Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/03/01
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_-_WoRMS.jpg){kind=link}
_-_WoRMS.jpg){kind=link}
_-_WoRMS.jpg){kind=link}
![27 File:Сетка "рабица" вокруг огородов - panoramio.jpg](#File:Сетка_"рабица"_вокруг_огородов_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(10).jpg){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(9).jpg){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(7).jpg){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(6).jpg){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(5).jpg){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(4).jpg){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(3).jpg){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(2).jpg){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(1).jpg){kind=link}
;_Irian_Jaya,_West_Papua,_Indonesia_-_WoRMS(1).jpg){kind=link}
;_Diggers_Camp_(AUS)_-_iNaturalist.org(2).jpg){kind=link}
;_Diggers_Camp_(AUS)_-_iNaturalist.org(1).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(3).jpg){kind=link}
_by_Ulrich_Wieneke_-_WoRMS.org.jpg){kind=link}
;_Irian_Jaya,_West_Papua,_Indonesia_-_WoRMS(2).jpg){kind=link}
3.png){kind=link}
1.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
![129 File:Photo targa "Maestro di Karate".jpg](#File:Photo_targa_"Maestro_di_Karate".jpg){kind=link}
_20_-_karatistka_uprostřed.jpg){kind=link}
![147 File:ד"ר אריה אלוטין עם מנדל סטבורובסקי.png](#File:ד"ר_אריה_אלוטין_עם_מנדל_סטבורובסקי.png){kind=link}
,_צולם_באמצע_שנות_ה-30_בגרודנו,_פולין.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Poor quality 76.187.211.251 05:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Obviously a joke. Hi res image. --Achim (talk) 16:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry Ashoknayar1945 (talk) 11:21, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: In use on ko:wp. Nonsense request via Android app. --Achim (talk) 17:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry, Nonsense Somesh Desai (talk) 11:48, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Keep No valid reason for deletion, not blurry and certainly not nonsense. And nominator didn't inform uploader, ping on behalf @Rowingbohe: .--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:03, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Speedy keep per Camouflaged Mirage. A gentle reminder: You should put the reminder template on the uploader's user talk page, not yours.--Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 13:05, 1 March 2020 (UTC)- Speedy keep Not an appropriate reason. Moreover, this tower stands in my hometown, but I insist keeping this file for the reason Desai gave is just nonsense.--Super Wang (talk) 13:13, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Bad faith nomination. --Tim Wu (talk) 13:39, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request via Android app. --Achim (talk) 17:31, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
duplication דוג'רית (talk) 12:24, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 14:41, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation as it looks like this map was copied from a website. Also, it is blurry and of low quality, superior maps can be found at Category:Barcelona Metro maps. GFJ (talk) 14:50, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
@GFJ: İ’ll answer your two statements:
- About copyright violation, can you tell me which concrete website?
- Yes, iťs of low quality, but this is a map as how will be the Barcelona Metro in the future, how will look, not the current map with the extensions as a discontinue line.
However, if you want to delete this file, my comment isn’t an objection or an approval, just a comment. Please don’t count it as an objection. --Josep Maria Roca Peña (talk) 15:24, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for your quick response. Alright, if you can confirm that this is indeed own work and not based on the modification of a copyrighted map, I can believe that. My concern was based on the similarity of your map (and perhaps even more so File:Mapa del Metro de Barcelona.jpg) to doc.atm.cat/ca/xarxa_ferrov_central.pdf. GFJ (talk) 16:09, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- The PDF of the link was the model, not a copy. For example checking the category you indicated above, the files File:Barcelona metro map.png, File:Barcelona Metro Map.svg, File:BCN metro.svg, File:Mapa del Metro de Barcelona actualizado en 2016.svg, File:Mapa metro Barcelona (actualitzat juliol 2019).svg, File:Mapa metro Barcelona - juliol 2019.svg and my file you indicated, are also based on that PDF. İ used Paint Shop Pro to recreate from zero the public map visible on each station in the Barcelona metro (that also is the map in the PDF) several years ago and in each extension İ’ve been updating the map manually (thaťs why my map is more different in the new inaugurated sections). Because İ used Paint Shop Pro and saved the map as JPG, the quality is low. --Josep Maria Roca Peña (talk) 17:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for sharing these details on how the map was generated. I withdraw my nomination. GFJ (talk) 18:48, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- The PDF of the link was the model, not a copy. For example checking the category you indicated above, the files File:Barcelona metro map.png, File:Barcelona Metro Map.svg, File:BCN metro.svg, File:Mapa del Metro de Barcelona actualizado en 2016.svg, File:Mapa metro Barcelona (actualitzat juliol 2019).svg, File:Mapa metro Barcelona - juliol 2019.svg and my file you indicated, are also based on that PDF. İ used Paint Shop Pro to recreate from zero the public map visible on each station in the Barcelona metro (that also is the map in the PDF) several years ago and in each extension İ’ve been updating the map manually (thaťs why my map is more different in the new inaugurated sections). Because İ used Paint Shop Pro and saved the map as JPG, the quality is low. --Josep Maria Roca Peña (talk) 17:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: Nomination withdrawn. GFJ (talk) 19:06, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
I wrote wrong title Magurale (talk) 02:56, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:41, 3 März 2020 UTC: G1 --Krdbot 14:31, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Not found at URL, no permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:10, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 14:09, 3 März 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.haberturk.com/arama/tugce-aral?tr=tu%C4%9F%C3%A7e%20aral&kategori= --Krdbot 20:32, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_WoRMS.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_WoRMS.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license is CC BY NC SA 4.0 at the source. Non-Commercial restriction. Mário NET (talk) 22:16, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
_-_WoRMS.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Majora at 01:06, 7 März 2020 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) - Requested by uploader --Krdbot 08:22, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_WoRMS.jpg){kind=link}
_-_WoRMS.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_WoRMS.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license is CC BY NC SA 4.0 at the source. Non-Commercial restriction. Mário NET (talk) 22:12, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
_-_WoRMS.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Majora at 01:06, 7 März 2020 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) - Requested by uploader --Krdbot 08:22, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_WoRMS.jpg){kind=link}
_-_WoRMS.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_WoRMS.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license is CC BY NC SA 4.0 at the source. Non-Commercial restriction. Mário NET (talk) 21:39, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
_-_WoRMS.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Majora at 01:06, 7 März 2020 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) - Requested by uploader --Krdbot 08:22, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
_-_WoRMS.jpg){kind=link}
It could be used for no educational purposes. It’s just a screenshot from porn and therefore has no educational value. LuiCJ (talk) 11:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
In normal circunstances i would say to Keep as image is in scope. LuiCJ (started editing in 23 February) is a SPA user, in a crusade against "porn". Commons is not censored, so arguments that this image "it doesn’t have any education value" is clearly false and misleading. However this image is a copyvio per watermark on this image, so 
Delete. Tm (talk) 16:37, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:27, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
This is a account that just posts nothing but porn shots with zero educational value. LuiCJ (talk) 11:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- If the user LuiCJ used a minute to check my contributions, it would quickly be revealed that I have had a global account from 2005 and that I have over one thousand edits on Wikimedia Commons alone. When it comes to the statement about "zero educational value", that may be dependent on how one view such pictures. As I understand Wikimedia Commons it it not only for educational purposes, but also for expressing various cultures. Quite a few people are interested in porn and amateur porn and thus it can be said it is part of their culture.
- Moreover, Wikimedia Commons is not censored, as long as the content is within the law. When I started to upload the pictures I also kept to existing categories, and in the category amateur pornography it was only one picture. Thus I think it can be argued that I have done a service to the community and to users of Wikimedia Commons.
- I have no problem if some or all of my amateur porn pictures are removed, but if deletions are made it should be on the basis of common accepted rules. That my user account should be deleted, on the basis of my latest uploads, is as far as I can see not based on what rules Wikimedia Commons have today. Ulflarsen (talk) 12:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
OK, I understand. Have a nice day. LuiCJ
- Keep All images and also the Ulflarsen userpage and talkpage. LuiCJ (started editing in 23 February) is a SPA user, in a crusade against "porn". Commons is not censored, images are in scope and this DR smells like an persecution of a long and productive user. Tm (talk) 15:49, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion of a user page. Feel free to request deletion of images. --Achim (talk) 21:51, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Swamiharihar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal images / self-promotion.
- File:Anhadyogi swami harihar.jpg
- File:SWAMI HARIHAR.jpg
- File:Pizap.com10.120242975186556581385138645328.jpg
- File:Swami harihar.jpg
- File:Pizap.com10.437458968721330171385655577640.jpg
GFJ (talk) 14:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:36, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iamaloknath (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, abundant normal images of the fort can be found at Category:Fort Aguada.
- File:Bright reflection of aguada fort.jpg
- File:Next to aguada fort.jpg
- File:Aguada fort front.jpg
- File:Beautiful view of aguada fort.jpg
- File:Seeing aguada fort.jpg
- File:Reflection of aguada fort.jpg
- File:Aguada fort reflection.jpg
GFJ (talk) 21:30, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:28, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal images, out of scope.
- File:MorganKiss.jpg
- File:MorganEyesOpen.jpg
- File:MorganEyesClosed.jpg
- File:MorganBeads.jpg
- File:MorganDuftyMain.jpg
GFJ (talk) 23:44, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:55, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SagheerMalik292 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Unused personal images.
Érico (talk) 03:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 03:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:46, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Martin Osvaldo Torrilla (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Unused personal images.
- File:Napomelon.jpg
- File:Federico d´alberti y martin torrilla.jpg
- File:Franco chapita vidal y martin osvaldo torrilla.jpg
- File:Torri face.jpg
- File:Martin osvaldo torrilla ganando la liga san andres.jpg
- File:Lucas rodriguez.jpg
- File:Martin Osvaldo Torrilla.jpg
Érico (talk) 03:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal images.
Érico (talk) 04:02, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:47, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Md Jalal Khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 23:46, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:54, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Md Jalal Khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
- File:Md Jamal Uddin.jpg
- File:Jalal Khan.jpg
- File:Taslima.jpg
- File:Latifa Begum.jpg
- File:Fakir Ahmed.jpg
Didym (talk) 15:06, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no meaningful contributions by this user. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Md Jalal Khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos. out of scope.
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 04:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:48, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Md Jalal Khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]no permission
- File:চট্টগ্রাম ফলমন্ডী.jpg
- File:Oldest Photo Of Zalal Khan Rony.jpg
- File:My Formal Photos.jpg
- File:Md Fakir Ahmed.jpg
Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 21:37, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:34, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
unused image that probably just be considered a spam image — billinghurst sDrewth 13:18, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:49, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
unused image that should be considered spam — billinghurst sDrewth 13:18, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:49, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DMT Alttafili (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Unused personal images.
Érico (talk) 03:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:40, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
not have educational role I think that this photo must be deleted because author is very lazy and not respect Wikipedia. Author was downloaded photo without description. Why? --Ayratayrat (talk) 15:36, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
![15:36, 29 February 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/03/01#c-Ayratayrat-2020-02-29T15:36:00.000Z-File:Сетка_"рабица"_вокруг_огородов_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 12:13, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
![12:13, 8 March 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/03/01#c-Sealle-2020-03-08T12:13:00.000Z-File:Сетка_"рабица"_вокруг_огородов_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Gabrielbaum (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability.
- File:Alysson Antônio França Xavier.png
- File:Sabrina Bittencourt invite IDEC NZ 2015.pdf
- File:COLABORAÇÃO COM UNESCO BARCELONA.png
- File:Laudo médico Transtorno Dissociativo de Memória .png
- File:LAUDO HOSPITAL DAS CLINICAS SP mãe.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:42, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EuPD-Research (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, questionable notability. A corresponding article in the German Wikipedia has been deleted.
- File:CHA Pokal 2016.jpg
- File:Qualitätsmodell.jpg
- File:Teilnehmerübersicht CHA.png
- File:Der Corporate Health Award 2016.jpg
GFJ (talk) 19:55, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:43, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Selfie, out of Com:Scope --Killarnee (T•R•P) 00:08, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
_.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:34, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
_.jpg){kind=link}
No educational worth. Personal usage. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 01:21, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 13:34, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Azharali8899 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Unused personal images.
Érico (talk) 03:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:57, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Seems to be copied from https://www.instagram.com/p/BtAyWfXhoCy (dated January 2019, before this upload) HaEr48 (talk) 03:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Confirmation for you: These photo really originals. Not copied, Andrew send photo for me to my personal email! This photo has received official permission from the original owner to be published!
Sincerely, Yemimas29
- Is there a documentation on the permission though? What exactly was the permission given? HaEr48 (talk) 21:49, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Answer: We talk directly via direct messages on Instagram. and he agreed to it. if you need proof, I'll send our conversation capture to your email! yemimas29 (talk) 5 March 2020
Deleted: permission via COM:OTRS required. --Sealle (talk) 13:32, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
відсутня цінність фото Goga504 (talk) 14:13, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comments (as uploader):
- To the extent the deletion request is based on lack of educational value, Commons has a surprising deficiency of media depicting the fate of manufactured articles in the environment (whether as litter or otherwise). In fact, while I expected there to be many, I have not been readily able to locate any other example of a discarded and flattened aluminum can on Commons at all. I would humbly suggest that such photos have considerably more educational value than the staged product shots that dominate Category:Beer cans.
- To the extent there is an underlying question of copyvio under applicable (here, United States) copyright law, I have not been able to locate any authority that there is even a potential copyright issue (i.e. that copyright can be used to preempt depictions of a utilitarian product merely because the manufacturer has affixed an arguably copyrighted label to it). Indeed, multiple US courts have commented on the lack of such authority (e.g. [1], [2]).
- Even if there were a potential US copyright issue here, the Miller High Life ornamentation, consisting of text and a simple geometric symbol, seems to be significantly below the applicable threshold of originality.
- The one aspect of the Miller ornamentation that seems potentially copyrightable is the fancy lettering of the word "Miller", but even if that lettering were otherwise copyrightable, it appears to have been in use since well before 1923 and therefore in the public domain.
- To the extent there might be concern over the Miller logo being recognizable, that would be an issue of trademark law which is not relevant on Commons.
Kept: Mr. Visviva, that is a lucid, intelligent, well thought-out objection. Sustained. :)). --Sealle (talk) 13:29, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
file is obsolet, usefull files have been uploaded. Greetz! Bukk (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader requested. --Sealle (talk) 13:31, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
delete photo. This man did not hold an important post in Bashkiria. In addition, he worked at his highest position for a short time. Photography has never been used in Wikipedia articles. удалить фото. Этот человек не занимал важной должности в Башкирии. К тому же работал на самой своей высокой должности непродолжительное время. Фотография ни разу не использовалась в статьях википедии. --Ayratayrat (talk) 21:10, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: non-free source. --Sealle (talk) 12:55, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
this is reklam --Ayratayrat (talk) 19:24, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative of a non-free ad. --Sealle (talk) 12:56, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
poor qualityö educational role is nothing --Ayratayrat (talk) 15:40, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 12:56, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
no use of that file and i change my mind about this being posted Bunatek (talk) 07:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:37, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
First published in the United States in Weird Tales; copyright renewed.[3] Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Abzeronow (talk) 16:10, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- No objection. I had imported this image from :en on request of another user, assuming that it might be free enough per the tags it carried on :en. The short discussion at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2020/01#Lovecraft_manuscripts_free_enough_for_Commons? seemed to have no clear-cut result. --Túrelio (talk) 19:52, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:40, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(10).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(10).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license is CC BY NC 4.0 at the source. Non-Commercial restriction. Mário NET (talk) 02:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(10).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Majora at 01:06, 7 März 2020 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) - Requested by uploader --Krdbot 14:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(10).jpg){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(9).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(9).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license is CC BY NC 4.0 at the source. Non-Commercial restriction. Mário NET (talk) 02:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(9).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Majora at 01:06, 7 März 2020 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) - Requested by uploader --Krdbot 14:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(9).jpg){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(7).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(7).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license is CC BY NC 4.0 at the source. Non-Commercial restriction. Mário NET (talk) 02:39, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(7).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Majora at 01:06, 7 März 2020 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) - Requested by uploader --Krdbot 14:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(7).jpg){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(6).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(6).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license is CC BY NC 4.0 at the source. Non-Commercial restriction. Mário NET (talk) 02:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(6).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Majora at 01:06, 7 März 2020 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) - Requested by uploader --Krdbot 14:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(6).jpg){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(5).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(5).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license is CC BY NC 4.0 at the source. Non-Commercial restriction. Mário NET (talk) 02:54, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(5).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Majora at 01:06, 7 März 2020 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) - Requested by uploader --Krdbot 14:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(5).jpg){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(4).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(4).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license is CC BY NC 4.0 at the source. Non-Commercial restriction. Mário NET (talk) 03:01, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(4).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Majora at 01:06, 7 März 2020 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) - Requested by uploader --Krdbot 14:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(4).jpg){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(3).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license is CC BY NC 4.0 at the source. Non-Commercial restriction. Mário NET (talk) 03:04, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(3).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Majora at 01:06, 7 März 2020 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) - Requested by uploader --Krdbot 14:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(3).jpg){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license is CC BY NC 4.0 at the source. Non-Commercial restriction. Mário NET (talk) 03:07, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(2).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Majora at 01:06, 7 März 2020 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) - Requested by uploader --Krdbot 14:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(2).jpg){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(1).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license is CC BY NC 4.0 at the source. Non-Commercial restriction. Mário NET (talk) 03:16, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(1).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Majora at 01:06, 7 März 2020 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) - Requested by uploader --Krdbot 14:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(1).jpg){kind=link}
;_Irian_Jaya,_West_Papua,_Indonesia_-_WoRMS(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
;_Irian_Jaya,_West_Papua,_Indonesia_-_WoRMS(1).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license is CC BY NC SA 4.0 at the source. Non-Commercial restriction.
Deleted by Majora at 01:10, 7 März 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mauritia mauritiana (Linnaeus, 1758); Irian Jaya, West Papua, Indonesia - WoRMS(1).jpg --Krdbot 14:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
;_Diggers_Camp_(AUS)_-_iNaturalist.org(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
;_Diggers_Camp_(AUS)_-_iNaturalist.org(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license is CC BY NC 4.0 at the source. Non-Commercial restriction. Mário NET (talk) 21:04, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Majora at 01:06, 7 März 2020 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) - Requested by uploader --Krdbot 14:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
;_Diggers_Camp_(AUS)_-_iNaturalist.org(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
;_Diggers_Camp_(AUS)_-_iNaturalist.org(1).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license is CC BY NC 4.0 at the source. Non-Commercial restriction. Mário NET (talk) 21:09, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Majora at 01:06, 7 März 2020 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) - Requested by uploader --Krdbot 14:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:PlayIT Show 2015, Budapest, 3.jpg
- File:PlayIT Show 2015, Budapest, 34.jpg
- File:PlayIT Show 2015, Budapest, 35.jpg
- File:PlayIT Show 2015, Budapest, 37.jpg
- File:PlayIT Show 2015, Budapest, 4.jpg
- File:PlayIT Show 2015, Budapest, 57.jpg
- File:PlayIT Show 2015, Budapest, 59.jpg
- File:PlayIT Show 2015, Budapest, 6.jpg
- File:PlayIT Show 2015, Budapest, 60.jpg
- File:PlayIT Show 2015, Budapest, 70.jpg
- File:PlayIT Show 2015, Budapest, 73.jpg
- File:PlayIT Show 2015, Budapest, 89.jpg
- File:PlayIT Show 2015, Budapest, 95.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:20, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut (talk) 18:09, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Doom (series)
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:37, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut (talk) 18:09, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Doom (series)
[edit]Copyrighted
Dronebogus (talk) 11:52, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:00, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:07, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; and I think this is a modified version. --Ahmadtalk 19:06, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Darth Maul
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted statues.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:10, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:07, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Former Eastern High Service Pumping Station Development site for the Baltimore Food Hub, E. Oliver Street and N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD (37863193015).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a derivative work Vera (talk) 08:05, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 20:36, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Toys
[edit]Selected files appear to be derivative works, copyright violations. See COM:TOYS
- File:12-11-03 chicco Handy 02.JPG
- File:12-11-03 chicco Handy 03.JPG
- File:12-11-03 chicco Handy.JPG
- File:1957+Hasbro+Fearless+Fireman+Firehouse+Interior.jpg
- Keep As stated here https://copyright.cornell.edu/resources/publicdomain.cfm Date of Publication:1923 through 1977 Conditions:Published without a copyright notice Copyright Term:None. In the public domain due to failure to comply with required formalities. It was produced in 1950s Alfvanbeem (talk) 17:50, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep See above remark Alfvanbeem (talk) 17:50, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep See above remark Alfvanbeem (talk) 17:50, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep See above remark Alfvanbeem (talk) 17:50, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep See above remark Alfvanbeem (talk) 17:50, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Official foto license was aquired in the museum. Only commercial use interdicted. Should the license header be moderated? current is {{self|GFDL|cc-by-3.0}} anagoria
- Keep Official foto license was aquired in the museum. Only commercial use interdicted. Should the license header be moderated? current is {{self|GFDL|cc-by-3.0}} anagoria
- Keep Buddha statue is not the toy at all, and it have been treated as the traditional religion motif since thousands years ago. It should not be treated as the copyright works, in my opinion. --Clusternote (talk) 00:18, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Religious icons are a different class of beast, in this case Buddha statues are highly unlikely to be original designs, it is kind of the point to use traditional types. --Fæ (talk) 04:37, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per above -Pete F (talk) 04:42, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- File:An old butler halloween ornament toy.jpg
- File:Baby Farm Toy on Floor.JPG
- File:Balsa Plane.jpg
- File:Balsa Plane2.jpg
- File:Balsa Plane3.jpg
- File:Bilibo smile.jpg
- File:Bilofix motorcycle.jpg
- File:Bladestar.jpg
- File:Buntes Holzspielzeug 2011.JPG
- File:Captain Power Toyline (Heroes).jpg
- File:Captain Power Toyline (Villains).jpg
- File:Car toy.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep Appears a reasonably faithful mass produced reproduction of a standard car design. As such it is itself a derivative work. --Fæ (talk) 04:35, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per above -Pete F (talk) 04:42, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Fæ, Pete F, I don't understand your argument.
- 1. It is not a Derivative work in that the "standard car design" is not a copyrightable work (though it may be covered by design patents). Also a "reasonable faithful reproduction" is the opposite of what is required to create a "derivative work": the work needs to demonstrate some originality itself: the author's personality.
- 2. If it was a derivative work, and so subject to copyright protection in its own right, we'd have to delete a photograph of it.
- Commons:Derivative works twice gives the example of a toy aeroplane having no utilitarian purpose and so is a work of art and copyrightable in itself. The fact that it is a reproduction of something else isn't relevant here (it could be a space car and that's wouldn't change the copyright situation) A toy plane is really the same issue as a toy car. -- Colin (talk) 12:20, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- I really have no strong opinion on this one. I've struck my vote above. -Pete F (talk) 15:16, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep "Casio MAGICAL LIGHT KEYBOARD ML-1" (1994) is not the toy, but an electronic musical instruments. If this photograph should be be delete, then also almost all photograph of musical instruments manufactured in 20th century might be deleted. Thus it should be kept, in my opinion. --Clusternote (talk) 00:50, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per above -Pete F (talk) 04:42, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- File:Cayla Happy Walking.jpg
- File:Christmas Dalmations (2115678849).jpg
- File:Clipper Crazy Racers De Beuk Bug Buggem.jpg
- File:Coca Cola Bear on Floor.JPG
- File:Collection toys I.JPG
- File:Collection toys II.JPG
- File:Cosmobotfinal.jpg
- File:Cow Sheep Pig (4839832858).jpg
- File:Crizzle.jpg
- File:Darda Buggy.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Pete F (talk) 22:50, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note I see some good arguments above, and agree with them. I may have been a bit overzealous in this nomination, thank you both for taking a closer look. -Pete F (talk) 04:42, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: I have never seen a Hasbro toy without a copyright notice. No evidence is presented here that this toy did not have one. As for the ones in the museum, the museum cannot license the copyright to the toys, only the right to take pictures and, since commercial use is not allowed, the license does no good anyway. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:22, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Toys
[edit]- File:HK 葵芳 Kwai Fong 葵涌廣場 Kwai Chung Plaza colourful toys machine May 2019 IX2 03.jpg
- File:HK 葵芳 Kwai Fong 葵涌廣場 Kwai Chung Plaza colourful toys machine May 2019 IX2 04.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:59, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Toys
[edit]Per COM:TOYS.
- File:"Олень".jpg
- File:000889 - Roscón de Reyes (3173579091).jpg
- File:100 Year Micky.jpg
- File:2007Xbox360TaiwanHalloweenSpecial BurgerKing Promotion.jpg
- File:4 baby toys.jpg
- File:A Canadian-made convertible sleigh and wagon.jpg
- File:A toy roller coaster IMG 9019.jpg
- File:Big Time Toys 1.jpg
- File:Bondi, 17 - Festival of the Winds 2011.jpg
- File:Brad turner 1.jpg
- File:BTS tata.webp
- File:Car toy.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:43, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:13, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:59, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Barack Obama
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
_(2798221015).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:40, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 22:38, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, no apparent encyclopedic relevance. GFJ (talk) 15:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:00, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Not the same as at http://ukrainka.org.ua/node/8984 Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:35, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Well, it is the same photo, provided by its author, but in different resolution due to hosting limitations. --Perohanych (talk) 23:11, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Also asked the author to send a permission to OTRS. --Perohanych (talk) 06:59, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Ticket:2020030310010332 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 16:00, 4 March 2020 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Діана_Овсяникова.jpg” under ticket:2020030310010332. --sasha (krassotkin) 09:48, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission accepted. --Ahmadtalk 23:04, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Delete: Surely this should be deleted because it is an extracted version of a deleted file (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:02019 0471 Equality March 2019 in Częstochowa.jpg). Ww2censor (talk) 15:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Delete: If the original has been removed, it's understandable that the clone should also be deleted.--GizzyCatBella (talk) 21:14, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:02, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:06, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Berklimboz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not found at URL.
- File:Tugce-aral.jpg
- File:Tuğçe Aral Yaz Pozu.jpg
- File:Tugce-Aral.jpg
- File:Tuğçe Aral.jpg
- File:Tuğçe Aral Villa pozu.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:12, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Ahmadtalk 23:05, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rohollah bahmani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not selfies, photographers' permission needed via COM:OTRS.
--Kamyar Ti (talk) 19:51, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:18, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. File:مداحی.jpg can be found on the web, and has a watermark. The two other photos are small and don't have proper EXIF data. Given the uploader's history, I deleted them, too. --Ahmadtalk 23:14, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_iNaturalist.org(3).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license is CC BY NC SA 4.0 at the source. Non-Commercial restriction. Mário NET (talk) 03:37, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(3).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: by Majora; failed license review, requested by uploader. GFJ (talk) 22:30, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
_iNaturalist.org(3).jpg){kind=link}
_by_Ulrich_Wieneke_-_WoRMS.org.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_by_Ulrich_Wieneke_-_WoRMS.org.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license is CC BY NC SA 4.0 at the source. Non-Commercial restriction. Mário NET (talk) 21:06, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
_by_Ulrich_Wieneke_-_WoRMS.org.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: by Majora; failed license review, requested by uploader. GFJ (talk) 22:29, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
_by_Ulrich_Wieneke_-_WoRMS.org.jpg){kind=link}
;_Irian_Jaya,_West_Papua,_Indonesia_-_WoRMS(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
;_Irian_Jaya,_West_Papua,_Indonesia_-_WoRMS(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license is CC BY NC SA 4.0 at the source. Non-Commercial restriction. Mário NET (talk) 21:06, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Majora; failed license review, requested by uploader. GFJ (talk) 22:29, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:16, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:10, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:13, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
I apologize I did not take this photo from what I can tell. Please delete it.
3.png){kind=link}
3.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Because it is Blurry Kurtkaiser (talk) 04:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
3.png){kind=link}
- Keep: This file is in use on ko:중앙교육연수원 and ko:대구1 생활치료센터. If it's sharp enough for Korean Wikipedia, it's sharp enough for Commons under COM:INUSE. --bjh21 (talk) 17:35, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: I agree with User:Bjh21; the thumbnails themselves are clear enough. Good enough until or when future photos may be uploaded.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 04:34, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
3.png){kind=link}
Because it is Blurry, Nonsense Kurtkaiser (talk) 04:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is in use on pt:Valour Football Club. COM:INUSE says that if it's good enough for Portuguese Wikipedia, it's good enough for Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 17:36, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
1.png){kind=link}
1.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Because it is Blurry Kurtkaiser (talk) 04:43, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
1.png){kind=link}
- Keep: This picture is in use on ko:대구1 생활치료센터. Under COM:INUSE, if it's sharp enough for Korean Wikipedia, it's sharp enough for Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 17:40, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: I agree with User:Bjh21; the thumbnails themselves are clear enough. Good enough until or when future photos may be uploaded.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 04:32, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
1.png){kind=link}
Unused logo of questionable notability, out of scope. GFJ (talk) 20:57, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:15, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status is not clear Graham Beards (talk) 21:00, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:15, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, potential copyright violation of the website curis24.com that this screenshot is supposed to show. GFJ (talk) 21:18, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unfree screenshot/copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:14, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio, belongs to science source images according to https://fineartamerica.com/featured/2-water-bear-eye-of-science-and-science-source.html Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:49, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- I uploaded a higher resolution without checking the origins, which I should have. I'm fine with removing the image, of course. Eissink (talk) 23:25, 1 March 2020 (UTC).
- Easily done, the watermark is essentially impossible to read in the originally uploaded image because of the resolution. My main concern is that other sources including Smithsonian Magazine have used this image under the commons license, when any common sense would tell you that someone uploading what reeks of "science stock image" as own work is incredibly suspicious. Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:19, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:13, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. GFJ (talk) 22:14, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. GFJ (talk) 22:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope and unused, appears to be self-created artwork. GFJ (talk) 22:26, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:09, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
promotional — Ирука13 22:50, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope (personal photo). --Wdwd (talk) 13:09, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
promotional — Ирука13 22:51, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 13:08, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. GFJ (talk) 23:04, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:08, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. GFJ (talk) 23:20, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:07, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, no apparent encyclopedic relevance. GFJ (talk) 23:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:57, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. GFJ (talk) 23:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. GFJ (talk) 23:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal file of questionable notability, out of scope. GFJ (talk) 23:31, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Distorted logo of a website, out of scope. A better version exists at File:تاغريدات انومستاني.png. GFJ (talk) 23:33, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:55, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong upload, the image comes from another book; I uploaded it while driving my bot. Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 23:39, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 12:55, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Likely copyright violation, this is an image of a proprietary game. GFJ (talk) 23:54, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:53, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
It is clearly a non-free image Graham Beards (talk) 20:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Despite what you think it IS indeed a free image!!! User:theowlsband
Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 14:11, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status is far from clear Graham Beards (talk) 20:56, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Comment File:SIX 60D8568F-6D0E-420B-8BC7-2C4DA2D66F75.jpg is a close dupe. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:55, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. (-> https://66.media.tumblr.com/b1d61e7a5a6a87f6a7d711a8f6497556/tumblr_ospna72daX1w1220xo1_1280.jpg ); Apply to same File:SIX 60D. --Wdwd (talk) 14:09, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Redundant (almost identical) to File:Cover of First Edition of Paris by Hope Mirrlees.jpg, not in use. GFJ (talk) 20:50, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 14:34, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + no license. --Ahmadtalk 23:25, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
and [[:File:SG Lewis - Logo.png]
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no license. --ƏXPLICIT 01:43, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AlbanGeller as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted in UK until 2021 Regasterios (talk) 18:45, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
I agree with deletion however this is not a case of speedy delete. --Regasterios (talk) 18:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:57, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
COM:EDUSE O revolucionário aliado (talk) 00:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:26, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
不要な部分をトリミングして再度アップしたので Falcated (talk) 02:03, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 16:31, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thesoulhacker (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Mrpsb nepal.jpg
- File:Prabesh Samrat.jpg
- File:Official launching ceremony of Nepal's Mega Cinestar.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:00, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:14, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, all the photos are copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 16:37, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:51, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 16:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 16:54, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:55, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 16:57, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 16:58, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 17:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 17:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 17:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Already exists. The SVG Effect (talk) 03:12, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 17:09, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Already exists. The SVG Effect (talk) 03:13, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 17:10, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Already exists. The SVG Effect (talk) 03:13, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 17:12, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Already exists. The SVG Effect (talk) 03:13, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 17:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Already exists. The SVG Effect (talk) 03:14, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 17:13, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Taken from non-free source https://open.spotify.com/album/6TXaOwBLoyJrD6vem7L8Ba?si=ZSZ2aI02RE6RswLmenKhoQ Even the file description admits as much HaEr48 (talk) 03:44, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, album covers are protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 17:19, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Taken from non free source. Even the description admits as much HaEr48 (talk) 03:45, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, I'll delete all contributions of the uploader as copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 17:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per request due to upload by my old account. SpinnerLaserz (talk) 09:24, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep: Age of account is not a reason for deletion. The file is in use on ru:Флаг Камбоджи and zh:柬埔寨國旗. --bjh21 (talk) 15:34, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: This is my old account SpinnerLaserz (talk) 16:39, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep:The high value file linked the historical works should be kept without doubt and it wasn't a proper deletion request as I consider the situation happened of other flags recently. The community of wikimedia should also pay attention to the probably obliteration against all kinds of dissidents moving on in connected wiki area.——Longway22 (talk) 02:55, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Dissidents? What dissidents are you referring to? SpinnerLaserz (talk) 04:44, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept, "upload by my old account" is not a reason to delete anything. The file is used. Taivo (talk) 17:33, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Copyrighted logo Yogwi21 (talk) 04:33, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete file:Logo Bali United.png due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 17:39, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
لأنها كلام فارغ Mustafaalacadory97 (talk) 04:33, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Mas por que eliminar um Kit de time de futebol? Não tem porque eliminá-lo se está certo e fiel ao original. LL2005 (discussão) 09h49min de 1 de março de 2020 (UTC)
Kept, the file is used. Taivo (talk) 17:41, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
لأنها كلام فارغ Mustafaalacadory97 (talk) 04:33, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Mas por que eliminar um Kit de time de futebol? Não tem porque eliminá-lo se está certo e fiel ao original. LL2005 (discussão) 09h51min de 1 de março de 2020 (UTC)
Kept, the file is used. Taivo (talk) 17:43, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
I assumed that:
1) since the frame from the copyrighted film is copyrighted;
2) any actor-in-role image is protected (see File: The Eleventh Doctor and Amy Pond.jpg);
this requires permission from the copyright holder (studio making the film).
As long as the character belongs to someone, there is no fundamental difference whether the actor-in-role picture (/ in a special suit) is taken by a third-party photographer or a photographer at a production studio. — Ирука13 05:18, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep see Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Copyrighted BBC Characters. This is only Capaldi in costume. It could be anywhere. It's not a copyrightable image on that basis. Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I think we require much more for this to be a COM:DW. Even if Capaldi was nude he would still look like Dr Who. The clothes he wear is nothing special. If it was a full body specially designed outfit like Darth Wader or Dornald Duck then we could discuss it. I see no reason to doubt that the Flickr user took the photo and user licensed it free so I see no problems. --MGA73 (talk) 13:56, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept, MGA explained that well. Taivo (talk) 17:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
No source given; if created himself, then it can't be the 'official' logo. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 06:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, we have bigger version with source. Taivo (talk) 17:58, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
again no use of that file and i change my mind about this being posted Bunatek (talk) 07:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Educationally worthless. AshFriday (talk) 08:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, his only upload. Taivo (talk) 18:02, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
out of scope — Ирука13 08:05, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
![08:05, 1 March 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/03/01#c-Iruka13-2020-03-01T08:05:00.000Z-File:Photo_targa_"Maestro_di_Karate".jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Can you be more specific, please. I appreciate the image could do with a better description, but that doesn't make it out of scope. Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:39, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- I guess I hurried and this is an erroneous nomination. I meant that this is one of the standard (widespread) texts in the martial arts environment and it is more appropriate that it be not in the form of an image with text, but simply in the form of text. — Ирука13 11:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, pure text in .jpg form is a bad solution. Taivo (talk) 18:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
![18:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/03/01#c-Taivo-2020-03-12T18:04:00.000Z-File:Photo_targa_"Maestro_di_Karate".jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Tobeimmersedin as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: This is a picture of me that someone used for my wiki without my consent. I've changed it and would like this one being used as a thumbnail removed please
Converted by me to regular DR, as IMO it does not qualify for speedy-deletion. At its immediate source, on Flickr, the image is still under the CC-BY license. However, per EXIF data (here and on Flickr) the copyright is with Michele Prosper, whereas the Flickr-account, expressedly claiming own work, is by Dutch Boyd. So, the original licensing on Flickr seems to be a bit questionable. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:12, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Well the original uncropped photo shows Shack-Harris together with Dutch Boyd who is a professionell poker player (he has an article in en:WP) and should really be the copyright owner of this and all other pictures on his Flickr account. -- M-B (talk) 09:03, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Then why do the EIXF data expressely state: (C) MICHELECOSPER.COM ? --Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept, I see no good reason for deletion. The file is properly licensed in Flickr, it is used in multiple projects. I do not find a better photo about depicted person. Taivo (talk) 18:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Wanted to Not using this file, want to delete 118.141.103.18 08:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, due to weak educational value. Taivo (talk) 18:19, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Want to not using this file, delete 118.141.103.18 08:51, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, bad composition, weak educational value. Taivo (talk) 18:21, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
The picture was taken about Bánfalvy Ágnes who thinks that this photo is not proper enough for her wikipedia page and she would like to ask for a deletion Ba2019 (talk) 08:55, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept, this is not a reason to delete the file, because it is still used in multiple projects. Taivo (talk) 18:23, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Unclear that this logo actually fails to pass the threshold of originality. Gunofficial1998 (talk) 10:01, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
It is clear that this logo actually passed the threshold of originality. The logo is created by Nguyen Van Ngat and used by the authority of Di An, Binh Duong, Vietnam, which is true that this file has the written author right. Nhoxleminhtien (talk) 17:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, obviously complex logo, the uploader also supports deletion. Taivo (talk) 18:27, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, we have bigger version with source. Taivo (talk) 17:58, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, not educationally helpful. GFJ (talk) 10:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, unused file with unknown purpose. Taivo (talk) 18:35, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Depicts the National Memorial to the Winter War (Q48075469), which is under copyright. No artwork FoP in Finland. Kissa21782 (talk) 10:45, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyright PD-Cambodia Gunofficial1998 (talk) 11:08, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, 1962 photos from Cambodia are not enough old for public domain. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:49, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Photograph of 1930 without photographer Goesseln (talk) 11:38, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, anonymous work, free in source country Austria due to age. But it was copyrighted on URAA date in 1996, so USA demands 95 years from publication. The file can be restored in 2026 (95+1 years from publication). Taivo (talk) 18:56, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chiara9lives (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence of permission from the copyright holder. It is certainly possible the uploader is the artist as seen at various online places such as Twitter but we need confirmation.
- File:Katniss Everdeen Drawing.jpg
- File:Jeffree Star Drawing.jpg
- File:SuicideSquadDrawing.jpg
- File:LadyGagaDrawing.jpg
- File:Deuce drawing.jpg
Green Giant (talk) 11:40, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, after receiving, processing and accepting OTRS-permission the files can be restored. Taivo (talk) 19:12, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
This is just a screenshot from porn and therefore it has no educational value. LuiCJ (talk) 11:44, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Image is in scope. LuiCJ (started editing in 23 February) is a SPA user, in a crusade against "porn". Commons is not censored, image is in scope, as is the only kind of image(albeit the filename should be changed to tittle less ofensive), so arguments that this image "it doesn’t have any education value" is clearly false and mesleading. Tm (talk) 16:33, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Educationally worthless. AshFriday (talk) 08:40, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment AshFriday, nothing more than the usual two words? As other user said in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Alex-weki, "what is "educationally worthless" is your predicable record of mass voting against all sexual images with zero regard for usage". You almost always vote to delete this kind of imagery, even when they are in use, so please provide valid reasons if you aspire to have your "opinions" taking into account. Please less moralistic crusades. Tm (talk) 19:36, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, normally I would keep the image, because it has huge educational value. Commons has a lot of files about sex with slim people, so photos about sex with fat people are especially valuable. Unfortunately this is small photo without metadata and considering other contributions of the uploader, in my opinion this is copyright violation. Screenshot of porn video is totally possible. Taivo (talk) 19:23, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
I doubt that this work was done by the object itself depicted in the photograph. Need permission from the photographer, not from the hero of the photo -- НоуФрост (talk) 11:59, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 19:29, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted wallpaper. 轻语者 (talk) 12:11, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, in addition small photo without metadata, copyright violation is likely. Taivo (talk) 19:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
_20_-_karatistka_uprost%C5%99ed.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_20_-_karatistka_uprost%C5%99ed.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
damaged. — Ирука13 12:16, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
_20_-_karatistka_uprostřed.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, really. Taivo (talk) 19:37, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
_20_-_karatistka_uprostřed.jpg){kind=link}
copyright Gunofficial1998 (talk) 12:22, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, incorrect license. Taivo (talk) 19:39, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
duplication דוג'רית (talk) 12:25, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, unused file, tiny size. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
duplication דוג'רית (talk) 12:25, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
![12:25, 1 March 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/03/01#c-דוג'רית-2020-03-01T12:25:00.000Z-File:ד"ר_אריה_אלוטין_עם_מנדל_סטבורובסקי.png){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader's request, unused file, tiny size. Taivo (talk) 10:20, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
![10:20, 13 March 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/03/01#c-Taivo-2020-03-13T10:20:00.000Z-File:ד"ר_אריה_אלוטין_עם_מנדל_סטבורובסקי.png){kind=link}
File:מנדל סטבורובסקי, אימו גולדה סטבורובסקי, אחיו מרדכי סטר (סטבורובסקי), צולם באמצע שנות ה-30 בגרודנו, פולין.png
[edit],_%D7%A6%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%9D_%D7%91%D7%90%D7%9E%D7%A6%D7%A2_%D7%A9%D7%A0%D7%95%D7%AA_%D7%94-30_%D7%91%D7%92%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%93%D7%A0%D7%95,_%D7%A4%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%9F.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_%D7%A6%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%9D_%D7%91%D7%90%D7%9E%D7%A6%D7%A2_%D7%A9%D7%A0%D7%95%D7%AA_%D7%94-30_%D7%91%D7%92%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%93%D7%A0%D7%95,_%D7%A4%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%9F.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplication דוג'רית (talk) 12:25, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, unused file, tiny size. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
duplication דוג'רית (talk) 12:26, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, unused file, tiny size. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
duplication דוג'רית (talk) 12:26, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, unused file, tiny size. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
duplication דוג'רית (talk) 12:26, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept, but the file is still used. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
duplication דוג'רית (talk) 12:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, unused file, tiny size. Taivo (talk) 10:28, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
duplication דוג'רית (talk) 12:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, unused file, tiny size. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
duplication דוג'רית (talk) 12:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, unused file, tiny size. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
duplication דוג'רית (talk) 12:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, unused file, tiny size. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
duplication דוג'רית (talk) 12:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept, but the file is still used. Taivo (talk) 10:33, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Not his "own work", this is a screenshot taken from SCM Southern Corridor Malaysia video, and those videos are not set as "reuse allowed" Snowflake91 (talk) 12:34, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:36, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Not his "own work", this is a screenshot taken from SCM Southern Corridor Malaysia video, and those videos are not set as "reuse allowed" Snowflake91 (talk) 12:35, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:38, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Not his "own work", this is a screenshot taken from SCM Southern Corridor Malaysia video, and those videos are not set as "reuse allowed" Snowflake91 (talk) 12:35, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:39, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Not his "own work", this is a screenshot taken from SCM Southern Corridor Malaysia video, and those videos are not set as "reuse allowed" Snowflake91 (talk) 12:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:41, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Not his "own work", this is a screenshot taken from SCM Southern Corridor Malaysia video, and those videos are not set as "reuse allowed" Snowflake91 (talk) 12:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:40, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Not his "own work", this is a screenshot taken from SCM Southern Corridor Malaysia video, and those videos are not set as "reuse allowed" Snowflake91 (talk) 12:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Not his "own work", this is a screenshot taken from SCM Southern Corridor Malaysia video, and those videos are not set as "reuse allowed" Snowflake91 (talk) 12:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:45, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Not his "own work", this is a screenshot taken from SCM Southern Corridor Malaysia video, and those videos are not set as "reuse allowed" Snowflake91 (talk) 12:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:44, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Not his "own work", this is a screenshot taken from SCM Southern Corridor Malaysia video, and those videos are not set as "reuse allowed" Snowflake91 (talk) 12:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:47, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Not his "own work", this is a screenshot taken from SCM Southern Corridor Malaysia video, and those videos are not set as "reuse allowed" Snowflake91 (talk) 12:37, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:48, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Not his "own work", this is a screenshot taken from SCM Southern Corridor Malaysia video, and those videos are not set as "reuse allowed" Snowflake91 (talk) 12:37, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:49, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Not his "own work", this is a screenshot taken from SCM Southern Corridor Malaysia video, and those videos are not set as "reuse allowed" Snowflake91 (talk) 12:37, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:50, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Not his "own work", this is a screenshot taken from SCM Southern Corridor Malaysia video, and those videos are not set as "reuse allowed" Snowflake91 (talk) 12:37, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:51, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Not his "own work", this is a screenshot taken from SCM Southern Corridor Malaysia video, and those videos are not set as "reuse allowed" Snowflake91 (talk) 12:37, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:52, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Not his "own work", this is a screenshot taken from SCM Southern Corridor Malaysia video, and those videos are not set as "reuse allowed" Snowflake91 (talk) 12:37, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:53, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Not his "own work", this is a screenshot taken from SCM Southern Corridor Malaysia video, and those videos are not set as "reuse allowed" Snowflake91 (talk) 12:37, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:55, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Not his "own work", this is a screenshot taken from SCM Southern Corridor Malaysia video, and those videos are not set as "reuse allowed" Snowflake91 (talk) 12:37, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:56, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Not his "own work", this is a screenshot taken from SCM Southern Corridor Malaysia video, and those videos are not set as "reuse allowed" Snowflake91 (talk) 12:37, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:57, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Not his "own work", this is a screenshot taken from SCM Southern Corridor Malaysia video, and those videos are not set as "reuse allowed" Snowflake91 (talk) 12:37, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:58, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Image of screen, source needed. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 12:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:00, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work of the uploader – looks like a stock photo uploaded only to place a spamlink in file description. Actually the whole description is spam and has nothing to do with the content of the photo. jdx Re: 12:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
unused file that probably should be considered spam — billinghurst sDrewth 13:21, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, en:Adda52 was thrice deleted due to non-notability. I'll delete file:Adda red logo-1.jpg as well due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
unused image that should probably be considered spam — billinghurst sDrewth 13:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, en:Adda52 was thrice deleted due to non-notability. Taivo (talk) 11:09, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
unused image that probably should be considered spam — billinghurst sDrewth 13:21, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, spam. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded a SVG-Version File:Kantonsschule Baden Logo.svg Malo95 (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom.; Not in use, 1:1 replacement.--Wdwd (talk) 16:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:14, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chronique131 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most likely copyright violations, considering the user's upload history.
Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:16, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
exhbitionistic nonsense 87.123.65.232 10:15, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Oh that was quick ! This picture is in the scope. No reason to delete it. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 10:20, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- Comment The quality of the picture is not so good, I admit. BUT the added value comes from the fact that it's the only picture we have of a post-ejaculation footjob. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:42, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 06:47, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Since the image has a low quality and it’s obviously from porn, it doesn’t have any education value. LuiCJ (talk) 13:34, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per last DR, image is in scope. LuiCJ (started editing in 23 February) is a SPA user, in a crusade against "porn". Commons is not censored, image is in scope as is in use in zh:足交 so argument that "it doesn’t have any education value" is clearly false and mesleading. Tm (talk) 16:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept. The file has educational value, because it is used. Taivo (talk) 11:18, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Not released under CC-BY-3.0, according to archived links Gyrostat (talk) 13:34, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Minorax as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Ankry (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Depending on whether the image is used. Keep if in use, else Delete. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 13:49, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) As pointed out in this UDR discussion, the user is an active contributor, so the deletion reason (F10) provided was invalid. However this personal image is not used on the uploader's homepage (such usage would be a clear reason to keep it) and it is unclear whether it is in COM:SCOPE (IMO, it has no educational value). So openning this discussion and pinging @Minorax, Fæ, Jameslwoodward, and 1989: the parties involved in deletion and UDR discussion. Ankry (talk) 13:59, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Eid John: ping uploader. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 14:01, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep no conditions. The photo is illustrative and so in scope. There has never been a constraint that mistakenly deleted photos have a higher bar than normal to be hosted. --Fæ (talk) 14:03, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Not many freely licensed photographs that prominantly have a Game Boy Color in them. It's in scope and a high quality photograph. Abzeronow (talk) 15:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Your first sentence is false. The only thing that’s “prominantly” in this photo is the boy. 1989 (talk) 16:21, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per Ankry. No educational value. 1989 (talk) 16:21, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- 1989, please be careful about using words such as "false" that imply that the user was deliberately lying. You and I disagree with his statement, but it is not "false".
- Unless User:Eid John puts this on his user page, it is an out of scope personal image and should be deleted. I cannot imagine anyone actually using this to illustrate a Game Boy Color which already shows File:Nintendo-Game-Boy-Color-FL.jpg. Delete. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Hey everyone, thank you for your comment, I'm accepting for this image to be deleted, and its true the image does not fit this theme, I only uploaded it as a demo as I was recording a video to share to community on how to upload an image direct to WIki Loves Africa that I'm a part of organizing team, so you may please proceed with the deletionof the image, thank you, and the photo ownership is under me. (Iddy John) User:Eid John 16:15, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, because uploader wanted to delete it. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rashadalkersawy (talk · contribs)
[edit]These image concern me. When I first saw some of these uploads I realised that they were from a professional photographer. The uploader's info indicates that they are one. So far so good. However I then found that 5 of the 11 actual photos uploaded had copyright info in the EXIF that related to two different photographers (and they are clear copyvios to me). However these 6 images lack copyright info in the EXIF. But the camera info in the metadata indicates that all but one are taken with the same camera model as the clear copyvios. The other is taken with a different camera but is the same basic style as some of the others. It seems worth looking closer at these. Thanks
- File:Rashad alkersawy- رشاد الكرساوى Africa-Egypt-RedSea-Hurghada -- live egypt.jpg
- File:Rashad alkersawy- رشاد الكرساوى Africa-Egypt-RedSea-Hurghada - wind with sky.jpg
- File:Rashad alkersawy- رشاد الكرساوى Africa-Egypt-RedSea-Hurghada -- wondrful sun set.jpg
- File:Rashad alkersawy- رشاد الكرساوى Africa-Egypt-RedSea-Hurghada -- blue sea view in evening.jpg
- File:Rashad alkersawy- رشاد الكرساوى Africa-Egypt-RedSea-Hurghada -- sea with sun set.jpg
Herby talk thyme 14:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted. I'll delete file:Rashad alkersawy- رشاد الكرساوى Africa-Egypt-RedSea-Hurghada -- silent with sea.jpg as well. These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rashadalkersawy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 13:50, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Killarnee as Copyvio (Copyvio). Subject died in 1906. Source gives no date but "circa 1880" is plausible. Photograph(which is American in origin) is very likely public domain. Abzeronow (talk) 14:31, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- The source page says that you can buy the picture, so it may be copy-protected. --Killarnee (T•R•P) 16:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- So does Getty and so do many museums that incorrectly claim copyright on public domain art. If the photograph by an unknown author was created before 1900, it's public domain in the US. Abzeronow (talk) 16:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- If you click on the picture on the website you will get to the page [4] and it says “not to be reproduced without permission”. But where does it say that the picture was taken before 1900? --Killarnee (T•R•P) 16:52, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- As mentioned above, source gives no date. Uploader asserts 1880 as approximate creation date, which is why discussion would be needed to assess whether this is a 19th Century photo or an early 20th Century photo. Abzeronow (talk) 16:59, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- And how are you going to find out? But in any case the uploader did not tell the truth, because how is he supposed to know the date? --Killarnee (T•R•P) 18:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- As mentioned above, source gives no date. Uploader asserts 1880 as approximate creation date, which is why discussion would be needed to assess whether this is a 19th Century photo or an early 20th Century photo. Abzeronow (talk) 16:59, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- If you click on the picture on the website you will get to the page [4] and it says “not to be reproduced without permission”. But where does it say that the picture was taken before 1900? --Killarnee (T•R•P) 16:52, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- So does Getty and so do many museums that incorrectly claim copyright on public domain art. If the photograph by an unknown author was created before 1900, it's public domain in the US. Abzeronow (talk) 16:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept, depicted person was born in 1828. Considering, how does she look like on the photo, this is clearly 19th century photo, in public domain due to age. Taivo (talk) 11:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hanadikhwaileh (talk · contribs)
[edit]http://inu.edu.jo/display.aspx?token=0&id=476
Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:38, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, by Herbythyme as copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, de:Andsafe was thrice deleted due to non-notability. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:46, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation, as it is unlikely that the uploader holds the rights to license this image. GFJ (talk) 14:52, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:50, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, mostly because it was in .gif format. It's not too difficult to recreate Scottish flag with 15 European Union stars in .svg format. Taivo (talk) 11:55, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be copyrighted by someone else than the uploader Hjart (talk) 14:58, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, author and copyright holder Daniel Hjorth. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:50, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:46, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete file:Logo SCOR SE.png due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 15:48, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete almost-copy file:Logo ICE BAS.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 15:51, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Only upload of the user, whose only other contribution was to start a draft article for "One D", which by now has been deleted. GFJ (talk) 15:06, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:54, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate copy of File:Chernyshyov, Leonid Alexandrovich (1908-1910).jpg DonRumata (talk) 15:04, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Not exactly a duplicate, but a bit redundant...and the other one is certainly better. I didn't know it was there when I did the transfer. WQUlrich (talk) 15:17, 1 March 2020 (UTC) PS: There's an English version of his article in progress, and I won't be using this image. I see it's been taken off the Russian article. WQUlrich (talk) 15:34, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:56, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 10:03, 14 März 2020 UTC: F67File is empty &out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. --Krdbot 14:11, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Murphy&Spitz Nachhaltige Vermögensverwaltung.png
- File:Murphy&Spitz Nachhaltige Vermögensverwaltung.gif
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:13, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete almost-copy file:Moneymax Original.png due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 16:17, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused maps of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: Within scope – results of Smer political party per district in yesterday's parliamentary election in Slovakia, although they are functional duplicates of in my opinion superior File:2020 nrsr smer.svg. The visualisation (sans the logos) comes from the website of the Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic but I am not sure what is their licensing policy. So the vague filenames, nonsense descriptions and false own work claims on this and other uploader's files are more of an issue.--TFerenczy (talk) 19:35, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, there exists a better file:2020 nrsr smer.svg. Taivo (talk) 16:19, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of https://hnonline.sk/parlamentne-volby-2020/2101180-preco-to-tym-dochodcom-do-psej-matere-zavidite-fico-sa-v-debate-dostal-do-roztrzky-s-moderatorom
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:41, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, recreation of content deleted as copyvio. Taivo (talk) 09:04, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own works, low resolution, no metadata, PNG file type -> probably screenshots from videos. Also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fico young.png, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fico 2020.png and user's talk page with many notifications.
- File:Designate prime minister Igor Matovic 2.png
- File:Designate prime minister Igor Matovic.png
- File:Igor Matovič slovak prime minister.png
Harold (talk) 08:48, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Jurajec was blocked for a month due to copyvios (second block). Taivo (talk) 10:08, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:29, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:23, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
First published in the United States in Weird Tales; copyright renewed.[5] Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:44, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Abzeronow (talk) 16:09, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- No objection. I had imported this image from :en on request of another user, assuming that it might be free enough per the tags it carried on :en. The short discussion at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2020/01#Lovecraft_manuscripts_free_enough_for_Commons? seemed to have no clear-cut result. --Túrelio (talk) 19:53, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:31, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:50, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:59, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, as copyright violation. Per EXIF, author is JACQUIE MARTINEZ. Taivo (talk) 16:53, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Family album Patka (talk) 05:17, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, the photos are likely still protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 16:57, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dyango Vargas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Los Panchos Actualmente con Gabi Vargas.jpg
- File:Doble Disco de Platino por el álbum Todo Panchos.jpg
- File:Presentación de Gabi Vargas al Trío Los Panchos.jpg
- File:Jesus Navarro, Gabi Vargas y Ovidio Hernandez.jpg
- File:Ovidio Hernandez y Gabi Vargas.jpg
- File:Gabriel Vargas Aguilar.jpg
- File:Gabriel Vargas.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:59, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Lolita de la Colina en los 70s.jpg
- File:Lolita, Olga y Mirta.jpg
- File:Franco Iglesias cabalgando.jpg
- File:Franco Iglesias paseando a caballo.jpg
- File:Reunión de amigos y cómplices en Miami Florida USA.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 18:03, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from movie poster. Should be cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
OK It is quite a normal situation, It is Edouard who is photographed next to the poster of his film (no problem and he is a friend)--Nicoleon (talk) 16:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Poster occupies larger part of photo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:02, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- OK - Hello. The poster is not complete, there is a sheet of paper with indications which masks a significant part of it. The poster is not the element that occupies the most surface on the image. We are there to look at the image of a person who presents his work to us himself and who is perfectly aware that we are photographing it. What's more normal ? - C'est moi (talk) 09:03, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Poster occupies larger part of photo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:02, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, OTRS-permission from poster copyright holder is needed to restore the photo. Taivo (talk) 18:06, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Also: File:Emilia Clarke 2013 (Straighten Colors).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
In my opinion there is a significant risk that the flicks stream didn't own the copyright. The Flickr-stream doesn't contain any similar files, the uploader at Wikimedia Commons is a notorious sock-user. Also, the file is a crop. See https://www.levante-emv.com/cultura/2019/03/22/emilia-clarke-sufrio-aneurismas-rodaje/1851511.html here for a (though more recent) larger version of the same file. Natuur12 (talk) 16:22, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Non cropped version is deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emilia Clarke (March 2013).jpg. Natuur12 (talk) 16:33, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete The image isn't even accessible on Flickr. 403 error. --QTHCCAN (talk) 15:41, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:08, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low-resolution duplicate of File:Citibank.svg, lacks a transparent background. GFJ (talk) 16:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:12, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Delete: the Flickr license contradicts the license mentioned in the description. Without confirmation, I think PCP applies. Ww2censor (talk) 16:53, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep The statement in Flickr description is pretty clear: "CC BY 3.0". These are not letters you gather randomly pounding the keyboard... Multi-licensing is possible, after all, and file description in Flickr is provided by the very same person providing the "license" under the picture date. Strakhov (talk) 21:44, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Agreed with Strakhov. If it was the other way around - the machine license was set to CC-BY but the Flickr user affirmatively declared "All rights reserved" in the description, then I'd respect the copyright claim. Some Flickr users are often unaware that they can set licenses for individual images if they're aware of their licensing setting at all. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:43, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 18:14, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope, uploader has been blocked indefinitely on the English Wikipedia. GFJ (talk) 17:02, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:18, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, uploader has been blocked indefinitely on the English Wikipedia. GFJ (talk) 17:02, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:17, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 17:06, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:19, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, no apparent encyclopedic relevance. 2001:4BB8:244:1989:D901:543D:9DD0:8AD9 17:07, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:22, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, no apparent encyclopedic relevance. 2001:4BB8:244:1989:D901:543D:9DD0:8AD9 17:07, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:21, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
A number of factors indicate that the uploaded file is not its author: the presence of this file in higher quality on the network (for example), the presence of a more complete version of the image (for example), the presence of this file on the network earlier than the date it was uploaded to Commons (for example) , filling in the chapters source / author / permission, file deletion history of the original author of the download. — Ирука13 17:59, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:25, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
possible copyvio --Killarnee (T•R•P) 18:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Please explain what exactly is the problem? Thanks.--Тавьев Максим (talk) 19:44, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- You specified [6] as the source, but the page does not show that the image is actually under the license you specified. You also have to insert a license tag under "License". --Killarnee (T•R•P) 20:07, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, this is my technical error: when I uploaded the file, I did not specify the license. Corrected, added a more complete link, indicated the years of the author’s life. Is everything all right now?--Тавьев Максим (talk) 03:58, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- This file is used in the article ru:Якулов, Георгий Богданович--Тавьев Максим (talk) 12:12, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- You specified [6] as the source, but the page does not show that the image is actually under the license you specified. You also have to insert a license tag under "License". --Killarnee (T•R•P) 20:07, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept, fixed. Taivo (talk) 18:28, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE + OTRS permission required Ahmadtalk 18:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 18:42, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
missing permission --Killarnee (T•R•P) 18:45, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, big photo with EXIF data, inexperienced user, claimed author has almost same name as uploader's username. Google image search does not show the image anywhere. I take it as own work. But the file has no other license than "full permission". That way Commons does not know, what the users can do with the file and what they cannot. If the uploader explains that to my user talkpage, then the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 18:46, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Rmund as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: I uploaded this family photo of my grandfather, but I would like to delete it. Thank you.
Converted by me to regular DR, as image does not qualify for speedy-deletion, as it's in use. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, due to copyright problems. Not sure, who is actually the photographer. Rmund did not say explicitly, that his grandfather was the photographer. {{PD-Peru-photo}} is a possible license, but publication data are needed for that. I am even not sure, that source country is Peru. At moment it's best to delete. Taivo (talk) 18:57, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not sure photo contains Topinka in it SecretName101 (talk) 19:40, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 18:58, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file should be deleted because it is NOT Ludwig van Beethoven. It is an unknown boy painted in the 19th century by an unknown artist. Dnedwards (talk) 19:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not a valid rationale for deletion. Possibly a rationale for renaming. William Avery (talk) 22:12, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- A highly dubious ID to be sure but even spurious icons can be notable. Sparafucil (talk) 00:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep – The nominator provided no valid reason to delete it. The proper course of action is, after discussion, to remove it from Wikipedia articles where it's used. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:40, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Are we sure it isn't Beethoven? I took that photo of that painting in Die Sammlung alter Musikinstrumente, Kunsthistorisches Museum, in the Hofburg in Vienna, and uploaded it here soon afterwards; the text I added is a simple copy of the label that was displayed with the painting when I took the photo, which called it 'the earliest authenticated likeness of Beethoven'. I thought an official label in a reputable museum would count as a reliable reference. I would be interested to see a reference that is as reliable that says it isn't Beethoven. Has the museum's curation team changed their mind since 2007? --RobertG (talk) 15:18, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Just because it isn't Beethoven isn't a reason to delete it. If it is deemed not to be Beethoven, it should be renamed. Magic♪piano 12:45, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per presentation in museum. If caution about identity is needed, that should be expressed in image captions. Do we have a ref for doubts? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:50, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
The case against using this portrait was made by Beethoven-Haus Bonn (https://www.beethoven.de/en/archive/view/4823531296653312/Alleged+Beethoven+portraits) more than half a century ago. (Beethoven-Haus has a reputation for doing thorough research.) But proof that the portrait is fake is unnecessary. It is its unverified status that makes it unsuitable for Wikipedia. I think it's misleading to include it in an encyclopedic article about Beethoven, but if no one agrees with me, then simply labeling the portrait as "alleged" would go a long way toward getting this image to conform to Wikipedia's standards, even if it wouldn't quite bring the Beethoven article up to encyclopedic standards. Beethoven-Haus has grouped it with several other alleged portraits, so you could say they regard it as a notable fake. Moreover, the updated caption would (I assume) show up automatically in all the places where people have been fooled into publishing it as an authentic Beethoven portrait. Thanks to everyone who has participated in this discussion.Dnedwards (talk) 17:27, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept, the file cannot be deleted due to that reason, because it is used. Taivo (talk) 19:00, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, not educationally useful. 2001:4BB8:244:1989:D901:543D:9DD0:8AD9 19:48, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:09, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Highly redundant to File:Blason de la commune de Laire.jpg but of inferior quality as the edges are cut off. 2001:4BB8:244:1989:D901:543D:9DD0:8AD9 20:00, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:11, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
What is the copyright status of the clip-art picture which this photo is a COM:DW of? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:01, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
The photo is at https://webstockreview.net/pict/getfirst. The website's terms and conditions at https://webstockreview.net/terms.html state "When you register, you grant a non-exclusive, royalty-free, transferable, sublicensable, worldwide license to use, store, display, reproduce, distribute and modify your work on https://webstockreview.net." I have no clue it that's sufficient. Benica11 (talk) 01:35, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: There is no FoP for 2D non-artistic works in Australia. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:36, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal file, out of scope. GFJ (talk) 20:10, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:40, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Extremely blurry, not educationally useful. GFJ (talk) 20:12, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:39, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Extremely low resolution, not educationally useful. GFJ (talk) 20:30, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:41, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Farma201608 (talk · contribs)
[edit]{{disputed}}
- File:Johann Friedrich Böttger (1682 m. vasario 4 – 1719 m. kovo 13).jpg
- File:Luisas Nikolas Voklenas.png
- File:Hippolyte Mège-Mouriès.jpg
- File:Felix Hoffmann (1868 m. Sausio 21 d. – 1946 m. Vasario 8 d.) – vokiečių chemikas.jpg
- File:Juzik.jpg
- File:Franz Friedrich Anton Mesmer ( gimė 1734m. gegužės 23d. - mirė 1815m. kovo 5d.).jpg
- File:Bernard Courois (1777-1838).jpg
- File:Antonas Mesmeris.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_vokie%C4%8Di%C5%B3_chemikas.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ubcule (talk) 21:12, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
- As this deletion nomination for unclear copyright was never listed at Commons:DR, I am listing it now in today's log and ask for it to be discussed. Please note that File:Felix Hoffmann (1868 m. Sausio 21 d. – 1946 m. Vasario 8 d.) – vokiečių chemikas.jpg and File:Juzik.jpg are highly redundant and almost identical. 2001:4BB8:250:621:50F8:C477:7FFA:F8D8 20:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- @2001:4BB8:250:621:50F8:C477:7FFA:F8D8 and 2001:4BB8:250:621:50F8:C477:7FFA:F8D8:
- I don't remember the details of this, but I suspect that the nomination was an unintentional error on my part that I incorrectly reversed.
- That's because
- I've given {{disputed}} as the "reason" above- which isn't a proper explanation in the first place(!)
- I changed the tags on the images to {{disputed}} immediately after and
- Looking at them, it's likely that most *are* out of copyright- and hance acceptable here- but have been tagged wrongly. That's something I'd be more likely to mark as {{disputed}} in the first place rather than nominate for deletion.
- Sorry for any inconvenience caused.
- Ubcule (talk) 18:22, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, the files are not own work. Multiple of them are probably in public domain due to age, but without source I cannot determine licenses. Taivo (talk) 19:59, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, encyclopedic relevance seems questionable. GFJ (talk) 20:55, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Commons is not a place for that. The data should be written directly into some project, using wikitable. Taivo (talk) 20:13, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
作者（および投稿者）の都合により削除依頼を出しました。 KKPCW (talk) 21:15, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 20:14, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Highly redundant to File:Aguada fort close view position.jpg, both files are not in use. 2001:4BB8:250:621:50F8:C477:7FFA:F8D8 21:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Highly redundant to File:Aguada fort with walls.jpg, both files are not in use. 2001:4BB8:250:621:50F8:C477:7FFA:F8D8 21:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:19, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
jtbc program '한끼줍쇼' capture ⓒJTBC -- 메이 (토론) 21:41, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, screenshot. Taivo (talk) 15:52, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
jtbc program '한끼줍쇼' capture ⓒJTBC -- 메이 (토론) 21:41, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, screenshot. Taivo (talk) 15:54, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Clear copyvio, as stated in the image watermark Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Highly redundant to File:Mohera Zamindar Bari....19.jpg, both files are not in use. 89.144.219.101 22:11, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:05, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Mohera Zamindar Bari....06.jpg, both files are not in use. 2001:4BB8:25C:C6D:E80B:5070:70D9:D1B 22:11, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:07, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Highly redundant to File:Simple nature at park 3.jpg, both files are not in use. 2001:4BB8:25C:3A04:7CF8:BEC9:B204:633F 23:12, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, deleted file is a bit more blurry. Taivo (talk) 16:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#EDUSE O revolucionário aliado (talk) 23:14, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Highly redundant to File:九重の塔.png１１１１１１１１１.png, both files are not in use. 2001:4BB8:25C:3A04:7CF8:BEC9:B204:633F 23:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Low-resolution duplicate (or photo of a photo?) of File:九重の塔.png１１１１１１１１１.png, both files are not in use. 2001:4BB8:25C:3A04:7CF8:BEC9:B204:633F 23:16, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:14, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
the image was supposed for private use. SRmvnearbh (talk) 23:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Delete Image of infants which are more appropriate for private albums Encik Tekateki (talk) 12:44, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Delete This Image is most likely not supposed to be use publicly, only for private albums.LoganTheWatermelon (talk) 23:29, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 16:15, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
I think that this photo must be deleted because author is very lazy and not respect Wikipedia. Author was downloaded photo without description. Why? If thıs events please put to Events ın Bashkortostan category but author ıs not don't this.--Ayratayrat (talk) 09:26, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, unused photo about unidentified woman, deleted as out of scope. Taivo (talk) 16:18, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
I think that this photo must be deleted because author is very lazy and not respect Wikipedia. Author was downloaded photo without description. Why? If thıs events please put to Events ın Bashkortostan category but author ıs not don't this.--Ayratayrat (talk) 09:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, unused photo about unidentified woman, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:20, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Painter Giorgos Mistriotis died in 1998, so COM:OTRS is needed. Achim (talk) 17:24, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Pinakas2!.gif” but not processed yet, ticket:2020030110006065. --Ww2censor (talk) 22:55, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: No OTRS for over 30 days. --Gbawden (talk) 11:51, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Nurul Hikmah Sipisang Mosque
[edit]All of the files in this category were uploaded by User:Zhilal Darma. All of those listed above (all but one in the category) show
- Source = Personal File
- Author = Rahmat Irfan Denas
Therefore, they cannot be kept on Commons without a free license from Rahmat Irfan Denas.
- File:Masjid Sipisang 2020 01.jpg
- File:Masjid Sipisang 2020 02.jpg
- File:Masjid Sipisang 2020 03.jpg
- File:Masjid Sipisang 2020 04.jpg
- File:Masjid Sipisang 2020 05.jpg
- File:Masjid Sipisang 2020 06.jpg
- File:Masjid Sipisang 2020 07.jpg
- File:Masjid Sipisang 2020 08.jpg
- File:Masjid Sipisang 2020 09.jpg
- File:Masjid Sipisang 2020 10.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: Hallo! Those files that I upload is part of projects under Wikimedia Indonesia Grant. The title of the project is: WikiSurau (Category:WikiSurau) where I organized the project with my partner, Rahmat Irfan Denas. You can see the information about the project in this page.
- The output of the project is contributing picture in free license. In the case, all files that I upload is taken by me and Rahmat. I helped my partner to upload in Wikimedia Commons.
- Sorry, I can't speak English fluently. Zhilal Darma (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Zhilal Darma, thank you for the explanation. Unfortunately, policy requires that the actual photographer must give the free license, so Rahmat must send a free license using OTRS. Your English is fine -- certainly better than my Bahasa Indonesia -- I had perhaps twenty words when we were in your country for four months 25 years ago, but none now. However, Rahmat may send the free license in either language. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: Thank you. This is so helpful. One question again. Do Rahmat have to send his OTR for every single photo that I upload? Can he send single OTR for all photo? Zhilal Darma (talk) 04:47, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: Hallo, Im waiting for you answer. :) Zhilal Darma (talk) 01:15, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Before you ping a person a second time, it is polite to look at their contributions and see if they have been on Commons -- I was away for several days. One OTRS message can cover any number of files -- if he specifies "All the files listed at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Nurul Hikmah Sipisang Mosque, that will be good. If you will be doing similar uploads of his files in the future, he could say "All the files uploaded by User:Zhilal Darma in the past or in the future, where I am the author." . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you! Zhilal Darma (talk) 13:02, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Before you ping a person a second time, it is polite to look at their contributions and see if they have been on Commons -- I was away for several days. One OTRS message can cover any number of files -- if he specifies "All the files listed at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Nurul Hikmah Sipisang Mosque, that will be good. If you will be doing similar uploads of his files in the future, he could say "All the files uploaded by User:Zhilal Darma in the past or in the future, where I am the author." . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: Hallo, Im waiting for you answer. :) Zhilal Darma (talk) 01:15, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: Thank you. This is so helpful. One question again. Do Rahmat have to send his OTR for every single photo that I upload? Can he send single OTR for all photo? Zhilal Darma (talk) 04:47, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; can be undeleted if we get OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
There is no valid use for this image, as it was created to promote the subject. Furthermore, it is perhaps the most absurd image that I have ever seen on Wikimedia Commons. Susmuffin (talk) 03:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. But it is still used in Wikidata. Taivo (talk) 17:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Why does Wikidata need a 3D model of a random filmmaker whose article was deleted? Susmuffin (talk) 02:20, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- I do not know; you must ask that in Wikidata. Taivo (talk) 14:48, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Why does Wikidata need a 3D model of a random filmmaker whose article was deleted? Susmuffin (talk) 02:20, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- I personally doubt the value of the file. ΣανμοσαThe Trve Lawe of free Monarchies 11:06, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. It is used in Wikidata because Commons has a category for this self-promoter. A vicious cycle but it is now broken. --Green Giant (talk) 16:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC)