Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/02/12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 12th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work; the image is copyrighted by Ubisoft and/or Level-5 IanTEB (talk) 08:49, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Thibaut (talk) 08:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope file from a permanently blocked user. Pierre cb (talk) 04:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 08:00, 12 Februar 2021 UTC: Out of scope file from a permanently blocked user. --Krdbot 15:31, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2020 KProfiles Túrelio (talk) 09:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Promo photo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete my data Monthanat kondee (talk) 14:50, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want to delete my data Monthanat kondee (talk) 14:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want to delete privacy data and pictures. 49.228.168.47 15:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wait a bit, please. --E4024 (talk) 16:20, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Monthanat kondee, why did you wait nearly 9 years after upload? --Túrelio (talk) 16:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, courtesy. --Túrelio (talk) 16:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to violate copyright 45.72.243.245 17:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, CC-BY-NC-SA. --Achim (talk) 18:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Logo, Random photo from internet Askeuhd (talk) 17:32, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete, copyvio of https://najhorsityzden.markiza.sk/ .   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 18:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 21:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to be a copy of this: https://www.instantstories.com/stories/shivani-narayanan-latest-hot-hd-photos-wallpapers-1080p-instagram-facebook/images/2990. 108.56.139.120 09:01, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola at 16:14, 27 Januar 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 21:39, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No image search results, but this is a pretty obvious crop of a promotional image, not "own work". Uploader is almost certainly a sock of Ammu Editz. Ravensfire (talk) 14:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same deleted file, another SPA? E4024 (talk) 15:55, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 14:06, 12 May 2021, by Elcobbola. --P 1 9 9   18:11, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wallu2 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.thefridaytimes.com/a-cricket-match-peshawar-1896/
Converted to regular DR as an image from 1896 should be in the public domain already.-- Túrelio (talk) 21:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then  Keep. I agree @Túrelio: with you as the image has been taken in Peshawar, Pakistan before Independence of Pakistan so it should be licensed under both PD-India and PD-Pakistan licenses. I initially nominated it for deletion because the author claims itself as its own work and uploaded it under wrong license as it seems to be copied from above given webstite but now I am now withdrawing with my recent nomination. Please close this nomination as soon as possible. Thank You.Wallu2 (talk) 08:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Apparently valid rationale given for why the image is in PD. Original speedy deletion nomination withdrawn by nominator. --GMGtalk 14:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a company logo, i will upload it localy on wikipedia (fair-use) once the company page is published CrumbY (talk) 23:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sheetalkumari8101995 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Same as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Karamjeet Madonna

Eatcha (talk) 11:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • I see 7 (seven) articles in WPs. Please let us not speak about scope while those articles stay. OTOH, I see a couple of large files that may be own works and not swiped from the net. Please do not delete anything without demonstrating that they are copyvios. --E4024 (talk) 13:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Who created those articles? Same user? Only 7 articles out of total 23 spam articles left. I'm making sure that the reaming articles get deleted ASAP. Thanks. -- Eatcha (talk) 07:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@E4024: I'm disappointed in you. As much as we want these photos for articles it doesn't take much to find them on the web. These are off insta, so I had to search for them manually but I found them. Gbawden (talk) 15:29, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy as copyvios and PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 15:29, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}} Extremely poor-quality image with pixelated bonds, small resolution and opaque background. Replaced by File:Solvent-free oxidation of 3,3′-dimethoxybenzoin to 3,3′-dimethoxybenzil.svg as high-quality version. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 23:29, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Lack educational use. Solomon203 (talk) 00:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE – personal photo of a user with no valid contribs (m:Special:CentralAuth/Orbu Martin) Gikü (talk) 00:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Lack educational use. Fake photo taken in 2005. --Solomon203 (talk) 00:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 00:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious Vandalism. Gikü (talk) 01:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SELFIE. En.wiki user page image by a non-contributing editor. (4 total edits in en.wiki, only non-user page edit wasn't constructive). BriefEdits (talk) 02:49, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

leaked personal information Jampresident (talk) 03:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Uploader's request. --Minoraxtalk 02:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:PS. Hanooz 08:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Trade (talk) 08:56, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Trade (talk) 08:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fantasy diagrams and alt history are out of project scope. Election diagrams must be about existing parliaments or notorious fictions Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it I found a different Category Cole hoffme (talk) 13:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Pi.1415926535. --Minoraxtalk 02:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wet tever (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal photos. One has only Facebook metadata, neither are in use anywhere.

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:49, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.] EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Airanc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rnehra26 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by P Sayeg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Who's the painter?

Hanooz 20:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:20, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jhonathansarache (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The sources of this images are stated with "Fuerza Armada nacional Bolivariana", some, like Amx-30_DE.jpg have watermarks of not governent websites. Liceces is given with CC-BY-SA, but I don't see evidence that the Armed Forces of Venezuela have realeased them with CC.

Avron (talk) 11:18, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jhonathansarache (talk · contribs)

[edit]

different sources, some images with watermarked authors. It is unlikely that these images are CC-BY-SA as stated.

Avron (talk) 12:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo? We can see the same photo in the YouTube video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igN-dcV-wlg&t=36 Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since). There is a license but I question whether the uploader is the author: Green Giant (talk) 01:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's photo of painting. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. It's apparently a painting by Pietro Annigoni, an Italian painter who died in 1988, of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the Shah (King) of Iran (see [1]). It will be in the public domain in 2059, according to the copyright rules of the United States and Italy. --Ahmadtalk 21:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is not the same as in source, possible copyright violation Renvoy (talk) 11:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a look at the Ukrainian text at the very bottom of the source page: "Всі матеріали на цьому сайті розміщені на умовах ліцензії Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International" --Perohanych (talk) 17:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Perohanych: , фото, яке ви додали, немає у джерелі, яке ви зазначили.--Renvoy (talk) 17:56, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Станом на 19:44, 16 червня 2020 було. Інакше я б те джерело не ставив. Що в такій ситуації робити? --Perohanych (talk) 18:00, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
UPD: turns out picture was taken from source (archive) but photo is not in use.--Renvoy (talk) 18:06, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The pictuse illustrates a wikidata article https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q96336831 --Perohanych (talk) 08:06, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Anatoliy (talk) 00:00, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope photo of a non-notable individual: ro:John Albert Ace Gikü (talk) 12:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. In addition, the uploader's username suggests that they are the person depicted in the photo, but the copyright holder of a photo is its photographer, not the person depicted in it, so it might be a copyright violation, too. --Ahmadtalk 23:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low resolution duplicate of File:SanMartino.cristian.bianchi.photography.jpg Threecharlie (talk) 21:42, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:31, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found here - https://www.paralympic.org/sites/default/files/document/180417084848454_2018_biography+sheet_Alexander.pdf - unlikely to be own work. Needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 07:50, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The is owned by Dr Debra Alexander and gave me a written permission to use it on her profile. What is your concern about this image? What verification do you need? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 197.185.110.180 (talk) 11:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. COM:OTRS needed. --Strakhov (talk) 08:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

upload only to help identifying a fungus on the trees in the foreground Pjt56 (talk) 08:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, early requested by uploader. --Strakhov (talk) 08:07, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Joostik (talk) 10:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 08:10, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from another site without CC licence https://tomas-havranek-profesionalni-plavec.webnode.cz/#&gid=1&pid=10 Matlin (talk) 20:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 08:14, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Lack educational use. Solomon203 (talk) 00:06, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: There aren't too many images in Category:Trains at Jialu Station (Taiwan), and if you're interested in trains, this has quite a few interesting details - in scope. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. This image is not in use in any Wikimedia projects, not even on some user page. Mosbatho (talk) 22:05, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, you're wrong; this is Betty Boop (or a remake of Esther Jones :) and if the file does not have copyright issues, I would like to keep this lovely image. Thx. --E4024 (talk) 22:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Here you can see a similar but certainly the Pinterest poster does not own the file, and got it from somewhere else. Hopefully it could be PD. --E4024 (talk) 22:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Bobamnertiopsis (copyrighted modern photo made to look antique). --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1988 sculpture in Minnesota, no FoP for outdoor artwork in US sadly. See previous discussion here. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 19:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1989 sculpture Ordovician Pore installed in Minneapolis; no FOP for artworks in the US. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 20:32, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1982 sculpture Arikidea installed in Minneapolis; no FoP in the US. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 20:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1988 sculpture Woodrow installed in Minneapolis; no FoP in the US. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 20:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1988 sculpture Walking Man installed in Minneapolis; no FoP in the US. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 20:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1986 sculpture Standing Glass Fish displayed in Minneapolis; no FoP in the US. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 20:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2017 sculpture Hahn/Cock installed in Minneapolis; no FoP in the US. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 20:56, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1988 sculpture Without Words installed in Minneapolis; no FoP for artworks in the US. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 20:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1995 sculpture Phoenix Rising installed in Minneapolis; no FoP for artworks in the US. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 21:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low-res version of File:Mohammadshah Qajar - Saniolmolk.jpg. Hanooz 08:42, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Joostik (talk) 10:50, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Joostik (talk) 10:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Joostik (talk) 10:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Joostik (talk) 10:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Joostik (talk) 10:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Joostik (talk) 10:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Joostik (talk) 10:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Joostik (talk) 10:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Joostik (talk) 10:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Joostik (talk) 10:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Joostik (talk) 10:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Joostik (talk) 10:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF Data, probably from Facebook mybe copyright violation Reda Kerbouche (talk) 12:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fairly obious flickr-washing Vera (talk) 13:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded a better version from the original source here: File:Eurasian lynx climbing a tree.jpg Boylarva99 (talk) 14:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete and redirect filename to better version. PS to @Boylarva99: for future similar cases, the usual proceedure with this is to upload the better quality version on top of the old one - MPF (talk) 17:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no description, blurry. No intuitive educational value Richard Avery (talk) 15:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in en:User:Psoats/sandbox with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in uk:Квантовий підсилювач and uk:Користувач:Kot.aleksei/Чернетка with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced in en:User:Livewire61 with TeX equivalent:

Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Picture of a random fella taken in 1988 - Bench is historic however the image is obviously unusable due to the fella. Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:35, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational value Veliensis (talk) 13:50, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

upload by an SPA that has Exif data that points to this being a picture first published on Facebook Vera (talk) 13:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this logo is not the own work of this user. It's also too complex for a {{Pd-textlogo}} tag imo. Vera (talk) 14:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self made fantasy, out of scope GerritR (talk) 14:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in COM:IRAN. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, not own work Lesless (talk) 10:12, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 09:50, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 09:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bernie Sanders slams table.jpg Bleki19 (talk) 22:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by JuTa at 11:03, 23 Februar 2021 UTC: No license since 13 February 2021 --Krdbot 15:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Nanahuatl (talk) 19:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete privacy data and pictures. 49.228.168.47 15:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1. File is used. We cannot delete it while being used. 2. If you care about your privacy why do you disclose your IP? (I mean other than uploading your own image here.) --E4024 (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Once file is no longer used,  Delete as out-of-scope. I did a quick internet search and it looks like this image is only appearing on WMF projects and mirror sites. Davidwr (talk) 17:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the ns in-between the original image please. E4024 (talk) 17:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monthanat kondee (talk • contribs) 12:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, the file cannot be deleted on that reason, because it is used. I'll delete second version due to missing educational value. Taivo (talk) 08:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 02:46, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:13, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, per COM:NOTUSED. Solomon203 (talk) 00:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 07:30, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 16:29, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I added Category:Goatees. I was surprised, that there is no such photo in the category. Taivo (talk) 08:49, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: INeverCry 23:03, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously nominated in 2013 but was kept because Category:Goatees was empty at that time. The category has since been filled with many photos that could replicate this photo's usefulness (e.g. File:Adam wehsely-swiczinsky.jpg). Could not re-contact the admin who chose to keep this photo because he has since been banned. Looking to nominate this photo for deletion per COM:SELFIE. BriefEdits (talk) 02:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 07:33, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the source doesn't have say image has a free license Avron (talk) 11:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 22:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence of freely available license Evaders99 (talk) 03:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 04:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:34, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 04:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:35, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

6 KB. Most probably taken from somewhere and uploaded as "own work". E4024 (talk) 02:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 09:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an "own work" but a screenshot as the file title confesses. E4024 (talk) 02:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 09:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Inigo Estivales Corrales (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots of various broadcasts, I assume directly from SpaceX, so not own work. One picture has a source YouTube video listed (File:Starship SN8.png), but it is not published under a suitable license. Afaik no SpaceX YouTube videos are. I am not sure if they as a company publish anything that's good for Commons (even Flickr account has only non-commercial) at all (Correction: turns out we have an OTRS ticket for the Flickr account, but that doesn't matter here), unless NASA is involved.

TFerenczy (talk) 15:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see {{Pixabay}}. The image was published the day after Pixabay switched to a more restrictive license. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 03:16, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 22:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 05:22, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong Surname of person Beko (talk) 08:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Redirect Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:28, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blur, unusable photo. Smooth O (talk) 09:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted unused blurry photo without evident in-scope value. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:30, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not cc licensed, I've checked the oldest archive. Eatcha (talk) 09:32, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:31, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From the aspect ratio and picture quality, and the fact it describes itself as some contestants on a TV show, this looks like a direct television screenshot rather than the own work of the uploader. Lord Belbury (talk) 12:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:33, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the picture of Alparslan Türkeş was extracted from File:Alpaslan Türkeş-Hasan Sami Bolak.jpg and should be replaced by something else. There is quite a bit more men than women atm so I would propose a woman would be selected for this. Vera (talk) 14:11, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you kindly do it yourself? Pinging User:PawełMM in case they would kindly like to help with the collage. Thanks in advance to both. --E4024 (talk) 14:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I would not know who to select for this collage. Vera (talk) 22:53, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nom; derivative of deleted CV. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:37, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted CV, false claims -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:39, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:39, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yuraily Lic as no permission (No permission since).

There is camera EXIF and a note in Turkish that this image was received from the concerned. As long as no prior publication is shown, I think we must keep it. E4024 (talk) 13:49, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, E4024. Where is the note? And who confirmed that the note was correct? --Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
On the "description" and "source" lines as you already know. I did not confirm anything, if you did, say so. Bye. --E4024 (talk) 21:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It is incumbent upon the uploader to load correctly permissions files. COM:OTRS is their route if they have genuine permission Timtrent (talk) 22:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
E4024, the description and the source say so. But can it be evidence? Isn't it the way of Wikimedia Commons to confirm by email what anyone haven't confirmed? So I tagged it as no permission and prompted the uploader to confirm by email. Am I doing it wrong? --Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I already said good-bye to you; didn't I? This is the last time I will reply you unless you do apologize. "Where is the note?" is not a sincere question. The file is not important but manners, yes. E4024 (talk) 22:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I apologize to you. "It's on the description and the source, that's the evidence", I didn't expect you were thinking so. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Removal of no permission was entirely inappropriate. Unambiguous failure of COM:EVID in needed of COM:VRT evidence. --Эlcobbola talk 21:21, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Whopeehere (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Came via Facebook per FBMD metadata; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation.

NinjaStrikers «» 12:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete given the uploader's other photos with dubious claims to being the copyright holder. OTRS confirmation would be required for these uploads. -- Whpq (talk) 21:45, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work by a newcomer. E4024 (talk) 01:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Found in various forms on different news websites, doubt its a free work by the uploader. Yeenosaurus (talk) 06:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
See https://tineye.com/search/d4d874a139253678a5d988e63de20b37780abc6e?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1. First occurrence is in 2016.Yeeno (talk) 04:29, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete --46.245.112.10 15:35, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:11, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France (ping Mathis B) Thibaut (talk) 08:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

video not cc licensed, have checked archive on https://web.archive.org/web/20190608164102if_/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3UBvgcduAo Eatcha (talk) 09:24, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:20, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not cc licensed, i've checked the archives. Eatcha (talk) 09:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:20, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Corsario CL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The sources of these images doesn't show that images have been release with CC-BY-SA

Avron (talk) 11:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Corsario CL (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

I doubt all these are taken by the uploader as stated. I just checked [2] which is a clear copyvio from the manucturere side [3] and [4] which is from [5]. All these images have different sizes which alo a hint that they have been gethered from the internet.

Avron (talk) 09:31, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unlikely to be own work. This one is published here. --Strakhov (talk) 06:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Corsario CL (talk · contribs) 4

[edit]

Unused screenshots, little context, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 12:42, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Logo. DRing due to age. Not covered by COM:FOP China as it is not outdoor. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, no evidence this is licensed freely. Elliot321 (talk) 19:16, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:20, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


this image should absolutely be deleted. -- Gohlanblack — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.194.225.130 (talk) 18:25, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a photo of me I never gave permission for. Artist has agreed to take it down from his personal and public sites. I'm worried it will jeopardize job opportunities in the future. Please delete ASAP! 69.250.102.43 20:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Info See Ticket:2021021210000399 and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anti Trump Protests in Baltimore (30272884803).jpg. Bencemac (talk) 12:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a photo of me I never gave permission for. Artist has agreed to take it down from his personal and public sites. I'm worried it will jeopardize job opportunities in the future. Please delete ASAP! 69.250.102.43 20:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Info See ticket:2021021210000399 and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anti Trump Protests in Baltimore (30872993926).jpg. Bencemac (talk) 12:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wosxy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No clear indication of source as required by COM:LI. Originally uploaded to tr.wikipedia, recently transferred to Commons by Tarih.

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:29, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder is Ralf Pieper, no indication that uploader is identical with this photographer or has his permission to publish this image under CC licensing. 87.150.14.40 22:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:59, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statement of Suchichi

[edit]

Author or uploader request deletion, unused --LaMagiaaa (talk) 10:50, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:05, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kein eigenes Werk, somit auch unzulässige Lizensierung / no own work, therefore also illegal licensing axel (talk) 21:42, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The timetables themselves I'd consider not copyrightable, but several of the graphics in there are most likely still protected. --Rosenzweig τ 16:07, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a difficulty in understanding what scope this image has or serves at. However, I have a feeling, or let's say experience, suddenly the uncategorized file will be classified and argued that it fulfills an important function. I wonder what... E4024 (talk) 00:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: I agree that this is a difficult case . I was thinking about the nails, or even the handle, but it's indeed difficult to imagine a realistic utility for that.-- Darwin Ahoy! 00:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep as stated, useful with the current categories, in special Category:Train straps, as we don't seem to have any image of a train strap with that particular (ergonomic) shape.-- Darwin Ahoy! 19:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: there are some who consider this useful and in scope. --P 1 9 9   01:39, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the underlying work (from the 2000 issue of Ang Dating Daan/ADD Magazine) is claimed to be licensed under Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. An online version of the 2005 issue of ADD Magazine indicates "All Rights Reserved" licensing at the bottom (meaning not in public domain or not in free licensing). In the Philippine copyright law, works will usually fall into public domain 50 years after the death of the author, or 50 years after the publication for anonymous or pseudonymous works. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:39, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is duplicated with this other, , they are practically the same file. FanNihongo (talk) 01:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The naming convention is important here. "torder" means the order admitted in Taiwan, which adds information. Michelet-密是力 (talk) 06:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, then. At any rate: I will remake these files soon, so it will do it respecting their differences: 阝-order.gif has two strokes and 阝-torder.gif has a little pause at the middle of the first stroke. FanNihongo (talk) 06:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Now I am completely sure they are the same file, I downloaded them and compare them, and the only difference is in the Frame 11, one has 100ms and the other has 400ms. Well I just wanted to give my opinion. So whatever the result is(deleted or kept) I will accept it.
As I explained above I will remake this file soon, so I will postpone the uploading of this file: I will wait one month to see the results, whether it is kept or delete it. FanNihongo (talk) 03:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete It already past one month, so I will upload the file as soon as it is finished. FanNihongo (talk) 06:06, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and redirected. --P 1 9 9   01:42, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo of Goro Mikami was carefully preserved by his bereaved family, and was provided to Waseda University. Neither the university nor the bereaved family has consented to its publication on Wikimedia Commons. Please remove it as soon as possible. Waseda University Athletic Center https://www.waseda.jp/inst/athletic/en/contact/ 133.9.62.53 02:12, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: historic image missing essential info: original author, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9   01:43, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 02:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. As a whole, uploads by this user are inconsistent and unreliable. --P 1 9 9   02:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 02:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. As a whole, uploads by this user are inconsistent and unreliable. --P 1 9 9   01:48, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a photo A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. As a whole, uploads by this user are inconsistent and unreliable. --P 1 9 9   01:48, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. As a whole, uploads by this user are inconsistent and unreliable. --P 1 9 9   01:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. As a whole, uploads by this user are inconsistent and unreliable. --P 1 9 9   01:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence of freely available license Evaders99 (talk) 03:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:48, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata credits Parisa Pourtaherian, clearly watermarked Ytoyoda (talk) 04:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:48, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo of my art and installation and I no longer wish to share it. Therealjimricks (talk) 04:50, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal artwork image. --P 1 9 9   01:49, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, wish to upload this file as an update to another file. All files in this category should be deleted likewise. for the same reason C1MM (talk) 05:11, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@C1MM: Hello, I started to replace the old files with GlobalReplace, don't delete your maps. --Milenioscuro (talk) 17:00, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9   01:50, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free screenshot Khinkali (talk) 08:42, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:50, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not map of ČR there is added fake part (Motrynsky kraj) and it has vulgar caption (posahana cr). 91.199.164.40 10:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, not useful. --P 1 9 9   01:51, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, see User_talk:Лейсан_Назипова, please Lesless (talk) 10:11, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:52, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copivio, not own work Lesless (talk) 10:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:52, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of these photos on the tableau was definitely taken by József Amster (1886–??), see here, obviously all of them. We don't know when he died. Regasterios (talk) 10:16, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Related files:



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not good quality, i will upload new file with better quality. Atul.sonwani (talk) 10:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   01:53, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE, picture of private award Renvoy (talk) 10:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The image is in use in the Wikipedia article about her. There is an ongoing debate in the local community whether to keep that article. The picture should not be removed while the article is still there.--Роман Рябенко (talk) 22:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no longer in use. --P 1 9 9   01:53, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random photo of an unremarkable structure (a billboard). No proper scenery is present here, as that structure obscured the view. Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTUSED, and very, very redundant to images of the same subject in its category. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Verily this is not a quality photo, Sincerely ....+Judgefloro (talk) 11:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Concur.  Delete as per nomination. Markoolio97 (talk) 16:51, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:55, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Digital Typhoon copyright. 👦 11:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

http://agora.ex.nii.ac.jp/site/ It is specifically stated: "The content of the website is copyrighted. Copying or redistributing resources without permission, or other usages beyond personal purposes is strongly prohibited." 👦 11:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:56, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ru:Lichi was 4 times deleted, its logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:56, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A redundant, excess image very, very similar to File:03409jfEspana Mabini Landmarks Barangays Lacson Sampaloc Manilafvf 11.jpg. Also COM:NOTUSED. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also: File:03409jfEspana Mabini Landmarks Barangays Lacson Sampaloc Manilafvf 12.jpg (by the same uploader) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:39, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as per COM:FOP and redundancy. Markoolio97 (talk) 16:53, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:57, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor composition and COM:NOTUSED image. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When I took this photo, I focused on the so-called flares orCategory:Sunlight through structures Category:Sunlight in the Philippines Category:Crepuscular rays in the Philippines Category:Clouds in the Philippines Sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete COM:ADVERT with regards to billboard of substantial display and COM:FOP for architecture. Overall, agree on poor composition and lighting. Would have been probably useful if it was better composed. Markoolio97 (talk) 16:57, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:58, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Olek Marszałek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All images are states CC-BY-SA self but some are sure not the work of the author, like the old with tanks. The patent is also not the work of the author. The images with shells have watermarks, so it is unlikely that the uploader is the author, and so on...

Avron (talk) 11:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:59, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per COM:ADVERT , self promotion Ts12rAc (talk) 12:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:59, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the Forum Diskusi Transportasi Jakarta, this map is not under CC BY-SA license, even if this map is available on Transjakarta and Transport for Jakarta website. I will try to talk with Transport for Jakarta, but until then, this map is not fall under free license. FarhanSyafiqF (talk) 14:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:00, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons scope, sorry Sergen Bey. E4024 (talk) 14:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found this image of a supporter of Beşiktaş JK sympathetic and categorized it. OTOH, it shows a very clear image of the club's name on the seats of the stadium, something that I could not see at a quick look at other files. Although I open this discussion, my vote is towards keep. E4024 (talk) 14:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clearly personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. Stadium is not the focus at all. --P 1 9 9   02:06, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 15:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made a few mistakes in this timeline, that I corrected recently in a new timeline File:Grand Uniforme Polytechnique timeline.png, which must be now the one and only version thanks to the suppression of this old and incorrect timeline. The new timeline was made thanks to the reference source : Notre École polytechnique, by Gaston Claris, available on archive.org. The illustrations that are not used in the new timeline but were used in this one are available on wikimedia commons: File:École polytechnique Petite et Grande Tenue Monarchie de Juillet et Second Empire.jpg ; File:Uniforme Polytechnique Cahiers d'enseignement illustrés.jpg ; File:Petite Tenue Polytechnique 1804.png. Hyperios (talk) 15:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, superseded. --P 1 9 9   02:06, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image seems to be a derivative image based on a geological map by swisstopo. (the national mapping agency of Switzerland). Although swisstopo offer free download of some of their maps (see e.g.https://www.swisstopo.admin.ch/en/home/meta/supply-structure/freely-available.html ) this does not give the downloader permission to create derivatives of the maps (see https://www.swisstopo.admin.ch/en/home/meta/terms-and-conditions.html ). GeoWriter (talk) 16:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GeoWriter, Do you know if I must ask swisstopo for a permission tu publish this map ? Thanks for your answer.--Lospinguinos (talk) 16:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have probably already violated the copyright of swisstopo. Therefore, I think it is unlikely that swisstopo would react in a friendly way if you asked them now, but I suppose it is possible. GeoWriter (talk) 17:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:07, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, del on DE, prob. copyvio — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nolispanmo (talk • contribs) 10:33, 12 February 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:11, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:31, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:11, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of Page 032 in the same group Kognos (talk) 16:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:12, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of Page 039 in the same group Kognos (talk) 16:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:12, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published after January 2019, restrictive license on Pixabay: https://pixabay.com/illustrations/flowers-bouquet-of-flowers-rosa-4659957/ Ytoyoda (talk) 16:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   02:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a promotional artwork, doubt it is free to use. Nehme1499 (talk) 17:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9   02:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Jan Myšák (talk) 21:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jan Myšák: Even though the anonymous person may be not notable, the picture itself can have some value for many items such as Category:People carrying furniture, Category:Moving and relocation, Category:Chests of drawers etc. However, there is the question of the privacy of the person displayed, especially when the photo contains exact coordinates of a certain house in Prague. --ŠJů (talk) 20:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:20, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file used by editor with < 10 edits in en.wiki. Out of scope. BriefEdits (talk) 21:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:21, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:SELFIE. used in en.wiki user page by editor with < 10 edits. BriefEdits (talk) 21:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:21, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted person died in 1991, the photo is much older. Is it really own work? I suspect real photographer's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 22:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9   02:21, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have a better version and this one is not being used. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:22, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. All of the files that the user has uploaded are taken from the same website actually.Nanahuatl (talk) 22:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:22, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly questionable that this is the uploader's own work. High-quality, high-resolution image that looks professional in nature. Article uploader calls themself Samyukthamenon, but the subject of the image is Samyukthamenon, which makes it unlikely that she took the photo, and thus, that she would hold the copyright. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:24, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Google search gives a higher resolution (1200x1557 px) for the first one. No metadata. Wouter (talk) 10:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:26, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LMGBInfo

[edit]

These files doesn't inform their origin, thus, are quite possible copyright violations. // Estos archivos no informan la fuente, por lo que son muy posiblemente violaciones de derechos de autor. --Malvinero10 (talk) 23:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:25, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 23:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Killari Wanka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images from several questionable sources, seems that many are not posted by the real authors. In any case there is not any evidence that they are lincenses with CC-BY-SA

Avron (talk) 11:31, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will be honest, I’m aware that some of my contributions do not have the proper documentation or simply shouldn’t have been uploaded and actually I was just waiting for someone to request their deletion, however I didn’t expect someone to request to delete all the images. These files I am referring to are: File:Inca spearmen.jpg, File:Incan axes.jpg and maybe File:Antisuyu Bowman.png]. Now I will try to explain the origin of each one of the images, respect to the most recent File:Ashaninka bowman.jpg in the added link you can see that it is the author who published the image while her visit to the native community, the second File:Inca bracers.jpg, I have been able to verify that the source is the oldest version of this file, also it has only been used 3 times, something similar happens in the following File:Huaraca andina.jpg, it has only been used 1 time (in addition to the original obviously) in the Age of Empires wiki, the person responsible for the photo is lakeslinger as it says on the source. In the following File:Champi Inca.jpg it’s a new photo and it was taken in 2019, other pages that use this file also mention that the author is Artemis Gallery, you can check it on the source. About the following 5, when I uploaded them it took me at least an hour to verify that those were the authors and that the sources were correct, I want to mention the case of File:Sayacmarca tower.jpg in which apparently it was first used in pinterest on the same date it was created. In File:Realistic Inca army.jpg there isn’t much to say except that although it was originally published in a post about the Yauyos culture from Huanuco but has always been related to the Inca army (you can see the characteristics typical of the Incas), it was probably a photo of an artistic recreation of that year. The following File:Inca Empire education.jpg is a more complicated case, I had already uploaded that image but I didn't really know who had done it, so it got deleted, I uploaded it again but now with the name of the author, I'll also take care of uploading the corresponding link after this. For the following File:Incan troops in the Andes.jpg I couldn’t find the author using the google image search function, the oldest being the one I put in the source. Now, for File:Auca Runa.png there was already a file in wikicommons, a fact that I ignored when uploading this image, so I could accept if it gets deleted, I can use the other one after all. The case of File:Incan Pickaxe.png is complicated, since I haven’t been able to find another image of this on the internet besides Qelqarimaq, Instagram author who is part of a project to divulge data about the Inca army, you can check his work by going to the source that I put in the file, I suppose I will have to ask him if he has taken the photo himself, which is the most likely since as I already mentioned, there is no other place on the internet where this is used. File:Inca soldiers.jpg is the image of a box of miniatures made by Caesar Miniatures as I added, it is a matter of changing the source in the file, which I will do later as with File:Inca Empire education.jpg. In File:Inca Commander.jpg you can see from the artistic style that the author is Jafet Botton, and although I found the image on forums and on pinterest (which sent me to taringa) I couldn’t get the original publication, so I added the post where I got it from. File:Moche warriors.jpg it's all good, I mentioned the author of the photos and also the link of the facebook post from where I got it (it's a group about pre-Inca cultures in Peru), something that I should add also is the name of the museum, although I planned to use it at the beginning for the Inca army article, I realized that it didn’t fit with the others so I removed it, I will probably use it later for other related articles. The case of File:Manco Inca rebellion.jpg is more complicated, the oldest version I found was on Pinterest and it also sent me to taringa, you can see the signature of the original author at the bottom but I haven’t managed to locate him, I will have to use some contacts to identify the author, I hope it’s not too difficult, I plan to remove it from its current place in the article about the Inca army and replace it with a drawing by Guaman Poma (not uploaded by me). In File:Antisuyu Bowman.png, all the current results tell me that it is actually a trench club from the WW1, previously I was getting another results, which would make sense since there is a tendency to copy images and talk about them as if they were real in a different context, I suppose I could tolerate its deletion. In File:Chincha Raft.png I have misplaced the name and source, data that I'll change along with th previous files.

I have many things to fix but now I would like to know how someone from Germany came across with this lol. You may wonder why I have uploaded so many images, well so questionable, the point is that I needed several files for the remodeling of the article about the Inca Army, the only article I am working on currently, for something the images are also called "illustrations", they enlighten you. You can check my work comparing my last edit with the first one I did in the article, and you will see the huge differences. You Know? Most people ignore important things about our history, if you ask anyone about the Tawantinsuyu, they will hardly tell you what someone told them on YouTube (I have reviewed the videos in English, they are terrible) or they will guess information; not necessarily about the Incas but about the Andean world in general, and this not only happens in the outside world but also in my own region (please use Hispanic america instead of Latin america) and country (Peru), our history is very undervalued compared to other cultures such as the Aztecs and their fancy colors, the difference on information is too big like to deny it. I can't be on Wikipedia most of the time, things from my private life and my country don't let me. Currently I've stopped making consecutive edits in the Inca Army article to go to work in my sandbox, you can check the progress here [6].I hope you understand me and that we can talk about this matter and in the best of cases, we can proceed to the deletion of the 4 images previously mentioned.

Killari Wanka (talk) 10:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't take me wrong, I would like to have these images on commons, but we have a stong Commons:Precautionary principle.Avron (talk) 14:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. all images were made by other people. uploader should follow VRT procedure for each image. If succesfull they can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 19:37, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License." Hanooz 21:53, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:40, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Multiple photos of multiple photographers has been published in the source (which is the personal website of Mohsen Emadi) with the cc license but Emadi is not the copyright holder of the photos, is he? I think we need permission via com:OTRS. Hanooz 16:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • What are you implying here, exactly? Are you claiming the only source of a file on the web is lying about its license? Are you saying that you know the license of the work better than the subject of the photo? Or, is it that you think you know the authenticity of copyright notice better than me, who knows the photographer? Could you please be more specific about which policies are violated, so there can be a proper discussion, instead of an individual's gut feeling and unclear agendas? Behnam (talk) 20:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the source today shows ccbysa4.0 licence as this file on Commons. so the image can be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 19:43, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong attribution of author. The author of the image is neither Alain Herzog nor Jamani Caillet EPFL-MEDIACOM (talk) 17:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:COURTESY. --Ellywa (talk) 19:44, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 廣九直通車 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The file is an image taken by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, which per COM:BAD#U.S. National Laboratories, are licensed under noncommercial terms. The file is therefore copyrighted and unfree. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:18, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I don't think that the Flickr source's source indication is entirely correct. This image is a variation on a NIH NIAID RML [7] image, which is freely licensed. The modifications amount to mere variations in coloration and are not copyrightable in the US. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 23:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:SS AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader stated on File talk:East Rail Line R train@Mong Kok East Station 20210206.jpg that the original video is their own work. I don't see any reason to distrust that at this point. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:17, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per remark and talk page. --Ellywa (talk) 23:17, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Screenshot per Metadata AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader did not comment. --Ellywa (talk) 23:19, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich fordere Sie auf das Foto in dieser und jeglicher anderer Veröffentlichung zu löschen! Sie haben hier Bilder / Fotos von Privateigentum erstellt, hierzu haben Sie keine Zustimmung des Eigentümers! Um genau dieses Bild mit dem Blickwinkel zu erstellen, musste das private Grundstück betreten werden und dafür liegt, bzw. lag Ihnen keine Genehmigung vor. Im Falle einer nicht Löschung behalte ich mir vor, rechtliche Schritte gegen Sie einzuleiten. --47.64.106.233 16:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've converted the IP-created speedy into regular DR to allow for discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 19:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The IP user claims that the image was not taken from public ways or places and that private grounds must have been entered to take the image. I'm not fully sure but I fear the IP user could be right, so the view would indeed not be covered by FoP Germany. If someone else wants to check, I assume the following photographer's position:
(previously assumed location removed) --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 18:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Regards, -Kleeblatt187 (talk) 22:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, posted by original uploader to the image-page: "Kann von Wikipedia n gelöscht werden. Bild wurde nicht von Privatgrundstück aufgenommen. Dennoch kann es natürlich Bildlich von der Wikipedianichen Bildfläche verschwinden." --Túrelio (talk) 11:20, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Looking at the map, one sees that the photo shows the house from its western corner. That does not fit to the camera position given above. --Mussklprozz (talk) 21:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why shouldn't the position be correct? Of course the the building was photographed on its western corner. Please look also for the shed and the bushes. --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 08:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Similar situation on 19 February 2021

I have been on the spot today, please find a similar image to the right. I'm still not sure whether the original photograph being discussed here is covered by FoP Germany or not. I'm quite sure, though, that the coordinates, which I assumed a few days ago are not fully correct. I have removed them now to avoid misunderstandings. --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 18:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: thanks for the photo from the similar spot. It seems that the photo was taken from some elevated position, otherwise it would have been partially closed by the fence. As COM:FOP Germany says "When a photographer has used special tools (such as a ladder) to create the picture or has taken the picture after removing objects that otherwise would have shielded the work from the public eye (think of a photographer brushing aside the branches of a hedge to get a better view of a sculpture), § 59(1) cannot be relied upon for the resulting view is no longer part of what the general public can visually perceive from the public place." So, I bet it is right to delete this photo. --rubin16 (talk) 07:31, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I posted it myself, I deleted it myself. The problem is that on the Official Portral of the President of Belarus At the bottom of the page, it says that "Materials from the Internet Portal can be used in mass media and distributed in the Internet without any restrictions regarding the volume and date of publication. Only a reference to the source is required. No prior consent to use the materials from the Internet Portal on behalf of the Press Service of the President of the Republic of Belarus is needed". But whether this is their fault, or it should be so, but it doesn't indicate that media files can be used in books and "on any other media" (I can't, for example, sell a T-shirt). Also there is not a word about Creative Commons on the site. There is no unambiguous indication of all the required degrees of freedom, in particular, there is no permission to change.
Also:

I after conferring with Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Belarus I uploaded File:Lukashenko belarusian state university-.2021-01-29.jpg. The source of the photos is "The Official Internet Portal of the President of the Republic of Belarus is the state information resource which ensures Internet coverage of the activities of the Belarusian Head of State, provides general information about the Republic of Belarus." [8] In the footer of that page and in the about section the permissions granted are:

"Materials of the portal can be reproduced in mass outlets or Internet servers without restrictions on the amount of material and the time of publication. The only condition is that any reproduction of materials should contain a reference to the original source. No prior consent from the Press Service of the President of the Republic of Belarus is required to use the materials of the portal."

If the only condition is a reference be made to the original source then that sounds like the equivalent of CC-BY, is that not an "explicitly freely license" ? --Jabbi (talk) 21:16, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jabbi The link is the only condition for use and distribution, but not for anything else. This disclaimer does not explicitly permit modification of files. And to indicate a specific license (for example, one of the Creative Commons licenses) there is exactly one necessary condition: this license must be indicated by the author or copyright holder himself. — putnik 21:31, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@putnik That makes sense. How about I send a query to the portal and ask them if they can provide a CC license for the material and we hold off the deletion for a bit? --Jabbi (talk) 21:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jabbi You can try. But Alexander Lukashenko just yesterday called for the use of push-button telephones instead of smartphones. So I am not sure that the Belarusian authorities are ready for a dialogue about free licenses. — putnik 23:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@putnik, I think you are right again. I agree with deleting it. --Jabbi (talk) 00:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should File:Лукашенко_А.Г._Исаченко_А.М._Слуцкий_район.jpg be added ? --Jabbi (talk) 00:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: we can't mark it as {{Attribution}} as nothing is said about freedom of modification and commercial use. --rubin16 (talk) 07:34, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this photo has been on Commons for a long time, so it's hard to check its origin conclusively, but it has all the hallmarks of a photo that was plucked off the internet: professional quality but low resolution, missing EXIF, uploaded by an inexperienced user. Vera (talk) 22:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 07:36, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For me, it seems like it contains more than basic geometric shapes... Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 22:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:TOO Austria. --rubin16 (talk) 07:44, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 07:45, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]