Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/09/14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 14th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope + personal pages QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 05:55, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 09:34, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope + promotional links QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 05:59, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily: Spam. --Achim (talk) 09:19, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect chemical reaction equation; the reactant/educt is exactly the same as the product. Already corrected by File:Methylhydrochinone Synthesis V4.svg by the same author. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 09:16, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:16, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other Beliag29 (talk) 08:04, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Moheen at 09:20, 14 September 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 13:17, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahesa bayu suryosubroto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably fair use images

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:17, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted assorted DW/Copyviols, orphan & uncat for more than a year. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:32, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Problem when the file was imported. Ganímedes (talk) 11:14, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted glitch/failed upload. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:27, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio - no permission Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 12:56, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Derivative work; no indication the album cover photographed is out of copyright. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:25, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This house is my private property. The person who took the picture of the house did not ask permission to enter the premesis or if they were allowed to put the pictures online. Futhermore, this house is not part of the "Holzersmühle" described in the article. It is a 33 year old building next to it, which has no historic relevance. I demand immediate deletion of this picture. Claravioletta (talk) 17:08, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Follow up Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gemünden (Eifel); Holzersmühle a.jpg. --Achim (talk) 20:27, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no FoP. --Achim (talk) 21:28, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This house is my private property. The person who took the picture of the house did not ask permission to enter the premesis or if they were allowed to put the pictures online. Futhermore, this house is not part of the "Holzersmühle" described in the article. It is a 33 year old building next to it, which has no historic relevance. I demand immediate deletion of this picture. Claravioletta (talk) 17:11, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Follow up Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gemünden (Eifel); Holzersmühle a.jpg. --Achim (talk) 20:28, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no FoP. --Achim (talk) 21:25, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This house is my private property. The person who took the picture of the house did not ask permission to enter the premesis or if they were allowed to put the pictures online. Futhermore, this house is not part of the "Holzersmühle" described in the article. It is a 33 year old building next to it, which has no historic relevance. I demand immediate deletion of this picture. Claravioletta (talk) 17:11, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Follow up Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gemünden (Eifel); Holzersmühle a.jpg. --Achim (talk) 20:27, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no FoP. --Achim (talk) 21:26, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This house is my private property. The person who took the picture of the house did not ask permission to enter the premesis or if they were allowed to put the pictures online. Futhermore, this house is not part of the "Holzersmühle" described in the article. It is a 33 year old building next to it, which has no historic relevance. I demand immediate deletion of this picture. Claravioletta (talk) 17:12, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Follow up Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gemünden (Eifel); Holzersmühle a.jpg. --Achim (talk) 20:29, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no FoP. --Achim (talk) 21:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This house is my private property. The person who took the picture of the house did not ask permission to enter the premesis or if they were allowed to put the pictures online. Futhermore, this house is not part of the "Holzersmühle" described in the article. It is a 33 year old building next to it, which has no historic relevance. I demand immediate deletion of this picture. Claravioletta (talk) 17:15, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Follow up Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gemünden (Eifel); Holzersmühle a.jpg. --Achim (talk) 20:29, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no FoP. --Achim (talk) 21:24, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This house is my private property. The person who took the picture of the house did not ask permission to enter the premesis or if they were allowed to put the pictures online. Futhermore, this house is not part of the "Holzersmühle" described in the article. It is a 33 year old building next to it, which has no historic relevance. I demand immediate deletion of this picture. Claravioletta (talk) 17:08, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Claravioletta, die Frage ist: Hat der Fotograf auf öffentlichem Grund und Boden (Straße, Gehweg) gestanden oder auf Privatgelände? --Achim (talk) 18:36, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Der Fotograf hat auf Privatgelände gestanden. Die Fotos sind von meiner privaten Wiese hinter dem Haus aus aufgenommen und aus meinem Innenhof der deutlich durch ein Tor und eine Einfahrt von der Straße abgegrenzt ist. Keines der verwendeten Fotos kann vom Blickwinkel her von öffentlichem Grund aus aufgenommen worden sein. Hinzu kommt, dass alle ausser einem Foto überhaupt nicht das bezeichnete Kulturdenkmal zeigen, sondern ein Wohnhaus von 1986, dass daneben steht.Claravioletta (talk) 19:39, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Claravioletta, danke für die Auskunft! Was dargestellt ist und ob fehlerhaft benannt, ist zunächst mal zweitrangig. Wenn die Fotos von Privatgelände aus aufgenommen wurden, dann werden sie gelöscht aufgrund der Regelungen von Panoramafreiheit und Hausrecht. Ich habe dem Fotografen eine E-Mail geschickt und warte nun auf Antwort. Gruß, --Achim (talk) 20:15, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The photographer apologizes for the mistaken representation of the Holzersmühlen building. The owner's daughter had given permission to take pictures. Of course, the pictures should be deleted at the request of the owner immediately.

Für die irrtümliche Darstellung des Holzersmühlen-Gebäudes entschuldigt sich der Fotograf. Die Tochter des Besitzers hatte mir am 03. August 2019 die Erlaubnis zum Fotografieren gegeben. Selbstverständlich sollten die Bilder auf Wunsch des Grundbesitzers unverzüglich gelöscht werden.--Colling-architektur (talk) 20:44, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Werner, thank you very much for agreeing with the deletion! So we can close this case. --Achim (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

.... the daughter was very nice. ;) --Colling-architektur (talk) 21:07, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

;) --Achim (talk) 21:32, 14 September 2019 (UTC) schade um die guten Fotos...[reply]

Deleted: per above, no FoP, uploader agrees. --Achim (talk) 21:33, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of compatible license on the video this and other screenshots were taken from. Funcrunch (talk) 18:26, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Speedy closing as the license is there see here. -- Darwin Ahoy! 22:23, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio: https://www.elysee.fr/emmanuel-macron Cheep (talk) 22:18, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#F1. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RAJESH DHAKA 2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low res, no metadata. Mostly are relatively small. Unlikely to be own work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:39, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:56, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RAJESH DHAKA 2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:22, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:56, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RAJESH DHAKA 2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:54, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:56, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amardeep Sahu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:34, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amardeep Sahu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 11:26, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. I have kept the 2 images in use on his user page on hi:wp per COM:INUSE. --BrightRaven (talk) 12:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amardeep Sahu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:33, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 12:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amardeep Sahu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unencyclopedic personal photos, out of scope

ManniLo (talk) 11:25, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:35, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amardeep Sahu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo. OOS.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:49, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:15, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:41, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep now used per User_talk:Estopedist1#Polarch_Profile.jpg--Estopedist1 (talk) 05:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, withdraw. -- User: Perhelion 10:43, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inserirò una foto migliore dello stesso luogo Bela Turner (talk) 06:32, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by JuTa at 18:47, 17 September 2019 UTC: No permission since 9 September 2019 --Krdbot 01:09, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Comando2019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://larepublica.pe/politica/868043-20-anos-de-la-operacion-chavin-de-huantar-revive-como-fue-el-rescate-fotos/EMPRESA/EMPRESA/

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:45, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Comando2019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Comando2019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low res images that do not have metadata. Unlikely to be own work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:30, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Comando2019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:41, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. COPYVIO. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:05, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Koolmubeen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo. OOS. File:Independence day (india) 2019.jpg from FB.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:33, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:05, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:27, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Infrogmation at 16:03, 20 September 2019 UTC: prank/insult image --Krdbot 19:03, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by پارس دیتا (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: promotional.

4nn1l2 (talk) 00:27, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + not in use. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:40, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by کمال نادری (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most of them are out of project scope: promotional. Some are personal files which cannot be hosted at Commons per COM:NOTHOST.

4nn1l2 (talk) 02:03, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:44, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. ~Moheen (keep talking) 07:03, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:45, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. ~Moheen (keep talking) 07:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:45, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. ~Moheen (keep talking) 07:37, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:46, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably fair use images

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:15, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above and not in use. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:48, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE unused personal image Lacrymocéphale (talk) 18:25, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:52, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:26, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:53, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is in use at IMDb and YouTube. An OTRS ticket is required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:11, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:52, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as no source (No source since) WolfmanSF (talk) 22:46, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. Please look again and you will find all the source info in the appropriate place, where it has been since the image was posted. WolfmanSF (talk) 22:54, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, when I checked, the source only displayed File:Saturn - HST 2019-06-20 full size.jpg. Might not have updated yet in my locale, it has now.--BevinKacon (talk) 11:19, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus license and bogus own work claim. If PD, proper licensing has to be provided. Jcb (talk) 23:57, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:50, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abdul Alaiwi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:52, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abdul Alaiwi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial geometric figures. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:51, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

def not own work, see https://www.freepik.es/foto-gratis/ordenador-portatil-escritorio-oficina_755831.htm Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:36, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also see the uploader's cross wiki activity. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:36, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:53, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:56, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request -I did not realise the license accompanying this image is not suitable for Wikipedia useHenryofh (talk) 15:03, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no file found. --Sealle (talk) 08:57, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Where this OTRS permission comes from? Are you an OTRS member? Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:18, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: Sorry I didn't know That non-OTRS uploaders were allowed to add an OTRS permission themselves. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:36, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: That is not allowed, but that is not what Shotgun pete did; what he did was add a template with OTRS permission baked-in. There are over a thousand such templates. Please don't nominate uses of any of them without good reason.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 20:55, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 09:01, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is 160.177.38.155 18:14, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

????--RomanM82 (talk) 17:56, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 08:58, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused so-called selfie, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:30, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:01, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 18:39, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:01, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyvio. Although google scan yielded no other copies, the photo still looks too professional for "own work" claim to be credible. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 02:28, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can't understand ”too professional”. I’m just professional of photo edition. That’s all.

Mikkabie (talk) 11:36, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for decision regarding this request.

Despite the fact that Japanese wikipedia article existed before, this file was made suddenly after her death. Although there is not exactly the same image, but the similar image can be seen on the web. For example, look at this. The uploader insists on own work, but there is no information about the shooting date and location, and it does not appear to have taken this photo, which is smaller than other works. Perhaps this file is a scan from the image she uploaded before death.--Y.haruo (talk) 10:57, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Y.haruo (talk) 10:57, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vanesa.66 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:43, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:28, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammad heena iqbal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST; Out of COM:SCOPE unused personal images.

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 08:17, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:28, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Davidfarly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, personal photos.

Ahmadtalk 11:16, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:28, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure; jagged & bad resolution. Have File:Structural formula of 1,2-epoxybutane.svg as high-quality vector replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 14:54, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom. Same orientation and same level of detail, so a simple drop-in replacement in higher graphical quality. CHEM-MOS blesses PNG, but even this one seems below that standard's resolution. DMacks (talk) 13:58, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:55, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 11:48, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:55, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 11:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chemical mistake (missing third bond to make the right-hand ring aromatic), fixed in File:Clavorubin V2.svg by same uploader. DMacks (talk) 03:31, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 12:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a scan from some unknown source, and many of the structural details are so small or poorly scanned it's hard to decipher. We have a bunch of Category:Taxanes, and if someone wanted some other specific one trivial to draw cleanly. DMacks (talk) 03:34, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 12:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Offensive 2.235.159.92 15:48, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Sono il ragazzo nella foto che sta legando, chiedo cortesemente che venga rimossa la foto per questioni legate al mio attuale lavoro. 151.75.158.203 15:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

not suitable, from my company they asked me to remove it because it is not very professional 151.75.158.203 15:21, 16 September 2019 (UTC) Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:26, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As User:Edgar181 notes, this structure has the appearance of an "Impossible chemical structure: neutral oxygen atom bond to three carbon atoms". I think I know what it meant, but this image is also generally small jpg and its use was only as an un-named compound example of a large class. I replaced it at ca:Anticancerígen with a high quality image. DMacks (talk) 03:39, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete I think DMacks is correct that the image is not inaccurate and that I've misinterpreted the diagram. But this is a perfect example of the hazards of low quality chemical structure images such as this one - they are simply too prone to misinterpretation. With the image no longer in use and per DMacks' additional reasoning, it should be deleted. Ed (Edgar181) 18:11, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment Just for kicks, I searched SciFinder for the key decipherable parts as best I could understand them, and came up with nothing. There are also several undefined stereocenters, and an unlikely cyclobutane ring as well. DMacks (talk) 05:42, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per nomination & discussion above! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 06:33, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:56, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mail at abc@microsoft.com 2001:4898:80E8:7:B6B8:22A9:44A0:D0D0 13:36, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:55, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-BY license not applicable to a 1994 photo of the late Barry White, taken originally by "Vince Bucci" and seen in a memorabilia photo. George Ho (talk) 00:24, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted DW by Flickr photographer. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:17, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Near Duplicate: Bisbee 053.jpg Gillfoto 01:19, 14 September 2019 (UTC)


Deleted per uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters. Not de minimis. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:50, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:21, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no name of photograph (contrubutor can be the photograph); no permission, no source Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:23, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recently uploaded PNG that is redundant to File:Pornhub-logo.svg (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:31, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, false license claim as well. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:24, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image Non Libre de Droit : Présente ici (lien direct ici) . Voir aussi les copyrights du site ici. Nonovian (talk) 15:06, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted false license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:24, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:09, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:26, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License only for Bollywood set, party, or event in India. Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:48, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:22, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото 1950 годов, автор, скорее всего, неизвестен. Необходимо обращение в OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 21:00, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ticket:2019091110006949. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:38, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото 1950 года, фотограф, скорее всего неизвестен. Необходимо обращение в OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 21:01, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ticket:2019091110006949. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:34, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото 1961 года, фотограф, скорее всего неизвестен. Необходимо обращение в OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 21:02, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ticket:2019091110006949. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:28, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото 1950 года, фотограф, скорее всего неизвестен. Необходимо обращение в OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 21:02, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ticket:2019091110006949. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:42, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pegulshi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: promotional.

4nn1l2 (talk) 00:31, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably fair use images

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:24, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:28, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused low quality photos. Better alternatives are available.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:28, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joseagush (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:28, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhaya31 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, permission needed

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:55, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:27, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:27, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:27, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:27, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by De Lisa Attilio Antonio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:08, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:26, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sachin.nayak902 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:20, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:26, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rastakwere (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images from different periods: unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:32, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:26, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rastakwere (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most have Author Jan Nyssen in Exif, needs OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:34, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rastakwere (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyvio. Three pictures of policeman Eric Snoeck. Uploader mentioned the sources of these: VRT, RTBF and policefederale.dot.be, each time with the annotation "Belgian government agency", implying that such work would be some kind of public domain. However, as this is the case for works made by United States government agencies, this does not apply for Belgian government agencies. VRT and RTBF are television stations, policefederale.dot.be is the Belgian federal police. The websites of these mention the (C) for copyright.

Henxter (talk) 09:40, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and user warned. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lucaflu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Inconsistent sizes, EXIF, some images unlikely to be own work. All most likely copyright violations.

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:09, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:26, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably fair use images

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:53, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not sure when artist died. possibly still under the +70 rule. --Gbawden (talk) 11:31, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Français : Œuvre récente d'un auteur possiblement pas dans le domaine public. Besoin de preuve de la date de décès de l'artiste. De plus, les informations (dates et licences) semblent incorrectes.
English: Recent artwork, author possibly not in the public domain. Needs evidence of the artist's death date. Moreover, the information (dates and licenses) seems wrong.

VIGNERON (talk) 14:38, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Peut être est ce un aspect de la date de décès du peintre que les cartels donnés par le musée?

Gérald Garitan (talk) 09:42, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - According to https://gw.geneanet.org/pierfit?lang=en&p=amaury&n=thierot he died in 1940, so these are PD in France, but not under the URAA. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:15, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rob315 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably fair use and useless images

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:56, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:30, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Beliag29 (talk) 08:05, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are many other blury pictures on wikimedia commons Bindydad123 (talk)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:29, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Movie still: copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:08, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:29, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Spstoychev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:03, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably fair use images

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:18, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably fair use images

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by CptViraj as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G2 - not eligible for speedy deletion via G2 - not implausible or broken Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:54, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New uploader; unlikely to be own work. 2001:2003:F418:6500:A103:3A96:CA8B:BD1F 15:54, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - I agree with the nominator. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 20:13, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 大诺史 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Uploader is long time contributor and image seems consistent with other contributions. Let's give this a regular DR. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:14, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would say permission is needed or AGF. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:15, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found this photo published on the website of the London School of Dramatic Art ([1]) and initially thought it was a copyright violation. However, the photo was uploaded to Commons in 2013, while the oldest version of the LSDA webpage I could find was from 2016 ([2]). Is this a possible backwards copy? I'd like to get some input from other editors. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 16:26, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright belongs to the photographer, not Robinson. It was uploaded by Creative1979 - we need OTRS to confirm that they are the photographer. --Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropping of non-permanent stuff installed in a public street. (Not Commons:De minimis, not Commons:Freedom of panorama). Strakhov (talk) 17:04, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-permanent stuff installed in a public street (or square). (Not Commons:De minimis, not Commons:Freedom of panorama). Unknown copyright status. Portraits should be blurried or cropped out. Strakhov (talk) 17:06, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, blurred and unused image A1Cafel (talk) 17:07, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, blurred and unused image A1Cafel (talk) 17:07, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE unused/spam image Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:25, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:52, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ken Kerbis after beating Guy Landau CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:03, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No free license on youtube. --Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

@Srittau: photographer is JULIA FULLERTON-BATTEN. Roy17 (talk) 21:51, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Taken from the Campari calendar. COM:LL. --Gbawden (talk) 11:19, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The exif indicates that this image is from facebook and may not be the uploader's own work. Catherine Laurence 00:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted character.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:23, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted poster A1Cafel (talk) 05:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope + promotional QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 06:01, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nixonporsiempre (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low res image without metadata. Unlikely to be own work. + 1 file is very small.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:29, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not clear if the uploader painted this painting or just took the picture. As such, the painting itself has an unknown artist and thus we can't tell the painting's license before we get to the picture. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:50, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. Copyrighted character.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:14, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. Copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:49, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:39, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:32, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 00:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS and COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:11, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:41, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:44, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:23, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - - FitIndia Talk 07:47, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality PDF wrapper around File:Franciszek Grzybowski ogłoszenie o otwarciu księgarni Czas nr 196 1862-08-27.jpg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:23, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This duplicates the built-in mediawiki functionality, and is probably no longer needed. It is only used around 500 times. Mike Peel (talk) 19:33, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Although, as noted, it is obsolete, its dletion will break several hundred category pages. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The temporary light installations at Hamburg port by artist Michael Batz are considered a work of art[3] and are, due to their temporary installation, not covered by Germany's freedom-of-panorama exception. Therefore, a permission by the artist is requried or the images need to be deleted.
Last week this case even reached the general public in Germany, as a number of users, who had uploaded such kind of images to Instagram or other social media were confronted with a request to pay a (very moderate) copyright-fee by the public agency, which manages the rights in these works.[4],[5],[6] According to press reports, the artist has now agreed to (automatically) permit non-commercial use of images from his installations [7]. This is, however, of no use for us, as per COM:L also commercial re-use must be permitted.-- Túrelio (talk) 09:44, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The same problem concerns all images in Category:Blue Port Hamburg:


#nothingmoretodo-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 02:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Habs oben hinzugefügt. --Túrelio (talk) 07:29, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but I disagree with this request, this light addition, in almost all this photos, seems to be just a illumination choice...
In some cases as: File:Chile House Hamburg (121595023).jpeg, we can simply transform in black white, or match the light sources, and there will be no difference at all.
I see as lack of originality to have a copyright issues, this is too simple to have a copyright status.
However, if we will delete the files presented here, we should also delete all files in this category: Category:Christmas lights in Germany, that in some cases, have an away more complex structure of light design than this.
-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 02:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Rodrigo, I didn't file this request out of pleasure. These illumination(s) are a sort of special case (well, not so special when you consider Category:Eiffel Tower at night), as it is — without doubt — considered a work of art and is the work of a publicly known artist. In addition, the artist has publicly claimed copyright in any images of his installations and, so far, I haven't found any refutation of his claim.
What actually needs to be discussed IMO for each of the listed images, is whether the depicted illumination 1) belongs indeed to a "blue port" installation (performed every 2nd year since 2008), and 2) is above de minimis. --Túrelio (talk) 07:01, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Túrelio, I understand that you don't want to do that, however he claiming could be analysed from our point of view.
And we can separate: the ones that could be deleted because the blue light is prominent, we can simply transform in b&w and delete the original from our system, or match the colour.
But again, the Christmas lights are far more complex, and I don't know how to proceed with we will delete this files. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 18:51, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but with File:2017-09-07 HS-Reise Blue-Port 2017 am Athabaskakai (2777).jpg I can see only a lack of originality. The form of the cranes is given, the "artist" did add some light bulbs to the arms of the cranes, finish. This isn't any more creative than mounting street lights in the middle of a street. --Matthiasb (talk) 11:14, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In Analogie zu diesem Urteil [8], das sich auf ein Werk mit Schöpfungshöhe bezieht, das immer nur kurz an einem öffentlichen Ort zu sehen ist, behaupte ich mal, dass ein Werk, dass sich für die gesamte Dauer seines (sehr kurzen) Bestehens an einem öffentlichen Ort befunden hat, und das für die gesamte Dauer seines Bestehens (also dauerhaft) dazu bestimmt war von Personen, die sich auf öffentlichem Grund befinden, begafft zu werden, und aufgrund seiner Größe kaum anders als öffentlich gezeigt werden kann, und dessen einzige Verwendungsmöglichkeit darin besteht, öffentlich gezeigt zu werden, unter FoP in Germany fällt. (ich finde auch nicht, dass es auf Instagram irgendeine "nicht-kommerzielle" Nutzung geben kann. Alle Bilder, die auf Instagram hochgeladen werden, dienen dem Zweck, dass Facebook, die Firma, die Instagram besitzt, durch die Ptäsentation dieser Bilder Gewinne erzielt. Egal wieviel Geld Zuckerberg spendet, Facebook ist eine gewinnorientierte Firma und nicht gemeinnützig.) --C.Suthorn (talk) 16:08, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, but some  kept. I use my own experience to decide, which photos are de minimis and which are not. The cranes were deleted, because they were not fully lighted and deciding, which parts of cranes to light and which not to is artistic decision. Taivo (talk) 14:56, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no qualifying images possible, as the lightmen request copyright --Bahnmoeller (Diskussion) 15:52, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

The issue is being dealt with here. Kind regards, Grueslayer (talk) 14:36, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:20, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism Broop (talk) 21:34, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 20:22, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Psychologist Guy as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: This is not an American illustration from before 1924. It is modern artwork, therefore violation of copyright. The source listed is "cryptid.ru" a Russian website, but no specific link is given. The same image is modern and found on various websites https://www.beebeebox.co.za/bears-in-africa/ , this is very likely copyvio and not in public domain. Definitely not drawn before 1924 Wdwd (talk) 22:29, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Sealle (talk) 20:20, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. See COM:CRT/United States#Freedom of panorama. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:01, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:19, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no name of photograh (contributor can be the photograph), no permission Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 13:00, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:30, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image non-libre de droit : présente ici (lien direct : ici). Voir aussi les copyrights du site ici. Cordialement, Nonovian (talk) 15:05, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:31, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 18:25, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:29, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no video? Estopedist1 (talk) 19:03, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:29, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is another version of the image with correct name and much better quality: File:MGlinka.jpg. Using this image to portray Ferdinand Cauer on Czech Wikipedia is a mistake anyway. Yellow Horror (talk) 20:57, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

talk:Yellow Horror - nemáte pravdu. Ferdinand Kauer a jeho fotografie je zde:

http://www.deutscheslied.com/en/search.cgi?cmd=composers&mini=Y&search=f

a ta koresponduje se mnou nahranou fotografií. Laskavě odstraňte šablonu a smazání.Píši ve své mateřštině, jiný jazyk neovládám. --Martin wolf (talk) 07:31, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • I already notified the Znojmo Municipal Library, that stated as the image source, about the misrepresentation, and they removed the image from their webpage. I'll try to do the same for the owner(s) of www.deutscheslied.com ✓ Done, but I obviously cannot be responsible for all Internet sites that mistakenly use this illustration.
(in Czech) O chybě jsem informoval Městská knihovna Znojmo, která je označena jako zdroj obrázku, a obrázek odstranili ze svých webových stránek. Pokusím se udělat totéž pro majitele stránek www.deutscheslied.com ✓ Done, ale samozřejmě nemůžu být zodpovědný za všechny weby, které tento obrázek omylem používají.--Yellow Horror (talk) 19:17, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:27, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a card cover, copyrighted unless there is evidence otherwise. The covers of cards are not own work even if the photo was taken by uploader.--Kai3952 (talk) 20:58, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:24, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Edgars2007 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: logo. Possibly below TOO. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:10, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: simple enough. --Sealle (talk) 20:24, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tejavalli reddy(1830787) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low res images without metadata. Unlikely to be own work. + 2 files are relatively small.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:32, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en:Zeblife was deleted due to non-notability. Probably the logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:32, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:32, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo image in eswiki MiguelAlanCS (talk) 08:38, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

and copyvio. MiguelAlanCS (talk) 09:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:32, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in India for 2-D works, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:59, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:33, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aparece en esta página, posible violación de los derechos de autor http://www.horasero.com.ve/2019/08/23/dayalex-ayala-demuestra-su-talento-con-todos-los-hierros/ Andresperalta (talk) 09:32, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 13:33, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Davenne georges (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably fair use images

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:12, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:34, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zardes~eswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably fair use images

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; dubious claim of own work. --Gbawden (talk) 13:34, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Obvious professional promo photo. Own work is unlikely, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:47, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:34, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:23, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Toys. Even in the one stated "not to be the subject", the entire table was covered in toys, please see COM:TOYS. The "blurred" image was non-notable image of child, not in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably fair use images

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:51, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably fair use images

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:32, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: insufficient source information to determine copyright status. --ƏXPLICIT 02:42, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jackventuro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably fair use images

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:43, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: double authorship claims. --ƏXPLICIT 02:46, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:45, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:36, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mistake in the file name Nivas10798 (talk) 06:48, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nivas10798: You can ask for the file to be renamed. See COM:FR for details. --bjh21 (talk) 12:35, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Bjh21: The uploaded image consists of another person who is not interested to have is image on Commons. This is the other reason for nominating the file. Thank you ! Nivas10798 (talk) 06:40, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, this qualifies for a  Speedy delete under criterion G7. --bjh21 (talk) 09:10, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader request within 7 days of upload. --Green Giant (talk) 17:41, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's highly inaccurate - it doesn't remotely resemble the distribution of Ramphastos ambiguus swainsonii Spizaetus (talk) 00:11, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use, although I restored the original file. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:51, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Souravjain122 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably fair use and useless images

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:34, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:52, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from others, Metadata has "Screenshot" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. ~Moheen (keep talking) 07:40, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:52, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gracegilker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Believed to be recently published/written books. Portland in 2004) and White House in 2014. Should this be considered fair use or no?

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:49, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:53, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably fair use images

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:54, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

all these were made by me Dx (talk)
 Speedy delete per above. Jkg1997 (talkcontribsCA) 15:59, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the images were already speedied by User:Racconish. Kept the video, because it does not seem to show any of the pictures. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:56, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich, die Eigentümerin, möchte die Veröffentlichung des Hauses in diesem Zustand nicht genehmigen. Haus wird zeitnah saniert sein. 77.3.166.204 07:57, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:56, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by D'Arch as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Clearly 2017 work from Ronald Hoogendoorn, see here in high res with watermark. So Lega Pallavolo Serie A is NOT Author of this picture.
Converted by me to regular DR for strategic reasons, as, if proven true, this might question the validity of the whole OTRS ticket. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


OTRS notified: Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#ticket:2017071910007048. --Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: The OTRS ticket is a confirmation of CC-BY-SA for legavolley.it, not for the Dutch Volley ball team. Ciell (talk) 21:19, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've searched on LegaVolley website, and wasn't able to find Fabian Plak. I don't know what @Valerio Bozzolan: has done, but the image doesn't seem to come from the website we have a permission from. --Ruthven (msg) 14:29, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Valerio Bozzolan had replied at User_talk:Valerio_Bozzolan#File:Fabian_Plak_(Legavolley_2019).jpg_2 that he contacted someone at LegaVolle. --Túrelio (talk) 14:49, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: Yes, thank you. Our LegaVolley "ambassador" CristianNX is still waiting for an official explanation from LegaVolley. In the meanwhile, because of I've seen that we were not finding the online version, let me just note that I have not a good memory so the whole import process was well documented in the related request for bot permissions in this wiki, linked from the edit summary of the file creation. There I have found the link to the involved dataset and finally the URL of the photo from the LegaVolley website used for the import process. Now, I don't know how it works, but I think that this demonstrates that we are totally in good faith and it is at least a problem between Ronald Hoogendoorn and LegaVolley. My tip is: let them clarify on themself, if there is any problem.
Tell me if I can do more :) ---Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 17:47, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Being the bold Wikimedian I am, I emailed the photographer (in Dutch) and asked if he would be willing to release the image under CC-BY-SA, because the picture is 2 years old already. If no response within a week, I propose to delete. It's clearly the same image, just cropped and cleaned of watermarks. Ciell (talk) 20:12, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi all, and sorry for the big delay! Legavolley answered me that the picture is part of the annual photo shooting for the volleyball national teams. This is the example for The Nederlands. This pictures are made by the different national federations (in this case the NEVOBO) and are released to be used also by the world (FIVB) and continental (CEV) federations. This is the answer that the Press Officer of the CEV gave us: "As far as we are concerned, we see those ‘head & shoulder’ pics as royalty free images, since they are provided to us only for the purpose of issuing a license for all players participating in CEV competitions – be it for clubs or national teams – and completing their respective individual profiles on the CEV website and more specifically under the relevant competition / team pages.". From that point, in a direct relation between continental and national federations, the pictures are used (as freely released) also by Legavolley. Let me know how can we "officaly" fix the problem here on Commons. --CristianNX 17:25, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The licence is clearly not valid. This picture was made by a third party, so only the original photographer can claim copyright or can give permission to release picturus for Commons. Lega Pallavolo Serie A is not author of this photograph, only the original photographer is. The only "officaly" fix of this "problem" seems to be to delete the file. D'Arch (talk) 02:54, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a) unused b) I don't see a need of creating Wp-style templates in addition to existing ones. Achim (talk) 10:51, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Was supposed to be used in {{Indefblocked-global-WPstyle}}, but caused an error. Calvinkulit (talk) 12:35, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:00, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Isn't likely to be own and most probably promotional (Special:PermaLink/365747532) Ahmadtalk 11:05, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:00, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 11:07, 14 September 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong pronunciation. Ghybu (talk) 11:48, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Picture​ on sign. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 11:44, 26 December 2018 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:04, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 12:10, 14 September 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy file DinaS (talk) 12:46, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: uploader request, unclear deletion reason, still in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:02, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

不適切であるため Kurawaxwitch Prashtict (talk) 12:56, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request, courtesy deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:03, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Есть аналог в векторном виде, более высоком качестве: File:5.17.3 USSR road sign.svgRedboston 14:27, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:03, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Authors response: This book was authored by "Adihalasiriar" (அடிகளாசிரியர்) who is a well known Tamil scholar (https://ta.wikipedia.org/wiki/அடிகளாசிரியர்). He is no more now. This book was published in 1999. Country of publication is INDIA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anba54 (talk • contribs) 19:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still under copyright. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:04, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the image says, this is the title image of https://www.pbs.org/video/new-york-times-op-ed-writereditor-bari-weiss-jfjbpg/ Weiss's appearance on Amanpour and Company PBS show. It's copyrighted by PBS. GRuban (talk) 19:58, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:05, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Chronus as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio. Possibly below TOO. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:10, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unclear threshold of originality for logos in Brazil. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:09, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably fair use and useless images

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:41, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: deleted image which was a derived work of the passport photo, the others are below the TOO, in my opinion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:57, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Italy, permission of the respective artists needed via COM:OTRS. Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Centro per l'Arte Contemporanea Luigi Pecci.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:35, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the files without another collection in parenthesis belong to the permament collection of the museum. --Sailko (talk) 14:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep we already have authorization by the owner whom is granting for single artists. See WLM 2019 OTRS--Sailko (talk) 08:51, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please refer for discussion in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Centro per l'Arte Contemporanea Luigi Pecci.
 Keep I see no reason to delete, it seems the nominator hurried. JukoFF (talk) 17:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete First, many of these are owned by third parties, not by the museum where the images were taken, so any license from that museum is irrelevant. Second, as a general rule, the owner of a work of art does not have the right to freely license it -- that right remains with the creators or their heirs. I see no evidence that any of these are properly licensed. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per previous DRs and Jim. Photos of copyrighed modern works of art. We need permission of the copyright holders, not of the museum. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:02, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]