Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/08/26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 26th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disney_junior_Logo.png Galva5000 (talk) 01:36, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dupl. of File:Logo Disney Junior.png. --Yann (talk) 04:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disney_junior_Logo.png Tarucha5000 (talk) 02:36, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden due to licensing problems. Taivo (talk) 20:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo_Disney_Junior.png (371 × 136 píxeles, tamaño de archivo: 7 KB, tipo MIME: image / png ) ; ( solicitud de rotación ) Galva5000 (talk) 01:37, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Disney Junior Logo.png. --Yann (talk) 05:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo_pj_masks.png ‎(195 × 195 pixels, file size: 4 KB, MIME type: image/png); Galva5000 (talk) 01:38, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dupl. of File:Logo Disney Junior.png. --Yann (talk) 05:42, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zinnia is not bougainvillea or bunga kertas in Indonesian language. Relly Komaruzaman | Talk 07:12, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: seems to be withdrawn. --JuTa 17:11, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was accidentally created. FREE STYLE inc (talk) 16:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:57, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.moscow-post.su/economics/otkrytie_iskupalos_v_bajkale21431/ coppivo Пашка 251 (talk) 18:29, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:59, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by INDIE PROMOTIONS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:29, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request Christopher-Photo (talk) 21:48, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not a recent upload, file is in use. --Wdwd (talk) 08:03, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request: Low Quality. Christopher-Photo (talk) 20:12, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussions. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use. Black and white, and quite dated. The author himself requested its deletion 3 years ago. Wikisempra (talk) 02:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:53, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer want it published. Also Black&White. Christopher-Photo (talk) 16:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author request, within reason. Not in use, no loss for Commons nor a good picture. Christopher-Photo (talk) 16:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 10:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly from [1]. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:29, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; found on the web, dubious claim of own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shahd Nabeel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, low res. No metadata. Unlikely to be own work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 05:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shahd Nabeel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images with EXIF data, last remaining files, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 11:37, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 05:09, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shahd Nabeel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images with small size, no EXIF, own work claim doubtful. Kind regards,

— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 05:12, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 12:02, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it at File:AEW Logo (simplified).svg as there is no need for it to be a seperate file. Piotr Bart (talk) 15:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:39, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Where that OTRS come from? Are you an OTRS Team member? Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:04, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clearly not uploader's own work according to watermark NinjaStrikers «» 17:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by JGHowes at 17:55, 27 August 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): not own work, watermarked --Krdbot 01:19, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as owner wish — Redboston 00:25, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:24, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issue. Wikiaactor (talk) 01:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 06:24, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure that this is under free use. Same picture was found on the AP website. http://www.apimages.com/metadata/Index/Associated-Press-International-News-Japan-JAPAN-/20493dfeabe4da11af9f0014c2589dfb/129/0 RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 05:49, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; we have far better free images of him anyway. --Gbawden (talk) 06:46, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS, no apparent use. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:58, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No picture Hasrolhashim (talk) 10:30, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tourist snapshot of extremly bad quality Berthold Werner (talk) 10:38, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nacional Music (talk · contribs)

[edit]

SPAM at pt.wiki. Singer without notability, blocked for SPAM at pt.wiki. No useful content.

Stanglavine (talk) 11:22, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Harikrishnanuae (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images or screenshots: unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:41, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://pikabu.ru/story/russkiy_dobrovolets_igor_nesterenko_6845191

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:11, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:41, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vikramrathorekarate (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:22, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:31, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:33, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ten different cameras at least, unlikely to be same people's work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:36, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP and one had authors name in exif. --Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Artistas Al Dia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Company SPAM at Wikidata and es.wiki. No useful content.

Stanglavine (talk) 13:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:04, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:36, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recently uploaded, low res PNG version of File:Flag of Perak.svg. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:05, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unused. Prefer vector version -- Elephanthunter (talk) 22:49, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:36, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from copyrighted newspaper or magazine. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:06, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:36, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copvio, artist of windows died 1973, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:25, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No useful content. Spam-only account. Stanglavine (talk) 13:38, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial/advertising sign, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   13:51, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ChotoBhai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free image, taken from https://www.sport24.co.za/Cricket/Proteas/phehlukwayo-relishes-learning-from-sas-star-pace-trio-20181107 Lugnuts (talk) 14:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused. Commons is not a private photo album. The article Avni Hasani is deleted from enwiki Estopedist1 (talk) 14:24, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

same File:Avni Hasani.jpg--Estopedist1 (talk) 14:25, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused. Commons is not a private photo album. The article Avni Hasani is deleted from enwiki Estopedist1 (talk) 14:25, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It's not even a logo, just the name of a language repeated in three other languages. -- Elephanthunter (talk) 01:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Infrogmation. --Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work: https://twitter.com/ze_alem/status/624208982626959361, Please explain why public domain in Eritrea or source country. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:34, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:38, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These are photos from a Wikimedia Sverige-organized event, similar to lots of previous photos in the category Category:Wikimedia Sverige events + subcategories. Should all those be deleted as well/are we missing some guideline? Ambrosiani (talk) 15:42, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry @Ambrosiani: but it was not obvious since, contrary to what you are stating, files are not categorized within Category:Wikimedia Sverige events. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Thanks, I understand now why it wasn't obvious. We did put them in a subcategory with a Swedish name, Category:Kvinnohistoriska_skrivstugor, I'll add a description to that category page! Ambrosiani (talk) 16:06, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:18, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:29, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments.

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:29, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:29, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free, stolen from https://www.deccanherald.com/sports/ngidi-surprised-punes-pace-and-bounce-671019.html Lugnuts (talk) 16:30, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly not the work of the uploader - Labeled as "professional shot" and the shot is similar to other images on her official and company website - needs some more evidence on provenance MilborneOne (talk) 18:14, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential copyright violation of [2] Liance (talk) 18:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:25, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

include

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Omar Galliani, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:45, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Supradip Jana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:20, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Supradip Jana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE / unused AntonierCH (d) 21:24, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

most likely not taken by the uploader: https://twitter.com/rolstonstudio/status/953412887627919361 100cellsman (talk) 21:33, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; taken from FB per exif. --Gbawden (talk) 06:26, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. https://web.archive.org/web/20190826151115/https://bv.fapesp.br/pt/pesquisador/246/sandro-roberto-valentini/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete URL is now up, but there is no licensing information. Looks like this needs permission from the photographer via Commons:OTRS. -- Elephanthunter (talk) 04:53, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:26, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Than Zaw Nuac (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Pi.1415926535. --Gbawden (talk) 06:25, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope. Promotional. Edslov (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 06:25, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Might be a complex logo per COM:TOO Australia (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:38, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted regardless, dubious license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:04, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be a screencapture of some kind, unlikely to be within scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:14, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:03, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work using a copyrighted online newspaper. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:59, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted DW. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:06, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyvio. From Internet, see https://alchetron.com/Mark-Valera Estopedist1 (talk) 08:17, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted blatant copyright violation/false claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:09, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carlostm26 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, low res, no exif. Unlikely to be own work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:20, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:23, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says photoshop. Also this is an enlarged picture from another picture. Pixelation is clear. A clear copyvio. Recommend to delete this file. Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:27, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Irfanarimbra786 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All the files are low resolution and EXIF data says photosop. These images are likely copyright violations.


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:23, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aparecen personas que no han dado el consentimiento para que aparezca su cara. Villalaco (talk) 10:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Moheen at 07:46, 2 September 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 13:14, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aparecen personas que no han dado el consentimiento para que aparezca su cara. Villalaco (talk) 10:49, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Moheen at 07:46, 2 September 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 13:14, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aparecen personas que no han dado el consentimiento para que aparezca su cara. Villalaco (talk) 10:51, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Moheen at 06:43, 2 September 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 13:14, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Boutique Ernest (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyvios: all different cameras. But judging by the username, the uploader may be closely associated with the stores, and maybe has the rights. Images could also be considered advertising/promotional.

P 1 9 9   14:37, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:24, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:24, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:24, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Charles Pépin

[edit]

The uploader suggests he's the person in the photos according to the user name, but will need information about the photographers and permission to license their photos. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata. Also no big picture. May be a screenshot or cropped version of original image. A clear copyvio. Suggest to delete this file. Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:29, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Zoki the Social Chef

[edit]

Uploader claims to be the person in the photos but need information about the photographers and their permission to license the photos. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:28, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:28, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says photoshop. Also no large resolution. May be a cropped version of original image. A clear copyvio of original photographer. Suggest to delete this file. Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:30, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:28, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says photoshop. Also no large resolution. May be a cropped version of original image. A clear copyvio of original photographer. Suggest to delete this file. Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:31, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:28, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says photoshop. Also no large resolution. May be a cropped version of original image. A clear copyvio of original photographer. Suggest to delete this file. Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:31, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:28, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says photoshop. Also no large resolution. May be a cropped version of original image. A clear copyvio of original photographer. Suggest to delete this file. Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:28, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says photoshop. Also no large resolution. May be a cropped version of original image. A clear copyvio of original photographer. Suggest to delete this file. Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says photoshop. Also no large resolution. May be a cropped version of original image. A clear copyvio of original photographer. Suggest to delete this file. Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:33, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says photoshop. Also no large resolution. May be a cropped version of original image. A clear copyvio of original photographer. Suggest to delete this file. Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:34, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Metadata. Also no large resolution. May be a cropped version of original image. A clear copyvio of original photographer. Suggest to delete this file. Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:34, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says photoshop. Also no large resolution. May be a cropped version of original image. A clear copyvio of original photographer. Suggest to delete this file. Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says photoshop. Also no large resolution. May be a cropped version of original image. A clear copyvio of original photographer. Suggest to delete this file. Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:36, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says photoshop. Also no large resolution. May be a cropped version of original image. A clear copyvio of original photographer. Suggest to delete this file. Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:36, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says photoshop. Also no large resolution. May be a cropped version of original image. A clear copyvio of original photographer. Suggest to delete this file. Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:37, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says photoshop. Also no large resolution. May be a cropped version of original image. A clear copyvio of original photographer. Suggest to delete this file. Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:37, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Author name in the metadata is completly different from the uploader. Also this user uploaded a set of copyvio photographs into commons. No high resolution image available. I am suspecting that this is a copyvio of original photographer. Suggest to delete this picture. Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:50, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:29, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be taken from canada soccer.com (see here) Eagleash (talk) 08:58, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:29, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Blacksoul007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW - video game screenshot - OTRS permission from game developer/publisher needed

Эlcobbola talk 16:14, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ozaki baka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Without EXIF data, these images are likely copyright violations. For example, File:MAHOTO2017.jpg, File:KAIWARE2017.jpg, and File:KAIWARE20172.jpg were previously published at spice.eplus.jp. The colored, un-cropped version of File:Obayashi2014.png was previously published at cinefil.tokyo.

153.230.45.146 03:13, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: nominated files from the top list: copyvio. Other files from this user, like File:Tenrikyo raihaizyo20160313.jpg, are not obviously a copyvio -> keep. --Wdwd (talk) 10:54, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ozaki baka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Versions of these images have been found elsewhere, with date preceding Commons upload. User has already had images deleted previously.

(Thank you to えのきだたもつ (talk · contribs), who drew my attention to this when they uploaded another image by the same user at Commons:Deletion requests/File:のん三陸鉄道201903.jpg.)

This is just a small selection of images of (what I assume are) members of idol bands uploaded by same user. I have not been able to check all user's uploads of idols, and some do not return matches via Google Images. However, if these are provable copyright violations, we should strongly consider deleting other, similar-looking idol images from the same user under our precautionary principle.

Ubcule (talk) 19:47, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, grabbed from internet. --PierreSelim (talk) 21:45, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ozaki baka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Thanks for Ubcule (talk · contribs)'s request. I also found these photos are from twitter:

Adding:

Adding:

Adding:

Adding:

These photos are from some different people's account.--そらみみ (talk) 11:16, 26 August 2019 (UTC) Adding:[reply]

(In this case, that would imply similarly professional-looking images of celebrities at media/PR events and similar, but not (e.g.) uploader's images of railway stations).Ubcule (talk) 17:50, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Grabbed from internet, mostly twitter and instagram. --PierreSelim (talk) 21:42, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ozaki baka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A considerable number of this user's uploads have already been deleted for proven copyright violation. (See previous deletion requests for same user, above).

They were all images of famous Japanese people (often members of idol bands). The photographs all had a similar style, as if they were professionally-shot PR or press photographs with a good viewpoint.

Many of this user's images that remain are very similar in both content and style, and this raises my suspicions. Although there is no definitive evidence that these are copyvios, I am very sceptical whether they can be trusted and wonder whether we should consider them in light of Commons' "Precautionary principle".

Some images (e.g. railway stations) are not included in this deletion request, as they are less likely to be copyright violations. (No images similar to them were deleted previously).

As they were previously involved in this case, そらみみ (talk · contribs) may wish to contribute their opinion here too. Thank you.

Ubcule (talk) 19:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic translation:
このユーザーのアップロードのかなりの数は、著作権侵害の立証のために既に削除されています。 (上記の同じユーザーの以前の削除要求を参照してください)。
それらはすべて有名な日本人(多くの場合アイドルバンドのメンバー)の画像でした。写真はすべて、似たようなスタイルを持っていて、まるでプロの写真を撮ったPRか、良い視点のプレス写真のようでした。
残っているこのユーザーの画像の多くは、コンテンツとスタイルの両方で非常に似ており、これは私の疑念を引き起こします。これらがcopyviosであるという明確な証拠はありませんが、それらが信頼できるかどうかは非常に懐疑的であり、 Commons '"Precautionary Principles"に照らして考慮すべきかどうか疑問に思います。
一部の画像(鉄道駅など)は、著作権侵害の可能性が低いため、この削除リクエストには含まれていません。 (それらに類似した画像は以前に削除されていません)。
彼らは以前この事件に関与していたので、そらみみ (talk · contribs)はここでも彼らの意見を提供したいと思うかもしれません。ありがとうございました。


Ubcule (talk) 19:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and discussion above; COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:28, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rasal Hague (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Ukraine. Besides if works by Ernest Kotkov , Valery Lamakh and Ivan Litovchenko probably not public domain yet.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:49, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:17, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rasal Hague (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Ukraine. Please explain why work is public domain.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:34, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Look at this page Category:Zoloti Vorota Metro Station: "Files is this category depict a work by the architect Anatolii Krushynskyi which is copyrighted. The copyright owner provided permission to license images of this work under Creative CommonsAttribution 3.0 Unported Licence." - Rasal Hague (talk) 07:09, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently @AMY 81-412: is not an OTRS agent. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:56, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Does it mean that Anatolii Krushynskyi (copyright owner) didn't provide permission to license images and we should revoke copyright owner’s permission? - Rasal Hague (talk) 12:16, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Rasal Hague: Apparently the 2017 permission concerns only Krushynskyi's works listed in the category. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: There are permissions from architects. --Anatoliy (talk) 23:09, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:14, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:51, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derived work from the one deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Banksy 28 October installment from "Better Out Than In" New York City residency.jpg Ruthven (msg) 16:19, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:50, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Nagorno-Karabakh.

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:49, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:49, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No source information for the map. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 09:48, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio; this is the YouTube thumbnail for David Milstein - Eni Award 2016 | Eni Video Channel (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgrL6BXbM_A) Bri.public (talk) 22:28, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:44, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res image, unlike to be own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:19, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 11:15, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Attempt to create an infobox, which should be done with a template instead (see en:British people). Cordless Larry (talk) 22:07, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Attempt to create an infobox, which should be done with a template instead (see en:British people). Cordless Larry (talk) 22:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Attempt to create an infobox, which should be done with a template instead (see en:British people). Cordless Larry (talk) 22:09, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Attempt to create an infobox, which should be done with a template instead (see en:British people). Cordless Larry (talk) 22:09, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Attempt to create an infobox, which should be done with a template instead (see en:British people). Cordless Larry (talk) 22:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Attempt to create an infobox, which should be done with a template instead (see en:British people). Cordless Larry (talk) 22:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because uploader desagrees here's a regular DR. https://www.flickr.com/photos/183720010@N04/48594962151/ , https://www.flickr.com/photos/183720010@N04/48595097222/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/183720010@N04/48594962336/ are probably not public domain because probably not user's own work Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:31, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 18:59, 4 September 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 01:13, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pj_masks_logo_.pgn.png (620 × 215 píxeles, tamaño de archivo: 92 KB, tipo MIME: image / png ) Tarucha5000 (talk) 23:44, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 20:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from bag design. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Looks to be modern commercial design. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:00, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, no information (even coordinates) Brateevsky {talk} 12:40, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Certainly usable - even as a backdrop for a horror flick. Retired electrician (talk) 15:20, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Русский: Были бы координаты, знал бы я, что это за подземный переход, где он находится, — я бы даже на удаление не вынес. А сейчас непонятно, что это за место, и где данную фотографию можно будет использовать.
      --Brateevsky {talk} 06:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 20:00, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe scan from paper, see [5] shizhao (talk) 03:57, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:41, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Need the licensing status of each image, at least the ones past the threshold of originality. Also it is a personal file uploaded to promote the user's business, which is outside Commons scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:00, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:39, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 05:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:28, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ips.arhiv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files with small size, low resolution, no metadata, own work claim doubtful. Kind regards,

— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:32, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan d'un article de journal Lomita (talk) 06:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, c'est le seul article parlant de la fin de la saline trouvé dans la presse. J'avoue que je ne suis pas allé aux Archives Départementales où d'autres articles, plus complets, peuvent exister. La discussion en présentera peut-être. --Rosart (talk) 07:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright issue. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:33, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by SageWater as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: File is corrupt/badly cropped, Rest of image is extremely grainy. The file isn't used anymore, but maybe has still some value. I'll crop it. Taivo (talk) 06:58, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: I think this is of value. It's the only long shot of a British Rail Class 380 we've got. All the others seem to be taken from close to with a wide-angle lens, often with disruptive reflections off the shiny new paintwork. We also only have three pictures of trains crossing the Slateford Viaduct and while File:Slateford Viaduct (8479660339).jpg is better, I can see that you might want a distinctively Scottish train there. --bjh21 (talk) 23:48, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Although not being the original speedy submitter (it got removed but it looked pretty valid to me) the cropped picture doesn't even really properly show the viaduct, And clearly puts the train in focus when the picture was uploaded for the wiki page. SageWater (talk) 00:31, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: acceptable now. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:35, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality and angle of the picture. DMirjana (talk) 07:21, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader request. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:35, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be used for self-promo on tl.wiki. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:42, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom. The image is used for an autobiography of a person named "Ace Balangitan". The respective associated articles for this person in en.wiki and tl.wiki were deleted for spamming. -WayKurat (talk) 16:46, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:28, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

recently uploaded, small, low res PNG version of Vietnam flag. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:45, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:28, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res image, unlike to be own work. Also no EXIF. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:46, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:27, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low res image, unlike to be own work. Also no EXIF. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:29, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of the uploader according to the user name; has the watermark of a photographer, need their permission to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:29, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of the cover of a published book which would be copyrighted at least by the publisher. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:04, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:30, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely false authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history. Professional product photo. Appears to have been previously published in higher resolution elsewhere based on Google results. LX (talk, contribs) 08:38, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:22, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Christiandavid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please modify the dates of shooting and explaine why images are public domain.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:48, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work - photograph dates between 1945 (plaque Jacques Storck) and end 1950s-begin 1960 when the building was demolished. Henxter (talk) 10:28, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom; certainly false date, other claims questionable. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was tagged for speedy deletion by User:Patrick Rogel and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) Kissa21782 (talk) 10:29, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kissa21782: Transformation from a speedy deletion request to a regular one needs a rationale. May you provide one? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I see no reason to delete this file: a non-advertisement-like image of a modern wedding dress; has educational value. --Kissa21782 (talk) 10:34, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Close as kept no counter arguments to keep votes, no evident requirement to delete and no consensus to do so. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:09, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Definitely not under a free license as claimed. However the logo may be too simple to qualify for copyright Whpq (talk) 10:53, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted false license, no improvements. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:11, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for 2D works. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:13, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused symbol. No meaningful description. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 16:21, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:15, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution; no Exif data. It doesn't look like a "own work". Stego (talk) 16:58, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom, unused -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:14, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is the correct URL, kindly double check. Also, please consider leaving me a message on my talk page if the issue is simply a 404. Regards, DoctorSpeed (talk)
@DoctorSpeed: You must link to the page containing the image, not to the image itself but I'm afraid it won't help determining its copyright status. Indeed similar images may be found at Andina website or others but are all copyrighted. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: I am having a hard time following the second sentence of your response. Could you reword that? Regards, DoctorSpeed (talk)

Deleted No evidence of free license provided. Was not in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:17, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGING, complex packagings that exceed COM:TOO Taiwan.

Wcam (talk) 10:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These "photos of whole bottles" contain packaging that are copyrighted protected hence not ok (COM:PACKAGING). For File:Heysong Sarsaparilla.jpg, based on the filename the packaging is the purpose of taking this picture and removing the packaging would make this photo useless, which is clearly not de minimis. The latter DR did not consider that Taiwan has a relatively low TOO as the packaging on the bottle is clearly more complex than the protected Sunshow logo. --Wcam (talk) 01:13, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, none of them is simple packaging. Taivo (talk) 20:18, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW of the architect's work; not covered by COM:FOP Spain because it was taken from the interior courtyard.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:27, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:34, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the article at id wiki, this school was established in 1986. It's not clear when the building itself was built and more importantly when the architect died. See COM:CRT/Indonesia#Freedom of panorama. Ricky81682 (talk) 03:52, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:35, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

company logo Ex13 (talk) 04:49, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - pure type, which does not have a copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:36, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not valid for a parent to release an image under the GFDL on behalf of a child. Parents don't own the copyright of works made by their children, regardless of their legal guardian status. A parent cannot make a lifetime GFDL grant for a copyrighted work on behalf of a child. Per discussion here the image should be deleted unless WMF legal rules otherwise. Psiĥedelisto (talk) 08:40, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I do not see that the image's uploader, ostensibly the artist's father, has been notified of this discussion. edit 14:17, 27 August 2019 (UTC): (Drmies added a notification template to the uploader's talk page here on the Commons.) For context, this deletion request follows an RfC regarding the image's suitability for use in a Wikipedia article, closed as "keep". Just plain Bill (talk) 09:30, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Er, that RfC was over four years ago; the more recent discussion that led to this deletion request is HERE. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Started more than six years ago, took about two years to close, yet still part of the context, and relevant to the motivation for this request. Some editors don't like the style of the image, and having failed to gather consensus around that, some are now on the licensing tack.
    This might be resolved by contacting the uploader, who presumably can convey his daughter's wishes in the matter. The drawing has been published in venues not connected to WMF; those six years have been plenty of time to contest the licensing, if anyone with standing had so desired. Until WMF's legal team weighs in, is there really a sudden need for haste? Just plain Bill (talk) 23:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: We had tis discussion some years ago with WMF counsel -- the bottom line is that works by minors are problematic because, as noted above, the child can revoke the license on reaching her majority. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:42, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata. Maybe a cropped verion of original photograph. May be a copyright violation of original photographer. Suggest to delete this file. Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:54, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:42, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says Different author name. I suspect this user is not the original author of this image. Also no large resolution. May be a cropped version of original image. A clear copyvio of original photographer. Also this person is not dead so there are good chances to get a good copyright violation free image. Suggest to delete this file. Ranjithsiji (talk) 09:57, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:43, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was tagged for speedy deletion by User:Patrick Rogel and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) Kissa21782 (talk) 10:30, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kissa21782: Transformation from a speedy deletion request to a regular one needs a rationale. May you provide one? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:34, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I see no reason to delete this file: a non-advertisement-like image of a modern wedding dress; has educational value. --Kissa21782 (talk) 10:34, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Kissa21782: There's a confusion: COM:CSD#F10 is not for advertising; COM:CSD#G10 is so it's not a valid reason. I maintain Dror Kontento is not only out of COM:SCOPE but COM:CSD#F10 applies because of no usefull edits. I remind you too that isolated galleries are not within scope. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:44, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that F10 is not for advertisements, but I do not see how this could be seen as a "low-to-medium quality personal file" as this is a rather high quality image of a wedding dress. And the designer's notability does not matter here, as a CC-licensed image of a modern wedding dress is educationally useful regardless of the designer (or file uploader) in my opinion. Kissa21782 (talk) 10:52, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note on Dror Kontento's notability: Kontento has an article on him in hewiki (he:דרור קונטנטו). the article is new (created yesterday) but It's a safe bet that it will stay on hewiki even if challenged. DGtal (talk) 11:16, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete The user uploaded a lot's of files of Dror Kontento's wedding dress designes but most of them deleted by me as they were found elsewhere in the net. Those two photos are probably copyvios as well. Patrick Rogel, COM:CSD#F10 was definitely wrong. They are not personal photos and there is nothing to do with advertising and they were, in my view, is project scope even if the designer not notable. The were good qulity photos that can be used in many parts of the project. Unfortunately the are probably copyvios. -- Geagea (talk) 11:59, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Everybody says these image are usefull but, at this time, I don't see them being COM:INUSE... --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Please see COM:PS: Wikimedia Commons is a media file repository. They should not be in use now. We need to make the files available and easily to be found and use. -- Geagea (talk) 12:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Indeed, Geagea. While being in use is often a good indication that a file is within project scope, not being currently in use is not an argument that a file is inherently out of scope. This should be basic for understanding Wikimedia. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:21, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Clearly a professional photo that is in use in several places on the web. Without further information we must assume that the license is not valid. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:45, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by K. Bekmuradov, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:53, 26 August 2019 (UTC) Добрый день! Право публикации этой работы дал мне наследник художника Батыр Бекмурадов. Он сейчас в Туркменистане. И не сможет лично отправить вам запрос. Как в таком случае поступить? Очень хочется оставить работу в свободном доступе, пусть люди видят это прекрасный портрет. С надеждой на понимание - в любом случае, приму ваше решение как основное. С уважением <<DDalia>>. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dalia Dvora (talk • contribs) 12:48, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfortunately, Commons rules clearly require a free license from the artist or his heir, using OTRS. Also, it is really too small to be useful. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:48, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:55, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:48, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC) Добрый день, уважаемые администраторы. Данный портрет художника показателен для его творчества. Портрет опубликован в его персональном каталоге 1979 года.Ни в одном музее его нет, в частных собраниях он также не значится. Возможно, что публикация поможет установить его местонахождение. Думается, что цель достаточно хорошая, поэтому прошу рассмотреть возможность оставить файл, чтобы разместить его на персональной странице художника, которая готовится к публикации на Википедии. С указанием "местонахождение неизвестно" и , если это соответствует правилам сообщества Википедии, разместить просьбу сообщить его местонахождение. С уважением - комментарий ````` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dalia Dvora (talk • contribs) 12:31, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Again, permission via OTRS from the artist is required. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:50, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even though an author of the photo is unknown (author: no data), Polish studio film Kadr owns proprietary rights to the photograph. I've received the mail from National Film Archive – Audiovisual Institute's marketing and retailing specialist Katarzyna Nowak with FINA's reservations for publishing the photo on wiki-sites. So we have to wait with wiki-using of this image until I'll receive a mail message with the Kadr’s consent for photo's usage rights. Pit rock (talk) 12:38, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've jest received the mail from the owner of the copyright rights to the photograph – Polish studio film "Kadr". They told me that if we want to use the exact photo somebody will have to pay 300 PLN (~77 USD). So I had to pass with that :-( Neither me nor the Wikimedia Project won't pay such money for each work to use that in our Project. Sorry, we'll have to delete this file.  Speedy delete --Pit rock (talk) 21:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:50, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copvio, artist of windows died 1973, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:24, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:50, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copvio, artist of windows died 1973, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:24, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:52, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copvio, artist of windows died 1973, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:52, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copvio, artist of windows died 1973, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:53, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died 1973, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:34, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:53, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist of windows died 1973, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:53, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work", no proper source and author, unknown copyright status. P 1 9 9   14:52, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The image is from 1915, and under U.S. copyright law, any work created before 1923 is in the public domain. That said, I agree that the description and license needs to be updated to reflect this. --Sky Harbor (talk) 17:42, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - User:Sky Harbor, what you say is true, but completely irrelevant. It is a 1915 Phillippine postcard, so it was clearly published more than 50 years ago and therefore PD. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:57, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

publish in 1974, copyrigthed shizhao (talk) 03:53, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Yes, but... I think this cover falls under {{PD-text logo}} to me, so I think it's better to  Keep --Ganímedes (talk) 10:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-textlogo}}. P 1 9 9   19:16, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Aavitus as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author's will (me). Volonté de l'auteur (moi).. The file is still usable. No replacement image is shown. Taivo (talk) 07:22, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Maps invented by my-self. --Aavitus (talk) 13:38, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9   19:16, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aparecen personas que no han dado el consentimiento para aparecer su cara. Villalaco (talk) 10:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. Mark image with {{Personality rights}}. P 1 9 9   19:22, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Near-duplicate of File:Walter Corda.jpg, with a meaningless filename (both in-links were meant to point to a non-existing placeholder picture). Rojelio (talk) 10:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not near duplicate: bigger size and better quality this one. P 1 9 9   19:19, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Laoling4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Source of all these images are "惠州轨道交通," literally means "Huizhou Rail Transit," which is a non-exist username, and sounds like something from the transit company's website. Many images have no EXIF info and sizes of around 100-300 KB, which indicate these images might be initially published on other websites and had undergone compression.

TechyanTalk11:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The username "惠州轨道交通," which is my previous username, but it is an inappropriate username, so I have already changed it to the current one. You can confirm this by checking at the archive page. Laoling4 (talk) 19:52, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
这些图片的大小也不太正常,请问您是用QQ之类的传过吗?--TechyanTalk12:44, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
是的,这些图片若是在以前版本的qq下传送是会被压缩的,还有些图片因为PS调过大小。Laoling4 (talk) 16:34, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader provided reasonable explanation. --TechyanTalk09:04, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW of https://www.netflix.com/us-fr/title/80147919.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 12:14, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:20, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is my personal copyrighten work. It is philosophical in nature therefore it is supposed to be questionable-like until you make your own determination upon reading it.

It is currently censored from american amazon.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ewlillicii (talk • contribs) 19:33, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]