Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/10/09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 9th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Datei wurde fälschlicherweise hinzugefügt. Das Bildrecht gehört ausserdem nicht Andreas Scherrer von KA BOOM. KA BOOM Sarina Fisch (talk) 09:31, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 13:54, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild hat falsche Metadaten hinterlegt. Urheberrechte und Fotograf sind nicht korrekt. KA BOOM Sarina Fisch (talk) 09:55, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 14:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild hat falsche Metadaten hinterlegt. Urheberrechte und Fotograf sind nicht korrekt. KA BOOM Sarina Fisch (talk) 09:55, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 14:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild hat falsche Metadaten hinterlegt. Urheberrechte und Fotograf sind nicht korrekt. KA BOOM Sarina Fisch (talk) 09:56, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 14:07, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild hat falsche Metadaten hinterlegt. Urheberrechte und Fotograf sind nicht korrekt. KA BOOM Sarina Fisch (talk) 09:57, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 14:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild hat falsche Metadaten hinterlegt. Urheberrechte und Fotograf sind nicht korrekt. KA BOOM Sarina Fisch (talk) 09:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 14:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File replaced by formula 2A02:2454:986A:C00:B892:DFA4:197D:603 11:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Die Datei "Rechnerischer Knicksicherheitsnachweis..png" kann gelöscht werden. --Kallemöhn (talk) 11:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not in use, uploader agrees with deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:20, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No longer needed, see above. --Achim (talk) 14:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Duplicate|File:Atlas-coelestis-harmonia-macrocosmica-facsimile-edition-05.jpg}} UpdateNerd (talk) 11:57, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 15:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Instagram - [1] Ravensfire (talk) 15:32, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 18:57, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marla Raucher Osborn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images mostly originating from impersonated Facebook account; no EXIF

Ankry (talk) 20:26, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by AntiCompositeNumber. --Ankry (talk) 20:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded within an other Wikimedia file, for replacement instead of a new file. BeTa (talk) 09:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 09:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate (the crop tool was playing tricks on me) Schwede66 22:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 09:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2018 Facebook image; OTRS permission needed. Also ticket:2020100710002553 Ankry (talk) 07:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by AntiCompositeNumber. --Minoraxtalk 12:33, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not actually appear to be "own work" - attribution is given to someone on Deviant Art, and there's no indication they either gave permission or are the same person as the uploader. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 08:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:33, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file used for promotion, out of scope Podzemnik (talk) 09:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. F10. --Minoraxtalk 12:34, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. F10. --Minoraxtalk 12:35, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. F10. --Minoraxtalk 12:35, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. F10. --Minoraxtalk 12:36, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. F10. --Minoraxtalk 12:36, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, Stupinsky Vyacheslav, am the author of the photo Ступинский_Вячеслав_Юрьевич.jpg and please remove it from Wikipedia. Ступинский Вячеслав (talk) 19:20, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader requested. --Sealle (talk) 11:41, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created accidentally with LRMediaWiki Tagooty (talk) 09:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 16:27, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hi team, this is me on the photo and I'd need it removed from your page. I live in New York, USA now and am here on an artist visa that is highly sensitive to being part of protests/ left-wing organizations. i'm trying to stay as non-political as possible to be able to keep my o1 visa. As a young freelance female photographer I really can't risk having clients not wanting to work with me based on one image they see of me protesting when they search my name in Google.please remove it. it's my personal face on that image and I have my own photography business. I'm trying to maintain a professional and upstanding business. this image was taken during a protest back in 2015 from an organization im no longer part of. I really dont want any of my clients seeing this image and affecting their decision to work with me. Please, is there any way I can be connected to the photographer directly? I'm sure they would understand my situation and take it down if I was given the chance to talk to them. 108.6.20.221 00:00, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

eva zar:Hi, this is Eva Zar. I contacted the photographer to let them know I feel really uncomfortable of this image being online. Renaming the image really isn't the same because it's still going to show up in Google Search. I agree, there isn't a law to delete this image, based on Austrian copyrights but I'm making the effort to let everyone know I really feel uncomfortable with this image being online. As mentioned in my prior statement this image was taken during a left-wing protest with a left-wing organization I'm no longer part of. It keeps showing up in the very first 5 photos of my google search. With USA's position right now I just don't want to get in trouble with Homeland Security and my visa status, nor do I want my clients to not work with me based on an image that was taken five years ago and isn't representative of me anymore. I'd greatly appreciate the deletion of this image and don't want to cause any harm. Thank you.


Deleted: per discussion. --Krd 10:31, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Source:Chuck Knoblauch Cameo". No camera EXIF. Small file by a newcomer who has been blocked at WP. E4024 (talk) 02:55, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is labeled with a professional photographer's name, not the claimant Bri (talk) 03:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small file with a different author name at MD. IMHO someone who knows more than me should check all uploads of this user. E4024 (talk) 03:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete There is no indication the website is available under the license stipulated. The website itself as depicted is not de minimis to the entire image. In fact, it's the focal object of the image. Thus, the image is encumbered with rights from the website which does not have such a release into the public domain. Hammersoft (talk) 03:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? What about the other "own works" of this uploader? E4024 (talk) 03:29, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file with transmission code; dubious "own work" by a user with copyvio record. E4024 (talk) 03:31, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright belongs to Detroit Free Press. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Flickrwashing. --Achim (talk) 11:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Uploader here--I just would like to say I uploaded it because I assumed the Flickr uploader had the copyright somehow. They probably don't. Mossypiglet (talk) 13:27, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 05:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 05:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 05:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:09, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 05:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:09, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. Minoraxtalk 06:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:09, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyright violation: http://www.rok-online.com/?p=20301 MikaelF (talk) 06:41, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:06, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a fair-use album cover, and the user who uploaded it has falsely claimed that the record label has licensed it for free use. Ss112 (talk) 07:18, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:06, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A small photo from a blocked account, no EXIF, likely copvio per COM:PRP Podzemnik (talk) 07:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status, no entry for Peru at COM:CUR. Supposed "own works" derived from modern banknotes of Peru, copyrighted by the issuer en:Central Reserve Bank of Peru. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:500intisb.jpg.

Gunnex (talk) 08:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Btw, same unclear copyright status for (modern) Category:Coins of Peru... Gunnex (talk) 08:38, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Update: At official site http://www.bcrp.gob.pe/banknotes-and-coins.html images of banknotes and coins are available under certain terms of use which may be somewho ("for informational purposes only") Fair use related, or? Gunnex (talk) 08:48, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Gunnex. La unidad monetaria denominada Inti dejó de ser de "curso legal" desde 1991 y su ley de creación (Ley Nº 24064 [7]) fue derogada mediante la la Ley Nº 25295, que estableció la nueva unidad monetaria del Nuevo Sol.[8] Además, la Ley Nº 24064 en ningún artículo dispone que las imágenes de los billetes o monedas de Intis tengan copyright. Lo mismo se aplica para las imágenes de los billetes o monedas de Soles de Oro (1863-1985) anteriores a los Intis.
¿Me puedes explicar de qué manera monedas sin valor legal y cuyas leyes fueron derogadas pueden llegar a tener algún copyright? [9]
Con respecto a las imágenes de Nuevos Soles, el Código Penal Peruano solo prohíbe lo siguiente:[10] (Confrontar también la Ley N° 26714 [11]).
  • Artículo 252.- Fabricación y falsificación de moneda de curso legal.
  • Artículo 253.- Alteración de la moneda de curso legal
  • Artículo 254.- Tráfico de moneda falsa
  • Artículo 255.- Fabricación o introducción en el territorio de la República de instrumentos destinados a la falsificación de billetes o monedas
  • Artículo 256.- Alteración de billetes o monedas
Es absolutamente falso que los billetes peruanos tengan copyright, pues no existe ninguna ley que lo especifique. En "Terms of Use" acerca de la información del BCRP dice "is offered to the general public for informational purposes only", y en la versión en español [12] dice: "El contenido del Portal de Internet del BCRP se elabora con fines informativos y su uso es responsabilidad del visitante. Puede reproducirse total o parcialmente, sin autorización expresa, siempre y cuando se cite la fuente.", ¿y qué hay en ese portal? pues imágenes de los billetes y monedas peruanos, los mismos que tú "dices" que tienen copyright basándote únicamente en la legislación de otros países.
Un saludo y espero que retires tus plantillas de borrado de todas estas imágenes, y especialmente de las imágenes de Intis. MarcoMogollon (talk) 03:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please, revisa el Decreto Legislativo 822 de 1996, Ley sobre el derecho de autor, que no menciona ni a las monedas ni a los billetes como objetos de "derechos de autor" o protección por parte del Estado. Bye, MarcoMogollon (talk) 04:15, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Thx for the feedback. As @Jameslwoodward: already indicated at Commons:Deletion requests/File:500intisb.jpg the Peruvian copyright law does NOT have a copyright exception for banknotes (and similar works) via the related copyright law Ley 822 (Art. 9: "No son objeto de protección por el derecho de autor"). So, the question remains: How to treat and license all these supposed "own works" (which they aren't: they were all derived from — see COM:DW — artworks made by Central Reserve Bank of Peru's designer team) in such a way that makes them compatible with COM:L. "(...) tú "dices" que tienen copyright basándote únicamente en la legislación de otros países." No, see Ley 822, Art. 9.
"¿Me puedes explicar de qué manera monedas sin valor legal y cuyas leyes fueron derogadas pueden llegar a tener algún copyright?" This is irrelevant.
Per above mentioned link, the terms of use (btw, appears to be quite fresh created [2014?], as historic versions of http://www.bcrp.gob.pe did not mentioned - so far I could verify - any "terms of use", presuming © by bcrp.gob.pe) offers a license which is — IMHO — open to interpretation: and that's why I started this request as "Unclear copyright status". Gunnex (talk) 16:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 DeleteI don't read Spanish and Google does not do a great job with everything above, so forgive me if I have missed something here. I see

"Es absolutamente falso que los billetes peruanos tengan copyright, pues no existe ninguna ley que lo especifique."
It is absolutely false that Peruvians have copyright bills because there is no law to specify.
translator: google

That is backwards. Every created work has a copyright unless the copyright law specifies otherwise, the copyright has expired, or the owner of the copyright puts the work in the Public Domain. The copyright obviously has not expired and "for informational purposes" is the only quasi-license I see, which is nowhere near enough for Commons. As I said at the other DR, the Copyright Law is tightly drawn and currency and coins do not seem to be included. So, unless I or the Google translation have missed something, I don't see how we can keep these. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:48, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per discussion. Unclear copyrright status Natuur12 (talk) 19:06, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:CUR Peru The Inti bill is not free image,

MiguelAlanCS (talk) 08:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gracoa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Source given as Gracia - no permission

Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlvarSvensk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

album cover/poster - needs permission

Gbawden (talk) 11:29, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by V.petcu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

all from InGeneron.inc - need permission

Gbawden (talk) 11:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bmallinger1227 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

High quality photos, claimed as own work but no exif. Found on their website https://internationalschoolmn.com/ per google

Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source nellyreifler.com, no permission, false copyfree claim Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brais Rodriguez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:TOYS copyrighted figurine

Gbawden (talk) 12:18, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source: "Sertanejo @danielaribeirooficial" Is this file acceptable? E4024 (talk) 12:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused unidentified logo — Draceane talkcontrib. 12:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 12:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 12:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 12:59, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 12:59, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 12:59, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 12:59, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear source, missing permission — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, unclear source — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:03, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:03, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:03, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, snapshot from some video? — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:05, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:05, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild hat falsche Metadaten hinterlegt. Urheberrechte und Fotograf sind nicht korrekt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KA BOOM Sarina Fisch (talk • contribs)


Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 05:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:17, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:17, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:17, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:17, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also include File:Avatars-000007590278-xxtxlo-t200x200.jpg

The article was deleted. The item will be deleted shortly. Do we need to keep the image? Does it help the project at all? Quakewoody (talk) 13:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:17, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, low resolution, fake EXIF — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:18, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:18, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:13, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:18, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:18, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:18, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:18, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Photo of photo. No permission. --Minoraxtalk 05:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:20, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:20, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:24, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:26, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Santiago Begambre (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unclear source, unused

— Draceane talkcontrib. 13:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:22, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:32, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Draceane, I just categorised the photo and added it to Wikipedia and Wikidata. Close DR? --Gnom (talk) 19:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Gnom: Yes, now  Keep. — Draceane talkcontrib. 19:49, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 05:22, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:23, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:23, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:23, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:23, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Crom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

posible copyvio from internet

MiguelAlanCS (talk) 14:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:49, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eng Abdirahman GAlde (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:25, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:25, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ShashankChandel1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:50, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vittor Longati (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, last remaining contribution of promotion-only user. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:27, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monteur Baptiste (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaders private images. Unused, no educational Content.

GeorgHHtalk   16:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:27, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monteur Baptiste (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private / self-promoting images, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Habertix (talk) 22:59, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monteur Baptiste (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   13:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cited source is a Flickrwashing account. Previously published at https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/telugu/movies/news/photo-alert-payal-rajput-flaunts-her-toned-midriff-in-her-latest-instagram-snaps/articleshow/72443623.cms — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamlokiodinson (talk • contribs)

 Delete: Confirmed. --Achim (talk) 18:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: The uploader clearly created a Flickr account to upload this picture on common.--QTHCCAN (talk) 19:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:28, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an own work, like all uploads of the same user. E4024 (talk) 20:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:29, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like a professional work but is claimed as own work - 16 Tineye.com results: tripadvisor, twitter, blogspot... Brian W. Schaller (talk) 23:24, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

may have been copied from http://pem.clinicalmonster.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2019/04/Brooklyn-Bridge_170614090305011-1920x960.jpg
note that the uploader, "Politicalcamera", has been blocked indefinitely over at Wikipedia due to abusive use of multiple (5) sock puppet accounts. Brian W. Schaller (talk) 23:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional material, out of scope Podzemnik (talk) 23:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional material, out of scope Podzemnik (talk) 23:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional material, out of scope Podzemnik (talk) 23:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

part of promotional material, out of scope Podzemnik (talk) 23:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a commercial company, out of scope. If important, OTRS permission is needed Podzemnik (talk) 23:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a commercial company, out of scope Podzemnik (talk) 23:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file Podzemnik (talk) 23:56, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks like a test file. Small, no EXIF, possibly out of scope. I suggest to delete per COM:PRP Podzemnik (talk) 23:59, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely a molecular substance, no basis for deciding it's bent rather than linear, and the choice of perspective makes it look quite unsymmetrical without basis in fact. DMacks (talk) 02:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 16:01, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is on the bad authors list. Pseudo Classes (talk) 10:18, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Tineye show older versions on the internet. --MGA73 (talk) 15:43, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure with pixelated bonds/atoms & opaque background. Have File:EGTA.svg as high-quality vector replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 16:06, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jwsponsler (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of unsupported PD tags. Images are from random internet sites (e.g., findagrave, facebook, etc.) that provide no indication of publication history or circumstance. Uploader removed no permission templates (see files' history) and then simply slapped on no notice PD templates corresponding to the images' dates with no apparent research (and certainly no evidence as required by COM:L and COM:EVID) to support those tags. We require, for example, scans of both the front and backs of images, citation of the publication in which image appeared with no notice, etc.

Эlcobbola talk 18:32, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:11, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is she? For which reason she could be in scope? The uploader has already uploaded a stock photo with watermark. Let's delete their uploads. E4024 (talk) 19:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:59, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 06:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 17:44, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 06:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 17:43, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from book cover. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 17:43, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 08:53, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus geometry. enwiki article about this topic is clear that it is not trans-planar. DMacks (talk) 02:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Repeared new image--Hoa112008 (talk) 11:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)Hoa112008[reply]
What is the dihedral angle in this new image, and what is the basis for choosing that specific numerical value? DMacks (talk) 11:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hydrogen ditelluride has been investigated theoretically, with various properties predicted. The molecule is twisted with a C2 symmetry. There are two enantiomers. Hydrogen ditelluride is one of the simplest possible unsymmetrical molecules; any simpler molecule will not have the required low symmetry. The equilibrium geometry (not counting zero point energy or vibrational energy) has bond lengths of 2.879 Å between the tellurium atoms and 1.678 Å between hydrogen and tellurium. The H-Te-Te angle is 94.93°. The angle of lowest energy between the two H-Te bonds (dihedral angle) is 89.32°. The trans cofiguration is higher in energy (3.71 kcal/mol), and the cis would be even higher (4.69 kcal/mol). Information is available at Ab Initio Calculations of the Rotational Barriers in H2Te2 and (CH3)2Te2--Hoa112008 (talk) 14:54, 9 October 2020 (UTC)Hoa112008[reply]
Sounds good, obviously. Please be sure you use sources rather than guesses when creating images. DMacks (talk) 09:40, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Okay!

Kept: as per discussion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from Forsvarsgalleriet.dk may be used unchanged for non-commercial purposes (detalls in Danish at https://forsvaret.dk/da/kontakt/regler-for-brug-af-forsvarsgalleriet/), so it is believable that permission is granted for use on Wikipedia. Upload to Wikimedia Commons under CC-BY-SA 4.0 is another matter which I doubt has been permitted. Dipsacus fullonum (talk) 14:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I specifically asked for permission to use this image on Wikipedia, and got an affirmative reply by email from Forsvarskommandoen, Ledelsessekretariatet on 9. Oct. 2020. I note that the picture of the general's predecessor, File:Bjørn Bisserup General 2017.jpg, is marked CC BY-SA 4.0, which makes is reasonable to assume the image in question surely must have the same terms. Would you like me to do anything further in this matter? Gjensen (talk) 16:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Gjensen: 'Permission to use on Wikipedia' is not the same as 'Permission to post to Wikimedia Commons', and it does not authorise you to assign the {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} license. Unfortunately the source link in File:Bjørn Bisserup General 2017.jpg is dead, but if the same organisation assigned a free license to that image they may be able to do so for this as well. If possible, please approach them again and ask them to email authorisation to the COM:OTRS system, or alternatively to post it with an acceptable free licence on their website or elsewhere. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:14, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have now emailed Forsvarskommandoen, Ledelsessekretariatet again, explaining the situation and asking that a {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} license be granted to this image. Today I received a reply "This is hereby approved". Would you like me to forward the correspondance (in Danish) to somewhere? Sorry I am unfamiliar with this process. Gjensen (talk) 21:37, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gjensen: the system is that the copyright owner should send the permission email directly to OTRS, please see Commons:OTRS#If you are NOT the copyright holder. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:18, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only files found on DC.gov are licensed CC BY-3.0-US, per the DC.gov terms and conditions. These files are from other sites, and, while they may be by employees of the District of Columbia, they are not covered by the aforementioned license. Most of these photos are from dccouncil.us, which explicitly states "All Rights Reserved". Note that DC government works are not considered US federal government works, and are therefore not automatically public domain (see Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-DCGov). Also see the revision history of {{DCGovWork}}.

clpo13(talk) 16:32, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:48, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 04:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:12, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This logo is copyrighted. Blue Sonic (talk) 04:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dont delete,but remove from Commons. Move to Indonesian Wikipedia.Tokyo Metro 6000 series (talk) 05:11, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tokyo Metro 6000 series: Jika berkas tersebut sudah dihapus dari Commons, nanti akan saya pindah ke Wikipedia bahasa Indonesia. Salam, Blue Sonic (talk) 08:16, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OkeTokyo Metro 6000 series (talk) 09:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Blue Sonic: ini saya percepat penghapusannya ya. Soalnya ini logo sudah di atas Threshold of Originality. Karena pengunggahan logo di Commons hanya untuk logo yang terlalu sederhana saja. RaFaDa20631 (talk) 08:14, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by EugeneZelenko. --Didym (talk) 20:12, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crop of a larger image available online in a blog dated before the upload here.[17] Verbcatcher (talk) 05:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:09, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Available in a Facebook page dating before upload here.[18] Metadata indicates a different author to that claimed Verbcatcher (talk) 05:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:07, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Risk of copyright violation, available on Facebook before upload here.[19] Verbcatcher (talk) 05:20, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:09, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Posted in a Tweet before upload here.[20] Verbcatcher (talk) 05:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:09, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The camera angle indicates that this was probably taken by an accredited photographer, particularly as this is a photo of a Defence Secretary who would have had tight security. Verbcatcher (talk) 05:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by RufinaSmith

[edit]

The metadata indicates 'Author Kumar, Praveen (NatWest Markets)', which conflicts with the claimed author name. We need OTRS verification that the uploader is the photographer. I have already nominated two of the files for deletion on the basis that they were published elsewhere before upload, this could also be resolved through OTRS. --Verbcatcher (talk) 05:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at http://cska.bg/index.php?main_page=document_general_info&products_id=6503&language=en&zenid=ls722vjbe40t9pmjv3nlrpvjl2 Ytoyoda (talk) 05:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:07, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published in a news report dated before upload here.[21] Verbcatcher (talk) 05:54, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:07, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

risk of copyright violation, published in a news report dated before upload here.[22] Verbcatcher (talk) 06:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:07, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KVK2005 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatives of non-free artworks.

VLu (talk) 06:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

risk of copyright violation, published elsewhere on pages dated before upload here.[23][24] Verbcatcher (talk) 06:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:05, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Risk of copyright violation, published in a news report dated before upload here.[25] Verbcatcher (talk) 06:31, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:05, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously swiped from [26], and doesn't appear to be "own work" at all. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 08:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete Out of scope. This is a CV, content for Wikipedia if the person is notable, not for Commons. "Wikimedia Commons is not an encyclopedia, dictionary, guide, or book" (COM:NOT). ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 08:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image. Some sort of unsupported assertion of identity theft. Personal campaign? Out of scope Malcolma (talk) 09:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete- looks like promocruft. Out of scope.Philipp Michel Reichold (talk) 10:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Political campaign document with unclear copyright status, also may be out of scope. Verbcatcher (talk) 09:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from author Neekon. Taivo (talk) 12:49, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dies ist mein eigenes Werk. Und möchte das es entfernt wird. 2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:15D:C6FE:95F2:F461 13:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 20:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich möchte das folgende Bilder aus Wikimedia Commons gelöscht werden. Begründung: Dies sind meine eigenenen Bilder und sind nicht schön und haben keinerlei Bezug auf Weinfelde 2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:9D0E:62DE:13AB:D24A 10:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But who are you? If you are uploader Lukas 91, then log-in and confirm. --Túrelio (talk) 08:17, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in scope, and doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion (no proof even that requester is uploader!). --P 1 9 9   17:57, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Schlechte Qualität auch nicht zeigenswert 2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:856D:A01F:18A7:BC87 08:36, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valide reason for deletion. The file is fine. --Jahobr (talk) 09:35, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Known LTA vandal. --Achim55 (talk) 18:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 14:15, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:59, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was published before, for example http://aktobetimes.kz/sport/952-sergey-morozov-stranu-proslavlyat-samoe-horoshee-zanyatie.html without Creative Commons licence. Matlin (talk) 14:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:59, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:59, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity draft and Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:58, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of the cover of a book published in 1983. Howhontanozaz (talk) 15:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:58, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a university logo, not likely "own work" Horus (talk) 15:34, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:56, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:56, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Это моя работа, мой файл к статье обо мне. Я разрешаю его использовать! This is my job, my file for an article about me. I give permission to use it! Goutsoullac69 (talk) 20:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? E4024 (talk) 16:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My work.Fullscaledx (talk) 17:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In that case please upload a larger file with camera EXIF and w/o watermarks (writings). --E4024 (talk) 17:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.findglocal.com/BR/Inoc%C3%AAncia/272464702879916/34%C2%AA-Festa-do-Pe%C3%A3o-de-Inoc%C3%AAncia---MS E4024 (talk) 17:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete, the link given above is undated, but the image there is a wider crop suggesting that the uploader may not have have access to the full image. Our image is also available on a webpage dated before the upload here.[27] The image has a watermark at the top right. Verbcatcher (talk) 05:45, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fabian Cromwell (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low res, no EXIF, uploaded in batch of blatant copyvios of this person (see deleted contribs). Duck/COM:PRP/

Эlcobbola talk 18:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:52, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is the source permitting free use? E4024 (talk) 20:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:50, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work and dubious scope. E4024 (talk) 20:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:49, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is the source for free uploads? I could not reach there. E4024 (talk) 22:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:48, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cropped copy from a (most likely) copyrighted source - see https://bkskarch.com/work/tammany-hall/ Brian W. Schaller (talk) 22:54, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:48, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation, the photo is a crop of a larger photograph published elsewhere.[28] The painting is a derivative work based on the photograph. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:48, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not authors own work, only used on unaccepted Draft on enwp. - RichT|C|E-Mail 23:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks like copyvio - no EXIF, very small, unlikely to be own work Podzemnik (talk) 23:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks like copyvio - no EXIF, very small, unlikely to be own work Podzemnik (talk) 23:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks like copyvio - no EXIF, very small, unlikely to be own work Podzemnik (talk) 23:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obviously not own work, no evidence of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:45, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:46, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need to know the source of the photograph to determine the licence Podzemnik (talk) 23:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:45, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Logo is PD in the US, but COM:TOO South Korea is unclear. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:05, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. --JuTa 19:57, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 89.196.72.155 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: reason=copy and has no source Not sure. One week for discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.196.72.155 (talk • contribs)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 14:31, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Metin Akdülger - Onedio Röportaj.png and its crops

[edit]

Copyright violation, no free license at the declared YouTube source.[29] The declared archive links are dead. Not all YouTube videos have free licences. File history includes 'Tag: License review by non-image-reviewers'. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:34, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:34, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was trying to learn how to upload an image to my ptwiki test page but was not aware that it would also be uploaded to Commons. Py4nf (talk) 01:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 14:34, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user(Mikamoto~ruwiki) uploaded, without permission, this copyrighted file, created by kakujin, from the page https://kakijun.jp/ without permission. On this link is all the copyright information but in Japanese, use Google translate to understand it.
Besides, all the Stroke order files that he uploaded and is uploading come from https://kakijun.jp, and should be deleted as well.
FanNihongo (talk) 01:57, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia. Ruthven (msg) 14:34, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image. Used in non-accepted AfC draft - RichT|C|E-Mail 02:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep PD-RU-exempt. Fry1989 eh? 15:51, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Fry. Ruthven (msg) 14:34, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:36, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:36, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:36, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:37, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:37, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Simply no way this is the uploader's own work. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:37, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work. Metadata said it was taken in 2017 while this was uploaded in 2019. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. No other copies found on the Net. Ruthven (msg) 14:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1952 work by Juan Nakpil, dead in 1986. No freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:50, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:39, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [30]. Yann (talk) 13:46, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Grammercy Residences is 2013 by Jerde Partnership International and Roger Villarosa Architects & Associates. Trump Tower is 2017 by Broadway Malyan Pomeroy Studio LPPA Design Group, Inc.

No freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:57, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:40, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque se debe borrar LEANDRO RENÉ (talk) 04:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:40, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque decidí que quiero reservarme todos los derechos y no quiero cerrar mi cuenta en creative coommons Gonchalooooo (talk) 04:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawal 5 months after the upload. Ruthven (msg) 14:41, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero reservar todos los derechos y eliminar esta y todas mis fotos de creative commons además de mi cuenta Gonchalooooo (talk) 04:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawal 5 months after the upload. Ruthven (msg) 14:41, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. Painting is a derivative of the a shot from the film, located below the work. Howhontanozaz (talk) 04:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Are you asserting that the photo is a movie still? If so, from which movie? If the photograph is by the declared author then there is no copyright problem. There may be a scope issue unless the people are named. Verbcatcher (talk) 06:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Verbcatcher: I assumed it was a derivative of a shot from the 2016 Indian film en:Aanandam since I could not think of any other reason why the uploader would upload a watercolor rather than the image itself, if he/she really is the copyright holder. Also, I believe the watercolor is out of scope since the artist is not notable. The image however could be cropped if it could be proven that the uploader is truly the copyright holder. Regards Howhontanozaz (talk) 15:45, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Thank you. I agree that there is a significant chance that the photograph is a still or a publicity shot from the film en:Aanandam. The three women could be the actresses shown on the film poster and the article title suggests this. There is therefore a significant risk that the license is incorrect. If the photograph is not available with a free license then the painting is derivative work of the photograph and neither of them is safe for Commons. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:40, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:41, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2004 bldg by Leandro V. Locsin and Partners https://artsandculture.google.com/partner/ayala-museum

No freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material Mrcl lxmna (talk) 04:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:42, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo is copyrighted by China Mobile. COM:TOO China Larryasou (talk) 04:40, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: A few things: 1) Shape was simple, and unlikely it can pass the Threshold of originality as it is just 5 boomerangs organized in a simple form. 2) Photo was taken in Canada in a public area, outside of the space owned by China Mobile. Raysonho @ Open Grid Scheduler / Grid Engine (talk) 00:00, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Raysonho. Ruthven (msg) 14:43, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a portrait with no credit to the creator. Copyright violation. Also no freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material Mrcl lxmna (talk) 04:56, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. OTRS permission needed. Ruthven (msg) 14:43, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 05:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Het beeld toont een voorbeeld van een kleuter tijdens de diploma uitreiking in Taiwan. --トトト (talk) 20:30, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in SCOPE. Ruthven (msg) 14:44, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Georgia Buidhe (talk) 03:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 05:57, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YevhenOl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:58, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YevhenOl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:41, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a single one of the set of images that have been at this filename are usable. The bent molecular forms (like H2O molecules) are not chemically correct--it's a network solid, and if it were molecular SiO2 it would seemingly be linear like CO2, and the ones by Claudio Pistilli are uncited derivative works. And its crystal structure has a poor choice of radii making one unable to even see some of the atoms (but it's also at File:Silicon-dioxide-3D-vdW.png rather than overwriting here if someone wants it). Category:Silicon dioxide has multiple better representations. DMacks (talk) 02:24, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment The author has uploaded a new version of this model. It needs to be checked if the file is still a case for deletion! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 13:31, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's reasonable now. User:Hoa112008, what is the specific refrence you used for the actual parameters to generate this specific diagram? Which polymorph is it? I ask because I'm trying to figure out what makes this a valuable addition to our existing Category:Silicon dioxide. DMacks (talk) 14:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • This is also an inappropriate COM:OVERWRITE of a substantially different type of content. DMacks (talk) 15:05, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • This is the structure of quartz. For example, in the unit cell of α-quartz, the central tetrahedron shares all four of its corner O atoms, the two face-centered tetrahedra share two of their corner O atoms, and the four edge-centered tetrahedra share just one of their O atoms with other SiO4 tetrahedra. This leaves a net average of 12 out of 24 total vertices for that portion of the seven SiO4 tetrahedra that are considered to be a part of the unit cell for silica (see 3-D Unit Cell). SiO2 has a number of distinct crystalline forms (polymorphs) in addition to amorphous forms. With the exception of stishovite and fibrous silica, all of the crystalline forms involve tetrahedral SiO4 units linked together by shared vertices. Silicon–oxygen bond lengths vary between the various crystal forms; for example in α-quartz the bond length is 161 pm, whereas in α-tridymite it is in the range 154–171 pm. The Si-O-Si angle also varies between a low value of 140° in α-tridymite, up to 180° in β-tridymite. In α-quartz, the Si-O-Si angle is 144°, (Holleman, Arnold Frederik; Wiberg, Egon (2001), Wiberg, Nils (ed.), Inorganic Chemistry, translated by Eagleson, Mary; Brewer, William, San Diego/Berlin: Academic Press/De Gruyter, ISBN 0-12-352651-5)--Hoa112008 (talk) 00:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)Hoa112008[reply]
  •  Keep for now as there seems to be a cited source for this depiction. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:52, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Still unclear. All Hoa112008 has done is cut'n'pasted content from en:Silicon dioxide. This content specifically mentions multiple different polymorphs, each with their own measurements. So which one does this image represent? It's also a violation of COM:OVERWRITE. DMacks (talk) 06:17, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I understand and I think we should think about deleting the file! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:22, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding my OVERWRITE concern, the use-case is to represent "SiO2" in chemical equations, so the fact of "one Si, two O" is important and a crystal structure is incorrect (a different COM:EDUSE). DMacks (talk) 12:32, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:59, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. The uploader uploaded only 2 files, one has full size and EXIFs, and this one has small size without EXIFs, although I did not find catches with google, this is typically the kind of image found in the web example. Very unlikely to be own work, otherwise why one of the upload has full size and EXIFs and not the other? Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:45, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

need to get better pixels Maren Rosenberg (talk) 17:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Maren Rosenberg: , please be clearer. Are you nominating this as you are the uploader and have changed your mind? Verbcatcher (talk) 05:49, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Verbcatcher. --ƏXPLICIT 06:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bust by Napoleon Abueva who died in 2018. No freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material Mrcl lxmna (talk) 04:29, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete sadly. w:Napoleon Abueva died in 2018. Still, no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Undelete when FOP is introduced in the Philippines (if ever the subject of this file qualifies for the future Philippine FOP), just like the cases of Armenian (2013) and Belgian (2016) architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in both countries. Nevertheless, IPOPHL has indicated in a November 2020 email reply to Higad Rail Fan that they are open for a dialogue with the Wikimedia Foundation with regards to FOP matter. When will this dialogue (to be initiated by WMF according to the email-reply) occur is yet to be seen, but hopefully sooner than later. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:25, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:44, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1988 architecture. No freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 04:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy keep all Keep Because the Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. It is fervently petitioned that - going to keep this for now until someone else can nominate if they see fit; Wherefore premises considered I humbly register my Strong Objection to this and the Mass Deletions Requests of this Single Editor, respectfully respectfully

4 years prescription since 2015 under the New 2019 SC Circular vis-à-vis Copyright law to question any FOP matter: a Legal Bar due to Extinctive Prescription to delete my photos and of User:Ramon FVelasquez as tagged by the Smart One September 2020 Mass Deletions

  • I sincerely hope that Editors will note my Underscoring of the 4 years Legal Bar on Deletion of FOP photos, I repeat from 2016, thus the tons of Mass Deletions tags by the Smart One on RamonFVelasquez should be stricken off the Talk Page as grave violations of Criminal Law ... respectfully Judgefloro (talk)
  •  Delete both images per no COM:FOP Philippines. Restore when FOP is introduced here, or failing that, undelete in 2039 (1988+50+1 years after the "publication" of this work by unnamed architects). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:44, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:36, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mind Museum is a 2012 bldg by architect Ed Calma. One seems to show the model of the bldg. No freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 04:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1988 architecture. No freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:59, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy keep all Keep Because the Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. It is fervently petitioned that - going to keep this for now until someone else can nominate if they see fit; Wherefore premises considered I humbly register my Strong Objection to this and the Mass Deletions Requests of this Single Editor, respectfully respectfully
4 years prescription since 2015 under the New 2019 SC Circular vis-à-vis Copyright law to question any FOP matter: a Legal Bar due to Extinctive Prescription to delete my photos and of User:Ramon FVelasquez as tagged by the Smart One September 2020 Mass Deletions
  • I sincerely hope that Editors will note my Underscoring of the 4 years Legal Bar on Deletion of FOP photos, I repeat from 2016, thus the tons of Mass Deletions tags by the Smart One on RamonFVelasquez should be stricken off the Talk Page as grave violations of Criminal Law ... respectfully Judgefloro (talk)
  •  Delete sadly. The building was opened in 1988. Undelete when FOP is introduced in the Philippines (if ever the subject of this file qualifies for the future Philippine FOP), just like the cases of Armenian (2013) and Belgian (2016) architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in both countries. Per Clindberg's response to my question on this talk page a couple of days ago, the "4 years prescription" is only relevant after the file has been deleted, as the existence of the file is still a continuous exploitation by reusers. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:37, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:52, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2000 bldg by arch. Roger villarosa who is alive.

No freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:15, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
  • In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
Rejoinder II
the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions
Reason
our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any
I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime
* (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"[reply]
  • Q. What are the elements of the 2012 CybercrIme vis-a-vis Commons Mass Deletions in my Talk page? A. they are: from hacking to attacks online a) using a john or jane doe or anonymous account b) hiding the identity by use of such alternate accounts c) via a habit, scheme or design d) to attempt to delete, erase or in any manner take meta or mass date like photos from any internet site or legitimate forum, device or even media like Commons, Wikipedia, Flickr, phot bucket, Facebook; vide: SECTION 1 (h) Without right refers to either: (i) conduct undertaken without or in excess of authority; or (ii) conduct not covered by established legal defenses, excuses, court orders, justifications, or relevant principles under the law. SEC. 4. Cybercrime Offenses. —(3) Data Interference. — The intentional or reckless alteration, damaging, deletion or deterioration of computer data, electronic document, or electronic data message, without right, including the introduction or transmission of viruses.
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.


  • Finally, I am submitting this proof to Commons Admins that your Deletion Request is not only without basis but a scheme, habit or plan to take off Valid Photos in Commons; the Statues is 18th Century; it took me 2 days to research on this to prove to Commons Administrators that this and most of your Mass Deletions are unlawful and contrary to Philippine Laws;
  • Intellectual Property Mediation and many other innovations to prevent long court litigations does not make law; as I said only the present not past S. C. ruling on FOP will put finis to all of these pros and cons upon FOP including the finer points of law or grey areas of Copy fair use vio etc. At the very least, an IPO or DOJ not declining to issue Replies to any Letters of ours or yours, will suffice for the moment as Basis of Commons community of editors and admins to create a policy on FOP deletions or undelitions; may I repeat and underscore that even the SC of USA and ours often issue Bad Law or highly divided rulings like 5-4 or here 8-7 not beating the greatest Phil case of Javellana vs. Secretary which made infidels and believers stand weeping or even dancing during the Bagong Lipunan; I admit that there are Commons exact rules like on packaging and the like that does not need debate; for me this is the very beauty fo the Philosopy of Commons or its Founders that pros and cons here make this Commons world better that SC court USA and Phil toss coin decisions, specifically in the 9th Circus Court of California as CA Justice William Bedsworth wroth on me the the 3 elves; I am for inclusion ... thus you see my redundancy and duplicates ... but as I said, I am ahead of your times as I told Justice Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. at 6:00 pm of Dec 24, 1999 Xmas my first Suspension Holiday : he scolded me for being off-tangent, off- topic; I told him that I am not of this world itong mundong mapaghuzga; soon, the Supreme Court will steal my Robes, Gavel and Golden Br. 73 Throne with is mine until age 70 or 2023 ... my names which as you said precedes all the SC Justices your nominated who cannot even hold my 87.55% Bar rating 12th Place Bar 1983, where UP Summa Cum Laude Napoleon Poblador now one to the top lawyers, failed to land in top 20 due to very low grade in Taxation which I topped at 86%; my classmate Ramon Caguioa sat beside us as my name made noises in the Ateneo since I could cite Volumes of the SCRA in exams but not the pages which is the only property of Ferdinand Edralin Marcos during the Arturo M. Tolentino debates; his younger brother Benjamin now Senior and candidate for CJ was nobody in the Ateneo; I say and know the Law, and I do not commit mistake; I am primary authority; but I underscore that I am co-equal with any editor here and I am just putting or sharing this input because of the present most difficult Mass Deletions that we experience, moro moro or moral farce so to speak; I have never contested nor objected to Deletions Request since my pictures are the subject and I stay neutral; that is why I created this Template: "Respectfully submitted to the sound discretion of editors and I have no objection to the Deletion ..." But Commons is facing a Signal No. 500 Mass Deletions ... and I still have no time yet as of this moment to finis my Legal Treatise to answer the Long Lines of Mass Deletions that appears in my Talk Page; one side of the coin like a pro or a coin can create here an alternate account and start the Mass Deletions; of course, the Mass Deletions were started since the editor said it, she or he is smart, and then admitted after being blocked to have done a great wrong... but then stated that a professor advised that the idea of Mass Deletions starting from smart notion could .... and I countered that my Fish Vendor and hired trike driver told me not to take photos of the fishes and the food Isusumbong nila ako kay Mayor; It's A Frank ... for gullibles and moro moro players I cannot like Justice William Bedsworth wait for the Next Mass Deletions to be copy pasted in my Talk Page;

I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:37, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy keep all Keep Because the Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. It is fervently petitioned that - going to keep this for now until someone else can nominate if they see fit; Wherefore premises considered I humbly register my Strong Objection to this and the Mass Deletions Requests of this Single Editor, respectfully respectfully
4 years prescription since 2015 under the New 2019 SC Circular vis-à-vis Copyright law to question any FOP matter: a Legal Bar due to Extinctive Prescription to delete my photos and of User:Ramon FVelasquez as tagged by the Smart One September 2020 Mass Deletions
  • I sincerely hope that Editors will note my Underscoring of the 4 years Legal Bar on Deletion of FOP photos, I repeat from 2016, thus the tons of Mass Deletions tags by the Smart One on RamonFVelasquez should be stricken off the Talk Page as grave violations of Criminal Law ... respectfully Judgefloro (talk)



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Derivative works violations: image files depict billboards and advertisements of Kapuso TV programmes. No evidence of COM:OTRS permission from the graphic artists of the GMA ads.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:06, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1999 bldg as says https://kmcmaggroup.com/building/Robinsons-Equitable-Tower/. No freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:29, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Equitable bldg is 1999 built - https://kmcmaggroup.com/building/Robinsons-Equitable-Tower/. Megaplaza is 1996 built - https://kmcmaggroup.com/building/City-and-Land-Mega-Plaza. No freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • While this can fulfill DM, both buildings are recent, so  Delete sadly. Unlike the claim above, this was actually opened in 1998 (immediate Google searching) but still fails COM:FOP Philippines. Undelete when FOP is introduced in the Philippines (if ever the subject of this file qualifies for the future Philippine FOP), just like the cases of Armenian (2013) and Belgian (2016) architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in both countries. Nevertheless, IPOPHL has indicated in a November 2020 email reply to Higad Rail Fan that they are open for a dialogue with the Wikimedia Foundation with regards to FOP matter. When will this dialogue (to be initiated by WMF according to the email-reply) occur is yet to be seen, but hopefully sooner than later. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:21, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1948 non-architectural work by Luciano Aquino. No freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted per UDR. Pre-1972 work. Abzeronow (talk) 17:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An artwork by Jerry Araos who died in 2012. No freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material Mrcl lxmna (talk) 04:38, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:26, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DC government works are not federal works per the rationale at Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-DCGov, and are therefore not automatically public domain. Additionally, § 2–531, cited on the file information page, doesn't say anything about DC government works being public domain. clpo13(talk) 15:57, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DC government works are not federal works per the rationale at Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-DCGov, and are therefore not automatically public domain. Without author and date information, it's impossible to know the copyright status of this photo. clpo13(talk) 16:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:57, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1948 non-architectural work by Luciano Aquino. No freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
  • In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder

Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime

* (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"[reply]
  • Q. What are the elements of the 2012 CybercrIme vis-a-vis Commons Mass Deletions in my Talk page? A. they are: from hacking to attacks online a) using a john or jane doe or anonymous account b) hiding the identity by use of such alternate accounts c) via a habit, scheme or design d) to attempt to delete, erase or in any manner take meta or mass date like photos from any internet site or legitimate forum, device or even media like Commons, Wikipedia, Flickr, phot bucket, Facebook; vide: SECTION 1 (h) Without right refers to either: (i) conduct undertaken without or in excess of authority; or (ii) conduct not covered by established legal defenses, excuses, court orders, justifications, or relevant principles under the law. SEC. 4. Cybercrime Offenses. —(3) Data Interference. — The intentional or reckless alteration, damaging, deletion or deterioration of computer data, electronic document, or electronic data message, without right, including the introduction or transmission of viruses.

Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.


  • Finally, I am submitting this proof to Commons Admins that your Deletion Request is not only without basis but a scheme, habit or plan to take off Valid Photos in Commons; the Statues is 18th Century; it took me 2 days to research on this to prove to Commons Administrators that this and most of your Mass Deletions are unlawful and contrary to Philippine Laws;
  • Intellectual Property Mediation and many other innovations to prevent long court litigations does not make law; as I said only the present not past S. C. ruling on FOP will put finis to all of these pros and cons upon FOP including the finer points of law or grey areas of Copy fair use vio etc. At the very least, an IPO or DOJ not declining to issue Replies to any Letters of ours or yours, will suffice for the moment as Basis of Commons community of editors and admins to create a policy on FOP deletions or undelitions; may I repeat and underscore that even the SC of USA and ours often issue Bad Law or highly divided rulings like 5-4 or here 8-7 not beating the greatest Phil case of Javellana vs. Secretary which made infidels and believers stand weeping or even dancing during the Bagong Lipunan; I admit that there are Commons exact rules like on packaging and the like that does not need debate; for me this is the very beauty fo the Philosopy of Commons or its Founders that pros and cons here make this Commons world better that SC court USA and Phil toss coin decisions, specifically in the 9th Circus Court of California as CA Justice William Bedsworth wroth on me the the 3 elves; I am for inclusion ... thus you see my redundancy and duplicates ... but as I said, I am ahead of your times as I told Justice Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. at 6:00 pm of Dec 24, 1999 Xmas my first Suspension Holiday : he scolded me for being off-tangent, off- topic; I told him that I am not of this world itong mundong mapaghuzga; soon, the Supreme Court will steal my Robes, Gavel and Golden Br. 73 Throne with is mine until age 70 or 2023 ... my names which as you said precedes all the SC Justices your nominated who cannot even hold my 87.55% Bar rating 12th Place Bar 1983, where UP Summa Cum Laude Napoleon Poblador now one to the top lawyers, failed to land in top 20 due to very low grade in Taxation which I topped at 86%; my classmate Ramon Caguioa sat beside us as my name made noises in the Ateneo since I could cite Volumes of the SCRA in exams but not the pages which is the only property of Ferdinand Edralin Marcos during the Arturo M. Tolentino debates; his younger brother Benjamin now Senior and candidate for CJ was nobody in the Ateneo; I say and know the Law, and I do not commit mistake; I am primary authority; but I underscore that I am co-equal with any editor here and I am just putting or sharing this input because of the present most difficult Mass Deletions that we experience, moro moro or moral farce so to speak; I have never contested nor objected to Deletions Request since my pictures are the subject and I stay neutral; that is why I created this Template: "Respectfully submitted to the sound discretion of editors and I have no objection to the Deletion ..." But Commons is facing a Signal No. 500 Mass Deletions ... and I still have no time yet as of this moment to finis my Legal Treatise to answer the Long Lines of Mass Deletions that appears in my Talk Page; one side of the coin like a pro or a coin can create here an alternate account and start the Mass Deletions; of course, the Mass Deletions were started since the editor said it, she or he is smart, and then admitted after being blocked to have done a great wrong... but then stated that a professor advised that the idea of Mass Deletions starting from smart notion could .... and I countered that my Fish Vendor and hired trike driver told me not to take photos of the fishes and the food Isusumbong nila ako kay Mayor; It's A Frank ... for gullibles and moro moro players I cannot like Justice William Bedsworth wait for the Next Mass Deletions to be copy pasted in my Talk Page;

I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:29, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [31]. Yann (talk) 18:26, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A 2015 work of architectural art. No freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 04:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfree work, recently opened in 2015. According to w:en:Venice Grand Canal, Taguig, the designer of this Venice-inspired architectural work was Paolo Marioni Architetto. As there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines, commercial license authorization from Paolo Marioni Architetto is required.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:38, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author, Creator:Lev Leonidov, died in 1952. Not PD until 2027 (1952+70+4). See also: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Lenin speaking at a meeting in Sverdlov Square in Moscow on 5 May 1920

Sealle (talk) 07:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

According to the captions, the photos were originally produced by Grigori Goldstein, not by Creator:Lev Leonidov - who the author is needs to be sorted out before we can decide whether the photos should be kept or deleted.Nigel Ish (talk) 10:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nigel Ish, once again, especially for you, please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Lenin speaking at a meeting in Sverdlov Square in Moscow on 5 May 1920: this photograph was mistakenly attributed to Goldstein by G. Boltyansky, and it is known since 1926. Sealle (talk) 10:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK - I didn't spot that part of the previous discussion until after I posted - is it just these photos in the Grigori Petrowitsch Goldstein category which the authorship is disputed?Nigel Ish (talk) 13:24, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, these are different crops and derivatives of the same single photo. Sealle (talk) 13:55, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would add that this is a photomontage: in the original photo both Kamenev and Trockij appeared. They vanished here. Therefore the author is anonymous.

It's a derivative work of the original photo - we need to consider both the copyright on the original photo (which is still valid) and the copyright of the anonymous person who blanked out Trotski etc, (which will have expired).Nigel Ish (talk) 11:06, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prince Plaza Condotel is completed in 1995 -https://www.travelweekly.com/Hotels/Makati-Philippines/Prince-Plaza-II-Condotel-p8741283

No freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 04:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:21, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am skeptical this book was released with no copyright notice. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:15, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment According to cocatalog.loc.gov, copyright was registered in 1961 (A00000485977) and renewed in 1989 (RE0000432719). I agree that it seems unlikely that a book published by a major US publishing company like Little, Brown would omit the notice. clpo13(talk) 22:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A 2015 architectural work of art according to wikipedia. No freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material Mrcl lxmna (talk) 04:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:42, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Waltermart malls were first introduced in 1995 as explained on wikipedia. Most likely this Plaridel branch is recent. No freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 05:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy keep all Keep Because the Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. It is fervently petitioned that - going to keep this for now until someone else can nominate if they see fit; Wherefore premises considered I humbly register my Strong Objection to this and the Mass Deletions Requests of this Single Editor, respectfully respectfully
  • The first one is a photo of the building. The second two could be argued that the building is in the background of a wider scene -- the photos seem to be more of the trees out front, though including the building in the background. It's not possible to take a photo of those trees from that angle without including the building, so they may be more incidental. If the purpose of the photo was to include the building it's fuzzier. But... these types of things are on the very, very edge of copyright law when it comes to deletion. I would probably lean  Delete on the first one if there is no architectural FoP, and  Keep on the second two regardless. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:19, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

4 years prescription since 2015 under the New 2019 SC Circular vis-à-vis Copyright law to question any FOP matter: a Legal Bar due to Extinctive Prescription to delete my photos and of User:Ramon FVelasquez as tagged by the Smart One September 2020 Mass Deletions

  • I sincerely hope that Editors will note my Underscoring of the 4 years Legal Bar on Deletion of FOP photos, I repeat from 2016, thus the tons of Mass Deletions tags by the Smart One on RamonFVelasquez should be stricken off the Talk Page as grave violations of Criminal Law ... respectfully Judgefloro (talk)


  • The four-year (or three in the U.S.) statute of limitations is pretty much meaningless here, since it's a continuing exploitation just by being here. If someone could take a photo here and use it in a new exploitation and get sued, it's not "free". If you upload a copyright violation here, then later delete it, then four years after the deletion you could no longer get sued for it, basically. I don't think that is relevant. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:19, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:07, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded higher resolution file: The Baranof Hotel WLM2020 705.jpg Gillfoto 19:50, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


Kept: per Verbcatcher. Both versions have their merits and flaws (higher resolution vs. better lighting), no clear "winner" here. --Gestumblindi (talk) 16:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for 2D works. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

my bad, didn't realize that this was not allowed. Feel free to delete the picture JackFromReedsburg (talk) 16:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MGA73 (talk) 21:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The indicated source is "worum.org". If it is this one (https://worum.org/) it's a copyrighted page. E4024 (talk) 00:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's from the community's Wiki though: https://wiki.worum.org/Predrag_Stevanovic Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 07:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The file is here. But I do not see a valid license. --Ruthven (msg) 14:33, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion (no license at the source). --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:12, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was tagged with a "no permission" - I think it is PD-ineligible so I changed to a DR. MGA73 (talk) 09:57, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. MBisanz talk 00:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old but still copyrighted logo of Singapore's MRT system by the Land Transport Authority of Singapore. Example of a map linked below, copyright symbol on lower right.

https://i2.wp.com/www.transitmap.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/tumblr_lyjoepFQTC1r54c4oo1_1280.jpg?fit=1200%2C994&ssl=1 Seloloving (talk) 11:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No idea how to judge Singaporean TOO status. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:18, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per previous DR. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:33, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Voanews.com content may also contain text, video, audio, images, graphics, and other copyrighted material that is licensed for use in VOA programming only. This material is not in the public domain and may not be copied, redistributed, sold, or published without the express permission of the copyright owner. Johncdraper (talk) 14:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The cited image is part of the VOA intellectual property, the source of the photo itself mentions it, the VOA photographers have their work under the PD-USGov-VOA license. The delete request just doesn't take place here. LLs (talk) 06:21, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - Valid permission {{PD-USGov-VOA}}. -- PhJ (talk) 17:37, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Yan Boechat is a VOA photorapher. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:28, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:32, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo credit to Ed Schoenfeld was a dead giveaway. As per this, photo is likely under copyright to CoastAlaska. No evidence given that the uploader is in fact the copyright holder. RadioKAOS (talk) 08:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment — Uploader contacted me on my talk page. He explained that he is in fact the copyright holder. He appears to be new here and apparently wasn't able to leave comments on this page for whatever reason. I explained that since this photo was previously published on a copyrighted website with no CC license credit given to him or his then-employer, OTRS verification would likely apply. Since he is new, perhaps someone else needs to help him with OTRS, since I've never had to bother with it before.RadioKAOS (talk) 13:06, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment — I have followed instructions provided by Kevin Wallem of Permissions, uploading the original of the photo and emailing the proper CC copyright document. Can this nomination be removed now? Thanks!
  • OTRS I have just accepted permission for “File:Rosita_Worl_addresses_the_Native_Issues_Forum_In_Juneau,_Alaska..jpg” under ticket:2020101410015339. --Ww2censor (talk) 23:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: ticket:2020101410015339. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:07, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No way this is in the public domain. It's a standard promo photo for Sully—see [32], [33]. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 23:24, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to deleting admin. Per the below, Usako-M has contacted the photographer, who has apparently confirmed that he will release the photo under a CC or PD licence. Thus, the photo will likely tagged with an OTRS template shortly. Perhaps we could hold off on closing this discussion until that's resolved. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 17:20, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Per below, nomination withdrawn. OTRS permission received. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 23:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

—- Hello Template:Ping: AleatoryPonderings,

This photograph is originally taken by photographer Viktor Radics and used by the various news/media, where I also found it. Some of the news/media sites credit Viktor while others do not.

Example credit: https://www.weraddicted.com/fashion-entrepreneur-george-sully-launches-black-designers-of-canada/

Tracing it back, here is Viktor’s original website where it can be found (scroll down the main gallery) www.viktorradics.com

As it has been used in the news/media, I thought it could be posted as well?

@Usako-M: No, a photo does not enter the public domain simply because it has been used (either with or without permission) in other media. The creator has to release it into the public domain; otherwise, you have to wait a really long time (often 50 years or more) after it's created in order for the work to enter the public domain. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:52, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


——- Thanks @AleatoryPonderings: . Is there some sort of Wiki release form? I’m a bit perplexed as to how all the pictures, of celebrities for example, are released for allowance on Wiki based on your explanation. I don’t think these celebrities (or even the photographers/paparazzi) are posting themselves? Do I have to contact the owners of the pictures I find for some form of written consent?

@Usako-M: There are a few different ways a photo of a celebrity could end up on Commons. (1) It might not be freely licensed, such as the photo that is the subject of this discussion, in which case it will eventually be deleted; (2) it was the photographer's own work, in which case it could be uploaded under a Creative Commons license or in the public domain, depending on the photographer's preference; or (3) it is released by the subject her- or himself, or the copyright owner, through OTRS. Short answer: yes, it might be possible to get a release from the copyright holder (would either be George Sully or the photographer) and use OTRS to upload it. But without using that process, there's no way to verify that the image is properly licensed. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 01:03, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


@AleatoryPonderings: I contacted the photographer and explained my usage. He kindly agreed to upload the photo for common use. Can I now delete this wrong picture and replace it with the one he uploaded?

@Usako-M: Yes. What you should do is direct the photographer to Commons:OTRS. He can then inform the OTRS team that he wishes to release File:GeorgeSully.jpg under a free license. There is no need to re-upload it; an OTRS team member will tag it with the appropriate license once it has been confirmed that he is the creator. It's actually better to use OTRS than deleting and re-uploading, because a professional photo like this will inevitably raise questions about authorship. BTW, please sign your posts with ~~~~ in the future, so it's easier for people to recognize your contributions. You can also indent posts by placing a colon—:—at the very beginning, so a conversation looks like a thread. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 17:18, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: ticket:2020101410016276. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:33, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The document was issued by Chunghwa post company. It's not a government agency. Larryasou (talk) 09:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 13:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gateway Mall - opened in 2004. Designed by RTKL Associates, Palafox Associates and Aidea (Gateway Mall 2). No freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 04:47, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artworks of unknown authorship in a Philippines city, and both look modern. But no freedom of panorama in the phils. Freedom of panorama allows people to create copies of copyrighted artistic works and use them for ANY purposes including commercial. Philippine copyright extends to works of art like buildings and sculptures. Copyright expires 50 years after the death of its artist (architect, painter, sculptor, or designer). Philippine copyright law doesnt recognize freedom of panorama. It only allows copies of such works like photos of buildings and sculptures if they are used for reporting or for teaching purposes if fair use is applied. Wikipedia commons doesnt allow fair use or for-noncommercial-only material

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:38, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 04:47, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:28, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:28, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:28, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:28, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo, exceeds COM:TOO UK Verbcatcher (talk) 08:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:28, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mauvaise licence, la bonne est celle-ci : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Exceptions_au_droit_d%27auteur Fraetus (talk) 16:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:29, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Curb Safe Charmer as Dw no source since (dw no source since)

The original background has been removed, but image not found by Google & others. However, no EXIF data. Achim (talk) 18:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


  • Comment This image, and the other one uploaded by the same user, have been screenshotted from this video: https://www.facebook.com/100380668418374/videos/1291831074499864, one from a frame circa 5 seconds in, and the other 25 seconds in. The screenshots have then been manipulated - in the first case by retouching to remove the logos on the screen in the background, and in the second to remove the background entirely. The uploader has claimed that they 'are a friend of the cameraman' who took the video, in which case they should have no difficulty providing evidence that they have CC0 permission for Wikimedia, and anyone else, to use the images for any purpose. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This photo has source as I pointed earlier that I got it from camera man, and there is permission I got from the owner of the photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abbas Kwarbai (talk • contribs)

Deleted: per nomination - Copyvio. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:17, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reclose. --Minoraxtalk 08:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't agree this is too simple for copyright Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: seems fine for a US logo. --Minoraxtalk 08:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in Russia as required by Russian law and Commons PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:50, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 12:03, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are already 3 other versions of this image with higher quality () Sentausa (talk) 11:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


kept, indeed this image has a higher resolution then the other 3 as mentioned by Re:Sentausa. Elly (talk) 14:53, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bild mit Copyrightvermerk Lutheraner (talk) 12:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Elly (talk) 14:58, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bild mit Copyrightvermerk Lutheraner (talk) 12:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Elly (talk) 14:58, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo was uploaded by user WoordvoerderMarcel (Dutch for 'spokesman Marcel') in the Metadata is the remark "©Foto: Hoge Noorden/ Jacob van Essen 07-03-2017". Marcel claims he is the photographer and is releasing it under a free licence but the real name of the photographer is Jacob van Essen who marked it with a © symbol. Robotje (talk) 14:29, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Elly (talk) 15:03, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incomplete licensing information Snoopy1964 (talk) 14:38, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is presumably a painting by w:de:Clifford Holmead Phillips, who died in 1975. It was uploaded by Holmead Nachlass. Wiktionary indicates that 'Nachlass' means 'Writings remaining unpublished at an author's death', so the account holder may own the copyright of the this painting. This should be confirmed through COM:OTRS.
The declarations 'Source: Own work, Author: Holmead Nachlass' are unsatisfactory ('Quelle: Eigenes Werk, Urheber: Holmead Nachlass' if the page is displayed in German). The name of the painter should be specified in these fields, and normally also the name of the photographer. In this case it may be acceptable to omit the photographer's name as this is a faithful reproduction of a two-dimensional work of art (by extension from the discussion in COM:PDART). If the photographer is unknown then put something like 'Painting by Clifford Holmead Phillips, photograph by unknown photographer', or the equivalent in German. {{Art Photo}} is convenient to format the information nicely and display it in multiple languages, but you don't have to use this template.
See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:„Townscape“ (1959).jpg, which has the same issues. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:37, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Elly (talk) 15:07, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Demetrios Galanis died in 1966. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:656A:2C19:3C96:261F 14:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Elly (talk) 15:15, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incomplete licensing information Snoopy1964 (talk) 14:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is presumably a painting by w:de:Clifford Holmead Phillips, who died in 1975. It was uploaded by Holmead Nachlass. Wiktionary indicates that 'Nachlass' means 'Writings remaining unpublished at an author's death', so the account holder may own the copyright of the this painting. This should be confirmed through COM:OTRS.
The declarations 'Source: Own work, Author: Holmead Nachlass' are unsatisfactory ('Quelle: Eigenes Werk, Urheber: Holmead Nachlass' if the page is displayed in German). The name of the painter should be specified in these fields, and normally also the name of the photographer. In this case it may be acceptable to omit the photographer's name as this is a faithful reproduction of a two-dimensional work of art (by extension from the discussion in COM:PDART). If the photographer is unknown then put something like 'Painting by Clifford Holmead Phillips, photograph by unknown photographer', or the equivalent in German. {{Art Photo}} is convenient to format the information nicely and display it in multiple languages, but you don't have to use this template.
See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:„Rothaariger Gassenjunge“ (1971).jpg, which has the same issues. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:39, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Elly (talk) 15:08, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing SDC copyright license & not really useful for educational purposes Monsieur X (talk) 14:24, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by QTHCCAN as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7
Converted to regular DR, as image does not qualify for G7-speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:49, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The original image version had been uploaded in July 2019. In October 2020, the uploader has overwritten the original version with 2 similar images and, only 1 day later, requested deletion because of "Non sapevo che sarebbe stata visibile pubblicamente. Spiacente, questa immagine non è interessante per un'enciclopedia. Ho cambiato idea, non voglio più che sia pubblicamente visibile." As the 3 filed DRs were incomplete, I've removed them and converted the G7-speedy into DR. As of today, the image is still in use on 2 projects. --Túrelio (talk) 14:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, in use. --P 1 9 9   15:05, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Foamfixer.jpg 2605:A601:AE09:4300:9886:BDA0:FD80:EAFD 15:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This contributor is defaming Foamfixer III, which is manufactured by my company. After going to the time and effort to get this removed in the past, Achem Hering has reposted this misinformation. 2605:A601:AE09:4300:9886:BDA0:FD80:EAFD 15:15, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image has been uploaded 13 years ago. It is in use on several wm projects. To me it doesn't look defaming, please explain. --Achim (talk) 15:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is nothing defamatory about the machine. The accompanying text describes issues related to silicone foam. Regardless of issues to do with silicone foam, the equipment itself is not being criticised. Ask 3M firestops, for example, why they dropped silicone foam from their offerings. Silicone foam is obsolete and has been largely replaced by polyurethane foam mixed together with acid washed graphite and endothermic components. Still, whether the foam is great, junk, or somewhere in between, the pump simply mixes and dispenses it. The pump itself is not disparaged, nor does the picture criticise the manufacturer or the pump itself whatsoever. I believe the manufacturer is conflating issues having to do with silicone foam with his pump. I never said there was anything wrong with the pump. I used it and it worked fine, and then it went back to GE Canada. --Achim Hering (talk) 18:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per discussion. --P 1 9 9   15:06, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  • also file:LogoLCABAtrans.png
    The license was never reviewed during 6 years and now the image has disappeared from source site. Probably we must now delete the files, because this is complex logo. Taivo (talk) 16:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment A similar logo is still visible at https://www.legislatura.gov.ar/. The site has a footnote saying "Nota: La información contenida en este sitio es de dominio público y puede ser utilizada libremente. Se solicita citar la fuente." (English: "Note: The information on this site is in the public domain and can be used freely. Citing the source is requested.") but it's not clear if that applies to the images as well. Maybe there's a more comprehensive terms and conditions or copyright page elsewhere on the site. clpo13(talk) 16:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:08, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of an individual who lived from 1884 to 1948 (en:Juan Dolores); I can find no evidence that this was actually released under a Creative Commons license, and the dates of creation and publication are unknown, so it's unclear whether or not this is in the public domain. Spicy (talk) 17:05, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The photograph is currently held by the Phoebe Hearst Museum of Anthropology, whose media permissions on their website state their association under the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (BY-NC-SA 4.0) Creative Commons License. However, on this website, they state "With the exception of media for which the Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology does not hold copyright...". I have very little information on the state of copyright associated with this image, however I can contact the museum for more information. Kopshi (talk) 04:58, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kopshi and thanks for the information - unfortunately CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 is not a compatible license (see COM:Licensing). It is a noncommercial license and Commons can only host works that permit commercial use. If you are in contact with the museum it might be worth seeing if they're willing to release the image under a compatible license via Commons:OTRS. Spicy (talk) 15:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:09, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Page blanked by uploader, Widesehl (talk · contribs). I'm assuming that is a request for deletion, and am opening this DR as it is >7 days from upload. I am somewhat suspicious of the own work claim as well, and I think it is likely that this image came from a stock vector graphics site. However, I wasn't able to find which one. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: on further review I believe it came from https://www.flaticon.com/free-icon/user_1828457, which appears to be under a non-free license based on https://www.freepikcompany.com/legal#nav-flaticon. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:15, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:10, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Page blanked by original uploader, Humayra Binte Asheque (talk · contribs), which I am interpreting as a request for deletion. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:18, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   15:11, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation, license template removed by original uploader Willizer (talk · contribs). AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:13, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some graphics inside home - not belong to panorama's freedom. Matlin (talk) 18:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:14, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"en base a http://www.openstreetmap.org/" Cjp24 (talk) 18:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oups! Kept.--Cjp24 (talk) 00:08, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per "Oups". added open streetmap template. Elly (talk) 15:41, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source file deleted. Cjp24 (talk) 18:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

are the maps (blank) copyrighted?--EEIM (talk) 03:11, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nemequene. --Cjp24 (talk) 04:14, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete this Source is better. Maybe this , but I don't like the color.--EEIM (talk) 22:33, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Elly (talk) 15:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that this image (map) is an own work. Cjp24 (talk) 18:49, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Elly (talk) 16:17, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission is not clear (PD?); own work? Cjp24 (talk) 18:56, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clearly cropped from an unknown source. --P 1 9 9   15:17, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an official logo HDORS (talk) 19:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   15:15, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

'Phantom of the Opera' stage photos

[edit]

These images show costumes, lighting, stage design and acting from a musical, all of which are copyrighted. --Gnom (talk) 20:07, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Even if we had the photographer's permission, we would still have to delete the images because they depict a copyrighted work. --Gnom (talk) 12:34, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. In addition: the first version of the master image File:Claudia Cota- Argentina 2009.jpg, from which the other two are cropped, had a watermark (c)Matias Galan, obvious copyvio. Elly (talk) 16:21, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but this is obviously a recent work of art and thereby still in copyright. Regrettably, France has no freedom-of-panorama exception for works in public space. So, we need either a permission from the sculptor or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:18, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Elly (talk) 20:11, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright reservered, but work is by an FBI employee ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


  • The reservation-of-copyright notice is irrelevant if there was, in fact, no copyright to reserve, owing to the author’s status as an officer of the U.S. government. Thus, this work is PD-USGov. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 17:11, 10 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --rubin16 (talk) 11:51, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Copyright reserved by copyright owner" , but this appears to be by a DHS employee... ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:24, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • The reservation-of-copyright notice is irrelevant if there was, in fact, no copyright to reserve, owing to the author’s status as an officer of the U.S. government. Thus, this work is PD-USGov. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 17:11, 10 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --rubin16 (talk) 11:52, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oaav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CUR Peru The image in the Inti bill is not anonymous, not free image

MiguelAlanCS (talk) 08:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 11:52, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero reservar todos los derechos y eliminar esta y todas mis fotos de creative commons además de mi cuenta Gonchalooooo (talk) 15:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 11:53, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

voanews.com content may also contain text, video, audio, images, graphics, and other copyrighted material that is licensed for use in VOA programming only. This material is not in the public domain and may not be copied, redistributed, sold, or published without the express permission of the copyright owner. Johncdraper (talk) 16:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The cited image is part of the VOA intellectual property, the source of the photo itself mentions it, the VOA photographers have their work under the PD-USGov-VOA license. The delete request just doesn't take place here. LLs (talk) 06:21, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nominator. The uploader have been uploading multiple copyrighted images and this needs to be stopped. Solavirum (talk) 19:16, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep - Valid permission {{PD-USGov-VOA}}. -- PhJ (talk) 17:38, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep - valid permission, the image was directly made by a VOA photographer (Yan Boechat/VOA).--Le Petit Chat (talk) 21:29, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 11:53, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gitartha.bordoloi (talk • contribs)


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 11:54, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nemequene (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I doubt that this image (map) is an own work.

Cjp24 (talk) 15:56, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:23, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nemequene (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I doubt that this image (map) is an own work. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nemequene.

Cjp24 (talk) 18:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I was created these maps that are a cut and short edition of Others Maps That I had created. because the Inital maps are too bigs and I want to the user can see a more closer and detailed map.

It's my own work from a map that is my own work. For example, the File:Rutacol-map-01det.svg is a zoomed map from File:Rutacol-map-01.svg This initial map was based from File:Mapa_de_Colombia_(red_vial).svg of Shadowxfox that It have License CC BY-SA 3.0

Thanks.

Nemequene

Definitivamente Ya no se puede contribuir a Wikipedia. Vienen a borrar arbitrariamente el trabajo hecho en meses y años. Todo es mi propio trabajo y tengo los archivos para constatarlo. Yo los subí y si bien el mapa base es de un usuario de Wikipedia. este tienen Licencia CC.

Además de una falta de respeto es un abuso que hagan eso.

Gracias

Nemequene

The source of files must be mentioned in Description/Source.--Cjp24 (talk) 21:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
For example: File:Mapa de Colombia (red vial).svg#Description. --Cjp24 (talk) 00:14, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ON this case, How I have to reference my work? --Nemequene

are the maps copyrighted? .--EEIM (talk) 22:28, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Los mapas como tal no tienen derechos de autor, yo he subido mapas que veo en internet y les hago alguna modificación y los paso como propios. Pero usted utilizaba mapas muy detallados, y ahora dice que los sacaba de otra fuente base en wikipedia, pero nunca mensionó la fuente base, yo propongo que los vuelva a subir y en la fuente o al final de la plantilla indique |source=|other versions.No te desanimes, cada vez hay menos gente contribuyendo, pero si se aprovechan de ella.--EEIM (talk) 22:56, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hola EEIM Muchas Gracias por tu colaboración. Volví a subir un mapa y ajusté las Fuentes.

Este sería el caso del Mapa de la Ruta Nacional 01. Me pueden ayudar a confirmar si queda bien así.

Muchas gracias Y me ha gustado colaborar. Es un proyecto de hace tiempo que no he podido terminar en años por el trabajo pero aspiro dejarlo completo y contribuyendo más Saludos.


Deleted: no information about the original source as added to the named files, so, deleted. --rubin16 (talk) 11:59, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that this image (map) is an own work. Cjp24 (talk) 18:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 11:55, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small picture. The source link doesn't work and the uploader has been blocked as sockpuppet. QTHCCAN (talk) 20:26, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: kept per original file that is free. --rubin16 (talk) 12:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeNumber as no source (No source since). The same photo can be seen on another 1920 postcard here so I see no reason to doubt its PD status. License template fixed. Ankry (talk) 21:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Ankry's comment. --rubin16 (talk) 12:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From a batch upload from Internet Archive of a 1903 book. The same image as File:The life and strange adventures of Robinson Crusoe (1903) (14780670254).jpg but with a thin rice paper in front of the image. Thuresson (talk) 22:20, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 12:13, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by I dream of horses as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: On https://www.versobooks.com/authors/850-john-rees and http://www.writeyou.co.uk/john_rees_stop_the_war without a public domain license I was unable to confirm previous publication using the Wayback Machine, converting to DR. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete: the small image size, lack of camera metadata and this being the only upload from this user all raise suspicions. We should observe the precautionary principle and delete this. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • "Small file w/o camera EXIF, by a one-time uploader", always suspicious, right, coach? :) Thanks for your support. --E4024 (talk) 03:13, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • @E4024: I assume that you are picking me up for inconsistency, as I have criticised your several of your nominations that were based on these characteristics alone. In this case this is not the only evidence as two links have also been presented. However, I do not claim to be always consistent, and this has made me reconsider this file... Verbcatcher (talk) 06:26, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak keep It is significant that the uploader added this image to w:en:John Rees (activist) with the caption "John Rees: Demonstration against Condoleezza Rice in Liverpool.[35] There were demonstrations against Rice's visits to Liverpool in 2006 and 2009,[36][37] although I could not find a record of a visit in 2008. It is likely that John Rees attended these demonstrations as he was an officer of the Stop the War Coalition. The uploader adding this detail adds credence to the claim of authorship. Verbcatcher (talk) 06:29, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep We really need to stop these "small image, no EXIF" nominations - especially when this is one (of many) where 600px isn't "small".
The only reason to delete this would be a challenge to the uploader's claim of authorship. No evidence has been given to dispute this, as Verbcatcher notes above, this seems most likely to be a photo taken by someone with some interest in the subject, and who has used their image elsewhere in related non-WMF pages. None of that is a reason to doubt the authorship claim. Nor is en:WP:COI an issue on Commons. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:59, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --rubin16 (talk) 12:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kjeldjoh as Logo (above threshold of originality). File is PD in the US but COM:TOO Denmark is unclear. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Neutral - I'm not sure.--Kjeldjoh (talk) 13:45, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: TOO cases aren't a good basis for making a decision, but unused and deleted based on PCP. --rubin16 (talk) 12:16, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Estevoaei as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: d|Situacion Cotobade.PNG

Not an exact duplicate, but of lower quality and reasonable for DR. Huntster (t @ c) 23:41, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Huntster, it can be deleted, it's unused and it has an incorrect name. --Elisardojm (talk) 16:56, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: it seems that there is no second file now, one is just a redirect to the second. --rubin16 (talk) 12:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:08, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep per precautionary principle. Unknown 1924 is factual, hypotheses about the weirdly delayed publication of photographs of a famous party leader are not. -- (talk) 13:30, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • That is the exact opposite of what the precautionaly principle means. We are not allowed to assume something was published before the cutoff date without knowing of a specific publication. The person being famous is not an excuse. Literally thousands of photographs of a given party leader would be taken by official photographers over the years, and the best few would be selected for publication - meaning that an old photo being unpublished is not uncommon at all. Please provide information about a specific early enough publication, or it will have to be deleted. Remember that Russian copyright countdawns begin on publication, not creation date, and there is no proof that this item was published long enough ago.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:17, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Fae. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

STILL no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be pd or ANY proof of meeting REQUIREMENTS to be PD as required by commons PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:49, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@PlanespotterA320: Please see Commons:Deletion requests#Appealing decisions. What new information or clarification are you adding? Verbcatcher (talk) 07:29, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
New information or not, the fact that an admin ruled this to be a "keep" goes against all basic Commons policy. Items are presumed to be copyrighted until proven otherwise. There is still no evidence that this item meets that clearly laid out criteria for being PD. An admin cannot uninlateraly disregard all of that just because they want to rule a particular way. The facts of a copyright status remain the same, and one mistaken admin does not change the basic fact that this item cannot be on commons unless an early enough publication is found.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@PlanespotterA320: The first place to challenge a closure decision is the closing admin's user talk page, to ask them to explain their decision. In extreme cases you could follow this up by raising the admin's actions at COM:AN/U, but this is unlikely to be appropriate in this case. If you think there is a widespread problem with publication dates of Russian works then please raise this at Commons:Village pump/Copyright. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:07, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 12:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]