User talk:Paul.schrepfer

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Paul.schrepfer!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 17:02, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Paul.schrepfer!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:54, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Crue du Vidourle à Villetelle.JPG was uncategorized on 29 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:54, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:STOKHOLM - SKANSEN - ATELIER D'ARTISAN.JPG was uncategorized on 29 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:54, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:STOKHOLM - SKANSEN - CONSTRUCTIONS ANCIENNES.JPG was uncategorized on 29 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:54, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Paul.schrepfer!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

Moros y Cristianos 17:15, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:15, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Le temps efface la mémoire.jpg

And also:

File:Villetelle, le dauphin bleu.jpg

Yours sincerely, — Racconish ^💬 06:44, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Liberte de panorama

Bonjour, Merci de lire Commons:Copyright rules by territory/France/fr#Liberté de panorama, et de rester courtois. Par ailleurs, de quand date la sculpture du dauphin bleu ? Si elle est suffisamment ancienne, il est possible de restaurer la photo. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Yann, j'ai lu ce texte (Je ne suis pas anglophone, désolé (pour ce qui est de la coutrtoisie...), et je suis resté courtois dans le sens, ou, moi, j'ai expliqué ma position dans la langue de mes interlocuteurs. Le dauphin bleu est ancien. Mais la question n'est plus là et devient : comment peut-on supprimer une image sans même (se) poser la question ? On tire d'abord et on discute ensuite ! Pour ce qui est des arrêts de bus, il y en a un certain nombre, il faut alors tous les supprimer, ou tous les conserver. Courtoisement. - C'est moi (talk) 05:32, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Il y a certainement encore des violations de droits d'auteur, mais ce n'est pas une raison. "Le dauphin bleu est ancien." Oui, mais plus précisément ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 05:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alors, je souhaite connaitre la procédure pour demander la supression d'une photo quand je vois une violation de droits d'auteur quand j'en suppose une : un arbre taillé, un animal en cage....... Le dauphin bleu a été supprimé, paix à son âme, il falait réfléchir avant de tirer. J'ai indiqué la manière de vérifier son âge, personne ne s'en est donné la peine, ..... Cordialement. - C'est moi (talk) 05:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Si cela peut te rassurer, j'avais bien fait une vérification, dont il ressortait que le seul dauphin bleu ancien de la commune était celui d'Ambrussum [1]. Cordialement, — Racconish ^💬 05:46, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Je n'ai pas lu tout l'article mais une recherche avec dauphin et avec bleu n'a rien donné, aucune occurrence dans ce texte([2]) ?????? Cordialement. - C'est moi (talk) 05:52, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ma question précédente était : " je souhaite connaitre la procédure pour demander la supression d'une photo quand je vois une violation de droits d'auteur quand j'en suppose une". Une réponse ? Cordialement - C'est moi (talk) 05:53, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Exemple : il y a là une violation potentielle du droit d'auteur : [3] Il me semblerait logique de demander à l'auteur de la photo d'apporter toutes les preuves du fait que le tailleur l'a autorisé à publier son oeuvre. Ca n'a manifestement pas été fait, pourquoi ? Cordialement - C'est moi (talk) 06:00, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voir p. 266 § 5, Commons:Deletion requests/fr#Créer une demande et Commons:Do not disrupt Commons to illustrate a point/fr. Cordialement, — Racconish ^💬 06:04, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re-bonjour @Racconish: j'ai trouvé en français dans wikipédia, au sujet de la liberté de panorama, la phrase suivante en français dans le chapitre principe de base : "L'article 2-1 de la convention de Berne (signée le 9 septembre 1886) cite explicitement les « œuvres d'architecture, de sculpture » comme relevant de son application.". Il ne faudrait pas faire dire au textes ce qu'ils ne disent pas. Ce panneau n'est ni une sculpture ni une oeuvre architecturale. Il n'est donc pas concerné. Cette photo mérite donc d'être restaurée. Par ailleurs, les textes en français me sembleraient utilisables. Il me semble nécessaire d'envisager la traduction de tous ces textes dans toutes les langues des utilisateurs, tâche à laquelle je pense m'atteler si je trouve un traducteur automatique performant, n'étant pas polyglotte. Le monopole attribué à une seule langue dans wikimédia me semble être en opposition à la volonté d'un accès plus facile à la culture et à sa diffusion puisqu'elle limite de fait une parfaite compréhension du fonctionnement tous ceux qui ne pratiquent pas cette langue exclusive. Amicalement - C'est moi (talk) 07:10, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Par ailleurs, je lis : "Cette page est un essai. Elle contient les conseils et opinions d’un ou plusieurs contributeurs de Commons. Il ne s’agit pas d’une règle ou d’une recommandation, et les contributeurs ne sont pas obligés de la suivre.". il s'agit de Commons:Do not disrupt Commons to illustrate a point/fr. Cordialement. - C'est moi (talk) 07:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Toutes les créations originales éligibles en droit français à la protection du droit d'auteur sont affectées. En revanche, il existe une exception au titre de l'article L. 122-5 11° du CPI pour certaines œuvres architecturales et sculpturales, sous réserve d'une prohibition d'usage commercial, elle-même incompatible avec les licences demandées sur Commons. Cordialement, — Racconish ^💬 07:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Racconish, ce panneau a été créé dans l'illégalité, il est en effet illégal de tromper les usagers par des indications fausses, il n'est donc pas protégé (Cour de Cassation - Le 28 septembre 1999). Je maintien donc la demande de restauration de mon oeuvre. Respectueusement - C'est moi (talk) 08:14, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

J'en reste là, en te laissant apprécier s'il convient de faire valoir ce curieux argument sur COM:UDR. Cordialement, — Racconish ^💬 08:45, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C'est déjà fait. Les curieux arguments ne sont pas les miens, mais ceux qui conduisent à une interprétation manifestement excessive et même contraire aux textes. Je vais très prochainement réinjecter une image de cette veine sur commons, je t'en tiendrai informé, à toutes fins utiles. Parce que, pour ce qui me concerne, je ne vais pas en rester là (évidemment dans le respect absolu des règles et en toute courtoisie). A bientôt Racconish - C'est moi (talk) 10:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Paul.schrepfer!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

— Racconish ^💬 11:01, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Racconish, du harcèlement ? - C'est moi (talk) 05:39, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voir aussi Commons:Categories/fr. Cordialement, — Racconish ^💬 05:54, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Puisque tu es "en ligne", as-tu un reproche à formuler au sujet de ma nouvelle image ? - C'est moi (talk) 05:56, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Paul.schrepfer. — Racconish ^💬 11:57, 3 July 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Bonjour Racconish, rentrant de congés, j'ai essayé de voir ou en était la "procédure" ci-dessus, mais elle ne semble plus accessible. Peux-tu m'en dire plus ? Merci par avance. Amicalement. - C'est moi (talk) 09:15, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le temps efface la mémoire 2.jpg

File:Le temps efface la mémoire 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 07:11, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Taivo, que vous vous posiez des questions, ça me semble normal! Que vous demandiez la suppression d'un média sur un simple soupçon, sans même avoir questionné l'auteur du média me semble contrevenir au principe de savoir vivre. Nous ne parlons pas la même langue, mais nous avons des outils qui peuvent nous aider. Cordialement.

Automatic translation: Hello Taivo, that you ask questions, it seems normal to me! That you ask for the suppression of a media on a simple suspicion, without even having questioned the author of the medium seems to me to contravene the principle to know how to live. We do not speak the same language, but we have tools that can help us. Cordially.

Masintõlge : Tere Taivo, et te esitate küsimusi, tundub mulle normaalne! Mulle tundub, et te küsite lihtsat kahtlust, et me ei soovi meedia autorit kahtlustada, vaid rikub põhimõtet teada, kuidas elada. Me ei räägi sama keelt, kuid meil on vahendid, mis meid aitavad. Lugupidamisega.

- C'est moi (talk) 08:32, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tere Taivo, kas te saate mulle sellest meediast aru saada? Tänan ette - C'est moi (talk) 08:50, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Taivo, je conteste vigoureusement l'effacement de cette image qui est parfaitement admissible. Votre refus de dialoguer me semble contraire à l'esprit du projet. Salutations. - C'est moi (talk) 06:51, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file was deleted due to missing educational value. By principle, you can request undeletion in COM:UDEL explaining, what kind of educational value the image has.

Traduction de Google: Le fichier a été supprimé en raison d'une valeur éducative manquante. En principe, vous pouvez demander à undeletion dans COM:UDEL d'expliquer le type de valeur éducative de l'image. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Need your presence at Featured video candidates

		We request the honor of your presence at Featured video candidates
		Dear Paul.schrepfer, Are you Interested in Film Making/Videography/Cinematography or Animated films? We think you are. Featured video candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your videos for the FV Tag. You can start reviewing/nominating videos now. Welcome ! -- Eatcha (talk) 17:35, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Un comble.jpg

Yours sincerely, — Racconish ^💬 08:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Racconish: . Merci pour l'info ! Reconnais tout de même qu'il aurait été dommage de ne pas faire cette photo. Si c'est le logo qui te poses problème (What else ?), je vais le flouter, je pense que tu sera d'accord avec moi pour convenir que le texte PINAR est anodin.

Dans un autre ordre d'idée, je t'avais indiqué une photo dans la catégorie Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy qui semblait ne pas respecter le droit d'auteur, et elle a été supprimée, mais dans cette catégorie, il y a au moins la moitié des photos pour lesquelles il faut sérieusement se poser des questions au niveau des droits d'auteurs! J'ai lu l'article relatif à la commune de Cergy, on y voit une photo de Port Cergy, pastiche d'architecture "ancienne" de François Spoerry datant de la fin des années 1980 ([4]), et on lit qu'il s'agit d'un travail personnel, serait-ce lui qui aurait déposé la photo sur commons à la fin des années 90 du siècle dernier ? Ses héritiers auraient-ils donné leur accord ? Et des exemples comme ça, il y en a des centaines (que dis-je, ......), par exemple : Tour des archives - Rouen.jpg; Entrée gare Part-Dieu Lyon.JPG; Eglise Saint-Martin (Montpellier).JPG; Plan d'Eau.jpg; Biopole Rennes Atalante Champeaux.JPG; Conseil régional des Pays de la Loire, Nantes.JPG; Bordeaux victor hugo 01.jpg; Archives départementales.jpg; Centre Jaude II.jpg; Centre Saint-Martial Limoges.JPG; INRS Nancy 2018.jpg; pour faire un rapide tour de France de quelques unes des plus grandes villes. Un tel laxisme est étonnant ! Manque de bras pour faire la purge ? Manque de volonté ? Je lis par ci par là que Wikimédia a des sous pour financer des projets, peut-être qu'un des projets pourrait être d'acheter des droits sur des images ? Il est en effet étonnant qu'un article comme Marne-la-Vallée ne comporte que des photos d'immeubles anciens alors qu'il s'agit d'une ville nouvelle et que l'article n'en reflète rien ? Ce serait une bonne chose et permettrait aux auteurs de toucher quelques sous. Cordialement. - C'est moi (talk) 12:34, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 31.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 31.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 09:44, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 16.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 16.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 09:45, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 14.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 14.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 09:45, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 15.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 15.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 09:45, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 12.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 12.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 09:45, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 10.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 10.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 09:46, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:05 janvier 2023 - Nécropole nationale de Pierrepont (F-54) 25.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:05 janvier 2023 - Nécropole nationale de Pierrepont (F-54) 25.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 09:47, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Chêne à Rimsdorf - pancarte.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Chêne à Rimsdorf - pancarte.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 09:48, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Léon Malaprade avec signature.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Léon Malaprade avec signature.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 09:49, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Léon Malaprade photo recadrée.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Léon Malaprade photo recadrée.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 09:49, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Borne du serment de Koufra - Herbéviller - 007.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Borne du serment de Koufra - Herbéviller - 007.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 10:02, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Paul.schrepfer

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images

Tip: Categorizing images

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Notification about possible deletion

Liberte de panorama

Tip: Categorizing images

COM:AN/U

File:Le temps efface la mémoire 2.jpg

Need your presence at Featured video candidates

Notification about possible deletion

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 31.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 16.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 14.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 15.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 12.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 10.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:05 janvier 2023 - Nécropole nationale de Pierrepont (F-54) 25.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Chêne à Rimsdorf - pancarte.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Léon Malaprade avec signature.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Léon Malaprade photo recadrée.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Borne du serment de Koufra - Herbéviller - 007.jpg

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Navigation menu

User talk:Paul.schrepfer

Tip: Categorizing images

Tip: Categorizing images

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Notification about possible deletion

Liberte de panorama

Tip: Categorizing images

COM:AN/U

File:Le temps efface la mémoire 2.jpg

Need your presence at Featured video candidates

Notification about possible deletion

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 31.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 16.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 14.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 15.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 12.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Dehlingen (F-67) Villa gallo-romaine du Gulterbach 10.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:05 janvier 2023 - Nécropole nationale de Pierrepont (F-54) 25.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Chêne à Rimsdorf - pancarte.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Léon Malaprade avec signature.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Léon Malaprade photo recadrée.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Borne du serment de Koufra - Herbéviller - 007.jpg

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Navigation menu

Search