made me creepy person please delete this creepy photo I don't look like this shit. Please I can't able to see this creepy face I don't look like this somebody edited my pic. 😔 Hyderabadi (talk) 08:31, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Delete: That was my picture which I was uploaded on commons as File:M. H..jpg later I deleted that picture from commons but earlier someone edited and uploaded my picture on commons and made me a creepy old man. Please delete it as soon as possible. Hyderabadi (talk) 05:48, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:09, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Gorinbo statue is an artwork of ja:富永直樹(1913 - 2006). No FOP in Japan.

Nightingale (talk) 12:32, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of en:Miyamoto Musashi (ja:宮本武蔵) at the Hachidai Jinja (ja:八大神社) in Kyoto was created by Atsuo Shibata (ja:柴田篤男) (alias, Bunya Tanaka (ja:田中文彌)) in 平成14年 (=2002). [6] The year of his death is 2018. [7] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:02, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, undelete in 2089. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of en:Miyamoto Musashi (ja:宮本武蔵) at en:Ganryū-jima (ja:巌流島) was designed by Naoki Hirose (ja:広瀬直樹) in 平成15年 (=2003). [8] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:25, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Visual File Change shows this has FBMD from Facebook' Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:38, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:16, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata suggests this came from Facebook or Instagram Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:38, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:16, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CanBea87 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical paintings and map. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by CanBea87 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.hdwallpapersfreedownload.com/uploads/large/cities/spain-hd-wallpaper.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:21, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CanBea87 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files which do not appear to be own work: Great pictures with terrible file sizes and qualities, Maps without attribution and what seems to be at least one professional diagram also without attribution.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:06, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9   15:20, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sekak98 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Gallery of images by an apparently contemporary artist, without permission. Also two photos of artist, also unlikely own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:16, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:19, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   08:45, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:32, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, plenty of good images at Category:Sochi Arboretum Alaexis (talk) 09:48, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:32, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image too dark to be of use. Malcolma (talk) 09:48, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:33, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Without knowing which school the file is of no educational value. Malcolma (talk) 09:55, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:33, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promo which is out of scope for Commons; see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Meneses Monroy. Sexto aniversario "El Comité" CECUT, Tijuana, México.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:El Comité 1973.- Convocatoria número 42.- Paganismo.jpg, en:Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Meneses_Monroy for context Born2bgratis (talk) 10:37, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


WARNING. The users Born2bgratis and Fmarioivan (probably the same person / A Sock puppet account) are trying to destroy everything related with the group El Comité. To erase neutral articles, images and links the way they do is vandalism. The germans (and others) have already tagged this user actions as vandalism https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer_Diskussion:Born2bgratis (look here). --AYSO60 (talk) 20:40, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The rejection of self-promotion is certainly not to be dismissed out of hand, but the person depicted in this picture is most likely relevant in Wikidata and therefore the picture is not outside the scope of Wikimedia Commons. Thus, if there is no objection to the license, this picture is to be kept. --Gymnicus (talk) 14:07, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Gymnicus. --P 1 9 9   15:35, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a photo, not own work Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:35, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   11:55, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:35, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, no checkable source GeorgHHtalk   13:26, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:36, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal achievments in table form, used only in draft, it must be used in plain text mode, no reason for image. Drakosh (talk) 14:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:36, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Volleybae (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flags of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:37, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aftmpreservationllc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and above TOO. --P 1 9 9   15:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope! Ras67 (talk) 21:32, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:40, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Meta data indicates that this may have been in Facebook before here. It's close in photo from United Nations, dubious own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:02, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be cropped from this Facebook Image Series ... in ours the man's hand is slightly different.  Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:31, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:02, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is taken by uploader, what is that white splooge on left side with words on it? Seems to be copied from somewhere else. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:03, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samuel Tigrai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Disturbing content: Apparently copied from Facebook or Instagram this series of war victim photos (complete with facial pixelation) is unlikely to be own work of the uploader. Two are composites. All are facebook or smaller sizes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unlikely own work. --P 1 9 9   14:09, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file size, low quality, unlikely own work. Also empty stadium. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:43, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9   14:22, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see any indication that the author has been dead for 70 years. The source is invalid, and I don't think the author is correct - also work is dated to 9 March 2021, not 70 years plus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:53, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:22, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fashionabhishek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

en:Draft:Designers Abhishek Dutta launches a clothes line brand made by the inmates of prison

Patrick Rogel (talk) 04:19, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Duck Copyright violations (F1) - per above + File:Consuls walks in Bengal weaves.jpg is here, for example. --Эlcobbola talk 20:09, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fashionabhishek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Despite the large file sizes, this is more likely a collection from various photographers than the work of one person. (a) Sizes are all over the place (b) metadata is variable and not what one would expect if this were the professional uploading themself. Seems like a collection.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. At least one image clearly credited to someone else. Unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9   14:24, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is the crown graphics own work (own drawing or traces) by the problematic User:SG452? Or was it obtained from a source that the uploader did not specify? Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle comes in. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:33, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, found online here. So possibly hoax as well. --P 1 9 9   14:31, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is the pattern graphics own creation by SG452 (talk · contribs), who has uploaded various problematic files? Or was it taken from a website somewhere? I doubt this is the uploader's own work. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:35, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. And out of scope. --P 1 9 9   14:31, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious authorship, false date - the man died in 1962 GAndy (talk) 04:15, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9   14:32, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, Obviously not own work Waran18 (talk) 07:02, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:34, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, Obviously not own work Waran18 (talk) 07:02, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:34, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, Obviously not own work Waran18 (talk) 07:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:34, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, Obviously not own work Waran18 (talk) 07:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:34, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, Obviously not own work Waran18 (talk) 07:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:34, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, Obviously not own work Waran18 (talk) 07:04, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:34, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph would appear to come from this article, which makes no reference of a Creative Commons license. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 07:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Yes, the filename matches that of the image used on the Telegraph site. Eric talk 14:35, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:35, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Copyvio https://routes.fandom.com/wiki/Autoroute_fran%C3%A7aise_A112_(Projet)?file=A112.jpeg Ryse93 (talk) 07:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:36, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a TV screencap. MKFI (talk) 07:50, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination ("Source Todorović himself" - needs VRTS). --P 1 9 9   14:37, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio https://10play.com.au/masterchef/recipes/panta-bhaat-with-aloo-bhorta-and-white-soy-ginger-sardines/r210707qsifn WWGB (talk) 11:16, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:41, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No exif, probably taken from Insta based on this shoot - https://www.instagram.com/p/CM9YOpEAy7l/ - PCP - unlikely to be own work as claimed Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional quality photo, no exif, unlikely to be own work as claimed. Think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 11:56, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found here before upload - https://www.idntimes.com/hype/entertainment/yulia-nor-annisa/ulang-tahun-ke-31-ini-potret-park-bo-young-c1c2-1 - no exif and likely taken from Insta. Needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 12:05, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kein "Eigenes Werk", keine Erlaubnis 80.187.118.77 12:25, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist mein eigenes Werk! --Mtag (talk) 14:58, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Might be own work, anyway not found on the web. --Achim (talk) 19:53, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Achim55. --P 1 9 9   14:45, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission since the file was uploaded, non-free Vacant0 (talk) 15:55, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, fails COM:LR. --P 1 9 9   14:46, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

perchè una inutile prova Bagnardi52 (talk) 16:55, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   14:47, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

since even the uploader states that the author of this picture is "La Repubblica" (an italian newspaper), this might be a copyviol Mannivu · 17:08, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:48, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Timtrent as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FBMD in metadata rubin16 (talk) 17:13, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:48, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A press photo that can be found on RCA's website. Very likely copyvio. Ur Nan123 (talk) 17:50, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:57, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.vam.ac.uk/articles/the-arts-of-the-mughal-empire/ notes the image is copyrighted by the Victoria and Albert Museum. If the image is under copyright, then there's no evidence it's a CC license. C.Fred (talk) 17:52, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: too old to be copyrighted, PD-art. --P 1 9 9   14:58, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence on this being own work and I found it from websites including this one which is the first image you see. Iggy the Swan (talk) 18:02, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:59, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is no longer accurate since some boundaries and municipalties have changed. A better svg version that is current is available. Jay1279 (talk) 18:27, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Superseded and deletion requested by original uploader. --Worldlydev (talk) 16:11, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Historical map. --P 1 9 9   15:00, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not old enough. And it doesn't seem to be a permanent installation. No FoP in UK for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 19:11, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:02, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rekadio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Simple copyrighted logos. They appear to be from Indonesia; what is the threshold of originality in Indonesia (COM:TOO Indonesia)?

-M.nelson (talk) 20:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused, no educational value. --P 1 9 9   15:03, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 도수참관 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unsourced images of old photos. Copyright status unclear.

GeorgHHtalk   21:58, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:05, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seair Manager (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not the uploader's own work. EXIF in 3 of the files assign copyright to Brechin Maclean Photography, another to Nick Didlick. We need proof that the copyright holders have released the photos under a free license via COM:OTRS.

-M.nelson (talk) 22:13, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:05, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to PNG and SVG versions, not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:22, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:06, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is specifically not freely available license, it is from their album art - https://www.allkpop.com/article/2021/04/album-mv-review-astro-all-yours Evaders99 (talk) 22:53, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:06, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: small size, missing EXIF, user uplaod history 4nn1l2 (talk) 23:39, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope non-notable team. --P 1 9 9   15:09, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by MoHasanie Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You guys have to stop nominating files with FoP problems for speedy deletion. This is a Wikivoyage pagebanner. You are committing an act of vandalism relative to Wikivoyage. Always nominate files that merely have FoP problems for regular deletion and give us time to upload them locally. I'm very angry at you, A1Cafel! Stop this NOW! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:31, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep Agree. I've been fed up with having to upload and download files numerous times, and I'm on a loan computer as well with limited storage as well. You're unrealisingly vandalising Wikivoyage, and you should possibly read my quote on my meta userpage, and take the last two words out. If you nominate a file for speedy deletion one more time which is a wikivoyage banner, it is your responsibility to upload that Wikivoyage banner to whichever language Wikivoyage that is. SHB2000 (talk) 03:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Question A1Cafel, will you at least stop nominating files in use for speedy deletion? I don't want to have to rush to download a file onto my computer and upload it locally before it's deleted. Be respectful; don't be a vandal. I feel like you get your jollies by being a fanatical deletionist. That doesn't serve the Wiki Community; it's uncollegial and vandalistic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • I nominated this file for speedy because this was extracted from an image which has FoP issues, the crop cannot resolve the issue as well. Also, there is previous case that images violated FOP are speedy deleted User talk:SelfieCity#File:Rocklin Banner.jpg. Just know that you are an admin in Wikivoyage, if you find this is rush to prepare another image, I will stop nominating image for speedy if they are in-use on Wikivoyage, even they have FoP conern. However, I disagree with your statement, calling me a vandal, particularly in Special:Diff/575803826. I know you may be frustrated, but please be COM:CIVIL. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:25, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate that, but I think you should adopt the same policy, regardless of which wiki an image is used on. But so you understand, we don't rush to prepare another image just because of FoP issues. We have fair-use exception rules and upload files like this locally when necessary - which we've had to do dozens of times lately because of the zeal of people like you to purge Commons. Thereby, Commons is becoming a less and less reliable site on which to host images and less and less the Wiki Movement's repository of images. That might be necessary, but it sure is annoying to us at other wikis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In effect, you have been doing your best to vandalize Wikivoyage from Commons. I will accept that you haven't specifically intended to do so, but this is hardly the first time there have been complaints about your zeal to delete photos in use, and this is at least the second time you've nominated a Wikivoyage banner for speedy deletion. If you didn't notice the last time I strenuously objected, OK, but threads on the Administrators' noticeboard show that your focus on deletion has gotten you into trouble in other ways, too. However, I will post to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#A1Cafel and yet more abusive deletions acknowledging our discussion here; that's only fair. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:46, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@A1Cafel: I don't see how Ikan was uncivil. To add on top of what Ikan said, the two of us (plus LPfi) are just rushing to upload files because of your silly reasons. Per COM:CSD#F3, you'd need to allow some time. I get putting speedy deletion tags on out of scope images like fictional flags, but this isn't out of scope. It's well within scope. It has education meaning to it. You also failed to listen to warnings at COM:ANI and I've been following the discussion about you.
But all I have to say, with being continually harassed from a WMF banned user just a few months after I got here is that this is even worse than that. Yes... it may not be intentional, but you have to stop being an indirect vandal. I could go to voy:en:Wikivoyage:User ban nominations, but that isn't going to do much isn't it.
To any admin here, would it help to revoke A1Cafel's autopatrolled status here? SHB2000 (talk) 06:04, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@SHB2000: Ask at COM:ANU instead, because someone also want to discuss if their file renamer and/or rollbacker flags be removed or not. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:42, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Liuxinyu970226: Removing all of the rights? You're going too far away. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:19, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why is that not too far? You failed to listen to all our warnings, and committed vandalism on en and ja Wikivoyage. I think your edits are better patrolled. SHB2000 (talk) 02:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment A crop does in many cases solve the problem of FoP, i.e. when the crop has its focus on something else than the original copyrighted subject (depending on the crop and details of local copyright law). Thus, whether an image violates the copyright of the architect has to be assessed for that image, regardless of an assessment of the source image. The linked DR is useless as reference, as only admins (thus probably not A1Cafel) can compare the file with those in the DR – they might have been much clearer cases. –LPfi (talk) 09:56, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @LPfi: But A1Cafel doesn't like cropping either. He will then accuse you of "small image without EXIF, dubious claim of own work" as seen in this deletion discussion and here as well. OhanaUnitedTalk page 14:15, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Which isn't relevant here. This is not even claimed to be own work (in the copyright sense). The point is that files should not be deleted because of the outcome of a DR on the original file, unless the points made in that DR apply. No points were made in the DR in question, so no points from it can apply here. Thus the file has to be discussed from a clean table, and certainly not be nominated as speedy. –LPfi (talk) 14:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    But yes, of course, if an image is cropped because of lack of (strong enough) zoom, then we'd have the "dubious claim" argument, which admins should take for what it is worth. –LPfi (talk) 14:45, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Not in use any more on Wikivoyage, in use at wikidata and af.WP. --Elly (talk) 21:44, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 14:24, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 21:41, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 14:25, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 21:45, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of Otu (ja:お通) in Himeji was created by Kentaro Hashimoto (ja:橋本堅太郎). [9] [10] The year of his death is 2021. No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:32, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 05:51, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Hot Springs National Park artist-in-residence program leaves copyrights with the artist; the NPS acquires the right to use the work non-commercially only[11].

BMacZero (🗩) 15:42, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. "not be used for commercial purposes". --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:30, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Versehentlich hochgeladen LoKiLeCh (talk) 17:44, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Tanzania A1Cafel (talk) 14:22, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Turkmenistan A1Cafel (talk) 14:23, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, not only does Turkmenistan have no FoP, but the English Wikipedia article about the building states it was completed in 2009. Since this is relatively recently, it can only be assumed that both architects (Kakajan and Durdi Durdyev) are still alive, and even if they were not, the copyright for the building would still be in effect. GriffintheFolf (talk) 00:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PeacefulJack (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:56, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Timtrent (talk) 15:32, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:56, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mosque was completed in 1995 by architect Eugène Beaudouin (1931–), Vittorio Gigliotti (1921–2015), Sami Mousawi (1938–) and Nino Tozzo. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Italy, thus permission from the architect is required.

A1Cafel (talk) 07:57, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not too sure. SHB2000 (talk) 02:46, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Same--A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I used the occasion to delete bad quality photos that were noeduse (tilted, out of focus, no representative, etc.) I kept certain photos that are usable, but either de minimis or of details that are not copyrightable. A separate DR focused on each single architect is necessary to evaluate which photo really violates FoP in Italy. Ruthven (msg) 14:52, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's limited freedom of panorama in France, which specific only to non commercial purposes and against our COM:L. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:47, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and remark. --Ellywa (talk) 19:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work with photo credit as given in description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant! Thank you everyone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:03, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 19:33, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

YouTube account associated "El profe Johan" is commonly used to upload copyrighted content like: youtu.be/C4FyqgQnb2M Wilfredor (talk) 02:34, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I note that clearly copyrighted content like the one pointed to by Wilfredor is not licenced as own work with CC-BY as this one, so without further proof the YT channel is not reliable, I tend to  Keep this content. In any case, I've contacted the FaceBook page of the group attempting to clarify the copyright.-- Darwin Ahoy! 16:07, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This film has the CC_BY_SA Youtube licence. There is no indication this video is taken from another source, it looks like an own video of the youtube user. --Ellywa (talk) 12:05, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Roskosmos is not a government agency, so this template and the mentioned Russioan copyright exception do not apply to their works. We need a free license from Roskosmos or from the mentioned authors in order to host the image in Commons. Ankry (talk) 07:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ankry: , if you're right, so half, if not all the patches in Category:Logos of Soyuz missions should be deleted, not just the MS-20. Erick Soares3 (talk) 14:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
first is who told you roscopsmos is not a government agency, are you meaning its a private agency. moreover i made the changes the changes if then also not satisfactory then delete all soyuz images as said by sric before deleting thisChinakpradhan (talk) 13:23, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Its Wiipedia article claims that it is a state owned corporation, a commercial organization, not a government agency. If this is not true, then needs fixing. Ankry (talk) 17:10, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ankry: , the definition of w:State corporation (Russia) says that it is a "non-commercial" entity and "According to the law, a state corporation is wholly owned by the Russian Federation...". Erick Soares3 (talk) 17:48, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ankry: , thing is that please proof how this soyuz ms 20 patch is different from earlier soyuz patches like soyuz ms 18 patch. your lines "Roskosmos is not a government agency, so this template and the mentioned Russioan copyright exception do not apply to their works. We need a free license from Roskosmos or from the mentioned authors in order to host the image in Commons." dont illustrate clearly. please tell more elaborately as this does not prove difference between earlier patches and this patch. earlier ones are not also freeily lisenced if this is not freeily lisenced. i tell you if you need make the wikimedia commons soyuz patchless please do it, since all images are under the same category, so give the proof please. Chinakpradhan (talk) 04:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep {{PD-RU-exempt}} as a logo from a Russian State Corporation. --Ras67 (talk) 17:05, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, see copyright I cited below. Lembit Staan (talk) 05:15, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • If this is to be deleted off Commons, then transwiki to English Wikipedia and attach a fair-use rationale to it (and all the other Soyuz mission patches that would also be deleted). If the Russian Wikipedia allows fair-use imagery, then it should also be transwikied there. -- 64.229.90.53 04:22, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    1. keep images for origninals created up to 2005: before that time Roscosmos was officially a federal agancy ("Federal Space Agency (Roscosmos)").
    2. either delete or request permission for newer images, per their copyringt policy Правила использования медиаматериалов. Below is the first paragraph:
    Текстовые, фото-, аудио- и видеоматериалы (далее — медиаматериалы) Роскосмоса доступны для свободного использования и распространения в целях, не подразумевающих прямое или косвенное извлечение коммерческой или политической выгоды. Авторы, предполагающие использовать медиаматериалы Роскосмоса в соответствии с данной политикой, могут не запрашивать разрешения Госкорпорации, однако обязаны указать Роскосмос в качестве источника.
Text, photo, audio and video materials (hereinafter referred to as media materials) of Roskosmos are available for free use and distribution for purposes that do not imply direct or indirect commercial or political gain. Authors who intend to use Roscosmos media materials in accordance with this policy may not request permission from the State Corporation, but must indicate Roscosmos as a source.
I.e., basically non-commercial with attribution, but the full text has more restrictions. Lembit Staan (talk) 05:15, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Minorax: , any idea what to do, since it will affect a lot of files? Erick Soares3 (talk) 19:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I did not find evidence that this file originates from Roskosmos, but I assume this is true. Roskosmos is a “Russian state corporation. This is not dispute in the discussion above. The English version of the website of Roskosmos does not show any copyright sign or terms of use. However, that will not mean the material is in PD. The Commons guideline, as mentioned on Template:PD-RU-exempt does not mention “state corporation”. So that would indicate Roskosmos does not fall in this template. On Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia, no mention is made of state corporations and copyright exceptions. On basis of this the image is copyrighted and should be deleted.

However, Template:PD-RU-exempt, does mention “state corporations”, but it does mention "state agencies".

For what its worth, Roskosmos is not included in en:Category:Government agencies of Russia. But it is also not included in the Russian category ru: Категория:Государственные организации России. So Roskosmos does not appear to be a state agency. However, if a state corporation could considered the same as as state agency it would fall in the Template:PD-RU-exempt. However, this template states that “official documents … laws, other legal texts, judicial decisions, other materials of legislative, administrative and judicial character…” are in PD. A logo or symbol does not fall in this category. So even in the hypothetical situation Roskosmos would be a state agency, the image has to be deleted. I hope my reasoning is clear. If you have reason to disagree, please request undeletion at COM:UNDELETE. --Ellywa (talk) 17:23, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maria Camila Romero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User also uploaded File:Wolfgang Streeck.jpg, these graphs are likely the work of the person depicted in that photo, and not own work.

Vera (talk) 07:53, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship, perhaps not active any more. @Maria Camila Romero: you can follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder to publish the image on Commons with a free license. If successful, the images can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:59, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mosque was completed in 1986. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Kuwait, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 08:11, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:59, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mosque was completed in 1986. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Kuwait, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 08:11, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:59, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mosque was completed in 1993 by architect Michel Pinseau (1926–1999). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Morocco. The copyright length of the country lasted for 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2070. A1Cafel (talk) 08:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Abzeronow (talk) 17:06, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nominationCan be undeleted in 70 years after 1999 so in 2070 .. --Ellywa (talk) 21:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Oman A1Cafel (talk) 08:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wenn diese Aufnahme gegen geltendes Recht verstößt: Löschen



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Oman A1Cafel (talk) 08:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wenn diese Aufnahme gegen geltendes Recht verstößt: Löschen



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Oman A1Cafel (talk) 08:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wenn diese Aufnahme gegen geltendes Recht verstößt: Löschen



Deleted: per nomination and COM:FOP Oman. --Ellywa (talk) 21:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Oman A1Cafel (talk) 08:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wenn diese Aufnahme gegen geltendes Recht verstößt: Löschen



Deleted: per nomination and [[COM:FOP Oman]. --Ellywa (talk) 21:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Valisport24 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as file does not qualify for speedy deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:07, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with: File:A Small Lake with an low-height overflow dam visible in far right.jpg


Deleted: per nomination. Personal photos. Without additional information on the location these photos are of no educational use and therefore considered out of scope per COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 21:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Valisport24 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image does not qualify for speedy deletion and might still be in scope. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:09, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same situation with:


Kept: the old hostel location is sufficiently documenten to can be in scope. The location of the cement factory is unknown, therefore this is solely a personal image and out of scope per COM:SCOPE, so the cement factory is deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Onduidelijkheid of de licentie waaronder de foto hier is vrijgegeven klopt. トトト (talk) 09:28, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The website https://calil.jp/library/101498/photo#h1 tells it is free to download material, but I do not see a CC-BY-SA licencing today. If you can proof otherwise, please ask for undeletion at COM:UNDELETE. --Ellywa (talk) 21:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [12]. Yann (talk) 20:10, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This coat of arms is totally wrong, because the hat must have a shape "all'antica" (ancient hat), as we can see in images of the time, as stemma Bianca Cappello; I created it File:Coat of arms of the House of Cappello.png. So we can deleted this uncorrect and unuseful version. Kaho Mitsuki (Dis-moi) 10:43, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. No reason for deletion of this image. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral image is not a reason for deletion. However, as this image is not in use on the projects it is considered of no educational value and therefore out of scope per COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 21:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FoP in China doesn't apply to text. 11:21, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete per nom. Apparently a biographical prose that is post-1970s (so the author must not be dead for more than 50 years). May also fall under COM:URAA. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Attribution of the author should be added, per COM:FOP China. This is missing in the file page. --Ellywa (talk) 21:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FoP in China doesn't apply to text. 11:21, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete per nom. Obvious derivative work copyright violation: the year indicated is 2003, hence the text author might be still alive or not yet deceased for more than 50 years. May also fall under COM:URAA. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:20, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and remark. --Ellywa (talk) 21:21, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ESTA FOTO ES DE ORCERA (JAÉN) 2.136.243.49 11:24, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. File has been renamed into Orcera. --Ellywa (talk) 11:39, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO China Minoraxtalk 12:02, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Symbol appears to be above threshold of originality. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 05:33, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and remark. --Ellywa (talk) 11:39, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art (windows) 80.187.118.77 12:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Das Fenster im Hintergrund ist in der aktuellen Version wegretouschiert. --Mtag (talk) 16:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The organ itself is also of a copyrighted and recent design. Designer is still active per https://www.orgelbauschreier.de. --Ellywa (talk) 11:43, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

modern art (windows) 80.187.118.77 12:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Die Orgel ist von 1936. Das Fenster ist vermutlich mindestens genauso alt, also älter als 85 Jahre! Dann ist es nach deutschem Recht gemeinfrei. Daher gibt es überhaupt keinen Grund das Bild zu löschen! --Mtag (talk) 13:26, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Things created in 1936 are often still in copyright. It's rather probable that the author lived for at least 16 more years which would make it still in copyright in the EU. You need to show evidence that the author died before 1952. Abzeronow (talk) 17:49, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: According to de: Gustav-Adolf-Kirche München-Ramersdorf, the round stained glass windows is designed by the daughter of the architect of the church. The architect Guido Harbers died 1977. His work is not in PD, nor will the work of his daughter be in PD. There is no Freedom of Panorama in Churches, so the image cannot be maintained. BTW, I consider the design of the organ purely functional, so imho this is not protected by copyright. Cropping the image is however not useful. Therefore the image has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

modern art (windows) 80.187.118.77 12:31, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

modern art (windows) 80.187.118.77 12:32, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the actual version I have replaced the window in the background with an own painting. --Mtag (talk) 13:43, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The own painting is too similar to the original work, so it is considered a derivative work and it cannot be maintained on Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mosque was completed in 1988. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Italy, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 14:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mosque was completed in 1988. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Italy, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 14:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mosque was completed in 1988. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Italy, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 14:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mosque was completed in 1988. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Italy, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 14:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia A1Cafel (talk) 14:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mosque was completed in 1963. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Senegal, thus permission from the architect is needed.

A1Cafel (talk) 14:21, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Slow down... Give us some time. don't rush here. SHB2000 (talk) 23:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DR is a way for the users to see if they can solve the issue. If you think DR is fast, then what process is slow? --A1Cafel (talk) 12:15, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:21, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD photograph of artwork; no information on license status of artwork. – BMacZero (🗩) 15:33, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MKFI as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Taken from Twitter: https://twitter.com/ChannelVAS/status/756402222863376384/photo/1

Uploader has stated he/she (or the company) owns the copyright of this photograph. @StefPap73: since the image has been previously published please send an OTRS verification. Note also that general press photographs are usually not published with a free license that also allows modifications and commercial use by anyone (including your competitors). You will need to confirm you intend to publish this photograph with a free license.

Finally you have stated that the source is your own work, ie. that you personnally held the camera and pressed the shutter. If this is not the case please indicate the actual photographer (if you can't find out but do own the copyright then something like "Company photo library" may do). MKFI (talk) 13:32, 19 July 2021 (UTC) Link added. MKFI (talk) 13:33, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


StefPap73 (talk) 13:56, 19 July 2021 (UTC) Thank you for your time once again, greatly appreciated. Please kindly bear with me as I am a novice in this process so I am still trying to study and figure out the proper OTRS process - once I'm confident I'll do it properly without adding extra work on you, I'll promptly do so.[reply]

Also, just to clarify, I only stated that I authorized the Channel VAS account to use this photograph in the link mentioned above, not that I have actually shot it (I did not, wish I was that good of a photographer...). It has also been used in several other occasions for Mr. Haidar's / Channel VAS promotion, including some indicative links for reference (just in case, if helpful):

Telecom Review Magazine cover, December 2020 (https://cdn.flipsnack.com/widget/v2/widget.html?hash=xj5g99jd1j)

Virtual Webit, June 2020 (https://virtual.webit.org/event-2020-06-fintech.php)

Endeavor Greece profile (https://endeavor.org.gr/mentors/bassim-haidar/)

Startupper.gr article - Oct 2017 (https://startupper.gr/deals/34067/%CF%83%CF%84%CF%81%CE%B1%CF%84%CE%B7%CE%B3%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%AE-%CF%83%CF%85%CE%BD%CE%B5%CF%81%CE%B3%CE%B1%CF%83%CE%AF%CE%B1-channelvas-waha-capital/)

In any case, I believe I have located the photographer that has shot this image, so please kindly bear with me as I reach out to him to confirm (and get in writing) that this would be OK to use, as the actual photo was taken before I joined the company so I don't have such a release on file.

Thank you again in advance for your time and support. Best regards, StefPap73.


Deleted: per nomination. @StefPap73: now you know the photographer of this image, ask them to follow the procedure on VRT to show they give permission to publish the image on Commons with a free license. Please ask to include a link to the image now deleted, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bassim_Haidar.jpg If successful, the image will be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 16:43, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP HK, freedom of panorama only applies to permanently installed 3D art in Hong Kong. This wax figure was a temporary display. plicit 13:58, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter, subheading Wax sculptures. --Ellywa (talk) 16:46, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yoonaah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious own-work claims. No metadata, different quality photos for a user whose userpage says her job is in photography. File:Leemin-ho-awards-ceremony-2013.jpg is widely available online, including this 2014 blog post. COM:PCP applies.

plicit 14:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, remark and per COM:PRP. Uploader did not comment or explain authorship. --Ellywa (talk) 16:47, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kashmiri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly above COM:TOO Poland. see Commons:Deletion requests/File:LOT Logo polska.svg

Minoraxtalk 15:47, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Copyright of these images belonged to LOT Polish Airlines since 1931 (year when they were created and became the official company logotype) until their 70-year protection period expired in 2001. The licence tags at both images were incorrect at the time of nomination – I have now changed them to PD-old-70 and PD-US-no notice as they should be. — kashmīrī 17:40, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and m.Nelson. Can be undeleted in 70 years after 1990 so in 2061 .. --Ellywa (talk) 16:50, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Public domain photograph; no information on license of artwork. – BMacZero (🗩) 15:48, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and remark. In addition, name of painter is unknown, therefore the photo is of litlle or no educational value and therefore out of COM:Scope. Not used on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 16:52, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect use of a template in lieu of Source parameters — kashmīrī 17:34, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, permission added to the only file where this template was used. --Ellywa (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As usual, user Лобачев Владимир continues to create/upload fake, historically inaccurate flags and coat of arms. This time he took a random illustration from a random website and uploaded it. It should be deleted to avoid confusion as it is historically inaccurate. Violation of COM:NOTHOST, WP:OR, WP:HOAX rules.

-- Pofka (talk) 19:10, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And why can't I upload images from that site? Just because you think this image "it is historically inaccurat"? So your personal assessment is more important than project rules? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 21:44, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
COM:NOTHOST. Enjoy looking at these random historically innacurate WP:OR images outside of Wikipedia's projects. -- Pofka (talk) 17:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Technically, all of these images are inaccurate, as the rider must be just white. The 1928 Constitution had the following description: "Article 8. State emblem: white horseman in a red field." The same description is preserved in the 1938 Constitution. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 21:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Colorful images created by Antanas Žmuidzinavičius were used officially as well. The original image is colorful, not white. Constitution of Lithuania states different things because you cite 1928 and 1938 Constitutions, while the coat of arms was created by Antanas Žmuidzinavičius in 1918, so 10 years before the earliest constitution you cite. -- Pofka (talk) 15:34, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Clarified the description. This is the embroidery "Pahonia" by Zoya Kaushenko (1911-1994), a student of the Vilnius Belarusian gymnasium, based on a drawing by Antanas Žmuidzinavičius, 1918. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 04:29, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyrighted embroidery. A written above, ghe artist of this work Zoya Kaushenko died in 1994. Thi image will be in PD 70 years after this year and can be undeleted in 2065. Can be undeleted earlier if permission for publication with a free licence is obtained from the heirs per VRT. --Ellywa (talk) 17:10, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user who uploaded the file says in the description that (s)he "stole" the image from a broadcaster's content 188.146.105.7 21:24, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per Commons:Licensing#Simple design. Grawiton (talk) 16:24, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. From the page Copyright rules in Poland: Polish copyright law has quite a long tradition of setting the threshold rather low, which may encourage frivolous lawsuits forcing courts to ponder whether simple graphic designs, short lines of text or even names should or should not be protected by copyright law.. Therefore this image -although simple - should be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JSmith1807 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most of these files, uploaded here in 2012, were already uploaded to Flickr in 2010 by seairseaplanes, tagged Ⓒ All Rights Reserved. The claim of Own Work and CC license are dubious; we need COM:OTRS from the photographer confirming that they have released these photos under a free license.

-M.nelson (talk) 22:52, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The user claims to be Seair Seaplanes in every one of their uploads. If this had happened more recently, I would ask them to complete an identity verification via COM:VRTS just to be extra sure, but they uploaded these photos in 2012 when our standards weren't so rigorous about these things. Along with the blatantly promotional text in the image description ("Seair Seaplanes serves British Columbia's south coast ... We're looking forward to flying with you soon!") I would find it hard to believe that the Commons user could be an impersonator. On the balance, Occam's razor tells us that the uploader is who they claim to be. (And we should remove that promotional text from the descriptions when all is said and done.) -- King of ♥ 05:35, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per remark of User:King of Hearts. Do you have time to remove promotional content from these images? Thanks. --Ellywa (talk) 17:15, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not of educational value; out of scope Krok6kola (talk) 23:13, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Fits in category:The finger (gesture). --Ellywa (talk) 17:19, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made a new map of this with different color shadings TylerKutschbach (talk) 23:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And where is that new map? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here’s the new map File:Ohio Presidential Election Democratic Primary Results 2008.svg TylerKutschbach

Thanks for the link. If you are changing all blue-cyan files to yellow-purple then you can nominate all files together for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:35, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not an exact dupe. --Ellywa (talk) 17:22, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This statue of Miyamoto Musashi in Musashi Museum, Mimasaka City was creates in the Shōwa 50s (1975 - 1984). (from the description on the base of the statue) No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:43, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 17:22, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect creation of a template instead of correctly listing the source. Only used on two images. — kashmīrī 17:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kashmiri: , you did nominate several templates for deletion. on Commons:Deletion requests/2021/07/19. Thank you so much for your effort to keep Commons clean. Could you be so kind to include the templates context on the images where the template is used and remove the template from the file pages? Please mention your action on the various DR's. After that, we can delete the templates. Thanks for reducing the workload of the admins. Ellywa (talk) 17:05, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I agree to delete this template, but it is currently still in use. If out of use, please nominate the template again. --Ellywa (talk) 22:17, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect creation of a template instead of correctly listing the source. Only used on one image. — kashmīrī 17:50, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I agree to delete this template, but it is currently still in use. If out of use, please nominate the template again. --Ellywa (talk) 22:17, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template spam - Incorrect creation of a template instead of correctly specifying the image source. — kashmīrī 17:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I agree to delete this template, but it is currently still in use. If out of use, please nominate the template again. --Ellywa (talk) 22:17, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template spam - Incorrect creation of a template instead of correctly specifying the image source. — kashmīrī 17:53, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I agree to delete this template, but it is currently still in use. If out of use, please nominate the template again. --Ellywa (talk) 22:17, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]