Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/08/02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 2nd, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 07:53, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:54, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By mistake no audio recording has been done. Gangdhara k b (talk) 06:06, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Site source sous copyright Bounè rodzo (talk) 08:05, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Touchedamour (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All seem to be derivative work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:04, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The last two could be found with TinEye, the other images have already been deleted (re-uploading deleted content) for example, see File:Modeling pin up lea.jpg. --4nn1l2 (talk) 13:20, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Touchedamour (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 13:21, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Usage shows automatically in scope, the nomination rationale is incorrect. No comment on copyright status.
# File Usage Non-core
1 Photographie érotique miroir, couple.jpg 2

-- (talk) 12:04, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@: Thanks, struck that out. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 12:06, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the second image is the same actual photograph, different tint so a reasonable derivative. It is not logical that one print is out of scope and the other in-scope. -- (talk) 12:08, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 12:19, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Sealle (talk) 07:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:30, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio per COM:CSD#F10.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:07, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from France, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 13:49, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:16, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from France, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 13:50, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:16, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 14:32, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:37, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from 1981, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:49, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from 1981, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:48, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:49, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bonjour je suis l'auteur de cette photo et je souhaite sa supression car elle est prise dans un lieu privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas qu'elle soit difusé sur internet Thomthom888 (talk) 05:38, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 07:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The reason is not valid as the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue. Besides, the deletion was already requested once: it was a fail and it is totally useless to ask it the deletion once more. Chabe01 (talk) 08:29, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thomthom888 est bloqué et veux supprimer cette photo. il en a droit. Vous l'avez bloqué alors supprimer cette photo comme il le demande. Supprimé cette photo. 2A01:CB15:8252:CA00:19B4:348:B2B:DA7A 09:27, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep
1) Is that IP address entitled to talk on behalf of Thomthom888 ?
2) On the file Temple batie cour.jpg Thomthom888 wrote :
I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:

w:en:Creative Commons attribution share alike

This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

PS - La photo prise le 14 juin 2018 est couverte par cette licence Creative Commons depuis au moins le 25 juillet 2019. Si l'auteur de la photo ne veut pas la voir ou la faire voir, il n'avait qu'à ne pas la publier ici.


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo taken in a private location; without authorization. The owner cannot delete it.

Photo privée prise dans un lieu privé ; sans autorisation. Le propriétaire ne peut pas l'effacer. 1Rames3 (talk) 16:45, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Photo of registered historic monument (monuments historiques de la France). Unless an explanation of what "authorization" is needed to take photo and how lack of such "authorization" makes it unusable on Commons,  Keep. Also, do not remove categories and descriptions when nominating images for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:03, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo taken in a private location; without authorization. The owner cannot delete it. Photo privée prise dans un lieu privé ; sans autorisation. Le propriétaire ne peut pas l'effacer. 1Rames3 (talk) 20:43, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • The previous deletion request is still open; no need to list it again while it is still under consideration. More information might be helpful. Feel free to answer in French; someone can translate. (Traduction mécanique : La demande de suppression précédente est toujours ouverte ; inutile de le ré-inscrire tant qu'il est encore à l'étude. Plus d'informations pourraient être utiles. N'hésitez pas à répondre en français; quelqu'un peut traduire. ) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:17, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Et bien, ce n'est pas avec vous que Wikipédia deviendra crédible et source de référence pour un travail. Quand je lis tous vos commentaires, je comprends mieux pourquoi il est impossible de travailler avec vous. Avec un peu de bon sens, faire des recherches nous amène toujours à des résultats. Commencez donc à faire ce travail. J'annule toutes mes mises à jour sur cette page, je ne souhaite plus partager mes informations avec des personnes qui font n'importe quoi. La plupart des informations sont fausses et il suffit de faire un peu de lecture pour le voir. Aussi, soyez honnête avec vous-même, sur cette page, sont partagé des photos prisent dans un lieu privé, sans autorisation, elles ne peuvent plus être enlevé, car les utilisateurs sont bloqué et elles sont utilisées sous prétexte d'une licence libre. Elles sont même reprises sur monumentum. Comment pouvez-vous faire cela ? Vous vous croyez en toute impunité dernière vos ordinateurs. Si ce sont vos valeurs sur Wikipédia, alors ne vous étonnez pas si à cause de vous plus personne n'a confiance à ce qui est marquée dessus. 1Rames3 (talk) 08:06, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Auto translation, as my French is poor:
Well, it is not with you that Wikipedia will become credible and a source of reference for a work. When I read all of your comments, I understand better why it is impossible to work with you. With a little common sense, researching always leads to results. So start doing this work. I cancel all my updates on this page, I no longer want to share my information with people who do anything. Most of the information is wrong and you only need to do a little reading to see it. Also, be honest with yourself, on this page are shared photos taken in a private place, without permission, they can no longer be removed, because users are blocked and they are used under the pretext of a free license. They are even repeated on monumentum. How can you do this? You think you have complete impunity behind your computers. If these are your values ​​on Wikipedia, then don't be surprised if because of you no one trusts what is marked on it anymore.
Andy Dingley (talk) 11:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thankyou for your long comment. Can we please discuss this, so as to better understand the issue.
There are images here that you did not photograph. There are images here, I understand, that you did photograph? Or that at least you uploaded them?
Why should these images be deleted? Your claim is that they were taken on private property? These would not be covered under French FoP, if they are not in a public space, however that is irrelevant. FoP only exists to grant permission for a photographer to reproduce a copyrighted design, such as an artwork or a new building, in addition to their general rights to photograph the world at large (Photography is permitted in France). As this building appears ancient, there is no such design right being protected, or eased by FoP, and so any photographer may simply photograph it anyway.
As I understand your complaint, you claim that these photographs involved some form of trespass in order to access the building? You then claim that the photographer thus has no right to their photographs. I am not a lawyer, I am certainly not a French lawyer, so please explain what aspect of French law would forbid this. We have no knowledge of how the photographer gained access. Perhaps they were invited into the building by the owner. Even if they were trespassing (Which we have no reason to believe), I know of no reason (My familiarity with French trespass law is old and now rusty) why such a trespass would then affect the licensing of photographs produced during such a trespass. I agree that French privacy law is much stricter than British law on privacy and photography, but to my limited knowledge that extends to photographs of people, not of buildings.
Wikimedia Commons recognises (albeit inconsistently) that photography involves privacy issues, and such claims have often been listened to in the past. But you have not made such a claim clearly here, and it is hard to see where privacy has been breached over these innocuous photographs of a building. A building that is recognised as a historic monument, and thus of some public interest: Category:Donjon du Temple I note that you are focussing on one set of images from this category, not all of them. Can you please explain why only some are a problem?
When you make allegations such as "Most of the information is wrong" it would be more helpful if you could be more specific: what is wrong? How should we correct this? We do hold accuracy to be of high value here and would wish to correct any such misunderstanding. However we are also volunteers here and unfamiliar with this building, so please help us.
Apologies for my poor French, and so I will not attempt a translation. Please feel free for anyone to post translations of my posts. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:10, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Michel421: Andy Dingley (talk) 12:18, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 00:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué 89.156.12.25 18:14, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This file was kept for 6 times, what's your new rationale? Repeating old rationales will only lead this file  Speedy keep. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:32, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. No reason to delete. Sock troll continues with vague rants and refusing to reply to questions of substance. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:08, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet Thomthom888 (talk) 05:42, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The nom has been blocked . Therefore, I am being bold and closing these as keeps. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:12, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment That is interesting opinion rant about supposed "trolls". You have not offered any reason why this image should be deleted. If something stated is wrong, please say what the correct information is. Why do you keep refusing to explain? What are you hiding? (Pardon, I should not descend to such a low level of discussion, even if someone else has.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy close. Are there any more of these still left? They're disruptive DRs filed repeatedly by a sockpuppet. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Closing as Kept -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:35, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:24, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:53, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PS - @Allony: Le propriétaire d'une chose ne dispose pas d'un droit exclusif sur l'image de celle-ci, il faut établir qu'il y a un trouble anormal : https://www.courdecassation.fr/jurisprudence_2/assemblee_pleniere_22/arr_ecirc_459.html Michel421 (talk) 19:04, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The nom has been blocked . Therefore, I am being bold and closing these as keeps. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet, la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:45, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:12, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:40, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet, la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:45, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:55, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:11, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thierry 74 comment osez vous affirmer autant de bêtises dans vos écrit Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux la page donjon du temple. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairemePage de trollsicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 194.199.3.13 08:34, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept per above -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:17, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet, la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:46, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:22, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:51, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:01, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:11, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept per previous keeps and no reason for deletion offered by nominator (nominator offers a vague rant while refusing to specify what the supposed misinformation is). -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:46, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué 89.156.12.25 18:21, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:20, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet, la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept per previous keeps and that the nominator has offered no reason for deletion. (Repeated rants and allegations of false information and scandals, while never explaining what information is incorrect or what the supposed scandal is.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet, la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The nom has been blocked . Therefore, I am being bold and closing these as keeps. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 17:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cette photo sert à contribuer à une page wikipedia dont les informations sont non fondé Thomthom888 (talk) 05:49, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:20, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thomthom888 est bloqué et veux supprimer cette photo. il en a droit. Vous l'avez bloqué alors supprimer cette photo comme il le demande. Supprimé cette photo. 2A01:CB15:8252:CA00:19B4:348:B2B:DA7A 09:27, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cette image, étant dans le domaine public, n'appartient à personne ; vous n'avez donc pas de droit de propriété dessus, encore moins de droit d' abusus et ne pouvez pas prétendre la supprimer. Michel421 (talk) 20:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

* Keep No valid reason ; the file is in the public domain anyway Michel421 (talk) 10:00, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 17:09, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cette photo sert à contribuer à une page wikipedia dont les informations sont non fondé Thomthom888 (talk) 05:49, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thomthom888 est bloqué et veux supprimer cette photo. il en a droit. Vous l'avez bloqué alors supprimer cette photo comme il le demande.

Supprimé cette photo. 2A01:CB15:8252:CA00:19B4:348:B2B:DA7A 09:26, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Thomthom888: :Cette image, étant dans le domaine public, n'appartient à personne ; vous n'avez donc pas de droit de propriété dessus, encore moins de droit d' abusus et ne pouvez pas prétendre la supprimer. Michel421 (talk) 21:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*  Keep No reason ; the file is in the public domain anyway Michel421 (talk) 10:04, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Change : Actually, the cadastral map bears the words "reproduction réservée" meaning that the material is not free. The message is in white on a very light brown background. Michel421 (talk) 20:18, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: There is a very good chance that this is in the public domain. However, we do not have a source or date of original publication to prove it. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:12, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cette photo sert à contribuer à une page wikipedia dont les informations sont non fondé Thomthom888 (talk) 05:50, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cette photo à été prise dans un lieu privé et le propriétaire ne souhaite pas que cette photo soit difusé sur internet sans son accord Thomthom888 (talk) 05:51, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author declares in description "It can't be used on Wikipedia". This means out of COM:SCOPE. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 06:52, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The author (Thomthom888) didn't write that: it was written by 2a01:e35:87fa:1170:c431:a645:894f:647a. I've reverted the change. --bjh21 (talk) 12:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Bjh21: You're right. And Thomthom888 asked for deletion above for a false reason. Whatever, this a subject with problematic users. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 12:57, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:50, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 07:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The reason is not valid as the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue. Besides, the deletion was already requested twice: it was a fail and it is totally useless to ask it the deletion once more. Chabe01 (talk) 08:29, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thomthom888 est bloqué et veux supprimer cette photo. il en a droit. Vous l'avez bloqué alors supprimer cette photo comme il le demande.

Supprimé cette photo. 2A01:CB15:8252:CA00:19B4:348:B2B:DA7A 09:21, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No valid reason ; no copyright issue ; 4th invalid request Michel421 (talk) 15:04, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo taken in a private location; without authorization. The owner cannot delete it. 1Rames3 (talk) 16:43, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep per multiple previous listings; unclear what "authorization" is needed to photograph a registered historic monument in France and why lack of such "authorization" would invalidate use on Commons. Also: Please do not remove description and categories when nominating an image for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:24, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Et bien, ce n'est pas avec vous que Wikipédia deviendra crédible et source de référence pour un travail. Quand je lis tous vos commentaires, je comprends mieux pourquoi il est impossible de travailler avec vous. Avec un peu de bon sens, faire des recherches nous amène toujours à des résultats. Commencez donc à faire ce travail. J'annule toutes mes mises à jour sur cette page, je ne souhaite plus partager mes informations avec des personnes qui font n'importe quoi. La plupart des informations sont fausses et il suffit de faire un peu de lecture pour le voir. Aussi, soyez honnête avec vous-même, sur cette page, sont partagé des photos prisent dans un lieu privé, sans autorisation, elles ne peuvent plus être enlevé, car les utilisateurs sont bloqué et elles sont utilisées sous prétexte d'une licence libre. Elles sont même reprises sur monumentum. Comment pouvez-vous faire cela ? Vous vous croyez en toute impunité dernière vos ordinateurs. Si ce sont vos valeurs sur Wikipédia, alors ne vous étonnez pas si à cause de vous plus personne n'a confiance à ce qui est marquée dessus. 1Rames3 (talk) 08:06, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept per precendence of prior related file discussions. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 15:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:54, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:13, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept per previous keeps and that the nominator has offered no reason for deletion. (Repeated rants and allegations of false information and scandals, while never explaining what information is incorrect or what the supposed scandal is.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:28, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué 89.156.12.25 18:23, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:16, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lucashamm81 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. No EXIF.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unambiguous copyvios - File:Logo la bataille des couples 2.jpg is here, for example. --Эlcobbola talk 17:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Renamed as Category:Signing ceremony for the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2607:fea8:20df:f26b:80c9:e3c5:6de0:aa2b (talk) 01:00, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Redirect, cat was created 2 days ago. --Achim (talk) 18:02, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photo 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:02, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by 4nn1l2 at 13:03, 2 August 2019 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:دکتر عبدالله قاسمی پیربلوطی.jpg: Out of project scope: unused personal photo --Krdbot 19:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2019 United States Artists Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unambiguous copyvios may use {{Copyvio}} - here, for example. --Эlcobbola talk 19:52, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(Sorry french) J'ai demandé la suppression rapide hier car fair-use (https://www.instagram.com/p/B0jDTa3hVpS/?utm_source=ig_embed). Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 09:56, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 06:37, 3 August 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: fair-use (https://www.cagesideseats.com/wwe/2019/7/30/20747288/maria-kanellis-dedicates-24-7-championship-win-moms-working-parents) --Krdbot 13:23, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph fails to meet the official guidelines of COM:TOYS, specifically:

When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.

The focus of this photograph is a toy for which there is no evidence of copyright status, something that could be easily rectified by WMAT checking the label. The hat has been sewn on to a commercial product, and the copyright should be assessed as we would any other figurative toy with a hat on it and partially obscured. Were this a Donald Duck or Kermit the Frog figure with a hat on, it would be an easier decision. The copyright holder for this toy should be afforded the same consideration as we would for the Disney corporation.

For an in-depth background and explanation of Commons copyright policies, refer to the Stuffed Animals essay and the precedent of prior closely related deletion requests:

  1. Petit tigre
  2. Erminig
  3. Wendy the Weasel & Percy Plush
  4. Wikimania 2014 Day 1
  5. Jimmy Wales meeting Mr Penguin

(talk) 20:17, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 20:59, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Toys DW of copyrighted character Pengaroo with no permission per COM:TOYS and section 1 above. Please delete the files, as well as the resulting empty cat.

* File:Wikimedia Conference 2017 by René Zieger – 429.jpg I've cropped the toy out of the picture. --Cornelius Kibelka (WMDE) (talk) 13:49, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:42, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep - This is a handmade one-off toy and the creator has already submitted several years a wide ranging permission for any photographs of it, by any person, to be allowed to be uploaded under any license. See Category talk:Pengaroo and This is the ORTS Ticket . Wittylama (talk) 14:10, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wittylama: Ok, but what about all the other plushies in File:2017 European GLAMwiki Coordinators Meeting 01.jpg?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:32, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I can't speak for other toys. I am only the official spokesman of Pengaroo. You'll have to speak to their media-managers separately. Wittylama (talk) 14:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's not how Commons works for copyright verification. The release needs to be there on the image page, not require private chats elsewhere. -- (talk) 14:58, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you didnt undertand me; I'll say it more clearly: I don't know.
THIS deletion nomination refers to images of Pengaroo, for which a valid permission/release notice exists for many years. I have no knowledge of, or interest in, the copyright status of other plush toys. Wittylama (talk) 18:15, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Kept all of them because these images were nominated for containing the copyrighted character "Pengaroo" for which we have a perfectly valid OTRS release (see OTRS #2016100310013995). If you think anything else is copyrighted in any of these images, you should nominate this image with a clear and sound reasoning. Multichill (talk) 18:32, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:08, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:58, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kuva ei ole vapaasti muokattava ja on muutenkin epäselvä. --Abc10 (talk) 08:03, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 10:54, 6 August 2019 UTC: Kuva ei ole vapaasti muokattava ja on muutenkin epäselvä. Lähde:http://ttam.dev.korv.fi/index909d.html?sivu=pressikuvat --Krdbot 13:21, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kuva ei ole vapaasti muokattava ja on muutenkin epäselvä. --Abc10 (talk) 08:07, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 10:54, 6 August 2019 UTC: Pressikuva, eikä ei ole vapaasti muokattava ja on muutenkin epäselvä. Lähteessä ei mainintaa vapaasta muokattavuudesta: http://ttam.dev.korv.fi/index909d.html?sivu=pressikuvat --Krdbot 13:21, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nora670 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Facebook images, missing permission.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:34, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:40, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nyeinchankoko1025 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE and some need OTRS permission.

Ahmadtalk 13:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:25, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faisalsheikhsahab (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 13:57, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:27, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 00:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:47, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused equivalent to File:Sodium-phenoxide-2D-skeletal-B.png except has opaque background. Category:Sodium phenoxide has other high-quality alts as well DMacks (talk) 02:29, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 09:43, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusually small negative symbol on the O (general concern about visibility, and also compared to size of positive on Na). Have File:Phenol-Na.svg as one of several SVG alts in Category:Sodium phenoxide DMacks (talk) 02:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 09:43, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Com:PS. Hanooz 07:34, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:48, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Com:PS. Hanooz 07:36, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:48, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Com:PS. Hanooz 09:35, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:48, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Com:PS. Hanooz 09:52, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:48, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kazakhstan12345 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Com:PS.

Hanooz 10:10, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:49, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: personal photo 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:13, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:49, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly self-promo (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:29, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:50, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muhammad Asad Ali (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:52, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muhammad Asad Ali

[edit]

Given the span in time for these files and the approximate age of the uploader (see File:Muhammad Asad Ali.JPG), it is highly unlikely that they took all these pictures. None of them have Exif either, so it is likely that these were taken from random websites. COM:LL Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:12, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, not own works. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:02, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:35, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:53, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:37, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:53, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:38, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:53, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:53, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:59, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:53, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Indigoua1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE

Ahmadtalk 21:05, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:04, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://yc.com.sa/category/photo-gallery, COPYRIGHT © 2018 - ALYAMAMA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by 1989 at 14:16, 9 August 2019 UTC: Insufficient or doubtful author or license; OTRS validation required (F1) --Krdbot 19:16, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leonel Pompa Caballero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:42, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leonel Pompa Caballero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data and logos, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 07:07, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:12, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johnnycoleman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused files

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:54, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope. --1989 (talk) 03:14, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

microsoft.com 2001:4898:80E8:0:55F8:550D:F241:78E0 05:17, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This DR appears to be vandalism. -- (talk) 06:06, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --1989 (talk) 16:41, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, see the source. See also other uploadings from this user Estopedist1 (talk) 06:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 16:42, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No description, no meaningful title, not used. Out of scope. If this even a selfie? Yann (talk) 06:09, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 16:44, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without EXIF data, last remaining image, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 07:03, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 16:49, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Herbythyme as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Bottle artwork will almost certainly be copyrighted Yann (talk) 08:06, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 16:49, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture too small Calvinkulit (talk) 08:34, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 16:59, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Battini vinaykumarreddy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:42, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:03, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly used for self-promo on en.wiki. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:49, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 17:06, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 12:50, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:07, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 12:52, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:07, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:52, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:07, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from UK, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 13:48, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:12, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from Europe, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 13:50, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:12, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from Sweden, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 13:51, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:12, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from Germany, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 13:51, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:13, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from Italy, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 13:52, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:13, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Art work, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 13:53, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:13, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from Spain, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 13:53, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:13, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from Europe, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 13:54, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:13, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

BTS before Billboard Music Awards rehearsal

[edit]

The license of the source video was changed to All rights reserved before license review could be processed, and there's no archived version that can prove they were once licensed under Creative Commons. --Chiyako92 (talk) 13:54, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:15, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by مهران رحمتی (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images are out of project scope; photos are unlikely to be own work: small size, low resolution, missing EXIF

4nn1l2 (talk) 13:57, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:16, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from Australia, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:02, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:17, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising with a copyright notice, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:04, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:17, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from art on buses. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:17, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from Europe, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:04, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:18, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from Europe, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:06, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:19, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from France, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:07, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:19, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from UK, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:09, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:19, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ma-sansun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from Sweden, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from Germany, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:21, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from Australia, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:21, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from Australia (?), not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:16, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:21, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from 1977, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:21, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from 1977, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:19, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:21, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:21, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from 1980, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:20, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:21, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from 1978, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:21, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from Argentina, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:21, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from Mexico, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:21, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:22, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio, uploader and author differs, permission from MUNAZO should be given via OTRS for this file to be kept. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:22, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DianaCornila (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:23, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from 1981, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:23, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from 1981, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:23, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from Argentina, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:28, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:23, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly taken from Facebook (per EXIF), thus a possible copyvio. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:28, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:24, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from 1981, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:30, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:24, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from 1981, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 14:30, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:24, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:24, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:24, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:24, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:34, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:24, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file; no educational value; possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 14:39, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:40, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:26, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:26, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2019 Diligent Media Corporation Ltd. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:45, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:27, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:26, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Franckliu18 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly used for self-promo on fr.wiki

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:48, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Franckliu18 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE

Ahmadtalk 20:23, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:28, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:28, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would say that this falls under G1 but I'm unsure, so I nom-ed for DR. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:56, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:29, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo; accidentally uploaded in batch Flickr upload Mindmatrix 15:00, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:29, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mobin78 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: personal files

4nn1l2 (talk) 15:02, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:30, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Doctorsecrets (talk) 03:08, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 15:07, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:31, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 15:07, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:31, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 15:08, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:31, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 15:09, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:31, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 15:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:31, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 15:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:31, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, not own work by the Flickr account holder. Yann (talk) 15:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:31, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MARTIN MBAU (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low res image that is unlikely own work. Also no EXIF.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:13, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:33, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:15, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:34, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial source: fitnessforit.com Tortillovsky (talk) 15:15, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:34, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be advert, but I can't read Spanish so I'll nominate this for DR instead so users who can read Spanish can help me out. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:35, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:20, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:35, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:22, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:35, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by City5pondy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

1 file seems to be an advert. While other 2 seems to contain a, possibly, a complex logo

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:27, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 17:36, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:27, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:37, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked, possible copyvio. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:31, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:38, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:32, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:38, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sardersalimreza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:40, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:35, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:40, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:40, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:45, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio. --1989 (talk) 17:39, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:49, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:41, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:49, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:41, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sam Sanchez Soto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). Also possible self promo.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:50, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:41, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:52, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:41, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:53, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:41, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a selfie, low res. I doubt that the uploader is Simone Leigh herself. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:08, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:23, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arshydosanjh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:23, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:21, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From Facebook (per EXIF), low res. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:24, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:21, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Неверный набор 85.140.6.215 13:24, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

d'accord -- Centenier (talk) 15:43, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unused redirect. --1989 (talk) 18:22, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low res, unlikely to be own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:18, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a wiki table, not used. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:27, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:18, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:28, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:18, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:18, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Ahmadtalk 13:34, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:17, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be a wiki table, not used. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:34, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:17, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Ahmadtalk 13:39, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:17, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE

Ahmadtalk 13:45, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:16, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tatiana R.J.P. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:24, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP in the Netherlands only for works which are permanently located in public places.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:56, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:50, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP in the Netherlands only for works which are permanently located in public places.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:57, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:50, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP in the Netherlands only for works which are permanently located in public places.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:58, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:50, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded it by mistake. Duplicate of the better (cropped) File:Zenith House, Exeter, 2019 2.jpg. George Nympton (talk) 15:59, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:51, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP in the Netherlands only for works which are permanently located in public places.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:59, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:ArtZuid 2013 - Dinh Q. Lê, The Farmers and The Helicopters, 2006 (8960607729).jpg and File:ArtZuid, G Mahlerplein Z.jpg is a com:casebook#Vehicles Vera (talk) 22:15, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, two kept. --1989 (talk) 17:54, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP in the Netherlands only for works which are permanently located in public places.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:02, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep for File:La Demeure Humaine.jpg. The work of art is created to be in public places permanently, and is indeed situated in public places since 1967, as it is now back at the building of Nederlandsche Bank at Frederiksplein, Amsterdam. The temporary place at Apollolaan -indeed public as well - does not change that. See also Category:La Demeure Humaine and nl:La Demeure Humaine. Lymantria (talk) 16:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, one kept. --1989 (talk) 17:57, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:07, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:57, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:08, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:58, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly OOS. Seems to be a test file. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:19, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 大诺史. I uploaded this subtitle to be used on the German Wikipedia as it may display the logo in the game's article. German law does not have a fair use clause, so in order to identify a cultural asset, logos are often used in the German Wikipedia as a free and non-copyrighted substitute for copyrighted covers, theatrical posters etc. de:Datei:Indianajones-logo.svg was uploaded on the German Wikipedia in 2011 back when German copyright laws regarding logos were governed with considerably more lenience by courts. As such, it can still be used in conjunction with separately uploaded images that do not meet the threshold of originality (such as this subtitle here), but nowadays, the main logo could not be modified or re-uploaded together with the subtitle as a new SVG file. Prime Blue (talk) 21:03, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The file is now included in the German Wikipedia article to show its intended use as part of a rewrite. I concede that this file may not be the most orthodox use of Wikimedia Commons, but I checked guidelines and copyright laws thoroughly and could not find anything that would prohibit such a use. Since this is the only way I can think of to illustrate the product of the topic without infringing on copyrights, I hope that a deletion of this file can be avoided. Thank you for your consideration. Prime Blue (talk) 13:51, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I shall  I withdraw my nomination per above. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:47, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --1989 (talk) 17:59, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pranat Pattanakude (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:27, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:00, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Crypto Koosh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:30, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:02, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Movie poster, fair use (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:31, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:03, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of phone UI Эlcobbola talk 17:04, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:04, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files are not useful and may not be free

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 18:08, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:06, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:29, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:06, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST. Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:24, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:07, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ibrahim Abul Gheit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:00, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ibrahim Abul Gheit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Random out of COM:SCOPE images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:58, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:12, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-re image, no metadata. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:05, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:12, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist's permission (or his heir's) needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:06, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:12, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:13, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:13, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ceescamel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:FOP in the Netherlands only for works which are permanently located in public places.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:53, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(UTC)

I know temporary sculptures are not allowed here. However, they are at an exhibition, whose organisor ArtZuid specific asks to take pictures of the statues an upload them. By the way Verschijning van Perlmuter is a permanently placed statue, it stands there from 1998.Ceescamel (talk) 09:04, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ceescamel: They can be uploaded here with the artists' permission. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:23, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote today to ArtZuid. I will let you know. But please remove your nomination for Verschijning. see Kunstwacht Amsterdam, Ceescamel (talk) 09:42, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Ik neem even aan dat je Nederlands of Vlaams bent, anders even pingen. Bericht van ArtZuid ontvangen; ze gaan het uitzoeken. Ze hebben daar zelf nooit problemen ondervonden met het verspreiden van foto's.: "Betreffende het wel of niet mogen uploaden van de foto’s op Wikmedia Commons, ik heb daar persoonlijk geen kennis van. We hebben er ook niet eerder iets over gehoord. Ik ga het volgende week uitzoeken en dan kom ik er bij u op terug." Dank voor doorhalen van Verschijning.Ceescamel (talk) 09:08, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS permision is needed. --1989 (talk) 18:27, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Janitoalevic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Derivative: TODOS LOS DERECHOS LIBERADOS. SE PUEDEN REPRODUCIR, USAR Y DESCARGAR TODOS LOS CONTENIDOS, SIN ALTERARLOS Y CITANDO LA FUENTE. DIRECCIÓN DE PRENSA, PRESIDENCIA DE LA REPÚBLICA DE CHILE

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:32, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Janitoalevic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Derivative: TODOS LOS DERECHOS LIBERADOS. SE PUEDEN REPRODUCIR, USAR Y DESCARGAR TODOS LOS CONTENIDOS, SIN ALTERARLOS Y CITANDO LA FUENTE. DIRECCIÓN DE PRENSA, PRESIDENCIA DE LA REPÚBLICA DE CHILE

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:34, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manakpreet Singh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, false dates: please explain why each picture is public domain.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:58, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manakpreet Singh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:48, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:37, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found on Instagram. Ahmadtalk 20:57, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 18:38, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yeatesey84 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:45, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by فبک آبادان (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: promotional for a certain workshop in Iran, file pages contain contact numbers and Facebook/Telegram webpages.

4nn1l2 (talk) 12:40, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:51, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smrd2008 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

File name suggests that the files were taken from WhatsApp, no permission to reuse

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:16, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:54, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PENIS, commons already have a vast coverage on this topic. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:20, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:54, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by زینب اعتمادی (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, promotional.

Ahmadtalk 19:54, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:49, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agriculturalengineer96 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution, no metadata.

Cjp24 (talk) 23:45, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:53, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agriculturalengineer96 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparent bulk COM:NETCOPYVIOs - low res, no camera EXIF, appeared elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:Msa bay equipment.jpg is here; File:Msa-chabahar.jpg is here; File:Pars-33.jpg is here; File:Cheese89446.jpg is here; File:058128s.jpg is here; File:Azarab20210120-194054~2.png is here; etc.), uploader history of copyvios, etc. Duck/COM:PRP.

Эlcobbola talk 15:42, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, very unlikely to be own work. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:25, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

None of those work of art was created by "an employee of the Congress as part of that person's official duties". None of them were "released to the public domain". Thus, they are copyrighted. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:52, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 04:49, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted File:HumphreyHHBust.jpg and File:NelsonARockefellerBust.jpg per discussion at COM:UDR: The busts qualify for {{PD-US-1978-89}} while the photos are {{PD-USGov-Senate}}. De728631 (talk) 14:02, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barkley Bust.jpg restored as per [1]. Yann (talk) 09:08, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RobertKaramagi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 07:20, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof that the author died before 1943. Ghirlandajo (talk) 20:50, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 07:19, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by TwoWings as no permission (No permission since) It has a Flickr review tag. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:02, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 07:19, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is not the good one Soniacaro12 (talk) 08:22, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

El escudo no es el original Soniacaro12 (talk) 08:54, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No es verdadero Soniacaro12 (talk) 10:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No es el escudo oficial de Fuente-Tójar 88.12.43.176 07:03, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV say thst if a file is used by other projects (as this one is, from ceb:Fuente-Tójar (kapital sa munisipyo) to zh-min-nan:Fuente-Tójar) then it should not be deleted for being bad, incorrect, or unofficial. --bjh21 (talk) 14:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: En heráldica no existen los escudos "oficiales", "originales" o "verdaderos". Existen versiones oficiales que no invalidan el que haya otras versiones diferentes.--Erlenmeyer (talk) 17:03, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep in use. 12:58, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion specified. --Jcb (talk) 18:45, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PENIS, commons already have a vast coverage on this topic. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:10, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 05:07, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Waaags (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:PENIS, commons already have a vast coverage of this topic.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:15, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 05:06, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:24, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 05:06, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

перенаправление с грубой опечаткой Пашка12 (talk) 17:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 05:04, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the flag of the Wabanaki Confederacy. I checked. We don't know what this is. CorbieVreccan (talk) 19:19, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 05:02, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a repeat upload of a previously-deleted file. The file was previously deleted as a hoax. In the description, the image creator says they are "proposing" this as a potential flag. It is not the flag of the Wabanaki Confederacy. This should be salted. CorbieVreccan (talk) 22:17, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Commons is not a place to propose new flags. --bjh21 (talk) 14:15, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je l'ai téléversé par erreur Prehistoricplanes (talk) 19:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 05:01, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST. Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 05:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:54, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 04:58, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:53, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload data states that it is a still from Bachelor Party and therefore not public domain or CC. Roscelese (talk) 15:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:52, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Liheze (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:53, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freigabe / Quelle nicht nachvollziehbar. Grundsatz (talk) 12:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Beingnabin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 1 file used on en.wiki for self-promo.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:56, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Confirules360 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work, uploader and author differs. Permission from Jacob Bioko should be given via COM:OTRS

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by İlkinm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files are not the own work of İlkinm. Without the permission of the true photographers/painter or their heirs, we we can not host them, COM:PCP!

Ras67 (talk) 14:00, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Некорректные данные о дате и авторстве снимка -- Tomasina (talk) 06:37, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:25, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Некорректные данные о дате и авторстве снимка -- Tomasina (talk) 06:37, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:25, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Некорректные данные о дате и авторстве снимка -- Tomasina (talk) 06:39, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aya Nakamura (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. No EXIF. Possibly copyvio.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC) + Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST (fr:Fayçal Mignon). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:17, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How do I prove ownership? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aya Nakamura (talk • contribs) 15:17, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Aya Nakamura: Please send in the permission to OTRS. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:09, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Degraded version of TV5 Monde (2009-).svg JessydeVilly (talk) 15:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:08, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leeon777 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly fufilling F10. Also per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:07, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.famousfix.com/post/anna-kuzina-28541160 копирайт Пашка12 (talk) 18:08, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:06, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused diagram with no meaningful explanation. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 20:27, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:05, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is this? Photo of a photo agency. There's no proof that this photo is uploaded by copyright holder. Used in websites like [2], [3], [4], Htm (talk) 20:34, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Plus they are advertising on Commons (under the summary-section).--Htm (talk) 20:40, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:05, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

vermutlich urheberrechtlich geschützt Xocolatl (talk) 10:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:13, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das ist nie und nimmer ein "eigenes Werk" von 2009. Xocolatl (talk) 12:17, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:13, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das ist nie und nimmer ein eigenes Werk des Uploaders. Xocolatl (talk) 12:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:13, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VIPIN KR TIWARI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly fufilling F10. also per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:02, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:12, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found on other websites under copyright (https://www.lesgrappes.com/vignerons/u/chateau-pape-clement ) Roumpf (talk) 13:04, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 13:36, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zulfikar malik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly fufilling F10. Personal/Private photo(s) of non-contributor.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:30, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:10, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly used for self-promo.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete along with cat. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Djjusticeghofficial (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Eatcha as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: bigger images at [5] Uploaded in 2008. Please show the source. Yann (talk) 06:32, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:55, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is explicit pornographic material with no real educational benefit Nxgen. (talk) 20:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 02:30, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • user:AshFriday, user:TheDudeFromTheUpperEchelon please elaborate, in what way is the file
      • outofscope? According to the categories it addresses a number of notable topics, that have articles in wikipedia
      • redundant? Are there other files at commons that could be used as a replacement?
      • poor quality? do you mean bad sex, or bad cinematography, or bad encoding?
      • worthless? If worthlessness is a reason for deletion, we should start by deleting all images of SUVs and supersportcars, because they are really worthless and not only because of destroying the climate and all our lives.
      • educational? It is not educational?
    • the file has (unlike many other files from the same categories) an OTRS permission so that it is sure, that from a legal pov it can be kept (unlike other files).

--217.166.240.234 08:29, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - also no OTRS received. --Jcb (talk) 15:46, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is blurry when viewed as a thumb nail. I want to upload a higher resolution version. Maya Taylor (talk) 02:31, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: spam. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:07, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DJ Service does not exist anymore. The image does not represent any active brand and should be deleted. Thank you. Spiffyorange (talk) 05:05, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: spam. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:12, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is the exact version of my photo File:Anonymous Stephen Báthory (detail) 01.jpg unbelievable! such files without reliable source shoul not be accepted Artinpl (talk) 11:13, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, it is a cropped version and secondly it is a public domain. You did not create the painting and even if you took the photograph of the portrait, the laws do not apply. The name of the artist and location is in the infobox. The picture was cropped to remove a white flash spot on the canvas. If you wish to delete it then do so but just informing you that the spot reduced the overall quality of the file. Oliszydlowski (talk) 11:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Such shamefull, dishonest activity should not be accepted! We are community working here voluntarly and should respect each other. Source of the file should be properly given. The file is identical. Artinpl (talk) 11:41, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I've corrected the source, and with the correct source there's no reason to delete the picture. --bjh21 (talk) 15:20, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Duplicates and highly disputed works are subject to deletion. Artinpl (talk) 16:13, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note that this file is not a duplicate of File:Anonymous Stephen Báthory (detail) 01.jpg, and is in use on ru:Список глав государств в 1578 году, which by COM:INUSE makes it ineligible for deletion on grounds of quality. --bjh21 (talk) 16:38, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Since there's no reliable source given by the uploader, and it's deifinately not an own work, how can you verify that it's not a copyrighted image? Images without proper source are also eligible to deletion. Artinpl (talk) 17:30, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm a bit confused: you appeared to start this DR by claiming that the picture was an uncredited crop of your photo, but now claim that it should be deleted because it might not be a crop of your photo. Anyway, I've dealt with this by recropping it from File:Anonymous Stephen Báthory (detail) 01.jpg. Now there's no doubt about where it came from. If an admin feels that deletion of the older revision is warranted, that's fine by me. --bjh21 (talk) 18:04, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's not the first time as this user uploads an image which is a slight modification of an image already in Commons, without proper source and description. Waste of time for us all - e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kober Anna of Austria, Q Poland.jpg. Artinpl (talk) 19:27, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Artinpl is advised to avoid frivolous DRs. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:15, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have copied this PDF from https://zenodo.org/record/1253886 to supplement its addition at w:en:Hydrothermal vent with an edit activated by Chris Capoccia.

The PDF carries an USGS affiliation and the record on Zenodo (a well known academic repository for self-archival) claims there is no copyright on it. However, some users like EEng have asserted that such statements may be wrong/misleading, so I'd like to hear the opinion of a few more users on whether the CC-0 works on Zenodo like this are usually indeed in the public domain.

Some information I found from USGS: James Bischoff and Robert Rosenbauer employer profiles; Are USGS reports/publications copyrighted?; 1100.5 - Authorship, Acknowledgments, and Credits in USGS Information Products; Frequently Asked Questions about Copyright Issues Affecting the U.S. Government CENDI/2008-1 Revised December 2017.

Nemo 11:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't know of any law which exempts the USGS from being PD-USGov -- if the work was done as part of their duties, it would seem that no copyright can be claimed in the text. If it was done on their own time, it could be different, as would the case where there were non-USGS co-authors. Under current policy (section 6D there), it seems there is 12-month embargo period allowed for journal-published articles, where the USGS will not publish their work. That is per this directive. I still don't think there can be a U.S. copyright on it, but maybe there was a summary or other copyrightable stuff added by the journal, not sure. Anyways, after 12 months it sounds like the USGS makes sure it's openly available if the journal does not. In this case, there is a reference here, which links to the Zenodo page as being the Open Access version. That has a CC0 license, which seems to indicate that there was a copyright which was released by someone (the journal?), though maybe that was just their closest approximation to PD-USGov. But, that can actually be a better license to mention than PD-USGov, and I can't see any reason to doubt it.  Keep for me, and I would probably put {{CC0}} as the primary license due to that link, and maybe add PD-USGov as well. May want to add {{License review}} to get a confirmation of it. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Even though the authors' associations are listed as USGS, the actual publisher and copyright holder for this document is Elsevier. Correct attribution is:

    Bischoff, James L.; Rosenbauer, Robert J. (1988). "Liquid-vapor relations in the critical region of the system NaCl-H2O from 380 to 415°C: A refined determination of the critical point and two-phase boundary of seawater". Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 52 (8): 2121–2126. doi:10.1016/0016-7037(88)90192-5.
    {{cite journal |doi=10.1016/0016-7037(88)90192-5 |title=Liquid-vapor relations in the critical region of the system NaCl-H<sub>2</sub>O from 380 to 415°C: A refined determination of the critical point and two-phase boundary of seawater |journal=Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta |volume=52 |issue=8 |pages=2121–2126 |year=1988 |last1=Bischoff |first1=James L. |last2=Rosenbauer |first2=Robert J. }}

    — Chris Capoccia (talk) 17:03, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sure, the citation can be improved. Please go ahead and edit as you wish!

      But are you saying you think Elsevier may hold any copyright on such a publication, and can you clarify how? It's complicated https://law.resource.org/pub/us/works/index.html but USA federal employees are not legally allowed to transfer any copyright to the publishers. Publishers generally recognise this, for instance: Wiley «The article will be identified as a US Government Work and will be in the public domain in the USA» and Springer «If you are employed by the NIH… ... you cannot transfer your copyright to the publisher». Nemo 18:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    • @Chris Capoccia: Legally, no, I don't think so. For PD-USGov stuff, which the text would be if USGS employees authored it as part of their duties, no copyright can be claimed. If there is no copyright which can be claimed, it cannot be transferred, so Elsevier cannot own it either. They can only own copyrights for works they create or are transferred to them. PD-USGov stuff is PD by law, unless there is a specific exemption from 17 USC 105 for that government department or that type of work, which I don't believe there is. No copyright can be created for that material, so the USGS has nothing to transfer. At any rate, the CC0 license would apply either way, which is why I suggested that (it's a better worldwide license than PD-USGov, and would also cover any expression that Elsevier did add, if they did). Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:15, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      click on the "Get rights and content" link on Elsevier's page for this article and see how far you get on getting completely free rights that you need for publishing on Wikimedia https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0016703788901925 . – Chris Capoccia (talk) 20:54, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      @Chris Capoccia: They can't claim rights they don't own. Well they can try, but there are no teeth. Similar to Alamy or Getty or whatever claiming rights over PD photos -- you will get similar stuff if you try to download from those sites, but for particular photos they are just making money off of PD work, and they can't prevent other people from copying (or selling the same). I would imagine that Elsevier gets authors to transfer their copyrights in most cases, but that is legally impossible for USGS works. Elsevier certainly can still charge for access, and maybe make you sign a contract to download, but they can't make a public domain work copyrighted again. If you get access via some other means, it's still public domain and can be copied, unless they added some additional expression on top of what the authors gave them. In the UK they would probably have a 25-year typographical arrangement copyright, but that is not the country of origin and would have expired anyways. There are no such typographical arrangement copyrights in the U.S. (or most countries really). Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:29, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • The paper in question is linked as an official publication by the US government [6]. And Elsevier's own policies [7] state "For US government employees, works created within the scope of their employment are considered to be public domain and Elsevier's publishing agreements do not require a transfer or license of rights for such works." The official version of the paper lists USGS as the author affiliation, so they are works created within the scope of the authors' US government employment. Therefore I think it is safe to treat them as PD regardless of Elsevier's failure to say so on the official version. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:28, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not sure what I've ever said to get pinged here, but David Eppstein knows what he's talking about so what he said. EEng (talk) 19:26, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Life would be so much simpler if people who are aggressive about copyright could at least take the trouble to get it right themselves. It would also be better if the US Government maintained a repository of papers authored by its employees. It seems highly probable that this is PD US Government, but it does not seem as if there is direct categorical proof - it relies on us joining the dots. I would come down on the side of PD with this one. Guy 22:00, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD status overrides bogus copyright claims by predatory publisher. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:17, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn’t appear to be the work of the federal government. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:42, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't think this should be deleted. This was a state ballot measure in California, so it's not supposed to be the work of the federal government. Having the text and arguments related to Prop. 20 is useful for historical research. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 134.186.64.151 (talk) 12:51, August 7, 2019‎ (UTC)
@134.186.64.151: We're not discussing whether this document is important or not, but to figure out the correct license, since Christian hurbis incorrectly added the {{PD-USGov}} license, which is only for works of the federal government, not state or local governments. It appears that the State of California claims copyright on the works it creates, so this is possibly copyrighted. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:37, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I've corrected the license to {{PD-CAGov}}. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:19, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non pertinent Loic-jordan NOUMBISSIE (talk) 14:04, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: we do not delete user talk pages. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:20, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:20, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from municipal police logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:20, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PORN/COM:PS/COM:Nudity; the quality of the file is suboptimal, it is not used anywhere, and I do not see any reason why this file should be useful. 77.8.55.252 15:13, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This name has nothing to do with the file it redirects to: so it's a misleading name. It was left after renaming, and it's clear that at this point nothing links to this entry, either on Commons or globally on other wikis. It's preferable to delete this, since another file with an identical name exists on Commons and its content is completely different but is actually reflecting the name (File:BlankMap-World-Microstates.svg). So this one should be deleted to avoid any confusion. Cherkash (talk) 20:06, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:23, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a derivative of File:Anatomy_of_the_Human_Ear.svg which already has a Telugu translation. Cherkash (talk) 21:48, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:23, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:NOTHOST: userpage image of user with no contribution. Ankry (talk) 06:10, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have no issue with deletion if that is what is deemed needs to happen. For my part though, I do not see that a head shot photo, as part of introducing myself, should be a concern — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lisa Lowan (talk • contribs) 03:52, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not a regular user on wp or commons. Happy to undelete if this changes. --Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has a higher quality one (File:DPRK passport.png) to replace it. Jacky Cheung (talk) 10:31, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

reuploaded https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mature_flower_diagram.svg in low res bitmap Nefronus (talk) 10:36, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo(s). Majority of contributions are or linked to its own user page. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:54, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Currently in use.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:22, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: Seems to be used for self promo. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 01:16, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; not a valid user on that wiki - last edit 2018. --Gbawden (talk) 08:19, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hanooz as no permission (No permission since) Any reason to doubt own work here? Yann (talk) 18:42, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I personaly took the picture! I uploaded it in fa.wiki years ago under the public domain. years after, someone moved it to the wikimedia commons.
I have been retired for several years and I don't know how to change the permissions anymore. however

{{PD-self}} Regards, --danghula (talk) 21:10, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who does "www.fb.com/behzad.0098" belong to? How could you prove? Hanooz 22:53, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
if you look at this edit https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Fishbazar.JPG&diff=86767664&oldid=56812367 you will see that an IP user changed to the www.fb.com , not the uploader Gbawden (talk) 08:12, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file naming error MiltonPompeyPO4 (talk) 18:57, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Heinrich Hoffmann (d. 1957). See warning at Category:Photographs by Heinrich Hoffmann. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Geniac as no permission (No permission since). The file is from 2011. 4nn1l2 (talk) 23:28, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PCP; unlikely to be work of uploader and it was on her twitter page recently, so likely a paid photo https://twitter.com/shakiturkey/status/1077478697014358016. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of TV5 (logo).svg JessydeVilly (talk) 15:06, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:20, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Erinbeyer87 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Invalid OTRS ticket. Ticket purports that photographer sent letter to band indicating use on Wikipedia is okay: 1) permission must be for use anywhere not just WMF and 2) sender did not supply, and OTRS agent did not request, a copy of such letter. File:Jolive.jpg, for example, is explicitly watermarked "© photographicretentions.nl", yet there is no correspondence or evidence of permission from this author/address.

Эlcobbola talk 16:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


File * File:Jolive.jpg has been replaced. A permissions letter from the photographer was submitted when this file was originally uploaded however is unlocatable now therefore it will be deleted. All other photographs listed:

Are in keeping with the wikipedia rules and (as I am the copyright holder) are available for use by anyone as previously stated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erinbeyer87 (talk • contribs) 11:26, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

From:OTRS
The ticket provides permission for File:SyrenDehumanized.jpg, File:Jolive.jpg, File:Bibelotlive.JPG, File:Amandafretless.JPG, and File:Amandaupright.JPG. This ticket would likely not have been accepted under current standards because it does not contain an explicit release under a specific free license. Permission for the album cover appears to come directly from the copyright holder, but the other files do not specify how the sender became the copyright holder. I would reccomend that the last 4 of those files be deleted, but I have no opinion on the album cover.

Deleted: per nomination; the OTRS ticket doesn't meet current standards. Best to resubmit via OTRS. The album cover wasn't covered. --Gbawden (talk) 06:10, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license and as mentioned in licensing section, it is only allowed to be used in his Wikipedia article. Permission needs evidence and commons only accept media that are explicitly freely licensed. 94rain Talk 15:04, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:10, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sabía que sería visible públicamente Jguerrerofdez (talk) 22:32, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reason - Translation (English): "I didn't know it was going to be visible to the public" Tortillovsky (talk) 16:17, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: personal image, ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:57, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sabía que sería visible públicamente Jguerrerofdez (talk) 22:32, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal image, ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:57, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that CC-BY license applies to seven copies of the posters distributed on a fence. The poster itself is probably copyrighted, so I contacted the real John Hamon about whether to approve and am awaiting response. George Ho (talk) 00:35, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: derivative work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:58, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:25, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:42, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nguồn lấy từ Baomoi, https://baomoi(.)com/phe-duyet-chi-gioi-duong-do-tuyen-duong-gom-nut-giao-cau-thanh-tri/r/28778926.epi#tag%7Ctimeline%7Cindex10 Darling (Talk) 03:00, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:34, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

эта устаревшая версия. Я хочу удалить и создать новую Sarhat bek Varsaman (talk) 20:10, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request, ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:55, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

эта устаревшая версия. Я хочу удалить и создать новую Sarhat bek Varsaman (talk) 20:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request, ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:55, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture depicts an architectural work by Dominique Perrault (b. 1953), a French architect who is still alive. This work is copyrighted and, as there is no Freedom of panorama in France, it won't be freely shared until 70 years after the death of the artist. For this reason, this picture must be removed from Wikimedia Commons. Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:35, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:56, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unless daughter of recently deceased artist has followed OTRS process this image is still her father's copyright and there's no indication of creative commons licensing Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:10, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I'm wondering how I go about getting my father's permission when he is no longer with us? This is a photo that my family owns. I manage my father's facebook and instagram accounts. I used this photo on Facebook, which was sited by one of your volunteers.
I can use other photos if for some reason this photo is offensive to the Wikipedia volunteers.
Sarah Reid — Preceding unsigned comment added by CCRButterfly (talk • contribs) 14:52, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@CCRButterfly: It is not that the image is 'offensive' in any way. This is to do with copyright and licensing. Please seek advice at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:08, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IlCommenda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted the information requested such as Date, Author, Source. For "Aeroporto di Sestri - Disegno di Legge" file I have posted the link where everibody can download it.--IlCommenda (talk) 17:44, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@IlCommenda: Does that mean you want to keep the files here?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 02:43, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: Yes --IlCommenda (talk) 21:47, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per changes made by JeffG. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Degraded version of TV5 Monde.svg JessydeVilly (talk) 15:07, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep under COM:INUSE so long as this version continues to be used on ko:TV5Monde. --bjh21 (talk) 15:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Flickr description includes a statement that prohibits derivative works. "The photograph may not be manipulated in any way". This violates Com:Scope. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 17:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep It's on Flickr with a CC-BY-SA-2.0 license, so they can't forbid derivative works with such a choice of license. They made a mistake, it's their problem, not ours. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:39, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    It's actually your problem, TwoWings. See Commons:Project scope#Precautionary principle. Their intention is clear - no derivatives. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 22:35, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    No it's not my problem. They released the photo with a CC-BY-SA-2.0 license, so there's no reason to consider it differently. It has nothing to do with the precautionary principle. Also note that it seems to be the case for many other pictures from that account and I'm not the first one to have uploaded files from this Flickr account, so it would not be my problem nor about this file only. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:08, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    For instance, it's written "If you require a photograph without a watermark, please use Flickr e-mail" for File:Incheon AsianGames Closing Ceremony 19.jpg, whereas it's released with a CC-BY-SA-2.0 license, with which we don't need to ask anything if we want to modify and use the file. With a CC-BY-SA-2.0 license :
    "You are free to:
    Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
    Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
    This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works.
    The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms."
    I.e. since this Flickr account released those pictures with CC-BY-SA-2.0 licenses, they can't demand a prohibition of derivative work nor a derogatory authorization of watermark removal. It's free thanks to the chosen license! They seem to be unaware of that, but they released those pictures with such licenses and they can't revoke it now. So I repeat : it's their problem, not ours (nor specifically mine). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 10:07, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per TwoWings. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 08:17, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Closing as Kept; unclear what type of "permission" is supposedly missing; I see no problem. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:51, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No correct name — nonsense, abracadabra; such names give copies from the Internet or social networks. The user uploads someone else's photos — see File:Печера «Язичницька».jpg uploaded as own photo, but this cropped from File:Печера Борщівський район с. Монастирок.jpg (oryginal uploader Колісник Анастасія). See also User talk:Аліна Стасів - similar cases. Микола Василечко (talk) 01:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment @Микола Василечко: I think your presumption is wrong, at least for the 3 examples you gave. The "cropped" images look similar to the alleged "originals", but none of them is identical in detail. Please look at the cross in File:Печера Борщівський район с. Монастирок.jpg and File:Печера «Язичницька».jpg, and note the different positions of the small tree trunk in front (right vs. left of the cross). Please revert this therefore. For File:HvAP5qaV9dU.jpg please check the position of the two trees on the left side of the building and their relation/distance to each other. For File:«Вертеба».jpg you can easily notice a difference in the photographer's position by looking at the dry stalks of herbs or blades of grass next to the door. --Te750iv (talk) 11:09, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. The nominated photos are worse than shown alternates, so Commons does not lose anything. Taivo (talk) 10:41, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work issues. There is no freedom of panorama in the US for posters and this is certainly not de minimis. Majora (talk) 02:32, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not de minimis, almost certainly not incidental either, at least for a normal photo. On the other hand, the base portrait photo itself was apparently a passport photo from France in 2000 (and likely not copyrightable there, though more likely copyrightable in the U.S.), put on a poster and put in various places since then. There could be additional expression added to the original photo though. But still, it may be less expression copied than a normal, obviously-copyrighted photo (where this would be a more clear derivative issue), possibly bringing de minimis back into it. Could understand either way, really. This photo is being taken due to the fact it's a poster of that person, not the actual artistic expression in the underlying photo itself, which can also enter into it (though the one case I'm thinking of, that fact made the ruling of awarded damages to be zero, even though it was indeed a derivative work). Carl Lindberg (talk) 03:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I contacted John Hamon about what to do with the poster seen in the photo. George Ho (talk) 00:50, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment neutral about if it is "de minimis" or "incidental", ect.. however French regulations have always been strict to my knowledge regarding the requirements for identity card photos included passports, IMO it is very unlikely that this photo is from an official national identity card. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:09, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:51, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 02:34, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Except if the artist himself was uploading images as a form of self-promotion. Given the explicit naming of the artist and the linking embedded in the text of the image, this seems a likely possibility. Plus, the artist has never lodged any objection to this image use, which, as he is named on the page would be relatively easy to Google. Urselius (talk) 10:00, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The original uploader was a guy named Peltast. However, there's no evidence, at least from what I can see, that he is the original author. Also another upload of his was deleted back in 2011 for the same reason. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 05:47, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"2006-11-13 19:55 Peltast 1074×789×8 (95701 bytes) Hypaspist by Johnny Shumate For more illustrations email jjjshumate@earthlink.net If illustration is used, please credit my name", (bolding mine). Looks very much like the artist and 'Peltast' are one and the same person. The licensing also claims that it is the uploader's own work. Urselius (talk) 10:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There is also another uploaded image by the same artist (Shumate), and it states "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Peltast at English Wikipedia. This applies worldwide.In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so: Peltast grants anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law." Looks more and more like the uploads are by the artist and are a form of publicity for his work. Urselius (talk) 10:07, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, the file was uploaded in 2006, before OTRS-system was invented. It is grandfathered old file, where evidence for own work is not so strictly required. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AlbanGeller as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Undated. Subject died in 1978.

First you remove the date, then you mark it as copyvio because it's undated. Yes, that's how that works.

Yes, the subject died in 1978. Does this woman look like 93-94 to you? The photo was taken by Elliott & Fry (active 1863-1962), so it's definitely no more recent than 1962. Early 1930s are by far the most likely as that's when she was in office. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:53, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, anonymous work from 1930s is copyrighted in source country UK until 2000s. That case the copyright was restored by URAA and USA demands 95 years from publication, which is not passed. No known publication date, so no known restore date also. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was image broadcast on VOA (see 15:38 to 16:25 ish) of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlAbzjfa5Ps ... however it is a still image that was not clearly taken by the US Federal Government (though it might have been). If kept, a better screencap of that video should probably replace this version. Storkk (talk) 08:43, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:16, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maxtaverne (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

EugeneZelenko, it seems like source is this book, published in Norway in 1930. I don't know about copyright status. Regards. Lin linao ¿dime? 17:02, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Images were cropped from this paper. Source is Asgaard (1930), pp. 357 and 370, pictures were taken around 1910. Now, we need to know about Norwegian copyright laws. Regards. Lin linao ¿dime? 17:07, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Norway. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:55, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. {{PD-Norway50}}? Lin linao ¿dime? 16:20, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
EugeneZelenko, is it ok? Lin linao ¿dime? 15:28, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Probably so, but I could not reqd Norwegian to verify that photographer was not credited. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Taivo (talk) 11:20, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Girth Summit as no permission (No permission since) 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:31, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, I believe own work. A lot of the user's uploads are created with ILCE-7M2 and this file also. Taivo (talk) 18:11, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

выходит редактированная версия Sarhat bek Varsaman (talk) 17:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 18:14, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

выходит редактированная версия Sarhat bek Varsaman (talk) 17:48, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, I do not see a better version. Taivo (talk) 18:40, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

эта карта имеет много недостатков и я как автор хочу удалить все его версии. Sarhat bek Varsaman (talk) 03:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no author, no proof this image is PD. Parsecboy (talk) 12:20, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are absolutely right. This photo was found on the web in an article by Jay Amundson on German Battleships, but he does not quote any sources. Although there is no proof that this photo is PD, you have to weigh in, that it could not have been taken later than in 1885, because the Hansa was by then no longer in service. And how great are the odds of someone, taking a picture before 1885, being still alive in 1941? That is my reason for declaring it PD.--Rsteen (talk) 17:16, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Commons doesn't operation what is probable, only what we can prove. Without definitive proof that the image is PD, we can't keep it. Parsecboy (talk) 00:43, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: 1) image is very old. 2) nobody knows the author anymore so may also be anonymous-EU Denniss (talk) 19:04, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no author, rationale for keeping in 2012 is not compelling. Still no evidence that the photo is PD in the US, which is a requirement for hosting on Commons. For the photo to be anonymous-EU, we need to have evidence of the research conducted to determine that the photo was published anonymously. Parsecboy (talk) 19:10, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Do we really have to keep flogging this old horse? The photo is in compliance with the US' 120-year guideline and the "outside US" 1909 guideline. What more do we need? Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 03:52, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Because your logic is flawed - the 120 year term length is only for works for hire - do you have evidence that this applies? . Without a date of publication, we can't determine when the image entered the PD in Germany. Nor can we determine what version of the US copyright law it falls under. Yes, it was most likely published before 1924, but we don't know that. It's very plausible that the photographer who took the photo in the 1880s lived into the 1930s; in that case, the photo still would have been under copyright in Germany in 1996, and thus would have had its copyright extended in the US by the URAA. As I said in the earlier DR, we don't operate on assumption, we operate on what we can prove. Parsecboy (talk) 13:20, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Commons is not a court. Court demands proof, Commons demands big probability. We have decided, that photos older than 120 years are usually treated as in public domain. I will add a license for US. Taivo (talk) 19:01, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Неправильно указана дата, когда был сделан снимок. Booktacular (talk) 22:35, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request on upload date. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:50, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Неправильно указана дата. Booktacular (talk) 22:37, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request on upload date, possible copyright problem. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:51, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Неправильно указана дата, когда был сделан снимок. Booktacular (talk) 22:37, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request on upload date. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:52, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Неправильно указана дата, когда был сделан снимок. Booktacular (talk) 22:38, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request on upload date. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:52, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Неправильно указана дата, когда был сделан снимок. Booktacular (talk) 22:39, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request on upload date. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:52, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Heinrich Hoffmann (d. 1957). See warning at Category:Photographs by Heinrich Hoffmann. PS: how pictures shot in France have a Polish license remains a mystery.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:58, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • The two "MET" images were donated to Commons by the Metropolitan Museum of Art, because they are part of their collection. Presumably the Met ius claiming ownership of the copyright. Beyond My Ken (talk)
  • The last listed image "Meeting at Hendaye" was nominated for deletion in October 2018, and was Kept. See here. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:39, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I was not aware of this so I notify @Gbawden: . Concerning the "Polish" photos, They have apparently been published by Wydawnictwo Prasowe Kraków-Warszawa. To be eligible to {{PD-Polish}} "all photographs by Polish photographers (or published for the first time in Poland or simultaneously in Poland and abroad)" must have been published without a clear copyright notice before the law was changed on May 23, 1994.", which is apparently not the case since Hoffmann works are still copyrighted. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:06, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
They are copyrighted in Germany, are they copyrighted in Poland? Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:03, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: undelete in 2028. Probably still copyrighted, COM:PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:16, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hallo, I'd like to delete this photo because of bad technical quality and I can't improve it. --Czyz1 (talk) 17:31, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of an unused, recently uploaded file of bad quality (42x42 pixels). -- 32X (talk) 13:43, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Malvinero1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Stills from unfree videos.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:41, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A precedent of this kind of files can be found right here.--Malvinero1 (talk) 19:48, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a photograph, therefore the license tag is wrong. This kind of work falls into the public domain after 50 years. It was taken from Argentina public TV "Art. 28, Ley 11723 vigente en Argentina indica que : "las noticias de interés general podrán ser utilizadas, transmitidas o retransmitidas, pero cuando se publiquen en su versión original será necesario expresar la fuente de ellas."--Malvinero1 (talk) 20:34, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete The user admits the license tag used is wrong. Instead say it's public domain under argentinian law, wich is false. The sources of the stills are not "news cast", they are historic films upload by the argentinian public chanel that declaims that are "historical record" (the name it's literally "historical archive"). Therefore both the stills and the source videos aren't in public domain.--EMans (talk) 00:40, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
rectified.I copied bad an argument of another discussion--Malvinero1 (talk) 01:05, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Las noticias podrán ser utilizadas, transmitidas o retransmitidas, porque no hay derechos exclusivos sobre estas ya que no constituyen la creacion de una obra en el sentido de la ley 11723. las noticias, como las ideas, no se protegen por el derecho de autor. Así, se ha expresado que la noticia ilustrada publicada en diarios, revistas u otras publicaciones no está revestida de los atributos que la ley 11723 exige para su amparo legal" (Emery, Propiedad Intelectual, 4ta. reimpresión 2009 editorial Astrea, pag. 163. 164)).

Las palabras "publicadas, transmitidas o retransmitidas"... It means that everybody can freely use them. The law requires atribution just if you use them as an exact or verbatin copy. Remember that this law is from 1933, it is, in fact a freedom of information article, but it also fits as a free license. For more information please visit http://www.bea.org.ar/2010/07/breve-guia-hacia-el-dominio-publico-en-argentina/

"se restringe el derecho de autor sobre los artículos publicados sobre temas económicos, políticos o religiosos de actualidad, difundidos por la prensa, radiodifusión, transmisión por cable, y se permite su reproducción, distribución y comunicación pública, a condición de que se asegure la indicación de la fuente y el autor si el trabajo apareció con firma ... (por ejemplo, Argentina art. 28 inciso 2, Brasil, art. 49 inciso I, Colombia, arts. 33 y 34,...) " Lipszyc, Delia. Derechos de Autor y Derechos conexos. Editorial Unesco, Cerlalc, Zavalía, pag. 233. Se restringe el derecho de autor, las noticias no son obras a la luz de la 11723. Las noticias están en dominio público. Saludos. --Turkmenistan (talk) 02:39, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The source it's no newscast, it's historic archives. So, talking about news has no relation here. --EMans (talk) 02:58, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
They are. The files are newcasts from historic archives of the argentine government. --Turkmenistan (talk) 03:21, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Almost every word is wrong. It's amazing:
  1. It is not news. In the videos you can clearly see that it is not edited or commented, it does not even have any logo belonging to the channel.
  2. They are not public historical archives, they are private that belong to a company.
  3. There is nothing here regarding the government. A state enterprise (RTA) and the government are two completely separate, independent entities and are even governed by different laws.
If you want to do a simple test, look at the site where the source is uploaded and read what is the license that corresponds to them. If it said CC or public domain, there would be no discussion. But it clearly marks that they are under the copyright rules.--EMans (talk) 03:34, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:21, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Malvinero1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Stills from unfree videos.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:50, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote to the copyright owner to ask for permission to upload these photos. He answered that I have to wait for an answer.--Jalu (talk) 13:34, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; no permission. --Gbawden (talk) 08:09, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]