Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/09/20
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
The user has uploaded two photos to Commons, both of which have been downloaded straight from anchrmagazine.com. One is File:Glass-Animals-3.jpg, which names Neil Krug as the author, the other is File:Glass Animals live.jpg, which names Rachel Zyzda as the author. There is no evidence that these two people have given permission to use the photos under the Creative Commons license. Here (lower down) it says "photo © Neil Krug" and About ANCHR says, "All rights reserved by ANCHR Magazine".
ErikvanB (talk) 01:14, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: obviously copyright violations. --Wutsje 01:42, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
此文件侵犯了版权 WUFAHENG (talk) 03:43, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:23, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
此文件侵犯了版权 WUFAHENG (talk) 03:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Derivatives of artworks, copyright status is unclear. COM:TOYS.
- File:Ёлочные игрушки Доктор Айболит и его помощники.jpg
- File:Ёлочная игрушка стеклянная.jpg
- File:Ёлочная игрушка Машенька.jpg
- File:Ёлочная игрушка Белочка с орехом.jpg
Quick1984 (talk) 17:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nom, photos of COM:TOYS. Consigned (talk) 07:54, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Most likely a screenshot of copyrighted work. Acagastya (talk) 10:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted by EugeneZelenko per (Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo). C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 14:42, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|Apparent copyright violation; uploaded content is from a commercial source.}} VikingB (talk) 18:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied (source https://www.amazon.com/MotivAider-Gen5-Ultimate-Desired-Behavior/dp/B08644GBXJ). --Túrelio (talk) 18:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Privacy issues. Uploader request. Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 23:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 06:56, 21 September 2020 UTC: Privacy issues. Uploader request. --Krdbot 20:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
This photograph was taken by Shawn Thew of the Associated Press, not a government agency. See [1]. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 16:00, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
found on his campaign page - unlikely to be own work https://www.godfreyforcongress.com/about-aaron/ Gbawden (talk) 19:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- I took this photo myself, personally manage his website, and uploaded it to this website. Please remove deletion request. If some release is required to be shown to Wikimedia in order to validate this photo, please provide the contact info so that I can do that.Featherandhare (Featherandhare) (Sept. 20, 2020)
- @Featherandhare: please follow the instructions at COM:OTRS as you will have to prove authorship Gbawden (talk)`
I sent the release to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org thank you. (Sept. 23, 2020) and confirmation was received: Ticket#: 2020092310026401
Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 12:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Not own work. Permission/source needed. Some are possibly above TOO, such as Kuwait Airways, Royal Brunei, etc.
- File:Sky express.png
- File:Air Mediterranean logo.png
- File:Kuwait Airways logo.png
- File:Royal Brunei logo.png
- File:Royal Jordanian Logo.png
- File:ZIPAIR Tokyo logo.png
- File:Jin Air-logo.png
- File:AlMasria Airlines logo.png
- File:Anadolu Jet logo.png
- File:Stobart Air-logo.png
- File:CityJet-logo.png
- File:CityJet logo.png
- File:SprintAir logo.png
- File:Red Wings Logo.png
- File:AirExplore-logo.png
- File:Azul Brazilian Airlines-logo.png
- File:Euro atlantic logo.png
- File:SATA Air Açores logo.png
- File:Enter-Air-logo.png
- File:Bulgaria-Air-logo.png
- File:Edelweiss-Air-logo.png
- File:Montenegro-Airlines-logo.png
- File:Montenegro Airlines logo.png
- File:Air-serbia-logo.png
- File:Old Arena sport logo.jpg
- File:Arena sport logo.png
Minoraxtalk 08:42, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 01:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Chemical mistake. The title compound is ionic and we have File:Sodium sulfate (Ionic Bond) 3D View.png. And if it were covalent, it would not have the +/– charges. DMacks (talk) 13:12, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as DMacks wrote, it's incorrect and should be deleted. However, File:Sodium sulfate (Ionic Bond) 3D View.png should be deleted too with a reason used with previous such discussions: probable licence violation + no educational value. Wostr (talk) 14:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 22:48, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
License fail: graphical composite of uncited originals. DMacks (talk) 13:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom + 3d model that has no educational value as it is unrealistic. Wostr (talk) 14:00, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 22:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Justin yav Sony11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work.
- File:Branham tabernacle.jpg.png
- File:Ewald Frank entrent de montré la bible à l'Assemblée.jpg
- File:Révérend Ewald Frank.jpg
- File:Ewald Frank prêchant la parole de Dieu.jpg
- File:Ewald Frank avec la photo de la colonne de feu de William branham.jpg
- File:Docteur Ewald Frank.jpg
- File:William m branham.jpg
- File:Prophète William marrion branham .jpg.png
Minoraxtalk 16:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 01:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/felipe gabaldon
[edit]personal photos out of the scope, mostly unused
- File:La familia Gabaldón (2648473471).jpg
- File:Visitando las ruinas de Gascas (2903164616).jpg
- File:Mamá, la tía Amparo y papá (2624932054).jpg
- File:Visitando las ruinas de Gascas (2902322907).jpg
- File:Inés y Lola (2612893014).jpg
- File:Mamá (2595108647).jpg
- File:Mamá y papá (2619074102).jpg
- File:... y la saga continúa (3003324163).jpg
- File:Mamá y yo (2624108571).jpg
- File:Mamá y yo (2636030761).jpg
- File:Mamá, papá y yo en un convite (2570150856).jpg
- File:La prima Mari Carmen (2989707869).jpg
- File:Mamá, la tía Amparo y el tío Santos (2618249849).jpg
- File:Mamá y yo, en la Plaza de Oriente (2570149952).jpg
- File:En la boda de la tía Carmen (2821561531).jpg
- File:Yo, mamá, Miguel Ángel, el tío Domingo, la prima Montse, la tía María y el primo Carlos (2571824773).jpg
- File:Joaquín Castillo (primo de mamá) (2565320996).jpg
- File:La tía Amparo y el tío Santos (2658141517).jpg
- File:Papá (2570151996).jpg
- File:De baños (2900270130).jpg
- File:Daniel y yo (2571824331).jpg
- File:El tío Ángel (2899367555).jpg
- File:El tío Ángel (2905925440).jpg
- File:El tío Ángel (2905923344).jpg
- File:La tía María (2883078294).jpg
- File:Miguel Ángel (2571824139).jpg
- File:La prima Mari Carmen (2990563316).jpg
- File:El tío Alfonso (2569323959).jpg
- File:Boda de la prima Concha (2649303692).jpg
- File:El primo Santos (2658147019).jpg
- File:Yo, mamá y Miguel Ángel (3404680925).jpg
- File:La señora Amparo (2636855864).jpg
- File:La prima Angelines (2989721269).jpg
- File:Foto familiar (2990572556).jpg
- File:Papá y mamá (2658142445).jpg
- File:El tío Santos (2618249191).jpg
- File:Boda de la prima Concha (2649304098).jpg
- File:La prima Mari Carmen (2989711285).jpg
- File:Primera comunión del primo Ángel (2989714273).jpg
- File:La abuela Carmen Villodre (2595108811).jpg
- File:La abuela Carmen (2570150116).jpg
- File:La prima Mari Carmen y Santos (2990553454).jpg
- File:Boda de la prima Concha (2649303926).jpg
- File:El tío Alfonso (2595943084).jpg
- File:Algunos de los primos (3003313551).jpg
- File:El tío Santos (2809958244).jpg
- File:Cris, yo y Angelines (2927944260).jpg
- File:Las tías Amparo y Manuela (2927932354).jpg
- File:En las lagunas de Ruidera... (2612780025).jpg
- File:La prima Angelines (2989720137).jpg
- File:La tía Manuela a los 19 (2900213768).jpg
- File:El tío Ángel (2905077013).jpg
- File:El tío Santos (2619072774).jpg
- File:La prima Angelines (2883077290).jpg
- File:Boda del tío Domingo (2570150752).jpg
- File:Yo, Alba, mamá y Miguel Ángel (3404680933).jpg
- File:Boda del tío Ángel (2888292566).jpg
- File:Miguel Ángel en Alicante (2571825063).jpg
- File:El tío-abuelo Alfonso Alcolea (2595108899).jpg
- File:Boda de la prima Concha (2649303808).jpg
- File:Primera comunión de la prima Inés (2648473569).jpg
- File:Papá, mamá y el tío Santos (2658970970).jpg
- File:Boda de la tía María (2822398822).jpg
- File:El tío Ángel y la tía Manuela (2903262660).jpg
- File:El tío Santos, mamá y la tía Amparo (2636856924).jpg
- File:La tía María y la tía Carmen (2822399252).jpg
- File:El tío Ángel y la tía Manuela (2905920136).jpg
- File:La prima Lola y la tía Manuela (2811625180).jpg
- File:Lola (a la defensiva) y Fini (3028695254).jpg
- File:La tía Amparo y la prima Inés (2636855682).jpg
- File:El tío Santos, la tía Amparo y el primo Santos (2658144897).jpg
- File:Miguel Ángel y yo entregándole la carta a los Reyes Magos (2569324999).jpg
- File:Papá y yo en el parque de Socuéllamos (2571824023).jpg
- File:Yo, en el parque de Socuéllamos (2571824579).jpg
- File:Tomando café- Melquiades, papá, Josete, el tío Santos... (2569325153).jpg
- File:El tío Santos y la tía Amparo (2636029679).jpg
- File:El tío Ángel, la tía Manuela y los primos (en Villarrobledo) (2899426835).jpg
— Draceane talkcontrib. 22:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 01:22, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
The image is not using now and this is not a pornographic page! Der Buckesfelder Talk Evaluation E-Mail 16:59, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Keep - neither "not in use" nor "pornographic" are valid reasons for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:26, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Kept: invalid DR, no censorship Denniss (talk) 19:29, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 04:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unknown plant uploaded by a sock. 4nn1l2 (talk) 05:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 06:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Jörg Dennis Krüger
[edit]Self promotion by non-notable person
- File:Portrait of Jörg Dennis Krüger 02.jpg
- File:Portrait of Jörg Dennis Krüger 03.jpg
- File:Portrait of Jörg Dennis Krüger 01.jpg
Vera (talk) 07:50, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments.
- File:Памятник сотрудникам ВМЗ, погибшим в годы ВОВ - 3.jpg
- File:Памятник сотрудникам ВМЗ, погибшим в годы ВОВ - 2.jpg
- File:Памятник сотрудникам ВМЗ, погибшим в годы ВОВ - 1.jpg
- File:Памятник работникам ВМЗ, погибшим в годы ВОВ (Нижний Тагил).jpg
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:10, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:06, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:07, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:50, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:10, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Reshamjungmalla007 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Dasain .jpg
- File:Tamang lama on biswakarma puja.jpg
- File:Tamangs celebrate dasain.jpg
- File:Tamang girls .jpg
- File:Khas dhami of Nepal.jpg
- File:Monument board of 3-9 Gorkha rifles THE CHINDITS.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:11, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:12, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MORALESMARESMARIAGUADALUPE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:MoralesMaresMaria Guadalupe Ejercicio 3.pdf
- File:MoralesMaresMaria Guadalupe Ejercicio 1.pdf
- File:MoralesMaresMaria Guadalupe Ejercicio 2.pdf
- File:MoralesMares MariaGuadalupe Ejercicioo 6.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 08:54, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MORALESMARESMARIAGUADALUPE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:MoralesMaresMariaGuadlupe ejercicio 3 mapa Proceso Administraivo.pdf
- File:MoralesMaresMariaGuadalupe Ejercicio 3 Proceos Administrativo 3.pdf
- File:MoralesMaresMariaGuadalupe Ejercicio 3 Proceos Administrativo4.pdf
- File:MoralesMaresMariaGuadalupe Ejercico 3 PAPlaneación.pdf
- File:MoralesMaresMariaGudalupe Ejercicioo 6.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:34, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MORALESMARESMARIAGUADALUPE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:GENERALIDADES DE LA EVALUACIÓN EN LA PROGRAMACIÓN DIDACTICA.pdf
- File:Generalidad de la Evaluacion Educativa.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:24, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MORALESMARESMARIAGUADALUPE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:12, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Unfortunately, Germany Freedom of Panorama is not allowed for aerial photography. Permission from the architect (Günter Kus) is necessary.
- File:Arena auf schalke veltins arena gelsenkirchen 1.jpg
- File:Arena auf schalke veltins arena gelsenkirchen 2.jpg
- File:Arena auf schalke veltins arena gelsenkirchen 3.jpg
- File:Arena auf schalke veltins arena gelsenkirchen 4.jpg
A.Savin 14:38, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:13, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Per German admin's inputs at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2022-12#File:Berlin Hi-Flyer Sept14 views04.jpg, the situation hasn't changed to a great extent. While a lower regional court (Landgericht Frankfurt) may had provided a more progressive approach to German FOP by allowing aerial photography, it remains to be seen when the highest courts of German land – Bundesgerichtshof, Bundesverwaltungsgericht, Bundesfinanzhof, and Bundesarbeitsgericht – would make similar decisions allowing the use of special equipments like drones to freely reproduce public buildings from a view not normally dedicated to public access (like mid-air) without architects' licensing permits. So far, none has made such decision, and out of 110+ regional courts throughout Germany, only Landgericht Frankfurt made a contradictory decision that seems to oppose the legal tradition of Germany with regards to German FOP. Hence the lower court's ruling cannot be relied on by Commons in accordance with COM:Project scope/Precautionary principle.
- File:Arena auf schalke veltins arena gelsenkirchen 1.jpg
- File:Arena auf schalke veltins arena gelsenkirchen 2.jpg
- File:Arena auf schalke veltins arena gelsenkirchen 3.jpg
- File:Arena auf schalke veltins arena gelsenkirchen 4.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:07, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Comment Newest case law, by the OLG Hamm (a higher court than the Landgericht Frankfurt), says that drone shots are not covered by German freedom of panorama. See [2]. This makes the Frankfurt decision an outlier more than ever IMO. The Hamm decision is being appealed to Germany's highest regular court BGH, so we may get a new decision from them in the next couple of years or so. --Rosenzweig τ 11:00, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:13, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Self-promotionnal picture by a sock account. Some of them are reuploads of previously deleted pictures of the parent account. Both accounts are blocked on other wiki projects for self-promotion.
- File:Tanjawi.sahmflow.jgp.jpg
- File:Diablo.sahmflow.jgp.jpg
- File:Tangier.sahm.flow.jgp.jpg
- File:Tanger sahmflow.jgp.jpg
- File:Tangier sahmflow.jgp.jpg
- File:Simou sahm.flow.jgp.jpg
- File:Diablo sahmflow.jgp.jpg
- File:Simou.sahm.flow.jgp.jpg
- File:Simou sahmflow.jgp.jpg
- File:Simou sahm flow.jgp.jpg
- File:Sahm.flow.jgp.jpg
- File:Sahm-flow.jgp.jpg
- File:Sahmflow.jgp.jpg
- File:Sahm flow.jpg
- File:Sahm.Flow.png
QTHCCAN (talk) 14:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Rodrigue Likwenge Photo - Ye Laey.jpg
- File:Rodrigue Likwenge Instagram - Ye Laey.jpg
- File:Rodrigue Likwenge en 2017-Football player.jpg
- File:Rodrigue Likwenge en 2017 Ligue 2 coupe de france.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SamirAmiri (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Gare de Tizi Ouzou 3.jpg
- File:Université de Tizi Ouzou-Hasnaoua.jpg
- File:Bibliothèque de l'hôtel de Ville de Tizi Ouzou.jpg
- File:Hôtel de Ville de Tizi Ouzou année 10s.jpg
- File:Ruines Romaines Tigzirt 1.jpg
- File:Hôtel de ville de Tizi Ouzou année 60s.jpg
- File:Didine Canon 16.jpg
- File:Soolking pic.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by عبدالله الشرفي (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:صورة للعلامة الديلمي مع العالمين حمود المؤيد ومحمد المنصور.jpg
- File:العلامة حمود عباس المؤيد.jpg
- File:Yahia aldailami.jpg
- File:IMG-20190829-WA0039.jpg
- File:IMG-20200728-WA0005 1599250106940.jpg
- File:Panel1 Le guerre dimenticate 5.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by عبدالله الشرفي (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:العلامة محمد بن محمد المنصور .jpg
- File:العلامة حمود عباس المؤيد .jpg
- File:السيد العلامة يحيى الديلمي.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:09, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Jonathan Kubben and the poker.jpg
- File:Jonathan Kubben in Bolivia.jpg
- File:Jonathan Kubben win again the Influencer Awards 2019 in Monaco.png
- File:Jonathan Kubben Quinonez win the Influencer Awards 2018 in Monaco.png
- File:Jonathan Kubben in Madagascar for Unicef.jpg
- File:Jonathan kubben's model.jpg
- File:Jonathan Kubben during his session in TedX Brussels.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jorgeramirezdsf (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Stnatur
[edit]- File:Samih Natur 1958 1.jpg
- File:Shamir samih natur.jpg
- File:Student 1969.jpg
- File:Alamama 1.jpg
- File:Korea 2002 samih natur.jpg
- File:00000 copy - עותק.jpg
- File:18- outside2.jpg
- File:Rabin, jerusalem.jpg
- File:סמיח נאטור ונג'יב מחפוז.jpg
- File:1SamihNatur.jpg ([3])
All of them are dubious own works, potential copyright issue. --Oesterreicher12 (talk) 22:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". Scope is another question: The file is in category:directors, but who or which one is the director? E4024 (talk) 00:45, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and it's also available here. --Ahmadtalk 09:34, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF but with a transmission code; dubious "own work" by a one-time visitor. E4024 (talk) 05:50, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Delete As per the nominator; besides, here is the original photo. --Mosbatho (talk) 11:31, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. In addition, a cropped version is available here. --Ahmadtalk 09:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Book cover, not own work Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. OTRS permission needed. --Ahmadtalk 09:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gerritse36kees (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a personal photo album. Out of scope.
- File:Youngchidi foto.jpg
- File:Youngchidi onderweg.jpg
- File:Youngchidi lachte.jpg
- File:Youngchidi amsterdam.jpg
- File:Youngchidi lacht.jpg
- File:Youngchidi outfit.jpg
- File:Youngchidi in de bijenkorf.jpg
- File:Youngchidi in de lift foto’s maken.jpg
- File:Youngchidi blij.jpg
- File:Youngchidi samenwerking champion.jpg
- File:Youngchidi rietlandpark.jpg
- File:Youngchidi collage.jpg
- File:Youngchidi grijze outfit.jpg
- File:Youngchidi nike outfit.jpg
- File:Youngchidi lift foto 2020.jpg
- File:Youngchidi lift foto.jpg
- File:Youngchidi op een bankje.jpg
- File:Youngchidi langs het water.jpg
- File:Youngchidi naar de kapper.jpg
- File:Youngchidi in de lift.jpg
- File:Youngchidi bij zijn raam in 2019.jpg
- File:Youngchidi in oosterpark.jpg
- File:Youngchidi schoolfoto.jpg
- File:Youngchidi verveelt zich.jpg
- File:Youngchidi insta foto.jpg
- File:Youngchidi tijdens coronatijden.jpg
- File:Youngchidi met zijn mogelijke vriendin.jpg
Minoraxtalk 08:35, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope and Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. --Mosbatho (talk) 11:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Delete and any others that the nominator may have missed. Also, I'd like to point out, a new editor has upload a Youngchidi image. Perhaps he is a sock? Quakewoody (talk) 14:12, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Nick. --Minoraxtalk 07:07, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 16:29, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope forest selfie without encyclopaedic value Zello (talk) 20:29, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
foto personal Ontzak 
(Bilbo ta Bizkai guztia) 21:15, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
foto personal de una menor de edad Ontzak (Bilbo ta Bizkai guztia) 21:15, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
foto personal de una menor de edad Ontzak (Bilbo ta Bizkai guztia) 21:16, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
foto personal de una menor de edad Ontzak (Bilbo ta Bizkai guztia) 21:16, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
foto personal de una menor de edad Ontzak (Bilbo ta Bizkai guztia) 21:16, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - out of scope. --E4024 (talk) 00:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Art work, requires OTRS; but if it is amateur art then it would be out of scope of Commons. E4024 (talk) 01:24, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Likely to be copyright violation. --Ahmadtalk 19:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope: no encyclopedic value 2A02:810D:4AC0:28CA:59E9:D870:1ABB:B40C 06:17, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 20:12, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Used on spam article by locked user. Minoraxtalk 08:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Not even an "own work" as announced. E4024 (talk) 02:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; out of COM:SCOPE. --Ahmadtalk 20:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious "own work" by a one-time visitor. E4024 (talk) 01:38, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio (different web sources). --Wdwd (talk) 13:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:08, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Johonwoods (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:אגם רודברג, 2019.jpg → [4], [5]
- File:ליאנה עיון, 2020.jpg → [6], [7]
- File:ליאנה עיון, 2019.jpg
- File:וייסמן בפסטיבל קאן בצרפת 2019.jpg
I have yet speedy deleted several uploadings from the user: the photographs of Israeli models taken from their instagrams. These four are also claimed to originate from the instagrams of the portrayed persons but I was unable to find them there and check the claim. However, it is more or less clear that the uploader has no rights for these pictures. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:26, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete all, unreliable uploader. I would also say have an eye on the user but I think they changed name already. --E4024 (talk) 14:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 14:51, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all. --JuTa 01:18, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Filed on behalf of User:Noise Dasein who put his DR with the following rationale "yo soy la persona de la fotografía y nunca autorice su uso en wikipedia" on the file-talkpage. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hola. Soy el autor de la foto y amigo de Noise Dasein, quien aparece en el archivo y realizó la solicitud de borrado. Al momento de tomar la foto, le pregunté si podía subirla a Commons y respondió afirmativamente, pero el otro día hablé sobre el tema con él y dice no acordarse. En virtud de nuestra amistad y por una cuestión de respeto, considero que la foto debe eliminarse. No sé si la consulta se puede suspender ahora para realizar el borrado de inmediato. Ojalá se pudiera, teniendo en cuenta que yo, el propio autor, es quien lo solicita. Quedo atento a sus comentarios. Abrazos y cuídense del bicho. --Juampayo Escorpio (talk) 05:39, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as image is unused anyway. --Túrelio (talk) 06:18, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded this, but would like it deleted because licence plates are readable Vanja Jugovac (talk) 12:24, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Really? I cannot read anything. Keep. --E4024 (talk) 19:18, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, E4024 is right, but ... uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:17, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Small, low res, recently uploaded & redundant to File:Flag of Brazil.svg Minoraxtalk 08:31, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 23:58, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of unidentified people with no indication of importance. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 17:06, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
identical with "pic02.gif" from Matthew Ward's Home Page. Perhaps not copyvio, but missing permission? --Edfyr (talk) 15:55, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:38, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Professional photo taken with professional equipment; watermark, yet person implicitly claims that it is a selfie by putting his name into the author field. No valid permission from photographer. Mussklprozz (talk) 08:24, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 05:04, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:49, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio : Photo © Philippe Descroix https://www.bedetheque.com/auteur-12542-BD-Nouveau-Thierry.html Bédévore (talk) 22:23, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 22:49, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
I made a svg file of this map. TylerKutschbach (talk) 00:14, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kaldari (talk) 01:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
I made a svg file of this map TylerKutschbach (talk) 16:31, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
PNG is a bad format for this type of image and the state is misshapen in this file 2600:1009:B061:DF52:7590:FC48:39AF:BD3C 03:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
I made a svg file of this map with color shadings. TylerKutschbach (talk) 00:21, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Superseding is no reason to delete an image. Kingofthedead (talk) 05:45, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Just change all the links to the new image. --Running (talk) 15:30, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kaldari (talk) 01:06, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
I made a svg file of this map TylerKutschbach (talk) 07:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- keep, old raster versions are usually kept and no valid reason for deletion. Already kept. See the above discussion @TylerKutschbach: . Kingofthedead (talk) 07:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
PNG is a bad format for this type of image and the state is misshapen in this file 2600:1009:B061:DF52:7590:FC48:39AF:BD3C 03:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- keep, see above nominations and rationale Kingofthedead (talk) 06:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
PNG is a bad format for this type of image, the state is misshapen in this file and is unused 2600:1009:B05F:E5D6:3CD4:9736:DE24:4928 02:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- keep per above and do something about this user please Kingofthedead (talk) 06:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
cropped (and heavily edited) image of a notable individual, uploaded by a new editor with no other edits. Missing EXIF, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 04:36, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Seems to have been copied from the Washington Post website per TinEye. --Kaldari (talk) 01:13, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
ToO in China is very low. This logo may be copyrighted in China. 沈澄心✉ 02:45, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Just like you said, TOO China is low, but you can't judge subjectively. You should have example(s) to prove it, or you can request deleting many logos like this with the same reason. In my opinion, this logo is made up of some curved geometry superimposed. It isn't copyrighted. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 15:00, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Rowingbohe: Here(related news coverage) is an example. The logo of 港亨 is mush more simple than the logo of China Communications Press. Uploading logos from China is strongly discouraged. --沈澄心✉ 08:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- I don't think so. "港" and "亨" are Chinese characters, and the word "Gang Heng" is made up of English letters. The news coverage said, "被异议商标与之在字体、表现形式上完全相同" (The objected trademark is exactly the same as it in font and form of expression.) Yes, in my eyes, the logo with Chinese character or English letter is copyrighted in China, but I can't see any character or letter on the logo of China Communications Press.--Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 08:45, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- You said, "The logo of 港亨 is mush more simple than the logo of China Communications Press", but I think the logo of China Communications Press is much(not
mush) simpler (notmore simple) than the logo of 港亨. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 08:46, 3 October 2020 (UTC)- @Rowingbohe: What about this one? (For the word simple, see wikt:simple.) --沈澄心✉
- So what do you mean? Do you want to delete all the logos that come from Mainland China? Thank you, but I only found simply in OALD. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 09:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- No. But most logos from mainland China should be deleted, unless {{PD-China}} applies. Many logos like this have already been deleted (an example). --沈澄心✉ 09:23, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- The logos of CCTV channels have some English letters. Also, CCP's logo is simpler than CCTV's. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 03:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Rowingbohe: Note that File:湖南卫视2013logo.png is also deleted. --沈澄心✉ 14:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Replied at the bottom of the page. By the way, can you describe the content of "File:湖南卫视2013logo.png" in detail? Only a "mango"? --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 16:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Rowingbohe: Note that File:湖南卫视2013logo.png is also deleted. --沈澄心✉ 14:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- The logos of CCTV channels have some English letters. Also, CCP's logo is simpler than CCTV's. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 03:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- No. But most logos from mainland China should be deleted, unless {{PD-China}} applies. Many logos like this have already been deleted (an example). --沈澄心✉ 09:23, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- The logo of Liuyi is made up of English letters "L" and "Y". Can you find any English letter in the logo of CCP? Also, File:PRDIR_logo_without_text.svg is OK, I don't think this one is copyrighted. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 09:08, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- So what do you mean? Do you want to delete all the logos that come from Mainland China? Thank you, but I only found simply in OALD. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 09:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Rowingbohe: What about this one? (For the word simple, see wikt:simple.) --沈澄心✉
- @Rowingbohe: Here(related news coverage) is an example. The logo of 港亨 is mush more simple than the logo of China Communications Press. Uploading logos from China is strongly discouraged. --沈澄心✉ 08:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry but with all due respect, you haven't answered my question directly so far: why does this file not conform to TOO China? You listed a lot of examples, but they have no connection to the logo of CCP. (In fact, I've read them before.) You're still judging subjectively. I think you should elaborate on the complexity of this logo.
- The reason for this deletion is confusing. You use a word, "may". You only provided a vague reason, but did not give a detailed explanation. This reason also applies to the submission of other deletion requests from logos of China. Category:Logos of China has lots of Logos that may be copyrighted in China, and most of logos in it are more complex than CCP's logo. But you only request to delete this one uploaded by me, it's confusing, too. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 16:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Whether the logo has English letters or not is not the key point. The shape itself is complex enough (like this). --沈澄心✉ 04:29, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Rowingbohe: "Only request to delete this one uploaded by me"? Have you ever taken a look at [8], [9] and [10]? --沈澄心✉ 09:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't notice that, I just looked at my user talk page. I could't be AGF to you anymore. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 14:08, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- There's no more thing to explain, since even
can be copyrighted in China. --沈澄心✉ 10:31, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for your explanation. Could you request to delete more logos in Category:Logos of China later? --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 13:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Rowingbohe: OK. I'm nominating more logos now. --沈澄心✉ 02:35, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for your explanation. Could you request to delete more logos in Category:Logos of China later? --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 13:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
![71 File:Zgrada "Državnog osiguravajućeg zavoda".jpg](#File:Zgrada_"Državnog_osiguravajućeg_zavoda".jpg){kind=link}
s_(2949624448).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![124 File:"Lens 2017", Georges Rousse. - Flickr - Lejeune Grégory.jpg](#File:"Lens_2017",_Georges_Rousse._-_Flickr_-_Lejeune_Grégory.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_3D_View.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2565320996).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_y_Fini_(3028695254).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2899426835).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![[7]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1300888494743617541/snGQx-Cp_400x400.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![12:24, 20 September 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/09/20#c-Vanja_Jugovac-2020-09-20T12:24:00.000Z-File:Zgrada_"Državnog_osiguravajućeg_zavoda".jpg){kind=link}
![09:17, 12 October 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/09/20#c-Taivo-2020-10-12T09:17:00.000Z-File:Zgrada_"Državnog_osiguravajućeg_zavoda".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:10, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of China
[edit]Copyrighted logos.
- File:1 画板 1.png
- File:512x512bb-removebg-preview 2 -removebg-preview.png
- File:Chengde Logo.png
- File:China Sex Museum Logo.png
- File:ChinaJoy 2012 Logo without background.png
- File:ChinaJoy 2012 Logo.jpg
- File:Eroom.png
- File:Hycan Logo.png
File:IYB - Logo.pngFile:JoyToe.gif- File:Logo of EPS.png
- File:Logo with purple background - Copie.jpg
- File:Steamer 2.jpg
- File:Zhuhai Airshow Logo.png
- File:中惠乌克兰.png
- File:南浔旅游logo.jpg
- File:朝内166人文文库.jpg
- File:紫光展锐商标.png
- File:英礼汇EliteClub.jpg
- File:蚌埠市公共交通集团有限公司LOGO.jpg
- File:다이얼로그차이나 로고.png
沈澄心✉ 03:00, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Is File:다이얼로그차이나 로고.png published in the US? If so, COM:TOO China doesn't apply. --沈澄心✉ 03:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- @沈澄心: File:IYB - Logo.png is my original work. Theodore Xu (talk) 06:12, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Theodore Xu: Sorry. I listed your work by mistake. --沈澄心✉ 09:45, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - excepeted the last as it is unlikely to be a chinese logo (though about China). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. 沈澄心✉ 03:03, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. 沈澄心✉ 03:03, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious "own work" by a one-time visitor. (See WM also.) E4024 (talk) 03:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:17, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose, this is a photograph of a building, as allowed under FoP. As grain elevators are frequently subject to demolition, to eliminate this picture would be a furtherance in the destruction of history. Krazytea (talk) 21:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:19, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Afghanistan A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:22, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
s_(2949624448).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
s_(2949624448).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
s_(2949624448).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
s_(2949624448).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not a real user; never has been. E4024 (talk) 04:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 04:58, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no it has a big size, I did not find previous catches, I think it may be ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Данная работа никому не принадлежит, только мне. Но я, автор, не настаиваю на том, чтобы данную работу оставить. Если герои фотографии не хотят - удалите. (This work belongs to no one but me. But I, the author, do not insist on leaving this work. If the characters in the photo don't want it, delete it.) С уважением, Ivanaivanova (talk) 20:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope: no encyclopedic value 2A02:810D:4AC0:28CA:59E9:D870:1ABB:B40C 06:19, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
The source image gallery page states that the images are free to use by the media, privately or in non-commercial use, which is insufficient per Commons:Licensing. The uploader said that they thought the images would be OK in Wikipedia and added the incorrect license to get the files uploaded. (One file was tagged by a bot for having no license but I included it in the DR too.)
- File:Salon aluesairaala ilmakuva.jpg
- File:Paimion sairaala 3.jpg
- File:Paimion sairaala 2.jpg
- File:Paimion sairaala 1.jpg
- File:Tyks T-sairaala.jpg
- File:Tyks T-sairaala ilmakuva.jpg
kyykaarme (talk) 14:17, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". The image certainly shows an old wall but as there is no use nor categorization I cannot be sure of its scope either. E4024 (talk) 00:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Neutral I did not find catches with google, I added infos and categorized the file. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:09, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". Also as there is no use nor categorization we do not know if these people are in scope. E4024 (talk) 00:42, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious "own work" by a one-time visitor. E4024 (talk) 05:42, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:17, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 05:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:17, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IvanScherban
[edit]- File:Родина Олександра Корнійця.jpg (1)
- File:Корнієць Олександр Павлович.png (2)
- File:Korniets Oleksandr Pavlovych.jpg
- File:Громадський діяч Олександр Корнієць.jpg
Links: 1; 2 dubious "own work", no exif, potential copyright issue, 1 and 2 are safe copyvios --Oesterreicher12 (talk) 07:22, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:16, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Used on a large number of social media platforms by the depicted person. com:OTRS verification would be prudent. Vera (talk) 07:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:15, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of person with no indication of importance. Can't find any reference to anyone of this name. Malcolma (talk) 09:36, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:15, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
dubious "own work", potential copyright issue Oesterreicher12 (talk) 10:04, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:14, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Clearly a copyrighted, very professional photograph, with no indication of an actual copyright release from the photographer or OTRS Softlavender (talk) 10:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:14, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted photograph with no actual release from the photographer Softlavender (talk) 10:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:13, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Wgo96
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
dubious "own work", potential copyright issue, see [11] --Oesterreicher12 (talk) 10:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:13, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Frutman
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
dubious "own work", potential copyright issue, no/bad exif --Oesterreicher12 (talk) 11:20, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:12, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Doubts that the uploader is the photographer, as is claimed. In this edit the uploader stated "Quelle: Haus der Kulturen der Welt", i.e. the cited institution as source for this image. In addition, the metadata of this file contain the typical Facebook/Instagram code, which suggest that it has been copied from these networks. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:03, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:12, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
No valid reason. This file was initially tagged by Max14056 as Speedy (Löschen) and the most recent rationale was: Foto auf Wunsch der Künstlerin bitte löschen. Foto stellt nicht dar wofür die Künstlerin steht, der Auftritt auf der Veranstaltung soll nicht öffentlich kommuniziert werden --Max14056 (talk) 19:09, 9 September 2020 (UTC) Stepro (talk) 20:47, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deleting. Public concert on a city market. Normal picture. --Stepro (talk) 20:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Es fällt auf, dass anscheinend (nach meiner bisherigen empirischen Erfahrung auf Commons + Wikipedia) nur Frauen ein derartiges Problem mit Aufnahmen von sich - die sie nicht selbst vorher inszeniert oder ausgewählt (kontrolliert) haben - äußern! Dazu kann ich keine Expertise abgeben, aber auffällig ist es und es sollte uns im Sinne der (angestrebten) immer noch nicht erreichten Gleichberechtigung (fehlendes Selbstbewusstsein oder Selbstwertgefühl?) gewisse Sorgen bereiten! --dontworry (talk) 07:19, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Max14056 as Speedy (Löschen) and the most recent rationale was: Recht am eigenen Bild verletzt --Stella Sommer (talk) 11:45, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:04, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Info This is exact the same thing as 11 days ago above, kept 4 days ago. This is not legitim and should not discussed again. --Stepro (talk) 02:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 12:11, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
book cover, COM:OTRS needed from copyright owner. Strakhov (talk) 13:24, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:09, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Useless modification of the original, have no use in any Wiki projects Andra Febrian (talk) 15:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:07, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
FBMD in metadata. Unlikely to be own work. Copyvio? Correct permission is required See COM:OTRS Timtrent (talk) 17:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation Timtrent (talk) 17:55, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
The photo seems to be made in 1940s. Own work is unlikely. First publication and photographer's name with his/her death year must be given to determine copyright status. Taivo (talk) 17:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation, the more so since only a very small resolution version is here Timtrent (talk) 18:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:05, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". There is a WM to the level of the chin also. E4024 (talk) 18:42, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Poorly framed and poorly shot picture, out of scope for Commons Timtrent (talk) 18:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted artwork Multicherry (talk) 18:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
artist is still alive, needs permission Gbawden (talk) 19:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
![19:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/09/20#c-Gbawden-2020-09-20T19:02:00.000Z-File:"Lens_2017",_Georges_Rousse._-_Flickr_-_Lejeune_Grégory.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
![12:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/09/20#c-Didym-2020-11-08T12:03:00.000Z-File:"Lens_2017",_Georges_Rousse._-_Flickr_-_Lejeune_Grégory.jpg){kind=link}
Weird, creepy, digitally altered version of File:Ivanmisner.jpg, which is itself nominated for improper licensing. It was being used for vandalism on enwiki Deacon Vorbis (talk) 19:03, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Regasterios. --Didym (talk) 12:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Low quality, already plenty of better-quality images of edge-on DVD library cases Multicherry (talk) 19:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
dubious claim of free license Horus (talk) 19:10, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. Studio photo, uploader has no other contributions. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation, widely published online in pages that predate its upload here.[12][13][14][15] Verbcatcher (talk) 20:21, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- And it is a small low-resolution image without camera metadata. The versions on other websites have a higher resolution. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:26, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
doubious "own work", see exif Oesterreicher12 (talk) 21:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Does not look like own work, probably copyright violation Librero2109 (talk) 22:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:59, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted mascots. No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:17, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:23, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Shiraoi, Hokkaido
[edit]COM:DW of a copyrighted statue. No FoP in Japan for statues.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:01, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of a copyrighted sign. No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per many cases of Category:Japanese FOP cases/kept, transport-related images are either {{De minimis}}, or they are even really not artworks. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Yuraily Lic: If you don't oppose me, then I would try to expand COM:FOP Japan to ask peoples refrain from such transport-related FOP DRs. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I think this is not an official road sign by the police or MLIT. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:47, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Yuraily Lic: "not an official", see two Kanmon tunnel cases on this matter (are you sure that that mural is painted by MLIT staffs? But both are kept per DM): Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kanmon Roadway Tunnel - 01.JPG and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kanmon roadway tunnel01.jpg. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:24, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Addition,
( Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sankebetsu Billboard01.jpg ) --Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:29, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Well, it's also likely that such boards are painted Digimons, Pokémons, Kumamons... But regareless what they painted, they are {{De minimis}}, as their main topics are transport stuffs, not such "made up animals", again are you planning to DR all planes that are having em? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:52, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The main subject of this photo is obviously the signboard. Not de minimis. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:43, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Yuraily Lic: You may look up the Commons:Deletion requests/Image:PokemonJA8956.JPG, Sankebetsu is just a creative enough top be considered a non-derivative work. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Info see also my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sankebetsu Billboard01.jpg, with an extract from COM:DM Japan. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:04, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:42, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The uploader keeps removing the Copyvio tag, so I assume he disagrees. Copyright status of the image is unclear, pd-old-70 does not apply because the author is not known, PD-Czechoslovakia-anon would only work if we know when and where it was first published and if we know it was published anonymously. Without this information, the copyright status us unknown, and the image is too recent for pd-old-assumed. Andel (talk) 06:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Billinghurst. -- CptViraj (talk) 07:19, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
made with wrong informations, please delete this image, i will make better ones — Preceding unsigned comment added by CavidRasul (talk • contribs) 2020-09-17T07:16:57 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 05:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
made with wrong informations, please delete this image, i will make better ones — Preceding unsigned comment added by CavidRasul (talk • contribs) 2020-09-17T07:15:02 (UTC)
Own request, made with wrong datas - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 21:22, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per request. Ruthven (msg) 11:47, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
made with wrong informations, please delete this image, i will make better ones — Preceding unsigned comment added by CavidRasul (talk • contribs) 2020-09-17T07:15:57 (UTC)
Own request, made with wrong datas - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 21:21, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per request. Ruthven (msg) 11:47, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
made with wrong informations, please delete this image, i will make better ones — Preceding unsigned comment added by CavidRasul (talk • contribs) 2020-09-17T07:15:30 (UTC)
Own request, made with wrong datas - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 21:21, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per request. Ruthven (msg) 11:47, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
made with wrong informations, please delete this image, i will make better ones — Preceding unsigned comment added by CavidRasul (talk • contribs) 2020-09-17T07:11:04 (UTC)
Own request, made with wrong datas Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 21:20, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
made with wrong informations, please delete this image, i will make better ones — Preceding unsigned comment added by CavidRasul (talk • contribs) 2020-09-17T07:14:33 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 05:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
made with wrong informations, please delete this image, i will make better ones — Preceding unsigned comment added by CavidRasul (talk • contribs) 2020-09-17T07:13:30 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 05:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
made with wrong informations, please delete this image, i will make better ones — Preceding unsigned comment added by CavidRasul (talk • contribs) 2020-09-17T07:14:05 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 05:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Estonia Elisfkc (talk) 16:35, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file is licensed as {{PD-US-1923}} yet its publication date is claimed to be unknown and its and its author is also claimed to be unknown. The url given as the source appears to be dead, but there might be an archived version of it here. The caption provided for the photo in en:B. Hick and Sons#Soho Iron Works states it's an aerial photo taken in 1966; How can a photo taken in 1966 be "PD-US-1923"? Either this was a mistake in the licensing or the uploader simply misunderstands what "PD-US-1923" means, but this photo can't really be kept per COM:PCP unless its provenance can be clarified enough to show its COM:PD. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - move to Wikipedia instead? Rstory (talk) 23:43, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Looks like the caption was updated, the license needs changing. Rstory (talk) 08:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- License changed and sources updated - please move to Wikipedia as required? Rstory (talk) 14:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Commons doesn't accept fair use per COM:FAIR so it can't be kept here; moreover, I disagree with your assessment that this would satisfy Wikipedia's non-free content use policy, and I don't think it a consensus could be established that it does at en:WP:FFD. If, however, you feel differently, then I think you're going to have to upload the file yourself to Wikipedia as non-free content and provide required non-free use rationale and non-free license that you think best applies. --Marchjuly (talk
) 14:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Will do. Rstory (talk) 17:53, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete COM:FU claims are not allowed on Commons. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
This file is licensed as {{PD-US-1923}} yet its publication date is claimed to be unknown and its and its author is also claimed to be unknown. The url given as the source is unlikely the original source for the photo and simply states "Borer in Heavy Machine shop. Date & operator unknown", and the caption provided for the photo in en:B. Hick and Sons#Soho Iron Works states just as much and is cited to the same website given as the source (which is not even close to a reliable source for English Wikipedia purposes). Without knowing when the photo was taken, you can’t just guess it’s "PD-US-1923"; so, this can't really be kept per COM:PCP unless its provenance can be clarified enough to show it’s really COM:PD. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep move to Wikipedia instead. Rstory (talk) 23:45, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Not sure why the source is unlikely to be anything other than the original source, the pic does not appear anywhere else online to the best of my knowlege? Rstory (talk) 08:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- The source has three images from the Heavy Machine shop, all three of borers - one caption shows a date of 1970, that is the only indication we have; for the moment I suggest, circa 1970. Rstory (talk) 16:08, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- License swapped to destroyed building from historic photo, either it seems might apply? Rstory (talk) 16:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Please move to Wikipedia as required. Rstory (talk) 16:33, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- As I posted at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aerial view of Hick Hargreaves & Co. Ltd.jpg, Commons doesn't accept fair use per COM:FAIR so this can't be kept here. I also disagree with your assessment that this would satisfy Wikipedia's non-free content use policy, and I don't think it a consensus could be established that it does at en:WP:FFD. So, I think you're going to have to upload the file yourself to Wikipedia as non-free content and provide required non-free use rationale and non-free license that you think best applies, and then allow things to be sorted out there. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:33, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Will do. Rstory (talk) 17:51, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- As I posted at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aerial view of Hick Hargreaves & Co. Ltd.jpg, Commons doesn't accept fair use per COM:FAIR so this can't be kept here. I also disagree with your assessment that this would satisfy Wikipedia's non-free content use policy, and I don't think it a consensus could be established that it does at en:WP:FFD. So, I think you're going to have to upload the file yourself to Wikipedia as non-free content and provide required non-free use rationale and non-free license that you think best applies, and then allow things to be sorted out there. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:33, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:22, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
我不小心上傳它 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aqh26201 (talk • contribs) 2020-09-15T13:24:32 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload (Google Translate: I accidentally uploaded it). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:23, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Any proof that this work is in PD: no date of publication, author, etc. Matlin (talk) 07:20, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:25, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Elgewen (talk) 10:08, 20 September 2020 (UTC) The uploader has given some explanation about the missing license, see the remark "Uploaded a work by Rafael Adam Baiges from Es una foto libre, sin derechos de autor de la partitura de una obra que escribió mi abuelo. with UploadWizard / (Uploaded a work by Rafael Adam Baiges from It is a free photo, without copyright of the score of a work that my grandfather wrote. with UploadWizard.)--Elgewen (talk) 10:16, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:27, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused duplicate of File:Warang Citi capital letter Ko.svg. /Leonel Sohns 11:36, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- As author I can say: KILL IT WITH FIRE! — Person or Persons Unknown (talk)
(contrib.) 11:38, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:25, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Delete own upload: misunderstanding of Thai copyright law. Horus (talk) 11:50, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: The "รายงานของทางราชการ" part of the Thai Copyright Act has been rather a mystery to me as to what exactly it refers to. Why do you now think this report isn't covered by the exemption? --Paul_012 (talk) 14:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Paul 012: Do you consider it "official reports" as in Article 7 (4)? My concern is that it may be "works in the literary, scientific or artistic fields;" in Article 7 (1) --Horus (talk) 20:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- I really don't know. There doesn't appear to be any online explanation or discussion of this exact phrase. The 7(1) provision is irrelevant to whether it falls under Article 7(4), though. --Paul_012 (talk) 00:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Retracted. --Horus (talk) 11:24, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- I really don't know. There doesn't appear to be any online explanation or discussion of this exact phrase. The 7(1) provision is irrelevant to whether it falls under Article 7(4), though. --Paul_012 (talk) 00:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Paul 012: Do you consider it "official reports" as in Article 7 (4)? My concern is that it may be "works in the literary, scientific or artistic fields;" in Article 7 (1) --Horus (talk) 20:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:27, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Author's request Swagging (talk) 13:35, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of low-res unused image, superseded by numerous alternatives. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:33, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Author's request Swagging (talk) 13:36, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of low-res unused image, superseded by numerous alternatives. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:33, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Author's request Swagging (talk) 13:36, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of low-res unused image, superseded by numerous alternatives. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:33, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Author's request Swagging (talk) 13:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of low-res unused image, superseded by numerous alternatives. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:33, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Author's request Swagging (talk) 13:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of low-res unused image, superseded by numerous alternatives. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:33, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Author's request Swagging (talk) 13:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion: it is the only one of rear view. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:32, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Author's request because of bad quality image Swagging (talk) 13:38, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:35, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Author's request Swagging (talk) 13:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
author's request Swagging (talk) 16:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:36, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Author's request Swagging (talk) 13:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of low-res unused image, superseded by numerous alternatives. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:37, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Author's request Swagging (talk) 13:42, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
photo is NOT own work originally published on Commons - previously published by RIA Novosti here PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
It is a representative logo of the disused brand. Blgwoodxo (talk) 15:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:40, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
It is a representative logo of the disused brand. Blgwoodxo (talk) 15:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:40, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
It is a representative logo of the disused brand. Blgwoodxo (talk) 15:55, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:40, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
It is a representative logo of the disused brand. Blgwoodxo (talk) 15:55, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:40, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
author's request Swagging (talk) 16:47, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of low-res unused image, superseded by numerous alternatives. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:41, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate photo of File:Original First Generation MotivAider 1988 square.jpg VikingB (talk) 18:43, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:42, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio from https://youngcomposers.community/impressum/ without CC licensing and without any apparent permission. 87.150.15.7 18:43, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:43, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
I have made a better copy. ChristiaanPR (talk) 19:26, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Lineairprogrammeren2020091903.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:44, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
I have made a better copy. ChristiaanPR (talk) 19:26, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Lineairprogrammeren2020091903.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:44, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
made with wrong informations, please delete this image, i will make better ones — Preceding unsigned comment added by CavidRasul (talk • contribs) 2020-09-17T07:09:53 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
made with wrong informations, please delete this image, i will make better ones — Preceding unsigned comment added by CavidRasul (talk • contribs) 2020-09-17T06:35:54 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
License unclear; photo not in list Beeld & Geluid, see discussion https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Media_from_Beeld_en_Geluid_Wiki_with_unclear_licensing Vysotsky (talk) 20:51, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:53, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivan9860 (talk • contribs) 2020-09-20T14:12:02 (UTC)
Info See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Карачаевский флаг.jpg alternative version of this flag also nominated for deletion. These DR's may need to proceed in tandem to reach consensus on which, if any, flag image to keep. Thanks. Crep171166 (talk) 08:52, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Speedy keep, no basis for the nom's claim. See also Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ivan986. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:10, 22 September 2020 (UTC)- Keep, per Jeff, although this design doesn’t show at https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/ru-kara.html (nor at https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/ru-balk.html). Still we don’t usually delete flag images just because they are unsourced. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 06:32, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, vague/unclear rationale, and looking at the contribution history of the nominator this DR looks like a pure retalation against Commons:Deletion requests/File:Карачаевский флаг.jpg. --Cavarrone (talk) 09:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, as per all of the above, especially the observations of Cavarrone. Also per my comments at the other DR - this flag depiction seems to be the genuine one. Thanks. Crep171166 (talk) 11:01, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, seems to be based on nominator's personnal interest, not about actual vandalism.--QTHCCAN (talk) 15:33, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:58, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
No original colors and stripes in the air. Bad quality. Mef.ellingen (talk) 22:58, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:01, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. The picture shows more than just the person; the composition in the photograph is valuable for Commons. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep If a trusted user has verified that this image is suitable for Commons, then surely it is more than an unused userpage image? Also per 1234qwer1234qwer4. Prahlad (talk to me / what I've done) 18:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:13, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation written Martin Sg. (talk) 04:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:02, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
not "own work" Horus (talk) 05:23, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Is the question over the copyright status of the photograph or the design of the object itself? The photo was taken from Facebook, so the own work claim is questionable, so delete unless proven otherwise. As for the original design, I think this might be okay under freedom of panorama, since it was installed in an open public place with the clear intention of leaving it there (even if it was promptly removed by authorities). --Paul_012 (talk) 14:18, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- If taking a pic of the object from public space is okay, then I believe this file can be kept if the information has been correctly provided. --Horus (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- I'm still concerned by the fact that the uploader admitted in the original upload log that the image was taken from Facebook, but later changed the statement. Unless there is clarification from Nitisart Jungtrakungrat I'd say it should be deleted. --Paul_012 (talk) 00:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Paul 012: In this Facebook post, the owner said "กรณีการนำหมุดไปใช้เพื่อการค้า ทางกลุ่มแนวร่วมธรรมศาสตร์และการชุมนุมระบุว่า สามารถทำได้", but it may need official statements. What's your idea? --Horus (talk) 11:23, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- "Commercial use is okay" is not wide enough, and in any case that statement probably refers to the 3D model files, not the original design. This wouldn't be relevant for this photo, though, if FOP is satisfied. --Paul_012 (talk) 02:58, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Paul 012: In this Facebook post, the owner said "กรณีการนำหมุดไปใช้เพื่อการค้า ทางกลุ่มแนวร่วมธรรมศาสตร์และการชุมนุมระบุว่า สามารถทำได้", but it may need official statements. What's your idea? --Horus (talk) 11:23, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- I'm still concerned by the fact that the uploader admitted in the original upload log that the image was taken from Facebook, but later changed the statement. Unless there is clarification from Nitisart Jungtrakungrat I'd say it should be deleted. --Paul_012 (talk) 00:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- If taking a pic of the object from public space is okay, then I believe this file can be kept if the information has been correctly provided. --Horus (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: I see various versions of this file on facebook and the upload log says it was taken from Facebook, too. Based on the talk page of the uploader, I think we'd better be cautious and delete. --rubin16 (talk) 18:06, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks.
- File:0841 - Moskau 2015 - Metrostation Kiewskaja (26335137241).jpg
- File:0844 - Moskau 2015 - Metrostation Kiewskaja (25798590733).jpg
- File:0845 - Moskau 2015 - Metrostation Kiewskaja (26309015772).jpg
- File:Bataille de Poltava.jpg
- File:Estación Kievskaya-Koltsevaya 01.jpg
- File:Festivités à Kiev.jpg
- File:L'Ukraine décorée fleurit.jpg
- File:Liberation de Kiev.jpg
- File:Moscou métro Kievskaya-Koltsevaya (1).JPG
- File:Moscou métro Kievskaya-Koltsevaya (2).JPG
- File:Moscou métro Kievskaya-Koltsevaya (3).JPG
- File:Moscou métro Kievskaya-Koltsevaya (4).JPG
- File:Moscou métro Kievskaya-Koltsevaya (5).JPG
- File:Moscou métro Kievskaya-Koltsevaya (6).JPG
- File:Nekrasoff, Dobroluboff, Tchernychevski, Chevtchenko.jpg
- File:Pouchkine en Ukraine.jpg
- File:Russia 3400 (4150131265).jpg
- File:Réunification de la Nation ukrainienne.jpg
- File:Traité de Pereïaslav.jpg
- File:Мозаїка станції Кіиївська Московського метрополітену.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sealle (talk) 08:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Sealle: the photographs were taken in Moscow, Russia, and this state does have the Freedom of panorama. --В.Галушко (talk) 09:06, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- В.Галушко, yes, this was my lapse, but these images are still and all non-free. Sealle (talk) 09:10, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Sealle: Hi! I've modified the file a bit to address your concerns about freedom of panorama in Russia. Can you take a look to see if it is resolved. Thank you! --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 02:50, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- The 3D frame depicted is copyrighted as well. Sealle (talk) 03:06, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- Ohh :( and now? --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 03:47, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- The 3D frame depicted is copyrighted as well. Sealle (talk) 03:06, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Sealle: Hi! I've modified the file a bit to address your concerns about freedom of panorama in Russia. Can you take a look to see if it is resolved. Thank you! --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 02:50, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- В.Галушко, yes, this was my lapse, but these images are still and all non-free. Sealle (talk) 09:10, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:ICOCA
[edit]Derivative work of non-free work.
Wcam (talk) 12:53, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination as this work was discussed and deleted before at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:ICOCA.jpg and it is clearly a case of COM:CSD#G4. --Wcam (talk) 18:10, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:09, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
flickr author released all his work like all rights reserved. Example: https://www.flickr.com/photos/alessandropagni/4918410028/ Caulfield (talk) 13:20, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: I haven't found the same photo on Flickr and having "all rights reserved" there doesn't prevent the author of free licensing somewhere else. --rubin16 (talk) 18:14, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of PD: if the author is unknown, no reason to mention 70 pma. VLu (talk) 13:31, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:14, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Modern art and promo photos. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Cher 1 4.jpg
- File:Cher 1 3.jpg
- File:Cher 1 2.png
- File:Cher 1 1.jpg
- File:Аристарх Чернушев.jpg
- File:Wdr 5.jpg
- File:Wdr 4.jpg
- File:Wdr 3.jpg
- File:Wdr 2.jpg
- File:Wdr 1.jpg
- File:Artist Egor Kraft.jpg
- File:Papasrapasynth.jpg
- File:Perduto2000.jpg
- File:Vtol Murmansk PRMK .jpg
- File:Vtol 12262 documentation.jpg
- File:Vtol melt.jpg
- File:Vtol conus documentation.jpg
- File:Vtol oil documentation.jpg
- File:Vtol motorgan.jpg
- File:Vtol rotor.jpg
- File:Vtol magnetophone.jpg
- File:Vtol you me.jpg
- File:Vtol prankphone.jpg
- File:Vtol hot spot poet.jpg
- File:Vtol floating point number.jpg
- File:Vtol wave is my nature.jpg
- File:Vtol poised.jpg
- File:Vtol divider.jpg
- File:Vtol guest.jpg
- File:Vtol topot m.jpg
- File:Vtol colector.jpg
- File:Vtol until i die.jpg
- File:Vtol red.jpg
- File:Vtol Дмитрий Морозов.jpg
- File:Vtol mayak.jpg
- File:Vtol 12262.jpg
- File:Vtol0616 o.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)]
These images were published with the permission of the author. He did send an email to OTRS. The number is: ticket#2020092110000503.
- File:Vtol Murmansk PRMK .jpg
- File:Vtol 12262 documentation.jpg
- File:Vtol melt.jpg
- File:Vtol conus documentation.jpg
- File:Vtol oil documentation.jpg
- File:Vtol motorgan.jpg
- File:Vtol rotor.jpg
- File:Vtol magnetophone.jpg
- File:Vtol you me.jpg
- File:Vtol prankphone.jpg
- File:Vtol hot spot poet.jpg
- File:Vtol floating point number.jpg
- File:Vtol wave is my nature.jpg
- File:Vtol poised.jpg
- File:Vtol divider.jpg
- File:Vtol guest.jpg
- File:Vtol topot m.jpg
- File:Vtol colector.jpg
- File:Vtol until i die.jpg
- File:Vtol red.jpg
- File:Vtol Дмитрий Морозов.jpg
- File:Vtol mayak.jpg
- File:Vtol 12262.jpg
- File:Vtol0616 o.jpg
Buuumer (talk) 04:08, 21 September 2020 (UTC)]
Ticket:2020092110000503 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 00:00, 24 September 2020 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_motorgan.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 21:57, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_rotor.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 21:59, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_magnetophone.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_you_me.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:01, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_prankphone.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_mayak.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:03, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_12262.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:05, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_wave_is_my_nature.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_poised.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:08, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_divider.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:09, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_until_i_die.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_red.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:12, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_hot_spot_poet.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:13, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_floating_point_number.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:14, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_guest.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:15, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_topot_m.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_colector.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:17, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_Murmansk_PRMK_.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:20, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_melt.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_oil_documentation.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_conus_documentation.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Vtol_Дмитрий_Морозов.jpg” under ticket:2020092110000503. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted those not covered by OTRS permission. --rubin16 (talk) 18:23, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
.PNG){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This map is unnecessarily covert in its sources. It is likely to be a derived work of a map published elsewhere. This must either be expressed in a way that can be correctly verified or it should be deleted per precautionary principle. The map is being used as the basis of nationalist racial theories, as Category:Human Y-DNA haplogroups in Poland demonstrates. Fæ (talk) 15:00, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
.PNG){kind=link}
- This work is original and of my authorship, inspired by previous works of other users. The colorimetric gradient and the 2-10-30-60% scale is of my invention because it allows to easily visualize the concentration of haplogroups in each region, more manageable to work because lower percentage ranges will only produce a more tiring work. I used many references that I will add soon. On the other hand, it cannot be affirmed that "probably" is a work derived from a map published elsewhere, without evidence, and request deletion, because this would be an injustice with users who upload their images with legitimate intentions.--Maulucioni (talk) 03:36, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- If the map is a fantasy, then it misrepresents itself as "science" and as fake news with negative educational value fails to meet scope.
- If the map is a derived work (as other maps created for this same purpose are being discovered to be) then it is a copyvio.
- Neither of these deletion options is an "injustice". --Fæ (talk) 09:38, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Genetic testing is a legitimate science that is used to determine human migration patterns and genealogy, it has nothing to do with fake news. Data collected from genetic tests cannot be copyrighted because it is not an expression. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • Contributions/Gone_Postal) 12:43, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- The map is likely to be copied from an original all rights reserved map. There is no indication anywhere than the map was created from pure data. Without sources this cannot be a keep. --Fæ (talk) 12:45, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- I didn't remember that the origin of the data was already listed. See in source.--Maulucioni (talk) 04:50, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- What we see is a PNG file with no explanation of what source data was used to create it. What we do see is elliptical references to vague sources, none of which appears to contain actual data that could possibly recreate this map.
- The "source" states {{own}}. Map based on [[w:en:Y-chromosome_haplogroups_by_populations|Y-chromosome haplogroups by populations]] tables, [[w:en:Haplogroup_R1b_(Y-DNA)|Haplogroup R1b (Y-DNA)]] article, [http://www.scs.uiuc.edu/~mcdonald/WorldHaplogroupsMaps.pdf Map of Y Haplogroups], [http://www.eupedia.com/europe/european_y-dna_haplogroups.shtml Distribution of Y-DNA page], Cruciani 2010, Abu-Amero 2009, Chiaroni 2009, Balaresque 2009, Hassan 2008, Tambets 2004, Rosser 2000, etc. which in no way is a statement that allows us to verify the license given. Certainly, the CC-BY-SA release appears misleading and gives no indication of precisely who holds the copyright to what and requires reusers to give attribution. --Fæ (talk) 11:48, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- Copyright in such cases is actually quite clear, it belongs to the person who has taken the data and by using creative process turned it into a map. Sometimes it helps to take a step back and think about a similar, but different, example. Here we have number sequences, and below them a diagram of those sequences. Data itself has no copyright, writing it in textual form has no copyright, plotting it on a liniar graph has no copyright, but plotting it on a blue line, using specific arrow style with specific font and specific colour has some minimal copyright. Thus {{own work}} is a statement sufficient for copyright. Now, if your argument is that the outline of the continents was copied from another file, that is a completely different argument which has nothing to do with data (which is overlayed by several users starting in 2012), then we can discuss this. Is this your argument? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • Contributions/Gone_Postal) 12:01, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- No, the issue is that this remains a failure against precautionary principle unless the claim that this is a map created purely from a data set, rather than derived from any of the published zone maps, can be demonstrated. To verify the licence in this case, the source data must be specified and the map must be reproducible from that data set. This is fundamental to the claim that copyright cannot apply as only selected data was used, even though some of the stated source publications are all rights reserved.
- The underlying map is a separate issue, my presumption was that it is likely to be copyright free, but you are correct that in addition it needs a source that can be verified. --Fæ (talk) 12:43, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- Copyright in such cases is actually quite clear, it belongs to the person who has taken the data and by using creative process turned it into a map. Sometimes it helps to take a step back and think about a similar, but different, example. Here we have number sequences, and below them a diagram of those sequences. Data itself has no copyright, writing it in textual form has no copyright, plotting it on a liniar graph has no copyright, but plotting it on a blue line, using specific arrow style with specific font and specific colour has some minimal copyright. Thus {{own work}} is a statement sufficient for copyright. Now, if your argument is that the outline of the continents was copied from another file, that is a completely different argument which has nothing to do with data (which is overlayed by several users starting in 2012), then we can discuss this. Is this your argument? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • Contributions/Gone_Postal) 12:01, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- I didn't remember that the origin of the data was already listed. See in source.--Maulucioni (talk) 04:50, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- The map is likely to be copied from an original all rights reserved map. There is no indication anywhere than the map was created from pure data. Without sources this cannot be a keep. --Fæ (talk) 12:45, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep No proof whatsoever that any copyright was violated. Bad faith DR which no amount of wikilawyering can validate. AshFriday (talk) 00:17, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The author says himself that the work is original research. It is not based on any authoritative sources. The picture should be deleted for spreading misinformation and inciting racist, chauvinistic sentiment.The Chinese Aryan (talk) 01:38, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- There is no rule against original research. There is nothing racist about haplogroups. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • Contributions/Gone_Postal) 05:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment A user that joined just yesterday has linked File:IE countries.svg here via a {{delete}}. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • Contributions/Gone_Postal) 05:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as in use. --Yann (talk) 21:14, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
.PNG){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Careful reading of the previous DR has not addressed the fundamental issue for this map, that there is no source for the work it was derived from. Raising again as the basic question of copyright for this derived work has failed to be addressed in any meaningful way.
Commons has plenty of public domain maps, were this map derived from a public domain map, there would be no issue here, it just needs to be referenced. This DR can be closed if someone provides such a source and we can compare the images to verify there is no copyright problem.
The last DR was closed on the basis that the file is in use, copyright was not addressed. The requirements of COM:L and COM:PRP are perfectly clear and inescapable. When there is doubt, we must be able to verify the copyright status of the original work when derived works are created. None of the sources quoted includes the map that underpins this image, neither does the uploader make any claim that this was how the map was created. It would be magical thinking to believe that the uploader imagined this map and it was not derived from anything at all apart from their creative imagination.
At no time has the uploader explained their source, or if a mapping tool was used that can be verified. Fæ (talk) 16:10, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- I will not reierate my opinion on the copyright of a global map. Apparently this is not concensus of admins on this project and this is unlikely to be resolved or change until we get some sort of opinion from Legal or potentially a court case. However, I still believe that categorising deletion requests of haplo-maps as anything to do with "racial theories" is libelous to the extreme. Races do no even exist when we talk about contemporary genetics, races are socio-political constructs and there are no theories about them when we talk about haplogroups. There is an archaic useage of the word race that means species or a genetic subgroup, but I doubt that in a 21st century anybody would classify a haplogroup as a "race" unless the intention was to smear somebody's reputation. We are an educational portal, and I would really hate to see somebody getting confused between genetic research and racial divisions that are today universaly rejected as pseudoscience. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • [[Special:Contributions/Gone_Postal|]) 16:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Indeed. Haplogroup maps are not about race. They are related to the historic and prehistoric origin of the human being. Maps tell us, for example, the migrations of populations across different continents for tens or hundreds of thousands of years. Scientific references are abundant and in them many authors make their own maps. But it seems that there is a desire to allow the existence of encyclopedic articles but it is wanted to destroy any type of graphic representation of the same subject, looking for any excuse for it. My opinion is that the attempt at censorship is obvious. The maps are not perfect, they are approximations, and need to be updated according to the most recent bibliography. I also find it unacceptable to doubt the users' own work and my qualification as a map artist, a hobby that I have developed all my life, since my childhood 50 years ago. I still have my school maps for proof.--Maulucioni (talk) 05:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Nobody has questioned your ability to draw maps.
- Indeed. Haplogroup maps are not about race. They are related to the historic and prehistoric origin of the human being. Maps tell us, for example, the migrations of populations across different continents for tens or hundreds of thousands of years. Scientific references are abundant and in them many authors make their own maps. But it seems that there is a desire to allow the existence of encyclopedic articles but it is wanted to destroy any type of graphic representation of the same subject, looking for any excuse for it. My opinion is that the attempt at censorship is obvious. The maps are not perfect, they are approximations, and need to be updated according to the most recent bibliography. I also find it unacceptable to doubt the users' own work and my qualification as a map artist, a hobby that I have developed all my life, since my childhood 50 years ago. I still have my school maps for proof.--Maulucioni (talk) 05:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- However nobody draws an accurate map of the world by imagining what the world might look like. That would be bizarre and is not a credible scenario.
- You traced an existing map. All that has been asked of you, over and over again, is to state what your source was so that anyone can verify it. You have evaded the question many times, and could have resolved these discussions without ever getting to the stage of needing a deletion request which attempts to flush out the basic copyright question that by policy has to be answered, what publication was this derived from? --Fæ (talk) 05:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Maulucioni: , @Fæ: I think I have a solution which will not only resolve all of the issues with the map deletion requests, but also improve Commons in the process. If Maulucioni has a video camera and a little bit of time, can they please record them drawing a map of some continent by hand without tracing an already existing map. Then upload that video here under a free licence, this would actually be a great video to have, as it would be the best possible illustration for 'map making'. The reason why I am asking for a continent and not for a country is that some ex-colonial countries have many straight borders, and that is not creative in any case. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • Contributions/Gone_Postal) 06:27, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- This would not be a solution to the issue of being a copyright violation under derivative works. The solution is to be honest about the source of this map, rather than evading this very basic question of copyright. --Fæ (talk) 09:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- If the user draws the map, then that is {{own}} by the very definition. If drawing something without copying another work is not own work, then nothing is own work. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • Contributions/Gone_Postal) 09:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- This map was copied. It is not a work of art displaying a fictional world seen in a dream.
- If you draw a recognizable cartoon of Mickey Mouse, it's a copyvio. The same rules apply to all derived works which happen to be called amateur drawings and claimed as own work.
- The solution here is to declare the source, rather than endlessly evading the question. --Fæ (talk) 09:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- That is patently false. If I draw a tree, I am not committing a copyright infringement on a tree. If I draw a sea shore, I am not comitting a copyright infringement on a sea shore. If I draw France, I am not committing copyright infringement on France. There is no copyright on facts. In fact you have it completely the other way around, if you draw a world that you have seen in your dream, that is the only time when that world has copyright infringement. Mickey Mouse has copyright only because there is no Mickey Mouse in the real world. I can make a fictional story with Donald Trump, I can make a fictional story with you in it, and that is not copyright infringement. Since this nomination clearly has no basis in copyright law,
I vote to. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • Contributions/Gone_Postal) 10:44, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
close it- Sure, you are absolutely correct. If you draw a tree, then nobody cares about copyright. However paintings of trees are copyrighted works.
- You cannot draw this map of the world, by yourself looking at the world from space.
- You would draw this map of the world by tracing a map of the world made by someone else.
- Maps are not all public domain. Most maps are all rights reserved or made available for non-commercial use. COM:L and COM:PRP are very clear. --Fæ (talk) 10:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Are you saying that in 21st century there are no photographs of earth from space? Are you really making that argument? And finally yes, if you trace another map, then maybe you are committing copyvio. Then you should jump at the opportunity to see how the map is drawn; but you say "This would not be a solution to the issue of being a copyright violation under derivative works", which is clearly not true, because that is the solution since then COM:DW does not apply as that is not a derivative work. See Commons:Derivative_works#What_is_a_derivative_work?. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • Contributions/Gone_Postal) 11:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Here's the big but, but the uploader who is writing on this page, has not said how exactly they created this map. If they used Google Earth, then it's a copyright violation.
- The solution here is to declare the source, rather than endlessly evading the question. --Fæ (talk) 11:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Are you saying that in 21st century there are no photographs of earth from space? Are you really making that argument? And finally yes, if you trace another map, then maybe you are committing copyvio. Then you should jump at the opportunity to see how the map is drawn; but you say "This would not be a solution to the issue of being a copyright violation under derivative works", which is clearly not true, because that is the solution since then COM:DW does not apply as that is not a derivative work. See Commons:Derivative_works#What_is_a_derivative_work?. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • Contributions/Gone_Postal) 11:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- That is patently false. If I draw a tree, I am not committing a copyright infringement on a tree. If I draw a sea shore, I am not comitting a copyright infringement on a sea shore. If I draw France, I am not committing copyright infringement on France. There is no copyright on facts. In fact you have it completely the other way around, if you draw a world that you have seen in your dream, that is the only time when that world has copyright infringement. Mickey Mouse has copyright only because there is no Mickey Mouse in the real world. I can make a fictional story with Donald Trump, I can make a fictional story with you in it, and that is not copyright infringement. Since this nomination clearly has no basis in copyright law,
- If the user draws the map, then that is {{own}} by the very definition. If drawing something without copying another work is not own work, then nothing is own work. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • Contributions/Gone_Postal) 09:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- This would not be a solution to the issue of being a copyright violation under derivative works. The solution is to be honest about the source of this map, rather than evading this very basic question of copyright. --Fæ (talk) 09:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
The maps I have made are not copies of Google earth, they are only inspired by its images. Google earth is based on US government institutions, such as NOAA and US Navy, which generate free images. Google earth images are very accurate, not only because they are based on satellite photos, but because they are represented three-dimensionally, in the sphere that is the Earth. My maps, like other maps, are two-dimensional, therefore they are unable to accurately represent reality. For example, the Pacific Ocean is very compressed, because in reality this ocean occupies almost half of the planet. My maps are far from the accuracy of Google earth. On a genetic map of native populations, it is not necessary to draw large oceans. For me it would have been very easy to copy another old image of commons, instead I preferred to make my own map to center it on the Pacific and placing the Americas on the right..--Maulucioni (talk) 12:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- I have realised that I have committed a fallacy fallacy when I have voted to close this DR. It is clear that it is not following correct logic, however, because the argument against something is false does not mean that the original is true. I would still appreciate it if we would have some evidence that the maps are created by a person without tracing some map, which can potentially have some creative elements in it (as I have said elsewhere map makers purposefully add false elements into their maps to get copyright protection. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • Contributions/Gone_Postal ListFiles/Gone_Postal) 12:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- As a confirmed derived work of Google Earth, which is not freely licensed (explicitly "non-commercial use"), the underpinning map is a known copyright violation even if the correct legally required attribution is added.
- As a reminder to readers; public domain and suitably freely licensed maps of the planet are available, such as Open Street Map. Maps of the planet are replaceable, and where doubt on sources exists should be removed. --Fæ (talk) 15:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: the user says that Google Earth wasn't used, it's own creation (and it is possible based on the user's contributions). If we do stick to the paradox proposed in the nomination, then no map can exist here at all: "if it is created by the uploader, it is an original research and has no educational value; if it is taken from somewhere, it is copyright". No valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 18:30, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
The problem with these pictures is twofold. First, pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. Second, there looks like little hope of getting permission from the copyright owner since the magazine is defunct. It is likely that these are thus out of scope for Commons, but they may be suitable for Wikipedia. New editors often confuse Wikipedia and Commons as being the same. They are very different with very different rules
- File:Mac II.jpg
- File:Streetsound Office.jpg
- File:Issue 73 Streetsound Magazine.jpg
- File:Issue -14 Streeetsound maagzine.jpg
Timtrent (talk) 19:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- in both cases i took the original photos, and i have them in my possession , these scans were created when i started working on the entry. Is there a way i can demonstrate that i have the photos? ( a photo of the photo>?). Additionally i was one of the publishers of the magazine at the time it ceased publication - and can be evidenced by my name in the masthead of the magazine. I also publish the archive site of the magazine (streetsoundmagaizne.com) and have received no claim from any party — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ctorella (talk • contribs) 20:19, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Ctorella: Please may I direct you to COM:OTRS through which evidence of copyright ownership may be furnished. The evidence required is precise. Timtrent (talk) 08:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
thank you i am in contact with them now...
Kept: marked by OTRS permission. --rubin16 (talk) 18:32, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Obsolete compared to File:China administrative claimed included.svg; not in use Geographyinitiative (talk) 17:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Sharper: I see you changed some details on this image recently. Let me know what you think of this deletion request for File:China administrative alt.svg. Geographyinitiative (talk) 23:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: superseded, I will place a redirect in case we have external linking. --rubin16 (talk) 18:33, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
NO Commercial use allowed- see https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/kathrine-switzer-photos?family=editorial&phrase=kathrine%20switzer%20photos&sort=mostpopular#license Tibet Nation (talk) 20:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--2409:4073:7:3150:C82A:FE86:F350:59D2 17:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: sometimes Getty posts pictures of others or even PD to earn money for them. It was uploaded on Flickr more than 9y ago, free licensed, and the account doesn't look like flickrwasher. --rubin16 (talk) 18:36, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
flicker washing. Flicker page gives pinterest as the nominal source with other things in the series being sourced to reddit. In reality image is getty or AP Geni (talk) 16:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Versions of this photo certainly appear in newspapers of the time, so it is likely we could {{PD-US-no notice}} a version of this, but such a version would be lower quality. Looks like the original photos were AP/UPI. Harrias (talk) 21:18, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The poster is copyrightable. Sure, there is text all over, but the black background also has an abstract drawing of a dying person. Furthermore, there have been written messages and signatures around the wall near the poster (strictly on white sheet surrounding the poster). COM:TOO Hong Kong would consider it copyrightable, and COM:FOP Hong Kong would not give posters FOP. I also believe that US copyright may also apply. George Ho (talk) 21:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nominator. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:36, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}