Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/08/14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 14th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Oos COM:EDUSE (msali raso 10:18, 14 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 10:18, 14 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 10:18, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:11, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of film poster. Source: https://ourvadodaragujarati.com/improvement-in-the-gujarati-movie-subsidy-policy-by-gujarat-government/ Nizil Shah (talk) 11:40, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:37, 14 August 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Movie poster --Krdbot 19:30, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistake of photo Reporte 24 Veracruz (talk) 04:49, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:51, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

includes copyrighted film still SecretName101 (talk) 04:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Clear DW including copyrighted material on Flickr.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:52, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

includes copyrighted film still SecretName101 (talk) 04:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

includes copyrighted film still SecretName101 (talk) 04:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:54, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work, likely trolling, possible attack image -- Tuválkin 08:31, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Clear case. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:56, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam and obvious copyright violation Jimfbleak (talk) 10:34, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:07, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PORN (msali raso 20:57, 14 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 20:57, 14 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 20:57, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted While sex-related content can be within project scope, the "own work" claim is highly dubious. Speedy deleting as advertising for explicit website watermarked on image. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lubna Hassan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All metadata specify that these images are screenshot. The only exception being File:28 & its been a very exciting career.jpg, which cites a Ziggy Wellens as the copyright holder. No source, no evidence that these images were released under a free license.

ƏXPLICIT 00:48, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 05:51, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't know who the person who uploaded this file is, but it's my photo and they are not the copyright holder. Can you remove this image? Thanks, Lauren Juliff. Source of my image: https://www.neverendingfootsteps.com/zanzibar-on-a-budget-travel-expenses/ 80.175.184.105 13:51, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Billinghurst at 13:08, 15 August 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dhow-construction-in-Nungwi-Zanzibar.jpg: I don't know who the person who uploaded this file is, but it's my photo and they are not the copyright holder. Can you remove this image? Thanks, Lauren Juliff. Source of my image: https://www.neverendingfootsteps.com/zanzibar-on-a-budget-travel-expenses/ --Krdbot 01:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Kamanda86 (talk) 04:48, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What? The most ridiculous reason ever, even more ridiculous than flat earth theory. – Flix11 (talk) 16:31, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:10, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Kamanda86 (talk) 04:49, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What? The most ridiculous reason ever, even more ridiculous than flat earth theory. – Flix11 (talk) 16:45, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:09, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE COM:SELFIE (msali raso 16:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 16:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 16:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:53, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am using commons to re-upload this photo. Thanks! Aman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aman Fong (talk • contribs) 08:56, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:58, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication this is free: http://www.dinosaurier-interesse.de/web/Nachrichten/Texte/2003/di-rp24.html FunkMonk (talk) 17:08, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:26, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

موافق با حذف هستم. این یک اثر انشقاقی است که در هنگام آپلود من متوجه این قانون نبودم. با تشکر Mostafameraji (talk) 13:46, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as the source page was deleted too. --JuTa 14:27, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Katezz91 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Everything by this user is copyvio.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:NETCOPYVIO. --4nn1l2 (talk) 14:19, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random deletion. Sachinthonakkara (talk) 09:51, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal image, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 07:04, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" in EXIF, please provide original publication/more detailed source info Ytoyoda (talk) 04:14, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:08, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The presence of a copyright symbol in the title would suggest that the image is copyrighted by someone other than the uploader. Herby talk thyme 13:01, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier doublons Xave25 (talk) 17:22, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 17:14, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some sort of personal artwork. Unused file. Out of Scope Malcolma (talk) 08:14, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:28, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, promotional for a factory in Iran Ahmadtalk 09:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:30, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Badly doctored photo, rendered unusable; possibly an attack image; nonsense description suggesting trolling. -- Tuválkin 09:12, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:30, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Justintheman125 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST/COM:PENIS

Эlcobbola talk 09:22, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:31, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Actually BAhmed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal/Private photo(s) of non-contributors (CSD F10)

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:51, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:32, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Actually BAhmed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Ahmadtalk 20:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, advertizing Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:38, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stranger0786 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly fufilling COM:ADVERT.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:36, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:34, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hkbu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unhelpful Photos

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:36, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:34, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nimajavaherpour (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE

Ahmadtalk 11:56, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:35, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:35, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:35, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:36, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anacastropeña (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:36, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:37, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:37, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mnabiyein (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 21:06, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The last two are used as user page images. Those user pages also include a filmography, but I don't know if that is made up. (I don't know how to verify) Can't find any other contributions to any wikiproject. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:SCOPE. Those in use were given a pass. --Storkk (talk) 11:28, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mnabiyein (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, out of scope, at least one is on a promotional user page that is tagged for CSD

Gbawden (talk) 10:13, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:05, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mnabiyein (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:16, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mnabiyein (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:02, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nabiyein bayan lepas.jpg may be used for self-promo. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:38, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Ahmadtalk 16:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:40, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE COM:NOTHOST ((msali raso 17:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC))) msali raso 17:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 17:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:40, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality structure with many alternatives in Category:Linalool (SVG and PNG). Wostr (talk) 19:41, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by COURIVE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:29, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo for non-Wikipedia - Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 20:30, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lachelle Wood (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:23, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope! Or please upload the whole image. Ras67 (talk) 21:58, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PrinceAnand2003 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work. please explain why images are public domain in India.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:28, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:21, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PrinceAnand2003 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Already deleted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:15, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + unfree files. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 16:17, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

weil sie nicht mehr benötigt wird 2003:D6:E3D3:1DAD:2034:60BB:B1F0:5F6F 16:18, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 14:54, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational content, uploaded for SPAM and divulgation Stanglavine (talk) 16:54, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:53, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE COM:PARTYPICS (msali raso 16:55, 14 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 16:55, 14 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 16:55, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:52, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://yandex.ru/images/search/?cbir_id=2211758%2Fe3atIXWRcV51ELCAbE8-JA&rpt=imageview&redircnt=1565801727.1 копиво 109.184.45.94 16:56, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:50, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE COM:SPAM (msali raso 16:56, 14 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 16:56, 14 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 16:56, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by 1989. --Didym (talk) 14:50, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image -- please delete 71.105.117.4 16:57, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:49, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image -- please delete 71.105.117.4 16:58, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:49, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://sddonbassa.ru/andrej-pinchuk-situatsiya-v-donbasse-na-predele/ копирайт 109.184.45.94 17:03, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:38, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filled with copyrighted images. FunkMonk (talk) 17:07, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:38, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Wyndham Hotels and Resorts is public domain as a text logo, consisting only of text and simple geometric shapes" – apart from referencing the wrong logo, that's a dubious claim. This is certainly more complex than several of the examples listed as "not OK" under COM:TOO US, for example the CarCreditCity variant with an extra border. LX (talk, contribs) 18:28, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:31, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims. Low-resolution photo with no metadata, uploaded by an unverified account using the name of an organisation. Previously published elsewhere, e.g. http://www.ceeman.org/programs-events/27th-ceeman-annual-conference/24th-ceeman-annual-conference. Verified permission required. LX (talk, contribs) 18:48, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:31, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:28, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:30, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This does not look like the usual Commons image. After taking a look at google I'm not sure so I want to ask the community and give the uploader a chance to voice themselves. D-Kuru (talk) 21:08, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It is used as an image on a page on Wikipedia for "the oldest tea house in the world". There is no image of the building itself. This image is used to show one of their products. So actually any other image will do. --D-Kuru (talk) 20:38, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:30, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This request is only for the TimedText page. This page only contains test content, and the video itself has no audible speech, so there is no reason for a TimedText page in the first place. MattF (talk) 21:44, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:23, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per ongeluk online gezet Sjorskremer (talk) 21:45, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:22, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by Christine Kurtz, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:04, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:22, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from https://twitter.com/HearQ8/status/850345658297053184 Reda benkhadra (talk) 23:20, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:20, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from https://stock.adobe.com/46248860 Reda benkhadra (talk) 23:30, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:20, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Infracción de copyright Jarl93 (talk) 06:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Viene registrado en la Oficina Española de marcas y patentes: [1] --Jarl93 (talk) 06:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by JGHowes. --Didym (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

ƏXPLICIT 06:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bahram rezaie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small size, low resolution, missing EXIF, user upload history

4nn1l2 (talk) 06:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I beleive this may be a copyright violation. The caption says "our spitfire" plus the image also appears at https://www.edencamp.co.uk/about/. The flag and clouds are identical in both pictures. CambridgeBayWeather Talk 06:42, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:38, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted photos. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:56, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:37, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free photos. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:01, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:37, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisements. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:03, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:34, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free photos. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:34, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of non-free photos. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:08, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:34, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Persiason (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also, see watermark: © Majzob.net. Kind regards,

— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 07:24, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tulsi Bhagat: سلام. این فایل ها دارای مجوز مالکیت عمومی می‌باشند.
Public domain This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Majzooban.org. This applies worldwide.
In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so:
Majzooban.org grants anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

، با سپاس Persiason (talk) 05:56, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:33, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost plain black image with “hidden” pattern (see equalized version) which is unlikely own work; possible trolling, considering the offered description. -- Tuválkin 08:50, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:32, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source and author not valid, no basis provided for PD ineligible. Could perhaps be PD-Gov, but currently no valid copyright information. Kissa21782 (talk) 09:34, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:32, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kissa21782 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10|Personal files of or by non-contributors. -- Tuválkin 09:41, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:30, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ehsan farsi8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Instagram screenshot. no permission.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:00, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:28, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE COM:SELFIE (msali raso 10:08, 14 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 10:08, 14 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 10:08, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:29, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Raavish Rana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 1 file used for self promo on en.wiki

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:27, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE (msali raso 10:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 10:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 10:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:04, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HarrisonMarkjr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seems to be used on en.wiki for selfpromo. Also dubious claim of own work. File:Mark Harrison Jr.jpg has Sue Ellen as the author.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:18, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:25, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE COM:SPAM (msali raso 10:22, 14 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 10:22, 14 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 10:22, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:24, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PARTYPICS COM:EDUSE (msali raso 10:25, 14 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 10:25, 14 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 10:25, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:24, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission of Pierre Florent needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:58, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:23, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MasumRezanalta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:24, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:22, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted photos. Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:48, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:20, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo previously published at https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1577926&page=6#/topics/1577926?page=11 Ytoyoda (talk) 12:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:20, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation? useless resolution, invalid aspect ratio Joschi71 (talk) 12:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:17, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" claim. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:20, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:13, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is uploaded by mistake. The owner does not want the picture of him to be published. Thanks in advance for understanding. Mariaah18 (talk) 14:01, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:13, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bperezj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:10, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bperezj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:10, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Friendsamin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.editplatter.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ravish-kumar.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Friendsamin (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

These files depict packaging copyrighted by Medlife Essentials; delete per COM:PACKAGING and COM:CSD#G10.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:29, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:10, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Remaining files uploaded by Friendsamin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF consistent with the first DR, COM:ADVERT, and COM:CSD#G10.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:16, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:09, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:09, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted photos.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:32, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:08, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:06, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:05, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted photos. Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:41, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:04, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted photos. Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:45, 14 August 2019 (UTC) この画像に ‪Yuraily Lic 氏よりクレームが付いたとのとのメールを運営者より頂きました。この画像は私自身が2018年8月に 大阪市中央区島之内2-6-16 朋友雑穀食府 を訪問し,私自身が撮影したものですが,飲食店のメニューですので,メニューの著作権を有する店舗関係者からのクレームであれば仕方ないと考えます。--Sojinproject (talk) 16:08, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:04, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted photos. Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:50, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:03, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:52, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:03, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:03, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Josip Hervat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work, looks like taken from books, etc

Josip Hervat (talk) 10:45, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Josip Hervat[reply]

Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Josip Hervat has sent an email to OTRS regarding these images Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OTRS agent (verify): The permission is written in hr (Croatian) but sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (in english). Apparently user:Dungodung can read that language, but only has permission for info-hr. I'll see if he can helps. --Ganímedes (talk) 15:29, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I can access the tickets in the permissions queue. First of all, they should be merged, as the first one is just a forward of the email that is requesting permission, while the other is just a forward of the email that is "giving" permission. Now, as for the giving, the permission statement states that "Josip Hervat" is allowed to use the photos for purposes of editing the Wikipedia page of Mr Bobetko, which I believe is not a proper permission. --Filip (§) 10:06, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merged and answer (in English. Sorry). Thanks, Filip. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:37, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm worried about the scope of some files. --Ganímedes (talk) 22:12, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:50, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Josip Hervat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official documents. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:02, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:01, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:01, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amos1947 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a new member of the group. I corrected by the comments I was given.

I would like to confirm the posting on Wikimedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amos1947 (talk • contribs) 12:41, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:01, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amos1947 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:59, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: File:Amana settelments 1986 ישובי אמנה.pdf per OTRS. -- Geagea (talk) 00:30, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Restored: File:תכנית אב להתישבות ביהודה ושומרון 1978Master Plan for 1978 Settlement.pdf per OTRS. -- Geagea (talk) 00:39, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentifiable image. Unused file. Descriptiohn no help. Out of Scope Malcolma (talk) 15:14, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:58, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shaykea (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:58, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dalmationn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Vast majority of user’s uploads were published previously elsewhere. No reason to believe these are any different.

Ytoyoda (talk) 15:30, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:56, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Katia skrypka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:55, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems unlikely to be the uploaders own work. And almost identical image appears at https://www.energy.gov/eere/amo/cromer-cycle-air-conditioner. RoySmith (talk) 00:19, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:48, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Well above the threshold of originality. I don't see how this is "simple geometry" like the license says. Saucy (talk) 00:33, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:47, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soupalonion (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Clearly not own work, missing essential source information.

Ytoyoda (talk) 00:38, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:47, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient evidence of permission. There is no way to determine if the alleged conversation actually took place, or if the copyright holder understands the license. Requires COM:OTRS. ƏXPLICIT 02:03, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:46, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clearly not own work - low res, very old, no note about being inherited family photo PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:04, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:45, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clearly not own work - very old, no note about being inherited family photo PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:45, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sanja-sochi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Kind regards,

— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 02:51, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:44, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" in EXIF, previously published on Facebook Ytoyoda (talk) 04:03, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:44, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Heavily pixelated, looks like a screenshot of a video. Please upload a higher quality version at least. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:43, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appeared at http://stadiumdb.com/stadiums/chi/estadio_nacional_de_chile before upload here Ytoyoda (talk) 04:30, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:42, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published previously at https://footballtripper.com/estadio-nelson-oyarzun-arenas-chile/ Ytoyoda (talk) 04:31, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:42, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" in EXIF indicates this photograph was downloaded from Facebook Ytoyoda (talk) 04:49, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:41, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 05:29, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

ƏXPLICIT 05:51, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:40, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Origem Obra do próprio / Own Own Work - Possibly Not Your Image O revolucionário aliado (talk) 06:02, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:40, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect page affects the rendering of en:File:GenesisLogo.png. Pbrks (talk) 16:51, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 04:08, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for artistic works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:04, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Japan's FoP for an image of this work wouldn't extend to a free image, as Commons requires it. See {{NoFoP-Japan}} Andy Dingley (talk) 08:44, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:38, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jolmia as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not found in the source. Better source would be good, but Exif is clearly marked mehrnews.com and apparently all mehrnews property is CC licensed (according to the footer)... on the other hand, there is no Freedom of Panorama in Iran. Storkk (talk) 08:04, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:38, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the flickr source is too suspicious. Roy17 (talk) 12:30, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; flickrwashing. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

R2-D2 is a copyrighted design, so these images are not yet able to be hosted on Commons.

russavia (talk) 19:15, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:51, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe these two be derivatives of a copyrighted character, and therefore, subject to copyright.

Themightyquill (talk) 13:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted R2D2 is a copyrighted character. There are additional images in this category which could be checked/nominated. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:30, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:R2-D2 (10585062134).jpg (COM:TOYS)

Josve05a (talk) 23:30, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted I have included File:Maker Faire 2007 - S2-D2 (508247085).jpg in the deletions because it is not useful with the large areas of pixelation in the middle. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

R2-D2 is a copyrighted work.

G I Chandor (talk) 00:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. Copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:00, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • About a decade ago someone nominated a whole whack of pictures of model cars for deletion - you know the ones that are children's toys. The nomination claimed that a picture of a toy Mustang car violated a copyright. I can't remember for sure now, but I think they were claiming the pictures of the model violated Mattel's copyright, not the copyright of the Ford Motor Company. The strange thing is that no one objects to pictures of actual Mustang cars, just to models of them. I find that counter-intuitive.
  • I put the three R2D2 costumes I uploaded into a cosplay category. So, when someone takes a picture of someone wearing a Wonder Woman costume, or a Spiderman costume, are they violating a copyright? Is the person who makes themself a Wonder Woman or Spiderman costume violating a copyright? If those pictures violate a copyright, is it the copyright of Marvel, or of the amateur costume maker?
  • Is someone going to argue these arguments apply to the images in Category:Cosplay of Bender (Futurama)? Geo Swan (talk) 01:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Yuraily Lic: most of these are costumes made by fans. If I understand your argumentation this picture should be deleted because it is a derivated work, but not this one which is also a derivated work made in lego. The only difference is the building material. --Cody escadron delta (d) 05:50, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to submit a DR about it, you can do it. I am not obligated to submit DRs for all copyvios files, and I won't stop you. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Yuraily Lic: you absolutely not answer to me. --Cody escadron delta (d) 06:02, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete These seem like obvious copyright violations here. Some kid in a cardboard box painted blue and white would be a stretch for deletion, but all the ones I looked at above are near exact copies. - Themightyquill (talk) 08:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussions above. --Wdwd (talk) 15:24, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Addition,

--Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:54, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:39, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. See also above DRs.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:41, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:12, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. See also above DRs.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:12, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. See also above DRs.

DMacks (talk) 03:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I was careful to only pick files that actually contained (in my view) a substantial and clear image of R2-D2, rather than de minimis, merely relating to it, or something so stylized that it was not a DW of that specific robot. For the file you mention, it appears so clearly to be this subject as a substantive part of this image, even though it's redrawn by hand; see Commons:Fan art#Copyright in fan art. One could replace it with a different generic/free robot, but one could not simply crop it out altogether. DMacks (talk) 13:51, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: almost all, per nomination, except for the one released by the Star Wars account on Flickr. --Rosenzweig τ 01:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the source states reuse allowed. However, I believe that this is a screenshot from the tv series it self, as such fair use. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:11, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: catalog of tv drama. Copyright violation. – Kwj2772 (talk) 14:08, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of artworks.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:40, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and no FoP for 3D artwork in JP. --Wdwd (talk) 15:31, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old filename after rename process (wrong person) X-Javier (talk) 11:57, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 15:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On Flickr, the license is CC BY-NC-SA 2.0, a non-commercial one, which cannot be put on Commons. See https://www.flickr.com/photos/33363480@N05/4061897387. Nigos (t@lkcontributionsUploads) 12:35, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per user:Sandstein. --Wdwd (talk) 15:35, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of illustrations and map. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:59, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

svg version of this file was deleted as copyrighted (university founded in 2007). NinjaStrikers «» 07:32, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted False license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Xfigpower as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: DR|source=https://pixabay.com/fr/photos/mont-saint-michel-%C3%AEle-rocheux-3554580/. Appears to be freely licensed on Pixabay, though I'm not sure how their authorship tags work - all I see is a number. Can almost certainly be kept, but authorship needs to be figured out. Storkk (talk) 08:03, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted May be free licensed, but uploader apparently didn't comply with licensing, and it hasn't been corrected since. (Someone familiar with pixbay might reupload it with proper license/attribution.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


[edit]

The letter "D" of the Defiant Wrestling logo has a thunder symbol within that letter. The logo is possibly copyrighted in the UK per COM:TOO#United Kingdom; the UK has very low standards of what's original enough for copyright protection ever since the EDGE logo court case decision. Also, the organization is located in the UK. Copies of the logo should be deleted from Commons. --George Ho (talk) 09:35, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i request the cancellation of the photo Winta Hagos (talk) 10:33, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per uploader request; photo was not in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:41, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i request the cancellation of the photo Winta Hagos (talk) 10:35, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Sourced public domain in-scope photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:44, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i request the cancellation of the photo Winta Hagos (talk) 10:35, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept in-scope public domain photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:47, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i request the cancellation of the photo Winta Hagos (talk) 10:36, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD in-scope photo.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly a complex logo per COM:TOO UK. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:27, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted False license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:50, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even if the Prudential logo (apparently) is in the public domain (see File:Prudential plc logo 2.svg). The logo below the line might be complex per COM:TOO Hong Kong (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:32, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted False license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:52, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfree; copyrighted by the UN.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:02, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:54, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier modifié Xave25 (talk) 16:36, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:00, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier modifié Xave25 (talk) 16:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 19:01, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier modifé Xave25 (talk) 16:39, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nouvel image basé sur celui en cours de téleversement LoiDavid2307171 (talk) 16:40, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per Uploader request-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)19:03, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted doll. Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- 19:04, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted map. Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:38, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)19:05, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:40, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)19:07, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is not correct. 1)Trapezund empire and southern Crimea was not georgian dependencies 2)Emirate of Shah-Armen was not georgian tributary vassal state 96.238.1.178 20:38, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Close as Kept, no consensus to delete. In use in multiple projects. Creation and uploading of better free licensed maps is encouraged. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1)Trapezund was not depend from Georgia , 2) state of Shah-i-Armen was not a tributary vassal state of Georgia, 3) Alans and Circassians was not depend from Georgia, only low populated mountainous areas of North Caucasus on the border with Georgia were depend from georgian Bagratids. Plains of Ciscaucasia were never depend from them. There wasn't such a thing as Georgian empire, like this map wrongfully claims, there was Georgian kingdom. 65.126.252.234 02:16, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Nothing has changed since the last nomination. The file is in use on many Wikipedia articles, from azb:گورجیستان شاهلیغی to vi:Vương quốc Gruzia, and also on Georgian expedition to Chaldia (Q48001373) and Georgian-Ayyubid Wars (Q55612563). Under COM:NPOV that means it should not be deleted just for being inaccurate. Based on the file history, there doesn't seem to be unanimous agreement to changing it (Georgiano reverted it twice), so any changes to address this complaint should be uploaded under a new name. --bjh21 (talk) 10:57, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is visual encyclopedia for information and knowledge, how could you aloud here visual file for history articles, if this file is completely false and bringing desinfirmation to the public?22:09, 18 September 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 107.242.117.42 (talk) 22:09, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Close again, deletion not supported. (Again, making and uploading better free licensed maps is welcome) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:45, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I discovered this is a duplicate of a file I uploaded earlier which was named BurlesonCountyCourthouse.jpg. I would like to keep the earlier submission and delete this one. Wiki name (talk) 22:21, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:22, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Proposed by whom? This map is based on nationalistic wet dreams and has no real source — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgiano (talk • contribs) 09:30, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Orphan dubious map -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:21, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is listed under the license "(CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)", which is incompatible with commons due to being non-commercial and not allowing derv. works Thespoondragon (talk) 04:39, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Not free licensed for Commons. (Reusing it here under a different license than the source is a violation of the creator's license.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:52, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Désolé mais cette image n'est pas intéressante pour une encyclopédie LoiDavid2307171 (talk) 16:42, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per uploader/creator request. File was not used in articles. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:55, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

J'ai changé d'avis, je ne désire plus qu'il soit visible publiquement LoiDavid2307171 (talk) 16:42, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per uploader/creator request. File was not used in any articles. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:57, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisements.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:28, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom; DW problem advertisements main or exclusive subject of photos. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:59, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

копиво, не своя работа 109.184.45.94 16:59, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Derivative extracted from previously deleted file. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:33, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:15, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Theix2019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Karel Mechiels (d. 2017), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:06, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(transfered) The current owners of these paintings (heirs of Karel Mechiels) as well as the photographer (the author of the page) agree to the use and licensing of these images on Wikimedia Commons as indicated. Which steps are needed to prove this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theix2019 (talk • contribs) 19:49, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Theix2019: It's explained above: they must send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:01, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Unfortunately no indication of Commons:OTRS permission. (If we receive one, files can be undeleted.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:26, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not PD-Russia (lack of publication information) PlanespotterA320 (talk) 22:10, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted If author of photo is unknown, their date of death is unknown; no info any any previous publication. Lacking info to establish copyright status. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:31, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe this is too complex to be considered PD-textlogo. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 02:41, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I asked for a permission, please wait a moment. --Brainswiffer (talk) 06:03, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Brainswiffer: You asked who for permission? Are you getting paid for this? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 20:22, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@World's Lamest Critic: Forget your investigative style. Everybody is able to copy a logo and to ask the owner SwissSkills for a permission (sending by them to OTRS). Do you get money for your investigations? ;-) It is also my hobby to feel responsable a little for all topics of Swiss education. In that case is new information: SwissSkills will not give a free licence to the logo (will allow only their partners to use). So we can delete.
In another context we should continue thinking about the licence problem for logos (the former protection as a trademark): Use for the articles in Wikipedia only, but no free use (the only logic variant). In Wikipedia Strategy 2030 there is such a topic for pictures. But now, the juristic situation is too unclear. Have a nice day. --Brainswiffer (talk) 09:39, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, it sounded like you were already in touch with the company. (Are you getting paid by them? You didn't say.) Here's the problem - by marking it as PD-textlogo, you have claimed that it is not copyrightable. That means it is allowable here, whether or not the owner agrees. Trademark and copyright are two separate issues. For that reason, I am removing your speedy deletion request. (I don't agree that it qualifies as PD-textlogo, which is the reason for this deletion request.) World's Lamest Critic (talk) 20:18, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Only God pays for my work here ;-) Again: I scanned and uploaded the logo without any doubts, that it is a good addition. Because of your deletion request I asked SwissSkills to send the necessary permission for use and a valid licence to OTRS. But they answered, that they do not want a free use (allowed by all of our cc licencess - they allow their partners to use only). So I removed logo from article and the logo can be deleted now. In German wikipedia "trademarked" is no more recommended, because it does not work with the recommended cc-licences (overrules it).
So the problem remains, that we need a licence for Wikipedia use only. Are you familiar with the strategy discussion Wikipedia 2030? They see this problem too and are looking for a solution. When anybody else with influence to our politics reads this here, this may be good.
There is nothing to discuss for this special logo. Use is not allowed by owner for Wikipedia with one of possible licences here. Neither you or I can solve this problem. So we have to wait and then I can ask them again.--Brainswiffer (talk) 04:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - if a permission is received then the image will be restored. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:54, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is unknown. Although this image comes from a Coast Guard site, the uploader knows that not all content there is necessarily public domain. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 04:26, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • This image is taken from the Coast Guard Compass, the Coast Guard's official magazine.
When the official coast guard magazine uses images that require an explicit credit, my experience is that they do so. I think doubting that this is an official photo is carrying the precautionary principle beyond beyond what is reasonable.
This is, after all, an image of an USCG sailor, in uniform, at attention, posing before USCG buildings, on a USCG base. Geo Swan (talk) 07:24, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Geo Swan: This is an image by an unknown author taken on an unknown date. The website it came from does not identify the location. Yet you claim to know where the photograph was taken. You should know by now that when you upload images Coast Guard and Navy images with questionable public domain claims, they get deleted. Maybe you should just stop doing that? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 20:16, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment What is the location where the photo was taken? I think the uploader is likely correct that this is a Coast Guard photo, but "likely" isn't quite good enough for establishing copyright status. I failed to find more information about the photo with a reverse image search. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:48, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:57, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:44, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:59, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of paronama in Bhutan A1Cafel (talk) 16:08, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've lived and worked in Bhutan for many years and never heard of such a restriction (let alone anyone being prosecuted for such) ~ though photographing the interiors of many temples , monasteries, and certain other buildings is restricted. Bhutan heavily promotes tourism including photographic tours and, if the law is read that way it would seem to run counter to that policy. I suspect this may be either a lacuna in the law or a misreading. Such photographs are frequently published in Bhutan itself, including by Government owned media. Anyway I'll try to ascertain the official position on this here and, to avoid any confusion, suggest the relevant act be amended to specifically allow fredom of panorama in Bhutan.
Christopher Fynn (talk)) 10:54, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:09, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of paronama in Bhutan A1Cafel (talk) 16:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've lived and worked in Bhutan for many years and never heard of such a restriction (let alone anyone being prosecuted for this) ~ though photographing the interiors of many temples , monasteries, and certain other buildings is restricted. Bhutan heavily promotes tourism including photographic tours and, if the law is read that way it would seem to run counter to that policy. I suspect this may be either a lacuna in the law or a misreading. Such photographs are also frequently published in Bhutan itself, including by Government owned media. Anyway I'll try to ascertain the official position on this here and, to avoid any confusion, suggest the relevant act be amended to specifically allow fredom of panorama in Bhutan.
Christopher Fynn (talk)) 10:53, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:10, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of paronama in Bhutan A1Cafel (talk) 16:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've lived and worked in Bhutan for many years and never heard of such a restriction (let alone anyone being prosecuted for this) ~ though photographing the interiors of many temples , monasteries, and certain other buildings is restricted. Bhutan heavily promotes tourism including photographic tours and, if the law is read that way it would seem to run counter to that policy. I suspect this may be either a lacuna in the law or a misreading. Such photographs are also frequently published in Bhutan itself, including by Government owned media. Anyway I'll try to ascertain the official position on this here and, to avoid any confusion, suggest the relevant act be amended to specifically allow fredom of panorama in Bhutan.
Christopher Fynn (talk)) 10:53, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:10, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:19, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:13, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of map or artworks.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:34, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:15, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisements. Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:48, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:15, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is unknown. Although this image comes from a Coast Guard site, the uploader knows that not all content there is necessarily public domain. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 04:27, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, This is a frivolous time wasting nomination. McShan was a highly respected petty officer, receiving her promotion to the CG's highest enlisted ranks just two months prior to her death from cancer. Of course the USCG had lots of official pictures of her. Of course they would use their own official pictures rather than use those taken by friends and family. Yes, the USCG, like other Federal agencies, will, very occasionally, use non-free photos, which they generally diligently credit to the actual rights owners.
  • During their last months on en.wiki, prior to their very well deserved indefinite block, nominator engaged in some ugly wikistalking of yours truly. After their indefinite block nominator brought their malicious focus on my efforts here to commons.
  • I don't know how to initiate consideration of an interaction ban being imposed on nominator, but I think that would be the best way to curb their disruptive activity. Geo Swan (talk) 21:56, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • The best way to reduce interaction with me would be if you were more careful with your uploads. You can't assume that anything on USCG sites is public domain. You should know this by now from all of the previous deletions of your uploads. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 22:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • Over on the wikipedia you offered me "helpful" amateur psychoanalysis. Here you are a mind-reader, telling me what I know, and what I don't know.

        I will trust that professionals at the USCG, their professional historians, writers for their official publications, and press officers, will explicitly credit any images they use, which aren't public domain. Geo Swan (talk) 00:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

        • I have never offered you amateur psychoanalysis, helpful or otherwise. I asked if you were on the autism spectrum because I found myself having a great deal of difficulty communicating with you and wondered if I needed to approach you differently. You took offense where none was intended. I have apologized more than once, but you obviously prefer to be offended. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 23:02, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It is an unused, poor quality, image. We have several others of the subject. The Precautionary Principle precludes our assuming that it is a USCG image when there is no credit. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo that is DW of a 1946 monument or oratory in France. Delete per COM:FOP France.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:49, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: As it is written in the link, "On 7 October 2016, the French parliament approved a law recognizing a limited version of the freedom of panorama that authorizes the reproduction by individuals (not organizations) of buildings and sculptures permanently located in public space, but only for non-commercial utilizations." The oratory is located in public space. Everyone can access to it everytime. Moreover, I do not publish this photo for commercial reasons, but for cultural ones. Therefore, I think that this picture is legal. If you need more information about the oratory, please ask me.N. Payen (talk) 18:14, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@N. Payen: Jimbo made a pronouncement before 02:21, 8 September 2004 (UTC) that we would not accept "non-commercial use only" content per this edit, codified in the WikiMedia Foundation Licensing Policy Resolution of 23 March 2007. See also the classification of "Non Commercial" as one of the "Restrictions which are not permissible" at https://freedomdefined.org/Permissible_restrictions#Non_Commercial. Why can't we reach you via email?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 18:22, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: Indeed, I did not receive your email, and I do not know why you cannot reach me via email. I created my Wikipedia account a long time ago, without using it so much; therefore it may be a different address that the one I use now. In my point of view, the point is not really non-commercial use, but the fact that the building is located in the public space. It is part of the life of the Christian community - what we call, in France, a "paroisse", and I really do not think there is any problem with this photo, as photos which are really similar to mine are already published in books related to the history of Guer.N. Payen (talk) 18:35, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@N. Payen: On 9 July 2018 you wrote to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org about a particular file, creating Ticket:2018070910005852. On 14 January 2019 I replied, but my reply message bounced off of ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com [172.217.197.27] due to "The email account that you tried to reach does not exist." I cannot email you via Special:EmailUser/N. Payen using your WMF account because "This user has not specified a valid email address." If you consent to discussion of the matter publicly I will do so; otherwise, please email permissions-commons@wikimedia.org from a working email address, adding the following to the subject bar of the email in its entirety: [Ticket#: 2018070910005852]. Then please let me know. There are 5 other tickets in the same predicament. If the photo would be illegal for you to put on a t-shirt or coffee cup and sell in downtown Guer or Paris, we will not host it here on Wikimedia Commons. The publishers of those books either got permission or operated illegally.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 21:55, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: Well, the pictures have been deleted, so there is no need to send a mail anymore. I thought it was a good idea to contribute to Wikimedia, because it allows us to make culture accessible, but I think I would not contribute anymore, and I will explain you why. There might be a discrepancy between French Law and the US one, just as "downtown Guer" would make a French guy laugh. In France, we recently passed a law which is called "RGPD" (May 25th, 2018) and which allow us to remove private pieces of information from the Internet. I could not imagine that I was not allowed to remove something from my profile, because Wikimedia's rules are illegal from the point of view of French Law. I understand that things must be open to debate, so information might be accessible, but, on the other hand, you should not force someone to give his email address nor essentialize him, saying that he posted wrong things in the past (not knowing he was not allowed), and that he will badly behave in the future (that is discrimination). Wikimedia will not receive any picture from my part. That being said, if Wikimedia do not want a picture, I will not oppose removing it ;-) .N. Payen (talk) 13:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@N. Payen: I'm sorry you feel that way. This is the first I am hearing that you want pieces of information removed. Please specify such pieces. I tried to email you regarding Ticket:2018070910005852, which was created when you emailed us. It appears you emailed us some 8 times (two tickets were combined). I am not forcing you to give a working email address; that is only necessary if you want to privately pursue any of the tickets created on your behalf regarding permission issues you once seemed to care about. When people post wrong things here because they did not know they were wrong, we try to educate them (for instance, asking them to review en:WP:THREAD and en:WP:INDENT), while at the same time trying to fulfill our mission. I never assumed that you "will badly behave in the future", you must have misinterpreted something I wrote (please be specific about that).   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:25, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - NC restrictions are not permitted on Commons/. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]