Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/10/24
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![56 File:BANTU "Everybody Get Agenda" Album cover.jpg](#File:BANTU_"Everybody_Get_Agenda"_Album_cover.jpg){kind=link}
_AUDI_R8_LMS_ULTRA_GT_TOUR_LE_MANS_,_France.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
PIRATAGEE 2A02:A03F:5A80:3400:C954:AD9E:60BA:B8F7 09:56, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense. --Achim (talk) 11:50, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi!
I uploaded the for a class thinking it would be protected under fair use, however, my professor corrected me. This picture is an album cover that I do not own.
Please delete the image when possible!
Thanks! 8isfate (talk) 00:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: File:3RACHA Logo.jpg per uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 10:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Non-free video game cover, potential copyright violation. MilkyDefer (talk) 04:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted, clear copyvio. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:11, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded this file to wikipedia while editing the autobus page, but I immediately stopped editing, but for some reason this file was uploaded to wikipedia commons. So I want to delete this photo. thanks Discostrange1979 (talk) 13:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 15:46, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Sheerazam (talk) 14:45, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense by an Android app user. --Achim (talk) 15:54, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
file is water marked - permission is doubtful. "in use" pages nominated for deleltion. editor is suspected mh6ti sock. Quakewoody (talk) 12:17, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ahmad252 at 12:20, 24 Oktober 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1) --Krdbot 21:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of en:File:The Invisible Man (2020 film) - release poster.jpg, which is a fair-use image Victor Schmidt (talk) 19:09, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
_-_release_poster.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 01:50, 25 Oktober 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Movie poster --Krdbot 09:54, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arianne Rajnee (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 15:27, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Source url: https://puppetcombo.com/store/product/nun-massacre-cdrom/ Sudonet (talk) 07:49, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 21:15, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 21:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since); uploader has requested deletion, though files are currently in use — billinghurst sDrewth 14:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Painter was born in 1962 and still alive. See https://tapyba.info/dailininkas/arturas-slapsys/. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also supports deletion (nominated the file for speedy deletion). Taivo (talk) 11:54, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danica Mae Geonzon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 13:09, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arianne Alipio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 13:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 13:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Inadvertent duplicate of File:Sunken City, San Pedro (20428008511).jpg Mliu92 (talk) 20:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 07:11, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden at 08:57, 28 Oktober 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 21:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from toys. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 17:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Beatriz Gonzalez Miramotes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) - uploader also sock of copyvio LTA. --Эlcobbola talk 17:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploader-requested deletion; we already have a very similar crop which I missed and have uploaded this colour-corrected version to instead. Ubcule (talk) 20:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 18:46, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Gustavo Oliveira Vieira (talk · contribs)
[edit]Book covers, newspaper clipping and facebook photo
- File:2001-mocidade.jpg
- File:Corr irene.jpg
- File:Pemarcel Diocese.jpg
- File:Pelosim.jpg
- File:Pemarcel.jpg
- File:Gaz1314nov14.jpg
- File:Outrom.jpg
- File:Educacao para paz 2ed.jpg
- File:CidPres.jpg
Rodrigolopes (talk) 00:26, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:07, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
unused image of unknown people
Rodrigolopes (talk) 00:38, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:07, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Payamkermanshahi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious own work claim: too many high-end cameras for such a short span of time ( NIKON D90, iPhone XS, Canon PowerShot SX6, Canon EOS 60D, NIKON D300S, Canon PowerShot G15, NIKON D90) for only 13 images many of which lack EXIF altogether. File:Saeid ahmadi karyani champion.jpg should be the work of an accredited photographer.
- File:Fadakar's picture.jpg
- File:Karate teaching in the karate educational seminar by Ali fadakar.jpg
- File:Iranian karateka.jpg
- File:Maziar Elhami Varmazani.jpg
- File:Camera picture.jpg
- File:Samaneh-khoshghadam.jpg
- File:Haghighi Farid.jpg
- File:Bahman asgari.jpg
- File:IMG-20191020-WA0006.jpg
- File:حقیقی قهرمان کاراته آسیا.jpg
- File:فرید حقیقی مقام پنجم مسابقات جهانی فرانسه را به ارمغان اورد.jpg
- File:فرید حقیقی قهرمان کاراته جهان 1.jpg
- File:Saeid ahmadi karyani champion.jpg
- File:Saeid ahmadi karyani.jpg
- File:قهرمان کاراته جهان-سعید احمدیIMG 0787.jpg
- File:فرید حقیقی.jpg
4nn1l2 (talk) 03:48, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete they are not own works. uploader said frankly in talk of user:4nn1l2 (in persian) that he is not owner of pics, so all of his uploads must be deleted because of wrong permissions and Violation of copyright.--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 09:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:36, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Manuel Jorge
[edit]Copyrighted artwork
- File:Manuel Jorge - Pintor (1).jpg
- File:Manuel Jorge - Pintor (10).jpg
- File:Manuel Jorge - Pintor (10b).jpg
- File:Manuel Jorge - Pintor (11).jpg
- File:Manuel Jorge - Pintor (12).JPG
- File:Manuel Jorge - Pintor (2).jpg
- File:Manuel Jorge - Pintor (3).jpg
- File:Manuel Jorge - Pintor (4).jpg
- File:Manuel Jorge - Pintor (5).jpg
- File:Manuel Jorge - Pintor (6).jpg
- File:Manuel Jorge - Pintor (7).jpg
- File:Manuel Jorge - Pintor (8).jpg
- File:Manuel Jorge - Pintor (9).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
JotaCartas (talk) 04:19, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:08, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kittyfoxracer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Heather Bartlett 707 female quad racer 8.jpg
- File:Heather Bartlett 707 female quad racer 9.jpg
- File:Heather Bartlett 707 female quad racer 7.jpg
- File:Screenshot 20201012-162808 Facebook.jpg
- File:Heather Bartlett 707 female quad racer 6.jpg
- File:Heather Bartlett 707 female quad racer 5.jpg
- File:Heather Bartlett 707 female quad racer 3.jpg
- File:Heather Bartlett 707 female quad racer 2.jpg
- File:Heather Bartlett 707 female quad racer.jpg
- File:Heather Bartlett 707 Female Quad Wars 1.jpg
- File:Heather Bartlett 707 Scarlett bandit.jpg
- File:Quad Wars Team at Harrison, Arkansas Monster Truck Nationals November 2018 16.png
- File:Quad Wars Team at Harrison, Arkansas Monster Truck Nationals November 2018 15.png
- File:Quad Wars Team at Harrison, Arkansas Monster Truck Nationals November 2018 13.png
- File:Quad Wars Team at Harrison, Arkansas Monster Truck Nationals November 2018 14.png
- File:Quad Wars Team at Harrison, Arkansas Monster Truck Nationals November 2018 12.jpg
- File:Quad Wars Team at Harrison, Arkansas Monster Truck Nationals November 2018 11.jpg
- File:Quad Wars Team at Harrison, Arkansas Monster Truck Nationals November 2018 10.jpg
- File:Quad Wars Team at Harrison, Arkansas Monster Truck Nationals November 2018 08.jpg
- File:Quad Wars Team at Harrison, Arkansas Monster Truck Nationals November 2018 09.jpg
- File:Quad Wars Team at Harrison, Arkansas Monster Truck Nationals November 2018 07.jpg
- File:Quad Wars Team at Harrison, Arkansas Monster Truck Nationals November 2018 04.jpg
- File:Quad Wars Team at Harrison, Arkansas Monster Truck Nationals November 2018 05.jpg
- File:Quad Wars Team at Harrison, Arkansas Monster Truck Nationals November 2018 06.jpg
- File:Quad Wars Team at Harrison, Arkansas Monster Truck Nationals November 2018 02.jpg
- File:Quad Wars Team at Harrison, Arkansas Monster Truck Nationals November 2018 03.jpg
- File:Quad Wars Team at Harrison, Arkansas Monster Truck Nationals November 2018 01.jpg
- File:Heather Training Races March to July 2018 12.jpg
- File:Heather Training Races March to July 2018 13.jpg
- File:Heather Training Races March to July 2018 10.jpg
- File:Heather Training Races March to July 2018 11.jpg
- File:Heather Training Races March to July 2018 09.jpg
- File:Heather Training Races March to July 2018 08.jpg
- File:Heather Training Races March to July 2018 07.jpg
- File:Heather Training Races March to July 2018 06.jpg
- File:Heather Training Races March to July 2018 05.jpg
- File:Heather Training Races March to July 2018 04.jpg
- File:Heather Training Races March to July 2018 03.jpg
- File:Heather Training Races March to July 2018 02.jpg
- File:Heather Training Races March to July 2018 01.jpg
- File:The Ugly Duckling Continues to Grow.jpg
- File:The ugly duckling evolving, now 35.jpg
- File:The Ugly Duckling Turns 35.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:42, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Иринаааа9999999 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like improper license: some user uploads a huge amout of works of the modern artist. Most probably a violation of rights. Additionaly^ Wiki is not a photo hosting. An article (if any) needs only a couple images.
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (38 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (37 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (36 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (35 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (34 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (33 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (32 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (31 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (30 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (29 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (28 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (27 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (26 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (25 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (24 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (23 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (22 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (21 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (20 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (18 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (17 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (16 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (15 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (14изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (13 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (12 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (10 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (9 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (8 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (7 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (6 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (5 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (4 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (3 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (2 изображение).jpg
- File:Картина Мистюкова А.Г. (1 изображение).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Bilderling (talk) 18:24, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:12, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 22:54, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Leptospira as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: File has no OTRS Author is alive, OTRS needed Ymblanter (talk) 15:10, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- He solicitado a la autora que envíe un correo a permissions-es@wikimedia.org y ya se ha recibido. Si se precisa otra confirmación solicitenmela --Nemo (talk) 12:49, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Salam_Mali_de_Irene_Lopez_de_Castro.jpg” under ticket:2020102510006668. --Ganímedes (talk) 19:12, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission accepted. --Ahmadtalk 22:59, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT file using for Ts12rAc (talk) 13:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; out of COM:SCOPE. --Ahmadtalk 05:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio from https://www.imdb.com/name/nm9351913/ RoySmith (talk) 13:54, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:08, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 2006nishan178713 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:07, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohammed ibn muslim (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart. Duplicate. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:03, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:02, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:00, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:00, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:00, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:00, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:00, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:00, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:00, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 07:42, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:58, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:58, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:58, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:57, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:57, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyvio, obviously a professional publicity shot, see identical image in Times of India gallery https://photogallery.indiatimes.com/beauty-pageants/miss-world/alissa-anderegg-chosen-as-miss-world-america-2020/articleshow/78769325.cms Bri (talk) 15:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:57, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:56, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joseatienza (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:55, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:55, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:54, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:54, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyright holder is BANTU Ijapa (talk) 16:23, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
![16:23, 24 October 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/10/24#c-Ijapa-2020-10-24T16:23:00.000Z-File:BANTU_"Everybody_Get_Agenda"_Album_cover.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
![22:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/10/24#c-Didym-2020-11-01T22:50:00.000Z-File:BANTU_"Everybody_Get_Agenda"_Album_cover.jpg){kind=link}
copyvio of the source, which is a random blog, and itself doesn't own copyrights to the images GreaterPonce665 (talk) 16:37, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:41, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 17:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:40, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
company logo with no name association. unused item - wikidata item deleted. Quakewoody (talk) 18:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:40, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
This seems to be a screenshot of a non-free computer program. I think its too complex to be pd-simple. Commons:Screenshot Bawolff (talk) 18:16, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:39, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
This seems to be a screenshot of a non-free computer program. I think its too complex to be pd-simple. Commons:Screenshot Bawolff (talk) 18:18, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:39, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Prothomalo-bangla 2020-10 b6dab7bd-e6d6-4080-a147-cadd0c94ec4a 65b17a1b-91f6-432e-b21d-9b3b1c02d243.webp
[edit]
copyright violation. copied from the newspaper link Dead.rabbit (talk) 18:28, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:39, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Personal file, OOS, used for promotion 17jiangz1 (talk) 19:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Any metadata, low-re image, unlikely to be own work. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:46, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
probable copyright violation. Can't find it at source indicated but if it is the source indicated (probable as apart of their CSR Programme) then there is a clear copyright statement "all rights reserved" Headlock0225 (talk) 09:51, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:45, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
unused personal work. No educational purpose. Malcolma (talk) 11:16, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:44, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused diagram. Apparently an illustration of text alignment. No educational use. Malcolma (talk) 11:25, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:43, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
_AUDI_R8_LMS_ULTRA_GT_TOUR_LE_MANS_,_France.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_AUDI_R8_LMS_ULTRA_GT_TOUR_LE_MANS_,_France.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not own work, no authorisation Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 12:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:43, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope - low quality photo with numerous better depictions Mindmatrix 13:44, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:43, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unused image of unknown people Rodrigolopes (talk) 00:08, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:00, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused, unsourced, probable copyright violation. AshFriday (talk) 01:28, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused, unsourced, probable copyright violation. AshFriday (talk) 01:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused image by non-noteworthy artist. Commons is not a repository for amateur cartoonists. AshFriday (talk) 01:34, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:58, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused, unsourced, probable copyright violation. AshFriday (talk) 01:38, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:58, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:57, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
I doubt permission. Copyright © 2011 Sony Music Entertainment. All Rights Reserved. RE RILLKE Questions? 18:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Common Good (talk) 19:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Definitely not own work, this file was used by Yonhap news, a South Korean newspaper (http://m.koreatimes.co.kr/pages/article.asp?newsIdx=271634) Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 03:10, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
A version found here before upload (http://m.koreatimes.co.kr/pages/article.asp?newsIdx=271634), definitely not own work Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 18:01, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT Ts12rAc (talk) 14:34, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:01, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT Ts12rAc (talk) 14:39, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:01, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by JotaCartas as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted artworks The artist is alive, and I do not see any evidence that the Flickr account owner has rights to distribute this artwork. (The license has been changed to NC in the meanwhile, which is not relevant for us). Ymblanter (talk) 15:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete As the uploader. An oversight on my part, as this painting(?) was only in a temporary exhibition in an portuguese museum and so there is not any portuguese freedom of panorama provision that could apply. Tm (talk) 17:08, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:25, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
low-rez userpage image uploaded in 2009 by someone who has made no other edits to any project; image is seemingly in use on pages but that's just the result of people being careless about filenames DS (talk) 16:53, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:26, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
The Cairns Regional Council website [1] indicates that material and images on the site can only be used for non-commercial purposes, which means it unfortunately doesn't meet the criteria for use on Wikipedia. Deus et lex (talk) 01:05, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 19:52, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
This was taken from the Spiral Dynamics Integral site, which licensed it from Don Beck. Per discussion with them, it is *not* cc-by-sa even though their own site is under cc license. The copyright in this image is owned by Don Beck and (presumably) Natasha Todorovic (on behalf of the late Chris Cowan). Ixat totep (talk) 00:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Colourized photo not likely to be in public domain Kaiser matias (talk) 00:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; false-color reworking of photo is not PD -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:38, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
This appears to be taken directly from the old NVC Consulting site where it is under copyright http://www.spiral-dynamics.com/faq_colors.htm Ixat totep (talk) 00:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:09, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
File description page blanked by original uploader with comment نظر به خواهش حسنیه عثمان باید فوتو دور انداخته شود . AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Comment: Based on the comment added by User:افغان پالیسی (who is also the uploader of the file), it appears that the person depicted in the photo (حسنیه عثمان) has requested its deletion. Ahmadtalk 22:38, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:41, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:41, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:41, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of pano in the phils and no permissions from sculptors or heirs to photograph and publish these. https://iskomunidad.upd.edu.ph/index.php/Oblation lists
- Guillerml tolentino dead in 1976 for the UP DILIMAN statue which is now under the intellectual property right of the insituiton since 2004 whose reproductions are strictly governed by it
- Anastacio Caedo - UP Manila. UP Baguio
- Napoleon Abueva - UP Los Baño\ 1983. UP Visayas 1989. UPV Tacloban 1992
- Fidel Araneta - UPV Cebu
- Jaime Ang - UP Mindanao 1995
- File:Aguila DMM - University of the Philippines Visayas Cebu 01.jpg
- File:He holding him.JPG
- File:Nothing but Knowledge.JPG
- File:The Oblation at the University of the Philippines Baguio.JPG
- File:University of the Philippines Manila School of Health Sciences in Leyte 01.JPG
- File:University of the Philippines Visayas (Miagao) Oblation Statue.jpg
- File:UP Baguio Oblation.jpg
- File:UP Concert Chorus logo.jpg
- File:UP Diliman Oblation - panoramio.jpg
- File:UP Manila.JPG
- File:UP Mindanao Admin Building.JPG
- File:UP Mindanao Oblation 28.02.2015.jpg
- File:UP Mindanao Oblation Lit during Isang Libong Alumni Para Kay Oble.jpg
- File:UP Oblation.JPG (note for undeleting admins: only restore the recent one, the old one by a different user has licensing problem, see this)
_Oblation_Statue.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete シベ (talk) 03:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of pano in the phils. No permission from its creator or heirs. Recent one based on its looks Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment this seems ordinary or plain to me. This should pass COM:TOO. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:25, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of pano in the phils and no permission form the creator or heirs. A recent one judging by its appearance Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- This should pass COM:TOO. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:26, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of pano in the phils. A recent sculpture judging by its appearance Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- This should pass COM:TOO. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:27, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:City of San Fernando, Pampanga
[edit]CLTV 36 STATION was introduced in 1995 and so this building is likely recent. no freedom of pano in the phils and no permission from the architect.
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of pano in the phils. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_Regency_Hotel_and_Towers - 2005 completion of the bldg therefore photos of it are unfree. No architect's permission Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:37, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:12, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Photographs by User:RioHondo
[edit]No freedom of pano in the phils. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayala_Center_Cebu - 1994 completion of the bldg therefore photos of it are unfree without architects permission
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:44, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:12, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sabahx as Fair use (Non-free). Logo is below the TOO in the US, but the source country is unknown. Out of scope as unused logo. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:45, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:12, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lucky Chinatown Mall
[edit]No freedom of pano in the phils. A 2014 bldg by RVP Architects for the outside while the stylish insides are from its owner Kevin Tan of Megaworld. Evidence is https://lifestyle.inquirer.net/61459/lucky-luxury-mall-set-to-redefine-chinatown/ no permission from both sides to photograph and publish these
- File:Lucky Chinatown Manila.jpg
- File:LuckyChinatownMalljf1507 02.JPG
- File:LuckyChinatownMalljf1507 03.JPG
- File:LuckyChinatownMalljf1507 06.JPG
- File:LuckyChinatownMalljf1507 08.JPG
- File:LuckyChinatownMalljf1507 09.JPG
- File:LuckyChinatownMalljf1518 02.JPG
- File:LuckyChinatownMalljf1518 03.JPG
- File:LuckyChinatownMalljf1518 04.JPG
- File:LuckyChinatownMalljf1518 06.JPG
- File:LuckyChinatownMalljf1518 07.JPG
- File:LuckyChinatownMalljf1518 10.JPG
- File:LuckyChinatownMalljf1518 11.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:59, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:12, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of pano in the phils, and no permission from the artist who created this entrance gate to photograph and publish foto of it Mrcl lxmna (talk) 04:03, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:12, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:SM CDO Downtown Premier
[edit]Wikipedia says it is completed in 2017 and its creator is DSGN Associates architectural company.
This means no permission from DSGN Associates to take photos and publish online freely. No freedom of pano in the phils.
- File:SM CDO Downtown Premier (Original Work).jpg
- File:SM CDO DOWNTOWN PREMIER ---- Downtown Cagayan de Oro City, Cagayan.jpg
- File:SM CDO Downtown Premier.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 04:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
File:The Winter Palace during wintertime surrounded by snow on a cloudy day in St. Petersburg, Russia..jpg
[edit]
Very bad quality, useless for Wiki as we have more than 300 better pictures of Palace Square facade of Winter Palace Екатерина Борисова (talk) 04:18, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:14, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
This is a photo of me that was uploaded without my knowledge and I would like it removed. Adlaf44 (talk) 04:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:14, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate| Shilownak (talk) 09:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Duplicate| Shilownak (talk) 09:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Duplicate| Shilownak (talk) 09:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- غلط املایی در نام Shilownak (talk) 09:18, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:14, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:TOO Australia, TOO doesn't really ever work. ItsPugle (talk) 09:30, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:14, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Nothing to confirm this image was taken in 1967 as claimed by the uploader - O'Connor was born in 1926, making him ~41 years old in 1967. This does not look like a 41-year-old man. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 09:44, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:14, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Nothing in the image source given confirms that it was taken in 1970, which just happens to be the most recent year in which Australian government items fall into the public domain. Many of the uploader's other images use "1 January 1970" as the image date without verification. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 09:45, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:14, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Raymond Dubois died in 1982. No freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:AC6B:43F7:5AF4:12EB 10:03, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:14, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Raymond Dubois died in 1982. No freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:AC6B:43F7:5AF4:12EB 10:03, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:14, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Haplogroup D of Y-DNA
[edit]These files are created by unfair use of my original file (File:Haplogroup D (Y-DNA) migration.png) without my knowledge. I would like them removed.
_migration.png){kind=link}
- File:Haplogroup D (Y-DNA) migration (2018).png
- File:Haplogroup D (Y-DNA) migration (Asian origin DE).png
- File:Haplogroup D (Y-DNA) migration (Asian origin version).png
- File:Haplogroup D (Y-DNA) migration (version 2.0).jpg
- File:Haplogroup D (Y-DNA) migration map.png
_migration_(2018).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_migration_(Asian_origin_DE).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_migration_(Asian_origin_version).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_migration_(version_2.0).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_migration_map.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--ABCEdit (talk) 11:16, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:14, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Louis Derbré died in 2011. No freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:424:4E68:5A9B:A534 13:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No evidence logo is in the public domain in Singapore. Terms of use can be seen in this link https://www.smrt.com.sg/Terms-of-Use. All proprietary content, trademarks, service marks, brand names, logos and other intellectual property displayed in any Website are the property of the SMRT Corp Group and where applicable, third party proprietors identified in any Website. No right or licence is granted directly or indirectly to any party accessing any Website to use or reproduce any such proprietary content, trademarks, service marks, brand names, logos and other intellectual property, and no party accessing any Website shall claim any right, title or interest therein are of any other website. It should be reuploaded on the English Wikipedia under fair use. Seloloving (talk) 14:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No evidence logo is in the public domain in Singapore. Terms of use can be seen in this link https://www.smrt.com.sg/Terms-of-Use. All proprietary content, trademarks, service marks, brand names, logos and other intellectual property displayed in any Website are the property of the SMRT Corp Group and where applicable, third party proprietors identified in any Website. No right or licence is granted directly or indirectly to any party accessing any Website to use or reproduce any such proprietary content, trademarks, service marks, brand names, logos and other intellectual property, and no party accessing any Website shall claim any right, title or interest therein are of any other website. It should be reuploaded on the English Wikipedia under fair use. Seloloving (talk) 14:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No evidence logo is in the public domain in Singapore. Terms of use can be seen in this link https://www.smrt.com.sg/Terms-of-Use. All proprietary content, trademarks, service marks, brand names, logos and other intellectual property displayed in any Website are the property of the SMRT Corp Group and where applicable, third party proprietors identified in any Website. No right or licence is granted directly or indirectly to any party accessing any Website to use or reproduce any such proprietary content, trademarks, service marks, brand names, logos and other intellectual property, and no party accessing any Website shall claim any right, title or interest therein are of any other website. It should be reuploaded on the English Wikipedia under fair use. Seloloving (talk) 14:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No evidence logo is in the public domain in Singapore. Terms of use can be seen in this link https://www.smrt.com.sg/Terms-of-Use. All proprietary content, trademarks, service marks, brand names, logos and other intellectual property displayed in any Website are the property of the SMRT Corp Group and where applicable, third party proprietors identified in any Website. No right or licence is granted directly or indirectly to any party accessing any Website to use or reproduce any such proprietary content, trademarks, service marks, brand names, logos and other intellectual property, and no party accessing any Website shall claim any right, title or interest therein are of any other website. It should be reuploaded on the English Wikipedia under fair use. Seloloving (talk) 14:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No evidence logo is in the public domain in Singapore. Terms of use can be seen in this link https://www.smrt.com.sg/Terms-of-Use. All proprietary content, trademarks, service marks, brand names, logos and other intellectual property displayed in any Website are the property of the SMRT Corp Group and where applicable, third party proprietors identified in any Website. No right or licence is granted directly or indirectly to any party accessing any Website to use or reproduce any such proprietary content, trademarks, service marks, brand names, logos and other intellectual property, and no party accessing any Website shall claim any right, title or interest therein are of any other website. It should be reuploaded on the English Wikipedia under fair use. Seloloving (talk) 14:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No evidence logo is in the public domain in Singapore. Terms of use can be seen in this link https://www.smrt.com.sg/Terms-of-Use. All proprietary content, trademarks, service marks, brand names, logos and other intellectual property displayed in any Website are the property of the SMRT Corp Group and where applicable, third party proprietors identified in any Website. No right or licence is granted directly or indirectly to any party accessing any Website to use or reproduce any such proprietary content, trademarks, service marks, brand names, logos and other intellectual property, and no party accessing any Website shall claim any right, title or interest therein are of any other website. It should be reuploaded on the English Wikipedia under fair use. Seloloving (talk) 14:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No evidence logo is in the public domain in Singapore. Terms of use can be seen in this link https://www.smrt.com.sg/Terms-of-Use. All proprietary content, trademarks, service marks, brand names, logos and other intellectual property displayed in any Website are the property of the SMRT Corp Group and where applicable, third party proprietors identified in any Website. No right or licence is granted directly or indirectly to any party accessing any Website to use or reproduce any such proprietary content, trademarks, service marks, brand names, logos and other intellectual property, and no party accessing any Website shall claim any right, title or interest therein are of any other website. It should be reuploaded on the English Wikipedia under fair use. Seloloving (talk) 14:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No evidence logo is in the public domain in Singapore. Terms of use can be seen in this link https://www.smrt.com.sg/Terms-of-Use. All proprietary content, trademarks, service marks, brand names, logos and other intellectual property displayed in any Website are the property of the SMRT Corp Group and where applicable, third party proprietors identified in any Website. No right or licence is granted directly or indirectly to any party accessing any Website to use or reproduce any such proprietary content, trademarks, service marks, brand names, logos and other intellectual property, and no party accessing any Website shall claim any right, title or interest therein are of any other website. It should be reuploaded on the English Wikipedia under fair use. Seloloving (talk) 14:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No evidence logo is in the public domain in Singapore. Terms of use can be seen in this link https://www.smrt.com.sg/Terms-of-Use. All proprietary content, trademarks, service marks, brand names, logos and other intellectual property displayed in any Website are the property of the SMRT Corp Group and where applicable, third party proprietors identified in any Website. No right or licence is granted directly or indirectly to any party accessing any Website to use or reproduce any such proprietary content, trademarks, service marks, brand names, logos and other intellectual property, and no party accessing any Website shall claim any right, title or interest therein are of any other website. It should be reuploaded on the English Wikipedia under fair use. Seloloving (talk) 14:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No evidence logo is in the public domain in Singapore. Terms of use can be seen in this link https://www.smrt.com.sg/Terms-of-Use. All proprietary content, trademarks, service marks, brand names, logos and other intellectual property displayed in any Website are the property of the SMRT Corp Group and where applicable, third party proprietors identified in any Website. No right or licence is granted directly or indirectly to any party accessing any Website to use or reproduce any such proprietary content, trademarks, service marks, brand names, logos and other intellectual property, and no party accessing any Website shall claim any right, title or interest therein are of any other website. It should be reuploaded on the English Wikipedia under fair use. Seloloving (talk) 14:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
screenshot under copyright from RAI Radiotelevisioneitaliana Caulfield (talk) 14:38, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Наталя Рожак (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from advertisement.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JotaCartas as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted artworks Now, I was not able to find the death date of Laura Savinet, but she was a student of Malhoa who painted her portrait in 1888, File:Portrait of Laura Sauvinet (1888) - José Malhoa (1855 - 1933) (17149692706).jpg. I would then estimate the birth date of Savonet as approximately 1870, and great chances are she is in public domain by now. Ymblanter (talk) 15:05, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
_-_Jos%C3%A9_Malhoa_(1855_-_1933)_(17149692706).jpg){kind=link}
- The only reference I found about Laura Sauvinet Bandeira (1876-1953) other than in Wikidata, was in ( "Tese de Doutoramento em História da Arte Portuguesa", Universidade do Porto, 20012, by Artur Duarte Ornelas Vasconcelos ) -> here, but I have doubts that this is a valid reference. So, may be is better to keep the file. --JotaCartas (talk) 16:23, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- The ( Feminae - Dicionário Contemporâneo, Lisboa, Comissão para a Cidadania e a Igualdade de Género, 2013. ) -> here has an entry about Laura Sauvinet Bandeira (pp.423-424). I do not have access to this book, but may be are there the birth and death dates. --JotaCartas (talk) 16:56, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- If she has died in 1953, the file becomes public domain on 1 January 2024.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JotaCartas as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted artworks Artist dies in 1985, meaning it will be PD in 2056 Ymblanter (talk) 15:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JotaCartas as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted artworks Artist died in 1974, meaning the painting goes to PD in 2045. Ymblanter (talk) 15:08, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
After uploading, I've just seen that it was already on Commons (couldn't find it upon prior research) : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:001221_Cassini_Jupiter_%26_Europa_%26_Callisto.jpg Charlestpt (talk) 16:03, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Poor quality Shrek4ver (talk) 16:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of pano in the phils. Essentially component of the 1991 Greenbelt mall complex, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Greenbelt_(Ayala_Center) Mrcl lxmna (talk) 16:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This seems to be a contemporary mural in Makati phils but theres no freedom of panorama in that country Mrcl lxmna (talk) 16:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I'd like to delete it Mr.Karmi (talk) 19:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: the picture is from a Skyblog and I do not see any Creative Commons mention on it. There is also no proof that Salem333 is Sara Nawel. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Also Commons isn't a photo hosting site for personal images. --Missvain (talk) 23:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Borrar otra vez 186.172.190.47 10:23, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: seems to be either out of scope or a reupload of the same image previously deleted. JPxG (talk) 05:04, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'd like to delete it Mr.Karmi (talk) 19:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
I'd like to delete it Mr.Karmi (talk) 19:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
I'd like to delete it Mr.Karmi (talk) 19:34, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Screenshot (derivative work) of File:Joyce Echaquan.jpg, which was deleted as a COM:DW at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jeangagnon. ミラP@Miraclepine 21:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Apparent screenshot from a Republic Wireless ad--I can't find the particular ad but the actor, costume, makeup, and background are the same as their other ads (search Youtube or Vimeo). Blameless (talk) 22:03, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
I'm both the uploader and the person depicted in this photo. At the time, I thought that being the object of the work would make me the photo's CR holder. I didn't have permission from the author to publish it, so I rather have it deleted and ask the author to upload it himself, if he agrees to. JonJon86 (talk) 22:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Obviously not own work. Multiple hits through Baidu image reverse search (Google doesn't work well on this one). Similar images from the same settings could be found here and here. It seems like this was picked from a series of pictures taken by a fans of this person, removed watermark, and uploaded. Techyan（Talk） 23:38, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Also, this cropped version:
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Techyan（Talk） 23:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
I made a svg file of this map. TylerKutschbach (talk) 23:57, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Unclear that authorship belongs to uploader. The image bears similarity to photographs taken in a photoshoot Lightfoot did with Alyssa Schakur in 2019, with her wardrobe being identical (down to the pin). I'm uncertain that the uploader is Alyssa Schakur. May even be an alternate crop and touching of this image by Schakur. SecretName101 (talk) 00:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Assuming good faith, I have requested permission for this image via OTRS. We'll let it play out and proceed accordingly. Thank you. Missvain (talk) 23:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: 00:54, 10 December 2020, by Fitindia. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:27, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Map has skyscrapercity.com watermark. Stolen map Mrcl lxmna (talk) 04:08, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- You have no evidence to back up your claim, troll. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:21, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Assuming good faith, I have requested permission for this image via OTRS. We'll let it play out and proceed accordingly. Thank you. Missvain (talk) 23:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Also let's skip the name calling, thanks. Missvain (talk) 23:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: 00:54, 10 December 2020, by Fitindia. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:31, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the philippines. Clicking through the coordinates leads to the Greenbelt complex that dates to 1991. But http://www.manilastatues.com/monuments/190/GreenBelt Animals Sculptures mentions the mall having recently obtained these wonderful statues suggesting they are far recent than 1991, but not as late as 2013 which is the year when the first comment on that webpage was posted. Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:09, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:34, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Not used in any articles. LucianoTheWindowsFan (talk) 18:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:35, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Very low-res pictures of numbers in a weird typeface. Too low res to be actually useful, and we have hundreds of numbers in vector format already. No realistic educational use.
- File:AAN 9.JPG
- File:AAN 8.JPG
- File:AAN 7.JPG
- File:AAN 6.JPG
- File:AAN 5.JPG
- File:AAN 4.JPG
- File:AAN 3.JPG
- File:AAN 2.JPG
- File:AAN 1.JPG
Kissa21782 (talk) 19:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Kritzolina as no license (No license since) - I was adding the licence tag while the speedy delete came in. The picture was clearly taken before 1925 Kritzolina (talk) 20:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: resolved. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Chatham_Bus_Station,_19_December_2017.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_31_October_2018_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Waterfront_Way_(Chatham_Bus_Station),_19_December_2017.jpg){kind=link}
,_31_October_2018.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Chatham_Bus_Station,_17_January_2018.jpg){kind=link}
,_Chatham_Bus_Station,_17_January_2018_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_rear_view.jpg){kind=link}
_front_view.jpg){kind=link}
_front_view.jpg){kind=link}
_rear_view.jpg){kind=link}
_CRDi_(India)_rear_view.jpg){kind=link}
_CRDi_(India)_front_view.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Other speedy deletions
[edit]Nominated G7 by uploader, but ineligible due to age. These are high quality, hand drawn works and could be within scope, so kicking them to DR.
- File:Theophilus the Wolf (separated) (without shading variant).png
- File:Harvett Fox (2021 version) (separated) (without shading and shadow variant).png
- File:Fox (Silvio B.) - Happy Fox Pop Day (separated) (without shading variant).png
_(without_shading_variant).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(separated)_(without_shading_and_shadow_variant).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Happy_Fox_Pop_Day_(separated)_(without_shading_variant).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete all because those variants are unnecessary. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 10:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC); edited: 10:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: These are high quality works, I commend the uploader for their artistry, courtesy deletion is granted. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Alison.Thornton.jpg Resolution is low because picture was taken over facetime with a camera because of Covid restrictions: if on social media it is because the subject has used it on her twitter page. Picture is original. Template:AGfangirl 10:39, 24, October 2020
- Comment Assuming good faith, I have requested permission for this image via OTRS. We'll let it play out and proceed accordingly. Thank you. Missvain (talk) 23:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Ticket:2020120210017776 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 04:00, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation. --JuTa 21:18, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Central Luzon Television
[edit]CLTV 36 STATION was introduced in 1995 and so this building is likely recent. no freedom of pano in the phils and no permission from the architect to photograph and publish such photos
- File:02390jfSan Fernando City Jose Dolores Overpass Tower Pampanga Olongapo Gapan Roadfvf 06.JPG
- File:02390jfSan Fernando City Jose Dolores Overpass Tower Pampanga Olongapo Gapan Roadfvf 08.JPG
- File:02390jfSan Fernando City Jose Dolores Overpass Tower Pampanga Olongapo Gapan Roadfvf 09.JPG Delete focus on the building JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:13, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- File:02390jfSan Fernando City Jose Dolores Overpass Tower Pampanga Olongapo Gapan Roadfvf 10.JPG
- File:02390jfSan Fernando City Jose Dolores Overpass Tower Pampanga Olongapo Gapan Roadfvf 13.JPG from here Delete as the focus is on the building... JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:13, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- File:02390jfSan Fernando City Jose Dolores Overpass Tower Pampanga Olongapo Gapan Roadfvf 15.JPG
- File:02390jfSan Fernando City Jose Dolores Overpass Tower Pampanga Olongapo Gapan Roadfvf 16.JPG
- File:02390jfSan Fernando City Jose Dolores Overpass Tower Pampanga Olongapo Gapan Roadfvf 17.JPG
- File:02390jfSan Fernando City Jose Dolores Overpass Tower Pampanga Olongapo Gapan Roadfvf 18.JPG
- File:02390jfSan Fernando City Jose Dolores Overpass Tower Pampanga Olongapo Gapan Roadfvf 19.JPG
- File:02390jfSan Fernando City Jose Dolores Overpass Tower Pampanga Olongapo Gapan Roadfvf 20.JPG
- File:02416jfSan Fernando City Jose Dolores Best Pampanga Olongapo Gapan Roadfvf 03.JPG
- File:CLTVjf.JPG... to here Delete as the focus is on the building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:13, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:35, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Keep because the De minimis de minimis non curat lex court refuses to consider trifling matters dates back to the 15th century. Copyright Public domain the alleged infringer's use of the copyrighted work was so insignificant as to be de minimis. "Courts have also recognized an exception to copyright infringement when the unauthorized use of a copyrighted work is deemed “de minimis,” or too minor and trivial to merit court intervention" the de minimis exception involves copyright infringement that is “so trivial that the law will not impose legal consequences. There is nothing in IPO rules or law that would say Uploading in Wikimedia Commons is infringement of Copyright; ... at present, they are SILENT still on the FOP Commons Uploading and 2 Directors declined to reply to my Letters as I was verbally told that Commons Uploading has nothing to do about Copyright Infringement: De minimis so to speak - IPO Office does not deal with triffles for First First and First, the Nominator, Editor or Uploader in Commons must have a Legal Standing or Locus Standi to file a Copyright Case which involved Huge Sums of Docket Fees and Attorney's Fees; In Short - can a Commons Editor go to Court and allege in a Complaint proper that this photo violates Copyright Law; for sure, until now, Trifles never reach the courts; and until the Day of Kingdom Come as Senator Imee Marcos said and I borrow her Wisdom, Phil Jurisprudence will never take judicial notice on trifles about Copyright Commons Uploading; thus Category:De minimis-related deletion requests/kept - Category:De minimis Country-specific laws does not have a Philippines section on De Minimis thus, I still need to begin and finish my intended to input on New FOP Discussion, Legal Treatise on Copyright law vis-a-vis Commons FOP and Fair Use; this is a gray area for Commons ... respectfully submitted to the sound discretion of Commons; very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
There is no clause or any paragraph or at least side line mentions of de minimis or incidental inclusion in the republic act 8293 otherwise known as the intellectual propsrty code of the phils. Mrcl lxmna (talk) 16:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- I already talked with the IPO lawyers and they told me that they agree with my Cited Sycip Salazar secondary authorities that all your Mass Deletions are covered by Trifles or De Minimis, meaning Copyright Law does not prohibit Uploading in Commons on FOP; your position has no leg to stand while my OBJECTIONS to your Mass Deletions are supported not only by a) USA Jurisprudence b) very learned treatises of a Top Law Firm like Sycip Salazar, c) verbal replies to my queries by IPO lawyers and d) tons of Legal Discussions on the Matter; an editor here cannot just say this or that is Copyright law; I cited Statutory Construction and Legal Maxim rules, while you just copy paste the Law; nobody can say this is the meaning of the Copyright law without laying the predicate; even if there is no square ruling from the Supreme Court on FOP uploading, still, the secondary authorities and Learned lawyer's writings I quoted suffice to say that all your Mass Deletions have no leg to stand: I await the IPO and its Bureau on a Specific Ruling backing the verbal replies they gave to me and or DOJ Secretary's Opinion which is over and above the IPO's would be rulings; In Time, all our deleted photos would be undeleted, since they are just in the files of Commons;
- Finally, I am submitting this proof to Commons Admins that your Deletion Request is not only without basis but a scheme, habit or plan to take off Valid Photos in Commons; the Statues is 18th Century; it took me 2 days to research on this to prove to Commons Administrators that this and most of your Mass Deletions are unlawful and contrary to Philippine Laws;
- How does an 18th Century Statue of Pampanga De La Merced which is a National Treasure be clothed with Copyright? How, How and How? sincerely respectfully submitted; very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 06:05, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Speedy keep all Keep Because the Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. It is fervently petitioned that - going to keep this for now until someone else can nominate if they see fit; Wherefore premises considered I humbly register my Strong Objection to this and the Mass Deletions Requests of this Single Editor, respectfully respectfully
4 years prescription since 2015 under the New 2019 SC Circular vis-à-vis Copyright law to question any FOP matter: a Legal Bar due to Extinctive Prescription to delete my photos and of User:Ramon FVelasquez as tagged by the Smart One September 2020 Mass Deletions
- I sincerely hope that Editors will note my Underscoring of the 4 years Legal Bar on Deletion of FOP photos, I repeat from 2016, thus the tons of Mass Deletions tags by the Smart One on RamonFVelasquez should be stricken off the Talk Page as grave violations of Criminal Law ... respectfully Judgefloro (talk)
- Delete most per no COM:FOP Philippines. As w:Central Luzon Television started in 1997, its headquarters is certainly recent. Undelete when FOP is introduced here. De minimis cannot be applied in most images (uploader has abused the term "de minkmis" even in obvious cases of non-DM images), but I'm not sure about others (ping @A1Cafel: , if the remaining images I didn't marked can be considered as "not the main subject" or "incidental"). Judgefloro's claim of "legal bar" cannot be applied in Commons; the "extinctive prescription" only applies four years after the infringing material has been removed (per Clindberg when I asked him about the judge-uploader's claims). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:13, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- I would say Delete all at this moment. All of the images showing the copyrighted building in the center part, undoubtedly the subject of the photo. I'm not sure whether someone can crop out the building for some of the image above, while it is still potentially useful (probably the numbers "06", "08" and "10" . --A1Cafel (talk) 08:28, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the phils and no permission from the architect DDT Constract Inc. For the photography and publication of this photo of the 2012 building Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:18, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Sad to say, Delete until freedom of panorama is finally introduced in our country. Still no FOP for majority of architectural and artistic (sculptures etc.) works in the Philippines, even after this two-month long discussion of Sept.–Nov.. While there may be a potential for a dialogue between IPOPHL and Wikimedia Foundation reps, per Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle (as mentioned at this 2017 deletion request to a Dubai building, in a kingdom that has no total FOP), "deletion first is the right approach", even during active forums, as Commons always respects the rights of the artists and architects, even if the general public of the work's country of origin (the Philippines for this case) does not. File/s can be undeleted once FOP exists or is introduced here—perhaps via COM:UNDEL or a COM:Village pump/COM:Administrators' noticeboard motion or announcement just like the cases of images of Armenian and Belgian architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in Armenia in 2013 and Belgium in 2016. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:37, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 03:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fairview Terraces
[edit]No freedom of panorama in the phils and no permission from the architect of the 2014 building as said by wikipedia entry.
- File:02433jfRobinsons Fairview Terraces Novaliches Quezon Quirino Cityfvf 10.JPG
- File:02433jfRobinsons Fairview Terraces Novaliches Quezon Quirino Cityfvf 11.JPG
- File:02433jfRobinsons Fairview Terraces Novaliches Quezon Quirino Cityfvf 12.JPG
- File:02433jfRobinsons Fairview Terraces Novaliches Quezon Quirino Cityfvf 13.JPG
- File:02433jfRobinsons Fairview Terraces Novaliches Quezon Quirino Cityfvf 14.JPG
- File:02433jfRobinsons Fairview Terraces Novaliches Quezon Quirino Cityfvf 15.JPG
- File:02472jfRobinsons Fairview Terraces Novaliches Quezon Quirino Cityfvf 01.JPG
- File:02477jfFairview Terraces Sapang Putik Proper Maligaya Road Novaliches Quezon Cityfvf 02.JPG
- File:02477jfFairview Terraces Sapang Putik Proper Maligaya Road Novaliches Quezon Cityfvf 03.JPG
- File:02477jfFairview Terraces Sapang Putik Proper Maligaya Road Novaliches Quezon Cityfvf 04.JPG
- File:02477jfFairview Terraces Sapang Putik Proper Maligaya Road Novaliches Quezon Cityfvf 05.JPG
- File:02477jfFairview Terraces Sapang Putik Proper Maligaya Road Novaliches Quezon Cityfvf 06.JPG
- File:02477jfFairview Terraces Sapang Putik Proper Maligaya Road Novaliches Quezon Cityfvf 07.JPG
- File:6402Quirino Highway Caloocan Novaliches, Quezon City 34.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:28, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep because the De minimis de minimis non curat lex court refuses to consider trifling matters dates back to the 15th century. Copyright Public domain the alleged infringer's use of the copyrighted work was so insignificant as to be de minimis. "Courts have also recognized an exception to copyright infringement when the unauthorized use of a copyrighted work is deemed “de minimis,” or too minor and trivial to merit court intervention" the de minimis exception involves copyright infringement that is “so trivial that the law will not impose legal consequences. There is nothing in IPO rules or law that would say Uploading in Wikimedia Commons is infringement of Copyright; ... at present, they are SILENT still on the FOP Commons Uploading and 2 Directors declined to reply to my Letters as I was verbally told that Commons Uploading has nothing to do about Copyright Infringement: De minimis so to speak - IPO Office does not deal with trifles for First First and First, the Nominator, Editor or Uploader in Commons must have a Legal Standing or Locus Standi to file a Copyright Case which involved Huge Sums of Docket Fees and Attorney's Fees; In Short - can a Commons Editor go to Court and allege in a Complaint proper that this photo violates Copyright Law; for sure, until now, Trifles never reach the courts; and until the Day of Kingdom Come as Senator Imee Marcos said and I borrow her Wisdom, Phil Jurisprudence will never take judicial notice on trifles about Copyright Commons Uploading; thus Category:De minimis-related deletion requests/kept - Category:De minimis Country-specific laws does not have a Philippines section on De Minimis thus, I still need to begin and finish my intended to input on New FOP Discussion, Legal Treatise on Copyright law vis-a-vis Commons FOP and Fair Use; this is a gray area for Commons
- I already talked with the IPO lawyers and they told me that they agree with my Cited Sycip Salazar secondary authorities that all your Mass Deletions are covered by Trifles or De Minimis, meaning Copyright Law does not prohibit Uploading in Commons on FOP; your position has no leg to stand while my OBJECTIONS to your Mass Deletions are supported not only by a) USA Jurisprudence b) very learned treatises of a Top Law Firm like Sycip Salazar, c) verbal replies to my queries by IPO lawyers and d) tons of Legal Discussions on the Matter; an editor here cannot just say this or that is Copyright law; I cited Statutory Construction and Legal Maxim rules, while you just copy paste the Law; nobody can say this is the meaning of the Copyright law without laying the predicate; even if there is no square ruling from the Supreme Court on FOP uploading, still, the secondary authorities and Learned lawyer's writings I quoted suffice to say that all your Mass Deletions have no leg to stand: I await the IPO and its Bureau on a Specific Ruling backing the verbal replies they gave to me and or DOJ Secretary's Opinion which is over and above the IPO's would be rulings; In Time, all our deleted photos would be undeleted, since they are just in the files of Commons;
- Finally, I am submitting this proof to Commons Admins that your Deletion Request is not only without basis but a scheme, habit or plan to take off Valid Photos in Commons; the Statues is 18th Century; it took me 2 days to research on this to prove to Commons Administrators that this and most of your Mass Deletions are unlawful and contrary to Philippine Laws;
- How does an 18th Century Statue of Pampanga De La Merced which is a National Treasure be clothed with Copyright? How, How and How? sincerely respectfully submitted; very sincerely sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 06:14, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete unfortunately. While there's a pending bill to amend the copyright law, the current status is still no FOP in the Philippines. And for some info, per this article, the mall was designed by British architectural firm Benoy. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of pano in the phils. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayala_Center_Cebu - 1994 completion of the bldg therefore photos of it are unfree without architects permission Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. As mentioned in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Buildings in Cebu City which kept this file, "mall bldg, low COM:TOO and more utilitarian." And btw, this is Ayala Malls Central Bloc, not Ayala Center Cebu. — Emperork (talk) 18:30, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Comment according to enwiki (w:Ayala Malls Central Bloc), the building was completed in 2019. While I previously defended photos of Philippine malls on the basis of the threshold of originality (using past precedence like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sm megamall.jpg), the higher number of case pages of Philippine mall buildings that resulted to deletion and the debatable TOO status here seems to weaken the TOO defense. Just days ago I accessed this Philippine Star article about SM mall designs, and it seems to imply the creativity of the designers or the SM malls, from Henry Sy who actually came up with the shoebox concept of the first SM Malls (e.g. SM Megamall and SM City Santa Mesa) to the people of SM's Engineering, Design and Development which provided for "out-of-the-box" architectural concept. About the FoP situation in the Philippines, @Emperork: , the IPOPHL said that freedom of panorama provision "is one of the proposed amendments currently being discussed at the present", according to our fellow Pinoy Wikipedian Higad Rail Fan who attended the IPOPHL webinar on copyrights last October 15. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:18, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- New comment. Sad to say, Delete until freedom of panorama is finally introduced in our country. Still no FOP for majority of architectural and artistic (sculptures etc.) works in the Philippines, even after this two-month long discussion of Sept.–Nov.. While there may be a potential for a dialogue between IPOPHL and Wikimedia Foundation reps, per Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle (as mentioned at this 2017 deletion request to a Dubai building, in a kingdom that has no total FOP), "deletion first is the right approach", even during active forums, as Commons always respects the rights of the artists and architects, even if the general public of the work's country of origin (the Philippines for this case) does not. File/s can be undeleted once FOP exists or is introduced here—perhaps via COM:UNDEL or a COM:Village pump/COM:Administrators' noticeboard motion or announcement just like the cases of images of Armenian and Belgian architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in Armenia in 2013 and Belgium in 2016. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:25, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Exterior of the Pavilion Mall
[edit]No freedom of panorama in the phils and no permission from the architect of the 1999 building as said by wikipedia entry.
- File:3877Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 46.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 01.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 02.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 03.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 04.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 05.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 06.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 07.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 08.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 09.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 10.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 11.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 14.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 15.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 16.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 17.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 18.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 19.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 20.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 21.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 22.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 23.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 24.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 25.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 26.jpg
- File:3931Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 27.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:24, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep because the De minimis de minimis non curat lex court refuses to consider trifling matters dates back to the 15th century. Copyright Public domain the alleged infringer's use of the copyrighted work was so insignificant as to be de minimis. "Courts have also recognized an exception to copyright infringement when the unauthorized use of a copyrighted work is deemed “de minimis,” or too minor and trivial to merit court intervention" the de minimis exception involves copyright infringement that is “so trivial that the law will not impose legal consequences. There is nothing in IPO rules or law that would say Uploading in Wikimedia Commons is infringement of Copyright; ... at present, they are SILENT still on the FOP Commons Uploading and 2 Directors declined to reply to my Letters as I was verbally told that Commons Uploading has nothing to do about Copyright Infringement: De minimis so to speak - IPO Office does not deal with trifles for First First and First, the Nominator, Editor or Uploader in Commons must have a Legal Standing or Locus Standi to file a Copyright Case which involved Huge Sums of Docket Fees and Attorney's Fees; In Short - can a Commons Editor go to Court and allege in a Complaint proper that this photo violates Copyright Law; for sure, until now, Trifles never reach the courts; and until the Day of Kingdom Come as Senator Imee Marcos said and I borrow her Wisdom, Phil Jurisprudence will never take judicial notice on trifles about Copyright Commons Uploading; thus Category:De minimis-related deletion requests/kept - Category:De minimis Country-specific laws does not have a Philippines section on De Minimis thus, I still need to begin and finish my intended to input on New FOP Discussion, Legal Treatise on Copyright law vis-a-vis Commons FOP and Fair Use; this is a gray area for Commons
- I already talked with the IPO lawyers and they told me that they agree with my Cited Sycip Salazar secondary authorities that all your Mass Deletions are covered by Trifles or De Minimis, meaning Copyright Law does not prohibit Uploading in Commons on FOP; your position has no leg to stand while my OBJECTIONS to your Mass Deletions are supported not only by a) USA Jurisprudence b) very learned treatises of a Top Law Firm like Sycip Salazar, c) verbal replies to my queries by IPO lawyers and d) tons of Legal Discussions on the Matter; an editor here cannot just say this or that is Copyright law; I cited Statutory Construction and Legal Maxim rules, while you just copy paste the Law; nobody can say this is the meaning of the Copyright law without laying the predicate; even if there is no square ruling from the Supreme Court on FOP uploading, still, the secondary authorities and Learned lawyer's writings I quoted suffice to say that all your Mass Deletions have no leg to stand: I await the IPO and its Bureau on a Specific Ruling backing the verbal replies they gave to me and or DOJ Secretary's Opinion which is over and above the IPO's would be rulings; In Time, all our deleted photos would be undeleted, since they are just in the files of Commons;
- Finally, I am submitting this proof to Commons Admins that your Deletion Request is not only without basis but a scheme, habit or plan to take off Valid Photos in Commons; the Statues is 18th Century; it took me 2 days to research on this to prove to Commons Administrators that this and most of your Mass Deletions are unlawful and contrary to Philippine Laws;
- How does an 18th Century Statue of Pampanga De La Merced which is a National Treasure be clothed with Copyright? How, How and How? sincerely respectfully submitted; very sincerely sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 06:14, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pavilion Mall
[edit]No freedom of panorama in the phils and no permission from the architect of the 1999 building as said by wikipedia entry.
- File:3877Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 45.jpg Keep just an arch JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.)
- File:3877Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 47.jpg - Weak keep average wall JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.)
- File:3877Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 48.jpg - Weak keep incidental or accessory? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.)
- File:3877Biñan City, Laguna Barangays Landmarks 49.jpg - Delete sadly JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.)
- File:Biñan,Lagunajf9153 08.JPG Delete up to just before keep. sadly the building and/or its annex (a cafe building) shown JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.)
- File:Biñan,Lagunajf9153 09.JPG
- File:Biñan,Lagunajf9153 10.JPG
- File:Biñan,Lagunajf9153 11.JPG
- File:Biñan,Lagunajf9153 12.JPG
- File:Biñan,Lagunajf9153 13.JPG - up to here Delete JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.)
- File:Biñan,Lagunajf9153 14.JPG - Keep arch again. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:10, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:23, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep because the De minimis de minimis non curat lex court refuses to consider trifling matters dates back to the 15th century. Copyright Public domain the alleged infringer's use of the copyrighted work was so insignificant as to be de minimis. "Courts have also recognized an exception to copyright infringement when the unauthorized use of a copyrighted work is deemed “de minimis,” or too minor and trivial to merit court intervention" the de minimis exception involves copyright infringement that is “so trivial that the law will not impose legal consequences. There is nothing in IPO rules or law that would say Uploading in Wikimedia Commons is infringement of Copyright; ... at present, they are SILENT still on the FOP Commons Uploading and 2 Directors declined to reply to my Letters as I was verbally told that Commons Uploading has nothing to do about Copyright Infringement: De minimis so to speak - IPO Office does not deal with trifles for First First and First, the Nominator, Editor or Uploader in Commons must have a Legal Standing or Locus Standi to file a Copyright Case which involved Huge Sums of Docket Fees and Attorney's Fees; In Short - can a Commons Editor go to Court and allege in a Complaint proper that this photo violates Copyright Law; for sure, until now, Trifles never reach the courts; and until the Day of Kingdom Come as Senator Imee Marcos said and I borrow her Wisdom, Phil Jurisprudence will never take judicial notice on trifles about Copyright Commons Uploading; thus Category:De minimis-related deletion requests/kept - Category:De minimis Country-specific laws does not have a Philippines section on De Minimis thus, I still need to begin and finish my intended to input on New FOP Discussion, Legal Treatise on Copyright law vis-a-vis Commons FOP and Fair Use; this is a gray area for Commons
- I already talked with the IPO lawyers and they told me that they agree with my Cited Sycip Salazar secondary authorities that all your Mass Deletions are covered by Trifles or De Minimis, meaning Copyright Law does not prohibit Uploading in Commons on FOP; your position has no leg to stand while my OBJECTIONS to your Mass Deletions are supported not only by a) USA Jurisprudence b) very learned treatises of a Top Law Firm like Sycip Salazar, c) verbal replies to my queries by IPO lawyers and d) tons of Legal Discussions on the Matter; an editor here cannot just say this or that is Copyright law; I cited Statutory Construction and Legal Maxim rules, while you just copy paste the Law; nobody can say this is the meaning of the Copyright law without laying the predicate; even if there is no square ruling from the Supreme Court on FOP uploading, still, the secondary authorities and Learned lawyer's writings I quoted suffice to say that all your Mass Deletions have no leg to stand: I await the IPO and its Bureau on a Specific Ruling backing the verbal replies they gave to me and or DOJ Secretary's Opinion which is over and above the IPO's would be rulings; In Time, all our deleted photos would be undeleted, since they are just in the files of Commons;
- Finally, I am submitting this proof to Commons Admins that your Deletion Request is not only without basis but a scheme, habit or plan to take off Valid Photos in Commons; the Statues is 18th Century; it took me 2 days to research on this to prove to Commons Administrators that this and most of your Mass Deletions are unlawful and contrary to Philippine Laws;
- How does an 18th Century Statue of Pampanga De La Merced which is a National Treasure be clothed with Copyright? How, How and How? sincerely respectfully submitted; very sincerely sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 06:13, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep all Keep Because the Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. It is fervently petitioned that - going to keep this for now until someone else can nominate if they see fit; Wherefore premises considered I humbly register my Strong Objection to this and the Mass Deletions Requests of this Single Editor, respectfully respectfully
- 4 years prescription since 2015 under the New 2019 SC Circular vis-à-vis Copyright law to question any FOP matter: a Legal Bar due to Extinctive Prescription to delete my photos and of User:Ramon FVelasquez as tagged by the Smart One September 2020 Mass Deletions
- I sincerely hope that Editors will note my Underscoring of the 4 years Legal Bar on Deletion of FOP photos, I repeat from 2016, thus the tons of Mass Deletions tags by the Smart One on RamonFVelasquez should be stricken off the Talk Page as grave violations of Criminal Law ... respectfully Judgefloro (talk)
- Delete most unfortunately, but Keep some. De minimis cannot be applied to those I reviewed and marked as delete: the building is neither incidental nor accessory. Undelete when FOP is introduced in the Philippines (if ever the subject of this file qualifies for the future Philippine FOP), just like the cases of Armenian (2013) and Belgian (2016) architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in both countries. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:10, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
ACDSee isn't a free software, and screenshots are mostly against COM:DM, feel free to remake such an example via freewares e.g. Inkscape Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:57, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep es ist völlig egal ob die Software frei ist. Die dargestellten Elemente haben keine Schöpfungshöhe. Siehe auch Commons:Deletion requests/File:Photoshop-screenshot.JPG --Ralf Roletschek 07:20, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, COM:SCREENSHOT seems pretty clear that screenshots of software are not allowed unless the software is freely-licensed or the copyright owner has released the screenshot under a free license. -M.nelson (talk) 14:54, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- Die Lizenz der Software hat überhaupt nichts mit einem Screenshot davon zu tun. Es geht einzig darum, ob der Screenshot geschützte Elemente enthält. --Ralf Roletschek 11:00, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Is there Commons policy to back up your assertion? COM:SCREENSHOT is clear that the software's license does matter. That page gives the example of web browser screenshots not being allowed if they show the software's interface. The interface in File:Exif-weg-bei-fb.jpg is just as complex (if not more) than a web browser's interface, so similarly should not be allowed. -M.nelson (talk) 11:35, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- COM:SCREENSHOT ist offenbar von Fans freier Software geschrieben worden, widerspricht aber der Rechtssprechung. Es ist allein entscheidend, was auf dem Screenshot zu sehen ist. Sind die Bestandteile geschützt, darf das nicht hochgeladen werden, sind die Elemente ungeschützt, kann man es hochladen. Siehe File:Photoshop-screenshot.JPG und die oben verlinkte Löschdiskussion. --Ralf Roletschek 22:15, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Is there Commons policy to back up your assertion? COM:SCREENSHOT is clear that the software's license does matter. That page gives the example of web browser screenshots not being allowed if they show the software's interface. The interface in File:Exif-weg-bei-fb.jpg is just as complex (if not more) than a web browser's interface, so similarly should not be allowed. -M.nelson (talk) 11:35, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Die Lizenz der Software hat überhaupt nichts mit einem Screenshot davon zu tun. Es geht einzig darum, ob der Screenshot geschützte Elemente enthält. --Ralf Roletschek 11:00, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I wouldn't consider Photoshop case as a proof of existing practice, it is just an only case from 2018 shown here. Screenshot is a derivative work, if software isn't free, the interface isn't free, too. --rubin16 (talk) 08:16, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Indiana state seal
[edit]Dubious public domain rationale
- File:Seal of the Indiana Attorney General.svg
- File:Indiana-StateSeal.svg
- File:Indiana state seal.png
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:47, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- I agree the current copyright status is dubious--the law does not unambiguously say that public records are not under copyright. (And the CDC did not create the seal, so that license is clearly incorrect.) However, upon researching the state seal itself, it appears to have been created before 1925, which would make it public domain in the US. This article from the official Indiana government website includes a discussion about the seal in 1905.
- I thus propose the state public domain rationale be changed to {{PD-US-expired}}. Trlkly (talk) 06:51, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- The SVG of the state seal was drawn by the federal government. They were on a series of CDC documents but the same drawings (bitmap versions) were also found on U.S. embassy websites. PD-USGov one way or another. So yes, the license on the state seal SVG is correct. The general design of the seal is different than a particular graphic representation -- see Commons:Coats of arms. Each different representation/drawing has its own independent copyright. Seal drawings you find on state websites are usually not OK, but that one in particular is fine. Keep
- The png has an invalid rationale, but it was taken from the same representation. That means it should have been changed to the {{US state seal from usembassy.de}} at the time from the deprecated tags it was once using, but instead someone changed to the current licensing text, which is indeed incorrect. So, changing to that tag would fix that (and you can see the original bitmap upload still at https://usa.usembassy.de/indiana.htm ). Keep
- The seal of the attorney general does look problematic. That would seem to have been copied from an in.gov website, and as such it is a state drawing, and would be copyrighted by the state. We would need a license for it. If the actual drawing itself was part of a law, you could possibly argue PD-EdictGov, but that is unlikely and has not been demonstrated. So for that one, Delete. Carl Lindberg (talk) 07:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: great thanks to Carl Lindberg, one deleted and two kept. --rubin16 (talk) 08:22, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
No proof of public domain. See w:Die Deutsche Wochenschau#Copyright Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:08, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. IT is from the Deutsche Wochenschau, this film firm ceased to exist more than 70years ago. There is no reason to delete it.--II.kerulet (talk) 19:14, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 08:23, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since); uploader has request deletion, though files are in use — billinghurst sDrewth 14:35, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Painter was born in 1962 and still alive. See https://tapyba.info/dailininkas/arturas-slapsys/. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Per EugeneZelenko, the current PD tag is inaccurate as the artist is still living. The file description says that the artist/owner of the painting has provided written agreement of a CC license; we need that agreement directly from the artist (not owner), ideally through COM:OTRS. Without it the image is assumed to be copyrighted by the artist and not free. -M.nelson (talk) 09:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 08:24, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: User doesn't seem to have red Commons licensing policy. Dereckson (talk) 15:43, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Do all authors died more then 70 years?
- File:Dordogne libre 20 février 1945.jpg
- File:Dordogne libre 5-6 octobre 1958.jpg
- File:Dordogne libre 6 mars 1945.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, the identity of the author is not disclosed on either of this extract, and more than 70 years have passed since its publication. So the French legislation (CPI art. L123-3) enforces accordingly (cf. Template:PD-France/en). --Etiennekd (talk) 17:19, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: mostly kept but one file published in 1958, so, not PD yet. --rubin16 (talk) 08:27, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JotaCartas as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted artworks
Converted to regular DR, not to have it deleted, but to collect expert-opinions about wether FoP-exception for Portugal covers indoor-located exhibits in museums or alike. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Keep This sculpture was offered by the author in 1938 (José Pereira and not André Pereira) to the Sociedade Martins Sarmento to be exhibited permanently in said museum and that has been since permanently exhibited without interruption. Museums are public places as per "a public place is a place that is publicly accessible, even if the access to the public is implicit and/or an entrance fee is charged and/or the right of admission is reserved. This includes, clearly, public interiors. (...) If he or she intended to leave the work in the public place for the lifetime of the work or at least for an indefinite period of time, then one should consider that such work is a permanent publicly placed work.". Tm (talk) 13:36, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per Tm, already PD in both Portugal and US. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:56, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Why is it PD? I don't find anything on :pt or Commons about José Pereira. --Túrelio (talk) 07:44, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: not much discussion here but I would agree with Tm that it is a public place. --rubin16 (talk) 08:29, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
