Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Buildings in Cebu City

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of pano in the Philippines. Refer to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama phil copy law doesnt allow non-fair use of photos of copyrighted architecture and sculpture in the phils. An architecture or sculpture is said to enter allowable commercial use of their photos if it has been 50 years after the death of the last surviving person architect engineer or designer or if 50 years after the completion if it is a work of joint companies in architecture

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 07:20, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. (Or procedural keep without prejudice.) Indiscriminate tagging of multiple files for a generic deletion reason should be discouraged. Each individual file should be discussed on its own merit and with specific reasons. For instance, File:Colegio de la Inmaculada Concepcion historical marker 01.jpg is a work of the Philippine government as this is a photo of a plaque produced by the government's history agency and is therefore free of copyright and is tagged correctly with {{WorkDepicted-PD-PhilippinesGov}}. —seav (talk) 12:35, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Mrcl lxmna: This file, File:Colegio de la Inmaculada Concepcion historical marker 01.jpg, is a marker of the Philippine government. No copyright subsists in works of Philippine government. Only the marker is pictured here. Also, in what ground did you want to remove File:Colegio de la Inmaculada Concepcion, Cebu City.jpg besides the general FOP tag that you've been adding to all photos? Do you know when was the building built and who is the architect of the building? Thanks! Carlojoseph14 (talk) 12:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Seav and Carlojoseph14: the no FoP in the Philippines matter was recently raised (anew) at the Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#Application of recent Philippine Supreme Court decisions on mere allegations of copyright, in light with the recent DR's made by this newly-registered user targeting various Philippine buildings and sculptures. I hereby request admins to put this and other DR's on hold until this matter has concluded meaningfully. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:44, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Now took a poll. This troll user should be stopped. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:35, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Too many unresponded doubts concerning the nomination. Please renominate, responding to the doubts raised here, if you disagree. --Ankry (talk) 07:30, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]