User talk:Claude J
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
File tagging File:Vogtmann Karen 1982.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Vogtmann Karen 1982.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
→AzaToth 13:55, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Uhlenbeck Karen 1982.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Uhlenbeck Karen 1982.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
→AzaToth 13:57, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
The permissions were clearly presented (George Bergman files as the others in [[1]]). I can see absolutely no reason to delete these files. See discussion on page of User Courcelles who deleted them.--Claude J (talk) 01:39, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:08, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Stasheff.jpg was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:08, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Sibony.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.60.32.195 19:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
I approved the deletion since it showed the wrong person, as acknowledged by the Oberwolfach Archive.--Claude J (talk) 15:25, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Spivak Michael.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Spivak Michael.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Lymantria (talk) 11:02, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- See also User talk:Adrignola#OTRS-question. Perhaps this is solved quickly. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 11:09, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
The OTRS applies to all pictures of George Bergman in the Oberwolfach Picture Archive, see the category.--Claude J (talk) 08:29, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
File:Claude sabbah.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:24, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Le dung trang.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:22, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Ledrappier.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 16:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Before anyone places again a deletion request on Oberwolfach photos, see this (label MFO) and with respect to the Bergman pictures the OTRS in the category Bergman pictures (Oberwolfach collection).--Claude J (talk) 05:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Science Competition 2017 has started
[edit]It is a world event.
This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active and who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...). |
--Alexmar983 (talk) 12:18, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Sweedler.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Atsme✍🏻📧 18:01, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Cartwright pugh 1970.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jochen Burghardt (talk) 21:23, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Juror for WSC2019
[edit]Hi, IF you are an active researcher (at least a Post Doc) would you like to be a juror for the 2019 edition of Wiki Science Competition? I would not mind anybody with your background. Otherwise, would you be interested to join as an expert "image peer-reviewer" to assess the scientific values of the finalists? Thank you for any reply!--Alexmar983 (talk) 13:14, 25 September 2019 (UTC)