Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/05/18
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
This file is duplicated in Wikimedia Commons. See first version. Dcapillae (talk) 12:08, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Please use {{Duplicate}} to tag duplicate files for speedy deletion, which I have now done. This avoids clogging up the deletion request process. Verbcatcher (talk) 13:00, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:20, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Αλεξανδρής Αλέξης (talk) 12:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied, uploader request. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Αλεξανδρής Αλέξης (talk) 12:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied, uploader request. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:37, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Αλεξανδρής Αλέξης (talk) 12:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied, uploader request. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:37, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Αλεξανδρής Αλέξης (talk) 12:47, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied, uploader request. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:39, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Αλεξανδρής Αλέξης (talk) 12:48, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied, uploader request. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:38, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Αλεξανδρής Αλέξης (talk) 12:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied, uploader request. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:38, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Αλεξανδρής Αλέξης (talk) 12:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied, uploader request. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:37, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Αλεξανδρής Αλέξης (talk) 12:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied, uploader request. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:38, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Αλεξανδρής Αλέξης (talk) 12:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied, uploader request. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
ανέβηκε καταλάθος Αλεξανδρής Αλέξης (talk) 14:25, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
{{SDG7}} Αλεξανδρής Αλέξης (talk) 12:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied; uploader request. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Αλεξανδρής Αλέξης (talk) 12:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied, uploader request. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Web resolution. Possible copyright infringement. Please confirm ownership. Sreejith K (talk) 14:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Looks like this is a duplicate of File:עודד פז.jpg --Sreejith K (talk) 14:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted and redirected to File:עודד פז.jpg. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|Uploading error occurred, too many files with wrong resolution and wrong commons license.}}
Uploading error occurred, too many files with wrong resolution. MikiSollo (talk) 14:39, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 18:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
copyvio. see official FB: https://www.facebook.com/TheRealKieraChaplin/photos/a.131647020236675/3938086409592698/?type=3&theater JD {æ} 19:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Raymond 20:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by IZNASSEN123 as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Territoire des Beni Iznassen.png. Not an exact or scaled down duplicate, converting to DR as author requests deletion >7 days after upload. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: close duplicate, redundant. Redirected. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation Viniciusmarvin (talk) 21:28, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:25, 20 Mai 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: this media is a logo or a derivative work thereof, which are always presumed to be copyrighted unless they are too simple to be copyrightable. Unless licensed under a free license, copyrighted logos are not accepted on Wikimedia Commons. Recreating a logo yourself does not give you the right to license it under a free license, and fair use claims are not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. --Krdbot 14:41, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Tourist snapshots uploaded by User Matlin 3
[edit]tourist snapshots / not notable people and no description
- File:2004 08 22 Bécs 080 (51008981390).jpg
- File:2004 07 23 Bécs 036 (51078260662).jpg
- File:2005 12 04 Bécs 086 (51081273327).jpg
- File:2004 08 24 Bécs 113 (51078163786).jpg
- File:2008 07 11 Bécs Laci (3) (51144962810).jpg
- File:2008 07 11 Bécs Laci (2) (51143182067).jpg
- File:2005 06 26 Bécs Donauinselfest 002 (51070547371).jpg
- File:1992 Bécs 005c (50430043888).jpg
- File:2004 08 24 Bécs 087 (51077464998).jpg
--Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:37, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 06:31, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Tourist snapshots uploaded by User Matlin 4
[edit]tourist snapshots / not notable people and no description
- File:2004 07 31 Eisenstadt 027 (48703824593).jpg
- File:2004 07 31 Eisenstadt 029 (48704323062).jpg
- File:2004 07 31 Eisenstadt 087 (48703824533).jpg
- File:2004 07 31 Eisenstadt 086 (48704159796).jpg
- File:2004 07 31 Eisenstadt 024 (48704159851).jpg
- File:2004 07 31 Burgenland 004 (48704323217).jpg
--Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 06:33, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Dumped here from Flickr with no description, grainy image and blurry. Not worth keeping. Braveheart (talk) 10:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 06:35, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
tourist snapshots / not notable people and no description
- File:2001 01 23 Kitzbühel 084 (50955701027).jpg
- File:2001 07 01 Graz DSCF0077 (50968161688).jpg
- File:2001 07 01 Graz DSCF0088 (50968161568).jpg
- File:2001 07 01 Graz DSCF0089 (50968969937).jpg
- File:2001 07 01 Graz DSCF0091 (50968861621).jpg
- File:2001 08 19 Salzburg DSCF0004 (50975796602).jpg
- File:2001 08 19 Salzburg DSCF0005 (50975683691).jpg
- File:2001 08 19 Salzburg DSCF0008 (50975796587).jpg
- File:2001 08 19 Salzburg DSCF0009 (50975796167).jpg
- File:2001 08 19 Salzburg DSCF0010 (50974995578).jpg
- File:2001 08 19 Salzburg DSCF0015 (50975683561).jpg
- File:2001 08 19 Salzburg DSCF0032 (50975796537).jpg
- File:2001 08 19 Salzburg DSCF0036 (50974995918).jpg
- File:2001 08 19 Salzburg DSCF0037 (50975683471).jpg
- File:2001 08 19 Salzburg DSCF0039 (50975683366).jpg
- File:2003 05 03 Salzburg 041 (51012007007).jpg
- File:2004 04 16 Hotel Sacher Salzburg 004 (51048705817).jpg
- File:2004 04 16 Hotel Sacher Salzburg 079 (51048705772).jpg
- File:2004 04 16 Hotel Sacher Salzburg 080 (51047891473).jpg
- File:2004 04 16 Hotel Sacher Salzburg 081 (51048705727).jpg
- File:2004 04 16 Hotel Sacher Salzburg 082 (51048621261).jpg
- File:2004 04 16 Hotel Sacher Salzburg 085 (51048705872).jpg
- File:2004 04 16 Hotel Sacher Salzburg 089 (51047891343).jpg
- File:2004 04 16 Hotel Sacher Salzburg 147 (51048705217).jpg
- File:2004 04 16 Hotel Sacher Salzburg 203 (51048705492).jpg
- File:2004 04 16 Salzburg 007 (51048621051).jpg
- File:2004 04 16 Salzburg 011 (51048620996).jpg
- File:2004 04 16 Salzburg 013 (51048620961).jpg
- File:2004 04 16 Salzburg 021 (51048653032).jpg
- File:2004 04 16 Salzburg 030 (51047837793).jpg
- File:2004 04 16 Salzburg 031 (51048568066).jpg
- File:2004 04 16 Salzburg 067 (51047838023).jpg
- File:2004 04 16 Salzburg 074 (51048652352).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Hotel Sacher Salzburg 205 (51048620806).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 091 (51048567481).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 094 (51047837013).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 095 (51047836988).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 096 (51047836948).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 097 (51047836938).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 100 (51047836913).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 101 (51048652022).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 103 (51047836838).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 106 (51047836763).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 113 (51047836673).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 116 (51047836648).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 117 (51048651737).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 119 (51047835433).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 120 (51048651672).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 125 (51048651567).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 126 (51048566901).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 127 (51047836373).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 129 (51048651467).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 130 (51048651427).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 135 (51047835393).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 141 (51047836098).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 164 (51048651167).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 165 (51048566481).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 169 (51047835948).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 170 (51048651002).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 200 (51047835878).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 208 (51048650767).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 209 (51048650752).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 210 (51047835678).jpg
- File:2004 04 17 Salzburg 211 (51047835643).jpg
- File:2004 05 31 Linz DSCN3563 (51051754211).jpg
- File:2004 05 31 Linz DSCN3564 (51051754156).jpg
- File:2004 05 31 Linz DSCN3565 (51051027728).jpg
- File:2004 05 31 Linz DSCN3566 (51051838712).jpg
- File:2004 06 30 Salzburg 029 (51054885346).jpg
- File:2005 04 16 Zwettl 072 (51065387701).jpg
- File:2005 04 16 Zwettl 073 (51065481997).jpg
- File:2005 04 16 Zwettl 085 (51065387651).jpg
- File:2006 07 09 Gmunden 176 M (51090002870).jpg
- File:2006 07 09 Gmunden 6604 (51087472641).jpg
- File:2008 05 01 Hallstatt 659 (51134568142).jpg
Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 06:23, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Mécompréhension. La photographe souhaite partager son fichier en CC-BY-NC-ND. C'est donc incompatible. Alacoolwiki (talk) 14:04, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Mécompréhension. La photographe souhaite partager son fichier en CC-BY-NC-ND. C'est donc incompatible. Alacoolwiki (talk) 21:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thedevoutcatalyst (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:HD#Help with Wikimedia OTRS release generator step 4.
- File:"Music in Monk Time" Foreign Distribution Poster.jpg
- File:MIMTPremiereFlyer.jpg
- File:Monk Time Poster.jpg
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I have been communicating with the uploader on English Wikipedia, and it is clear to me that they did not understand the full implications of Creative Commons licensing. They did not read the fine print and thought they were uploading for use on Wikipedia only. One of these images is probably appropriate for use on Wikipedia as non-free content but none is appropriate for Commons, in my view. Cullen328 (talk) 00:58, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: support deletion given that free-licensing clearly was not intended. - Jmabel ! talk 01:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 13:50, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
The file was uploaded by mistake Sakiv (talk) 20:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Billinghurst at 04:12, 23 May 2021 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 08:52, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Large margins, watermark in corner, improper typography of "2" (should be subscripted). Have File:Dopamine.svg among many other alts DMacks (talk) 23:22, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 19:37, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Incorrect bonding/orientation of the two OH on left (bond-line should connect to O not H). Have File:Adrenalin - Adrenaline.svg among many other alts DMacks (talk) 23:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 19:38, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Large margins, watermark in corner, improper typography of "2" (should be subscripted). Have File:Serotonin-2D-skeletal.svg among many other alts. DMacks (talk) 23:27, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 19:38, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Large margins, watermark in corner, improper typography of "2" (should be subscripted), and mis-positioned bonds to two OH groups (should go specifically to the O). Have File:Norepinephrine structure.svg among many other alts. DMacks (talk) 23:46, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 19:39, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Uneven bond-lengths and -angles. Have File:Dopamine.svg among many alts. DMacks (talk) 23:48, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 19:39, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Uneven bond-lengths and -angles. Have File:Dopamine.svg among many alts. DMacks (talk) 23:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 19:40, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Uneven bond-lengths and -angles. Have File:6-OHDA.svg as alt DMacks (talk) 23:52, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 19:40, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Is he someone in scope? E4024 (talk) 00:25, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:36, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Is it free to upload from this site? Is the prof in scope? E4024 (talk) 00:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:36, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
This is artwork and I don't have the licensing information, it also does not have educational purposes Milks-expired (talk) 01:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:37, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brubalcabagarrido (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused screenshots, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:RC wiki 1.png
- File:RC wiki 3.png
- File:RC wiki 2.png
- File:RC wiki 5.png
- File:RC wiki 4.png
- File:RC wiki 6.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:00, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:38, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vgparmar91 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: transmission code in most EXIF data. Also all unused without clear educational purpose, out of scope.
- File:Rcc sunset.jpg
- File:Rcc asdfg.jpg
- File:Rcc village.jpg
- File:Rcc temple.jpg
- File:Rcc steel.jpg
- File:Rcc night building.jpg
- File:Rcc interiors.jpg
- File:Rcc hostel.jpg
- File:Rcc banner.jpg
- File:Rcc archi.jpg
- File:Rcc duplex.jpg
- File:Rcc.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:39, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:39, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:39, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:39, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Redloocustodia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Custodia Carretera.png
- File:Red logística.png
- File:Logo Redloo.jpg
- File:LOGOTIPO REDLOO-12.png
- File:Logo redloo.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:40, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused book cover, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:05, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:40, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:07, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:40, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:08, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:41, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Screenshots of software of unclear copyrights status.
- File:Adobe Flash Player Settings - Website Storage Settings panel.png
- File:Adobe Flash Player Settings - Local Storage Warning.png
- File:Related objects - VMs.png
- File:VSphere Web Client - Schedule actions.png
- File:VSphere Web Client - Recent objects.png
- File:VSphere Web Client - History.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Unused screenshots, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:09, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:41, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daniela.ceron.urzua (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused math equations, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:41, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:42, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused text-only image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:42, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Very low quality —capmo (talk) 02:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:42, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res image of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. And likely DW/screengrab. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:43, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused text-only table, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:43, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:43, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot snippet, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:43, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
This is not actually the company logo KhaledAlWathiq (talk) 02:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:44, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Not in scope; uploaded by a user blocked on enwiki for discussion about their block. See here for when the image was used, but as the user has now blanked her talkpage, making it pointless to keep this around. Elli (talk) 02:41, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Support - I don't need it anymore. SoyokoAnis 12:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:44, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
It is clear that not own work:https://www.facebook.com/TerryGou1018/photos/1078951945911410 寒吉 (talk) 08:56, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Can found in the internet. COM:OTRS permission is needed. SCP-2000 08:58, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:18, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
This must not be an image of Terry Jones, in whose cat the file is at present, as that person died before this pic was taken. I guess this is OoS. E4024 (talk) 02:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:45, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Any scope here that I might be missing? E4024 (talk) 03:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:45, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Advertisement, no educational value. Velma (talk) 07:12, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:46, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Advertisement, no educational value. Velma (talk) 07:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:47, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, insufficiently described abstract collage by an insignificant author. ŠJů (talk) 11:05, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete --Gampe (talk) 18:00, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, insufficiently described abstract collage by an insignificant author. ŠJů (talk) 11:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete --Gampe (talk) 17:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. "Artistic" image by unimportant author, with misspelled Czech text in the image. ŠJů (talk) 11:08, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete --Gampe (talk) 17:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Views of bathing women, children and topless men in Angat River from General Alejo Santos Bridge
[edit]Unused redundant and uncurated images of random people swimming, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. Personality right issues as well since they were obviously not even aware of being photographed.
- File:7326Views of bathing women, children men Angat River 01.jpg
- File:7326Views of bathing women, children men Angat River 02.jpg
- File:7326Views of bathing women, children men Angat River 03.jpg
- File:7326Views of bathing women, children men Angat River 04.jpg
- File:7326Views of bathing women, children men Angat River 05.jpg
- File:7326Views of bathing women, children men Angat River 06.jpg
- File:7326Views of bathing women, children men Angat River 07.jpg
- File:7326Views of bathing women, children men Angat River 08.jpg
- File:7326Views of bathing women, children men Angat River 09.jpg
- File:7326Views of bathing women, children men Angat River 10.jpg
- File:7326Views of bathing women, children men Angat River 11.jpg
- File:7326Views of bathing women, children men Angat River 12.jpg
- File:7326Views of bathing women, children men Angat River 13.jpg
- File:7326Views of bathing women, children men Angat River 14.jpg
- File:7326Views of bathing women, children men Angat River 15.jpg
- File:7326Views of bathing women, children men Angat River 16.jpg
- File:7326Views of bathing women, children men Angat River 17.jpg
- File:7326Views of bathing women, children men Angat River 18.jpg
- File:7373Views of bathing women, children men in Angat River 01.jpg
- File:7373Views of bathing women, children men in Angat River 02.jpg
- File:7373Views of bathing women, children men in Angat River 03.jpg
- File:7373Views of bathing women, children men in Angat River 04.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 01.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 02.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 03.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 04.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 05.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 06.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 07.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 08.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 09.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 10.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 11.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 12.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 13.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 14.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 15.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 16.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 17.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 18.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 19.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 20.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 21.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 22.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 23.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 24.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 25.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 26.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 27.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 28.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 29.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 30.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 31.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 32.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 33.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 34.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 35.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 36.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 37.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 38.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 39.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 40.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 41.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 42.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 43.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 44.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 45.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 46.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 47.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 48.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 49.jpg
- File:7394Views of bathing women, children in Angat River 50.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:32, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Out of scope, also leaning towards COM:SPAM and COM:HOST. Similar case is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Judgefloro#Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 3. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:07, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:40, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused low quality photos of unidentifiable tiny blobs (supposedly pigeons) on a wire, no educational value, unusable, out of scope.
- File:02155jfBarangays EDSA Barangka Ilaya Mandaluyong Cityfvf 03.jpg
- File:7376Pigeons of the Philippines resting on overhead power lines 01.jpg
- File:7376Pigeons of the Philippines resting on overhead power lines 02.jpg
- File:7376Pigeons of the Philippines resting on overhead power lines 03.jpg
- File:7376Pigeons of the Philippines resting on overhead power lines 04.jpg
- File:7376Pigeons of the Philippines resting on overhead power lines 05.jpg
- File:7376Pigeons of the Philippines resting on overhead power lines 06.jpg
- File:7376Pigeons of the Philippines resting on overhead power lines 07.jpg
- File:7376Pigeons of the Philippines resting on overhead power lines 08.jpg
- File:7376Pigeons of the Philippines resting on overhead power lines 09.jpg
- File:7376Pigeons of the Philippines resting on overhead power lines 10.jpg
- File:7376Pigeons of the Philippines resting on overhead power lines 11.jpg
- File:7376Pigeons of the Philippines resting on overhead power lines 12.jpg
- File:9727Bustos, Bulacan Town Proper 10.jpg
- File:9727Bustos, Bulacan Town Proper 11.jpg
- File:9727Bustos, Bulacan Town Proper 12.jpg
- File:9727Bustos, Bulacan Town Proper 13.jpg
- File:9727Bustos, Bulacan Town Proper 14.jpg
- File:9727Bustos, Bulacan Town Proper 15.jpg
- File:9727Bustos, Bulacan Town Proper 16.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Leaning towards COM:SPAM and COM:HOST. Similar case is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Judgefloro#Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 3. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:04, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:40, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Very possibly not an own work; small file w/o camera EXIF but with a transmission code. E4024 (talk) 00:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation per their own website: forcaaerea.com ©2021 FOX 52 (talk) 03:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
No Photographer attributed. Anonymous but dated 1958 not < 1951 so error Victuallers (talk) 07:47, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: done by Fitindia. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
copyvio, google maps image coprighted by google Hidayatsrf (talk) 08:22, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung. Fotografin corinnaspitzbarth.de (s. EXIF-Daten) stimmt der Veröffentlichung unter CC-Lizenz nicht zu. Entsprechende Mail liegt mir vor. Pjt56 (talk) 08:32, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I can't verify that, but for a file like this with a named photographer in Exif and uncertainty if that is the uploader or not some kind of OTRS confirmation would be needed anyway. --Rosenzweig τ 11:10, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Insufficiently described abstract art by unimportant author. ŠJů (talk) 11:12, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete --Gampe (talk) 17:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, intentionally devalued low quality photo. ŠJů (talk) 11:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete --Gampe (talk) 17:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
low quality, without notability ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 11:41, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
low quality, promotional photo, without notability ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 11:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carloselabogado (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.
Minoraxtalk 13:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amine Novela (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.
- File:Amine Novela - امين نوفيلا .jpg
- File:امين نوفيلا.jpg
- File:AmineNovela.jpg
- File:Amine Novela امين.jpg
- File:امين.jpg
- File:Amine Novela.jpg
Minoraxtalk 13:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:53, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Official photo of the group, unlikely to be own work. It has 1024px resolution on Commons, while 1599px here. ~Cybularny Speak? 13:27, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yA13kYmjs0o Ytoyoda (talk) 13:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:53, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Screenshots are taken from many copyrighted news websites. I propose this file will be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 14:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. E4024 (talk) 15:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
This file is out of project scope. Commons:Project scope Also this photoshop work created with a copyrighted photo. [1]. This file will be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 14:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - DW. --E4024 (talk) 20:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
sevmedim Yeissensura (talk) 14:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Unused personal photo, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
per previous deletions - nothing has changed. Snackmurat (talk) 19:30, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:21, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nereo Bicarme (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:020Facing Opposite Directions by Nereo Bicarme.jpg
- File:023Family of Horses by Nereo Bicarme.jpg
- File:022The Horses by Nereo Bicarme.jpg
- File:021Three Flagstaff Horses by Nereo Bicarme.jpg
- File:016Two Horses by Nereo Bicarme.jpg
- File:019Solitude by Nereo Bicarme.jpg
- File:011Seize the Day by Nereo Bicarme.jpg
- File:018Sorting the Grass by Nereo Bicarme.jpg
- File:016Strolling Horse by Nereo Bicarme.jpg
- File:012Grazing Horse Painting by Nereo Bicarme.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ricardo Falcon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused images; likely out of COM:SCOPE.
Ankry (talk) 14:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:54, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:54, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flags. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Ak koyunlu.png
- File:02Babür.jpg
- File:01Osmanlı.jpg
- File:Əladı Təcrýda.png
- File:Túran bəyrağı.jpg
- File:Gökbayraq.jpg
- File:QƏRBİ AZƏRBAYCAN İRƏVAN TÜRK CÜMXURİYƏTİ BƏYRAĞI.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Landesmedienanstalt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Unknown person; not realistically useful for educational purposes; for family album JopkeB (talk) 14:47, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res image of non-notable person, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Lower res, no camera EXIF, appeared elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:Fashion and Lifestyle content creator.jpg and File:Angela Kadeedee 1.jpg are here (credited to "spacekrtve" ≠ uploader Mlisa15); File:Fashion content creator Angela Kadeedee.jpg is here (credited to "Kamau Kamau" ≠ uploader Mlisa15); File:Angela Kadeedee 4.jpg is here (credited to "tiluthecreator" ≠ uploader Mlisa15); etc.) Duck/COM:PRP issue.
- File:Stephanie a travel blogger.jpg
- File:Angela fashion blogger.jpg
- File:Kadeedee inspiration.jpg
- File:Angela Captivating.jpg
- File:Angela innovative.jpg
- File:Stephanie content creator.jpg
- File:Angela Kadeedee 4.jpg
- File:Angela Kadeedee3.jpg
- File:Angela kadeedee 2.jpg
- File:Content creator, Digital Marketer and model.jpg
- File:Fashion and Lifestyle content creator.jpg
- File:Angela Kadeedee 1.jpg
- File:Fashion content creator Angela Kadeedee.jpg
- File:Kenyan content creator Angela Kadeedee 01.jpg
- File:Angela Kadeedee.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 15:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio, 'cause in source: ВСЕ ПРАВА НА ЛЮБЫЕ МАТЕРИАЛЫ, ОПУБЛИКОВАННЫЕ НА САЙТЕ, ЗАЩИЩЕНЫ В СООТВЕТСТВИИ С РОССИЙСКИМ И МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫМ ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВОМ ОБ АВТОРСКОМ ПРАВЕ И СМЕЖНЫХ ПРАВАХ. ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕ ЛЮБЫХ АУДИО-, ФОТО- И ВИДЕОМАТЕРИАЛОВ, РАЗМЕЩЕННЫХ НА САЙТЕ, ДОПУСКАЕТСЯ ТОЛЬКО С РАЗРЕШЕНИЯ ПРАВООБЛАДАТЕЛЯ Lesless (talk) 15:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused text only image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused photoshopped image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:32, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for monuments. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Failed upload, unusable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Viiticus (talk) 19:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Aitolahti.vaakuna.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 19:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Alatornio.vaakuna.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 19:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Coat of arms of Åland.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 19:47, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Flag of Cyprus.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Just because a vector file now exists, doesn’t necessarily mean the an old 2004 upload needs to be deleted. Bidgee (talk) 00:27, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Flag of Cyprus.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Flag of Afghanistan.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:05, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:52, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Stema judetului Botosani.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:12, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:52, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Semaia tes Kyprou.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:52, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Semaia tes Kyprou.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- I don't mind it being deleted. --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 21:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:52, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Stema judetului Botosani.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:25, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:52, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Stema judetului Botosani.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:41, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:53, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Stema judetului Botosani.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:53, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Stema Calarasi.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:53, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Actual Mehedinti county CoA.png. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:53, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:RO Județul Sălaj COA.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:58, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:54, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Stema Vrancea.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:59, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:54, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Actual Iasi county CoA.png. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:54, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Mures county coat of arms.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:54, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Actual Caras-Severin county CoA.png. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:08, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:54, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:1.36 Belarusian road sign.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:O'Carroll arms.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:56, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:O'Neill.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:56, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:O'Rourke Arms.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:O Antagonista logo.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:US Navy O1 insignia.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Oakland Coffee Logo.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:25, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Oath tagline blue RGB 170221.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Oath tagline blue RGB 170221.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:27, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:58, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Oath tagline blue RGB 170221.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:28, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:58, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Symbol of Obanazawa Yamagata.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:34, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:58, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:51, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:38, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Wappen piran.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:39, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- It should bot be used any more. But usually we keep old files (Commons talk:Superseded images policy). You never know if it has been copied to a website or is used in a school book somewhere with a reference to Commons. --MGA73 (talk) 05:36, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:58, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Obdam wapen.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Flag of Obdam.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:DEU Oberau COA.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Coa Slovakia Town Kelembér.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:CoA of Obědovice.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Flag of Obědovice.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:47, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:DEU Oberbaldingen COA.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:DEU Oberbaldingen COA.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Wappen Oberachern.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:DEU Oberbexbach COA.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:DEU Oberharmersbach COA.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:52, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support, per nom. — OwenBlacker (talk; please ping me in replies) 07:17, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:DEU Oberhausen COA.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:52, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, withe the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:DEU Oberkirn COA.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:DEU Oberhausen bei Kirn COA.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:DEU Oberleichtersbach COA.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:00, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:DEU Obermoschel COA.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep:Es ist schade, zu sehen, dass einfach eine Massenlöschaktion gestartet wird. Was auch immer man damit bezwecken will... Hier wurde versäumt die Umstellung auf die Vektordatei rückgängig zu machen. Die hier verwendete Schildform ist korrekt. Fränsmer (talk) 09:37, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:DEU Oberöfflingen COA.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:DEU Oberroßbach COA.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:DEU Oberthal COA.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:07, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:03, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:DEU Oberwambach COA.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:09, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:03, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:DEU Oberzissen COA.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:03, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Flag of Occitania (with star).svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:03, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Flag of Occitania.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:03, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Coat of Arms of Obukhiv Raion.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination --Микола Василечко (talk) 04:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:04, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Emblem of Ochi, Kochi.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:04, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused file SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 03:47, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Cancelling deletion request SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 06:14, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:ONMA emblem.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:20, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:04, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:ONMA emblem.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:04, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:DEU Odert COA.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Coat of Arms of Peñafiel.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:29, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Escudo heráldico de Ohanes.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:32, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Oijen en Teeffelen wapen.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:32, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Coa Hungary Town Ököritófülpös.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:33, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Coat of arms of Haiti (1964-1986).svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:37, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:06, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Old Flag of San Marino.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:39, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - PNG files are not a sufficient reason for deletion only because a better vector file exists! --Oren neu dag (talk) 14:20, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:06, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Old main synagogue Segovia2.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 11:06, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Bruno Covas (2007).jpg Épico (talk)/(contribs) 22:25, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Was already deleted and redirected to duplicate file. --Rosenzweig τ 17:28, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely own work by uploader. More likely taken from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=up2QnW2z-aw. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:41, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE : commons is not a depository for personal creations Kathisma (talk) 22:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Bogus self/CC claim - discussion needed whether below TOO in country of origin Эlcobbola talk 14:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio suspect, same file can be found in Google image search. ■ MMXXtalk 06:34, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 00:30, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
File will no longer be used. Mirthwanna (talk) 19:58, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting as a copyvio. --Minoraxtalk 13:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
no evidence of freely available license Evaders99 (talk) 19:58, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
no evidence of freely available license Evaders99 (talk) 20:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
no evidence of freely available license Evaders99 (talk) 19:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 14:16, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Low quality image that in all likelihood isn't own work. No need to keep this image on the project. Anarchyte (talk • work) 08:05, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep In scope and in use in en:St. Xavier's Senior Secondary School, Bathinda. Tm (talk) 08:04, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Tm: It's a copyright violation: https://gyazo.com/d3e37f1f25a798c644ea65f98d443d84 from https://www.xavierbathinda.com/ Anarchyte (talk • work) 13:12, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 21:21, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Very possibly not an own work. E4024 (talk) 00:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:47, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
I'd say the globe makes it too complex to be uncopyrightable. Jonteemil (talk) 01:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- The file has been reverted to another non-bitmap globe instead so if only the bitmap globe is above the TOO a revdel should be decided upon.Jonteemil (talk) 21:02, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Both versions are complex. Taivo (talk) 09:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Hmm, isn't a 2D globe {{PD-ineligible}} since it's common knowledge? Every atlas in the world (that doesn't use satellite imagery) has literally that exact globe. It shouldn't be able to copyright that, or am I wrong?Jonteemil (talk) 19:06, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- In my opinion you are. Usually America is not depicted that way, but something like in file:LOGO OFICIAL COPA AMÉRICA PARAGUAY 1999.jpg. Do you see difference? I do. Taivo (talk) 19:13, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Yeah that map has some bit of creative licensing. --Missvain (talk) 22:10, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Discovery Kids
[edit]Above the threshold of originality.
- File:Discovery Kids (1997).png
- File:Discovery Kids (2002).png
- File:Discovery Kids Channel (1996).png
- File:Discovery Kids Channel (2002).png
- File:Discovery kids logo before 2004.png
Jonteemil (talk) 01:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:11, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Ильназ Галявиев на заседании Советского районного суда об избрании ему меры пресечения.jpg
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://sovetsky.tat.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=press_dep&op=1&did=779 , does not meet the criteria of {{PD-RU-exempt}}. SD was challenged, opening DR. See also extra text on File talk:Ильназ Галявиев на заседании Советского районного суда об избрании ему меры пресечения.jpg which did not convince me. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:59, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Well, this rule applies to the materials of the criminal case. If this photo is not specifically in the criminal case, then the norm does not apply to it, and the file must be deleted. So far, I see no reason to believe that the photo was taken as part of the investigation and is in a criminal case. = Эта норма распространяется на материалы уголовного дела. Если данной фотографии нет именно в уголовном деле, то на неё и не распространяется норма, и файл должен быть удалён. Я пока не вижу оснований считать, что фотография сделана в рамках расследования и находится в уголовном деле. Lesless (talk) 06:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Why do you think, that this rule applies only to the materials of the criminal case? Official news releases of the other Russian courts (as well as any kind of the materials taken from their official websites) are available under copyleft licence (([2] and [3])). The website of the Sovetsky district court of Kazan doesn't consist page about copyright. == Почему вы считаете, что данное правило распространяется только на метриалы уголовного дела? Официальные релизы (равно, как и друге материалы с сайтов российских судов) публикуются под свободной лицензией ([4] and [5]). Сайт Советского районного суда странички, посвешённой использовании их контента, не имеет, но ровно также он не имеет и знака копирайта --Mackavi (talk) 11:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- ...а должен иметь явное указание свободной лицензии. И это тогда не
PD-RU-exempt
. Lesless (talk) 15:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- ...а должен иметь явное указание свободной лицензии. И это тогда не
- Why do you think, that this rule applies only to the materials of the criminal case? Official news releases of the other Russian courts (as well as any kind of the materials taken from their official websites) are available under copyleft licence (([2] and [3])). The website of the Sovetsky district court of Kazan doesn't consist page about copyright. == Почему вы считаете, что данное правило распространяется только на метриалы уголовного дела? Официальные релизы (равно, как и друге материалы с сайтов российских судов) публикуются под свободной лицензией ([4] and [5]). Сайт Советского районного суда странички, посвешённой использовании их контента, не имеет, но ровно также он не имеет и знака копирайта --Mackavi (talk) 11:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Photo doesn't comply with license {{PD-RU-exempt}}. Please also look at this. ƧKΛZIобс. 12:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- I sent request to explain terms of use to Sovetsky district court of Kazan --Mackavi (talk) 13:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, you seem to have explained, but I still think that the license is incorrect. ƧKΛZIобс. 13:46, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- I sent request to explain terms of use to Sovetsky district court of Kazan --Mackavi (talk) 13:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per above, also refer to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ilnaz Galyaviev.jpg.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:11, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Is it free to upload from the given source? E4024 (talk) 03:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:11, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
If the artist of the painting, the photographer and the uploader are the same person there is no problem. What if not? I think we should ask OTRS permission for this and several other pictures by the same uploader. E4024 (talk) 03:37, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:11, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Burak Esenbey, the author, must give permission, I guess. E4024 (talk) 03:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:11, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
The skeletal diagram is under Copyright from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2021.104884 Levi bernardo (talk) 04:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Levi bernardo: That means that your image should be deleted also, as it clearly is a derivative work with no evidence of permission. Hemiauchenia (talk)
- Levi Bernardo has claimed on Wikipedia that his image is "fair use" diff, per Commons:Fair use, images uploaded under fair use should be deleted. Hemiauchenia (talk) 06:00, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:11, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Wrong aspect ratio for image and it is copyrighted 78Game (talk) 04:07, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:11, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
I marked this pic for speedy, because the person is OoS and the draft has no chances of being accepted, IMHO, judging by the sources. E4024 (talk) 04:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:11, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as Logo — billinghurst sDrewth 05:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:12, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as Logo — billinghurst sDrewth 05:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:12, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as Logo — billinghurst sDrewth 05:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:12, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as Logo — billinghurst sDrewth 05:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:12, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Calendar with photos of female entertainers in Taiwan by Shin Kong Life, at Jukui House, Taichung 20081130.jpg
[edit]Derivative work (copyrighted image on the calendar). According to the Taiwan copyright law, Article 32, the uploader must prove the death of copyright holder and also must prove that it has past 50 years after his/her death.--Kai3952 (talk) 05:07, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Outdoor or indoor? If first then {{FoP-Taiwan}}, if later, bye. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:27, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- I see no connection between COM:DW and COM:FOP Taiwan.--Kai3952 (talk) 15:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:13, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful licensing. According to the source, the illustration was published in the encyclopedia in 1989. Maxinvestigator (talk) 05:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Dear Maxinvestigator! The question is the age of the person in this photo. The year of birth of Lazar Vulfovich Berman is 1894. In 1915 he was supposed to be 21 years old, and he was already known and was a member of the literary group "Marseille Sailors". This photo may be from this period. But if these arguments are in doubt, then I will not insist. Eraevsky (talk) 06:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- The problem is not more about when the photo was taken, but when it was published. Maxinvestigator (talk) 13:43, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:13, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
no license 半島困難 (talk) 05:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: A source is listed. Please provide a valid policy-based rationale for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 22:14, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
without supply of sources 179.211.25.196 07:27, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:15, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
loaded in error its dated 1958 and needs to be before 1951 to be free Victuallers (talk) 07:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:15, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
No Photographer attributed. Anonymous but dated 1958 not < 1951 so error Victuallers (talk) 07:46, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:15, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Better version here: [6] ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 08:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 22:15, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Der Urheber des Bildes möchte der Lizenz Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 doch nicht zustimmen InaJac (talk) 10:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, copyrighted banknote, see COM:CUR United Kingdom. Verbcatcher (talk) 13:07, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:15, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Redirected image not in use anymore because SVG version exists 185.209.238.168 00:48, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: we usually don't delete PNG/SVG duplicates. --rubin16 (talk) 13:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Redirection not used. File:Fußball-Landesliga Westfalen, Logo.png should stay. Nordat (talk) 11:07, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:16, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Redirection not used. SVG stays of course Nordat (talk) 11:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:16, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Video game cover art, used in web [7], OTRS permission needed if uploader is a representative of the game studio. MKFI (talk) 11:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:16, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted cover art, OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 11:59, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:16, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Wrong license (uploader is not author), unknown license/author of avatar image, out of project scope (--> wikiquotes?) A.J. (talk) 11:59, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:16, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and it is mentioned (in Hebrew) that it was provided by a spokesperson. As in all these cases, it cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 12:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:16, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Facebook file according to EXIF data. Permission needed. ~Cybularny Speak? 12:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:18, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution professional photo, probably an official portrait of that artist (eg. [8]). Unlikely to be own work. ~Cybularny Speak? 13:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:18, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
if it is "an artist's rendering" then it isn't likely to be copyright to the person who has uploaded it as their own work. WereSpielChequers (talk) 13:07, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: in a newspaper report dated before upload here, attributed to a different author.[9] Verbcatcher (talk) 13:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:18, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution photo without EXIF data, other version existed prior to uploading. Unlikely to be own work. ~Cybularny Speak? 13:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:18, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Image quality and angle suggest this is a video screenshot, not an original photograph Ytoyoda (talk) 13:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:18, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/shenzhou mission patch
[edit]Complex logos exceeding COM:TOO China, and no evidence is provided indicating these images are from "documents of legislative, administrative and judicial nature" (or any item in {{PD-PRC-exempt}}. Government works are not automatically PD in China, unlike some other countries. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shenzhou 9 mission patch.png.
- File:Shenzhou 10 mission patch.png
- File:Shenzhou-11 mission patch.png
- File:Shenzhou 7 mission patch.png
- File:Shenzhou 6 mission patch.svg
- File:Shenzhou-10.png
- File:Shenzhou 12 insignia.png
Wcam (talk) 13:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Erick Soares3 (talk) 15:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:23, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
NoFoP-US - No Freedom of panorama in USA for sculptures JopkeB (talk) 14:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:23, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Alphaeus Philemon Cole died in 1988, so he is not dead for 70 years; violation of copyrights JopkeB (talk) 14:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:23, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
No proper description, unclear subject, unknown people, probably photo for family album, not realistically useful for educational purpose JopkeB (talk) 14:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:23, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
No proper description, unclear subject, unknown people, probably photo for family album, not realistically useful for educational purpose JopkeB (talk) 14:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:23, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
No evidence the uploader owns the copyright for the fish's design (no permission from the copyright holder). Additionally, the source of the photo is... eBay (as evidenced in EXIF). We need to be sure that the author of the fish and plaque design has placed the item in public domain, and here no such evidence is available.
Certainly, one can argue that the fish's colours and shape are the work of the Nature while the plaque has little in terms of originality. Such a discussion is, naturally, welcome in the course of the deletion procedure. — kashmīrī 14:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:23, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement 94.45.0.106 14:46, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:24, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation JopkeB (talk) 14:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:24, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Netora as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|2=https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/o/622114/ — billinghurst sDrewth 14:52, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:24, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Netora as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|2=https://design.art.nihon-u.ac.jp/works/gugiakiyama — billinghurst sDrewth 14:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:24, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded a newer verion of the seal that doesn't include the background. This version is no longer used and needs to be deleted. Jsmith0909 (talk) 14:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:24, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in San Marino and the photo violates author's copyright. Taivo (talk) 15:28, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:24, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Logo above COM:TOO P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:25, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Flag of Aerica:Svg 2A02:2F05:1209:3A00:581D:561F:D0B8:9C4C 15:58, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Where is the flag ?!!!!!! Omda4wady (talk) 18:06, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: No rationale given for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 22:25, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation Author born in 1951 and still alive Каракорум (talk) 17:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:25, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Image taken from a screenshot of a copyrighted video — MUSA (talk) 17:32, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:29, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Not uploaders own work. TinEye showing 30 matches GeorgHH • talk 17:33, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:29, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
This painting is by Nazario Montero Madrazo died in 1963 so still under copyright. It is exhibited inside the Museo Histórico Militar de Valencia, therefore {{FoP-Spain}} is not a valid reason to upload the file. Unless the user can reliably demonstrate that the work is permanently exhibited outside the museum.
- File:Franco1940-Detail MusHistMili-Valencia 20191204 398.jpg
- File:Franco1940 MusHistMili-Valencia 20191204 398.jpg
Anna (Cookie) (talk) 17:41, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support del borrado por los motivos expuestos.--Enrique Cordero (talk) 19:30, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support After re-reading {{FoP-Spain}} I must agree, my mistake. --Zenwort (talk) 12:26, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 14:49, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful lincense, uploader with numerous violations, false date of image. Kamolan (talk) 17:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:32, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful lincense, uploader with numerous violations, false date of image Kamolan (talk) 17:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:32, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
This photo was uploaded on November 17, 2020. The subject is Cladinho who plays soccer for Bragantino in Brazil. This photo was published on the team's Twitter feed on February 3, 2020. This 2019 article credits "Ari Ferreira" as photographer. Thuresson (talk) 18:09, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:33, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Possible Copyright violation. No FoP for 3D artwork in USA unless this is sufficiently old to be public domain. Unless we can date the sculpture (anyone?) I think we should err on the side of caution and delete. Headlock0225 (talk) 18:12, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:33, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded on March 11, 2021 and claimed to be a photo from June 2, 2020. This photo was published on fashion designer et:Gerli A. Chantelles Instagram feed on June 23, 2019. This Commons user has only contributed photos relating to Gerli Chantelle. Thuresson (talk) 18:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:33, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Probably a screenshot of the video delivered for a fee, not in the public domain.[10] Poplist (talk) 18:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:33, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Yves Hervochon died in 2020. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:A481:C98B:F8FB:6DF3 18:59, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:33, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Yves Hervochon died in 2020. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:A481:C98B:F8FB:6DF3 19:00, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:33, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Artwork dated 1984. No OTRS. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:A481:C98B:F8FB:6DF3 19:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:33, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
File is on wikipedia with a rationale notice: File:Seal of Southfield, Michigan.svg WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 19:20, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:36, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
File is on wikipedia with rationale: File:Flag of Southfield, Michigan WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 19:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:37, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
most probably also copy vio. already four deleted chaplin images from this account. JD {æ} 19:22, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, and in peace; her cat is full of pics. --E4024 (talk) 19:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:37, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Trademarked WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 19:22, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:37, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fantasy election map, outside of project scope. Hog Farm (talk) 20:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:37, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Uploader requested. A proper SVG version of this image now exists as File:Hong Kong road sign 132.svg. Fry1989 eh? 21:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:37, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lolamompinmacias (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
Didym (talk) 21:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Also please add to nomination File:Josep_Nadal,_Pepín_Nadal.jpg by same uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:10, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 21:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @Didym: , may I ask you why do you think the image ElieKayo.jpg is unlikely to have been taken by @Leoka2602: ? and how can she prove you it is a picture taken by her, from an original print of a picture also taken by her? Thank you in advance and warmest regards, Galahmm (talk) 18:52, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- I expect Leoka2602 might submit a OTRS ticket to confirm the picture's ownership. Moumou82 (talk) 21:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:ElieKayo.jpg” under ticket:2021052510012034. --Mussklprozz (talk) 11:23, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS accepted. --Missvain (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Not used anywhere, no notable person by that name, no encyclopedic value. ···日本穣Talk to Nihonjoe 21:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
collague without sources Ezarateesteban 22:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Fake SVG + deleted from original repository Thomas Linard (talk) 22:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Lower res, no EXIF, all user uploads this subject matter COM:NETCOPYVIOs taken from social media (e.g., File:American Bully Classic Male.jpg is a variant of this; File:American Bully Male.jpg is a variant of this; File:American Bully Stud.jpg and File:Lilac Tri American Bully.jpg are variants of this and this). COM:PRP issue.
- File:American Bully Classic Male.jpg
- File:American Bully Male.jpg
- File:American Bully Stud.jpg
- File:Lilac Tri American Bully.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 22:17, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:American Bully Stud.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021051810012066. --shizhao (talk) 03:43, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:American Bully Stud.jpg” under ticket:2021051810012066. --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:15, 21 May 2021 (UTC)- Withdrawn. There remains an open question, which needs to be clarified within the ticket. --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:45, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
very nice photo but unuseful without description nor categories, where is that place? Ezarateesteban 22:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:45, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
not own work, unknown source FleurDeOdile (talk) 22:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Delete– Probably not his own work (the image quality is also just plain awful). LightandDark2000 (talk) 02:26, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- Withdrawing. However, the listed "author" is still incorrect (it obviously isn't the uploader). LightandDark2000 (talk) 04:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete – clearly not own work. HurricaneEdgar 12:23, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @LightandDark2000 and HurricaneEdgar: The user has provided the correct source and license. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Keeping for now. If you find another reason to nominate, feel free. --Missvain (talk) 22:46, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful lincense, uploader with numerous violations, false date of image. Kamolan (talk) 17:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:32, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful lincense, uploader with numerous violations, false date of image. Kamolan (talk) 17:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:32, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful lincense, uploader with numerous violations, false date of image Kamolan (talk) 17:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:32, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful lincense, uploader with numerous violations, false date of image Kamolan (talk) 17:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:32, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Small file w/o camera EXIF but with transmission code, uploaded by a one-time-only visitor as "own work". Probably it was taken from social media. If the uploader can see this, they should resort to OTRS. BTW we have another pic of the subject, although from behind: File:Rodin Alper Bingöl.jpg E4024 (talk) 16:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Missvain at 22:25, 4 June 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rodin alper bingöl.jpg --Krdbot 01:56, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
copyright not visible on source Vincentvikram (talk) 15:37, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Racconish at 08:44, 9 June 2021 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 13:53, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Own work? From which year? Why is the file so tiny? E4024 (talk) 00:28, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Ich war mit der Tübinger Jugenkantorei 1960, 1961, 1962 und 1963 auf Singwochen in dem Pfingstferien im Kloster Maulbronn (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kloster_Maulbronn) und habe dort zusammen mit meinem Zwillingsbruder Klaus (https://kilchb.de/klausmohr/index.php) fotografiert. Auf einem Bild dirigiert Walter Kiefner die Kantorei. Aus diesem größerem Bild habe ich Walter Kiefner für Wikipedia herausgeschnitten. --Joachim Mohr (talk) 08:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:56, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as Unfree Flickr file (Unfree Flickr file) and the most recent rationale was: Unfree — billinghurst sDrewth 05:17, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - The Flickr image is ARR and is a derivative work itself, so this is doubly bad. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
L'artiste est morte il y a moins de 70 ans Le Paragone (talk) 08:34, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:58, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Nigel PG Dale
[edit]- File:The well-used Patera Building - the original prototype manufactured in Stoke-on-Trent.jpg
- File:Patera Building Stoke-on-Trent 1982.jpg
- File:The Patera Building Prototype Forty Years On.jpg
- File:Patera Structure Graphic.jpg
Incorrect authors are specified, and there is no evidence that the authors have agreed to the CC-BY-SA-4.0 license assigned to these files.
See the discussion at w:en:User talk:Nigel PG Dale#Images on Patera Building.
- The discussion linked above describes this as "taken in October 2020 by Colin Pugh, a lecturer at Manchester University School of Architecture. He has given, in writing, his permission to use his image."
- The discussion linked above says this is "one of hundreds given out in a press-release pack to coincide with the 1981 Interbuild Exhibition at the NEC. It was produced by the Longton Industrial Holdings Plc Publicity Dept with the express intention that it should be published." This does not indicate a free license.
- The file description indicates "provided by Mark Whitby". This is confirmed in the discussion linked above which says that "it appears in the Publication Building with Steel" and that the uploader has Mark Whitby's permission to use it.
The uploader states that they have permission from the authors to use three of the images. However, this does not mean that the authors have agreed to the CC-BY-SA-4.0 license. These licenses need to be confirmed using the COM:OTRS system. --Verbcatcher (talk) 12:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete (Sorry, I'm not sure if this is how you're meant to !vote on Commons, but...) I queried this a month ago, as seen in the talk page discussion linked to above, but didn't really get anywhere, and nothing seems to have changed in the intervening time. I also commented out the images, pending clarification, but one was subsequently de-commented, and I didn't want to get into an edit war. The 'evidence' for these being copyright violations is mostly circumstantial, granted, but conversely I've not seen anything to substantiate the claim that the necessary rights have been obtained; therefore I would rather err on the side of caution and delete the images, than take any risks. Best, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:41, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:00, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Author: John Zich / Copyright holder: ©2017 photo by John Zich What can I add here? E4024 (talk) 19:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 07:23, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of a copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC) お世話になります。 この画像については、店に展示されていたものであり、撮影の許可は取りましたが、作者からの掲載許可はいただいておりません。ですので、方針に従い、削除に同意いたします。すみませんでした。Miyuki hirai (talk) 01:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:50, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Taken from a website using its own license ("OpenMB") which I'm not sure if consistent with CC BY-SA 3.0. Specifically, it requires attribution to: "the Government of Manitoba, licensed under the OpenMB" Dovno (talk) 09:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Created and added "Template:OpenMB License". . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:42, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement 94.45.0.106 14:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
copyright https://twitter.com/SaniMhm Remy34 (talk) 16:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Je suis désolée pour le fichier supprimé. Je fais confiance à la communauté et m'excuse de mon erreur car je pensais qu'une photo de profil Twitter pouvait tomber dans l'espace public. Je ne sais pas trop bien comment faire avec les droits de photo, c'est pour cela que j'avais coché la phrase "je ne suis pas sûre pour les droits". Merci :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fifionwiki (talk • contribs) 14:56, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Racconish. --Gbawden (talk) 12:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
EXIF sagt: Urheber ist "HUBERTUS HAMM". Uploaderin "EmmaWolff" ist jedoch Werksstudentin der Goldkammer und behauptet, sie wäre Urheber. Sieht somit nach URV aus Jbergner (talk) 09:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- evtl der Fotograf und Fotokünstler w:de:Hubertus Hamm? --Jbergner (talk) 09:32, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 11:31, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Der Grundstückseigentümer wünscht die Löschung. Bodo Kubrak (talk) 14:00, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not after 5 years. --Rosenzweig τ 11:32, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pinoy Wikipedian Pride as Fair use (Non-free use rationale) and the most recent rationale was: logo | Article = iWant TFC | Use = Product | Description = Logo of iWant TFC | Source = iWant TFC Facebook page | Date = 2020-09-01 | Owner = ABS-CBN Corporation | Low_resolution = Yes — billinghurst sDrewth 14:46, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Unsupported license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:07, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as Logo — billinghurst sDrewth 05:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:50, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 20:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Недопустимость ВП:ОРИСС. Нужны опубликованные источники, либо чертежи, которые вы перерисовали. Kursant504 (talk) 04:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, assuming not an own drawing, no comment of uploader, deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 21:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Недопустимость ВП:ОРИСС. Нужны опубликованные источники, либо чертежи, которые вы перерисовали. Kursant504 (talk) 04:17, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, assuming not an own drawing, no comment of uploader, deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 21:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
То, что фото находится в семейном архиве не означает, что вы имеете на него авторские права. Авторские права принадлежат фотографу, если нет документов об ином. Kursant504 (talk) 04:32, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (photo from family album, unknown photographer). --Ellywa (talk) 21:14, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Историческое фото, судя по всему из какого-то наставления, не может быть собственной работой. Если же вы являетесь автором, то требуется разрешение через OTRS. Kursant504 (talk) 04:34, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, A historical photo, apparently from some kind of instruction, cannot be your own work. If you are the author, then permission is required. Uploader did not comment. --Ellywa (talk) 21:15, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Недопустимость ВП:ОРИСС. Нужны опубликованные источники, либо чертежи, которые вы перерисовали/дополнили. Kursant504 (talk) 04:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nonsense DR, please speedy close. --05:34, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Own work with Inkscape. You will not find an original image. Please close this unjustified request. --Hedwig Klawuttke (talk) 23:33, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per explanation of uploader. --Ellywa (talk) 21:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Явно ложно указано авторство: изображён автор, и это точно не селфи, а профессиональное фото -- Tomasina (talk) 06:00, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Translated: The authorship is clearly falsely indicated: the author is depicted, and this is definitely not a selfie, but a professional photo. --Ellywa (talk) 21:17, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Missing permission from TSE A1Cafel (talk) 06:05, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, insufficient clarity about authors/source. Uploader did not explain situation. --Ellywa (talk) 21:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Файл не используется негде. Собственник файла хочет удалить его. Ppjev (talk) 08:22, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, probably copyrighted document of unclear origin. --Ellywa (talk) 21:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Template:Db-filecopyvio Ppjev (talk) 08:29, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, twice nominated. --Ellywa (talk) 21:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Файл не используется негде. Собственник файла хочет удалить его. Ppjev (talk) 08:25, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, probably copyrighted document of unclear origin. --Ellywa (talk) 21:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Template:Db-filecopyvio Ppjev (talk) 08:28, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, probably copyrighted document of unclear origin. --Ellywa (talk) 21:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF, uploaded by a one-time visitor, as "own work". The file is in use but we have two other images of the subject with OTRS, therefore this will not be a loss. Another DR on the file (although with another file name) was opened today but closed before I could see it and contribute to the discussion. We have a talk about this on Admin Geagea's TP. I would like them to join this discussion if they wish so. OTOH, I kindly ask help from User:Verbcatcher who tried hard -in vain- to teach me how to search for previously published files on the net. E4024 (talk) 15:12, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Above I wrote "one-time visitor" as they had only one upload, but that is due to the fact that their previous uploads were all deleted. --E4024 (talk) 15:17, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, please be clear what the basis of your nomination is. If you are nominating as a suspected copyright violation then the existence of other pictures of the subject on Commons is not relevant. The Hebrew Wikipedia article on the subject at w:he:עודד פז establishes that this file has an educational purpose. I looked with Tin Eye and with Google Images and did not find any indication that this file was copied from a website. This does not look like a publicity photo, and its composition is consistent with a photograph taken at a press conference or other public meeting. It was initially uploaded to Hebrew Wikipedia, where the contributor has made a few other edits over several years.[11] The smallish size and lack of metadata are insufficient reasons to conclude that this is a probable copyright violation. (If you want Geagea to contribute here then you should link their user name ( e.g. with @Geagea: ). Verbcatcher (talk) 16:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for running to answer my call. No need to ping Geagea because the file has been edited by Admin Geagea, therefore must be in their watchlist, and we two spoke about this probable DR. I could have pinged another admin, User:Sreejithk2000, who opened Commons:Deletion requests/File:Oded paz (2).jpg and said "Web resolution. Possible copyright infringement. Please confirm ownership." That also made me more suspicious about this file. --E4024 (talk) 17:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, please be clear what the basis of your nomination is. If you are nominating as a suspected copyright violation then the existence of other pictures of the subject on Commons is not relevant. The Hebrew Wikipedia article on the subject at w:he:עודד פז establishes that this file has an educational purpose. I looked with Tin Eye and with Google Images and did not find any indication that this file was copied from a website. This does not look like a publicity photo, and its composition is consistent with a photograph taken at a press conference or other public meeting. It was initially uploaded to Hebrew Wikipedia, where the contributor has made a few other edits over several years.[11] The smallish size and lack of metadata are insufficient reasons to conclude that this is a probable copyright violation. (If you want Geagea to contribute here then you should link their user name ( e.g. with @Geagea: ). Verbcatcher (talk) 16:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Oded paz (2).jpg was just 249 × 186 file, much smaller than this file. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:47, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- The depicted subject is in scope. The issue is copyright. The file first uploaded by אביגילאפין in February 2018. low resolution was uploaded by Zvikorn in October 2019. The last one was nominated for deletion her. The file was redirected to the original file and the DR closed. Zvikorn upload the file as a new version to File:Oded paz.jpg which I reverted. User Zvikorn and אביגילאפין did not uploaded files to he.wiki.
- when I saw the file I tried to find it elsewhere in the net but couldn't find nothing so I leave it. I don't have strong opinion her. Any decision is ok to me. -- Geagea (talk) 22:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Oded paz (2).jpg was just 249 × 186 file, much smaller than this file. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:47, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hello guys, wanted to mention my take here. The file deleted mentioned in @E4024: reply to this thread was deleted very quickly due to it being a copy of this file. This file is a up to date picture of the subject of the article and is in use. Zvikorn (talk) 16:44, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- We know that it is being used; that is why I mentioned that there are other files with OTRS to replace this one. Do you know anything regarding the copyrights of this photo? To be or not to be, that is the question. E4024 (talk) 16:48, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader did not comment since may 2021. --Ellywa (talk) 21:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Ich habe versehentlich mich als Autor des Bildes angegeben. Es sind jedoch nur Scanns von Bildern. Mir wurde nur das Okay gegeben sie zu Veröffentlichen, ich bin nicht die Autorin der Bilder. BauSar95 (talk) 17:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Von wem wurde das okay gegeben? Stadt- und Kreisarchiv Paderborn, S – M 4? Wer ist der Urheber bzw. wer hat das Urheberrecht inne? Gibt es Informationen dazu wer das Foto gemacht hat und wann? Wann wurde das Bild veröffentlicht? Hekerui (talk) 10:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader says they are not the owner of the copyright. --Ellywa (talk) 21:27, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Ich habe versehentlich angeben die Autorin des Bildes zu sein. Das Bild ist nur ein Scann, den ich veröffentlichen durfte. BauSar95 (talk) 17:07, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader says they are not the owner of the copyright. --Ellywa (talk) 21:27, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Heinrich Dolle in seinem Arbeitszimmer 1932, laut Beschriftung „bei der Reisevorbereitung".jpg
[edit]Ich habe versehentlich angeben die Autorin des Bildes zu sein. Das Bild ist nur ein Scann, den ich veröffentlichen durfte. BauSar95 (talk) 17:08, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader says they are not the owner of the copyright. --Ellywa (talk) 21:27, 3 January 2022 (UTC)