Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/07/11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 11th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Impersonator YAMLAPLEASUNBANMWIAMCUTER (talk) 01:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shitty image YAMLAPLEASUNBANMWIAMCUTER (talk) 01:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suck m dick YAMLAPLEASUNBANMWIAMCUTER (talk) 01:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:30, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is mostly a Tree YAMLAPLEASUNBANMWIAMCUTER (talk) 01:23, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:30, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shit my pants YAMLAPLEASUNBANMWIAMCUTER (talk) 01:24, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:30, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fuck you adloft YAMLAPLEASUNBANMWIAMCUTER (talk) 01:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shitty image Bitch YAMLAPLEASUNBANMWIAMCUTER (talk) 01:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: vandalism. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:30, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

YOU COWARD YAMLAPLEASUNBANMWIAMCUTER (talk) 01:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: vandalism. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain : vandalism is the intention to delete the page without any reason or the content of the picture? ShaulaH (talk) 05:05, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 79.183.51.147 05:04, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Available on the web, probably copyright image C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 01:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:30, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Оскільки Селфі, Розмито Annivi333 (talk) 23:34, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Usual nonsense request by Android app user. --Achim (talk) 08:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is only a draft of my own work. OBGK1918 (talk) 08:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 10:15, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD0f000771010000be030000c0070000800800006d090000130c00006611000041120000 E4024 (talk) 04:14, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I opened this DR by mistake. Facebook files are considered CR'ed and our DRs are quite backlogged. Therefore I marked the file for SD and as soon as it is deleted I will close this DR not to add to the existing work load of deletion admins. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 04:24, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All four images were uploaded by BotMultichillT which apparently mistook still-copyrighted paintings by a living artist named John Byrne for that by another artist of the same name who painted in the 19th-century.

ミラP 05:00, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Miraclepine: thanks for flagging this. This occasionally happens when we have a mix up of people on Wikidata. Will clean up on Wikidata and delete the files here. Multichill (talk) 14:43, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Multichill: Already done by me. ミラP 15:12, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NMLKPOOJGHIIIIUNMUKUUJU1JIJNJGHI JJGUOOPOUY88UUTJJRHUHBNJO9TOJGJJJH 2001:D08:D5:5B49:5883:81A:73E1:CA1D 13:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 14:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'd had to delete this page through;

I had deleted this page, and there is a warning; block 180.191.95.189 13:18, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: You're welcome. --Achim (talk) 14:32, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

user already uploaded copyrighted images as own work. I don't think this image is own work Yilku1 (talk) 00:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Billinghurst at 01:52, 11 Juli 2020 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lisos tradicionales de amber lager, rubia lager y stout.jpg: user already uploaded copyrighted images as own work. I don't think this image is own work --Krdbot 20:46, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Joshgwa

[edit]

Fantasy diagrams: out of project scope. --Slashme (talk) 15:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedied as nonsense / external hosting. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fantasy diagram, out of project scope Slashme (talk) 15:50, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:35, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Peterha2002.au

[edit]

Fantasy diagrams, out of project scope. --Slashme (talk) 16:06, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:36, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hunter316316

[edit]

Not diagrams of real-world or notable fictional bodies. Out of scope. --Slashme (talk) 16:13, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Okayliberal

[edit]

Test files. Out of scope. --Slashme (talk) 16:38, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:41, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Keeps adding porn pictures to Hagia Sophia map 81.224.211.18 16:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Already blocked, deletion is not the right way to deal with vandals. --King of ♥ 21:00, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty category; content moved to Category:Teams of Rosario Central. - Fma12 (talk) 14:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 03:43, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Duplicate|Piramīdas_Greiļu_kalnā_-_panoramio_(1).jpg|later upload}} Dāvis Kļaviņš (talk) 18:18, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:48, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google Images and Tineye has lots of hits on this image -- seems like it's a template image with the central text being customizable. For example, here. The original source is unclear, so we would need to know where the base image came from, and COM:OTRS copyright permission from the owner. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:17, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Billinghurst at 01:28, 12 Juli 2020 UTC: Content created as advertisement (G10): Commons:Deletion requests/File:BW GROUP.png: Google Images and Tineye has lots of hits on this image -- seems like it's a template image with the central text being customizable. For example, here. The original source is unclear, so we would need to know where the base image came from, and [[COM:OTRS]... --Krdbot 08:45, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MLVIVEK22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in vanity Wikidata item.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors). --Wdwd (talk) 13:26, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: advertisement of questionable notability. Used in self-promotional draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Promotional content. Out of Scope --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 05:48, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as clearly oos. --Túrelio (talk) 19:20, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation https://www.soltecpumps.com/en/products/bt-pumps/ 178.76.210.46 20:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 20:06, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tri Sulis Tiyani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:04, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tri Sulis Tiyani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:04, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tri Sulis Tiyani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF and many small resolutions of the image uploaded by the user who give the author section that the pic is his/hers. CC: @Sealle and other admins.

Labdajiwa (talk) 05:41, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked User:Tri Sulis Tiyani for 1 year because they didn't change their behavior after a previous block of 3 months. In addition I indeffed their sock User:Tri-Triyani-17, who is also blocked indef on id:wp. --Achim (talk) 14:14, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all but one per nomination. --Achim (talk) 14:15, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is clearly a copyright image Daemonickangaroo2018 (talk) 13:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:15, 15 Juli 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): No license since 2020-07-11. For more information read the introduction of COM:L, about essential information and about Internet images. --Krdbot 02:39, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

por que lo subi con errores y ahora me evita subir un articulo Fabiorojasgrullon (talk) 01:08, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 11:35, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope self-declared celebrity. E4024 (talk) 01:24, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Fitindia. --Jianhui67 TC 04:39, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope self-declared celebrity I found at Category:Most beautiful flight attendant. E4024 (talk) 01:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE - COM:SELFIE DannyS712 (talk) 04:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Taken from FB and I marked it for speedy. Deletion Requests are quite backlogged; we should either use SD/F10 for speedy deletion of this kind of unnecessary files or -in cases like this- inform of CR vio due to FBMD at MD. --E4024 (talk) 04:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Deleted by @Túrelio: . DR can be closed. Thank you. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 05:23, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: done by Túrelio. --Jianhui67 TC 04:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope. E4024 (talk) 05:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope. E4024 (talk) 05:08, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope. E4024 (talk) 05:09, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope. DW. MD may indicate other owner etc. E4024 (talk) 05:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a promotional photo without a free license, and without permission, author is stated Robert Vaet for CBS. The source is a fan web that doesn't has really the copyright. Elisardojm (talk) 07:39, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:41, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:SELFIE and COM:NOTUSED. Out of scope personal photo. BriefEdits (talk) 07:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:41, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://buquesarmadaperu.blogspot.com/ Ontzak (Bilbo ta Bizkai guztia) 09:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsharp, overexposed, unidentifiable Mhohner (talk) 10:12, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:51, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:53, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Theo Marquez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

low quality selfies of a non notable child, no value for commons or any project

Praxidicae (talk) 11:17, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

professional portrait/promotional image of a (notable?) individual, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 12:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

professional/promotional photo created by a spam-only account on enwp. Dubious self-work claim FASTILY 12:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

professional/promotional photo created by a spam-only account on enwp. Dubious self-work claim FASTILY 12:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:43, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:43, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohit Kumar Lakhera (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:43, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lars Gustavsen (talk) 14:15, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gone_Postal IKR, Anyone would think this was an April Fools joke! :) –Davey2010Talk 20:33, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jianhui67 TC 04:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lars Gustavsen (talk) 14:15, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jianhui67 TC 04:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope unused personal drawing. FunkMonk (talk) 14:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:44, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lars Gustavsen (talk) 14:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jianhui67 TC 04:44, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:44, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AcademiaEnglishOn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in self-promotional draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Portretë (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:43, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faijle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faijle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk 14:29, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:11, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SirPauloJuan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daniyalrahat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image published before on Facebook, so probably not a free image... Shev123 (talk) 16:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Indianhub1998 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Images created by LTA which is globally blocked. Images used for x-wiki promotion

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 17:59, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copie de http://finistereetsolidaires.fr/isabelle-assih/ Habertix (talk) 18:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam-only image Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:59, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:48, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muhammad Awais 82 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not your free personal web host. No contribs to any wm project.

Achim (talk) 09:53, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:44, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SylvainChavas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:48, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SylvainChavas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:36, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Newmanthfc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, book, newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:48, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused out of scope personal image. E4024 (talk) 04:03, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:32, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:18, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: picture of 1960, copyright violation. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:41, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Ashishmk1 (talk) 12:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • What is nonsense is what you are doing: Coming here every other day with a new user name to delete files while your other account TP is full of deletion notifications. (Of course if I am not wrong. I cannot remember your previosly banned username now, but I even remember which admin blocked that one. Of course I may be wrong as I cannot check IPs. How is life in India these days; any IP conflicts with other users?) --E4024 (talk) 04:25, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, forgot to say: Fürstentum Liechtenstein number plates are quite rare and notable. E4024 (talk) 04:29, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, FL 701 Z is a valid license plate of Liechtenstein. I reverted it to the original version. Walser123 (talk) 10:46, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:24, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright by Pedro Silva Dellert10 (talk) 13:42, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9537339. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:29, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://yandex.ru/images/search?cbir_id=1617445%2FA-ID75i4Mhh8FKaY1caGqQ&cbird=5&rpt=imageview&redircnt=1550509886.1 копирайт Панн (talk) 17:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

block evasion by an indefinitely blocked user

Kept: the given source is much younger than the commons image. --JuTa 02:17, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.leftfront.org/person/Швыткин_Юрий_Николаевич.855569 coppivo 2017 ПашкаМушкин (talk) 11:46, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Does not appear to have a valid deletion reason --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.leftfront.org/person/Швыткин_Юрий_Николаевич.855569 coppivo 2017-2020 Слезантий2 (talk) 13:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the earliest version of the claimed source page is dated from March 2020 [1] so that the image at Commons cannot be taken from there. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:41, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lars Gustavsen (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: might be used somehow, a part of historical building's interior. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:52, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a fantasy diagram: doesn't seem to match any current Polish legislature. Out of scope. Slashme (talk) 17:09, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: just a phantasy, out of scope. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:58, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong file type (pdf is not allowed for image files), out of project scope (non-notable people combined with random text). Rosenzweig τ 23:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Might also be a copyvio, as claimed author is not identical to uploader, though he/she claims "own work". --Túrelio (talk) 08:03, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Actually, it is the same user, only recently renamed. --Rosenzweig τ 10:54, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Out of scope and this image is not used on any Wikimedia project. --Mosbatho (talk) 08:18, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope (non-notable people combined with random text). --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:03, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} license. Per RfC, PDM 1.0 marked as PD-self/author is not allowed in Commons, they must be marked as {{PD-old-70}} or {{PD-USGov}}, as they cannot specified the status of the sourced country and the USA. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:08, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close: already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:39, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

eeefefef FightColoseum (talk) 18:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Though "eeefefef" is not known as a valid reason for deletion, it's the uploader's request shortly after upload, so COM:CSD#G7 would be applicable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:41, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong license Victuallers (talk) 08:13, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by AzaToth at 11:37, 19 Juli 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: Posted to source as All Rights Reserved. Only free files are allowed on Commons. --Krdbot 02:30, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant photos of the San Francisco Chinatown gate

[edit]

Photos by JCruzTheTruth in Category:Dragon Gate, San Francisco for his "The Beat of the City" series. Photos were taken in succession and add no new information. Per COM:Redundant Reasons for deletion request --BriefEdits (talk) 00:09, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 20:47, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marianne D 2020 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these mention "Christof Lackner", apparently a professional photographer, either in the EXIF data or in the author field. COM:OTRS permission seems necessary here.

Tokfo (talk) 08:42, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 20:48, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These pictures belong to me. It worries me that the pictures are in the Commons, but also because of the protection of my personal privacy, I don't want them to be here. Thank you!--Turkmen talk 20:47, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 20:50, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused image of a coffee cup. Lars Gustavsen (talk) 19:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In scope. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:27, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is obviously a fair-use image which does not belong on Commons. The uploader is a Wikipedia editor and not the owner of the artwork. Yoninah (talk) 22:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 05:16, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claim is "own work" but I find that implausible - perhaps from a poster, stamp or similar? Sitush (talk) 13:04, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:40, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a flipped version of the photo found here - http://www.govmu.org/English/News/Pages/National-Assembly-elects-Mr-Prithvirajsing-Roopun-as-President-of-the-Republic-of-Mauritius.aspx. Although this is higher res, I have my doubts about the own work claim given the uploaders copyvio history Gbawden (talk) 10:39, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:57, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unavailable video Victuallers (talk) 11:14, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:54, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

108 KB "own work" is too small to believe the own work claim. Please upload a larger file and better with camera EXIF. E4024 (talk) 14:15, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:53, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Justine.toms (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical books. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:49, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Riccardo Romano 208 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:48, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Simeonscott (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in vanity WIkidata item.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all files speedy deleted by several administrators. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:48, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not free (taken from ynet) Bar (talk to me) 15:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:46, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie Meshaqueoqumu (talk) 16:30, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: dubious own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:45, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LohengrinWien (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, painting, drawing, video. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

Estopedist1 (talk) 18:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:44, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

yes drlr FightColoseum (talk) 18:59, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment "yes drlr" is not a valid reason for deletion, but is this unused and rather low quality (strange colors, looks poorly edited) picture in scope? Gestumblindi (talk) 13:43, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:43, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flagging as "redundant/bad quality". This is a copy of File:Vincent van Gogh - Wasmes - Maison du boulanger Denis - Angle Rue du petit-Wasmes et Rue Wilson-002.JPG put through some kind of extreme colour filter, for no obvious reason. (Perhaps to make it look a bit like a Van Gogh painting?) Lord Belbury (talk) 19:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:42, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Personal artwork. Lars Gustavsen (talk) 19:32, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:40, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information about the file is highly questionable: the alleged source is in German, but the map is in Spanish; the user who uploaded the map claims to be the copyright holder without further explanation, but according to German law he ought to be the creator of the map himself. --ThT (talk) 20:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:40, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user who uploaded the file seems not to be the author and may be not authorized to release the work into public domain (see also contradictory information in the description history: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Gender_in_Pronouns.png&diff=prev&oldid=30272944) ThT (talk) 20:32, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:39, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source seems to be a printed work not published with the referred license. ThT (talk) 20:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:38, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source seems to be a printed work not published with the referred license. ThT (talk) 20:38, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:38, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence of licence claimed PlanespotterA320 (talk) 22:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:36, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I highly doubt this is own works. Seems to be taken somewhere from the internet. Probably copyrighted. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:36, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I highly doubt this is own work. Seems to be taken somewhere from the internet. Possibly copyrighted. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:36, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I failed to find the PD license in [2] or [3]. In addition, the added LicenseReview is not double checked. YFdyh000 (talk) 23:23, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:32, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletionResearch.Institute.for.Crime.and.Security (talk) 06:38, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

deletion RISC - The Research Institute for Security and Crime (talk) 07:00, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{Delete}} MusicFm (talk) 09:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of personal photo. Non-notable and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   18:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

my personal information, I have the right to be forgotten Research.Institute.for.Crime.and.Security (talk) 06:37, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

legal name and face appears RISC - The Research Institute for Security and Crime (talk) 06:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete info MusicFm (talk) 07:02, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{Delete}} MusicFm (talk) 10:08, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of personal photo. Non-notable and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   18:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 23:11, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

video unavailable on youtube Victuallers (talk) 08:03, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was license reviewed at time of upload. The entire purpose of license review is to prevent us needing to delete the file if the original source goes stale. As long as there's no compelling reason to believe that the Youtube video was license laundered,  Keep.--Bject (talk) 08:35, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep see this html code license info screenshot from this archived page: https://archive.vn/FiEaT Puramyun31 (talk) 12:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. License verified via info from: https://archive.vn/FiEaT. --MGA73 (talk) 06:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

vid unavailable Victuallers (talk) 08:03, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

投稿時点ではクリエイティブコモンズ画像であり、保持するべき。It is a Creative Commons image at the time of posting and should be retained. Keep.--Bject (talk) 08:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep see this html code license info screenshot from this archived page: https://archive.vn/FiEaT Puramyun31 (talk) 12:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Verified via info from: https://archive.vn/FiEaT. --MGA73 (talk) 06:35, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong license Victuallers (talk) 07:53, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Reviewed based on info on https://web.archive.org/web/20200204185525/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ni4HPFzu2Lg. --MGA73 (talk) 06:46, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this Image have been already matched with its original one that have been uploaded in Wikimedia commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PEENOISE OF POLITICS (talk • contribs) 08:14, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia. -- CptViraj (talk) 09:59, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:10, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:10, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted photo A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:10, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1949 "own work"? How old is the uploader? E4024 (talk) 04:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:11, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MD shows this photo was taken 20 years ago. Therefore I doubt the "own work" claim, as the photographer should know better the dates. E4024 (talk) 04:43, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:11, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Two hours before this picture was uploaded to Commons it had appeared here: https://lb.ua/news/2015/07/27/312029_ukrainskie_voennie_poluchat_novuyu.html - and was claimed as taken from the facebook page of the Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko. However, it is possible that the uploader was also present at the same place in the same moment and created the very similar picture (as far as this uploaded copy seems to be too large for being borrowed from Facebook). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 06:35, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:14, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:23, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:24, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:24, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:17, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:26, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:20, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:20, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is from the family archive. Published with permission from the family. Huzik (talk) 21:17, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:21, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:24, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:32, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:24, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The name of the file is supposed to be Ahmedov Haci Yusub oglu AdalatAli (talk) 18:47, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ask for renaming instead. Ruthven (msg) 17:11, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license, no metadata Axakov (talk) 10:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:24, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license, no metadata Axakov (talk) 10:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio from [4]. --Sealle (talk) 09:26, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong vid license Victuallers (talk) 08:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete no mention of youtube cc license anywhere on the description. Doesn't comply with Commons policy. Thanks --05:12, 10 October 2020 (UTC)C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂)

Deleted: per nomination. Found the image on other sites but no proof of free licence their too. --CptViraj (talk) 07:57, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

video is private Victuallers (talk) 07:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: License can be reviewed here http://web.archive.org/web/20190105230120if_/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSwtJikE7uk. --MGA73 (talk) 11:49, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

video is private Victuallers (talk) 07:38, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: License can be reviewed here http://web.archive.org/web/20190105230120if_/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSwtJikE7uk. --MGA73 (talk) 11:50, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private vid Victuallers (talk) 07:39, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: License can be reviewed here http://web.archive.org/web/20190105230120if_/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSwtJikE7uk. --MGA73 (talk) 11:48, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private vid Victuallers (talk) 07:39, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: License can be reviewed here http://web.archive.org/web/20190105230120if_/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSwtJikE7uk. --MGA73 (talk) 11:46, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong vid license Victuallers (talk) 08:13, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: License can be reviewed here https://web.archive.org/web/20200308132442if_/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tu0ondubbKE. --MGA73 (talk) 11:59, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong vid license Victuallers (talk) 08:14, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: License can be reviewed here https://web.archive.org/web/20200308132442if_/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tu0ondubbKE. --MGA73 (talk) 12:00, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I agree this is below TOO. --MGA73 (talk) 12:03, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Not copyrightable, as the image of Mount Rushmore is owned by the federal goverment. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:17, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep As a derivative work of something in the public domain, this is only copyrightable if there is "'nontrivial expressive variation' between the original and the derived work and that any such differences 'distinguish from the underlying work in some meaningful way.'" Robert S. Davidson v. United States, 138 Fed. Cl. 159, 2018 U.S. Claims LEXIS 801, Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P31,294 (Fed. Cl. June 29, 2018) (quoting Shrock v. Learning Curve Int’l, Inc., 586 F.3d 513, 521 (7th Cir. 2009)). I don't see any such differences, and such, this work is uncopyrightable. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:21, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Mdaniels this is very similar to the original PD work. --MGA73 (talk) 12:06, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per arguments above. Its a DW of a PD work. --MGA73 (talk) 12:07, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

la imagen muestra mentiras Josefer155 (talk) 01:34, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: If content is {{Disputed}} add the template or fix the errors. The file is in use so it is in scope. --MGA73 (talk) 12:13, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Georgian parliament issues all materials under copyright, see http://parliament.ge/ge/ Mehman 97 10:06, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:14, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Error as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Humberto Garavito murió en 1970. Long term file, best to have community consensus.  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:48, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aashaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo.

~Moheen (keep talking) 15:54, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:33, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aashaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

exif display origin source should be facebook, maybe not uploader's own work.

轻语者 (talk) 01:36, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I took the photos of this actors with my Facebook Camera. Then I re-upload the files to Wikimedia Commons. Aashaa (talk) 13:45, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PCP, unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is going towards becoming an MTA (medium term abuse) as while we DR an image he uploads another. Until when? You may be blocked. E4024 (talk) 02:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; taken from the web. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Regasterios as no permission (No permission since). Not sure if it's above COM:TOO; I personally think it's likely to be {{PD-textlogo}}. Ahmadtalk 02:59, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Ahmed. --Gbawden (talk) 10:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

14 KB "own work" is quite dubious, IMHO. E4024 (talk) 03:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

65 KB, and looks like a promo pic by some pro photographer. Please upload large version with EXIF to convince us it is your own work as you declare. E4024 (talk) 03:03, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:24, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

81 KB small file, and looks like a promo pic by some pro photographer. Please upload large version with EXIF to convince us it is your own work as you declare. E4024 (talk) 03:04, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:24, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete I can't find this image at the source indicated. However, the site is clearly marked with a copyright notice that is not compatible with Commons licensing. I did find the image on two other sites ([5]), but I did not find a Commons compatible license on those sites either. Hammersoft (talk) 03:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:24, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete While I appreciate the sentiment expressed by the uploader in the upload process (see revision history), this doesn't clear the image of copyrights. The source indicated on the image description ([6]) page is accurate, but there is no indication there that this image is available under cc-zero license nor any license compatible with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 03:16, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:24, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image of an inactive user. unused. GeorgHHtalk   14:10, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 16:07, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made himself or his/her son an article on userpage. E4024 (talk) 04:08, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made himself a bio article on userpage. E4024 (talk) 04:13, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Although INUSE not a valid user IMO. --Gbawden (talk) 10:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from youtube thumbnail JTE Dimandix (talk) 08:17, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata but there is copyrighted mark Axakov (talk) 10:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; pcp. --Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:16, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:16, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:24, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:16, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:16, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license, no metadata Axakov (talk) 10:26, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm a bit unsure here whether the artist has agreed to this licence (same with many other images uploaded from that site)? FunkMonk (talk) 12:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: File was license reviewed and icensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY-4.0). --Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Lars Gustavsen (talk) 13:49, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep what makes you think this picture is out of scope? Multichill (talk) 19:46, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Image is way too dark and IMHO poorly depicts a pirate - We have better images of pirates here, Also judging by the file description I'd say this is more of a business promotion than it is a genuine "donation", Anyway image is too dark to be of any real use. –Davey2010Talk 00:40, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I disagree that this image is too dark to be useful. It displays reasonably well on my screen. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 13:59, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete The picture is blurry but this is not the main problem. The problem is that it cannot illustrate anything reasonable: why this guy is a pirate? Just a man in barely visible strange clothes - what is educational aim to use this photograph? Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:33, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Andrei and Davey, OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:14, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless low quality photo. Solomon203 (talk) 13:49, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:13, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lars Gustavsen (talk) 14:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:11, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Duplicate|Piramīdas_Greiļu_kalnā_-_panoramio.jpg|later upload}} Dāvis Kļaviņš (talk) 18:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Processed as a dup. --Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal drawing. Lars Gustavsen (talk) 19:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Davey2010. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this image with my name and localization, and i want to remove. ARMS 2003 (talk) 21:32, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE, can be renamed. --Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a copyright violation because it comes from: http://stg.org.in/mdu%20home_htm_files/189.jpg Neurofreak (talk) 13:45, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While it is the same image, I do not believe that there is evidence that it came from that site. Our version is of higher quality, and contains its metadata, and it is an old file and can quite easily pre-date that webpage where image is 500px × 362px. No reason that the photographer cannot have the file in both places.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:52, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe true, but is there is a way to figure out when it was published on that website? It was uploaded on commons in 2011. Neurofreak (talk) 10:21, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
According to its HTTP headers the file on stg.org.in was last modified at "Sat, 10 May 2014 17:16:44 GMT", so at first glance it looks like it post-dates our copy. --bjh21 (talk) 11:00, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:13, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution duplicate of File:Argentine map of Argentina.png Yilku1 (talk) 00:14, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:13, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt this is free to upload. E4024 (talk) 01:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: It is my own artwork: https://durchschlag.livejournal.com --Sakateka (talk) 07:49, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations! Please do not upload your art work to Category:Ezine unless they are related to that city. BTW do not remove the deletion tags from files, as it is a disruptive activity that may cause sanctions against you. E4024 (talk) 14:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Previously published, no COM:OTRS. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt this is free to upload. E4024 (talk) 01:12, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: It is my own artwork: https://durchschlag.livejournal.com --Sakateka (talk) 07:50, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations! Please do not upload your art work to Category:Ezine unless they are related to that city. BTW do not remove the deletion tags from files, as it is a disruptive activity that may cause sanctions against you. E4024 (talk) 14:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Previously published, no COM:OTRS. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Free to upload or DW? E4024 (talk) 01:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: It is my own artwork: https://durchschlag.livejournal.com --Sakateka (talk) 07:50, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations! Please do not upload your art work to Category:Ezine unless they are related to that city. BTW do not remove the deletion tags from files, as it is a disruptive activity that may cause sanctions against you. E4024 (talk) 14:09, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Previously published, no COM:OTRS. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images, claimed to be freely licensed, are not correctly attributed to their copyright holders, meaning that this image violates licensing terms. Buidhe (talk) 01:26, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Magog the Ogre: This DR needs an en wiki admin to look for the deleted page there if sources were stated but got lost upon transfer. --Denniss (talk) 15:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:17, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion as of November 13, 2020. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:11, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If you try to download the photo from the source, it says it's copyrighted from "Rafael Wallace", so, there is no Creative Commons lincense Paladinum2 (talk) 02:26, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:10, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superceded by file:George Bellows - Florence Davey (1914).jpg. --Arlo James Barnes 05:53, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure the purpose of this request. The original file was donated from its source, the National Gallery of Art, as part of a museum partnership with Wiki Commons. The file donated is a hi-res usable file, released explicitly under a CC0 license, with embedded metadata. The donated file was also color checked by the museum's color science team, whereas the file that Arlo James Barnes replaced it with skews the actual color of the painting, making it brighter/bluer than it is in reality. The file that is to supersede this file is also too large for usage in most browsers. Brwz (talk) 13:13, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There seem to be several points there, so I'll address them individually.
  • The source size doesn't matter for the sister projects like the Wikipedias, since MediaWiki has automatic thumbnailing to more appropriate sizes to save bandwidth. Other downstreams can use their own methods of treating the image, but Commons should be repository for the best-quality version of an image.
  • I appear in the edit history of the 3,211 × 4,096 file, not the 12,960 × 16,533 one (that's @Aavindraa and Botaurus: rather). I was adding an image to d:Q20191821 and only noticed the existence of the larger image after I attempted to improve the smaller one by using the download link at NGA's website, on the 'art-object' page.
  • Metadata is important, but it is not hard to ensure that any given image has it.
  • Colour rendition is important, but if we have a known-good profile, I don't see why a correction couldn't be applied (with the 'wrong' colour version left in the edit history).
  • 'hi-res' isn't terribly meaningful, because a comparative is more useful -- 'higher-res' -- and as you say there are considerations beyond pixel dimension.
So I don't have a true preference for one filename over another, I just think we should have one canonical best version of a painting...rendition, pixel detail, metadata, and all. I invite discussion of such matters, of course.

--Arlo James Barnes 18:57, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:10, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The quality of this image is poor, and a much less grainy and pixelated image of the same person already exists at File:Carolina-img.png. 46.132.185.39 08:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:09, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Photo credit: Public Art in Public Places" in the description implies that the uploader was not in fact the license holder. The website is copyrighted, not freely licensed. Sdkb (talk) 08:50, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:08, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of other photo with a potential copyright violation; see Commons:Deletion requests/File:SKYSPACE (in situ).jpg. Sdkb (talk) 08:51, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:08, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

That's not Melania Trump, that's Clara Cleymans imitating Melania Trump and it's a screenshot from a TV show. Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 09:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:08, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gunofficial1998 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not a legal document
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion about whether claimed PD-GovVietnam exception is applicable to this photography or not. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:06, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is written in the license that: "Warning: The template is for images of scanned text documents only." But this file is not. ~ Ultraviolet (talk2me) ~ 11:18, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright until 2050 (75 years from the date of first publication). Tranminh360 (talk) 08:42, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:08, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:06, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

change in divisions, map no longer valid Makeandtoss (talk) 11:00, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:05, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

change in divisions, map no longer valid Makeandtoss (talk) 11:00, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:05, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

change in divisions, map no longer valid Makeandtoss (talk) 11:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:05, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

change in divisions, map no longer valid Makeandtoss (talk) 11:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:04, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lars Gustavsen (talk) 14:18, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:04, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A copyright-violation artistic work of coat of arms. Such a work claimed with permission but without an OTRS ticket or other things proved to allow the donation of the copyright. -- (Dasze) 15:59, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is my logo which is used for a football club that I work for. Inter Taoyuan Football club which is a newly professional football club. I am disgusted after all my efforts to add this to Wikipedia that it has been removed. Reinstate it ASAP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Factprovider1989 (talk • contribs) 06:48, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Factprovider1989: I have to notify you that you should leave your reply here, instead of the talk page. As to the permission problem, what you've claimed is without a reference to a ticket from OTRS, where the team deals with the donation problems always. It is hence weak. You must provide evidence that such a work is yours, or you were awarded by your boss to donate the work to Wikimedia Commons, to the OTRS. The member there will guide and assist you to finish it.
    The copyright problem may cause a massive problem and even cause a lawsuit to the Wikimedia Foundation. We cannot allow the possibility of that and any work lacks permission. Please be aware of that. -- (Dasze) 12:11, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Factprovider1989: I'll add to what Dasze said: If this is indeed the logo of your organization, in order to use it on the Commons, you'll have to change the copyright on the picture to one of the free licenses at Commons:Licensing. That means other people would have to be able to re-use your logo without your permission for commercial reasons. *If* you/your boss do not agree to these terms, the image must be removed from the Commons. Now if there is an article about your organization on the Chinese or English Wikipedias, you might be able to have the logo put locally on each Wikipedia article as those projects do accept "Fair use" images (see en:Wikipedia:Fair Use). If you would like this to be restated in Chinese, please let me know and I can ask an editor to help me WhisperToMe (talk) 23:10, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:03, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete There is no evidence at the source indicated that this image is available under a cc-by-sa-4.0, nor any license compatible with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 18:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:02, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Duplicate|Greiļu_kalna_piramīda.jpg|later upload}} Dāvis Kļaviņš (talk) 18:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:02, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad vid license Victuallers (talk) 18:54, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:02, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo shows a German painter who lived from 1892 to 1940. The photographer and year the photo was taken are said to be unknown.

This means that we do not have enough information to keep this file. The photographer of a photo that may have been taken as late as 1939 (the year the man portrayed was imprisoned by the Nazi regime) may well have lived beyond 1949, which means the photograph would still be protected by copyright per the usual 70 years pma formula.

The file should be deleted per the precautionary principle, unless it can be shown in a convincing manner that the photo is in the PD or under an acceptable free license. Rosenzweig τ 19:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening, thank you very much for your attention on this picture. Since Friday we are the owners of a new poetrait and in a few days we can delete this one and show a file with all the copyrights we need. Now, we have the Name of the Photographer, the year. Thanks for all, best regards, Frank Keller--Frank Erik Keller (talk) 20:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:01, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, text in the interior of the church, no freedom of panorama 2001:1716:4610:4850:68AB:6E7F:49CB:5C12 19:49, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:01, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TeomanDeniz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

While these come form a site http://rsc-wiki.wikidot.com which licences them Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) they are used on the English Language wikipedia for purely promotional purposes I suggest this means they are out of scope for Commons. Noting the Commons and Wikipedia are separate entities, their use is in a Draft: article at Wikipedia, one unlikely to make further process, and that has been nominated for deletion as an advert (currently, though that status is flexible))

Timtrent (talk) 21:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I am semi-mistaken about the original site's licencing. It appears that only the home page carries that licence (at timestamp of this comment), and refers to 'page' not 'site' or 'site-wide'. Many/all other pages carry no licence information. Whether the licence is attributable to images taken from other pages or not is a matter for wiser heads than mine. Timtrent (talk) 21:48, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination + inconsistent licensing at source. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confirmation of free license Axakov (talk) 10:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Licencing very doubtful.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:36, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Sergey Fedchenko, grandson of Ivan Fedchenko. So, I'm owner of my granddad papers and I posted this document (autobiography of my granddad) in Wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Сергей Федченко (talk • contribs) 17:16, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:10, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata but there is copyrighted mark Axakov (talk) 10:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 11:33, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata but there is copyrighted mark Axakov (talk) 10:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 11:33, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata but there is copyrighted mark Axakov (talk) 10:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 11:33, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata but there is copyrighted mark Axakov (talk) 10:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 11:33, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata but there is copyrighted mark Axakov (talk) 10:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 11:31, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata but there is copyrighted mark Axakov (talk) 10:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 11:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata but there is copyrighted mark Axakov (talk) 10:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, permission is required to keep the file. --Jianhui67 TC 12:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata but there is copyrighted mark Axakov (talk) 10:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, permission is required to keep the file. --Jianhui67 TC 12:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Existe una versión más nueva y adecuada. CITY MVD (talk) 03:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 17:06, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata but there is copyrighted mark Axakov (talk) 10:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 17:06, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

change in divisions, map no longer valid Makeandtoss (talk) 11:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:04, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

change in divisions, map no longer valid Makeandtoss (talk) 11:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 17:06, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://hughstephensblog.net/2016/05/23/a-copyright-controversy-the-giant-rubber-ducky-is-back/
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-35931668
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/meet-the-worlds-most-controversial-inflatable-yellow-duck

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed to be template:PD-Polish, but there is no indication of when and where it was first published, so it cannot be demonstrated that it was first published before 1994, or that it was published without a clear copyright notice. Thus we cannot be sure that the requirements of the license are met. Nigel Ish (talk) 15:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – unknown, author – unknown. That way the file cannot be in Commons. Taivo (talk) 07:55, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]