Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/09/16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 16th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover. Fair use only, should be uploaded locally rather than on Commons. Lentokonefani (talk) 08:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Piziski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo on ar.wp.

Minoraxtalk 05:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@علاء: Kindly check. Thanks. --Minoraxtalk 05:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Minorax: Deleted and blocked on arwiki, then locked globally as spam-only account. Also deleted on commons. Thanks --Alaa :)..! 11:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Content created as advertisement (G10). --Alaa :)..! 11:05, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation GPL93 (talk) 03:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license, but how else to licence derived OTRS-images? Also see, File:Hereplein - luchtfoto.png. (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Hardscarf (talk) 06:19, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: License added. @Hardscarf: You should copy the license template from the source image, just like any other derivative work. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:32, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used for self promo on en.wp Minoraxtalk 11:52, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Nat at 00:46, 17 September 2020 UTC: CSD F10: Out of project scope --Krdbot 08:48, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kd.thienluan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Google Maps is not free enough for commons.

Minoraxtalk 15:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as not own work by uploader, copyright-holder does not allow commercial use and likely uploaded w promotional intent. --Túrelio (talk) 09:31, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kd.thienluan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violation; Google maps is not free enough for commons.

Minoraxtalk 09:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as not own work by uploader, copyright-holder does not allow commercial use and likely uploaded w promotional intent. --Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 06:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. F10. --Minoraxtalk 13:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of the source files was deleted today by Gbawden as copyright violation, making the whole collage copyright violation as well. Taivo (talk) 08:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Foxy1219: Thank you! But I discovered another problem. The collage consists file:Ethiopia 2012 African Union, new HQ (6972190151).jpg, which I nominated for deletion as copyright violation due to missing freedom of panorama in Ethiopia. For example, photo about lion sculpture is free, because copyright of lion sculpture has expired. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo: : OK, I replaced the photo which was nominated for deletion. Foxy1219 (talk) 03:47, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is not what I thought. The whole building is protected with copyright and all photos about it are copyrighted. I nominated file:African Union Conference Centre (18167970401).jpg for deletion as well. Taivo (talk) 09:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo: : Thanks for reminding this. I removed the photo of African Union Building, and replaced with File:Addis abeba, cattedrale di san giorgio, esterno 05.jpg (St. George's Cathedral), I hope this time will be OK. --Foxy1219 (talk) 02:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, now I can withdraw the request. But I'll  delete two first versions due to copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dbautista31 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No source/permission.

Minoraxtalk 14:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dbautista31 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No source/permission

Minoraxtalk 05:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Meena Lal Sahu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk 11:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:08, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 07:11, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scene from movie, not their own work, no permission  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 05:13, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vide Max 3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk 05:37, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:11, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Utkarsh Aditya Singh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a personal photo album. Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk 05:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:12, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lauren at the Council (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Claimed as own work but clearly historical photos

Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:14, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

İt has not written well Mirçingiz humane (talk) 09:02, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Landryiscute (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promo on en.wp

Minoraxtalk 09:23, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:16, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xpostaci (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, One looks like a scan based on the grainyness - not sure about scope either

Gbawden (talk) 10:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jastro1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication if the software is free - COM:SS applies

Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aupamalik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

None of these are own work as claimed

Gbawden (talk) 10:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:29, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Psyfreak1111 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No permission.

Minoraxtalk 11:46, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fidaa noon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly used for promo on en.wp. Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk 11:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MASAIDIE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk 11:51, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. Minoraxtalk 11:56, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. Minoraxtalk 11:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. Minoraxtalk 11:58, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. Minoraxtalk 11:59, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Webeecho143 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Music covers, probably still copyrighted by the image designers, photographers, or music publishers (who generally hold copyrights to music covers).

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 12:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MissTransGlobal 1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No one knows who's behind the account. Permission via OTRS preferred.

Minoraxtalk 12:23, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment To closing admin, permission is available at [1]. --Minoraxtalk 14:46, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Minorax. I added the permission link to the file descriptions for future reference. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MissTransGlobal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Picture commissioned for Miss Trans Global by Susan ObehiNoiɾ, Anis Amanina and other photographers. We need VRT to confirm this permission

Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gbawden Hello dear, I personally commissioned these images, I was with Susan on the 02 September, 2024, as we took the pictures, there are image evidence on my social media pages. I can supply the image evidence. We always commission images not published anywhere first but on our social media pages to raise awareness about transgender and LGBT issues around the world.[2]https://misstransglobal.com/permission-to-use-our-content/ You can also refer to our official website to see Miss Trans Global which I founded, giving anyone freedom to use all images in good faith, for educational purpose, articles, LGBTIQ, pageantry, activism, and transgender awareness. MissTransGlobal (talk) 13:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MissTransGlobal i have withdrawn my nomination. In future when you upload files please add the permission link in the permission field for easy reference. I have added this for you Gbawden (talk) 06:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I think since that user is a beauty pageant organization, I think you should be do a file permission link like a previous nomination because they organized for them for four years since then, and should do it to every files that they're uploaded from them. The file permission is available at [3]. And should be follows per Commons:Licensing. Apipattana (talk) 02:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination Gbawden (talk) 06:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gbawden Thank you so much.MissTransGlobal (talk) 21:33, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on en.wp. Page tagged for deletion. Minoraxtalk 12:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mrssr0011 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎.

~Moheen (keep talking) 12:37, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 12:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 12:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk 12:43, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT (photographer's logo over photo) Fgnievinski (talk) 14:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: That logo can be cropped out, assuming the own work claim is valid. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on en.wp Minoraxtalk 14:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Attaremad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by سینا کلهر (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 05:10, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotion of non relevant person 94.62.110.84 16:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Undocumented claim of being self work and out of context photo. Pierre cb (talk) 16:32, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1939 photos are not own work. Real author and better license are needed. If the photo is previously published, then publication data also. Taivo (talk) 16:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio based on its appearance in other searches Only (talk) 16:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FAHADChughtai123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation

Timtrent (talk) 16:52, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says: 2001 SNOWBOUND, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED GeorgHHtalk   16:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File page without file. /Leonel Sohns 17:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from Pexels published after July 5, 2018 are incompatible with Commons as there are restrictions on commercial use, and are not licensed CC-Zero.

Ytoyoda (talk) 18:11, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cinthiagutierrez91 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope. promo image

MiguelAlanCS (talk) 18:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Celesgirl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

MiguelAlanCS (talk) 18:29, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sumaq Illariy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

promo images. out of scope

MiguelAlanCS (talk) 18:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promo images, out of scope

MiguelAlanCS (talk) 18:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 18:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

droit d'auteur 83.200.101.206 18:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rnagfn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images uploaded to Pexels after the site converted its license from CC-Zero to a more restrictive proprietary one.

Ytoyoda (talk) 19:19, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:31, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crop of a photo that appeared in this tweet: https://twitter.com/ChouhanShivraj/status/1299986065239887872. Unlikely that the stated source owns the rights to the image. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:25, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of screenshot with unknown copyright status. Taivo (talk) 19:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violations Sakhalinio (talk) 19:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Royal Sondashi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

More of the same, derivative works of photographs and out of scope based on the text.

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:37, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File taken from Getty Images, which does not have a Creative Commons license. TaurusEmerald (talk) 19:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not 100 years since publciation - 1955 publication date ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Swapped to PD-US-not renewed, as before 1963. -- (talk) 07:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most probably a screenshot from some video. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:32, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most probably a screenshot from some video. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 22:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is my work and the individual that is in the picture asked me to remove it for personal reasons. Nima250 (talk) 22:45, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is listed as being published by Getty Images and thus is not free use. Kirbanzo (talk) 23:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 23:52, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a picture that I took of my father. He has also given me permission to post this picture on Wikipedia. Nima250


Kept: Keep for now. Can't find it elsewhere and it is in scope. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obviously not actually own work PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:45, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful to be own work PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:46, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; scanned photo. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS has been pending for nearly a month. No evidence photo has been released under a free license.  — Tartan357  (Talk) 02:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS has been pending for nearly a month. No evidence photo has been released under a free license.  — Tartan357  (Talk) 02:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS has been pending for nearly a month. No evidence photo has been released under a free license.  — Tartan357  (Talk) 02:23, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS has been pending for nearly a month. No evidence photo has been released under a free license.  — Tartan357  (Talk) 02:23, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful Fixpol (talk) 13:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per TwoWings. Green Giant (talk) 15:34, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused unnecessary crop E4024 (talk) 02:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without camera EXIF; dubious "own work" by an occasional visitor. E4024 (talk) 03:14, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of (File:Abu Zayd al-Hilali.jpg) TheseusHeLl (talk) 04:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Processed as a duplicate as INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Logo EverlearnerBeast (talk) 04:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image, no evident usage, no clear educational purpose  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

would appear to have design element so should ideally have permissions if it is representing an organisation  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:27, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake আমিৰ হামজা (talk) 07:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kidsrock91

[edit]

Fantasy diagrams. Out of scope. --Slashme (talk) 07:54, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Bulgaria A1Cafel (talk) 09:06, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from Tropical Tidbits are copyrighted, per Copyright © 2012-2020 Tropical Tidbits, All Rights Reserved A1Cafel (talk) 09:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Bulgaria A1Cafel (talk) 09:18, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo on es.wp Minoraxtalk 09:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CarlosVallado (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo on es.wp & wikidata.

Minoraxtalk 09:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quakewoody: Reuploaded. --Minoraxtalk 14:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free television screenshot GeorgHHtalk   10:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 10:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 10:51, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work claimed, but description credits the actual photographer, thus no proof of free license. Lentokonefani (talk) 10:56, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_User:Mr_167 189.144.190.106 11:05, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious claim of free license Horus (talk) 11:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - https://www.wallstars.se/tavlor/13154-amboy-route-66-poster.html explicitly states copyright Tournesol (talk) 11:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CordeliaMonsu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Works of artists who are still alive, autorization needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr

Shev123 (talk) 11:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fado Kodo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk 11:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 11:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 11:54, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joram Mal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk 11:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ABABABABABAAAA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk 11:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the subject's LinkedIn photo: https://www.linkedin.com/in/campbell-hill/, incredibly low-res. No evidence of permission. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wiki Comms Community - I have been given permission to use images from his website etc., but the consent does not meet Wikimedia Commons legal requirements. Will re-seek formal consent and, due to the free license, double-check the image/s I can use. --Goldfinchshuffle (talk) 13:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then why do you claim "own work", when it is not? --Túrelio (talk) 07:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedy|subject does not own copyright to image}} have contacted the subject who has confirmed he does not own the copyright to this image --Goldfinchshuffle (talk) 07:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; needs permission from the person who took the photo, not the person in the photo!. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-res personal photos that appear to be screenshots. Uploader's previous contributions have been deleted. No evidence that these are freely licensed.

Ytoyoda (talk) 13:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 14:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in unapproved draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in unapproved draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

version perimee et remplacee Migo47 (talk) 17:00, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

version perimee et remplacee Migo47 (talk) 17:00, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

version perimee et remplacee Migo47 (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

version perimee et remplacee Migo47 (talk) 17:02, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment You tell us (four times) that the file has been replaced, but I do not find the replacement on wikipedia-commons. Please add category flag "Category:Citroën Type C 5HP" and "Category:1924 Citroën automobiles" (between "" and "") to the replacement file which (I infer) you have uploaded ... somewhere.

Si j'ai suffisant compris, tu écrits que tu viens de remplacer le fichier. Bon. Mais je n'ai pas pu trouver chez wiki-commons le fichier nouveau que tu nous as fourni n'importe où. Alors, pourras tu ajouter au nouveau fichier les catégories "Category:Citroën Type C 5HP" and "Category:1924 Citroën automobiles" (entre "" et "") afin que nour pourrions comparer les deux?

Merci d'avance and thank you. Be well / sois en bonne santé. Charles01 (talk) 19:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Français : No Freedom of Panorama in France. Church built in 1958, less than 70 years ago, not yet in Public Domain.
English: Pas de liberté de panorama en France. Église construite en 1958, il y a moins de 70 ans, pas encore dans le domaine public.

VIGNERON (talk) 14:19, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Français : No Freedom of Panorama in France. Church built in 1958, less than 70 years ago, and architect is Guillaume Gillet (died 1987) not yet in Public Domain.
English: Pas de liberté de panorama en France. Église construite en 1958, il y a moins de 70 ans, et l'architecte est Guillaume Gillet (en 1987) pas encore dans le domaine public.

See also/voir aussi :


VIGNERON (talk) 09:27, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 11:40, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Minorax, I know you are an admin and have to cope with the backlog in DRs. I wish you energy and patience. Therefore, with more reason you should -IMHO- just mark this kind of files with an SDF10. Would it not be better? With all the due respect... --E4024 (talk) 02:33, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@E4024: File seems to be a little too old for speedy IMO. --Minoraxtalk 13:54, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blank file. Not used. Out of scope. Minoraxtalk 11:43, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 11:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a derivative work of the MCU Infinity Gauntlet. Pretty sure the original work is copyrighted. Chess (User talk:Chess) Please ping when replying. 02:06, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- clothing, even very fancy clothing, is considered utilitarian and therefore does not have a copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:23, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, no permission. Minoraxtalk 12:56, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brand visible, suspected covered advertising 217.92.177.21 13:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I think you mean "covert", but we have many similar images where a brand name is visible, without comment. Incidental, so not advertising. Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept per Rodhullandemu. --Minoraxtalk 12:29, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sunnyday2020pinetree (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foto sfuocata e bassa qualita'. Tremej (talk) 20:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 09:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all contributions of Jekky1 (talk · contribs) due to same reason. They are used only in ru.wiki article, which is nominated for deletion. Taivo (talk) 08:26, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A separated Barbie doll head on a stick. Copyright issues per COM:TOYS, but I also wonder about the "realistically useful for an educational purpose" part of COM:SCOPE. El Grafo (talk) 13:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 18:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

通常(毎回)通りアップロードしましたが、写真の下の部分が余白(グレー)が発生しております。 Gohachiyasu1214 (talk) 12:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedied as F7 (File is empty, corrupt, or in a disallowed format). --Yasu (talk) 15:12, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violations and non-free images: these are all simple pictures of Bank of England notes of designs first issued in 1971 or later (see https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/banknotes/withdrawn-banknotes for dates of introduction), meaning that they're unambiguously still in copyright. Some of them may be being used within the Bank's conditions, but those conditions are not generous enough to constitute a free licence.

bjh21 (talk) 14:51, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:29, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violations. All of these are straightforward pictures of Northern Ireland or Scottish banknotes issued since 1950. These are issued by commercial banks and as far as I can see none of those banks has licensed them under a free licence.

bjh21 (talk) 15:44, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:08, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR UK

Ox1997cow (talk) 09:08, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: These are all current banknotes of the Bank of England, which doesn't permit their use under a free licence. --bjh21 (talk) 10:26, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are Bank of England Emergency Wartime Issue notes as shown on https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/banknotes/withdrawn-banknotes. According to that page, they were designed by "W M Keesey and others". Walter Monckton Keesey died in 1970, so these notes won't enter the public domain until 2041 at the earliest. The Wikipedia article on him mentions only that he designed the reverse of these notes, but its source for that is the Bank of England page linked above, and that page doesn't have any such restriction, so I think under COM:PRP we should assume that both sides of the notes are in copyright.

bjh21 (talk) 11:33, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    • As I understand copyright to the images of banknotes belongs to bank, not to creator. And bank made it free/public domain. Even if I`m wrong File:10 Sh 1940 E.jpg and File:Ł1 1940 E.jpg are obverse, not reverse of banknote, to whom Walter Monckton Keesey had no relation at all. --Ibidem (talk) 12:53, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      I agree that the copyright belongs to the bank. The date of death of the author is only relevant for working out the length of copyright. The problem is that the bank hasn't, as far as I know, granted a free licence for the use of these notes. The bank does grant a licence on https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/banknotes/using-images-of-banknotes, but it's not a free licence by Commons' standards because it requires marking with "SPECIMEN", and requires that reproductions not appear in an "inappropriate context". On the authorship point, what evidence do we have that Keesey only designed the backs of the notes? The Wikipedia article on him claims this, but it cites a Bank of England Web page that says "Design: W M Keesey and others", making no distinction between the sides. --bjh21 (talk) 16:01, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:41, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation Timtrent (talk) 15:40, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:25, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination+anyway for me it is an obvious photomontage, therefore several free sources are needed. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:22, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope promotional material. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:16, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lilotel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks

  • File:Formula of Sorrow (1).jpg
  • File:Formula of Sorrow (2).jpg
  • File:Formula of Sorrow (3).jpg
    • Тут есть мое разрешение и разрешение OTRS единственного наследника Вадима Сидура — Дмитрия Сидура. Александр Позин выполнил не художественную, а техническую работу. Он просто увеличил статую в размере (поскольку сам Сидур к тому времени умер). А значит его вклад не защищён авторским правом. Таким образом, нам надо решить является ли вклад Бориса Бейдера защищённым авторским правом, или он подпадает под понятие минимализма --Lilotel (talk) 12:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • File:Formula of Sorrow (5).jpg
    • Тут есть мое разрешение и разрешение OTRS единственного наследника Вадима Сидура Дмитрия Сидура. Поскольку тут нету изображение вклада Бориса Бейдера (архитектурного решения памятника), то файл является свободным --Lilotel (talk) 10:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • File:Formula of Sorrow (4).jpg

Dogad75 (talk) 09:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS permission was added. --A.Savin 17:48, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Random photo from internet Dcaroest (talk) 18:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Krd at 14:56, 21 Oktober 2020 UTC: created by abuser --Krdbot 20:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake NBTFTV 2 (talk) 01:56, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, G7. --Túrelio (talk) 14:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense licensing tag. What is the copyright status of the work on the origin country (most probbaly in Iran)? 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:01, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:28, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obviously not truly own work PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:02, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence of licence claimed PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:03, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused unnecessary crop. E4024 (talk) 02:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:04, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Person in photo requested to be deleted DollVixen (talk) 03:19, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:04, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation GPL93 (talk) 03:31, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced and no-license image. The uploader claims that its his work, but it look like it was copied from another website. TheseusHeLl (talk) 04:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:06, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced and no-license image. The image looks old, but the uploader claims that its his work. TheseusHeLl (talk) 04:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:06, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image was copied from (Maroc: Une fauconnerie de plus de 10 siècles menacée) TheseusHeLl (talk) 04:29, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:08, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from the thumbnail of this 2009 youtube video ([5]) TheseusHeLl (talk) 04:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:08, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced and no-license image. The uploader claims that its his work, but it look like it was copied from a french book. TheseusHeLl (talk) 04:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:08, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from this blog ([6]) TheseusHeLl (talk) 04:50, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:08, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry EverlearnerBeast (talk) 04:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused crop. --P 1 9 9   02:18, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poster from movie, not their own work, no permission  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:17, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

shows kashmir as part of pakistan 73.223.220.26 07:04, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The file is in use on en:Outline of Pakistan. Commons' policy, expressed in COM:NPOV is that we keep files that are used on other projects even if they're inaccurate. Moreover, this map labels Kashmir as "disputed territory", which seems correct to me. --bjh21 (talk) 12:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   02:19, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Addiesalter (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like unused personal images of a wannabe celebrity. A Google search for "Addie Salter" does not suggest that she would be noteworthy enough to be mentioned in Wikipedia or any other siter project. The young man in the first picture appears to be en:Aiden Flowers. But since the uploader appears in the image herself, claims of authorship seem dubious. The second picture is of terrible quality and unlikely to be used anywhere.

El Grafo (talk) 10:32, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license. (No license since) . Uploader added {{PD-self}} later. But thats definitly not PD-self, because its not own work. JuTa 10:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from the Pepperdine Graphi - needs permission. And scope? Gbawden (talk) 10:45, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:23, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I misunderstood Japanese copyright law. I thought the copyright on the photo would expire 50 or 70 years after it was taken, but it was 50 or 70 years after it was published or after the copyright holder died. The photo was released only recently, and the copyright owner had only been dead for about 40 years, so it isn't in the public domain. Kochizufan (talk) 10:46, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:31, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1988 photo, not own work Gbawden (talk) 10:56, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:24, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text only file, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   11:37, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:24, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Parcequ il;porte atteinte á mon image ! Je n aime cette photo de moi 2A01:E35:2FDC:8FB0:7437:33CC:12D1:E2BA 13:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. In use. --P 1 9 9   02:25, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another separated Barbie doll head on some kind of metal rod. Copyright issues per COM:TOYS, but I also wonder about the "realistically useful for an educational purpose" part of COM:SCOPE. El Grafo (talk) 13:25, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@El Grafo: What do you mean by "Another"?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:27, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: Nothing in particular, just the second one I nominated in a row: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Barbed Barbie.jpg. --El Grafo (talk) 09:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:32, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright issues per COM:TOYS. El Grafo (talk) 13:27, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:33, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:59, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:33, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded the file, but now I believe that the video stream may be using copyrighted footage. I have extracted the audio and uploaded it separately. This file can potentially be deleted and undeleted at an appropriate date. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 17:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   02:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without camera EXIF; dubious "own work" by an occasional visitor whose talk page shows other issues. E4024 (talk) 03:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:47, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without camera EXIF; dubious "own work" by an occasional visitor. E4024 (talk) 03:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:47, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - https://www.wallstars.se/tavlor/10307-vastgotska-poster.html explicitly claims copyright Tournesol (talk) 11:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:45, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - https://www.wallstars.se/tavlor/11051-the-beverly-hills-hotel-poster.html explicitly claims copyright Tournesol (talk) 11:18, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:44, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claim of own work is dubious. The same image was posted on this blog on 2013 June 26, years before the ,upload to Commons. Thgis page has many more images which are clearly from the same photoshoot. Whpq (talk) 13:08, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:44, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Credited to Ray Giubilo, not sure if this is the uploader Ytoyoda (talk) 13:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was not the uploader. Please delete this jpg, as it may be copyright infringement. Thanks!


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Twitter profile pic for subject: https://twitter.com/paralympicblade. Previously published photos require OTRS verification. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wiki Comms Community - I have been given permission to use images from his website and social media accounts, but the consent does not meet Wikimedia Commons legal requirements. Will re-seek formal consent and double-check the image/s I can use.--Goldfinchshuffle (talk) 13:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then why do you claim "own work", when it is not? --Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was published at https://www.matcampbellhill.com/post/it-s-not-what-happens-to-you-but-how-you-react-to-it-that-matters-epictetus at a higher resolution. Previously published photos require COM:OTRS verification. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wiki Comms Community - I have been given permission to use images from his website etc., but the consent does not meet Wikimedia Commons legal requirements. Will re-seek formal consent and, due to the free license, double-check the image/s I can upload.--Goldfinchshuffle (talk) 13:55, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedy|subject does not own copyright to this image}} Have contacted the subject who has now confirmed he does not own the copyright to this image --Goldfinchshuffle (talk) 07:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/lifestyle/article/aerosolshield-nhs Ytoyoda (talk) 13:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wiki Comms Community - I have been given permission to use images from his website, including this one. However, the consent does not meet Wikimedia Commons legal requirements. Will re-seek formal consent and, due to the free license, double-check the image/s I can use.--Goldfinchshuffle (talk) 13:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then why do you claim "own work", when it is not? --Túrelio (talk) 07:43, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedy|subject does not own copyright to image}} have contacted the subject who has confirmed he does not own the copyright to this image --Goldfinchshuffle (talk) 07:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:42, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lizenz nicht glaubwürdig, Scan aus Buch/Zeitschrift Felix Talk! 13:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:42, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not mere text. The word "Mulan" has several artistic elements that can easily be considered copyrighted. 187.236.94.23 19:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:40, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marcia Beatriz Einsfeld (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pexels images uploaded after the site went from a CC-Zero to a restrictive proprietary license.

Ytoyoda (talk) 19:43, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Pill 1.jpg, File:Pill 2.jpg and File:Pill 3.jpg as they are published on Pexels before July 2018.  Delete the rest per nom. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most per nomination (see Commons:Bad sources#Pexels.com). Kept 3 images per above. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong color Code Olympia-Verlag (talk) 07:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is uploader's request and courtesy deletion is possible, but there's two obstacles. At first, Commons has no substitute image. At second, the file is still used. Taivo (talk) 13:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, now Commons has substitute image, but the file is still used. Taivo (talk) 20:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"The Greatson of M.K.Atatürk Aplicant Cadidate President of Turkish Republic" is false and cannot be accepted. This is a mock on a national hero. E4024 (talk) 15:25, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Unless this claim is being used to commit copyvio, I say have some sense of humour. After all I am a greatest of children of Barak Obama and Winnie the Poo. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 16:43, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete, taking into account the overall picture, as this account has no further contributions to Commons or any other project (1 upload was deleted as copyvio) since it was created 5 months ago. --Túrelio (talk) 07:58, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: user page of non-contributer. --JuTa 13:15, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without camera EXIF, dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 01:43, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Not finding it on google images - claim of own work might be valid Gbawden (talk) 09:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Of course; I also have small files w/o EXIF. File:Հակոբ Հակոբյան-Ինտելեկտուալ Ռենեսանս հիմնադրամ.JPG, also uploaded by this user, has EXIF and is almost 7 GB large; therefore out of suspicion. However other two files by the same occasional visitor are small and do not have camera EXIF, check these two please: File:Սուրբ Նարեկ մատուռ.jpg and File:Սուրբ Նարեկ մատուռը հակառակ կողմից.jpg. OTOH, File:Մարդկային գործոն-Լոգո.jpg is certainly not an own work, but presented as such. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 14:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. I scrutinized all the uploads, none found on Google images. But the deleted the obvious copyvio screenshot. --P 1 9 9   13:41, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious copyright claim. variation of award banner as seen on https://doylesguide.com/ranking-recognition/ Robertsky (talk) 03:32, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The one uploaded was without watermark - hence not dubious. As seen here: https://doylesguide.com/leading-criminal-lawyers-singapore-2020/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheFallible (talk • contribs) 00:39, 16 September 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused trivial logo, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   13:34, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

used on article, so either taken from work and a copyright violation; alternatively this is user creation and not part of a WP article  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:31, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry EverlearnerBeast (talk) 04:56, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: sufficient quality, no alternative available. --P 1 9 9   13:28, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is uploaders only photo. It is own work and PD-art. I wonder if the intent was to add PD-self. Since there is a license then adding a nld would not be correct. So I made this DR. MGA73 (talk) 10:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP (confusing license). No loss: many alternatives available, including some from the same angle. --P 1 9 9   13:47, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Owner Calvin Cropley request for removal of this image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Unexpected_Smile.jpg and Calvincropley (talk) 13:15, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I see no valid reason. The photo was published on cc-by-2.0 licence and the fact was checked by the bot. Electron   20:22, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:16, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed. Request sent by me, Author Calvin Cropley is the owner to this Image. Calvincropley (talk) 12:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC) No longer needed. I Calvin Cropley, Author of this content holds the Full Copyright to this. Request to be removed. Calvincropley (talk) 12:59, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep But can be used in the future. I see no valid reason. The photo was published on cc-by-2.0 licence and the fact was checked by the bot. Electron   08:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Electron. --P 1 9 9   13:20, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ower would like this removed image deleted, as the person photographed in the image does not need this. Owner Calvin Cropley does not wish to have image listed and believes Creative Commons was mistakenly added via post. 2001:8004:5120:25E7:1833:A46D:BAD1:7B11 08:46, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Please read above. Still not a valid reason given. --PaterMcFly (talk) 12:39, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 11:06, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed. I Calvin Cropley, Author of this content holds the Full Copyright to this. Request to be removed. Calvincropley (talk) 12:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No longer needed. I Calvin Cropley, Author of this content holds the Full Copyright to this. Request to be removed. Calvincropley (talk) 12:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No longer needed. I Calvin Cropley, Author of this content holds the Full Copyright to this. Request to be removed. Calvincropley (talk) 12:58, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9   13:23, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed. I Calvin Cropley, Author of this content holds the Full Copyright to this. Request to be removed. Calvincropley (talk) 12:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No longer needed. I Calvin Cropley, Author of this content holds the Full Copyright to this. Request to be removed. Calvincropley (talk) 13:00, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9   13:26, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

version perimee et remplacee Migo47 (talk) 17:02, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: replaced with what? No equivalent found. --P 1 9 9   13:18, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

version perimee et remplacee Migo47 (talk) 17:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: replaced with what? No equivalent found. --P 1 9 9   13:19, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}} removed by original uploader RomanHild (talk · contribs) without comment. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:02, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: insufficient reason for deletion, and license is irrevocable. --P 1 9 9   13:06, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Attribution doubts. Low resolution. Probably copyvio 80.181.228.144 06:52, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Afghanistan? It seem to be on the sea, but Afghanistan is totally landlocked, no sea, it's a mountainous country, the photo is clearly a fake. 79.51.30.220 06:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & precautionary principle. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof that this is an image from NOAA A1Cafel (talk) 09:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Image is from 2010, eleven years ago the source was available, it is not now. We cannot delete every photo because the source (in this case NOAA via a newspaper) has vanished. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in France. Per fr:Phare de l'Armandèche, this is 1968 building and the photo violates architect's copyright. Architect fr:Maurice Durand died in 1978 and the photo can be restored after copyright expiration in 2049 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 16:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Since the publisher of that image is known (A. Nieps), is the author really anonymous? I would compare it to an AP or Reuters photograph without the name of the photograph on it. Le Petit Chat (talk) 18:37, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Image has name of photographer, date seems to be old enough, no valid reason. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung, laut Lizenz ist der Urheber Joram Harel Management, das auch der Hochlader ist. Da ein Managment keine natürliche Person ist, kann diese nicht der Urheber (sprich:Fotograf) sein. Außerdem steht in der Bildbeschreibung im deutschen Artikel eine andere Person als Urheber Lutheraner (talk) 12:59, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


deleted per nomination, the EXIF data are showing the name of the photographer, who probably holds the copyright. Permission should be sought, but uploader did not respond. Elly (talk) 20:53, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File claimed to pd-Russia with an unknown author -for this to be applicable it would have to be published pre 1946 at the latest. However, the only source given is a website, which states that the entry is based on a 1995 article - there is no evidence of where or when it was first published, and as it is a photo of a prototype fighter aircraft that did not enter production, it may not have been published at the time. Nigel Ish (talk) 16:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The caption says Summer 1941 which fits the existence of this aircraft? Nimbus227 (talk) 18:32, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
When the photo was taken isn't the issue - whether the photo is pd depends on when it was published - and it is unlikely that the Soviet Union would have published photos of a brand new prototype of a secret military aircraft on the eve of the German invasion. This may have sat in an archive somewhere until well after the end of the Second World War. To keep this photo on Commons we need to convince ourselves that the photograph was published prior to 1 January 1946.Nigel Ish (talk) 20:19, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and following discussion. Elly (talk) 09:04, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JBW as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It seems extremely unlikely that the uploader personally owns the copyright to this party logo, as they claim. (Incidentally, I am not sure that the logo of a political party in in scope for Commons.)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion whether depicted logo is above TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:19, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The restoration work is done by me. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 05:46, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 16:58, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chi ha pubblicato l'immagine non è il vero autore ma un impostore e ladro di diritti chiedo l'immediata rimozione in quanto vero autore del disegno. 93.34.127.47 13:54, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 16:59, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is sourced to http://jaskiniepolski.pgi.gov.pl/Details/Information/496 (the third button on the bottom row), where it is attributed to Recielski Krzysztof with a date of 2019-08-19. It is licensed {{Attribution}} based on https://www.pgi.gov.pl/korzystanie-z-serwisu.html. The license and source information was removed from the file by Jkucmierz (talk · contribs), replaced with a link to http://speleofoto.pl. This image also appears on that website here, with a date of 2015-05-27. Neither website is archived, and http://speleofoto.pl contains no indication of a free license. 5.173.41.132 19:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Now, the image is attributed in the same location to "Kućmierz Jan". There is no reason to doubt the license while the image is still available at the same location under the same terms (only its attribution was changed/fixed there). Ankry (talk) 09:16, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, yes, but the issue is if the Institute has the rights to release this picture, as it was used by them without author's agreement. Polimerek (talk) 10:23, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Then we should doubt licensing of all images from this site if their declaration is unreliable. Ankry (talk) 13:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep There is no reason to complicate the matter. Let's trust the Institute. Regards Henry39 (talk) 06:49, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 16:59, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]