Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/03/21
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Illegal content. JPxG (talk) 05:38, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deleted per nom. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright infringement from [1] Gahukuro (talk) 06:21, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete all his/her uploads as copyvios. Taivo (talk) 07:17, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
This image is copied from magazine. Gahukuro (talk) 06:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete all his/her uploads as copyvios. Taivo (talk) 07:15, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright infringement from[2] Gahukuro (talk) 06:45, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete all his/her uploads as copyvios. Taivo (talk) 07:13, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
User:WikiAbuHuraira WikiAbuHuraira (talk) 03:03, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Own user space. --Achim (talk) 10:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
si Jose influencer (talk) 07:08, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request & OOS. --Achim (talk) 11:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Not a real user. All conts on userpage. E4024 (talk) 03:15, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:12, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Rubin16 as no source (No source since) Трифонов Андрей (talk) 14:08, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
The source is Wikimapia, it is indicated from the moment of loading and was there when you created the alert. Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 covers all Wikimapia imagery --Трифонов Андрей (talk) 14:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: fixed now, thanks to the uploader. --rubin16 (talk) 14:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright Vio CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:10, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 17:48, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
mistake pic Prabina16 (talk) 15:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
mistake please Prabina16 (talk) 15:59, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:23, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
I want upload a new file for this file Hrahaei (talk) 17:19, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
This inappropriate gif will not help the IP address 98.245.190.43 get unblocked from editing Wikipedia. CokesBucks (talk) 19:00, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1) + Content intended as vandalism (G3). --Эlcobbola talk 19:03, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
wrong copyright Ilikeballoonss (talk) 21:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 21:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Possibly out of scope, the images within the file would need to be sourced, and vetted for free license. Zppix (talk) 21:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:19, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marco56333 (talk · contribs)
[edit]I do not believe these images are freely licensed as they mostly appear to be screenshots, and there are no sources stating they are freely licensed. It is also hard to believe that these would be the uploader's own work.
Zppix (talk) 21:41, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:19, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marco56333 (talk · contribs)
[edit]screenshot, not cc-by-sa
shizhao (talk) 02:14, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marco56333 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like Commons:License laundering.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per above. COM:OTRS permission is needed. SCP-2000 14:16, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, no metadata. The user has already uploaded someone else's photos in violation of copyright. Lesless (talk) 17:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Well-Informed Optimist at 19:54, 21 März 2021 UTC: Content created as advertisement (G10) --Krdbot 03:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, no metadata. The user has already uploaded someone else's photos in violation of copyright. Lesless (talk) 17:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Well-Informed Optimist at 19:54, 21 März 2021 UTC: Content created as advertisement (G10) --Krdbot 03:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, no metadata. The user has already uploaded someone else's photos in violation of copyright. Lesless (talk) 17:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Well-Informed Optimist at 19:54, 21 März 2021 UTC: Content created as advertisement (G10) --Krdbot 03:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, no metadata. The user has already uploaded someone else's photos in violation of copyright. Lesless (talk) 17:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Well-Informed Optimist at 19:54, 21 März 2021 UTC: Content created as advertisement (G10) --Krdbot 03:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, no metadata. The user has already uploaded someone else's photos in violation of copyright. Lesless (talk) 17:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Well-Informed Optimist at 19:54, 21 März 2021 UTC: Content created as advertisement (G10) --Krdbot 03:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, no metadata. The user has already uploaded someone else's photos in violation of copyright. Lesless (talk) 17:06, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Well-Informed Optimist at 19:54, 21 März 2021 UTC: Content created as advertisement (G10) --Krdbot 03:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright watermark on the file. E4024 (talk) 12:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; pcp. --Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Photographer's name on the image. E4024 (talk) 20:50, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Gbawden, maybe you will speedy this, if it is a "deleted file re-uploaded" case; I do not remember the image. --E4024 (talk) 20:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; speedy as a copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Fake own work. E4024 (talk) 14:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- *Delete appears to be an oft created file that is not own work and requires permissions Timtrent (talk) 08:15, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 17:39, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
While given the author's username, they likely own copyright and can license this photo, this isn't in scope - no educational use. Elli (talk) 22:15, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted per nomination. No original meta data, no indication on linked source that the image is properly licensed. If the uploader would like to confirm permission, please see COM:CONSENT. --GMGtalk 16:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: Raw text, non notable document Headlock0225 (talk) 23:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Low chemical quality (incorrect geometry at "C", missing stereochemistry at ring-attachment). Category:Proline (and Category:L-Proline subcat thereof) have high quality images in a variety of formats and styles. DMacks (talk) 05:17, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I would propose File:Prolin - Proline.svg as proper replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:13, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Incorrectly-named not-quite-visual-duplicate of File:Mn2(CO)10.png, which is correctly named and uploaded moments later by same uploader. DMacks (talk) 15:57, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Agree, delete. I am going to replace the updated one too.--Smokefoot (talk) 20:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom & in consent with the original author. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 13:55, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:18, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
duplicate better version (Salzwanderweg 11.jpg) exists -- sarang♥사랑 16:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC) {{Speedy|Uploaders request: duplicate}}
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 19:10, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
No indication of consent; per the metadata and the image itself, taken with a 300mm lens from a VERY long distance away. Creepy and sad! JPxG (talk) 01:49, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete no good reason to keep this creepshot. Elli (talk) 01:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
No indication of consent; per the metadata and the image itself, taken with a 300mm lens from a VERY long distance away. Creepy and sad! JPxG (talk) 01:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
No indication of consent; per the metadata and the image itself, taken with a 300mm lens from a VERY long distance away. Creepy and sad! JPxG (talk) 01:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete no good reason to keep this creepshot. Elli (talk) 01:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:14, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Converting to a batch nomination, per some discussion I had with the fellas about the best way to do this:
- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 03.jpg
- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 04.jpg
- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 05.jpg
- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 06.jpg
- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 07.jpg
- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 08.jpg
- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 09.jpg
- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 10.jpg
- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 11.jpg
- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 12.jpg
- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 13.jpg
File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 14.jpg(already nominated above)- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 15.jpg
- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 16.jpg
- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 17.jpg
- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 18.jpg
- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 19.jpg
- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 20.jpg
- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 21.jpg
- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 22.jpg
- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 23.jpg
- File:Central Park Bikini Sunbather 24.jpg
No indication of consent; per the metadata and the image itself, taken with telephoto lenses (300mm, 200mm, etc) from a VERY long distance away. Creepy and sad! There is zero encyclopedic utility to these images: we have plenty of photos of asses that were taken with consent. JPxG (talk) 01:53, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- I'm the uploader and I'm fine with the deletion of the above and all other related images. I hadn't considered the consent/privacy implications at the time of the upload. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:36, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per the above. E4024 (talk) 16:38, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:14, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused and inaccurate compared to File:NZ House of Representatives November 2020 Map.png Elli (talk) 02:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:14, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
probable advertisment Ciaurlec (talk) 02:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
probable advertisment Ciaurlec (talk) 02:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Insufficient information about background images. There is some information in the description about the background images, but it's not sufficent to establish their copyright status. File may also be out of COM:SCOPE. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Low-quality depiction of nudity. Elli (talk) 02:41, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and for dubious own work. Small png file w/o EXIF, uploaded by a one-time-only visitor. --E4024 (talk) 22:12, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
see description Commons:Project scope Commons is not private photo album - All located on the publisher's user page wp-pt - see Global file usage or file name O revolucionário aliado (talk) 03:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
see description Commons:Project scope Commons is not private photo album - All located on the publisher's user page wp-pt - see Global file usage or file name O revolucionário aliado (talk) 03:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: Restored this one because it's a photo of Hospital Psiquiátrico São Pedro, in Porto Alegre, in its abandoned state, so it's obviously on scope. It was also nominated by a well known LTA.-- Darwin Ahoy! 21:27, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
see description Commons:Project scope Commons is not private photo album - All located on the publisher's user page wp-pt - see Global file usage or file name O revolucionário aliado (talk) 03:03, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
see description Commons:Project scope Commons is not private photo album - All located on the publisher's user page wp-pt - see Global file usage or file name O revolucionário aliado (talk) 03:03, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
see description Commons:Project scope Commons is not private photo album - All located on the publisher's user page wp-pt - see Global file usage or file name O revolucionário aliado (talk) 03:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Eaterjolly
[edit]- File:Big applejack is soaring in the air with magic by xbi dbzf1y9.jpg
- File:Sphinx and somnambula pony by xbi dbszlx8.jpg
- File:Twilight sparkle and hydra by xbi dc0yfok.jpg
- File:Derpy and large muffin by xbi dazthmc.jpg
- File:Mugiwaras vs crisis by karbo d137okx.jpg
Violates COM:Fanart for being too similar to the original copyrighted material. --PrincessPandaWiki (talk) 03:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Agree Finding the license excited me too much. I failed to acknowledge the upstream source. Eaterjolly (talk) 04:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
I did an oopsie woopsie and forgot to read the date carefully, this isn't PD-USGOV because he hadn't been elected at the time of the photo. JPxG (talk) 05:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:19, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Glumblebum (talk · contribs)
[edit]Broken SVG (text labels do not display). Have File:L-Aspartate-4-semialdehyde.png as high-quality (albeit raster) of this substance.
DMacks (talk) 05:15, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:20, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
File:-transgender pride includes An amazing leader in our nation's capital @casarubyDC (14206275045).jpg
[edit]Out of scope; photo of someone we don't have an article on and no clear other use Elli (talk) 05:15, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Please take more care with deletion requests on LGBTQ subjects. Commons does not delete photographs because an article about the subject has not appeared on a sister project. This is Ruby Corado, the founder of Casa Ruby a charitable organization supporting "transgender women of color". The clue was right there in the filename, had you been bothered to google it before pressing the delete link. --Fæ (talk) 11:50, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep obviously on scope, as stated above.-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - Photo subject does have an article on English Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_Corado POLITANVM talk 12:16, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:19, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ASHFAK COYON (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Non notable person and seem self promotion.
SCP-2000 05:18, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:20, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ASHFAK COYON (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Non notable company and spam.
SCP-2000 05:21, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:20, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
uploaded for advertising purposes, unlikely to be own work, abused in advertising items on Wikidata
- File:Kyranford3.jpg
- File:Kyranford1.jpg
- File:Kyranford.jpg
- File:Kyranford2.jpg
- File:Sohailshamsudeen200.jpg
- File:Sohailshamsudeen12.jpg
- File:Soohailshamsudeen.jpg
- File:Sohailshamsudeennn.jpg
- File:Sohailshamsudeen.jpg
- File:Igbalode.jpg
- File:Nutone.png
- File:Torontoregsa.jpg
- File:Delroywilliams.jpg
Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 00:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
I did not realize this image falls under copyright protection Stickerkitty (talk) 18:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Ticket:2021031510010915 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 21:00, 18 March 2021 (UTC)- Falls under freedom of panorama according to German legislation --Mussklprozz (talk) 07:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
I didn't realize these works are protected by copyright. Stickerkitty (talk) 15:59, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- By OTRS correspondence with @Stickerkitty. FoP Germany does not apply --Mussklprozz (talk) 20:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as a photo of multiple copyrighted stickers. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, there is freedom of panorama in Germany, but one of the stickers is derivative work of copyrighted photo. Taivo (talk) 11:01, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
I find this image of our President watching some kind of Japanese cartoon pornography to be offensive. I believe it violates Commons policy on Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. Mo Billings (talk) 17:21, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipe-tan is not "Japanese cartoon pornography" and the image is meant for humor. Perhaps the description that the image is a meme, and not real, should be clearer, but I don't see this inherently violating any Commons policies. Elli (talk) 22:08, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Im in agreement for keeping, this file is meant to be funny, and as far as I can tell doesn’t violate any policies. Zppix (talk) 21:25, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- What is funny about showing America's greatest President looking at Japanese porn? Mo Billings (talk) 23:06, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose deletion. This was made in good faith, does not defame Former President Trump, and is public domain. I see no reason for deletion as of policy. Sennecaster (talk) 01:17, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:35, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Nominating as the prior deletion rationale was mistaken. This is not an IDENT failure but it does very specifically fail COM:NOTHOST. This is a user created pointy image created to deride Wikimedia Commons, proving a point made during a discussion on Jimmy Wales' talk page. It is out of scope and has negative educational value.
It also creates a hostile environment, per COM:BP, and threatens to create a trend of every possible politician or public figure having their image manipulated to be watching cartoons or other sexualized depictions of children. There are only bad and damaging reasons for hosting user-created rubbish like this.
Reminder, this is not a popularity vote. The last DR had an "unusual" selection of contributors, apparently for some this was the only DR they have ever contributed to, and in some cases was made part of their first 10 edits to this project. That's not a good look for any discussion, let alone a deletion process. Fæ (talk) 09:44, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per Fæ: out of the scope, no educational value. — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:44, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Humour is subjective and we all find different things funny .... but I draw the line at Trump looking at a sexualised drawing of a child. (there's nothing funny about it). Humour aside there's no educational value here either. Also apparently there were child porn issues here years ago so it doesn't exactly give us a good look does it ?. –Davey2010Talk 11:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment When I questioned the closure of the original deletion request, I was told by two admins that this image did not violate COM:PEOPLE's requirement that "Images must not unfairly ridicule or demean the subject". Although the stated deletion rationale is COM:NOTHOST, this still seems to be a discussion about the use of someone's image in a derivative composite image that associates the image subject with whatever the image maker chooses (good or bad). This is a larger issue than just this one image. Mo Billings (talk) 15:44, 8 April 2021 (UTC)- Comment this image was not created to deride Wikimedia Commons. However, it apparently has caused quite some controversy so I don't object to it being deleted, but please assume good faith. There was nothing pointy about this image. Elli (talk) 16:31, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- I do assume good faith on you and am astonished by the level of tolerance in Commons. I have seen here heads of state depicted as animals (of course very disturbing and -IMHO- unacceptable, because insults all the country); in comparison to those things this is smt simply to smile at and walk away. My two cents w/o any "votes". E4024 (talk) 19:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- There a huge gap between Commons hosting user (Wikimedian) created fantasies and hosting externally published works. --Fæ (talk) 19:06, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per Commons:Project_scope#File_in_use_on_Commons_only and {{Userpageimage}} we allow users to have a small number of files to use on their own user page. --MGA73 (talk) 19:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- On which of the uploader's user pages is this in use on? Perhaps it was removed in between this comment and when I looked? — Rhododendrites talk | 21:44, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- I've removed the picture at this point. I'm tired of this and would rather the image be deleted honestly, I didn't anticipate this much drama nor am I interested in partaking. Elli (talk) 03:26, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- On which of the uploader's user pages is this in use on? Perhaps it was removed in between this comment and when I looked? — Rhododendrites talk | 21:44, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
vduploader is fine with deletion, out of COM:SCOPE, etc. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:44, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Fine? No uploader is tired of users that goes on and on and on... Personally I think time would be spend on something better than trying to censor other users userpages. --MGA73 (talk) 08:08, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hmmm. Understanding the context, I've struck my delete vote. While I think there are mild COM:PEOPLE concerns for creating fictional images like this, making it seem like someone -- even a public figure -- is looking at something they're not, I don't have a strong opinion on that in this case. abstaining now — Rhododendrites talk | 13:16, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Fine? No uploader is tired of users that goes on and on and on... Personally I think time would be spend on something better than trying to censor other users userpages. --MGA73 (talk) 08:08, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I think Fæ got this wrong. The file was created for the uploaders own userpage. Then another user tried to get the file deleted probably because the user felt it would make Trump look bad and when that did not work that other user made a File:President Donald J Trump looking at Japanese cartoon pornography.png to prove a point. When that did not work either that other user went to Jimbo's talk page to try again. This is just for the record so we get this right. --MGA73 (talk) 08:20, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the correction to the order of events. It remains a good example of why COM:NOTHOST ought to be enforced a bit more rigorously. Though some selfies are useful for Wikimedians on their user pages, as would be their photos at Wikimedia events, self-made fictional and non-educational works, especially political attacks, or dubious "jokes", should remain out of scope and be subject to housekeeping deletions. --Fæ (talk) 17:05, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Well I don't think its an attack. The file was only used on a user page and I doubt more than a few users would have ever seen it if it was not for Mo.
- And about porn. If a girl in a bikini is porn then many women are porn models. Personally I think it would offend most women if we call them porn models just because they wear a bikini. But thats my last comment from me in this discussion. I think we spend too much time on it allready. --MGA73 (talk) 19:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Agree it's not porn, but it is a sexualized depiction of a teenage girl and the nomination mentioned a hostile environment but not an attack. As a Wikimedian self-created fantasy, it should be a NOTHOST failure. If not, we should probably think of revising that text to be a bit more than using the one example of selfies. --Fæ (talk) 19:49, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- (not really about this image, but) I don't think we need a super strict enforcement of NOTHOST against people who actually are active contributors. Like if someone takes a lot of pictures and wants to upload a few with iffy educational use, I don't see the harm. Elli (talk) 20:36, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Agree it's not porn, but it is a sexualized depiction of a teenage girl and the nomination mentioned a hostile environment but not an attack. As a Wikimedian self-created fantasy, it should be a NOTHOST failure. If not, we should probably think of revising that text to be a bit more than using the one example of selfies. --Fæ (talk) 19:49, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:56, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE and, considering the username of the uploader, self-promotion. Ahmadtalk 21:55, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete fyi this can be speedy-deleted as an F10 (personal photos of non-contributors). Elli (talk) 22:34, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:35, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Botan Dalmis is the subject of the photograph thus he is unlikely to be the author or copyright-holder. Needs permission from the actual photographer via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:50, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Elcobbola at 21:43, 30 März 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 02:25, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Arzu Bagirova is the subject of the photograph thus she is unlikely to be the author or copyright-holder. Needs permission from the actual photographer via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Elcobbola at 21:43, 30 März 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 02:25, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Non notable company and person. Seem spam.
SCP-2000 05:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:49, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
All these images in this category are redundant to Category:Subic-Clark-Tarlac Expressway (Dau, Mabalacat - Concepcion, Tarlac section). Images under their wrong file names (do not depict NLEX and instead depict the Mabalacat - Concepcion, Tarlac segment of SCTEX), and the category itself is invalid (NLEX doesn't extend to Tarlac City). While renaming all these file names may help, these will end up as redundant to numerous images already hosted at Category:Subic-Clark-Tarlac Expressway (Dau, Mabalacat - Concepcion, Tarlac section). All are also COM:NOTUSED, except one (File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 41.jpg) which is in use and shall be moved to the proper category and renamed appropriately.
- File:104North Luzon Expressway 01.jpg
- File:104North Luzon Expressway 02.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 02.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 04.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 05.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 07.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 08.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 10.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 11.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 12.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 13.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 14.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 15.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 16.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 17.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 18.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 19.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 20.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 21.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 22.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 23.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 24.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 25.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 26.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 27.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 28.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 29.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 30.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 31.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 32.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 33.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 34.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 35.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 36.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 37.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 38.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 39.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 40.jpg
- File:DSCN0098North Luzon Expressway 42.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:18, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
OOS, no COM:EDUSE Achim (talk) 08:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Posters, permission needed, please see COM:OTRS.
- File:Plakat KUNST UND DRAMA Miles Davis.jpg
- File:KUNST UND DRAMA Nebeltanz.jpg
- File:Plakat von KUNST UND DRAMA zu OFFE.jpg
- File:Plakat KUNST UND DRAMA NÜRNBERG-NATUR.jpg
- File:Plakat KUNST UND DRAMA Ausstellung Rathaus 2011.jpg
- File:Plakat 1. DAVOSER KURZFILMNACHT mit Roland Eugen Beiküfner (2).jpg
Yann (talk) 10:13, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:31, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Taken with at least 12 different cameras or missing metadata, so unlikely to be own work. Some file pages also mention other photographers, but no permission. The OTRS ticket on File:Roland Eugen Beiküfner, Poster für einen Film in den Niederlanden.jpg is probably useless, as it does not mention an author or a license.
- File:Roland Eugen Beiküfner und Michael Elliott.jpg
- File:Friederike Pöhlmann-Grießinger, Autorin.jpg
- File:Roland Eugen Beiküfner 2020.jpg
- File:Kunstobjekt GELIEBTER WATZMANN von Roland Eugen Beiküfner.jpg
- File:Protest von Václav Havel KUNST UND DRAMA-Produktion.JPG
- File:DIE ZENSUR Roland Eugen Beiküfner.jpg
- File:FÜNF JAHRE.jpg
- File:Objekt MEERESRETTUNG.jpg
- File:Friederike Pöhlmann-Grießinger als Ina Wagner in DER PFAD.jpg
- File:UNO-ROLLER von Roland Eugen Beiküfner.jpg
- File:Isolde Holderied und Roland Beiküfner , Off-Road Event von Toyota.jpg
- File:Maximilian M. Altmannsberger.jpg
- File:Gerda Poppa.jpg
- File:MILES ODER DIE PENDELUHR AUS MONTREUX Szenenfoto der Theatergruppe KUNST UND DRAMA mit Roland Eugen Beiküfner und Jodok Lingg.jpg
- File:Beikuefner le corbusier.jpg
- File:Roland Beiküfner in FAUST-EIN AGENTENLEBEN als Prof. Dr. Karl-Heinz Buchholz.jpg
- File:Szene aus Theaterstück Paula Ludwig-Freundschaften und Wege mit Friederike Pöhlmann-Grießinger und Roland Eugen Beiküfner.jpg
- File:Roland Eugen Beiküfner schreibt das Drehbuch zu DER PFAD in Portugal.jpg
- File:Logo LE CORBUSIER BAUT BERLINER FLUGHAFEN.jpg
- File:Friederike Pöhlmann Grießinger in Paula Ludwig - Freundschaften und Wege.jpg
- File:Rudi Stohl und Schauspieler Roland Beiküfner bei der QUATTRO LEGENDE 2015.jpg
- File:Lawrence Davies Musiker in Shackleton Banjo oder Bibel 636 Tage im Eis.jpg
- File:Toyota Corolla E9 Rally.jpg
- File:Roland Eugen Beiküfner und Albert Summer besprechen den Hans Eschelbach - Pfad von Götzis nach Fraxern.jpg
- File:VERITAS LITERATURPREIS.tif
- File:Musiker James Michel.jpg
- File:KUNST UND DRAMA Menschenrechtspreis 2018.jpg
- File:Friederike Pöhlmann-Grießinger.jpg
- File:Szenenfoto Gisela Elsner Blickwinkel 2017.JPG
- File:William Becher - Leben und Werk in Lindau.jpg
- File:Paula Ludwig -Freundschaften und Wege.jpg
- File:Roland Beiküfner Deutscher Schauspieler.jpg
- File:KUNST UND DRAMA - Institut für theatralische Formen , Logo Foto Kunst und Drama.jpg
- File:Roland Beiküfner am Beginn seiner Motorsportlaufbahn im Alter von 12 Jahren auf dem Circiut Pomposa in Italien.jpg
- File:Objekt SPERRZONE von Roland Eugen Beiküfner 2017.jpg
- File:Ligurische Grenzkammstraße VW Bus T2.jpg
- File:KUNST UND DRAMA am Stadttheater Lindau.jpg
- File:Roland Eugen Beiküfner 2016.jpg
- File:Uraufführung Shackleton Banjo oder Bibel.jpg
- File:Roland Eugen Beiküfner 2015.jpg
- File:DER HUT VON JOSEPH BEUYS Logo.jpg
- File:Roland Eugen Beiküfner in der Performance Flug.jpg
- File:Roland Eugen Beiküfner in TORQUATO TASSO.gif
- File:Rolands Hasenjagd für Joseph Beuys.jpg
- File:Roland Eugen Beiküfner in der Performance KÖNIGS SEHTEST.jpg
- File:Roland Eugen Beiküfner in der KUNST UND DRAMA Produktion KLEINE GEFÄNGNISSE GROSSE FLUCHTEN.JPG
- File:Schauspielerin Friederike Pöhlmann-Grießinger in Stillstand.jpg
- File:Friederike Pöhlmann-Grießinger von KUNST UND DRAMA.jpg
- File:Shackleton BANJO ODER BIBEL Friederike Pöhlmann-Grießinger.jpg
- File:Shackleton BANJO ODER BIBEL Roland Eugen Beiküfner.jpg
- File:Kleine Gefängnisse Große Fluchten Premiere 2011.JPG
- File:KUNST UND DRAMA Ausstellung Rathaus 2012 Antonia Hersche Eichin.jpg
- File:Pressefoto MILES ODER DIE PENDELUHR AUS MONTREUX von Henning Mankell.JPG
- File:Friederike Pöhlmann-Grießinger, KUNST UND DRAMA, Montreux Jazz Festival.JPG
- File:Roland Eugen Beiküfner erklärt die Capri-Batterie.JPG
- File:Roland Eugen Beiküfner, Poster für einen Film in den Niederlanden.jpg
Didym (talk) 15:16, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 13:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 16:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
COM:NOCREEPSHOTS - no evidence of consent from subject. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:20, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, obviously and per nom. And before we have the "this probably isn't technically illegal" discussion again: I'm aware, but barring clear evidence of consent, hosting this picture is unethical, unnecessary, and degrading. Blablubbs (talk) 16:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- And can I just point out that the caption The underwear seam is well visible at that young girls behind is beyond creepy? Blablubbs (talk) 16:28, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom and Blablubbs. Dronebogus (talk) 14:20, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Panty lines
[edit]
They were speedy deleted by Jon Kolbert under the rationale "Wikimedia is no place for creep shots." However, such a decision does not conform to policy per Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion. Opening regular DR per request on COM:UDR
- File:VPL Visible Panty Line 1.jpg
- File:VPL Visible Panty Line 2.jpg
- File:VPL Visible Panty Line 3.jpg
- File:VPL Visible Panty Line 4.jpg
Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Info For past discussion please see the following
- Commons:Deletion requests/Media from Category:Panty Line and others
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:VPL Visible Panty Line 1.jpg (Result: Kept: Subject is not identifiable and the image is in use)
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:VPL Visible Panty Line 2.jpg (Result: Kept: no valid reason for deletion.)
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:VPL Visible Panty Line 3.jpg (Result: Kept: no valid reason for deletion.)
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:VPL Visible Panty Line 4.jpg (Result: Kept: no valid reason for deletion.)
- Delete Potentially embarrassing photos of non-public figures taken without their consent. The handful of existing uses can be easily replaced with photos of obviously consenting models. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:14, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of consent for any of the subjects. As previously stated, they can be easily replaced. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:41, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Let me just parse this out, if I may. The claim is that these were taken in the '80's. That would predate regular people having access to digital recording devices that could produce images even approaching this resolution. So it is safe to assume that the photographer kept a film camera on them when on the streets, so that they could take photographs from behind of unknowing women when he could see their panty lines. The photographer develops these photos for whatever purpose they intend to use them for.... and then holds on to them, according to their upload date and estimated original creation dates, about 20 years, then uploads them here, because of their educational value in teaching the people of the world about panty lines? And we're going to buy that? Just no. These women did not consent in the '80s, clearly, and tracking them down now to ask them is basically out of the question, and I have to question why someone who would do something so utterly creepy has such a level of advanced permissions here, but I guess that's a discussion for another day. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:05, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Beeblebrox: Well, I do not think the images could be uploaded to Commons at time more close to '80s due to Commons creation date ;P And do you think that asking such questions in public without pinging the user who is subject of your question is OK? Ankry (talk) 09:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- They made it public by uploading their creeper photos to Commons in the first place, and they've been informed of this discussion, it's up to them if they want to comment here or not. I'm aware Commons did not exist in the '80's. That's my point. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:49, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Beeblebrox: Well, I do not think the images could be uploaded to Commons at time more close to '80s due to Commons creation date ;P And do you think that asking such questions in public without pinging the user who is subject of your question is OK? Ankry (talk) 09:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Consent is required from identifiable people; no evidence that any of those is identifiable. Noting also that speedy deletion of used image for not legal/copyright issue was out of process. Ankry (talk) 21:23, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Unethical and the images can be replaced easy. i think men defending this is a bit embarrassing, we all know wikipedia is male dominated and theres so much work done to close the gender gap so shouldnt women be able to have basic privacy on this website??? 2600:6C64:4F3F:D66A:9538:1ADD:294E:B7BC 21:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- While a decision here is up to the community, any comments about users' gender are inappropriate and they do not help filling the gender gap in any way. Ankry (talk) 09:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I'm sorry but the argument "Consent is required from identifiable people" is the same shit excuse used by those who partake in the hobby/sexual assault activity of upskirting. These images are potentially degrading, offensive and a gross ongoing violation of privacy, and should be deleted without question. Those suggesting they're acceptable and/or there's nothing wrong with them need to take a good long look at themselves in the mirror and ask themselves where they draw the line on images without the subject's consent. That the images can be replaced is not relevant, even if they couldn't be replaced, that perceived 'irreplacability' would be no reason to keep them. Nick (talk) 21:35, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Person is unidentifable. The attempt to delete is pure censorship of images the nominator doesn;t approve of. There is no policy-based rationale for deletion. Beyond My Ken (talk) — Preceding undated comment was added at 23:17, 14 March 2021 (UTC) (UTC)
- Comment What concerns us here is if the images if the photos comply with Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. COM:PEOPLE concern itself with three main points:
1. identification;
2. legal issues;
3. consent; and
4. moral issues.
Is the subject identifiable?
In the case of the 4 photos, the faces of the subjects are not visible in the sightest. As such, they are not identifiable on that point. The subjects could be identified by their clothes and/or body. But unlikely. The bokeh sufficiently blurs the background to prevent identification by location. Furthermore, the subject cannot be identified via the file description.
But let us consider for a moment that the subjects are identifiable.
Let's look at the legal issues. There are two legal rights concerning these photos and the subjects: The right of privacy and the right of publicity. The latter right does not affect the hosting of an image on Commons. The former, however, does.
Was the subject and was the photo taken in a private place (somewhere where the subject has a reasonable expectation of privacy) or in a public place (somewhere where the subject has no such expectation)?
In the case of all four photos, the subjects were clearly in a public place -- i.e. on an open, public street. As such, there is no expectation of privacy.
On the issue of consent: Most juristictions do not require consent for taking photos of a subject in a public place. COM:PEOPLE provides examples as to when consent is required, when it is not, and general exceptions to when it is required. Of interest is the following:
"The following examples do not require consent in many countries: [...] An anonymous person, in a public place, especially as part of a larger crowd [...] The following examples typically require consent [...] Nudes, underwear or swimsuit shots, unless obviously taken in a public place – even if the subject's face is obscured (unreasonable intrusion)" (Bolding added to highlight)
Note here that a photo of "[a]n anonymous person, in a public place" does not require consent, and neither do "[n]udes, underwear or swimsuit shots [...] obviously taken in a public place".
That brings us to moral issues:
It seems that some of the opinions for deletion portray the files here akin to upskirting/downblousing. It is understandable why someone would make such comparisons. But are such comparisons justified? Maybe. Maybe not. While there are certainly those of the opinion that such photos are "creepy" or any related adjectives, strictly speaking, the four photos are neither shots that would be considered upskirting nor downblousing.
But, in any case, "[c]ommon decency and respect for human dignity" should be paramount.
As to whether the photos should be kept or deleted, I'm
Neutral on the question. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 06:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC) - Delete per Nick and the Brox. Wholly unethical and with real-life implicating for the project. Serial Number 54129 (talk) 10:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- That's pure baloney. There are no ethical, moral, or legal issues here at all, andno "real world implications" These people could be any one of millions of people. The deletion nomination is totally about prudery. There are absolutlely no policy-based reasons for deletion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- The only baloney here, Beyond My Ken, is your boneheaded refusal to accept the same kind of healthy reality everyone else has to live in day in day out. Weather report from Moon BS, anyone? Serial Number 54129 (talk) 12:12, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- What a dense thing to claim. The issue at hand is not simply the content of the images, but rather that the subjects did not consent to them being taken. Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- If this was about prudery, this would be way, way down the list. There's far more explicit content on Commons, as everyone knows. This is about someone creeping up on unsuspecting women and taking pictures without their knowledge. We shouldn't host such material when it's clearly easy to get people to consent to be photographed in nearly any context. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. The lawyering about legality here is baffling to me: Whether Commons should be hosting creepshots or not should really not be a contentious question. It was unethical to take these photos, and it is unethical to host them. Blablubbs (talk) 15:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment These people would be identifiable if the photos were new. Not by a random Commons user, but probably by most people who know them. And being seen in an embarrassing context by a random Commons user is probably no big deal, in contrast to being seen in an embarrassing context by acquaintances, employers etc. But now, 30+ years later, few would recognise them, and a photo of you 30 years ago is not the same as one taken yesterday.
So Photographs of identifiable people could apply: "The right of privacy is the right to be left alone and not to be made the subject of public scrutiny without consent." and "Hence, unless there are [...] moral concerns (e.g., picture unfairly obtained), the Commons community does not normally require [consent]" Here "defamation" and "picture unfairly obtained" could very well be deemed to apply.
Then there is the question on scope. The images are in use, so not up to us to decide. I think "panty line" could very well be illustrated by images of consenting people (so "Commons does not need you to ... grab a camera"), and I suspect that the images could be removed from some of the articles on ground of defamation etc. by the local communities. But I found at least one use that seemed unproblematic and where the image could be difficult to replace: Moda en la década de 1980 ("fashion in the 1980s"). Also some uses in "Panty line" illustrations seem non-defamatory. But I think few would like to be found in the category.
So I am undecided on what to do with these images. –LPfi (talk) 15:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC) - Delete per COM:NOCREEPSHOTS. Ok, so I just created that shortcut, but it goes to a section referenced by several above. The most important line being: The provenance of an image may taint its use irredeemably. A "downblouse" photograph is not made ethically acceptable just because the subject's face is cropped out. A paparazzi telephoto shot of a naked sunbather does not become acceptable merely by pixelating the face. This is not a "downblouse," but the reasoning is the same. It draws attention to someone's undergarments without their consent. I think a harder question is what to do with, say, the many images we have of unsuspecting sunbathers and beachgoers. As an aside, I was surprised to see some of the "in use" claims. On the English Wikipedia, I've nominated the panty line article for deletion as a dicdef. — Rhododendrites talk | 17:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- I've boldly added "or 'creepshot'" to the text of the section in question. I think the term has sufficient recognition to be a good descriptor, but the link to Wiktionary should make clear what it means. — Rhododendrites talk | 17:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I don't really see an educational purpose for these types of photos. One can easily enough get photos of people's bums elsewhere on Commons. Oaktree b (talk) 21:30, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep File:VPL Visible Panty Line 3.jpg as in use in Moda en la década de 1980, but rename the files, change the descriptions and Delete the category unless somebody can convince us that the category is educationally useful. –LPfi (talk) 11:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- It can't be too hard to find/produce a replacement image including a spandex miniskirt with a consenting model. Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Question Does this deletion request apply to all the images in the category or only these four? And if it's the latter, why only these four? Are they different in some way? Mo Billings (talk) 17:34, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- This specific discussion only applies to those four images, although feel free to start deletion requests for other images if you feel it is merited. Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:46, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Outside COM:SCOPE. Not far enough outside that it isn't arguable, but it is far enough that a lack of explicit consent is a problem here. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Even if these photos aren’t technically against any laws or policy, and the subjects are difficult to identify, they’re still unethical and if kept could normalize the idea that creepshots are okay to put on Commons because of dubious legal/policy loopholes. Plus they’re not that difficult to replace with ethically produced images. Dronebogus (talk) 06:23, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The argument that these are "not illegal" is sort of the ultimate concession; you're saying that the only compelling reason these images should be kept is because they are not illegal to host. The law does not illegalize everything that is immoral and not everything that is illegal is because it's immoral. On the contrary, these photos are very questionable in nature and done without the subject's consent. I myself have done candid street photography but under no circumstances do I keep any photos that depict people in questionable or suggestive manners, such as an overt emphasis on pants and buttocks—let alone keep them for thirty years. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:39, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- It looks like the great majority of the participants have shown and expressed that Commons should not be a host to What the Peeper Saw type images. We are neither spies nor paparazzi. Therefore Delete them. E4024 (talk) 23:17, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- I need to know that where these files are taken, these might be affecting FOP issues in many different jurisdictions. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:51, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- If I had to guess I’d say Germany— the creator is German, the plate on the car in picture 4 is too long to be a North American plate, and the text in picture 3 looks like it might be German. In any case I’m not sure if it really matters since there already seems to be an overwhelming consensus to delete on ethical grounds. Dronebogus (talk) 14:14, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as unethical creepshots where consent has clearly not been obtained, and out of scope/of scant educational value. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 17:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:SCOPE and COM:NOCREEPSHOTS. --Thibaut (talk) 16:07, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Panty lines
[edit]Per COM:NOCREEPSHOTS and previous discussions; there is no evidence of subject consent for any of these images, some are quite evidently taken in settings where people did not know that they were being photographed.
- File:5DS 3337.jpg
File:Bicyclist crossing De Hogesluis Amsterdam 2016-09-15-6775.jpg- File:Legging Visible Panty Line.png
- File:Pantalon moulant.png
- File:Schwarze Glanzradlerhose.JPG
- File:Visible Panty Line A71I0406.jpg
- File:Visible panty line of a Malaysian woman.JPG
- File:Visible Panty Line.png
- File:Visiblepantylineunderawhiteskirt.jpg
- File:Visible panty seam line.jpg (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Visible panty seam line.jpg)
- File:Spandex fetishism.png
Blablubbs (talk) 16:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep File:Bicyclist crossing De Hogesluis Amsterdam 2016-09-15-6775.jpg. The main focus is a woman riding a bicycle, that's it. There's nothing creepy about it. FYI, the category was added by Daniel Case, not the photographer. 1989 (talk) 16:48, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Fair, point, oversight on my part. Withdrawing that one. Blablubbs (talk) 16:53, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for withdrawing File:Bicyclist crossing De Hogesluis Amsterdam 2016-09-15-6775.jpg - that appears to be incidental and not the focus of the image. The rest are concerning on the other hand and should be Delete'd Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all. Add File:Spandex fetishism.png also, the only upload by user:Ninik900 that has been forgotten/left out of this batch and block them as promised on their TP: "You may soon be blocked". We do not need peeper photos here. E4024 (talk) 23:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- I concur. Delete that one too. Blablubbs (talk) 01:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- I concur.
- Delete as per my reasoning for the previous batch of files. I also find the argument that these people being photographed cannot be recognised absolutely preposterous - they're going to be recognisable to themselves and a great many are likely to be recognisable to many others, such as family and close friends. Nick (talk) 09:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as unethical creepshots where consent has clearly not been obtained, and out of scope/of scant educational value. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 17:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Since there are a lot of people thinking about COM:PEOPLE and its application to pictures of people without consent here in this thread, I'll just mention another nomination. It's a different kind of case, and would benefit from opinions: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Teen girls hanging out.jpg. — Rhododendrites talk | 17:27, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
blank square, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 17:00, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
This deletion request also applies to:
- File:Shake boraBora.png
- File:PitBull.png
- File:NonStop.png
- File:KingsBridge.png
- File:GreenEnergy.png
- File:Friday.png
- File:RevoEnergy.png
- File:Eatme 291220.png
- File:Apps cider 291220.png
- File:Природне джерело 291220.png
I highly doubt that this images are really the uploader's own work. They just look like your average advertising shots. D-Kuru (talk) 18:28, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in en:Wigner distribution function with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:31, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:31, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mdbiplob.sarkar.3 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.
- File:Biplob photos.jpg
- File:Abdur Razzak Biplob details.jpg
- File:Abdur Razzak Biplob at tea garden.jpg
- File:BIPLOB.jpg
Achim (talk) 19:32, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation 83.200.72.7 19:45, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, Copyright violation.--Waran18 (talk) 08:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation 83.200.72.7 19:46, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, Copyright violation.--Waran18 (talk) 08:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
unused uncat flickr child's drawing, doesn't seem to be in a scope. Pibwl (talk) 20:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
fake uk election chart. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 21:32, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
fake uk election chart. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 21:32, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be a test. Out of COM:SCOPE. Ahmadtalk 21:53, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
Ahmadtalk 21:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Very likely to be a non-free screenshot. Anadolu Agency's watermark is visible on the photo. Ahmadtalk 22:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Not in scope/used for anything. Elli (talk) 22:07, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rajesh Manthan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion, out of scope. No contributions to any wm project.
- File:Rajesh Manthan.jpg
- File:Ae zindagi tu humko.jpg
- File:Lyricist Rajesh Manthan.jpg
- File:Hathon se yoon lyrics image.jpg
Achim (talk) 22:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mehdiasadzade (talk · contribs)
[edit]Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIOs - most low res; either lacking EXIF, having disparate EXIF (e.g. Canon EOS 5D Mark III, Canon EOS 5D Mark II, iPhone 6s Plus), or EXIF crediting "Copyright holder @reza.feizy"), uploaded in batch with blatant copyvios of this subject (see File:Farshid Asadiann.jpg, File:Farshid Asadian 26391B42-81CE-4F0C-867A-B91C74AEF848.jpg, File:Farshid Asadian Iranian athlete.jpg, File:Farshid Asadian 69853209-1FFB-439C-A021-A8DAE8C5A599.jpg); etc. Duck/COM:PRP issue. Also COM:NOTHOST - non-notable athlete (e.g., w:Farshid Asadian deleted as such). Эlcobbola talk 14:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- File:Farshid Asadian C8C25B94-4457-4CD2-AAB2-7B8605A5A82C.jpg
- File:Farshid Asadian DA606867-0E5B-4C52-9A64-F35220A677B8.jpg
- File:Farshiiiiiid Asadian.jpg
- File:Farshid Asadian 1BDBF401-FC7D-4AFD-BAC2-8C9DBB2B4318.jpg
- File:Farshid Asadian.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 23:53, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:49, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
alternate history maps uploaded by User:Byzantium Purple
[edit]- File:Split the Vote 1952.png
- File:Split the Vote 1948.png
- File:Split the Vote 1956.png
- File:Split the Vote 1960.png
- File:8aJP3Ah.png
- File:US election 2088.png
- File:POT1980.png
- File:Pot1996.png
- File:J7tGFoZ.png
- File:Louisiana 1916 W.png
- File:POT2012.png
- File:ALU 1916.png
- File:2016 MoE election.png
- File:ALU 1920.png
- File:Infinity 2016.PNG
- File:Infinity 2020.png
- File:ALU 1924.png
- File:Svgfiles 2016-01-16-16-52-04-663716-11743184060710250056.svg
- File:Genusmap.png
- File:MoE1896.svg
- File:MoE1968.svg
- File:ACOIF 2000.svg
- File:ACOIF 1988.svg
- File:ACOIF 1984.svg
- File:ACOIF 1980.svg
- File:Clash of Infinite Fictions 1984.png
- File:Clash of Infinite Fictions 1980.png
Fictional "alternate History" Files by User:Byzantium Purple. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Some of the election maps are mixed in the categories of the normal election maps, what is in my opinion just inviting embarrassing mistakes by unsuspecting users. --Jahobr (talk) 18:10, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:16, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by رامین میرزازاده (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos of a non-contributor. All their edits to arwiki are to their userspace/sandboxes. These serve no useful education value and are out of scope.
Elli (talk) 22:03, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 00:04, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 15:38, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 09:36, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
No YouTube Creative Commons Attribution licence found on the source given C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 07:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MGA73 (talk) 08:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 23:54, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
See COM:FOP Japan. Freedom of panorama in Japan for artistic works in public places only extends for noncommercial. Unless we can establish that the artist died over 70 years ago, I don't think this is usable for Commons. Hog Farm (talk) 02:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: erected not earlier than 1978 (according to w:Issie). --Yasu (talk) 15:32, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Proof of authorization or FoP ? TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:57, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, undelete in 2027. --Túrelio (talk) 19:18, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
porque si xd TheJCNA (talk) 23:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 18:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Anthere at 22:33, 4 Mai 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:51, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Interior of Stade de France
[edit]These show the interior of the stadium substantially and not de minimis. France has no commercial freedom of panorama, and these images are copyvios as missing permission for free licensing from architects Michel Macary, Aymeric Zublena, Michel Regembal, and Claude Constantini.
- File:Panorama Stade De France.jpg
- File:Stade de France - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Stade De France 504.jpg
- File:Stade de France vide - panoramio.jpg
- File:Stade de France, France Miniature, April 2015.jpg
- File:Stade DE France.jpg
- File:Stade De France.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if those dozens of images on this category showing the stadium interior while a game is ongoing can also be considered no FOP violations (missing architects' permission), since France has a very particular de minimis standard based on existing jurisprudence. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:07, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Another imported image from Flickr, a telephoto lens (300mm this time) shot of ladies' asses in a public area with no indication that they were aware of the photo being taken. Not great! JPxG (talk) 02:34, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Public place, people dressed completely decently for the beach. "Asses in public" is your interpretation. Yes, I'm well aware that young women are over-represented in beach photos, and yes objectification is a serious cultural problem - but those are problems with society, not with this photo. It's just people enjoying the beach in South Carolina in 2007. As the people are walking away from the camera, faces not visible, so people not identifiable. I see no problem that requires deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:00, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - COM:FOP UK states "Note that under UK law, "works of artistic craftsmanship" are defined separately from "graphic works". Graphic works are defined in Section 4 as any painting, drawing, diagram, map, chart or plan, any engraving, etching, lithograph, woodcut or similar work. The freedom provided by Section 62 does not apply to graphic works - such as a mural or poster - even if they are permanently located in a public place. These cannot be uploaded to Commons without a licence from the copyright holder." (emphasis mine)
- So unless I've read it wrong posters are fine?, That being said I would assume the pictures on the poster fail DW and would need to be blanked out?. –Davey2010Talk 13:32, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: No, that's backwards. " The freedom provided by Section 62 does not apply to graphic works - such as a mural or poster -". . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mx+c mxc^2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW of the copyrighted work. Uploaded by VOA 's sockpuppet.
SCP-2000 04:20, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stade de France 1
[edit]- File:660-StadeDF.jpg
- File:Flickr - funky1opti - IMG 7224.jpg
- File:FRA-ECO - SDF - 130316.jpg
- File:Muse Stade de France.jpg
- File:Panorama stade de France.jpg
- File:Panoramique SDF.jpg
- File:Paris rugby fans.jpg
- File:Rugby match.jpg
- File:Sdf losc-benf 22.11.05 - 5.JPG
- File:Stade de France - Rencontre Stade français – Racing Métro 92.jpg
- File:Stade de France 2005.jpg
- File:Stade de France November 21, 2009 a.jpg
- File:Stade de France November 21, 2009 b.jpg
- File:Stade de France Tribune Nord.jpg
- File:Stade de France, France-Suisse.jpg
- File:Stade de France, Paris, France.JPG
- File:Stade de France001.JPG
- File:Vue aérienne du nord de Paris le stade de France au milieu.jpg
LGA talkedits 06:01, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- It seems to me that File:Stade de France, France-Suisse.jpg can be kept as there is hardly any architecture in the image (de minimis). Lymantria (talk) 13:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- What about the big French shirt, that would also be protected as a work. LGA talkedits 20:47, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
For your information :
Règlement Intérieur du Stade de France (http://accueil.stadefrance.com/reglement-interieur), Article 31 :
Les prises de vues et enregistrements sonores ne peuvent être réalisés dans le Stade de France sans une autorisation expresse du Consortium Stade de France ou des personnes habilitées par lui.
De même, les installations ou équipements techniques ne peuvent être photographiés, filmés ou enregistrés sans une telle autorisation. Une tolérance est laissée aux amateurs n’utilisant ni pied ni flash pour leurs prises de vues, le Consortium Stade de France se réservant toutefois le droit d’interdire les prises de vues et enregistrements de toute nature dans certains espaces ou à l’occasion de certaines manifestations qu’il désignera spécialement.
So, LGA, please read conditions before request deletions...
Best regards, CSab80 (talk) 18:40, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- Assuming that Google translate gets that right, it says "The filming and sound recordings can not be made in the Stade de France without express permission from the Stade de France or persons authorized by him" and only a "Tolerance is left to amateurs" - You will still need permission if you want to publish them. LGA talkedits 20:47, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep It's nedded for those who didn't go to the stadium. 174.91.72.204 18:15, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in France FASTILY 08:01, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stade de France 2
[edit]No FOP in France. Despite the warnings
- File:Sdf 060304.jpg
- File:Canal Saint-Denis - octobre 2012 - Saint-Denis - Bassin de la maltournee (2).jpg
- File:SAINT-DENIS-rue Micheline Ostermeyer.JPG
- File:Sdf losc-benf 22.11.05 - 2.JPG
- File:Sdf losc-benf 22.11.05 - 3.JPG
- File:Sdf losc-benf 22.11.05 - 4.JPG
- File:SG1S1958.JPG
- File:SSL20121.JPG
- File:Stade de France - restaurant panoramique.jpg
- File:Stade Francais Paris Biarritz.jpg
- File:Top 14 2008 SF vs BO 05.JPG
Flickrworker (talk) 22:13, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep for
- File:Canal Saint-Denis - octobre 2012 - Saint-Denis - Bassin de la maltournee (2).jpg - Stadium is probably DM.
- File:SAINT-DENIS-rue Micheline Ostermeyer.JPG - Stadium is probably DM.
- Delete for
- File:SSL20121.JPG - Due to image quality the stadium is not relay visible, and the image is unlikely to be of any encyclopaedic use.
- File:Sdf 060304.jpg
- File:Sdf losc-benf 22.11.05 - 2.JPG
- File:Sdf losc-benf 22.11.05 - 3.JPG
- File:Sdf losc-benf 22.11.05 - 4.JPG
- File:SG1S1958.JPG
- File:Stade de France - restaurant panoramique.jpg
- File:Stade Francais Paris Biarritz.jpg
- File:Top 14 2008 SF vs BO 05.JPG
- LGA talkedits 23:59, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept 2, deleted rest per no FOP in France -FASTILY 06:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stade de France 3
[edit]France has no commercial freedom of panorama, and these images are copyvios as missing permission for free licensing from architects Michel Macary, Aymeric Zublena, Michel Regembal, and Claude Constantini. "File:2003 Paris Saint-Denis stadium.jpg" seems a borderline case as a game was being played during the time this picture was taken, but the file title implies the stadium interior as the intended/priginal aim of the picture and is problematic, considering there is no FOP in France which is one of anti-FOP countries in the world (Greece is another).
- File:2003 Paris Saint-Denis stadium.jpg
- File:Eingänge A, B, C und D des Stade de France.JPG
- File:Estadio de paris.jpg
- File:France-Andorre Stade de France 01.jpg
- File:France-Andorre Stade de France 03.jpg
- File:Le Stade (from Metro) - panoramio.jpg
- File:Stade de France - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Stade de France - panoramio.jpg
- File:Stade de France 1500 01.jpg
- File:Stade de France 1500 02.jpg
- File:Stade de France 1500 03.jpg
- File:Stade de France, Saint-Denis - panoramio.jpg
- File:Stade France St Denis Seine St Denis 4 sept 2019.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Pictures showing the field would be OK, but those showing large parts of the stadium are not, no matter what is happening on the field. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stade de France
[edit]These images heavily show the interior architecture of the stadium, even if games are ongoing. Per closing admin's input at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stade de France#Files in Category:Stade de France 3, "pictures showing the field would be OK, but those showing large parts of the stadium are not, no matter what is happening on the field." As France does not allow commercial Freedom of Panorama, these images are all infringing architect's copyrights.
- File:Rockin'1000 au Stade de France 2022 - Après Concert.jpg
- File:Rockin'1000 au Stade de France 2022 01.jpg
- File:Stade de France France Croatie 01.jpg
- File:Stade de France France Croatie 02.jpg
- File:Stade de France France Croatie 03.jpg
- File:Stade de France France Croatie 04.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:54, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
This is a modern photomontage/composite image (a derivative work) created by Bartek Malysa for Harvard Magazine in 2002. Although the various elements are all likely public domain, the montage is a new creative work that probably exceeds the threshold of originality, and there is no evidence the remixed work has been released under a free license. --Animalparty (talk) 04:31, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope self-made flag. Elli (talk) 05:19, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope self-made flag. Elli (talk) 05:19, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope self-made flag - only use is on a userpage of someone who last edited ~5 years ago. Elli (talk) 05:19, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope self-made flag. Elli (talk) 05:20, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope self-made flag. Elli (talk) 05:20, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blackariteam (talk · contribs) 01
[edit]Incorrect author/source. Unlikely for Səbuhi Hiseynov to be the copyright holder since he is the subject of the non-selfe photos. Needs permission from each photographer/copyright holder via COM:OTRS
- File:Sabuhi Huseynov in Denmark (2018).jpg
- File:Sabuhi Huseynov badminton 2015 National Championship.jpg
- File:Sabuhi Huseynov badminton 2015 National Championship Jahid Alhasanov.jpg
- File:Sabuhi Huseynov badminton Murad Bayramov (2015 Ulyanovsk,Russia).jpg
- File:Sabuhi Huseynov badminton image.jpg
- File:Sabuhi Huseynov badminton Azerbaijan University games (Azerbaijan State Academy of Physical Education and Sport).jpg
- File:Sabuhi Huseynov badminton (Tv).jpg
- File:Sabuhi Huseynov 2017 at University (Azerbaijan State Academy of Physical Education and Sport).jpg
- File:Sabuhi Huseynov badminton coaching in Lituhania.jpg
- File:Sabuhi Huseynov badminton 5th Konya Rumi International Children games 2015 (TEAM).jpg
- File:Sabuhi Huseynov badminton 2020 European Team Championship.jpg
- File:Sabuhiuniversitygames12.jpg
- File:Teamazeturkey.jpg
- File:Turkeybadmintonchoaching.jpg
- File:Sabusabu01.jpg
- File:Firstgolddouble.jpg
- File:Nationalsabuhi2.jpg
- File:Sabuhihuseynov01.jpg
- File:Bakusabuhiteam.jpg
- File:Sabuhinational111.jpg
- File:Sabuhieuropean4.jpg
- File:Sabuhieuropean3.jpg
- File:Sabuhieuropean2.jpg
- File:Sabuhinational1.jpg
- File:Sabuhiestoniaeuropean.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note that the uploader has changed the name in the Author field from Səbuhi Hiseynov to other individuals. He is also deleting DR templates from the files and tried to blank out this page. @Blackaritateam: Please refrain from doing so. For these images to be kept, please tell the photographers to send an email declaration through COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 17:17, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blackariteam (talk · contribs) 02
[edit]Habil Humbatov is the subject of the photograph thus he is unlikely to be the author or copyright-holder. Needs permission from the actual photographer via COM:OTRS.
- File:Habil Hümbətov boks7.jpg
- File:Habil Hümbətov boks5.jpg
- File:Habil Hümbətov boks6.jpg
- File:Habil Hümbətov boks4.jpg
- File:Habil Hümbətov boks3.jpg
- File:Habil Hümbətov boks2.jpg
- File:Habil Hümbətov boks1.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gastonjeremiah (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence of permission at claimed source (https://twitter.com/denyigban/status/1307730140290580481/photo/1).
Howhontanozaz (talk) 06:32, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Press photo, Random photo from internet, Logo Panadda Thislun (talk) 19:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
See uploader's other deleted contribs, varying image sizes, no metadata. PCP --Minoraxtalk 05:21, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- FB file. --E4024 (talk) 01:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
nonsense Minoraxtalk 00:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nom; G1. --E4024 (talk) 01:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.
Minoraxtalk 00:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation - Source page does not list any Creative Commons licence. Mbrickn (talk) 00:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Not used nor useful. E4024 (talk) 01:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Amorepacific
[edit]Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. This building was completed in 2017.
ƏXPLICIT 01:28, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:39, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Ciaurlec (talk) 01:39, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:39, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
see description Commons:Project scope Commons is not private photo album O revolucionário aliado (talk) 02:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:43, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
see description Commons:Project scope Commons is not private photo album O revolucionário aliado (talk) 02:57, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: identified location, in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeNumber as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Axelle have made a transition and doesn't identified as the man on this picture. Please, remove. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:57, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
see description Commons:Project scope Commons is not private photo album - All located on the publisher's user page wp-pt O revolucionário aliado (talk) 02:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: identified location, in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:46, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
see description Commons:Project scope Commons is not private photo album - All located on the publisher's user page wp-pt - see Global file usage O revolucionário aliado (talk) 02:59, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
see description Commons:Project scope Commons is not private photo album - All located on the publisher's user page wp-pt - see Global file usage or file name O revolucionário aliado (talk) 03:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: identified location, in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
see description Commons:Project scope Commons is not private photo album - All located on the publisher's user page wp-pt - see Global file usage or file name O revolucionário aliado (talk) 03:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This is a freely-licensed, well-composed photo that I can easily find a use for. JPxG (talk) 03:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: identified location, in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Another weird photo from Flickr: a telephoto shot (200mm) taken from a considerable distance featuring a woman in a state of undress. Not really used anywhere. No indication of consent. JPxG (talk) 03:48, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep No reason for deletion: good quality photograph, the licensing is ok, flickr license check has been successful, the woman is not identifiable and this image is in use there since 2015. --Mosbatho (talk) 15:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Mosbatho. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
While the image itself is freely-licensed on Flickr, full (uncropped) version of the image reveals the image as pixellated and a black border is seen at the upper-right corner of the image. The original resolution at Flickr (612px) seems questionable too. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:57, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Added Info: the Flickr uploader is also seen on the original, uncropped image, and doesn't seem to be doing a selfie to take this photo (based on the uploader's posture as seen on the original image). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: likely COM:LL. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted portrait A1Cafel (talk) 04:19, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Redundant compared to File:Louisiana Senatorial Election Results by County, 1996.svg Elli (talk) 05:48, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:52, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright issues (from youtube capture ) Centrair (talk) 07:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:54, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright issues (from youtube capture ) Centrair (talk) 07:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:54, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Soy el autor de esta fotografía, lo subí sin pensar las consecuencia, esta página atenta totalmente hacia mi y mi privacidad,por eso pido que este archivo sea borrado , de antemano muchas gracias. YoElCocos (talk) 07:34, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:54, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Redundant to File:5027Traffic in Candaba Pampanga Viaduct 53.jpg, which is better because there's no distracting other vehicle (unlike this nominated image). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:58, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lohshishan2008 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Blatant self-promotion. No contributions to wm projects.
Achim (talk) 09:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:58, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
no permission from the author [3] Tyseria (d) 09:06, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:59, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Corrupted file, cannot be understood properly Moumou82 (talk) 09:10, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- approuve — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zinou2go (talk • contribs) 11:38, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:00, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
unused personal image. Zinnmann (talk) 07:30, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, only used on self promotional draft page, not a meaningful contributor. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Stated as depicting deleted wikidata:Q84364433. Promotional image. No educational value and therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:36, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:01, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:North Luzon Expressway scenery (Pulilan, Bulacan and San Simon, Pampanga to City of San Fernando sections)
[edit]These remaining images show random scenery that are already redundant to those existing at: Category:Mount Arayat, Category:North Luzon Expressway (San Simon, Pampanga segment), Category:North Luzon Expressway (San Fernando, Pampanga segment), Category:North Luzon Expressway (Santo Tomas, Pampanga segment), Category:North Luzon Expressway (Apalit segment), Category:Pandaras, San Fernando, Pampanga, and Category:Santo Rosario (Pau), Santo Tomas, Pampanga. All good images whose exact locations are traceable have been moved to their respective categories above, while the exact locations of these remainder images cannot be identified/traced (even with the assistance of Google Maps and Google Street View). All are also unused too.
- File:FvfNLEx2332 01.JPG
- File:FvfNLEx2332 02.JPG
- File:FvfNLEx2332 03.JPG
- File:FvfNLEx2332 04.JPG
- File:FvfNLEx2332 05.JPG
- File:FvfNLEx2363 01.JPG
- File:FvfNLEx2363 02.JPG
- File:FvfNLEx2363 03.JPG
- File:FvfNLEx2363 04.JPG
- File:FvfNLEx2363 05.JPG
- File:FvfNLEx2363 07.JPG
- File:FvfNLEx2363 08.JPG
- File:FvfNLEx2363 09.JPG
- File:FvfNLEx2363 10.JPG
- File:FvfNLEx2363 11.JPG
- File:FvfNLEx2363 12.JPG
- File:FvfNLEx2363 13.JPG
- File:FvfNLEx2363 16.JPG
- File:FvfNLExScenery2297 20.JPG
- File:FvfNLExScenery2297 21.JPG
- File:FvfNLExScenery2297 22.JPG
- File:FvfNLExScenery2297 23.JPG
- File:FvfNLExScenery2297 25.JPG
- File:FvfNLExScenery2297 26.JPG
- File:FvfNLExScenery2297 27.JPG
- File:FvfNLExScenery2297 28.JPG
- File:FvfNLExScenery2297 29.JPG
- File:FvfNLExScenery2297 30.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:00, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:02, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
alternate History maps uploaded by User:LeSoleilRoiUSA
[edit]- File:Kethledge, not Kavanaugh.svg
- File:2028 NPVIC activated reloaded.svg
- File:2028 NPVIC activated.svg
- File:2010 Dem Shellacking.svg
- File:TNO64.svg
- File:2020 Reform COOPER-KLOBUCHAR.svg
- File:2020 REform senate v2.svg
- File:2020 REFORM SENATE.svg
- File:2020 REFORM.svg
- File:2015 FSA Elections v2.svg
- File:2015 FSA Elections.svg
- File:2020 no go west presidential v3.svg
- File:2020 no go west presidential v2.svg
- File:2020 no go west presidential.svg
- File:2020 No go west v3.svg
- File:2020 Presidential pop vote v3.svg
- File:2020 Presidential pop vote v2.svg
- File:2020 Presidential pop vote.svg
- File:2020 No go west v2.svg
- File:2020 No go west.svg
Files by User:LeSoleilRoiUSA: Fictional "alternate History" maps. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. --Jahobr (talk) 09:55, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - sampled some of these, and all are fictional election maps with no evident value for this project. Hog Farm (talk) 01:16, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:04, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/155800497@N08
[edit]Suspected flickrwashing. New account with 0 followers. Artworks would need OTRS
- File:LE MANSTEVEMACQUEEN.jpg
- File:Jack Armstrong Boots.jpg
- File:JAandtheblackstar.jpg
- File:Michael Jackson Glove and Mirage Hat.jpg
- File:Jack Armstrong Michael York.jpg
- File:Jack Armstrong with Tom Jones.jpg
- File:Cosmic star ship.jpg
- File:Montagejackarmstrong.jpg
- File:PRIMALSUN -1 FRAMED FRONT.jpg
- File:PrimalSunTwins-1.jpg
- File:Jack Armstrong with Pamela Anderson.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:04, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:10, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:06, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:10, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:06, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this is their own work. Image metadata states that this image was created using screenshot software and it looks like a screenshot. Missing metadata to suggest the source image is the uploader's own work. Likely a copyright violation. mattbr 10:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:06, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this is their own work. Appears to be a screenshot of a television broadcast? Logo in the bottom left corner and blurry. Missing metadata to suggest the source image is the uploader's own work. Likely a copyright violation. mattbr 10:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:06, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this is their own work. Missing metadata to suggest the source image is the uploader's own work. The uploader's other uploads marked as own work are suspected copyright violations. Likely a copyright violation. mattbr 10:17, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:06, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused image which is the uploader's only contribution. Appears to be promotional. No educational value and therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:36, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:07, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of The Dark Side of the Moon cover. Yann (talk) 10:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:07, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Yellow stars spoil the image. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Copyright violation https://stock.adobe.com/images/ripe-red-pomegranates/237929991. Howhontanozaz (talk) 09:32, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:07, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Unclear how this is own work as it's from a published book. FDW777 (talk) 10:57, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:07, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Unclear how this is own work as it's from a published book. FDW777 (talk) 10:57, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- File:Terence O'Neill 1964 UUC Yearbook.jpg is basically the same image, adding it too. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
I do not see educational value, out of project scope. In addition, Wikipedia-only licenses are prohibited in Commons. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot from internet site Sakhalinio (talk) 11:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
No more picture Navigator84 (talk) 11:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused redirect. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:09, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
A company logo, file not used on Wikimedia projects. No educational value and therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:09, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
misidentified, course-words in descriptions Hugo.arg (talk) 11:13, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
No more picture Navigator84 (talk) 11:13, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused redirect. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
No more picture Navigator84 (talk) 11:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused redirect. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
No more picture Navigator84 (talk) 11:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused redirect. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohammadreza 9188 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of com:PS.
- File:پاکسازی نمادین ورزشگاه.jpg
- File:همایش فرهنگ شهروندی.jpg
- File:غرفه نوروزی انجمن دانش آموختگان.jpg
- File:توزیع بروشور فرهنگی در ورزشگاه.jpg
- File:نشست یکصد و پنجاه وهشتم انجمن دانش آموختگان خرم آباد.jpg
Hanooz 11:18, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
«The photo was provided by V. P. Suprun specifically for use in the projects of "Wikipedia"». Required OTRS permission. 91.193.178.230 11:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rogercisnemal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small files without metadata and promo images, unlikely to be own works.
- File:PACO RENTERÍA GIRA MUNDIAL.jpg
- File:PACO RENTERÍA GIRA ÁFRICA.jpg
- File:PACO RENTERÍA KENIA.jpg
- File:PACO RENTERÍA EN ÁFRICA.jpg
- File:PACO RENTERÍA.JPG
- File:PACO RENTERÍA 2014.jpg
Yann (talk) 11:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:13, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Horrorkore999 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused JPEG logos. Copyright? Scope?
Yann (talk) 11:40, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:13, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Published in bigger size here (direct link). Permission needed. Yann (talk) 11:48, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
A logo, file not used on Wikimedia projects. No educational value and therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:53, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 12:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
K-ON! characters are non-free copyrighted. Thibaut (talk) 12:12, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Old low-quality png versions of files in Category:Nationwide maps of United States Senate elections results (set) with a deprecated color scheme. These are unused and there is no good reason to keep them around any longer.
- File:Us senate result 1962.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1960.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1958.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1956.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1954.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1952.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1950.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1948.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1946.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1944.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1942.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1940.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1938.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1936.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1934.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1932.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1930.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1928.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1926.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1924.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1922.PNG
- File:Us senate result 1920.PNG
Elli (talk) 13:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:15, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 13:55, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete Commons is not facebook. --Mosbatho (talk) 19:56, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:16, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
An unidentified logo stated by the uploader as own work. File not used on Wikimedia projects. No educational value and therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:59, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:16, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 14:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:16, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, unused photo Oaktree b (talk) 14:15, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, personal photograph Oaktree b (talk) 14:17, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
abuse אנדרסן (talk) 14:20, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in vi:Phân tích nhân tử with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 14:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
{{copyvio|1=The photographer of this photograph did not give permission for Creative Commons use}} Louisnelza (talk) 12:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
License inconsistent (Choi died 2002; image created 2018). Image does not seem to be own work, rather "own scan" of foreign work. Phil1881 (talk) 12:23, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:11, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
The better version is File:SCPH-5500 and PlayStation Controller 20060131 (2).jpg. Solomon203 (talk) 12:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:12, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this is their own work. Missing metadata and watermarked website suggest that the image is not the uploader's own work. Watermarked website has a copyright notice. Likely a copyright violation. mattbr 13:39, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:15, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this is their own work. Missing metadata, small size and that the image is seemingly watermarked with a copyright mark (difficult to read) suggests that the image is not the uploader's own work. Likely a copyright violation. mattbr 13:42, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:15, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this is their own work. Missing metadata, small size and the uploader's other contributions marked as own work are suspected copyright violations (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kazımarsln.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Basmaci.jpg) suggests that the image is not the uploader's own work. Likely a copyright violation. mattbr 13:45, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:15, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/new-packing-phone-films-for-iphone_60736509258.html Nehaoua (talk) 13:59, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:17, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this is their own work. Image is from the red carpet event at the 41st Annual People's Choice Awards at Nokia Theatre LA Live on January 7, 2015 (very similar images are online from this event). This image (with the same name and file extension) is published at https://shaniceharrison.blogspot.com/2015/09/the-15-hottest-men-countdown-2015.html, stated as being published before the upload date at Commons; whilst the blogger is very likely not the copyright holder, it indicates that the uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder as it existed elsewhere prior to upload. This is the only contribution of the uploader (if they had a pass to this event you would expect to see many other such images) and is missing metadata. Very likely therefore that the file is not the uploader's own work as claimed and is very likely a copyright violation. mattbr 14:32, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. BTW, good DR rationale (wish more DR's were this complete). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:20, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
errore caricamento --Vilma.bono (talk) 12:09, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
errore caricamento
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:21, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
errore caricamento--Vilma.bono (talk) 12:17, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Ho confuso il mio file con uno non mio, per questo ho richiesto la cancellazione--Vilma.bono (talk) 15:15, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:27, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in it:b:Chimica organica/Reazioni organiche: introduzione e classificazione with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:27, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Joostik (talk) 15:28, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
This picture is of my great aunt. I have digitalized it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BKlaasen (talk • contribs) 17:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, historical photo without original author, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:29, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:30, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
perchè non serve a niente WikiLabo (talk) 15:37, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:33, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from poster. Should be blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
The same image appeared two days before the upload at this website ("Published on January 5, 2021") and on Twitter. Gestumblindi (talk) 15:40, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Zoozaz1 (talk) 00:51, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:26, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:34, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this is their own work. This image was available prior to the upload date according to https://www.22caratjewellery.com/2013/11/singer-sunitha-south-pearls-set.html and https://wowsouthstars.blogspot.com/2015/07/singer-sunitha-photos.html; whilst these users are very likely not to be the copyright holder, it indicates that the uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder as it existed elsewhere prior to upload. This is the only contribution of the uploader and is missing metadata. Very likely therefore that the file is not the uploader's own work as claimed and is very likely a copyright violation. mattbr 15:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:34, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:35, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Press picture Navigator84 (talk) 15:46, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:36, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
A logo. File not used on Wikimedia projects. No educational value and therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:27, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:38, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
This unused drawing appears to be out of scope as non-educational artwork. AFBorchert (talk) 15:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
DO NOT DELETE! Last ditch effort (talk) 16:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:39, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:39, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:12, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:41, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
I don't think this is apporpriate in Commons Douuwwurunwuuzhe 16:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Now, it seems, is more convinient to nominate an image to deletion instead of doing a proper research. If the nominator had did this this would repeat again. How many times is it needed to repeat the same conclusions. These file is clearly educational and not being of your liking is not a reason to delete. Its parent category. Category:Project "Geekography" by Exey Panteleev (nude portrayals of computer technology) clearly states its scope and educational use:
- Project by Exey Panteleev, as an artistic project that connects technology and nude photography. This project has been a Winner of The Best of Russia 2011 (and selected as one of the 55 best between 309 winners), an photographic award organized by the Moscow Contemporary Art Center Winzavod with the support of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, and has been nominated in 2011, 2012 and 2013 in the american International Colour Awards.
- This project that have been covered by several newspapers, magazines and technolgy websites, like the The Next Web , GQ Italy and the french newspaper Libération, that have made articles about this project, besides being interviewed to an interview to the tech page of Mail.Ru where he talks about his project. Besides these newspapers and tech sites, other covered this same project, like being news in Reflex, was the cover of the Russian "Hacker Magazine" of January 2012 was by him" or of the ukrainian "SHO Art Magazine" of July\August 2012.
- Because of the subjects of this projects, Violet Blue, "an American journalist, author, editor, advisor, and educator" covered this same project and had photos published in "nude art photography" book."
- This educational purpose has clearly been established since November of 2019, when there was an covert attempt to sequester the Wikiconference 2019 and an concerted attempt to delete this images, with allegations of mysogeny, uneducational subjects, situation that was reject by vast majority in Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2019/11#Category:Nude_portrayals_of_computer_technology.
- Also there were several deletion requests, with the same arguments, closed as kept and invalid reasoning to opening those deletion requests, like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fake News (48708611322).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - z-index.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Binary prefixes (41983361972).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - before.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:HTML output - Exey Panteleev.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Erlang (9690003046).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - display.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Full Stack (Exey Panteleev).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:RSS feed icons painted on a naked woman (by Exey Panteleev).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - QR code.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bling-bling - iframe.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - Proxy.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - MongoDB's "WHERE".jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Radio button and female nude.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - float left right.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:SQL - DROP TABLE.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bling-bling - iframe.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:TypeScript bodypaint (15003177534).jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Nude portrayals of computer technology.
- So, @Douuwwurunwuuzhe: , care to withdraw your deletion request, as this image and its similars have been kept plenty of times. Tm (talk) 17:00, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Canceled Well, i find This image as very inappropriate in the Commons, since this is clearly a Semi-Pornographic Content. I have encountered some of these and even more horrible version of it while searching for Kaomoji Emoticons at Category:Smiles in the Commons. And it is because i saw the form of it, i immediatelly nominate it for deletion. And i think other people would do the same. Though I just want to make our community to be as clean as possible from these stuffs. That's all. And i will Cancel the deletion Nomination as concerned. Since it have a clear description above. Thank you. Douuwwurunwuuzhe 18:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:09, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
broken file. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 17:22, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:46, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Fictional Flag. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:48, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Fictional Flag. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:48, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Fine by me for above mentioned reasons Andel (talk) 18:21, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Wrong date, no reliable source, and no permission.--Hashmat56 (talk) 18:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:44, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DavidFromUssel (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW - scans of cartoons by fr:Gervy, who died 1998. France is pma +70, so not PD until ca. 2069 (1998 + 70 + 1).
- File:Alain au FarWest.png
- File:Pat'apouf.png
- File:Pat'apouf Détective.png
- File:Pat'apouf détective.png
Эlcobbola talk 18:19, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:45, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused private "artwork", no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:49, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:46, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Google Street View screenshot. Picture fades to black at the top in the same way Street View does, and the service's rectangular selection box is visible above the houses on the left. Lord Belbury (talk) 18:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:46, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely own work. Hashmat56 (talk) 18:53, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, transmission code in metadata. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:57, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:06, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
These three low-quality and watermarked images are redundant, as the contributor has uploaded better-quality versions of them later the same day.
- File:Zijaanzicht Sint-Hermesbasiliek.png
- File:Conopeum Sint-Hermesbasiliek.png
- File:Toren Sint-Hermesbasiliek.png
Henxter (talk) 19:10, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:49, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Reverse image search shows this was posted to facebook, and does not indicate that this is published under a free license. https://www.facebook.com/LeoPriegoMoctezuma/videos/angel-israel-la-creacion-te-alaba/2805074023041280/ Zppix (talk) 19:13, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:49, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
The image is small and poor quality. A new [cleaned] version is available at File:Anne Russell Lady Herbert later Countess of Worcester.jpg. The sitter is no longer identified as Bess Throckmorton, nor is the artist thought to be Robert Peake the Elder. PKM (talk) 19:17, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Why delete it? What means "cleaned"? Cleaned by Photoshop? Why not complete with "other versions"? --Felistoria (talk) 22:21, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- "cleaned" in this case means the actual painting was restored by an art conservationist, but I am fine with keeping if it has value. I have recently been informed that old dirty versions of paintings do have historical value. - PKM (talk) 19:07, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination - PKM (talk) 19:08, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:49, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:32, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
- , where is an integer
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:34, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
- , Ω is the bandwith of
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:38, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:39, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:40, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Non-free file as it is a logo, and therefore unsuitable for Commons. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 19:41, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, above TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:42, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:47, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:47, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
12.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![53 File:"Andre the Giant Has A Posse" and "Lovelife" sticker.jpg](#File:"Andre_the_Giant_Has_A_Posse"_and_"Lovelife"_sticker.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
1.png){kind=link}
_-_Jackson_Pollock_(1912-1956).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_flag.gif){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
12.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
12.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
10.png){kind=link}
12.png){kind=link}
12.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![18:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/03/21#c-Stickerkitty-2021-03-18T18:21:00.000Z-File:"Andre_the_Giant_Has_A_Posse"_and_"Lovelife"_sticker.jpg){kind=link}
![15:59, 21 March 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/03/21#c-Stickerkitty-2021-03-21T15:59:00.000Z-File:"Andre_the_Giant_Has_A_Posse"_and_"Lovelife"_sticker.jpg){kind=link}
![11:01, 29 March 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/03/21#c-Taivo-2021-03-29T11:01:00.000Z-File:"Andre_the_Giant_Has_A_Posse"_and_"Lovelife"_sticker.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
1.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
1.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
1.png){kind=link}
1.png){kind=link}
_-_Jackson_Pollock_(1912-1956).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Jackson_Pollock_(1912-1956).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_Jackson_Pollock_(1912-1956).jpg){kind=link}
_-_Jackson_Pollock_(1912-1956).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:47, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 19:50, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:51, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
advertising photo of an insignificant personality --Ayratayrat (talk) 20:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:51, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Author request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jerome501 (talk • contribs) 2021-03-18T16:58:10 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:52, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, looks to be some type of advertising? Elli (talk) 22:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:53, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Elli (talk) 22:06, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:53, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused and no clear educational use. Elli (talk) 23:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Fictional Flag. There is no such thing as the "reformist nazi party". Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 23:55, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope artwork. Elli (talk) 05:17, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. It's pretty good character artwork that required OTRS permission to get. The artist is pretty young but has written for IE Examiner. I checked out their/her website, and it was also pretty good. I think both the author and this image does say something rather educational that is currently being unexplored about this subject. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 17:28, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Hi, author of the file here, Midori Friedbauer. I would appreciate it if this file would not be deleted. It is being used in [an article] about transgender human rights by a journalist in a country that legally requires the sterilization of transgender individuals and I think that the artwork is doing good work in providing a free piece of media to help people talk about such issues. There is not a lot of media in the commons depicting transgender rights, people, issues, pride, etc. and this piece was made by a transgender person, me. It's high resolution and it's share-alike so it is very useful to people. Pisces Unicorn (talk) 21:53, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. I recommend that this not by deleted because it is a high quality image, has copyright permission, and is useful. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.118.92.187 (talk) 22:11, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. This has usage permission from the artist and is one of the few images tagged transgender. Its part of wikimedia commons mission to provide media for use in informational and educational material. This image is of high-quality and absolutely works toward that goal. 2600:1700:FF80:82D0:0:0:0:42 22:31, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: Unused personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, no educational use, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:15, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Maybe don't have an image of 'the evolution of anime pantyshots' 35.133.34.227 07:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:16, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation 83.200.72.7 19:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, Copyright violation --Waran18 (talk) 08:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:26, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Content not supported by any source. Potentially biased data 83.54.40.228 20:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Nonsense DR, please speedy close. --Denniss (talk) 14:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use {{Fact disputed}} instead. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
من آن را به اشتباه آپلود کردم — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hassiibb (talk • contribs) 2021-03-21T19:03:18 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
حق نشر — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hassiibb (talk • contribs) 2021-03-21T18:56:07 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
من تغییر عقیده دادم، نمیخواهم دیگر برای همه قابلمشاهده باشد. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hassiibb (talk • contribs) 2021-03-21T18:56:30 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused file of which we already have numerous alternatives. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
من تغییر عقیده دادم، نمیخواهم دیگر برای همه قابلمشاهده باشد. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hassiibb (talk • contribs) 2021-03-21T18:57:16 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused file of which we already have numerous alternatives. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
من آن را به اشتباه آپلود کردم — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hassiibb (talk • contribs) 2021-03-21T18:59:21 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused file of which we already have numerous alternatives. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
من آن را به اشتباه آپلود کردم — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hassiibb (talk • contribs) 2021-03-21T19:00:03 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused file of which we already have numerous alternatives. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
من تغییر عقیده دادم، نمیخواهم دیگر برای همه قابلمشاهده باشد. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hassiibb (talk • contribs) 2021-03-21T18:46:05 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused file of which we already have numerous alternatives. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of The-time-will-come.flac, I forgot that I already uploaded it Vitaly Zdanevich (talk) 21:59, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:33, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Source photo be found at the company page dated to at least March 2020, which is before this image's creation date. The original photo does not indicate any CC license, which would make this a disallowed derivative work. BriefEdits (talk) 22:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:34, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 22:07, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, found online. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:35, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Caption suggests that this is a screenshot from a film, which is derivative work. BriefEdits (talk) 22:32, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:36, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image lacks credible sources. The flag used at the Olympics cannot possibly be different from the official country flag. Kj1595 (talk) 07:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Are you really serious? Look at the footage of the opening ceremony. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 07:46, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 12:07, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image lacks credible sources. The flag used at the Olympics cannot possibly be different from the official country flag. Kj1595 (talk) 07:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Are you dead serious? Look at the footage of the opening ceremony. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 07:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment In principle they shouldn't be different, but in practice they may be (from the lack of official speciation, dying process, or even manufacturing mistake); this is valid for any flag. I see your point creating those flags, trying to recreating the feeling/history of the Summer Olympics, but taking colors from the opening ceremony is somewhat troublesome: the shades and colors are different depending on the lightning conditions, shadows, the camera angle and color calibration, video compression, etc. Also, the remastered version of the opening ceremony is likely to be different from the original footage. That's why I would discourage their use in the Wikipedia articles. Giro720 (talk) 09:53, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 12:07, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Sunhitradio (talk · contribs)
[edit]
--Nintendofan885T&Cs apply 11:40, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Es list offensichtlich, dass die Lizenz fehlerhaft ist. Angeblich ist die Urheberin Snezana Besic - es handelt sich aber ganz eindeutig nicht um ein Selfie, außerdem laut Titel Urheber Jost Wischnewski Lutheraner (talk) 15:10, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- So ganz klar ist das nicht. Schon mal was von einem Selbsauslöser gehört?--Gelli63 (talk) 10:46, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- wobei natürlich bei dem Titel die Möglichkeit gegeben ist, dass das Bild von Jost Wischnewski stammen könnte. Aber das ist Konjunktiv.--Gelli63 (talk) 10:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:27, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation Timtrent (talk) 15:32, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Montages of some free, and some copyrighted images taken without permission.
- File:İsmailli monatge.jpg
File:Guba City Montage.jpg(this one is fine, since all source images are from Commons)- File:CollageMaker 20210216 140213183.jpg
- File:Oghuzphoto.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 18:34, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:23, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
I highly doubt that this image and the ones listed below are really self made work and/or are licenced under a free licence. D-Kuru (talk) 11:26, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- Вероника Коваленко 2.jpg - already deleted
- Вероника Коваленко 3.jpg
- Вероника Коваленко 4.jpg
- Вероника Коваленко 5.jpg
- Вероника Коваленко 6.jpg
- Вероника Коваленко 7.jpg
- Вероника Коваленко 8.jpg
- Вероника Коваленко 9.jpg
- Вероника Коваленко 10.jpg
- Вероника Коваленко 11.jpg
- Вероника Коваленко 12.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
I highly doubt that this image is really the uploader's own work (no EXIF, only image uploaded, low resolution) D-Kuru (talk) 18:42, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Agree Agree, no purpose. A l p h a m a Talk 10:52, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 08:48, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Subject is not notable enough for English Wikipedia, en:Draft:Katie Callaway. Thuresson (talk) 13:55, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:06, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Originally flagged for speedy deletion as non-free/fair-use. FastilyClone (talk) 01:02, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: Deletion discussion converted from an inappropriate mass speedy tagging as "fair use": see User talk:Hedwig in Washington#Mass deletion of soft drink can photos. No other reason has been given for deletion. Just for completeness: This file (and its other version File:Brain-Toniq-Can-small.jpg) appear on their face to be uploaded by the copyright holder: It seems that Scott Ohlgren is the owner/creator of Brain Toniq; and there are a couple of Google search results that indicate that the uploader's username is associated with Scott Ohlgren. --Closeapple (talk) 05:17, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 18:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
This deletion request also applies to:
I doubt that this image is the uploader's own work. It looks like your average advertising image tagged as "own work" D-Kuru (talk) 17:59, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:06, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
HP Scanjet G4050 - Scanned image. Not own images false own work claim Микола Василечко (talk) 20:20, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:06, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Leontrotskyekk
[edit]- File:Marvel America.svg
- File:1964 Tantamount.svg
- File:Veep Contingent.svg
- File:Hillary vs. Obama.svg
- File:Final Round.svg
- File:Round One.svg
- File:GoresReElection.svg
- File:New Deal Coalition Regained - 2016 Election.svg
- File:Democratic Party presidential primaries results, 2016 (1).svg
- File:DemocraticKasich.svg
- File:Manchinwasright.svg
- File:1972 NBC.svg
- File:1976 McGovern.svg
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Fictional "alternate History" Files by User:Leontrotskyekk. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. --Jahobr (talk) 20:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all out of scope. Elli (talk) 03:31, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 02:34, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
This looks simple, but if it is a copy of the album cover, it needs a permission from the designer and/or photographer. Yann (talk) 11:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete COM:TOO It's a pure-text warning label. Andy Dingley (talk) 02:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: PD-text. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
アップロードは間違いです Juliet・Nanami (talk) 12:19, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:25, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
There is freedom of panorama in Russia for architecture, but not for sculpture. The sculpture was erected in 1964 and it is still protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 15:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Per [4], the sculptors are A.S.Fugenko, U.L.Sinkevich, and M.Ya.Gricuk. I couldn't find out when those three died or if any of them is even still alive, so it's uncertain when the file can be restored. --Rosenzweig τ 14:06, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FF-11 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not an own work, see [5]: The footnote in the image description (added with the linked change) says that the picture is "owned" by Einar und Eva Werth but the user wrote on his dewiki userpage: Mein Name ist Dr. med.vet. Björn-Martin Werth (My name is Dr. med.vet. Bjärn-Martin Werth).
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image is probably already in the PD. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- I am the owner of this picture of my grandgrandfather and it can use every person. Is this the right way to corresponce. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BMWerth (talk • contribs) 20:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: owning a print of a photo does not automatically mean that you also own the copyright or any other rights to the image. Without any meaningful information about the author and the date just given as "before 1958", we cannot keep this file, so deleted per the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 14:11, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bpickering1986 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Stadium 1980's.jpg
- File:Marineland Hardhat Diver.jpg
- File:Triple Jump Marineland of Florida.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
I am actually a former Marineland of Florida Employee worked there 1983 1994 images are my photos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bpickering1986 (talk • contribs) 00:06, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I was inclined to believe the uploader's statement, but then saw that at least two of the files are apparently from Facebook. If these are your photos despite being from FB, please send an e-mail to COM:VRT and wait what they have to say about possibly restoring the files with a documented permission. --Rosenzweig τ 16:48, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted statue, not sure if FOP applies here A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP since not on permanent display. --Geni (talk) 19:25, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio of a copyrighted architecture: a) no commercial freedom of panorama in France; architect w:I. M. Pei died in 2019 so still within 70 years of French posthumous copyright term (missing COM:OTRS permission from his heirs/estate); and c) see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid. Fails de minimis as it is intentional instead of an accessory object. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:50, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 19:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
This file is a screenshot from a YouTube video uploaded by a Belarusian TV channel "Capital TV". I don't see anywhere they have a CC-BY-SA-3.0 license Krylowicz (talk) 20:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- For some reason, the author posted files from YouTube under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 license, although there should be a CC-BY-3.0 license. But there is not even such a license here, and if it was, it should be archived, but it hasn't any archive history. Delete. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 12:34, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 19:30, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Logo, but I think the logo was simple enough John123521 (talk) 06:59, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. This is an international logo, unknown who designed it and who owns the copyright. Various contries have different TOO, so deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 11:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image lacks credible sources. Kj1595 (talk) 07:45, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Are you really serious? SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 07:50, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- You posted as the title the official flag of a country from a certain period and provided as a source a Flickr page? Kj1595 (talk) 05:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, consists of elements in PD which cannot be copyrighted. --Ellywa (talk) 11:05, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Based on description and contents, video does not appear to be intended for educational value. May also be a video of a criminal act, depending on local public indecency laws. 2600:1700:1120:CBE0:21C0:1176:5D8:E144 08:40, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 11:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image lacks a credible source. The link shown as the source is an amateur site. A better, more credible (official) source is needed. Kj1595 (talk) 07:50, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep This file is a derivative of the Great Arms of Prince Wilhelm of Wied (see page 4), which falls under {{PD-Albania-exempt}}. Since the copyright in a derivative work covers only the addition, and this file has no meaningful additions, it should also fall under PD-Albania-exempt. Pbrks (talk) 22:40, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No credible evidence is provided that this was the crown prince's standard. Kj1595 (talk) 03:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- That's not a valid reason for deletion. Consider adding {{Factual accuracy}} to the file page if you believe there is a factual inaccuracy. Pbrks (talk) 04:58, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. As stated on the file page the file is a derivative work of Jaume Ollé taken from another website. As noted on the disclaimer page the images are copyrighted and can only be used for non-commercial and non-political purposes, which is not compatible with the licences used on Commons. Therefore this image has to be deleted. @Pbrks: you can follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the original designer to publish the image on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image can be undeleted. Please remember the person of the photo is probably not the photographer/copyright holder. --Ellywa (talk) 19:33, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image lacks a credible source. The link shown as the source is an amateur site. A better, more credible (official) source is needed. Kj1595 (talk) 07:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep This file is a derivative of the Great Arms of Prince Wilhelm of Wied (see page 4), which falls under {{PD-Albania-exempt}}. Since the copyright in a derivative work covers only the addition, and this file has no meaningful additions, it should also fall under PD-Albania-exempt. Pbrks (talk) 22:40, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No credible evidence is provided that this was the princess's standard. Kj1595 (talk) 03:19, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- That's not a valid reason for deletion. Consider adding {{Factual accuracy}} to the file page if you believe there is a factual inaccuracy. Pbrks (talk) 04:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. As stated on the file page the file is a derivative work of Jaume Ollé taken from another website. As noted on the disclaimer page the images are copyrighted and can only be used for non-commercial and non-political purposes, which is not compatible with the licences used on Commons. Therefore this image has to be deleted. @Pbrks: you can follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the original designer to publish the image on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image can be undeleted. Please remember the person of the photo is probably not the photographer/copyright holder. --Ellywa (talk) 19:35, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
_flag.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_flag.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image lacks a credible source. The link shown as the source is an amateur site. A better, more credible (official) source is needed. Kj1595 (talk) 07:54, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
_flag.gif){kind=link}
- This nomination is currently technically invalid, because Kj1595 did not leave a notification message on my user talk page (just some broken templates). AnonMoos (talk) 09:54, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- DO NOT DELETE as long as Kj1595 is unwilling to show the common courtesy of leaving a valid notification message on my user talk page. There's no need to discuss the specific details concerning this image until and unless there is an actual valid deletion nomination (which there isn't now)... AnonMoos (talk) 09:48, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - As seen in his comment at this deletion request, Kj1595 appears to be disputing the factual accuracy of this image, not a copyright issue. Pbrks (talk) 05:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. As stated on the file page the file is a derivative work of Jaume Ollé taken from another website. As noted on the disclaimer page the images are copyrighted and can only be used for non-commercial and non-political purposes, which is not compatible with the licences used on Commons. Therefore this image has to be deleted. @Pbrks and AnonMoos: you can follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the original designer to publish the image on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image can be undeleted. Please remember the person of the photo is probably not the photographer/copyright holder. --Ellywa (talk) 19:36, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
_flag.gif){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Previously published on International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies, also the "author" appears in the image, and it is not own work
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as rationale in rather weak. The mentioned external hit is undated and clearly refers to material by Dieter Schuh. It even states "Das Tibetinstitut legt hiermit deshalb eine umfassende Bilddokumentation von Dieter Schuh vor". For the 2nd argument "author appears in image, thereby not own work": Considering the overall circumstances, it does not seem unthinkable to me that the photo was taken with the help of a self-timer. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:45, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Dieter Schuh Tibet.jpg
- File:Dieter Schuh in Tibet on August 2007 detail, 5462064 Dieter Schuh und tibetischer Frabrikant (cropped).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- I became aware of this deletion request as the article Dieter Schuh is on my watchlist on the French Wikipedia. I do not understand the argument developed by A1Cafel for his speedy deletion nomination based on suspected copyright violation. The file was originally uploaded by Dieter Schuh himself on the German Wikipedia on 26. Sep. 2009 21:34 (CEST), see here The file was later transferred to Commons on October 3rd 2009, see here. To suspect that Dieter Schuh is not the copyright owner of his own portrait (either commissioned or self-produced with timer, the distinction between the two seems rather irrelevant to me), which he has uploaded himself in Commons and published on the website of the Institute he is the founder sounds irrational to me.--Dominique Roux (talk) 11:42, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Yes the images were uploaded by the subject himself. In this case it does not seem selfies. Therefore the images are deleted, per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 19:39, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
No proof that KOGL type I applies to the twitter of the Blue House A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:41, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image lacks a credible source. The link shown as the source is an amateur site. A better, more credible (official) source is needed. Kj1595 (talk) 07:50, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep This file is a derivative of the Great Arms of Prince Wilhelm of Wied (see page 4), which falls under {{PD-Albania-exempt}}. Since the copyright in a derivative work covers only the addition, and this file has no meaningful additions, it should also fall under PD-Albania-exempt. Pbrks (talk) 22:40, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No credible evidence is provided that this was the prince's standard. Kj1595 (talk) 03:19, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- That's not a valid reason for deletion. Consider adding {{Factual accuracy}} to the file page if you believe there is a factual inaccuracy. Pbrks (talk) 04:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: As stated on the file page the file is a derivative work of Jaume Ollé taken from another website. As noted on the disclaimer page the images are copyrighted and can only be used for non-commercial and non-political purposes, which is not compatible with the licences used on Commons. Therefore this image has to be deleted. @Pbrks: you can follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the original designer to publish the image on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image can be undeleted. Please remember the person of the photo is probably not the photographer/copyright holder. --Ellywa (talk) 19:34, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Szczur14pp (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author / date of creation / date of author's death (in case license 'PD-old-70' was selected) / date when the work was first published in Poland (in case license 'PD-Polish' was selected) information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. There is no reason to assume that the author of photos marked as 'PD-old-70' actually died 70+ years ago, or to assume that works marked as 'PD-Polish' were actually published in Poland before May 23, 1994.
- File:Mieczysław Łopuski w reklamie.jpg
- File:Łopuski podczas szkolenia (1 z lewej).jpg
- File:Z Wiktorem Jarockim.jpg
- File:Na nartach za koniem.jpg
- File:Na przystani.jpg
- File:Ze Stepokurą i podoficerem.jpg
- File:Jako ppor. Wojska Polskiego.jpg
- File:Gimnazjalista.jpg
- File:Jako-kapitan.jpg
File:Dedykacja mjr. Paszkiewicza dla kpt. Fleischmanna.jpgFile:Telegram mjr. Kundy do kpt. Fleischmanna z okazji zawarcia małżeństwa.jpg- File:Kurs spadochronowy - w środku M. Łopuski.jpg
- File:Łopuski M.jpg
- File:Jan Stasiak st. sierż.jpg
- File:Sierż. K. Domeradzki.jpg
- File:Domeradzki Kazimierz sierż.png
File:MDS B.jpgFile:MDS S.jpg- File:Przy izbie chorych batalionu Ludwikowo (1 od prawej).png
- File:W armii cesarskiej.jpg
File:Odznaka Honorowa Orlęta.jpg- File:Kapitanowie Fleischmann i Rodzeń.jpg
- File:Kapitan Jan Fleischmann.jpg
- File:Zarębski Jan - chor.jpg
- File:Podoficerowie 14 pp, w środku chor. Jan Zarębski.jpg
- File:Wlazełko Ludwik.jpg
- File:Stepokura Władysław.jpg
- File:Rodzeń Józef.jpg
- File:Minkina Józef.jpg
- File:Maskowicz Eugeniusz.jpg
- File:Fabijanowski Wacław.jpg
- File:Trojan Stanisław.jpg
- File:Stasiaczek Stanisław.jpg
- File:Miciński Wacław.jpg
- File:Artur Lamecki - podpis.jpg
- File:Rok 1934 - żołnierze 14 pp podczas budowy kopca Piłsudskiego w Krakowie. Pierwszy z prawej kpr. Kazimierz Dwojaczny.jpg
- File:Kompania szkolna ckm 14 pp - marzec 1936.jpg
File:Skierowanie do 1 psp.jpgFile:Przebieg służby.jpgFile:Nadanie ZKZ S. Boryczko.jpg- File:Gromczyński Wojciech płk.jpg
- File:Płk st. sp. Wojciech Gromczyński.jpg
- File:Jung Władysław gen. dyw.jpg
- File:Powierza Władysław płk dypl. dca 62pp.jpg
- File:Ważyński Konstanty ppłk dypl. 11dak.jpg
- File:Mirgałowski Bolesław ppłk dca 59pp.jpg
- File:Romiszewski Brunon płk dca 15pal.jpg
- File:Pomazański Henryk płk dypl. dca pd 15DP.jpg
- File:Radoliński Jan mjr dypl.jpg
File:Książeczka wojskowa z wpisem o mianowaniu adiutantem 41 pp.jpgFile:Legitymacja krzyza AK dobra.jpgFile:Książeczka wojskowa 1928.jpgFile:Książeczka wojskowa 1923.jpg- File:Kpt. Boryczko Stefan w 1928.jpg
- File:Por. Stefan Boryczko w 1923.jpg
- File:Chór 5 ppLP w Legionowie - 1917. Boryczko pierwszy z lewej.jpg
- File:Kpt Stefan Boryczko (1931-1933).jpg
File:Legitymacja Krzyża AK 1.jpg- File:Sztab Generalny Warszawa 1924.jpg
- File:Dowództwo Okręgu Generalnego Kielce 1921.jpg
- File:Sztab Generalny 1924 - Boryczko 2 od lewej.jpg
File:Zaświadczenie z Koła Piątaków.jpgFile:Legitymacja Krzyża AK 2.jpgFile:Legitymacja VM.jpg- File:Wraz z żoną Eugenią (1928).jpg
- File:Kapitan Stefan Boryczko.jpg
- File:Mjr lek. Jacobson-Jedlina Wojciech.jpg
- File:Mjr dr Jacobson-Jedlina Wojciech.jpg
- File:Jako kmdt. szkoły wraz z instruktorami.jpg
- File:Jako oficer KOP.jpg
File:Pozwolenie na prowadzenie pojazdów mechanicznych.jpg- File:W rozmowie z gen. Andersem (jako kmdt. szkoły).jpg
File:Legitymacja odznaki pułkowej P7P.jpgFile:Legitymacja Krzyża Monte Cassino.jpgFile:Awansowanie na kapitana.jpg- File:Porucznik Kłosiński z żoną w ogrodzie. II połowa lat 30-tych XX w.jpg
- File:Portret rysunkowy.jpg
File:Nadanie SKZ z mieczami.jpgFile:Nadanie Medalu Wojska.jpg- zmieniono licencjęFile:Nadanie Gwiazd za kampanie.jpgFile:Legitymacja odznaki pamiatkowej 2 KP.jpgFile:Pozwolenie na prowadzenie pojazdów.jpg- File:Zdjęcie 1943.jpg
- File:Maskowicz Eugeniusz (w środku) 1920-1923.jpg
- File:Maskowicz Eugeniusz ppor.jpg
- File:Kpt. Rodzeń na włocławskim moście.jpg
- File:Gołab Józef ks. kpt kapelan.jpg
- File:Kłosiński Mieczysław ppor.jpg
- File:III Dywizyjny Kurs Instruktorski dla Podoficerów 4 DP przy 14 pp.jpg
- File:Stepokura Władysław ppor. 14 pp.jpg
- File:W. Stepokura w 1968 roku.jpg
- File:W. Stepokura w latach 60-tych.jpg
- File:Stepokura Władysław - cmentarz Osobowicki we Wrocławiu.jpg
- File:Kpr Stefan Jastrzębski - 31 pp.jpg
- File:X. Józef Gołąb - kapelan 14 pp.jpg
- File:Zimnal Mieczysław por.jpg
- File:Wójcik Stefan ppor.jpg
- File:Wiśniewski Jan ppor.jpg
- File:Straub Stanisław por.jpg
- File:Spychalski Stefan por.jpg
- File:Smolarczyk Lucjan por.jpg
- File:Rolecki Czesław ppor.jpg
- File:Ptaszyński Franciszek por 3.jpg
- File:Nowicki Gerard kpt.jpg
- File:Niesiołowski Franciszek por.jpg
- File:Nejman Mieczysław ppor.jpg
- File:Naziembło Michał por.jpg
- File:Meres Bolesław ppor.jpg
- File:Matczyński Feliks ppor.jpg
- File:Łukomski Kazimierz por.jpg
- File:Kurowski Józef st. sierż.jpg
- File:Kuniński Ziemowit ppor.jpg
- File:Krawczyk Antoni ppor.jpg
- File:Karasiński Józef ppor.jpg
- File:Karabanik Franciszek ppor.jpg
- File:Jaklewicz Kazimierz ppor.jpg
- File:Iwański Franciszek ppor.jpg
- File:Holly Karol por.jpg
- File:Grotowski Wiktor ppor.jpg
- File:Grabiński Jan ppor 2.jpg
- File:Dzierzbicki Marian mjr 2.jpg
- File:Domagalski Stanisław ppor.jpg
- File:Budzyłło Bazyli kpt.jpg
- File:Buczyński Zygmunt por.jpg
- File:Bolesław Sierzputowski z żoną Idą i córką Wandą - Irkuck 1911-12 gabinet w domu przy ul. Miasnoj.jpg
- File:B. Sierzputowski na ganku domu przy ul. Miasnoj w Irkucku (1911-1912).jpg
- File:Blomberg Andrzej ppor.jpg
- File:Balcerkiewicz Jan Wojciech ppor.jpg
- File:Edmund Ciemnoczołowski z rodziną.jpg
- File:Edmund Ciemnoczołowski przy desce kreślarskiej.jpg
- File:Edmund Ciemnoczołowski (zbiory Andrzeja C.).jpg
- File:Stanisław Pietrzyk jako podpułkownik Wojska Polskiego.jpg
- File:Major Pietrzyk z żoną.jpg
- File:Kapitan Pietrzyk z zoną i córką.jpg
- File:Węgrzyn Walenty kpt.jpg
- File:Beliczyński Zygmunt por.jpg
- File:Biesiekierski Konstanty ppor.jpg
- File:Omielanowicz Czesław por.jpg
- File:Gen. Bolesław Sierzputowski z żoną Idą z Żółtowskich i córką Wandą później Olszańską.jpg
- File:Gen. Sierzputowski w 1930 roku, siedzi w środku.jpg
- File:Gen. Bolesław Sierzputowski z żoną Idą w 1911 r.jpg
- File:Ppor. Feliks Stawicki.jpg
- File:Gen. Bolesław Sierzputowski.jpg
- File:Jarocki Wiktor kpt.jpg
- File:Puliński Dionizy ppor.jpg
- File:Lemański Wirgiliusz por.jpg
- File:Zabłocki Aleksander mjr.jpg
- File:Bańczak Józef kpt.jpg
- File:Bogucki Antoni por.jpg
- File:Tkaczyk Józef kpt.jpg
- File:Z żołnierzami batalionu wartowniczego Senne I - kwiecień 1946 (stoi trzeci od lewej).jpg
- File:Rok 1920 - porucznik Pietrzyk siedzi pierwszy od prawej w dolnym rzędzie.jpg
- File:Kapitan Stanisław Pietrzyk - 6 grudnia 1923.jpg
- File:Stanisław Pietrzyk - I Korpus w Rosji.jpg
- File:Włocławek 1931, córka Jadzia pierwsza od lewej w środkowym rzędzie.jpg
- File:Jako komendant obozu Sennelager (siedzi w środku). Szósty od prawej stoi ppor. Tadeusz Żółtowski.jpg
- File:Na zjeździe Polskiego Związku Niewidomych.jpg
- File:Pluton łączności 14 pp (IX.1933) - w środku siedzi dca pułku - ppłk Sudoł, na prawo od niego siedzi dca pl. łączności - por. Jan Herman.jpg
- File:S. Pietrzyk podczas manewrów lub wojny.jpg
- File:S. Pietrzyk (z prawej) podczas pracy w Polskim Związku Niewidomych.jpg
- File:Stanisław Pietrzyk na koniu - garnizon Włocławek.jpg
- File:S. Pietrzyk jako uczeń szkoły wojennej w Kijowie.jpg
- File:S. Pietrzyk (w środku) podczas służby w baonie KOP Skałat.jpg
- File:Wypoczynek nad jeziorem Czarne k. Włocławka.jpg
- File:Włocławek 1934 - mjr Pietrzyk stoi tyłem.jpg
- File:Włocławek 1933 - mjr Pietrzyk stoi od prawej.jpg
- File:Pietrzyk Stanisław ppłk - oflag VI E Dorsten.jpg
- File:Pietrzyk Stanisław ppłk - oflag VI B Dössel, X.1945.jpg
- File:Morawski Władysław płk.jpg
- File:Młyński Kazimierz ppłk.jpg
- File:Łabencki Czesław por.tif
- File:Łabęcki Czesław na emeryturze (1973).jpg
- File:Łabęcki Czesław z matką (Parczew - 1934).jpg
- File:Łabęcki Czesław ppor.jpg
- File:Łabuć Czesław ppłk.jpg
- File:Leparski Leopold mjr.jpg
- File:Jastrzębski Antoni płk.jpg
File:Legitymacja pierścienia 14 pp.jpgFile:Legitymacja żony oficera - Anny Kozińskiej.jpgFile:Patent oficerski J. Kozińskiego.jpgFile:Świadectwo ukonczenia Oficerskiej Szkoły Piechoty.jpgFile:Dyplom nadania SKZ.jpg- File:Portret wykonany w 1935 roku przez Jana Stępnia.jpg
- File:Józef Koziński z rodziną w przedwojennej Warszawie.jpg
- File:Józef Koziński na Wiśle, jako kapitan jachtu.jpg
File:Dyplom odznaczenia Brązowym Medalem za Długoletnią Służbę.jpg- zmieniono licencję- File:Obóz harcerski - jezioro Łuba.jpg
- File:Wyjazd na obóz harcerski do Kazimierza Biskupiego (1947).jpg
- File:Szkoła Podchorążych Piechoty.jpg
- File:Jóżef Koziński na poligonie.jpg
File:Legitymacja członka sekcji kajakowców KPH.jpgFile:Legitymacja Koła Harcerzy z Czasów Walk o Niepodległość.jpgFile:Legitymacja nadania Krzyża Zasługi dla ZHP (1975).jpgFile:List mianowania działaczem harcerskim (1932).jpgFile:Zaświadczenie o pełnieniu funkcji komendanta hufca Włocławek (1946).jpg- File:Choinka harcerzy w GZK (1937).jpg
- File:Bulwary lata 30. - chrzest kajaków.jpg
File:Legitymacja brązowej odznaki turystycznej Polskiego Związku Kajakowego.jpg- File:Józef Koziński z narzeczoną.jpg
- File:Sierpień 1922, obóz harcerski, w środku gen. J. Haller, pierwszy z lewej J. Koziński.jpg
- File:Seminarium Nauczycielskie Łowicz 1925.jpg
- File:Harcerstwo 1917.jpg
- File:Komendant hufca harcerzy.jpg
File:Dyplom Harcmistrza Polski Ludowej.jpgFile:Odznaka komendancka PW.jpgFile:Odznaka instruktorska PW.jpg- File:Sieradz 1916.jpg
- File:Werschner Adam ppłk.jpg
- File:Płk Misiag z dziećmi z ochronki.jpg
- File:Jagiełło Ryszard ppor.jpg
- File:Pietrzyk Stanisław mjr 2.jpg
- File:Stawicki ppor x.jpg
- File:Stawicki Feliks ppor 2 x.jpg
- File:Marian Matusiak - mjr LWP.jpg
- File:Mjr WP Marian Matusiak.jpg
- File:Matusiak Marian mjr.jpg
- File:Kpt. Tadeusz Czeszejko-Sochacki.jpg
- File:Ppor. 14 pp Władysław Stepokura.jpg
- File:Edmund Ciemnoczołowski.jpg
- File:Żwański Władysław mjr.jpg
- File:Stepokura Władysław ppor.jpg
- File:Olędzki Józef kpt.jpg
- File:Przedlacki por.jpg
- File:Juszczyk ppłk ks.jpg
- File:Majewski por.jpg
- File:Kpt. Czyżewicz.png
- File:2 komp. rez. ckm i br. tow. 14 pp (XI.1931).jpg
- File:Szelepin Władysław por.jpg
- File:Kompania szkolna ckm 14 pp (5.III.1935).jpg
- File:Pluton łączności 14 pp (16.IX.1933) - w środku siedzi por. Jan Herman.jpg
- File:Herman Jan.jpg
- File:Por. Henryk Ługowski.png
- File:Kpt. Jan Kowalczuk.png
- File:Fiszer mjr 2.jpg
- File:Por. F. Walewski prowadzi kompanię ckm 14 pp.jpg
- File:Kpt. Jan Stefan Witkowski.jpg
- File:Walewski pchor.jpg
- File:Załęski ppor.jpg
- File:Witkowski kpt.jpg
- File:Stanisław Kaliszek.jpg
File:Karta członkowska (Belgia).jpgFile:Kaarta członkowska (Belgia).jpg- File:Por. Uściński - Szkocja.jpg
- File:Por. Edward Uściński.jpg
- File:Jerzy Pieszkański.jpg
- File:Kompania podoficerska 14 pp (1933).jpg
- File:1 kompania ckm.jpg
- File:Mijakowski, Pietrzyk, Fiszer, Paszkiewicz.jpg
- File:Pluton łączności 14 pp (5.8.1932) - w środku siedzi por. Zawarczyński.jpg
- File:Pluton łączności 14 pp (I.1930).jpg
- File:Wilczak kpt.jpg
File:Zaświadczenie demobilizacyjne (29.7.47).jpgFile:Ukonczenie kursu w CWBPanc (12.10.37).jpgFile:Ukończenie SPKaw. (5.8.33).jpgFile:Mianowanie porucznikiem (22.12.35).jpgFile:Patent oficerski E. Uścińskiego.jpg- File:Belgia rok 1944.jpg
File:Zaproszenie na raut do Prezydenta RP.jpgFile:Zaświadczenie Francja 9.10.1939.jpgFile:VM PSZ.jpgFile:VM Polska.jpgFile:Legitymacja Medalu Wojska.jpgFile:Krzyż 1 DPanc.jpgFile:Legitymacja Krzyż Ochotnika.jpgFile:Legitymacja Gwiazda za Niemcy i Francję.jpgFile:KW Polska.jpgFile:KW PSZ.jpgFile:Legitymacja Francja 1939.jpgFile:Legitymacja 2 bcz 1940.jpg- File:Wilhelmshaven 1945.jpg
- File:Szkocja 1941.jpg
- File:Maczuga 1944.jpg
- File:Belgia 1944 - dekoracja VM.jpg
- File:1934 defilada z okazji 3-go maja. Prowadzi por. Bartosiński.jpg
- File:Sztandar 14pp na ulicach Włocławka.jpg
- File:2 komp. 14 pp. W środku por. Holly, obok w furażerce por. Buczyński i w płaszczu ppor. Królak.jpg
- File:Edward Uściński.jpg
- File:Bartosiński ppor.jpg
- File:Zawarczyński por.jpg
- File:Ćwiczenia rezerwy 49 pp w Zarzeczu - lato 1938.jpg
- File:Ppor. rez. 49 pp Mieczysław Hołdanowicz.jpg
- File:Ppor. Królak Leonard.jpg
- File:Królak ppor.jpg
- File:Juliusz Rómmel i Rudolf Ostrihanski.jpg
- File:Kpt. Rudolf Ostrihansky.jpg
- File:1 komp. 22 pułku p.jpg
- File:Ryszard Jagiełło por.jpg
- File:Jadwiga i Stanisław Pietrzyk.jpg
- File:Eugeniusz Smoleński.jpg
- File:Bączkiewicz mjr.jpg
- File:Biegi narciarskie żołnierzy KOP.jpg
- File:Budsław 1934 - płk. Wiatr dekoruje ppłk. Czubryta ZKZ.jpg
- File:Mołodeczno - uroczystość w 86 pułku piechoty.jpg
- File:Mołodeczno - ppłk. Czubyt i płk Wiatr.jpg
- File:Zawody sportowe - 1931 Budsław.jpg
- File:Szwadron KOP Budsław w 1934 na święcie Hubertus.jpg
- File:Czubryt kpt 14 pp.jpg
- File:Ppłk KOP Józef Wiatr.jpg
- File:Ppłk Józef Wiatr.jpg
- File:Emil Zawisza z ojcem.jpg
- File:Piotr Kunda mjr 14pp.jpg
- File:1932 wycieczka do Olkowicz.jpg
- File:Budsław 1932.jpg
- File:Ppłk Czubryt.jpg
- File:1935 Mołodeczno - przywitanie ze sztandarem (pierwszy z prawej).jpg
- File:1938 Bielsko-Biała przemawia ppłk Czubryt.jpg
- File:Julian Czubryt ppłk.jpg
- File:Misiąg płk.jpg
- File:Kpt. Emil Zawisza de Sulima.jpg
- File:Józef Koziński por.jpg
- File:Łobza II mjr.jpg
- File:Kurs działonowych ppanc 1939 - siedza od lewej Koziński, Dzióbek, Sudoł, Kunda, Ulatowski.jpg
- File:Minkina por.jpg
- File:Fabianowski por.jpg
- File:Kpt. Antoni Berger (14 pp).jpg
- File:14 pp - 11.VI.1923 - 3 kompania rezerwy.jpg
- File:Pietrzyk mjr.jpg
- File:Trojan kpt.jpg
- File:Szkoła Podoficerska 14pp.jpg
- File:Mjr Aleksander Fiszer.jpg
- File:Ppłk Ignacy Szpunar - maj 1940 Woldenberg.jpg
- File:Wittman kpt.jpg
- File:Ppor. Edward Dorszewski.jpg
- File:Kunda Piotr - mjr.jpg
- File:Pukianiec mjr.jpg
- File:Czubryt, Wąsowski, Wlazełko, Sanak, Alejski, Rodzeń.jpg
- File:Ćwiczenia plutonu sanitarnego 14 pp. (ppłk Wąsowski, por. Pukianiec).jpg
- File:Wąsowski Ewaryst ppłk lek.jpg
- File:Kpt. Mieczysław Sanak.jpg
- File:Delegacja 14pp u P. Mościckiego.jpg
- File:14 pp - w 15 lecie niepodległości.jpg
- File:Kpt. cc Jan Serafin.jpg
- File:Mjr Mieczysław Teodorczyk.jpg
- File:Szkoła Podoficerska 14 pp (1939).jpg
- File:Kpt Jan Fleischman z 14 pp wraz z kompanią.jpg
- File:Kpt Jan Fleischman.jpg
- File:Jan Fleischman - kpt 14pp.jpg
- File:12 Promocja SPP (1935) - gen. Maxymowicz-Raczyński, ppor. Henryk Karasiewicz.jpg
- File:Kurs działonowych ppanc przy 14 pp - ppłk W. Dzióbek.jpg
- File:Ppłk Hugo Mijakowski - WKS Cuiavia (1935).jpg
- File:Mjr Bohdan Sołtys.jpg
- File:Karasiewicz por 2.jpg
- File:Uroczystosć w 14 pułku piechoty.jpg
- File:Świderski 2.jpg
- File:Sudoł ppłk.jpg
- File:Świderski mjr.jpg
File:7 srebrny.jpg- File:Wilhelm Paszkiewicz, major.jpg
File:6 Armia Austrii.jpgFile:5 Krzyż Walecznych.jpgFile:4 Za Wołyń.jpgFile:2 Gwiazda Przemyśla.jpgFile:1 Orlęta.jpgFile:Dyplom mjr. Rodzenia.jpg- File:Mjr Piotr Kunda.jpg
- File:Kpt. Artur Lamecki.jpg
- File:Mjr Ludwik Wlazełko.jpg
- File:Ppłk Hugo Mijakowski.jpg
- File:Mjr Jan Łobza.jpg
- File:Kapitan Ignacy Alejski.jpg
- File:Mjr Okupski.jpg
- File:Kpr. Jan Karol Musiałkiewicz.jpg
- File:Kurs podch. rez. 4DP (1933) wraz z gen. bryg. Maxymowicz-Raczyńskim.jpg
- File:Czubryt.jpg
- File:14 pp rok 1929-1930.jpg
- File:14-pp0001.jpg
- File:Józef Rodzeń.jpg
- File:Włodzimierz Brayczewski.jpg
- File:Władysław Dzióbek, podpułkownik.jpg
- File:Kpt. 14pp Józef Rodzeń.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1920-1923.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._Sz%C3%B3sty_od_prawej_stoi_ppor._Tadeusz_%C5%BB%C3%B3%C5%82towski.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_w_%C5%9Brodku_siedzi_dca_pu%C5%82ku_-_pp%C5%82k_Sudo%C5%82,_na_prawo_od_niego_siedzi_dca_pl._%C5%82%C4%85czno%C5%9Bci_-_por._Jan_Herman.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_podczas_pracy_w_Polskim_Zwi%C4%85zku_Niewidomych.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_podczas_s%C5%82u%C5%BCby_w_baonie_KOP_Ska%C5%82at.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_w_%C5%9Brodku_siedzi_por._Jan_Herman.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_w_%C5%9Brodku_siedzi_por._Zawarczy%C5%84ski.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_gen._Maxymowicz-Raczy%C5%84ski,_ppor._Henryk_Karasiewicz.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_wraz_z_gen._bryg._Maxymowicz-Raczy%C5%84skim.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
WTM (talk) 12:42, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Głos
- Wśród zakwestionowanych zdjęć jest wiele zdjęć dokumentów urzędowych, które są z zasady wyłączone spod prawa autorskiego i należą do domeny publicznej. Należałoby tylko zmienić licencję z {{PD-Polish}} na {{PD-Polishsymbol}}.
Patrz: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Poland – Wikimedia Commons
Przykłady: File:Nadanie Medalu Wojska.jpg lub File:Dyplom odznaczenia Brązowym Medalem za Długoletnią Służbę.jpg
- Szczur14pp. Zacznij od tego:)
- WTM - czy dobrze radzę?--keriM (talk) 20:41, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Słusznie @Kerim44: dzięki za przypomnienie, rzeczywiście dokumenty urzędowe oznaczone {{PD-Polishsymbol}} nie będą budziły zastrzeżeń. [That's right Kerim44, thansks for the reminder, indeed (according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Poland) official documents marked with {{PD-Polishsymbol}} will not raise objections anymore] WTM (talk) 16:36, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Ja już po tylu latach nie ogarnę z jakich gazet i publikacji poszczególne zdjęcia pochodziły. Kilka, może kilkanaście - z pamięci bym ogarnął, gdzie były opublikowane. Ale zakwestionowane są setki zdjęć, które umieszczałem na przestrzeni kilku lat. Niektóre z nich widziałem już wykorzystane w innych publikacjach, jako pochodzące z wikipedii--Szczur14pp (talk) 17:08, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Szczur14pp - to ja "stary" mam za Ciebie poprawiać?:) - trzy "dokumenty" już poprawiłem - zacznij od tego. Potem zdjecia legitymacyjne.. spytamy mądrzejszych o typową dla nich licencję... i tak dojdziemy do końca. Swoją drogą - napisz coś tam na swojej wizytówce, by nie swieciło "jak młodemu":)--keriM (talk) 18:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Mam chyba dwa dni urlopu w tym tygodniu to rozpocznę poprawianie licencji w środę. Zobaczę czy coś umiem zrobić z wizytówką--Szczur14pp (talk) 18:54, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Już w kilkunastu zmieniłem licencję, a w kilku dopisałem gdzie było opublikowane. Czy można te zdjęcia "poprawione" usunąć jakoś z tej listy, żebym widział, które muszę poprawić?--Szczur14pp (talk) 19:14, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- moim autorytetem jest WTM (sic!) ;) -spytajmy jego--keriM (talk) 22:18, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Have you checked COM:FOP Poland, where some files above may apply that? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:00, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oficjalne dokumenty z Polski, nie są objęte prawami autorskimi (zdjęcia do legitymacji czy dowodów). Wiele z innych fotografii jest zrobiona przed 45, więc i tu wygasły prawa. Jak widzę, większość była już gdzieś publikowana. Sądzę, że są np. na Polonie, gdzie będą opatrzone odpowiednią sygnaturą Gruzin (talk) 15:57, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- We wszystkich dokumentach urzędowych pozmieniałem licencję na PD-Polishsymbol. W części zdjęć z licencją domeny publicznej dodałem miejsce publikacji zdjęć. Na pozostałe nie jestem w stanie w krótkim czasie odtworzyć miejsca ich opublikowania. Natomiast większość z nich znajduje się również w zbiorach Muzeum Historii Włocławka--Szczur14pp (talk) 15:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Jeszcze kilka fotografii z książeczek wojskowych oraz przez siebie wykonanych zdjęć nagrobnych uzupełniłem o zmianę licencji. W kilku zdjęciach z domeny publicznej podałem miejsce publikacji, więc nie wiem dlaczego nie zostały odznaczone w tym spisie. Kilka po sprawdzeniu w ten sposób mogę jeszcze zmienić licencję lub dodać w opisie. Reszta wymaga poszukiwań miejsca publikacji od nowas - czego nie uczynię od ręki--Szczur14pp (talk) 15:56, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion, kept those who were marked with <s></s> Thanks for all your work Kerim, very helpful. --Ellywa (talk) 09:50, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
South Korea raises the p.m.a. to 70 years since 2013, thus images published in or after 1963 are protected by copyright for 70 years A1Cafel (talk) 15:45, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 22:42, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
South Korea raises the p.m.a. to 70 years since 2013, thus images published in or after 1963 are protected by copyright for 70 years A1Cafel (talk) 15:48, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 22:48, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 KR license on the website A1Cafel (talk) 15:49, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 23:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danny794986432981498215 (talk · contribs)
[edit]
Very clearly mistagged, but they might qualify for {{PD-text}}. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 16:55, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion.m @MJL: please correct the Copyright tags, you can do that if they are not correct, which appears the case. When in doubt, you better ask questions in the COM:VP then nominate for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 23:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 83.200.72.7 17:55, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. source seems not required for such a simple design, anybody can reproduce this. --Ellywa (talk) 23:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:35B9:6775:89A0:7E14 15:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:22, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Use {{Factual accuracy}} instead. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
No source 83.200.72.7 17:55, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship (still active in march 2021). --Ellywa (talk) 23:11, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 83.200.72.7 17:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Reasonable to assume this is own work. --Ellywa (talk) 23:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:35B9:6775:89A0:7E14 15:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:31, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
No source 83.200.72.7 17:57, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship (still active in march 2021). --Ellywa (talk) 23:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since) Ivan Vtorov (talk) 18:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- At time of tagging this historical photo was claimed to be own work. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:50, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and can be undeleted safely 120 years after the image was made, which will be 1936+120=2056.. --Ellywa (talk) 23:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
SVG visibly inaccurate. A new PNG version with more pixels is more accurate. Peter.wieden (talk) 23:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
But you know that this is a SVG vector graphic and it can be scroll up, edited and so on. --Krzysztof Zajączkowski (talk) 01:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
I know it. But you scroll the deviations large. I don't know, how a SVG can be edited. My fisheye transformation program can only work with Bitmaps, not with vectors. Creating a vector graphic based on a low-resolution bitmap was not a good idea. If you compare the new bitmap with the enlarged vector graphic, you will see the differences. The new PeterW_zt_3.png has 7680 x 4320 pixels and a moderate file size. Articles that used "PeterW_zt_3.svg" have been changed to "PeterW_zt_3.png". By the way: I would like to leave the animation "PeterW_zt.gif" as it is for now. --Peter.wieden (talk) 19:11, 23 March 2021 (UTC) By the way: I made a new version of the animation "PeterW_zt.gif".Peter.wieden (talk) 23:28, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 23:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
SVG visibly inaccurate. A new PNG version with more pixels is more accurate. Peter.wieden (talk) 23:45, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Articles that used "PeterW_zt_2.svg" have been changed to "PeterW_zt_2.png".--Peter.wieden (talk) 18:47, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 23:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The tunnel was modeled more accurately with a new PNG file. Peter.wieden (talk) 23:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Initially, the exterior view of the tunnel was a VRML screenshot. This representation showed an angular tunnel. In 2021, the tunnel was newly created with a fisheye transformation program. The tunnel now looks round, as it really is.. Articles that used "PeterW_zt_1.svg" have been changed to "PeterW_zt_1.png". --Peter.wieden (talk) 19:45, 23 March 2021 (UTC) Text modified: --Peter.wieden (talk) 23:34, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 23:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
South Korea raises the p.m.a. to 70 years since 2013, thus images published in or after 1963 are protected by copyright for 70 years A1Cafel (talk) 15:48, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Can be undeleted in 70 years after 1972 so in 2043.. --Ellywa (talk) 23:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 23:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
