Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/01/08
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_Grazien_Nymphen_Paris_vor_Louvre_81.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_crop.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_-Slovak_invasion_of_Poland_(1939).JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
My work, not the uploader's work. I created this logo in September 2011 (original is of much better quality), then released it on Flickr in 2014 (here) but all rights reserved. I may upload it on Commons later, but not this version. For now I would like this copy just be deleted. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 13:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lolamartinez123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]https://www.reddit.com/r/rupaulsdragrace/comments/crt1ik/queerpost_ayumi_hamasaki_isnt_just_yuhuas/
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1), e.g. [1]. --Эlcobbola talk 16:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lolamartinez123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]album covers, permission from creator needed.
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 10:45, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 18:16, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Not found in the provided source. Hanooz 13:07, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- I don't know why the Mojnews deleted some published photos! By the way, I uploaded another version of the image that there is already in the source; You can delete the previous non-free version. --Maometto97 (talk) 18:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Fixed. --Hanooz 19:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
created by mistake PARIDHKARIWALA (talk) 06:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
created by mistake PARIDHKARIWALA (talk) 06:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Created multiple pages by mistake 115.96.127.181 17:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 19:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Even thought the Copyright for this Foto is mine (Agentur Brandner got it from me) - I don not need it here so it can be deleted. I used other Fotos on my Wiki Page. 88.130.155.108 12:48, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 20:28, 8 Januar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: http://www.agentur-brandner.de/klienten/pohlmann-j.html --Krdbot 01:55, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Reconozco que no sé donde me metí. Use wikimedia por casualidad para terminar rápidamente un trabajo de instituto en grupo, la creación conjunta de una wiki. Esta imagen no es mía y quiero borrarla ya que sé que no hice bien las cosas con el copy. Gracias Adrián Otayza (talk) 18:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 19:13, 8 Januar 2020 UTC: no es una imagen mía, usé esta página porque no sabía como poner imágenes en una wiki personal de un trabajo de instituto --Krdbot 01:55, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Arch-Angel Raphael the Artist (talk) 09:48, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no valid reason for deletion. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:40, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
https://twitter.com/qulcpay/status/1173179030310285314 クイックパイ (talk) 18:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; copyvio. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
speedy delete, is NOT cc-licenced Jensbest (talk) 17:53, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Arthur Crbz at 12:09, 9 Januar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 13:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
SEO spam Ubcule (talk) 19:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:26, 9 Januar 2020 UTC: CSD G10 (files and pages created as advertisements): Google search of uploaders name shows they are from same company --Krdbot 13:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Looks like a self-promoting SEO image; is this person notable? Ubcule (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Arthur Crbz at 08:39, 9 Januar 2020 UTC: No OTRS permission for 30 days --Krdbot 13:58, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Spam.... Ubcule (talk) 20:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:26, 9 Januar 2020 UTC: CSD G10 (files and pages created as advertisements) --Krdbot 13:58, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Screenshot of a wikipedia page (so freely licenced). The uploader still violates everyones copyright by claiming this is his "own work" denying every other author credit. He also licences this image under some licnece while ignoring the original licences.
Seen from a black and white point of view this is nothing but a simple violation of copyright. Even some content is may licenced under a free CC licnece the permission to use the content is gone as soon as you don't follow the licence's rules 193.171.152.103 14:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- This user uploaded many images like this one. Another example is File:MediaWiki dark theme - gallery-1 - Vector skin.png. The gallery page with many images and of course all were taken by him so there is no problem relicencing the image. --193.171.152.103 14:53, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- From uploader: Keep and advise
Hello Anonymous! (and to whom it may concern)
These Mediawiki screenshots about a theme I'm working on are uploaded following the advice of Mediawiki-wiki administrators. It's not relevant to me that the Source field contains "own work": this was the first and simplest choice in the uploader and seemed reasonable as the images demonstrate my work with the theme, the content in this context is secondary.
However I have no intent to deny the obvious credit if that needs to be made explicit. If necessary, the "source" and "author" metadata can be changed in one batch for all the uploaded images. I assume AutoWikiBrowser should be used. I need information about how to use that on Commons.
The credit for the software goes to the MediaWiki developers (GPL-2 license applies), credit for the content goes to Wikimedia contributors (usually CC-BY-SA 3.0 applies). I really hope it's not necessary to collect and list the licenses and owners of all the dozens of thumbnails :-)
In response to the concern I'd suggest the following metadata, please reflect whether this would be satisfying:
|source=Wikimedia |author=The theme (style) demonstrated in the image is original work, the content and software is freely licensed by multiple Wikipedia contributors and developers.
The current metadata is the same on possibly all images, thus the following can be replaced programmatically:
|source={{own}}
|author=[[User:Aron Manning|Aron Manning]]
The license would also more appropriately use the Mediawiki-screenshot template as demonstrated on one of the images:
=={{int:license-header}}==
Software ([[mw:Copyright|MediaWiki]]):
{{MW-screenshot}}
Content (text and images within from Wikipedia contributors):
{{cc-by-sa-3.0}}
Or similar free license in some cases. {{unsigned2|13:41, 9 January 2020|Aron Manning}}
Instead of:
=={{int:license-header}}==
{{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}
Disclamer: I'm sorry for not replying in short. I hoped, if there are any concerns that would be brought up on my user talk page, with the advice of what source attribution is expected on these screenshots and how to do that in batch. It took a few hours to upload the images and fill all the fields one-by-one, even with the simplest choice of "own work". Would be a waste of time to repeat that process just to change the metadata.
Thanks in advance. —Aron Man.🍂 edits🌾 18:06, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Let's use File:MediaWiki dark theme - gallery-1 - Vector skin.png as an example. It is a screenshot of Category:Culture of Venezuela. Files like File:Artesania de venezuela.jpg are not a problem. They are licenced under CC0 so they have a PD-like state. File:Artesania venezolana diversa 2013 001.JPG however is licenced under CC-BY-SA-3.0. This image requires the attribution of the author and that the licence conditions are made clear on reuse. File:Desfile asturiano.jpg is licenced under CC-BY-SA-2.0 and the image is from flickr.
- Depending on what the end goal is, it could be questioned what the purpose of these images are and if they should be uploaded to Commons. You could argue that any user on Commons who uploads files here has to expect that his work could be used for development purposes as well. That does not apply to images uploaded to flickr. The user on flickr did never agree that his files are published without any note of his authorship so that the images can be used more easyly for development purposes. --193.171.152.103 13:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Speedy keep: Let’s close this nonsense DR fast. The nomination is either utterly clueless (to match the clueless justification by the uploader) or malicious. This file just needs to have its license changed to the least permissive of all licences used for the individual media files used in this screenshot — while its current sourcing as {{Own}} and licencing as {{Self}} is wrong, deleting it as a copyvio is ludicrous. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:08, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- Simple yes or no question: At the time of the upload were the terms of the licences of the displayed images executed correctly or not? If not clear: I'm refering to attribution, share-alike and so on. --193.171.152.103 14:43, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: source & license have been adjusted. --Achim (talk) 16:53, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
_Grazien_Nymphen_Paris_vor_Louvre_81.jpg){kind=link}
_Grazien_Nymphen_Paris_vor_Louvre_81.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as no permission (No permission since) Jdsteakley (talk) 14:03, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
_Grazien_Nymphen_Paris_vor_Louvre_81.jpg){kind=link}
It appears that the Peter Feist collection at the Humboldt University Berlin has a good license:— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdsteakley (talk • contribs)
Kept: added source & license, WMDE coop. --Achim (talk) 18:59, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
_Grazien_Nymphen_Paris_vor_Louvre_81.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as no permission (No permission since) Jdsteakley (talk) 14:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
It appears that the Peter Feist collection at the Humboldt University Berlin has a good license. It may be that the uploader, a newcomer to Wikimedia, did not know how to license this file properly.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdsteakley (talk • contribs) 16:07, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: added source & license, WMDE coop. --Achim (talk) 18:51, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
This picture contains Exif information that I don't want to share Edobardo (talk) 20:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Keep hi User:Edobardo, I've removed everything but technical details and asked the old version to be deleted. This should fix any privacy concern.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: only technical exif data left. --Common Good (talk) 08:00, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
https://twitter.com/qulcpay/status/1211546944159379456 クイックパイ (talk) 17:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied as copyvio. --Yasu (talk) 15:24, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
SEO spammer (Turkish text is all promo blurb) Ubcule (talk) 19:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by GreenMeansGo at 17:26, 12 Januar 2020 UTC: G10. Files and pages created as advertisements --Krdbot 01:51, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
copyvio; metadata states this is a Dallas Morning News photo Bri.public (talk) 17:48, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Missvain at 22:21, 13 Januar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 01:50, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Teteriatnyk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Scanned images. Source/permission needed.
- File:Senator Helen Esuene in Office.jpg
- File:Senator Helen Esuene 11.jpg
- File:Senator Helen Esuene 1.jpg
- File:Senator Helen Esuene 12.jpg
- File:Senator Helen Esuene 14.jpg
- File:Senator Helen Esuene 15.jpg
- File:Senator Helen Esuene 13.jpg
- File:Senator Helen Esuene.jpg
- File:Senator Helen Esuene 16.jpg
- File:Senator Helen Esuene 17.jpg
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 04:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
I cannot find depicted person from en.wiki. Maybe the photo is out of project scope as unused photo about non-notable person. Taivo (talk) 11:58, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Mr. Taivo: please read this page en:Daoud Abdel Sayed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmed aldola (talk • contribs) 19:58, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept, encyclopedic value is shown. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Found on Facebook, no permission. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 03:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:41, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Unidentified chart. Unuseable and out of scope. Themightyquill (talk) 09:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:04, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Unidentified logo. Unuseable and out of scope. Themightyquill (talk) 09:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:04, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Promotional image of lawyer. Out of scope, and likely not a selfie. Themightyquill (talk) 10:22, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:05, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-notable person, out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 10:27, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:05, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Multibeton (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope – the long description is an article in Czech by an unsatisfied customer complaining about his bad experience with inferior/faulty products and guarantee practices of the company by the name of "Multibeton" and the pictures are of said products. The filenames also reflect this ("How not to do undefloor heating" "Quality comparison between Multibeton and regular product" "bad design and technology, the ridge is too deep"). Even after removing the uploader's review and renaming the files it remains out of scope/not very useful because if I am to believe the expertise of the uploader, the green mesh is not a standard part of underfloor heating solutions so it'd be a confusing catalog of allegedly faulty products. I have not nominated a few files by the uploader from the same set that may be useful.
- File:Porovnani-kvality-Multibeton-a-bezne-potrubi-reference-zkusensoti-recenze (4).JPG
- File:Porovnani-kvality-Multibeton-a-bezne-potrubi-reference-zkusensoti-recenze (5).JPG
- File:Porovnani-kvality-Multibeton-a-bezne-potrubi-reference-zkusensoti-recenze (2).JPG
- File:Porovnani-kvality-Multibeton-a-bezne-potrubi-reference-zkusensoti-recenze (1).JPG
- File:Multibeton-ruzove-potrubi-spatna-technologie-vyroby-podelna-hluboka-cara-ukazuje-na-spatnou-vyrobu.JPG
- File:Multibeton-ruzove-potrubi-spatna-technologie-vyroby-podelna-hluboka-cara-ukazuje-na-spatnou-vyrobu (3).JPG
- File:Multibeton-ruzove-potrubi-spatna-technologie-vyroby-podelna-hluboka-cara-ukazuje-na-spatnou-vyrobu (1).JPG
- File:Multibeton-ruzove-potrubi-spatna-technologie-vyroby-podelna-hluboka-cara-ukazuje-na-spatnou-vyrobu (2).JPG
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni-.jpg
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (28).jpg
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (27).jpg
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (24).jpg
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (25).jpg
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (26).jpg
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (23).jpg
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (22).jpg
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (21).jpg
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (20).jpg
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (19).jpg
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (18).jpg
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (15).jpg
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (16).jpg
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (17).jpg
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (12).JPG
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (14).JPG
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (13).JPG
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (11).JPG
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (10).JPG
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (9).JPG
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (8).JPG
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (6).JPG
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (7).JPG
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (3).JPG
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (5).JPG
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (4).JPG
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (2).jpg
- File:Jako-nedelat-podlahove-topeni-multibeton-reference-ostrava-multibeton-vytapeni- (1).jpg
- File:Multibeton-co znamená záruka 30let-reference-recenze-zkusenosti (2).jpg
- File:Multibeton- záruka 30let-reference-recenze-zkusenosti.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
TFerenczy (talk) 11:42, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Out of scope and have no educational value. - FitIndia Talk Mail 22:46, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vibhav mishra raj (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 22:40, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jagjeevan singh G one (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 22:39, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jacklombardi77 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not sure how the first is own work when he's clearly not holding a camera. Either way both low quality images of non-notable individual. Second one used on Wikidata in page now nominated for deletion there.
GMGtalk 19:16, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Well the first image is me recording myself and the second was an image taken with my cell phone. Both are me and both are my work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacklombardi77 (talk • contribs) 20:40, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- The ownership of the cell phone makes you not the creator of a picture taken with it. --DaB. (talk) 21:14, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photos. Ruthven (msg) 12:02, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jacklombardi77 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out-of-scope and/or spam.
- File:Meet Positives Small Logo.jpg
- File:Meet Positives- Herpes dating website.png
- File:Meet Positives cover image.jpg
- File:Meet Positives tagline - Never have the talk again.jpg
- File:CWDSC Chicago SEO Logo.jpg
- File:Chicago Website Design SEO Company letter head.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 20:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Delete Obvious advertising, from a user who has already been warned on another project for advertising. GMGtalk 20:28, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Out-of-scope and/or spam. - FitIndia Talk Mail 22:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Unused personal photo, out of scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 22:37, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AUGUSTINE SHIMENGA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:52, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:27, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alix Clain (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of selfies by another famous rapper, out of project scope. No contribs to any wm project.
- File:Voilà une photo de l'artiste .jpg
- File:Alix Denis Clain.jpg
- File:Alix Denis (rappeur Français) .jpg
- File:DORETDEDIAMANT .jpg
- File:Doretdediamant .jpg
- File:D'Or et de Diamant .jpg
- File:Denis Alix.jpg
_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Achim (talk) 14:25, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, personal photos out of COM:SCOPE by non-contributors. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:32, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lal babu pr.yadav (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:RpL yadav.jpg
- File:Lal babu prasad yadav1.jpg
- File:Lal babu yadav.jpg
- File:Lal babu prasad Yadav.jpg
- File:Lal babu pr.yadav.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:27, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close, Files already deleted by ~riley. - FitIndia Talk Mail 03:24, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iamsayyedahmed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 03:26, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hafiz Muhammad Rashid Ujjan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:35, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 03:59, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Lowish resolution (pixelated with some wrong-color pixel artifacts). Have a bunch of higher-quality alts in Category:Diazepam DMacks (talk) 03:29, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 14:42, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
File:Adamantane 3D spacefill.png is a higher quality version of what this seems to represent (notwithstanding the categorization related to diamonds, though that cat has many high-quaity alts of the chemical structure of that substance also) DMacks (talk) 03:34, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 14:43, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NotebookAruba (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE (en:Edjean Semeleer), some screenshots.
- File:Concert "Hey... ta Pasco!" 2019-2.jpg
- File:Concert "Hey... ta Pasco!" 2019-3.jpg
- File:Concierto "Hey... ta Pasco!" den Ser'i Noka regalo na muchanan y nan maestronan. Dec. 19, 2019-2.jpg
- File:Momento special durante concierto "Hey... ta Pasco!" 2019, dedica na Padu Lampe.jpg
- File:Ministro di Finansa, Asuntonan Economico y Cultura ta entrega Edjean un reconocemento den nomber di Gobierno di Aruba, pa Edjean su 25 aña di excelencia artistico.jpg
- File:Concert "Hey... ta Pasco!" 2019.jpg
- File:Dunando presentacion na Huize Maristella.jpg
- File:Elenco artistico cu a participa den concierto "Hey... ta Pasco!" 2019.jpg
- File:Concierto "Hey... ta Pasco!" den Ser'i Noka regalo na muchanan y nan maestronan. Dec. 19, 2019.jpg
- File:Concierto "Hey... ta Pasco!" den Ser'i Noka regalo na muchanan y nan maestronan. Dec. 19, 2019-3.jpg
- File:Concierto "Hey... ta Pasco!" den Ser'i Noka regalo na muchanan y nan maestronan. Dec. 19, 2019-4.jpg
- File:Edjean infancia.jpg
- File:Lagoen Maart 2018.jpg
- File:Artistanan GoCultura.jpg
- File:Edjean Freewinds Fundraiser.jpg
- File:Rey di Dande.jpg
- File:Concierto Nicolaas Store.jpg
- File:Fundraising concert Edjean on Freewinds.jpg
- File:Concierto Ser'i Noka 2.jpg
- File:Edjean April 2019.jpg
- File:Concierto Seri Noka.jpg
- File:Edjean Stadhuis.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:24, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:13, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ananthanbalagan4 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:15, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictitious documents of questionable notability.
- File:Политическая партия "Святая Луганда".pdf
- File:Автономная Республика Шота-Руставели.pdf
- File:ПАО "Святая Луганда".pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:16, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Out-of-scope SEO spam. Ubcule (talk) 19:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --Wdwd (talk) 08:08, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Maison Carlier (Liège)
[edit]2 architectural drawings (copyright architect Carlier, deceased in 1993) and 1 photograph (copyright photographer Niffle, deceased in 2007), not in public domain.
- File:Maison Carlier Plans Jardin & Intermédiaire.jpg
- File:Maison Carlier Rez de chaussée.jpg
- File:Photo Salon.jpg
Henxter (talk) 12:28, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 11:18, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Documents. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
- File:מועמדות אורי גור אריה לפרס רוטשילד לחינוך..pdf
- File:לוגו וסמל יצחק הנשיא - קריית שמונה.pdf
- File:תכתובות עם רחל ינאית בן צבי.pdf
- File:מכתב הוקרה על פעילות חינוך חברתי ממפקח משרד החינוך .pdf
- File:מתוך תכתובות עם רחל ינאית בן צבי.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
--NogaGur90 (talk) 06:14, 11 January 2020 (UTC)Hello. These are documents provided by the family of the value's subject. Rights have been given to me. Not sure how I should list those.
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marian Buštík (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos, drawings, coats of arms. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Václav III Adam (zápis o úmrtí).jpg
- File:KlasterOrlova.jpg
- File:Carrodunum 1670.jpg
- File:H.Szeliga7.gif
- File:PániZMessenpecku2.jpg
- File:PániZMessenpecku.jpg
- File:ZamekBrandysCTesin.jpg
- File:Erb Władysław Odonic Plwacz.png
- File:Sobkové z Kornic a Sobek-Skal.jpg
- File:Emerich3forgac.jpg
- File:Belikzkornic.jpg
- File:Hynalzkornic.jpg
- File:Mikulasrudzki1658.jpg
- File:Ruckirudzki.jpg
- File:Helenabesszchrostiny.jpg
- File:Rudzskyrudz1.jpg
- File:Rudzkyzrudzerb1.gif
- File:Rudzkyzrudzerb.jpg
- File:Streleckyklubpolostrava1.jpg
- File:Streleckyklubpolskaostrava.jpg
- File:Johana Josefa von Trach z Březí (ve stáří).jpg
- File:Johana Josefa von Trach z Březí (za mlada).jpg
- File:Piastoveczhohensteinu.jpg
- File:Bílov v roce 1941.jpg
- File:Jaskovska1917.png
- File:Jaskovskamapa1.png
- File:Rothkirch.jpg
- File:Oj anglie.jpg
- File:Oj napajedlakroj.jpg
- File:Otakar Janůj, Napajedla 1935.jpg
- File:Otakarjanujsokol.png
- File:Pandvurdoubravice pivsklepy.jpg
- File:Erb Trachů z Březí.jpg
- File:Erbbeesůzchrostiny.jpg
- File:Albrecht Rakouský.jpg
- File:Zámek Chotěbuz po roce 1872.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marian Buštík (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work – Screenshots from Google Street View Kancelářská budova na ulici Cihelní 14, Moravská Ostrava.png, Vila na ulici Michálkovická 81, Slezská Ostrava.png, Kancelářská budova na ulici Bohumínská 61, Slezská Ostrava.png,HradNavsiOdOlse.png, TvrzOstravaSvinov.png.
- File:Kancelářská budova na ulici Cihelní 14, Moravská Ostrava.png
- File:Vila na ulici Michálkovická 81, Slezská Ostrava.png
- File:Kancelářská budova na ulici Bohumínská 61, Slezská Ostrava.png
- File:HradNavsiOdOlse.png
- File:TvrzOstravaSvinov.png
TFerenczy (talk) 20:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:32, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marian Buštík (talk · contribs)
[edit]Lokalita Nádražní a Chelčického, bývalá Krausova kolonie v 2011.png not own work, thesis, pic on page 22
AloisJarnotReichswald.jpg – source&author provided but no CC compatible license in source
Vodní tvrz Velké Albrechtice03.jpg – not own work, per License Agreement user-uploaded pics to mapy.cz also aren't released under CC license
JaseníPotok.jpg – source&author provided but no CC compatible license in source
Blücherův dvůr.png – not own work, cropped watermark
Zámekpustejovportal.jpg – probably not own work (in source "Photo: Oldřich Usvald's archive")
Vodní tvrz Velké Albrechtice.png – not own work, cropped watermark
- File:Lokalita Nádražní a Chelčického, bývalá Krausova kolonie v 2011.png
- File:AloisJarnotReichswald.jpg
- File:Vodní tvrz Velké Albrechtice03.jpg
- File:JaseníPotok.jpg
- File:Zámekpustejovportal.jpg
- File:Vodní tvrz Velké Albrechtice.png
- File:Blücherův dvůr.png
TFerenczy (talk) 19:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:33, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marian Buštík (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical images (you can't claim PD-old-70 if the author or the date of the author's death is unknown!). and images that are not own works, but clearly stated "source from internet" or taken from Facebook ("FBMD" in EXIF data).
- File:Hotel Quittner.jpg
- File:Lokalita Nádražní a Chelčického, bývalá Krausova kolonie v 1911.png
- File:Lokalita Nádražní a Chelčického, bývalá Krausova kolonie.png
- File:Česká banka Union Ostrava 1943 (pohlednice).jpg
- File:Česká banka Union Ostrava (1920-1922).jpg
- File:Lidovy dům Ostrava sál2.png
- File:Lidovy dům Ostrava sál1.png
- File:Lidovy dům Ostrava, restaurace.png
- File:Lidovy dům Ostrava.png
- File:Pohled na areál družstva „Budoucnost" v roce 1935.png
- File:OrliceHostieBerle.jpg
- File:Closen von Haidenburgrodokmen.jpg
- File:Magdalena z Hohensteinu rodokmen.jpg
- File:LOGO Hefaiston 2018.jpg
- File:Zchoknoepitaf.jpg
- File:Panský dvůr Doubravice - kaple.jpg
- File:Panský dvůr Doubravice - Křížová klenba v chodbě.jpg
- File:Hlaskazamekchotebuz, mezi roky 1952-1958.png
- File:PanDvurDoubravice - mastale.jpg
- File:Průchod mezi sálem a černou kuchyni.jpg
- File:Hláskazch2001.jpg
- File:Zchhláska.jpg
- File:Soret-korok-sonda.jpg
- File:Zchdvůr.jpg
- File:Czchkravin.jpg
- File:Erbbees.jpg
- File:Erbtrachu.jpg
- File:Silážníjáma.jpg
- File:Hláska u zch.jpg
- File:Škola chotěbuz.jpg
- File:ŠS.jpg
- File:Nápis nad vjezdovou bránou.jpg
- File:Epitaf z roku 1778.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Ticket:2020020310003566 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 14:00, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:38, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused file of unexplained screenshot. Out of scope Malcolma (talk) 19:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope Saayeeh (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:00, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
com:PCP very small photos without attribution to Mehr photographers. Probably not a Mehr photo.
- File:Esteghlal FC vs Esteghlal Ahvaz FC, 13 September 2004 - 01.jpg
- File:Esteghlal FC vs Esteghlal Ahvaz FC, 13 September 2004 - 02.jpg
- File:Esteghlal FC vs Esteghlal Ahvaz FC, 13 September 2004 - 03.jpg
- File:Esteghlal FC vs Esteghlal Ahvaz FC, 13 September 2004 - 04.jpg
- File:Esteghlal FC vs Esteghlal Ahvaz FC, 13 September 2004 - 05.jpg
- File:Esteghlal FC vs Esteghlal Ahvaz FC, 13 September 2004 - 06.jpg
- File:Esteghlal FC vs Esteghlal Ahvaz FC, 13 September 2004 - 07.jpg
Hanooz 13:58, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination Saayeeh (talk) 13:56, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 04:07, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by احسان کریمیان (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Ahmadtalk 20:11, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Comment These images look like film posters to me. Masum Reza📞 04:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Need to go through the COM:OTRS procedure. --4nn1l2 (talk) 04:51, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
The image seems to be a downscale version of Progress Singapore Party's logo (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progress_Singapore_Party) rather than a derivative work (i.e. representing the logo with simple geometric shapes, as that of File:PAP logo variation.svg). This seems to be a poor attempt at passing off as a variant of the logo to avoid copyright flag. Robertsky (talk) 04:03, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 14:16, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-tivial logo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I found an article on the website a Russian registered media, which is dated several months before the date the file was uploaded & contains an illustration that seems to be a cropped version of this file.The uploader was blocked in Russian Wikipedia several years ago for actions that included uploading copyright-protected texts and images, and is currently being mentored as per ruling of the RuWiki Arbitration Committee. Синкретик (talk | contribs) 19:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Update: this file seems to be a cropped version of photo #13 from this article, which has the same date as the file. --Синкретик (talk | contribs) 19:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hello. The lock was removed six years ago. There is nothing strange. That my photo was used by the media. I'm a journalist -- Dgeise (talk) 19:58, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Then you should be able to present an original photo with an EXIF that will eliminate all doubts. --ssr (talk) 20:16, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Update: not all, I was a little wrong. --ssr (talk) 20:52, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- The EXIF of the image of the above-mentioned photo #13 says the author is Alexander Khitrov. In the bottom right corner of the news article there is grey text that ends in "All rights reserved" (Russian: "Все права защищены.") How can you comment that? --Синкретик (talk | contribs) 20:48, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Alexander Khitrov my nickname Dgeise --Dgeise (talk) 13:58, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- The EXIF of the above-mentioned photo #13 which was published in July 2015 says the model of the camera is Сanon EOS 5D Mark III. In June 2015 the photographer Alexander Khitrov's Livejournal profile contained information that he uses a Canon 5D Mark III camera (Russian: Чем я снимаю: Фотоаппарат Canon 5D Mark III). --Синкретик (talk | contribs) 12:40, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Dgeise: According to one of the official policies, the burden of proof in copyright disputes is on the uploader, so the request that you provide evidence that you own the rights to the file is appropriate. --Синкретик (talk | contribs) 20:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Alexander Khitrov my nickname Dgeise --Dgeise (talk) 13:58, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- Then you should be able to present an original photo with an EXIF that will eliminate all doubts. --ssr (talk) 20:16, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- A few days ago I contacted Alexander Khitrov at his Skype and Facebook acoounts listed in the LJ profile External Services (Russian: Способы связи) and Bio (Russian: О себе) sections respectively, but so far both of my messages remain unanswered. --Синкретик (talk | contribs) 20:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Several days ago I invited the user that is mentoring the uploader in Russian Wikipedia to join this discussion. The former's been inactive since early January, but I hope he will eventually reply. --Синкретик (talk | contribs) 21:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Sealle (talk) 01:42, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal image Ubcule (talk) 19:35, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. CU-blocked on en:wp. --Achim (talk) 16:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Unused file. Some sort of personal artwork. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 22:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:15, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in Japan. "my sky hole 水の情景" is designed by Bukichi Inoue (1930~1997) according to https://www.tokyokeiki.jp/Portals/0/html/person/saiyo/field/pdf/hapi_04.pdf, and established in 1994. そらみみ (talk) 04:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
NoFoP-Japan, see Category:Tower of the Sun // sikander { talk } 🦖 13:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
https://twitter.com/qulcpay/status/1211556492446294017 クイックパイ (talk) 17:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete As a copyright violation. This is a good image, but apparently not under a free licence. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 12:35, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos, paintings, drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:MedaljerSilsand.jpg
- File:MM.G.00276-04.jpg
- KeepThis one seems properly licensed with sufficient data on the object depicted. Lymantria (talk) 11:24, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- File:No-MM G0276.jpg
- File:KVB.1095 (1).jpg
- File:Lysaker Kemiske Fabrik.jpg
- Keep This one seems to have a proper license from its source. Lymantria (talk) 11:24, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- File:NFB.32841.jpg
- File:Oberst Bjørn Christophersen.jpg
- File:Anders Sandøe Ørsted Bull.jpg
- File:Jonas Schanche Jonasen.jpg
- File:Didrik Arup Seip - OB.F06415c.jpg
- File:Jens Olaf Gjerløw - ca. 1935 - Oslo Museum - OB.F05899.jpg
- File:Elverumsfullmakten side 2.JPG
- File:Elverumsfullmakten side 1.JPG
- File:Om militaire Poster, eller Afhandling om Feltforskandsningers Angrep og Forsvar, til nytte for en Infanteri-Officeer, der i Krigen detascheres, Paris oversatt til dansk, Kiøbenhavn 1781.jpg
- File:Sommerhielm3.JPG
- File:Sommerhielm2.jpg
- File:Sommerhielm1.jpg
- File:Per Blindheim.jpg
- File:Oscar Strugstad (den eldre).jpg
- File:Ruth Krefting.JPG
- File:Anton Rønneberg.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:47, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Kept 2, balance deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 13:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Complex logo, permission needed. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 03:38, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 12:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of https://www.gettyimages.in/detail/photo/shadow-of-soccer-player-on-lawn-high-res-stock-photography/520208604?adppopup=true Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:29, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Túrelio. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:55, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 16:29, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:58, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
No clear in-scope usefulness to having some arbitrary but specific phrase rendered as a textual graphic like this. Ubcule (talk) 20:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Currently in use on a user's sandbox on enwp which has been marked for speedy deletion. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 09:07, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:55, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
seo spam Ubcule (talk) 20:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. most likely out of scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:16, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
This image is froma fashion photo shoot. See this cropped use on one web site, and this is clearly another pose from the same shoot. OTRS confirmation of copyright would be required. Whpq (talk) 13:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete out of project scope. Commons is not flickr! --193.171.152.103 14:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:24, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Movie poster. Zoranzoki21 (talk) 11:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Delete The uploader claims at UnDR today that he is the author of this, but since he has also uploaded a poster from another movie company, I think that is highly unlikely. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:04, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:EugeneZelenko for violating copyright. GFJ (talk) 09:09, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
BEcasue this is the worst picture of me! Its been photo shop and i look like, god I dont know. But it is hurting my reputation. I am begging you please remove it! 72.177.107.174 19:20, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Info OTRS deletion request. Bencemac (talk) 14:50, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused file of unexplained screenshot. Out of scope Malcolma (talk) 19:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope Saayeeh (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Unidentified flowchart. Unuseable and out of scope. Themightyquill (talk) 09:49, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
SEO spam Ubcule (talk) 19:35, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:12, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Not own work found on Facebook, upload date November 16, 2018 link - FitIndia Talk Mail 18:25, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:42, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrea4747 (talk · contribs)
[edit]http://www.agencearlettepetitjean.fr/portfolio/rodolphe-conge/
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:08, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:49, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrea4747 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copie de http://www.agencearlettepetitjean.fr/wp-content/uploads/conge02.jpg et http://www.agencearlettepetitjean.fr/wp-content/uploads/conge01.jpg
Este archivo parece estar rompiendo la Licencia de derecho de autor.[1] RockSkaPunkMetal (talk) 00:22, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
copyviolation - scan from Israeli newspaper DGtal (talk) 09:14, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 14:34, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 03:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination Saayeeh (talk) 13:54, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:59, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
copyright vio MassiveEartha (talk) 04:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
All portraits uploaded by this user so far expect these were deleted for copyright infringement. Looking at this user's edits on Chinese Wikipedia, it is pretty obvious that this user search for pictures online, upload them onto Commons, only for them to be used on Wikipedia entries with little regards on copyright. Most of their edits are something like this and this, simply replacing existing portraits in articles to those uploaded by themself, which look "nicer" than those existing ones, thus glorify the image of those public figures. I have no ground believing any single picture uploaded by this user is truly copyright-free. These haven't been deleted because no one is able to find an exact replica anywhere else online.
Techyan（Talk） 04:42, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
"Provided for non-commercial research and educational use. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use." Themightyquill (talk) 10:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:13, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Source https://zurueckzudengruenen.at/leonore_gewessler/ says nothing about CC-licence 80.109.14.168 00:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 | If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). | →  |
Deleted: per nomination. Fails Commons:License review. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:49, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
SEO spam. Ubcule (talk) 19:42, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 20:32, 30 März 2020 UTC: CSD G10 (files and pages created as advertisements) --Krdbot 00:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 12:46, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image and/or unknown person, out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 19:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 16:45, 2 April 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 18:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Apparent Flickr washing - no evidence Flickr account has any relationship (i.e., authorised to license on behalf of) Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College. Эlcobbola talk 17:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover Gikü (talk) 17:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover Gikü (talk) 17:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
copyright holder in metadata does not match uploader. is the uploader Kevin McGowan of Houston, Texas? Bri.public (talk) 17:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
https://twitter.com/qulcpay/status/1179368602803326980 クイックパイ (talk) 17:59, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
All uploaded as "own work", which is obviously not the case. I've noted their sources where available. While there is potential for some to come from free sources, I've not been able to identify any for these images. Precautionary principle dictates they should not be kept.
- File:Strategic Propulsion Systems.jpg - BBC article states source is Lockheed Martin
- File:Advanced Armament System.JPG - Source is Northrop Grumman
- File:Dawn-Orbital.jpg - While possibly from NASA, unable to locate any source for this
- File:ORBCOMMs.jpg - Unknown, unsure even what satellite system this is
- File:Mitex in Orbit.jpg - Website gives credit to Northrop Grumman. A smaller version of this image is at Northrop Grumman
- File:GEO - IS18.jpg - Unknown, but background looks very similar in composition to the MiTEx image above
- File:Antares COTS Demo Mission water.jpg - Shows a clear copyright statement for "Jeff Revell 2008". Unable to locate any evidence this is from a government source.
— Huntster (t @ c) 18:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Picture clarity less Mahalakshmi.vs02 (talk) 18:14, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:16, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Not own work found on Facebook, upload date January 31, 2019 link - FitIndia Talk Mail 18:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Out-of-scope spam Ubcule (talk) 19:30, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:14, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PedroUrdimales (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bulk COM:NETCOPYVIO and clear COM:DWs. Self/CC claims are bogus - no information on actual authors, publication, or copyright status of underlying works.
- File:Juan Manuel Rodrigez. Prócer de la independencia de El Salvador.jpg
- File:Fidel sanchez hernandez 1969.jpg
- File:Político salvadoreño que se desempeñó en una ocasión, como Presidente de la República de El Salvador del 26 de enero al 1 de febrero de 1850.jpg
- File:José María Peralta.jpg
- File:Licenciado José Damián Villacorta.jpg
- File:Joaquín Escolán y Balibrera.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 19:34, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:14, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Self-promo spam. Ubcule (talk) 19:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:14, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
カテゴリーに振り分けることを Snail1234 (talk) 16:20, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --E4024 (talk) 16:23, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 19:48, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 193.171.152.103 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: per <nowiki>{{nopenis - in use thus not speedyable Achim (talk) 19:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- The reason for the deletion request is still the same. There are plenty images already on Commons that have a higher resolution and are not blurred. There is no reason to keep this image since it adds no benifit to the existing stock that is made up of higher quality --193.171.152.103 14:39, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Blurry, much better on commons. --Gbawden (talk) 10:14, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Another unused selfie / self-promo spam upload. Ubcule (talk) 19:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Self-promoting/spamming upload of user of no clear notability; in (mis-)use at Wikidata, but AFAIAW that doesn't warrant keeping it here. Ubcule (talk) 19:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Following comment was posted at Commons talk:Deletion requests/File:David Sottimano.png; moved here as intended response to discussion:-
- "Self-promoting/spamming upload of user of no clear notability; in (mis-)use at Wikidata, but AFAIAW that doesn't warrant keeping it here." - by no means is this spamming/self-promoting. It's part of a process to build a profile that is clear for conference organizers and editors asking me to write for their publications. I understand that the image without a profile might be considered as self-promotional, but that's not my intention. What do I need to do to ensure my profile on wikidata/wikicommons passes the litmus test? As a supporting argument, here's a google search for my name which will show various worldwide conference appearances and blog posts: https://www.google.com/search?q=david+sottimano
- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dsottimano (talk • contribs)
- Wikidata does not exist as a tool to aid in your professional life, and self-penned blog posts do not establish notability.
- Wikidata:Notability explains that
- "An item is acceptable if and only if it fulfills at least one of these two goals, that is if it meets at least one of the criteria below: "
- "It contains at least one valid sitelink to a page on Wikipedia, Wikivoyage, Wikisource, Wikiquote, Wikinews, Wikibooks, Wikidata, Wikispecies, Wikiversity, or Wikimedia Commons."
- "To be valid, a link must not be a talk page, MediaWiki page, special page, file, translations page, page in User or Draft namespace, page used by LiquidThreads [..] page used by Structured Discussions [..] subpage of Portal namespace, or any page that is intended for TemplateStyles."
- [etc]
- Note that this does not mean you can (e.g.) simply create a Wikipedia page on yourself to get around this rule, unless you can demonstrate notability by its standards.
- Ubcule (talk) 20:07, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Out-of-scope SEO spam.
Ubcule (talk) 19:42, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Self-promoting image; in use at Wikidata for self-created spam profile, but this does not warrant retention here. Ubcule (talk) 19:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused selfie/personal image, probable SEO spam. Ubcule (talk) 19:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adiptokarmakar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope and/or spam.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ubcule (talk) 19:48, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Low-quality image being used as excuse for link to classifieds site (i.e. possible spam). Ubcule (talk) 19:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo of non-notable person, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused sky picture, no context/location, no educational value over the myriads of sun/cloud pictures already on Commons. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Prof photograph for Rolling Stone, pulled from Twitter feed, apparently. No license in evidence. Jmcgnh (talk) 20:49, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JoshiLittleonion (talk · contribs)
[edit]Flickr washing - Uploaded to Commons 8. January 2020. How serendipitous that the uploader (all of whose uploads have been copyvios of this subject (!!!)) found it immediately after upload to Flickr on 8. January 2020. Author per metadata is Matteo Casilli who 1) is not the Flickr author ("Leave Music") and 2) who lists their official pages and does not reference Flickr.
Эlcobbola talk 21:53, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Uploads by a blocked uploader. Clear flickrwashing. --Leoboudv (talk) 23:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:06, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope: selfie of the uploader with no educational value. Hut 8.5 22:10, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:58, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
File is not freely licensed. ElKevbo (talk) 00:03, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
I would be more than happy to have the photographer sign a license release or provide the release we have from the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Florio37 (talk • contribs) 00:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Florio37: Please ask the photographer to send permission via COM:OTRS. Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Laurel Library entrance showing glass public artwork sculpture made by Washington Glass School and Studio.jpg
[edit]
Previously published on various websites, see TinEye. Permission needed. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 03:48, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
1) terrible filename, 2) already uploaded a cropped version, 3) I was the uploader Sinobball (talk) 10:53, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
out of project scope LutzBruno (talk) 10:53, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Project scope LutzBruno (talk) 10:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
person requested to remove Durga Gokhale (talk) 14:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
person requested to remove Durga Gokhale (talk) 14:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
person requested to remove Durga Gokhale (talk) 14:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Verstehe ich nicht. Das Bild ist offensichtlich nicht heimlich aufgenommen und sie ist Person der Zeitgeschichte. Somit gibt es keinen Löschgrund? Ralf Roletschek 09:12, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Taken from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
person requested to remove Durga Gokhale (talk) 14:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
person requested to remove Durga Gokhale (talk) 14:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vijayrai90 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Handheld XRF Instrument.jpg
- File:Nanoindentator.jpg
- File:X-Ray Fluorescence.jpg
- File:Dew Point measuring instrument.png
- File:Pocket type surface profile gauge.png
- File:Digital surface profile gauge.png
- File:Profile gauge.png
- File:X-Ray Fluorescence instrument for Gold Testing.jpg
- File:Couloscope.jpg
- File:Hallmarking Bangle XRF.jpg
- File:Coating Thickness Measurement using Coulometric method.jpg
- File:Dew Point Meter.png
- File:Indentation Test Fischer.jpg
- File:Nanoindentation Instrument.jpg
- File:Fischer Head Office.jpg
- File:Karat Meter - EDXRF Machine.jpg
- File:Karat Meter Gold Testing Machine.jpg
- File:EDXRF.jpg
- File:Spectrometer for Alloy Analysis.jpg
- File:Ultrasonic thickness gauge.jpg
- File:Electrical conductivity.jpg
- File:Gold Testing Machine.jpg
- File:FISCHER ED-XRF.jpg
Didym (talk) 16:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:23, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Dubious own work claim; subject died in 1957. Image almost certainly was taken before 1945 because he is in uniform and wearing Nazi decorations. Buidhe (talk) 16:19, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- It is a photography from our family’s album. He was the husband of my maternal grandmother’s sister. In 1918, three sisters (born in Orăştie, than in the Austrian-Hungarian Empire), found themselves in three different countries: my grandmother in Romania, one sister in Czechoslovakia and the third sister in Hungary, each of them at their husbands’ home. I inherited the album from my grandmother. --Miehs (talk) 16:49, 8 January 2020 (UTC) P.S. at Jozef Turanec I have added other 5 images scanned by me from the same family album: 2 with Jozef Turanec in his home, 2 Jozef Turanec with his wife and 1 with his widow near his grave. --Miehs (talk) 17:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Miehs: Thanks. Since Turanec is a well known person, could I persuade you to contact Commons:OTRS to clarify that you own the photographs and agree to release them under a free license? Thank you. Buidhe (talk) 06:07, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Buidhe: I am not very accustomed with these proceedings. I would thank you for helping me by informing them that I completely agree to the release under a free license of all the images uploaded by me! --Miehs (talk) 06:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Miehs: It's very easy just send email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . They may require some evidence that you have the copyright to the photographs. I will add an {{OTRS pending}} tag to all of these images. Buidhe (talk) 06:23, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Buidhe: I am not very accustomed with these proceedings. I would thank you for helping me by informing them that I completely agree to the release under a free license of all the images uploaded by me! --Miehs (talk) 06:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Miehs: Thanks. Since Turanec is a well known person, could I persuade you to contact Commons:OTRS to clarify that you own the photographs and agree to release them under a free license? Thank you. Buidhe (talk) 06:07, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Turanec_Josef_1.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020010910001684. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 10:47, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: No OTRS since Jan. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Dubious own work claim; subject died in 1957. Image almost certainly was taken before 1945 because he is in uniform and wearing Nazi decorations. Buidhe (talk) 16:20, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- It is a photography from our family’s album. He was the husband of my maternal grandmother’s sister. In 1918, three sisters (born in Orăştie, than in the Austrian-Hungarian Empire), found themselves in three different countries: my grandmother in Romania, one sister in Czechoslovakia and the third sister in Hungary, each of them at their husbands’ home. I inherited the album from my grandmother. --Miehs (talk) 16:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC) P.S. at Jozef Turanec I have added other 5 images scanned by me from the same family album: 2 with Jozef Turanec in his home, 2 Jozef Turanec with his wife and 1 with his widow near his grave. --Miehs (talk) 17:10, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Turanec_Josef_2.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020010910001684. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 10:48, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: No OTRS since Jan. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Misinformative title, out of COM:SCOPE - COM:SELFIE DannyS712 (talk) 21:40, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:46, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 16:20, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope Saayeeh (talk) 14:00, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 16:21, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope Saayeeh (talk) 14:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Smshaheen123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Kodala tea Estate.jpg
- File:কোদালা হাই স্কুল.jpg
- File:আগুনিয়া চা বাগান.jpg
- File:Lalanagor High School.jpg
- File:চন্দ্রঘোনা আদর্শ বহুমুখী উচ্চ বিদ্যালয় .jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
The Flickr license at https://www.flickr.com/photos/148195145@N05/43100222202/in/album-72157668697982027/ clearly states all rights reserved Sphilbrick (talk) 16:34, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
This request motivated by ticket:2020010810006403 --Sphilbrick (talk) 16:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- I understand that many of you cannot access the ticket but I just received permission to note that the ticket is sent in by the copyright holder.--Sphilbrick (talk) 13:42, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Arthur Crbz. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Əhliman Ərşadlı (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo materials. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Irevannnnnn.jpg
- File:Dərbənd teatrı.jpg
- File:Mingəçevir teatrı .jpg
- File:Xaqani Aliyev.jpg
- File:Naxçıvan tetarı .jpg
- File:Naxçivan teatri.jpg
- File:Müharibədə keçən ömür.jpg
- File:Molla nəsrəddin.jpg
- File:Molla nesreddin evlenir.jpg
- File:Xan bezeme.jpg
- File:Irevan xanligi kitab uz qabigi.jpg
- File:Xaqani Aliyevvv.jpg
- File:Həsənov H.N 1950.jpg
- File:Həsənov H.N.jpg
- File:HNH.jpg
- File:Hesen Hesenov.jpg
- File:Həsən Həsəov.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Əhliman Ərşadlı (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:57, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
File:Artist's conception of the Battle of Ridgeway -- in the actual battle the men did not fight 'in close order', and the officers weren't mountedScreenshot 2018-11-05 at 22.19.11.png
[edit]
Unused low-quality and B&W version of File:Battle of Ridgeway, C.W. LCCN2006677453.jpg and File:The Battle of Ridgeway.jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- P199, a{{Duplicate}} tag is all that is required... Geo Swan (talk) 17:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Normally I wouldn't even tag them, I would just delete and redirect. In this case, it is not even a close duplicate. There doesn't seem to be any matching criteria for speedy deletion in this case (COM:CDS). Regards, --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:03, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Processed as a duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
person requested to remove Durga Gokhale (talk) 14:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Nikita (c) Rodvin Davis. --Gbawden (talk) 10:24, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Romania. Kunok Kipcsak (talk) 07:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 09:05, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Romania. Kunok Kipcsak (talk) 07:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 09:05, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FOP in Romania. Kunok Kipcsak (talk) 07:34, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 09:05, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
No FOP in Romania. Kunok Kipcsak (talk) 07:35, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 09:05, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Description does not match source. Themightyquill (talk) 10:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:24, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Naeem Sahil (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copied from facebook, unlikely own work. Flag one is duplicate of File:Flag of Azad Kashmir.svg. Personal pic is being used for self-promotion.
‐‐1997kB (talk) 09:52, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:56, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Author request deletion: Small and unused image, with many alternatives in the category A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:01, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
already deleted (see [2]) but re-uploaded Estopedist1 (talk) 07:29, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:01, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
and File:LUIS DÁMASO.Una Furtiva Lacrima.ogg
unlikely to be own work. Repetitive re-uploading after deletion Estopedist1 (talk) 05:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 22:18, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Derivative or copy of painting by still-living artists. The ship was rediscovered in 2002 so it is a modern painting. There is another version here credited to "David Jordan/Newport Museum and Art Gallery". Carl Lindberg (talk) 08:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:01, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Promotion by real estate agent Themightyquill (talk) 10:21, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Source image not published under a free licence such as Creative Commons Cnbrb (talk) 10:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation. The claim "own work" is false - the metadata says the author is Igor Modic of the Delo newspaper. No evidence of permission. — Yerpo Eh? 10:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation. Not a valid reason for speedy deletion. Unable to found this image on the internet. However, date mentioned in the description seems to be wrong. Maybe the uploader can provide additional information about this picture (source, date, photographer). Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. PCP - unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 13:56, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:56, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:54, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Proposed for a speedy deletion by Patrick Rogel as copyvio (cf. a previous publication of the photo). The uploader (apparently) claims to be the author, so converted into a regular deletion request. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Que l'I.P. soit @Florencekirastinnicos: ne change rien au fait que cette photo a été importée ici d'un blog sous license non-libre. Dans pareil cas, le téléverseur doit envoyer une permission via COM:OTRS/fr ou téléverser une nouvelle version à haute résolution d'après l'original papier ou le négatif. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:59, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Une demande de permission OTRS a été demandée à l’auteur de la photo par mes soins. Merci de bien vouloir respecter le délai de 8 jours indiqué par le bandeau. --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 22:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 13:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Diegobcardenas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Gamero DT Millonarios.jpg
- File:Carlos Queiroz DT Colombia.jpg
- File:Hinchada del Unión Magdalena.jpg
- File:Procateldral de Nuestra Señora de Líbano (Bogotá).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:53, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Diegobcardenas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
- File:Escudobriceño.gif
- File:Escudo de Tocancipá.gif
- File:Escudo de soata-1-.jpg
- File:Escudo-paz-de-rio.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:54, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Diegobcardenas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Jozo Zovko.jpg
- File:Rafael Dudamel Campeon Deportivo Cali 2021 II.jpg
- File:Estudio Principal Canal 1.jpg
- File:Casa de los Comuneros.jpg
- File:RTVDH.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Diegobcardenas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Escudo Cali Sin Deportivo.png
- File:Escudo 2 Union Magdalena.png
- File:Escudo Deportes Quindio.svg
- File:Salvacion Nacional.jpg
- File:Logo Amber Capital.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Derivative copyvio, even if in scope. Ubcule (talk) 19:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Derivative copyvio, even if in scope. Ubcule (talk) 19:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Self-promoting image; in use at Wikidata for self-created image, but that arguably doesn't belong their either. Ubcule (talk) 19:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:52, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Poor-quality image being used for spam ("This image represents a very simple box. A very normal object in packaging companies, such as [company name redacted]. A company that provides a wide variety of solutions for strapping, wrapping and sealing your products. As well as a wide range of consumables and all kinds of auxiliary items.") Ubcule (talk) 19:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:52, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, no permission, listed site seems to be repository of random images with no licenses. Ubcule (talk) 19:53, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:52, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Poor-quality image with limited usability, possibly no permission, excuse for spam link? Ubcule (talk) 19:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:51, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Out-of-scope/spam. Ubcule (talk) 20:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:52, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Limited or no usefulness in isolation like this. Ubcule (talk) 20:10, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:50, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
seo spam Ubcule (talk) 20:10, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Comment In use on en:Draft:SEO Charge. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:57, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:50, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Scans of Soviet photos, unlikely made by the uploader. Missing author, permission.
- File:Административное здание на Тургеневской площади, фото.jpg
- File:Административное здание, Москва Тургеневская площадь, проект.jpg
- File:Кинотеатр россия интерьер.jpg
- File:Кинотеатр "Россия" г. Москва.jpg
- File:Solopov Dmitri Sergeevitch portret.jpg
- File:Солопов Сергей Геогревич.jpg
A.Savin 20:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:49, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Author request deletion: Small and unused image, with many alternatives in the category A1Cafel (talk) 07:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:02, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Author request deletion: Small and unused image, with many alternatives in the category A1Cafel (talk) 07:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:02, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Author request deletion: Small and unused image, with many alternatives in the category A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:02, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Author request deletion: Small and unused image, with many alternatives in the category A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:02, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
This CoA is fictional and never existed as a state arms or insignia, pure fantasy and graphic poor-quality/amateur work, just useless, because the Wikimedia already has better versions. – Dragovit (talk) 11:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Indeedous (talk) 21:35, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
fictional / self-made coat of arms derived from File:Wappen_Ludwigsburg.png + File:Wuerttemberg_Arms.svg + false name, this combination was never created and adopted (= fictional) by Electorate of Württemberg, also crown is inaccurate, all unusable, the file and it's name still making confusion Dragovit (talk) 14:24, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per lack of COM:EDUSE due to fiction/bad design. --Achim (talk) 21:39, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:49, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Нич Мария Михайловна (1922).jpg
- File:Однокласова загальноосвітня школа, Великий Полюхів, список учнів 1926 р.стр.2.jpg
- File:Однокласова загальноосвітня школа, Великий Полюхів, список учнів 1926 р.стр.1.jpg
- File:Масломичі, Грубешівський повіт,2000 р., археологічні дослідження.jpg
- File:Список впавших старшин, підстаршин та стрільців відділу «Вовків». 1944-1945р.р.jpg
- File:Список впавших старшин, підстаршин та стрільців відділу «Вовків». 1944-1945р.р.1.jpg
- File:Список впавших старшин, підстаршин та стрільців відділу «Вовків». 1944-1945р.р.2.jpg
- File:19.03.1944 р.Протокол з нападу польської банди на с.Козодави.jpg
- File:Черничин, 1982 р., археологічний об'єкт 3, могила 23.jpg
- File:Черничин, 1982 р., археологічний об'єкт 3, могила 22.jpg
- File:Черничин, 1982 р., археологічний об'єкт 3, могила 13.jpg
- File:Черничин, 1982 р., археологічний об'єкт 3, могила 12.jpg
- File:Черничин, 1982 р., археологічний об'єкт 3, могила 4.jpg
- File:Черничин, 1982 р., археологічний об'єкт 3, могила 26.jpg
- File:Черничин, 1982 р., археалогічні дослідження, могила 19, епоха ранього бронзу, в могилі біля дивно положеного людського скелету було 10.jpg
- File:Черничин, 1982 р., археологічний об'єкт 3, могила 3.jpg
- File:В. Коман - археологічні дослідження в Черничині. 1981-1985р.р.jpg
- File:Облікова карта госпіталя.1915. Мазур К.Д.jpg
- File:Облікова карта госпіталя.1915.Писарчук О.Ф.jpg
- File:Облікова карта госпіталя.1916. Мазур М.В.1.jpg
- File:Облікова карта госпіталя.1916. Мазур М.В.jpg
- File:Облікова карта госпіталя.1916.Рабчук М.А.jpg
- File:Облікова карта госпіталя.1916.Сабарна А.М.jpg
- File:Облікова карта госпіталя.1916.Сабарна М.М.jpg
- File:Облікова карта госпіталя.1917. Мазур П.Д.1.jpg
- File:Облікова карта госпіталя.1917. Мазур П.Д.jpg
- File:Облікова картка госпіталя.1917.Бахмачук І.В.jpg
- File:Облікова картка госпіталя.1917.Біда П.І.jpg
- File:Облікова картка госпіталя.1917.Войтович В.М.jpg
- File:Облікова картка госпіталя.1917.Цимборский І.П.jpg
- File:Масломичі. Марія та Віра Сивак. Період міжвоєнний.jpg
- File:Брати Володимир Сивак, 1923 р.н., і Євген Сивак 1927 р.н. Черничин.jpg
- File:Переселеньска карта, видавана сім'ї Сівак, село Масломичі, під час операції Вісла.1947 р.jpg
- File:Село Стрільці, Холмщина,1938 р. Родина Струцюків Георгій (Юрій) та Ганна,діти Йосип та Софія.jpg
- File:С.Стрільці, Холмщина. Церква і дзвінниця. Міжвоєнні роки.jpg
- File:С.Стрільці, Холмщина. Дзвінниця. Міжвоєнні роки.jpg
- File:Ікона св.Юрія XVII ст., з церкви в с.Стрільці, Холмщина.Після зруйнування церкви 1938р., знаходиться в церкві св. Івана Теолога в Холмі.jpg
- File:Ікона Покрови Пресвятої Богородиці з с.Стрільці, Холмщина.Після зруйнування церкви 1938р. ікона знаходиться в церкви св. Івана Тео.jpg
- File:Холмщина, село Стрільці. Діти перед церквою св.Юрія. Міжвоєнні роки.jpg
- File:Холмщина, село Стрільці. Іконостас в церкві св.Юрія 1938 р.jpg
- File:Холмщина, село Стрільці. Церква св.Юрія розібрана 1938 р.jpg
- File:Чульчиці.40-ві ХХ ст. Церква св. Олексія.jpg
- File:Столпє.Сторожова вежа з ХІІ ст.Фото з 60-тих років.jpg
- File:Вежа у Столп'є.1909. Російська листівка.jpg
- File:Вежа у Столп'є.1909 рік. Російська листівка.jpg
- File:1900,Вежа в Столпє.jpg
- File:Вежа в Белавіно 1891. 2 версти від Холма.jpg
- File:Вежа в Белавіно-реконструкції вежі в Белавіно згідно Константина Прожогі.jpg
- File:21-23.10.1941 рік.Соборне зібрання Холмської єпархії.jpg
- File:Холм 1920. Церковне свято в кафедральному соборі Богородиці.jpg
- File:Холмський собор Богородиці.Вигляд до 1875 р.jpg
- File:Холм.1916р. Іконостас і розписи Холмського собору Богородиці.jpg
- File:Холм.1939.Дзвінниця Кафедрального Собору Пресвятої Богородиці.jpg
- File:Холм.1916.Кафедральний собор.jpg
- File:Холм.1916.Катедра Пресвятої Богородиці.jpg
- File:Холм.1916.Іконостас катедри.jpg
- File:Холм.1916.jpg
- File:Холм.1910.Кафедральний собор.jpg
- File:Холм,1917.Кафедральний собор.jpg
- File:Холм,1916.Соборний комплекс Пресвятої Богородиці.jpg
- File:Холм 1915. Собор Богородиці.jpg
- File:Холм 1917.Кафедральний собор.jpg
- File:Холм 1916.Соборний комплекс Пресвятої Богородиці.jpg
- File:Холм 1913.Собор Різдва Пресвятої Богородиці.jpg
- File:Холм 1911.Собор Різдва Пресвятої Богородиці.jpg
- File:Холм 1910.Кафедральний собор.jpg
- File:Холм 1910.Кафедральний собор (2).jpg
- File:Холм 1905. Холмський кафедральний собор Богородиці.jpg
- File:Холм 1905-1909. Єпископ Євлогій (Георгієвський) в Холмському соборі Богородиці.jpg
- File:Соборний комплекс Пресвятої Богородиці (Холм)1910.jpg
- File:Іконостас і розписи Холмського собору Богородиці.1915.jpg
- File:Памятка повроту собору православним 19.05.1940.jpg
- File:1916.Холмський кафедральний собор Богородиці.jpg
- File:1917. Холмський кафедральний собор Богородиці.jpg
- File:1916 Холмський собор Богородиці.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B0,%D0%B4%D1%96%D1%82%D0%B8_%D0%99%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BF_%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%A1%D0%BE%D1%84%D1%96%D1%8F.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%B2_%D0%A5%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BC%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D1%83_%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%96_%D0%91%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%96.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
1910.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:38, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Квартет В.Півнов, Л.Шутко, І.Шутко, N.N. поч.70-х.jpg
- File:В.Півнов. Київ, органний зал, костел св.Миколая, поч. 80-тих.jpg
- File:Київська консерваторія. В.Кошуба,А.Котляревський, органіст з Чехії, В.Півнов, поч.80-тих.jpg
- File:В.Півнов на фабриці органів Rieger - Kloss, Крнов, Чехія, поч. 80-тих.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
The original hosting site, http://www.rw6ase.narod.ru/00/twcb/kwn49_19.jpg, does not license photos under GFDL or CC. Presume copyrighted (by contributors to rw6ase). Retired electrician (talk) 22:22, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Generalfeldmarschall von Brauchitsch begrüßt Ferdinand Čatloš in seinem Hauptquartier, rechts Keitel am 29. 4. 1941.jpg
[edit]
1941 image claimed pd because published before 1925? No valid publication information given which would qualify this image for PD. Buidhe (talk) 16:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:10, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Person on photo died in 1986. Maxinvestigator (talk) 09:35, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Obviously not truely own work. Photo published in 1980's, property of government.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:25, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 14:05, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Historical painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- but... all of this is written — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andreaumaq (talk • contribs) 22:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: PD-Art, Signac died in 1935. Painting is also shown here. --Achim (talk) 22:46, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: information added. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Small image without sufficient EXIF data, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 01:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep it is 100% normal for uploaders to have both this resolution and this level of EXIF data for their own images. This image has never been uploaded elsewhere. A1Cafel should take especially close notice of the many warnings he's received for disingenuous nominations like this one. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Comment given that this was the only upload that A1 nominated today, and that I warned him yesterday, I am 99% sure this is a revenge nomination. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:24, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted material. Copyright notice is in the lower left corner. 193.171.152.104 13:35, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This is an image of an information board permanently placed at a public location. It's clearly covered by FoP-Germany. -- Ies (talk) 13:42, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- The copyright notice in the bottom left corner says "fotolia ©". I don't think the author of the image on fotolia was ever asked if it is OK for him that his work is published under a free licence. Fotolia is a webservice that hots images for illustrative purposes and you have to pay a fee to be allowed to use the image. The board is also not a derivative work as such (for example the area around the board is the main subject and the board just happened to be there) but the main subject of the image. If the image itself is published under a free licence I have to assume as end user that every part of it is as well. So the copyrighted image from fotolia is now freely licenced even the author did never agree to a royalty free (with CC-0 almost public domain like) publishment of his or her image. Since the images are used to illustrate the text and cover a large part of the board they can also not be considered De minimis. --193.171.152.103 14:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- I do not think the copyright notice (Urheberrecht) matters here. The whole board is commissioned by the city [3] and contain only public available information. Surely there are many pictures of public signs in commons, so there should be an information somewhere. (FoP-Germany makes sense here) -- A1000 (talk) 19:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- There should be some cases for sure. The point still is that you would relicence an image under a free licence for which you have not the copyright to do so --193.171.152.104 13:09, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep 193.171.152.104, please look at {{FoP-Germany}}.--Prosfilaes (talk) 10:44, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: FoP-Germany. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 23:32, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Still from a video published by Vanity Fair, photoshopped with another actor's face; source image not published under a free licence. Cnbrb (talk) 10:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:02, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: |source =https://andreidohotarusculptor.weebly.com/Not sure that the image has been uploaded after being used on this website. Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- it's more likely that an author's photo finds its way from their website to Commons than the other way around. Vera (talk) 14:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 15:03, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Zdjęcie własne, nie odpowiada misji wikipedii Machianier (talk) 11:47, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:04, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW ofhttps://fr.freeimages.com/search/taiwan-landscape Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:58, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete A pretty clear copyright violation. Logan Talk Contributions 01:46, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:04, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 15:18, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:24, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
COM:DW of https://www.secrets-de-filles.fr/barbie-poupee-50-ans-belle/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:05, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Screencaps no ? 82.127.152.107 12:11, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete unknown source (and likely not free licensed) as it is a photo of a screen --67.184.0.138 14:58, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP - looks like a screenshot or photo of a photo. --Gbawden (talk) 15:06, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Dupe of Warning road sign gallery. Achim (talk) 15:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:08, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted screenshot A1Cafel (talk) 15:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Id say they are prepareing for the inteview as you can see in the other pics and so no copyright was gained.--Sanandros (talk) 21:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC). --Sanandros (talk) 21:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
1943 image claimed as own work. Dubious. Buidhe (talk) 16:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:30, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
No publication information. Would have to have been published 1945 or earlier to qualify for {{PD-Czechoslovakia-anon}}. If not, probably still copyrighted. Buidhe (talk) 16:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:32, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Delete: Per nom above. hueman1 (talk) 09:08, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:30, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Various US school logos among bulk copyvio upload of the same. Discussion needed whether these are below TOO (self/CC claims are bogus)
Эlcobbola talk 16:52, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination except File:Forest Park.png per COM:TOO US. ƏXPLICIT 00:41, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
The PBS logo, which is part of these station logos, has been deleted on multiple occasions for being non-free, and is an example given at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States#Threshold of originality as not allowed to be uploaded to Commons. The 1998 PBS logo has a copyright registration (VA0001310087); this is far more likely to be because of the "Everyman"/"P-head" in the circle, which was tweaked for (but remains very much part of) the 2019 logo (which these PBS SoCal logos include), than anything else.
WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 09:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted by Minorax. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: in scope, Category:Noticias Uno. --ƏXPLICIT 00:48, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 193.171.152.103 as Copyvio (copyvio) - in use thus not speedyable, TOO to be discussed. Achim (talk) 19:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per COM:TOO India. --ƏXPLICIT 00:53, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Source image not apparently published under a free licence Cnbrb (talk) 10:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Although not a movie still, the artist's image is not explicitly published under a licence such as Creative Commons. Cnbrb (talk) 10:24, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:17, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
File:Pope John Paul II holding a koala and meeting with media, Brisbane, 25 November 1986 (36318174586) (cropped).jpg
[edit]_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as no license (No license since) The file was actually licensed as CC-BY-SA by the government of Queensland, the question is whether they have right to do so. Moving for deletion to discuss this. Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:56, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
There is no way to assert the pictures were taken by Polish photographers or first published in Poland Dd1495 (talk) 08:26, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 07:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
No publication information given which would qualify this image for PD. Rationale requires publication before a certain date. Previous version had copyright watermark. Kept by banned user INeverCry. Buidhe (talk) 16:53, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:27, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Questionable PD status. Published in 2004 book would still be under copyright unless there was an earlier publication. {{PD-SlovakGov}} probably does not cover photographs by military personnel. Buidhe (talk) 16:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:27, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Questionable PD status. Published in probably recent book (author also published book in 2004) would still be under copyright unless there was an earlier publication. {{PD-SlovakGov}} probably does not cover photographs by military personnel. Would have to be published before 1946 for {{PD-Czechoslovakia-anon}} to apply. Buidhe (talk) 16:58, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:27, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
_crop.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_crop.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Questionable PD status. Published in probably recent book (author also published book in 2004) would still be under copyright unless there was an earlier publication. {{PD-SlovakGov}} probably does not cover photographs by military personnel. Would have to be published before 1946 for {{PD-Czechoslovakia-anon}} to apply. Buidhe (talk) 16:59, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
_crop.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:27, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
_crop.JPG){kind=link}
File:05580 Ferdinand Čatloš Komancza - Slovak soldiers posing with Ukrainian civilians in Komańcza -Slovak invasion of Poland (1939).JPG
[edit].JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Questionable PD status. Published in probably recent book (author also published book in 2004) would still be under copyright unless there was an earlier publication. {{PD-SlovakGov}} probably does not cover photographs by military personnel. Would have to be published before 1946 for {{PD-Czechoslovakia-anon}} to apply. Buidhe (talk) 16:59, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:28, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
File:05577 Slovak soldiers posing with Ukrainian civilians in Komańcza, Ferdinand Čatloš (center) -Slovak invasion of Poland (1939).JPG
[edit]_-Slovak_invasion_of_Poland_(1939).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-Slovak_invasion_of_Poland_(1939).JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Questionable PD status. Published in probably recent book (author also published book in 2004) would still be under copyright unless there was an earlier publication. {{PD-SlovakGov}} probably does not cover photographs by military personnel. Would have to be published before 1946 for {{PD-Czechoslovakia-anon}} to apply. Buidhe (talk) 17:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:28, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
File:05576 Slovak soldiers posing with Ukrainian civilians in Komańcza - Slovak invasion of Poland (1939).JPG
[edit].JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Questionable PD status. Published in probably recent book (author also published book in 2004) would still be under copyright unless there was an earlier publication. {{PD-SlovakGov}} probably does not cover photographs by military personnel. Would have to be published before 1946 for {{PD-Czechoslovakia-anon}} to apply. Buidhe (talk) 17:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:28, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Questionable PD status. Published in probably recent book (author also published book in 2004) would still be under copyright unless there was an earlier publication. {{PD-SlovakGov}} probably does not cover photographs by military personnel. Would have to be published before 1946 for {{PD-Czechoslovakia-anon}} to apply. Buidhe (talk) 17:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:28, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
No evidence of publication which would qualify for PD. Would have to be published in Czechoslovakia before 1946 to meet {{PD-Czechoslovakia-anon}}. Buidhe (talk) 16:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:29, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Originally tagged by @Brandt Luke Zorn: as "copyvio", I think this file's copyright should be discussed rather than speedy deleted.
Nominator's arguments are: "With sufficiently high resolution, it is clear that there is a copyright notice: "Copyright 1976 Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. All Rights Reserved." See, e.g., this scan via Heritage Auctions. Even in the lower-res version here at Commons the text of the copyright notice is clearly there in the bottom-left corner, albeit not legible at this resolution. Unfortunately this is a post-1963 poster, so any lack of renewal is irrelevant and the copyright almost certainly remains valid."
Fma12 (talk) 14:58, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Fma12—I agree that a discussion would be worthwhile. I'd initially considered starting a request rather than simply tagging for speedy delete, but was unsure which was considered "proper" under the circumstances. That may have been rash of me, and if so I apologize. I appreciate your very even-handed opening of this discussion. Since you've already reproduced my deletion argument, here are some other thoughts about how I came across the poster in the first place:
- I decided yesterday to find public-domain posters for as many of English Wikipedia's level-5 "vital" film articles as I could. Virtually all of the posters I've uploaded are pre-1964 and became PD due to lack of renewal, not lack of notice; the latter only comes up in a handful of cases, usually where lack of renewal is a rock-solid back-up argument anyway.
- So I was surprised to see that the post-1963 Taxi Driver already had a PD poster, since film distributors seem to have been fairly diligent with notices on posters—certainly more so than book publishers tended to be with notices on dust jackets. After reviewing higher-resolution scans, I found that the Taxi Driver poster did carry a notice, and the notice was not defective.
- I came to that conclusion about the poster's copyright status to my own immense regret, as it would be a tremendously valuable and very cool free resource. I can't think of another reason that the poster would have entered the public domain, but I'm open to ideas—I'd truly prefer to find a reason that it's public domain than to delete it, if possible. Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 21:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @Brandt Luke Zorn: First of all, thanks for your comprehension and kindness. It would be a shame that this poster be eliminated so it is a beautiful piece of art itself. Nevertheless, I'm not even half as expert as you are in expired copyrights, so unfortunately I can't contribute with further arguments to support the permanence of this poster at Commons. I hope another user come up with valid reasons to consider this poster PD and keep the file here.
- I have been also searching on ebay to find a high-res image where the legend "® copyright... " can be visible to determine the status of the artwork. But unfortunately, I haven't found a suitable image to reach a conclusion because they were not big enough to read what legends say. On the other hand, many of these posters had the white frame (where usually copyright legends are placed) cropped, like this or this. :( Fma12 (talk) 14:33, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- I think those posters on eBay were probably cropped or more likely simply copied from the original design. Since the full high-res image is behind a (free) registration wall, I've uploaded a screenshot of the poster's bottom-right corner on Imgur to show the notice. Other copies of the poster listed at HA show the same notice.
- I do highly recommend getting an account for that site, btw; there's so much of value there in terms of quality of scans and potential to verify public domain status. One of the reasons I've come to use Heritage Auctions as a go-to when hunting down book covers/movie posters is that they tend to produce immaculately high-res scans, some of the only scans of sufficient quality to see tiny copyright notices on film posters (which are nevertheless still a bit hard to read in some scans, but would be perfectly legible on 27 in. × 41 in. physical paper copies). Plus, as an auctioneer, the site authenticates the products and describes them in some detail, indicating whether the poster (or whatever else) is an original, whether it has been restored, etc.—meaning you can be sure that you're seeing the poster as originally published by the copyright holder, which is what's relevant for copyright. Definitely one of the better sites for finding such things imo, alongside eBay and Worthpoint.
- I'm sure you probably know about US copyright renewal to some extent already, but: if the poster had been published in 1963 or earlier, the copyright holder would have been required to renew the copyright 28 years afterward (with an option to renew early in the 27th year). So even though most big movie distributors became diligent about placing notices on their posters starting around the mid-1930s or so (in my observation), I have yet to come across a single one that bothered to renew a copyright on poster art. If you look through my recent uploads, I try to always include links and instructions for where you can find the right place to search for renewals, since the official government database is only for registrations/renewals from 1978 onward (which would cover renewals from 1950–1963) and you have to look elsewhere to search for renewals from 1949 or earlier. Unfortunately after 1964 renewal was no longer required, so most American posters from 1964–1989 remain under copyright as long as they had a notice in the first place. From that time period, I suspect the few American posters without a notice would have been mostly independent films with a very small distributor; Eraserhead from 1977 is one of the examples that comes to mind. Even the poster for Night of the Living Dead had a notice, even though the film itself notoriously entered the public domain due to mistaken removal of the notice before publishing.
- I unpacked all the renewal stuff because, after glancing through your uploads, it's clear that you're a far more prolific contributor than me, on an entirely different level tbh, and 20th-century American copyright law is notoriously bizarre and convoluted. If my explanation is any small help to you to find more public-domain images, that would rule. I'm not a copyright nazi or deletionist by nature at all, I'm much more interested in collaboration and contributing cool free stuff to the project. It's a bummer that, as two Taxi Driver fans, we had to "meet" under these circumstances—you're a good guy and I'm glad this discussion has been positive and productive! Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 20:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- I have been also searching on ebay to find a high-res image where the legend "® copyright... " can be visible to determine the status of the artwork. But unfortunately, I haven't found a suitable image to reach a conclusion because they were not big enough to read what legends say. On the other hand, many of these posters had the white frame (where usually copyright legends are placed) cropped, like this or this. :( Fma12 (talk) 14:33, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
_theatrical_poster.jpg){kind=link}
- I also hope we met under other circumstances, so I definitely agree with you this discussion has been entirely productive for both. I also learned a lot about expired copyrights thanks to your explanations and detailed descriptions based on your experience in the area (which is vast). About my contributions, I love all kind of artwork although –I admit– I haven't upload a big amount of movie posters, but I like to contribute with a large variety of interests, such as vintage sports photos, logotypes, football kit templates, paintings, Argentine-PD works, and more.
- You're also a cool guy and I hope this is the beginning of a long-time collaboration between you and me. Be sure I'll contact you for assistance when I dedide to upload movie posters or even comic covers (which expired copyrights in the USA are far complicated too, at least for me until I go further into them). Nowadays I'm working on a template for collectible cards, based on some manufacturing companies (such as Goudy or Bowman) which copyrights over their products are extinct or not renewed. I'll give you further details on your talk page, if you are interesed in giving me a little hand with it. Thanks a lots. - Fma12 (talk) 22:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:13, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Commons:Derivative works from plate design. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The derivative work from the plate design is irrelevant in this scenario. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quinti9 (talk • contribs) 20:27, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:15, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Pre-election awareness activity of the Contestants Delhi Legislative Assembly Election.webm
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: No indication of the source of the music. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
This image was flagged for copyright infringement by User:A1Cafel. I took this image myself and released it under CC0, after which another site uploaded my image and is selling licenses for it. How can I prove that this image is indeed my own work that I released under CC0? Obviously I don't take issue with my image being reuploaded elsewhere, but it does irritate me that someone else is selling licenses to an image released to the public domain and that is being used as evidence to remove the freely available version online. Laurel Wreath of Victors (talk) 20:14, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Here is a link to the site that is selling licenses for my photo. Laurel Wreath of Victors (talk) 20:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- They offer it under a nominally (slightly) higher resolution, 1887 x 1060 px, than "our" version. Did you publish the image elsewhere in that resolution? --Túrelio (talk) 20:22, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- No, I haven't, though this image is actually a screenshot from a video which I should still have access to but haven't published anywhere online. Would providing the original video be enough to establish that I am the author? The video has a full resolution of 1920 x 1080. Laurel Wreath of Victors (talk) 20:28, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- They offer it under a nominally (slightly) higher resolution, 1887 x 1060 px, than "our" version. Did you publish the image elsewhere in that resolution? --Túrelio (talk) 20:22, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: COM:AGF because the Commons file was uploaded the day after the protest, almost certainly predating the Alamy version. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
die Datei wurde zur speedy deletion makiert, hier liegt aber keine Uhrheberrechtsverletzung vor, deswegen der regular deletion request. Das Foto wurde im Auftrag der Band gemacht und ist inkl. aller Rechte uebergeben wurden. Die Uhrheberrechte liegen komplett beim Hochladendem. Viele Gruesse Markus Markus.sacher.81 (talk) 11:22, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo Markus, lies dir bitte diesen Abschnitt durch: Fremde Aufnahmen. Wie Du selbst schreibst ist der Urheber ein Dritter, nicht Du als Hochladender. Dieser, also der Urheber muss hier eine Einverständniserklärung abgeben. Der Weg ist in der Verlinkung beschrieben. Wenn ich dich recht versteh betrifft dies alle von dir hochgeladenen Bilder. U.u. habt Ihr ein Nutzungsrecht erworben, das ist hier zunächst aber nicht weiter von Bedeutung. Dies zum einen, da wir das Vertragswerk nicht kennen und es auch sekundär ist. Bitte kläre die offenen Fragen. Sonst müssen ggfs. alle Bilder gelöscht werden. Beste Grüße und Danke --Benutzer:WvB (talk) 10:25, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: previously published works must have permission via OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:24, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Drawings by Nemcik (died 1986) are still copyrighted in home country (Slovakia), where copyright extends 70 years after death. The graffiti is all free because of {{FoP-Slovakia}}. Buidhe (talk) 16:11, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Category not empty. Please nominate files if seeking deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:27, 17 August 2020 (UTC)