Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/08/17
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Promotional image only, out of Wikimedia's project scope. Veracious (talk) 05:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Advertising. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Eissink as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Art work by a living artist; uploader and source do not seem to hold the copyright. Yann (talk) 05:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 05:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Eissink as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Art work by a living artist, Wayne Thiebaud; uploader does not seem to hold the copyright. Yann (talk) 05:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 05:41, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Eissink as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Art work by a living artist, Sharon Core; uploader does not seem to hold the copyright. Yann (talk) 05:40, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 05:41, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Centenier as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: unusable Yann (talk) 05:42, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 05:42, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by PlanespotterA320 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: This is a "pre-upload" (US copyright expires 2040, Russian copyright expires 2065), ready for current deletion and pre-listed for later undeletion. As uploader I request deletion. Yann (talk) 07:14, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:14, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 2.205.20.120 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Copyviol (screenshot from Google Street View) Yann (talk) 07:52, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:53, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Purely promotional material is out of project scope. Yann (talk) 07:59, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:59, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Purely promotional material is out of project scope. Yann (talk) 07:59, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:00, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Purely promotional material is out of project scope. Yann (talk) 08:00, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 08:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yanguas as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.instagram.com/p/BoCAZsoldZ_/ Yann (talk) 08:29, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Selfie, but no contribution, so out of scope. --Yann (talk) 08:30, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
No usages in Wikicommons. Kidkkr (talk) 09:00, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:16, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MarcoAurelio as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Wrongly imported per edit summary at https://commons.wikimedia.org/?diff=361095544 Yann (talk) 05:38, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per Green Giant @ [1]. This is a wrong import from me. —MarcoAurelio 10:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:38, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was copyright violation from TV show of the Television Pool of Thailand, not own work Mopza (talk) 08:48, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO [2]. --4nn1l2 (talk) 10:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope: Not a proper galley, a mini-encyclopedia article Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Article not gallery so out of scope and speedy. --Herby talk thyme 11:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope: Not a proper gallery, a mini-encyclopedia article. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:25, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Article not gallery so out of scope and speedy. --Herby talk thyme 11:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope: Not a proper gallery, a mini-encyclopedia article. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:30, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Article not gallery so out of scope and speedy. --Herby talk thyme 11:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope: Not a proper galley, a mini-encyclopedia article. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Article not gallery so out of scope and speedy. --Herby talk thyme 11:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful.
- File:Tamanratusari.jpg
- File:Rumohaceh.jpg
- File:Tamanratu.jpg
- File:Pucoekkreung.jpg
- File:Pltdapung.jpg
- File:Pantaiulelee.jpg
- File:Pantailampuuk.jpg
- File:Museumtsunami.jpg
- File:Bukitlhokeumpe.jpg
- File:Blangpadang.jpg
— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:55, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIOs may use {{Copyvio}}. --Эlcobbola talk 11:18, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
This photo is copyrighted and doesn't belong on this page. Ariannagrainey (talk) 17:43, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, I was not sure. This was big photo with complete EXIF data. But considering the uploader's other contributions (I deleted or nominated for deletion them all) and that this is his/her only uploaded photo, I tend to believe Arianna and I'll delete the photo. In the future, sending takedown notice through COM:OTRS works faster. Taivo (talk) 17:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for deleting!! - Arianna Grainey
Product packaging. How old is the art? Stefan4 (talk) 21:08, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. "Rocamadour fermier" is the name of a cheese, not a commercial brand. No problem IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 22:23, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- See COM:CB#Product packaging. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:46, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- Irrelevant, per Myrabella below.--Jebulon (talk) 15:34, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- Keep For three reasons: 1) as Jebulon pointed out, "Rocamadour fermier" is the name of a kind of cheese, not a commercial brand. The specific name of the farm from which this cheese comes has been cut. 2) The drawing of the goat is standard, very simple, and can be considered "so simple as to be ineligible for copyright protection". 3) The drawing depicting the village of Rocamadour above the printed name is archetypal, probably derived from a XIXe century print like this one. Furthermore, it is blurred. --Myrabella (talk) 13:15, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- The village drawing might be old, but drawing a goat sounds more artistic than writing the word "paradis" above a door or making a nail clipper (see COM:TOO#France). --Stefan4 (talk) 13:25, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- The goat here can be considered as a standard and utilitarian piece of information, without genuine personalization. It is only a secondary part of the image. It can be considered as de minimis. --Myrabella (talk) 13:53, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- The village drawing might be old, but drawing a goat sounds more artistic than writing the word "paradis" above a door or making a nail clipper (see COM:TOO#France). --Stefan4 (talk) 13:25, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept: DM seems applicable here FASTILY 07:47, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Product packaging is probably not free. This is a new image that for the previous deletion request. Lionel Allorge (talk) 12:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: I reverted to the overwritten file and deleted (as copyvio) the one referred to here. --Herby talk thyme 13:07, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. Lionel Allorge (talk) 07:22, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Red cord - against photo policy Wikimania -speedy delete if possible Vysotsky (talk) 13:50, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted Multichill (talk) 14:41, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
out of scope ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 14:06, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, considering circumstances and uploader's behavior, I'll delete the file speedily as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:57, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:NETCOPYVIO [3]. --4nn1l2 (talk) 14:36, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
copyviol - a cut-out from a photo posted in Tio.ch, and credited by "Keystone-sda.ch/STR (DOMINIK ANGERER)". — danyele 15:09, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
copyviol - photo posted in Tuttomotoriweb.com, and credited by "Getty Images". — danyele 15:10, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:18, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
probably copyviol - photo posted in Autosport.com without indication about a free or CreativeCommons licence. — danyele 15:12, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:18, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Appears to be blatant Flickrwashing. A video screenshot from a newly created Flickr account with just one image. Ytoyoda (talk) 11:06, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:56, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Bad chemical structure; too wide margins & partly opaque (white) background (perhaps due to a SVG conversion mistake). Superseded by File:Polyphenylene General Formula V6.svg by the same author Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 12:20, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete --Jue (talk) 18:58, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete --JWBE (talk) 20:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:09, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:17, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. No metadata. Selfie of subject but uploader claims as own work.
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:EDUSE COM:OOS () msali raso 15:40, 17 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 15:40, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:38, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:05, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:38, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:OOS COM:EDUSE () msali raso 17:16, 17 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 17:16, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:36, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:EDUSE COM:OOS () msali raso 17:22, 17 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 17:22, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:35, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:EDUSE () msali raso 17:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 17:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was copyright violation from TV show of the Television Pool of Thailand, not own work Mopza (talk) 08:43, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 4nn1l2 at 10:25, 17 August 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: This file was copyright violation from TV show of the Television Pool of Thailand, not own work; https://mgronline.com/onlinesection/detail/9620000076752 --Krdbot 01:23, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was copyright violation from TV show of the Television Pool of Thailand, not own work Mopza (talk) 08:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 4nn1l2 at 10:22, 17 August 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: This file was copyright violation from TV show of the Television Pool of Thailand, not own work; https://mgronline.com/onlinesection/detail/9620000076752 --Krdbot 01:23, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Looks like a screenshot, similar images can be found on Google. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:45, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment File:Sirivannavari Nariratana .jpg is a crop of this one. 大诺史, do you have a specific url link where this is found on the internet? JGHowes talk 16:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- @JGHowes: Similar images can be found if you type the file name. It can also be found on her Facebook. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 01:09, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:15, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted photos. Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:13, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep New version with corrected perspective and anything more than COM:DM in the COM:DW area blurred. Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: New version OK. Old version hidden. --Yann (talk) 02:34, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
please merge this file to File:World Map WBSC.png. This file is obsolete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meoru00 (talk • contribs) 16:53, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: you may mark it as {{Duplicate}}. --JuTa 02:32, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:46, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license on Flickr and has been recognized as such. --Edelseider (talk) 08:43, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Edelseider: Not at all: as a COM:license reviewer I've recognized anything. It's Flickrwashing since the image is from Facebook and Facebook content is not allowed here. Please have Karen Melchior sending a permission via COM:OTRS with a transfer of ownership from photographer to her enclosed. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:06, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Wow @Patrick Rogel: , so you are accusing me of fraud? First, the source of the image (on Flickr) says "Instagram", not "Facebook" and secondly, it was apparently uploaded on Flickr by Karin Melchior herself. Are you accusing me of fraud, yes or no? Because gratuitous and unfounded accusations tend to come back and bite their author very hard. --Edelseider (talk) 11:05, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Edelseider: First please calm down, second don't try again to remove deletion templates especially when you are in fault. Indeed:
- Facebook images (which are recognizable by the FMMD code) are not allowed here;
- The copyright holder is almost always the photographer and not the person pictured so, as already said, please have Karen Melchior sending a permission via COM:OTRS with a transfer of ownership from photographer to her enclosed;
- Nobody has accused you of anything. Nevertheless you are responsible for the files you upload and you must verify the files are OK BEFORE upload, not after;
- If you think you are not able to recognize Flickrwashing you should avoid uploading from Flickr. Kind regards, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:16, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: I am very much able to read sentences such as this: This image was originally posted to Flickr by karmel80 at https://flickr.com/photos/86185290@N00/48306127612. It was reviewed on 17 August 2019 by FlickreviewR 2 and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-2.0. I don't understand what you are up to except bullying me (a perfect stranger) for no reason. --Edelseider (talk) 11:20, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Edelseider: First please calm down, second don't try again to remove deletion templates especially when you are in fault. Indeed:
- Wow @Patrick Rogel: , so you are accusing me of fraud? First, the source of the image (on Flickr) says "Instagram", not "Facebook" and secondly, it was apparently uploaded on Flickr by Karin Melchior herself. Are you accusing me of fraud, yes or no? Because gratuitous and unfounded accusations tend to come back and bite their author very hard. --Edelseider (talk) 11:05, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Edelseider: Not at all: as a COM:license reviewer I've recognized anything. It's Flickrwashing since the image is from Facebook and Facebook content is not allowed here. Please have Karen Melchior sending a permission via COM:OTRS with a transfer of ownership from photographer to her enclosed. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:06, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also not a selfie, so permission from photographer is needed. --Yann (talk) 11:54, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:27, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as the source image was deleted too. --JuTa 14:28, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:EDUSE COM:OOS () msali raso 17:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 17:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989. Reason for deletion: CSD F10. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:26, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Branawaan Sivakaran (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work. Possible copyvio. No EXIF.
- File:DB2019AU00510 full.jpg
- File:Volkswagen i.d. buzz cargo 65.jpg
- File:Vw-buzz-cargo-001.webp
- File:Id-r-tianmen-mountain-2019.jpg
- File:Vw-id.3-2020-01 0.jpg
- File:VW-ID-3-2006034.jpg
- File:DB2018AU02403 full.jpg
- File:Vw-id-neo-980x620.jpg
- File:Volkswagen-id-3-si-aprono-i-preordini.jpg
- File:VW-Aero-e-Illustration-474x316-773557298f6fb8ca.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 02:53, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SachinSingh2654822 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:48, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jovialedit (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work. Low res image. Some possibly from Instagram.
- File:Ptomar.jpg
- File:Parastomar.jpg
- File:UNADJUSTEDNONRAW thumb 4.jpg
- File:UNADJUSTEDNONRAW mini 5.jpg
- File:UNADJUSTEDNONRAW mini 3.jpg
- File:UNADJUSTEDNONRAW mini 2.jpg
- File:First .jpg
- File:UNADJUSTEDNONRAW mini 4.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:04, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal images, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 07:27, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:PARTYPICS () msali raso 19:55, 17 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 19:55, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
No metadata, high quality celebrity photo, edited with Windows Photo Editor. Requires OTRS I think. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Possibly from Facebook. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:17, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:45, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hfaiovena4t as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Inappriopriate transparency. Emergency. Background should be white sRGB FFFFFF. Yann (talk) 08:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. The author may set zero for his/her subtractive system wherever s/he pleases, even to full transparency. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Speedyedit. The article isn't about "his/her subtractive system" it's about a system worth mentioning in the first place. 2A01:119F:21D:7900:C25:B440:A1C7:B464 16:45, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: The file is in use on en:RG color space. Under COM:NPOV, Commons should not interfere in content disputes on other projects. @Hfaiovena4t: If you think this file is inapropriate for use on en:RG color space, you should deal with that on English Wikipedia, not here. --bjh21 (talk) 18:44, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as per above. --Yann (talk) 19:27, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 15:55, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Seems very unlikely that this is the uploader's own work given the same logo can be seen used at bjym.org/event and copyright ownership over the content is being claimed by the en:BJYM. The logo also seems a bit too complex to be {{PD-textlogo}} or {{PD-ineligible}}. It might be close/borderline even per COM:TOO United States, but COM:TOO India is only described a being similar to that practiced by the United States and following the principle of "Modicum of Creativity". If the footnote in COM:INDIA#cite_note-Singh-5 is intended to be an clarification of what this principle means with respect to Indian copyright law, then it does seem that there might be enough creativity involved in the creation of some elements of this logo for it to be considered too complex to be ineligible for copyright protection per COM:PCP; so, unless it's licensing is OTRS verified, I don't think the file should be kept. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:36, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious nonfree above TOO. --DMacks (talk) 02:33, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:הקרוונים במקומם.jpg
- File:תמונת הישוב - קרוואנים ואשקוביות 10-79.jpg
- File:בית המרחץ 12-77.jpg
- File:הטרום אסבסט הראשון הגיע 7-78.jpg
- File:מעטפת דואר של גוש אמונים לקראת עליית נווה צוף.jpg
- File:סמינריון בנושא יישובי כביש חוצה בנימין נוה צוף 1977-1997.pdf
- File:נווה צוף 11-1977 . גן הילדים הראשון, רב גילאי ,לגילאי 2-6.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- I'm a new member of the group. I corrected by the comments I was given.
I would like to confirm the posting on Wikimedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amos1947 (talk • contribs) 12:41, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:01, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:תכנית אב להתישבות ביהודה ושומרון 1978Master Plan for 1978 Settlement.pdf
- File:Amana settelments 1986 ישובי אמנה.pdf
- File:Initial Settlement Plan 1977.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:59, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
- Restored: File:Amana settelments 1986 ישובי אמנה.pdf per OTRS. -- Geagea (talk) 00:30, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alihasanasyari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-re images, no metadata, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Tanda Jasa Edwin.jpg
- File:Tugas LN Edwin.jpg
- File:Operasi Militer Edwin.jpg
- File:Foto Pendidikan Edwin.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:29, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AlbanGeller as Noncommercial (Cc-by-nc-nd-3.0). The photo is used in multiple projects and it has been in Commons 7 years, so regular deletion request is created to allow discussion. Taivo (talk) 11:27, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete This file will remain in copyright until 2026. AlbanGeller (talk) 11:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 12:28, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AlbanGeller as Noncommercial (Cc-by-nc-nd-3.0}}). The file has been in Commons 7 years and it is used in 15 projects. Regular deletion request is created to allow discussion. Taivo (talk) 11:48, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete This file will remain in copyright until 2022. AlbanGeller (talk) 21:59, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 12:28, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Srinarayanasevabhavanam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotional, out of scope.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:06, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:36, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal images, out of scope.
Yann (talk) 06:06, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shakiba Travel Compnay (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also, probably images from © Copyright 2017-2019 SHAKIBA TRAVEL CO. | Explore Iran | All rights reserved. Kind regards,
- File:Alamut-castle-17.jpg
- File:Alamut-castle-16.jpg
- File:Alamut-castle-15.jpg
- File:Alamut-castle-14.jpg
- File:Alamut-castle-13.jpg
- File:Alamut-castle-09.jpg
- File:Alamut-castle-07.jpg
- File:Alamut-castle-06.jpg
- File:Alamut-castle-05.jpg
- File:Alamut-castle-01.jpg
— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:20, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also, some of them found: Copyright © 2018 University of Kurdistan - All Rights Reserved.
- File:AgriUOK-Pic (11).jpg
- File:AgriUOK-Pic (10).jpg
- File:AgriUOK-Pic (8).jpg
- File:AgriUOK-Pic (9).jpg
- File:AgriUOK-Pic (7).jpg
- File:AgriUOK-Pic (6).jpg
- File:AgriUOK-Pic (4).jpg
- File:AgriUOK-Pic (5).jpg
- File:AgriUOK-Pic (1).jpg
- File:AgriUOK-Pic (3).jpg
- File:AgriUOK-Pic (2).jpg
- File:AgriUOK.jpg
— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died 1996, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 14:35, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:40, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:38, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Copyvio from "Beeldbank Cultuur Historische Vereniging Ter Aar". The person in the photo is probably Willem Snaterse, who died in 1988 at the age of 78 in Ter Aar. Gouwenaar (talk) 15:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Image hors contexte Abcom1 (talk) 14:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- ? Cheep (talk) 16:58, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Account of a communication service that does not care about the recommendations of at least two projects: frwiki and commons. Lofhi (talk) 18:48, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep immediately. Absolutely no valid reason to delete. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 19:09, 17 August 2019 (UTC).
- Speedy Keep. No valid reason given. Anyway: it's a picture of a public figure in a public space where there is no reasonable expectations of privacy and performing her public-figure-actions which is one of the "consent exception" in France. --AntonierCH (d) 22:00, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 16:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 14:50, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment This is unlikely to be the uploader's own work. This is a heavily retouched picture, or a painting. At least some more explaination is needed. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:20, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sachin M V (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small. Low res. No metadata. Unlikely to be own work.
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sachin M V (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution, no camera EXIF, visual characteristics suggest screenshots, all other user uploads copyvios of footballers. Quack.
Эlcobbola talk 14:00, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; rabbit; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thwekanyaw (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). Logos may be copyright.
- File:Ssh nfl div1.jpg
- File:Eunoscrescentshalom.jpg
- File:Eunos crescent aung ko (3).jpg
- File:Aung ko bagan.png
- File:Min thiha.png
- File:Arashthefootballer.jpg
- File:Yan naing.png
- File:Aung ko.png
- File:Sithu.png
- File:Swan Yee IWL 2019.jpg
- File:Pho Chan IWL 2019.jpg
- File:Aaronaungiwl.jpg
- File:Shalomnfldivision2champion.jpg
- File:Shalomnfldiv2champion.jpg
- File:Saw shalom nfl div. 2 champion.jpg
- File:Hotspursfcsinngaporelogo.jpg
- File:Hsfclogo.png
- File:Fcnipponlogo.png
- File:Cfclogo.png
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:07, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:44, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thwekanyaw (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work. No metadata. Possible copyvio.
- File:Shalom keeper.jpg
- File:Eunos crescent shalom goalkeeper.png
- File:Nflgkshalom.jpg
- File:Saw shalom haythaw nfl photo.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Thre is a larger, albeit dated later, version online at https://allwork.space/2018/09/can-you-guess-uks-most-entrepreneurial-city-in-2018/ Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:24, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Huy Nguyễn Thanh Gia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Church portraits, small images, unlikely own work.
- File:Đức cha Giuse Nguyễn Chí Linh.jpg
- File:Đức cha Phêrô Trần Đình Tứ.jpg
- File:Đức cha Phaolô Tịnh Nguyễn Bình Tĩnh.jpg
- File:Đức cha Phêrô Nguyễn Soạn 1999.jpg
- File:Đức cha Giuse Trần Xuân Tiếu 1999.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:29, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Not a selfie, but identified as picture of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:28, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thekookers (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small photos without metadata, low quality images, unlikely own work.
- File:Tempe mendoan.png
- File:Teh putih.png
- File:Kembang mekar.png
- File:Black kebab.png
- File:Blondie.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:28, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:EDUSE COM:OOS ( msali raso 15:42, 17 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 15:42, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by Christian Ferrer. --Didym (talk) 16:27, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Because it is 108.177.7.88 15:57, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 16:26, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Немања Николић (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-re images, unlikely to be own works.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:08, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:25, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Немања Николић (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-re images, unlikely to be own works.
- File:21740642 1901843820076368 4405782806463305998 n.png.jpg
- File:Игуманија Ефросинија.png
- File:Игуманија Рафаила.jpg
- File:Гаврило лепавински.jpg
- File:Jovan1.jpg
- File:Архимандрит Симеон Биберџић Добрићевски.jpg
- File:Архимандрит Симеон Биберџић.jpg
- File:Архимандрит Венијамин Мићић игуман.jpg
- File:Архимандрит Венијамин Мићић.jpg
- File:ApelIgumanaArsenijaMatica.jpg
- File:Архимандрит Мардарије Шишовић.jpg
- File:Зора Дубљевић.jpg
- File:M, Efimija.jpg
- File:Metodije Kragulj.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:29, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:25, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Low res image, unlike to be own work. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:15, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:24, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
University seals are not own work. OTRS-permission from university representative is needed – or evidence, that this seal is very old. Taivo (talk) 16:59, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:13, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Strelok1929
[edit]- File:Guayaquil del Siglo XVIII.png
- File:Guayaquil del Siglo XVII.png
- File:Barrio Villamil - Guayaquil.png
- File:Junta Patriotica.png
- File:Barrio Las Peñas.png
- File:Guayaquil 1838.jpg
- File:Guayaquil 1774 por Francisco Requena.jpg
- File:Ciudad Vieja.png
- File:Barrio del Bajo.png
- File:Ciudad Nueva.png
- File:BARRIO CENTENARIO.png
- File:BARRIO CUBA.png
- File:SAN PEDRO.png
- File:U costeña vs U serrana.jpg
- File:SPORT 1.jpg
- File:9 SEPTIEMBRE 1919 CLUB UNIVERSITARIO.jpg
- File:Barrio Villamil.png
The user himself states in most cases that he found the files on the internet.--Freddy eduardo (talk) 17:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:13, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Ricardo Mattar is not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 17:46, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:12, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: claimed date is 14.8.2019 (upload date), but a slightly darker version of this image has been published in an image board in june: https://yli.sh/102453740 MKFI (talk) 18:07, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:12, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Burzojelodar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE
Ahmadtalk 18:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:11, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Selina2006 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:NOTHOST - unused, non-notable person, appears to be COM:SPAM (copyvio promo shots) related to grupoterapeutica.com
Эlcobbola talk 19:51, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:11, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:PARTYPICS () msali raso 19:57, 17 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 19:57, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:11, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:22, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- File:宮島口桟橋あなごめし(あなご処しろやま)外観.jpg
- File:岩手短角牛弁当やわらか煮(肉のふがね)外観.jpg
- File:AQAizu天然炭酸水.jpg
- File:鶏わっぱ(東武日光駅)外観.jpg
- File:八幡平サーモンづくし弁当(道の駅にしね)外観.jpg
- File:幻のイトウとサーモン弁当(道の駅にしね)外観.jpg
- File:小樽石舟庵のうに弁当(石舟庵)外観.jpg
- File:八幡平サーモンづくし(八幡平道の駅にしね)外観.jpg
- File:酪王いちごオレ・酪王カフェオレ.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:24, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:22, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. No metadata. File:Amos dembélé en 2017 à Logineo.jpg seems to be used on fr.wiki for self-promo
- File:Cheick Oumar Kante dans son atelier.jpg
- File:Papyvalerie photo 1.jpg
- File:Amos dembélé en 2017 à Logineo.jpg
- File:Amos DEMBELE au bureau à Logineo.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:27, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:20, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. No metadata, low res. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:20, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
not needed here. com:porn 42.111.133.37 03:55, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per norm 03:59, 17 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sachinthonakkara (talk • contribs) 03:59, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:53, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:19, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Promotional image only, out of Wikimedia's project scope. Veracious (talk) 05:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:18, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Using Wikimedia Commons to sell cars. Veracious (talk) 05:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:18, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
upon closer look, may not be pd-shape due to some elements I had not previously noticed. SecretName101 (talk) 05:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:17, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kissa21782 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: please see our project scope Yann (talk) 06:37, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:16, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 123nimaalipour (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful.
— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:59, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:15, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Akash.waghmare1991adtbaramati (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful - please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 07:04, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:13, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Seems to be used for self-promo on en.wiki 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:51, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:12, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Possible COPYVIO Bagas Chrisara (talk) 08:12, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:12, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Underground DF (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low res. No metadata. Unlikely to be own work.
- File:André Ribeiro.png
- File:Johann Becker.png
- File:Frank Lima.png
- File:Encarte do EP Fantasma.jpg
- File:AudioFantasma.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:22, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dariamed93 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images, out of scope. Also not selfies, so permission from photographer is needed.
- File:Daria1858.jpg
- File:Daria1176.jpg
- File:Daria21.jpg
- File:Daria0223.jpg
- File:Копия 1.jpg
- File:Dariamed1993.jpg
Yann (talk) 08:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:09, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jomako~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Ministère.jpg
- File:Poto poto.jpg
- File:Immeuble de brazzaville.jpg
- File:Route de la corniche.jpg
- File:Hotel Alima Palace, Oyo..jpg
- File:Aéroport Ngot Nzoungou de Dolisie.jpg
- File:Bacongo, Brazza.jpg
- File:Moungali.jpg
- File:Palais sasssou.jpg
- File:Jardin présidentiel Congo.jpg
Yann (talk) 08:46, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 2.205.20.120 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Copyviol (screenshot from Google Street View) Yann (talk) 08:50, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:07, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 2.205.20.120 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Copyviol (screenshot from Google Street View) Yann (talk) 08:51, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:07, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 2.205.19.18 as Speedy (Speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Copyviol (Screenshot from Google street view Yann (talk) 08:51, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:07, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EPSF-Mansoura (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work. Files do not have metadata. Some are low res.
- File:EPSF-Mansoura10.jpg.png
- File:EPSF-Mansoura9.png
- File:EPSF-Mansoura8.jpg.png
- File:EPSF-Mansoura7.png.jpg
- File:EPSF-Mansoura6.png.jpg
- File:EPSF-Mansoura5.jpg.png
- File:EPSF-Mansoura3.png.jpg
- File:EPSF-Mansoura2.jpg
- File:EPSF-Mansoura1.png
- File:EPSF-Mansoura4.jpg
- File:EPSF-Mansoura11.jpg
- File:EPSF-Mansoura13.jpg
- File:EPSF-Mansoura12.jpg
- File:EPSF-Mansoura14.jpg
- File:EPSF-Mansoura15.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:06, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:14, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:05, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
i dont want it anymore in wiki Theoyiorkas (talk) 10:29, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:03, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
- File:Josiane Lessard running a meet and great bike ride.jpg
- File:Josiane lessard at Vidcon 2019 in Anaheim CA.jpg
- File:Josiane Lessard’s most recent lenses.jpg
- File:Josiane Lessard a Selena Fan?.jpg
- File:Josiane lessard.jpg
- File:Josiane lessard spotted down the hill!.jpg
- File:Skin suit by VV Sport Design.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:02, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos, book cover and coat of arms. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Blason de la famille de Lagrévol.gif
- File:Moisson-yvelines.jpg
- File:CouvertureCLAJ69.jpg
- File:Roger Raoul ROCHER.jpg
- File:Militant laïque de l' enfance.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos missing evidence for license provided
- File:Roger raoul.rocher.jpg
- File:Bron-1919.png
- File:Baigneurs plage du Rhône.jpg
- File:Char à Aix en Provence.jpg
- File:Lac du Fontanil.jpg
- File:Croix à l'entrée de Rochepaule (Ardèche).jpg
- File:Une fête de faucons rouges.jpg
- File:Premier Mai1965.jpg
- File:Manifestation pour la mixité des résidences universitaires.jpg
- File:Faucons Rouges Saint Fons.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 10:54, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation this Web site. スイス山梨県 (talk) 11:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Info 運営会社の利用規約では無断転載は著作権侵害となっています。( According to the terms of use of the operating company, unauthorized reproduction is a copyright infringement. ) --スイス山梨県 (talk) 11:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:58, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope. Ratte (talk) 11:12, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:58, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Contested speedy by User:Masumrezarock100. Claimed as below threshold of originality, but the cityscape silhouette, knife and texture is unique making it above TOO. BevinKacon (talk) 11:16, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:58, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Het is niet meer relevant Nathanzola (talk) 11:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation this Web page.
According to the terms of use of the operating company, unauthorized reproduction is a copyright infringement. スイス山梨県 (talk) 11:24, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation this Web page.
According to the terms of use of the operating company, unauthorized reproduction is a copyright infringement. スイス山梨県 (talk) 11:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
This is last remaining upload of self-promotion-only user. I nominated his userpage and sandbox in en.wiki for speedy deletion, so it should be unused personal photo soon. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Subject's promotional photo lifted from https://schneiderwebsite.com - highest-resolution copy I can find is [4] - appears to be a photo of a video image - no evidence it's under a free license David Gerard (talk) 12:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:56, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and previous publications found elsewhere. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:37, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
looks like non commercial https://web.archive.org/web/20160311025036/barnacle.biota.biodiv.tw/pages/1366 Roy17 (talk) 12:40, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- I had uploaded this for an illustration in the Wikispecies page. All I wanted was the picture, as the data is included on the page. If there are copyright problems, then go ahead.
- What does commercial have to do with availability? Usually commercial means restricted copyrights, as such capitalists make more money. Neferkheperre (talk) 13:42, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Neferkheperre: See Commons:Licensing: Media licensed under non-commercial only licenses are not accepted either. --SVTCobra 14:46, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:54, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:54, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:53, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:56, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:53, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Seems like a screenshot from video game. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:09, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:53, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Małgosia Hermanowicz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Three different authors, no permission.
- File:Muzykoteka Warsztaty.jpg
- File:MOS 9101.jpg
- File:Fot Bartek Warzecha DSC7527.jpg
- File:MOS 7774.jpg
~Cybularny Speak? 13:12, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:15, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:50, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 13:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:50, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted photos. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:48, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:49, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nooralam.aree (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).
- File:Noor Alam Araria.jpg
- File:Rani Tabssum.jpg
- File:Noor Alam Arariavi.jpg
- File:Photo passport size.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:21, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:58, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nooralam.aree (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope Commons is not a social media site
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 13:51, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by Yann. --Didym (talk) 16:48, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Naka-ku, Yokohama
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted photos.
- File:中国料理 翠鳳本店 メニュー - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:中国料理 翠鳳本店 メニュー - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:中国料理 翠鳳本店 メニュー - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:中国料理 翠鳳本店 メニュー - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:中国料理 翠鳳本店 メニュー - panoramio.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:04, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:46, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted photos. Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:12, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:46, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Not own work. Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 14:18, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:46, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:45, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by พีรชัย วงษ์ชาลี (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most other uploads have either been deleted or marked for deletion. Some of these have facebook metadata, others are clearly not own work.
- File:สมเด็จพระนางเจ้าสิริกิติ์ พระบรมราชินีนาถ พระบรมราชชนนีพันปีหลวง .jpg
- File:พระพุทธรูปประจำโรงเรียนมัญจาศึกษา.jpg
- File:กิจกรรมหน้าเสาธงโรงเรียนมัญจาศึกษา.jpg
- File:ผังโรงเรียนมัญจาศึกษา.png
- File:แผนผังโรงเรียนมัญจาศึกษา.png
Majora (talk) 01:04, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 22:22, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by พีรชัย วงษ์ชาลี (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused flag and diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:45, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by พีรชัย วงษ์ชาลี (talk · contribs)
[edit]Facebook size & quality images without metadata.
- File:SMT MC Classroom ( Gifted ).jpg
- File:Buddha statue Manchasuk School.jpg
- File:Flagstaff Manchasuksa School.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:02, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 17 August 2019 (UTC) Seguramente el texto no es de importancia general, más bien para un tema y momento determinado. El texto es mio y las fotos, en mi opinión, son de libre uso. Entodo caso se puede tirar del wikimedia commons — Preceding unsigned comment added by León del Esla (talk • contribs) 13:18, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:44, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nova Clarice (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:44, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, contemporary artwork, no fop (chapel built 1982) Martin Sg. (talk) 14:36, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:41, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died 1996, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 14:37, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:41, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
no authorization from the photographer... Nomen ad hoc (talk) 14:37, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. This photo has been published more than a month ago on Le Nouvel Economiste website. --Arcyon (discuter) 19:07, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Permission from the author is required and no OTRS ticket has been found for this media. @Nomen ad hoc: The DR is unnecessary since there is already a "stronger" "missing evidence of permission" tag... that we now have to remove for the longer process of the DR. --AntonierCH (d) 22:04, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Apologies, didn't know that. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 22:12, 17 August 2019 (UTC).
- Delete --Deansfa (talk) 14:34, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:44, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died 1996, no fop (chapel built in 1982) Martin Sg. (talk) 14:38, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died 1996, no fop (chapel built in 1982) Martin Sg. (talk) 14:38, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
One person has red lanyard Liridon (talk) 16:52, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: That person is OK with this photo. --Didym (talk) 17:36, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:54, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:30, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted maps. Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:29, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nicola Labanca (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Rotonda Monumentale Città di Lagonegro.jpg
- File:Fontana Monumentate G. Murat 1813.jpg
- File:Suddivisione amministrativa delle provincie e dei capoluoghi di distretto del Regno delle Due Sicilie.png
- File:Antico Sigillo Porta di Ferro 1552.jpg
- File:Antico Sigillo multimediale post-feudale Città di Lagonegro San Michele Arcangelo che uccide il drago.jpg
- File:Antico Sigillo post-feudale Città di Lagonegro- San Michele Arcangelo che uccide il drago. .jpg
- File:Titolo di città .png
- File:Bonaventura Picardi.jpg
- File:Coppa Italia Dilettanti Basilicata .jpg
- File:Coppa Italia Dilettanti .jpg
- File:Cattedrale S.Nicola Lagonegro .jpg
- File:Giuseppe De Lorenzo Scienziato , Filosofo , Poeta e Politico Italiano di .gif
- File:Lapide Merežkovskij in Lagonegro .jpg
- File:Palazzo di città comune di Lagonegro .jpg
- File:Secondo monumento lapidario ai caduti della grande guerra.jpg
- File:Monumento ai Caduti nella grande Guerra 1914-1918 Lagonegro.jpg
- File:Lapide Onorifica Cristoforo Grossi Medico Rivoluzionario in Lagonegro.jpg
- File:Mascherone Antica Fontana del “Canterano” Lagonegro.jpg
- File:Lapide Antica Fontana del “Canterano”.jpg
- File:Arco Porta di Ferro Castello Feudale Lagonegro .jpg
- File:Porta di Ferro Castello feudale di Lagonegro .jpg
- File:Storico commemorativa Fontana G.Murat In Lagonegro.jpg
- File:Fontana Giacchino Murat .jpg
- File:Incisione Storico-commemorativa Fontana G.Murat In Lagonegro.jpg
- File:Palazzo Corrado in Lagonegro .jpg
Didym (talk) 15:52, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- File:Chiesa della Candelora Lagonegro.jpg
- File:Concattedrale San Nicola Lagonegro.jpg
- File:Croce Monumentale Piazza Bonaventura Picardi .jpg
- File:Statua Oro e Argento di San Nicola di Bari in Lagonegro.jpg
- Delete all. I deleted speedily some obvious copyvios and nominated for deletion 4 other suspected copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 16:17, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Images from different sources/authors, no permission; -> COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 09:10, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
No information on the age of this picture, so that it's unknown whether the license would be valid. Jcb (talk) 23:00, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 09:05, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
replaced by File:다짐 곡선.png Gcd822 (talk) 23:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:03, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Photomontages, a free source must be provided for each images
Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019081810004538 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 01:00, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 12:09, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AlbanGeller as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © Capstack Portrait Archive/ Mary Evans Picture Library. Converting to deletion request to give opportunity for further clarification. Co-nominating File:Amyj.png, also tagged at copyvio, which seems to come from the same original photo. Ariadacapo (talk) 07:27, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
(pinging the original uploaders and some editors of the file pages, Powerek38, MLWatts, Ecummenic, Josve05a) -- Ariadacapo (talk) 07:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Both files will remain in copyright until 2038. AlbanGeller (talk) 07:41, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete The sourcing in the National Portrait Gallery seems accurate, and means the portrait is still under standard copyright, not PD-UKGov. We have other photos of Amy Johnson available, so I won’t try to have the copyright holders relicense it. Ariadacapo (talk) 08:04, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 08:13, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Not F10 and INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 08:13, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Knihovna s infocentrem as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: omyl Yann (talk) 09:18, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
The person in the photo disagrees with the publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knihovna s infocentrem (talk • contribs) 2019-09-19T13:13:41 (UTC)
Deleted Not used; uploader first asked for deletion same day as uploading. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:20, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Eissink as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader is not the author. Yann (talk) 09:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Taken from family album per source, no info on photographer, date etc. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AlbanGeller as Noncommercial (Cc-by-nc-nd-3.0). The file is heavily used and it has been in Commons for 7 years, so regular deletion request is created for allowing discussion. Taivo (talk) 11:20, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete This file will remain in copyright until 2025. AlbanGeller (talk) 11:22, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:19, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
duplicate of 2012 TC4 observed (annotated).jpg vip (talk) 13:29, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:19, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
No specific source, but plenty of bigger copies on the Internet. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:57, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - As the uploader, I don't contest this deletion request. STSC (talk) 16:54, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted map. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:20, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW. This explanation board is copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW. This explanation board is copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:56, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:45, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фотография встречается в Интернете до загрузки на Викисклад http://ekskluziv-smi.ru/sergej-belikov-ne-zhalejte-vremeni-dlya-fizkultury/, https://fb.ru/article/401286/pevets-sergey-belikov-foto-biografiya-lichnaya-jizn-tvorchestvo, https://ruspekh.ru/people/item/belikov-sergej-grigorevich Dogad75 (talk) 23:37, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:44, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 23:40, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Description boards in Japan 1
[edit]COM:DW. The explanation boards are copyrighted works.
- File:Explanation board in Demachi Park,Yatsushiro City.jpg
- File:Explanation board, Jofuku Park.jpg
- File:Nedo Castle Ruin Explanation Board.jpg
- File:赤羽西一丁目 2014 (15859344465).jpg
- File:Injuji-totsukaha.jpg
- File:北条時頼の墓説明板.jpg
- File:天野遠景の墓説明板.jpg
- File:平福寺由緒説明板.jpg
- File:新得駅前「火夫の像」説明板.jpg
- File:清水八幡史跡説明板.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:08, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW. These explanation boards are copyrighted works.
- File:Ryoanji map temple (7276351610).jpg
- File:Shindo-haiji, setsumeiban.jpg
- File:子之神社縁起.jpg
- File:小松寺境内案内板.jpg
- File:影隠地蔵.jpg
- File:新得駅前「北海道の重心地」モニュメントの説明板.jpg
- File:深良用水2.JPG
史跡訪問して帰って画像UPでヘトヘトなので特に異議は唱えませんが 天野遠景は墓と離れていてい背景化は不可、北条時頼は俳句追加、子之神社は本文1473に対応、影隠地蔵は背景とし地蔵の方が本体とか 他のFileも説明があればより理解が深まりますが、最近日本語版も本文の参考文献出典範囲注釈が厳しいので画像なら問題ないかですが 権利関係で問題があれば削除はやむをえません I can speak english a little.Visiter walking monument easy、But copyright rules of Japan must protect。 --C2revenge (talk) 14:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)C2revenge(会話)
(日本語で失礼します)File:Shindo-haiji, setsumeiban.jpgですが、「説明板付近の遺跡風景」が写真の主題であって、「説明板の内容」が写真の主題ではないのは画角の通りです。解像度の都合上で説明板が読めてしまってダメだというのであれば、異議は唱えません。--Saigen Jiro (talk) 10:37, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep File:Shindo-haiji, setsumeiban.jpg - I uploaded a redacted version. whym (talk) 14:05, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW. Photos and text are copyrighted works.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:52, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, I cropped one more picture. If you do not like it, you can re-nominate it for deletion due to out of scope, but at moment it is used. Taivo (talk) 13:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Description boards in Japan 2
[edit]COM:DW. The explanation boards are copyrighted works.
- File:Chigo no Mori 2.JPG
- File:GraveSign.jpg
- File:Guide display board of Higashinomiya Kofun.jpg
- File:Haguro Castle03.jpg
- File:Hakodate Switch Tower Sign.jpg
- File:Hososima-toudai-setumei.png
- File:Info-board-Ohama-thermal-power-station.jpg
- File:MT-Ogakie Station-Information board.jpg
- File:Photos of Guide display board of Higashinomiya Kofun.jpg
- File:UmegaePark01.jpg
- File:サルボ歩道案内看板 - panoramio.jpg
- File:井手丸山古墳案内板.jpg
- File:御霊櫃峠 案内板付近.jpg
- File:松倉城案内看板、奥に立て直した祠(榎大神).jpg
- File:椎津城0013 主郭内案内板.JPG
- File:相内公園の案内板.jpg
- File:角屋 - 看板.jpg
- File:(伝)平国香の墓説明板.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
平国香これないと辿り着くのは難しいですが異論は唱えません、問題ない画像をまたUPします --C2revenge (talk) 11:18, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, I cropped one image. Taivo (talk) 16:59, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Description boards in Japan 3
[edit]COM:DW. The explanation boards are copyrighted works.
- File:Ooe mine Station Ruins Information signboard 20200331.jpg
- File:Sunpu Castle Park 201015o.jpg
- File:ガーデンふ頭臨港緑園20200919 11.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:31, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
- I pixelized the text in the first file (File:Ooe mine Station Ruins Information signboard 20200331.jpg). I left the old picture inside it because the site was closed before 1947. Assuming the picture was taken back then, it is PD: {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}}. (ja:大江山鉱山) whym (talk) 05:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination except File:Ooe mine Station Ruins Information signboard 20200331.jpg. ƏXPLICIT 02:06, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Description boards in Japan 4
[edit]COM:DW. The explanation boards are copyrighted works.
- File:Haguro Castle04.jpg
- File:Oshitate Shrine 20190326 05.jpg
- File:保月山六面石幢の案内板.jpg
- File:北照井堰用水3.jpg
- File:Aotsuka Kofun 20200126 02.jpg
- File:Aotsuka Kofun 20200126 09.jpg
- File:Shigaraki Palace Site (Dairino) 20201115 06.jpg
- File:Shigaraki Palace Site (Dairino) 20201115 17.jpg
- File:Shiotsukō Archaeological Site 20201119 01.jpg
- File:Shiotsukō Archaeological Site 20201119 02.jpg
- File:Chōhō-ji Yakata 20200919.jpg
- File:Kaganoi Castle 20200511 01.jpg
- File:Kakei Temple 2019-10-14 3.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:52, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep last file (File:北照井堰用水3.jpg). The part in concern has been pixelized in the new version. whym (talk) 13:35, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination except File:北照井堰用水3.jpg. ƏXPLICIT 02:06, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Description boards in Japan 5
[edit]COM:DW. The explanation boards are copyrighted works.
- File:Densetu-kanbanJPG.jpg
- File:Hirugano Highland SA 2019-10-22 1.jpg
- File:Inariyama Kofun (Kamo, Takashima) 20200919 02.jpg
- File:Kuden Jourozuka site.jpg
- File:Kyoto National Museum 20200909 03.jpg
- File:Lion before closing of Ebisu Mitsukoshi.jpg
- Fixed, thanks!
- File:Oigi Yamanishi Kofun 4.jpg
- File:Ruin of Chōfuku-ji Temple 20201119 02.jpg
- File:Shiotsu Shrine 20201119 10.jpg
- File:Taga jinja 2019d2.jpg
- File:Taga jinja 2019d4.jpg
- File:唐松一里塚説明板.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:42, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
I can speak English a little, so I'm writing in Japanese. 以前議論になったものも含め、私のUPした画像が含まれています。すべてあまり気にせずUPしてしまったものですので、削除もやむを得ないと考えています。ただ、File:Ruin of Chōfuku-ji Temple 20201119 02.jpgのように、看板そのものを映したわけではないものについては、カットしてあげなおしたほうが良いかなと思います。--先従隗始 (talk) 06:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Export to other image repository?
[edit]As C2revenge wrote above, these texts are important references, they are often the only written source of information about a local event or place. I totally understand that they can't be kept on Commons unless the text is blurred. Ideally, how about copying these pictures to a more lenient repository (such as Flickr or other) before deleting? That would prevent the loss of information, as these boards often fall apart or get removed to make place for urban development. This would also allow the pictures to be re-imported into Commons once copyright expires. Cheers! Syced (talk) 01:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: It is easier to undelete on Commons than re-import from an external repository. Anyone who wants to see the text for reference may ask an admin for a copy. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:04, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Description boards in Japan 6
[edit]COM:DW. The explanation boards are copyrighted works.
- File:20181106 Toyako 5257 (48429779491).jpg
- File:Shoboji-Kofun-information-board.jpg
- File:Takebashi bridge04.jpg
- File:Takebe Taisha 20200919 06.jpg
- File:Tokyo, 2019 - 486.jpg
- File:Tokyo, 2019 - 558.jpg
- File:Tokyo, 2019 - 623.jpg
- File:Tokyo, 2019 - 657.jpg
- File:Yasashiyato iseki.jpg
- File:柳沢遺跡現地案内版(2020-2-18).jpg
- File:雑色杉本遺跡の看板.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:19, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Okazaemon
[edit]Copyrighted character. [5]
G I Chandor (talk) 08:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Okazaemon
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted character. [6]
- File:AK-Kita-okazaki-drink-vending-machine-with-Okazaemon.jpg
- File:AK-Naka-okazaki-with-Okazaemon.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
no Freedom of Panorama in Estonia WikedKentaur (talk) 09:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
no Freedom of Panorama in Estonia WikedKentaur (talk) 09:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
no Freedom of Panorama in Estonia WikedKentaur (talk) 09:29, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
no Freedom of Panorama in Estonia WikedKentaur (talk) 09:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - Pointless nomination. Unclear what the reporting user is listing as a reason. Blomsterhagens (talk) 18:33, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The reason is Commons:Freedom of panorama. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
no Freedom of Panorama in Estonia WikedKentaur (talk) 09:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:22, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
no Freedom of Panorama in Estonia WikedKentaur (talk) 09:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:22, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
no Freedom of Panorama in Estonia WikedKentaur (talk) 09:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
no Freedom of Panorama in Estonia WikedKentaur (talk) 09:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:19, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. [7] Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:38, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
It's a book cover. And so it must be copyrighted. Gazal world (talk) 10:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The picture is by Axeli Gallen-Kallela and is out of copyright, but the rest of the design is predumably copyrighted. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:16, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted map. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:40, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I uploaded this photo, but I agree with the suggestion to delete it. I'm sorry for bothering you. I will be careful about handling the same kind of photos. stck_w (Talk/Edits) 06:52, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:41, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I uploaded this photo, but I agree with the suggestion to delete it. I'm sorry for bothering you. I will be careful about handling the same kind of photos. stck_w (Talk/Edits) 06:50, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:41, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I uploaded this photo, but I agree with the suggestion to delete it. I'm sorry for bothering you. I will be careful about handling the same kind of photos. stck_w (Talk/Edits) 06:50, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted map. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:42, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I uploaded this photo, but I agree with the suggestion to delete it. I'm sorry for bothering you. I will be careful about handling the same kind of photos. stck_w (Talk/Edits) 06:51, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:13, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted artworks. No FoP in Japan for artistic works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:48, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- I did not uploaded it; only cropped the watermark. Anyway must be deleted per Yuraily Lic--Pierpao.lo (listening) 15:59, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:58, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Originally marked as copyvio by Piotr Bart with the reason: Per COM:TOO#Czechia. Pbrks (talk) 18:09, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep 20th Century Fox Television (and therefore Walt Disney), an American company, owns the Simpson. Translations do not change the copyright status (see here); this image falls under {{PD-logo}}. Pbrks (talk) 18:14, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Closed as Kept per Pbrks; simple text. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:12, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Delete: the uploader is not the author of this stamps which is the UK government for the Dominica post office and a 1977 Dominica stamp is copyright for 50 years if w:crown copyright applies or the greater 70 years if {{PD-Dominica}} applies. The earliest date copyright expires is 2028. Ww2censor (talk) 21:49, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:23, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Chewbacca
[edit]COM:DW. Copyrighted character.
- File:Cannes 2018 Star Wars 2 (cropped).jpg
- File:Chewbacca.jpg
- File:EMP SW 2015-06 215.jpg
- File:EMP SW 2015-06 Chewbacca.jpg
- File:Meeting of the stars (23351838356).jpg
- File:MoMI NYC - Star Wars, Chewbacca (6040914442).jpg
- File:Star Wars A Galaxy Far, Far Away Chewbacca 1.jpg
- File:Star Wars A Galaxy Far, Far Away Chewbacca 2.jpg
- File:Star Wars A Galaxy Far, Far Away Chewbacca 3.jpg
- File:Star Wars A Galaxy Far, Far Away Chewbacca 4.jpg
- File:Star Wars A Galaxy Far, Far Away Chewbacca 5.jpg
- File:Star Wars A Galaxy Far, Far Away Chewbacca 6.jpg
- File:Star Wars A Galaxy Far, Far Away Chewbacca 7.jpg
- File:Star Wars and the Power of Costume July 2018 31 (Chewbacca costume from Episode IV).jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:13, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:29, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:2011 Pan American Games
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters. These are mascots of 2011 Pan American Games.
- File:Gavo, Huichi y Leo, Mascotas Panamericanas de Guadalajara 2011.jpg
- File:Huichi and gavo mascots.png
- File:Leo 2011 pan am mascot.png
Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:49, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Because the Pop'n anime artstyle is better than the classic one. Hello! I'm Nyami! (talk) 13:13, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Nick (talk) 13:27, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted characters. These are mascots of video game "pop'n music". [8] Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:56, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
It is my own work and I want to delete because it could be use to impersonate me Irachatan (talk) 05:59, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as courtesy deletion; unused personal file. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:56, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
It is my own work and I want to delete because it could be use to impersonate me Irachatan (talk) 05:59, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as courtesy deletion; unused personal file. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:56, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
It is my own work and I want to delete because it could be use to impersonate me Irachatan (talk) 06:00, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
It is my own work and I want to delete because it could be use to impersonate me Irachatan (talk) 06:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as courtesy deletion; unused personal file. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:55, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:22, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW. Copyrighted map. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:41, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. [9] Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted characters. [10] Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Eissink as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Art work by a living artist; uploader and source do not seem to hold the copyright. Yann (talk) 06:53, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
See Commons:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. PD-SerbiaGov doesn't apply to photographs. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:20, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:01, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Why US law was applied to film created in Austro-Hungary? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi! Than you can change the right type of copy rights. It is more than 100 years old footage. Do not delete it just becaouse of wrong type of licence. Thanks!--Togaheather (talk) 19:52, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
I changed the Copyright info.--Togaheather (talk) 19:30, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Togaheather: Do not remove the deletion request template from image if the deletion request has not been closed. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:07, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: Does the matter looked resolved to you? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:10, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- YouTube is definitely not primary source. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Noconteos: Do not remove deletion listing notices from file pages while the request is still open. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
--- Deleted PD license claim is unsupported -- Unknown author, but claim author died 70 years ago. (Eg, plausible hypothetical if author was 25 when this was filmed and lived to age 75, media would not qualify for this tag until 2038.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Possibly a complex logo per COM:TOO UK. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:30, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted False authorship & license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:27, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment See Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Iran#Freedom_of_panorama. How long has this exhibit been installed? If no information, looks like we'd need to delete. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:21, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
--- Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
--- Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:18, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC) --- Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:20, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
--- Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:12, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
--- Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:22, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:12, 17 August 2019 (UTC) --- Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:23, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:12, 17 August 2019 (UTC) --- Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:23, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:12, 17 August 2019 (UTC) --- Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:24, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:12, 17 August 2019 (UTC) --- Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:24, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:17, 17 August 2019 (UTC) --- Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:25, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:27, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
--- Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:19, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:27, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:49, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:27, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
--- Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Very low quality; badly framed, misidentified, and too small to have any realistic use MPF (talk) 23:57, 17 August 2019 (UTC) --- Deleted unused small poor quality photo of common bird. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted characters. Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:16, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ARMcgrath as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: not used Yann (talk) 05:46, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: ARMcgrath is the uploader of this file. But G7 doesn't apply. -- CptViraj (📧) 05:49, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept Free licensed photo of person with articles about them in more than 20 projects; not being in current use is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:13, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. This is a mascot of BANDAI City. [11] Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:02, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. This is a mascot of NTT東日本 (NTT East). [12] Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:29, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:08, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. This is a mascot of Huis Ten Bosch (theme park). [13] Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:06, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. This is a mascot of Lemon.Inc. [14] Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:17, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:05, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. [15] Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:05, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. [16] Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:03, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tyg728 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: 请求删除原因:与其他文件和页面完全重复;有一个质量更好但不完全相同的页面。File:Beautiful Scene of the Square Pot.jpg Yann (talk) 09:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note that the reason given for deletion in Chinese is that this is a duplicate of File:Beautiful Scene of the Square Pot.jpg which Tyg728 considers to be the better version. Hzh (talk) 11:02, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- 此为平面艺术品的影印本。同样的图片,重复,保留的另外一张更接近原作。--Tyg728 (talk) 11:26, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept The other image of this PD work may arguably be higher quality, but this version is in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
此为平面艺术品的影印本。有一个质量更好但不完全相同的页面File:Beautiful Scene of the Square Pot.jpg Tyg728 (talk) 03:18, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep nothing has changed since request last month. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:39, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
KEPT. The file is still used in 5 projects. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Delete: date of issue is 1953 not 1901 & author is listed on right side as Cheffer, Henry (1880-1957) so copyright likely expires in 2028. A better colour image exists here. Ww2censor (talk) 10:04, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted map. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:53, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:57, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:54, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:55, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی (در هنگام بارگزاری قانون مالکیت معنوی آثار انشقاقی در ویکیپدیا را نمیدانستم) Mostafameraji (talk) 20:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:56, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی (در هنگام بارگزاری قانون مالکیت معنوی آثار انشقاقی در ویکیپدیا را نمیدانستم) Mostafameraji (talk) 20:37, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:57, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep COM:TOO --妖精書士 (talk) 02:20, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- This package contains illustrations. Not COM:TOO. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:56, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I uploaded a new version which will hopefully be okay to be kept. I agree that the package design is problematic, but the rest of the picture (the food itself) can be usable. The old version needs to be deleted in that case. whym (talk) 13:03, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
This is not "own work", it is a derivative of File:Postcrossing - Logo.png. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 04:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- There's also a problem if the original image being above threshhold of originality. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 04:35, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted False license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:11, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:27, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Clear DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Hardly own work -- CptViraj (📧) 07:54, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019081910009219 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 21:00, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Nehal_N._Mehta.jpg” under ticket:2019081910009219. --Ganímedes (talk) 02:50, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Withdrawn per OTRS. (non-admin closure) -- CptViraj (📧) 08:33, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Graham217385 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The subject claims to be the author but likely a photographer is the copyright holder. I think an OTRS permission statement if really needed to keep these images.
Ww2censor (talk) 10:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Graham_Short_(micro-artist).jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2019081710002658. --Ww2censor (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment this image will not be verified by OTRS as the copyright holder is not reachable. Ww2censor (talk) 14:02, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:51, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:17, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. --4nn1l2 (talk) 15:03, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:25, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. --4nn1l2 (talk) 15:04, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:26, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. --4nn1l2 (talk) 15:02, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:26, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. --4nn1l2 (talk) 15:05, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی (در هنگام بارگزاری قانون مالکیت معنوی آثار انشقاقی در ویکیپدیا را نمیدانستم) Mostafameraji (talk) 20:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of copyrighted art. --4nn1l2 (talk) 21:00, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی (در هنگام بارگزاری قانون مالکیت معنوی آثار انشقاقی در ویکیپدیا را نمیدانستم) Mostafameraji (talk) 20:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of copyrighted art. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:59, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی (در هنگام بارگزاری قانون مالکیت معنوی آثار انشقاقی در ویکیپدیا را نمیدانستم) Mostafameraji (talk) 20:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of copyrighted art. --4nn1l2 (talk) 21:01, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی (در هنگام بارگزاری قانون مالکیت معنوی آثار انشقاقی در ویکیپدیا را نمیدانستم) Mostafameraji (talk) 20:35, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of copyrighted art. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:59, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی (در هنگام بارگزاری قانون مالکیت معنوی آثار انشقاقی در ویکیپدیا را نمیدانستم) Mostafameraji (talk) 20:35, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of copyrighted art. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:58, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی (در هنگام بارگزاری قانون مالکیت معنوی آثار انشقاقی در ویکیپدیا را نمیدانستم) Mostafameraji (talk) 20:37, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:56, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی (در هنگام بارگزاری قانون مالکیت معنوی آثار انشقاقی در ویکیپدیا را نمیدانستم) Mostafameraji (talk) 20:37, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:55, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:17, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of copyrighted art. --4nn1l2 (talk) 21:27, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of copyrighted art. --4nn1l2 (talk) 21:27, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of copyrighted art. --4nn1l2 (talk) 21:28, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of copyrighted art. --4nn1l2 (talk) 21:28, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی (در هنگام بارگزاری قانون مالکیت معنوی آثار انشقاقی در ویکیپدیا را نمیدانستم) Mostafameraji (talk) 20:35, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of copyrighted art. --4nn1l2 (talk) 21:23, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی (در هنگام بارگزاری قانون مالکیت معنوی آثار انشقاقی در ویکیپدیا را نمیدانستم) Mostafameraji (talk) 20:36, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of copyrighted art. --4nn1l2 (talk) 21:22, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
© Willemieke Kars: https://www.groene.nl/artikel/21-vragen-aan-bregje-hofstede (on 17 September 2018)
Willemieke Kars doesn't sound like Ronnie Pedro. Quality here is much higher though. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:01, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted artwork. Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:07, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:34, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted artwork. Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:12, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:34, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted artwork. Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:13, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:34, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. [17] Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:18, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:34, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted object. Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep A kind of Food samples. --Benzoyl (talk) 08:49, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: A hamburger does not have a copyright, but a sculpture of a hamburger does. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted artwork. Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Namahage
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted artworks.
- File:Namahage.JPG
- File:Red Namahage at Akita station.jpg
- File:Statue of Namahage , なまはげの像 - panoramio (1).jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:37, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fukui Station (Fukui)
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted artworks.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:08, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted artworks. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:14, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted artwork. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:27, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW. The explanation boards are copyrighted works.
- File:Death place of Uryu Tamotsu.jpg
- File:Description of the Minato Castle.jpg
- File:Owadanotomari-iwakura.jpg
- File:岩見重太郎.JPG
- File:荒山合戦古戦場の看板.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:49, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
I believe that this image is very much above threshhold of originality. The letters themselves are PD, no question there, but arranging the letters on different coloured stamps, which are on the different angles is exactly what copyright is suppose to protect - creativity and originality. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 04:07, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Please note: I would be so very happy if somebody will explain to me how this image can be in public domain. I would love for it to remain on Commons, but as I understand copyright it must be deleted. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 04:09, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Each of the "stamps" is fundamentally a single letter in a typeface. Typefaces cannot be copyrighted. Therefore this is PD. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep the user did not bring proof that the picture shows a copyrighted character. Actually there are two famous Wookiee characters in the Star Wars universe : Chewbacca and Tarfful (they can be seen here : [18]), this picture does not show any of them. --Cody escadron delta (d) 06:00, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Either way, this is a copyrighted character. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:19, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - this may be a costume made by a fan, but it still infringes, as doe the photo. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:44, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:44, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted artwork. No FoP in Japan for artistic works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:44, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. [19] Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:37, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:44, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted artworks. No FoP in Japan for artistic works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:58, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:44, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted artwork. No FoP in Japan for artistic works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:00, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:44, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statues of bears in Japan
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted artwork.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:05, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:44, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. This is a mascot of Kirishima City. [20] Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:06, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:44, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kawasemi0311 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted character. This is a mascot of 福島ひまわり里親プロジェクト. [21]
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:24, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:44, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. [22] Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:44, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. [23] Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:05, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:45, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. This is a mascot of AJISEN RAMEN. [24] Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:45, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. [25] Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:30, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:45, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. [26] Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:45, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: reason=As this is a Swedish logo, COM:TOO Sweden applies and it states that "A simple general rule is that if it is unlikely that two persons would create, for example, a text identically or similarly, the text is probably sufficiently original to qualify as a protected work. (..) Often, the requirements for copyright protection are considered to be relatively low." Yann (talk) 07:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:45, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kensukeizawa (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted character. This is a mascot of WALLOP.[27]
Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:29, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:45, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Kuvaajaksi on keskustelusivulla ilmoitettu Taneli Oksanen, mutta pyynnöstä huolimatta ei ole ilmoitettu onko hän lataajanimimerkki Abc10 (talk) 08:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Comment User:Abc10 started the deletion request only 20 minutes after asking the up-loader about the authorship, which is too hasty. It has now been informed on the Finnish Wikipedia that the photographer has given permission for the up-loader for publishing the image in Commons, and therefore apparently an OTRS-request procedure should be followed instead, and the deletion request should be closed. Antilope (talk) 13:38, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - when, and if, the OTRS permission is received and checked, this can be restored. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:46, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. [28] Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:35, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:46, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. [29] Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:38, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:47, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. [30] Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:41, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:47, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- Not free enough to share on commons, for need of permission [31] (ja), and especially for the official prohibitions on color/shape modifications:
|
This photo is hardly judged as "De minimis". (see also similar cases: Commons:Deletion requests/Files under Category:Guribū,)
--Tokorokoko (talk) 15:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Musubimaru
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted character. [32]
- File:All Nippon Airways (Star Wars - BB-8 livery), Boeing 777-381(ER), JA789A (25998663802).jpg
- File:むすび丸祭りバージョン.jpg
- File:サーキットホイール (8112799169).jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:51, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- I believe File:All Nippon Airways (Star Wars - BB-8 livery), Boeing 777-381(ER), JA789A (25998663802).jpg & File:サーキットホイール (8112799169).jpg can be considered as DM. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:16, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- User:大诺史, thank you for your opinion. About File:サーキットホイール (8112799169).jpg, I also thought the doll was small. But, the doll is almost in the middle of the photo. When someone uses this photo, there is always the doll in the center. May I crop this photo? --Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:33, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:48, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. [33] See also Com:Deletion requests/File:もずやん.jpg Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:56, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:48, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. [34] Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:00, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:48, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. [35] Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:48, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. [36] Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:06, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Opposeイベント会場において投稿者自身が撮影したものであり、出典や他の情報源のものを写して投稿したわけではありませんので、取り下げを強く求めます。--岩手ファーストの会 (talk) 23:26, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- User:岩手ファーストの会, please read Commons:二次的著作物 about derivative works. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:55, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Comment二次的著作物のツリー化したものに沿って説明しましょう。
A : おっぽくんの写真(今回投稿した写真)
B : ファンが勝手に撮影した大野智と櫻井翔の写真
の2つがあるとします。流れに沿って質問すると
Q1 : 保護期間満了によるPD NO
Q2 : 独創性はあるか YES
ここまでは、A・Bともに同じ答えですが、ここから答えが異なります。
Q3 : 公共の場所に恒久的に展示してあるか
A : YES 駅やイベント会場などにおいてポスターやパンフレット、着ぐるみで展示されています。
B : NO 認められていません。写真やポスターで展示されていたとしても、ごく一部です。
Aに対する質問 : パノラマの自由はあるか
YES : もし、NOであれば撮影したイベント会場の主催者によって撮影が禁止、または制限されます。しかし、撮影したイベント会場では撮影に対する制約などはありませんでしたので、パノラマの自由が確保された状態のもとで撮影したため、投稿しても差し支えないものと判断しました。ちなみに、Bのごく一部の写真の場合、パノラマの自由は一切認められていません。
Bに対する質問 : 作者(著作権者ともいう。ここでは所属事務所であるジャニーズ事務所をさす)などから写真をフリーなライセンスで投稿する許可を得た
NO : 即ち、投稿できません。
したがって、Aは写真を撮ってフリーなライセンスで投稿可能、Bは投稿できません、ということになります。したがって、おっぽくんの写真はルールに基づいた投稿であります。--岩手ファーストの会 (talk) 05:34, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment "おっぽくん" is copyrighted character of East Japan Railway Company [37]. No evidence of free use. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Comment 先に説明したとおり、二次的著作物のルール上、問題ありません。なぜなら、気仙沼線・大船渡線BRTの駅において、おっぽくんをPRするポスターが展示されていたり、パンフレットにおいても自由に持ち帰ることができます。また、おっぽくんのラッピングを施したバスも運行されています[38]。また、気仙沼線・大船渡線BRTをPRするイベント会場においておっぽくんの着ぐるみが展示されており、自由に撮影することができます。これらのことから、パノラマの自由が確保されているのです。
もし、パノラマの自由が確保されていない場合、東日本旅客鉄道の申し入れによって、イベント会場の主催者が撮影を禁止・制限されます。また、おっぽくんの写真が二次的著作物のルール上問題があるとするならば、駅にポスターが展示されていたり、パンフレットを自由に持ち帰ることができないでしょう。更に、おっぽくんのラッピングバスも運行できませんし、おっぽくんの写真も撮影できません。
したがって、おっぽくんの写真はイベント会場で撮影したうえで投稿したものであり、出典のものをコピーしたものではないので、投稿に問題はないと考えています。もし、それでも問題があるというのであれば、おっぽくんのラッピングバス1・おっぽくんのラッピングバス2も考えてみたほうがよいでしょう。--岩手ファーストの会 (talk) 11:04, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:48, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. [39] Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:16, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:48, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tyg728 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: 请求删除原因:上传版本错误,申请删除后重新上传 Yann (talk) 09:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:49, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. [40] Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:25, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:49, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
permission from architect and model author?? WikedKentaur (talk) 09:27, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:49, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:17, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Iran. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:17, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Iran. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:17, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Iran. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی Mostafameraji (talk) 20:17, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Iran. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی (در هنگام بارگزاری قانون مالکیت معنوی آثار انشقاقی در ویکیپدیا را نمیدانستم) Mostafameraji (talk) 20:38, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivatove work of a non-free artwork. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:33, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی (در هنگام بارگزاری قانون مالکیت معنوی آثار انشقاقی در ویکیپدیا را نمیدانستم) Mostafameraji (talk) 20:36, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep File:حمام قجر قزوین Hammam Ghajar Ghazvin- Iran 33.jpg and File:حمام قجر قزوین Hammam Ghajar Ghazvin- Iran 30.jpg. I will blur these files or will ask on com:GL. Hanooz 07:27, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: User:Hanooz will get the files blurred. --4nn1l2 (talk) 21:08, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی (در هنگام بارگزاری قانون مالکیت معنوی آثارقانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی (در هنگام بارگزاری قانون مالکیت معنوی آثار انشقاقی در ویکیپدیا را نمیدانستم) انشقاقی در ویکیپدیا را نمیدانستم) Mostafameraji (talk) 20:37, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:حمام قجر قزوین Hammam Ghajar Ghazvin- Iran 30.jpg. FYI, @Hanooz: . --4nn1l2 (talk) 21:10, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی (در هنگام بارگزاری قانون مالکیت معنوی آثار انشقاقی در ویکیپدیا را نمیدانستم) Mostafameraji (talk) 20:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of non-free artwork. --4nn1l2 (talk) 04:13, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
قانون پانوراما یا مالکیت معنوی اثر انشقاقی (در هنگام بارگزاری قانون مالکیت معنوی آثار انشقاقی در ویکیپدیا را نمیدانستم) Mostafameraji (talk) 20:36, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of non-free artwork. --4nn1l2 (talk) 04:14, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RSTRSTRSTRST (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted character. [41]
Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:24, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted character. [42] Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:30, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SkipsThomas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Arms of 2nd Earl of Pembroke as recorded by York Herald, 1620.jpg
- licence changed to "PD-old-100", please keep file Lobsterthermidor (talk) 23:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- File:Quarterings of 2nd Earl of Pembroke as recorded by York Herald, 1620.jpg
- licence changed to "PD-old-100", please keep file Lobsterthermidor (talk) 23:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- File:1620 Visitation of Cornwall for THOMAS.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- licence changed to "PD-old-100", please keep file Lobsterthermidor (talk) 23:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Source/license tag were fixed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Not sure why you so opposed about this packaging thing, the main thing is on the product idea, focus isn't on the label. Nesnad (talk) 11:35, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Label is not COM:DM since it is the (or part or the) main subject of the image. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 02:04, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фотограф и персона на фото-одно и тоже лицо. Необходимо обращение в OTRS. Dogad75 (talk) 22:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 14:33, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 2.205.20.120 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Copyviol (screenshot from Google Street View) Yann (talk) 07:06, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tyg728 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: 请求删除原因:上传版本错误,申请删除后重新上传 Yann (talk) 09:35, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Possibly a complex logo per COM:TOO UK. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:49, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
image from 2007, invalid license 2804:14D:5C9D:9328:0:0:0:1000 04:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- @2804:14D:5C9D:9328:0:0:0:1000: I corrected the license. This foto was taken while he was minister of the justice, so was taken in 1946 (Seventy-three years ago).--JorgeBenJorge (talk) 12:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- The license is better now, but the metadata states that this imagem was created in 2013, so i am not sure, maybe is better for someonelse like a moderator answer this. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2804:14D:5C9D:9328:0:0:0:1000 (talk) 14:04, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- @2804:14D:5C9D:9328:0:0:0:1000: Now I have found a 100% valid lincense. I think that we can end this discussion.--JorgeBenJorge (talk) 01:18, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
- The license is better now, but the metadata states that this imagem was created in 2013, so i am not sure, maybe is better for someonelse like a moderator answer this. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2804:14D:5C9D:9328:0:0:0:1000 (talk) 14:04, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: License has been updated. —howcheng {chat} 19:01, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
derivative work (of the image displayed on the screen) of unclear copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:25, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Looks like the derivative video seen would have been a N. Korea Gov't work, so PD. Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/North_Korea -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:47, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Infrogmation, and image in background is of such low quality, not reusable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:47, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Vicky atanacio as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Unofficial Yann (talk) 09:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:10, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Minaminakadori, Naka Ward, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture 231-0006, Japan - panoramio (1).jpg
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:51, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:11, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:54, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:11, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tyg728 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: 请求删除原因:上传版本错误,申请删除后重新上传 Yann (talk) 06:54, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- 上传错误的版本,上傳者请求删除,删除后再重新上传。--Tyg728 (talk) 07:09, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing source. — Racconish 💬 08:35, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by PlanespotterA320 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: Can be undeleted 2106. Yann (talk) 06:55, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Why 2106? Regards, Yann (talk) 07:13, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing author. — Racconish 💬 08:36, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Someone's dissertation nominally released under a free license, but in a copyright discussion on English Wikisource it came to light that it contains a significant number of images that are either clear copyvio or of indeterminate (but clearly questionable) copyright status. After failing to garner any volunteers to redact the file in 5+ years (including an attempt to recruit Wikimedia Australia to help) , the associated pages have now been deleted at enWS as known copyvio.
The initial work to determine individual image copyrights (by ShakespeareFan00) is as follows:
No. | Source | Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Museum of Victoria's Photo Archive No.262 | c. 1931 | Pre 1955 Australia. |
2 | #20661 Victoria Army Musem | 19?7 | ? |
3 | Mitchell Library No. 10868 | 1906 | Pre 1955 - Australia |
4 | Mitchell Library No. 16630 | 1922 | Pre 1955 - Australia |
5 | ? | ? | ? |
6 | ? | ? | ? |
7 | A. Locket | ? | ? |
8 | Mitchell Library No. 17584 | 1922 | Pre 1955- Australia |
9 | Musee Royal de l'armee et D'Historee Miltaree | ? | Pre 1923 abroad? |
10 | Imperial War Museum E(AUS) 1860 | c.1918 | Pre 1923 - abroad? |
11 | Imperial War Musuem E(AUS) 1240 | ? | Pre 1922 abroad? |
12 | Imperial War Muesum Q.9273 | c. 1918 | Pre 1923 abroad? |
13 | Museum of Victoria's Photo Archive- No. 6706 | ? | Pre 1955- Australia? |
14 | Imperial War Museum Q 31245 | c. 1918? | 1923 abroad? |
15 | Imperial War Musuem Q30330 | c.1918? | 1923 abroad? |
16 | Museum of victoria's Photo Archive No. 1558 | c. 1927 | Pre 1955- Australia? |
17 | Imperial War Museum. E(AUS}. 2894 | c.1918 | Pre 1923 abroad? |
18 | Museum of Victoria's Photo Archive No. 1446 | c.1935 | Pre 1955 Australia? |
19 | Frontspeice to Krupp and the Intenational Armaments ring | 1915 | ? |
20 | The Bulletin Feb 3rd, 1921 | Still Copyright | |
21 | C96 n/A Nr. 5973) | ? | ? |
22 | Mitchell Library No. 69110 | 1938 | Pre 1955 Australia? |
23 | John Oxley Library No. 169185 | ? | ? |
24 | Museum of Victoria's Photo Archive no. 6930 | ? | ? |
25 | Mitchell Library No. 17368 | ? | ?? |
26 | Mitchell Library No. 02302 | c. 1920 | Pre 1955 Australia? |
27 | ? | 1986? | Still in Copyright |
28 | ? | 1992 | Still in Copyright |
29 | Imperial War Museum No.E(AUS).2852 | c.1918 | Pre 1923 abroad? |
30 | West Coast Pioneers' Memorial Museum | c.1923 | Pre 1955 Australia. |
31 | Museum of Victoria's Photo Archive No. 430 | ? | ? |
32 | (Courier Mail 2061/RSM 1500-7). | ? | Still Copyright? |
33 | (Advert) | ? | Still copyright |
34 | ? | | |
Note that we have a partial transcription of the freely-licensed text sitting in deleted revisions on enWS, so if anyone is actually willing to go through and redact all the images that do not pass COM:PRP, we would very much appreciate a notice (to me, or on s:WS:S, would both work) so we can salvage the bits that are actually freely licensed or PD. Xover (talk) 09:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 08:54, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
No US copyright rationale. Probably copyrighted in US זָרַח (talk) 10:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 08:45, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since). Circa 1940s Slovakian photograph. Could be public domain in the EU, if we can find evidence of publication before 1946, it would be public domain in the US too. Abzeronow (talk) 18:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, this looks like more from around 1960. Yann (talk) 12:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
no Freedom of Panorama in Estonia WikedKentaur (talk) 09:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 12:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Evidence for creation or publication before 1924 is needed. Alternatively, evidence for photographer being dead more than 70 years ago is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:29, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 11:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tyg728 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: 请求删除原因:与其他文件和页面完全重复;有一个质量更好但不完全相同的页面。File:Universal Peace Building.jpg Yann (talk) 09:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- 此为平面艺术品的如实影印本,重复同样的图片。--Tyg728 (talk) 12:48, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 13:13, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tyg728 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: 请求删除原因:与其他文件和页面完全重复;有一个质量更好但不完全相同的页面。File:Hall of Rectitude and Honor.jpg Yann (talk) 09:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- 此为平面艺术品的影印本,同样的图片,重复!--Tyg728 (talk) 11:22, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 13:13, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tyg728 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: 请求删除原因:与其他文件和页面完全重复;有一个质量更好但不完全相同的页面。File:Market Street at Sitting Rocks and Winding Stream.jpg Yann (talk) 09:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)**
- 此为平面艺术品的如实影印本,同样的图片,重复!--Tyg728 (talk) 11:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 13:13, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tyg728 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: 请求删除原因:上传错误版本,申请删除后重新上传 Yann (talk) 09:35, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- 上传错误的版本,请求删除,删除后重新上传。--Tyg728 (talk) 11:20, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 13:13, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
上传错误的版本,请求删除,已重新上传File:Xieqiqu Ruins of Yuanmingyuan, Old Summer Palace, Peking, 1870's.jpg。 Tyg728 (talk) 08:22, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Yann: They are saying they uploaded another version of the same file File:Xieqiqu Ruins of Yuanmingyuan, Old Summer Palace, Peking, 1870's.jpg. I did not inspect carefully but you might want to merge the 2 files. Thanks much. --Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:42, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
上传者请求删除原因:相同的图片File:Xieqiqu Ruins of Yuanmingyuan, Old Summer Palace, Peking, 1870's.jpg,重复上传,删除此版本 Tyg728 (talk) 07:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 08:07, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted map. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- 実際に訪問者が歩いて史跡を見つけやすいよう案内図を追加しました、が権利関係で問題があれば削除はやむをえません I can speak english a little.Visiter walking monument easy、But copyright rules of Japan must protect° — Preceding unsigned comment added by C2revenge (talk • contribs) 13:59, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 13:15, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
While {{PD-RU-exempt|type=stamps}} does apply to the other side of this postal card, I do not believe that this decorative-only side is also in public domain simply because it was printed on a postcard. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 12:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- It would not call it "printed on a postal card" -- if I purchased a blank postcard and then printed the picture on it, then yes, I would have said that, but these postal сards the USSR were produced under the Ministry of Communications of the Soviet Union, which commissioned the artists to produce the art, and paid them; so it was "work for hire", the artists did not get to retain the copyright (just the name rights). In other words, it's just lik envelopes --
- -- copyright status applies to the entire thing, not to an individual side.
- Meanwhile, until this is figured out, I'm halting my work on scanning my collection. I would hate to waste the time needed to process 300+ postcards just to see them deleted. -- Wesha (talk) 03:59, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I have tons of Soviet cards that I have scanned, and I am not uploading them, assuming that only the official part it without copyright. I would love to be able to post them here. I am not 100% sure about my reasoning, but the argument "If it is printed on anything that is used for postal service, then it is already without copyright" is definitely falacious. I will wait for the conclusion of this DR to make any pronouncements about the front of the envelope that you have posted. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Do we have any legal opinion on that, beside speculations of 2 people with opposite opinions, one of each is "not 100% sure about one's reasoning"? My (100% sure) reasoning is:
- any art on the mailpieces is "work for hire" => copyrights are given up to the state => later, 2006's law declined to maintain copyright of the state => PD.
- How exactly do you expect "a separate copyright message" to be printed on the art side? -- it will be unreadable. Of course copyright message is on the reverse side where there's plenty of blank space.
- In Russian, items with imprinted stamps are called Цельная вещь (literally, "whole item") which further underlines my point that the sides should not be considered separately. Copyright message applies to the combination of { front side with art, back side with delineation, stamp }
- In case of the envelopes: the definition of "sides" is moot: in fact, it only has ONE printed side; the other side is completely blank (or has security pattern); if you are willing to damage your collectable item, you can un-glue the flaps and unfold them -- then both art and copyright message will be on the same side of the paper sheet.
- -- Wesha (talk) 15:55, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Do we have any legal opinion on that, beside speculations of 2 people with opposite opinions, one of each is "not 100% sure about one's reasoning"? My (100% sure) reasoning is:
- You are confusing issues here. Copyright does not force you to unglue anything, it talks about copying something. This page that you are reading right now has several copyrights, your text is copyrighted by you, and mine is copyrighted by me. The fact that you cannot "unglue" one text from another has nothing to do with that. Also I am not questioning the copyright status of stamps at all in this discussion, I understand that they are in public domain. But we are talking about a greeting card here, which just happened to be produced by the Ministry of Communication. And finally, current law has nothing to do with the copyright statement, even if you do not put (c) mark on something it is still copyrighted by you if you can copyright it at all; previous laws required to place marks in proximity to the work, not necessarily on the work itself. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 16:32, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Once again: upon production of the art, the art's copyright belongs to the artist indeed -- with one exception: in case of "work for hire", the copyright on the art produced belongs not to the artist, but to the person/entity who commissioned (paid) the artist, in this case the Ministry of Communication. (The naming right (i.e. the right to say "This art was drawn by me!") is inalienable - but we are not arguing about that one here.) Are you following so far?
- Let me try it the other way around: you say you are not questioning copyright status of stamps. What would you consider the *principal* difference between a stamp and a postcard? Both are items of art commissioned by the Ministry of Communication that is printed on paper, that can be transported by the postal system, and people can leave marks on them (writing, postmarks, etc.) The main difference that I see is size of the said paper, which I consider purely a quantitive, not qualitive difference.
- And, finally, if we really want to get down to it: can you name one US copyright lawyer whos legal opinion you would agree with? I might be willing to hire him to provide his legal opinion and put an end to the issue once and forever. -- Wesha (talk) 18:34, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- First of all, it is not me that we need to talk about, it needs to be the community concensus. Secondly, we'd have to hire two lawyers, because by Commons policy the work has to be in public domain in both countries (US and Russia). Now, as to the answer to your question, the main diffeence is that stamps are a form of payment, the stamped postal card or a postal envelope is a form of an official document, but a happy new year composition is not. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:28, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- My point is that "stamped postal card WITH composition" is an official document. Composition is just as inseparable part of the said official document as a stamp. You cannot (could not) go to the store and ask the cashier to sell you just the part with the stamp, but not the part with the picture. And, fine, give me two lawyers. (I mean, it would be a waste of money for me to hire a lawyer and then hear from you (and others) that "that lawyer is unacceptable", right?) -- Wesha (talk) 20:10, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Also note that {{PD-RU-exempt|type=stamps}} is my mistake. I changed it to {{PD-RU-exempt|type=postal cards}} -- Wesha (talk) 00:19, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: you cannot separate a product produced by the Ministry of Communications of the Soviet Union, which are copyright free into its constituant parts. Either it is their production or not. You cannot decide that one part is freely licensed and another part is not. It's all or nothing. Do you think it's possible to separate the illustration on a miniature sheet from the stamp on the sheet into a free portion and a copyright portion, such as File:1982 Покорение Эвереста советскими спортсменами.jpg or File:1958 CPA 2229 (cropped).jpg? It's an official postal production and the entire is copyright free. Ww2censor (talk) 22:08, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Firstly, I want to reiterate that I would like for this to be in public domain, then I can upload many of my postcards here as well. Secondly, unfortunately you are addressing a point that I am not making. I am not saying that this is not a work of Ministry of Communications, rather that this work is not an official document, just something that they added to an official document. The fact that it is physically attached means that there is an aggregate work as well, but in here I am not arguing that either, I am talking only about this specific side. Russia is not the US, and the work of the government is not automatically in public domain, it is only in public domain if it is an official document. Even drafts of the documents are not PD. And is the picture of a tree with the phrase Happy New Year an official document or a form of legal tender? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 09:08, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
- As stated, I believe these are freely licensed and that's all I have to say on the matter. No offense but, if you want to argue around and around against your own aspirations that's of course up to you. Ww2censor (talk) 09:35, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
- I agree with your instinctive knee-jerk reaction "but it's festive, so it can't be an official document!". Well, surprise, there was no law that demanded that official documents must be completely nitty-gritty and non-festive (as much as some people might want to think of Soviet Union as of some sort of a jail, where all walls are painted some depressive shade of green and all sorts of festivities and expressions of joy were prohibited -- pardon me, I lived there and I call complete and utter BS). Drafts were not PD for the simple reason that there was no guarantee they will become an official document and thus the creators of such draft document could be not paid -- say, an artist created an art for a postcard, but the committee ruled in favor of a different artist -- they didn't want the failed competitor guy to lose their capability to make some money by selling his art to somebody else, displaying it, etc. Once again, if you REALLY want a legal opinion, give me the name of the lawyer you want that opinion from, and I'll get it from them, just for you. But, if that opinion says the same thing you've been told all around, then you promise to scan and upload your entire collection, deal? As they say, "the one who wants, does; the one who doesn't want, invents reasons why it can't be done." -- Wesha (talk) 15:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
- There was nothing "knee-jerk" in what I wrote. Since you keep purposefully misrepresenting everything that I say, I will not respond unless you will acknowlege the following: 1) I did not say that I didn't live in the Soviet Union. 2) I did not say that documents must be dull. 3) I did not make a "knee-jerk" reaction. I already have tons of my postcards that are scanned, I am doing that for my own personal archive. The reason why I have not been uploading them was a very cold-hearted analisys which has lead me (potentially, but not necessarily) to conclude that the cover is a decorative element and not an official document. 4) I did not make any demands that I need to be convinced, in fact on several ocasions I have stated the opposite, that I would be happy if the community will make a determination opposite from mine, because that will allow me to contribute more. I simply do not want to spend time only to have my work deleted and I believe that achieving a community concensus is a good thing. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:49, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- Then let's achieve consensus. My point is:
- Artwork is an inseparable part of an entity "postcard", just as envelope art is an inseparable part of an entity "envelope" (simply put, you can't remove artwork part without destroying the entity);
- Copyrights on either belong to the Ministry of Communications, as any and all element(s) on them was created FOR the Ministry of Communication, and thus constitute "work for hire" which means copyrights were relegated from the creator to the Ministry as part of the contract;
- The entirety of the postcard/envelope constitute an official document, as they were created by an official entity (the Ministry of Communications). Yes they are forms, but "form is a document with spaces (also named fields or placeholders) in which to write or select, for a series of documents with similar contents. The documents usually have the printed parts in common".
- Now when you mentioned that you are natively Russian/Soviet, I understand where your problem is stemming from: you think of Russian word "document", which comes with strong connotation of "involving some official written text", but in English the word has more meanings, including document [2]: Any material substance on which the information is represented by writing.
- Also I'm not convinced your only interest here is to not "spend time only to have my work deleted". None of your time is spent on uploading my scans -- but somehow are willing to make me halt my work. One of Wikipedia pillars is "be bold", so go ahead and be. What I see happening now, though, is that you are either trying to force the community to voice this determination now, or you are not happy that somebody else (not you) who has some guts is doing something you could be doing, thus "stealing all the thunder". So far, I see two people from the community supporting my POV, and one, yours. -- Wesha (talk) 19:50, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- Then let's achieve consensus. My point is:
- Delete It’s a big mistake to consider this image as a sign of postage. There is no indication that refers to it. A postage stamp is printed on the other side. Only the other side is not protected by copyright. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 12:15, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
- As I pointed out above: You do understand that the envelope is made of a whole sheet of paper, so if you unglue the flaps and flatten them, then all the printed elements will be on ONE side ("the one with a stamp"), and the other side will be completely blank / security patter, right? It will destroy the value of the envelope as a philatelic item, but if you insist, I can do that. -- Wesha (talk) 22:59, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
- I'll just point out that some of the arguments above are a bit hard to follow because I don't understand to which image or part thereof they're referring to. If File:USSR State Hermitage First Day Envelope, 1984 - front.jpg is the "stamp", then File:USSR State Hermitage First Day Envelope, 1984 - back.jpg could be considered PD-ineligible because an icon and some words may not pass the threshold of originality. Nemo 13:25, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
- See my point directly above your post: the entirety of the envelope is printed on one side of a sheet of paper. It's just folded (and glued) before final use. So "back" and "front" are inseparable: if you insist that they are, i will just unglue the flaps and make a picture of the unfolded envelope. -- Wesha (talk) 23:08, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
- Why do you say the envelope when the postal card is discussed? Illustrative side of the postal card. The envelope example is very unsuccessful. You can do anything with this item, but that will not make it a "sign of postage." But under Russian law, only images of "postage signs" are subject to copyright exclusions. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 06:02, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- Once again: postal card is a whole item, and it is (not) covered by copyright as a whole item. You can't come to a store and say "please sell ONLY me the part with the stamp, no, I won't take the part with the picture". -- Wesha (talk) 15:45, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- This is a weak argument. Imagine a vinyl record with two sides. Anthem is recorded on side A. Explicit copyright exception, as a state symbol. And on side B, the Beatles song is recorded. And so you say: the Beatles song is free copyright, since on side A there is a copyright-free work of art. But this is absurd. Secondly. These cards are not one in terms of production technologies. First, one side is always printed, then the other side is printed, often on different printing presses. Often there are different printing methods. One side (for example) offset, the other side (for example) letterpress. Or offset varnishing. Or with gold stamping. etc. One side is printed in one or two colors, the other side is multi-color. And thirdly. The International Federation of Philately (FIP) differentially refers to such postcards, the front side with a postage stamp and the back side with an illustration. The front side with the postage stamp FIP recognizes philatelic material. But FIP does not recognize the flip side with an illustration. Therefore, at international exhibitions of collectors, you can show the side with a postage stamp only. This is recorded in documents, they write about it in books, reference books, catalogs. So: a respected international organization does not recognize a postal card as a single inseparable object. And in the fourth. You are mistaken when you say: it was impossible to buy without an illustration. The Soviet Ministry of Communications issued postcards without illustrations on the back. The client could choose one or another postal card. And usual postcards without postage stamps were always printed. You could buy a card, a post card is not necessary. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 20:00, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- And, what exactly is the problem YOU are trying to solve here? You are trying to protect Wikipedia from copyright lawsuits? Give me a copyright lawyer and I will pay them to confirm that (in this particular case) Wikipedia is safe. -- Wesha (talk) 15:48, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- Once again: postal card is a whole item, and it is (not) covered by copyright as a whole item. You can't come to a store and say "please sell ONLY me the part with the stamp, no, I won't take the part with the picture". -- Wesha (talk) 15:45, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- Why do you say the envelope when the postal card is discussed? Illustrative side of the postal card. The envelope example is very unsuccessful. You can do anything with this item, but that will not make it a "sign of postage." But under Russian law, only images of "postage signs" are subject to copyright exclusions. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 06:02, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- See my point directly above your post: the entirety of the envelope is printed on one side of a sheet of paper. It's just folded (and glued) before final use. So "back" and "front" are inseparable: if you insist that they are, i will just unglue the flaps and make a picture of the unfolded envelope. -- Wesha (talk) 23:08, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: I don't see a convincing argument why this falls under PD-RU-exempt. Just because it was commissioned by a ministry does make it an "official document". --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [43]. Yann (talk) 21:29, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Refer to Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Formosa_loves_river. This file was supposedly similiar. It was also raised on Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#File:Landform_of_Formosa.png currently. The uploader twice removed the no source derivative tag with additional sources. However, all seems to be copyrighted and my arguments on the 1st DR still stand. According to them, these images are from NASA however, NASA requires commercial users to gain permission if anyone use the images, hence, incomptable with CCBYSA, and derivate images doesn't exempt. Hence, dubious copyright status and delete. Cohaf (talk) 10:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: Academia Sinica, Taiwan.、Academia Sinica's provided materials. and Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Formosa_loves_river. The evidence is very clear. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 10:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- If this is about ASTER data, while it is jointly produced between the U.S. and Japan, it seems to be free. w:Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer says as much. It sounds like the GDEM data is an automated processing (i.e. no additional copyright) over the raw ASTER data, such as this. Some of the data was charged for, but if there is no charge (and they say it's available for anyone) then I would presume (like most NASA stuff) it's OK, even if not technically PD-USGov it's probably close enough. Given the description of the data, unsure if they really aim the satellite for particular photos, or if that is pretty much automated as well, meaning there may not be any copyright to begin with. The source website has all kinds of open source links, so they seem to think it's OK to use. I really can't think of any reasons why it would not be OK, other than extreme theoretical cases. I'd probably just call it PD-USGov-NASA (though credit the Japanese METI as well). Whether the user added enough expression to generate a copyright they can license, I am less sure. Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:51, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- This is really a very interesting case, we need to find a proper license for it if this file is kept. I am keen to have every step of the file making and every free use license documented if this is kept to protect us from legal issues. Thanks for your analysis Clindberg, appreciate this.--Cohaf (talk) 07:43, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- It is a case-by-case thing, per m:Wikilegal/NASA images, since Japan's METI ministry is involved. But, per [44], Beginning today, all Earth imagery from a prolific Japanese remote sensing instrument operating aboard NASA’s Terra spacecraft since late 1999 is now available to users everywhere at no cost. The public will have unlimited access to the complete 16-plus-year database for Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) instrument. On NASA's ASTER page, they say All ASTER data products are now available at no charge to all users. Those are basically the statements we have. There is no non-commercial restriction, and the intent seems pretty clear that derivative works are expected (that is the reason to release that stuff). So, maybe {{Copyrighted free use}} is the most accurate license. They do ask for a credit line typically, but I don't see that as a requirement. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:31, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Per Sanmosa at the undeletion request, we need the uploaded to prove the steps needed to create the image, COM:PCP.--Cohaf (talk) 04:35, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
- It is a case-by-case thing, per m:Wikilegal/NASA images, since Japan's METI ministry is involved. But, per [44], Beginning today, all Earth imagery from a prolific Japanese remote sensing instrument operating aboard NASA’s Terra spacecraft since late 1999 is now available to users everywhere at no cost. The public will have unlimited access to the complete 16-plus-year database for Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) instrument. On NASA's ASTER page, they say All ASTER data products are now available at no charge to all users. Those are basically the statements we have. There is no non-commercial restriction, and the intent seems pretty clear that derivative works are expected (that is the reason to release that stuff). So, maybe {{Copyrighted free use}} is the most accurate license. They do ask for a credit line typically, but I don't see that as a requirement. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:31, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Anyway, if IGBA can make the source website change (or correct) the permission, I will appreciate that. ΣανμοσαThe Trve Lawe of free Monarchies 04:37, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: Could you have a look, since you restored the images in the referenced DR? Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:51, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. — Racconish 💬 05:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © 2008-2021 QGIS. The uploader asserts that it is own work based on QGIS-provided materials. Geographic facts are not copyrightable. Did they use only facts from QGIS, or did they copy some form of creative expression from them? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:17, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. This file has been discussed in 2019 and I see no new information why the file should be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 17:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)