Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/03/11
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_Kabupaten_Jeneponto.jpg){kind=link}
,_Luxembourg_PP1216879317.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_AN0869790.jpg){kind=link}
- この写真は日本人女性 Kaztima109 19:15, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- This picture is Japanese woman killed by Chinese in Tongzhou_Slaughter 1937. Kaztima109 19:17, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- Any valid sources or just another manifestation of Japanese propaganda? --Алый Король (talk) 03:17, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Keep. No valid reason for deletion has been provided. --DAJF (talk) 04:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)- Keep. Not a valid deletion rationale. If it were true, and if there was some evidence, it might be a case for renaming, but not for deletion and no evidence has been provided in any case. It's high time the Japanese came out of denial and faced up to their appalling behaviour in WWII. SpinningSpark 17:01, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Please use the {{Rename}} template to request a change of file name. Green Giant (talk) 13:09, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Although the photo is of an anonymous person, it is obtrusive, violent, and obviously nonconsensual. This photo does not serve a purpose in understanding the crimes committed as described in the article. 24.38.222.73 06:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. OMG, cowards are coming here to ask anonymously because their consciousness can't keep with the atrocities made in their name! --Millosh (talk) 07:03, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 07:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
If not deleted then covered so that seeing such images of a brutalised human being is a choice not something suddenly and traumatically appearing in such a matter of fact way as you research a topic,as if she is punctuation not someone that lived a hopeful life and died horribly. Other media outlets warn you the image may be graphic and let you decide to see it. I do not need to see the dehumanised body of a raped and murdered woman to understand the accomanying text. I am sure neither she nor her family gave permission and I feel this image amongst others disrespects the victim as well as being appalling to see without warning. If deletion is denied then please consider taht people would like the option to choose whether or not I see this content and not suddenly be faced with it 79.70.9.92 18:24, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 19:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Explicit image of sexual violence, torture and death. Medora73 (talk) 06:49, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Heavily in use photo that has been kept in three prior DRs. "I don't like it" is not a valid deletion rationale. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:41, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
_Kabupaten_Jeneponto.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Kabupaten_Jeneponto.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
ingin di hapus karena upload fotonya doubel Irhan Pratama Dg Ngitung (talk) 00:04, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
_Kabupaten_Jeneponto.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 08:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
_Kabupaten_Jeneponto.jpg){kind=link}
You are not currently logged in. While you are free to edit without logging in, your IP address (viewable on your talkpage, where you can check messages sent to your IP) will be recorded in this page's edit history. Creating an account will conceal your IP address and provide you with many other benefits. Please do not save test edits. If you want to experiment, please use the Sandbox. AdvancedSpecial charactersHelp 2001:41D0:602:9CC:0:0:0:0 10:09, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:23, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
You are not currently logged in. While you are free to edit without logging in, your IP address (viewable on your talkpage, where you can check messages sent to your IP) will be recorded in this page's edit history. Creating an account will conceal your IP address and provide you with many other benefits. Please do not save test edits. If you want to experiment, please use the Sandbox. 2001:41D0:602:9CC:0:0:0:0 10:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:27, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
You are not currently logged in. While you are free to edit without logging in, your IP address (viewable on your talkpage, where you can check messages sent to your IP) will be recorded in this page's edit history. Creating an account will conceal your IP address and provide you with many other benefits. Please do not save test edits. If you want to experiment, please use the Sandbox. 2001:41D0:602:9CC:0:0:0:0 10:15, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
You are not currently logged in. While you are free to edit without logging in, your IP address (viewable on your talkpage, where you can check messages sent to your IP) will be recorded in this page's edit history. Creating an account will conceal your IP address and provide you with many other benefits. Please do not save test edits. If you want to experiment, please use the Sandbox. 2001:41D0:602:9CC:0:0:0:0 10:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Joseph Stalin Joseph Stalin Joseph Stalin Joseph Stalin Joseph Stalin Joseph Stalin Joseph Stalin YAMLAISLENIN (talk) 00:59, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- I ask for immediate dismissal of this obviously bogus Deletion Request with no valid reason given. - Jmabel ! talk 01:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
extremely out of focus 184.166.180.202 10:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Not really sharp but in use in some articles. --Raymond 10:45, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
You are not currently logged in. While you are free to edit without logging in, your IP address (viewable on your talkpage, where you can check messages sent to your IP) will be recorded in this page's edit history. Creating an account will conceal your IP address and provide you with many other benefits. Please do not save test edits. If you want to experiment, please use the Sandbox. 2001:41D0:602:9CC:0:0:0:0 10:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
You are not currently logged in. While you are free to edit without logging in, your IP address (viewable on your talkpage, where you can check messages sent to your IP) will be recorded in this page's edit history. Creating an account will conceal your IP address and provide you with many other benefits. Please do not save test edits. If you want to experiment, please use the Sandbox. 2001:41D0:602:9CC:0:0:0:0 10:17, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
You are not currently logged in. While you are free to edit without logging in, your IP address (viewable on your talkpage, where you can check messages sent to your IP) will be recorded in this page's edit history. Creating an account will conceal your IP address and provide you with many other benefits. Please do not save test edits. If you want to experiment, please use the Sandbox. 2001:41D0:602:9CC:0:0:0:0 10:18, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:21, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Cessna 560XL Citation Excel Abelag Aviation, LUX Luxembourg (Findel), Luxembourg PP1216879317.jpg
[edit],_Luxembourg_PP1216879317.jpg){kind=link}
,_Luxembourg_PP1216879317.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{duplicate|Cessna 560XL Citation Excel, Abelag Aviation JP6312089.jpg}} DS28 (talk) 14:26, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- If you want to use the duplicate template, you have to use it /instead/ of raising a DR. This DR is a mess of transclusions. --Fæ (talk) 16:01, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 08:19, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
I do not need it Napicoya (talk) 21:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 08:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Can't find a use Scentsnub (talk) 04:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, speedy kept. --jdx Re: 11:33, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Has no use Scentsnub (talk) 04:21, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, speedy kept. --jdx Re: 14:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyright Mark P. 8301 (talk) 10:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Moheen at 17:37, 12 März 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 02:26, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Dagestan does not have any relation to Nordic countries, Wikimedia is not the place for to propose new flags. This falls completely in out of scope lines. Sail 95 (talk) 23:24, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:33, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Dagestan does not have any relation to Nordic countries, Wikimedia is not the place for to propose new flags. This falls completely in out of scope lines. Sail 95 (talk) 23:29, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:31, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Logo Kurtkaiser (talk) 03:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, false license claim contrary to source website. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:29, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Malachi Bissette General Store Ledger 1928 - DPLA - d31693da356bac4c029b320906be8c9f (page 187).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Because it is Blurry, Nonsense KshitizBathwal (talk) 17:35, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request via Android app. --Achim (talk) 18:45, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation: book cover. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 10:31, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:27, 16 März 2020 UTC: Derivative work of non-free content (F3): Book cover --Krdbot 20:18, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
I am not sure that this image meets the requirements for free publication 90.68.179.140 13:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deletion. --Indeedous (talk) 22:11, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Halimawsabanga (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.
- File:Leonardo Rano PP.jpg
- File:Estraza.jpg
- File:Al ex.jpg
- File:Gamo, Dennis.jpg
- File:Ricky Emboltorio.jpg
- File:Fr. Allan.jpg
- File:Fr. Jun.jpg
- File:Subaldo.jpg
- File:Art pacho.jpg
- File:Chua Toni.jpg
- File:Toto ranolll.jpg
- File:Floro Litgio.jpg
- File:Reil Posas.jpg
- File:Sinon Alcarde.jpg
- File:Francisco Romano.jpg
- File:Raul Vale.jpg
- File:Fr. Floro Litigio.jpg
- File:Fr. Ronilo Huesca .jpg
- File:Cristito Joloro - Diocesan PP.jpg
- File:Fr. Forting Ferolino.jpg
- File:SK Chairman Hon. Generose Navarro .jpg
- File:Laya Malaya.jpg
- File:Laya 03-29-1998.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:49, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.
- File:Utopia records art work by Lennox Barrett.jpg
- File:Voice house music publishing owner Lennox Barrett.jpg
- File:Voice house music.jpg
- File:Lennox Barrett Recording Artist Songwriter Publisher.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:50, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mustafagallen34 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 01:04, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 00:54, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kressysingh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and the second one can be found here. --Ahmadtalk 00:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi EugeneZelenko I work for Mark Pearson and finally decided to update his Wikipedia page on his behalf. The reason the image is already in Google Search is because we had used it elsewhere (including Facebook) before I got around to updating his wiki page. I took this picture myself. Does this help? Not sure what else you might need. Let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarcelWoolfe (talk • contribs) 06:23, 12 March 2020 (UTC) You can also verify that I work for Mark Pearson himself by emailing me at my official parliamentary email marcel.woolfe@parliament.nsw.gov.au or even emailing Mark Pearson if you must at mark.pearson@parliament.nsw.gov.au. These addresses are official and secure so when we respond you know it's verified. Otherwise let me know what else I can do to help assure you - Marcel Woolfe
- Please ask photographers/copyrights holders to send permissions to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
There is an OTRS email received for “File:MarkPearson.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020031210009907. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 23:26, 12 March 2020 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:MarkPearson.jpg” under ticket:2020031210009907. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 00:14, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission accepted. --Ahmadtalk 00:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal diagrams, logos, tables, and text-only images, out of scope.
- File:Yellow notes.jpg
- File:Twee sterren, transparante achtergrond.png
- File:Twee sterren op witte achtergrond.png
- File:Naar een gewenste situatie.png
- File:Comfort zone.png
- File:Request fulfillment semantisch model.png
- File:Request fulfillment procesmodel.png
- File:Klachten semantisch model.png
- File:Klachten procesmodel versie 1.png
- File:WordPress reacties toestaan.png
- File:WordPress scherminstellingen reacties.png
- File:BPMN example.png
- File:Applicatie voorbeeld 1.png
- File:3 lagen architectuur.png
- File:Kennismanagement ontologie versie1.png
- File:Rapport NL.PNG
- File:Berichten NL.PNG
- File:Logo iMonitoring.jpg
- File:Semantisch model voorbeeld1.png
- File:Task datamodel.png
- File:Voorwaardelijke opmaak voorbeeld.png
- File:Contact-button.png
- File:Overerving voorbeeld.png
- File:Pencil blauwe vierkantjes.png
- File:Order.png
- File:Mockup risicomanagement reageren op risico's.png
- File:Vertaaltabel.png
- File:CiviCRM drupal demo.png
- File:Gezondheidszorg ontologie.png
- File:Pleio voegtoe.png
- File:Systeemontwikkeling aanpak.png
- File:EIM domeinen.png
- File:Waarom regels?.png
- File:If else.png
- File:Moodle beperk toegang.png
- File:Blok toevoegen.png
- File:Jump to the current week.png
- File:Huidige onderwerp.png
- File:Huidige onderwerp button.png
- File:Moodle aanmeldingsmethode.png
- File:Moodle gebruikers.png
- File:Moodle HTML.png
- File:Moodle MOOC week 4.png
- File:Moodle MOOC week 1.png
- File:Moodle MOOC week 2.png
- File:Moodle MOOC week 3.png
- File:Integraal klantbeeld.png
- File:Moodle vraagtypen.png
- File:Moodle activiteiten.png
- File:LOD visualisatie open data en linked data.png
- File:Opleiding rooster.png
- File:Opslag van triples.png
- File:LodLive simple search.png
- File:LodLive example.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:07, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal/corporate diagrams, logos, tables, and text-only images, out of scope.
- File:Bedrijfsontologie.png
- File:Corporate performance management.png
- File:Ontologie voorbeeld boek.png
- File:Persoonlijke ontwikkeling voorbeeld1.png
- File:Portfolio management semantisch model.png
- File:LOD voorbeeld belastingdienst kadaster.png
- File:Claims management zaakgericht werken.png
- File:Portofolio management semantisch model.png
- File:Tuin voorbeeld2.png
- File:Boven de lijn.png
- File:Strategiekaart kapstok.png
- File:Strategiekaart.png
- File:Takenlijst mockup.png
- File:Mindmap Nederlandstalige wikiversiteit 130715.png
- File:Claims management.png
- File:BPRM conceptueel model.png
- File:Organisatiebeheer-objecten en relaties.jpg
- File:Abuse proces.png
- File:Entiteitenmodel.png
- File:Mendix naamconventies.png
- File:Telecom conceptueel model.png
- File:Conceptueel model studiereis.png
- File:Assertion.png
- File:Voorbeeld violation.png
- File:Regel mandaatvoorbehouden.png
- File:Overtreding regel mandaatvoorbehouden.png
- File:Melding bij toevoegen van bevoegdheden.png
- File:Conceptueel model artikel 10 4.png
- File:PM app concepten sprint1.png
- File:PRM visie.png
- File:HCM modules.png
- File:Instantiediagram relatie r;r les 2 vraag 1.png
- File:Instantiediagram relatie r les 2 vraag 1.png
- File:Graaf art 10 8.png
- File:Mandatering instantiediagram art10 4.png
- File:Mandatering visualisatie art 10 4.png
- File:Organogram Ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie.png
- File:Sky Group organigram.png
- File:Mandatering conceptueel model.png
- File:Portfolio app mockup.png
- File:Vrije tijds app conceptueel model.png
- File:Relatie matrix.png
- File:Homogene relaties voorbeeld.png
- File:Mandatering formatieplaatsen.png
- File:Foutmelding in Atlas.png
- File:@pp'ltje van oranje architectuur.png
- File:Leertraject ipv incidenteel leren.png
- File:Autovoorbeeld visualisatie 2.png
- File:Autovoorbeeld visualisatie 1.png
- File:Relaties voorbeeld1.png
- File:Compositie voorbeeld1.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:14, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal/corporate diagrams, logos, tables, and text-only images, out of scope.
- File:Semantisch model Be Informed.png
- File:Betekenis aan de relatie geven.png
- File:Kadaster semantisch model.png
- File:9-vlaks-model.png
- File:Semantisch model risico management versie 20130227.png
- File:SW-mindmap.png
- File:Gliffy uitlijnen.png
- File:Pizza bestellen visio.png
- File:Incident management.png
- File:Team 2.0 mindmap.png
- File:Kikker-voorbeeld.png
- File:Netwerkorganisatie.png
- File:Be Informed semantisch model 2013 februari.png
- File:Semantisch model domein inkoop.png
- File:Semantische model proces- en regelmanagement.png
- File:Powerpoint gekrommende lijnen.png
- File:Scherm pizza-app.png
- File:Semantisch model supermarkt.png
- File:Semantisch model UWV.png
- File:Regen paraplu.png
- File:Graaf facebook.png
- File:Graaf pizzeria.png
- File:Pizza bestellen.png
- File:Eieren-casus.png
- File:Ochtend-ritueel.png
- File:Prezi leren beginslide.png
- File:Algarve2.png
- File:Algarve1.png
- File:Casus autoverhuur vreemd gedrag.png
- File:Casus vakantie1.png
- File:Autoverhuur2.png
- File:Autoverhuur.png
- File:Een zeskantje.png
- File:Clustering op twee dimensies.png
- File:Casus kopen huis.png
- File:Metamodel case management 001.png
- File:Passies en dromen.png
- File:Be Informed casus huizenjacht.png
- File:PSD voorbeeld OphalenContactpersonen.png
- File:Service basis model.png
- File:Taart kopen procesvoorbeeld 2.png
- File:Taart bakken procesvoorbeeld 1.png
- File:Mindmap HNL.png
- File:Wikiversiteit mindmap.png
- File:Medische app.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:00, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:28, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal/corporate diagrams, screenshots, tables, and text-only images, out of scope.
- File:Aanvragen verlof.png
- File:Informele organisatie.png
- File:Kenniswaardeketen.png
- File:Wikiversiteit in jaarplan 2013.png
- File:Ontwerpproces.png
- File:Be Informed versie 3 en versie 4.png
- File:Creëer meerdere.png
- File:Gedragsblokken.png
- File:Matching site.png
- File:Gedragsdiagram voorbeeld 1.png
- File:Be Informed architectuur.png
- File:Subprocessen.png
- File:Taxonomy voorbeeld 2.png
- File:Taxonomy voorbeeld 1.png
- File:Taxonomie rollen.png
- File:Matchingflow versie 121017.png
- File:Matching mockup.png
- File:E-learning mindmap.png
- File:Proces1.jpg
- File:Casus.png
- File:Commens wikimedia help.png
- File:Vijf lagen model.JPG
- File:Alloceren versie 1.0.png
- File:Bizagi object ertussen zetten.png
- File:Screenshot5 speed dialer.png
- File:Screenshot4 speed dialer.png
- File:Screenshot2 speed dialer.png
- File:Screenshot1 speed dialer.png
- File:Screenshot3 speed dialer.png
- File:Voorkeurstaal.png
- File:Projectorganisatie.JPG
- File:BPM lifecycle.png
- File:BPM opleiding voor business analisten.png
- File:Continuum product dienst.png
- File:Procesmodel indienst.jpg
- File:Solution map automotive.JPG
- File:Mockup aanvragen verzekering.png
- File:Lynda wat is SharePoint.jpg
- File:Software AG KPI's.JPG
- File:Periodiek systeem.jpg
- File:Supercalc.png
- File:OD topics.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:24, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:55, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 17:02, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Underexposed photo, part of mass upload. We have several fine pictures of paths in forests already. Out of scope. Pugilist (talk) 14:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:25, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Underexposed photograph, part of mass upload. Out of scope. Pugilist (talk) 14:04, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:23, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:23, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:23, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by OKTAVIANUS BOLONG (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Kerja Keras Seorang Bapak.jpg
- File:Bulan Yang Sangat Indah.jpg
- File:Kerja Keras Bapak.jpg
- File:Kerja keras.jpg
- File:Terimakasih Ayah.jpg
- File:Bapak.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:19, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Killarnee as Copyvio (copyvio). However, this photo was taken in 1925 and has long been in a public domain. JukoFF (talk) 14:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: could still be copyrighted for decades. --Didym (talk) 17:19, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:18, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:15, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:12, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Company content, out of scope.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:51, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:37, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:11, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- I agree with you, in fact. I will remove the work from the commons. Secretkeeper12 (talk) 22:40, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:11, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
and File:Mancanağı fiqurlu dəzgah.jpg
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:10, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kamil Cəlal oğlu İbrahimov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:10, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EagleWells (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Mary Allan (McGowan) on Huon Wood.jpg
- File:PRG-280-1-35-169.jpg
- File:M Allan 1924 with horse.jpg
_on_Huon_Wood.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:10, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Roselma Rocha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Espedito Sobrinho na rádio alto piranhas.jpg
- File:Espedito e Roberta na igreja catedral de Cajazeiras-PB.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:09, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:09, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Haribatasenepal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Galateaartista (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Mural heisenburguer.jpg
- File:Mural caffarena86.jpg
- File:Atelier de gala.jpg
- File:Tatuajes por lovegalatea.jpg
- File:Lovegalatea galateaartista.jpg
- File:GALA1.jpg
- File:Atelier galatea.jpg
- File:Mural realizado por lovegalatea y nelsontarqui para la cadena de comida gourmet Heisenburguer.jpg
- File:Love Galatea en la Biblioteca Nacional exponiendo junto a Solano Lopez dibujante del eternauta.png
- File:Il piccolo vapore de Vincente Walter.jpg
- File:Mural perspectiva de heisencity, para heisenburguer por lovegalatea y nelsontarqui.jpg
- File:Mural para HEISENBURGUER.jpg
- File:Algunas obras de LoveGalatea.jpg
- File:Exposición de Arte de LOVEGALATEA y NELSON TARQUI en El Emergente.jpg
- File:ATELIER DE GALATEA.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:07, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
See [1] Brotfried (talk) 15:01, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Lars_rominger3.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:06, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Regular DR instead since uploader is objecting. http://www.degevoeligesnaar.nl/Stichting_De_Gevoelige_Snaar/Uke_A_Go_Go.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:23, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- (transfered) Cher Ami, cette photo est mon propre propriétaire. Les URL est une URL de moi. Exusé, mais je ne suis pas d'accord avec 'auteursrechten schending' ici. http://degevoeligesnaar.nl est a moi. Beste vriend, de genoemde foto is mijn eigendom. De URL is een URL die ik bezit. Het spijt me maar ik ben niet akkoord met de 'auteursrechten schending' waar over wordt gesproken. Ook http://degevoeligesnaar is van mij. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John Doehetzelf (talk • contribs) 18:30, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- @John Doehetzelf: Hi. Either add a valid license on the footer of your website or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Nevertheless I think it's useless (or at least premature) since it seems you are not notable enough to get your page on Dutch Wikipedia (first deleted in 2014, on deletion again since yesterday) so you should adress this issue there before thinking of your images here because no article on Wikipedia means no images here (read COM:SCOPE). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:40, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:05, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The author of the work is still alive: http://santiagoydanez.com/biography.html?lang=en, so this work needs a free license from the painter. Tekstman (talk) 15:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:04, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:น้องจีนมี๋น่ารัก.jpg.jpg
- File:Jinmy.jpg.jpg
- File:อีอ้วนนนนนน.jpg
- File:จิมิ.jpg
- File:นฤพร.jpg
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:03, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
No indication of publication under a free license at the source.
- File:제네시스 G80 4.jpg
- File:제네시스 G80 1.jpg
- File:프로페시 3.png
- File:프로페시 1.jpg
- File:원터치 워크인.jpg
- File:원터치 워크인(1).png
- File:ICT 커넥티드 변속 시스템(2).jpg
- File:ICT 커넥티드 변속 시스템.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ahmadtalk 17:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:58, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ThePhoneCompany2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Blurred, unused images. Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:And Then The Beck Girls Came From The Big City Up North And We Had To All Straighten Up And Engineer This Thing Correct Or They Will Bring Their Big Engineering Family And They Will Build It EXACT Or None At A 2014-05-14 12-34.jpg
- File:Just the same process in which a quilt is planned so our Telephone Network Begin With One Farmer and then One Rancher and One Full Section Of Land- Where The Dream Began With Me- 2014-05-14 12-22.jpg
Ahmadtalk 17:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:58, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry photo part of mass upload. Out of scope. Pugilist (talk) 20:27, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:56, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by QueerEcofeminist as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. Sealle (talk) 20:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Uploaded as own work, no source given. Sealle (talk) 20:49, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:55, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Artur Beul (d. 1972), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Habe gerade die Freigabeerklärung an das Support-Team geschickt. --Sonnenmusik (talk) 22:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Ticket:2020031110009543 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 14:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Artur_Beul_Feusisgarten_1979.jpg” under ticket:2020031110009543. --Mussklprozz (talk) 20:19, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: . --Didym (talk) 16:53, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
I accidentally uploaded this thinking it was CC-BY-SA, but it's in fact in a non-commercial license, as you can see in the link provided as a source YuriNikolai (talk) 21:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:50, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NOVA OPERA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Permission of each photographer (Artem Galkon, Anastasiia Mantach, Julia Ostrouchko, Anastasiia Telikova, Denys Ovchar, Nova Opera) needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Roman Grygoriv, NOVA OPERA composer-conductor.jpg
- File:IYOV Panorama 1 Denys Ovchar.jpg
- File:IYOV Panorama.jpg
- File:IYOV OPERA.jpg
- File:IYOV Back.jpg
- File:HAMLET 4.jpg
- File:HAMLET 3.jpg
- File:HAMLET 2.jpg
- File:HAMLET 1 (Denys Ovchar).jpg
- File:GAZ, opera-dystopia.jpg
- File:Andrey Nadolskyi.jpg
- File:GAZ opera-dystopia.jpg
- File:Dream Opera stage.jpg
- File:Babylon, opera-circus, Maryanna Golovko.jpg
- File:Dream Opera Prohasko.jpg
- File:Babylon Dolls.jpg
- File:ARK Dance.jpg
- File:ARK Hall.jpg
- File:Aerophonia Izdryck.jpg
- File:ARK Dance 2.jpg
- File:ARK Cartoons.jpg
- File:Aerophonia 4.jpg
- File:Aerophonia PORTRAIT 1.jpg
- File:Aerophonia Amphitheater from stage.jpg
- File:Dream Opera neprOsti, world Premier, Art-zavod Platforma, 24-25.09.2016.png
- File:Opera IYOV stage group during the ceremony of T.G. Shevchenko National Prise.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:59, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:49, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NOVA OPERA (talk · contribs)
[edit]© 2020 Nova Opera – All rights reserved. Permission of each photographer needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Опера-цирк BABYLON, панорама другої дії. Фото Артем Галкін.jpg kept
- File:Андрій Надольский, опера-цирк BABYLON.jpg kept
- File:Марьяна Головко в ролі Іштар. Опера-цирк BABYLON.jpg
- File:Opera-cicrus Babylon.jpg
- File:Ірма Вітовська, Анастасія Блажчук та Дмитро Рибалевський (Гертруда, Офелія та Полоній). Неоопера-жах Гамлет.jpg kept
- File:Анастасія Блажчук в ролі Офелії та Іван Бліндар в ролі Лаерта. Неоопера-жах Гамлет.jpg kept
- File:Ірма Вітовська в ролі Гертруди. Неоопера-жах Гамлет.jpg kept
._%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%BE%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0-%D0%B6%D0%B0%D1%85_%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%82.jpg){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:14, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Ticket:2020032310008272 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 14:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Ірма_Вітовська_в_ролі_Гертруди._Неоопера-жах_Гамлет.jpg” under ticket:2020032310008272. --Tohaomg (talk) 17:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Анастасія_Блажчук_в_ролі_Офелії_та_Іван_Бліндар_в_ролі_Лаерта._Неоопера-жах_Гамлет.jpg” under ticket:2020032310008272. --Tohaomg (talk) 17:57, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Ірма_Вітовська,_Анастасія_Блажчук_та_Дмитро_Рибалевський_(Гертруда,_Офелія_та_Полоній)._Неоопера-жах_Гамлет.jpg” under ticket:2020032310008272. --Tohaomg (talk) 17:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Андрій_Надольский,_опера-цирк_BABYLON.jpg” under ticket:2020032510004594. --Tohaomg (talk) 18:39, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Опера-цирк_BABYLON,_панорама_другої_дії._Фото_Артем_Галкін.jpg” under ticket:2020032510004594. --Tohaomg (talk) 18:42, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Delete File:Марьяна Головко в ролі Іштар. Опера-цирк BABYLON.jpg and File:Opera-cicrus Babylon.jpg. Keep the others, they have permissions from authors.--Andriy.v (talk) 15:56, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Tohaomg: Just to confirm that there isn't any related OTRS ticker for the 2 files mentioned by Andriy.v. --Minoraxtalk 12:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Minorax: , no. Full-text search in OTRS for those images gave no results. --Tohaomg (talk) 14:06, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Tohaomg: Just to confirm that there isn't any related OTRS ticker for the 2 files mentioned by Andriy.v. --Minoraxtalk 12:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: 5 kept, 2 deleted. --Anatoliy (talk) 17:18, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dimanavidinova (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art and promo photos. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Ива Хаджиева 5.jpg
- File:Димитър Арнаудов снимка.jpg
- File:Ива Хаджиева снимка.jpg
- File:Ива Хаджиева 4.jpg
- File:Ива Хаджиева 3.jpg
- File:Ива Хаджиева 2.jpg
- File:Ива Хаджиева 1.jpg
- File:Ива Хаджиева.jpg
- File:Димитър Арнаудов 8.jpg
- File:Димитър Арнаудов 7.jpg
- File:Димитър Арнаудов 5.jpg
- File:Димитър Арнаудов -4.jpg
- File:Димитър Арнаудов 3.jpg
- File:Димитър Арнаудов 2.jpg
- File:Димитър Арнаудов 1.jpg
- File:Димитър Арнаудов.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:01, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dimanavidinova (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Iva Hadzhieva and/or Facebook images, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:8. Ива Хаджиева Брод, бронз, 1988; Iva Hadjieva Stream Passing, bronze, 1988.jpg
- File:6. Ива Хаджиева Студентка, шамот, 1984 Iva Hadjieva Student, chamotte, 1984.jpg
- File:1. Ива Хаджиева Хирошима, шамот, 1982 Iva Hadjieva Hiroshima, chamotte, 1982.jpg
- File:4. Ива Хаджиева Ябълка, 40х25х75см Iva Hadjieva Apple, 40x25x75 cm.jpg
- File:11. Ива Хаджиева “Отдих“, Гипс 50x70см, 1985 Iva Hadjieva “Relaxation”, gypsum 50x70сm, 1985.jpg
- File:9. Ива Хаджиева Куклар, Почетен приз, връчван от Академията за Куклено изкуство, бронз, 1995 Iva Hadjieva Puppetier,.jpg
- File:10. Ива Хаджиев Леви-Десни, бронз, 1991 Iva Hadjieva Left-Right, bronze, 1991.jpg
- File:7. Ива Хаджиева Мълвата, бронз, 1983 Iva Hadjieva The Rumor, bronze, 1983.jpg
- File:2. Ива Хаджиева Куклар, плакет, бронз, 1995 Iva Hadjieva Puppeteer, plaque, bronze, 1995.jpg
- File:3. Ива Хаджиева Клюкарки; бронз 40х15х20 см Iva Hadjieva Gossip Girls, bronze 40x15x20 cm.jpg
- File:5. Ива Хаджиева Мъжко хоро, бронз, 1986 iva Hadjieva Male's Line Dance, bronze, 1986.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:48, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Low-re images and five different cameras: unlikely to be the same person's work.
- File:07 - Roberto Magris a 500.jpg
- File:12 - Roberto Magris a 500.jpg
- File:Ira Sullivan.jpg
- File:08 - Roberto Magris a 500.jpg
- File:05 - Roberto Magris a 500.jpg
- File:03 - Roberto Magris a 500.jpg
- File:02 - Roberto Magris a 500.jpg
- File:Roberto Magris 3.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:48, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
No educational value, used for advertising on Wikidata only Hoo man (talk) 22:40, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:47, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
selfie of irrelevant person, out of scope of commons Achim Raschka (talk) 22:40, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:47, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
selfie of irrelevant person, out of scope of commons Achim Raschka (talk) 22:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:47, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
selfie of irrelevant person, out of scope of commons Achim Raschka (talk) 22:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:47, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope; personal photo with no cross-wiki use. TJH2018talk 22:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:46, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope; no educational use. TJH2018talk 22:50, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:46, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted image inappropriately uploaded as own-work CC-BY-SA 4.0 until proven otherwise. --benlisquareTalk•Contribs 22:58, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hilarious and gave me a good chuckle, but it's likely not the uploader's own work and certainly out of the project scope. Delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:09, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Seems like it is a COPYVIO to me. Commercial product uploaded as own. Delete GoodCrossing (talk) 23:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:45, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Porn quality video... uploader is unlikely the author. Sorry if this is explained in the audio; my speakers don't work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Educationally worthless, out of scope and likely a copyright violation. Remove according to the precautionary principle. AshFriday (talk) 23:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:45, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
This is a non-notable person, the image is not linked, verging on advertising. appears to be a vanity shot. Richard Avery (talk) 23:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:44, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Unclear image of a non-notable person, image is unlinked. No educative value. Richard Avery (talk) 23:39, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:44, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Screenshot of non free software
Gbawden (talk) 08:04, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:05, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fabryka Porcelany AS Ćmielów (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artworks taken from www.galeria-rij.com - needs permission from artist too
- File:Szałamaja Lubomir Tomaszewski.jpg
- File:Trzech w deszczu.jpg
- File:Taniec Nocy, technika autorska dym, praca z 2013 roku, wymiary 61 x 48 cm, obraz sygnowany podpisem artysty.jpg
- File:Płonienny taniec 34 x 51 cm.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:04, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Oversaturated. Out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 08:38, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:04, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Found here and others - https://www.ihm.se/i-fokus/blogg/alexander-parleros-finns-han-pa-riktigt/ - unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:03, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
An official photo likely taken from FB/Myspace - see https://www.facebook.com/events/pamiers-loco/concert-de-puerto-candelaria-au-festival-latino-pamiers-loco/201303637724065/ - unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:03, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Look watermark bottom right corner. I do not believe own work. Copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:46, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:03, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Cropped from https://www.kurdipedia.org/default.aspx?lng=8&q=201004191326474164 - I can't find a free license on the site. Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:02, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:01, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Source given as www.kvis.ac.th - (C) at source
Gbawden (talk) 09:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:01, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
According to the source website it is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License Tekstman (talk) 09:18, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:01, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No Exif. Unsure if the uploader is also the owner of the image is lifted from somewhere. Psubhashish (talk) 09:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Exif edited with external app and original exif missing. Unsure if the uploader is also the owner of the image is lifted from somewhere. Psubhashish (talk) 09:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Exif edited with external app and original exif missing. Unsure if the uploader is also the owner of the image is lifted from somewhere. Psubhashish (talk) 09:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
No Exif. Unsure if the uploader is also the owner of the image is lifted from somewhere. Psubhashish (talk) 09:37, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Exif edited with external app where original exif info missing. Unsure if the uploader is also the owner of the image is lifted from somewhere. Psubhashish (talk) 09:38, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
No Exif. Unsure if the uploader is also the owner of the image is lifted from somewhere. Psubhashish (talk) 09:38, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
No Exif. Unsure if the uploader is also the owner of the image is lifted from somewhere. Psubhashish (talk) 09:39, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
No Exif. Unsure if the uploader is also the owner of the image is lifted from somewhere. Psubhashish (talk) 09:39, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:59, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
"Pic taken from Real Sound Studios" makes me suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:58, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
The size of the images, as well as the presence of some of them on the network, indicates the absence of rights to them from the uploader.
- File:Reyhan Topchubashevaa.jpg
- File:Salatin.jpg
- File:Gamar.jpg
- File:Sakina.jpg
- File:“Toy” – (1936) topchubasheva.jpg
- File:Topchubashova.jpg
- File:Zivar Mammadova 1.jpg
_topchubasheva.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Ирука13 11:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:44, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Likely copyvio: no EXIF and uploader has a history of uploading copyvio images. Wcam (talk) 11:44, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:44, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
not source provided, not an own work Ezarateesteban 12:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:43, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused non-notable, personal logo: out of scope. GFJ (talk) 12:40, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:42, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Gösta Harry Haglund (d. 1986), permission from his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:00, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Didym (talk) 17:41, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Not own work. Can be found on weibo.com and instagram 42.98.5.63 13:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:41, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Gösta Granström (d. 1957), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:03, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Didym (talk) 17:41, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Not own work. Can be found on weibo.com and instagram. Silvermetals (talk) 13:05, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:39, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Göta Ingeborg Fogler (d. 1992), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:06, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:37, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Not own work. Can be found on weibo.com Silvermetals (talk) 13:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Not own work. Can be found on facebook Silvermetals (talk) 13:08, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Göran Brunius (d. 2005), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:09, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Not own work. Can be found on internet using image search. Silvermetals (talk) 13:10, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dmitri cortes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyvios: historical images all credited to "Mandaue Tourism Office". No evidence of permission, nor is there any reason why {{PD-USgov}} would apply.
- File:Casa Municipio.png
- File:Sotero Barte Cabahug.png
- File:Mandaue Fraternal Society 1920's.png
- File:Pasyon sa Mandaue.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:10, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:34, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyvios: historical images claimed as own work, logo above TOO. Unreliable user: all other uploads by this user already deleted.
- File:Vannes 2013.JPG
- File:Bagadig Bro Landerne.jpg
- File:Saint joseph2.jpg
- File:Saint joseph1.jpg
- File:Logo Bagad Bro Landerne.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:15, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:33, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Not own work see [2] its Thomas Eppler and permissen needed Brotfried (talk) 13:20, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:32, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Tekstman as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The painter died in 1958. In addition, the photographer does not hold the rights. Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Uploader pointed out at COM:UDR that La pintura supera los cien años (The painting is over 100 years old) Gbawden (talk) 13:38, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The age of the work is irrelevant in almost all countries. What matters is that Rouault died in 1958, so the work will be under copyright in France until 1/1/2029. It can not be kept on Commons without a free license from his heirs. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per Jim and COM:FRANCE. It would be okay to transfer to enwiki if the painting was published before 1925. Other Wikipedias may be able to use it under a claim of fair use. clpo13(talk) 16:17, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per French copyright law. Hopefully this does get transfered to enwiki. Abzeronow (talk) 16:37, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:32, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Es liegt keine ausreichende Lizensierung vor, Urheber/Rechteinhaber nicht klar bezeichnet. Unklar, ob der Hochlader berechtigt ist, Foto unter freie Lizenz zu stellen. Lutheraner (talk) 13:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:30, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be "own work": looks like a crop from somewhere else, and style and B&W format is unlike all other uploads by this user. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:29, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:52, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:29, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:29, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:28, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Not own work see [3] its Dr. Birgit Lutzer and permissen needed Brotfried (talk) 13:59, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:28, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:27, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:27, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Canadian federal government works are Crown Copyright, cannot be licensed ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Apparently FoP Canada doesn't cover print / text / poster. // sikander { talk } 🦖 18:16, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:16, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted work ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: There is no FoP for posters in Canada. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: I thought FoP Canada covered this, but apparently not. // sikander { talk } 🦖 18:15, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- We don't have FoP for 2D. 3D works permanently in public only (very much like the British version). ViperSnake151 (talk) 22:15, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:16, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Two files without metadata probably (c)vio (big load already deleted). Others don't make sense and or are blurry - out of scope.
- File:نمایی از انجام مسابقات رباتیک دانشگاه دهخدای قزوین.jpg
- File:نماز خانه دانشگاه دهخدا.JPG
- File:نمایی کوچک از کتابخوانه دانشگاه.JPG
- File:سلف غذاخوری دانشگاه دهخدا (واحد پسران ).JPG
- File:یکی از سه مجموعه سایت دانشگاه دهخدا.JPG
- File:نمایی از مسابقات رباتیک دانشگاه دهخدا.JPG
- File:بوفه دانشگاه.JPG
- File:انتشارات دانشگاه دهخدای قزوین.JPG
- File:تصویر یک روز برفی از دانشگاه دهخدا قزوین.jpg
Comment User claims own work on this image, all others are (c)vios. See my talk page.
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:56, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:25, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work. The Wikipedia logo and the Coronavirus are fine, but the Hajji Firuz, the fish and the sabzeh (plant) shown are most probably copyrighted. Searching "وکتور حاجی فیروز" in Google, I could find a link from pector.ir; the direct link is [4]. Although it is unavailable at the time, the thumbnail in Google shows exact the same Hajji Firuz (in the logo, there is a black line on his costume; that's a part of the watermark of the said website). From this link, it can be understood that the said website doesn't release its content under a free license, but rather sells them as products. The source of the fish and the sabzeh is not clear as well.
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ahmadtalk 16:44, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete DW no source 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:24, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
سلام وکتور های ماهی و سبزه از [5] مطابق لینک ارائه شده بند 5 دارای مجوز هستند . اشاره دقیق برداشت از این طرح [6] درباره منبع حاجی فیروز با توجه به این که این طرح برای لوگو نوروز 99 ویکی فا در حال نظر خواهی است تقاضا دارم حذف نشود تا زمان پایان اجماع . اگر اجماع حاصل شود تصویر حاجی فیروز جایگزین خواهد Sftzed (talk) 18:44, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Sftzed: سلام. در آن پیوند ([7])، چطور اثبات میشود که طرحهای دریافتشده از آن وبگاه، تحت مجوز آزاد هستند؟ Ahmadtalk 15:59, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:16, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hans Pape
[edit]de:Hans Pape (Maler) (1894.1970), German artist, copyright violation
- File:Hans pape, cantico dei cantici, 1910-34 (utrecht, catharijneconvent) 01.JPG
- File:Hans pape, cantico dei cantici, 1910-34 (utrecht, catharijneconvent) 03.JPG
- File:Hans pape, cantico dei cantici, 1910-34 (utrecht, catharijneconvent) 04.jpg
_01.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mutter Erde (talk) 18:01, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:15, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
It appears that the freedom of panorama laws in the Netherlands makes this image iffy (model inside a museum).[8] FunkMonk (talk) 19:29, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:15, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
useless quality photo of the car, that we have portrait photographs by the same user Pibwl (talk) 19:35, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:14, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Want to upload it directly to the page Rrishvan (talk) 20:10, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:12, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
a flyer behind an automobile window - no encyclopedic value, and it is not even matched with any other photo. Pibwl (talk) 20:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:10, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No encyclopedic value; no permission TJH2018talk 22:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:10, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Vanity. Self promotion. Fixertool (talk) 23:17, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Ya lo corregí. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sergio Jonathan (talk • contribs) 07:22, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:09, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Namibia has no relation to Nordic countries at all. You cannot see the flag existing in other places on the Internet. It look like it was created for 'fun', Wikimedia is not the place for to propose new flags - this falls in out of scope line. Sail 95 (talk) 23:40, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of newspaper Victorgrigas (talk) 23:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: No FoP in Italy. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:26, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
InfoPlease also refer to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Italy Lockdown.tif.廣九直通車 (talk) 01:41, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete No way is this de minimis. Maybe it falls under NFCC, but that's for Wikipedia to deal with. -- Veggies (talk) 06:53, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Extracted from File:Keolis 2017 logo.svg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not sure why this would be deleted. It's the company official logo. Let me know if there is something I should do to prevent deleting. Best, --Swaf75 (talk) 12:46, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:37, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Low res, wrong format version of File:Milan Puskar Stadium South End Zone.jpg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:37, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete --MGA73 (talk) 16:21, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:37, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since) Kalbbes (talk) 01:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete file is unlicensed. PD-old-100 definitely doesn't apply to photographs of tombs. See COM:ART. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I uploaded this file and I agree with the above comment. Kalbbes (talk) 16:33, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:37, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
obvious copyvio (see waterwark) DHN (talk) 01:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:37, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Definitely not own work, just like the rest of the stuff this user has uploaded, which he claims as "own work." HistoryofIran (talk) 01:33, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Definitely not own work, just like the rest of the stuff this user has uploaded, which he claims as "own work." HistoryofIran (talk) 01:33, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Definitely not own work, just like the rest of the stuff this user has uploaded, which he claims as "own work." HistoryofIran (talk) 01:33, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Definitely not own work, just like the rest of the stuff this user has uploaded, which he claims as "own work." HistoryofIran (talk) 01:33, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Definitely not own work, just like the rest of the stuff this user has uploaded, which he claims as "own work." HistoryofIran (talk) 01:33, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Definitely not own work, just like the rest of the stuff this user has uploaded, which he claims as "own work." HistoryofIran (talk) 01:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Definitely not own work, just like the rest of the stuff this user has uploaded, which he claims as "own work." HistoryofIran (talk) 01:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Definitely not own work, just like the rest of the stuff this user has uploaded, which he claims as "own work." HistoryofIran (talk) 01:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Definitely not own work, just like the rest of the stuff this user has uploaded, which he claims as "own work." HistoryofIran (talk) 01:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Definitely not own work, just like the rest of the stuff this user has uploaded, which he claims as "own work." HistoryofIran (talk) 01:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Definitely not own work, just like the rest of the stuff this user has uploaded, which he claims as "own work." HistoryofIran (talk) 01:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 01:57, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 02:01, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 02:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 02:04, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 02:04, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 02:04, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:33, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Agree. Eissink (talk) 02:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Has no use Eddieputts (talk) 04:33, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:34, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Has no use Eddieputts (talk) 04:35, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:34, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
No evidence that this is the users own file. It is heavily edited and a non-standard small size. Strongly suggests this is an edited copy of somebody else's file Velella (talk) 04:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:32, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Dubious licensing: no evidence the author died 70 or more years ago, not published before 1925 as well. Sealle (talk) 04:58, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:31, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Uploads by Prolemasses1107
[edit]- File:Confederate Election 1909.png
- File:La Revolution Eternelle Electoral College 1852.png
- File:1932 Election Map PNG.png
- File:1932 Election Map Socialist Election.svg
- File:Bernie Sanders 2016 PNG.png
- File:Bernie 2016 Electoral College.svg
- File:Ted Kennedy 1976 PNG.png
- File:Ted Kennedy 1976.svg
- File:Bernie Victory 2016 Wikibox PNG.png
- File:Bernie 2016 Electoral College.svg
- File:Springtime of Nations United States Election 2016.png
- File:2016 Election Wikibox PNG Gore Victory.png
- File:Electoral Map 2016 Gore Victory.svg
- File:2012 Election Wikibox PNG Gore Victory.png
- File:Electoral Map 2012 Gore Victory.svg
- File:2008 Election Wikibox PNG Gore Victory.png
- File:2008 Electoral Map Gore Victory.svg
- File:2004 Election Wikibox PNG.png
- File:2004 Electoral Map Gore Victory.svg
- File:2000 Election Al Gore Victory Wikibox PNG.png
- File:2000 Electoral Map Al Gore Victory.svg
All fictitious, unused maps that have no encyclopedic use. Need someone else to add {{Delete}} to all of these files. --Wow (talk) 05:03, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:31, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
blocked users version, not used, not needed anymore 83.148.227.178 10:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Blocked user is not a valid reason for deletion. Currently unused but still usable. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion Alan (talk) 00:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced depiction, imaginery creation of a sockpuppeteer Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 07:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is used by sv:Husbondsvimpel. Under COM:NPOV, if it's accurate enough for Swedish Wikipedia, it's accurate enough for Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 15:55, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no alternate file presented. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of file:Pennant of Etelä-Karjala.svg Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 07:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: The files are not identical: file:Pennant of Etelä-Karjala.svg has a black line around the yellow area that's missing from this version. sv:Husbondsvimpel uses this version, presumably deliberately. --bjh21 (talk) 15:58, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Used the other image where this one was in use and deleted, as duplicate and leser quality. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Chemische Waffe.png Claude J (talk) 07:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
The uploader, in an effort to make a joke, tried to put this as the official sign of US chemical weapons in the article de:Chemische Waffen, Diff (this is also his/her description in commons)--Claude J (talk) 07:27, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:27, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jbmosher72 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused images. User uploaded them by mistake and so they refused to confirm the license using COM:OTRS despite that in File:Threading The Needle.jpg author info visible in EXIF. Courtesy deletion request per ticket:2020031110001596.
- File:Summer School.jpg
- File:Threading The Needle.jpg
- File:Ship's Mast.jpg
- File:Path To The Heavens.jpg
- File:Farming Twilight.jpg
Ankry (talk) 07:40, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:27, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
User uploaded the image by mistake and so they refused to confirm the license using COM:OTRS despite that author info visible in EXIF. Courtesy deletion request per ticket:2020031110001596. Note: image is used. Ankry (talk) 07:48, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:26, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
i want to upload new image Rohit Dhamecha (talk) 07:58, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & because image contained derivative works. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:26, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Procedural listing of files tagged for deletion per above, but not properly listed. ƏXPLICIT 23:47, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- F10 +copvio (FBMD) - Speedy delete. --E4024 (talk) 03:41, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 14:39, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
In my opinion this is not a simple logo. OTRS-permission from party representative is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:10, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:26, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
From what I can tell this is in the US - no FOP for art works Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:26, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Thienhau2003 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: G7. Author or uploader request deletion
Converted by me to regular DR, as image does not qualify for speedy deletion, as it's in use. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:37, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:26, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Thienhau2003 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: G7. Author or uploader request deletion
Converted by me to regular DR, as image does not qualify for speedy deletion, as it's in use. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:37, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion- in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:25, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
It is not an official flag of EAEU (see File:Flag of the Eurasian Economic Union.svg), it is fake. Wikisaurus (talk) 09:50, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:25, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Photographie Luc Boegly - 2014 et pas de liberté de panorama en France 195.25.99.205 09:57, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Εκθέσεις για τα 2.500 Χρόνια από τη Μάχη του Μαραθώνα - Exhibitions to mark 2,500 years from the Battle of Marathon (5246503766).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
bad quality - there is two other and better versions. Sammyday (talk) 11:17, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete File:Phidippides.jpg is a much better example of this painting. clpo13(talk) 16:24, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
https://yandex.ru/images/search?cbir_id=1617445%2FA-ID75i4Mhh8FKaY1caGqQ&cbird=5&rpt=imageview&redircnt=1550509886.1 копирайт Панн (talk) 17:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. The file is in high resolution on Commons, much higher than on any other page on the web (which indicates that these websites took the photo from Commons, and not the other way around). There are no other suspicious moments such as watermarks, copyright remarks and so on. If a user uploads a file you cannot find anywhere else, you have to AGF unless you have significant reasons to assume bad faith. There is no rule so far that everyone had to confirm own authorship via OTRS. --A.Savin 21:56, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - per my comments here; previous closure was abusive. Эlcobbola talk 20:24, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Reupload of File:Юрий Швыткин.jpg. Uploader ignored the permission concern. 1989 (talk) 00:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- The tagging as "no permission" was nonsense, as the file description had been filled in properly as own work by the uploader and no explicit permission was required. Jcb deleted the file after 7 days, since they (as often) didn't bother to take a closer look. --A.Savin 00:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. Google images (and Tineye) does not find any results before upload date (2017) Робионек Д. С (talk) 08:46, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: the given source is much younger than the commons image. --JuTa 02:17, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
https://www.leftfront.org/person/Швыткин_Юрий_Николаевич.855569 coppivo 2017 ПашкаМушкин (talk) 11:46, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept. Does not appear to have a valid deletion reason --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
https://www.leftfront.org/person/Швыткин_Юрий_Николаевич.855569 coppivo 2017-2020 Слезантий2 (talk) 13:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: the earliest version of the claimed source page is dated from March 2020 [9] so that the image at Commons cannot be taken from there. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:41, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Javadsafaee (talk · contribs)
[edit]LTA uploaded. F10.
Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Getty Images watermark and/or copyfraud Gyrostat (talk) 12:35, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Educational value as is, to demonstrate harvesting from Wikimedia Commons free images and the breaking of moral rights of attribution. I have added an explanation and cross-linked to the original photograph on Commons. --Fæ (talk) 12:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oh ok, I got your point. I didn't understand why to keep a watermarked file if the original file is already on Commons since many years. Gyrostat (talk) 13:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Rename to File:1600 Himmelsscheibe von Nebra sky disk anagoria Getty Watermark.jpg to avoid confusion and comply with name policy.--BevinKacon (talk) 12:12, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Per Fae. Renamed per above. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Who is the painter? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:55, 11 March 2020 (UTC) The painter Isaac Grunewald, 1889-1946Janee (talk) 12:57, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia + DW (photo). — Ирука13 12:58, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia + DW (photo). — Ирука13 12:58, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
The cast copy of this ancient head does not have a copyright, but the reconsturction certainly does. This image infringes on that copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:21, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Underexposed photo, part of mass upload. Out of scope. Pugilist (talk) 14:17, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:21, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
coppivo https://news.sputnik.ru/politika/6de285d13c321a418f8edd4f42cbcbf9247dc275 ПашкаМушкин (talk) 14:39, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Obviously it was took from Commons.--Александр Мотин (talk) 14:02, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + © Фото с сайта mk.ru in image. That means COPYRIGHT photo to mk.ru... not uploader & not commons. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:21, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Сергей_Борисович_Прокопенко.jpg duuble ПашкаМушкин (talk) 14:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:20, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Underexposed photo, part of mass upload. Out of scope. Pugilist (talk) 14:50, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:20, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted text ViperSnake151 (talk) 15:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Apparently FoP Canada doesn't cover print / text / poster. // sikander { talk } 🦖 18:16, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:20, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Sustitución por otro Isturgi (talk) 15:51, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:19, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation, an OTRS ticket would be helpful. GFJ (talk) 16:24, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:17, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Superseded and quasi duplicate of TWA Flight 800 zones.png, no additional advantage for this one! Ras67 (talk) 16:38, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:16, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
The file is an image of recent newspaper posted in Italy, in which there are no FOP in Italy per COM:FOP Italy. As a result, the file is copyrighted and unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 03:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- But in the way it is photographed, you can barely read it. It is not a full front on photograph.HartemLijn (talk) 08:26, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- it's just the front page, so it respects commercial oportunities. Pancho507 (talk) 10:45, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Agree, this illustrates the paper, rather than reproducing it. Newystats (talk) 00:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- it's just the front page, so it respects commercial oportunities. Pancho507 (talk) 10:45, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Copyrighted newspaper. They are the subject of the photo, de minimis can't apply. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:28, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Keep at least the "Tutti in casa" part which became symbolic - and ironic as somebody did hang a newspaper instead of staying at home, and someone else pictured instead of staying at home. If needed blur the bottom part of the front page as it is not a focus: the main goal is an order to stay at home, and the order in itself is not copyrightable — NickK (talk) 02:22, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete This is obviously unfree. It probably should have been speedy-deleted. It does not fall into de minimis in any reasonable sense. Get rid of it and all it's derivatives. -- Veggies (talk) 23:34, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment If this DR is closed as kept, please create a JPG version of this file. Thanks, pandakekok9 02:45, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. While the text may not be legible, there are also photos involved which makes this image a derivative of unfree works. --De728631 (talk) 00:31, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
έγινε λάθος Filimon13 (talk) 15:46, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 09:00, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
I made a mistake before and this is the name of another bridge nearby ([10]), so this redirection might be misleading. “ CAPITAL PATROLLER ” ☎ 911 17:23, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 08:59, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
I made a mistake before and this is the name of another bridge nearby ([11]), so this redirection might be misleading. “ CAPITAL PATROLLER ” ☎ 911 17:24, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 08:59, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
I made a mistake before and this is the name of another bridge nearby ([12]), so this redirection might be misleading. “ CAPITAL PATROLLER ” ☎ 911 17:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 08:59, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
No reason to waste everybody's time with it. The licence has changed before this video was archived on any site I can find and before it had a chance to be reviewed. It does not appear due to any other reason than a change of heart of the news company. The video is published in 2017, so likely undeletion date is 2138. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 21:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 08:56, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The map is wrong and based on original research. It should be removed for inciting racial hatred and chauvinism. The Chinese Aryan (talk) 01:51, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.PNG){kind=link}
- Keep There is nothing racist about Y-DNA or haplogroup R. There is no rule against original research. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per above. It seems the work of one or few troublesome vandals that keep on tagging good maps as "wrong". I came across a few. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:51, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I believe that this is not an issue of vandalism, but rather due to misinformation and misappropriation of some ideas by the right wing, so people think that the correct reaction is to attack those ideas directly rather than the appropriation of those ideas into political discourse. Science is apolitical, it just studies what is. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 12:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Yup, true. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- The requester is a sock of a recent vandal on Chinese Wikipedia. I have blocked him as such. Please consider speedy close. -Mys_721tx (talk) 07:28, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is in use on multiple Wikipedia articles, from es:Haplogrupo R ADN-Y to zh:原始印欧人. That means that under COM:NPOV Commons will keep it even if it's inaccurate. As for inciting racial hatred, while I don't doubt that the map could be used to incite racial hatred, it won't do som on its own. Any such incitement should be dealt with where it actually happens. --bjh21 (talk) 15:02, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
.PNG){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
No source for the underpinning map. Fæ (talk) 14:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- I strike my keep vote for now, but that does not mean that I am voting to delete. At this moment there needs to be some explanation. This map appears to be Hobo-Dyer equal-area projection. If there is a creative element, then it is in the projection, not in the data (continents themselves, etc) unless that data is creative and does not simply state how the world is, but we are not talking about a fictional map here. But the projection seems to be made in 2002. But if we classify the projection itself as creative enough, then we should delete all the maps that use that projection. I am unsure if the court would grant a person an ability to assert copyright on a projection of a 3D object onto a 2D plane, but that is not inconceivable. That is a creative process, and there are choices that need to be made. For now I am still leaning towards a vote of keep, but we may decide to delete all maps of the world with that projection, if we decide that per PRP there may possibly be a copyright claim. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:03, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- FYI, there is significant involvement here by LenguaMapa (and 2 other accounts in the file history that appear to be unidentified old socks), refer to Category:Sockpuppets of WorldCreaterFighter. From what we know, the identified sock accounts are very much the tip of the iceberg. Any copyright claims need to be firmly and independently verifiable.
- Could you explain what underpinning map you believe is the original verifiable freely licensed version, presumably that then has been re-projected by someone using an automated process? --Fæ (talk) 17:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Nope, cannot explain something I didn't say. What I am saying is this: The shape of continents is not a copyrightable shape. They are the way they are. What can be copyrightable is somebody's creative alterations of this shape. Since we are not dealing with a fictional map, we have only a limited set of alterations that would not make the map useless. I really do hope that I am wrong when it comes to the projection, since if I am right, we would need to delete every contemporary projection on this project. Since my last post here, I did realise that there is a second creative process that must be at work here, when we take a shape and zoom out, we do not simply make all the distances smaller, we must soften the edges, otherwise there is a risk of having a fuzzy edge to all the continents, especially where there exist island chains, many small features, etc. If you do nothing thy will become a mush that is indistinguishable at this resolution, adds noting, but hides real data. That is definitely a creative process, and thus it is subject to copyright. I am a bit tired now, so I should probably sleep on this before making up my mind on the way I would vote. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:09, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- I strike my keep vote for now, but that does not mean that I am voting to delete. At this moment there needs to be some explanation. This map appears to be Hobo-Dyer equal-area projection. If there is a creative element, then it is in the projection, not in the data (continents themselves, etc) unless that data is creative and does not simply state how the world is, but we are not talking about a fictional map here. But the projection seems to be made in 2002. But if we classify the projection itself as creative enough, then we should delete all the maps that use that projection. I am unsure if the court would grant a person an ability to assert copyright on a projection of a 3D object onto a 2D plane, but that is not inconceivable. That is a creative process, and there are choices that need to be made. For now I am still leaning towards a vote of keep, but we may decide to delete all maps of the world with that projection, if we decide that per PRP there may possibly be a copyright claim. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:03, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- All drawn maps have copyright unless they are public domain by age or originally published as public domain. The "shape of continents" is copyrightable if it is drawn. --Fæ (talk) 19:38, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- I would like to change my vote to Delete. Let me clarify my reasoning. First of all I disagree with the characterisation of the DR as a racially based file, we should document the beliefs of fringe groups, that is a very important part of any educational project to provide information about such groups rather than hiding it. I also believe that the file should be undeleted at the latest in 2131, or earlier if that is possible. My vote to delete is based squarely in "permission or OTRS needed" reasoning, as I have explained above we must admit that the decision on what details to draw in a global map is a creative decision, and therefore it is protected under copyright, even if it is a weak protection disallowing direct copying only. In this case Tineye has identified that this particular shape of the map has been seen on another site in 2010 in September, since image has been uploaded here before that date, we can imagine that it was copied from here to there, however, if we look at https://web.archive.org/web/20140326023244/http://www.secrethistoryx.com:80/2010/07/lilith-is-feeling-left-out/ then we see that the post where it is used has been made prior to the file appearing here. P.S. I know that it may appear stupid to change one's vote several time in the same DR, but I will do so if 1) We will get OTRS ticket regarding this particular map shape, or 2) There has been this particular map shape uploaded to Commons or another archived source prior to the 19th of July 2010 under a free licence. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Gone Postal: File:Haplogroup Q (Y-DNA).PNG uploaded 16th July 2010? --MGA73 (talk) 09:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- File:Geografía del macrohaplogrupo M.png and File:Geography of haplogroup M (mtDNA) subclades.png from 2009? --MGA73 (talk) 09:08, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Maulucioni: Would you please comment on this? I will still have to wait on the result of Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/華夏1000, but your response would be very helpful. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 12:29, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Gone Postal: File:Haplogroup Q (Y-DNA).PNG uploaded 16th July 2010? --MGA73 (talk) 09:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- I would like to change my vote to
- All drawn maps have copyright unless they are public domain by age or originally published as public domain. The "shape of continents" is copyrightable if it is drawn. --Fæ (talk) 19:38, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
.PNG){kind=link}
_subclades.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep I agree that there is no clear source but we have that problem for quite a few old maps and new maps have been drawn on basis of these old maps and that is not the ideal but thats how it is. For all we know perhaps the user visited the entire world and made the map all alone from scratch (but I doubt it)!
- I think we can argue that the original map (whatever that is) does not meet the requirements in COM:TOO. But if someone show up and claim that they made the original map and ask us to delete the map we can of course start a new DR. --MGA73 (talk) 20:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- FYI we can now confirm that this one file has been overwritten by 3 different sock accounts of the puppeteer and serial copyright violator WorldCreaterFighter, a 4th account is a blocked sock account, but not yet directly identified.
- There is very little doubt that this is a copyright violation, as most of the other uploads by this sock farm have been. Your confidence is misplaced. --Fæ (talk) 20:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- You mix copyright and socks. The question is if the map is above TOO or not and if the original uploader perhaps used a PD map and just forgotten to list the source. PRP is not the only "rule" on Commons. We also have AGF and ignore all rules. I think we shall be careful but we should not be extreme. We discuss TOO in many deletion requests and we have also discussed many times what to do with old files that have some problems. Sometimes we delete and sometimes we keep. If there is a risk that someone lose money I think we should be more careful than when it is obvious that there is noone that will ever lose as much as 1 cent if we keep a file. Take the discussion of {{PD-scan}} and {{PD-art}}. There we copy what someone else created and say we don't care even if they complain. Sould we go PRP and delete it all? No, we respect copyright but we don't delete if the creative level is close to zero. --MGA73 (talk) 21:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- No, the sock farm lies about copyright and has a long, long history of misdirecting on copyright.
- The doubt here is well above the required "significant doubt" of COM:PRP. We do not wait for take-down notices to remove copyvios. --Fæ (talk) 11:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- I have still not seen evidence that User:Maulucioni, User:Hunnjazal and en:User:Sugaar are socks. So why do you suddenly suspect that they upload copyvios? You have not provided any hits on TinEye or Google showing any images uploaded before the first version on Wikipedia/Commons. --MGA73 (talk) 15:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- This is a tangent, one I find bizarre. "Hunnjazal" and "Sugaar" have not touched the file which is under discussion here. However LenguaMapa, SibirHusky, 일성강 have edited this file and are all blocked sockpuppet accounts.
- The doubt here is well above the required "significant doubt" of COM:PRP. --Fæ (talk) 16:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- I think it is obvious that the source of the file is File:Geography of haplogroup M (mtDNA) subclades.png and it was uploaded by the users above. Your argument for deleting is that we must suspect that it is a copyvio becaue it is uploaded by socks. I do not want to spend more time discussing this file. I thought it was about a missing source and the question if the map was above COM:TOO but I now see that the agenda is something else. --MGA73 (talk) 16:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- These are rather wild aspersions, I am at a loss as to why you don't want to examine the copyright evidence in a methodical way.
- In the meantime Maulucioni claims to have drawn the underpinning map pixel by pixel in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Haplogroup Q (Y-DNA).PNG. Based on this testable claim, I have searched for this particular map and its projection, and find it being used in research papers at higher quality, making this own work claim demonstrably false. I suspect the map has been extracted from a mapping tool without attribution. Refer to the other DR.
- It's a copyvio. --Fæ (talk) 16:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- I think it is obvious that the source of the file is File:Geography of haplogroup M (mtDNA) subclades.png and it was uploaded by the users above. Your argument for deleting is that we must suspect that it is a copyvio becaue it is uploaded by socks. I do not want to spend more time discussing this file. I thought it was about a missing source and the question if the map was above COM:TOO but I now see that the agenda is something else. --MGA73 (talk) 16:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- I have still not seen evidence that User:Maulucioni, User:Hunnjazal and en:User:Sugaar are socks. So why do you suddenly suspect that they upload copyvios? You have not provided any hits on TinEye or Google showing any images uploaded before the first version on Wikipedia/Commons. --MGA73 (talk) 15:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- You mix copyright and socks. The question is if the map is above TOO or not and if the original uploader perhaps used a PD map and just forgotten to list the source. PRP is not the only "rule" on Commons. We also have AGF and ignore all rules. I think we shall be careful but we should not be extreme. We discuss TOO in many deletion requests and we have also discussed many times what to do with old files that have some problems. Sometimes we delete and sometimes we keep. If there is a risk that someone lose money I think we should be more careful than when it is obvious that there is noone that will ever lose as much as 1 cent if we keep a file. Take the discussion of {{PD-scan}} and {{PD-art}}. There we copy what someone else created and say we don't care even if they complain. Sould we go PRP and delete it all? No, we respect copyright but we don't delete if the creative level is close to zero. --MGA73 (talk) 21:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
.PNG){kind=link}
- Keep Per above. As far as South Asian part goes, I myself have edited it and guided other users (sock or not) to get it as correct as possible as per available researches. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:29, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- You appear to misunderstand. This deletion nomination is "No source for the underpinning map." it has nothing to do with whether the content is "correct". --Fæ (talk) 17:46, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- procedural keep item is marked dw-nsd. If someone finds the original, we should keep it. Otherwise it is unsourced, which is not really a matter for deletion discussion. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:50, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Perhaps what needs to happen is somebody who is interested in this subject could transfer the data from this map onto another map that we already have, I doubt that tranformations should be that difficult to make, and the errors can be ironed out without resorting to DR discussions. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:09, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- As "the data" has not been published and is impossible to verify because "y otros" means it's not actually verifiably sourced from any scientifically peer reviewed data, reconstructing any of this is of dubious value and might give the misleading impression for Wikipedia editors that any of this is proper science. --Fæ (talk) 10:20, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Perhaps what needs to happen is somebody who is interested in this subject could transfer the data from this map onto another map that we already have, I doubt that tranformations should be that difficult to make, and the errors can be ironed out without resorting to DR discussions. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:09, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear source, unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 02:29, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Keep. One could argue whether an ordinary Teddy bear meets the threshold of originality (the Category certainly begs to differ, given the many hundreds of images of teddy bears it contains), but the 'collage'-like application of a surgical mask certainly makes it obvious a parody, or at least a human expression of perhaps seeking comfort in times of near-pandemic in a humorous way transcending every focus on the possible one-in-a-million seam that fits the legs to the stuffed bears trunk. So I think this DR is totally overdone. Eissink (talk) 02:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC).
- Keep Standard generic type "Teddy bear" toy such as have been mass produced for more than 115 years; no copyright concern even without the mask. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:19, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Keep A teddy bear is too simple, and "teddy bear" toy has been there for more than a century. Please see the last line of the last but one para of COM:TOYS "Some toys are also too simple to meet the threshold of originality".
acagastya 06:23, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Pennant of Häme.svg Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 07:15, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10219702848915361&set=a.1499777508025&type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC) + out of COM:SCOPE + not a selfie.
- Keep Despite this being findable on Chefisaacalonso's Facebook page (no surprise), you can only download it in a lower resolution than has been uploaded to Commons. For this reason the release is entirely credible, as is @Chefisaacalonso: being the right account for the same person.
- Plus, a slightly technical point, if you try downloading from Facebook, the image will have a unique FBMD number in the EXIF data. The upload to Commons has no such data hidden within the file, increasing the credibility of this upload.
- By the way @Patrick Rogel: precisely how can this photograph be out of scope when it is so clearly illustrative of professional chefs and restaurant cooking? Being out of scope is not a mantra to apply to absolutely everything and anything you don't like, that's just thoughtlessness and when repeated this way in multiple DRs as you have been doing, amounts to disruption. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 15:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- You don't like COM:CSD#F10, you don't like {{copyvio}}, hence your reverts a-go-go. what do you like @Fæ: ? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:33, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Good faith for new uploaders in accordance with PRP. --Fæ (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- It's the picture which is problematic, not the uploader (so far) though claiming own work on a photo which is obviously not a selfie is against Commons rules. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:46, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Good faith for new uploaders in accordance with PRP. --Fæ (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- You don't like COM:CSD#F10, you don't like {{copyvio}}, hence your reverts a-go-go. what do you like @Fæ: ? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:33, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Not found via google images so likely to be own work. In scope - can be used to depict a chef. --Gbawden (talk) 11:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Useless photo, with a woman posing before the car - of which there are better photographs by the same author. Pibwl (talk) 19:29, 11 March 2020 (UTC) Same for File:1964 Chrysler 300 K All Original numbers matching vehicle...............e.jpg and File:1964 Chrysler 300 K All Original numbers matching vehicle..............d.jpg and File:1964 Chrysler 300 K All Original numbers matching vehicle.jpg and File:1964 Chrysler 301 K All Original numbers matching vehicle.jpg with the uploader (to whom we are grateful for uploading other photos!) bragging about his car.
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:35, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Breunig Klaviertransporte as Speedy (Löschen) and the most recent rationale was: Begründung Da die Einblendung nicht geduldet wird, untersagen wir die Verwendung des Bildes. Copyright ist bei Breunig Klaviertransporte.
- Keep File was originally uploaded under Creative-Commons-Lizenz „Namensnennung – Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 international“. LexICon (talk) 21:55, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Uploader wants it deleted only because another user requested to remove the uploader's in-picture advertisement. --Rennrigor (talk) 07:10, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- not sure: Isn't COM:GCSD#G7 applicable? Habitator terrae 🌍
- Considering that the file was tagged for deletion on the day of upload, yes, I think it is applicable. Therefore: Delete as a courtesy to the uploader. GFJ (talk) 08:49, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Considering that the file was tagged for deletion on the day of upload, yes, I think it is applicable. Therefore:
- Keep COM:CSD#G7 is only valid for unused content. This is not true (anymore) for this file. — Speravir – 23:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Keep: Keeping as source of touched up file. --Gbawden (talk) 11:32, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Definitely not own work, just like the rest of the stuff this user has uploaded, which he claims as "own work." HistoryofIran (talk) 01:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:14, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 02:01, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- This file was uploaded on 5 December 2017. I checked the copyright status before uploading, so I strongly believe it was "cc-zero". I don't think it's proper to wait until file was removed from Flickr and then to nominate it for deletion. A1Cafel, I am sorry to take this liberty to ask: why didn’t you check the copyright status at that time?--Kai3952 (talk) 18:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- The bot FlickreviewR 2 automatically confirms the licensing of files from Flickr, but only if the correct template, {{Flickrreview}}, is put on the file description page. The template is usually added at the time of upload if the source is Flickr, but that apparently didn't happen in this case. The template wasn't added until this edit on November 7, 2018, by which time the photo had been removed from Flickr. The only thing to do is to contact the Flickr user and ask if they can put the image back online or confirm that it's okay via COM:OTRS. clpo13(talk) 23:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Clpo13: I tried to contact him(by email, trying to reach him), but couldn't contact him. Could you help me with that?--Kai3952 (talk) 00:00, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- The bot FlickreviewR 2 automatically confirms the licensing of files from Flickr, but only if the correct template, {{Flickrreview}}, is put on the file description page. The template is usually added at the time of upload if the source is Flickr, but that apparently didn't happen in this case. The template wasn't added until this edit on November 7, 2018, by which time the photo had been removed from Flickr. The only thing to do is to contact the Flickr user and ask if they can put the image back online or confirm that it's okay via COM:OTRS. clpo13(talk) 23:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - aside from the copyright question, I don;t think this image has any educational use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:15, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Non-credible claim of ownership - claimed as own work, but appears to be a professional glamor shot. creffett (talk) 02:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- This photo was taken by me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nyiminsan (talk • contribs) 16:30, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Big image with EXIF, so AGF. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:16, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the uploader owns the copyright of the photographed text. Failing such evidence, they can not release the file under any copyright license, so the file is Commons-incompatible. Daniel Mietchen (talk) 02:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Assuming that http://www.zoj.com.ua/ is the magazine in which this article from 2003 was published, I am not seeing any evidence for a free commons-compatible license. COM:OTRS permission is needed, or else this file should be deleted. --HyperGaruda (talk) 07:39, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
-- Фото статті "гуляє" інтернетом, без зазначення данних про власника фото чи Ліцензію. Вочевидь власник прав на фото статті в газеті не претендує на будь які права. Але - як цього (видалення) вимагають ПРАВИЛА, - треба видалити.
ВоєводаЯ (talk) 14:26, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:17, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Contains material (climate-action-fridaysforfuture-4150536) that is not compatible with Commons guidelines. The restrictions of the Pixaby license are not in accordance with Commons:Licensing. Martina talk 03:57, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:18, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Unsourced depiction, likely imaginary creation of a sockpuppeteer Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 07:09, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is used by de:Flagge der Finnlandschweden and en:Flag of the Swedish-speaking Finns. Under COM:NPOV, if it's accurate enough for German and English Wikipedias, it's accurate enough for Commons.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:18, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Unsourced depiction, likely imaginary creation of a sockpuppeteer Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 07:10, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Unsourced depiction, likely imaginary creation of a sockpuppeteer Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 07:10, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Unsourced depiction, likely imaginary creation of a sockpuppeteer Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 07:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is used by sv:Husbondsvimpel. Under COM:NPOV, if it's accurate enough for Swedish Wikipedia, it's accurate enough for Commons. I also note that it's similar (but not identical) to File:Pennant of Swedish-speaking Uusimaa.svg. --bjh21 (talk) 15:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Unsourced depiction, likely imaginary creation of a sockpuppeteer Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 07:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Unsourced depiction, likely imaginary creation of a sockpuppeteer Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 07:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is used by sv:Husbondsvimpel. Under COM:NPOV, if it's accurate enough for Swedish Wikipedia, it's accurate enough for Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 15:25, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Unsourced depiction, likely imaginary creation of a sockpuppeteer Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 07:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is used by sv:Husbondsvimpel. Under COM:NPOV, if it's accurate enough for Swedish Wikipedia, it's accurate enough for Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 15:28, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Unsourced depiction, likely imaginary creation of a sockpuppeteer Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 07:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is used by sv:Husbondsvimpel. Under COM:NPOV, if it's accurate enough for Swedish Wikipedia, it's accurate enough for Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 15:30, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Unsourced depiction, likely imaginary creation of a sockpuppeteer Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 07:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is used by sv:Husbondsvimpel. Under COM:NPOV, if it's accurate enough for Swedish Wikipedia, it's accurate enough for Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 15:34, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Unsourced depiction, likely imaginary creation of a sockpuppeteer Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 07:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is used by sv:Husbondsvimpel. Under COM:NPOV, if it's accurate enough for Swedish Wikipedia, it's accurate enough for Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 15:32, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Unsourced depiction, likely imaginary creation of a sockpuppeteer Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 07:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is used by sv:Husbondsvimpel. Under COM:NPOV, if it's accurate enough for Swedish Wikipedia, it's accurate enough for Commons.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Unsourced depiction, likely imaginary creation of a sockpuppeteer Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 07:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is used by sv:Husbondsvimpel. Under COM:NPOV, if it's accurate enough for Swedish Wikipedia, it's accurate enough for Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 15:37, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Pennant of Pohjois-Pohjanmaa.svg Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 07:15, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: The colours are subtly different and this version is in use on sv:Husbondsvimpel. There may be some reason why Swedish Wikipedia chose to use this version, so until Swedish Wikipedia stops using it, we should keep it. --bjh21 (talk) 15:45, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:20, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Pennant of Savo.svg (as pennants are hoisted on a single point the arrangement of the colours isn't relevant, files is by a sockpuppeteer) Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 07:17, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Not a duplicate. File:Pennant of Savo.svg has a black border around the yellow part which this file lacks. Also the shades of yellow are different. This version is in use on sv:Husbondsvimpel, and Swedish Wikipedia may have a good reason to prefer this version over the other. Under COM:INUSE, Commons should honour that. --bjh21 (talk) 15:51, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:20, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of file:Pennant of Keski-Suomi.svg (as pennants are hoisted on a single point the arrangement of the colours isn't relevant, files is by a sockpuppeteer) Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 07:18, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: The two versions are not identical: file:Pennant of Keski-Suomi.svg has a black border around the red section that this version lacks. uses this version, and it's possible that was a deliberate choice. --bjh21 (talk) 15:54, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:20, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
le blanson est faux dans sa forme. merci de contacter la mairie de Meymac (bulletin@meymac.fr) 217.128.201.142 13:03, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep: Ce fichie est utilisé sur beaucoup d'articles des Wikipédias, de ca:Maimac à zh-min-nan:Meymac. Par COM:NPOV, si c'est assez juste pour Wikipédia, c'est assez juste pour Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 16:09, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Bonjour, je suis l'auteur de ce dessin. Comme il est inscrit dans la fiche, ce dessin a été proposé d’après l'ouvrage de Robert Merceron "les blasons de la Corrèze et de ses communes" publié en 1990 pour la revue Limouzi. Ce blason et donc son blasonnement ("d'azur à trois pals ondés d'argent") a été validé par un vote du Conseil Municipal le 18 juin 1988.
Le dessin respecte scrupuleusement le blasonnement et n'est pas faux. Quant à la forme elle n'intervient pas dans la validation du dessin. Sur son site la commune a choisi une autre forme tout aussi valable. Les deux représentations (et il en existe beaucoup d'autres) sont acceptables. Donc je persiste à proposer ce dessin de blason comme représentatif des armes de la ville : "d'azur à trois pals ondées d'argent"--Jacques63 (talk) 07:59, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep. mêmes raisons que les autres : le blason est héraldiquement correct et utilisé. Kathisma (talk) 22:26, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Dubious licensing, no evidence this is PD. Sealle (talk) 04:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:54, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
license is a lie, image is actually not freely licensed Ysangkok (talk) 05:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:OTRS permission required. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:54, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Ambiguous definition of term use. Are derivative works and/or commercial use permitted?
- File:Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare and Objective of Novel Coronavirus Countermeasure.pdf
- File:Abe and First Novel Coronavirus Expert Meeting.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
http://japan.kantei.go.jp/policies/terms_e.html Commercial use of Content is also permitted. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/terms_of_use.html Commercial use of Content is also permitted. What needs to be determined to meet the copyright criteria? I'm new at Wikimedia Commons --Randdavit (talk) 17:20, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Other photo in [13] & Same photo in [14] ([15]) --Benzoyl (talk) 15:39, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/terms.html ... File:20200108monodukuri05.jpg etc "permitted". --Benzoyl (talk) 15:46, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Thereby. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:53, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- (Delete) The administrators of the Kantei don't say "Copyrighted free use". — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 126.189.41.42 (talk) 12:31, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- [DELETE] The uploader of the image said "Copyrighted free use". But the copyright holder of the image don't says "Copyrighted free use". --126.189.186.53 01:44, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
![[15]](https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/content/20200216senmonka_03.jpg){kind=link}
The copyright page states, "The information made available via the website (hereinafter referred to as “Content”) may be freely used by any person in accordance with provisions 1 to 6 detailed below, including reproduction, public transmission and adaptation through translation or other modifications, etc. Commercial use of Content is also permitted." Doesn't this constitute "copyrighted free use"?--146.151.113.93 04:01, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- PS I made a derivative :File:Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare and Objective of Novel Coronavirus Countermeasure.svg (if delete source-pdf, delete that also the svg) — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 18:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete This is not freely licensed. The license contains the following provisions:
3) Prohibited use a. The Content must not be used in the following ways: (a) Usage that violates laws and ordinances, regulations, or public policy * (b) Usage that represents a threat to the safety of the state and/or its citizens * Usage violating public policy means criminal use, use that is contrary to moral principles (marital order, sexual morality), use that severely restricts personal freedom, profiteering or unfair dealings etc.
Particularly the provisions on "use that is contrary to moral principles" is problematic. This is definitely not freely licensed and should be removed. Zellfaze (talk) 16:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- I agree to delete, because I'm not understand Japanese letter.Gsarwa (talk) 03:04, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per {{GJSTU1}}. If this license is to be deprecated, it needs to be a community-wide decision, not a w:WP:LOCALCONSENSUS at an individual DR. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:58, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Nominated by uploader User:Prehistoricplanes for the following reason: "Désolé mais cette image n'est pas intéressante pour une encyclopédie". My own opinion: Keep as it does look educationally useful to me, although a courtesy deletion could be considered. GFJ (talk) 10:58, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, requested by author, not used anywhere. --ƏXPLICIT 12:42, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
das Problem liegt in der Art und Weise der Darstellung dieser Gedenktafel - durch Bildbearbeitung und Ausschnittsveränderung ist die eigentliche Gedenktafel und deren Standort als solche nicht mehr erkennbar. Stattdessen entsteht durch diese Bearbeitung der Eindruck, es könnte sich um die originale Fotografie handeln. Das führt wiederum dazu, dass diese urheberrechtlich geschützte Fotografie ohne Lizenzerwerb für kommerzielle und politische Zwecke verwendet werden kann (und auch bereits wurde) und damit das Urheberecht am Original-Foto umgangen wird. Ob es sich bei der durchgeführten Bildbearbeitung um ein Verstoß gegen § 62 (1) UrhG oder möglicherweise um eine unberechtigte Vervielfältigung des Original-Fotos durch Anfertigen eines Fotos vom Foto handelt, wäre im Zweifel juristisch aufzuklären. Alfredo6666 (talk) 18:02, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- Foto der Gedenktafel im öffentlichen Raum fällt unter Panoramafreiheit. Es wurde keine inhaltliche Änderung oder Ausschnittsverändung vorgenommen. Bildbearbeitung umfasst lediglich Umwandlung in Graustufen, minimale Entzerrung und Entfernung Einzelreflexion. Das „Kunstwerk“ ist vollständig dargestellt (die Stele ist nicht als Teil des Kunstwerk aufzufassen, da alle sonstigen Tafeln des Dresdner Revolutionswegs direkt an Gebäudewänden angebracht sind, und keine solche Stele umfassen). Es handelt sich keinesfalls um eine Foto des Originalfotos, sondern der von der Stadt erstellten Tafel. Die ursprüngliche Urheberschaft des Originalfotos ist im Bild der Tafel klar benannt. Seitenbeschreibungsseite nach geringfügigen Änderungen eindeutig. -- burts ∞ 12:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- siehe auch Diskussion hier:
de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen#Foto_einer_Gedenktafel_mit_Foto_im_öffentlichen_Raumde:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen/Archiv/2020/01#Foto_einer_Gedenktafel_mit_Foto_im_öffentlichen_Raum
Kept: per above. --JuTa 22:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
_AN0869790.jpg){kind=link}
_AN0869790.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{duplicate|File:British Aerospace BAe 146-200(QT), TNT Airways (Pan Air) JP5889182.jpg}} DS28 (talk) 09:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
,_TNT_Airways_(Pan_Air)_JP5889182.jpg){kind=link}
There's no need for a DR and a duplicate tag. Using the latter here does not work anyway. --Fæ (talk) 10:24, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Tag adjusted. GFJ (talk) 11:45, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
The JP version has EXIF data, but is a smaller resolution. Comparing the two they are not digitally identical as they have different saturations. It may be better to keep both and cross-link them, unless there is an overriding reason to believe that one is more "original" than the other. Both were taken from photo-sharing forums in 2013. --Fæ (talk) 11:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Per Fæ - not the same files, they both could fidn their usage. I crossed linked them. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
What's the painters' death date and why works are public domain in Sweden.
- File:Gösta Haglund självporträtt.jpg
- File:Gösta Granström självporträtt.jpg
- File:Gösta Bohm självporträtt.jpg
- File:Gösta Fougstedt självporträ.jpg
- File:Gustaf Fahle självporträtt.jpg
- File:Gustaf Croner självporträtt.jpg
- File:Gustaf Arnolds Självporträtt.jpg
- File:Gunnel Frieberg självporträtt.jpg
- File:Gunnar Fästh självporträtt.jpg
- File:Greta Falk-Simon självporträtt.jpg
- File:Gustaf Franzen självporträtt.jpg 1885-1922
- File:Frithiof Carlson självporträtt.jpg 1849-1921
- File:Gustaf Wilhelm Finnberg självporträtt.jpg 1784-1883
- File:Gustaf Brusewitz Självporträtt.jpg 1812-1899
- File:Fredrik Boije af Gennäs självporträtt.jpg 1773-1857
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:10, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- old self made from old artist Ftedik af Boije must be made ca 1780-1857.
And Gustaf Finnberg 1784-1883, Gustaf Franzen 1885-1922 Janee (talk) 13:27, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Janee: Since you have put the {{PD-old}} template on files it supposes that "This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer", which is not always the case: File:Gösta Haglund självporträtt.jpg is by Gösta Haglund; he died in 1986 so far from 75 years. The same way, date of which the work has been painted is irrelevant. I've noticed too that all your uploads related to Svenskt konstnärslexikon contains the wrong {{PD-old}} license though {{PD-Sweden-photo}} is far more appropriate. I let you a few time to discover the Swedish licenses here, to double-check your entire uploads to verify if photographs are more than 50 years old or to explain for what other reason they are public domain in Sweden, correct the field "Date" with the date of shooting (and not the date of upload) in the file descriptions before I put your uploads on deletion. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted; can be undeleted if proper information is provided. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Verifiable sources missing, no evidence of Creative Commons license indicated.
- File:Svante Warg 2.jpg
- File:Rune Rådsten.jpg
- File:Einar Persson.jpg
- File:Elsie Wallin.jpg
- File:John Waller 2.jpg
- File:Gurli Wallberg.jpg
- File:Gösta Thålin 2.jpg
- File:Leif Sylin.jpg
- File:Ulrika Sundström.jpg
- File:Hans Östman 2.jpg
- File:Lars Spak.jpg
- File:Gertrud Samén.jpg
- File:Folke Skoghäll 2.jpg
- File:Lars Vidlund 2.jpg
- File:Bernt Johansson tecknare.jpg
- File:Lasse Lundh.jpg
- File:Harriet Hultkrantz.jpg
- File:Agneta Ljung.jpg
- File:Maria Lindberg.jpg
- File:Ragnar Lindén konstnär.jpg
- File:Dan Lekberg.jpg
- File:Soldanella Oyler konstnär.jpg
- File:Stig Olson tecknare.jpg
- File:Birgit Lehtonen-Axelsson.jpg
- File:Lillan Kullgren.jpg
- File:Nikolai Oad.jpg
- File:A Lennart Norin.jpg
- File:Solveig Norrman-Swärd.jpg
- File:Gustav Kjellberg.jpg
- File:Lennart Kindgren.jpg
- File:Berne Nilsson.jpg
- File:Maj Morin.jpg
- File:Gustav Brantedal.jpg
- File:Richard Brixel.jpg
- File:Gun Dunér-Leijonhufvud.jpg
- File:Lena Hedberg.jpg
- File:Barbro Ager-Ländin.jpg
- File:Anna-Lise Granath.jpg
- File:Siv Engström-Svensson.jpg
- File:Göran Danielsson.jpg
- File:Arne Elserud konstnär.jpg
- File:Elsa Ericson konstnär.jpg
- File:Gunda Eriksson.jpg
- File:Berit Hammar.jpg
- File:Bertil Bagare.jpg
- File:Sven Hallström.jpg
- File:Erik Berg konstnär.jpg
- File:Birgitta Holm.jpg
- File:Inga Berg konstnär.jpg
- File:Walter Holmström konstnär.jpg
- File:Rolf Birgersson.jpg
- File:Rune Botersten.jpg
- File:Märtha Grill 1866-1951.jpg
- File:Carl von Plomgren Advokat.jpg
- File:Måstena gård Carl von Plomgren.png
- File:Carl von Plomgren Måstena.png
- File:Andreas Grill brandkapten.jpg
- File:Gustaf Erik August Böttiger livmedikus.jpg
- File:Bror August af Klinteberg C.son.jpg
- File:Oscar Harald Malmberg generaldirektör.jpg
- File:Rolf Magnus von Heidenstam.jpg
Komarof (talk) 05:50, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- https://portrattarkiv.se/about
"All portraits and user-submitted information are free to use with the Create Commons BY-SA 4.0 license if not specified otherwise on the portrait page."RZuo (talk) 08:44, 14 November 2023 (UTC)- RZuo, the link you provided leads to CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 DEED, which is incompatible with WM Commons. --Komarof (talk) 09:00, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- do you not read the text? RZuo (talk) 09:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Which one? No matter how they shortened the license name, while they give the clear and direct link to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ If you missed this, please go back and check. By the way, the text you liked so much contains Create instead of Creative. And could you kindly explain why do you think that the images were taken from this particular website? --Komarof (talk) 09:11, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- read again.--RZuo (talk) 10:01, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
RZuo, it's very sad you are so inattentive. Both links in the text so dear to your heart lead to the license CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 DEED, though the first of them does have semiliterate text Create Commons BY-SA 4.0 license. Do you at last dare to click the hyperlink this text contains? And for some reason your laconicism again prevented you from answering my question, what exactly shows the images were taken from this website. --Komarof (talk) 10:20, 14 November 2023 (UTC)- RZuo, especially for you and everyone else who seems to perceive pictures better than words: [16]. --Komarof (talk) 10:31, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- sorry for my wrong quotation. it should be
- "Alla porträtt samt användarinmatad information är fria att använda under licensen Create Commons BY-SA 4.0 license om inte annat har angetts på porträttsidan."--RZuo (talk) 11:01, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- All portraits [[17]] are licensed under the Create Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 if not specified otherwise on the portrait page. Janee (talk) 11:01, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- read again.--RZuo (talk) 10:01, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Which one? No matter how they shortened the license name, while they give the clear and direct link to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ If you missed this, please go back and check. By the way, the text you liked so much contains Create instead of Creative. And could you kindly explain why do you think that the images were taken from this particular website? --Komarof (talk) 09:11, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- do you not read the text? RZuo (talk) 09:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- RZuo, the link you provided leads to CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 DEED, which is incompatible with WM Commons. --Komarof (talk) 09:00, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yrkesverksamma konstnärer i Örebro län,
På första sidan i häftet står det att det är fritt att kopiera och mångfaldiga innehållet föutom bilder på enskilda konstverk File:Titelsida för yrkesverksamma konstnärer.jpg. Hela häftet består av fotostatkopierade lösa blad i A-4 format som delades ut kostnadsfritt på 1970-talet. Sidorna finns inte utgiven i bokform och har inget ISBN nummer. Bladen som består av fotostatkopior gavs ut i samarbete med Örebro läns landsting, Örebro kommun och KRO:s Örebroavdelning. De avfotograferade bilderna kommer från ett bevarat exmplar vid Kumla bibliotek. Janee (talk) 16:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Janee, Det räcker inte för WM Commons. Snälla se Commons:Licensing/sv:
- Allt upphovsrättsskyddat material på Commons (inte i den offentliga domänen) måste licenseras enligt en gratis licens som specifikt och oåterkalleligt tillåter vem som helst att använda materialet för något ändamål att bara skriva att "materialet kan användas fritt av vem som helst" eller liknande är inte tillräckligt. I synnerhet "måste" licensen möjliggöra följande villkor
- Återpublicering och distribution "måste" tillåtas.
- Publicering av härlett arbete "måste" tillåtas.
- Kommersiellt bruk av arbetet "måste" tillåtas.
- Licensen "måste" vara evig (utan utgångsdatum) och oåterkallelig.
- --Komarof (talk) 17:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- När kompendiet yrkesveksamna konstnärer skapdes 1978 fanns inte Creative Commons detta skapades först 2001 och av den orsaken kan det inte anges någon Creative Commons CC0-licens eftersom texten och bilderna gavs ut 23 år innan det överhuvudtaget fanns något Creative Commons. Helt klart är att det tydligt står i häftet att text och bilder får kopieras och mångfaldigas, vilken licensform detta skulle motsvar vet jag inte, har försökt att höra mig för bland utgivarna men KRO vet inget om dessa blad/texter de har inte ens en egen kopia och det finns inga medlemmar kvar i styrelsen från den tiden då detta var aktuellt (Samtliga inblandade avlidna). Örebro kommun har ingen kunskap om häftet finns inte heller kvar någon personal på kulturenheten från den tiden, och de har inte heller kvar något material från detta häfte, men fick i alla fall med mig med från den person jag pratade med, att står det att "det är fritt att kopiera" gäller det fortfarande, även om regler ändrats eller tillkommer gäller den text som står angiven. När det gället den tredje medverkande i framtagandet av häftet/kompendiet myndigheten Örebro läns landsting fick jag vid dages telefonsamtal inga besked utan uppmanades att återkomma nästa vecka. Men jag fick i alla fall intrycket att det var landstinget som stod för huvudparten av framställningen, kopiering och insamling och samamställning av uppgifter. Men jag kommer eventuellt att få bättre besked nästa vecka. Jag skall även prata med länstyrelsens juridiska avdelning om fråga vad de anser att "texten fritt att kopiera och mångfalda" motsvarar i dagens Creative commons. Janee (talk) 15:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- Janee, Det räcker inte för WM Commons. Snälla se Commons:Licensing/sv:
Deleted: unfortunately, the license is non-commercial, and PD-Sweden doesn't apply. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)