Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/02/18
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![26 File:Unidad habitacional "Latinoaméricanana Copilco".jpg](#File:Unidad_habitacional_"Latinoaméricanana_Copilco".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_cyclam_perclorate.jpg){kind=link}
_cyclam_perchlorate.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_1923-1924,_oil_on_canvas,_Smithsonian_American_Art_Museum.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_linguístico)_18.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_linguístico)_19.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_linguístico)_20.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_linguístico)_23.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_linguístico)_24.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_linguístico)_25.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_linguístico)_30.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_linguístico)_33.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_linguístico)_34.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_linguístico)_35.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_linguístico)_40.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_linguístico)_46.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_par-_--La_création_de_spectacles_originaux,_2013-12-07_06-00.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
https://gbglekki.org profile pic DMacks (talk) 04:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by DMacks at 04:46, 18 Februar 2020 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gene Seow.jpg: https://gbglekki.org profile pic --Krdbot 08:24, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deceptive copyright statement: says PD but is copyright C-SPAN (and identified as a screen capture from C-SPAN broadcast); this is not eligible for {{PD-USGov}}. Uploaded by long-term abuser in order to pursue harassment of purported whistleblower. No legitimate encyclopaedic use, blocked by edit filter on enWP, violates Foundation policy on living individuals. Guy 01:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP, last upload of a disruptive user. --Gbawden (talk) 14:11, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
J'ai fait une erreur je veux reprendre Ousmane Diallo OsmanLeo (talk) 06:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 19:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Davemichael1222 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No permission
- File:Greatgazoo.png.gif
- File:Twogirlslaughing.png.jpg
- File:Barney.png.gif
- File:Fred.png.jpg
- File:Pebbles.jpg.png
- File:Night.jpg.gif
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 02:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Delete Minorax, these photos are blatant copyvios and should have been nominated for speedy deletion. See for example. T CellsTalk 12:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:علاء for violating copyright. GFJ (talk) 20:17, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in US or country of origin PlanespotterA320 (talk) 03:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
_2.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep {{PD-Armenia}} — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 06:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination But please use country-specific license tags in your uploads BEFORE a deletion request asks you to.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination withdrawn. GFJ (talk) 20:33, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in US or country of origin PlanespotterA320 (talk) 03:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep 120-year-old photo of unknown authorship = {{PD-Armenia}} — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 06:55, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination. Please has country-specific license tags in your uploads BEFORE they get nominated for deletion.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:42, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination withdrawn. GFJ (talk) 20:28, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violated unknowingly Pablo.pk23 (talk) 04:19, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Storkk for violating copyright. GFJ (talk) 20:10, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
author's request Sova 23 (talk) 19:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:1989, CSD G7. GFJ (talk) 07:59, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
According to this page on the Sound and Vision website, the image is copyrighted. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 23:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Keep Please look twice. Vysotsky (talk) 23:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)- "All data on this site is derived from external sources, principally Europeana, but also Wikipedia. As such Niall O'Leary Services accepts no liability in respect of the accuracy of data on this website."
- @Vysotsky: Did you try the link to Europeana? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 00:29, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- Of course. Europeana and copyright, that's a nice story. Now seriously. When checking copyright, always go to the source. Source can be found here. Take the number (FTA001007376_010) and check it on the list of 18,885 images that Beeld & Geluid Wiki officially released under CC-BY-SA-3.0. Should do the trick. Vysotsky (talk) 00:53, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- I see it. Thanks. This can be closed. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 01:05, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- Of course. Europeana and copyright, that's a nice story. Now seriously. When checking copyright, always go to the source. Source can be found here. Take the number (FTA001007376_010) and check it on the list of 18,885 images that Beeld & Geluid Wiki officially released under CC-BY-SA-3.0. Should do the trick. Vysotsky (talk) 00:53, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Vysotsky: Did you try the link to Europeana? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 00:29, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: License verified, no reason for deletion. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 07:45, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Telewizja Polska Tomasz Rutkowski (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Skoda żądająca zmian w Polsce.jpg
- File:Ulotka Tył.jpg
- File:Tomasz Rutkowski walczy za pokrzywdzonych bezprawiem swoim życiem i zdrowiem.jpg
- File:Ten Okradł mnie z mieszkania za które zapłaciłem i nie zwrócił mi wpłaconych środków sam się wzbogacił na mojej krzywdzie.png
- File:Zacząłem walczyć po tym jak zabito mi dziecko. Dziecko mi Zamordowano Prawdopodobnie na organy.png
- File:Koszulka.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 14:18, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Same as his Apple Music pic - https://music.apple.com/us/artist/prince-ty/970817879 - unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 13:32, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:51, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Not official logo Bonafide101 (talk) 07:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Not official logo BrookeWealthGbl (talk) 16:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Uploader added "This image is set for deletion", COI on en:wp, so unused. --Achim (talk) 16:47, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Not official logo BasketballWizard (talk) 07:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:OOS. --Ahmadtalk 21:17, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Blatant spam.
jdx Re: 02:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:37, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by مصطفی یبلویی (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:IMG-20190904-WA0010.jpg
- File:IMG-20190904-WA0008.jpg
- File:1582012206796 0 MAKEUP ۲۰۲۰۰۱۱۹۰۹۲۷۴۸ save.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:18, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:38, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Actor pankaj Awasthi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:22, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:39, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Requested by the author, title resulting from a mistake Jamez42 (talk) 13:18, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Túrelio, CSD G2. GFJ (talk) 14:10, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused file. Photo of unidentified person looking out of window, No educational use. Malcolma (talk) 13:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:34, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Hasani-Machinery (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE. In addition, File:Hasani Machinery.jpg needs permission sent via OTRS.
- File:Certificate-Documents-9.jpg
- File:Certificate-Documents-8.jpg
- File:Certificate-Documents-6.jpg
- File:Certificate-Documents-7.jpg
- File:Certificate-tablet-maker.jpg
- File:Certificate-Documents-5.jpg
- File:Certificate-Documents-ce.jpg
- File:Hasani Machinery.jpg
Ahmadtalk 20:51, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 15:12, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Self promo on wikidata Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 02:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; OOS. --Ahmadtalk 21:22, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Previously published, see https://www.khabarfoori.com/detail/715729/شکست-آ.ا.ک-آتن-در-نخستین-حضور-%22سال%E2%80%8Cافزون%22, OTRS ticket needed Ytoyoda (talk) 05:35, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:23, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused promo materials of company of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:28, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ankur Yadav Music (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:NETCOPYVIO/COM:NOTHOST - unused images of non-notable person (appears self promotion per uploader name); images appeared elsewhere before upload to Commons (e.g., here) and have disparate (or no) EXIF (e.g., SM-A305F, vivo 1716, etc.) even if in scope, COM:OTRS permission needed.
- File:Ankur Yadav Dhakwa.jpg
- File:Ankur Yadav Guitar.jpg
- File:Ankur Yadav Composer Yash.jpg
- File:Ankur Yadav composeryash.jpg
- File:Ankur Yadav Music Director.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 16:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:35, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo for non-wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 17:50, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:38, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
{{non-free}} Dzasohovich (talk) 18:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Ymblanter. --Ahmadtalk 21:39, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amirseilsepour (talk · contribs)
[edit]Some photos have already been published elsewhere. If you are the copyright holder[1], please contact permissions-commons
wikimedia.org and send a permission statement using Commons:Wikimedia OTRS release generator. Thanks
- File:عکاسی پرتره (زهرا).jpg
- File:عکاسی فشن.jpg
- File:عکاسی پرتره (کیمیا).jpg
- File:عکاسی پرتره (شهرزاد).jpg
- File:عکاسی کلوز آپ.jpg
- File:عکاسی پرتره سیاه و سفید.jpg
- File:عکس هالوین.jpg
- File:عکاسی پرتره (فرنوش).jpg
- File:عکاسی پرتره.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
4nn1l2 (talk) 19:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:46, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Seems to be a copy from https://www.inmuebles24.com/propiedades/copilco-universidad-unidad-latinoamericana-52996931.html . The big burned out white spot is unmistakable. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
![20:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/02/18#c-Ellin_Beltz-2020-02-18T20:57:00.000Z-File:Unidad_habitacional_"Latinoaméricanana_Copilco".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; the direct link is [2]. --Ahmadtalk 21:53, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
![[2]](https://img10.naventcdn.com/avisos/18/00/51/20/82/22/1200x1200/41146545.jpg){kind=link}
![21:53, 25 February 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/02/18#c-Ahmad252-2020-02-25T21:53:00.000Z-File:Unidad_habitacional_"Latinoaméricanana_Copilco".jpg){kind=link}
This is a rendering not a photo from appearance of sky and other factors. Does not appear to be own work, too small, etc. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; can be found on the web, too. --Ahmadtalk 21:51, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pawelsawicki (talk · contribs)
[edit]http://auschwitz.org/en/copyright/
- File:Prezydent Andrzej Duda. 75. rocznica wyzwolenia Auschwitz.jpg
- File:Piotr MA Cywiński.jpg
- File:Dagan.jpg
- File:Else Baker. 75. rocznica wyzwolenia Auschwitz.jpg
- File:75. rocznica wyzwolenia Auschwitz.jpg
- File:Marian Turski. 75 rocznica wyzwolenia Auschwitz.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:36, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- There is an agreement sent by Auschwitz Museum official for all pictures mentioned except president Andrzej Duda's one, but it needs to be clarified. Anyway, please hold on with this deletion. See ticket:2020021810007981. Polimerek (talk) 22:00, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- I have accepted Musuem's agreement except for Andrzej Duda's pictures, which still needs to be clarified, but it is in progress. Polimerek (talk) 11:07, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Prezydent_Andrzej_Duda._75._rocznica_wyzwolenia_Auschwitz.jpg” under ticket:2020021810007981, so it seems that the case is solved. --Polimerek (talk) 00:32, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- I have accepted Musuem's agreement except for Andrzej Duda's pictures, which still needs to be clarified, but it is in progress. Polimerek (talk) 11:07, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Now have OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE (deleted on fa.wiki).
- File:تابلو صنایع دستی از چرم.jpg
- File:روزنامه.jpg
- File:طراحی با مداد.jpg
- File:نقاشی رنگ روغن.jpg
- File:تندیس با فلز.jpg
- File:Abrukmaun Drawing1.jpg
- File:Ostad.farhadi.jpg
- File:Gallery.abrukamun.jpg
- File:Abrukamun Gallery.jpg
- File:نمایشگاه ابروکمون.jpg
- File:Farhadi.jpg
- File:خورشید خانم.jpg
- File:M.fahradi.jpg
- File:Farhadi2.jpg
- File:مسعود فرهادی.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by VLu as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: false license, non-free book cover Jeblad (talk) 17:32, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure this illustration was used on other sites and tagged with acceptable licenses. I checked it before I used a cropped version. Now it seems to posted on iStockPhoto and credited to kristyewing. It would not be the first time illustrations has been relicensed, and unless anyone finds an alternate source with open license I guess it must go. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde book cover.png. Jeblad (talk) 17:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- What a bogus rationale… Still
Speedy delete as non-free artwork, cause files at iStock are not free. VLu (talk) 18:31, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Feel free to express yourself in any way you want, but stay civil. Thank you! Jeblad (talk) 19:05, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- What a bogus rationale… Still
- Delete Even if there are inconsistencies, I can't find reliable source older than GettyImages, and they claim they had the image since 2008. Jeblad (talk) 22:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by VLu as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: false license, non-free book cover Jeblad (talk) 17:33, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure this illustration was used on other sites and tagged with acceptable licenses. I checked it before I used a cropped version. Now it seems to posted on iStockPhoto and credited to kristyewing. It would not be the first time illustrations has been relicensed, and unless anyone finds an alternate source with open license I guess it must go. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde book cover.jpg. Jeblad (talk) 17:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- I took the photo of a book cover. Is this not allowed? Willbb234 (talk) 17:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Willbb234, please familiarize yourself with COM:DW policy. VLu (talk) 18:12, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Jeblad, what all of this for? Who told you that iStock files have compatible / “acceptable” license? The standard iStock license is non-free and files like this are to be deleted speedily, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:IStock-597641190 2 (3).jpg or Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mosquito pest.jpg for example. VLu (talk) 18:12, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Read my post, in particular “I checked it before I used a cropped version.” As I recall it was available at several sites, also with acceptable licenses. Jeblad (talk) 18:21, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Jeblad, so read mine as well as COM:L policy. What websites exactly do you mean and what licenses exactly and why do you suppose “acceptable”? VLu (talk) 18:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- “I'm pretty sure this illustration was used on other sites and tagged with acceptable licenses.” Jeblad (talk) 18:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Well done. Ok, once again. Am I to believe you or you take the effort to prove it? VLu (talk) 18:49, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- What you chose to do is totally up to you. Your speedy deletion is moved to an ordinary deletion, which makes it possible for other users, not just me, to find evidence for previous relicensing. Right now it seems like the original (ie artwork) is only at iStockPhoto, and it will be deleted unless an older source with open license can be found. As I wrote in the original followup; “unless anyone finds an alternate source with open license I guess it must go.” Jeblad (talk) 19:17, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Jeblad, deletion requests are not for wasting time like “somebody, please find something for me”. If you have no evidence of a free source, file is to be deleted, period. You brought here no any significant reason to go beyond speedy deletion. VLu (talk) 20:24, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- What you chose to do is totally up to you. Your speedy deletion is moved to an ordinary deletion, which makes it possible for other users, not just me, to find evidence for previous relicensing. Right now it seems like the original (ie artwork) is only at iStockPhoto, and it will be deleted unless an older source with open license can be found. As I wrote in the original followup; “unless anyone finds an alternate source with open license I guess it must go.” Jeblad (talk) 19:17, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Well done. Ok, once again. Am I to believe you or you take the effort to prove it? VLu (talk) 18:49, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- “I'm pretty sure this illustration was used on other sites and tagged with acceptable licenses.” Jeblad (talk) 18:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Jeblad, so read mine as well as COM:L policy. What websites exactly do you mean and what licenses exactly and why do you suppose “acceptable”? VLu (talk) 18:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Read my post, in particular “I checked it before I used a cropped version.” As I recall it was available at several sites, also with acceptable licenses. Jeblad (talk) 18:21, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- I took the photo of a book cover. Is this not allowed? Willbb234 (talk) 17:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete. Even if it was tagged on third-party sites with a compatible-seeming license, it could still be license laundering. In the absence of evidence of free licensing from a source that seems authoritative (such as in the printed book or the website of the book's publisher), it should be deleted. --RL0919 (talk) 20:11, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Even if there are inconsistencies, I can't find reliable source older than GettyImages, and they claim they had the image (the artwork) since 2008. Jeblad (talk) 22:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COMMONS:SCOPE, no apparent notabiity or use in projects Jamez42 (talk) 19:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COMMONS:SCOPE. English article was deleted in 2016 due to apparent lack of notability Jamez42 (talk) 19:14, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and found here before upload http://azulyglamour.blogspot.com/2014/04/aqui-entre-nos-heliana-ordonez.html. --Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, small size, poor quality, odd pixelation and Unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Blurry, unused personal photo. 2001:4BB8:258:1902:CDA3:68D2:F0A9:6BEF 21:04, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of File:Tomasz Rutkowski.png Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by 1989. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Incorrect value of bond-angle is incorrect. A regular tetrahedron is 109.45° (or 109° 28'). "109.2°" conflates minutes as decimal-places of degrees. Category:Chemical structure of methane has multiple alternatives, including correct "decimal degrees" and "degrees-minutes" notations. DMacks (talk) 06:28, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 15:44, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:40, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
This photo is a naked photo. Md Tanbir Islam (talk) 09:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: No reason for deletion, see COM:NOTCENSORED. GFJ (talk) 20:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep High quality photograph. AshFriday (talk) 00:38, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Delete: Wikimedia commons is not a porno site.Md Tanbir Islam
Kept: per GFJ / AshFriday; good quality photo, not "porno". --Gestumblindi (talk) 02:11, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Film Poster Rmnwnsx (talk) 12:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 22:11, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
The photo is from a newspaper website and the uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder. Farragutful (talk) 20:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 02:15, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
It duplicates Category:Valentine's Manual. Manual of the Corporation of the City of New York is the formal name of Valentine's Manual. They are the same publication. Vzeebjtf (talk) 16:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Deletion request closed without implementing any change as the topic is being discussed at a more appropriate place: Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/02/Category:Manual of the corporation of the city of New York. GFJ (talk) 12:01, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
_cyclam_perclorate.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_cyclam_perclorate.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Missing bonds from the four N to the Ni atom. Have File:Nickel(II) cyclam perchlorate Structure.jpg among several correct alts. DMacks (talk) 04:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
_cyclam_perchlorate_Structure.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_cyclam_perclorate.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete {{BadJPG}} The opaque background is a quality issue as well. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 21:12, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 22:56, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
_cyclam_perclorate.jpg){kind=link}
_cyclam_perchlorate.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_cyclam_perchlorate.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Ni should be in center of four N, bonded to them. Have File:Nickel(II) cyclam perchlorate Structure.jpg among several correct alts. DMacks (talk) 04:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
_cyclam_perchlorate.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 22:57, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
_cyclam_perchlorate.jpg){kind=link}
Previously published at http://www.newsincyprus.com/news/144735/iranian-thriller-to-be-shot-in-cyprus and elsewhere Ytoyoda (talk) 05:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (in 2018). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:27, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Lousy geometry. Have File:Nickel(II) cyclam perchlorate Structure.jpg among several better alts. DMacks (talk) 05:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 22:59, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Metadata credits AMIR FARZANEH Ytoyoda (talk) 05:36, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 00:58, 29 Februar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 08:12, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake. It is probably under copyright as a photo in a sales catalogue William Ellison (talk) 09:42, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 01:23, 29 Februar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing !L --Krdbot 08:12, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Vitorya1234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Zee pruk.jpg
- File:Zeepruk.jpg
- File:3e0a1658c38924e70c92333bdd6f91a220d877b1r1-1080-1080v2 hq.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:49, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rapperchrinicles (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:49, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:DTMilano.jpg
- File:Darktribe 2018.jpg
- File:Julien Agnello.jpg
- File:Tribal Fest 2015.jpg
- File:Groupe 2011.jpg
- File:Bruno Caprani.jpg
- File:Darktribe-07.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:50, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:51, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Hola, esta foto la subí por error y no he podido eliminarla. Darvinsonrojas (talk) 17:18, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Comment Uploader reques deletion, 2 years after upload. File may be out of scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk)
- Also OTRS deletion request. Please ping me when you close the discussion. Thanks in advance! Bencemac (talk) 08:53, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requests deletion of unused personal photo. Likely copyright issues anyway, as the uploader is the subject of a non-obvious-selfie, and meta data indicates the image was taken from Facebook. @Bencemac: . --GMGtalk 12:09, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by KremenaNikolova (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:35, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- The jpg may be marginal but it is in use on a draft article. Even if a COI, article creators are allowed to upload photographs of themselves for illustration, if they want to. INUSE applies per The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project.
- The pdf is obviously out of scope but can be considered separately. --Fæ (talk) 11:29, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Have kept File:CvetanRadushev.jpg as its INUSE.- FitIndia Talk Mail 13:44, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 02:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 14:36, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
No source/permission.
- File:Zenobia, Adinaa.jpg
- File:Adina Zenobia 9.jpg
- File:Adina Zenobia 18.jpg
- File:Adina Zenobia 3.jpg
- File:Adina Zenobia 2.jpg
- File:AZ headshot.jpg
- File:Adina Zenobia 1.jpg
- File:Adina Zenobia 6.jpg
- File:AZ (20).jpg
- File:AdinaZenobia.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 02:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete These photos should have been nominated for speedy deletion. Regards. T CellsTalk 12:49, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 14:35, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Streetosvietnam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:PACKAGING
Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 14:36, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement of questionable notability.
- File:Fördjupning i varumärkes expandering etablering - Gyllenstorm.pdf
- File:Advanced edition. mobilapplikation och digital marknadsföring - Gyllenstorm.png
- File:Gyllsofta - Gyllenstorm.png
- File:Affiliate marketing - Gyllenstorm.png
- File:Mobilapplikation och digital marknadsföring- Gyllenstorm.png
- File:Product psychology - Gyllenstorm.png
- File:CV and internet marketing - Gyllenstorm.png
- File:Sound podcasts marketing and seo - Gyllenstorm.png
- File:Vcf file and internet marketing - Gyllenstorm.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 14:38, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement of questionable notability. Also has a previous DR for similar reasons.
- File:Gyllsofta Linklist Austria.png
- File:Gyllsofta Linklist Spain.png
- File:Gyllsofta Linklist China.png
- File:Gyllsofta Linklist Germany.png
- File:Gyllsofta Linklist Japan.png
- File:Gyllsofta Linklist Taiwan.png
- File:Gyllsofta Linklist France.png
- File:Gyllsofta Linklist Netherland.png
- File:Gyllsofta Linklist Norway.png
- File:Gyllsofta Linklist Monaco.png
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 11:42, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:56, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ninigrigalashvili2608 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works: low-re images sport.gov.ge/, vintage photos of photos. For those please explain why public domain in Georgia.
- File:გელა ზაალიშვილი.jpg
- File:ტარიელ გაფრინდაშვილი.jpg
- File:გელა ბოლქვაძე.jpg
- File:გაგა ბახტიძე.jpg
- File:გურამ საღარაძე( სპორტსმენი).jpg
- File:ზვიად პატარიძე.jpg
- File:გივი მაჭარაშვილი.jpg
- File:რევაზ მინდორაშვილი.jpg
- File:სერგო ჯაიანი.jpg
- File:ნინო თიბილაშვილი.jpg
- File:ემზარ გელაშვილი.jpg
- File:დავით ბოდაველი.jpg
- File:Irina gerasimova.jpg
- File:Medea jugeli.jpg
- File:გურამ კოსტავა.jpg
- File:Guram kostava.jpg
- File:საიდა გუმბა.jpg
- File:მაია აზარაშვილი.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:05, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
FYI all but one file is in use:
| # | File | Usage | Non-core |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | გელა ზაალიშვილი.jpg | 1 | |
| 2 | ტარიელ გაფრინდაშვილი.jpg | 1 | |
| 3 | გელა ბოლქვაძე.jpg | 1 | |
| 4 | გაგა ბახტიძე.jpg | 1 | |
| 5 | გურამ საღარაძე( სპორტსმენი).jpg | 1 | |
| 6 | ზვიად პატარიძე.jpg | 1 | |
| 7 | გივი მაჭარაშვილი.jpg | 1 | |
| 8 | რევაზ მინდორაშვილი.jpg | 1 | |
| 9 | სერგო ჯაიანი.jpg | 1 | |
| 10 | ნინო თიბილაშვილი.jpg | 1 | |
| 11 | ემზარ გელაშვილი.jpg | 1 | |
| 12 | დავით ბოდაველი.jpg | 1 | |
| 13 | Irina gerasimova.jpg | 1 | |
| 14 | Medea jugeli.jpg | 1 | |
| 15 | გურამ კოსტავა.jpg | 1 | |
| 16 | საიდა გუმბა.jpg | 1 | |
| 17 | მაია აზარაშვილი.jpg | 1 |
--Fæ (talk) 13:26, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Storkk: could you explain why files listed in this DR are being deleted rather than discussed here? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 15:23, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @Fæ: - they were tagged as {{Copyvio}} as well as being listed for DR. Just a guess, but it looks like Patrick Rogel tagged a few as copyvios before creating a mass DR for all the user's uploads. The ones I deleted seemed clear-cut enough that I'm not sure it's worthwhile to restore for the duration of the DR, but if another admin disagrees, I'd be fine with them undoing these deletions. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 17:04, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Fæ: Could you explain what's the goal of these tables you are adding since today at DRs? IMO we are discussing of copyvio not how much the files are in use... --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:10, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Not started today as it happens. Files being in use puts emphasis on the evidence for deletion.
- There has been no discussion about copyright in this DR so far, only the nomination. The deletions by Storkk are before this DR is closed.
- If the evidence is sufficient to delete these files without discussion, the DR should not have been raised. --Fæ (talk) 16:15, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:11, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ninigrigalashvili2608 (talk · contribs)
[edit]2019 | © საქართველოს განათლების, მეცნიერების, კულტურისა და სპორტის სამინისტრო
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:26, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:11, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 17:05, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in promotional Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 17:04, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Unusd photo of an unknown person out of COM:SCOPE. Also possible copyright violation. jdx Re: 12:36, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:15, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused. Probably private photo Hjart (talk) 13:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:00, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused. Probably private Hjart (talk) 13:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:00, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:58, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:58, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: low quality photo of common subject. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:58, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:58, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Privacy of creator & subject. Stephenbalaban (talk) 17:36, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:56, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Privacy of creator & subject. Stephenbalaban (talk) 17:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:56, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Privacy of creator & subject. Stephenbalaban (talk) 17:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:55, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Privacy of subject & creator. Stephenbalaban (talk) 17:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:56, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Extremely low resolution, not useful. GFJ (talk) 19:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:55, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
MIGUEL ANGEL EL FARAON Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 19:49, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:54, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, appears to lack educational context. This is the sole contribution of the uploader. GFJ (talk) 19:56, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:54, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Extremely low resolution, not useful. 213.147.160.52 20:05, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:54, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Extremely low resolution, not useful. 213.147.160.52 20:05, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:53, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:18, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:53, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
The photo is from a church website and the uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder. Farragutful (talk) 20:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:53, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, no apparent encyclopedic relevance, not in use. GFJ (talk) 21:48, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:52, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, not in use. Likely a personal photo from the uploader, since there is a name in the file title. 2001:4BB8:258:14A:E0F9:2F35:AE91:D19B 21:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:51, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 07:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- We can confirm the license from here. http://web.archive.org/web/20190113165406/https://www.flickr.com/photos/27003603@N00/14729074675/ --QTHCCAN (talk) 02:23, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: the archive information has a free license. Ruthven (msg) 19:48, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:18, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Нарушение авторских прав Kotofey2016 (talk) 09:12, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 16:44, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Derivative works: we have a release for the image from flickr, but the painting in the image likely exceeds Threshold of originality, and we do not have a copyright release for it. BigrTex (talk) 00:56, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:47, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. ƏXPLICIT 01:21, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [3] Ox1997cow (talk) 00:29, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2023-09#File:Chilgok_Weir_at_Night_%EC%B9%A0%EA%B3%A1%EB%B3%B4%EC%9D%98_%EC%95%BC%EA%B2%BD.jpg){kind=link}
Derivative work of non-free photographs. ƏXPLICIT 01:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:50, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. ƏXPLICIT 01:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:51, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Previously published, used as the subject’s LinkedIn profile photo, needs OTRS ticket: https://www.linkedin.com/in/connie-chen-02431599 Ytoyoda (talk) 06:00, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:53, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Previously published photo: https://www.basketball-bund.de/news/teams/jugend/u16-herren/u16-jungen-zweiter-test-gegen-polen-erfolgreich-1100677, requires OTRS ticket Ytoyoda (talk) 06:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Ich bin nicht die Person über den der Artikel geht (das wäre ich gerne) ich bin eine Stadion Sprecherin welche ihn schon öfters ansagen durfte. Wegen seiner internationalen Erfolge vorallem mit der Nationalmannschaft bin ich der Meinung dass der Artikel weiterhin bestehen sollte und fände es schade wenn dieser gelöscht wird. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joemi3311 (talk • contribs) 12:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Joemi3311: Thank you for responding. You can ensure the file stays on Commons by properly crediting the copyright owner and providing verifiable evidence of permission through COM:OTRS. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:54, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused file. Table without meaningful explanation. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 16:29, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:04, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Small photo with no EXIF data, can be found on the web using Google search by image/TinEye, uploaded by a user with a history of uploading copyvios. If it's old enough, the standard licensing templates and evidence is needed. Ahmadtalk 17:56, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:08, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, lacks context or educational relevance. GFJ (talk) 19:17, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:07, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
COMMONS:SCOPE. Article in Spanish has been repeatedly deleted for promotional content Jamez42 (talk) 19:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:10, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused image with a rather small angle of view, partly blurry. Better images exist at Category:Pet rabbits. GFJ (talk) 19:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:12, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Replaced by File:Catalonia-regions-map.svg. GFJ (talk) 20:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:12, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
The photo is from a church website and the uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder. Farragutful (talk) 20:31, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:14, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
The photo is from a newspaper website and the uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder. Farragutful (talk) 20:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:16, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Dated 1944, license claims prior to 1943. Don't think so, sorry. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:16, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
The photo is from a website and the uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder. Farragutful (talk) 20:50, 18 February 2020 (UTC) Did I do something wrong? Wait, what do you mean by copyright holder? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RepublicanFan (talk • contribs) 00:56, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:19, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Romaine Brooks, Peter (A Young English Girl), 1923-1924, oil on canvas, Smithsonian American Art Museum.jpg
[edit],_1923-1924,_oil_on_canvas,_Smithsonian_American_Art_Museum.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_1923-1924,_oil_on_canvas,_Smithsonian_American_Art_Museum.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Artist died in 1970 - work is not in public domain. No indication that it is available under an appropriate CC licence Nl maclean (talk) 20:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:20, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
And also: File:Buchach, socrealizm.JPG
No FoP in Ukraine. Derivatives of works with unclear copyright status. Uploader did not create a mosaic. See same request. Микола Василечко (talk) 21:36, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:23, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
The source (https://www.rbc.ru/politics/05/08/2017/5985345d9a7947895ca1d104) says "Наталья Весельницкая (Фото: Юрий Мартьянов / «Коммерсантъ»)". That means "Photo: Yury Martianov, Kommersant". Kommersant is a popular Russian newspaper. Its usage as described here https://www.kommersant.ru/copyright specifically does allow some free use, but "без использования оригинальных иллюстраций", which means "without use of original illustrations". GRuban (talk) 15:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 02:08, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
chicane (in danish) Hjart (talk) 15:31, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
No proof image has been published 5 years prior (if it is an isolated photo) or 10 years prior (it it is part of a photo series) to 1996, when a law was passed suppressing 1956 law allowing only 5/10 years of copyright. Gikü (talk) 17:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Obvious violation of the license. Mihai (talk) 00:32, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Regasterios (talk) 16:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:24, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:38, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:24, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:40, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
No proof image has been published 5 years prior (if it is an isolated photo) or 10 years prior (it it is part of a photo series) to 1996, when a law was passed suppressing 1956 law allowing only 5/10 years of copyright. Gikü (talk) 17:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Obvious violation of the license. Mihai (talk) 00:31, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Dan Mihai Pitea: Hi Mihai, care to convert this into a vote instead? Same with Commons:Deletion requests/File:Laura Stoica Band - 1995.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Laura Stoica & Răzvan Mirică - 1992.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Laura Stoica - Festivalul Mamaia 1995.jpg. Gikü (talk) 09:10, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Gikü: Hello, I nominated them for deletion again because she'd deleted the del. labels from the file pages. I'm in a hurry now, so be my guest, you have my permission for all the talks, otherwise I'll have to do it at some later time. Salutări, --Mihai (talk) 09:14, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 12:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
No proof image has been published 5 years prior (if it is an isolated photo) or 10 years prior (it it is part of a photo series) to 1996, when a law was passed suppressing 1956 law allowing only 5/10 years of copyright. Gikü (talk) 17:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Obvious violation of the license. Mihai (talk) 00:31, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 12:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
No proof image has been published 5 years prior (if it is an isolated photo) or 10 years prior (it it is part of a photo series) to 1996, when a law was passed suppressing 1956 law allowing only 5/10 years of copyright. Gikü (talk) 17:13, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Obvious violation of the license. Mihai (talk) 00:33, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 12:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. This Image may have been taken from https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2019/07/three-questions-with-andy-richter-podcast-conan.html and doesn't appear to have the correct licence. Vistadan 20:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:13, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Who is the painter? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:36, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
From maroelamedia.co.za. Photographer's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
From maroelamedia.co.za. Photographer's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:19, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Palácio do Catete (cidade do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) (abaixo o imperialismo linguístico) 18.jpg
[edit]_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_18.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_18.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 07:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: File is back on Flickr (under the same account) and has been reviewed. --bjh21 (talk) 13:11, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:09, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Palácio do Catete (cidade do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) (abaixo o imperialismo linguístico) 19.jpg
[edit]_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_19.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_19.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 07:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: File is back on Flickr (under the same account) and has been reviewed. --bjh21 (talk) 13:11, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Source link is to a different photo on Flickr. --bjh21 (talk) 13:16, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Bot verified Flickr file was same as Commons file. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:11, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Palácio do Catete (cidade do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) (abaixo o imperialismo linguístico) 20.jpg
[edit]_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_20.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_20.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 07:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: File is back on Flickr (under the same account) and has been reviewed. --bjh21 (talk) 13:12, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Source link is to a different photo on Flickr. --bjh21 (talk) 13:17, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Bot verified Flickr file was same as Commons file. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:12, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Palácio do Catete (cidade do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) (abaixo o imperialismo linguístico) 23.jpg
[edit]_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_23.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_23.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 07:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: File is back on Flickr (under the same account) and has been reviewed. --bjh21 (talk) 13:13, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Source link is to a different photo on Flickr. --bjh21 (talk) 13:17, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Bot verified Flickr file was same as Commons file. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:12, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Palácio do Catete (cidade do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) (abaixo o imperialismo linguístico) 24.jpg
[edit]_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_24.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_24.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 07:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: File is back on Flickr (under the same account) and has been reviewed. --bjh21 (talk) 13:13, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Source link is to a different photo on Flickr. --bjh21 (talk) 13:18, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Bot verified Flickr file was same as Commons file. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:12, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Palácio do Catete (cidade do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) (abaixo o imperialismo linguístico) 25.jpg
[edit]_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_25.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_25.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 07:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: File is back on Flickr (under the same account) and has been reviewed. --bjh21 (talk) 13:14, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Source link is to a different photo on Flickr. --bjh21 (talk) 13:18, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Bot verified Flickr file was same as Commons file. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:12, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Palácio do Catete (cidade do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) (abaixo o imperialismo linguístico) 30.jpg
[edit]_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_30.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_30.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 07:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Bot verified Flickr file was same as Commons file. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:14, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Palácio do Catete (cidade do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) (abaixo o imperialismo linguístico) 33.jpg
[edit]_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_33.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_33.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 07:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Bot verified Flickr file was same as Commons file. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:14, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Palácio do Catete (cidade do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) (abaixo o imperialismo linguístico) 34.jpg
[edit]_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_34.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_34.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 07:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Bot verified Flickr file was same as Commons file. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:14, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Palácio do Catete (cidade do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) (abaixo o imperialismo linguístico) 35.jpg
[edit]_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_35.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_35.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 07:55, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Bot verified Flickr file was same as Commons file. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:14, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Palácio do Catete (cidade do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) (abaixo o imperialismo linguístico) 40.jpg
[edit]_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_40.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_40.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 07:55, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Bot verified Flickr file was same as Commons file. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:14, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Palácio do Catete (cidade do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) (abaixo o imperialismo linguístico) 46.jpg
[edit]_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_46.jpg){kind=link}
_(abaixo_o_imperialismo_lingu%C3%ADstico)_46.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 07:55, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
falha corrigida e dos demais arquivos do Palácio do Catete Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 19:00, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Bot verified Flickr file was same as Commons file. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:14, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
royal alberta museum images are not public domain - copyright violation. Mangostar (talk) 12:59, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Stifle (talk) 16:24, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 07:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Image seems to be cropped from File:Imageslike.com-original-lasvegas-mammals-05032-olive-backed-pocket-mouse-perognathus-fasciatus-g.jpg and if I read the year correct it is from 1838. That should make it PD. But I would like someone else to have a look. --MGA73 (talk) 21:52, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep It's obviously in public domain due to age. I couldn't find I. C. Werner's biography but it's nearly no chance that he worked in 1838 and lived till 1950. Mithril (talk) 01:27, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:15, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Potential copyright violation as the sign that is photographed may have a copyright. 2001:4BB8:258:14A:E0F9:2F35:AE91:D19B 22:03, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: {{FoP-Germany}} applies. --Rosenzweig τ 21:10, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
No need for this. This is only a selection of some images a single user finds good. 92.75.40.212 14:18, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- This is a gallery page. The template Template:Gallery page says it explicitly:
This is a gallery page containing specially selected images. They have been chosen as highlights of a particular topic, but do not represent the full range of images that are available on Commons. For a wider selection of images connected with Gallery page, see ..
- Gallery pages were created to contain only those images that are considered good enough. --VoidWanderer (talk) 14:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Speedy keep nothing to do here. We have tons of similar, unstructured, galleries with some files--Estopedist1 (talk) 16:31, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: feel free to add your own favorites. --JuTa 05:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
not needed. All galleries are incomplete. We already have {{Incomplete}}. Also there are few cases when even {{Incomplete}} is justified, eg suitable here: Category:Audio files of animal sounds from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service -- Estopedist1 (talk) 20:35, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per above. In use on exactly 1 gallery page (SVG musical instrument schemes), other templates created by this IP have already been deleted. --Achim (talk) 11:31, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 08:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, appears to lack encyclopedic relevance. Not in use. GFJ (talk) 21:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:41, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in unapproved draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:46, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
"Photographed by -dh for http://www.boldviewz.com/" in description, not own work A1Cafel (talk) 07:16, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
probably not own work 190.231.218.94 07:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
probably not own work Hilaya45 (talk) 19:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete 89 KB and the uploader confirms that it "probably is not an own work". E4024 (talk) 22:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 07:56, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 07:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
because I do not have the permission to photograph persons who were in the photo Francisco José Castillo Ruiz (talk) 08:02, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and possibly OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Looks like an image lifted from somewhere using scan. Nothing about the source is mentioned nor the EXIF info available. Psubhashish (talk) 08:29, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Looks like an image lifted from somewhere using scan. Nothing about the source is mentioned nor the EXIF info available. Psubhashish (talk) 08:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Looks like an image lifted from somewhere using scan. Nothing about the source is mentioned nor the details of EXIF info available. Psubhashish (talk) 08:31, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
The uploader seems not to be the author Les Meloures (talk) 08:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 12:01, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Underexposed photo part of mass upload. Out of scope. Pugilist (talk) 09:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:01, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:48, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Embraer 505 Phenom 300, Embraer JP7316862.jpg with more obstructive watermark Marc Lacoste (talk) 10:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
User:Dyaluk08 repeatedly requested the speedy deletion of this file (see version history), claiming that he knows the uploader and that the uploader wishes for it to be deleted. While the file does not qualify for CSD G7, it is unused and a courtesy deletion might be considered. GFJ (talk) 11:31, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of a file with no exif. --Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work, photo of photo. Who is the original photographer and when (s)he died? When and where the photo was first published (if it was ever published before upload into Commons)? Taivo (talk) 11:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Afrostoryteller (talk · contribs)
[edit]Permission of each photographer needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Pappy Kojo.png
- File:Mzvee.png
- File:Efya for A2O magazine Ghana paint splatter shot by Charlene Asare.png
- File:La Meme Gang for A2O shot by Nigel.png
- File:Marie Humbert shot by Charlene Asare for A2O.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:05, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Permission of each photographer was attained. How may I submit proof or direct you to them Mr. Rogel for confirmation? Afrostoryteller (talk) 13:14, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Afrostoryteller: As explained above please have them using COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:16, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Thank you very much Mr. Rogel. I'll redo these again apologies for wasting your time with such a minor issue. Afrostoryteller (talk) 13:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Proofwriter (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most of them found at higher resolution at http://www.karimerikanto.com/teosluettelo_kauhavan_taidetalo_2015.pdf, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Kari Merikanto teos - Alkumeri elää.jpg
- File:Kari Merikanto - Taideustimia.jpg
- File:Kari Merikanto teos - Merestä kohti taivaan valoa.jpg
- File:Kari Merikanto teos "Elämän virta" - Kupliva koivunmahlaskumppa etiketissä.jpg
- File:Kari Merikanto teos - Gravitaation synty.jpg
- File:Kari Merikanto teos - Elämän koodi.jpg
- File:Kari Merikanto teoksen yksityiskohta - Elämän fantasia - ensimmäinen näytös.jpg
- File:Kari Merikanto teos - Elämän fantasia.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Abdulrazzaq_Alobaid
No thoughts on copyright, just not an obvious f10. Fæ (talk) 13:11, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Files of Gzbernini
[edit]Gzbernini (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
"Personal archive" is not an acceptable source. Photographer is unknown, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - In the File:Lucinha morena.jpeg he wrote: "Foto tirada por mim" ("Photo taken by me"), so I'm assuming that he's the photographer and, therefore, the copyright holder. It seems that he's also the photographer in the other two pictures.--SirEdimon (talk) 05:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. File:Lucinha morena.jpeg is clearly a photograph of a newspaper/magazine photo, and none of the images have original metadata. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Je suis l'auteur de la photographie et mon nom apparaît dans des recherches associée à cette image et je ne le souhaite pas. Alexy29 (talk) 00:36, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Je suis l'auteur de la photographie et mon nom apparaît dans des recherches associée à cette image et je ne le souhaite pas. Alexy29 (talk) 00:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Je suis l'auteur de la photographie et mon nom apparaît dans des recherches associée à cette image et je ne le souhaite pas. Alexy29 (talk) 00:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Je suis l'auteur de la photographie et mon nom apparaît dans des recherches associée à cette image et je ne le souhaite pas. Alexy29 (talk) 00:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Je suis l'auteur de la photographie et mon nom apparaît dans des recherches associée à cette image et je ne le souhaite pas. Alexy29 (talk) 00:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
complex logo, the copyright release looks doubtful Bloody-libu (talk) 06:55, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Below the TOO in the US and Japan. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:49, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
errato caricamento Cedmike (talk) 07:33, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: author request deletion of recently uploaded (at time of request), unused content. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation João Justiceiro (talk) 07:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope: unused logo. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:51, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Mauvaise qualité Kev22 (talk) 09:42, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- This is my photo and I want to delete it because it is of poor quality and unusable. Kev22 (talk) 08:48, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:51, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Mauvaise qualité Kev22 (talk) 09:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- This is my photo and I want to delete it because it is of poor quality, unusable and duplicated with: File:Heuliez GX 317 n°259 - TUB - Intérieur.jpg. Kev22 (talk) 08:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Mauvaise qualité Kev22 (talk) 09:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- This is my photo and I want to delete it because it is of poor quality and unusable. Kev22 (talk) 08:47, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Mauvaise qualité Kev22 (talk) 09:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- This is my photo and I want to delete it because it is of poor quality and unusable. Kev22 (talk) 08:47, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Mauvaise qualité Kev22 (talk) 09:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- This is my photo and I want to delete it because it is of poor quality and unusable. Kev22 (talk) 08:50, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Mauvaise qualité Kev22 (talk) 09:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- This is my photo and I want to delete it because it is of poor quality and unusable. Kev22 (talk) 08:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:53, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Mauvaise qualité Kev22 (talk) 09:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- This is my photo and I want to delete it because it is of poor quality and unusable. Kev22 (talk) 08:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:53, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Mauvaise qualité Kev22 (talk) 09:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- This is my photo and I want to delete it because it is of poor quality and unusable. Kev22 (talk) 08:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:53, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Superseded image.File:Momoishi Toll Road Route Sign.svg is better quality. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 12:21, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:22, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Not own work, derivative work of this artwork John123521 (talk) 13:22, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10
Not an F10. As this is an apparent photo of a photo, there are likely copyright concerns. Fæ (talk) 13:24, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Fæ: It can be both. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:32, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- How does this photograph meet CSD F10? --Fæ (talk) 13:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:24, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Car c'est un logo qui m'appartient et il n'est pas dans le domaine publique Entpzl (talk) 13:32, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Below the threshold of originality in France and the US. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Encik Tekateki as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10|COM:SELFIE
Not an obvious F10. Photographs of journalists are in-scope. Fæ (talk) 13:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: It's borderline, but since it's an identifiable person, we'll keep it for now. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:31, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Encik Tekateki as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10|COM:SELFIE
Not an obvious F10. Fæ (talk) 13:42, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope, uploaded for the purpose of advertising. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
https://www.stsenzatitolo.com/st/artist/tiane-doan-na-champassak/, selfie? Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- File in use. Being a selfie is not a deletion rationale. --Fæ (talk) 15:13, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio: previously published https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10154983329095044&set=a.438127290043 without indication of free license. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Not own work, photo of photo missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jamisesc84 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no source. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Muhammadnijamuddin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Maulana Zubair Ahmed.jpg
- File:Allama Ahmad Shafi.jpg
- File:Muhammadnijamuddin.jpg
- File:Nijamwiki.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Historical paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Արտավազդիկ Եկեղեցու ավերակները.jpg
- File:Eranuhi Aslamazyan.jpg
- File:Նաիրի Զարյան.jpg
- File:Պաշտպանության ֆոնդին.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: File:Արտավազդիկ Եկեղեցու ավերակները.jpg and File:Eranuhi Aslamazyan.jpg are by Eranuhi Aslamazyan, who died in 1988. They will become free in 2059. I was not able to find out if the other two were created by Eranuhi Aslamazyan or Mariam Aslamazyan, who died in 2006. There is no evidence that the works have been released under CC licenses. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:59, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Harvey Milligan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Villa Marina under construction.jpg
- File:Trial Flight of Luton Minor at Hall Caine Airport - November, 1938.jpg
- File:Villa Marina House.jpg
- File:Castle Mona Hotel.jpg
- File:Sean Connery at the Castle Mona.jpg
- File:Abernethy Breakwater.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Uploader has a history of COM:License laundering. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:53, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: no source. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:01, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:01, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Please have the copyright holder contact COM:OTRS. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:02, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work, photo of photo. Who is the original photographer and does (s)he allow free publication of the photo? When and where the photo was first published? Taivo (talk) 16:00, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: unsourced. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Ten plik graficzny już istnieje Gungir1983 (talk) 16:15, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: not an exact duplicate of File:Koniuszko A young woman with bangs.jpg, no reason provided as to why this image is inferior per COM:REDUNDANT. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:04, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, the user's only upload, unlikely to be own work
- File:Atterissage des câbles ACE à Dakar 3.jpg
- File:Atterissage des câbles ACE à Dakar 2.jpg
- File:Atterissage des cables ACE à dakar.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 16:21, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio: previously published https://ace-submarinecable.com/gallery/, no evidence of permission. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:22, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Per :ru:Инкубатор:Иван Соболев. Журналист, телеведущий, шоумен Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, unlikely to be own work. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Birmingham, AL- Dec 2013 2013-12-06 18-21.jpg, both files are not in use. GFJ (talk) 19:19, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Medium_New_Sign_2.jpg, not in use. 2001:4BB8:254:7D2:F465:1C2F:B998:DF76 19:32, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Cultures d'Europe-Amen sam adaj a pour objectif de promouvoir l'ensemble des ressources de la culture tzigane (musique, danse, théâtre, cinéma, poésie, langue) par- --La création de spectacles originaux, 2013-12-07 06-00.jpeg
[edit]_par-_--La_cr%C3%A9ation_de_spectacles_originaux,_2013-12-07_06-00.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_par-_--La_cr%C3%A9ation_de_spectacles_originaux,_2013-12-07_06-00.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not educationally useful: The image shows hardly anything, not even the complete head of the person. Probably out of scope as well. 213.147.160.52 19:35, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, EXIF shows 'Google'. Likely to be taken from the web.--Kai3952 (talk) 20:18, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:59, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, EXIF shows 'Google'. Likely to be taken from the web.--Kai3952 (talk) 20:18, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio of https://web.archive.org/web/20110109184944/https://www.asiaa.sinica.edu.tw/gallery/show_c.php?i=559f81557e82fa737f99be7ff6adf2ce. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:01, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Not a good looking model, its not clear how this image could be used in an article.. 2806:264:4407:A7EA:1C43:46C1:D984:EB00 21:32, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:01, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Gunofficial1998 as Dw no source since (dw no source since). Keep, the portrait of the person in question is older than 1941 (the date when the subject died), this should not be speedy deleted. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: It may be PD, but it's still unsourced. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:02, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Blurry, redundant to File:Geni vinnarna igen! = männen!! 2013-12-23 21-41.jpg. GFJ (talk) 21:49, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gunofficial1998 as no source (No source since). This file is old enough for "{{PD-Vietnam}}", the person who tagged it doesn't seem to understand how sourcing on Wikimedia Commons works and has been on a speedy deletion tagging spree for some time now. Keep for this file. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:50, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: It may be PD, but it's still unsourced. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:02, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gunofficial1998 as Dw no source since (dw no source since). This file is old enough for "{{PD-Vietnam}}", the person who tagged it doesn't seem to understand how sourcing on Wikimedia Commons works and has been on a speedy deletion tagging spree for some time now. Keep for this file. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: It may be PD, but it's still unsourced. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:02, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gunofficial1998 as Dw no source since (dw no source since). While this file is unlikely "Own work", if the source website can be found this file might be eligible for "PD-VNGov" if it's a Vietnamese government work. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: It may be PD, but it's still unsourced. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Not useful, potential copyright violation as the sign that is photographed may have a copyright. 213.147.162.160 22:01, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Sign is covered by COM:FOP Spain, but the image is a copyvio of https://cullerabonita.blogspot.com/2010/11/cullera-abre-al-publico-el-sendero-de.html. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Redundant to File:HK 灣仔 Wan Chai 春園街 Spring Garden Lane view 囍匯 The Avenue Dec-2013 shop sign 7-11.JPG. 2001:4BB8:258:14A:E0F9:2F35:AE91:D19B 22:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no reason provided for why this image is inferior to the other per COM:REDUNDANT. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Araz Yaquboglu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader requested deletion. Courtesy deletion of recent and unused uploads.
- File:Əsgərov Bəxtiyar.jpg
- File:Bəxtiyar Hüseynalı oğlu.jpg
- File:Əsgərov Bəxtiyar H.o.jpg
- File:Əsgərov Bəxtiyar H.o. 2018.jpg
- File:Əsgərov Bəxtiyar Hüseynalı o.jpg
- File:Bəxtiyar Hüseynalı oğlu Əsgərov.jpg
- File:Bəxtiyar Əsgərov 2018.jpg
- File:Bəxtiyar Əsgərov (2018).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:17, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Araz Yaquboglu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Violation of the rule Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Azerbaijan
Maxinvestigator (talk) 05:47, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Araz Yaquboglu (talk · contribs)
[edit]http://agf.az/en/gallery/photo/avropa_gimnastika_ittifaqinin_27_ci_konqresi__split__xorvatiya__/
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:45, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:13, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Araz Yaquboglu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Too many cameras (at least 15) to be true, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Tərlan Qasımov.jpg
- File:Ferid Gayıbov-6.jpg
- File:Rafiq Bayramov “Hyatt Regency-Naxçıvan”da.jpg
- File:Rafiq Bayramov.jpg
- File:Rafiq Bayramov (alim).jpg
- File:Vaqif Rəhmanov.jpg
- File:Bəxtiyar Məmmədov (jurnalist).jpg
- File:Qalib İmanov.jpg
- File:Fərhad Turanlı.jpg
- File:Cavanşir Feyziyev-3.jpg
- File:Cavanşir Feyziyev-2.jpg
- File:Namiq Əliyev (jurnalist).jpg
- File:Hafiz Baxşəliyev.jpg
- File:Abel Məhərrəmov 0091.jpg
- File:Abel Məhərrəmov 0066.jpg
- File:Abel Məhərrəmov 0090.jpg
- File:Abel Məhərrəmov.jpg
- File:Abel Məhərrəmov 0059.jpg
- File:Abel Məhərrəmov 0062.jpg
- File:Abel Məhərrəmov 0056.jpg
- File:Abel Məhərrəmov 0053.jpg
- File:Abel Məhərrəmov 0052.jpg
- File:Abel Məhərrəmov 0051.jpg
- File:Abel Məhərrəmov 0047.jpg
- File:Abel Məhərrəmov 0046.jpg
- File:Füzuli Sabiroğlu (2009).jpg
- File:Füzuli Sabiroğlu 2013.jpg
- File:Farid Gayibov.jpg
- File:Tofiq Yusif - 219.jpg
- File:Tofiq Yusif - 116.jpg
- File:Tofiq Yusif - 5298.jpg
- File:Tofiq Yusif - tribuna.jpg
- File:Tofiq Yusif - 4054.jpg
- File:Tofiq Yusif danışarkən.jpg
- File:Tofiq Yusif - Tərtər.jpg
- File:Tofiq Yusif - 8715.jpg
- File:Tofiq Yusif - RİH.jpg
- File:Tofiq Yusif - RIH.jpg
- File:Tofiq Yusif - 8575.jpg
- File:Tofiq Yusif - 8714.jpg
- File:Əsgərov Bəxtiyar Hüseynalı oğlu.jpg
- File:Bəxtiyar Əsgərov (siyasətçi).jpg
- File:Bəxtiyar Əsgərov.jpg
- File:Faiq İsmayılov (2014).jpg
- File:Şair Maarif Köçkün övladları Elçin və Emin ilə.jpg
- File:Şair Maarif Köçkün.jpg
- File:Maarif Köçkün.jpg
- File:Əli bəy Azəri.jpg
- File:Xaqani Yusif oğlu Hüseynzadə.jpg
- File:Nazir Əhmədli (2017).jpg
- File:Nazir Əhmədli.jpg
- File:Araz Yaquboğlu 0015.jpg
- File:Araz Yaquboğlu 0008.jpg
File:Karen Kokburn.jpg- File:İsmayılov Cavid Əjdər oğlu.jpg
- File:Tofiq Yusif Qarabağ müharibəsi veteranları ilə.jpg
- File:Tofiq Yusif və Suliddin Yusifov.jpg
- File:Jurnalist Tofiq Yusif.jpg
- File:Yazıçı Tofiq Yusif.jpg
- File:Şair Tofiq Yusif.jpg
- File:Tofiq Yusif oğlu Hüsеynov.jpg
- File:Hüsеynov Tofiq.jpg
- File:Tofiq Yusif ordenlə.jpg
- File:Vahid Novruzov - 2013.jpg
- File:Ənvər Seyidov.jpg
- File:Mehdi İskəndərli.jpg
- File:Vidadi Süleymanov. 2016.jpg
- File:Vidadi Süleymanov 2016.jpg
- File:Vidadi Süleymanov - 2016.jpg
- File:Rauf Qurbanəliyev.jpg
- File:Rəşad Nəsirov.jpg
- File:Abbas Bağır.jpg
- File:Afət xanım.jpg
- File:Abbas Bağırov (həkim).jpg
- File:Fəxrəddin Teyyub.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:39, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I've used several cameras, but there doesn't seem to be a pattern here. File:Tofiq_Yusif_-_tribuna.jpg uses the Nikon D7100 (a mid-range DSLR) in 2015, goes to the Nikon D3 in 2016 for File:Cavanşir_Feyziyev-3.jpg (full-frame, but otherwise inferior older camera), and then in 2018 is shooting File:Tərlan_Qasımov.jpg with the entry level Canon EOS 1100D, which is inferior (except for hand-holding) to the two Nikon cameras previously used? That's not exhaustive, but that doesn't look good.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:20, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- File:Şair Maarif Köçkün övladları Elçin və Emin ilə.jpg is clearly not own work, at least not as a whole; it's either photoshopped or they're standing before a pre-printed background.--Prosfilaes (talk) 03:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- I looked at two random files, and one of them, File:Karen Kokburn.jpg is a legit crop of another Commons file. Have we made a good work? --E4024 (talk) 03:22, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Among those 15 cameras there must be at least one that belongs to this user, for sure. [I use not only 3-4 cellphones myself, but also force people to take the pic of the plate of food before them at the table, at times, not to stand up and disturb other people myself; or simply because my old-fashioned phone has no space of memory left, and I receive them by bluetooth or mail. They are my pics. (Indeed generally those people delete the pic immediately from their phones, shaking their head to both sides and rolling their eyes on me... :)] I guess this picture shows the user clearly, making a selfie. Therefore we cannot delete any pic taken with that same cellphone, although I have no idea if we have any image taken with it here, at this DR. I hope these details will be taken care of and sorry for my personal-ish chat within brackets. --E4024 (talk) 02:32, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I see no problems with using different cameras. Araz Yaguboghlu is a famous journalist, so owning (buying and selling) a lot of cameras should not be a ground for a copyright violation. Prediction should not be a tool in this type of situation.--Toghrul Rahimli (talk) 11:59, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
- It certainly is suspicious. To be short, a journalist is going to use the same camera (so they're maximally familiar with it) and tend to upgrade within brands (so they keep that familiarity) and if possible keep the same lens mount (i.e. Nikon F mount, or Canon EF mount). (Professional photographers have a lot of expensive lenses that sometimes singly cost more than the camera body they're attached to.) If you're a famous journalist who can afford to own a lot of cameras, you're not going to go backwards; you're going to replace cameras with better ones, not used and inferior equipment.
- (To expand: Anyone who shoots their own camera is not going to go through a lot of cameras; you have one set up the way you like it, and use it. They're also going to jump to clearly better cameras. I'm skeptical of a journalist going from the Nikon D7100 to the Nikon D3; you lose more than you gain, especially for a journalist. (A paparazzi might gain more.) If you've broken it, it's a $1K camera, easily replaceable for a famous journalist, and why replace it with a model that had been superseded six years ago instead of a D4S or D5 or D810? And then why go to a Canon EOS 1100D, which stopped being made in 2014? The Canon EOS 2000D is its successor, and is only $500. And if you're a journalist instead of a photographer, why switch brands? You know the Nikon controls, and you've sunk money into Nikon lenses, so the D3400 is about as light and capable as the EOS 2000D, and you don't have to spend extra money on lenses. As a bit of a photography geek, I can't see why anyone would use this series of cameras for serious work.)--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:32, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: very likely copyright violations, considering the different cameras and styles. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:43, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Araz Yaquboglu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Problem seems not have been solved with the last batch of may 2019: too many cameras from different brands.
- File:Mahir Abbaszadə 08.01.2020.jpg : found cropped
- File:Ali A.H.jpg
- File:Ağayarov Şərif Ziyadxan oğlu.jpg
- File:Ələddin Allahverdiyev 02-12-2019.jpg
- File:Ələddin Allahverdiyev 2019.jpg
- File:Ələddin Allahverdiyev 2019-12-02.jpg
- File:Nəriman Cavadov.jpg
- File:Hüseynli Səyavuş.jpg
- File:Tofiq Yusif 2019.jpg
- File:Məmmədov A.N.jpg
- File:Aliq Nağı oğlu Məmmədov.jpg
- File:Мамедов, Алиг Наги оглу.jpg
- File:Məmmədov Aliq Nağı oğlu.jpg
- File:Aliq Nağıoğlu.jpg
- File:Aydın Məmmədov (tarixçi).jpg
- File:Telman İmanov.jpg
- File:Səyyarə Oruc qızı Məmmədli.jpg
- File:Mətin Quliyev.jpg
- File:Rəssam Vaqif Ucatay.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:22, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Could you do the analysis please? You cannot expect folks reading this DR to examine the metadata on 19 different files to check the pattern of kit used. --Fæ (talk) 16:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Pinging @E4024: , @Prosfilaes: and @Srittau: . --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:31, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- As this is probably not easy, on the presumption I might reuse such a query, I put one together:
- Canon EOS 5D Mark II File:Hüseynli Səyavuş.jpg
- Canon EOS 5D Mark III File:Ələddin Allahverdiyev 02-12-2019.jpg
- Canon EOS 5D Mark III File:Ələddin Allahverdiyev 2019.jpg
- Canon EOS 5D Mark III File:Ələddin Allahverdiyev 2019-12-02.jpg
- Canon EOS 60D File:Nəriman Cavadov.jpg
- Canon PowerShot A3150 IS File:Aliq Nağı oğlu Məmmədov.jpg
- Canon PowerShot A3150 IS File:Мамедов, Алиг Наги оглу.jpg
- Canon PowerShot A3150 IS File:Məmmədov Aliq Nağı oğlu.jpg
- Canon PowerShot A3150 IS File:Aliq Nağıoğlu.jpg
- NIKON D3 File:Mahir Abbaszadə 08.01.2020.jpg
- NIKON D300 File:Rəssam Vaqif Ucatay.jpg
- NIKON D7100 File:Tofiq Yusif 2019.jpg
- NIKON D7100 File:Telman İmanov.jpg
- NIKON D800 File:Ağayarov Şərif Ziyadxan oğlu.jpg
- NIKON D90 File:Aydın Məmmədov (tarixçi).jpg
- NIKON D90 File:Səyyarə Oruc qızı Məmmədli.jpg
- Not given File:Ali A.H.jpg
- Not given File:Məmmədov A.N.jpg
- Not given File:Mətin Quliyev.jpg
- Delete In 2019-2020, he used a Nikon D3, Nikon D7100 and a Canon EOS 5D Mark III?!? If you have money to burn, get some new cameras. If you're actually a working journalist, get one good camera and use it. All three are decent cameras, but all three have different controls (which is something no professional journalist has time to deal with) and all three optimally use different lenses--given that all of these were several years obsolete in 2019, who's got money for that? There's an argument for putting money into the lenses instead of the camera body in photography circles, which would explain why the cameras are old, but means he absolutely shouldn't be using three mostly-incompatible models. I'm personally appalled by the PowerShot--it's 2019, get a cellphone--but I guess I could see it. But if you're dragging around an old PowerShot, that screams "get the job done" not "photography enthusiast"; you'd have one interchangable-lens camera, not three.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:01, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- My edits through Commons are much more than uploaded files. Starting from today I will ensure you that above-mentioned problems do not happen once more. You may delete the files indicated by you in my Talk Page, if appropriate. I do not see any problem in such deletion. --Araz Yaquboglu (talk) 05:29, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:52, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Araz Yaquboglu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official document and logo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:"Laçın" döş nişanı.png
- File:Polad Həşimova verilən Şah İsmayıl Xətai adına Fəxri Fərman.jpg
- File:Milli Azərbaycan Tarixi Muzeyi (məktub).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, all of the files are copyrighted. Delete. Kadı Message 14:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
complex logo, not a PD-textlogo Bloody-libu (talk) 06:51, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- I think in this case it can qualify for SD:F2 --67.184.0.138 00:04, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:08, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
There is no indication that the photo is available from the source with CC-BY-SA 4.0 C messier (talk) 16:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 04:07, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
too complex logo, not a PD-text logo Bloody-libu (talk) 06:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep This logo is below the threshold of originality in the US, as it is just a font with few embellishments. I am unsure about COM:TOO France, but it is likely below that threshold as well. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --ƏXPLICIT 11:28, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lutein678 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non free logos
Appears to fall under PD-textlogo and file is in significant crosswiki usage. Fæ (talk) 11:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 11:28, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of the photographs. We'd need the permission of the photographers of all the individual photos. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:22, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
The permission of the author of the photographs, Concha Albalat Criado, has been sent — Preceding unsigned comment added by Puri Girones (talk • contribs) 12:17, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:55, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 03:36, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. No indication it wasn't published. Photo of anonymous authorship circa 1915. Reasonable said photographer did not survive past 1950 in the Soviet Union and photographer will never be known. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 07:10, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Uploader is responsible for proving that it WAS published (what publication, where, and when) before the cutoff date. We cannot assume anything was published early enough without such publication information, no matter how old the photo is.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:26, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- All photographs taken in the Russian Empire are the public domain Hunu (talk) 21:37, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Nope. Only if they were PUBLISHED in the Russian Empire.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:55, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- All photographs taken in the Russian Empire are the public domain Hunu (talk) 21:37, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Uploader is responsible for proving that it WAS published (what publication, where, and when) before the cutoff date. We cannot assume anything was published early enough without such publication information, no matter how old the photo is.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:26, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in US or country of origin PlanespotterA320 (talk) 03:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in US or country of origin PlanespotterA320 (talk) 03:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in US or country of origin PlanespotterA320 (talk) 03:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in US or country of origin. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 03:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep it is a detail from File:Дзержинский_в_тюрьмах.jpg.Leutha (talk) 11:16, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- So? That item is a copyright violation to. It also lacks indication of early enough publication as required by Russia and the URAA. Sorry, 2007 magazine is well after cutoff date.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:44, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in US or country of origin PlanespotterA320 (talk) 03:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation, speedy deletion request filed by other user. However, I believe the file can stay. See Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Pelikaan onderhoud.jpg. Poppo154 (talk) 07:56, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- The rationale for the copyvio-suspicion was: "The implicit OTRS on all users upload is invalid, the source has no license, so no free one either". --Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Question Is there any evidence that the author of this photo, JASPER VEROLME, is a regular government employee? Also, as stated here the CC0 license does not apply to copyrighted photos. Ankry (talk) 12:15, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Ankry, on the source page (https://magazines.defensie.nl/defensiekrant/2020/06/06_lens_06) the photographer is credited as "sergeant Jasper Verolme". As it is a photo of a Dutch Navy ship (and it is posted in the Dutch Navy magazine), it is beyond reasonable doubt that he is in fact employed by the Dutch Ministry of Defense. There is no external copyright holder credited, therefor the CC0 is applicable. Again, this is as I see it, I would like to hear it if i'm wrong! Poppo154 (talk) 14:05, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- It is adviced that Dutch governmental work is freely licenced, there is no law that prescribes that. You assume it must be CC0, but according to Dutch law the file is only CC0 if it is clearly specified somewhere. This magazine site has no license at all specified, therefor my assumption is that it is copyrighted by default, like all material under Dutch law is copyrighted if no license is mentioned. Edoderoo (talk) 18:49, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Edoderoo, on the main page of all the magazines (https://magazines.defensie.nl/) it is stated this is a defensie.nl website. Therefor the copyright licence as stated here https://www.defensie.nl/copyright are applicable, thus CC0. If this is not sufficient then all images uploaded from these pages would be possible copyright violations. Poppo154 (talk) 07:45, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Edoderoo, sorry to stalk you but also have a look here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Uitreiking Militaire Willems-Orde KCT 2016-3.jpg Poppo154 (talk) 13:13, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Edoderoo, on the main page of all the magazines (https://magazines.defensie.nl/) it is stated this is a defensie.nl website. Therefor the copyright licence as stated here https://www.defensie.nl/copyright are applicable, thus CC0. If this is not sufficient then all images uploaded from these pages would be possible copyright violations. Poppo154 (talk) 07:45, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- It is adviced that Dutch governmental work is freely licenced, there is no law that prescribes that. You assume it must be CC0, but according to Dutch law the file is only CC0 if it is clearly specified somewhere. This magazine site has no license at all specified, therefor my assumption is that it is copyrighted by default, like all material under Dutch law is copyrighted if no license is mentioned. Edoderoo (talk) 18:49, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Ankry, on the source page (https://magazines.defensie.nl/defensiekrant/2020/06/06_lens_06) the photographer is credited as "sergeant Jasper Verolme". As it is a photo of a Dutch Navy ship (and it is posted in the Dutch Navy magazine), it is beyond reasonable doubt that he is in fact employed by the Dutch Ministry of Defense. There is no external copyright holder credited, therefor the CC0 is applicable. Again, this is as I see it, I would like to hear it if i'm wrong! Poppo154 (talk) 14:05, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per https://www.defensie.nl/copyright. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
As uploader stated files not made with a smartphone are probably not be him. Consedering his 50+ copyvios already deleted the remaining ones sould be per COM:PCP.
- File:Rohmer IMG 3885.jpg
- File:François Forget.jpg
- File:Jean Zinn-Justin.jpg
- File:Odile Eisenstein.jpg
- File:Daniel Mansuy.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:29, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Info considering usage, deletion should be slightly more than on sus:
| # | File | Usage | Non-core |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rohmer IMG 3885.jpg | 3 | |
| 2 | François Forget.jpg | 5 | |
| 3 | Jean Zinn-Justin.jpg | 7 | |
| 4 | Odile Eisenstein.jpg | 7 | 3 |
| 5 | Daniel Mansuy.jpg | 5 |
--Fæ (talk) 13:31, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I can make a table too:
| File | EXIF date | Camera | Software |
|---|---|---|---|
| File:Daniel Mansuy.jpg | 2007-06-27 10:38 | NIKON D80 | Adobe Photoshop CS Macintosh |
| File:Odile Eisenstein.jpg | 2014-01-13 12:37 | Olympus E-M1 | GIMP 2.8.14 |
| File:François Forget.jpg | 2016-01-16 07:46 | Canon EOS 5D Mark III | Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Macintosh) |
| File:Jean Zinn-Justin.jpg | 2018-10-26 14:00 | Canon EOS 5D Mark II | Adobe Photoshop Elements 16.0 (Windows) |
| File:Rohmer IMG 3885.jpg | 2019-01-31 11:24 | Canon EOS 550D | Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6.1 (Windows) |
- There is no continuity whatsoever between the cameras and software used here. Considering the history of copyvio from this user, it strains credibility to say that these images are likely to be their own work. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Uploader has an incredibly long history of uploading dubious self-made images spanning various camera models to the point that COM:PCP must be rigidly applied. In the EXIF for these remaining files, we have an iPhone 7, 8, SE, a Samsung phone, a Nikon D5, a Nikon Coolpix 950, a scan, and a "BRIGITTE EYMANN" listed as the author in File:Roland-Douce.jpg.
- File:JCA-Wikipedia.jpg
- File:Rdouce portrait.jpg
- File:Roland-Douce.jpg
- File:Photo G. Orth 10 7 20.jpg
- File:Azzedine Bousseksou.jpg
- File:Photo-réduite-AzB.jpg
- File:M CAMPILLO.png
- File:Flandrin Patrick.jpg
- File:Hayward Vincent.jpg
- File:Photo EP.jpg
- File:Thomas Lecuit.jpg
- File:Alain Berthoz 1.jpg
- File:Edouard Brezin 1.jpg
- File:Pierre Corvol 1.jpg
- File:Jean François Bach.jpg
ƏXPLICIT 11:41, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:49, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:01, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:50, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:01, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kai3952 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://udn.com/news/story/7923/2106749. The postcard is labelled in Japanese, making the claim that it was published pre-1945 highly plausible. I'm not sure whether Japanese law or Taiwanese law would apply, but in either case it would be in the Public Domain. Storkk (talk) 13:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Storkk: Image is taken directly from a news website, and we do not have enough information to know if it is in the public domain.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:21, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Kai3952: assuming the postcard itself is PD, which would seem to be a pretty safe bet, the uploads, even if taken directly from another website, would appear to be faithful reproductions of a Public Domain 2-Dimensional work. Please see {{PD-Art}} and the accompanying policy Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag... we as a community have taken the position that regardless of local laws, we consider faithful reproductions of public domain 2-dimensional works to contain no original authorship and be ineligible for their own copyrights. So these are PD for our purposes assuming the postcards themselves are PD. And as stated, in both legal jurisdictions that could be plausibly thought to apply, the postcards would appear to be almost certainly PD. Storkk (talk) 17:26, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Not own work. Publication seems November 2018 (https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20190602100304-4-76411/sosok-ayah-di-mata-mendiang-ani-yudhoyono) Please provide evidence it has been FIRST published 1966. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- This work was originally published anonymously or under a pseudonym before January 1, 1943 and the name of the author did not become known during 50 years after publication.Военная форма соответствует довоенным годам, т.е до 1941 года--KSK (talk) 17:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Just because the photo was taken early enough does not mean it was published early enough. WHERE was it published? What newspaper/book/magazine/poster/other publication? I can't just take your word, we need the exact publication.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:00, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:05, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:05, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
@PlanespotterA320: I oppose the deletion. The style of the dress uniform in the image attests to the fact that the photo was taken during World War II. He died in 1946. I doubt that he was disinterred later just for the photo shoot.— Ineuw talk 20:04, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- That's not enough. The exact publication it was in before the cut-off date must be presented. Also, it is very likely it wasn't immediatly published - Soviet photographers would often take multiple photos of a person in a shoot and the one best photo would be put in the central publications. As we still have no proof this specific photo was published by the cutoff date, we have no proof is it PD, and the burden of proof is on the uploader to show that is it PD.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:50, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- I have a friend in Moscow who has family connections with the Ensemble. He knows a researcher who should be able to track down the original publication date, and whether the author was named or anonymous. Please give me some time to contact him and get a reply. Thank you. Storye book (talk) 14:17, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Update: I have corrected the file according to research information received. I hope this is now satisfactory. Storye book (talk) 12:12, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- The information you provided means that the photo is PD in Russia but not the US. It can use the PD-Russia template. There is some dispute on Commons as to wether stuff not PD in the US but PD in the source country should be deleted, so we can leave that for an admin to decide.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:29, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- If it gets deleted, it can be undeleted in 2042 per the 95 years after publication rule.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- The information you provided means that the photo is PD in Russia but not the US. It can use the PD-Russia template. There is some dispute on Commons as to wether stuff not PD in the US but PD in the source country should be deleted, so we can leave that for an admin to decide.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:29, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Update: I have corrected the file according to research information received. I hope this is now satisfactory. Storye book (talk) 12:12, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- I have a friend in Moscow who has family connections with the Ensemble. He knows a researcher who should be able to track down the original publication date, and whether the author was named or anonymous. Please give me some time to contact him and get a reply. Thank you. Storye book (talk) 14:17, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I added {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}, which says that it possibly copyrighted in the US and if you happen to be the copyright holder you can request the deletion. I think it is sufficient. Copyright rules in the US are so bizarre it is close to impossible to figure out why various objects which are PD in the source country would be PD in the US. So we usually ignore lack of clear reason that something is PD in the US as long as it is PD in the country of origin. --Jarekt (talk) 22:35, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- It's not weird at all. We were just given information that the item is PD in Russia, but NOT the US. The question is, wether that is acceptable.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:20, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:05, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
no proof of CC licence claimed PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- It seems the licence was indicated by mistake. If it's deleted, will the file be left? --Симуран (talk) 20:29, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- @PlanespotterA320: The license is included by mistake; hope the problem solved. — Khurshed.yusufbekov (talk) 12:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- We have no reason to think that this is PD. Unless you can provide proof it was published early enough, it will have to be deleted.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:21, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:05, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:05, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:05, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:42, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep 1) The style of this photo strongly suggest an official studio portrait (lack of background, static facial expression). Given that Fersman died in may 1945, it is highly unlikely that this photo had not been distributed/published before 1946. 2) If the source (RIAN archives) do not know the author and publication source then it would be extremely difficult to trace those for us, and thus it is safe to assume the author is unknown. Materialscientist (talk) 09:04, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Commons:Burden of proof REQUIRES that publication information be provided. We cannot assume it was published early enough just because of the style. After all, a different photo of him could have been in his obituaries. Also, RIA Novosti is not good at labeling authorship - the author could have very well been noted in a publication and not credited by RIA Novosti. (Case in point, read by commentary about RIA Novosti's attribution mishap with a photo by Oleg Knorring)--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:51, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not exactly. It states the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence, which is not the same thing.
- My diligent search didn't yield the author of this photograph.
- Mishaps happen, yet in my experience nearly all RIAN archive photos are unique and have a much more reliable and ample description than many other archives. Materialscientist (talk) 17:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Appropriate evidence in this case means publication date. Not a personal assumption that it "probably was" published early enough. And be careful with stuff from RIAN! They are like Russia's getty images, it is better to be safe than sorry when dealing with them.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:50, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Commons:Burden of proof REQUIRES that publication information be provided. We cannot assume it was published early enough just because of the style. After all, a different photo of him could have been in his obituaries. Also, RIA Novosti is not good at labeling authorship - the author could have very well been noted in a publication and not credited by RIA Novosti. (Case in point, read by commentary about RIA Novosti's attribution mishap with a photo by Oleg Knorring)--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:51, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:06, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
STILL no indication of early enough publication to be PD (by 1950) as required by Russian law. Doesn't matter when an uploader "assumes" an item was published despite the wrong ruling in the previous deletion nomination of this item. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:42, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 17:15, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:42, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alexander Fersman 1938.jpg. Materialscientist (talk) 09:05, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alexander Fersman 1938.jpg. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:07, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Despite incorrect rulings in past deletion nominations due to user ignorance of policy, we STILL don't have ANY indication of early enough PUBLICATION for this item to be PD-Russia. Unless such publication is found, this item must be considered a copyrighted property of RIA Novosti. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:26, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 17:13, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:51, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Other version are at File:Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin, 1919.jpg ("VLJS") and File:Stalin-Lenin-Kalinin-1919.jpg ("SLK"). These versions are nearly identical to each other but not identical to the "Congress" photo being discussed here. The description page of "VLJS" says it was published in 1940.[4][5]. Its "Licensing" section clearly indicates why the image is in the public domain in Russia and in the United States. The description page for "SLK" has a description of Stalin, Lenin and Mikhail Kalinin (falsified detail of a photo from the VIII Congress of the Russian Communist Party, March 1919). Part of much larger photo showing other Congress members.. It sounds like the uploader is asserting that the photo, as published in 1940, is a falsified version of another photo. If you overlay either the "SLK" or "VLJS" photo on top of the "Congress" photo, it's clear that the first two are a crop of the "Congress" photo, but either the Congress photo or the other two have been retouched. Given the murky politics of the time and the habit of the Communist Party of that era to fabricate history through false photographs, it's not unreasonable to assume that the larger photo was published somewhere prior to 1940.- Bottom line: This is one of those outlier cases. Assuming we can neither prove nor disprove its public-domain status, we should ask ourselves "how plausible is it that the image is in the public domain." If the plausibility is much closer to 100% than 50% - and I'm thinking higher than 80% - then we should keep it but "delete it immediately" if anyone with standing to complain complains, or anyone with evidence of non-publication presents that evidence. Unless I see more evidence, I would lay at least 8 out of 10 odds it is in fact in the public domain. Davidwr (talk) 20:23, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
In light of the claim at the bottom of [6]Google translate that says (in translation) Federal Archival Agency, 2018. When publishing materials from the site, mentioning and citing materials Mandatory link to the site indicating the Internet address of the material. Publication of images of archival documents is allowed only with permission of the archives in which they are stored. I'm changing to "delete, with the hope that the Russian State Archive of Socio-Political History will release this photo, F. 393. Op. 1. D. 124. The photo. Photographer V.K. Bulla. , under a compatible license someday soon OR that we will uncover proof of its public domain status. Davidwr (talk) 20:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)- Keep Author was dead for more than 50 years in 1996. The photographer is listed as en:Viktor Bulla, who died on 1 October 1938, more than 80 years ago. This means all of his photographs were in the public domain in Russia in 1996, regardless of publication date, unless the photo secured a US copyright prior to 1988 or one of a few other rare situations apply. I don't see any evidence of a pre-1988 US copyright or of any rare situation that would indicate it is not in the public domain. The correct copyright template is {{PD-old-70-1996}}. Davidwr (talk) 21:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- PlanespotterA320 I just read your user page and it sounds like you may have information about Russian and Soviet copyright law not reflected in Commons's copyright guidance. If there are possible situations where this photo is still under a Russian or US copyright, we need to know, especially if you can make general statements like "photographs taken in 1919 [or any other long-ago year] by a photographer who died in 1938 [or any other date more than 70 years ago] which were not published until recently may be under copyright in the following circumstances .... because ....". Davidwr (talk) 21:11, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Davidwr: The information you stated "photographs taken in 1919 [or any other long-ago year] by a photographer who died in 1938 [or any other date more than 70 years ago] which were not published until recently may be under copyright in the following circumstances .... because ...." is made clear on Commons. It is perfectly acceptable for me to state a fact like that. All you have to do is read the footnotes about posthumous publication in the Template:PD-Russia. That licence template says, I quote, "If the author of this work was subjected to repression and rehabilitated posthumously, countdown of copyright protection began not from the death date, but from the rehabilitation date. If the work was first published posthumously, the copyright term is counted from the date of that first publication, unless the author was later rehabilitated, in which case it runs again from that later rehabilitation date." And per the clause about items that are unpublished for over 70 years after the death of the author, that would mean that the item was still copyrighted in Russia on the URAA date, and would have to be removed per Commons policy. I am not making any outlandish statements here. I am going off of the literal text of the PD-Russia template (including the footnote that apparently nobody reads) and the text of the PD-1996 templates. I hope that answers your questions. Yes, publication dates matter, no matter how long ago the author died. In regards to the claim that {{PD-old-70-1996}} applies, remember that public domain status in Russia and pd status in the US are two different things. It is very common for something to be PD in the US but not in Russia or vice-versa. If this is not PD in BOTH US and Russia, it has to be deleted. Right now we have no reason to this this was PD in Russia, or even published at all, on the URAA date.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:19, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. It answers most of my questions. It looks like the photo was first published no later than 29 March 2005[7]. A google search by date for the image shows a result allegedly dated Feb 1. 2001 (if you are searching, look for 700 × 496 - Feb 1, 2001 - Восьмой съезд РКП(б). состоялся с 18 по 23 марта 1919 в Москве. Присутствовали 301 делегат с решающим голосом и 102 — с совещательным, ...) but Google sometimes mis-dates results. I'll keep looking for evidence of prior publication. Davidwr (talk) 21:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- If it was first published 2005, it will be a LONG time before copyright expires.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. It answers most of my questions. It looks like the photo was first published no later than 29 March 2005[7]. A google search by date for the image shows a result allegedly dated Feb 1. 2001 (if you are searching, look for 700 × 496 - Feb 1, 2001 - Восьмой съезд РКП(б). состоялся с 18 по 23 марта 1919 в Москве. Присутствовали 301 делегат с решающим голосом и 102 — с совещательным, ...) but Google sometimes mis-dates results. I'll keep looking for evidence of prior publication. Davidwr (talk) 21:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Search results as outlined in the struck comments above, I found evidence of an altered crop being published in 1940. However, I found no evidence of the full photograph being published prior to 2001 and no conclusive evidence of it published before 2004-2005 or so. The evidence I do have came from doing web-based searches for the image and text commonly associated with it then using archive.org to see how far back I could find it. I also tried and failed to find it in Google Books. It looks like several archival institutions have published - or re-published - photos such as this one in the last 20 years. As PlanespotterA320 pointed out, if the full image was not published a long time ago or otherwise released under a suitable license, it is not in the public domain. If anyone has access to Communist-Party literature or Communist-Party-friendly newspapers from the weeks after the conference, those would be good places to look for the image. Given the instability of the times and the cost of printing images even in a newspaper or journal, I am not optimistic these will be found soon even if they do exist. Davidwr (talk) 19:53, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Davidwr: I would like to know more about the publications that was cropped that you found. Consensus it that if a portion is published, it's still considered published. What publication was it, when was it, and most importantly, was there attribution to the photographer (and if so, who?)--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:14, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- I will get back to you on that. Davidwr (talk) 20:23, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Davidwr: I would like to know more about the publications that was cropped that you found. Consensus it that if a portion is published, it's still considered published. What publication was it, when was it, and most importantly, was there attribution to the photographer (and if so, who?)--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:14, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
![[4]](https://rusbibliophile.ru/netcat_files/multifile/1748/10557/Stalin_60_3.jpg){kind=link}
- Images that are crops of the big one being discussed, uploader, first upload, credit given in first upload
-
- File:Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin, 1919.jpg, EugeneZelenko, 04:58, 15 April 2005, "I scanned this image from: "Сталин. К шестидесятилетию со дня рождения." Москва, Правда, 1940."
- Relevant off-wiki link: [8]. Note that the image shown on this link to the book (full size, with caption) is likely the basis of the "doctored" image listed below, in File:Stalin-Lenin-Kalinin-1919.jpg
- File:Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin, 1919.jpg, EugeneZelenko, 04:58, 15 April 2005, "I scanned this image from: "Сталин. К шестидесятилетию со дня рождения." Москва, Правда, 1940."
- Image that appears to be doctored crops of the big one, OR perhaps evidence that the big one is a forgery:
- Davidwr (talk) 21:13, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- Suggestion if there are any Russian citizens reading this, consider asking the successor of the TASS news agency or the RIA Novosti news agency for permission using the OTRS process. Some stock photo houses that show attribution to news agencies: [9][10]. Davidwr (talk) 20:06, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Davidwr: Wikipedia is actually currently asking for a list of high-importance photos from TASS and RIAN. I have sent many emails and they have been notified of the petition already, but they have never responded. TASS, RIAN, RGKAFD, and other archives are really stingey about CC licences. This photo is relatively low-importance to the photos they have that we REALLY need. It would be better that the few select photos they release (on the rare occasion they do) be portraits needed for biographies of dead peaople and stuff like that.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:14, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- Recommendation to closing admin if this is deleted: I would also recommend preserving all of the information on the file's discussion page so it is can be used for others who are trying to track down evidence of prior publication. It can be appended here or put on the talk page of this discussion. Davidwr (talk) 19:53, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- Evidence of a printed publication is in the original upload to the Wikimedia Commons. the original verson uploaded by Eyemo on 13:25 7 March 2011 clearly shows what looks like it was a crop of a 2-page spread in a book or magazine. It's hard to tell if the binding was stapled or stitched, but it looks more like stitched binding than staples to me. Stitched binding went out of style decades ago, but they were still in common use in the United States into the 1970s or 1980s. A very similar image with different coloration is here. In this image, the fold is unclear, it could have just been a single-page photo that was folded and unfolded in the same spot. Davidwr (talk) 20:23, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- Eyemo has been active in the past 3 months on the Russian Wikipedia. If anyone here speaks Russian, consider messaging him on his talk page there. Davidwr (talk) 20:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: No clear resolution since February 2020. If there is evidence of earlier publication please let me know and I will happily restore the file. As for information for those searching for publication information, it can be added to the talk page. --Green Giant (talk) 23:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Thank you very much. The image is not for a private use, but for this blog entry https://blog.wikimedia.cz/2020/02/prvni-cesky-wikidatista-rezident-institut-umeni-divadelni-ustav-vykrocil-k-otevrenym-propojenym-datum/. Purkii (talk
Kept: per User:Purkii. --Green Giant (talk) 23:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Soviet period photo with unclear copyright status. There is no evidence that the author died 70 years ago. Juggler2005 (talk) 18:14, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
COM:EVID: "In all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate that the file is in the public domain. In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader." --Juggler2005 (talk) 18:16, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
>> This work was originally published anonymously or under a pseudonym before January 1, 1943 and the name of the author did not become known during 50 years after publication. --213.87.135.156 15:00, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep "Proving" anon publication and 50 years of the author not becoming known would be a monumental and likely impossible task. With this particular license, the logical approach is to accept the claim unless there's evidence to the contrary. INeverCry 23:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per INC Natuur12 (talk) 15:09, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:51, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
_1.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
_1.jpg){kind=link}
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:55, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain (url is to 2004 book, way too late) PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hello. It's state owned photo. It was made in UkrSSR in 1937, no copyright holder existed. --Brunei (talk) 21:51, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- State-owned photos are PD in the United States, but not most other countries like Russia and Ukraine. If you read the PD-Ukraine template, you would have realized that their copyright is RETROACTIVE, meaning works that were not previously considered copyrighted (like this one) are now copyrighted. Don't be rude, especially when you are not an expert on the subject.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:46, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- Excuse me, why do you write Don't be rude? Was I? I look at this problem other way: we want illustrations for Wikipedia which could not be subject of copyright so no person or juridical body can come and declare its rights on it. I believe nobody will claim it's not in public domain. From the formal point of view it WAS PUBLISHED in 1937 in a criminal case of this gentleman (primary source for Wikipedia) which was accessed by number of people in Kharkiv, Kyiv, Moscow, Berlin, and perhaps Warsaw and Krakow during 1937-1943. --Brunei (talk) 14:54, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- "Nobody will claim copyright" doesn't mean it isn't copyrighted. And what publication from 1937 was it published in are you referencing here but decided not to put in the file description? If there is proof of early enough publication, it can be kept. Just write in the file description source section what newspaper/magazine/book from 1937 it was. But if you are merely ASSUMING it was published in 1937 because that is when it was taken - that is not OK. I asked you not to be rude bc of your comment "Hello. It's state owned photo" (which was rude, condescending, and ignorant)--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hmm, I didn't know the word Hello means something rude, condescending, and ignorant in modern English. Anyway, I didn't mean any of them, I just wanted to greet you on this page since I believe it is unpolite not to do so. As of this picture I know it was published in NKVD case №016138, 23/05/1937 which is now in Kharkiv regional archive. Products of repressive Soviet state which didn't accept copyright principle as "capitalist" and "bourgeois" and published in the form of criminal case are probably in public domain. There is always a "grey zone" in law and rules operation, as no rule can cover all real cases. Here we can use principle of common good for Wikimedia projects and humanity itself in my opinion.--Brunei (talk) 19:00, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- It depends on the context. It certainly came across as though you meant it as "duh" (given your following comments). Anyway, was NKVD case №016138 23/05/1937 accessable to any member of the public, or just NKVD people with security clearances/whatever permission equivilant. Publication does not mean "put in an archive box that a few select NKVD people can access" - in copyright terms, it means that the item must be viewable to the general public (like a newspaper, magazine, or poster). As far as I am concerned, I have NEVER seen a soviet newspaper from the 1930's or 1940's containing mugshotphotos.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:15, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, the point is made, thank you. I prefer to listen to other thoughts.--Brunei (talk) 12:19, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- We are not on Wikipedia, we are on Wikimedia Commons. — Ирука13 20:23, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- It was made to illustrate Wikipedia, not vice versa.--Brunei (talk) 18:16, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- It depends on the context. It certainly came across as though you meant it as "duh" (given your following comments). Anyway, was NKVD case №016138 23/05/1937 accessable to any member of the public, or just NKVD people with security clearances/whatever permission equivilant. Publication does not mean "put in an archive box that a few select NKVD people can access" - in copyright terms, it means that the item must be viewable to the general public (like a newspaper, magazine, or poster). As far as I am concerned, I have NEVER seen a soviet newspaper from the 1930's or 1940's containing mugshotphotos.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:15, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hmm, I didn't know the word Hello means something rude, condescending, and ignorant in modern English. Anyway, I didn't mean any of them, I just wanted to greet you on this page since I believe it is unpolite not to do so. As of this picture I know it was published in NKVD case №016138, 23/05/1937 which is now in Kharkiv regional archive. Products of repressive Soviet state which didn't accept copyright principle as "capitalist" and "bourgeois" and published in the form of criminal case are probably in public domain. There is always a "grey zone" in law and rules operation, as no rule can cover all real cases. Here we can use principle of common good for Wikimedia projects and humanity itself in my opinion.--Brunei (talk) 19:00, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- "Nobody will claim copyright" doesn't mean it isn't copyrighted. And what publication from 1937 was it published in are you referencing here but decided not to put in the file description? If there is proof of early enough publication, it can be kept. Just write in the file description source section what newspaper/magazine/book from 1937 it was. But if you are merely ASSUMING it was published in 1937 because that is when it was taken - that is not OK. I asked you not to be rude bc of your comment "Hello. It's state owned photo" (which was rude, condescending, and ignorant)--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
- Excuse me, why do you write Don't be rude? Was I? I look at this problem other way: we want illustrations for Wikipedia which could not be subject of copyright so no person or juridical body can come and declare its rights on it. I believe nobody will claim it's not in public domain. From the formal point of view it WAS PUBLISHED in 1937 in a criminal case of this gentleman (primary source for Wikipedia) which was accessed by number of people in Kharkiv, Kyiv, Moscow, Berlin, and perhaps Warsaw and Krakow during 1937-1943. --Brunei (talk) 14:54, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- State-owned photos are PD in the United States, but not most other countries like Russia and Ukraine. If you read the PD-Ukraine template, you would have realized that their copyright is RETROACTIVE, meaning works that were not previously considered copyrighted (like this one) are now copyrighted. Don't be rude, especially when you are not an expert on the subject.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:46, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- As far as I briefly observed your recent discussions elsewhere on this website I would have courage to emphasize necessity of keeping to en:wikipedia:Assume good faith guideline from your side. I understand you are high professional in copyright issues but this should make you more responsible in conversations with less experienced users. We are here for free knowledge, not for free quarrels. Hope for your understanding and consideration.--Brunei (talk) 12:19, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. On Commons, the default assumption is that any work is copyright protected. The onus is on the uploader to demonstrate that the work is free to reuse per COM:EVID. This has not been demonstrated in this discussion. Please do try to be civil, even if there is no policy on it. --Green Giant (talk) 00:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:42, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 00:04, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:42, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 00:06, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain, not actually own work PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 00:06, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain. Photo owned by TASS agency (ID #13761945), photo taken by Vladimir Savostyanov (1914 – 1985). PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 00:06, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 00:06, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 00:06, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain. Even though author died more than 74 years ago, photo needs to have been published early enough in order to be public domain (Russia has posthumous publication clause) PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:49, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- I would redirect this to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by Pavel Troshkin. Materialscientist (talk) 11:05, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & by reference to prior close noted above. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:19, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
