Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/08/23
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
This images was accidentally uploaded with a batch of images from the National Gallery of Art, Washington. It is within copyright and should be deleted immediately. Brwz (talk) 00:39, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, per request by uploader; upload mistake -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:03, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by GreenMeansGo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: I'm not sure there is a reverse search for pdfs, but this is derivative of a large amount of other works, and seems well out of scope besides. Given users only other upload, very likely also taken from online without permission. GMGtalk 03:01, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, collection of many photos without attribution nor sourcing. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:10, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Mistake, sorry. CesareBonaparte (talk) 03:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, per request by uploader -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:13, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Not own work. I found this file here. Seby1541 (talk) 05:21, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:43, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
User page apparently not created by the user. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Herbythyme. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:09, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused & old chemical structure; superseded by File:Valence structural formula of methylamine.svg with better file name & also high-quality. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 09:12, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:07, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Pornografisches Material Susifotze (talk) 13:23, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 13:42, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by P&S Comunicação (talk · contribs)
[edit]Just for SPAM at pt.wiki.
- File:Produto Francisca Joias.jpg
- File:Produto Francisca Joias.png
- File:Sabrina Nunes.jpg
- File:Sabrina N.jpg
- File:Sabrina Nunes, CEO da Francisca Joias.jpg
Stanglavine (talk) 11:49, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - product spam. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
bad quality, better file exists: file:Wikimaniadia2byEzarate.9.jpg Ата (talk) 13:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and uploader request. --Ezarateesteban 17:44, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: More unused files. Commons is not a private photo album. NOTE: These files were used in now-deleted hoax articles by uploader and then again by their sockpuppet on en WP.
CactusWriter (talk) 17:36, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 22:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I fail to see how these documents about investments can have any relevance to the scope of this project.
- File:Jimenez Torres Investments.pdf
- File:Investments Vanguard Jorge Jimenez 15.pdf
- File:Acquisition.pdf
Herby talk thyme 08:50, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete all. These appear to be part of an elaborate joke / hoax being perpetrated by the uploader to claim that Torres is the richest man in Puerto Rico. (See en:Draft:Jorge A. Jimenez Torres.) If the numbers in these documents were to be believed, they would make Jimenez the wealthiest man in the world; a claim which surely would have been uncovered by now and not need a new draft article. WikiDan61 (talk) 15:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Aaah and that draft has gone so "out of scope" too. Thanks for the link. --Herby talk thyme 16:51, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The draft article on en wp has now been deleted so these are out of scope and can be deleted. --Herby talk thyme 16:52, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The draft article on en wp has now been deleted so these are out of scope and can be deleted. --Herby talk thyme 16:52, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused & old chemical structure; superseded by equivalent File:Structural formula of 2-ethylbutan-1-ol.svg with better file name & also high-quality. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 18:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/User talk:Djmanusoggi
Lo sentimos, esta imagen no es interesante para una enciclopedia CentralTime301 (talk) 23:33, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:39, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Because it is A selfie Susifotze (talk) 14:42, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Not own work, no permission. --Yann (talk) 11:28, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Highly doubtful this is own work. Alternate versions available online. Low resolution thumbnail. Likely too complex to qualify under COM:TOO. GMGtalk 12:28, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 08:33, 24 August 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 19:18, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Changed idea 95.179.169.119 16:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 11:30, 24 August 2019 UTC: Changed idea --Krdbot 19:18, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Changed idea 149.28.139.199 16:47, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 11:30, 24 August 2019 UTC: Changed idea --Krdbot 19:18, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
These images are claimed to be public domain in Pakistan due to their early 1960s publication dates. However, in the US the copyright appears to have been restored under URAA.
- File:Pakistani singer Noor Jehan in 1966.jpg
- File:Mala Pakistani singer in 1965.jpg
- File:Ahmed Rushdi singer 1966.jpg
- File:Actor Nirala in 1961.jpg
- File:Actor Lehri in 1962.jpg
- File:Comedian Rafi Khawar in 1966.jpg
- File:Playback singer A Nayyar in 1966.jpg
- File:Actor Waheed Murad in 1965.jpg
- File:Pakistani actress Rani in 1966.jpg
- File:Music director Nisar Bazmi in 1965.jpg
- File:Singer Mujeeb Alam in 1966.jpg
- File:Playback singer Akhlaq Ahmed.jpg
- File:Film actor Waheed Murad and Actress Deeba.jpg
- File:Singer Masood Rana in 1965.jpg
- File:Film artist Waheed Murad in 1966.jpg
- File:Waheed Murad with co-stars in 1960.jpg
- File:Singer Ahmed Rushdi performing live 1963.jpg
- File:Actor Waheed Murad with Sabiha Khanum in 1964.jpg
- File:Waheed on set in 1965.jpg
- File:Actor Munawwar zarif in 1965.jpg
- File:Ahmed Rushdi during recording in 1965.png
- File:Runa with Rushdi.jpg
Guanaco (talk) 21:45, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Delete Not free in US yet due to URAA. — Jeff G. ツ 21:48, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Keep Images are in public domain according to the country's law and US has got nothing to do with this.Kishfan (talk) 02:40, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Kishfan: Wikimedia Commons files are hosted on servers in the US, we must comply with US copyright law. See COM:L#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law for details. — Jeff G. ツ 02:51, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I was not aware of that. Sorry.Kishfan (talk) 02:59, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:04, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
No evidence that image has been published more than 50 years ago.
- File:Singer Mujeeb Alam 1958.jpg
- File:Actress Rani and Director Hassan Tariq 1959.jpg
- File:Waheed Murad with Noor Jehan.jpg
- File:Munawwar Zarif in 1959.jpg
- File:Masood Rana 1956.jpg
- File:Actor Latif Kapadiya 1962.jpg (added by World's Lamest Critic)
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:20, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, PRP, and previous discussion above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:25, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Comment Mujeeb Alam was born in 1948, so he would have been 10 years old in File:Singer Mujeeb Alam 1958.jpg. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 03:11, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- File:Waheed Murad with Noor Jehan.jpg was taken in 1971, according to this article. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 03:14, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I have added File:Actor Latif Kapadiya 1962.jpg as the date on that one is also obviously false. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 03:18, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: missing essential sourcing information. --ƏXPLICIT 06:32, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The Seanacus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional gallery of images probably collected from unnamed sources due to file sizes, lack of quality, jpg artefacts and so on.
- File:Snoopy Art Trail.jpg
- File:Giant nest created for the Harry Potter & The Cursed Child Front of House Display. Palace Theatre, Shaftsbury Avenue London.jpg
- File:Early Days Aden Hynes Sculpture Studios College.jpg
- File:Aden Hynes Sculpture Studios Logo.png
- File:Aden Hynes Sculpture Studios Managing Director.jpg
- File:Dragon sculpture created for the theming of the Dragon Falls log flume attraction at Chessington World of Adventures.jpg
- File:Giant golden BAFTA mask award sculpture, created for the televised award ceremony on stage.jpg
- File:Giant dtone Buddha faces created for the theming of the Dragon Falls log flume attraction at Chessington World of Adventures.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; user warned. --Gbawden (talk) 06:24, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
save wikipedia, delete the deletionists AWhiteElk (talk) 19:11, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim (talk) 21:45, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ragazzodeitalia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely claim of own work on this gallery of old photos of a performer. Small file sizes, low quality, no metadata - make it unlikely that these are all the work of a single photographer - other than as a collection from unnamed sources.
- File:Evelyn - Walter Chiari - Perl of Gold Award.jpg
- File:Centro America Evelyn Tour.jpg
- File:Grand finale Noche de Gala.png
- File:Noche de gala evelyn show.jpg
- File:Evelyn Noche de gala musical.jpg
- File:Evelyn tango show in Madrid.jpg
- File:Jorge Perez Evelyn in Bologna- Italia.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:47, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
No permission from the photographer. Picture is not old enough for PD-old. Jcb (talk) 19:05, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Permission given by the author, Rijksmuseum at the source (PD). Uploaded by User:LizzyJongma, former Datamanager at Rijksmuseum, advocate of Open Access and current Board Member of Wikimedia Netherlands. Source was even mentioned, but under "Accession number". Some museums upload images because they like to share. Vysotsky (talk) 09:03, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Nonsense, a 'museum' does not take pictures. Also uploader did not add an applicable license, so the file cannot be kept anyway without more information and a valid license. Jcb (talk) 14:34, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- No, the Rijksmuseum employs photographers. And Dutch copyright is crystal clear, see art. 4.1 and article 7. (IVIR translation of art. 7: "Where labour which is carried out in the service of another consists in the making of certain literary, scientific or artistic works, the person in whose service the works were created is taken to be the maker, unless the parties have agreed otherwise.") The Rijksmuseum published this photograph with the correct license, as was clearly indicated in the Summary of the orginal description and in the given original source as Copyright Publiek domein. Mind you, the Rijksmuseum has now published >400,000 images (PD) in Rijksstudio, incl. photographs of sculptures, furniture and jewelry. Thousands of these images have already been uploaded to Commons. Vysotsky (talk) 16:10, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- At the source, there is no copyright information. But looking for general information, we can read: "7. Op afbeeldingen en teksten zonder publiek domein vermelding op deze website rust auteursrecht van het Rijksmuseum als auteursrechthebbende op het fotomateriaal, en in voorkomend geval op de afbeelding zelf. Het enkele feit dat deze website afbeeldingen en teksten bevat betekent niet dat het Rijksmuseum in alle gevallen gerechtigd is licenties te verlenen voor verdere openbaarmaking of verveelvoudiging daarvan." - conclusion: with the current information we must consider this file a copyright violation. Jcb (talk) 16:31, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- I'm sorry to say, but you don't look thoroughly enough and you misread texts. Step by step: go to the photo of the object at the website of the Rijksmuseum. Click on "meer objectgegevens" (more metadata). Scroll down and see "Verwerving en rechten. Verwervingaankoop 1891. Copyright Publiek domein". The text you quote is clearly about afbeeldingen en teksten zonder publiek domein vermelding (without an indication of public domain.) This one has a clear public domain mention. By Jove, the image has even been uploaded by User:LizzyJongma, former Datamanager at the Rijksmuseum, advocate of Open Access and current Board Member of Wikimedia Netherlands (as I already mentioned above). Do you dispute the copyright tag "Public domain" of the Rijksmuseum? Vysotsky (talk) 20:55, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- The 'Public domain' is about the depicted object, not about the picture. I don't believe that you did not notice that. Jcb (talk) 21:09, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Sigh. Of course I noticed the public domain tag is about the depicted object and also about the picture. I think it is quite remarkable that you, as a Commons administrator who deleted tens of thousands of images, is seemingly not aware of the copyright details of some of the best initiatives regarding "releasing" images by GLAM institutions from the country you live in: RCE (486k images to Commons), Dutch Nationaal Archief (414k images to Commons) and Rijksmuseum (now 17k images in Commons). As for the Rijksmuseum: here are some interesting reads: Rijksmuseum & copyright, Medium, Open Rijksmuseum, Hereditas Nexus etc. Or this video in Commons. Indeed, the photographs of the objects are also CC-0. Vysotsky (talk) 22:43, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- The 'Public domain' is about the depicted object, not about the picture. I don't believe that you did not notice that. Jcb (talk) 21:09, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- I'm sorry to say, but you don't look thoroughly enough and you misread texts. Step by step: go to the photo of the object at the website of the Rijksmuseum. Click on "meer objectgegevens" (more metadata). Scroll down and see "Verwerving en rechten. Verwervingaankoop 1891. Copyright Publiek domein". The text you quote is clearly about afbeeldingen en teksten zonder publiek domein vermelding (without an indication of public domain.) This one has a clear public domain mention. By Jove, the image has even been uploaded by User:LizzyJongma, former Datamanager at the Rijksmuseum, advocate of Open Access and current Board Member of Wikimedia Netherlands (as I already mentioned above). Do you dispute the copyright tag "Public domain" of the Rijksmuseum? Vysotsky (talk) 20:55, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- At the source, there is no copyright information. But looking for general information, we can read: "7. Op afbeeldingen en teksten zonder publiek domein vermelding op deze website rust auteursrecht van het Rijksmuseum als auteursrechthebbende op het fotomateriaal, en in voorkomend geval op de afbeelding zelf. Het enkele feit dat deze website afbeeldingen en teksten bevat betekent niet dat het Rijksmuseum in alle gevallen gerechtigd is licenties te verlenen voor verdere openbaarmaking of verveelvoudiging daarvan." - conclusion: with the current information we must consider this file a copyright violation. Jcb (talk) 16:31, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- No, the Rijksmuseum employs photographers. And Dutch copyright is crystal clear, see art. 4.1 and article 7. (IVIR translation of art. 7: "Where labour which is carried out in the service of another consists in the making of certain literary, scientific or artistic works, the person in whose service the works were created is taken to be the maker, unless the parties have agreed otherwise.") The Rijksmuseum published this photograph with the correct license, as was clearly indicated in the Summary of the orginal description and in the given original source as Copyright Publiek domein. Mind you, the Rijksmuseum has now published >400,000 images (PD) in Rijksstudio, incl. photographs of sculptures, furniture and jewelry. Thousands of these images have already been uploaded to Commons. Vysotsky (talk) 16:10, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Nonsense, a 'museum' does not take pictures. Also uploader did not add an applicable license, so the file cannot be kept anyway without more information and a valid license. Jcb (talk) 14:34, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Dear all, all images/photographs of the Rijksmuseum were published in good faith on Wikimedia Commons in 2015. The uploadtool nor helpful wikimedians (nor anyone else) requested additional copyrightstatements about the photographs of PD material back then. I dont think any of us were aware of a distinction between the depicted object and the photographs taken of PM material. All photographs are taken by staff members of the Rijksmuseum. Even though not explicitly stated in the metadata it is Rijksmuseum Policy to publish all digital data produced by staff members of the museum under a CC0 license. Deleting all images of the Rijksmuseum because of this omission would, in my humble opinion, be a mistake and great loss for Wikimedia Commons --LizzyJongma (talk) 07:30, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for this useful addition. This statement, together with art. 7 of Dutch copyright law, should suffice. Vysotsky (talk) 07:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- @LizzyJongma: Can you please contact OTRS, so that this can be verified? Different from what Vysotsky thinks, such a statement posted by a user here is not sufficient. Also please make sure that your uploads have a valid license for the picture (unless it is a 2D reproduction of a 2D work), because a picture like the one in this DR with only PD-old will be deleted anyway for not having a valid license. Jcb (talk) 15:04, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Jcb: Hoi Jcb, ik heb erg moeite met deze nominatie en de reacties van jou op deze pagina. Op https://hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.18227 kan je duidelijk zien dat de afbeelding is vrijgegeven onder cc-zero net zoals alle andere werken op deze website. Dus nee, Lizzy gaat niet wat naar OTRS sturen en deze foto gaat gewoon behouden worden. Je bent hier enorm uit de bocht gevlogen. Multichill (talk) 16:32, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Ik lees op die plek alleen dat het object Public Domain is, niets over het auteursrecht van de foto. Verder lees ik in de algemene voorwaarden van de site, zoals hierboven geciteerd, dat het ontbreken van een 'Public Domain' vermelding bij de foto betekent dat die niet Public Domain is. Dus met wat we nu hebben moeten we deze afbeelding beschouwen als niet vrij. Dit zijn de feiten die iedereen kan natrekken. Alles wat er verder beweerd wordt is gebaseerd op fantasie. Jcb (talk) 16:50, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Jcb: Hoi Jcb, ik heb erg moeite met deze nominatie en de reacties van jou op deze pagina. Op https://hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.18227 kan je duidelijk zien dat de afbeelding is vrijgegeven onder cc-zero net zoals alle andere werken op deze website. Dus nee, Lizzy gaat niet wat naar OTRS sturen en deze foto gaat gewoon behouden worden. Je bent hier enorm uit de bocht gevlogen. Multichill (talk) 16:32, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- @LizzyJongma: Can you please contact OTRS, so that this can be verified? Different from what Vysotsky thinks, such a statement posted by a user here is not sufficient. Also please make sure that your uploads have a valid license for the picture (unless it is a 2D reproduction of a 2D work), because a picture like the one in this DR with only PD-old will be deleted anyway for not having a valid license. Jcb (talk) 15:04, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Kept image is released as cc-zero on Rijksmuseum website. Multichill (talk) 17:05, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
After the conclusion, but for archive purposes, I'd like to add quickly that in all public communication, Rijksstudio has always been super clear that their intention is to release the images under CC-0. So even if you see any doubt in those particular pages (I don't see it, but *if* you do) then you could consider those additional press releases etc as context. Take for example the API terms of use: "All data and all images made available through the API are either in the public domain or are subject to a CC0 license. The data and images are royalty-free and may be copied, distributed, modified and used without the permission of the Rijksmuseum.". Or this CC case study: " But after some convincing by organizations that advocate for unrestricted access to the public domain, the Rijksmuseum began to open its collections more by choosing to use the CC0 Public Domain Dedication for the digital reproductions.". There are a number of interviews where this intention is clearly emphasized. I can nowhere find any insinuation that their CC-0 (which is a license, not the PD-mark) would only apply to the object and not to the photo. So once you accept the claim that they are the copyright holder (which for an organization like this, should happen on good faith), it should be straight forward imho.
As a bit of feedback to Jcb: I know we take sometimes pride in being thorough as a community in our copyright status - but there's a limit to what is reasonable. Especially when it concerns large collections, a polite question and conversation with the uploader may be a more appropriate approach than a nomination like this. You come across as hostile and I'm confident that is not your intention. Effeietsanders (talk) 20:49, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Where can I find the text that this image is CC0? The referenced URL only states 'public domain' and that seems the work. Rijksmuseum could add one general copyright page that the copyright of all photographs of 3D objects in Rijksstudio belongs to the Rijksmuseum and is licensed under CC0. --Hannolans (talk) 08:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- They 'could add' all kind of pages to suit individual requests. However, the question here is whether that is really needed. The specific page clearly stated cc-0; and for anyone doubting that they may have intended to release the object instead of the image (which really surprises me, but whatever) the context makes the intention obvious. Effeietsanders (talk) 12:50, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- The copyright is 'public domain' at the english page and 'publiek domein' at the nlpage. Confusing that they link the status 'public domain' to https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.en what is an CC0 declaration. A conflicting license is really not helpful. The tag Public Domain should link to https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/deed.nl --Hannolans (talk) 14:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- I think the intention is quite clear: they release whatever rights they may have into the Public Domain (which is not the mark!). Your approach would probably lead to various other people being confused the exact opposite direction (if they would only mark it as public domain, they would never have released it if you want to be super precise about it). I honestly don't see how people can be confused about their intention. I can imagine eternal discussions about which exact phrasing or link would be 'better' or 'more precise' and maybe they even welcome that kind of feedback if provided in the right manner. This is however a deletion request, suggesting that they did not have the right to publish it on Wikimedia Commons. Effeietsanders (talk) 16:03, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Currently the PD license is only visible below the title Objectgegevens (object data). Apparently Hannolans interprets this exact the same way as I do. This is not a detail on the phrasing, it's the complete absence of any statement on the copyright situation of the picture. (Public Domain Mark is indeed wrong, see here) - Jcb (talk) 16:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- I think the intention is quite clear: they release whatever rights they may have into the Public Domain (which is not the mark!). Your approach would probably lead to various other people being confused the exact opposite direction (if they would only mark it as public domain, they would never have released it if you want to be super precise about it). I honestly don't see how people can be confused about their intention. I can imagine eternal discussions about which exact phrasing or link would be 'better' or 'more precise' and maybe they even welcome that kind of feedback if provided in the right manner. This is however a deletion request, suggesting that they did not have the right to publish it on Wikimedia Commons. Effeietsanders (talk) 16:03, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- The copyright is 'public domain' at the english page and 'publiek domein' at the nlpage. Confusing that they link the status 'public domain' to https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.en what is an CC0 declaration. A conflicting license is really not helpful. The tag Public Domain should link to https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/deed.nl --Hannolans (talk) 14:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- They 'could add' all kind of pages to suit individual requests. However, the question here is whether that is really needed. The specific page clearly stated cc-0; and for anyone doubting that they may have intended to release the object instead of the image (which really surprises me, but whatever) the context makes the intention obvious. Effeietsanders (talk) 12:50, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Seems like not own work, but professional promo photo. Small size, no metadata, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:24, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gargara151 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploads by a new user with inconsistent low resolution and incomplete EXIF. Images of a public figure (Iranian pop singer) with questionable authorship and no evidence of permission (the first one is clearly taken from a commercial site and has no educational usage). A better image with reviewed license is available at File:Ali Abdolmaleki.jpg
GermanJoe (talk) 06:37, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gargara151 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small size, low resolution, missing EXIF, user upload history.
4nn1l2 (talk) 11:58, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal vacation photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:56, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:06, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Recently uploaded png file that is redundant to China's svg flag that is already on commons 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 02:09, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Low quality and unused file. 颜邯 (talk) 10:34, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:48, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Very low quality and unused file. 颜邯 (talk) 10:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:48, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused file. A mix of personal biography with some craft instruction. Out of Scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:53, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:48, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused file possibly piece of personal artwork. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 14:13, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:49, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gouspak pathan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Gouspak pathan.jpg
- File:GAUSKHAN PATHAN.jpg
- File:GAUSPAKKHAN PATHAN.jpg
- File:GOUSPAK PATHAN.jpg
- File:GAUSPAK PATHAN.jpg
- File:VIJAY KUMAR DESHMUKH.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Image out of project scope Liance (talk) 14:45, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:51, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Edward M Wood (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possibly oos.
- File:Chiraditya7.jpg
- File:Chiraditya6.jpg
- File:Chiraditya5.jpg
- File:Chiraditya4.jpg
- File:Chiraditya3.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:48, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Most definitely OOS. Delete. Hiàn (talk)/editing on mobile account. 15:04, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:51, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
out of project scope : not an external hosting tool for "Model House of Commons" (Reddit) Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 16:53, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:52, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal vacation photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:05, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:52, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. And quality of image looks more like DW than original work. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:53, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danny Mcmann (talk · contribs)
[edit]Discasto talk 21:13, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:53, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:33, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:54, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation. Uploader's user name suggests that he is the subject of the photo, we require the photographer's permission and this does not appear to be a selfie. Similar photo at http://westindiacommittee.org/about-us/wic-team/ Verbcatcher (talk) 01:19, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:45, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. No metadata. Possible copyvio.
- File:Image ester technopole.jpg
- File:Emplois.png
- File:Raisons sociales.png
- File:Pl. Jourdan.jpg
- File:Cathédrale Saint Etienne de Limoges.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 02:11, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:45, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
This photo clearly wasn't taken where the uploader claims it was, since the bird in the photo is a dunnock (Prunella modularis), a European species which doesn't occur in Bangladesh (and this individual shows no signs of being in captivity). A reverse google image search brings this up as a potential source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/salnel/19429487840 (where the photo is labeled as copyrighted with all rights reserved) Spizaetus (talk) 03:08, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:45, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Dubious grainy photo is a likely screen shot given uploader's history at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by S882019 and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bol at Oregon.jpg —Bagumba (talk) 03:20, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:44, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
It contains false information about percentage of remembering attributed to the original author Dale. https://lidtfoundations.pressbooks.com/chapter/edgar-dale-and-the-cone-of-experience/ 208.104.233.59 04:14, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is in use in de:Edgar Dale and en:Edgar Dale. If the picture is accurate enough for English and German Wikipedias, it's accurate enough for Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 13:27, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:44, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ingridzippe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted renderings from R&R Studios
- File:05-M-Downtown-MiamiEDIT-3.jpg
- File:05-M-Downtown-Miami lighter.jpg
- File:08-Museum-of-Art-Fort-Lauderdale.jpg
- File:05-M-Downtown-Miami.jpg
- File:Besame Mucho 12345.jpg
SounderBruce 04:18, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:43, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Is uploader photo author? Needs verification. Htm (talk) 04:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:43, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyright infringement.(https://central-j.com/company/) 円周率３パーセント (talk) 05:53, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:43, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
copyvio from https://www.blaser.com/de_CH/knuttwiler-powerdays-2019, harrasment against Greta Thunberg, no description, no exif, unused image by single purpose account C.Suthorn (talk) 06:13, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
wrong upload Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 06:45, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
no description. Not used Estopedist1 (talk) 06:46, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to the hashtags in the description, it's the "O" key from a apple keyboard. Useful at Category:Keyboard letters.-- Darwin Ahoy! 10:33, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Strange claims as Elizabeth Taylor (?), 1975 (?), own work (?), camera position(?) Mutter Erde (talk) 06:54, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Barry Langford can't be the photographer Mutter Erde (talk) 07:07, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Bruneman (talk) 08:09, 23 August 2019 (UTC) Band does not exist anymore
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; now a historical record. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elgatocepedaom1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work. No metadata.
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:52, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious copyvios, see watermark. --Yann (talk) 13:53, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elgatocepedaom1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work. Low res. Some from FB.
- File:FILHASS.jpg
- File:FILHAS Dayhana, Fernandinha 4 é 5 anhos.jpg
- File:FILHAS.jpg
- File:FILHAS CHUPAS.jpg
- File:FILHAS 5.jpg
- File:DOLARES a 63 2019.jpg
- File:CASA QUINTA.jpg
- File:OMAR2.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:31, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Scans/photos of photos. Permission should be given via OTRS. Might be personal/private photos too.
- File:Singing Competition 1990.jpg
- File:Rakaman album solo pertama 1999.jpg
- File:CTM 2003.jpg
- File:TMT 96.jpg
- File:Persembahan depan mb 1984.jpg
- File:Anis Suraya 4 tahun.jpg
- File:EON1992.jpg
- File:Pesta Pantai 1989.jpg
- File:Hari Guru 1990.jpg
- File:Persembahan Makan Malam Sukan Peringkat Negeri Terengganu Wisma Darul Iman 1996.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:37, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:27, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Fue modificado el enlace erroneo. Gaite Manuel 06:27, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Yann. --Gbawden (talk) 10:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Files of User:Prince Roy
[edit]- File:Harbin Scenes 哈爾濱景色 (1791504023).jpg
- File:Harbin Scenes 哈爾濱景色 (1792346804).jpg
- File:Harbin Scenes 哈爾濱景色 (1791501025).jpg
These files from Flickr include personal image. --颜邯 (talk) 10:24, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Instagram image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:35, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Wrong license, not a work by the federal government of the US. 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:39, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for noting this. Will get in touch with city officials to check. Nshervsampad 01:16, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
The file is corrupted or the uploaded was wrong. Ganímedes (talk) 11:07, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- It look more like a server side bug that need to be reported to phabricator and not a file that need to be deleted. Deleting the file will not make the problem go away. --Wilfredor (talk) 12:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- In that case, look for all the files with the same problem uploaded in this category, because it's not a single-photo problem. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 00:19, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Yes it applies perhaps to 1% of files uploaded on that category --Wilfredor (talk) 14:09, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- It look more like a server side bug that need to be reported to phabricator and not a file that need to be deleted. Deleting the file will not make the problem go away. --Wilfredor (talk) 12:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
copyrighted image fails COM:FAIRUSE see wikipage DBigXrayᗙ 12:57, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete unless uploader can show the are actually the author of the original poster. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:49, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
lifted from a Bose web site https://www.bose.fr/fr_fr/support/products/soundtouch_systems_support/ls135_iii.html (3rd photo in the gallery) Domdeparis (talk) 13:07, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Photo is a nokia corporate image used all over the net and in their user documents. Clearly not their own work https://usermanual.wiki/Document/nokia6650frm400serviceschematicsv10.1144138418/html Domdeparis (talk) 13:12, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Photos lifted from the web and pasted together to make a photo montage https://www.americanradiosupply.com/mini-uhf-male-to-uhf-female-coaxial-adapter-connector/ https://www.precisioncam.ca/mini-uhf-female-to-uhf-male-adapter/ Domdeparis (talk) 13:33, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Not own work, photos lifted from the web possible Amazon https://www.amazon.com/Anderson-Metals-Garden-Fitting-Connector/dp/B0070TUXOC Domdeparis (talk) 13:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Selfie with no other information and no usage. The Title says "Hindi CIA". Satdeep Gill (talk) 13:45, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. AlbertoDV (talk) 14:07, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. AlbertoDV (talk) 14:07, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. AlbertoDV (talk) 14:07, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. AlbertoDV (talk) 14:08, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. AlbertoDV (talk) 14:08, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. AlbertoDV (talk) 14:09, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ptrameshdubey (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, promotional.
- File:مرکز تحقیق و توسعه شرکت نواندیشان دنیای صنعت.jpg
- File:برنده ستاره طلایی ژنو.jpg
- File:مهندس کورروش بیات.jpg
Ahmadtalk 16:43, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and building photo likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Not own work.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:44, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 14:06, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- File:Capturecu.png
- File:Capturewowwikipedia.png
- File:Capturebobcasey.png
- File:Genusmap - 2019-08-03T210707.318.png
- File:Genusmap - 2019-07-22T102231.421.png
- File:Genusmap - 2019-07-06T161135.072.png
- File:Genusmap - 2019-07-03T085608.593.png
- File:Genusmap - 2019-06-30T095226.059.png
- File:Genusmap - 2019-06-29T094408.061.png
- File:Genusmap - 2019-06-25T100557.266.png
- File:Genusmap - 2019-06-25T082823.889.png
- File:Genusmap - 2019-06-18T080509.428.png
- File:Genusmap - 2019-06-14T084021.878.png
CptViraj (📧) 03:59, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:13, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Low-re images, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Captureghwb.png
- File:Capturestmark.png
- File:Capturehoward.png
- File:Capturefrankie.png
- File:Capturejerry2.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:52, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Not the work of the uploader and no evidence of release from OMNIPOL a.s. MilborneOne (talk) 17:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
It is extremely unlikely that a university has released its wordmark into the public domain; such a claim surely needs some supporting evidence. ElKevbo (talk) 17:06, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, PCP. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:38, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: Not that’s theres any use for this file, but why not just change it to PD-simple or PD-text? Corky 20:58, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Corkythehornetfan: We don't want the university to sue us or the reusers. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work, doesn't look at all like a real iPhone photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP based on uploader history. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work, see scan artefacts Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP based on uploader history. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
From history of uploads it is unlikely that this is the work of the uploader - refer http://www.aviationanalysis.net/2014/10/WILLIAMS-FJ44-4M-POWER-ALENIA-M-345-HET.html MilborneOne (talk) 17:06, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
From history of uploads it is unlikely that this is the work of the uploader MilborneOne (talk) 17:07, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Photos were edited from source images to remove (C) marks. Not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:07, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Obviously not own work, cut out from something else. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:08, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP based on uploader history. --Gbawden (talk) 10:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Even if this were own work, it's of too poor quality to retain. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:08, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP based on uploader history. --Gbawden (talk) 10:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Obviously not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:08, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:24, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Image not at source given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:09, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; findagrave isn't free anyway. --Gbawden (talk) 10:25, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work, looks like game image or artists rendering Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:10, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:24, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work - see letterboxing Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:10, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:24, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Not free at source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:11, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused and metadata reads "(Photo by Adolfo Bezzi / Electa / Mondadori Portfolio via Getty Images)" Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:11, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
From size and lack of quality, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:12, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP based on uploader history. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, size and lack of quality. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, looks like a team groupshot. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free picture. See w:Antoine de Saint-Exupéry#Extension of copyrights in France.
Juggler2005 (talk) 15:30, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination/ exupery is still under copyright Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:15, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Not useful files
- File:AyotzinapaVivosLos43.png
- File:LloraCatrinaLlueveRabia.png
- File:El campo resiste..jpg
- File:Resiste Corazón Estampa Gigante en la calle.jpg
- File:Plantilla Stencil Resiste Corazón Marcos.jpg
- File:Resiste Corazón Estampa Gigante.jpg
- File:Resiste Corazón (Póster).jpg
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 17:24, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Strong
Oppose. This files belongs to part of the history of the social movements of contemporary Mexico, fulfilling at most the main objective of the Commons as project. Plus, this artistic collective decided made a liberation of his works under Creative Commons. "Useful" for who or what? --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 19:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC) - Oppose: No entiendo el concepto de «Not useful files».
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
copright violation from source website Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:28, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
My own work; Please delete. TheReclaimist (talk) 18:29, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is in use in four articles in English Wikipedia, and also ta:பெசாஹா அப்பம் and Pesaha Appam (Q7171321). Deleting it would cause disruption to those projects for no good reason. --bjh21 (talk) 00:25, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Bjh21: @Gbawden: So we cannot remove our own work that was submitted? Completely ridiculous. TheReclaimist (talk) 18:53, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Credit in the bottom left Wedjet (talk) 19:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Taken from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Hasan Janasheen is not notable personality. 103.79.170.106 20:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Lack of exif data, image took from a Flickr user's photo which is copyrighted: https://www.flickr.com/photos/isleofwightboy-/16179453810/in/photolist-qDHVWb-qTZdQJ-uE6PQ9 Vauxford (talk) 20:16, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by JGHowes. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Lack of exif data, image not likely author's Vauxford (talk) 20:41, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Lack of exif data, image not likely author's Vauxford (talk) 20:41, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
No evidence that image has been published more than 50 years ago. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:18, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Strong keep. Why don't you just relax and check the DOD of the actor who died 17 years ago (:. And this was published more than 50 years ago.Umair Aj (talk) 19:41, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Umair Aj: And where's such an evidence? May you link to a 1962 publication, please? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:22, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Patrick Rogel, it is very much there and instead of wasting time why don't you focus on something positive? Already told you the actor died 17 years ago and started acting in 1951.Umair Aj (talk) 20:25, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom and looks like a screenshot. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Мовшук Сергій (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-re images, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Мовшук Сергій 045.jpg
- File:Мовшук Сергій 038.jpg
- File:Мовшук Сергій 037.jpg
- File:Мовшук Сергій 036.jpg
- File:Mовшук Сергій 05.jpg
- File:Mовшук Сергій 03.jpg
- File:Mовшук Сергій 04.jpg
- File:Mовшук Сергій 02.jpg
- File:Mовшук Сергій 08.jpg
- File:Mовшук Сергій 01.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:48, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- May we merge this thread with this one: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Мовшук Сергій? --VoidWanderer (talk) 00:29, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
File:HK 西環 Sai Ying Pun 水街 Water Street 167 Connaught Road West 香港萬怡酒店 Courtyard by Marriott Hong Kong hotel MoMo Cafe restaurant snack June 2019 SSG 01.jpg
[edit]COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 23:04, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
On source page: Copyright © 2019 ChicagoCop.com // sikander { talk } 🦖 23:26, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
- File:Tayto Northern Ireland crisp packet 01.jpg
- File:Tayto Northern Ireland crisp packet, rear side.jpg
ƏXPLICIT 23:49, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 23:59, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:14, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense, Other, Blurry, A selfie 82.132.218.4 10:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Your deletion request is a nonsense. This is a remarkable cultural building in Argamasilla de Calatrava (Spain).Zarateman (talk) 10:43, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:14, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Leon Makielski
[edit]Non free photos:The artist died in 1974
- File:Leon Makielski.jpg
- File:Makielski Landscape, MI.jpg
- File:Makielski Landscape.jpg
- File:Portrait of Penelope Peterson.jpg
- File:Ralph Modjeski.jpg
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 16:15, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:53, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:SpongeBob SquarePants
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted cartoon.
Roy17 (talk) 22:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:53, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Low-re images, unlikely to be own work.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:14, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Bogus license. Should be sourced & re-licensed if in public domain.
- File:Cyprus anastasiades eucouncil.jpg
- File:Romania iohannis eucouncil.jpg
- File:Kyriakos-mitsotakis eucouncil.jpg
- File:Antti-rinne eucouncil.png
- File:Gitanas-nauseda eucouncil.jpg
- File:MacerataMonumentoLuce.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:58, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:43, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Norrköpings Konstmuseum (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Stefan Teleman, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Stefan Teleman Digital bild 1 foto Stefan teleman låg upplösning.jpg
- File:NKM A 1398 Stefan Teleman, Azerbajan, 1994-95 (Västerländsk humanism och kristen etik), Akryl på duk J5A1632.jpg
- File:NKM A 1318 Stefan Teleman, En samlande och enande gestalt, 1975, Akryl på pannå J5A1646.jpg
- File:Stefan Teleman, Självporträtt, 1954. Foto- Mats Arvidsson..jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by H. B. Vollmer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Edith Meyer von Kamptz (d. 1969), permission of her heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Edith Meyer v. Kamptz-Boxer; Öl, 1930er-Jahre.jpg
- File:Edith Meyer v. Kamptz-Porträt einer jungen Frau; Öl, 1930er-Jahre.jpg
- File:Edith Meyer v. Kamptz- Selbstporträt; Öl, undatiert.jpg
- File:Das Gutshaus Kiel auf dem Hammerberg in Uchte, um 1902; seit 1946 'Studienhaus'.jpg
- File:Edith Meyer v. Kamptz- Junge Frau; Bleistift, Kohle, Aquarell, undatiert (vermutl. 1930er-Jahre).jpg
- File:Edith Meyer v. Kamptz- Zwei Frauen; Pastell, undatiert.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:20, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission received. --Jcb (talk) 09:52, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by H. B. Vollmer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Edith Meyer von Kamptz (d. 1969), permission of her heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Edith Meyer v. Kamptz- Frau mit Handtasche; Öl, 1930er-Jahre.jpg
- File:Edith Meyer v. Kamptz-Junge Frau; Öl, 1930er-Jahre.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:41, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission received. --Jcb (talk) 09:52, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Nominated for speedy as an unused personal photo. Currently used on es.wiki, but the article was previously deleted and is currently nominated for speedy deletion. GMGtalk 10:23, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Images taken by aerophoto.cz
[edit]There is no permission for all images uploaded by Aerophoto CZ s.r.o. (talk · contribs) made by aerophoto.cz. --Smooth O (talk) 12:39, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- For reference, this affects the following pictures:
- File:Pivovar Budvar.jpg
- File:Hluboka nad Vltavou.jpg
- File:Ortofotomapa České Budějovice.jpg
- File:Centrum České Budějovice.jpg
- File:Centrum Česke Budějovice.jpg
- File:Panorama České Budějovice.jpg
- File:Český Krumlov Jelení lávka 2.jpg
- File:Český krumlov jelení lávka zima.jpg
- File:Český krumlov Jelení lávka.jpg
- File:Zámek Hluboka nad Vltavou panorama.jpg
- File:Zámek Hluboká nad Vltavou mozaika.jpg
- File:Zámek Kratochvíle mozaika.jpg
- I've added a {{Delete}} template to all of them, as required by our deletion process. --bjh21 (talk) 14:19, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Acc. to the username, the images were uploaded by the author company. What is needed then? Should the company be asked if it's theirs, and whether they grant the permission, or....? Andree.sk (talk) 11:51, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- The author should contact OTRS. Jcb (talk) 20:28, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:28, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
My upload files and I want to takedown my photos from Wikimedia Ahmed Salahuddin BD (talk) 14:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 20:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
My upload files and I want to takedown my photos from Wikimedia Ahmed Salahuddin BD (talk) 14:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 20:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
My upload files and I want to takedown my photos from Wikimedia Ahmed Salahuddin BD (talk) 14:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 20:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
My upload files and I want to takedown my photos from Wikimedia Ahmed Salahuddin BD (talk) 14:39, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 20:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
My upload files and I want to takedown my photos from Wikimedia Ahmed Salahuddin BD (talk) 14:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 20:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
My upload files and I want to takedown my photos from Wikimedia Ahmed Salahuddin BD (talk) 14:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 20:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
My upload files and I want to takedown my photos from Wikimedia Ahmed Salahuddin BD (talk) 14:43, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 20:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
My upload files and I want to takedown my photos from Wikimedia Ahmed Salahuddin BD (talk) 14:45, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 20:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
My upload files and I want to takedown my photos from Wikimedia Ahmed Salahuddin BD (talk) 14:46, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 20:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
My upload files and I want to takedown my photos from Wikimedia Ahmed Salahuddin BD (talk) 14:47, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 20:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Philippines and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. If the sculpture is cropped out, then remaining photo would have very bad quality. Taivo (talk) 07:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This is obviously a duplicate of File:Lorettokapelle (Freiburg) 1.jpg by the same author, but of inferior quality. Telford (talk) 08:16, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Thats ok,t can be deleted, It's reaimport from geo.hlipp.de, not initiated by me. --Jörgens.Mi Talk 10:42, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:32, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
unhelpful picture. Not used Estopedist1 (talk) 08:27, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Useful for illustrating wood texture at a 105mm focal length with that specific type of Nikon.-- Darwin Ahoy! 10:44, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept per DarwIn. Mundane but unobjectionable photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
served its purpose Cheksbry (talk) 09:06, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Dubious license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Se han actualizado los colores en otra imagen, mantener esta induce a error y muchos internautas la utilizan sin darse cuenta de que es obsoleta. Pacov (talk) 19:23, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Se han actualizado los colores en otra imagen, mantener esta induce a error y muchos internautas la utilizan sin darse cuenta de que es obsoleta. 185.207.146.100 10:15, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: The file is in use on es:Historia antigua de la península ibérica and hy:Կինն Էլչեից. Under COM:INUSE, Commons should not delete used files for being inaccurate. You could update the description if you think it's incorrect. --bjh21 (talk) 21:09, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept per Bjh21; in use. Creation and uploading better free licensed images is very welcome. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:36, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This image is sourced from Flickr where it does indeed have a free license. However, the Flickr account appears to be used for flickrwashing the license. This image is obviously a photo of a video being played on a tv but is marked with a free license. This image is a movie poster and has a free license. These two images are watermarked with "Buboy Eito Photography". As it turns out, Buboy Eito has a Flickr account and the first of the two images is posted on Flickr. It has EXIF data and is not released under a free license. Given all this, I doubt this image is under a valid license. Whpq (talk) 10:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Apparent "Flickr-washed" copyright violation. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:38, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. AlbertoDV (talk) 14:08, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Keep, potentially can be used in Wikimedia projects (see categories). And Delete the similar file — File:Moscow, VDNKh, fallen leaves on wooden deck (30719212903).jpg. --Brateevsky {talk} 08:05, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept per Brateevsky; mundane but unobjectionable. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. AlbertoDV (talk) 14:09, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Artwork?! just a pair of dumpsters. The owner's logo is de minimis. Retired electrician (talk) 15:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept per Retired electrician. Mundane but unobjectionable. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:41, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
unhelpful picture. Not used Estopedist1 (talk) 15:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Nice closeup, useful for Category:Dust on objects.-- Darwin Ahoy! 15:41, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept per DarwIn. Good photo of mundane but unobjectionable subject. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:43, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted file Thats Just Great (talk) 18:05, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:35, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Image seems to be under the copyright of the "The World Famous Comedy Store" and is from their Flickr account Thats Just Great (talk) 18:55, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This is not the same image as the previous one of this name which was deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept Yes, it from their Flickr account, as the description clearly states that this is the source, and they have shared the photo under a free license. I see nothing amiss with license and credit. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:47, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 23:47, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- There is a lot of that stuff in Category:Doritos, much more explicit than this one. In any case, if {{De Minimis}} do not apply, it can be cut by half and still be useful, so Keep. But I really would like an opinion if the packages in Category:Doritos should be sent to nomination, including the one in the right from the National Cancer Institute.-- Darwin Ahoy! 00:21, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. DW; copyrighted packaging is certainly the main focus of the photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. AlbertoDV (talk) 14:08, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Delete, because we have better file — File:Moscow, VDNKh, fallen leaves on wooden deck (31157016360).jpg. --Brateevsky {talk} 08:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 19:54, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. AlbertoDV (talk) 14:08, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --A.Savin 19:56, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. AlbertoDV (talk) 14:08, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 19:57, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. AlbertoDV (talk) 14:08, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 19:58, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. AlbertoDV (talk) 14:09, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 19:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Film stills: copyrighted.
- File:Portrait jocelynesaab.jpg
- File:Beyrouth, jamais plus.png
- File:Capture d’écran 2019-08-14 à 14.49.02.png
- File:Il était une fois beyrouth.png
- File:Dunia-4.jpg
- File:Une vie suspendue screenshot.png
- File:One-dollar-a-day-2-2.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:45, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:50, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
This is not the correct diagram. There was a mistake happened when created with the diagram tool. A modified file was created and updated. So delete this file. Ranjithsiji (talk) 04:35, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:35, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
この作品より前の画像がよかったため。 ＠y12hide13 (talk) 05:09, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:36, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
low-res version of http://dhdb.hyldgaard-jensen.dk/images/spiller/1683.jpg, identical to image on http://www.eurohandball.com/ec/cl/women/2012-13/player/515696/AndreaPenezic Magnus (talk) 07:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:37, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Unused, nonsense file name, nonsense description Estopedist1 (talk) 08:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Categorized: Only picture ilustrating US company Category:Darn Tough, one of the few in Category:Wool socks, and only one of its kind in Category:Merino wool. Also useful illustrating 105mm focal lenght using that type of Nikon. After categorization, seems obviously useful.-- Darwin Ahoy! 10:41, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates and the photo violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:40, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Complex logo per COM:TOO China.
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:42, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:45, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- File:Ittihadkit.png
- File:Kit body legea elsharkia 1617h.png
- File:Kit body sporta alahly 1617h.png
- File:Kit body sporta alahly 1617a.png
- File:Kit left arm sporta alahly 1617a.png
- File:Kit left arm sporta alahly 1617h.png
- File:Kit right arm sporta alahly 1617a.png
- File:Kit right arm sprta alahly 1617h.png
- File:Kit shorts alahly1617a.png
- File:Kit shorts ittihad1516a.png
- File:Kit shorts legea elsharkia 1617h.png
- File:Kit socks sporta alahly 1617.png
- File:Kit socks sporta alahly 1617a.png
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kit body alahly2018.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kit shorts legea elsharkia 1617a.png.
Failed to meet Wikimedia Commons standards for association football kits (Club badges, sponsor logos, and manufacturer logos should never be included). Also the File:Kit shorts alahly1617a.png file should be deleted without a redirect to make a place for another file of Al Ahly's away shorts for the 2016-17 season (File:Kit shorts alahly17a.png). Ben5218 (talk) 16:43, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Several of these are currently in use, and Commons' usual policy (COM:INUSE) is not to delete files that are in use . @Ben5218: Could you instead upload new versions of those that are wrong, and update the pages that use File:Kit shorts alahly1617a.png to use File:Kit shorts alahly17a.png instead? --bjh21 (talk) 21:37, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Bjh21: I can create a different version for most of these files and update all articles that use these files to use mine. Ben5218 (talk) 10:09, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Comment. All files above are now eligible for deletion as I replaced all articles containing them with another files created by me that matches Commons standards for association football kits. Ben5218 (talk) 15:56, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:50, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- pas d'autorisation Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 13:53, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Pourquoi? Paul-Eric Langevin 22:45, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- pourquoi ?
- 1) parce que les pochettes de disques ne sont pas "libres de droits"
- 2) parce que vous n'avez pas l'autorisation de Colombia
- 3) parce que vous n'avez pas l'autorisation du photographe
- (suggestion à Paul-Eric Langevin: se renseigner sur la législation, et cesser de télécharger des archives familiales numérisées, en affirmant que vous avez les droits sur ces images]
- --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 08:48, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:51, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aitortxasko (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and coats of arms. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Escudo del apellido (de) Barrondo..gif
- File:Escudos del apellido Barrondo..gif
- File:Pedro de Barrondo Garay en el panfleto de fiestas de Simondrogas..jpg
- File:Pedro de Barrondo Garay.jpg
- File:Chasco escudo 1.png
- File:Txasko.png
- File:Chasco escudo 2.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello there, I am Aitor Txasko, from Spain; the OWNER of all those historical coats of arms and all its copyrights, also the AUTHOR of all these final collage images, and the USER who has uploaded all the JPG files. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aitortxasko (talk • contribs) 22:27, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:52, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aitortxasko (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Jose Angel Chasco.jpg
- File:Xabier Antoñana Chasco.png
- File:Pablo Antoñana Chasco.jpg
- File:Andoni Txasko.jpg
- File:Jesus Molviedro Chasco.png
- File:Escudo Chasco Los Arcos fachada.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello there, I am Aitor Txasko, from Spain; the OWNER of all those historical coats of arms and all its copyrights, also the AUTHOR of all these final collage images, and the USER who has uploaded all the JPG files. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aitortxasko (talk • contribs) 22:28, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:53, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I wonder why you want to delete my document? What do you mean with "questionable notabilty"? The copyright of this document is all right. The document has many permission from editors, has new content, and a small part of it has no permission from editors. It's a document for educational purpose, it's a document given from free to help people feed their kids. Thanks for you response. Elkuyu 21:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:53, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Bild wurde mit Schnelllöschung markiert, obwohl ich es selber gemacht habe KM B (talk) 15:42, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
-
Das Bild, das ich letzten Dezember hochgeladen habe, wurde mit Schnelllöschung markiert. Ich bin ehrlich gesagt gerade ziemlich erstaunt. Ich bin unerfahren und dementsprechend bin ich offen für Anregungen oder Korrekturen.
Nun zum Bild. Ich habe eben vor etwa einem haben Jahr ein Satellitenfoto von Google Maps gemacht und dann in Powerpoint die verschiedenen Piers des Flughafen Istanbul dort eingezeichnet. Danach habe ich eine Legende auf deutsch eingefügt und diese Datei als Bild auf Wikimedia Commons hochgeladen. Ich hatte aber nicht erwartet, dass das etwas falsches wäre, da ich der Meinung war, dass es mein eigenes Werk ist. Also die Satellitenaufnahme ist natürlich nicht von mir, aber der ganze Rest schon.
Nun Meine Frage: Was ist mein Fehler? Liegt das Problem an der Satellitenaufnahme, die nicht ich gemacht habe? KM B (talk) 15:50, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation of the satellite image. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:58, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
This file does not have an obvious source and a reverse Google search reveals several images identical in content but of different sizes (see https://bucket3.glanacion.com/anexos/fotos/57/2096357h688.jpg as an example) PeeJay2K3 (talk) 16:29, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:00, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons is not an external host for nationstates.net ; Skjoldeland does not exist Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 16:50, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - seems out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:59, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Facebook or smaller size, unlikely own work Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:00, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Official image with no evidence of permission from AERO Vodochody MilborneOne (talk) 16:58, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Although these should have been listed as a batch.
- There's no evidence for these being "own work", nor that they're under the control of the uploader such that they can license them like this. [1] indicates "I got the copyright directly from the company (owner). I moved this whole thing to the Aero lawyers. They will contact you." i.e. that they're not the uploader's own work. A claim "I got the copyright directly from the company" is unbelievable (the uploader wouldn't get to hold the copyright, just for asking) and if (more believably) the company agreed to license them somehow, that would have to go through OTRS from the company, not the uploader. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:26, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- File:L-39ng aero.jpg
- File:Aero l-39ng engine.jpg
- File:Aero l-39ng rollout.jpg
- File:Aero l-39ng cockpit.jpg
- Any more? Andy Dingley (talk) 17:28, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader had other files on commons, but they were already deleted from previous DRs for license reasons. Definitely needs to go through OTRS. DMacks (talk) 15:54, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:06, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yves Mausen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Jean Kiras, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Jean Kiras, Le Vol perpétuel, acrylique sur toile, 114 x 146 cm.jpg
- File:Jean Kiras, Visages, crânes et masques, huile sur toile et relief, 146 x 114.jpg
- File:Jean Kiras, Un Peintre et la bibliothèque, acrylique sur toile, 150 x 200 cm.jpg
- File:Jean Kiras, New York Stock Exchange, gouache sur papier photo, 160 x 112 cm.jpg
- File:Jean Kiras, In Memoriam Pompéi, acrylique sur toile, 100 x 100 cm.jpg
- File:Jean Kiras, La Bibliothèque, acrylique sur papier marouflé sur bois, 109 x 74 cm,.jpg
- File:Jean Kiras, Le Dévôt Christ, acrylique, crayon et fusain sur toile, 140 x 114.jpg
- File:Jean Kiras, Gisants, acrylique sur bois, 162 x 130 cm.jpg
- File:Jean Kiras, Crânes, Zinc polychrome et granit, 35 x 25 cm.jpg
- File:Jean Kiras, Le Christ aux paysages, détail de l'état intermédiaire du 4 juillet 2007.jpg
- File:Jean Kiras, Suite grecque, hst, 200 x 150 cm.jpg
- File:Jean Kiras, La Ville, huile sur toile, 146 x 114 cm.jpg
- File:Jean Kiras, L'Aube des paysages, huile sur toile, 95 x 75 cm.jpg
- File:Jean Kiras, L'Aube des paysages, huile sur toile.jpg
- File:Jean Kiras, Suite grecque, huile sur toile, 200 x 150 cm.jpg
- File:Jean Kiras, L'homme incertain, huile sur papier.jpg
- File:Jean Kiras, Torses, huile sur toile, 146 x 114.jpg
- File:Kiras, Crucifixions, Huile sur toile, 146x114.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:01, 23 August 2019 (UTC) Hello Patrick Rogel, I suppose you will get this message. I am very surprised by your request. Some of these images also appear on the website of the artist Jean Kiras which I am the webmaster of. The photos are mine. All this happens of course with Kiras' approval. What is possibly missing? Best wishes, Y.M. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yves Mausen (talk • contribs)
- @Yves Mausen: Hi. You can't grant a license (by stating "own work") on behalf of somebody else and as webmaster you know that "Jean Kiras. Tous droits réservés" means that All rights are reserved with Kiras so, as explained above, please have Jean Kiras himself sending a permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:31, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- This seems like an unnecessary complication to me but however, have it your own way! Jean Kiras will give his authorisation today. By the way, I uploaded a new file which also appears on Kiras' website https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jean_Kiras,_Corps,_Aldo_Moro,_gouache,_75_x_56_cm.jpg
Feel free to ask for it to be deleted. It still does not explain why you mention photos (such as "Le Christ aux paysages") which have never been used on his website? But I suppose it is a good thing that thanks to you artists and their work in general are protected... So, thank you!
- @Yves Mausen: Il n'y a rien de "surprenant" ni de "compliqué", c'est la loi sur le droit d'auteur (merci de vous y référer). Vous avez copié ici "Le Christ aux paysages"; c'est déjà suffisant pour constituer une infraction. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
I regret to inform the members of the community that given the circumstances, Jean Kiras has decided not to grant Wikimedia the licence to reproduce his works of art. I have therefore no choice but to join the deletion requests concerning all images mentioned as well as the following https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jean_Kiras,_Corps,_Aldo_Moro,_gouache,_75_x_56_cm.jpg I apologise for any inconvenience caused! Yves Mausen--213.55.220.133 17:28, 24 August 2019 (UTC)--Yves Mausen (talk) 16:49, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:10, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yves Mausen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Jean Kiras, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Jean Kiras, série In Memoriam Pompéi, acrylique sur toile, 100 x 100 cm.jpg
- File:Jean Kiras, Le Vol perpétuel, acrylique sur toile, 120 x 160 cm.jpg
- File:Jean Kiras, In Memoriam Pompéi, fusain et acrylique sur papier, 50 x 70 cm.jpg
- File:Jean Kiras, Suite grecque, Zeus, acrylique sur toile, 200 x 150 cm.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:33, 23 August 2019 (UTC) The above statement is also valid for this series of images. Jean Kiras does not want to grant Wikimedia the licence to publish images of his work of art. I join the deletion requests. Many thanks. --213.55.220.133 17:29, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; some deleted by Taivo already. --Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
This file includes personal image. 颜邯 (talk) 10:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- @颜邯: Keep A file should not be deleted for the sole reason of containing personal image. See also COM:PEOPLE Tomskyhaha (talk) 10:53, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Not for sole reason of image containing personal content, but for lack of evident in-scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:11, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:EDUSE Jamez42 (talk) 10:51, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Tiene uso educativo. Instruye (de manera no convencional) sobre un momento de la historia venezolana reciente. Por lo tanto, considero que debe mantenerse.--Universalis (talk) 13:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Closed as kept Deletion not required; no consensus to delete. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:13, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
与File:Belvedere of the God of Literature, Summer Palace, Beijing, 6–18 October, 1860.jpg完全重复；有一个质量更好但不完全相同的页面 Tyg728 (talk) 12:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept in use in multiple projects; not a problem. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:15, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Apparent scan of printed image. Need information to ascertain license of the original DMacks (talk) 02:13, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:05, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
The frame is 3 dimensional, so {{PD-art}} doesn't apply. 199.247.38.17 02:55, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Frame has inscription looking to date about as old as the painting. If this really is a problem (?), I suggest cropping the image rather than deleting. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:08, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The frame is mostly plain and flat, but it does have the inscription. The usual interpretation of Bridgeman-Corel allows this. Johnbod (talk) 12:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per Johnbod. The art work in held at the Metropolitan Museum in New York, and Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. applies. Victoriaearle (talk) 16:24, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Delete {{PD-Art}} A "photograph of an old coin found on the Internet" is not ok. Why? because on 3D articles "there is likely to be sufficient creativity in the lighting arrangements for the photographer to obtain a new copyright on the image."
Is this frame less 3D than a coin? I don't think so. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:34, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:06, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted logo (source, and also per: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cvijet Majki Srebrenice.jpg Smooth O (talk) 09:42, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:06, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Agarsel 4234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical maps and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Accord entre les fractions d'El Golâa.jpg
- File:Numédie 1742.png
- File:Ancien carte de 1700.png
- File:Agarsel 1700.png
- File:Groupe d'élèves des années 40.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Photos are sourced to what appears to be a COM:FLICKRWASHing account. The account purports to represent the dance sport's sanctioning body and has a few photos spanning several years, but it was created this month and all the photos were uploaded today. They're all low-res and offer no authorship or camera info. There's a possibility it's a legit account, but some obvious red flags there.
- File:Championnat-France-Pole-Sport-2015-03052015-IMG 5606 15.jpg
- File:Championnat-France-Pole-Sport-2015-03052015-IMG 5606 14.jpg
- File:Championnat-France-Pole-Sport-2015-03052015-IMG 5606 13.jpg
- File:Championnat-France-Pole-Sport-2015-03052015-IMG 5606 12.jpg
- File:Championnat-France-Pole-Sport-2015-03052015-IMG 5606 11.jpg
- File:Championnat-France-Pole-Sport-2015-03052015-IMG 5606 10.jpg
- File:Championnat-France-Pole-Sport-2015-03052015-IMG 5606 09.jpg
- File:Championnat-France-Pole-Sport-2015-03052015-IMG 5606 08.jpg
- File:Championnat-France-Pole-Sport-2015-03052015-IMG 5606 07.jpg
- File:Championnat-France-Pole-Sport-2015-03052015-IMG 5606 06.jpg
- File:Championnat-France-Pole-Sport-2015-03052015-IMG 5606 05.jpg
- File:Championnat-France-Pole-Sport-2015-03052015-IMG 5606 04.jpg
- File:Championnat-France-Pole-Sport-2015-03052015-IMG 5606 03.jpg
- File:Championnat-France-Pole-Sport-2015-03052015-IMG 5606 02.jpg
- File:Championnat-France-Pole-Sport-2015-03052015-IMG 5606 01.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 18:16, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
The Flicker account is legit although brand new. I've asked the championship organizer to create it in order to release copyright on a few pictures in order to illustrate the pole dance article in french. The original right holder is the championship organizer, Pole Dance Paris. You can see a selection of these images used on his website https://www.poledance-paris.com/championnat-de-france-de-pole-dance-2018/ and you can contact them at the contact email of their domain : info@poledance-paris.com if needed or give me some way for them to confirm this.
Thanks for you help. Learning rookie here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polegeek (talk • contribs) 18:28, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, This page is dead for me. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:30, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
in addition, the owner of the photographs has put online on his own website a page specifying the license of the photos uploaded on wiki commons. https://www.poledance-paris.com/selection-photo/
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Polegeek (talk • contribs) 21:23, 23 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polegeek (talk • contribs) 19:24, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hi,
- I am not sure the photographer knows what s/he is doing. The copyright page has a clear statement: Toute représentation totale ou partielle de ce site par quelque procédé que ce soit, sans l’autorisation expresse de Pole Dance Paris est interdite et constituerait une contrefaçon sanctionnée par les articles L.335-2 et suivants du Code de la propriété intellectuelle. Google Translate: Any total or partial representation of this site by any means whatsoever without the express permission of Pole Dance Paris is prohibited and constitutes an infringement punishable by articles L.335-2 and following of the Code of Intellectual Property.. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:25, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
He basically understands that he's "giving away" the selected images to Wikipedia and by extension to everybody else. Not sure he understood everything when it comes to CC licences, but he got the main point and created a dedicated page on his website just for this. The organisation behind this website who owns those images have literarily tons of them, several thousands of high quality pictures such as those, ranging on a ten years timescale, and they are willing to help when I told them I was working on WP's pole dance page. There's probably a few copyright notices on his website, but this page is specifically stating that those are CC-by-sa and he told me he could put additional pictures if needed, witch is cool. https://www.poledance-paris.com/selection-photo/ - Regards, --Polegeek (talk) 06:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Yann. Also note that "The original right holder is the championship organizer, Pole Dance Paris." is incorrect -- the original copyright holder is the photographer and we need some evidence of how it is that the organization has the right to freely license these. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:10, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 18:39, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:11, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
I have uploaded a higher quality TIF version of this image, given to me directly from the archives of the Naval War College Museum File:NWC-wargame-1950s.tif. This image (which I uploaded) is redundant. Kurzon (talk) 18:50, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:14, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Patent was published after 1989, so it is copyrighted. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:16, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Minecraft creeper
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted game characters.
- File:Anime Expo 2011 (5917370353).jpg
- File:Creeper in Dewstow 2.jpg
- File:Creeper in Dewstow Grotto 1.jpg
- File:FF21 (8478902630).jpg
Roy17 (talk) 22:31, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This is just hounding other editors on Commons, not anything about DRs.
- See:
- Time for a speedy close and a block. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: There are three copyrights here: 1) that for the Minecraft character, 2) that for the fan art representation of theMinecraft character, and 3) for the photograph. Assuming (3) is properly licensed as CC-BY, the images infringe copyrights (1) and (2) and the fan art infringes copyright (1). . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cosplay of Minecraft
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted game characters.
Roy17 (talk) 22:48, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Just what is the "copyrightable" content here?
- Firstly the nominator doesn't understand the difference between copyright and a design right.
- Secondly, any design right in Minecraft is expressed through the 2D texture maps, not the trivial idea of "characters as square boxes". If it's the texture maps which are the issue, then these images are not Minecraft textures (if anything, there might be a case for Star Trek redshirts in one of them)
- Thirdly, this is just a sheer bad-faith nomination to harrass another Commons editor, not an honest DR. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Minecraft creeper Andy Dingley (talk) 23:14, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: There are three copyrights here: 1) that for the Minecraft character, 2) that for the fan art representation of theMinecraft character, and 3) for the photograph. Assuming (3) is properly licensed as CC-BY, the images infringe copyrights (1) and (2) and the fan art infringes copyright (1). . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:22, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Wertloses Geräusch, Useless noice Netpilots (talk) 12:59, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Keep, the file proves that this is how she pronounces her own name and that the pronunciation in File:Greta Thunberg.ogg is not made up out of thin air. For non-Swedish speakers, the pronunciation is non-trivial. If it is possible to remove the background noise I'm not opposed to that of course. --Fippe 17:05, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Just one second useless noice. No one can say 'Greta Thunberg' in one second. The noice compared with a possible human vioce is ten to one. Ten times more noice than spoken words. --Netpilots (talk) 12:05, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:48, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Unused for six years badly cropped trial version of File:Herb Polski 1919-27 Polish coat of arms 1919-1927.svg. Aʀvєδuι + 18:59, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:49, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
DW rather than own work. No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 19:07, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Uploader indicates own work, and specifically indicates: Moi, En rouge, créateur de l'image, concède sa licence au DP, comme indiqué ci-dessus *I, En rouge, creator of the image, release it into PD, as writen above Vysotsky (talk) 08:49, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Which is obviously not true. This is a derivative work, not own work from scratch of course. Jcb (talk) 14:32, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Neutral:@Jcb:
- As "creator", I assert the following:
- in your sentence "No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation", only the first grievance can be considered:
- "authorship" is given "I, En rouge, creator of the image",
- "copyright" is given "release it into PD",
- "work" can effectively considered as derivative (see below).
- In 2005, considerations about copyright, derivative, ... were not precise nor guided as they can be now.
- Sources for File:Location GreatLakes-Africa.png are:
- background map (as 'pseudo documented' in first revision, in history) comes from
[not my work], in public domain
- (and Tanzania coloured in grey [my own work])
- lakes come from
- scaling and compositing [my own work], of CIA maps (public domain, 2005 version) [nine images, not my work]:
- with GIMP [not my development]
- then scaling, colouring, thresholding, ... of the resulting composition [my own work], with GIMP
- and overlaying the resulting lakes onto the background map.
- lines and letters are drawn with GIMP:
- lakes are identified with their initial (same in french and english, excepted Y for lake Kyoga ;-) for international reuse of the picture [my own work]
- countries are named with their two-letters codes, from ISO 3166-1 [not my work], for international reuse of the picture [my own work]
- lines and letters disposition is [my own work]
- background map (as 'pseudo documented' in first revision, in history) comes from
- Voilà ! ~~~~En rouge (talk) 17:31, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Moreover:
- this image has a low resolution, and, nowadays, can preferably be replaced with a SVG one
- but few references exist, in many wiki, with localised legend
- Note:
- same request for deletion, and same above explanation apply to File:Location RegionOfTheGreatLakes-Africa.png
- ~~~~En rouge (talk) 17:31, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Akryl_p%C3%A5_duk_J5A1632.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
_Barrondo..gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kept: plain and generic base map is not copyrightable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
DW rather than own work. No source for the used base map. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 19:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Keep. Uploader explicitly stated that its their own work by providing their username as author's name. So DR rationale is inaccurate, to put it mildly. No reasonable doubt that a few possibly creative elements (if there are any, placement of numbers, perhaps) are uploader's own work. Border data is generally understood to be non-creative (see COM:DW#Maps) and if its subject to any rights, then it is COM:NCR (database rights), rather than copyrights. Pikne 13:13, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- This is OBVIOUSLY not own work and the underlying base map is obviously not too simple to be eligible for copyright. And please stop stalking me. Jcb (talk) 15:01, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- My response is here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:LocatieBussum.png. Pikne 16:13, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: plain and generic base map is not copyrightable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:57, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Whatever this is a pronunciation of, it's certainly not Latvian ēzelis Chuck Entz (talk) 18:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is in use on wikt:de:ēzelis and wikt:mg:ēzelis. So long as those two Wiktionaries have a use for it, Commons should not delete it for being mispronounced. See COM:NPOV and COM:INUSE for the policy behind this. --bjh21 (talk) 23:23, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: I know essentially nothing about Latvian phonology, but I notice that File:Lv-zvirbulis.ogg and File:Lv-šakālis.ogg by the same speaker have a similar feature where the last "i" isn't pronounced. To me this suggests that this may be a feature of the speaker's accent rather than a mistake. --bjh21 (talk) 00:11, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Oh, and... I'm assuming here that this is intended to be a request for the deletion of File:Lv-ēzelis.ogg rather than File talk:Lv-ēzelis.ogg as stated above. If it's really a request to delete the talk page, I oppose that on the grounds that the talk page isn't meant be be a pronunciation of "ēzelis". --bjh21 (talk) 00:28, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment:Lol I love the solid argument on the talk page - apparently I am insane, vandal or both for answering a request to upload pronounciation samples in my native language. I remeber the user, who made the request, said they were not hearing final i, although I can, might just be that quality of mic was not extremly good and didn't pick up on a quieter sound at end of the word very well. I'd suggest nominator to show off their fine language and pronounciation skills by making a better one, instead of being uncivil ~~Xil (talk) 08:14, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion of a file talk page. If you want to nominate the file itself, please do so. --Sealle (talk) 09:58, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Possibly could be PD-old or PD-Poland but it's not proven. CC licence is definitely not suitable here and the source page just has an all rights reserved tag. ~Cybularny Speak? 19:44, 23 August 2019 (UTC) To zdjęcie ma status publiczny - znajduje się jak wskazałem na stronie edukacyjnej polskiego senatu - nie bardzo więc rozumiem określenie, że jego status jest niejasny. Pozdrawiam --Wodnik11 (talk) 09:16, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP, COM:EVID. --Sealle (talk) 09:54, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request - Band does not exist anymore. Bruneman (talk) 08:07, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per author request. ~riley (talk) 02:24, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Mash-up of elements of the present day coat of arms of the Czech Republic. Real CoA of the Protectorate was that File:Greater arms of Bohemia and Moravia (1939-1945).svg Aʀvєδuι + 18:56, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Support deletion. The uploader has given the current Czech Republic coat of arms as the source of this work, which is an absolute non-sense: how can a 1993 work serve as a source for 1939 work? --Jan Kameníček (talk) 17:46, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 21:07, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
