Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/03/10
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Everding-HKZ_vs_TSZ.png){kind=link}
_TSZ_vs_Everding-HKZ.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05489.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05492.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05493.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05575.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05577.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05578.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05581.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05583.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05587.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05588.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05591.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05594.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05595.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05635.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05643.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_results_(including_overseas)_by_region,_2002.png){kind=link}
_results_(including_overseas)_by_departament,_2002.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Because it is Nonsense Anmol1311 (talk) 19:54, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request via Android app. --Achim (talk) 09:47, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ambika prasad kushwaha (talk · contribs)
[edit]F10. Unused personal photos, user indef in enwp for socking, not significant contributor elsewhere.
- File:Amit kumar.jpg
- File:Ambika prasad kushwaha.png
- File:Ambika prasad kushwaha.jpg
- File:Amit prasad kushwaha .jpg
Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:47, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 13:31, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Javadsafei (talk · contribs)
[edit]F10. Vanity spam, out of commons scope as well as no educational value
Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:10, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 13:31, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ambika kushwaha simraungadh (talk · contribs)
[edit]vanity spam, F10, out of scope, not educational
Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:25, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 13:30, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ambika kushwaha simraungadh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.
Mitte27 (talk) 13:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected to File:ハングリード株式会社ロゴ.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
FYGFRTDRT 12.1.154.108 16:32, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim (talk) 17:21, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Mail at abc@microsoft.com 2001:4898:80E8:7:F5FC:76A:51CF:D9DD 17:58, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim (talk) 18:28, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
no evidence of license claimed PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:03, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and copyright violation (copies from the internet and claimed as own work). --Green Giant (talk) 18:17, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Killarnee as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © on the source page I believe this is free media, but nominating here to be on the safe side. Ymblanter (talk) 18:16, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:31, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
к удалению 109.184.108.37 19:34, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: We dont delete redirects older than one week. --Achim (talk) 20:12, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Shows up as a blank image, apparently there is an issue with the .xcf extension 3 kids in a trenchcoat (talk) 20:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- IrfanView: "xcf version not supported" --Achim (talk) 20:54, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: broken, uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 20:55, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
"[...] I don't believe it's copyrighted." I'm not sure about this --Killarnee (T•1•2) 13:21, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1). --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Watermark "Enrique 2012" appears, unlikely to be the uploader's work Ytoyoda (talk) 15:14, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:41, 11 März 2020 UTC: Unfree Flickr license: https://flickr.com/photos/76565673@N03/8018503070 is licensed under All Rights Reserved --Krdbot 14:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Derivative of the award, which design is not free. Ankry (talk) 15:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- There is OTRS permission for the photo in ticket:2020031010007029. Permission for the award is not achievable.
Delete --Krd 17:26, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd. Closing pandakekok9 02:38, 13 March 2020 (UTC) (closure by non-admin)
Files uploaded by Siddharthsinhakavi (talk · contribs)
[edit]F10. Personal photos by non-contributors. Only 3 global edits, and it seems this user attempt to create Wikipedia articles using Wikidata ways in commons.
--AldnonymousBicara? 10:24, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 10:37, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Ayaz Mohammadzadeh1.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 20:03, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 14:01, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Requested by the photographee Deror avi (talk) 11:31, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- the original uncropped file has otrs permissions. Why to delete this Pic? Shinaimm (talk) 19:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- user:Geagea - Can you help? Shinaimm (talk) 17:42, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Moved to: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amit Segal. July 2015.jpg. -- Geagea (talk) 00:36, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by El sampras (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Hugo robledo otro con gran experiencia en el bata , actualmente subcampeon.jpg
- File:Actualmente uno de los mejores del bata , jose gonzales.jpg
- File:Juan cantero uno tambien de las nuevas esperanzas del tenis del bata.jpg
- File:Sebastian cantero unos de los mas experimentados ya lleva mas de 17 años jugando al tenis.jpg
- File:El equipo del bata es del año 2014.jpg
- File:Joaquin gomez otro que viene hace ya como 8 años jugando y mejorando.jpg
- File:Matias mendoza , uno de los pibes del bata que surgio hace 3 años una de las nuevas promesas ya con buenos resultados.jpg
- File:Unos de los mas experimentados del grupo ese rulo tambien forma parte del equipo.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:10, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:29, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karar thamer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:19, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:30, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused tiny graphic, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chanh tin123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]promotional material
- File:SHEICO NUOC THAI.png
- File:RENDER ECLAT.png
- File:BO XU LY NUOC THAI 18 MET KHOI NGAY.png
- File:ECLAT GD 02 PNG.png
- File:ECLAT GD 01 PNG.png
- File:ECLAT GD 01 NUOC CAP PNG.png
- File:BAOSTEEL NUOC THAI.png
- File:BAOSTEEL NUOC CAP.png
Motopark (talk) 08:23, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete --Achim (talk) 19:17, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chanh tin123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos and logos, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:LOGO NCTMECHANICAL.jpg
- File:LOGO DANG LEN MANG.jpg
- File:LIÊN HOAN CUỐI BUỔI HỌC THỰC HÀNH PHAY.JPG
- File:SINH VIÊN CƠ KHÍ.JPG
- File:HỌC NHÓM INVENTOR.jpg
- File:CA NHAN.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:31, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:12, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photos of non-notable events, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Edición especial de Iniciador en La Red Innova.JPG
- File:Primer Iniciador Madrid (Marzo 2007).png
- File:I Congreso Nacional de Emprendedores Iniciador.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:52, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:12, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused low-quality photo of unidentified house, no context/location, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:52, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:12, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:12, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:34, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused screenshots and logo, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Vista-banner-categoria.png
- File:Vista-notificaciones.png
- File:Vista-beeper.png
- File:Vista-portal.png
- File:Vista-chat.png
- File:I-see-you-usuarios-en-portal.png
- File:Decompra logo CENTER PAGE.gif
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:33, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SHIFU EMAD (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:58, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SHIFU EMAD (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo materials. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:IWUF Wushu Taolu Competition Rules & Judging Methods (Excerpt) 2019 - Final.pdf
- File:Shifu Emad ELsherbiny.jpg
- File:SmartSelect 20191004-215910 Chrome.jpg
- File:Shaolin master.jpg
- File:SnipImage (002).jpg
- File:Mahau quan shaolin organization.png
- File:Duanwai.jpg
- File:Kumminmg 204106.jpg
- File:SKAY.jpg
- File:Shaolin master .jpg
- File:Shaolin 2.jpg
- File:DUANWEI.png
- File:WUSHU.png
- File:Wushu Qigong .jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:36, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
not under license creative commons 190.225.46.246 02:30, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no indication of publication under a free license at source. --Ahmadtalk 10:08, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mundoaudiovisualdelsur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos, out of scope, and 2 small screengrabs, copyvio.
- File:Telesur Aysen TV en Terrerno.jpg
- File:Hugo Guerrero Salamanca Creador del Medio.jpg
- File:Primer Logo Canal de Cable.jpg
- File:Logo Telesur Aysen TV.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:23, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, no value over the original dog silhouette already on Commons, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Comment it is not a logo but a pladeholder. The text is “Photo of dog is missing”. I dont think it is used anymore. Its just a part of the history. --MGA73 (talk) 18:17, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:23, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adebayo adegunle alabi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos of non-notable team and player, no educational value, out of scope. Looks like photos of photo as well, copyvio.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:58, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:24, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
_Everding-HKZ_vs_TSZ.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Everding-HKZ_vs_TSZ.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused graph, little educational value or use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
_Everding-HKZ_vs_TSZ.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
_Everding-HKZ_vs_TSZ.png){kind=link}
_TSZ_vs_Everding-HKZ.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_TSZ_vs_Everding-HKZ.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused graph, little educational value or use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:10, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
_TSZ_vs_Everding-HKZ.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
_TSZ_vs_Everding-HKZ.png){kind=link}
Unused photo of non-notable musicians, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:59, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Spam; no clear educational use Vahurzpu (talk) 15:35, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Also nominating:
- File:Cosmetic-and-plastic-surgery-117-300x338.jpg
- File:Cosmetic-and-plastic-surgery-152-300x318.jpg
- File:Cosmetic-and-plastic-surgery-162-300x311.jpg
- File:Cosmetic-and-plastic-surgery-164-300x350.jpg
- File:Cosmetic-and-plastic-surgery-198-300x350.jpg
- File:Cosmetic-and-plastic-surgery-216-300x330.jpg
- File:Cosmetic-and-plastic-surgery-277-300x339.jpg
- File:Cosmetic-and-plastic-surgery-280-300x326.jpg
- File:Cosmetic-and-plastic-surgery-284-300x350.jpg
Vahurzpu (talk) 15:37, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by GreenMeansGo. --Ahmadtalk 10:41, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 11:14, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Low-res drone photos with no EXIF data
Ytoyoda (talk) 16:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Elcobbola. --Ahmadtalk 10:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted broadcast Ytoyoda (talk) 05:05, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete This image is screenshot from TVone news site image is owned by w:tvOne (Indonesia). F1. Apparent copyright violation.--AldnonymousBicara? 10:31, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 13:22, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
spam, out of scope Nolispanmo 10:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:25, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
not authorship of the ilustration given, author is still live so must be not free Ezarateesteban 12:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Herkunft der Datei nicht erkennbar Grundsatz (talk) 12:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Taken from a year book, not own work Gbawden (talk) 12:44, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted clothing A1Cafel (talk) 13:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 13:25, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:21, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:20, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope. Only used on a userpage of a non-contributing user. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, out of scope. And looks like scan, so likely copyvio as well. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:30, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:19, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused tiny graphic, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:32, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 19:22, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Looks like a screengrab, copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, out of scope, and superseded by File:ILUHYAPAPI.png. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:12, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:17, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Schuiten Luc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Luc Schuiten - AH Schaerbeek.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Vegetalcity affiche.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Bateau copyleft.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Permademocratie dessin.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Dassonville photo.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Pergola Fontainas dessin.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Aérium dessin.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Place jardin fleurs dessin.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Piétonnier BXL dessin.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Verviers dessin.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Musicity dessin.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Pavillon photo.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Cite Tressee dessin.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Cite Tours dessin.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Ville resiliente dessin.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Vegetal city dessin.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Cite Vagues dessin.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Cite Lotus dessin.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Cite Habitarbres dessin.jpg
- File:Metz photo.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Jardins-verticaux dessin.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Orejona photo 3.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Orejona photo 2.jpg
- File:Orejona photo 1.jpg
- File:Louvain-la-Neuve photo.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Folon photo.jpg
- File:Yverdon photo.jpg
- File:Un autre possible couv.jpg
- File:Shanghai, vision future en 4 dimensions.jpg
- File:Strasbourg en 2100.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:17, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Schuiten Luc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art without artist/s permission.
- File:Luc Schuiten - Tramodulaire dessin.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Ornithoplane.jpg
- File:Luc Schuiten - Ornithoplane dessin.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:13, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:15, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Appears to be a news photo, missing EXIF data: https://www.unionjalisco.mx/articulo/2017/07/09/deportes/7-momentos-en-la-historia-del-estadio-chivas Ytoyoda (talk) 15:17, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Oppose No evidences. --Urbanuntil (talk) 19:48, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:14, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:12, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Non-free; NBC watermark is visible in the lower left corner. Vahurzpu (talk) 15:40, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:12, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:12, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:11, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Not own work. Can be found on facebook Silvermetals (talk) 15:51, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:11, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo, unidentifiable man. Probably private Hjart (talk) 16:00, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:10, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused, low quality private photo Hjart (talk) 16:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:10, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Facebook upload predates Commons upload: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10157415774435379&set=a.137630535378&type=3&theater. Requires OTRS ticket. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:56, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:09, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Image quality, metadata and file format suggest these images are screenshots. Source info needed.
Ytoyoda (talk) 16:59, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:09, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
not a free pic but (c) Airbus Marc Lacoste (talk) 17:34, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:09, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
https://www.peoplelife.ru/122579 coppivo 109.184.108.37 18:01, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:06, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
coppivo coppivo 109.184.108.37 18:52, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:06, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Image non libre de droits : couverture d'un magazine publiée en 1987 Bédévore (talk) 19:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:05, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Non-trivial logo; bad own-work claim Paul_012 (talk) 20:00, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:04, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Noticeably higher resolution can be found at https://www.flickr.com/photos/13150359@N03/2518028015/sizes/o/, and it's part of a set. Doubt our uploader is original author. GRuban (talk) 20:28, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:03, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
This seems to be a tricky case. A promotional poster as "own work"? Okay, it looks like being an upload from one the the film directors himself, so it's not an OBVIOUS copyvio. But can we trust in the soundness of the licensing ang usage rights chain? I would like to direct the attention towards some of the logos, which are not really only simple geometric shapes, the one bottom right could even be described as a likeness of a living being. Well, we could still argue "de minimis". In sum, this upload needs in my opinion a deletion discussion centered on licensing and author rights. Grand-Duc (talk) 20:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by EugeneZelenko. --Ahmadtalk 22:44, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello, in fact I am Mario Selim one of the film's directors. May be the "ouwn work" concept it`s a mistake. I want to say that this is a work of my company (Soundtrackfilms) and it was designed by my brother, Alfonso Lopez. Talking about the logos, the "living being shape" is the company's logo of Roberto Miranda (MIGRA), the other film director. The other logos are of CNTV National television council and Soundtrackfilms. May be I have to change the "own work" concept. Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mario Selim (talk • contribs) 21:14, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by EugeneZelenko. --Ahmadtalk 13:21, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation, published online before upload here https://www.gibraltarfinance.com/press-releases/former-minister-for-justice-joins-isolas-litigation-team Verbcatcher (talk) 23:01, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:02, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Not own work. Very clear copyright violation of Nintendo. Arthurfan828 (talk) 11:10, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:32, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Estadio de Riazor 2019.jpg is a COM:NETCOPYVIO - no free license at source (indeed, to the contrary). Other images are collages incorporating that image.
Эlcobbola talk 18:31, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
The file was uploaded by my friend. But he wants it to be deleted. Jelican9 (talk) 19:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope Md Tanbir Islam (talk) 19:28, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Very small; we have plenty of larger and higher-quality images of this tower. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:01, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 19:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Wikieditor512 and Infornagua
[edit]- File:Alcalde Gustavo Gutiérrez intensificó rehabilitación y apertura de espacios públicos en Naguanagua.jpg
- File:Inauguración plaza transilvania.jpg
- File:Purufucadora de agua.jpg
- File:Alcalde Naguanagua.jpg
Likely copyvio. Uploader has stated that the images are from the Naguanagua municipality press, but has not provided the link for the pictures or proven that the images were released with a Creative Commons license. --Jamez42 (talk) 20:51, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:19, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05489.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_05489.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong title, description, categories and meta data. Corrected file will be uploaded. Norman.seibert (talk) 17:39, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05489.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05489.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05492.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_05492.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong title, description, categories and meta data. Corrected file will be uploaded. Norman.seibert (talk) 17:39, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05492.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05492.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05493.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_05493.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong title, description, categories and meta data. Corrected file will be uploaded. Norman.seibert (talk) 17:39, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05493.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05493.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05575.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_05575.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong title, description, categories and meta data. Corrected file will be uploaded. Norman.seibert (talk) 17:41, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05575.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05575.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05577.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_05577.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong title, description, categories and meta data. Corrected file will be uploaded. Norman.seibert (talk) 17:41, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05577.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05577.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05578.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_05578.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong title, description, categories and meta data. Corrected file will be uploaded. Norman.seibert (talk) 17:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05578.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05578.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05581.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_05581.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong title, description, categories and meta data. Corrected file will be uploaded. Norman.seibert (talk) 17:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05581.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05581.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05583.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_05583.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong title, description, categories and meta data. Corrected file will be uploaded. Norman.seibert (talk) 17:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05583.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05583.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05587.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_05587.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong title, description, categories and meta data. Corrected file will be uploaded. Norman.seibert (talk) 17:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05587.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05587.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05588.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_05588.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong title, description, categories and meta data. Corrected file will be uploaded. Norman.seibert (talk) 17:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05588.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05588.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05591.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_05591.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong title, description, categories and meta data. Corrected file will be uploaded. Norman.seibert (talk) 17:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05591.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05591.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05594.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_05594.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong title, description, categories and meta data. Corrected file will be uploaded. Norman.seibert (talk) 17:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05594.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05594.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05595.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_05595.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong title, description, categories and meta data. Corrected file will be uploaded. Norman.seibert (talk) 17:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05595.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05595.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05635.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_05635.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong title, description, categories and meta data. Corrected file will be uploaded. Norman.seibert (talk) 17:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05635.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05635.jpg){kind=link}
_-_05643.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_05643.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong title, description, categories and meta data. Corrected file will be uploaded. Norman.seibert (talk) 17:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05643.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_05643.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Logo of FITEQ (http://fiteq.org) with no evidence of permission to use. WikiDan61 (talk) 15:00, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- I would say the license Template:PD-shape would be the right one. --Killarnee (T•1•2) 13:39, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- I disagree. I think the unique design hinting at the stitching of the Teqball ball brings it beyond the realm of "simple shapes and text" covered by {{PD-Shape}}. WikiDan61 (talk) 18:25, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:19, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Lack of proof of copyright ownership. MarioGom (talk) 14:33, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
NoFoP for monuments in Russia // 176.59.38.3 14:28, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Presumed to be a copyright violation for reasons stated in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Boukker logo.png. Thuresson (talk) 16:30, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
I have very strong doubts about the claim of "own work" -- almost impossible -- and that, in turn, seems to me to cast doubt on this user's purported "own work" uploads of other images of Luis Lima. Jmabel ! talk 04:39, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- I want to add other three images: File:Luis Lima e Susana Frangi.jpg, File:Luis Lima apresenta programa.jpg, File:Luis Lima e Marilin Miller.jpg with the same rationale. I don't think that any of these images are "own work" and I don't think the uploader holds the copyright of any of these images.--SirEdimon (talk) 20:00, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:29, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
This image is my copyright. It is not in the public domain and should not be available under this license. cease and desist immediatly. 38.87.7.234 22:17, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment If the image is your copyright, can you please explain this website? Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Please see "Commons:Deletion requests/File:INGSOC flag.svg" (second nomination). As the result of that deletion request may affect this file I am nominating this file so its authors are notified of the ongoing discussion. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment, note that 1984 (nineteen-eighty-four) is a British film, a country with a notoriously low "COM:TOO". --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:41, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I have edited the page to make sourcing more clear. From [1] which states Free Art License. Is there reason to think this is not correct? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: , this file was being raised for deletion over at the flag discussion raised above and an admin could have closed to delete this version as well if not properly tagged. I haven't had time to go into deeper investigation due to real life issues, but by tagging it the Wikipedia's where this file is used will be notified of this ongoing discussion (by the Community Tech Bot). Note that if this license applies here the flag is DW of a free file so also acceptably licensed if it would be tagged accordingly. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note that the two logos are NOT the same. Both were inspired by the fictional "INGSOC" of Orwell's novel en:Nineteen Eighty-Four, but are different. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: , going over this file, I withdraw this nomination and will add in the original DR that this file is freely licensed. I saw the original nomination and panicked that this "COM:INUSE" file may be deleted based on the other discussion. I should have read the previous discussion above. I must admit that after some users started insulting me claiming that I "wasn'tfa here to educate people" that I got sloppy in trying to prove that I am not on this project to be "trolling", obviously a sloppy request like this isn't going to help in such a case. Anyhow, as this file is demonstrably freely licensed ot shouldn't be up for deletion. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note that the two logos are NOT the same. Both were inspired by the fictional "INGSOC" of Orwell's novel en:Nineteen Eighty-Four, but are different. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: , this file was being raised for deletion over at the flag discussion raised above and an admin could have closed to delete this version as well if not properly tagged. I haven't had time to go into deeper investigation due to real life issues, but by tagging it the Wikipedia's where this file is used will be notified of this ongoing discussion (by the Community Tech Bot). Note that if this license applies here the flag is DW of a free file so also acceptably licensed if it would be tagged accordingly. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Close as Kept per discussion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted photo on IMDb, not under Commons license TaurusEmerald (talk) 02:27, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; source is google, needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Commons is not a place to store personal/casual snapshots and photos. No educational or encyclopedic value. Missvain (talk) 02:35, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Previously published at http://hombresderadio.blogspot.com/2007/12/esteban-mirol-las-oyentes-me-invitan_30.html, needs OTRS ticket Ytoyoda (talk) 04:59, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Es gibt eine Kategorie mit diesem Namen Werner100359 (talk) 06:21, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by 1989. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Metadata contains a "FBMD" tag, which means this image may have been taken from Facebook. OTRS permission is required from the copyright holder in this case.--Kai3952 (talk) 14:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low res photo with no EXIF data, larger versions available (though at later dates) at https://lopezdoriga.com/deportes/agotados-los-boletos-para-el-clasico-nacional/ and https://agencias.mexitours.travel/index.php/es/about-5/ciudad-de-mexico-3/503-tour-estadio-azteca.
User has uploaded an All RIghts Reserved Flickr photo as "own", so not sure if the claim is credible. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:47, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Image is shown in both Mexitours and lopezdoriga websites, indicating copyright. Not clear on the original source, so I think it should be removed unless the original photographer releases it properly. -- Alexf (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Oppose truly fully clear inter-country editors rivalry. None data to justify a delete. --Urbanuntil (talk) 23:50, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:13, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
File name is incorrect, is a Red-tailed Hawk, not a Golden Eage Derrellwilliams (talk) 21:53, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Derrellwilliams: , just move it to the correct name.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter: I don't have permissions to change file names--Derrellwilliams ([[User talk:Derrellwilliams|
Kept: I renamed it, User:Derrellwilliams, see Commons:File renaming. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:11, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:56, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:08, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
This image comes from a blacklisted flickr account. I tried to pass it and received this warning. Leoboudv (talk) 22:02, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: "Copyright holder: © Raine Villa". The Flickr file doesn't even have that medata. Look: Exif from Flickr Exif from Commons --QTHCCAN (talk) 13:16, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Nevermind, that exif was created by the uploader by modifying the picture. There's this copyright on her other uploads [2] [3]. Not really legit though. --QTHCCAN (talk) 13:26, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
![[2]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8c/Marshal_Baghramyan_station1.jpg){kind=link}
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Washington_Mutual_branch_in_San_Jose,_California.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:08, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Was made aware after transferring from it.wikipedia that it violates Italian copyright laws, as sculptor only died in 1959. N-gio (talk) 22:34, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:02, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:20, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:53, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for artworks which this poster is in the US Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:00, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 07:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Somehow broken image with unclear description Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:45, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Not in use. Not in scope. Not educationally useful.Jonteemil (talk) 22:49, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Pepadd as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: inappropriate
Converted by me to regular DR, as image does not qualify for speedy deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:12, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
I request its deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pepadd (talk • contribs) 01:07, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Either OoS or copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 11:44, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This image has no source. Hunan201p (talk) 08:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- This is a crop from a parent image showing three sculptures - this page gives the source as "|Source = This is a scanned image from Bunakov. Graphic and Sculptural Reconstructions. |Date = 1930s |Author = unknown |Permission = This work is in the public domain because of its age:" It is a product of an anonymous Soviet photographer of the 1930s of sculptures by Vladislav Bunakov, possibly the photographer was Bunakov, how this affects its copyright status, I have no idea. Urselius (talk) 10:30, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Keep Per related.[4]. The photographer is identified as Vladislav Bunakov, so there is now no reason to delete. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 10:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)- Keep Per above. Krakkos (talk) 12:54, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Yamnaya_people.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused graph, no longer needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:07, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo of non-notable event/persons, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:53, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep as an excellent example of a mohawk hairstyle. clpo13(talk) 16:20, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:06, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Illustrative of gay pride in Iceland. According to the Flickr page, this was taken during Reykjavik Gay Pride 2011. Based on the event and the description/title, I'd guess the photo is of a drag queen. clpo13(talk) 15:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:41, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COMO BIEN SE DESCRIBE EN EL D.O.E. núm. 46, de 20 de abril de 1995 ESTE NO ES EL ESCUDO REAL DE OLIVA DE MERIDA (BADAJOZ) 46.25.119.87 15:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for a deletion as this image is widely used and thereby within COM:SCOPE. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:05, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:40, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Old photos and scans. Need to know who the original photographer/date was so we know its PD status but def not own work
- File:Majid Qodiriy Rehabilitation after Reressions Ref Letter issued in 1958.jpg
- File:Majid Qodiriy's family 1936.jpg
- File:Majid Qodiriy Ref Letter Central Asiatic University Tashkent.jpg
- File:Majid Qodiriy with son among actors of Turon dram-theatre-studio.jpg
- File:Majid Qodiriy with his sons at Tashkent Museum of nature.jpg
- File:Majid Qodiriy taking participation in educational conference in Old part of Tashkent, photograph from newspaper article 1921.jpg
- File:Majid Qodiriy among school teachers 1910s.jpg
- File:Majid Qodiriy with Uzbek students in Berlin.jpg
- File:Majid Qodiriy in 1918.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 14:09, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
old logo - not in use anymore Stella7811 (talk) 01:47, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - we routinely keep old works for historical reference. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:01, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:20, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:01, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
not own work Gunofficial1998 (talk) 08:20, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Do you have any evidence that this image isn't the own work of the author? A lack of EXIF data can have many reasons, per "COM:PCP" there has to be significant doubt that an image isn't free, simply saying that something isn't own work without any further motivation isn't a good reason. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:35, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per disc. --Indeedous (talk) 15:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted artworks A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:08, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted artworks A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:08, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted artworks A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: de minimis applies here - target of photo is people in foreground. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:09, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted artworks A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: copyrighted elements cropped out and revision deleted. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:11, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
This is not "own work" and it certainly is not CC-BY-SA 3. It is visually identical to the shield which may be seen in the top left corner of https://www.princeton.edu/ and to the best of my recollection, it is also visually identical to what w:File:Princeton_shield.svg looked like before it got deleted (aside from the fact that this is a raster image rather than a vector image). That deletion rationale was "F7: Violates non-free use policy" - which IMHO is perfectly unambiguous. This is a non-free image and can't live on Commons. NYKevin (talk) 07:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Concur Shadowssettle (talk) 14:23, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- It may have been better to nominate this for speedy deletion, it's a copyvio so can qualify. However, it would be easier if someone just closed this discussion Shadowssettle (talk) 09:14, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:11, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
License Laudering, photo of a photo, is it free? Ezarateesteban 12:26, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:26, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image has no source. Hunan201p (talk) 08:16, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
- This is a crop from a parent image showing three sculptures - this page gives the source as "|Source = This is a scanned image from Bunakov. Graphic and Sculptural Reconstructions. |Date = 1930s |Author = unknown |Permission = This work is in the public domain because of its age:" It is a product of an anonymous Soviet photographer of the 1930s of sculptures by Vladislav Bunakov, possibly the photographer was Bunakov, how this affects its copyright status, I have no idea. Urselius (talk) 10:28, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your input. I don't think this qualifies as a source, though. - Hunan201p (talk) 14:48, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Urselius: thanks. I still can't find that author. Can you give us his name in Cyrillic? Maybe the ISBN of the book in question? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:09, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your input. I don't think this qualifies as a source, though. - Hunan201p (talk) 14:48, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete See below. - Hunan201p (talk) 17:10, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hunan201p is currently under a 3 month long block on Wikipedia for disruptive editing on articles related to this discussion.[5] Krakkos (talk) 19:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per related.[6]. The photographer is identified as Vladislav Bunakov, so there is now no reason to delete. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 10:54, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per above. Krakkos (talk) 12:54, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- A simple name is not a sufficient source, though. I can't find anything by a "Vladislav Bunakov" online. We need a known publiciation the images were taken from. - Hunan201p (talk) 17:11, 12 March 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sirfurboy (talk • contribs) 16:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete See below. - 24.247.20.187 (talk) 01:25, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- No matter the copyright, the sculptures in the photos do not represent scientifically accurate depictions of the topic. They were created using outdated, inaccurate, and prejudiced methodology. They are essentially too old to be relevant in the scientific context of the article. - 24.247.20.187 (talk) 01:25, 19 March 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.247.20.187 (talk) 05:30, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- This is not a deletion reason. This is merely a reason not to use the images on a certain article (or to use the images with caution). -- Sirfurboy (talk) 16:32, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- 24.247.20.187 appears to be an IP sock of Hunan201p. Krakkos (talk) 19:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- No matter the copyright, the sculptures in the photos do not represent scientifically accurate depictions of the topic. They were created using outdated, inaccurate, and prejudiced methodology. They are essentially too old to be relevant in the scientific context of the article. - 24.247.20.187 (talk) 01:25, 19 March 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.247.20.187 (talk) 05:30, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per above. Author is already provided. Störm (talk) 14:45, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Per Magog. A non-free work with unknown work and unknown author. Original file has been deleted already. No reason to keep. PicturesOfTheWorld (talk) 21:36, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment redirecting to main talk page. PicturesOfTheWorld (talk) 21:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)</ref>
- PicturesOfTheWorld is a confirmed sockpuppet of Tirgil34. The nominator Hunan201p is currently being investigated on Wikipedia because it is suspected that he is an additional sockpuppet/meatsock of Tirgil34. Krakkos (talk) 19:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Image is almost certainly out of copyright. --Hibernian (talk) 19:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Procedural keep as part of another bundled DR. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:48, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Image seems to be a rather close derivative from this image without any evidence of a free license[7].-- Túrelio (talk) 09:44, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:50, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Also derivative File:Amit Segal 2015 (cropped).jpg from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amit Segal 2015 (cropped).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Requested by the photographee Deror avi (talk) 11:31, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment How do we know this? You are not he as far as I can tell. Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:08, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment There is an OTSR ticket, so why do you claim that the photographer want to delete this? Sokuya (talk)
- Apparently not the photographer, the subject of the photograph. Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:58, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- I don't think the subject has a say in this. He can contribute a new photo to Wikipedia and we'll replace it, but we shouldn't delete it. I oppose the delete proposal. Sokuya (talk) 19:11, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Apparently not the photographer, the subject of the photograph. Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:58, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Shinaimm, There is no copyright issue her as we have propper permission from the photographer through OTRS. And the license is irrevocable. But the issue is that the photographer asking to delete the file. No reason is given. User Deror Avi is a lawyer and a respectful member of Wikimedia Israel. I'm sure that the photographer contact to him. But the File:Amit Segal 2015 (cropped).jpg is in use and we have couple of oppose users, so i don't think the file can be deleted. -- Geagea (talk) 00:35, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: We cannot honor this courtesy request as the image is in use. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:51, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused low quality diagram, superseded by many better ones in Category:Golden spirals. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:28, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:51, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for non-works of artistic craftsmanship in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 16:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: complex graphic. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:53, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
very bad "fake" screenshot of wikimap — Draceane talkcontrib. 17:27, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
I do not know how to mark the position on map, so mark the position on map and you can delete the file.--Alfi51 (talk) 20:47, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Now it is unused, I've replaced it in the infobox. — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:06, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:53, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
parce que y'a une erreur Mahami Inah Abba (talk) 17:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Mahami Inah Abba: Quelle erreur? Et sur quelle page?Jonteemil (talk) 07:28, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: user talk pages dont get deleted. --JuTa 21:03, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
An animation of the virtual band member of Gorillaz on a stage projector is copyrightable, and even trying to blur the whole screen out would make the image worse. Regardless of what device was used to create the image, the image itself should be deleted. George Ho (talk) 02:40, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Just some context - the photo was taken during the concert with permission (photo pass, issued to Wikimedia), and there was no contract prohibiting usage of photos. Also, since it is clearly a stage photo (and just a small part of the artwork, in low resolution), I believe the possibilities for misuse are minimal. Matijapuzar (talk) 09:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Matijapuzar: Have you recently contacted the one who gave permission about the licensing and usage? I would like to know whether that person approve the CC-BY-SA license? Also, that "small part" you describe isn't small at all, and the resolution isn't as "low" as you think; de minimis would not apply. George Ho (talk) 02:45, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- This is from a concert 2+ years ago, I haven't contacted anyone again recently nor I do I intend to. If the band or their management feels it is breaching their copyright, I have no problem with the photo being removed. Matijapuzar (talk) 20:54, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Matijapuzar: Have you recently contacted the one who gave permission about the licensing and usage? I would like to know whether that person approve the CC-BY-SA license? Also, that "small part" you describe isn't small at all, and the resolution isn't as "low" as you think; de minimis would not apply. George Ho (talk) 02:45, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:28, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
как капия многопиксельная ОшкуковАС (talk) 22:32, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:30, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
как копия многопиксельная ОшкуковАС (talk) 22:32, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:30, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
как копия многопиксельная ОшкуковАС (talk) 22:36, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- @ОшкуковАС: можешь уточнить? Sorry, I'm not able to understand the rationale, google translate gives "as a multi-pixel copy", but that's mean nothing to me. Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:59, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:30, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
copyvio https://ontopstudio.nl/3songs/ Kattenkruid (talk) 14:48, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Category:Art works Category:Album cover artists
Deze cover art heeft nu twee categorieën. Was dat het probleem? Ik lees eigenlijk niet wat er hand is met deze cover...ik heb de rechten enzo — Preceding unsigned comment added by John Doehetzelf (talk • contribs) 15:11, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi John Doehetzelf, met de nominatie "copyvio" wordt bedoeld dat het mogelijk een auteursrechtenschending is van een bestand dat elders op het internet te vinden is. Als jij zelf de auteursrechten bezit, kun je dat oplossen door de licentie die je hier op Commons gebruikt (CC-BY-SA-4.0) ook te noemen op je webpagina, of door contact op te nemen met ons mailteam via Commons:OTRS/nl voor een bevestiging van de vrijgave. Zie die pagina voor de procedure en de vrijwaring die we van je verwachten. Ciell (talk) 21:37, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no COM:OTRS permission. --ƏXPLICIT 12:40, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 17:08, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PermaLiv_mj%C3%B8sgr%C3%A5tt_10-03-20.jpg Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 17:59, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
there is o lot of problem with new version of photo, so it is better to delete all and I will upload a totally new one. The main problem it is because it is showed in the small photo the old one DanbagW (talk) 06:13, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
It is an old photo when there are no guidepost on the place, now there are the guideposts RPE_Guide_post_VBAA520-150.jpg DanbagW (talk) 08:28, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DanbagW as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: reason=It is an old photo when there are no guidepost on the place, now there are the guideposts File:RPE_Guide_post_VBAA520-150.jpg|subpage=File:RPE Guide post VBAA540-090.jpg|year=2020|month=March|day=10
Converted by me to regular DR, as image does not qualify for speedy deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
I put the photos I know are to delete, please delete !DanbagW
- Keep Potentially useful for anyone interested in how the trail used to be marked with hand-made directions. --Fæ (talk) 20:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
No there is nobody interested....are wrong photos...delete pleaseDanbagW
Deleted: Uploader requested, unused image. --Anatoliy (talk) 17:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
The new photo will be a duplicate of photo RPE Guide post VBAA520-080.1.jpg so it is better to delete this old photo because indications where changed with the new one of the other photo DanbagW (talk) 05:50, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DanbagW as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: reason=The new photo will be a duplicate of photo RPE Guide post VBAA520-080.1.jpg so it is better to delete this old photo because indications where changed with the new one of the other photo|subpage=File:RPE Guide post VBAA540-020.jpg|year=2020|month=March|day=9
Converted by me to regular DR, as image does not qualify for speedy deletion. The "duplicate" File:RPE Guide post VBAA520-080-1.jpg shows only a small section. IMO, both images are in scope. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:49, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
I put the photos I know are to delete, please delete !DanbagW
Deleted: Uploader requested, unused image. --Anatoliy (talk) 17:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Dubious license tag: obviously not published before 1925 as claimed, date of first publication is unclear. VLu (talk) 09:30, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- it’s your personal point of view that is not connected with reality - Devlet Geray (talk) 07:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Devlet Geray, think twice: if you claim that the photo was created before 1930, how does it prove that it was published before 1925? And there's no evidence of that 1930 publication, although you must provide it. --VLu (talk) 07:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- the license was changed. --Devlet Geray (talk) 13:22, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. This won't fly as well. The verifiable source is still missing, but it is you who claims this is Turkish newspaper. So, the country of origin / first publication must be Turkey, and US and Russia's PD templates are irrelevant. --VLu (talk) 13:38, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- yes I do claim that the source is a Turkish newspaper, but this photo was first published in the Crimea, which was a part of RSFSR then --Devlet Geray (talk) 14:16, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- So where's the source? What's the name of Turkish newspaper in RSFSR? Where's a publication date? --VLu (talk) 16:16, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- the source is the newspaper. It was first published in Crimean newspaper (not Turkish) --Devlet Geray (talk) 19:05, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- So where's the source? What's the name of Turkish newspaper in RSFSR? Where's a publication date? --VLu (talk) 16:16, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- yes I do claim that the source is a Turkish newspaper, but this photo was first published in the Crimea, which was a part of RSFSR then --Devlet Geray (talk) 14:16, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- the license was changed. --Devlet Geray (talk) 13:22, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Devlet Geray, think twice: if you claim that the photo was created before 1930, how does it prove that it was published before 1925? And there's no evidence of that 1930 publication, although you must provide it. --VLu (talk) 07:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 09:25, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Unused text-only doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:18, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The document consists of a ordinance approved by the municipal council of Guanare, Venezuela. To say the least, the file falls under the public domain under Venezuelan law. --Jamez42 (talk) 18:49, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --MB-one (talk) 09:26, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
doubtful to be own work given how old it is; licence very questionable PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:23, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination improperly licensed. Probably copyrighted. --MB-one (talk) 09:27, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:27, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Suspicion is not the "significant doubt" required by the precautionary principle. --Fæ (talk) 15:59, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- That's not what the precautionary principle means. Precautionary principle means that if we don't have proof this was published early enough to be PD, we cannot assume otherwise.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:05, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- PRP: The precautionary principle is that where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted.
- Vague ideas that a photograph might not have been published, or otherwise made available to the public, 70 years ago, (i.e. it was kept locked away somewhere where nobody could see it, for over 25 years, then suddenly published for some ungiven reason) is not "significant doubt". A better term would be unlikely "hypothetical doubt". --Fæ (talk) 17:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- No. Photojournalists took many photos that went unpublished (many photos in a photoshoot, the best one would go in the newspapers). Family photo albums are rarely published. There are a plethora of reasons not unlikely why this photo would not have been published before the cutoff date. It is not unreasonable at all to think an item was not published early enough when there is no indication of an early enough publication date. Proof of early enough publication must be provided, or else this will have to be deleted. Simply assuming it "was probably" published because of the age of the photo IS NOT SUFFICIENT, precedent in previous deletions dictate this. Russian copyright law is based on publication date, not creation date, and without satisfying the burden of proof of publication information, there is no reason to think it is PD.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- That's not what the precautionary principle means. Precautionary principle means that if we don't have proof this was published early enough to be PD, we cannot assume otherwise.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:05, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No indication of PD status in US. --MB-one (talk) 09:29, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since). Is it possible this is a PD-old? Green Giant (talk) 15:57, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Maybe, but its lacking source, author, license and description. --JuTa 15:58, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
REACTION The picture File:Afbeelding 11 Slag bij Woeringen.png is copy right free . Its source the CODEX MANESSE dated from the early Middel-Ages. The picture is free available in the public domain. Searching Internet[codex manessa] one can find the picture and/or one of the other pictures from the same codex. For instance: The sites: news.stanford.edu / etsy.com / kalab.com / scriptorium.dk / shutterstock.com / manuscriptminiatures.com / society6.com / gettyimages.ca / facsimilefinder.com and so on. Also is various books,in the public domain. f.i. Worringen 1288. aut. Vera Torunsky. Rheinland Verlag GmbH Koln 1988. Archiefberatungsstelle Rheinland. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanlmug (talk • contribs) 10:40, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --MB-one (talk) 09:30, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
doubtful to be own work given quality and fact that it was published by new user PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Dear PlanespotterA320, please explain, what are your doubts based on and what is the problem with the quality and "fact that it was published by new user". Actually, I'm not a new user and registered in Wiki about 10 years ago. But even if I were a new one, what of it? Why a new user cannot publish a photo with high quality? I confirm that I'm a copyright holder of this photo, the original hardcopy of which is located in our family archive. Nebosklon (talk) 13:29, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Nebosklon: The file was listed in User:OgreBot/Uploads by new users/2019 December 20 12:00 which is designed to make it easier to find high-risk files. As for copyright status - you merely used the "own work" tag. You did not provide any specific explanation about how you own the copyright status - given the style of the portrait, it is doubtful to be a family-made photo (looks a lot more like a professional portrait). Did you take the photo yourself (not just merely photocopy the photo), or did you inherit the copyright from a deceased family member who took the photo? Or was the photo taken by an unknown person and then you just photocopied the scan? 1980 was quite a long time ago, many Wikipedians weren't even born then. Can you please clarify this?--02:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
@PlanespotterA320 The photo was made by a photographer to order of Ю.П.Доброленский, and the potographer gave him an original of the photo. Being a member of Ю.П.Доброленский's family, I inherited this photo from him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nebosklon (talk • contribs) 15:49, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Ownership of photograph does not imply ownership of copyright. --MB-one (talk) 09:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
_results_(including_overseas)_by_region,_2002.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_results_(including_overseas)_by_region,_2002.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This map is not correct. Christina Taubira carried Guyane en Guadeloupe, and Jospin got la Réunion, and not Chirac. Also the colors are not the ones usually used for French parties. Iniți (talk) 22:16, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 23:40, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
File:French presidential election (1. round) results (including overseas) by departament, 2002.png
[edit]_results_(including_overseas)_by_departament,_2002.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_results_(including_overseas)_by_departament,_2002.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This map is not correct. Christina Taubira carried Guyane en Guadeloupe, and Jospin got la Réunion, and not Chirac. Also the colors are not the ones usually used for French parties. Iniți (talk) 22:16, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 23:41, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Also:
- File:Scythian male.jpg
- File:Scythian male (2).jpg
- File:Yamnaya male (3) (2).jpg
- File:Yamnaya man 1.jpg
- File:Dnieper-Donets male (Volniensky).jpg
- File:Yamnaya male (2) (1).jpg
- File:Yamnaya male (3) (3).jpg
- File:Yamnaya male (2).jpg
- File:Yamnaya male (2) (2).jpg
- File:Yamnaya male (2) (3).jpg
- File:Yamnaya male (3) (1).jpg
- File:Yamnaya male (3).jpg
- File:Yamnaya man 2.jpg
- File:Sarmatian female.jpg
- File:Saka male.jpg
- File:Yamnaya man 3.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
This image has no source. Hunan201p (talk) 14:45, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment added a bunch. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:06, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Insufficient source; Google returns 0 results. No explanation of why the photographer is unknown. We need something more to go on. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:06, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete So far, multiple people have given different possible "sources" for this art, in the form of named sculptors. We really have no idea who made them without a WORK (that is, a publication which clearly describes who created the sculptures and the photographs). Which is, definitely, what a source embodies - Hunan201p (talk) 17:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hunan201p is currently under a 3 month long block on Wikipedia for disruptive editing on articles related to these images.[8] Krakkos (talk) 19:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete All those picture are not reliable sources any longer. One should upload to Wikimedia new facial reconstructions of Yamnaya people based on recent genetic research. Azerty82 (talk) 06:59, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- I don't think that is a deletion reason. It may be a reason not to use them uncritically in certain articles but not a reason to delete the media. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 12:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment These are related to two others where user Urselius has provided some comment[9], [10]. The source is given, it is just that the actual photographer appears to be unknown. Not sure if it is sufficient to keep. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 12:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'd have thought Sirfurboy was right here. These were valid scientific reconstructions; if science has moved on, then they should be labelled as "Outdated reconstruction" or something of that sort. After all, we're interested in Ptolemy and Copernicus and Galileo even if we don't agree with them any longer. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep As Urselius has stated,[11][12] these photographs appear to have been initially published by the relatively unknown Soviet photographer Vladislav Bunakov in the 1930s. The photographed reconstructions were made by Mikhail Mikhaylovich Gerasimov, a pioneer in the field of forensic facial reconstruction. These photographs have been reproduced in later works by Gerasimov, and in more recent works by Western scholars such as J. P. Mallory. Krakkos (talk) 10:17, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per Krakkos. Now we know the name of the photographer there is no reason for deletion. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 10:50, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- The sculptor died in 1970; it won't be free in Russia until 2041. And we still know nothing about the photographer. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:48, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Copyright lies with Bunakov, as the photographer. It does not lie with the sculptor. Nevertheless I cannot find when Bunakov died, and I am unclear as to whether copyright law is affected by the soviet communist era. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 16:38, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- wrong. It lies with both. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:31, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Copyright lies with Bunakov, as the photographer. It does not lie with the sculptor. Nevertheless I cannot find when Bunakov died, and I am unclear as to whether copyright law is affected by the soviet communist era. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 16:38, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- The sculptor died in 1970; it won't be free in Russia until 2041. And we still know nothing about the photographer. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:48, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per Magog. The fact that the sculpture itself is not yet free is enough to say that this is a derivative of a non-free work. --pandakekok9 05:06, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per above. Author name is already provided. Störm (talk) 14:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Per Magog. A non-free work with unknown work and unknown author. Original file has been deleted already. No reason to keep. PicturesOfTheWorld (talk) 21:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
![[9]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Yamnaya_man_1.jpg){kind=link}
![[10]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Yamnaya_male_(3)_(2).jpg){kind=link}
- PicturesOfTheWorld is a confirmed sockpuppet of Tirgil34. The nominator Hunan201p is currently being investigated on Wikipedia because it is suspected that he is an additional sockpuppet/meatsock of Tirgil34. Krakkos (talk) 19:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep All these images are almost certainly out of copyright. --Hibernian (talk) 20:37, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per above. Puduḫepa (talk) 19:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep PThese images are not only useful and worth keeping for academic and historical reasons, but are also quite proper recons as well. Bathtub Barracuda (talk) 07:22, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I'm seeing a lot of arguments not based in policy here. We don't care if an image is useful. A simple vote adds nothing. Stating something is out of copyright when the discussion above shows otherwise adds nothing. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:27, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Magog's comments - the copyright rests with both sculptor and photographer. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:37, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Procedural listing. This file was tagged for deletion with the same rationale, but never included in the nomination above. ƏXPLICIT 00:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Circular source, misleading sockpuppetry, seems pointless to spend more volunteer time on this. --Fæ (talk) 16:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:13, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyvio http://ontopstudio.nl/OTSnieuw/download/cv_marc_lezwijn%20(1).pdf Kattenkruid (talk) 14:32, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deze foto (waarover ik publicatie rechten heb van Lex de Kam) komt inderdaad ook voor in mijn CV die op mijn eigen website staat. Is dat een probleem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by John Doehetzelf (talk • contribs) 15:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Ja. Hetzelfde probleem als bij Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cover 3 Songs.jpg. --bdijkstra (overleg) 12:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: No OTRS permission. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:56, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
