Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/08/25
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Per BY-NC-ND Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:14, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:16, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AlbanGeller as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7. Uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload; here multiple months have passed. One week for discussion is allowed. Taivo (talk) 08:53, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Taivo: This hasn't been linked to anywhere. It's nothing more than an inferior {{Duplicate}} of File:LloydGeorge.jpg and there's really nothing of value lost in speedily deleting this file. AlbanGeller (talk) 09:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, @AlbanGeller: when you nominate such files for deletion in the future, please do not say "G7" as the only reason. This is not a reason for deleting your files and this looks like no reason for deletion at all. I must guess myself, why the photo must be deleted. In the future, please make that easier for me, showing replacement file, just like you did it in previous paragraph. Taivo (talk) 09:16, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Photograph of a 2D copyrighted image, not covered by the Right of Panroma under UK or US law Hchc2009 (talk) 09:18, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:45, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Source was deleted by Pi.1415926535 because QueerEcofeminist nominated it because "not a web host + promotional purpose". Obviously this file is in use on multiple projects so that rationale is invalid. Unless there are severe doubts about the copyright status, we should Keep this and restore the files from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Madhopsarkar. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:03, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, as per nom. Dead.rabbit (talk) 06:33, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Not a deletion request. Please make undeletion requests at COM:UDR. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:11, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:EDUSE msali raso 15:57, 25 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 15:57, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Not used, bad framing Idmsn (talk) 21:52, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo at 09:21, 26 August 2019 UTC: Fair use material is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons (F2): surpasses threshold of originality --Krdbot 13:19, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
File:Ant. J. Fr.ois Mesnager - né à Germigni-l'Evêque le 17 j.er 1756 depute de Meaux à l'Assemblée nationale de 1789 - (estampe) - Labadye del. ; Texier sc.jpg
[edit]Because it is Other 47.39.52.200 10:05, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 20:52, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
{{Copyvio}} ZG 90 (talk) 18:39, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted as copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Requested by the uploader. Relly Komaruzaman | Talk 04:28, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: seems to be withdrawn. --JuTa 13:07, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
- Redirected to File:Bunga Zinia.jpg as duplicate --JuTa 05:16, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 20:32, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + promotion motive. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 07:12, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Not own work, but a collection of copyrighted comic strips. No permission from the copyright holder. Vanjagenije (talk) 03:11, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:04, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Edvan Oliveira (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own work, several cameras and also none at all... small sizes, low quality.
- File:Santa rosa-pi.jpg
- File:MARCA PREFEITURA STR FINAL-01.jpg
- File:Vista aérea de Santa Rosa do Piauí.jpg
- File:Igreja Católica Santa Rosa de Lima.jpg
- File:Corridas de Cavalos - Durante festa do Vaqueiro.jpg
- File:Repórter- Edvan Oliveira.jpg
- File:Vista da Cidade a partir do Bairro Fazenda .jpg
- File:Igreja-Matriz-Santa Rosa de Lima.jpg
- File:Ponte de Pedra..jpg
- File:FOTO PANORÂMICA SANTA ROSA DO PIAUI.JPG
- File:PRAÇA CENTRAL VISTA A PARTIR DO MORRO DA AGESPISA.JPG
Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:53, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by พีรชัย วงษ์ชาลี (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most other uploads have either been deleted or marked for deletion. Some of these have facebook metadata, others are clearly not own work.
- File:สมเด็จพระนางเจ้าสิริกิติ์ พระบรมราชินีนาถ พระบรมราชชนนีพันปีหลวง .jpg
- File:พระพุทธรูปประจำโรงเรียนมัญจาศึกษา.jpg
- File:กิจกรรมหน้าเสาธงโรงเรียนมัญจาศึกษา.jpg
- File:ผังโรงเรียนมัญจาศึกษา.png
- File:แผนผังโรงเรียนมัญจาศึกษา.png
Majora (talk) 01:04, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 22:22, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by พีรชัย วงษ์ชาลี (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused flag and diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:45, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by พีรชัย วงษ์ชาลี (talk · contribs)
[edit]Facebook size & quality images without metadata.
- File:SMT MC Classroom ( Gifted ).jpg
- File:Buddha statue Manchasuk School.jpg
- File:Flagstaff Manchasuksa School.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:02, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Doostdarekhoda (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work on these images, also notice the advertisements "buy CD Tranning"...
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:04, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MD Amzed hossan Talukder Amue (talk · contribs)
[edit]Facebook or smaller images unlikely to be own work of uploader.
- File:BGMEA University of Fashion & Technology logo.png
- File:Muslim Modern Academy.jpg
- File:Permanent campus BGME University.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:09, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
No source of basemap. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:09, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
No source of basemap. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:09, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
No source of the base map. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:10, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
No source of the base map. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:10, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
No source of the base map. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:10, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
No source of the base map. Also map is labeled "FAKE". Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:10, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Imaginary logo, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:10, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work, poor quality image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:12, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Image titles include "concept" which means architectural renderings, not own work.
- File:Largest shopping mall in Iran concept (Isfahan City Center) 03.JPG
- File:Largest shopping mall in Iran concept (Isfahan City Center) 02.jpg
- File:Largest shopping mall in Iran concept (Isfahan City Center) 01.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:16, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hussen Amer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images are small and of low quality which results in a situation where - considering the subject matter - these are unlikely to be own work.
- File:صورة لشيخ عبد الرحمن مريوش شمخي الجباره الكعبي.jpg
- File:صوره الشيخ عبد الرحمن.jpg
- File:عبد الرحمن شمخي مريوش.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:17, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Razvan.ONOFREI (talk · contribs)
[edit]Some kind of personal gallery - maybe from family scrapbooks or something - but from file size, derivative works, etc., not own work.
- File:Gheorghe-maria-015.jpg
- File:Gheorghe-maria-014.jpg
- File:Gheorghe-maria-012.jpg
- File:Gheorghe-maria-011.jpg
- File:Gheorghe-maria-009.jpg
- File:Gheorghe-maria-008.jpg
- File:Gheorghe-maria-006.png
- File:Gheorghe-maria-004.jpg
- File:Gheorghe-maria-003.jpg
- File:Gheorghe-maria-002.jpg
- File:Prof. PhD Eng. Gheorghe MARIA.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:24, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nikolla Dafa (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on these facebook or smaller sized images with no metadata that do not appear to be contemporary own work.
- File:Thumbnail 20190729 135410.jpg
- File:Gjate garave.jpg
- File:Kercim nga trampolina 8 m e larte.jpg
- File:Thumbnail 20190729 135145.jpg
- File:Aajpg.jpg
- File:Gjate hedhjes se Cekici.jpg
- File:Thumbnail 20190729 135339.jpg
- File:TAQ DAFA.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Dubious own work, small, poor quality./ Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Collebud88 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images appear copied, see metadata - file size, quality, etc.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:36, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vikasudayrajsharma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bollywood Hungama doesn't permit us to copy, distribute and/or modify photograph from Bollywood news (see source link and OTRS permission). To be more clear, photograph is from the Indian Film Festival of Melbourne (IFFM) which happened to be outside of India. Not likely to exist here. OTRS permission for BH images don't hold for photos outside India. Kind regards,
— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 05:48, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:45, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Pictures from another website (uploaded before : https://noticiasdearronchesonline.blogspot.com/2017/02/camara-municipal-de-arronches-ofereceu.html) Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:27, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio, uploaded by someone else, before https://forum.motorguia.net/road-book/107255-carros-de-policia-ambulancias-87.html Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploaded without authorization, taken from someone here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2571.htm#r17 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:30, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploaded without authorization, taken from someone here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2571.htm#r17 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:30, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:36, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploaded without authorization, taken from someone here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2571.htm#r17 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:30, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:36, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploaded without authorization, taken from someone here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2571.htm#r18 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:30, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:36, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploaded without authorization, taken from someone here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2571.htm#r20 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:31, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:36, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploaded without authorization, taken from someone here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2571.htm#r20 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:31, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:36, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploaded without authorization, taken from someone here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2571.htm#r44 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:32, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploaded without authorization, taken from someone here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2571.htm#r44 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:32, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploaded without authorization, taken from someone here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2571.htm#r44 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:32, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploaded without authorization, taken from someone here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2571.htm#r44 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:32, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploaded without authorization, taken from someone here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2571.htm#r45 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:32, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploaded without authorization, taken from someone here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2567.htm#r23 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploaded without authorization, taken from someone here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2567.htm#r23 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploaded without authorization, taken from someone here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2567.htm#r23 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploaded without authorization, taken from someone here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2567.htm#r23 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploaded without authorization, taken from someone here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2567.htm#r23 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:38, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploaded without authorization, taken from someone here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2567.htm#r23 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:38, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploaded without authorization, taken from someone here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2567.htm#r23 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:38, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploaded without authorization, taken from someone here : https://www.autotitre.com/forum/Vehicules-speciaux/Photos-de-voitures-de-Police-34001p2572.htm#r34 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom - copyvio. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 16:38, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ClaireDemayer (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:59, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:45, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Files of User:Agelworld
[edit]The user's only two contributions are pdf documents that are literally just advertising for their business. Out of Project scope. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:43, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:23, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Files of User:Kasyed
[edit]- File:Shilajit by Natural herbs shop.jpg
- File:Shilajit From The himalayas by Natural Herbs Shop.jpg
- File:Shilajit (paste) From The himalayas by Natural Herbs Shop.jpg
- File:Shilajit supreme qulality From The himalayas by Natural Herbs Shop.jpg
- File:Shilajit (Fresh) From The himalayas by Natural Herbs Shop.jpg
Advertising by a single-purpose account. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:59, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:24, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely own work - certificate. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:30, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:24, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
(c) at https://qazaxsement.com/az/2019/03/09/yerli-%C9%99halini-isl%C9%99-t%C9%99min-etm%C9%99k-m%C9%99qs%C9%99di-il%C9%99-qazax-sement-zavodunun-t%C9%99l%C9%99bin%C9%99-%C9%99sas%C9%99n-zavodda-calisan-podratci-sirk%C9%99tl%C9%99r-iscil%C9%99r/ from 2018 Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:31, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:24, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
No source of mountain photo or basemap/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:32, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:24, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Atharvgairola692004 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Facebook or smaller size files with no metadata suggest they are not own work.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ali.jamal3 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own work on this illustration & glamour shot.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:56, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope for being both PDF format and self-promotion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:59, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Low res image, unlike to be own work. Also no EXIF. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Notice the overprinting at lower left corner, that the image is unused and that it appears to be a Selfie. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:02, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ouseph1997 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claims of own work on small images, images which are obviously not own work, and small facebook or smaller images collected into this gallery.
- File:Mar Joseph Kallarangatt Pala.jpg
- File:Kallarangatt Mar Ouseph.jpg
- File:Coat of arms of Archdeacon and Gate of all india.jpg
- File:Mar Sapor and Mar Proth Forane Church Kothanalloor.jpg
- File:Pesaha.jpg
- File:Yousif& Francis photo1.jpg
- File:Reji Pulluthuruthiyil with Dr APJ Abdul Kalam.jpg
- File:Marthoma Sleeha Sleeha of Hendo.jpg
- File:Syro Malabar Flag.jpg
- File:Unofficial Flag of Syro Malabar Church.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:05, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE Ahmadtalk 19:53, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 17:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope Vyacheslav Bukharov (talk) 20:06, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 17:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Com:OS. Hanooz 21:49, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 17:24, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Com:OS. Hanooz 21:49, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 17:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Com:OS. Hanooz 21:50, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 17:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Com:OS. Hanooz 21:47, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:09, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by پایگاه علم روز (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Com:OS.
Hanooz 21:47, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:09, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Com:OS. Hanooz 21:48, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:09, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Com:OS. Hanooz 21:48, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:09, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Com:OS. Hanooz 21:48, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:09, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
This is a copyright violation on Youtube. Also this uploader has been blocked for license laundering under multiple accounts. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:13, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:07, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
This is a copyright violation on Youtube. Also this uploader has been blocked for license laundering under multiple accounts. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:13, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete immediately, the YouTube uploader (Noticias en Red) it's not the copyright owner, channel America TV. Frodar (talk) 22:23, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:06, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Image from copyrighted magazine. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:31, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:03, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work on drawing & image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:07, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:15, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ununpentium115 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own work, seems to be copied from corporate website.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:09, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:15, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Private Picture. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 20:36, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 14:45, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Private Picture. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 20:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 14:45, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Com:OS. Hanooz 21:44, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 14:42, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Per their username, the uploader is the subject of the photo, the metadata indicates the author is "BerlianDaandelPhotography". Need their permission to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:11, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Orphan personal photo; no other contributions by uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:00, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Graphic uploaded only as advertising, has no potential educational uses, out of Project scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Add these similar files for the same reason:
Thanks Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:32, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per del req-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:02, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Advertising by a self-proclaimed digital marketing consultant. Out of Project scope: has no potential educational uses. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:40, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:03, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
image blurred beyond recognition — Preceding unsigned comment added by Хомелка (talk • contribs) 2019-08-23T17:08:19 (UTC)
Deleted Orphan badly blurred photo of plant we have many good images of. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:06, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jabba the Hutt
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted character.
- File:Jabba the Hutt (10585038414).jpg
File:Philpott coppinger.jpg- File:SWCA - Jabba the Hutt (16582673293).jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- About File:Philpott coppinger.jpg, I canceled. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:30, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted 2 per nom (kept one which has OTRS). -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:08, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Photograph is uploader's work but the original poster is not, and its copyright status is not described Adabow (talk) 04:26, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Derivative work; photographer does not have rights to license the poster photographed. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:09, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Appears to be a self-created, promotional image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:49, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept, in use in en:w article about person referenced. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:11, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
This file was sent to "no source" but it appears to have a source. Due to the list of exceptions for NASA photos, I am asking an additional administrator to review this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:57, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I've added the source and NASA licence. Can i also remove the (No source since) tag as normal user? Regards --Ras67 (talk) 12:40, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- The no source tag is already gone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept problem appears resolved. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:12, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
useless, bad quality Milseburg (talk) 07:43, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Uncat since June; blurry unclear unidentified photo with no evident in scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:15, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work showing a poster whose copyright status is unclear. Chiyako92 (talk) 07:52, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. DW poster is main subject of photo, not de minimis. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:17, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:08, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Copyright viol -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:19, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:33, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted False license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:20, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
copyright... looks like google maps image Grullab (talk) 10:42, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Indeed. I do not believe the uploader of the satellite. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:23, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rowanwindwhistler (talk · contribs)
[edit]As of 2018-10-15, Commons no longer accepts GFDL-only files, per Commons:Village pump/Proposals/Archive/2018/08#No longer allow GFDL for some new uploads. As uploader, User:Rowanwindwhistler must choose another license. I will withdraw this deletion request once the uploader has done so.
- File:Mohammad adil rais-Invasion of Anatolia and Armenia-es.svg
- File:OkupacjaKP1914-18-es.svg
- File:Marathe-es.svg
- File:Territorial expansion during the reign of Khan Krum 803-814-es.svg
- File:TerritoriosSerboMontenegrinosLondres1915.svg
- File:81ArabAbbasidPeriod750-885-es.svg
- File:Byzantine Macedonia 1045CE-es.svg
- File:Caucasus 1245 AD map-es.svg
- File:Prussiamap-es.svg
- File:Caucasus 1450 map de altSimplified-es.svg
- File:Caucasus 1450 map de alt-es.svg
- File:Caucasus 1490 map de alt-es.svg
- File:AsturiasDeSantillana.svg
- File:FGM prevalence UNICEF 2016-es.svg
- File:Map of Eduens people-es.svg
- File:EsuemaFlortubulosa.svg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:36, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Magog the Ogre, the licenses of the files have been changed
an exception of File:TerritoriosSerboMontenegrinosLondres1915.svg, File:Prussiamap-es.svg and File:EsuemaFlortubulosa.svg.MONUMENTA Talk 16:16, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:09, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by على حدة طيبا (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Iranian teenage girl in underwear in Dubai 1.jpg
- File:Iranian teenage girl in underwear in Dubai 2.jpg
- File:Iranian teenage girl in underwear in Dubai.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:12, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Problematic as all get out, but File:Iranian teenage girl in underwear in Dubai 1.jpg is in use.--Prosfilaes (talk) 11:11, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Lots of problematic reasons, as mentioned above, but I'm going to focus on the fact the pictures portray the hips of a woman in underwear. No face, no background. Nothing about the pictures illustrates anything about being Iranian, teenage, or in Dubai, not to mention prostitution (as the descriptions do), so I find them unlikely to be useful for any educational purpose. Delete these, given that we have plenty of less problematic photos of women wearing underwear. Category:Women's knickers Even the one that's in use, since, again, nothing about the photo illustrates what it purports to illustrate. --GRuban (talk) 17:41, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per GRuban. --4nn1l2 (talk) 15:53, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:49, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:03, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Looks like a Facebook or similar image, due to size and file quality. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:59, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:02, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gyrostat as no source (No source since) - however it is from NASA. Please advise why this is considered "no source"? Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:13, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I've added the source and NASA licence. Can i also remove the (No source since) tag as normal user? Regards --Ras67 (talk) 12:39, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:02, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no source (No source since): it says "own work" - please advise why this webM is not considered own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:15, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Looking at the history you can see that the uploader fixed this shortly after the tagging. As long as they don't state so, we cannot consider something to be own work by the uploader of course. But now the uploader did what they initially forgot on upload, I don't understand why the tag was converted to DR where it could have been simply removed. Jcb (talk) 07:58, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- I very occasionally ask for clarity on deletions so that the process is adequately documented. Thank you for your reply. I withdraw my nomination Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Metadata says "screenshot". Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:19, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:58, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Seems to be used for self promo on en.wiki 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:19, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Low res image, unlike to be own work. Also no EXIF. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:40, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:48, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
too unclear Rudolphous (talk) 06:47, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:47, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work showing a video – whose copyright status is unclear – on a screen. Chiyako92 (talk) 07:52, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:47, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Small, low res, no exif. Unlikely to be own work. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:54, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Datu abidin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Definitely not own work. Source should be provided. File:Sumpong Seal.jpg, File:Barangay 7 Seal.jpg & File:Managok Seal.jpg are from Facebook (per EXIF).
- File:SUMPONG-SEAL-300x300.png
- File:DALWANGAN-300x300.png
- File:BARANGAY-CABANGAHAN-300x300.png
- File:BARANGAY-APO-MACOTE-300x300.png
- File:Sumpong Seal.jpg
- File:Barangay 11 Malaybalay Seal.jpg
- File:Barangay 10 Seal.jpg
- File:Barangay 7 Seal.jpg
- File:Barangay 1.jpg
- File:Kalasungay Seal.jpg
- File:Managok Seal.jpg
- File:Aglayan Seal.jpg
- File:Seal of Barangay Casisang, Malaybalay, Philippines.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:05, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:06, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:06, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:06, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:05, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Drawing by Marco Foppoli, (as can be seen here) still living Italian heraldic artist. Therefore under copyright and inappropriate on commons. 89.85.248.226 01:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio from bad Flickr user Sacheverelle. This image has been previously deleted per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:1950s_Christian_Dior_Silver_Satin_Dress.jpg Mabalu (talk) 01:56, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license. Well there is a {{PD-ineligible}}, but is this valid here? JuTa 03:40, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- No, {{PD-ineligible}} is invalid license tag. Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:54, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license. Well there is a {{PD-ineligible}}, but is this valid here? JuTa 03:42, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- No, {{PD-ineligible}} is invalid license tag. Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:55, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
File:Приказ Минздравмедпрома РФ от 19.06.1996 г. № 254 «Об отмене «Методических рекомендаций «Программа детоксикации».jpeg
[edit]This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license. Well there is a {{PD-ineligible}}, but is this valid here? JuTa 03:43, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- No, {{PD-ineligible}} is invalid license tag. Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:55, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- (Jameslwoodward), but what about Template:PD-RU-exempt/en? This document should fall within this definition. MBH 00:03, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- MBH, Eugene, who is a Russian native speaker, thinks it should be deleted. I don't read Russian at all, but I know that Eugene is very rarely wrong. I see that you are also a Russian speaker, so perhaps the two of you could discuss it -- I will do whatever you agree upon, or, of course, Eugene could restore it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- When I tagged file, tag was {{PD-ineligible}}. I didn't follow it since that. Sure, {{PD-RU-exempt}} is correct tag. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: License was fixed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Small size, low quality, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:34, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:55, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Dw no source since (dw no source since), but I don't see the problem. It's a photo of a sports arena. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:39, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- I also do not see any problem in this picture. It is just a sport arena and the picture is made by me personally. --Visem (talk) 07:13, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: All ture, but the arena is in Ukraine and appears to be recent enough so that we must assume that it is still under copyright. The image infringes on the architect's copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
This is not work of US government. Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:04, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:58, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, in my opinion the file is out of project scope due to small size and bad quality. Taivo (talk) 08:06, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:58, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:19, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:58, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal file, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:26, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:59, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
- File:Vincenzo maiorano white.png
- File:Vincenzo maiorano super milano.png
- File:Vincenzo maiorano fashion week.png
- File:Maiorano vincenzo modabari look.jpg
- File:Maiorano vincenzo style.jpg
- File:Vincenzo-Maiorano-stile.jpg
- File:Maiorano Vincenzo.jpg
- File:Vincenzo-Maiorano-761x1024.jpg
- File:Vincenzo-maiorano.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:54, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:00, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Not "own work", but a magazine scan of copyrighted photo without permission. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:41, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:00, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
not used. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:00, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:07, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:00, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
unused. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 10:50, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:00, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
If published 1992, not public domain yet in the U.S.A.. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:52, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:01, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
At en.Wiki the logo is assessed as non free! Please tell us via OTRS that you have the right to publish this under a free licence, else COM:PCP. Ras67 (talk) 12:10, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:02, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
This is actually not by Frohawk, but by Julian Human[1], a living artist. FunkMonk (talk) 12:51, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:02, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation. It is a cropped version of a photo published elsewhere. You can tell it is from the original because of the vehicles that can be observed between the skid and the body of the helicopter, and the green portaloo on the nose of the skid. Original, credited to Adam Glasson is here - https://www.bathchronicle.co.uk/news/bath-news/air-ambulance-m4-caused-delays-317481 2A00:23C6:FA02:EC00:7504:F6DB:F461:1E1C 13:13, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:05, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
copyvio from https://www.facebook.com/shahidshabazofficial/photos/rpp.128980254100631/925884024410246/?type=3&theater Tracy Von Doom (talk) 13:18, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:04, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
This is not a free image. It does not belong on Commons. It is a copyrighted logo that belongs on Wikipedia under a fair use rationale. Original logo here - https://greatwesternairambulance.com 2A00:23C6:FA02:EC00:7504:F6DB:F461:1E1C 13:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:05, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Used for self-promo on en.wiki. Article under speedy. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:23, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:05, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:47, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:05, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Instagram image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:07, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:06, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of the project scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:07, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:06, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
and
- File:Taye 132.jpg
- File:Taye's law of gravitational pull.jpg
- File:TAYE'S LAW OF GRAVITATIONAL PULL.jpg
- File:Taiwo.jpg
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:08, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:06, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:06, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Instagram picture, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:06, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Uzumasa hideki (talk · contribs)
[edit]False dates, unlikely to be own works.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:05, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Most likely stolen from Britannica, specifically from https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/151065/Danish-literature/277544/Postwar-literary-trends which is behind paywall; look at http://media-1.web.britannica.com/eb-media/09/9909-003-729C26FF.jpg . The page http://web-edition.sarvavijnanakosam.gov.in/index.php?title=%E0%B4%9A%E0%B4%BF%E0%B4%A4%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%B0%E0%B4%82:Danish-Language-3.png&uselang=en of course isn’t a serious bid for a free license. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:27, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:08, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1939. Jcb (talk) 17:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Original from Spanish army (Armada Española). PD according to Spanish copyright law (70y after publication). Vysotsky (talk) 08:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Spanish copyright is PMA+80. Jcb (talk) 14:31, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- No, copyright in Spain is either PMA+70 or PMA+80 but PMA isn't applicable in this case. This is an anonymous work, published by the Spanish army. Therefore art. 27.1 of Spanish copyright law applies, which states The exploitation rights in anonymous or pseudonymous works referred to in Article 6 shall last for 70 years following the lawful disclosure thereof. Vysotsky (talk) 14:50, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- There is no information at all at the source website on the publication. The claims that this would be a) published by Spanish army over 70 years ago or b) anonymous work, come both out of nowhere. The only information available at source is the year of creation. Jcb (talk) 15:03, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- You keep hammering on irrelevant points. There are only two important facts re copyright in this case: year & photographer. 1) The boat is in the dock, so the photograph was made in 1913. 2) The name of the photographer is unknown. Therefore it is (acc. to Spanish copyright) an anonymous work. This concludes to art. 27.1 of the Spanish copyright act being applicable, and leads to this photograph being in the public domain. Vysotsky (talk) 15:20, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- So you drop the 'publication' part now you realize that there is no publication information? The fact is that we don't have sufficient information to assume this image to be PD. Jcb (talk) 15:32, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- I don't drop anything. I ask you to read the Spanish copyright act. Vysotsky (talk) 15:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- So you drop the 'publication' part now you realize that there is no publication information? The fact is that we don't have sufficient information to assume this image to be PD. Jcb (talk) 15:32, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- You keep hammering on irrelevant points. There are only two important facts re copyright in this case: year & photographer. 1) The boat is in the dock, so the photograph was made in 1913. 2) The name of the photographer is unknown. Therefore it is (acc. to Spanish copyright) an anonymous work. This concludes to art. 27.1 of the Spanish copyright act being applicable, and leads to this photograph being in the public domain. Vysotsky (talk) 15:20, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- There is no information at all at the source website on the publication. The claims that this would be a) published by Spanish army over 70 years ago or b) anonymous work, come both out of nowhere. The only information available at source is the year of creation. Jcb (talk) 15:03, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- No, copyright in Spain is either PMA+70 or PMA+80 but PMA isn't applicable in this case. This is an anonymous work, published by the Spanish army. Therefore art. 27.1 of Spanish copyright law applies, which states The exploitation rights in anonymous or pseudonymous works referred to in Article 6 shall last for 70 years following the lawful disclosure thereof. Vysotsky (talk) 14:50, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Spanish copyright is PMA+80. Jcb (talk) 14:31, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The date of creation is irrelevant here -- the only thing that matters is the date of publication and, as Jcb says, there is no evidence that it was published.until its appearance here. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:11, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. I could not track this back to e.g. Nasa. Jcb (talk) 18:50, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LegendaryJagMaster (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of photos, missing permission.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:25, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 21:44, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:13, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Seemingly artwork from 2010, however not by the photo author, and therefore not eligible for PD-old and a source or OTRS for CC is needed Kissa21782 (talk) 21:47, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:14, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
obvious copyvio Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Withdraw as nom after closer look at copyright status. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:18, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1.75.228.57 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: screenshor for website Yann (talk) 02:18, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. When I made and uploaded this screenshot I was careful to check, asking on Commons:Village pump/Copyright/ the copyright status, and there were no concerns raised. The main body of the image consists of PD images; if there are concerns about the page header chrome - though de minimis likely applies - then that can be cropped off, while retaining the rest. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:06, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per above. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:33, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Replaced by a better copy in file File:EAM-Greece-Poster-Lighthouse-1944.jpg Flashdart2 (talk) 02:47, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:33, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 04:09, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: low quality, superseded by File:Znak A-1.svg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:34, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Satish Dahiya (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).
- File:Priyasha Dahiya.jpg
- File:Sujata Dahiya.jpg
- File:Sujata wo Major Satish Dahiya.jpg
- File:Satishdahiyawithwife.jpg
- File:Satishdahiya.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:29, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete for File:Satishdahiya.jpg unless it can be OTRS verified. This file does seem to be being used in this draft for an English Wikipedia article; so, maybe it would be considered OK per COM:SCOPE. The problem with this file is, however, that it can be seen used online on quite a number of websites, such as this one, prior to it being uploaded to Commons. The subject of the draft is supposed to have been killed in 2017 and the photo is dated to 2013; so, it is possible that it is the uploader's own work and is just being used on other websites. At the same time, it's also just as possible that uploader is not the original source of the photo and just got it from one of these websites. Per COM:PCP, the file should probably only should be kept if copyright ownership can be verified by Wikimedia OTRS per item 2 of COM:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS?. Delete for the four other photos even if OTRS verified. File:Sujata wo Major Satish Dahiya.jpg actually seems to be the source image for File:Satishdahiya.jpg and the other three also appear to be personal images of Dahiya and his family. The EXIF data and the dates the photos were taken would seem to support this, and I guess it's possible that they could be used in an English Wikipedia article; that would, however, be more of an editorial/contextual concern than a licensing concern. User:Satish Dahiya who uploaded the photos cannot obviously be the deceased Major Satish Dahiya, but my guess is that he or she is probably a family member or friend of Dahiya trying to create a Wikipedia article about Dahiya. I guess if OTRS could verify these images as well, they could be kept under their current licenses, but I personally think there would still the COM:SCOPE issues though since it's unlikely that these would all be considered acceptable per en:WP:IUP#Adding images to articles to be added to a draft or article about Dahiya. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Marchjuly: Woah, That’s a detailed explanation! Thank you :) 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 01:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:36, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:37, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination
CC0 1.0 is not a valid license. - File:梁兆玉浸大.jpg
- File:梁兆玉浸大學生會會室.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:18, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Why? The source shows that these files were indeed released under CC0 1.0. And COM:CC shows that CC0 is a license acceptable to commons. --Catherine Laurence 08:27, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- IMO confusion between CC Public Domain Mark 1.0 and CC0. CC0 1.0 doesn't exist. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:39, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- (Asked by Catherine Laurence about this). The image was provided by this source with this licensing 此圖片以CC0 1.0發布 translated means this photo is licensed based on CC0 1.0 which is this. According to Commons:Licensing#License_information, its allowed. Keep--Cohaf (talk) 09:08, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
photo de mauvaise qualité 109.209.57.11 08:46, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: good enough quality, at least most of the image. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:40, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
image en mauvais état 2A01:CB00:8387:7E00:E861:9C27:B0AD:D585 07:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no alternative at that time. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
no description. The source URL is not alive anymore Estopedist1 (talk) 09:40, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no educational value. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:41, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 09:42, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: LIkely not own work, considering that the only other image uploaded by this user is clearly taken from the web. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:45, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Certainly not "own owrk". No permission from the real author. This uploader uploaded dozens of copyrighted photos without permission. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:45, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:46, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
información metadatos indeseada Jose Carlos Meleiro (talk) 10:27, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio: not own work. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
información de terceros en metadatos indeseada Jose Carlos Meleiro (talk) 10:29, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio: not own work. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
contiene información de tercera persona en metadatos que no quiero que sea publica Jose Carlos Meleiro (talk) 10:30, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio: not own work. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
possibly copyright violation Grullab (talk) 10:55, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
not used. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:15, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:50, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Better picture available: File:Nagarjun- shivapuri national park 20190316 111249.jpg Judithcomm (talk) 11:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:52, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- also file:IV NATION(IV NEL & GUCCI KID).png
IV Nation is not mentioned in en.wiki. The band and its members are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:52, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Recently uploaded png file that is redundant to File:Oauth logo.svg 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:53, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:54, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:45, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:54, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:CSD#F10 () msali raso 15:45, 25 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 15:45, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:54, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
authorship appears disputed (getty images indicates J. Wilds - could it be from a private civilian collection?), source links to enwikipedia not a .gov site. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:52, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Have found and added the original image, which is in the collections of NARA as a US Army Signal Corps photo. Note that the J. Wilds photo on Getty Images is a different photograph entirely - note the different angle and Johnson's hand position. Kges1901 (talk) 18:27, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Do you have any direct NARA links? The link you attached requires registration. I searched "Robert S. Johnson" in NARA and didn't find anything.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:25, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- It is a file digitized by Ancestry.com's Fold3 service but not by the NARA itself, so it won't come up on the online NARA catalog. If you insist I can screenshot the Fold3 page. Kges1901 (talk) 23:09, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Kges1901: I'm a little confused here, so a screenshot would help.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:52, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
-
- Looks Ok I guess. Nomination withdrawn.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 12:21, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:55, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 18:10, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:56, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:39, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:56, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope Vyacheslav Bukharov (talk) 19:45, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:57, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope Vyacheslav Bukharov (talk) 19:48, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:58, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Advertisement Vyacheslav Bukharov (talk) 20:04, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:58, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope Vyacheslav Bukharov (talk) 20:06, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: certainly in scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:58, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope Vyacheslav Bukharov (talk) 20:07, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:58, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Almost completely black image, seemingly unusable file if no valid context is given. Kissa21782 (talk) 21:03, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:59, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Worse version of File:1973 CPA 4276.jpg Красный wanna talk? 21:59, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and redirected. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:59, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Please provide evidence of publication 50 years ago (Iraq) and 30 years ago (Iran).
- File:Mohammed Bahjah Al-Athari.jpg
- File:Jalaluddin Hanafi.jpg
- File:Abd al-Husayn Sharaf al-Din (cropped).jpg
- File:Abd al-Husayn Sharaf al-Din.jpg
- File:Sadr al-Din al-Sadr.jpg
- File:Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr.jpg
- File:Amjad al-Zahawi - BW Portrait.png
- File:Ilham Al Madfai in 2005 (cropped).jpg
- File:Ayad alawi high res (cropped).JPEG
Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:48, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Patrick Rogel ,Thier style or by making an average (like 45 years old for someone aged 80). the Two last pictures is not mine, i just cropped it. Tell me how i can provide that Sadr al-Din al-Sadr.jpg is passed more than 50 years, when he died at 1954? --Ruwaym (talk) 15:31, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Ruwaym: It's not a matter when pictures have been shot but published. Please provide evidence of publication 50 years ago (Iraq) and 30 years ago (Iran) by weblinks. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:33, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Patrick Rogel Please provide Iraq is a government first, then i can help you. --Ruwaym (talk) 15:36, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- @4nn1l2: I guess you can help me. --Ruwaym (talk) 15:46, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, I could not find the date of first publication for File:Sadr al-Din al-Sadr.jpg. While I think the image is old enough to be out of protection, I also believe Commons information should be verifiable per Commons:Essential information. Regretfully, Delete. 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- @4nn1l2: I guess you can help me. --Ruwaym (talk) 15:46, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per 4nn1l2. ~riley (talk) 02:23, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
May not be authors own work. EXIF says photoshop. May be a clear copyvio of the original photographer. Strongly recommend to delete. If it is a fair use then must be uploaded to individual wikis. Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:51, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Move to English Wikipedia. Kutyava (talk) 00:20, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:22, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
No source. Apparently this file does not come from mentioned heraldry website, they have a different depiction. And although the description of the CoA is PD, individual depictions have their separate copyright. No authorship information for this depiction, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 09:55, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:22, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
a File:De-auf die Finger klopfen.ogg already exists, no need for duplicate Jeuwre (talk) 10:36, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:22, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
a File:De-gebraucht.ogg already exists, no need for duplicate Jeuwre (talk) 11:12, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:21, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
I wish to have all versions of this person't photo from before 18 Sptember, 2017 removed. They no longer serve a purpose as the one from 18 September, 2017 is the most up-to-date one. I am the copyright owner of all these photos. Mikko Luntiala (talk) 11:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:22, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- also File:شرح شعار التراس سوبرنوفا .png
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:22, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saahil R Sultanpuri (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) (perhaps the other people are notable).
- File:On the Lauching of Media lexicon Edu.jpg
- File:Kumar Sanu Birthday.jpg
- File:Legendary world famous Kathak Guru Birju ji Maharaj.jpg
- File:Late Legendary composer Khayyam saab blessings me.jpg
- File:With Legendary Singer Asha Bhosle After Recording.jpg
- File:On release of Haule Haule Single song media meet with Hari Haran And Sadhna jejurikar ji.jpg
- File:IMG-20190705-WA0010-01.jpg
- File:With Javed Akhtar saab.jpg
- File:Husn Wale Farebi After Finale song recording.jpg
- File:With Rajesh Vishishth.jpg
- File:Sahil Sultanpur Media file.jpg
- File:Sahil sultanpuri.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:52, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:19, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Low-re images of celebrities, unlikely to be own works.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:17, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:21, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio, from here : https://pershyj.com/p-use-bidlo-treba-postaviti-v-stiila-golovnii-patrulnii-volini-21244 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 18:36, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:21, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio, from here : https://pershyj.com/p-use-bidlo-treba-postaviti-v-stiila-golovnii-patrulnii-volini-21244 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 18:36, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:21, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
автор не разрешил переносить навикисклад — Preceding unsigned comment added by Den1980- (talk • contribs) 2019-08-21T00:51:08 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Ukraine. --Gbawden (talk) 12:50, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
fehlende Genehmigung. Bitte Hinweis auf Urheberschaft bei den Metadaten beachten. Silewe (talk) 11:38, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- the uploader is likely to be the author. --A.Savin 14:37, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 14:38, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
トリミング無しで投稿しましたので 江戸村のとくぞう (talk) 05:24, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused and uploader requested, COM:SPEEDY G7 equivalent. —howcheng {chat} 19:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
DW rather than own work. No source for the base map. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 10:58, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Keep. Uploader explicitly stated that its their own work by providing their username as author's name. I see no reason to doubt that creative elements are uploader's own work. Country outlines are generally understood to be non-creative (see COM:DW#Maps) and if they are subject to any rights, then it is COM:NCR (database rights), rather than copyrights. So I see no reasonable doubt that someone else's copyright's are being violated either. Pikne 11:47, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- This is OBVIOUSLY not own work and the underlying base map is obviously not too simple to be eligible for copyright. And please stop stalking me. Jcb (talk) 14:41, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- See my response here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:LocatieBussum.png. Pikne 16:36, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: very simple and plain map without any copyrightable elements. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:53, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Die Datei wird in keiner Wiki verwendet und genügt da es verwackelt ist nicht den Ansprüche an eine Veröffentlichung. Im Übrigen ist ein weiteres Bild des Neustrelitzer Wasserturms aus dem gleichen Sichtwinkel fotografiert vorhanden — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eandré (talk • contribs) 2019-08-19T16:08:29 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:51, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
a File:De-Bände.ogg already exists, no need for duplicate Jeuwre (talk) 10:40, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: Not actually a duplicate: the two files are two different recordings of the same word. --bjh21 (talk) 23:58, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:28, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Smooth O as no permission. Is this covered by {{FoP-Mexico}}? JuTa 10:56, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: No indication of visibility from a public place. — Racconish 💬 15:28, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Blick identisch mit File:Scheitlinsbüchel Pfad 02.jpg, nur hier noch imho störender Kopf Martin Sg. (talk) 11:30, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Das ist bewusst: Eines ist das enzyklopedäische, sachliche Bild, das andere das mehr künstlerische, dynamische Bild. Kann durchaus sein, dass jemand etwas mit Menschen sucht. --Albinfo (talk) 14:42, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:25, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
No image is rendered in either a Chrome or Firefox browser. Perhaps it's an Apple vs PC incompatibility?? Bob K (talk) 12:33, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Please retain the file as the frames of the GIF animation File:Fourier_series_sawtooth_wave_circles_animation.gif are derived from this file. The renderer has recently been having problems with large SVGs (in this case, 512×30720 pixels). You should see an image when a smaller thumbnail is rendered, e.g. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/09/Fourier_series_sawtooth_wave_circle_animation.svg/32px-Fourier_series_sawtooth_wave_circle_animation.svg.png . Thanks, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 15:17, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Nope. I don't see it there either. --Bob K (talk) 22:19, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:24, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Darstellung überholt, besseres Bild bereits hochgeladen Jost (talk) 16:04, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Please name the new picture. Without this info the old file should be kept.--Wdwd (talk) 07:57, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:21, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Darstellung überholt, besseres Bild bereits hochgeladen Jost (talk) 16:06, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:22, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Darstellung überholt, besseres Bild bereits hochgeladen Jost (talk) 16:08, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:21, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Darstellung überholt, besseres Bild bereits hochgeladen Jost (talk) 16:09, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:20, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Darstellung überholt, besseres Bild bereits hochgeladen Jost (talk) 16:11, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Please name the new picture. Without this info the old file should be kept.--Wdwd (talk) 07:57, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:20, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Fair use (Fair use) The description says fan art. It is probably copyrightable anyway, but needs to be discussed. Ymblanter (talk) 16:48, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- The file is mine. The artist is me too.007master (talk) 18:22, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Dubious authorship. OTRS validation needed. — Racconish 💬 15:19, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
The image was found on a wikipedia variant http://wiki.scolopi.net where it was uploaded without source or reference. Pictured created between 1967-1989, unlikely in public domain. Henxter (talk) 17:11, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission needed. — Racconish 💬 15:16, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Part damaged, has been replaced with https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PL_Thomas_Paine_-_Zdrowy_rozs%C4%85dek,_I_ed.pdf TeresaPelka (talk) 18:10, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Info file is used in Wikisource. Ankry (talk) 18:32, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Info the file is not supported by the author (me); keeping it would violate copyright. With regard to Wikimedia and worth of written material, it is enough to spellcheck both: you'd be keeping the file for sandpit exercise. Please use another. --TeresaPelka (talk) 11:08, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I have requested removal of the file many times, over years: the written matter had been compromised by a third party. I placed my requests with Polish Wikisource. It is only a glimpse to compare two small samples.
Naturally, error-free quality was my objective throughout, not only for the sample.
Thomas Paine, Common Sense in Polish (Zdrowy rozsądek), my 1st edition, spellcheck. Language Tool message on top of the screen, "No errors were found".
Thomas Paine Common Sense in Polish, correct
Zdrowy rozsądek, the file that should be removed:
Thomas Paine, Common Sense in Polish, the damaged file
I do not provide diversification for my works, and cannot agree to have it forced by Wikisource. I have also offered, a few times, that my works could be removed altogether. --TeresaPelka (talk) 22:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:14, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Part damaged, has been replaced with https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PL_Deklaracja,_Konstytucja,_Karta_i_dalej,_I_ed.pdf TeresaPelka (talk) 19:39, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Info file is used in Wikisource. Ankry (talk) 18:33, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Info the file is not supported by the author (me); keeping it would violate copyright. With regard to Wikimedia and worth of written material, it is enough to spellcheck both: you'd be keeping the file for sandpit exercise. Please use another. --TeresaPelka (talk) 11:06, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Oppose These files aren't damaged (User:TeresaPelka uses polish term uszkodzony to describe it, but everyone can download or read it). It's just previous issue/redaction of the same work. It was edited by many polish Wikisource users, me too. I don't agree to delete and waste my work, even if new redaction is better than previous. It's not violate copyright, since the licence is Creative Commons. --Matlin (talk) 15:53, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I have requested removal of the file many times, over years: the written matter had been compromised by a third party, and this means the file is damaged. I placed my requests with Polish Wikisource, before edition by Matlin and others. I have provided proper formats, it is only a glimpse to compare two small samples.
Of course, linguistically error-free quality was my objective throughout, not only for the sample.
USA civics in Polish (Deklaracja, Konstytucja, Karta), my 1st edition, simply spellcheck. The message on top of the screen is "No errors were found", and The Language Tool is quite good quality, though it may fail on syntax and declensions in Polish.
USA civics in Polish, correct
Deklaracja, Konstytucja, Karta, the file that should be removed:
USA civics in Polish, the damaged file
I do not provide diversification for my works, and cannot agree to have it forced by Wikisource: quality is very important in professional translation. I have also offered, a few times, that my works could be removed altogether, but that has been denied by Polish Wikisource so far. --TeresaPelka (talk) 22:12, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:14, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no license (No license since) JuTa 22:36, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Does not contain a recognized license, eligible for deletion in 7 days via 'no license since'. Make sure to not keep-close this DR as long as the file is in Category:Files with no machine-readable license. Jcb (talk) 14:30, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - A license statement is shown on the Indian army's website, nothing here indicates that the source was a third party. FOARP (talk) 11:36, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per archive produced. — Racconish 💬 15:12, 8 December 2019 (UTC)