Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/10/28
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_01.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
this file has already been resolved Filipe da Cunha (talk) 14:00, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: image already deleted. --Ankry (talk) 15:51, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
A 1954 image would still be copyrighted, so uploader should prove ownership. Instead they say it's from La Fleche which is... a magazine, perhaps? GRuban (talk) 00:15, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
The picture is from my personnal (family) private collection. La Flèche is a city https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Fl%C3%A8che where the picture was taken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick1999~frwiki (talk • contribs) 09:44, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- OK, I can accept that. Withdrawing nomination, my apologies, and thank you for the photograph. --GRuban (talk) 15:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Close as Kept, nomination withdrawn, concerns appear to have been addressed. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:49, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
I realized it is bad for my privacy Imrannigam (talk) 10:46, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, there is no more "Reichstag". c:File:My Parliament.svg is available for testing Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:30, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
out of project scope, fantasy diagram, c:File:My Parliament.svg is available for testing Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:30, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
out of project scope, fantasy diagram, c:File:My Parliament.svg is available for testing Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:30, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
out of project scope, fantasy diagram, c:File:My Parliament.svg is available for testing Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:30, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted OOS personal file -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MariaFacebook (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MariaFacebook (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy - re-creation. ~riley (talk) 05:18, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
not cc-by, see source shizhao (talk) 01:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Procedural close, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEobgdEtin kO2BsTNJ0TwA. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Flag of a political party can't be the own work of the uploader. √Tæ√ 14:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination/+speedy. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kevino18meza (talk · contribs)
[edit]https://www.pinterest.fr/ishikadutta2k16/jake-bass/
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:22, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:16, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
obvious copyvio (https://news.zing.vn/my-tam-dong-nhi-thay-anh-dai-dien-ung-ho-tet-sum-vay-post621047.html) DHN (talk) 21:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — regards, Revi 06:02, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
There is already an image of this aircraft on commons. Tigerdude9 (talk) 01:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Tigerdude9: That is not a valid reason for deletion. This image looks pretty educational to me. No sign of copyrignt violation either. But the file can be deleted per G7. If you truly wish to delete this file, just put
{{SD|G7}}to the file page within the next 7 days. Regards, Masum Reza📞 06:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Wrong Image added. Request for deletion Gnoeee (talk) 11:05, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Or just rename the file "Mahe" to "Thalassery"-❙❚❚❙❙ JinOy ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 17:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: file renamed. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 17:00, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sina safiyari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: self-promotion.
- File:سینا.jpg
- File:رکورددار چرخش دو پا با اسکیت.jpg
- File:کسب مقام اول دور در چرخش دو پا و ثبت ملی.jpg
4nn1l2 (talk) 14:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:08, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:09, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maxfactor1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:09, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
From exif can judge that the original source of the image is facebook, which may not be the uploader’s own work. Catherine Laurence discussion 15:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:09, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of use & personal image. √Tæ√ 15:02, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. --AshokChakra (talk) 16:41, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:10, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:10, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:11, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete This version lacks verified copyright licensing. Besides, we now have a png version here: File:GluskinSheff Logo Black RGB.png, which has been properly licensed via OTRS. There is also a version at en-wiki tagged PD-USonly: en:File:Gluskin Sheff logo.svg, which I've now tagged as {{Obsolete}}. There is an en-wiki article about the subject. JGHowes talk 17:12, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:12, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:12, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ABHAY SUNDAR S (talk · contribs)
[edit]I marked these as SD with F10 (Personal photos by non-contributors), but I think we can keep some of them since w:en:Ravisankar exists. However, I think many of these photos can be deleted because of poor quality and being out of project scope. I have listed all those files in this DR. I've excluded some files like File:Ravisankar malayalam singer of Keralaa.jpg, File:Ravisankar cute singer.jpg, File:Ravisankar ravisankar.jpg, File:Ravisankar in a stage Show.jpg, File:Ravisankar A malayalam playback singer A wellknown singer of South India.jpg and File:Ravisankar with manoj k jayan.jpg because I think they can be used for an educational purpose in Wikipedia (and maybe other projects).
- File:Ravisankar south indian singer.jpg
- File:Ravisankar a lighting ceremony.jpg
- File:Ravisankar with Sarath.jpg
- File:Ravisankar India.jpg
- File:Ravisankar stage SHow.jpg
- File:Ravisankar traditional song.jpg
- File:Ravisankar in a stage show.jpg
- File:Ravisankar bhavagayakan.jpg
- File:Ravisankar with mohan lal.jpg
- File:Ravisankar selfie.jpg
- File:Ravisankar with malaylam actress.jpg
- File:Ravisankar in a ceremony.jpg
- File:Ravisankar a stage program.jpg
- File:Ravisankar in kairali tv.jpg
- File:Ravisankar with dakshina moorthi.jpg
- File:Ravisankar in a night show.jpg
- File:Ravisankar with hariharan G.jpg
- File:Ravisankar singer in kerala.jpg
- File:Ravisankar wellknown singer of Kerala.jpg
- File:Ravisankar ravisankar singer.jpg
- File:Ravisankar wellknown singer.jpg
- File:Ravisankar singer In kerala.jpg
- File:Ravisankar singer of kerala.jpg
Ahmadtalk 10:46, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Ahmad252: All of his files still had the SD tag so were in danger of being deleted before this DR is closed. I have removed the tags Gbawden (talk) 19:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. I removed those tags from the files I didn't list here, but not from these. Ahmadtalk 19:38, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: I don't think scope is a problem, but copyright is. They don;t have EXIF, they're small, and at least one is watermarked with the name of the actual photographer. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ABHAY SUNDAR S (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small, no EXIF. All other images from this uploader have been deleted as copyvios.
- File:Ravisankar with manoj k jayan.jpg
- File:Ravisankar in a stage Show.jpg
- File:Ravisankar A malayalam playback singer A wellknown singer of South India.jpg
- File:Ravisankar ravisankar.jpg
- File:Ravisankar malayalam singer of Keralaa.jpg
- File:Ravisankar malyalam singer in kerala.jpg
- File:Ravisankar malayalam singer.jpg
- File:Ravisankar Malayalam Playbacksinger.jpg
- File:Ravisankar southindian singer.jpg
- File:Ravisankar singer.jpg
- File:Ravisankar 5.jpg
- File:Ravisankar2.jpg
- File:Ravisankar.jpg
- File:Ravisankar-1.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:14, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Low quality, inconsistent bond lengths/angles, ambiguous stereochemistry. We have the superior alternative File:Myxothiazol.svg available. Ed (Edgar181) 15:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Wostr (talk) 19:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination, extremely poor-quality chemical structural formula. Opaque background & inconsistent style. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 20:05, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:18, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:18, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
An unused and uncategorised media. Probably not notable company. Advertisement. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:02, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:46, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE Ahmadtalk 08:08, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
fantasy diagram (fascists and nazis in the Duma of the USSR ?), out of project scope, c:File:My Parliament.svg is available ofr testing Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:48, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:44, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
fantasy diagram (New England was divided in different States of the USA in 1972), out of project scope. c:File:My Parliament.svg is available for testing. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:54, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:43, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
fantasy diagram (New England was divided in different States of the USA in 1972), out of project scope. c:File:My Parliament.svg is available for testing. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:54, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:43, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
fantasy diagram (New England was divided in different States of the USA in 1972), out of project scope. c:File:My Parliament.svg is available for testing. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:54, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:43, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
empty page without an image file Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 09:57, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:55, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:21, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:54, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:54, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:26, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:53, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:30, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:42, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
photos of Norbert and Sharon
[edit]out of scope personal photos
Vera (talk) 12:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:40, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
An unused and uncategorised media. Commons is not a private video album. COM:PORN? The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:04, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:39, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Questionable scope, possible promotional, possible DW with multiple photos in image. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Used in promotional Wikidata item EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Fictional emblem. Sisuvia (talk) 15:39, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:35, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Not a real flag. Sisuvia (talk) 15:39, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:36, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused low quality image CourtlyHades296 (talk) 16:27, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:33, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
mostly black screen. Video from 6.23-6.36 therefore hard to find. No info about the photo, authorship? Estopedist1 (talk) 16:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Appears to be intended solely to attack a living person. Serves no educational purpose. Apparently an undeclared derivative work of File:GONZALO_BLUMEL.jpg. Associated with vandalism on wikidata:Q50532720. Bovlb (talk) 17:48, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Also recommend blocking the uploader. --Kinu (talk) 20:49, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:31, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused file. Small image of unidentifiable object. No educational purpose. Malcolma (talk) 17:51, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Not a useful file. --Kinu (talk) 20:50, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Appears to be intended only to attack a living person. Serves no education purpose. Bovlb (talk) 17:53, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Also recommend blocking the uploader. --Kinu (talk) 20:49, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
flurry, unidentified location Xocolatl (talk) 21:12, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:29, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
flurry, unidentified Xocolatl (talk) 21:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:28, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Unusable file. ɱ (talk) 21:54, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:28, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Unusable file. ɱ (talk) 21:54, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:27, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
needs a permission by the photographer, see OTRS Mutter Erde (talk) 07:32, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:19, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: from Facebook, see EXIF
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion. Image was claimed by uploader to come from Facebook (and does contain FB code in its EXIF data). However, as no link had been provided and as Google does not find it, eventual license cannot be verified. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- source: https://www.facebook.com/69640469952/photos/a.10151231084409953/10151231097109953/?type=3&theater --shizhao (talk) 09:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Great. So, the source-claim is now confirmed. However, there is no license-statement for this image on FB. Delete. --Túrelio (talk) 09:53, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Great. So, the source-claim is now confirmed. However, there is no license-statement for this image on FB.
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:20, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:20, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JuninhuOliveira (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Talokudo faz vilão no espetáculo a realidade que nos cerca.jpg
- File:Talokudo.jpg
- File:Juninho Talokudo show com Lucas Veloso Hotel Thermas Mossoró.jpg
- File:Humoristas Talokudo e Lucas Veloso.jpg
- File:Humorista Juninho Talokudo.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:16, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; at least one was from FB. --Gbawden (talk) 13:20, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, contemporary artwork, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:48, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
I dispute this deletion request since I uploaded the image on the artist's request and he wants to share this image and his work under the attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0). Perhaps this Creative Commons licence is not valid in Germany but that does not warrant deletion of the file since the file is deleted from the German Wikipedia page. --Vincentvandermarck (talk) 12:48, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Vincentvandermarck: Please send permission via COM:OTRS Gbawden (talk) 13:21, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:22, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Small image and lack of EXIF. Appears to be Facebook image per the transmission location code A1Cafel (talk) 12:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:20, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Small image and lack of EXIF. Appears to be Facebook image per the transmission location code A1Cafel (talk) 12:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:20, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 12:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:20, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Possible copyvio, the snail picture is on Adobe Stock https://stock.adobe.com/447723?as_campaign=TinEye&as_content=tineye_match&epi1=447723&tduid=f2dd48980c005937695b7a371b878b68&as_channel=affiliate&as_campclass=redirect&as_source=arvato CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:21, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Wrong named duplicate of File:Father Marquette.jpg Eissink (talk) 13:50, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- This is a photo I took and I misnamed it. It should be deleted. Wingerham52 (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:21, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Originally from Starlux's facebook post. MNXANL (talk) 19:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:19, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
obvious copyvio (watermark) DHN (talk) 21:19, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:17, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
No EXIF At Flickr, https://www.cleverock.com/tribute-to-beatles-white-album-akron-civic-theater-akron-oh-09-28-2019/, COM:LL Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:17, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
https://www.cleverock.com/tribute-to-beatles-white-album-akron-civic-theater-akron-oh-09-28-2019/
- File:Micky Dolenz.png
- File:Jason Scheff.png
- File:Christopher Cross.png
- File:Joey Molland.png
- File:Mike Nesmith.png
- File:Tony Kaye.png
- File:Steve Howe.png
- File:Alan White.png
- File:Geoff Downes.png
- File:Billy Sherwood.png
- File:Lou Pardini.jpg
- File:Robert Lamn.jpg
- File:James Pankow - Chicago.jpg
- File:Dave Amato.jpg
- File:Bruce Hall (REO).jpg
- File:Keith Howland (Chicago).jpg
- File:REO Drummer.jpg
- File:Kevin Cronin.jpg
- File:Lee Louch, Chicago.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:48, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; flickrwashing. --Gbawden (talk) 13:18, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Grupo Empresarial de la Industria Química (talk · contribs)
[edit]http://www.geiq.cu/?q=galeria/directivos
- File:Hildita-morales.jpg
- File:Marena123.jpg
- File:Vicepresidente-leonardo 0.jpg
- File:Vicepresidenta-lissette 0.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:54, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:17, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:'Maja Potosina' Took the best wall on the galley.jpg
- File:Portrait for id taken with my canon camera by my older brother the painting behing me is also my creation.jpg
- File:These are the siblings of Mr. Todd. Being the oldes a daughter then two sons.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:50, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; at least one was from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 13:17, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Linoleic acid has cis double bonds, not trans. Ed (Edgar181) 13:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom + low quality. Wostr (talk) 19:57, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- File:Ammonium linoleate.png looks like correct replacement? DMacks (talk) 02:19, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 16:50, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
in 1992 the Baltic countries were free&independent, fantasy diagram out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:57, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
An unused and uncategorised media. Test video? Estopedist1 (talk) 16:39, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- I believe that this was meant to go in a bug report that I never ended up writing. I can no longer reproduce the bug, so it should be safe to remove this file. Sebastian Berlin (WMSE) (talk) 07:43, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Не указан автор иконы и его разрешение на свободную лицензию. Dogad75 (talk) 16:46, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
L'ho caricata per errore Miori Michela (talk) 17:21, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
L'ho caricata per errore Miori Michela (talk) 17:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
copyright violation: no own work - taken from [1] ProfessorX (talk) 17:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
copyright violation: no own work - taken from [2] ProfessorX (talk) 17:49, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
copyright violation: no own work - taken from [3] ProfessorX (talk) 17:50, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
copyright violation: no own work - taken from [4] or similar page ProfessorX (talk) 17:51, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
pas l'usage dans Wikipedia 2A02:120B:2C7D:FAB0:843:AD95:7AAE:2C6A 18:16, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose: No rational reason for deletion is provided. There is no copyright violation, as the file was put on Commons by its author. The reason given « pas l’usage dans Wikipedia » is cryptic as it stands, and definitely would need further precisions. Sapphorain (talk) 22:00, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Keep No valid reason for deletion provided. Yann (talk) 13:46, 29 October 2019 (UTC)- Keep No valid reason for deletion provided. AnBuKu (talk) 16:20, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
actualité dépassée Charlotteandrewiki (talk) 12:20, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept. That's obviously false: the file is still used in multiple projects. Taivo (talk) 18:25, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
copyvio ? Cheep (talk) 18:23, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
copyvio ? Cheep (talk) 18:23, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation. Not the uploader's work, no evidence of permission. — Yerpo Eh? 19:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:40, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Likely selfie, not uploader's own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:52, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:39, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
I have learned this image is a private photo and not PD. Please remove it. Thank you Atwngirl (talk) 21:53, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:39, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Wrong copyright status. Source video is not under "CC". Sayrelis (talk) 22:54, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
This should be taken down or age restricted. This really isn't appropriate for minors and is pretty gross. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikechase3 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 28 October 2019 (UTC) (UTC)
- @Mikechase3: Actually Wikimedia wikis are not censored. I vote for it to be deleted since this is of very poor quality. I am not so sure about it's educational value though. Masum Reza📞 10:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment The files in Commons will not be deleted solely on the grounds that it may not be "child-friendly" or that it may cause offence to you or others, for moral, personal, religious, social, or other reasons. But quality is here quite bad, I tend to support deletion. Taivo (talk) 10:41, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
There is some minor on this page, we will upload the article soon with correct information. ShahidPr (talk) 13:18, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 10:43, 7 November 2019 UTC: G2: Broken redirect --Krdbot 13:48, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D graphic works in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:04, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D graphic works in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:04, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by User:Danielwreyes
[edit]Unused, uncategorised. Bad quality, duplicates, some without sound --Estopedist1 (talk) 07:48, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination by George Chernilevsky. Ruthven (msg) 08:06, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Source Dead before archiving or LR, please delete this. Per uploader request Eatcha (talk) 13:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:07, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Copy-pasted from https://rktt.ru/gallery
- File:Car1-1.jpg
- File:Car4-1-1.jpg
- File:Car4-1.jpg
- File:Car3-1.jpg
- File:Car2-1-2.jpg
- File:Car2-1-1.jpg
- File:Car2-1.jpg
- File:Car1-1-2.jpg
- File:Car1-1-1.jpg
- File:Car4-1-1 (1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Bilderling (talk) 15:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. Ruthven (msg) 08:07, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
copyright violation: no own work, taken from [5] ProfessorX (talk) 17:48, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Not a copyright violation at all! Just a duplicate of File:Quagga in enclosure.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 08:09, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
no metadata, slow resolution, it seems to be a copyvio, not an own work Ezarateesteban 22:49, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:09, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
https://www.sponichi.co.jp/entertainment/news/2019/05/06/jpeg/20190506s00041000253000p_view.jpg Déjà vu • ✉ 15:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as copyvio. Image is from this news story and shows no indication of being a free image. - Purplewowies (talk) 16:08, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:54, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Fictional flag. Sisuvia (talk) 15:39, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:54, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Looking at archives of the website, it seems extremely unlikely that Paramount released this image under attribution. Pbrks (talk) 14:12, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
fisctional diagram, fantasy party names, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:22, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:23, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, our of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:23, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Yougoslavia had broken with the USSR, fantasy diagram out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:39, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation: image taken from a community website. Farragutful (talk) 12:18, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:12, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work 4ing (talk) 13:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Images of the imperial family are not commons-compatible. See http://www.kunaicho.go.jp/copyright/rule.html. We've had this before at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Japanese Emperor 2016.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emperor Naruhito and Empress Masako 02.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emperor Akihito official.png, etc. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emperor Naruhito on October 22, 2019.jpg for reason.--Momiji-Penguin (talk) 05:25, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:09, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
this is trash 66.203.31.133 14:02, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Can you be a lot more specific as to why this useful and legitimate image is "trash" and has been nominated for deletion? --Olegkagan (talk) 14:57, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Author=unknown -> invalid licence Magnus (talk) 14:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
appears to be exact duplicate of File:WSIS Forum 2013 - HL Dialogue No 1, Women’s Empowerment in the Information Society Systemic, Scalable Strategies E F Passive A (8738550448).jpg (same dimensions, same file size). Before deletion, the description texts of both files should be joined. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:34, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- delete away, system usually flags duplicates when loading but obvs not this time Victuallers (talk) 11:37, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: but deleted and redirected the other one as the younger copy. --JuTa 06:42, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Stanislaw Zarnecki (d. 1956), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:12, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Corcorazon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Newspaper scans: copyrighted.
- File:Martha huatay la republica genocidio 1985.jpg
- File:Martha huatay revista cambio.jpg
- File:Martha huatay con familiares.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:32, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:40, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry Space00010 (talk) 06:11, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment @Space00010: That is not a valid reason for deleting an image.--Boothsift 06:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: poor deletion rationale. --Strakhov (talk) 08:04, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
,_01.jpg){kind=link}
,_01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Because it is Other Space00010 (talk) 07:07, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
,_01.jpg){kind=link}
- @Space00010: Any link explaining what Other is? Powermelon (talk) 07:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I see no obvious problem; no specific reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:51, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Infrogmation. --Strakhov (talk) 08:06, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
,_01.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D artwork in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 04:42, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:56, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free object A1Cafel (talk) 05:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:57, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Images from Chemical Principles
[edit]These are all from Chemical Principles, which declares its license as NC and possibly also ND. See wikibooks:User_talk:Elo_1219 for prior discussion involving the original uploader (the images here were all imported from wikibooks) demonstrating that there is no evidence of a more-liberal license, and also Special:Contributions/Elo_1219 where other of this uploader's images have been deleted from commons for the same reason. Further many of the images do not have a proper attribution chain: they only cite the wikibooks upload as source, not the actual book from which they were taken (== license-holder).
- File:Chemical Principles Equ 5.1.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 1-4.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 1.1.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 1.2.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 3.1.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 3.10.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 3.11.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 3.12.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 3.13.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 3.14.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 3.15.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 3.16.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 3.17.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 3.18.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 3.19.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 3.2.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 3.3.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 3.4.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 3.5.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 3.6.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 3.7.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 3.8.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 3.9.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 4.1.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 4.2.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 4.3.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 4.4.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 4.5.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 5.1.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 5.2.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 5.3.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 5.4.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 5.5.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 5.6.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 5.7.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 5.8.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 6.1.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 6.2.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 6.3.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 6.4.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 6.5.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig 6.6.png
- File:Chemical Principles Fig2-1.jpg
- File:Chemical Principles Pic 5.1.png
- File:Chemical Principles Table 3.2.png
- File:Chemical Principles Table 4.1.png
- File:Chemical Principles Table 5.3.png
- File:Chemical Principles Table 5.4.png
- File:Chemical Principles Table 5.5.png
- File:Chemical Principles Table 5.7.png
- File:Chemical Principles Table 6.1.png
- File:Chemical Principles Table 6.2.png
- File:Chemical Principles Table 6.3.png
- File:Chemical Principles Table 6.4.png
DMacks (talk) 05:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Violation COM:FOP Ukraine rule. Maxinvestigator (talk) 02:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:20, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Low resolution professional quality artistic photo, that the uploader is unsure of the year it was taken; honestly I doubt it is uploader's own work. GRuban (talk) 02:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
I confirm. I have the rights of this picture. It's a scan from an argentic original Yves33000 (talk (discussion • contributions) 13:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: In that case the photographer of the original, or his heirs, owns the copyright and in order to restore it here, either he or his heirs must send a free license using OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:22, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
File comes from Facebook, not from official website of the Municipalidad de Rosario. CFU license is not applicable A1Cafel (talk) 05:42, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:32, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. This looks like a screenshot of a page and the uploader likely captured it. The image and the texts are likely copyrignted. I am not convinced that this is not out of our project scope. Masum Reza📞 06:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
I am the writer of this file which is a PDF file not a screenshot capture. The subject is my brother, and all the facts and references will be added if there isnt enough there already. Thank you for the concern and care. --Nature Finch (talk) 18:05, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: We do not keep PDFs in this form. If the subject fits within the notability criteria of WP, then the text should be created as a WP page and the photo uploaded here seperately. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:36, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
And:
Isn't own work, might be PD Vera (talk) 06:52, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:38, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted by Ruptly (Special:Diff/371509898) Hanooz 07:07, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: I don't think they are the same video. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:46, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
The drone footage is courtesy of Ruptly, not released under CC-BY 4.0 Gyrostat (talk) 17:46, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Obviously the videos are identical. --mikani (to talk) 08:01, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Similar but not identical -- there is more than one drone in the world. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:32, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: I totally disagree with this conclusion. The drone images have the same movements, same angles of view. It’s a bad decision to allow this copyright infringing video to be on Commons. -mikani (to talk) 16:24, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- I watched the two videos side by side on two screens. I just watched them again. There was perhaps ten seconds when the two viewpoints were similar. The rest was completely different. I also find it hard to believe that Tasnim pirated video and spent the time and effort necessary to remove the watermark. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:06, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- Well they could have bought it, as is a commons practise for TV network. The Guardian did the same, and credited Ruptly ; so did Global News, also crediting Ruply. This is the same video, by the way.
- Furthermore, it looks like a violation of the Tasnim licence anyway, per the licence template: "Per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license." Gyrostat (talk) 18:14, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- I watched the two videos side by side on two screens. I just watched them again. There was perhaps ten seconds when the two viewpoints were similar. The rest was completely different. I also find it hard to believe that Tasnim pirated video and spent the time and effort necessary to remove the watermark. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:06, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- The mentioned sequences are obviously the same. Even the artifacts on the camera lens are recognizable and identical ! The observations by Gyrostat were relevant. They should have been adressed, not deleted. Also, the file does not meet the condition for the Tasnim license tag, which is to be credited explicitly to the name of a photographer from Tasnim. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:04, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: I never said that Tasnim had hacked the video. I am a French journalist who works in a large news channel. The only images shot this way and on that date, we were shot by Ruptly who sold them to all the media. The copyright infringement is against Ruptly, not Tasnim if the video was purchased from Ruptly, they have the right to use it, not us. In addition, Gyrostat was kind enough to detail the movements of cameras which are identical, the positioning. --mikani (to talk) 06:43, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: Could we have a return with all its evidences? --mikani (to talk) 09:26, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Two things -- first, you keep talking about how the two videos are identical, but they are not. Viewed side by side there is only about ten seconds of material that might be from the same drone. But, leaving that question aside, the one is tagged with {{Tasnim}} and has the watermark necessary for that tag. You are therefore suggesting that Tasnim has freely licensed something that they don't have the right to freely license. Maybe so, but is that our problem? We certainly don't accept license laundering from individuals, but when a major news agency freely licenses a work, I think we can accept that they know what they are doing. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: I am very shocked by this answer. Yes, this is our problem if a video does not have the correct license. It is our responsibility only to clean up the media which should not be on commons. It is the responsibility of administrators when they are informed that content infringes a copyright to remove it. --mikani (to talk) 13:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- "Shocked" -- Really? We rely all the time on professional sources to correctly license the works they post. You don't know that this is a copyvio -- you are assuming that Tasnim did not have the right to freely license it. I am assuming, as we do all the time, that our professional source understands copyright and has correctly licensed the image. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- We do not claim that Tasnim did not have the right to freely license this video. {{Tasnim}} explains that the work of Tasnim is freely licensed and that other sources reused by Tasnim don't belong in a Tasnim license ; the same way that VOA files are in the public domain, but not AP or Reuters pictures that VOA might reuse {{PD-USGov-VOA}}). The problem is not Tasnim wrongly licensing the file, but Commons assuming that this was Tasnim work when Tasnim used another source. {{Tasnim}} clearly states that an agency photographer must be attributed, not simply the agency. We have no such credit here. Gyrostat (talk) 14:36, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- To be clear, Tasnim cannot freely license a video that does not belong to it. In this case, the video belongs to Ruptly, with several users, we demonstrate it by comparing the plans, the sequences, the camera movements. So Tasnim cannot freely license this video which belongs to Ruptly. So we have to delete this file which does not respect the commons licenses because it is a file under copyright by Ruptly. --mikani (to talk) 14:43, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- I am able to tell you that the passage of the video inside the cathedral, the zoom out, are images of the BFM television channel. These images are also exclusive. It is possible to consult them at this address if you have an AFP account: http://u.afp.com/3YPd --mikani (to talk) 14:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- To be clear, Tasnim cannot freely license a video that does not belong to it. In this case, the video belongs to Ruptly, with several users, we demonstrate it by comparing the plans, the sequences, the camera movements. So Tasnim cannot freely license this video which belongs to Ruptly. So we have to delete this file which does not respect the commons licenses because it is a file under copyright by Ruptly. --mikani (to talk) 14:43, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- We do not claim that Tasnim did not have the right to freely license this video. {{Tasnim}} explains that the work of Tasnim is freely licensed and that other sources reused by Tasnim don't belong in a Tasnim license ; the same way that VOA files are in the public domain, but not AP or Reuters pictures that VOA might reuse {{PD-USGov-VOA}}). The problem is not Tasnim wrongly licensing the file, but Commons assuming that this was Tasnim work when Tasnim used another source. {{Tasnim}} clearly states that an agency photographer must be attributed, not simply the agency. We have no such credit here. Gyrostat (talk) 14:36, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- "Shocked" -- Really? We rely all the time on professional sources to correctly license the works they post. You don't know that this is a copyvio -- you are assuming that Tasnim did not have the right to freely license it. I am assuming, as we do all the time, that our professional source understands copyright and has correctly licensed the image. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: I am very shocked by this answer. Yes, this is our problem if a video does not have the correct license. It is our responsibility only to clean up the media which should not be on commons. It is the responsibility of administrators when they are informed that content infringes a copyright to remove it. --mikani (to talk) 13:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Two things -- first, you keep talking about how the two videos are identical, but they are not. Viewed side by side there is only about ten seconds of material that might be from the same drone. But, leaving that question aside, the one is tagged with {{Tasnim}} and has the watermark necessary for that tag. You are therefore suggesting that Tasnim has freely licensed something that they don't have the right to freely license. Maybe so, but is that our problem? We certainly don't accept license laundering from individuals, but when a major news agency freely licenses a work, I think we can accept that they know what they are doing. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: Could we have a return with all its evidences? --mikani (to talk) 09:26, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: I never said that Tasnim had hacked the video. I am a French journalist who works in a large news channel. The only images shot this way and on that date, we were shot by Ruptly who sold them to all the media. The copyright infringement is against Ruptly, not Tasnim if the video was purchased from Ruptly, they have the right to use it, not us. In addition, Gyrostat was kind enough to detail the movements of cameras which are identical, the positioning. --mikani (to talk) 06:43, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
I don't see any evidence that Ted Stryk is the copyright owner of an image from a 1975 Soviet spacecraft photo Kees08 (talk) 07:17, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
It probably isn't fair to say that Ted Stryk owns the copyright of an image from a 1975 Soviet spacecraft photo, but it probably also isn't fair to say that the image in question is the same image sent by the spacecraft. The original "images" sent by the lander to the orbiter and from the orbiter to the Earth look very different. In order to be made to look like the image here, the original transmissions must be processed to remove visible calibration and noise signals. Anyways, no, it's reasonable to suspect that Ted doesn't own the copyright for the original photo from the Soviet lander, but yes, it's possible he owns this processed version because he processed it himself.
It does explicitly state, on Ted's page (https://www.planetary.org/connect/our-experts/profiles/ted-stryk.html) on the website hosting the image that, "Please note that since the processed images are copyrighted, they should not be reused without permission." I wonder if permission to use Ted's image has been granted by Ted?
A little more depth on the original Soviet images can be found here: http://mentallandscape.com/C_CatalogVenus.htm — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 97.79.137.34 (talk) 22:06, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - I doubt that there is any copyright here at all. The original images were taken by an automatic camera, therefore have no copyright. Removal of calibration and noise does not genereate a new copyrihgt. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:49, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for indoor works in Brazil A1Cafel (talk) 07:52, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:50, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Photo of painting, need permission from artist or details about PD eligibility Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:50, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Considering the history of this uploader, this image is very unlikely own work. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:54, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:51, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
The Little Mermaid is still protected by copyright. No FOP in Denmark Pugilist (talk) 08:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:51, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
following connectivity problems (third world internet provision here in England) I have now uploaded a similar image with a different name. Charles01 (talk) 09:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Versione obsoleta, sono già state inserite altre immagini più nuove rispetto a questa e non è utilizzata in nessuna pagina. L'immagine era stata inserita da me. Grazie Simonemb (talk) 09:51, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Extremely low quality image and in unsuitable pdf-format. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:18, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, file is in use on Albanian Wikipedia, if you believe it should not be, take it to the talk page there. -Pete F (talk) 02:08, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
useless in this form – personality rights Albinfo (talk) 10:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per previous - very bad quality image, but is in use. What is the "personality rights" concern and why would that be a reason for deletion in this case? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:56, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- The way it is used, it should be an image file, not a PDF. Anyhow, in my opinion it's not really adding value to the article. I'll ask an Albanian admin regarding this.
- The quality is so bad, you can't recognize anything even in the PDF. Again: no value.
- Regarding personality rights: Don't think we need to show somebofy here just because they are descendants of a earlier prominent family. --Albinfo (talk) 13:51, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ok. If there is consensus for it not to be used there (not just unilateral removal) I have no objection to deletion. If consensus there is that it is useful for the article, should be kept. Please let us know what if any discussion is there. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- An Admin of the Albanian Wikipedia removed the file from the article: [6]. --Albinfo (talk) 07:12, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ok. If there is consensus for it not to be used there (not just unilateral removal) I have no objection to deletion. If consensus there is that it is useful for the article, should be kept. Please let us know what if any discussion is there. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - we do not keep PDFs of images. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:53, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation.
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion. Image claimed as own work by uploader, but file contain Facebook/Instagram code in EXIF data. Didn't find it via Google. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:44, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Clearly a facebook image, which we cannot keep. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:54, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, contemporary artwork, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
I dispute this deletion request since I uploaded the image on the artist's request and he wants to share this image and his work under the attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0). Perhaps this Creative Commons licence is not valid in Germany but that does not warrant deletion of the file since the file is not used on any German Wikipedia page. --Vincentvandermarck (talk) 12:51, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - In order to restore the image to Commons, March Bauer himself must send a free license using OTRS.. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:56, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS free license now present. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:39, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
According to EXIF, the image might be taken from Facebook. Gikü (talk) 13:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:56, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Because I uploaded this by accident, and the description is wrong. Mont.jeff (talk) 14:09, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete probable copyvio, as this file comes from a "family crest" bucket shop".Kathisma (talk) 01:48, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:56, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
From exif can judge that the original source of the image is facebook, which may not be the uploader’s own work. Catherine Laurence discussion 15:04, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:56, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos and publication. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:57, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
A collection of non-free logos does not comply with COM:FAIRUSE. Kinu (talk) 19:16, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- As long as it is just the letter logos it is fair use. --Wikideas1 (talk) 21:16, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - there can be no copyright on an all type logo in the USA. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:59, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: старое фото, фотограф, скорее всего неизвестен, оцифровано в нае время. Необходимо обращение в OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 19:17, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:59, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 19:32, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:59, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
The image is stolen from the internet. There are several news sources for this image (https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/inx-media-case-3-member-ed-team-reaches-tihar-to-grill-p-chidambaram/articleshow/71607873.cms). Request to permanently delete this image as this image does not belong to the person who uploaded the picture into Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The owner has noi prior record of taking celebrity or any known quality pictures. The image has extremely low density and cannot be seen properly when enlarged. The image is being used to malign the person who is shown in image in their Wikipedia article. PLease delete this stolen image. Thanks, Mark 49.36.142.34 19:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:02, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Андрей_Костин Dogad75 (talk) 19:39, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - this is a very differerent file. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:04, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
The copyright threshold in Hong Kong is very low (see COM:TOO Hong Kong), so this image may infringe copyright. Catherine Laurence discussion 15:08, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
The copyright threshold in Hong Kong is very low (see COM:TOO Hong Kong), so this image may infringe copyright. Catherine Laurence discussion 15:09, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Replaced by File:1848-1849 - Aral Sea - Shevchenko Butakoff Maksheyev = e-book.pdf Kozak Nevada (talk) 15:57, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:05, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
not own work, property of the goverment of Paraguay, http://www.diputados.gov.py/ww5/index.php/noticias/creacion-de-ministerio-de-familia-fue-declarada-de-interes-nacional?ccm_paging_p=162 I'm unsure if pictures taken by the goverment fall under PD in Paraguay so i'm nominating it for deletion instead of copyvio CodeLyokotalk 19:40, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused Fake SVG duplicate of File:Emblem of India (sketch).png. As the image is a sketch/drawing, it would be near impossible for a good SVG of this image to be created Thespoondragon (talk) 21:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:07, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Scottceneje (talk · contribs)
[edit]Watermarked images. Permission from photographers Daniel BamiLoye and Daniel Oyetoro needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:D'Banj Performing at the Flytime Music Festival.jpg
- File:Rhythm Performance.jpg
- File:Rhythm Unplugged.jpg
- File:Burna Singing at Rhythm.jpg
- File:A performance at one of the Rhythm Unplugged.jpg
- File:Cecil Birthday Party.jpg
- File:Burna Boy at Rhythm.jpg
- File:Rhythm unplugged logo.jpg
- File:MYKE IKOKU AND CHILDREN.jpg
- File:Myke.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:06, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- (transfered) Hello. The images are property of flytime entertainment and i received full write to use them before publishing the articles. Scottceneje (talk) 06:03, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:33, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Scottceneje (talk · contribs)
[edit]Two different photographers for a own work claim, too many different cameras.
- File:PRU Red Carpet.jpg
- File:Hammond and Wyclef Jean.jpg
- File:Otedola at the Rhythm Unplugged Red Carpet.jpg
- File:Mr Hammond.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:09, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:08, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Uploaded under a CC-SA-3.0 license - but the only source listed is Google searches, and appears to be a low quality scan from a book or magazine. As we don't know the source or where it was first published, we don't know whether copyright in the photo has expired or not. Nigel Ish (talk) 23:22, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:11, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
File:58 Струнный квартет МХАТ в составе - Леонарда Бруштейн, Андрей Костин, Геннадий Садовник, Александр Смирнов.jpg
[edit]
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: старое фото, указанные автор снимка и персона на фото-одно лицо. Необходимо обращение в OTRS. Смотрите также https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Андрей_Костин Dogad75 (talk) 19:42, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:55, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Нет разрешение автора фото или правообладателя. Фотограф и персона-одно и тоже лицо. Необходимо обращение в OTRS. Dogad75 (talk) 19:51, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:01, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото встречается в Интернете до загрузки до Викисклада http://free-view.org/2016/06/18/bulat/ . Необходимо обращение в OTRS. Dogad75 (talk) 19:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:03, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
The file is claimed as "own work" by the uploader but I suspect they haven’t understood our rules. Did the uploader take the photo in 1966 or did they find it in 2019? Green Giant (talk) 20:07, 28 October 2019 (UTC) Это фото из семейного архива, выполнено в 1966, загружено в 2019 году, хозяин фотографии - автор. WarDoc — Preceding unsigned comment added by WarDoc46 (talk • contribs) 05:22, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:04, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
not cc-by, see source shizhao (talk) 01:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: procedural close in favor of the other DR. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:26, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anahit (Alda) Grigoryan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Original research by the uploader.
- File:Musp06.jpg
- File:Musp05.jpg
- File:Musp04.jpg
- File:Musp03.jpg
- File:Musp02.jpg
- File:Musp01.jpg
- File:Мп2.jpg
- File:Мп1.jpg
- File:Acoustic 1.png
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:27, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEobgdEtin_kO2BsTNJ0TwA
[edit]All video and pics not cc-by from [7]
- File:バレッタ裕、村上喜紀、五十嵐雅 出演！『ぬまてれ☆』第６回【numan】.webm
- File:(前編)バレッタ裕、五十嵐巧巳、五十嵐雅出演！「ぬまてれ☆」第7回【numan】.webm
- File:(後編)バレッタ裕、五十嵐巧巳、五十嵐雅出演！「ぬまてれ☆」第7回【numan】.webm
- File:大崎捺希さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第20回－.webm
- File:木島隆一さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－声優編第16回－.webm
- File:【numan】『映画刀剣乱舞』廣瀬智紀さん（鶯丸役）キャストコメント.webm
- File:【numan】『映画刀剣乱舞』岩永洋昭さん（日本号役）キャストコメント.webm
- File:『ぬまてれ☆～キミのハートにダイレクトマーケティング～』第2回｜出演：村上喜紀、五十嵐巧巳、五十嵐雅【numan】.webm
- File:櫻井圭登さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第34回－.webm
- File:深町寿成さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－声優編第15回－.webm
- File:汐谷文康さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－声優編第24回－.webm
- File:輝馬さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第17回－.webm
- File:星乃勇太さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第16回－.webm
- File:【numan】『映画刀剣乱舞』定本楓馬さん（骨喰藤四郎役）キャストコメント.webm
- File:渡辺紘さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－声優編第27回－.webm
- File:高塚智人さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－声優編第23回－.webm
- File:永塚拓馬さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－声優編第28回－.webm
- File:飯山裕太さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第22回－.webm
- File:河本啓佑さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－声優編第18回－.webm
- File:長江崚行さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第27回－.webm
- File:川上将大さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第19回－.webm
- File:石井孝英さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－声優編第25回－.webm
- File:伊崎龍次郎さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第21回－.webm
- File:北川尚弥さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第30回－.webm
- File:財木琢磨さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第24回－.webm
- File:(前編)バレッタ裕、五十嵐巧巳、五十嵐雅出演！「ぬまてれ☆」第8回【numan】.webm
- File:多和田秀弥さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第18回－.webm
- File:天﨑 滉平さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－声優編第20回－.webm
- File:田村心さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第28回－.webm
- File:菊池勇成さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－声優編第22回－.webm
- File:中島ヨシキさん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－声優編第17回－.webm
- File:【numan】赤羽根健治さんスペシャル動画｜『イケメン戦国』猿飛佐助、本編配信決定記念！.webm
- File:坂垣怜次さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第26回－.webm
- File:木津つばささん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第32回－.webm
- File:野津山 幸宏さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－声優編第21回－.webm
- File:高橋健介さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第23回－.webm
- File:木島隆一・ 帆世雄一・五十嵐雅出演！『ぬまてれ☆～キミのハートにダイレクトマーケティング～』第3回【numan】.webm
- File:市川太一さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－声優編第29回－.webm
- File:(後編)バレッタ裕、五十嵐巧巳、五十嵐雅出演！「ぬまてれ☆」第8回【numan】.webm
- File:帆世雄一､木島隆一､五十嵐雅(MC)出演！9-8開催numanイベントvol.1『ようこそnuman編集部へ！』告知動画.webm
- File:『ぬまてれ☆～キミのハートにダイレクトマーケティング～』第1回｜出演：村上喜紀、五十嵐巧巳、五十嵐雅【numan】.webm
- File:谷水力さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第33回－.webm
- File:【numan】ヒプノシスマイク独占コメント｜駒田航さん（入間銃兎役）＆神尾晋一郎さん（毒島メイソン理鶯役）.webm
- File:保住有哉さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－声優編第30回－.webm
- File:(前編)バレッタ裕、村上喜紀、五十嵐雅出演！「ぬまてれ☆」第5回【numan】.webm
- File:(後編)バレッタ裕、村上喜紀、五十嵐雅出演！「ぬまてれ☆」第5回【numan】.webm
- File:木島隆一、帆世雄一、五十嵐雅 出演！『ぬまてれ☆』第4回【numan】.webm
- File:影山達也さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第31回－.webm
- File:木島隆一、五十嵐巧巳、五十嵐雅出演！「ぬまてれ☆」第9回前編【numan】.webm
- File:木島隆一、五十嵐巧巳、五十嵐雅出演！「ぬまてれ☆」第10回前編【numan】.webm
- File:木島隆一、五十嵐巧巳、五十嵐雅出演！「ぬまてれ☆」第10回後編【numan】.webm
- File:帆世雄一、村上喜紀、五十嵐雅出演！「ぬまてれ☆」第12回前編【numan】.webm
- File:帆世雄一、村上喜紀、五十嵐雅出演！「ぬまてれ☆」第11回前編【numan】.webm
- File:石原壮馬さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第29回－.webm
- File:木島隆一、五十嵐巧巳、五十嵐雅出演！「ぬまてれ☆」第9回後編【numan】.webm
- File:第11回後編│帆世雄一、村上喜紀、五十嵐雅出演！「ぬまてれ☆」【numan】.webm
- File:村上喜紀、帆世雄一、五十嵐巧巳、木島隆一、バレッタ裕出演！「ぬまてれ☆特別編！Bistro沼ッス」【numan】.webm
- File:太田将熙さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第25回－.webm
shizhao (talk) 02:00, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep All were archived on archive.today. Creative Commons is irrevocable. File:『ぬまてれ☆～キミのハートにダイレクトマーケティング～』第2回｜出演：村上喜紀、五十嵐巧巳、五十嵐雅【numan】.webm is also archived on archive.org, double confirming the license. Pinging @4nn1l2, GRuban. You may need to look at the HTML. See COM:WHERE LICENSE#YouTube. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:16, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep please also see the pages: http:archive.md/hI77M(archive source page), http:imgur.com/a/BD4SUXu (html code of the page) they are source/license infomations of the file File:太田将熙さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第25回－.webm, it has been erroneously speedy-deleted by Túrelio. other files also Keep Puramyun31 (talk) 10:50, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep some. I can confirm that the Archive.org and Archive.md links given by Alexis Jazz and Puramyun31 do have "creative_commons" in the HTML source, which YouTube videos that were not creative commons licensed do not. So at least those should be kept. Unfortunately, at least a few of the others I checked in the above list weren't archived before 2019, and for those I can't find that license. So it looks like that YouTube channel changed the license sometime after July 2018 but before June 2019; I'm not sure whether we can keep the ones that we can't find archive links for. Commons:License review is a good thing. --GRuban (talk) 15:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- @GRuban: which ones were not archived? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:31, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Well, for example, the last one. File:太田将熙さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第25回－.webm, it doesn't have anything saved on archive.org, or any links to other archives with saved versions. I clicked a few others at random with mixed results; unfortunately, since Japanese is Greek to me er; I mean; um ..., none were particularly memorable, so I don't know which were good and bad, but there were some of each. --GRuban (talk) 19:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- @GRuban: The example File:太田将熙さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第25回－.webm as you mentioned above has been answered already by me. I used another archive site,"archive.md (the domain has been changed "archive.fo", also uses 'archive.today") (not "archive.org") [http:archive.md/hI77M](archive source page), [http:imgur.com/a/BD4SUXu] (html code of the page) I will provide archived source/license info from another archive site as soon as possible. Puramyun31 (talk) 10:34, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- @GRuban and Puramyun31: They should all have links now to search both archive.org and archive.today. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:14, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- Almost Keep Now all of the videos have source and license info archived pages/"Creative Commons Attribution" HTML code screenshots (see "source" section of the video descriptions), except File:星乃勇太さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第16回－.webm, the video does not have the archived version which is archived before the license changing Puramyun31 (talk) 11:52, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- Almost
- @GRuban and Puramyun31: They should all have links now to search both archive.org and archive.today. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:14, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- @GRuban: The example File:太田将熙さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第25回－.webm as you mentioned above has been answered already by me. I used another archive site,"archive.md (the domain has been changed "archive.fo", also uses 'archive.today") (not "archive.org") [http:archive.md/hI77M](archive source page), [http:imgur.com/a/BD4SUXu] (html code of the page) I will provide archived source/license info from another archive site as soon as possible. Puramyun31 (talk) 10:34, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- Well, for example, the last one. File:太田将熙さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前！－俳優編第25回－.webm, it doesn't have anything saved on archive.org, or any links to other archives with saved versions. I clicked a few others at random with mixed results; unfortunately, since Japanese is Greek to me er; I mean; um ..., none were particularly memorable, so I don't know which were good and bad, but there were some of each. --GRuban (talk) 19:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- @GRuban: which ones were not archived? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:31, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: I have kept all files for now per the discussion. That said, these files still need license reviews. Please renominate files where a valid license can not be found in the archives. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:46, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Topic categories should be not added through templates. ŠJů (talk) 23:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
See Commons:Categories#Major categories: "Topical categories shouldn't be included through templates". --ŠJů (talk) 00:05, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Topical categories can be inserted but only if they are present in the template code. This way instead is cumbersome to change them because they are written as field in the deployed template for each category where it is inserted. That apart, is an useless template. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:59, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- The template is currently still in use. We need to replace its uses before we can remove the template. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: I agree with the deletion in principle, but the template is still in use and deleting it at this point would be harmful. Please renominate if no uses are left. Maybe Commons:Bots/Work requests can help?. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:43, 12 January 2020 (UTC)