Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/05/30

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 30th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, low-res and small. Have File:2 formylpyridine.png and File:Picolinaldehyde.svg as replacements. DMacks (talk) 02:34, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Leyo 00:58, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing persons image copied from here or a similar source on the internet. Peripitus (talk) 11:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:09, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Alter Fritz as Speedy (SLA) and the most recent rationale was: low quality Captain-tucker (talk) 00:28, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support nomination, could be speedied.  Delete. --Túrelio (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: very low quality Julo (talk) 12:54, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by FDMS4 as no source. This appears to be a crop of a photo by Harum Koh from Flickr, licensed for noncommercial use-only (BY-NC-SA-2.0). —RP88 16:39, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated for speedy deletion: Thank you.    FDMS  4    16:56, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: Could be found on http://www.wsofchampionshipbelt.com EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by D-Kuru. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:29, 5 June 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

press image from 1975, not a self-made image in 2014. This appears to be self-edited rather than self made. Uploader has this conceptual issue across many images. Peripitus (talk) 05:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Clear copyvio, therefore a speedy. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:32, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, copied from here https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=859229197424609&id=743099239037606&set=a.743125645701632.1073741828.743099239037606&source=46&refid=17 Vigyani (talk) 22:51, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:47, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 188.104.105.41 16:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: yep. JuTa 23:48, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.lapagesportive.com/mario-lemieux-se-vide-le-coeur/ Supertoff (talk) 06:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by Fastily --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 09:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio http://crosbylover.tumblr.com/post/85971806445/ray-shero-youre-a-penguin-for-life-in-my-heart or http://lazy18geno71.tumblr.com/ Supertoff (talk) 05:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by Fastily --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 10:03, 2 June 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio http://www.lapresse.ca/sports/hockey/201405/16/01-4767298-les-penguins-congedient-leur-dg-ray-shero.php Supertoff (talk) 06:01, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by Fastily --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 09:57, 2 June 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am sure that this is a capture from a TV show about the 2014 olympics, not a self-made image with a camera. I have not found the origional source though Peripitus (talk) 05:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clear copyvio, therefore a speedy. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:17, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation - image listed as uploader's own work; original image is at IMDB and, based, on size of Commons' upload (and fact EXIF data has been stripped), appears to be a screen capture BlueSalix (talk) 01:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Coypright of Pasika Productions in EXIF. russavia (talk) 20:38, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ubjscsncnccndjbcdncnhhddhdhyjhnhbfncmkncdimbdhinsjocehiugbccjbebcndnjdnecinexbidncn 24.164.82.175 21:19, 30 May 2014 (UTC) Keep Obvious mistake. Jean-Fred (talk) 22:43, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:35, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:37, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:43, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://bleacherreport.com/articles/920848-san-jose-sharks-five-worst-decisions-of-doug-wilsons-career Supertoff (talk) 21:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

frame from a video - note on the image page states "I edited by photoscape". No idea where the video is from and, given the generality of the scene, it may not be findable. This is not a self-made origional. Peripitus (talk) 11:44, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:48, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:43, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:36, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Brooks+Orpik/Stanley+Cup+Finals+Pittsburgh+Penguins+v+Detroit/PrDfNUfQg7n Supertoff (talk) 21:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:58, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:43, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:38, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:41, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image collection, not educationally useful — Racconish ✉ 19:19, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Seems to be a copyright violation, see here: obviously a comilation of some photographs from there. --High Contrast (talk) 19:46, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See also other files for deletion from same contributor. — Racconish ✉ 07:18, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image collection, not educationally useful — Racconish ✉ 19:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image collection, not educationally useful — Racconish ✉ 19:17, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:34, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image collection, not educationally useful — Racconish ✉ 19:17, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image collection, not educationally useful — Racconish ✉ 19:15, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:44, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:56, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image collection, not educationally useful — Racconish ✉ 19:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:37, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:41, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:43, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:43, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 08:50, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:34, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:36, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:34, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:35, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:32, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image collection, not educationally useful — Racconish ✉ 19:24, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:47, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Superseded by an image of the same object with better quality: File:Maribor (8657258715).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Captain-tucker (talk) 08:48, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:30, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:33, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:36, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:35, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image collection, not educationally useful — Racconish ✉ 19:21, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW sугсго 07:06, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:55, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Evgeni+Malkin/Stanley+Cup+Finals+Pittsburgh+Penguins+v+Detroit/iC4Bzz5lUNk Supertoff (talk) 21:22, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:31, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:29, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:31, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:33, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:56, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:43, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:32, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:33, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:31, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.sportsmemorabilia.com/player/Ruslan_Fedotenko Supertoff (talk) 21:19, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:11, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:58, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text-only file. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:35, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is apparently taken from a website. This image is hosted on many sites, some a higher resolution including this one Peripitus (talk) 01:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:54, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is apparently taken from a website. This image is hosted on many sites, some a higher resolution including this one Peripitus (talk) 01:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:54, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:58, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Globally replaced files in Category:Images with a TeX equivalent

[edit]

These are all images that have been globally replaced with TeX, and are consequently unused. According to Category:Images with a TeX equivalent, they can be speedily deleted, however I cannot find the appropriate criterion. Hence nominating here.

Storkk (talk) 16:11, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by McZusatz -- Steinsplitter (talk) 07:41, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Globally replaced files in Category:Images with a TeX equivalent

[edit]

These pictures of formulas have all been globally replaced by TeX. As they are no longer in use, they may be speedily deleted. I'm using DR as the venue so that the uploaders or others can reproduce them in the future as per the code below.

Storkk (talk) 12:56, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Storkk (talk) 07:30, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted --Pitke (talk) 17:09, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:44, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is a downscaled version of one seen on many websites (eg: this) Given the number of copies I can't tell which site hosts the original Peripitus (talk) 01:15, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:54, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope; not only does this not add to Commons' educational value, but uploader has also committed other copyright violations. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 18:46, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:43, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Botev1921 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:37, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahorno (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF. Uploaded in a row on 27.10.2013 and all related to es:TISVOL.

Permission(s) via COM:OTRS needed.

Gunnex (talk) 16:33, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:42, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:47, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:49, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:44, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JGrobstein (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:37, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sergiomedina90 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded in a row on 26.10.2013, all files related to es:Uniagraria, university in Colombia. Most likely grabbed from http://www.uniagraria.edu.co/ (Todos los derechos reservados. Propiedad exclusiva de la Fundación Universitaria Agraria de Colombia) and/or https://www.facebook.com/uagraria/. Examples:

Permission needed.


Gunnex (talk) 08:05, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:34, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Merihtarim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope.

Amitie 10g (talk) 02:41, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:33, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mikiobituary (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:36, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kasch89 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Strongly doubt own work claim

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:32, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:54, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yoyanec (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images (with copyvio claims on OTRS).

   FDMS  4    21:33, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:47, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Midiassociaisgrupo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:35, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Compte officiel JoB Btp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparently only uploaded for use on a self-promotional user page on French Wikipedia. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.

LX (talk, contribs) 22:29, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:47, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tsingt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of promo photos and album cover. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:36, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Olaff Crown (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, self-created artworks and photographs of exhibition by a non notable artist. I have not nominated File:BAF OLAFF.jpg because it could be used to illustrate en:body painting.

BrightRaven (talk) 07:49, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:58, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Teko Martins (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of promo/fan photos and album covers. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:35, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vintagerare (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No exif data, unlikely all own work of the uploader, suspect copyvios.

Krd 16:57, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:42, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vimalrajkappil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All images are simply taken from webpages and are copyright violations. I have deleted all of the same images, by the same user, on enwiki and blocked them and a sockpuppet account there. eg: File:Verumkaithari to Disarm knife.jpg is a downscaled version of this

Peripitus (talk) 01:07, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. This uploader just tags everything as own work. Damiens.rf 13:24, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. This uploader just tags everything as own work. Damiens.rf 13:24, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is: "Graphic courtesy JHU FUSE Project" see: http://archive.stsci.edu/fuse/gallery/pub_quality/ Uwe W. (talk) 10:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I retract the entry because text on top of the page says: “All of these images are public domain, but we ask that credit be given as indicated below. Enjoy!”--Uwe W. (talk) 10:08, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn Ymblanter (talk) 17:56, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused pure text PDF. Out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:51, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:43, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, published in 2013 e.g. here: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 13:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:47, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not "own work". This is a picture of a (tarot) card, whose drawing may well be copyrighted (without proper source information, we wiil never know). Damiens.rf 13:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not "own work". This is a picture of a (tarot) card, whose drawing may well be copyrighted (without proper source information, we wiil never know). Damiens.rf 13:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reason to believe it's freely licensed. It's just a logo downloaded from a facebook page. Damiens.rf 13:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:47, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan of photograph. Uploader makes no claim that they were the original photographer, or otherwise hold the copyright. Storkk (talk) 13:19, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping, image was deleted by another admin. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:10, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user file 37.5.6.16 19:43, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:39, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:10, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request by uploader himself[1] for being not useful, aka out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:03, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:41, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 13:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

LOGO, can't be free. Bilderling (talk) 09:15, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 17:54, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:43, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biagio2103 (talk • contribs) 2014-05-29T21:51:48‎ (UTC)


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope due to the poor image quality - extremely blurry/unsharp. No encyclopedic use possible I think. High Contrast (talk) 20:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:38, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:41, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:17, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:42, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality version of File:Integration area under curve.png, no reason for it to be PDF. Storkk (talk) 13:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the image has no provenance and appears to be a crop of this image or another from a website. Unfortunately I can't find the original source of this one. Peripitus (talk) 01:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 17:51, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry. Eleassar (t/p) 09:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unclear how it could be used Ymblanter (talk) 17:55, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a personal photo and it hasn't an educational purpose. I want to delete it. Marcoos44 (talk) 13:56, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:42, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a slightly larger version of this image is online (see here. Peripitus (talk) 00:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 16:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. This uploader just tags everything as own work. Damiens.rf 13:24, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 20:24, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:38, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie; deleted and re-posted 2 times, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mohan Sai.jpg and Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/05/30#File:Mohan_Sai.jpg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. This image was already used to vandalize in the Spanish wiki. Ies (talk) 13:30, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Commons fair use upload bot as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: No Freedom of Panorama for artworks in the US. Copies uploaded to en.wikipedia.org as fair use candidates. Captain-tucker (talk) 00:29, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as original nominator (for speedy delete). Clear case of the lack of freedom of panorama in the United States for artistic works. I support a fair use version on en.wikipedia for en:Dimitri Hadzi, but a better quality image (like deleted en:File:Omphalos.JPG) may be more appropriate for that. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:41, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 16:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:38, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 17:57, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Storkk as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: According to the description, a screen cap from The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Krd 17:42, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of a non-notable person ~ Nahid Talk 13:58, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:42, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a screenshot of a copyrighted website. Torrent Freak's website is released under a CC BY-NC 3.0 license (according to the website itself) and therefore not free enough for Commons. TLSuda (talk) 01:32, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I was wrong, so I withdraw. Apparently in 2011, it was released under a CC-by-SA-2.0 (I updated the license and the source so others don't make my same mistake). Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 01:37, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn Ymblanter (talk) 17:52, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TorrentFreak website is released under CC BY-NC 3.0, which is non-free and not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Someone could reupload on Wikipedia as "fair use". "NC" license is non-free. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:F0E4:E7FB:6914:F2A8 10:02, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yexstorm2001 uploaded a new screenshot from 2018 as a new version of the screenshot that I uploaded from 2011. Even if the website was still published under an acceptable license, the new screenshot should have been uploaded under a different name. However, it does appear that TorrentFreak now uses a non-commercial license, so this new version should be deleted, but only the new version. The license for the original screenshot that I uploaded is still as valid as it was in 2011. --Cgt (talk) 13:21, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe ask TorrentFreak people to change the license back to CC BY-SA? The non-free "NC" license is used on so many websites. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:F0E4:E7FB:6914:F2A8 17:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Both the new and old version include images and icons which are not owned/created by TorrentFreak, such as avatars advertisements, and stock images. De minimis does not apply to screenshots, since the icons and images are intentionally included and could have been avoided. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:16, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. This uploader just tags everything as own work. Damiens.rf 13:24, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, tineye finds image all over the web: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 13:08, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:47, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, looks professionally shot (and from a privileged position), therefore uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 13:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:42, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, tineye finds image on the web: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 13:08, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:47, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:50, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:43, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:41, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Macedon-40 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Works of Greek painters which are not in public domain in Greece. Most likely {{PD-US}} is applied incorrectly.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Macedon-40 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Works of Greek painters which are not in public domain in Greece. Most likely {{PD-US}} is applied incorrectly.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir, first of all, be so kind to remove from nominated "bulk" files SOHOS1, PAPALOUKAS2, PAPAPALOUKAS5. This files are not works of painters, but photo of unknown authors. Furthermore, this photo dated before 1923. Will continue. Macedon-40 (talk) 14:48, 1 June 2014 (UTC) Add: files OTHONEOS 3 and 4 are also photos dated 1913. Macedon-40 (talk) 05:38, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:OTHONEOS4.jpg is a painting. File:OTHONEOS4.jpg photographer died in 1949 according to file information. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:40, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm pretty sure this rendition was deleted before as non-free. The source certainly doesn't provide a free use. We need a freely made SVG, that's the only way the Nigerian arms will be accepted here. Fry1989 eh? 00:31, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:56, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False licence, not self work. See also commons:Deletion_requests/File:Coat_of_Arms_of_Nigeria.png 46.113.83.152 22:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, letterboxed - assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 12:17, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a (dirty) screen - unlikely to be {{Own}} except as a derivative work of the original. Additionally, there are scope issues. Storkk (talk) 09:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Why would anybody take a photo of Google Image results? Not too sure about the copyright status of it (simple text, but a lot of it) but since it's out of scope it's nothing worth thinking about. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 11:21, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: FASTILY 08:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:37, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering logs. Gunnex (talk) 11:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fr:Georges_Debunne died in 2008. Uploader is almost certainly not copyright holder, and the poster is not in the public domain until 2079. Storkk (talk) 12:22, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication in source that this is CC-BY-SA or another acceptable license.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am Japanese.Actually,I am not good at English.Therefore this sentence may have a mistake.This photograph was photographed and publicationed at the Philippines in 1954.The protection period of the copyright is expired in Japan and the Philippines and becomes the free use(2004).This photograph is used in Diaz's film IMELDA, but Diaz does not have a copyright.In addition, as for this use, even Philippine Copyright Law is accepted;

Philippine Copyright Law SEC. 184. Limitations on Copyright

184.1. Notwithstanding the provisions of Chapter V, the following acts shall not constitute infringement of copyright: (a) the recitation or performance of a work, once it has been lawfully made accessible to the public, if done privately and free of charge or if made strictly for a charitable or religious institution or society; (Sec. 10(1), P.D. No.49)(b) The making of quotations from a published work if they are compatible with fair use and only to the extent justified for the purpose, including quotations from newspaper articles and periodicals in the form of press summaries: Provided, That the source and the name of the author, if appearing on the work, are mentioned; (Sec. 11, third par., P.D. No. 49)(c) The reproduction or communication to the public by mass media of articles on current political, social, economic, scientific or religious topic, lectures, addresses and other works of the same nature, which are delivered in public if such use is for information purposes and has not been expressly reserved: Provided, That the source is clearly indicated; (Sec. 11, P.D. No. 49)(d) The reproduction and communication to the public of literary, scientific or artistic works as part of reports of current events by means of photography, cinematography or broadcasting to the extent necessary for the purpose; (Sec. 12, P.D. No. 49)

I am waiting for an answer of CineDiaz now.Thank you for your cooperation with the matters mentioned above.--Y.haruo (talk) 18:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • 1) That an image may be PD in its country of origin does not mean that it is PD in the US. Both need to be true for an image to be hosted on Commons. 2) None of section 184.1 appears to apply hear, as this is not "private", this is not a "quotation", this is not "for information purposes" (images on Commons may be reused for commercial purposes), and this is not a current event. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:42, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This picture is in the public domain in Philippines because its copyright has expired, according to SEC. 213.5 of the Philippines Copyright Law 2009.

213.5. In case of photographic works, the protection shall be for fifty (50) years from publication of the work and, if unpublished, fifty (50) years from the making. SEC.213.5 This photograph which published in 1954 becomes public domain in 2004. This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U. S. within days) and it was first published before without complying with U. S. copyright formalities or after without copyright notice and it was in the public domain in its home country Philippines on the Uruguay Round Agreements Act date (January 1, 1, 996}).

File:Not Rukiah but Sofia.jpg/Your upload file reference.--Y.haruo (talk) 14:12, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleteウルグアイラウンド協定法の理解が出来ました。ローカルで上げますので削除してください。--Y.haruo (talk) 16:42, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Y.haruo comments in her/his mother tongue that (s)he understands URAA and (s)he uploads the same file on ja:Wikipedia.--Hahifuheho (talk) 14:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The file in question is not on public domain in the United States. --Hahifuheho (talk) 14:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 09:04, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reliable details of when this was first published, the filedesc gives the publication as 1954 but gives a facebook page the source; however on closer examination of that page it gives the photo credit as Ramona S. Diaz's film IMELDA but that film only came out in 2003, if that was indeed the first publication then this image will still be in copyright in the US. Absent proof of how this image is PD in the US this needs to be deleted as per the COM:PCP. LGA talkedits 09:36, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is easy to prove that Diaz is not the first publisher. You can look at here[2] and there[3]. Diaz photographed a magazine kept at the Lopez museum.Your claim is equal to saying that Diaz took a photograph of next Lyndon B.Johnson in that page[4].--Y.haruo (talk) 12:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But we need to have the exact details of first publication to establish if this image is indeed PD in the US. For example if it only published after March 1989 then it will be copyright in the US. 12:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)


It is a fact that this file is photographed circa 1954, and it is a fact that this file is keeping at the Lopez museum. Typically, the magazine gravure is fresh. The photograph taken as the gravure of the magazine is published after photography inside a few months. The publication of the gravure picture does not need long duration of time.And This photograph stamped "(r)ough proof". This is a seal of the final stages before the publication. It is natural to think that this file is published circa 1954.In contrast your assertion is groundless. This proof is Probatio diabolica.

I specified the Lopez museum in the Philippines as this file source.I sent an email to confirm a copyright to Lopez museum and Cinediaz in a former deletion request, but there came no reply yet. I think that I was not able to use English well, or they was not able to prove that held a copyright. If you are doubt, You can ask them. You can find background information. I feel sad that a precious file is deleted by your behavior. If there is the reason that I can understand, I vote in a deletion vote by oneself.--Y.haruo (talk) 14:15, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As I said above, all we need is a confirmed date and location of publication to establish the US copyright status (see COM:L). LGA talkedits 21:05, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am adducing evidence already. This photograph was published circa 1954. Because, the symbol of the publication is included in a photograph. However You pretend to not see that. And you repeated that kind of remark. I only wait for a fair judgment afterward.--Y.haruo (talk) 21:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

US copyright law defines publication in an exact way, and it is not indicated by a symbol. In what book, magazine or newspaper did this first appear ? LGA talkedits 21:28, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons -FASTILY 08:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Additionally, description is "ALL RIGHTS RESERVED" in Spanish. Storkk (talk) 13:51, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:57, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, photo-of-a-photo: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 12:26, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the subject, this picture was taken approximately between 1940 and 1960. No information about the photographer or the publication. So it is probably a copyvio. BrightRaven (talk) 12:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of our SVG version. Fry1989 eh? 03:33, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sostituita da una mappa in formato svg in stile unificato. (File:Roman Catholic Diocese of Como in Italy.svg) Friedrichstrasse (talk) 22:21, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata - assertion of {{Own}} in doubt. Uploader, if you are copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 09:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crop of 1990 polaroid by Linda Bukowski. [5] no indication of free license Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:49, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, photo has embedded text: walkingistanbul.com. http://www.walkingistanbul.com/EserDetay.aspx?mk=249. Sayginer (talk) 12:41, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata - unlikely to be {{Own}} work. Uploader, if you are copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 09:32, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyvio, unlikely to be own work (btw, there are several altenatives available in its category). Tekstman (talk) 10:24, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:34, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing attribution and license information of all the media files visible. User:Ecemaml should add them if he thinks the screenshot is worth the necessary, rather large efforts.    FDMS  4    13:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I now understand the purpose of these screenshots, therefore please hide the first revisions of File:Ayuda Commons - Wikidata.jpg and File:Ayuda Commons - Wikidata (5).jpg.    FDMS  4    14:39, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Done -FASTILY 08:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:57, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work of this painting with no provenance given. Peripitus (talk) 05:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Configured to be licensed with {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}}, I can't retrieve any license infos from https://plus.google.com/photos/111772715412238783719/albums/5596862900994531345/5596863651746113762?pid=5596863651746113762&oid=111772715412238783719 (2011, identical exif) or from the related Picasa album via https://plus.google.com/photos/111772715412238783719/albums/5596862900994531345?banner=pwa. Further infos/{{Picasareview}} needed. Gunnex (talk) 20:11, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per above, nominating also:

Gunnex (talk) 21:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non esiste una "Strada statale 16 aa" Friedrichstrasse (talk) 21:11, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that source publishes this under a free license. However it's possible, so nominating here instead of {{Npd}}ing as it may be a drive-by upload. Storkk (talk) 09:11, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 12:37, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, looks professinoally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 12:43, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 12:37, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata and text overlay make the assertion of {{Own}} dubious. If uploader is copyright holder, the steps on COM:OTRS should be followed to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 09:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata - assertion of {{Own}} in doubt. Uploader, if you are copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 12:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kradzież praw autorskich Mirek237 (talk) 18:28, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test page, accidental creation Жаворонок Катерина (talk) 12:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Test page, accidental creation Жаворонок Катерина (talk) 06:04, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no author for the picture. The picture has been directly taken and uploaded from "http://www.bollywoodhungama.com". The source of the picture is here (http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/more/photos/view/stills/parties-and-events/id/1459719). As the person who took the picture has not given an official copyright notice or proof of originality, this picture should henceforth be deleted from Wikimedia Commons.as this violates the copyright laws and policies of Wikimedia. -Jacob 116.74.10.38 19:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: No reason for deletion. License and permission OK. Yann (talk) 13:02, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found this following the undeletion request (see Old revision of COM:UDEL ). I have some doubt that bollywood hungama is the author, we had similar cases in the past, similar insofar that the watermark of bollywood hungama is missing and that other publication with other author information can be found on the internet. In this case I refere to indiatoday giving Viral Bhayani - presumably https://twitter.com/viralphoto - as author. --Martin H. (talk) 16:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Martin H.: Hi, Hungama is a website, not a photographer, and it publishes pictures made by photographers under a free license (i.e. we don't know what agreement there is between them). Do you have any clue that the license and/or the permission are not valid? I don't see any. The picture on India Today could be published with a special agreement from the photographer, or simply copied from Hungama. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The template explicitely mentions " Bollywood Hungama parties/events that are exclusively created by their own photographers" --Martin H. (talk) 15:56, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
How do you know that Viral Bhayani is not one of their photographers? Do they have a list of their staff somewhere? Yann (talk) 06:46, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure that the "statement of exclusively created" invalidates anything that Yann has said. One can exclusively create, and still licence for public domain.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:39, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Source website does not indicate that they do not own the rights to this image. If this is a recurring problem we should reconsider the rules for this license template but with the current status I don't see enough doubt to warrant deletion. Regards, --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 14:29, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image of damaged subject B137 (talk) 12:50, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep In mainspace use on two Wikipedia pages and talkspace use on three, therefore it is automatically educational for Commons purposes. But even without that, the quality seems entirely reasonable; how many similar photos do we have? darkweasel94 17:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep No significant quality issues. Whether the subject is damaged or not is of no consequence. Mtaylor848 (talk) 18:39, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no consensus to delete FASTILY 08:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Edgar Brandt, author of the monument, died in 1960. This is copyrighted, there is no FoP in France, sorry. Jebulon (talk) 16:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, looks professionally shot - uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 12:58, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata - assertion of {{Own}} in doubt. Uploader, if you are copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 09:26, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:43, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SANTABABES (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images' copyright is not owned by the uploader. For most of the other images by the same user I've found the original source. While I can't for these the lack of exif, appearance for one that it's a part of a video frame, the lack of provenance on the upload page and the wide geographic dispersion show these are copyright violations. The uploader seems, unfortunately, not understand copyright and derivative works.

Peripitus (talk) 11:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not an exact copy, just similar - check the location of the people near the fountain on the left. There are a lot of images of this day from close to the same place so it's probably a set of press photographers shooting very similar images. - Peripitus (talk) 12:37, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, you're right. I didn't look closely enough this time. Doesn't change anything, though. Should still be deleted. Lupo 13:05, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 08:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:34, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:31, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Toilet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, also containing sexist descriptions.

Ices2Csharp (talk) 20:41, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all the creepy stalker images, keep the rest. I don't see any point in us hosting his huge collection of creepy stalker images, especially since half of them have nonsense titles. These are just useless cruft. Kaldari (talk) 03:32, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well obviously there aresome which don't belong in this DR and should stay, such as File:Warning sign at the meuse side by Spijkenisse.JPG, so this is gonna have to be picked through with a fine comb. I'd also hardly call "Running and jogging is good for every woman for her health and to prevent constipation" sexist, but it's absolutely creepy, so nuke the creepy stalker ones and keep any good ones like that warning sign. Fry1989 eh? 03:47, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
True, it looks like a few of the images are outside the stalker theme. We should probably keep those. I've modified my vote accordingly. That sign photo is hilarious. Kaldari (talk) 04:02, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I removed File:Warning sign at the meuse side by Spijkenisse.JPG from the nomination. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:10, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Jeez - what a load of... I've just deleted one that is so blurry/pointless that I am happy it is clearly out of scope. I'll trawl through more when I get the time. --Herby talk thyme 08:15, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NUKE all images which have captions or image titles which speculate on the state of the photographed subject's bowels. AnonMoos (talk) 13:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would this include any of the following? Kramer Associates (talk) 19:47, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have deleted a lot of obvious {{Out of scope}} ones. Needs opinions on whether the current remaining ones are Out of scope or not. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:50, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • When I find a lot of images like File:A coot family on a nest.jpg, File:A coot with young coot and lot of eggs.jpg, File:A dogfish has rolled.jpg marked as "Out of scope, also containing sexist descriptions" I can't help but feel there is an abuse of process going on here. The idea of DRs is to nominate images that one has looked at and decided probably should be deleted, not nominate everything and leave it to other people to sort through the list. A lot of people have no doubt wasted a lot of effort trawling through this long list of bad taste (and apparently creepy stalker) images when really the nominator should have at least looked at every image before nominating. I haven't looked at all the remaining images, but those I have looked at seem fine, so I vote keep the rest for now, until someone finds a specific reason to delete. --Tony Wills (talk) 12:28, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How can you say this user a >>creepy stalker<<? Is it forbidden to photograph people that are even not identifyable on the images? --79.221.106.19 13:22, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. These insults are embarrassing. --Trycatch (talk) 13:39, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is simply censorship on the basis that the images make people here very worried about the photographer's state of mind. An excessive interest in toilet/constipation/defication is bad enough, but an excessive number of images of young women, probably taken without their knowledge, is a big worry. If there was only the odd image on these subject lines they might be seen as useful. I think people want to encourage the photographer to broaden their photographic subject matter and stop following young women about with a camera ;-). Complain at the administrators notice board, or post undeletion requests if it is important to you. --Tony Wills (talk) 13:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per Tony - there is probably quite a lot of the remaining ones that should be kept in practice. However some were simply junk images. Maybe a bit much to nom all the uploads. --Herby talk thyme 13:57, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I chose this way to avoid wasting hours on this. If administrators agree the remaining files are OK, just keep them and close the DR, no problem. I think the real problematic files are already gone. Ices2Csharp (talk) 18:48, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not keeping this open any longer. In future, do not mass nominate everything an editor uploads, when half of the files they have uploaded are obviously in scope, and do not fall into the reason for deletion. You use visualfilechange, so group similar files together for review. Do not use the excuse of doing it like this to save yourself "hours", becasuse now I am going to have to waste hours to clean up after a disruptive nomination. russavia (talk) 11:33, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in fact you just spent 6 minutes on it. This was an exceptional case, for which visual selection wouldn't do. I could have made separate DRs for all of the files that have been deleted, but that would have been far more time consuming, even for closing administrators. I don't know why you call this 'disruptive', do you actually know the meaning of that word? Ices2Csharp (talk) 13:05, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Toilet (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wrong defecation hemorrhoids.jpg, bad quality user artwork with no educational value.

-mattbuck (Talk) 01:00, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --High Contrast (talk) 12:54, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Toilet in 2013 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

NOTE: Previous discussions of files from this uploader have been moved to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Toilet/Archive. (ESkog)(Talk) 19:38, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A very large number of this user's uploads seem to be outside the Commons:Project scope. In particular, many of these uploads are images of random unidentifed women, mostly from behind. There does not seem to be any conceivable encyclopedic purpose for these images. I've tried to carefully pare the list down to only those which are clearly problematic; there may be more that warrant individual discussion.

(ESkog)(Talk) 17:55, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: Some of these images are perfectly normal — others, along with their titles, are alarmingly creepy. There is no reason to delete the former (and thus this DR has no merit), but crotch shots and candid moments should be deleted on sight. And I hope the local Police was warned about this pervert already, before he does worse than shaming uploads. -- Tuválkin 05:18, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Breakup of the images above, to allow fracctioned voting
“normal” images

File:Mallebos heeft mooie ruiterpaden.jpg File:Horserijders and walking people.jpg File:French tourist in Holland mallebos.jpg File:Woman bathing in Sri Lanka.JPG File:Woman Toilet with toilet paper for the ladies room Sri Lanka.JPG File:Woman with toiletpaper.jpg File:Two crouching girls Nepal.jpg File:Sitting women Peru.jpg File:Three crouching women.jpg File:Fietsende man en hardloopster.JPG File:Wedstrijdlopers in actie.JPG File:Wedstrijdloopster in actie.JPG File:Female with blond hair and cap.jpg

shots from the back

File:Walking girl with black bag on shoulder.jpg File:Wandelende vrouw met honden Nederland.jpg File:Cycling female near forest.jpg File:Jogging female with mobile in hand.jpg File:Black mother daughter walking 3.jpg File:Twee wandelende donkere vrouwen.jpg File:Walking couple with black dog.jpg File:In hand woman with horse.jpg File:Cycling blond girl 4.jpg File:Fietsende vrouw bij mallebos 2.jpg File:Walking girl with blond long hair 4.jpg File:Skating black girl.jpg File:Vrouw die loopt in de polder.jpg File:Summer walking of a woman.jpg File:Fietsende vrouw in de polder.JPG File:Running woman with red shirt.JPG File:Running woman in Spijkenisse 3.JPG File:Sitting woman near the waterside.JPG File:Walking jogging sportswoman Holland.jpg File:Woman fishing in spui Holland.jpg File:Woman with fishing rod Holland.jpg File:Black and white girl walking.jpg File:Meiden die skeeleren 5.jpg File:Roller skating woman 3.jpg File:Roller skating woman 4.jpg File:Three walking girls with dog 3.jpg File:Running blond woman 3.jpg File:Woman running in summer.jpg File:Two walking girl one with bike.jpg File:Two running women 6.jpg File:Skating girl 4.jpg File:Running woman on a road 4.jpg File:Running woman 6.jpg File:Running woman 7.jpg File:Oversteken in Spijkenisse.jpg File:Walking woman with two wolves dogs.jpg File:Running woman with tattoos.jpg File:Walking woman and girl and large dog and a small one.jpg File:Standing woman and dog.jpg File:Walking woman with brown bag.jpg File:Woman running on a road in Spijkenisse.jpg File:Cyclist who drinks.jpg File:Cycling sportswoman.jpg File:Cycling cyclist.jpg File:Twee wandelende vrouwen.JPG File:Two sitting women in Kandy Sri Lanka.JPG File:Walking girls with black braided long hair Sri Lanka.JPG File:Three walking girls in Sri Lanka.JPG File:Walking woman in Kandy Sri Lanka.jpg File:Very very long hair Sri Lanka.JPG File:Two walking women Sri lanka.JPG File:Two sitting girls one with long hair.JPG File:Sitting girl long hair Sri Lanka.JPG File:Girl braided long hair Sri Lanka.JPG File:Crouching woman during event.jpg File:Vrouw aan het skeeleren.JPG File:Ook veel vrouwen trainen alleen.JPG File:Vogelzang en mallebos recreatiegebied.JPG File:Crouching blond mother with little daughter.jpg File:Girl with blond hair and phone.JPG File:Moving skating cycling people.JPG File:Two horses three girls.JPG File:Three dogs and woman walking.JPG File:Blond girl with horses mallebos.JPG File:Crouching angling woman.JPG File:Walking woman tied up hair.JPG File:Girls on skates Holland.JPG File:Vrouw met lang blond haar.JPG File:Woman with blond hair and flag.JPG File:Wandelen joggen in het mallebos.JPG File:Recreatie stad Spijkenisse.JPG File:Two horsewomen.JPG File:Vrouw aan het joggen Spijkenisse.JPG File:Walking woman puts out about.JPG File:Eating pony with girl.JPG File:In hand horsegirl Spijkenisse.JPG File:Walking woman with stroller and son.JPG File:Fietsende vrouw.JPG File:Two rollerskaters in Holland.JPG File:Sitting woman and children.JPG File:Horseriding mallebos.JPG File:Wandelende donkere vrouw.JPG File:Wandelen mallebos recreatiegebied.JPG File:Horseriding Holland.JPG File:Running girls Holland.JPG File:Sitting women bench.JPG File:Backside dressed Spanisch army.JPG File:Trimster in Spijkenisse.JPG File:Walking in Geervliet.JPG File:Female long hair Nepal.jpg File:Woman with blound hair.JPG File:Walking woman with a dog.jpg

buttocks closeups

File:Buttocks of woman.jpg File:Billen.jpg

candid and/or unflattering poses

File:Crouching in Indonesia.jpg File:Vrouw die hurkt.JPG File:Crouching woman behind wall Peru.jpg

(as above, with objectionable filenames)
“normal” images

File:Cycling old female.jpg File:Crouching female on waterside.jpg File:Female with black hair in train Sri Lanka.JPG File:Two crouching females Indonesia.jpg File:Women are good runners.JPG

shots from the back

File:Walking female on market in Spijkenisse.jpg File:Crouching and sitting female.jpg File:Cycling female with blond hair Holland 3.jpg File:Cycling female with bag.jpg File:Running man and female in Holland 3.jpg File:Walking sportsfemale.jpg File:Two running jogging and walking females 3.JPG File:Fietsende dame.jpg File:Walking and jogging female 11.jpg File:Running female near mallebos.jpg File:Walking female with her dogs 3.JPG File:Cycling female 2.JPG File:Walking and jogging female 3.jpg File:Running female 8.jpg File:Running female 6.jpg File:Cyclist female on road.jpg File:Two walking and jogging females 3.jpg File:Black braided hair female Sri Lanka.JPG File:Young female braided hair and bag Sri Lanka.JPG File:Fishing female in chair.JPG File:Cycling sportsfemale in Holland.jpg File:Two sitting females looking dancing.JPG File:Walking female with long hair Sri Lanka.jpg File:Female long black hair Sri Lanka.jpg File:Female braided long hair Sri Lanka.JPG File:Backside flight attentant.JPG File:Crouching female in Bolivia with white hat.jpg File:Crouching female with hat in Bolivia.jpg File:Crouching female helping .jpg File:Running female white headphone.JPG File:Many females jogging.JPG File:Crouching female early middle ages.jpg File:Crouching female and her child standing.jpg File:Sitting female in Holland.jpg File:Blond woman crouching.jpg File:Running sportsfemale.JPG File:Angling blond female.JPG File:Blond female with braids.JPG File:Twee joggende damens.JPG File:Walking female with two dogs.JPG File:Wandelende dames.JPG File:Walking mother and girls.JPG File:Walking female in Spijkenisse centre.JPG File:Running female with headphone and drinkingbottles.JPG File:Two sitting black females.JPG File:Walking mother with children.JPG File:Mother and daughter horseriding.JPG File:Young female long hair Equador.jpg File:Mother and daughter in Spijkenisse.JPG File:Running housewife.JPG

buttocks closeups

File:Buttocks of walking female.jpg File:Ass of a woman.jpg

candid and/or unflattering poses

File:A drinking female.jpg File:Two sitting females 4.jpg


Deleted: out of scope, with questionable intentions. Two kept per below FASTILY 08:34, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Toilet (talk · contribs) 5

[edit]

Hand-drawn images of bad quality mostly about defecation and constipation. In this sole way POV and no educational use. Not the first time subject to deletion.

Yikrazuul (talk) 11:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly agree. User Toilet had once a sanction, but this user is not interested in a chang of behaviour (just see the tons of deletion requests so far).
In addition, what should we do with images like this, this or that violating COM:PEOPLE? Impo this user abuses commons as a sole own FlickR or picassa upload dumb of private images (holidays, vacations,..). --Yikrazuul (talk) 10:26, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Toilet 6

[edit]

Please look at previous deletion requests for this uploader to get an idea of context.

Thumbnails given, per above.
shots from behind, consent doubtful and encyclopedica value dubious. Some, like the first one, have problematic titles, too. Not exhaustive, there are quite a lot of these from the Rotterdam Marathon, too.

There are also many pictures of women and children squatting on their heels (and one of a man in the same pose, that I recall). Some, like the ones shown, seem to have little encyclopedic value, while others could be useful but need retitling to reflect what the photo actually shows, apart from the fact the fact that someone is crouching. Many of these and more are in Category:Crouching women.

There were quite a few shots of young girls with babies which had English and Dutch titles asserting that the girl was the child's mother (and one showing a child walking past someone in a nun's habit, asserting the same). I've requested renaming for most, but these children look so unhappy, I'd suggest that there is a consent concern, and maybe we should just delete them. There are also a lot of assertions of motherhood for women of more plausible ages; not sure what to do with those.

These are concerning on consent grounds (I've omitted the massage ones that show the photographer).

File:Female in Greece.jpg (dup) (weird detail)  ?

While we're at it, I second the earlier suggestion that anything with the word "constipated" or similar should be renamed. Even non-human shots like File:Constipated camel..jpg and File:Constipated camel in Morocco.jpg.

Then there are some which appear to be non-consensual long-range shots of open defecation.

And in other images:

These two (both the same shot) show a girl apparently laughing at the photographer from a small concrete enclosure with half-height walls, described in the metadata as a toilet; she may be washing at a tap? Since the photographer apparently considered this photo sexual, consent is dubious.

There are also photos with other-marking captions, stating that subjects are of a different gender or ethnicity from the photographer and frequently little else. A few examples, some of which may need deleting on other grounds:

I am concerned about some of the uploader's attitudes, especially in light of photos showing the photographer teaching.

These images were all uploaded by User:Toilet. I believe they should be deleted, for the same reasons as the precedents for deleting this users' photos. Consent is dubious, legality may be (for instance, in the Netherlands, there is a right to privacy, especially in sexual contexts, againstphotos taken in public places). And the encyclopedic value is pretty low, too.

Apologies for the files I have missed and any I have re-nominated for deletion by mistake. There are lots of other problematic files from this user, I am trying to rename or delreq them all. Any help is very welcome. Frankly, I wish this user had never uploaded anything; the value of the images is offset by the burden on other editors to do all this. HLHJ (talk) 05:11, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:47, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source given at the original enwiki upload ( the entire summary given was "Urumi Payattu, Kerala"). Given the user's other uploads and warnings on Wikipedia for copyright issues I think it is unlikely that this image is self-made and likely that the image is not freely licenced Peripitus (talk) 01:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Windows XP screenshot of proprietary software Microchip08 (talk) 19:30, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zwenne (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear whether the uploader is also the photographer Karl W T Berg, see EXIF and watermarks

37.5.6.16 17:51, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Woweizzk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works: 2 transport maps of en:Zhuzhou and a related collage File:株洲名片.jpg: The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file.

Gunnex (talk) 10:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:上官云珠.jpg Zanhe (talk) 09:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry duplicate of File:Arms of Fiji.svg. Fry1989 eh? 03:34, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obvious problem file by a user I have just indefinitely banned for repeatedly uploading non-free content after warnings MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:54, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]