Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/06/20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 20th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La photo originelle est ici File:Patrick Harvie & Lorna Slater.png pas de droits connus pour Commons Pierrette13 (talk) 04:18, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (cf. Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with patrick lorna). — Racconish💬 10:50, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Leonardo "Leo" Spaventa Filippi (Milano, 1912 – Varese, 1999) è stato un pittore italiano. . These will be under copyright in Italy until 1/1/2070.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 18:18, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 18:18, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paradise Chronicle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyright violation; contemporary artwork; no freedomm of panorama!

Martin Sg. (talk) 13:15, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am interested for a clarification on the issue myself. They hang in the same museum and are from the same time as other images which are on display on wikipedia like The Burning Giraffe. The Burning Giraffe artist is Salvador Dali who died in 1989. My Burning Giraffe which I took the image myself shall not be able to used but the other one from an unaccessible webpage is allowed? Whats the problem?Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:45, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 18:21, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GayMediainc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 18:38, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 18:36, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 18:36, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 18:36, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asopicor La Salina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope unused promotional images

George Chernilevsky talk 15:48, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 18:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Don Pisko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused promotional images

George Chernilevsky talk 16:29, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 18:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rio3115 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal images / logos

George Chernilevsky talk 16:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 18:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki in 2009 DS (talk) 16:45, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also applies to File:PUBLIC Promo.jpg. DS (talk) 16:46, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedied as xwiki-spam. --DMacks (talk) 17:01, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cjwing (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope unused promotional images of non-notable Dj

George Chernilevsky talk 16:47, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 18:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marceloaraujolima (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal images

George Chernilevsky talk 16:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 18:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bassans99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal images

George Chernilevsky talk 16:54, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 18:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeronimo Sagarduy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal images with poor description

George Chernilevsky talk 17:11, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 18:23, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jalpa.mkm

[edit]

Incorrect Own work declarations (by an uploader already on poor terms with copyright) – usually scans or photographs of potentially copyrighted works. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:36, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:40, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jalpa.mkm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal image and personal FB addres of blocked user

George Chernilevsky talk 17:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 18:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate that have lower resolution thumb|left Jakub T. Jankiewicz (talk) 17:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jakub T. Jankiewicz: I tagged it with "{{duplicate|1=File:Fountain-in-rome.jpg|user=Jeff G.}}" for you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 18:09, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: dupe, fixed. -- Darwin Ahoy! 12:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicaat Rob K. Pa3ems - beheerder Reliwiki 17:25, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 23:25, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplcaat Rob K. Pa3ems - beheerder Reliwiki 17:26, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 23:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privacy rights Norman.seibert (talk) 14:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —DerHexer (Talk) 23:05, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privacy rights Norman.seibert (talk) 14:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —DerHexer (Talk) 23:05, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self portrait taken with a photomaton (cf. Le Droit d'auteur et les droits voisins, André Bertrand, Paris, Masson, 1991, p. 582 : "Si l'objectif d'un photomaton est fixe et l'éclairage banal ou standardisé, il n'en demeure pas moins que le sujet peut jouer sur ces deux éléments en se mettant en quelque sorte en scène d'une manière originale et marquer le résultat photographique de sa personnalité"). Permission of the copyright owner of Vian's estate needed.

— Racconish💬 09:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First upload had a comment:"Autorisation de la Cohérie Boris Vian [Ticket#2014011710011973]". So maybe this ticket (maybe french OTRS?) is of help to decide if this picure can be kept. --Mirer (talk) 13:17, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Mirer: La Cohérie Vian manages the copyrights so it would be fine, except that I don't see where you found that OTRS ticket number. — Racconish💬 13:31, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Racconish: in the 1st version of the uploaded file in the correct field of the info-template. --Mirer (talk) 13:33, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Racconish: There was even a template with an link to OTRS, which was deleted in 2014 by Yann[1] with the rationale:"Photomaton, so no permission needed". --Mirer (talk) 13:37, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination — Racconish💬 13:38, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 13:38, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright Prantab21 (talk) 12:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 03:20, 24 June 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: AFP photo: https://sports.ndtv.com/football/rio-mayor-says-he-could-cancel-copa-america-matches-2456823 --Krdbot 02:14, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden at 06:37, 24 June 2021 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 02:14, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Didyara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

all claimed as own work but no exif and most are photos of photos or official photos. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:14, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright Prantab21 (talk) 12:49, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 18:57, 26 June 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: Copied from SciTechDaily; photo credit is Christopher Dibble, not the uploader's "own work". https://scitechdaily.com/andrea-ghez-wins-share-of-2020-nobel-prize-for-discoveries-in-black-hole-physics/ --Krdbot 02:10, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 9FX22AsmkPOi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Twagoner (talk · contribs)

[edit]

File:Rafael Soriano-Working.JPG has a higher resolution different crop at http://rafaelsorianofoundation.org/?page_id=112 so is highly unlikely to be the original. Since these are the only two uploads from this user, on the same subject, and uploaded the same time, I'm going to speculate that the other file wasn't his property either.

GRuban (talk) 23:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 10:45, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Twagoner (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Painter has died in 2015 no permission that these images are under creative commons license. possibilities of copright violation

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 07:59, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Twagoner (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image violate Portrait Right. Rekishi-JAPAN (talk) 14:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 久野敦司 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Excellentchoice88 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Biontech vaccination room in Turkey.jpg 𐰇𐱅𐰚𐰤 (talk) 14:06, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Scaled down dup. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Huzaifa abedeen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:15, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Huzaifa abedeen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 18:38, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 18:39, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All of these files are some texts presented in a picture form. In these texts the uploader makes some statements about the very general scientifical topics (like defining gravitation) that don't look reasonable. Should be deleted as being out of scope of the project. See also User talk:Мирзанур Камалтдинов Хафизович for a dozen of earlier deleted files of the same kind. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 15:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:16, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Katelsamir (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal images

George Chernilevsky talk 18:36, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:17, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NIYIGABA DC CLEMENT (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal images

George Chernilevsky talk 18:40, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:18, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Angela Jonsson.jpg all photographs from FilmiTadka have to be considered suspect unless the release can be validated in a more convincing way than the claims of the source website. COM:PRP applies.

(talk) 19:26, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deletion and partial undeletion. In view of the consensus so far and the precedent, I had deleted all the files in this request. Nevertheless, per Dharmadhyaksha's request on my talk page and at Commons:Help desk [2], I have undeleted all files starting with "A" to allow the discussion to continue. Should any editor wish to have another file undeleted in the mean time, please let me know. Thanks, — Racconish💬 10:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While I think (based on Mysterymanblue's work on the previous DR) that these files should be  deleted, this DR should be allowed to run for at least the standard duration. The previous DR only targetted one image, so the people who uploaded all the other files in the category were notified only yesterday that those files were at risk. It's possible that some of the files can be saved, since FilmiTadka did claim to have their own photographer, but if there are any we haven't managed to distinguish them from the rest. --bjh21 (talk) 11:17, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Again, should any one wish more files to be temporarily undeleted while this discussion continues, please let me know. — Racconish💬 11:32, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's good that examples are available while the DR runs for 7 days, there's no reason to think that more than a fair sample are needed to be kept visible. It's a large DR and if anyone spots counter-examples where the release can be better validated, that's to be welcomed and might lead to further analysis if felt worth the volunteer effort. -- (talk) 11:48, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
All files now undeleted to allow for discusssion. — Racconish💬 16:27, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: (1) Having any kind of derogatory comments in EXIF data is not a reason for deletion; and certainly not for mass deletion. We are not censored. Additionally, not all files have this EXIF data. (2) @Mysterymanblue: has pointed in earlier DR that File:Avinash Sachdev FilmiTadka.jpg has been hosted on other site www.nowrunning.com; with their watermark. But we cant be sure of who hosted it first. If we are to trust in FilmiTadka's OTRS email and license, NowRunning can very well copy the image from FilmyTadka and paste a watermark of their own (i.e. remix) and host it. (Similar to how we are hosting it, cropping it, etc.) (3) Just because photographer Viral Bhayani is a commercial photographer, its wrong to presume that every work of his is copyrighted. Additionally, not all photos are by Bhayani. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 17:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[1] is a tangent, though for the record, I disagree as there would be cases such as targeted harassment that would make it an excellent policy-based reason to delete or suppress. [3] is a tangent, as far as I can see. [2] we can agree on, it makes COM:PRP a critical reason to delete these files. -- (talk) 17:28, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Dharmadhyaksha: You're right that I have not proven that every file from FilmiTadka is a copyright violation. The point is that in order to keep files on Commons, we need compelling evidence that they are freely usable. You say it's "wrong to presume that every work of his is copyrighted", but that is the presumption we maintain on Commons. Copyright protection is automatic in India, so every file must be assumed to have all rights reserved unless we have reason to believe otherwise. By showing that FilmiTadka has almost certainly passed off others' work as their own, their word loses credence, and we can no longer assume that the photos they have on their website are what they claim to be. Also, it is not possible for NowRunning to have just gotten their photo from FilmiTadka (or vice versa) because they both have opaque watermarks on the photo in different places. This means that they both got the original, unaltered photo from the same source.  Mysterymanblue  20:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@ and Mysterymanblue: PRP is relevant when we are doubtful of the source. Here, we clearly have OTRS where parties and events photos have been given as copy-free by FT. Of course every image is taken by some person, who may or maynot be commercial photographer that we know or not know. But since FT has given OTRS and they also had similar declaration on their website, i don't see why we should assume that Bhayani is still holding the copyrights? Also, watermarks can be removed and other watermarks can be added. For example File:Aishwarya rai88.jpg was uploaded with the watermark of Bollywood Hungama. It was later removed by one of our users and re-uploaded. One can now see other websites (example) putting up their own watermarks at various locations. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 13:56, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You do not seem to have supplied any evidence that would remove the "significant doubt" that exists. The statement on their website (that no longer exists) is no longer credible. -- (talk) 18:57, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What significant doubt? Mysterymanblue's doubt exists only because they think watermarks means copyrights; which is incorrect. I gave an example on how watermarks can be removed and evidently other websites are also using images with their own watermarks on it. As to their statement, the statement on their website was present then and can be seen through archives now also (License archive link). Once the images have been made copy-free, that cant be altered to be made copy-righted again. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:09, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You have not addressed the significant doubt raised in the last DR. Example below as another illustration of the problem. -- (talk) 10:53, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Dharmadhyaksha: You mention OTRS/VRT emails from FilmiTadka. Are you able to provide the ticket number? I ask because as far as I can see no files from FilmiTadka currently have a {{PermissionTicket}} template. --bjh21 (talk) 17:42, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This may be confusing FilmiTadka with BollywoodHungama photographs. -- (talk) 18:55, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh right! Got confused with BH. Have struck out the OTRS mentions from above statements. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:09, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Putting this file through TinEye, a second, larger, version (688 x 1024 pixels) can be found to have been hosted at the site BollyOne. The critical evidence is that the plant in the BollyOne version shows an extra frond which was photoshopped out in the FilmiTadka version, the BollyOne version shows more of the ground so the FilmiTadka is obviously less authentic to the original photograph and the photograph from BollyOne is watermarked with "(c) Viral Bhayani" in an area that appears deliberately cropped out of the FilmiTadka one.
Temporary link to side-by-side shot: https://ibb.co/6P8BLY4
Even this single example throws significant doubt as to how FilmiTadka sourced the photograph, or whether the photographer did ever legally release it as CC-BY.
If you wish to do further research on this photographer alone, there are 177 matches to "VIRALBHAYANI" in Commons metadata listed at User:Faebot/SandboxF.
Thanks -- (talk) 10:53, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. @Racconish: I have taken the liberty to close this. - FitIndia Talk 07:37, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sulanda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Multiple images of an identifiable person engaging in sex acts, without indication that the subject has consented to these being distributed freely.

GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 18:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Elcobbola. - FitIndia Talk 10:39, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rajesh321 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal images

George Chernilevsky talk 18:29, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:40, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal low quality image George Chernilevsky talk 18:47, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:40, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Schniggendiller (talk) 00:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:36, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE 62.216.207.216 00:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:37, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:OOS Frodar (talk) 09:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:39, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's unclear what is pictured and how it could be used. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:14, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:40, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Several phrases presented as a picture. Out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:18, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:40, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Several phrases presented as a picture. Out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:19, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:40, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The pictured person in Ali Bani Atta (علي بني عطا), a poet from Jordan. The article about him had been deleted from ar.wiki years ago due to lack of notability, and I cannot find any proof of the opposite. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:42, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 12:38, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:43, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by James Blanco (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:48, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 15:14, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:48, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 15:19, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:49, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution graphic, unlikely to be own work and out of scope. ~Cybularny Speak? 15:56, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:49, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising image; out of scope Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:47, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:50, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Jan Myšák (talk) 20:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:51, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Jan Myšák (talk) 20:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:51, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is SEO spam Guardianmx (talk) 23:13, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:52, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this photo isn't used anywhere. Commons isn't web host. out of project scope. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 23:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:52, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this photo isn't used anywhere. Commons isn't web host. out of project scope. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 01:17, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:51, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal image George Chernilevsky talk 17:20, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 06:04, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal image George Chernilevsky talk 17:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 06:03, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope personal image, self-promotion of non-wikipedian George Chernilevsky talk 18:54, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 06:05, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 20:54, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:28, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost the same as File:Rajatava Dutta in bangladesh.jpg but the left guy blinked. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:13, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:26, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Renardo la vulpo as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: map is probably not the uploader's work but owned by the RR company, Bayerische Oberlandbahn. FoP-Germany does not apply for train interiors. Renardo la vulpo (talk) 22:15, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the speedy DR to an ordinary one. The medium has been in Commons for five months, so a speedy deletion request does not seem adequate or necessary. This should give the uploader time to prove their {{Own}} work claim. {{Self-photographed}} is no valid basis for a {{Self}} license. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 22:25, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; Missing permission for shown artwork, no FoP. --Wdwd (talk) 15:21, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A formal PR picture. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 22:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:19, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong image SeaningM (talk) 22:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:18, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's Myne pic. Selected by mistake कृष्ण कान्त शर्मा (talk) 21:54, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 07:21, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I realized it is bad for my privacy Khmergfn15 (talk) 14:18, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 07:21, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

potential copyright violation. No indication of an open license at source MassiveEartha (talk) 00:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 07:22, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted picture A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 07:36, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
duplicate of Curkuma Putz (talk) 05:59, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 07:40, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self Promotion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msclrfl22 (talk • contribs) 2021-06-19T18:22:46‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 07:43, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Challiyan (talk) 12:00, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not a recent upload and in use. --Wdwd (talk) 07:44, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Von Luschan's scale used opaque glass pieces as samples. All extant instances are heavily discoloured and this chart was made using such discoloured samples. To the best of my knowledge no good calibrated photograph from the time exists; even the better pictures don't seem to contain calibration patches and there may be concerns of glass pieces being swapped. 77.61.180.106 07:03, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remark: File:Felix von Luschan Skin Color chart2.svg should probably be deleted as well. It may look better, but that might actually make it more pernicious. The file I nominated is so obviously wrong that nobody is going to be misled into believing it is correct, but the second chart looks pretty enough that people might take it at face value. However, the colours were taken from pictures with possibly swapped samples ([3]) and without any calibration patches. Even if a good chart could be produced, you'd have to instruct the viewer to set their display brightness and skin lighting just right and I think people will be unable to follow such instructions correctly. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 77.61.180.106 (talk) 07:13, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep COM:INUSE, and this is massively in use. Moreover, this is silly; we may as well object to the display of any photograph without calibration, which very few if any of Commons' photos have.--Prosfilaes (talk) 07:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Did you actually look at it? If it is in use, that just means that there are a lot of erroneous articles that need to be fixed. And this isn't some photograph of a historical artefact or something. This is a chart purporting to be Von Luschan's scale, but it isn't and it cannot be, because his scale has been lost to time, probably forever. It's impossible to include this file in an article without effectively lying. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 77.61.180.106 (talk) 10:38, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Did I mention COM:INUSE? Commons stores files for other Wikimedia projects. If they choose to use them, we do not judge whether those files should be used or not. If we can have listings for Proto-Indo-European, we can have Von Luschan's scale.--Prosfilaes (talk) 12:27, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep rationale for deletion doesn't make sense to me as it necessarily implies that NO image on wikipedia EVER will be faithful to the original. This image file indicates it's a reproduction which adequately conveys anonymous editor's concerns of faithfulness to the original. Additionally, it is of historical interest to his work and not meant for contemporary use. He/she has also deleted the images use from a couple en articles which I am going to revert. Cburnett (talk) 15:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.(use "upload new version" to correct the image, if necessary). --Wdwd (talk) 07:48, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, the photo for vandalism & bullying (please, see contr. in Russian wiki) Lesless (talk) 09:29, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 04:39, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope ecelan (talk) 10:06, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 04:38, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 14:22, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 04:37, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal low quality image George Chernilevsky talk 16:43, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 04:37, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal low quality image George Chernilevsky talk 16:44, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 04:37, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal low quality image George Chernilevsky talk 16:45, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 04:37, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal image George Chernilevsky talk 17:16, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 04:38, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Judgefloro DW files - Set 01

[edit]

1. Barangay Ginebra San Miguel advertising boards/posters in San Nicolas, Manila

Commons:Derivative works.

-JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2. DW-problematic images of Pandacan, Manila

_JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:18, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

3. Tarpaulins with illustrations (pictures of people) at Baliwag's parish church, from Category:St. Augustine Parish Church of Baliuag

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:55, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nominations. --Wdwd (talk) 08:38, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Judgefloro DW files - Set 02

[edit]

1. From Category:Manuel L. Quezon University

Commons:Derivative works

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2. From Category:GMA Network, Inc.

COM:Derivative works of literary pieces. Frames that show texts of speeches of gratitude from Kapuso figures

Undated photo in the frame, but the description on the lower-left has an attribution: Photo taken from GMA Gold 50 Years of Broadcast History.

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

3. All four files under Category:Robert Stewart (entrepreneur)

Image files are derivative works of a picture frame of an old photo of GMA Network's founding father, w:Robert Stewart (entrepreneur), who ventured into the radio business in 50s (most likely the old photo came from this period). But it is not sure on who was the photographer and when did he/she died. May either be OK or not per {{PD-Philippines}} or COM:URAA (U.S. copyright restoration on all eligible international works). The only attribution on the description plate found on top of the old photo, is essentially: "Photo taken from GMA Gold 50 Years of Broadcast History".

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

4. Two files from Category:Vigils-prayers (demonstrations and protests) - Media coverages of the Ferdinand Edralin Marcos Burial Cases (G.R. No. 225973 - November 8, 2016 Judgment, Padre Faura Street, Supreme Court of the Philippines, Ermita Manila)

COM:Derivative works of a tarpaulin with portraits. Several seems to be eligible for {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} as these are reproductions of official portraits of judges etc., but it is difficult to determine which as these are mixed with portraits which I suspect are not government-sourced images.

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:02, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

5. Advertising/promotion board and photographs from Category:Amana Waterpark (Pandi, Bulacan)

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:47, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

6. From Category:Isdaan Floating Restaurant-Fun Park (Salapungan, Gerona, Tarlac)

COM:Derivative works. Main / intended subject is a marquee/sign containing copyrighted ads and Mickey Mouse character.

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:44, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 02:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Judgefloro DW files - Set 03

[edit]

1. Banner tarpaulins under Category:Bocaue, Bulacan Pagoda

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:21, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of an unsourced document clearly not the work of the uploader 81.174.135.227 08:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC) i took the photo and the document is referenced therein too. G. Blacker 71.38.7.161 12:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio (DW). --Wdwd (talk) 09:10, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright Prantab21 (talk) 12:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by JuTa at 01:54, 29 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 18 June 2021 --Krdbot 08:21, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of an unsourced document clearly not the work of the uploader 81.174.135.227 08:09, 20 June 2021 (UTC) I took the photo and it is from a source that is referenced therein in references. G. Blacker71.38.7.161 12:36, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio (DW). --Wdwd (talk) 12:59, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of an unsourced document clearly not the work of the uploader 81.174.135.227 08:10, 20 June 2021 (UTC) I own that brochure which is in my possession, took the photo, and it not copyright protected.71.38.7.161 12:48, 20 June 2021 (UTC) aka G. Blacker[reply]


Deleted: copyvio (DW). --Wdwd (talk) 12:59, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of an unsourced document clearly not the work of the uploader 81.174.135.227 08:10, 20 June 2021 (UTC) I created that book cover and book using shutterfly from our personal family historic photos in our library and took the photo.71.38.7.161 12:44, 20 June 2021 (UTC) aka G.Blacker[reply]


Deleted: copyvio (DW). --Wdwd (talk) 13:00, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of an unsourced document clearly not the work of the uploader 81.174.135.227 08:11, 20 June 2021 (UTC) I took the photo and I am owner of the document with all rights ascribed to that ownership71.38.7.161 12:42, 20 June 2021 (UTC) aka G.Blacker[reply]


Deleted: copyvio (DW). --Wdwd (talk) 13:00, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of an unsourced documents clearly not the work of the uploader 81.174.135.227 08:24, 20 June 2021 (UTC) I took the photo and am owner of the books as well as all rights to it 71.38.7.161 12:39, 20 June 2021 (UTC) aka G. Blacker[reply]


Deleted: copyvio (DW). --Wdwd (talk) 13:00, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by new user who appears unaware of copyright; UoC does not publish content with a free licence as per their copyright page Schwede66 08:25, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:01, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of an unsourced document clearly not the work of the uploader 81.174.135.227 08:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC) the photo taken is image personally taken by Blacker family camera in 1957 and is part of our library. G. Blacker 71.38.7.161 12:56, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:05, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UoC does not publish content with a free licence as per their copyright page Schwede66 08:29, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:04, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UoC does not publish content with a free licence as per their copyright page Schwede66 08:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:04, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UoC does not publish content with a free licence as per their copyright page Schwede66 08:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:03, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is nothing on their website about copyright and we therefore have to assume that the photo does not have a free licence Schwede66 08:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:03, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UoC does not publish content with a free licence as per their copyright page Schwede66 08:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:03, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UoC does not publish content with a free licence as per their copyright page Schwede66 08:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:03, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UoC does not publish content with a free licence as per their copyright page Schwede66 08:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:02, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UoC does not publish content with a free licence as per their copyright page Schwede66 08:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:02, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not sure it is in PD in New Zealand.

The author isn't anonymous - "Fine Arts Professor John Simpson designed a simplified version of Canterbury College's arms and it was duly approved and authorised by the English Kings of Arms in Letters Patent dated 10 May 1965."(link). So, 50 years since publication date not applicable.

He was still alive in 2017 (link), so, 50 years since death not applicable too rubin16 (talk) 07:14, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per COM:New Zealand, applied art is protected for 25 years from creation. Simpson was alive in 2021 btw [4]. --Rosenzweig τ 07:01, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UoC does not publish content with a free licence as per their copyright page Schwede66 08:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:02, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UoC does not publish content with a free licence as per their copyright page Schwede66 08:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:02, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement. (source: https://cosmic-hall.org/plan_your_event/cosmichall/) もんじゃ (talk) 09:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:11, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio; artist died in 1987. Martin Sg. (talk) 09:36, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (remark: artist died 1972). --Wdwd (talk) 13:13, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Pan Tau as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Obviously wrong licence
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as maps from 1893 are likely already in the PD. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:37, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as PD-old-100-expired. --Wdwd (talk) 13:34, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the picture by mistake. Uninteresting picture. RogerWiki (talk) 09:40, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 13:40, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the picture by mistake. Uninteresting picture. RogerWiki (talk) 09:40, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 13:40, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per uploader's request (I am the uploaded of this file) Satpal (CIS-A2K) (talk) 10:01, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 13:42, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio (see image metadata). Drahreg01 (talk) 10:15, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The name of the user who uploaded the file (Илья Кокин (talk · contribs)) and the copyright holder (Popov Vladimir, from Exif) do not match. Low resolution. ЧастникУчастник (talk) 10:53, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:20, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painting by the living artist from Kazakhstan, OTRS needed. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:03, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:37, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painting by the living artist from Kazakhstan, OTRS needed. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:37, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork by the living artist from Kazakhstan, OTRS needed. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:38, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even if the uploader owns the rights for this collage, it is unclear if he or she also owns the copyright for the map used in it and for the photographs. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:14, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 09:38, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:EDUSE File is not useful as it contains many fallacies. The relation between philosphers is not opposition or endorsment. There is sythesising, mixing etc. Also, Xenophanes is not Eleatic philosopher, Zeno of Elia defended Parmendies, not Xenophanes, and Socrates was at odds with most sophist philosophers. Pls see also discussion page. Cinadon36 (talk) 12:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: (Hint: You can upload a new file version to correct possible mistakes in the sketch). --Wdwd (talk) 09:40, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentally registered in jpeg. 織原美津夫 (talk) 13:12, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 09:46, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentally registered in jpeg. 織原美津夫 (talk) 13:13, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 09:46, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentally registered in jpeg. 織原美津夫 (talk) 13:13, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 09:46, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is a private picture belonging to me (amaury baot) . It should not be on wikipedia 92.184.97.45 13:39, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: file is in use and DR not from uploader. Please log in to your user account for this type of DR. --Wdwd (talk) 09:49, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OfficeofRM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 11:04, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The pictured person in Ali Bani Atta (علي بني عطا), a poet from Jordan. The article about him had been deleted from ar.wiki years ago due to lack of notability, and I cannot find any proof of the opposite. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:30, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BJ Hutton (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused personal images, self-promotion of non-wikipedian

George Chernilevsky talk 16:26, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:34, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope personal image of a non-wikipedian George Chernilevsky talk 17:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:34, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope personal image of a non-wikipedian George Chernilevsky talk 17:07, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:34, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal image George Chernilevsky talk 17:09, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:34, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal image George Chernilevsky talk 17:21, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:35, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal image George Chernilevsky talk 18:38, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:35, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal low quality image George Chernilevsky talk 18:49, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:35, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal image George Chernilevsky talk 18:50, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:35, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope personal image, self-promotion of non-wikipedian George Chernilevsky talk 18:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:35, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photographer complain, non applicanle portrait on wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annarolli (talk • contribs) 12:19, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete as a copyvio of https://phmuseum.com/zoubiramina .   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:09, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy deleted per Jeff G. --Royalbroil 02:26, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sinebaii しこしこまじん (talk) 09:36, 20 June 2021 (UTC) (取り下げ)ふざけてかいてしまいました。--しこしこまじん (talk) 09:40, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept (non-sysop closed): User withdrawn. --(^・ェ・^) (talk) 23:42, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Perspective view of Korolev crater.jpg vip (talk) 19:57, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 14:52, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, have not exif information, seems not to be the uploader’s own work. (`・ω・´) (talk) 05:50, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:18, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All files under this category are COM:NOTUSED redundant to files at Category:Philippine National Railway tracks - Railway bridge (Santa Mesa & Pandacan railway stations - Barangay 630, Santa Mesa - Barangays 836-838, Pandacan, Manila), Category:Philippine National Railway tracks in Santa Mesa & Pandacan, Manila (Santa Mesa & Pandacan railway stations), and Category:Pasig River (Pandacan-Santa Mesa section). Fulfill COM:SPAM.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:15, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Looking at the first few images, there are some that are actually artful and maybe useful. Take File:1806Pasig River Pandacan, Manila Barangays 03.jpg for example. There are no other images in those linked categories that show the train passing by this bridge while children play on the bridge's pillars. The image shows normal life in that point of time. If tbis was a 19th century photo with the same subjects and composition, pretty sure it would not be regarded as redundant. Howhontanozaz (talk) 20:58, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted most. Kept some as it might be useful in some way. --Minoraxtalk 14:28, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope unused photo of non-notable logo with description: "taking photos is my job" George Chernilevsky talk 16:59, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:19, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

س Mikelyang1234 (talk) 07:25, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NETCOPYVIO[5]. --4nn1l2 (talk) 19:29, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE 62.216.207.216 00:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 22:55, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE 62.216.207.216 00:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 22:55, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE 62.216.207.216 00:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

E.g. NN.WP, since uses tend to get deleted by overzealous Commons editors.--Prosfilaes (talk) 07:26, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 22:55, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request by uploader. Not been used. Wumingbai (talk) 02:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and unused image, can be replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dolores_2021-06-18_2015Z.jpg A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, although I could find a different use for the image in Dolores's article, as I believe it is better to have more than less images. JayTee32 (talk) 13:58, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. In this image, main object is IFC Seoul Buildings. Ox1997cow (talk) 06:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. In this image, main object is IFC Seoul Buildings. Ox1997cow (talk) 06:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. In this image, main object is IFC Seoul Buildings. Ox1997cow (talk) 06:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. In this image, main object is Parc1 Tower. Ox1997cow (talk) 06:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Originally uploaded at the Thai wikipedia by th:User:Op_commun, who has uploaded many images of questionable provenance. Paul_012 (talk) 07:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonnotable art from a nonnotable artist (identified only by Commons username); beyond scope issues, it looks like a a close copy of a photograph of unknown source, probably copyrighted, Prosfilaes (talk) 07:22, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Pan Tau as no permission (No permission since)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image should be in the PD already, though some research might be warranted. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:39, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 22:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image lifted from https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/freedom-fighter-vidyadhar-guruji-dies-aged-105/article19390059.ece Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not completed 92.29.135.37 11:00, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 22:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The autor of this image is not Sheldon Whitehouse, US Senator. This is a stock photo which was obtained by the senator. No PD license for this image. 2A02:810D:4ABF:D1C4:F831:8F6E:8494:9BD5 11:50, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot Ankry (talk) 13:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Metadata suggests that this is a post-mortem photo. Ankry (talk) 13:39, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Greece. Despite the mural is in the 1970s, this is still not old enough to be in PD A1Cafel (talk) 14:16, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from tattoo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description said Photo: RIA Novosti, the updated copyright term said photo taken by MIA Russia Today or TASS News Agency are not under CC license 219.78.191.198 15:16, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:58, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Credit said "Фото ТАСС" (English: Photo TASS). The copyright terms of Kremlin said Photo taken by MIA Russia Today/TASS News Agency are excluded from the CC license.

A1Cafel (talk) 15:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:58, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Credit said "Фото ТАСС" (English: Photo TASS). The copyright terms of Kremlin said Photo taken by MIA Russia Today/TASS News Agency are excluded from the CC license.

A1Cafel (talk) 15:38, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:58, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The screenshot maybe indeed an own work, but the user interface it depicts (the photo as well) most probably are protected by copyright. C messier (talk) 15:46, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:58, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The screenshot maybe indeed an own work, but the user interface it depicts most probably are protected by copyright. C messier (talk) 15:47, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:58, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The screenshot may be indeed an own work, but the user interface it depicts most probably is protected by copyright. C messier (talk) 15:47, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:58, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The screenshot may be indeed an own work, but the user interface it depicts most probably is protected by copyright. C messier (talk) 15:48, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:58, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Credit said "Фото ТАСС" (English: Photo TASS). The copyright terms of Kremlin said Photo taken by MIA Russia Today/TASS News Agency are excluded from the CC license.

A1Cafel (talk) 15:49, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

another file exist at File:Pulavar.jpg Balaji (talk) 16:46, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From someone tweet, and that's not a public domain photo Urang Kamang (talk) 17:53, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work copyright violation: image shows a sculpture from Indonesia, a country with no freedom of panorama. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Artwork details
  1. Name: Garuda Wisnu Kencana statue
  2. Date unveiled: 2018
  3. Artist: Nyoman Nuarta (COM:OTRS correspondence from him if he agrees the use of commercial licensing in this image is required).

See also: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Garuda Wisnu Kencana. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal artwork. Mix of rose and space George Chernilevsky talk 18:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work copyright violation: image shows a sculpture from Indonesia, a country with no freedom of panorama. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Garuda Wisnu Kencana. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Artwork details
  1. Name: Garuda Wisnu Kencana statue
  2. Date unveiled: 2018
  3. Artist: Nyoman Nuarta (COM:OTRS correspondence from him if he agrees the use of commercial licensing in this image is required).

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 20:24, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:38, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie; deleted and re-posted 2 times, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mohan Sai.jpg and Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/05/30#File:Mohan_Sai.jpg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artworks by W. braun who died in 1986; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:48, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artworks by W. braun who died in 1986; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artwork by Braun who died in 1986, no fop (see https://www.pfarrverband-gruenwald.de/uber-uns/unsere-pfarrei/ausstattung-st-peter-und-paul/) Martin Sg. (talk) 18:49, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio; artworks by W. Braun who died in 1986; no fop: (see https://www.pfarrverband-gruenwald.de/uber-uns/unsere-pfarrei/ausstattung-der-kirche-maria-koenigin/)

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:54, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:00, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio; artist dH. Schilcher died in 2003; no fop. (see https://www.pfarrverband-gruenwald.de/uber-uns/unsere-pfarrei/ausstattung-der-kirche-maria-koenigin/) Martin Sg. (talk) 18:55, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:00, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artwork created in 2003, no fop. (see https://www.pfarrverband-gruenwald.de/uber-uns/unsere-pfarrei/ausstattung-der-kirche-maria-koenigin/) Martin Sg. (talk) 18:55, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:00, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope unused personal artwork George Chernilevsky talk 18:56, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:00, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not relevant DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 21:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:00, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not own this picture. I downloaded from an old picture website and claimed it as original work although it isn't. Dawood Hjeij (talk) 23:19, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:00, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obsolete logo, not used anywhere EPorto (WMB) (talk) 01:59, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader request. --King of ♥ 05:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obsolete logo, not used anywhere EPorto (WMB) (talk) 02:00, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader request. --King of ♥ 05:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope personal artwork George Chernilevsky talk 15:50, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:54, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

merubah gambar yang baru Juniorhomeschoolingbalikpapan (talk) 03:29, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:{{subst:delete2|image=File:Sekolah-dirumah-junior-homeschooling-balikpapan.jpg]]


Deleted: Advertising, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   18:31, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Minderwertige Grafik. Sie wurde durch eine neue bessere ersetzt. Sciencia58 (talk) 08:58, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist die neue Grafik, die jetzt im Artikel verwendet wird File:Instinktmodell Hassenstein 1.png Sciencia58 (talk) 08:59, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:43, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pas d'autorisation, photo de qualité médiocre Pierrette13 (talk) 09:07, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:43, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unsuable, due to poor technical quality; could possible be the result of enlarging a tiny photo to the current size Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:55, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:45, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope obsolete screenshot for old arcived talk page George Chernilevsky talk 17:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:46, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 17:15, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:46, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly it is not the author's own work, it appears to be a copy of a photograph of the photographer Lucas Figueiredo (see). Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 17:57, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:47, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as "own work" but metadata explicitly includes copyright declarations incompatible with the unproven claim being made. Salvidrim! 19:48, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:47, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong image Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 20:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   18:48, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside COM:SCOPE I've missed the piece in COM:SCOPE where it said we were here to harass and misgender trans women. See en:Talk:Jessica Yaniv if you don't know the backstory. No objection if anyone wants to speedy this. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:26, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, I can find no such directives in COM:SCOPE either, if you find it pls post it. The offending link has now been changed to a vanilla one. CatCafe (talk) 23:37, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, speedily if possible, as an attack image specifically created for the purposes of harassment by a member of an extremist hate group. Bilorv (talk) 23:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, only if the source link is the only problem as that's now been changed, and it now source link refers to to plain no commentary page. Thanks, CatCafe (talk) 23:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • What part of COM:SCOPE does it pass without any evidence that this represents the subject with any meaningful accuracy? Obviously the source link was not the only problem, as the source is the main problem. Bilorv (talk) 23:39, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's quite a good likeness of her in 2018 I believe. And the illustration of itself doesn't seem to harass in any way, it's not like some mean caricature, or does it contain any offensive slurs in the image. CatCafe (talk) 04:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You believe based on what? An opinion you hold seemingly out of nowhere is not "evidence". Bilorv (talk) 10:52, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Based on the dozens of other images of her posted online over the years. You're being overtly ridiculous now, here's one example [6]. CatCafe (talk) 11:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: the image was created for the purpose of attacking a trans woman and is not realistically useful for any educational purpose (it's only reasonable use would be to illustrate articles directly related to its subject, where this image in particular is inappropriate). Those two reasons both suggest this should be deleted per COM:D. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 21:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Firefangledfeathers. I cannot imagine any realistic educational use of this image, on a Wikipedia article or elsewhere. SreySros (talk) 00:38, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Whilst I'm not convinced by arguments that the author is necessarily a member of an extremist hate group, I don't see any future uses of this image on any WMF projects. If that ever changes, it can be re-uploaded, but at this point, it's not helpful. BrxBrx (talk) 18:49, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9   18:51, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Pan Tau as no permission (No permission since)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion about whether this work is really still in copyright. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The authors are named in the map. The licence Is completely wrong without permission. Pan Tau (talk) 09:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The map names indeed two authors. I quote from the credit line:
Umgebungs- und Eisenbahnkarte gez. v. L. K. Wittmann, Pf. v. Perach. Stadtplan gez. v. H. Wittmann, Techn., Altötting.
The first author appears to be the late Lothar Konrad Wittmann, 1901–1929 parish priest of Perach (see [7], [8]). --AFBorchert (talk) 14:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture was uploaded to Flickr under free licence by the portrayed person, the American ambassador to Kazakhstan Kenneth J. Fairfax. However, he cannot be the author of the photograph, consequently its free licence is void. Metadata include copyright for some Zhabchuk_Alexandr. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:59, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from the official website of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan

[edit]

All these pictures are borrowed from the Official website of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. I cannot find at this website anything about copyright issues. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:56, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. In this image, main object is Parc1 Tower. Ox1997cow (talk) 06:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

우측건물 꼭대기쯤 "Parc.1" 이라는 글자가 있을 겁니다.--Kth696586 (talk) 09:09, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Kth696586: See COM:FOP SK. Ox1997cow (talk) 18:32, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 221.133.172.113 (talk) 22:34, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:31, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pchaas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyright violation; artist died in 2010.

Martin Sg. (talk) 09:38, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How is the request for deletion justified? As stated upon uploading I own the copyright of both the photo reproduction and the paintings shown in the photo. As a family member I legally administer the artist's estate. It would have been a matter of due respect to contact me on this matter before submitting the request for deletion. However, since the files have already been taken down I will not upload them again. --Pchaas (talk) 08:13, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Pchaas needs to COM:OTRS to have them restored. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:31, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

most likely no own work (screenshot, unknown source). Fl.schmitt (talk) 16:57, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:31, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

may be above COM:TOO US. text alone is not enough, but if you make the image smaller, the colors appear as an image. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:25, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep TOO in the US is quite high, the gradients of color don't make the logo particularly more original than if they weren't there. Di (they-them) (talk) 20:42, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:23, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image appears to have been photographed by Abdias Bideh, from GloboEsporte.com There is no indication that the image is in an available license, nor was the user responsible for the upload willing to clarify such doubts (see). Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 21:20, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in-use picture of an unknown person. The Commons is not an online photo album and cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 22:13, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to delete. The picture belongs to my father, inside a page which is all about him. There are no rights for this picture, and there is no reason to delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by זיו בן-דרור (talk • contribs) 22:24, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:52, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

URV: Das Bild stellt das urheberrechtlich geschützte Werk "Travelling to the Sun Through the Night" von "Kiluanji Kia Henda" dar. Zudem keine Panoramafreiheit, da nichtpermanent und zudem Reproduktion einer 2D-Vorlage. Rôtkæppchen68 17:12, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Literal Google Translate to English: "The picture shows the copyrighted work "Traveling to the Sun Through the Night" by "Kiluanji Kia Henda". In addition, no freedom of panorama, as it is non-permanent and also a reproduction of a 2D template."
My  Comment: though I believe this may be covered by COM:FOP Germany as the photographer seems located in public place, I lean towards  Delete as this seems to be a photo of a photo. Notice the white margin at the top-left corner. Perhaps a book, a postcard, or another photo? COM:Project scope/Precautionary principle now kicks in. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:24, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:30, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description said Фотохост-агентство (English: Host Photo Agency), which means not works from Moscow Kremlin. The CC license is invalid.

A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Фотохост-агентство" — это обозначение ведущего агентства мероприятия, которое выступает или ТАСС, или Кремль. Причём, если был бы фотографы ТАСС, то обозначался "Фотохост-агентство ТАСС", а так обозначался Кремль. "Фотохост-агентство" - это не какая-то коммерческая организация, это фотографы мероприятия, чьи фотографии используют все.
"Host photo agency" is the designation of the leading agency of the event, which is either TASS or Moscow Kremlin. Moreover, if there were TASS photographers, then it was designated "Host photo agency TASS", and so "Host photo agency" was designated Moscow Kremlin. "Host photo agency" is not some commercial organization, these are the event photographers whose photos are used by everyone.--Леонид Макаров (talk) 04:24, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per remarks. In addition. the source website indicates all material is CCBYSA except photos from TASS and another photoagency, see http://www.kremlin.ru/about/copyrights. --Ellywa (talk) 17:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP South Korea (`・ω・´) (talk) 14:14, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@-akko: However, the original building is built in 1926. So, I think it's public domain. Ox1997cow (talk) 18:43, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Since the building was created in 1926, I think {{PD-Korea-1910-1945}} might apply. I've been unable to identify a named architect; it's generally credited to the Japanese occupation, so may fit under the "70 years after publication when made public in the name of an organization" clause in that template. -M.nelson (talk) 19:12, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: it is a bit doubtful, but I think this particular photo does not show a creative design. Such woodwork and stonework can be seen in all sorts of older buildings. --Ellywa (talk) 17:28, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think this is PD as the NYPL states, "The item you've requested has been digitized but is only available for access at NYPL. Please come visit us to see the item!"[9] Buidhe (talk) 20:26, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. According to archivists at both the Library of Congress and the New York Public Library, this photo was distributed in 1946 by Dorothy Larrimore of Doubleday and Company to newspapers and other publications as a publicity photograph without a copyright notice. It was used to promote Wilson's latest book, "Memoirs of Hecate County." As this photo was released without a copyright notice prior to 1977 and as an inspection by the Library of Congress in 1996 found "no information on creator or on reproduction rights found with the image," this image resides in the public domain. -- Flask (talk) 20:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Buidhe: It appears the item is actually available from NYPL at this URL: NYPL Digital Gallery ⁠Item #302150. A NYPL archivist pointed this out to me. Flask (talk) 16:04, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, images released in the US without a copyright notice prior to 1977 are Public Domain. We obviously could move this historic portrait to Wikipedia for fair use, but since it's clearly PD that last resort should not be necessary. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:48, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 17:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]