Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/03/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 31st, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most of these coins are not allowed to be here per COM:CUR Philippines.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:13, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The restrictions are a non-copyright restriction, and additionally for coins only apply to reproductions "in metal form". No illustration here is in metal form so I fail to see how these violate the regulation. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:18, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination per Carl.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 23:15, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nom withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NGC and NDS coins are currently legal tender, therefore they aren't allowed to be reproduced per COM:CUR Philippines.

pandakekok9 06:58, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  I withdraw my nomination Ah dammit, I didn't see the previous DR above. Only metallic reproductions are prohibited. All these files are not metallic reproductions. (facepalm) pandakekok9 07:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. My mistake. pandakekok9 07:07, 31 March 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense, Blurry Mohammed Adaghass (talk) 23:57, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Usual nonsense request via Android. --Achim (talk) 11:07, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:54, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 10:24, 31 März 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: --Krdbot 13:32, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Golf-ben10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos mostly not own work. Possibility of copyvios.

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I add a logo for deletion due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 11:51, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: logos above ToO. Speedy deleted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:25, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Golf-ben10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:51, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wikipe-tan coaching.png

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Idem File:Pénétration transcutanée.svg ‎ Salsero35 (talk) 17:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Túrelio. --JuTa 07:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Christian Ferrer as no permission (No permission since). The uplader claimed in my talk page that this screenshot may be free of copyright. I have serious doubt about that, but well, I open a regular DR to allow the discussion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:54, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hanooz: non-free? where should I pay? It's a free program. the channel is not codded Shahryarsee (talk) 17:07, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Los Angeles-based television which follows the US copyright law. Furthermore, the screenshot is new. IRIB (Tehran-based) screenshots will be free after 30 years. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:16, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Per others. By the way, this program isn't owned by IRIB (as Hanooz and 4nn1l2 have explained above). Even if it was, it would still be protected; governmental works in Iran aren't in the public domain. It would require OTRS permission. Ahmadtalk 17:04, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The work is a blatant copyvio by a new user. Shahryarsee is invited to read the copyright rules before contributing to the Wikimedia Commons. That said, this should not discourage him for making further uploads!. --Mhhossein talk 12:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from a TV transmission, not suitable for CC-BY-SA Ferdi2005[Mail] 20:13, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - copyvio so speedy. --Herby talk thyme 11:35, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thawng Thang 162.210.247.132 22:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, test edit by IP from Texas. --Achim (talk) 12:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia Mx Lucy (talk) 18:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 20:29, 2 April 2020 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 01:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was not the picture that was approved to be used for her bio. Maddymantsch (talk) 00:15, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 07:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CV of non-substantive contributor is out-of-COM:SCOPE. DMacks (talk) 04:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aw heck, may as well include the rest of Special:Contributions/Thejokerred, seemingly just here to promote their own work or upload copyvio material. DMacks (talk) 04:40, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:Fairepart (cropped).jpg. Jonteemil (talk) 04:43, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Revoked, files shouldn't be deleted if marked as source of another file.Jonteemil (talk) 05:26, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 07:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted object A1Cafel (talk) 10:24, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:51, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:IC4 in Copenhagen Central.jpg. Jonteemil (talk) 04:51, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Revoked, files shouldn't be deleted if marked as source of another file.Jonteemil (talk) 05:25, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I agree. Files shouldn't be deleted if marked as source of another file Morten Haagensen (talk) 19:51, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 07:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file and now there's been a problem with copyright issues. So it would be better to delete it. Mrb Rafi (talk) 09:10, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cr7193291394920 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivan P. Clarin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivan P. Clarin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low res photos of child actors and school shooting victims all claimed as own work.

Belbury (talk) 10:50, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:23, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IronDerBear414 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Md Robin Rahman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:41, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Sorry Sir..... Yes I know it was a mistake on my part..... Yes..I have DELETED it(Personal image) from my page....And please guide in future for any more mistakes.....Sorry once again..... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waleed Shafqat 2020 (talk • contribs) 01:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:42, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Дима Г (talk) 02:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, in my opinion the photo is out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paolo.marraffa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, probably from the Internet.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:31, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad SDG icons

[edit]

Bad quality versions of Sustainable Development Goals icons, with wrong license, replaced by new files in SVG uploaded by myself in Category:Sustainable Development Goals icons

Ferdi2005[Mail] 12:56, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paolo.marraffa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:32, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence of permission under CC-SA-4.0 100cellsman (talk) 10:32, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo with no EXIF data, uploaded by an LTA with a history of uploading copyright violations. Out of COM:SCOPE. Ahmadtalk 12:22, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:OOS Frodar (talk) 12:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I created this file and no longer need it. It's an orphan (not used anywhere on any Wikipedia). Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 13:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Commons is an autonomous project. If the graph is correctly described and categorized and meaningful, it does not matter whether it is currently used in any other project. It is enough if it is meaningfully used in the Commons project. --ŠJů (talk) 15:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zio2018 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zio2018 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most probably not the uploader's own work. Looks like a page scanned from a magazine. Teemeah (talk) 20:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dupe of File:Vancouver Harbour, British Columbia (470106) (9444286314).jpg — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:52, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/Supersceded. File:USACAPOC Beret Flash.png is a higher quality and higher resolution .png and this file has no links to it. MahaBlazer (talk) 21:09, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Thanks for doing it. --Kwasura (talk) 22:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE (en:Draft:Eyitayo Ogunmola). Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:52, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation 116.97.86.191 02:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: No indication of a free license on the source site (F1) --Achim (talk) 11:15, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:21, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:CUR Philippines. NGC banknotes are still legal tender. pandakekok9 06:41, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 22:45, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW 85.212.70.75 07:16, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 22:41, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:40, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 22:41, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of sidewalk in unidentified location. Hebrew caption and discription translates as "this is a pole". Name of file translates as "Guy in his free time". No educational value. Out of scope. Plus offensive username. Sije (talk) 11:10, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Without a meaningful description and without coordinates, it is impossible to identify the location of this rather generic photo, a possible educational use seems unlikely. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image/spam Ubcule (talk) 16:04, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, spam. Ubcule (talk) 16:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 22:50, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Ubcule (talk) 16:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 22:59, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OUt of scope/spam Ubcule (talk) 16:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 22:59, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:19, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No claim of fair use CatcherStorm (talk) 23:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no indication of a free license on the source site. --Hanooz 01:56, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful to be own work considering low quality, no reason to think it's PD with lack of publication information PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:33, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:58, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Qp37 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably out of COM:SCOPE. Anyway permission of painter needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Qp37 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably out of COM:SCOPE. Anyway permission of artist needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:57, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Qp37 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably out of COM:SCOPE. Anyway permission of painter needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:10, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope.

Дима Г (talk) 02:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:18, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Дима Г (talk) 02:20, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:18, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph was taken by en:C. Cameron Macauley in 1946. The image was uploaded by user Cmacauley in 2011. This user is not C. Cameron Macauley; Macauley died in 2007. Chubbles (talk) 03:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 04:49, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due to a dispute over whether this file is in the Public Domain or not, it is probably best to delete this file and wait until someone is willing to allow use of their file or a new free file emerges. The latter is currently a hard task as car 3662, the last surviving example, is currently being restored at the museum.

Before deletion, I’ll just state that I didn’t see any copyright notices when I searched up the page, only the date of 1908. Therefore I believe that it may be usable as public domain, but of course if it was published by another person who holds the photo it may be copyrighted.

Therefore, depending on the results, it may be deleted or kept. I believe that it could be under public domain but I won’t be offended as it may as well be best to wait until it is confirmed whether it is indeed copyrighted or under public domain.

Davidng913 (talk) 12:56, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Steve Morgan's original comments, date of publication is not clear. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of art. Дима Г (talk) 00:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of File:16 ОБрАА.png. Kwasura (talk) 00:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Art by Norman Carton

[edit]

The original artist died in 1980, making their work ineligible for {{PD-Art}}. If rights to any works have passed onto heirs, the Commons:OTRS process should be followed. --Vycl1994 (talk) 00:19, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#EDUSE O revolucionário aliado (talk) 01:26, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright status unclear: probably copied from this page. Passengerpigeon (talk) 03:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:32, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work—old picture of a wwii era Slovak politician. Buidhe (talk) 03:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:32, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request of own uploader because exist a better version of the same photo. Ecummenic (talk) 04:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:32, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from 1946 potentially still protected, depending on original publication info, which is not included here. DMacks (talk) 04:36, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I have changed the license to PD-anon-70-EU, because this seems indeed a picture from 1946 and the photographer is unknown, so no need to remove it. I am not the uploader. Eissink (talk) 14:31, 31 March 2020 (UTC).[reply]


Dear Reader The photo was taken in 1946 by an unknown member of the church. The photo was printed and framed by the local photographer and hangs like portraits of all pastors in the church council chamber. Arie M. den Toom (talk) 17:13, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: May be PD in the EU, but under copyright in the USA until 1/1/2042. Also, who is he? Is this in scope?. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for outdoor 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:36, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small without EXIFs, unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:36, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Translation merged to File:The Planets Definition 2.svg ysjbserver (talk) 05:55, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:36, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Components_of_a_die.png Learn Mechanical (talk) 06:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Learn Mechanical: Hello! Do you want to delete File:Components of a die.png or your own user talk page?Jonteemil (talk) 07:25, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:38, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless page that doesn't add any real reader value that only has about 160 pageviews a month Sadads (talk) 07:26, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:40, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern sculpture, no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. ~Cybularny Speak? 08:19, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern sculpture, no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. ~Cybularny Speak? 08:20, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JohnVerburg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

At this resolution/file size it seems unlikely to me that these images will be of any realistic use within our projects.

Herby talk thyme 08:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Who is our? and what resolution do you need? These are small files intended for web use and certainly work very well for that purpose. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnVerburg (talk • contribs)
 Comment Maybe check out where you are as far as this is concerned. This is a Wikimedia Foundation project which has a laid down scope - here. Small low resolution images are not really that useful. I'll assume you have the original images and if so uploading those at a significantly higher resolution would be good. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 17:31, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1st here: https://pigeoncote.com/dovecote/cooke16.html. --Achim (talk) 18:23, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They looked like scanned images to me - a source/date would be useful too. --Herby talk thyme 07:08, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination _ The first was in use, but taken from the cited page. The scond is not in use. Both small, no EXIF, provenance unclear. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of File:107 РЕАП.png. Kwasura (talk) 10:30, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of File:155-й артилерійський полк.png. Kwasura (talk) 10:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Victor Adespea

[edit]

These images were all uploaded by User:Victor Adespea. I believe they should be deleted because they are suspected copyright violations.. --Pafsanias (talk) 10:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All of them are licensed under terms of Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) which can be confirmed through signed documents on need. With cordial respect (Victor Adespea (talk) 12:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Additional evidence:
  1. File:Coperta „Nomadul. Chemarea lui Voda”.jpg – copyrighted book cover (that image is itself a derivative work of another book cover: Tais Afinskaja, Endzhi - markiza demonov, 2017)
  2. File:Portret-Andrei-Zapsa.jpg – metadata copyright holder: SOPHY DREAM
  3. File:Orchestra Mezzo (2016).jpg – watermark “Prokopiev Photography”
It is hard to believe that these photos are Victor Adespea’s “own work”. See also: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Andreizapsha. --Pafsanias (talk) 14:01, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Later add, for the same reason: File:Portrait-Conducting-Andrei-Zapsa.jpg - author:SOPHY, copyright holder:SOPHY DREAM (in metadata). --Pafsanias (talk) 09:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coperta „Nomadul. Chemarea lui Voda”.jpg the original images used by cover: https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/beautiful-red-haired-girl-green-medieval-530904457; https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/dreamy-mystic-blue-color-magic-foggy-279974123; bought under Standard Shutterstock License. With this license, purchasers have the rights to unlimited digital use, up to 500,000 uses in print runs such as posters, books and magazines and in out-of-home advertising. Purchased files may also be used for unlimited viewers.

All other pictures data was uploaded with the proper links. The use of „own work” for them was mistaken. I am sorry. (Victor Adespea (talk) 13:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC))[reply]

@Victor Adespea: Is this an April Fools' Day joke? Are you the author of the photos with the watermark "Prokopiev Photography" used on Andrei Zapșa's facebook page and in many other places? Did you learn the details concerning the creation process of the book's cover from its author? Are SOPHY's photos copyrighted by SOPHY DREAM or not? Where could we verify the original licence of these images if you are not their author? --Pafsanias (talk) 14:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guram52 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, drawing and book cover. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

̈EugeneZelenko. Спасибо, исправления вненсены--Guram52 (talk) 17:29, 26 October 2019 (UTC)̈[reply]

Не во всех файлах, например в File:Основатель деревни Утяганово Кармаскалинского р-на Галлямов (Котлогаллямов) Абделкарим.jpg. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

̽̈File:Наглядное пособие, выполненное учителем нем. языка Гайнетдиновым Р.Б. д. Зуяк.jpg - фото выполнено мной с альбома Гайнетдинова Р.Б., который хранится у меня. Автором рисунка был он сам. Скончался в 2000 году--Guram52 (talk) 18:01, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Обладание альбомом не даёт вам обладания авторскими правами на размещённых в нём произведениях. Пожалуйста, прочитайте w:ru:Авторское право в России. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no information about the first publishing date. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:41, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guram52 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works as claimed, historical photos and scanned newspaper pages, proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

Sealle (talk) 11:30, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense, no COM:EDUSE. Achim (talk) 11:40, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:48, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:52, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:54, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Also see: COM:CRT/United Kingdom#Freedom of panorama : Section 62 of the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 is much broader than the corresponding provisions in many other countries, and allows photographers to take pictures of buildings, and sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship (if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public) without breaching copyright. Such photographs may be published in any way.
The practical effect of the broad Freedom of Panorama provisions in the UK and in other countries with similar laws is that it is acceptable to upload to Commons not only photographs of public buildings and sculptures but also works of works of artistic craftsmanship which are on permanent public display in museums, galleries and exhibitions which are open to the public. According to Copinger and Skoane James, "The expression "open to the public" presumably extends the section to premises to which the public are admitted only on licence or on payment". Again, this is broader than 'public place' which is the wording in many countries. Electron   20:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The photo taken in the UK is only File:Stormtrooper Portrait.jpg. This photo was taken at Star Wars exhibition. Not permanently. FOP-UK does not apply to this. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:20, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in UAE.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:46, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's not an answer. Where, what, and when was it PUBLISHED before the cutoff date?--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:12, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is not an answer, but agreement with your opinion. The time of publication is unknown (perhaps the first publication took place recently), so the photo cannot be in the public domain. --Bff (talk) 19:53, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I misunderstood.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:56, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is marked as copyrighted. Karitxa (talk) 17:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Most of our files are copyrighted, but are freely licensed. In this case, the watermark names the uploader. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:52, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:15, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:25, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Derivated fan works. It's like a cosplay. --Clodion (talk) 18:32, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep as per Clodion Jmex (talk) 09:15, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Star Tours – The Adventures Continue Speeder Bike.jpg was taken at Disney's Hollywood Studios. Not fan works, obviously. File:74-Z Düsenschlitten (10585115535).jpg, the creator of this work is not described. But, all creative works are copyrighted. There is no evidence that the copyright holder of this model allows free use. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:07, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
this request is therefore fallacious because there are therefore two scenarios.--Clodion (talk) 11:39, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete both. The first was taken in Germany and the second in the United States. There is no freedom of panorama for works like this in the United States, and, according to COM:FOP Germany, freedom of panorama there only applies to permanent works located in public places, which does not include places where entrance fees are charged, which was the case at Star Wars Celebration Europe II, a temporary exhibition. Even if they were fan-created works (which I don't think is likely for either), they would not be allowed since they are accurate reproductions of official, copyrighted designs (in other works, derivative works). clpo13(talk) 17:11, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- COSPLAY applies to costumes, which, no mattr how fantastic, are clothing and therefore utilitarian. Cosplay accessories -- weapons, masks, vehicles, are not utilitarian and therefore have copyrights. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:58, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong subject - this is apparently not the Tirpitz, but the Bismarck as per this image. MSJapan (talk) 04:56, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - please use {{Rename}} instead. --Jcb (talk) 15:38, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dieses Foto sollte das Schwesterschiff Bismarck zeigen, aufgenommen Mitte September 1940 auf der Kieler Bucht. 2003:ED:F726:1EE0:59:3264:4A58:5EA 17:45, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the same reason as above, which is not a valid reason for deletion. Hohum (talk) 20:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Hohum and Hohum: What's he's trying to say is that you should be providing the correct source or at least a justification as to why it's the Tirpitz and not the Bismark. Misattribution is as big a sin as copy-vio, in my book, bigger. Broichmore (talk) 17:26, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The reason for deletion needs to be valid according to COM:D. Hohum (talk) 15:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Hohum and Hohum: You uploaded a file without checking it's provenance, that is what this is about. So fix it, else your perpetrating a lie on the internet. Which ship is it? Simple. Broichmore (talk) 20:12, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This page is for deletion requests only. Hohum (talk) 18:02, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - THe {{Fact disputed}} tag deals with the issue here. Deletion is not appropriate. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:46, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Credit to Darren McNamara/ALLSPORT, Flickr account does not own the copyright Ytoyoda (talk) 18:25, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not an own work, copyvio Ezarateesteban 18:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although paintings are older than 70 years, taken image and uploaded on that site is not older than 70 years, so authors of that image is alive and on website stays "Copyright 2015 c All right reserved - Design & Development by DJA". Ehrlich91 (talk) 19:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, the photographer has no copyright as it is simply a faithful reproduction of an old, public domain, two-dimensional work of art. See [1] Мико (talk) 10:42, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:02, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-resolution version of File:Coat of arms of the Crommelin family with the French lily.jpg. While it is not an exact scaled-down duplicate, I still think it is inferior to the larger image and thus unneeded. De728631 (talk) 19:16, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:02, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Grand-Duc as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This still image is not "PD-USN": according to its description, it was taken by a Nigerian sailor ("Nigerian navy photo by Petty Officer 1st Class P.O. Gbarufu/Released"). Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Nigeria does not list an exemption or PD clause for governmental works, hence, it would be a copyvio. Well I dont think it is a speedy. The last word is released. It could very well be that photographer released the copyrights to the USN. MGA73 (talk) 19:53, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, a discussion is just fine. I took a look with an EXIF viewer addon at the source, where you may read some IPTC data. Quote:
„Schlüsselwörter = USS Gunston Hall (LSD 44) / APS / Africa Partnership Station / unrep / foreign military / navy / u.s. navy
By-line = MC2 Cynthia Griggs
By-line Title = U.S. Navy Photographer
Kredit = U.S. Navy
Quelle = Navy Visual News Service (NVNS)
Autor = Oscar Sosa
Caption/Abstract = 100324-N-0000G-001 GULF OF GUINEA (March 24, 2010) Nigerian navy Seaman H.O. Dairo, a sailor participating in Africa Partnership Station West embarked aboard the Whidbey Island-class amphibious dock landing ship USS Gunston Hall (LSD 44), watches as the German navy Type 702 Berlin-class combat support ship Frankfurt AM MAIN (A 1412) conducts a refueling at sea with Gunston Hall. Gunston Hall is on a scheduled deployment in West Africa supporting Africa Partnership Station, an international initiative developed by U.S. Naval Forces Europe and U.S. Naval Forces Africa to improve maritime safety and security in West and Central Africa. (Nigerian navy photo by Petty Officer 1st Class P.O. Gbarufu/Released)
Spezialanweisungen = Released/Distributed by Navy Visual News Service 703-614-9154“
That is to me not some release entitling to a PD-USN tag. The "released" is far more likely something about en:classified information and not copyrights. Per COM:PRP and considering the Nigerian law (https://wipolex.wipo.int/en/text/268735 , section 10 and 11), we would need something better to be sure about such a wide intellectual property rights transmission. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 20:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That makes it even more interesting. So the EXIF says "U.S. Navy Photographer" and "Kredit = U.S. Navy". That is a clear statement, that the copyright belongs to the US Navy. But they also mention Nigerian navy and that goes in the other direction. If we cant trust that they have the copyright when they claim to have it then we have a problem. --MGA73 (talk) 12:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would say that by the look of it, everything referencing some USN author is about the curating people of the image databases and the textual description. Cynthia Griggs likely took care about editing the IPTC data and the keywords in the navy's image repository while Oscar Sosa handled the entries for the NVNS databases. In my opinion, the sole entry relevant for any copyright status is „Nigerian navy photo by Petty Officer 1st Class P.O. Gbarufu“ (corroborated by the EXIF showing a Nikon D3000 DSLR, I never saw such an entry level camera used by US Navy photographers, these people use at least prosumer or straightforward professional devices). Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 02:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:05, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No explanation how a painting by an unknown artist from an unknown year can be public domain Thuresson (talk) 21:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:06, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" in metadata, likely downloaded from the subject's Facebook page Ytoyoda (talk) 21:41, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ytoyoda: @Knich11997: I don't see why this image is a candidate for deletion. It may have FB metadata. However, was uploaded by the photographer Knich11997 who has bona fides as the person who took to photograph. It may well be that the image has been used on FB, and so contain that metadata, but that doesn't mean that Knich11997 has lost the original copyright and so have the right to give free licence to its use. Erasmus Sydney (talk) 11:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Erasmus Sydney: A Couple of things: I'm not seeing anything that indicates Knich11997's "bona fides as the person who took to photograph". Anyone can claim to be the copyright owner. Second, I'm not suggesting that the photographer has lost the original copyright. But photographs that were published elsewhere before being uploaded to Commons require OTRS tickets (follow the link for instructions).
Now, I'm guessing Erasmus Sydney and Knich11997 are on Andrew Hastie's staff? If that's the case, then I think it would be a good idea to disclose the affiliation. Thanks, let me know if that all makes sense or you still have questions. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there @Ytoyoda: , okay, we're agreed that a photographer who takes a shot has copyright of an image, even if it's put on Facebook, so that IP is retained, and that photographer can choose to upload an image on wiki commons and make the licence free at that point, even if the image has appeared somewhere else first. It's not like no image can appear on wiki if it's seen on social media beforehand. If someone owns an image, they can choose to upload it. True? Erasmus Sydney (talk) 10:47, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
About what your interests are here, or mine, or @Knich11997: , who he's volunteered for in the past, or worked for, or who you've volunteered for, or I've volunteered for, well, I don't think it's my right to pry and ask you that, so I'm not going to. Hope that's okay. Erasmus Sydney (talk) 10:58, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure why you're arguing me on the necessity of an OTRS ticket. It's explained at the OTRS page I linked to earlier. If you're unhappy with the policy, debating me will not make it go away.
And obviously, you're welcome to your privacy, but if you are on Andrew Hastie's staff, then it would provide a reasonable explanation for why you would own the rights to photographs of him and avoid these discussions.
Anyway, I'm pointing out ways to make sure your uploads are kept here, but if you prefer to debate me, then that's fine I guess? Ytoyoda (talk) 12:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ytoyoda: You're totally right. There's a clear process. Thanks for pointing out the best way forward. Thanks for your time and plain talk.Erasmus Sydney (talk) 21:58, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:06, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Everything by user is copyvio, unlikely to be the author of this professional shot. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:51, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:06, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Actslibrary (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:10, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims to be the author of this photo, Cameron Macauley. However, the source of this image is this website. The website states, "Anh Lê Văn Hưng gởi hình" (Mr. Le Van Hung sent the picture). The uploader is not Le Van Hung. Chubbles (talk) 03:22, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 04:38, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to superseding JPG version. Jonteemil (talk) 04:34, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Revoked, files shouldn't be deleted if marked as source of another file.Jonteemil (talk) 05:26, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 04:39, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is credited to Daniel Soñé Photography, LLC, not the NIH’s own work Ytoyoda (talk) 06:39, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@The Squirrel Conspiracy: Thanks for pointing me to the statement on Flickr. I saw the “all rights reserved” in the metadata and the disclaimer in {{PD-USGov-NIH}} and figured it was copyrighted. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • @Ytoyoda: I have just received an email from NCATS' public affairs specialist that states that the photos are in the public domain. If you believe it necessary, I'd be happy to forward the conversation to OTRS, though forwarded conversations are insufficient for tickets. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:50, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@The Squirrel Conspiracy: I don't think that's necessary, I saw the statement on the Flickr page too. I'm happy to withdraw the request. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:17, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 04:39, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leandro de Lemos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, please explain why public domain in Brazil.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:36, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


I am creating an article about the oldest Masonic lodge in the State of Minas Gerais and, consequently, in the country (where one of the people who signed his letter was Saldanha Marinho, an important historical figure in Brazil) and which completes this year 150 years of uninterrupted existence. It emerged 20 years after the foundation of the city and develops important philanthropic work in the city and region. These photos are of the former presidents (called Venerable by Freemasons). I would like to ask you to keep the images to allow the page to be assembled. thanks Leandro de Lemos (talk) 23:04, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Leandro de Lemos: It's not the issue: you have to explain why images are public domain in Brazil. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
All images of personalities are freely accessible to anyone interested, including copies already made in books. The Masonic Lodge Fidelidade Mineira provides the images even so that these people do not disappear from history. Many of the old Venerables do not have photos because they have no living relatives or their descendants do not have such old photos. Maintaining these photos on Wikipedia will serve to immortalize them for future stories of Freemasonry in Brazil. Documents posted as the Foundation Minutes are also freely accessible. The documents like "File: Motion of Applause from the Municipal Chamber for the 150th anniversary of Fidelidade Mineira.png" and others are also in the public domain, easily accessible and I made the link available on the page I am creating. If you are interested, please check the page still under development: https: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usu%C3%A1rio: Leandro_de_Lemos / Tests. If I need to send you a copy of the authorization of the images, all made available by Loja Maçônia Fidelidade Mineira. I only ask for a few days due to the advent of the Coronavirus that caused the Lodge to be closed by quarantine, as most Masons are part of the risk group. It should be noted that I am part of the board, so I have the endorsement of the store for this. If the above is not enough, I ask you to kindly guide me on how to proceed to make the images acceptable on Wikipedia. I'm really looking to be active and contribute with articles, and I wouldn't want to be making mistakes.Grateful.Leandro de Lemos (talk) 01:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Leandro de Lemos: "Freely accessible" doesn't mean they are free as we use this word here. By "free" they should have already been published under a free license e.g. on the Foundation Minutes. By "public domain" they should be old enough. What are they, please? Please reply above after each file name. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 05:16, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment @Patrick Rogel: there was authorization, from the original owner via OTRS ticket 11348994, for use of these images. But the article where these images would be used has been eliminated as it does not meet the criteria of notoriety in force on Wikipedia Lusophone. In practice, they are merely an attempt to disclose individuals without encclopedic relevance, who commandedan encyclopedically irrelevant institution. That said, they fall outside the scope of the commons, and therefore should be eliminated, as proposed.--Leon saudanha (talk) 13:21, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 06:43, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://indarock.com/13346-deystvo-art-club-agata.html Дима Г (talk) 01:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement Gobrona (talk) 11:15, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:32, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement Gobrona (talk) 11:16, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:32, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement Gobrona (talk) 11:16, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:32, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright content.Check Figure 2 of the publication at the link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325625804_A_Neuroeconomic_Framework_for_Creative_Cognition 1233 (talk) 13:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted Logo of a soccerteam, not CC-BY-SA Migebert (talk) 13:22, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; needs permission. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This particular design, internally known as Flourish Vine, is probably subject to copyright. Since there are other pictures of non-copyright Gideon Bibles on Commons, I don't see that this potential copyright violation advances the project. PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 13:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HillsboroughDude (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not works of federal government. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:40, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Motmoterz 23 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:46, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Motmoterz 23 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:46, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Animation of the Arabic name Abdullah. No encyclopedic use. Bürgerentscheid (talk) 13:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SBALLPLR15 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical logo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SEO spam Ubcule (talk) 16:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; has OTRS but OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality 85.221.142.3 17:43, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 13:17, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Not a valid reason to delete and image is in scope. A new account and starts by searching nudity and sexuality related images because they are obscene? Either this is a sock of someone or a moral crusader that cant even understand the irony of someone that only sees one type of image and calls them obscene. Tm (talk) 18:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although paintings are older than 70 years, taken image and uploaded on that site is not older than 70 years, so authors of that image is alive and on website stays "Copyright 2015 c All right reserved - Design & Development by DJA". Ehrlich91 (talk) 19:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, the photographer has no copyright as it is simply a faithful reproduction of an old, public domain, two-dimensional work of art. See [2] Мико (talk) 10:42, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Evident screenshot cut from something not in CC-BY-SA. Ferdi2005[Mail] 20:13, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Evident screenshot even with frames, decared from the author from the TV programme Buon Pomeriggio on local TV Telenorba. Ferdi2005[Mail] 20:15, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Evident screenshot from a RAI - Radio Televisione Italiana italian TV programme, because you can see in the right corner "Don Matteo 11 Questa sera ore 21.25" which means "Don Matteo 11 [Italian TV programme on RAI 1] tonight at 21.25". Copyrighted. Ferdi2005[Mail] 20:16, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Evident screenshot from somewhere copyrighted. Ferdi2005[Mail] 20:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/superseded. 440 CIVIL AFFAIRS BN DUI.png is much higher quality. MahaBlazer (talk) 21:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/superseded. 308CABdeSSI.svg is much higher quality and this file has no links to it. MahaBlazer (talk) 22:04, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/superseded. USA - 321 CAB.png is much higher quality .png file and this file has no links to it. MahaBlazer (talk) 22:07, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/superseded. US Army 350th CACOM SSI.png is much higher quality .png file. MahaBlazer (talk) 22:11, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MahaBlazer: Next time please use the Duplicate tag Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/superseded. US Army 351st CACOM SSI.png is much higher quality .png file. MahaBlazer (talk) 22:13, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/superseded. US Army 360th Civil Affairs Bde DUI.png is a higher quality .png file that is otherwise identical. MahaBlazer (talk) 22:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/superseded. Civil Affairs & Psychological Operations Command shoulder sleeve insignia.png is a higher quality .png file and this file serves no further purpose. MahaBlazer (talk) 22:44, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/superseded. Civil Affairs & Psychological Operations Command shoulder sleeve insignia.png is a higher quality .png file and this file serves no further purpose. MahaBlazer (talk) 22:44, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/superseded. Civil Affairs & Psychological Operations Command shoulder sleeve insignia.png is a higher quality .png file and this file serves no further purpose. MahaBlazer (talk) 22:44, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/superseded. 490ca dui transparent.png is a higher quality .png file and this file serves no further purpose. MahaBlazer (talk) 22:45, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Persiacampbelldelacruz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Otto Francisco Campbell Gutierrez , artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/superseded. 350th Civil Affairs Command distinctive unit insignia.png is a higher quality .png file and this file serves no further purpose. MahaBlazer (talk) 22:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/superseded. 351st Civil Affairs Command distinctive unit insignia.png is a higher quality .png file and this file serves no further purpose. MahaBlazer (talk) 22:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/superseded. 352nd Civil Affairs Command distinctive unit insignia.png is a higher quality .png file and this file serves no further purpose. MahaBlazer (talk) 23:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/superseded. 353rd Civil Affairs Command distinctive unit insignia.png is a higher quality .png file and this file serves no further purpose. MahaBlazer (talk) 23:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/superseded. 426th Civil Affairs Battalion distinctive unit insignia.png is a higher quality .png file and this file serves no further purpose. MahaBlazer (talk) 23:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No valid public domain claim. This image is a modern creation that uses ancient script as a design element and as a whole exceeds COM:TOO China. Also {{PD-PRC-exempt}} only applies to text (see here). Wcam (talk) 13:28, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:50, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per se. Mauvais cadrage, flèches dans le mauvais sens. Je vais modifier le fichier SVG et le retélécharger Salsero35 (talk) 16:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence given, why this paper should be PD-old. It isn't published anonymous as the page stated, the publisher is named, so it isn't anonymous. It was published round about 1905, so no 120-years ago for keeping it. Quedel (talk) 17:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better quality image: File:Shree jagannath temple inside bangalore sankar 2.jpg Cjp24 (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/superseded. 352CABgdSSI.svg is much higher quality vector file. MahaBlazer (talk) 22:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jrgmendoza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Do educational institutions logos really fit into {{PD-Coa-Mexico}}?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wcam as no source (I assume that the source might be WBSC's official website: https://www.wbsc.org/ ), but another user made a valid contest that this might be below Switzerland's TOO, to which WBSC is located in Switzerland Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Wcam, Waz8, Xgeorg, IagoQnsi, and RainbowSilver2ndBackup: @Qqkuro66541: ^^ --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No matter how the TOO situation it is for this image, it is wrong for the uploader to claim this image as "own work" when it is apparently the logo of the World Baseball Softball Confederation, and explicit source information is required per COM:L#License information. --Wcam (talk) 02:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest to ping Switzerland users to verify situations here (copied from Wikidata: d:Wikidata:WikiProject Switzerland): @Manoillon, Pasleim, Alexmar983, Masegand, and Hadi: @Lantus and Nattes à chat: --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:53, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Corrected to PD-textlogo and kept, lacking any firm indication this is above what seems to be a fairly high TOO. Can be renominated without prejudice if more information becomes available. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:28, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferrer from the file title there is a photograph of a map attributed to Almagro and Arribas. Original upploader does not cite the original source of this map. Almagro is very probably the archaeologist Martín Almagro Basch (1911-84) and there is no evidence that his work can be reproduced freely. On the other hand the number 1959 included in the title of the file looks to be published or created on that date (not in PD if no addittional information is not provided to support this statement). More reliable information must be provided. Bestiasonica (talk) 13:39, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/superseded. 352CABgdSSI.svg is much higher quality vector file. MahaBlazer (talk) 22:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:23, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/superseded. US Army 353rd CACOM SSI.png is much higher quality .png file MahaBlazer (talk) 22:21, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:23, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]