Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/06/08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 8th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For undeletion in 2043 PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:41, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 06:45, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete now, so it can be undeleted in 2043. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:59, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 06:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For undeletion in 2041 PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 06:44, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No scope to use in commons Hari Paudyel (talk) 07:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:32, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No scope to use in wikimedia commons Hari Paudyel (talk) 07:18, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:31, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mardetanha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These unused personal photos are out of COM:SCOPE.

Mhhossein talk 18:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These are not personal photos, These are picture of Wikipedians participating in wiki related workshop Mardetanha talk 19:15, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There's no indication of being taken in a workshop, just a closed box. Why should we really keep these personal and out of scope pics? --Mhhossein talk 06:09, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: indeed out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 15:24, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mardetanha 2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos and out of scope.

Mhhossein talk 11:17, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I myself deleted some of photos which had low quality or no future possible use, other photos should be kept, I am traveling at the moment and I sporadic access Mardetanha talk 11:46, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Commons:Project_scope#File_in_use_on_Commons_only: "Files relating to projects or events of the Wikimedia Foundation are also allowed (e.g. photographs of user meetings)." Jee 02:36, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jkadavoor: I wonder if you have checked the files. See this one for example. Why should we keep it? As I said earlier, "There's no indication of being taken in a workshop, just a closed box." --Mhhossein talk 12:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I saw it but the remaining three seem fine. The file name, description and category are related to some Wikimedia related events. We usually don't make an editorial judgement on that topic as its up to the local community how useful they are. Jee 12:20, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is up to the decision of the admin closing the discussion. Another time; I don't see any value in keeping these personal photos. Regards. --Mhhossein talk 12:32, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
May not be useful. But we explicitly allowed two exceptions: 1. images to use in user pages 2. Wikimedia projects or events related files. Jee 15:43, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
None of which is satisfied here. We had a similar case previously. --Mhhossein talk 12:46, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
JCB was wrong closing it with deletion, I will request for undeletion soon Mardetanha talk 12:04, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: remaining files per nomination the files with a person do not depict an event, they just depict a random non notable person in a chair. --Jcb (talk) 16:15, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mardetanha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very similar to File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (62).jpg

大诺史 (talk) 07:35, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mardetanha talk 07:43, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very similar to File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (53).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 07:36, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mardetanha talk 07:43, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (119).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 07:38, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mardetanha talk 07:41, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violent picture Nirjal stha (talk) 07:38, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:30, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Graphically violent content, no scope in Wikimedia Commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 05:04, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No scope to use in wikimedia commons Hari Paudyel (talk) 06:41, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 06:58, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture focused on person Nirjal stha (talk) 07:54, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:31, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (149).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 08:16, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mardetanha talk 08:38, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More like a non-free logo. Wedjet (talk) 07:20, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not public domain image per source.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:34, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found directly at source and might be copyrighted as well 大诺史 (talk) 05:39, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio. Reason for deletion: Copyright violation; unfree stock image. 大诺史 (talk) 12:57, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal photo(s). 大诺史 (talk) 05:39, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:18, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal photo(s). 大诺史 (talk) 05:46, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment delete associated talk page too. 大诺史 (talk) 05:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:18, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur d'upload LilianFrrt (talk) 10:46, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio. Reason for deletion: Copyright violation. 大诺史 (talk) 12:59, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Firma Lic.Lenín Moreno.png, white background removed. 大诺史 (talk) 12:26, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Withdrawn by nominator. 大诺史 (talk) 12:29, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ralf Roletschek as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: eigenes Foto, gestern hochgeladen --Ralf Roletschek 13:08, 8 June 2019 (UTC) -- Tuválkin 13:51, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Billinghurst. Reason for deletion: Uploaders request. 大诺史 (talk) 13:54, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sollte eine Category, keine Cartegory werden Im Fokus (talk) 00:59, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, typo. --Achim (talk) 20:34, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Vicks VapoRub 5gm.jpg
File:Vicks VapoRub.jpg

Logo/label probably has enough originality to attract copyright. Thus, this photograph is a non-free derivative of a copyrighted work.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Support The whole label probably is just passed the threshold as a whole, although I'd argue about the logo itself having copyright, its rather simple. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 13:20, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 22:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album back cover : copyrighted, COM:LL Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:26, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination- copyvio. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:32, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover : copyrighted, COM:LL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:31, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination COM:DW/copy of copyrighted material. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:33, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vulgar content AyodeleA1 (talk) 23:02, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Mentifisto 23:15, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gpkp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. And screenshots from the link http://www.bhagavad-gita.org/Gita/chapter-18.html are in questionable copyright.

Ref: Ticket#2019021110008076

~Moheen (keep talking) 12:34, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:54, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gpkp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Missing EXIF informations at Flickr. Besides it's very unlykely that the person pictured is the photographer.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:58, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 04:01, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gpkp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very unlikely that thse You Tube accounts are the copyright holders.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gpkp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PACKAGING?

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative copyvio- Straightforward reproduction of copyrightable text. Ubcule (talk) 20:33, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 20:39, 8 Juni 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 01:32, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

to be replaced with another with copyrights DeviJamwal (talk) 23:01, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as requested by uploader. ·×ald·es 02:05, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:41, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo, dubious claim of own work 大诺史 (talk) 08:50, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Rastrojo at 16:55, 9 Juni 2019 UTC: Content intended as Vandalism, threat, or attack (G3) --Krdbot 19:30, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of a Spanish painter died in 1963. 80 years pma rules in Spain. Furthermore, the applied template does not apply, as this is not a photographic work Discasto talk 21:17, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:43, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Definitely not own work. 大诺史 (talk) 14:18, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Should be SVG if kept. File is too blur. 大诺史 (talk) 14:21, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:32, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Definitely not own work. Should be SVG if kept. 大诺史 (talk) 14:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I posted it because i found this logo on their website. And i thought it was nicer then the one on the page. Johnallen008 (⧼Talkpagelinktest⧽) 14:05, 8 June 2019 (Philippine Time)


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:32, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alves Aleluia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Coats of arms, religious seals, images of a church, and church person. Highly unlikely own work, small size, theme the same, nothing else is.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:02, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; other uploads were copyvios, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alves Aleluia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 19:18, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Billinghurst at 02:36, 10 Juni 2019 UTC: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7): reason for removal goes here --Krdbot 07:28, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, obviously secretly taken shot of a identifiable minor and low image-quality. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:57, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:15, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, obviously secretly taken shot of a identifiable minor. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:58, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not a public place anyway. Yann (talk) 11:09, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:15, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, likely secretly taken shot of a identifiable minor and not the best image-quality. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:02, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not a public place anyway. Yann (talk) 11:08, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:15, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, likely not openly taken shot of an identifiable minor. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:04, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:16, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, obviously secretly taken shot of a identifiable minor and low image-quality. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:05, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:16, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, obviously secretly taken shot of a identifiable minor and not the best image-quality. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:07, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:16, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, obviously secretly taken shot of a identifiable minor and not the best image-quality. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:08, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:16, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, likely not openly taken shot of an identifiable minor. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:09, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not a public place anyway. Yann (talk) 11:07, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:16, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrights Torobashi (talk) 23:35, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:26, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal photo(s). 大诺史 (talk) 13:18, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom and COM:SELFIE --DannyS712 (talk) 21:49, 8 June 2019‎ (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 23:23, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ottobat75 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

FBMD, doubtful own work

Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:12, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ottobat75 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE - see COM:SELFIE

DannyS712 (talk) 01:02, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photos are out of scope. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:05, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal correspondense. Moreover, the author= declaration is likely forged. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:30, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Keir Morse has given me permission to upload his plant ID photos to Wikipedia, based on the terms of an email he sent me.

In my question to Commons:Help Desk, titled "May I act as agent for a copyright holder?" I include an image of the email Keir sent me giving his permission.

Perhaps I'm using the wrong medium to communicate his email.

I'd be happy to submit my documentation a different way, if someone will tell me how to proceed.

Thanks,

Bruce PlantID (talk) 18:01, 8 June 2019 (UTC)Bruce PlantID[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Permissions should be sent to OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 23:02, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lulustoc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:PENIS and COM:SELFIE - out of COM:SCOPE

DannyS712 (talk) 01:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sambasivarao Peravali (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10, Personal photos of or by non-contributors.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:44, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal photo(s). 大诺史 (talk) 05:31, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akashgautam.14 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal photo(s).

大诺史 (talk) 04:16, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:57, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thirzdae (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal photo(s).

大诺史 (talk) 06:06, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom and COM:SELFIE --DannyS712 (talk) 21:59, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:57, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred image Afifa Afrin (talk) 07:34, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unusable. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:01, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Metadata shows the image is clearly marked as copyrighted to Angelina Golina, all rights reserved, making it incompatible with Commons licensing requirements. Hammersoft (talk) 21:58, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 19:21, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Metadata shows the image is clearly marked as copyrighted to Angelina Golina, all rights reserved, making it incompatible with Commons licensing requirements. Hammersoft (talk) 21:58, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 19:46, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced through 3DRotationR Yomomo (talk) 21:48, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced through 3DRotationR 03 Yomomo (talk) 21:50, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced through 3DRotationR 04 Yomomo (talk) 21:50, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced through 3DRotationR 05 Yomomo (talk) 21:51, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SELFIE - out of COM:SCOPE DannyS712 (talk) 21:51, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Queenierose.tan1998 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:SELFIE - out of COM:SCOPE

DannyS712 (talk) 21:52, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced through 3DRotationR 01 Yomomo (talk) 21:52, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SELFIE - out of COM:SCOPE DannyS712 (talk) 21:58, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SELFIE - out of COM:SCOPE DannyS712 (talk) 22:05, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

contain unauthorised content JITHIN VIJAYAN (talk) 10:24, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:20, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this copyrightable under either US or South African law? (User appears to be from South Africa going by packaging uploaded elsewhere with .za domain, but that might be misleading.) Ubcule (talk) 20:37, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OK. Yann (talk) 14:00, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this copyrightable under either US or South African law? (User appears to be from South Africa going by packaging uploaded elsewhere with .za domain, but that might be misleading.) Ubcule (talk) 20:37, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This seems OK to me. Yann (talk) 13:45, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OK. --Yann (talk) 13:54, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this copyrightable under either US or South African law? Ubcule (talk) 20:38, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This seens OK to me. Yann (talk) 13:44, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OK. --Yann (talk) 13:54, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative copyvio- Straightforward reproduction of box art that's certainly above threshold of originality in US (and probably South Africa where uploader appears to live). Ubcule (talk) 20:41, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:44, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative copyvio- Straightforward reproduction of box art that's certainly above threshold of originality in US (and probably South Africa where uploader appears to live). Ubcule (talk) 20:41, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:44, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is *probably* above threshold of originality in US at least, due to photo on packaging. Ubcule (talk) 20:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:42, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyrightable artwork and above threshold of originality in US, and possibly in South Africa where uploader appears to live. Ubcule (talk) 20:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:42, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyrightable artwork and above threshold of originality in US, and possibly in South Africa where uploader appears to live. Ubcule (talk) 20:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:43, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING Ubcule (talk) 20:45, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:41, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unacceptable derivative work of a copyrighted character.

xplicit 01:57, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 19:11, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Este archivo estaba destinado a ser usado en redes sociales (this file was made to be used in social media) NS777 (talk) 05:43, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request within first week. --Strakhov (talk) 19:13, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TUR-ottoman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fraudulent authorship claims, unsubstantiated PD claims, pointless SVGs consisting of embedded raster images, and recreation of previously deleted content outside of process by persistently block-evading serial sockpuppeteer and persistent serial copyright violator Kritkitty. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kritkitty, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Evostoryarchive, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Flagstoryarchive, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Military-culture, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Myan-bruma8888, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by KSA-deeraexecute, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SRB-SCGredstar, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by AUS-aboriginal, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by POL-warszawianka, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by BEL-Brabant and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by LTU-gediminas.

LX (talk, contribs) 09:39, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:00, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this copyrightable under either US or South African law? (User appears to be from South Africa going by packaging uploaded elsewhere with .za domain, but that might be misleading.) Ubcule (talk) 20:38, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yann at 13:52, 18 Juni 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sherwin2 --Krdbot 19:15, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries no subject and definition to keep in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 06:17, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I can't work out what the subject is at all. --bjh21 (talk) 08:17, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. For future readers: Image showed something that looked like part of a wall and some green flooring(?) without any context; actually looked more like the result of accidentally hitting the shutter button than a deliberately taken picture. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:31, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries no subject and definition to keep in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 06:18, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: We only have six images of graffiti in Nepal, and those are all much more formal graffiti than this. I think the picture is worth keeping as an example of Nepalese graffiti. --bjh21 (talk) 08:15, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per bjh21. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:32, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries no subject and definition to keep in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 06:24, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: We only have twelve photos of Bhedetar in total and none of this object (whatever it is). The image is too dark, but it could easily be lightened. --bjh21 (talk) 08:31, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per bjh21. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:37, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too complex logo to be PD. And not is an own work, wrong license Ezarateesteban 00:32, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not only that logo. Several logos uploaded by Renzo Brandano Perviú are too complex for PD:

And more other logos...

--Mega-buses (talk) 20:32, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:10, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rodrigospascoal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, unlikely to be own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:24, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:29, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rodrigospascoal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images directly uploaded from linked websites. Licensed under CC0 1.0, but this is not supported by the sources nor has any evidence been provided by the uploader that these are not copyrighted.

Impru20 (talk) 16:22, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete – copyrighted; the user messed up his uploads. Images from news articles and personal profiles are usually not free. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:45, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture and irrelevant for WLE 2019 Nirjal stha (talk) 17:07, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:36, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture and irrelevant for WLE 2019 Nirjal stha (talk) 17:07, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:36, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect source and license. Very unlikely to be "own work" of uploader. Hohum (talk) 17:50, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader of this file uploaded four pictures, and if I understood that correctly, they all show different Taiwanese murder victims. One is obviously a screenshot from TV, two are passport pictures (one of it blurred) and the other a standing snapshot. Overall there's no reason to belief that the uploader has the rights on any of these pictures. King Rk (talk) 18:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Cheep (talk) 18:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader of this file uploaded four pictures, and if I understood that correctly, they all show different Taiwanese murder victims. One is obviously a screenshot from TV, two are passport pictures (one of it blurred) and the other a standing snapshot. Overall there's no reason to belief that the uploader has the rights on any of these pictures. King Rk (talk) 18:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader of this file uploaded four pictures, and if I understood that correctly, they all show different Taiwanese murder victims. One is obviously a screenshot from TV, two are passport pictures (one of it blurred) and the other a standing snapshot. Overall there's no reason to belief that the uploader has the rights on any of these pictures. King Rk (talk) 18:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader of this file uploaded four pictures, and if I understood that correctly, they all show different Taiwanese murder victims. One is obviously a screenshot from TV, two are passport pictures (one of it blurred) and the other a standing snapshot. Overall there's no reason to belief that the uploader has the rights on any of these pictures. King Rk (talk) 18:14, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:17, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal image — JJMC89(T·C) 19:01, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:17, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zarjbnllo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal photo(s).

大诺史 (talk) 15:12, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Markyouze (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal photo(s).

大诺史 (talk) 13:30, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lack of encyclopedic aspects Wieralee (talk) 13:50, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:49, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal photo(s). May also be COM:DW 大诺史 (talk) 14:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:49, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license. Uncle Fred 14:49, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal photo(s). 大诺史 (talk) 15:30, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work. Possible copyright violation. 大诺史 (talk) 16:20, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-re images, no metadata, unlikely to be own works. 大诺史 (talk) 07:24, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yann at 12:14, 22 Juni 2019 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 19:02, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like spam. Desc. in (Google Translate) English:

"Online casino techniques to know online casinos. How to play for real money." Frood (talk) 02:50, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:05, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DOM-El Trujillo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fraudulent authorship claims, unsubstantiated PD claims, pointless SVGs consisting of embedded raster images, and recreation of previously deleted content outside of process by persistently block-evading serial sockpuppeteer and persistent serial copyright violator Kritkitty. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kritkitty, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Evostoryarchive, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Flagstoryarchive, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Military-culture, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Myan-bruma8888, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by KSA-deeraexecute, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SRB-SCGredstar, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by AUS-aboriginal, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by POL-warszawianka, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by BEL-Brabant, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by LTU-gediminas and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by TUR-ottoman.

LX (talk, contribs) 09:40, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A screenshot from the copyrighted movie "Zhizn i smert Lyonki Panteleeva" (2006) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4996524/ IgorMagic (talk) 09:44, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistook the photo to be in the public domain. Even though the image was from the official industry.gov.ph website, where at the bottom one can see "REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES All content is in the public domain unless otherwise stated.", the photo's metadata states that the image's author is NPPA Images and is copyrighted 2016 © NPPA IMAGES, All Rights Reserved
www.nppaimages.com
inquiry@nppaimages.com. Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:31, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ceci est une photo de moi, je ne souhaite pas qu'elle reste sur wikipedia 176.161.12.144 10:37, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: in any case, out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Walking buddha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:20, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohim15482 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:34, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-wikipedian - OoS --Alaa :)..! 11:39, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© dynamo.kiev.ua, 1998—2019. При полном или частичном использо Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kumar4060 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, no metadata, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:12, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also:


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kissa21782 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10|Page where used deleted from fi-wiki for being unnotable, image uploaded by subject's family member  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:20, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: False date, https://fr.shopping.rakuten.com/offer/buy/102054080/un-grand-bonheur-mike-brant-partition-musique-1970-partition-et-songbook.html Also to note file history and three images, with overwrites  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:29, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, unused, personal, no metadata... does not appear to be in Scope even if not COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:54, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:19, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken images uploaded by Roman Raghu Shrestha

[edit]

Nabin K. Sapkota started separate DRs for these files, but they all suffer from the same problem and should be handled together:

Of each of these, Nabin K. Sapkota wrote:

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries no subject and definition to keep in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 07:44, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All of these photos appear almost entirely grey, with just a small strip of image at the top. Presumably something went wrong in the upload process. I think all of these should be  deleted since they're of no use as they are. --bjh21 (talk) 14:40, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:42, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-re images, no metadata, unlikely to be own works. 大诺史 (talk) 07:27, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:41, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:FernandoCX

[edit]

These images were all uploaded by User:FernandoCX. I believe they should be deleted because they appear to be blatant copyright violations. They appear to have been downloaded from Lolla Sex Shop (Warning: The website's certificates are not up-to-date, but it appears to be safe nonetheless.) These images are all complete with watermarks from Lolla. Uploader gives no indication of permission, only claiming "own work" for the images. --SVTCobra (talk) 07:29, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:39, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: private image, not used. Solomon203 (talk) 07:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:39, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture with watermark or additional text added through software Nirjal stha (talk) 08:04, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:38, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free image Lugnuts (talk) 08:24, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:37, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free image Lugnuts (talk) 08:26, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:36, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free image Lugnuts (talk) 08:27, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:36, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Th e file is drawing about the characters in the animation "Pleasant Goat and Big Big Wolf", which is a derivative work. As the OTRS ticket only gives the permission regarding the drawing, and no permission regarding the characters are given, the file is likely to be copyrighted and unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 09:26, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Support+ Agree to delete this file. I am sorry to do that! I didn't know the policy until OTRS 廣九直通車 told me. Easusq


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Большие сомнения в авторстве фото: певице сейчас 93 года, этому снимку по меньшей мере 50 лет -- Tomasina (talk) 09:28, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope due to small size and bad quality. We have category:People at the beach in Venezuela. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:34, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:SELFIE 大诺史 (talk) 06:03, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:57, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly taken from somewhere, uploader claims as own work. File does not have EXIF data. 大诺史 (talk) 06:08, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:57, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation. Complex logo. 大诺史 (talk) 06:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abu bakar 34 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Photos are from facebook, no permission

大诺史 (talk) 06:18, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Abu bakar 34 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos taken from facebook, no permission. See previous nomination, they are the same photos.

大诺史 (talk) 15:35, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:53, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal photo(s). 大诺史 (talk) 07:04, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Scope to use in Wikimedia commons Hari Paudyel (talk) 07:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: in addition, out of focus. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture focused on people gathered in an event Nirjal stha (talk) 07:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The source of the picture seems to be http://barakhabar.com/news-details/4995/2019-05-01. @Barakhabar: Are you connected to barakhabar.com? If you are, you will need to provide some evidence of this. You can either:
  • Put a page somewhere on barakhabar.com explaining that the Commons account Barakhabar is official,
  • Put a note on barakhabar.com indicating what licence this picture is released under, or
  • Send an email from a barakhabar.com address to OTRS at info-commons-at-wikimedia.org.
--bjh21 (talk) 14:04, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prpyn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, no metadata, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:16, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Prpyn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, no metadata, unlikely to be own works.

大诺史 (talk) 05:49, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Prpyn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, no metadata, unlikely to be own works

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:30, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality very low resolution and wrongly mirrored, correct versions http://www.smb-digital.de/eMuseumPlus?service=direct/1/ResultLightboxView/result.t1.collection_lightbox.$TspTitleImageLink.link&sp=10&sp=Scollection&sp=SfieldValue&sp=0&sp=0&sp=3&sp=Slightbox_3x4&sp=12&sp=Sdetail&sp=0&sp=F&sp=T&sp=16 File:Kopisch Berlín 02.jpg;: File:Kopisch Berlín 01.jpg Oursana (talk) 22:18, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal photo(s). 大诺史 (talk) 14:22, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries no subject and definition to keep in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 07:40, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Category:Rafting in Nepal is pretty sparse, and it doesn't contain anything else like this. --bjh21 (talk) 09:07, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per bjh21. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:33, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (140).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 08:08, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not identical, but a slightly different aperture according to the EXIF. Personally it makes so little difference that I'd say we don't need two nearly-identical images in this case. Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:14, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Rodhullandemu - not needed as near-duplicate. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:35, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:54, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:38, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries no subject and definition to keep in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 08:02, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. In scope per Yann.--Roy17 (talk) 22:27, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as it carries watermark Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 06:29, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 04:41, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pysiatko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two awards, not created by photographer. Architectural renderings by Ryszard Jurkowski, two have OTRS pending since upload. The rest are likely copied from various webpages as they have highly variable quality(low), small sizes (some facebook sizes) and no useful metadata.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:21, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon Ellin Beltz, Don't try to be a smarty pants. All our files are awaiting the approval of the OTRS team. The first email was sent from the company's domain (air-jurkowscy.pl) 6 months ago. https://www.dropbox.com/s/zru4he1yqj8iq5i/copyrights%20of%20work%20depicted%20and%20media%2014%20dec%202018.jpg?dl=0 And the second email was sent 4 months ago. https://www.dropbox.com/s/8bg368vpzc891v8/Ticket2018121410006939.jpg?dl=0 It is not our fault they are so slow in responding. I'm a partner at AiR Jurkowscy Architekci architectural firm, and that makes me a copyright holder of all the photos I upload. Which, by the way, go to the article on Ryszard Jurkowski, who is the founding partner of AiR Jurkowscy Architekci, and who personally chose the photos to accompany his article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryszard_Jurkowski P.S. When you nominate photos for deletion shouldn't you by any chance give a valid reason? Because I can see you nominated files such as: File: Altar for Pope.jpg and Altar for Pope John Paul II.jpg, which have never been published before and were taken in 1999 (so before even the internet era) during the Pope's visit to Poland. You nominated File:Ryszard Jurkowski1.jpg, a photo that was taken personally by me in 2007 on a trip to Berlin, and it has never been published before either. You have nominated File:Energopol Office Building, Katowice.jpg which has never never published, and finally you've chosen File:Ryszard Jurkowski.jpg, the very photo that Ryszard Jurkowski nominated as his profile pic for wiki. So just get a grip!!! --Pysiatko (talk) 12:02, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from discussion page...

And as for the rendering by Ryszard Jurkowski - well, quite recently he ask me to upload it as a cry for help, saying: 'They've deleted all my photos or nominated them for deletion. Maybe if we upload a rendering of a building that has not yet been built they will finally leave us alone.' Clearly even this didn't work!!! --Pysiatko (talk) 12:09, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Ellin Beltz but I have to agree with Pysiatko. You shouldn't nominate for deletion media awaiting approval. Photos taken in 1999 will have low quality and photos taken in 2007 by eg. a mobile phone will also have low quality. But it doesn't mean they are copied from FB or elsewhere. --BunchPunch (talk) 12:48, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ellin Beltz, you nominated File:SARP Honorary Award.jpg and File:SARP Honorary Award Medallion.jpg for deletion. Why? When you open Article:SARP Honorary Award you will see that Ryszard Jurkowski received this award in 1999. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SARP_Honorary_Award And he was also the President of the Association of Polish Architects (and still is the honorary one), the very organization that issues this awards. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_Polish_Architects So what was your motivation for nominating these photos for deletion? Can't Ryszard Jurkowski take a photo of his own award and upload it to an article on an organization he presided. --BunchPunch (talk) 15:10, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation https://www.office-kon.net/ 愛されて100年コストパフォーマンス抜群 (talk) 05:40, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete obvious copyvio.--Roy17 (talk) 14:52, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:44, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this upload exists Annaleaalbright (talk) 08:05, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Didym at 21:23, 16 Juli 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Annaleaalbright --Krdbot 00:45, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Opaida0400 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal photo(s). Possible copyright violation, COM:DW.

大诺史 (talk) 13:33, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment See also, File:الدرجات العلمية.jpg. 大诺史 (talk) 13:36, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 13:01, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:28, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by علاء at 13:01, 18 Juli 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Opaida0400 --Krdbot 18:46, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Architecture by Ryszard Jurkowski, not a photo - architectural rendering. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:18, 8 June 2019 (UTC) From the discussion page:[reply]

File:Hotel in Katowice.jpg

[edit]

Good afternoon Ellin Beltz, Don't try to be a smarty pants. All our files are awaiting the approval of the OTRS team. The first email was sent from the company's domain (air-jurkowscy.pl) 6 months ago. https://www.dropbox.com/s/zru4he1yqj8iq5i/copyrights%20of%20work%20depicted%20and%20media%2014%20dec%202018.jpg?dl=0 And the second email was sent 4 months ago. https://www.dropbox.com/s/8bg368vpzc891v8/Ticket2018121410006939.jpg?dl=0 It is not our fault they are so slow in responding. I'm a partner in AiR Jurkowscy Architekci architectural firm, and that makes me a copyright holder of all the photos I upload. Which, by the way, go to the article on Ryszard Jurkowski, who is a founding partner of AiR Jurkowscy Architekci, and who personally chose the photos to accompany his article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryszard_Jurkowski P.S. When you nominate photos for deletion shouldn't you by any chance give a valid reason? Because I can see you nominated files such as: File: Altar for Pope.jpg and Altar for Pope John Paul II.jpg, which have never been published before and were taken in 1999 (so before even the internet era) during the Pope's visit to Poland. You nominated File:Ryszard Jurkowski1.jpg, a photo that was taken personally by me in 2007 on a trip to Berlin, and it has never been published before either. You have nominated File:Energopol Office Building, Katowice.jpg which has never never published, and finally you've chosen File:Ryszard Jurkowski.jpg, the very photo that Ryszard Jurkowski nominated as his profile pic for wiki. So just get a grip!!! --Pysiatko (talk) 12:00, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests/File:Hotel in Katowice.jpg

[edit]

And as for the rendering by Ryszard Jurkowski - well, quite recently he ask me to upload it as a cry for help, saying: 'They've deleted all my photos or nominated them for deletion. Maybe if we upload a rendering of a building that has not yet been built they will finally leave us alone.' Clearly even this didn't work!!! --Pysiatko (talk) 12:12, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pysiatko

[edit]

Ellin Beltz, the Article:Ryszard Jurkowski says that: 'Since 1990 he [Ryszard Jurkowski] has been a senior partner at AiR Jurkowscy Architekci, a practice he had established with his wife who also holds a degree in architecture.' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryszard_Jurkowski When you open the link that Pysiatko sent you will see that the permission to publish the media is given by Anna Jurkowska of AiR Jurkowscy Architekci. https://www.dropbox.com/s/zru4he1yqj8iq5i/copyrights%20of%20work%20depicted%20and%20media%2014%20dec%202018.jpg?dl=0 It's the same architectural firm, which means you just nominated for deletion media that Ryszard Jurkowski wants to have in his article. --BunchPunch (talk) 14:52, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


@Ganímedes: : Could you check the OTRS queue for this one, also? See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pysiatko. Thank you! Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:57, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miladhatami (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:HOST - not "realistically useful for an educational purpose".

DannyS712 (talk) 00:50, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 09:18, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gustavo Trelles 0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Gustavo Trelles 0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and posters. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:28, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:29, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture Nirjal stha (talk) 08:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by 1989 at 15:59, 10 August 2019 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 00:35, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture Nirjal stha (talk) 08:12, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by 1989 at 15:59, 10 August 2019 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 00:35, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture Nirjal stha (talk) 08:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by 1989 at 15:59, 10 August 2019 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 00:35, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:59, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 23:15, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:18, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP South Korea, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea.

xplicit 00:26, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:35, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that the photographer, Delmi Álvarez, who is living, has freely licensed these images as claimed by the uploader.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:15, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:42, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per OTRS member request. @Jameslwoodward and Well-Informed Optimist: File:AD55sarajevo1MG 9090-033.jpg already contained an OTRS permission added by Tks4Fish on 2019-02-03. Ankry (talk) 14:05, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© FUNDAÇÃO FHC 2019 - TODOS OS DIREITOS RESERVADOS Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:22, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The "© FUNDAÇÃO FHC 2019 - TODOS OS DIREITOS RESERVADOS" does not apply to this image, "The photos in this section are available for download in high definition and may be used for dissemination purposes, provided that the respective credit is quoted. The other images published in this site can only be used with permission." Carlos Ricarte (talk) 22:35, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Fundação FHC section makes a distiction between the images in the section "Relacionamento com a imprensa" and those in rest of the site, the "Foto Oficial do Presidente Fernando Henrique Cardoso" falls under the following permission: "The photos in this section are available for download in high definition and may be used for dissemination purposes, provided that the respective credit is quoted.". Carlos Ricarte (talk) 22:40, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, according with Carlos Ricarte's comment. --Érico (talk) 22:33, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image. Paladinum2 (talk) 02:44, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese- A licença atribuída é a creative commons, que permite inclusive seu uso comercial, creio que quando a fundação estabelece função de divulgação, não englobam a questão comercial, por exemplo.Paladinum2 (talk) 00:49, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I review my earlier position and now come to understand that this image is in fact a copyright infringement. The source does not indicate under which license the image was published. It doesn't even cite "creative commons." So, in line with the precautionary principle, the image will be deleted. --Érico (talk) 19:55, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution version of File:Bokser wikipedia.jpg DannyS712 (talk) 00:58, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

So-far fictional livery. Way way too soon, no formal or official images have yet been released Nightfury (talk) 14:15, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: See COM:NPOV: the image is in use on English Wikipedia. Commons will not delete in-use files just because they're "wrong". --bjh21 (talk) 18:26, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:INUSE. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:SWR Class 442.png, file no longer needed nor used Nightfury (talk) 11:44, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 12:14, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File superseded by File:Class 444 in swr livery- update.png - no longer needed nor used Nightfury (talk) 11:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 12:11, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP United States, there is no freedom of panorama in the U.S. for art.

xplicit 01:46, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted DW by Flickr photographer. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:29, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF, dubious authorship of other uploads. — Racconish💬 05:23, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken this image personally. It is actually a lineup including sponsors and golf course representatives. I cropped out the "crowd" to have a profile image of my son. Do not understand the claim by Racconish that the EXIF data has been tampered with. Please reinstate this image.--Stefantast (talk) 07:06, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per Racconish. Present uncropped photo with intact EXIF if you wish to show. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:33, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries no subject and definition to keep in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 07:02, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Blurry snapshot of mundane object with dubious title/category; out of scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:36, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries no subject and definition to keep in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 07:06, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: I've added a category and description based on the depicts (P180) statement on the file. --bjh21 (talk) 08:50, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per Bjh21; seems in scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No scope to use in wikimedia commons Hari Paudyel (talk) 07:19, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: I saw nothing objectionable to the cropping out of the right section of the photo, which contained nothing but blurred background and watermark. While uploading cropped versions over existing versions is *generally* not appropriate, in this case I see nothing in-scope lost. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept per discussion. (I suggest the watermark be digitally removed or cropped out, but that is not a deletion issue.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:40, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries no subject and definition to keep in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 07:20, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:55, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries no subject and definition to keep in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 07:21, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:56, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very similar to File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (51).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 07:37, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with this nomination is they files are not same Mardetanha talk 07:43, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Mardetanha: Is 52 the zoomed in version of 51? 大诺史 (talk) 08:05, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
yes, and zoomed version is not same Mardetanha talk 08:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Inoffensive second photo of in-scope museum object. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:00, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture with photographs mark Nirjal stha (talk) 07:40, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The watermark is subtle and doesn't disrupt the use of the picture. --bjh21 (talk) 09:16, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per Bjh21-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:01, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries watermarks Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 07:41, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept The relevant category was not hard to figure out from the image title. In scope. (Photo would be improved by removal of watermark, but as it does not obscure the main subject of the photo that's not a deletion issue.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:06, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

same as File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (123).jpg

大诺史 (talk) 07:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with this nomionation too, as one the files has some information lablel for the object which would be help to later identify the object Mardetanha talk 07:45, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Mardetanha: Isn't 124 & 125 the "zoomed in" version of 123, and without the description? 大诺史 (talk) 08:06, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Having 3 similar photos of this museum artifact may not be highly needed, but it is harmless. Deletion unnecessary. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture focused on person Nirjal stha (talk) 07:43, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Personal photo without compensating in-scope importance evident; uncat since May. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:08, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture focused on person and market place Nirjal stha (talk) 07:46, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept In scope photo of local market; people are incidental (and when a market is open it's likely harder to get a similar photo with no people). -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:12, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture focused on person Nirjal stha (talk) 07:46, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Personal photo -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:15, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries no subject and definition to keep in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 07:58, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Agreed. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:26, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries no subject and definition to keep in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 08:02, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Agreed.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:17, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE (personal, unused) Biplab Anand (Talk) 10:11, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Actually this is a nice portrait. --Yann (talk) 11:53, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Agreed.--Prosfilaes (talk) 20:07, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture with watermark of photographer Nirjal stha (talk) 08:06, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:33, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture Nirjal stha (talk) 08:07, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Clearly. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:35, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries no subject and definition to keep in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 08:17, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Out of scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


User:WookieInHeat

[edit]

Reasons for deletion request -Would like to have these files I uploaded removed please.-WookieInHeat (talk) 08:26, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep not uploaded by requestor. 大诺史 (talk) 08:39, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per {{SDG7}}. 大诺史 (talk) 10:26, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm the author of the photos (my user name is listed as author on their pages), they were transferred to Wikipedia Commons from English Wikipedia by another user though. WookieInHeat (talk) 09:15, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Three of the four are in use on English Wikipedia. CSD G7 really doesn't apply: the photos were uploaded quite a lot more than a week ago. --bjh21 (talk) 09:25, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, three out of four are in use. No deletion request notice ever posted on photo pages (just a reverted "speedy" before this request listing). -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is an image of a blanket with characters from the animation "Pleasant Goat and Big Big Wolf". As the blanket with copyrighted elements is the subject of the file, de Minimis does not apply here. As a derivative work with copyrighted elements, the file has a chance to be copyrighted and unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 09:31, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Support The cartoon of this photo is not licensed. You can realize that the color of the goats are different from the real cartoon. --Easusq (攀講) 2019 nièng 8 nguŏk 20 hô̤ (B2) 11:44 (UTC)


Deleted DW (also blurry; no in scope usefulness other than very poor illustration of copyrighted characters) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:54, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of c:File:110219-N-HI707-172 (5473995432).jpg Le Petit Chat (talk) 09:39, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Closed; dupe already deleted and file name redirected to other version. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:57, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal photo(s). 大诺史 (talk) 09:49, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted Personal photo, only contribution by uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:58, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation and unlikely to be own work. Should go via OTRS. 大诺史 (talk) 09:50, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:59, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope due to bad quality. The request goes only for for last version; the first version is better and can be in Commons. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Closed; reverted to earlier better version. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:00, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 37.5.7.137 06:18, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I guess it is against Japanese law to take pictures of recognizable people without their permission. Mycomp (talk) 10:23, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Close as Kept; I would guess that sports people on the field of play at a game would be an exception. (Let me know if this is incorrect/contrary to usual practice.) Image is also in use in multiple projects. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:08, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filen är felaktiv Lars (Lon) Olsson (talk) 10:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept; file seems to load ok; deletion request notice had already been removed from photo by uploader/nominator. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:16, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The QR code in this image, contains my private information! Amirhossein Ashrafzadeh (talk) 12:15, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Courtesy deletion per uploader request; image was not in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:19, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sailko as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: blurry version of File:Madonna dell'umiltà, pistoia, cupola 05.JPG and other similar  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Neither photo seems optimal, but both different, of historic architectural detail apparently hard to get a good photo of due to lighting. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:23, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low res signature superseded by png, File:Firma Luis Alberto Costales.svg 大诺史 (talk) 12:30, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a historical file, should not delete. --Dabit100 (talk) 02:00, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept per Dabit100. Deletion not required; no consensus to do so. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:24, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is copyright status of Texas government works? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


you can delete the image if you want, I Can't Find the Laws about the Copyright in Texas. so yea.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cryb111 (talk • contribs) 01:45, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, State of Texas work, no evidence of free license presented. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:26, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 09:12, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Song. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:48, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Orphan uncat digital music file. If indeed "own work", no evident in scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:54, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal photo(s). 大诺史 (talk) 10:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Well, it is in Category:People at work in Mozambique, part of the Wiki Loves Africa 2017 contest with the theme "People at Work", and apparently depicts people who work at some beverage production or sales place (there are Coca-Cola crates in the background). However, they're not actually at work in that specific moment, but posing for the picture. I still think it's in scope because, apparently, it depicts people at their workplace. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:17, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per Gestumblindi. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:52, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:PPi symbol.svg, nominated file is large & contains raster graphics (BadSVG) 大诺史 (talk) 13:20, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose It would not have been a problem to overwrite this really bad file with the superseding one; but it should remain untouched, as an example for multiple-bad SVG, comparable with the other one. Deleting does not help anything, but keeping it as something of educational value. When I care for the other files of GAThrawn22, I shall overload them; but this one, the worst of all, has its own quality... Therefore  Keep. -- sarang사랑 16:47, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, it's often done but nevertheless a really bad habit to delete files that are referenced by others. As it is the case here. -- sarang사랑 18:02, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept per discussion; deletion not required and no consensus to delete -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:30, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I’m not sure why this was nominated. It doesn’t have copyright issues. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 104.191.244.79 (talk) 13:31, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Dariafoxmorrison (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flags. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment @EugeneZelenko: suspected serial sockpuppet. See Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kritkitty. 大诺史 (talk) 14:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One deleted (fictitious flag created by uploader; orphan); one kept (in use) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elaine.Nielson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from toys.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Clear DW of copyrighted character figures. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:31, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Coat of arms. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Orphan uncat. If original creation of uploader, out of scope; if not, false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:33, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation علاء فحصي (talk) 15:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted DW-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:FOP India, this is not architecture or sculpture but a drawing and by the file name it appears to be inside an office. 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:48B6:74E1:B77D:A01C 18:02, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is in office of APCRDA, a government body and its a permanent 3-Dimensional item set for public display.—IM3847 (talk) 18:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is not a "drawing" at all, but a photo of a 3D model. That's why there's a problem - nothing to do with Commons:FOP India at all. Despitie the silly nom, this has to go. Johnbod (talk) 22:18, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:50, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Newton256 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Facebook or smaller images, no useful metadata other than one has transmission numbers.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:43, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted also orphan lacking specific categorization; in scope usefulness not evident. One was clearly DW as well. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:39, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Newton256 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Professionally posed photos posted by repeat copyright infringer. Delete per COM:PRP

MER-C 19:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:24, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" doesn't usually happen to autographed celebrity photos, but here it is. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:08, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted DW with dubious license claim; no indication of copyright status of original photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:41, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo does not seem to be simple at all Discasto talk 21:35, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Simple or not, false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:48, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sameerthn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:SELFIE - out of COM:SCOPE

DannyS712 (talk) 22:12, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. (One was in use as user photo on en:w, but user there was indefinitely blocked.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:44, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1949. Jcb (talk) 22:40, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom; insufficient info to establish copyright status. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:46, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Searching in Google image, this photo is not taken by 仙世鸽鸽. Masdggg (talk) 04:15, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 10:04, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries no subject and definition to keep in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 07:35, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept (Closing this myself due to backlog.) Deletion requests should be for images not appropriate or out of scope for Wikimedia Commons; not being relevant for some particular contest is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:33, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture Nirjal stha (talk) 08:07, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:43, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture Nirjal stha (talk) 08:07, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:42, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture Nirjal stha (talk) 08:07, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:42, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

same as File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (121).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 08:08, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:44, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor lighting as compared to File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (156).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 08:27, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:45, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by PNG (File:CloseupofMikeReissSignatureCropped.png). White background removed. 大诺史 (talk) 12:18, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For what reason do you feel the image should be deleted? Greshthegreat (talk)


Kept No requirement for deletion; no consensus to delete. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:47, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pachucy1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images from polish University Websites, Education Websites, historical photos and documents (but not 70 years post mortem old) just for example: https://www.rektorzy.pl/serwis.php?s=2251&pok=54869&id=314696 https://www.rektorzy.pl/serwis.php?s=2251&pok=54869&c3=12632&l=160 https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/the-first-polish-conference-on-the-territorial-defence-forces.463319/ https://ostrowiecka.pl/2019/05/20/ostrowiecka-uczelnia-z-monoprofilowym-centrum-symulacji-medycznej/ http://www.wsbip.edu.pl/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=252:uroczysta-inauguracja-roku-akademickiego-2016-2017&catid=50&Itemid=135

because of the mass of stolen images the chance that here are really free images to find are very low.

Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:17, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Babouei (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded by a user with a long history of copyright violations. These files should be deleted per the precautionary principle.

xplicit 01:40, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

might be derivative work. 大诺史 (talk) 05:40, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be COM:DW but uploader claims as own work 大诺史 (talk) 05:48, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not relevant for contest and no scope in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 06:38, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not relevant for contest and no scope in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 06:39, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries no scope and definition to keep in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 06:49, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries no subject and definition to keep in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 06:51, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

picture focused on person Nirjal stha (talk) 07:44, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from Whatsapp. No permission. Also, COM:OOS. 大诺史 (talk) 07:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No scope to use in commons Hari Paudyel (talk) 07:17, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture Nirjal stha (talk) 08:02, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (21).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 08:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries no subject and definition to keep in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 08:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing EXIF informations at Flickr. Besides it's very unlykely that the person pictured is the photographer. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:56, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; License Laundering. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All superseded by File:Assinatura Di Melo Melhorada.svg

大诺史 (talk) 12:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scaled down duplicate of File:Eisendieck signature.jpg 大诺史 (talk) 12:22, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:Emmanuel Christen Johnny Jack.png, white background removed 大诺史 (talk) 12:23, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low res signature superseded by SVG. (File:Conde de la conquista.svg) 大诺史 (talk) 12:16, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:06, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res signature superseded by PNG. (File:Conrad Russell signature March 2001.png) 大诺史 (talk) 12:18, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low res signature superseded by SVG (File:Elza Soares Assinatura Segunda Versão.svg) 大诺史 (talk) 12:20, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res signature superseded by SVG (File:Firma Francisco del Castillo El Mozo.svg) 大诺史 (talk) 12:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:06, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ester2757 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DUPE of File:Firma1.png

大诺史 (talk) 12:32, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:06, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim to own work, size/quality, meta. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:53, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another celebrity autographed photo claimed as own work, unlikely. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:08, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agnès Téziste (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No COM:FOP in France.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:21, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ليث الشمرتي (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claims of own work. Facebook sizes, only two pictures come from an iPhone, and both are Facebook sized selfies. Those which were marked "FBMD" in meta were sent to speedy.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:38, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 04:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Undescribed, anonymous person. No educative value in this image. Richard Avery (talk) 05:48, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:58, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries no subject and definition to keep in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 07:58, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 22:59, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries no subject and definition to keep in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 08:05, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 22:59, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture Nirjal stha (talk) 08:08, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 22:59, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture Nirjal stha (talk) 08:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 23:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (71).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 08:12, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:59, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (10).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 08:16, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:59, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (27).jpg fully depicts subject, this doesn't. 大诺史 (talk) 08:17, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:59, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (32).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 08:18, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:59, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (88).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 08:19, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:59, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (82).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 08:20, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:59, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (96).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 08:21, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 23:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (84).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 08:21, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 23:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (76).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 08:24, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 23:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not fully the page as compared to File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (74).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 08:24, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 23:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (150).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 08:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 23:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (146).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 08:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 23:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject not fully shown as compared to File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (156).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 08:26, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 23:01, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Aghakhan museum in Toronto by Mardetanha (159).jpg 大诺史 (talk) 08:27, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 23:01, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope 大诺史 (talk) 08:51, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason for deletion - in scope. ~riley (talk) 23:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by original File:0000386 representation 354 original.tif Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 13:20, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 23:01, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Av2Ro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 23:01, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SolomonV2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work, not enough information for license.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:58, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 23:02, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BELABBACI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Lovely tiny low quality photos, no metadata, seem to be copied from somewhere.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:06, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 23:02, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture and irrelevant for WLE 2019 Nirjal stha (talk) 17:05, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason for deletion. T CellsTalk 13:11, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be derived from 1999 source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:08, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant for contest as well as picture carries no subject and definition to keep in commons Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 06:55, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

None of the other photos have this view and the person is not the main focus Gbawden (talk) 10:00, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no consensus for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:00, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FOP in Uzbekistan Didym (talk) 20:06, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:07, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to fufill COM:PARTYPICS

大诺史 (talk) 16:23, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep They were taken at a party but most of them have management positions at NHS or similar so could be used somewhere, not only on our projects Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Gbawden. --Sealle (talk) 21:53, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stefantast (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I had initially tagged these files as missing permission. Since the uploader considers this to be a 'personal vendetta', a community discussion seems to be more appropriate. See his explanations on his talk page and Commons:Deletion requests/File:German Champions 1935.jpg.

— Racconish💬 06:55, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Schauffele is my paternal Grandfather. This particular image File:Schauffele Molly.jpg was taken on his 60th birthday by a family member. The image File:Richard "Molly" Schauffele head shot 600.jpg is a photo of my grandfather behind a desk that I cropped out for the purpose of creating a profile image. The image File:1924 05 15 Fussball schauffele vfb gegen hirsch kfv klein.png is in the possession of the family and has no known author as that information might have been lost during the war. I am a heir to these photographs. Same is true for File:Johann Hoffmann.jpg who is my maternal grandfather. I am grateful to Racconish, for listing this here for review as I feel he had initially acted rash in simply deleting all these images.--Stefantast (talk) 07:23, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment. I did not delete these files but merely asked you to provide a permission. Your claim to be their author is obviously dubious and the copyright owner's permission is needed. — Racconish💬 07:29, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment. Right. To clarify: I appreciate the format of a deletion request (where the uploader is encouraged to comment) versus the mere tagging of a file, where I do not get the opportunity to state my case. When I speak afore about "deletion", I mean "tagging without opportunity to comment". Admittedly, I was ignorant about the duration of intellectual property rights to photographic images (portraits) being as long as they are. I falsely assumed that the duration was only 50 years.--Stefantast (talk) 07:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    This is the standard procedure at Commons and our discussion on your talk page, partly in response to your emails, is evidence that you were given full opportunity to comment Clin. It is only because you took the matter as a "personal vendetta" that I deemed a deletion request more appropriate. — Racconish💬 07:51, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 13:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In use https://www.kachuabani.com/post.php?p_id=78 Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:51, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

এ ছবিটি আমার নিজের কাজ। তার সাক্ষাতকার গ্রহণের সময় আমি সংগ্রহ করেছি। পরে তার দাফতরিক কাজে এ ছবিটি আমার কাছ থেকে শামসুন্নাহার চেয়ে নিয়েছেন এবং আমি তাকে প্রদান করেছি। আপনি যে লিংক দিয়েছেন সে ওয়েবসাইট কর্তৃপক্ষ তার কাছ থেকে বা তার দফতর থেকে সংগ্রহ করতে পারে। প্রমাণ হিসেবে আমি ব্যক্তিগত ফেসবুক ওয়ালে প্রকাশিত তার সাথে ২০১৫ সালে সাক্ষাতকারের তথ্যটি দেখাতে পারি। [1]

Google Translate "This photo is my own work. When I took her interview I collected. Later, in his coterative work, I took this picture from Shamsunnahar and I gave it to him. The website that you gave the link can collect from him or from his office. As proof I can show the interview information in 2015 with her published on Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1980937532216989&set=picfp.100009022832179&type=3&theater" — Preceding unsigned comment added by DelwarHossain (talk • contribs)

Kept: per the Facebook link posted by DelwarHossain. BTW: Please do not remove [dead link] templates by yourself, leave that to the closing admin. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 3

may fufil COM:SPAM. Files nominated basically depicts the same thing, a road. May also fufil COM:FOP Philippines

List of files

大诺史 (talk) 07:19, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment More files that I didn't nominate is at Category:Pulilan-Baliuag Diversion Road (Tarcan-Matangtubig, Baliuag - Inaon, Peñabatan, Balatong, Dulong Malabon-Tibag, Pulilan, Bulacan) - 2019.
These photos include highly educational, relevant and landmark images of Category:By-pass (roads) in the Philippines; Thanks for your message, and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; I respectfully submit the following reasons, supported by news and DPWH data and information on this Bypass Road; a) 9.60-kilometer long road is a Diversion or Bypass that cuts short the travel from Baliuag to Pulilan: to wit: all the SUV or vans going to Dau or San Fernando Pampanga are now passing this instead of the heavy traffic roads of Pulilan Regional Road to NLEx or the San Simon Exit; b) all the vehicles passing Daang Maharlika and suffering the heavy or almost standstill traffic in Tarcan junction, and in Jollibee Pulilan Junction to go to NLEx or Pulilan town proper, will Bypass this Road; c) this is a landmark and tourist attraction road; that is, it is bikers friendly as your can see the white marked bicycle lanes for tourists and Lay-by or rest areas; d) the amount spent for this Bypass is PHP509.60 million to P 1 Billion and finished in record time; e) in Wikimedia Commons, the photos are very educational since the Categories delineates the metes and bounds of the architecture of this work; I took so much enough photos since the road covers 2 barangays of Baliuag and 5 Barangays of Pulilan; here are the news proofs of notability of these photos; in fact Secretary Villar and Pulilan Mayor Maritz Ochoa inaugurated this road with Historical markers I still am looking for as this was headline news in our TVs: Pulilan-Baliuag diversion road The 9.60-kilometer long road begins at Pulilan-Calumpit road in Tibag, Pulilan and ends in Daang Maharlika in Tarcan in Baliuag, Bulacan with cost of PHP509.60 million - Network Development Construction of By-Passes (Pulilan-Baliuag, Bulacan Diversion Roads - Row) very sincerly yours, Judgefloro 07:36, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
As proof of notability I respectfully submit the following DPWH submissions to the public of the cost and descriptions of the project, to wit: P 115 million pesos contract cost [ Phase 1 is P 97 million contract cost Phase 2 is P 251 million pesos contract cost] Phase 3 is P 115 million pesos contract cost Secretary Villar landmark road projects sincerely Judgefloro 08:02, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
9.6-kilometer bike-friendly diversion road in Bulacan opens a four-lane road that features bike lanes Photos of the Inauguration, thus landmark notability on Thursday, May 9, 2019 photos of witnesses Pulilan Mayor Maritz Ochoa-Montejo, Rep. Gavini Pancho and DPWH Regional Director Roseller Tolentino sincerely Judgefloro 08:08, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 Comment I only agree with you to a certain extent. Some of the images uploaded are just taken on the same road but at different points. The distance between these points doesn't really make anything more visible (i.e. distance between photos taken are too close). Hope you understand my POV. 大诺史 (talk) 15:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Agree Although  Keep some of the images of the road since it is pretty notable. Markoolio97 (talk) 03:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Exhaustive argument and discussion on notability
Rejoinder
Exhaustive argument and discussion on the notability, landmark, educational, engineering and Philippine record on roads, never before done in past President's since Emilio Aguinaldo to Aquino, Jr. Category:Pulilan-Baliuag Diversion Road
With all due respect, I am hereby submitting the following, in line with the Philosophy of Wikimedia Commons of sharing photos for Wisdom, inter alia, to wit:
Prefatory
First in Philippine History of Road works
Wikimedia Commons Category:By-pass (roads) in the Philippines and Vide Category:By-pass (roads) all over the world on file hereat Commons, including Category:Roads in the Philippines by provinces Category:Roads in Pampanga Category:Roads in Nueva Ecija Category:Roads in Bulacan Laguna (province), inter alia, name them all, one cannot find -
Category:Cycle lanes in the Philippines Bicycle lanes and/or with Rest area Lay-by or Category:Rest areas in the Philippines
Admittedly, in Marikina and Antipolo, Bicycle lanes are innovations to ease traffic by former Mayor Bayani Fernando; in Lumban, there is only one Lay-by but here in Pulilan-Baliuag Diversion Road, not only from start to finish of the 9.6 kilometers consting P 506 million finished in record less than 2 years, Bicycle lanes and/or with Lay-by or Category Rest areas do line up both side of the by-pass road from Barangay Tarcan in Maharlika Highway to Barangay Tibag in Pulilan Regiona Road, both are notable Article of Wikipedia; while a political critic would argue such is waste of Tax money, still from the view of Secretary Villar of DPWH, Biker friendly By pass road was conceived due to the Tourist requirements of Pulilan as Kneeling Carabao Festival capital of the Philippines and Baliuag as Buntal Hat Festival capital of Luzon;
Economic savings due to reduction of travel from Baliuag to Pulilan vice versa from 1 1/2 hours to 20 minutes
Interconnection of 2 Wikipedia articles Philippine highway network Pan-Philippine Highway - Baliuag section and Pulilan Regional Road at Tibag toward North Luzon Expressway Pulilan exit
There are 3 modes of travel between these 2 towns: a) via the traffic conjestion of Jollibee Cutcut Junction and during 2 market days a week traffic standstill in Pulilan Regional Road ad Cut cut to Poblacion to reach NLEx; b) UV express vans from SM Baliuag and/or Poblacion to NLEX via i) San Simon exit or ii) Pulilan exit, to reach Dau Mabalacat of San Fernando Pampanga, takes 1 hour; iii) Travellers from MacAthur Highway from Santa Rita, Guiguinto NLEx and Cabanatuan to Baliuag travelers to reach NLEx need not face the traffic to reach Pulilan NLEx or Baliuag and Pulilan Town Proper due to savings of time reduced to 20 minutes because of this By pass road;
Mark Villar
Marvel and first in Engineering both Civil, mechanical and electrical including the Geodetic aspect vis-a-vis the Tiqui Builders advanced Construction or roads
advanced Cement and enforcement mechanisms of the By pass
I claim that I have not ever seen Philippine roads, except in Duterte's presidency, that cement road no longer need asphalt covering like in NLEx, due to strong quality of Eagles and Republic cement mixed with secret ingredients and with strong steel to withstand the pressures of even 20 wheeler trucks; however, this rainy season, they do not allow trucks and buses to pass to make strong the just inaugurated road but later they can pass;
How I photographed the roads, namely the numbers of photos needed to catch the Category:Paddy fields in Bulacan covering 7 Barangays and the Bicycle lanes and/or with Lay-by or Category Rest areas
I hired a tricyle paying $6 or about 300 pesos to catch the scenery and roads centering on the Bicycle lanes and/or with Lay-by or Category Rest areas: this is 9.6 kilometers and about 25 photos per Barangay of the entire route is modest enough having in mind 3 birds with one stone, namely, 7 barangays, 7 Paddy fields, 7 grasslands, a creek and PBB Bridge; one my ponder that the roads are almost empty of vehicles and they look all the same; but not, since this Bypass has just been opened; one can imagine if may vehicles pass this, then it would enhance the beauty of the photos; Bypass begins at Pulilan-Calumpit road in Tibag, Pulilan and ends in Daang Maharlika in Tarcan in Baliuag, Bulacan with cost of PHP509.60 million - Network Development Construction of By-Passes (Pulilan-Baliuag, Bulacan Diversion Roads - Row) in Barangays Dulong Malabon 14°55'28"N 120°48'38"E Tibag 14°54'23"N 120°49'30"E Inaon 14°56'30"N 120°49'35"E Balatong 14°56'10"N 120°50'33"E Peñabatan 14.9175, 120.8552 Pulilan, Bulacan interconnecting with Barangays Matangtubig 14°57'3"N 120°52'10"E Tarcan 14°55'57"N 120°53'0"E Baliuag, Bulacan, Bulacan Philippine highway network;
A great contribution to Category Real Estate in the Philippines and reduction of Corruption in Public Works due to Jump of Category:Real estate in the Philippines Real Estate prices of mere ricelands without value to inevitable conversion of these lands to Commercial estates for Housing
This project did pop up from nowhere and nobody was notified before the project started, taking into surprise the Real Estate sector; just imagine from not even P 50 per sq. meter, the price of ALL ricelands passed by this Bypass jumped to about a conservative P 3,000 per square meter; deep inside this fact, many were caught unaware of this Real Estate boom done by this Bypass road; without fear, I predict that Villas and Camellas of Villar and others like those I photographed in Bulacan and Nueva Ecija and Laguna, will sprout like mushroom around this Bypass road;
Finally, an Impossible made possible
from paddy fields with creeks, so naive and almost impossible for roads to be constructed upon due to weak and watery foundation
Sec. Villar's genius of Engineering and Architecture made a First in Philippine road history
IN FINE, I respectfully submit that: the same thing happens in Pan-Philippine highway section from Junction Pulilan Cut-cut to Junction Sampaloc, San Rafael: repeated road or Highway works and reblockings failed to correct the once paddy fields and watery foundation resulting to Forever road works; but here in Bypass road, the Marvel of Advance Engineering by Tiqui Construction, and state of the art Engineering coupled with Secret cement additives with strong steel, made this P 506 million Bypass a legacy of the DPWH to Philippine Engineering and Science;
Valued images of Landmark Bypass Road
IN FINE II, not even 1 photo of the landmark Bypass road can justly be found in Commons and internet but here; allow me to subjectively and objectively express my philosophy of sharing wisdom to the future researchers and generaration: unlike other Internet sites, Commons does not resize the photos and the Categories are well delineated to allow readers to easily find the photos; when one opens Category:Cebu City Category:Davao City and the entire Visayas and Mindanao in Commons, one cannot find high quality picture as I did for Luzon 18 provinces; I never concentrated just on Historical Markers or Churches but also on broad overcompassing Categories of Roads, Schools, Buildings, and name them all; not only hard work but huge expenses just to fulfil the Sharing of Wisdom via Commons photos to future generations; many of my photos are intact even if Churches and other buildings are destroyed reconstructed and gone; if the photos of these Bypass roads are gone, by deletion, then, future generations will for sure loose the opportunity to know and learn about the above considerations they can only find in Commons, nowhere else, and for free to the public domain without any considerations whatsoever, very sincerely, Respectfully submitted Judgefloro 09:39, 10 June 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. As per COM:PS: Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. = meaning we don't need a massive collection of nearly duplicate images. We have told Judgefloro/Ramon FVelasquez many times in the past to be more selective when uploading. And no need to give a long sermon on the notability of the road, that is irrelevant to the number of needless images. P 1 9 9   13:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 7

Nearly duplicated images (sets distinguished by the numbers). No need to keep them all. Probably keeping 2-3 of each set is sufficient.

List of files







(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:50, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines amid stormy weather; with all due respect, I am submitting my following thoughts and discussions on this matter: the photos are not only valued images, but first in the internet, never seen yet, since Calauan is a tourist place or visitor attraction, in fact these 3 days in all front pages and TV headlines due to the Landmark Calauan Mayor Antonio Sanchez case:
a) Category:Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road (Silangan-Lamot 1-Lamot 2-Santo Tomas-Dayap, Calauan & Masapang, Victoria) contains only 139 pictures which covers 6 Barangays of Silangan-Lamot 1-Lamot 2-Santo Tomas-Dayap, Calauan & Masapang from Masapang Junction; a-1) Category:Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road Calauan-Victoria Road is very notable since the DPWH technically and formally named it so as new access or by-pass road to ease traffic and to allow commuters alternative routes in going to Calauan and Victoria Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road, DPWH;
b) Category:Kanluran, Calauan, Laguna has only 75 pnotos, when this Barangay Kanluran , Calauan, Laguna 14.1487, 121.3108 Calauan,_Laguna is very large enough;
c) Category:Balayhangin, Calauan, Laguna has only 108 photos when in fact this Barangay Balayhangin, Calauan, Laguna 14.1298, 121.3164 Calauan,_Laguna is located beteween 2 roads, namely i) the photos about half taken in the Category:Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road and ii) the other half is taken on the Bay–Calauan–San Pablo Road a wikipedia article which is very notable;
d) Category:Mabacan, Calauan, Laguna List of barangays in Laguna (province) Barangay Mabacan, Calauan, Laguna 14.1344, 121.2885 Calauan,_Laguna is also a very large Barangays and only 118 photos were taken to create to researchers what this village is all about;
e) Category:Paliparan, Calauan, Laguna has only 209 photos when List of barangays in Laguna (province) Barangay Paliparan 14.1205, 121.2722 Calauan,_Laguna is very large comparatively;
f) Category:Perez, Calauan, Laguna List of barangays in Laguna (province) Barangay Perez, Calauan, Laguna 14.1043, 121.2693 Calauan,_Laguna has only 121 photos, which covers only about 1/4 of the sites covered by 1/4 of the Perez Road;
g) these Kanluran - Balayhangin - Mabacan - Paliparan - Perez Road servicing these 5 Barangays from Calauan Pineaapple is the only New Route being constructed to reach Barangay Limao 14.0940, 121.242 Calauan,_Laguna where one can now reach Hidden Valley Springs Resort a Prime tourist destination where a day tour is 2,750 pesos located here and in Barangays Barangay I 14.0629, 121.2555 Barangay II 14.0697, 121.2449 Barangay III 14.0716, 121.2546 Barangay IV 14.0624, 121.2485 Alaminos, Laguna accessed from a very distant location of Category:Alaminos, Laguna National Highway;
h) It takes about 6 hours from my place at Bulacan to reach these Barangays and 6 hours to travel home; the cost of travel and hiring vehicles in the photography amount to about P 1,500, hence, it is submitted that these valued very notable photos are not only rare but treasures for future generations of the public domain in Wikimedia Commons in line with the Philosophy of its founders - sharing of Wisdom; respectfully submitted and very sincerely Judgefloro 10:17, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Additional argument, discussion and submissions on the issue of notablility and sufficiency of the number of photos
Good afternoon from hereat Stormy Jenny Category:Tropical Storm Podul (2019); I respectfully submit the following:
1) Sitios, puroks and villages compose the Category:Barangays of Calauan, Laguna; like before particularly when I was starting here in Commons about 2010 to 2015, I could take specific photos of Health Centers, Barangay Halls, even Chapels and Schools, among other interesting points; I could have taken more tourist spots like falls and Historical markers, but they are too far and I would spend hours to reach them in addition to the long 6 hours to reach Laguna from Bulacan, and 6 hours to be back leaving only 2 hours for photography;
2) The most important problem of my photography is that most of the Barangays are critical or dangerous areas;
3) Hence, I opted to stay inside the vehicle like jeep or tricycle hired to take photos of these Sitios, puroks and villages via Road photography;
4) I beg to disagree on the duplication of photos: because for example, Barangay Mabacan, Calauan is too large a barangay with about 7 Sitios, puroks and villages;
5) The going to or North photos capture only some of the :Sitios, puroks and villages; and the going back or South photos also capture only some of the Sitios, puroks and villages but and but, the scenery is totally different;
6) In Category:Salvacion and San Agustin, Pangasinan 8 December 2015, while I was taking photos while walking when I stepped down of the tricycle, I was locked down in the Barangay Hall and arrested to the Police station; I was asked to sign a waiver that I have no complaint against my detention; I failed to Google this critical area only to have found that Taguinod brothers were shot in Barangay San Agustin;

The subject photos for requested deletion are Highly valued images of the Sites which caught International, Global and Philippine Headlines attentions in 1993 and these Weeks Category:Site of Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murder (Sitio Paputok, Kilometro 74, Mabacan, Imok, Balayhangin & Erais Farm, Santo Tomas & Lamot 2, Calauan, Laguna)

6) The subject photos for requested deletion are Highly valued images of the Sites which caught International, Global and Philippine Headlines attentions in 1993 and these Weeks;
7) Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murder Antonio Sanchez (politician) Site of the Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murder-rape is Km. 74 Brgy. Balayhangin Calauan Laguna 14°7'53"N 121°18'44"E along Category:Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road Barangay Balayhangin, Calauan, Laguna 14.1298, 121.3164 Calauan,_Laguna and List of barangays in Laguna (province) Barangay Mabacan, Calauan, Laguna 14.1344, 121.2885 Calauan,_Laguna and Barangay and Erais Farm 30-hectare farm in Santo Tomas, Calauan, Laguna 14.1711, 121.3367 Calauan, Laguna Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road‎ (Silangan-Lamot 1-Lamot 2-Santo Tomas-Dayap, Calauan & Masapang, Victoria) from Victoria (Masapang) Duck Junction Calauan - Victoria Road Calauan-Victoria Road Erais Farm Site of Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murder (Sitio Paputok, Kilometro 74, Mabacan, Imok, Balayhangin & Erais Farm, Santo Tomas & Lamot 2, Calauan, Laguna) Eileen Sarmenta and Allan Gomez murder Antonio Sanchez (politician) People vs. Antonio Sanchez, et al xxx"'The next destination was a sugarcane field in Sitio Paputok, Kilometro 74 of Barangay Mabacan. It was here that Luis announced that it’s time for the group to feast on Eileen (the exact words of Luis were “Turbohin na rin natin ang tinurbo ni Boss”)." xxx " Both vehicles then headed for Erais Farm situated in Barangay Curba, owned by the Mayor." xxx "The next destination was a sugarcane field in Sitio Paputok, Kilometro 74 of Barangay Mabacan." 'xxx a dead female loaded inside a Tamaraw van was found in Barangay Mabacan." " a card gambler was able to retrieve a pair of white shorts lying near the national highway in Barangay Balayhangin. In the morning of June 30, 1993, the Mayor, with some companions, jogged towards the direction of Barangay Mabacan and at the same time inquired from residents whether they noticed anything unusual on the night of June 28, 1993. A certain “Mang Torio” told the Mayor that he found a pair of “maong” pants lying at the side of the road but left if there. After inspecting the dirty “maong” pants, the Mayor instructed Mang Torio to keep the pants as the former will send someone back to pick it up."
7a) I respectfully appeal and with due respect submit my humble thoughts and reply on these issues, very sincerely Judgefloro 06:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Kept: Google Streemaps-like photos. I certainly wouldn't encourage anyone to make photos like these, and some photos are certainly not necessary, but I don't want to make that decision, since we'd keep a sizeable amount. If someone wants to nominate individual photos, feel free to. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:05, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 8

COM:ADVERT (advertisements) — COM:NOTUSED no forseeable educational use.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Functus officio - the photos were educational advertisements inviting learners to be interested in Tourism of the Philippine for the specific events therein mentioned - as tarpaulin advertisement billboards, they are very informative and educational; but now they are merely remains of the past and were removed after the occasions; even if I consistently objected to deletions of photos vis-à-vis the 4 year Philippines and Commons - US Jurisprudence on Extinctive prescription, I have no objection to the deletion of these already used photos based on the foregoing considerations Judgefloro (talk) 06:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Judgefloro: see User talk:Clindberg#About Judgefloro's claim of "extinctive prescription" for RA 8293 for my question about the applicability of "extinctive prescription". And no, it is not relevant to Commons — it comes into effect 4 years after the file/s has/have been deleted, because there are no more files that reusers may exploit and potentially infringe creators'/authors' copyrights. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:10, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:15, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 9

Redundant to both File:0067jfLandscapes Quezon City Santa Mesa Manila Boundary Magsaysay Aurora Boulevardfvf 15.jpg and File:0087jfLandscapes Quezon City Santa Mesa Manila Boundary Magsaysay Aurora Boulevardfvf 03.jpg. Almost duplicate, COM:NOTUSED.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No objection to the deletion and Maraming Salamat po sa inyong pagtangkilik at paglilinis ng puspusan sa aking mga Road and Landscapes pictures; in my anglebyangle walking photography of road and overpasses, I am really at a loss when I gaze at the sun and the views thereunder; I could not keep my hand careful in too many photos; I had a trauma lately when Taal Exploded: you know - why should I have not taken so many pictures of Category:Agoncillo, Batangas and Category:San Nicolas, Batangas - they were - are annihilated and obliterated almost by Category:2020 Taal Volcano eruptions; I would like to take photos of the NLEX from Guiguinto to Balintawak, but even my sibling has 5 cars, he has no jeepney without glasses; I was told that all vehicles must close their windows; I do not like to take photos with the car or bus or truck glasses blocking my camera; I also wanted to take the Skyway, but they would not permit yet the 400 cc motors; just telling my storytale ... sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 10

COM:ADVERT, advertising tarpaulin/s, and a random listing. COM:NOTUSED and out of COM:SCOPE.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was at a loss in searching for the jurisdictional boundaries of Caloocan barangays, and after asking people, I found this Tarpaulin : sayin Barangay 21 a) it is required by law DPWH and LGUs should post notices on public places regarding i) amount, source, beginning and finishing of project b) and of course the winning bidder, to tell people, file Graft case if there is ghost, white elephant projects or road to neverland; well of course, the handsome politicians smile; I asked so many trike drivers, why? they could not answer correctly - pampapogi, level up, for the next election, I said no: the correct song is: they are very very very happy jumping with ecstasy for they will be richer, and it is one way of winning the lotto;
Off-topic lecture on tarpaulins

when I was in Br. 73, RTC, Malabon, Fiscal now Retired Judge Judge Edmundo T. Acuña, Regional Trial Court, Caloocan City, Branch 123 WHEREFORE, respondent Judge Edmundo T. Acuña is found GUILTY of impropriety and is REPRIMANDED therefor. He is STERNLY WARNED that the repetition of the same or similar act shall be dealt with more severely.; he repeatedly told me that my arch enemy Br. 72, is bragging of winning Sweepstatkes, and even had a certificate; I told Judge Ed, the crying Judge of Calokohan City, when in only son Ed at age 24 died of aneurysm and after finishing Law and passing the Bar exams; He could not accuse me of Cursing since As Philippine Angel of Death, I told him repeatedly, Don't be afraid, I won't hurt you! but Mark my work, they will regret it! (taking my robes, gavel and golden throne Br. 73); he confessed that my suspension was born and cooked at Malabon Canteen, which with all court salas except mine was totally burned exactly on 2000 July a year after I was suspended for 69 months; he also confessed that he encountered many pera pira temptations; he asked me to pray for him;

I write this tale of the reason why the Law on procurement, now requires the tarpaulin announcement of transparency; hence I submit the matter of deletion to the sound judgment of the Commons Community
No objection to the deletion of these 2 photos this one is obsolete finished product so to speak hence functus oficio
@Judgefloro: then be more selective in uploading, like what P199 and several other editors have told you. Commons is not a place to host your personal images showing addresses and redundant directional signs, just because these images only served as your guide to not get lost. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This one is the official Category:Mass schedules in the Philippines created on 2014 as sub-category of Category:Mass schedules ; it is very informative and tells the faithful the Category:Schedules in the Philippines hence I submit the matter of deletion to the sound judgment of the Commons Community sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 09:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid this is too redundant already to related images in the category you mentioned. Also this is COM:NOTUSED. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Rejoinder and good point: I always wanted to take photos of interiors of very important Parish Churches with open lights; this only happens during Sundays; more often, when I arrive in Churches from Batangas to Isabela, most Churches are closed and if open their ligths are not open; so, if my itinerary is near the place, I would drop by the Church again; my main problem is the exact time of the Mass beginning or ending; more often than not, Mass schedules are posted poorly and erased in time, except those by Jollibee or Malayan Insurance; hence, I did file a good comment on the Mass schedule, for I think it is the only one remaining; Category:Mass schedules in France has only 20 photos and most are poorly built; here, when Parish Priests are transferred, Mass schedules are changed, and I had to get them ... submitted to the sound discretion of the Commons Community sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 07:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 11

A set of redundant images. See COM:SPAM and COM:NOTUSED. Uploader has been notified to be more selective in their uploads. Only 2 or 3 images for each person or child depicted is enough (those that I didn't nominate).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect ...

Good argument and discussion: My photos used by International public domain I took time to search them in Google, since I accidentally saw when browsing, that many of my photos are and were used continously by International books, magazines and newspapers inter alia; and no one could guess, what picture of the 1.7 million files they would use; so, as many editors here listened to me, I did ask often: why should we or they or anyone prevent the Public Domain World Planet from being choosy, weird and or ignorant of the good or better photos that they should use?
And I desire to UNDERSCORE my Lamentation like that of Jeremiah, why why and why did I not put in Commons floods of Photos of the ERASED Annihilated Category:San Nicolas, Batangas and Category:Agoncillo, Batangas and nearby almost obliterated Towns due to Taal Explotion?
IN FINE here, a) I desire to quote here what Justice Category:Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. said to console me 36 hours of my no-sleep on July 20-22, 1999, Longest Suspension of a Judge in World History: "She was appointed by Cory, but she just sits down reading Briefs ... she did not experienced what I and many Trial Judges had ... I went home Sats and Sundays bringing volumes of Transcripts ... !" She is the Ponente who Signed your Suspension ... if only Category:Andres Narvasa had not retired at 70 ... I repeatedly told CJ Davide my Cebuano ... "It would be a feather on your cap if you can put Floro and Category:Arturo Brion the husband of my seatmate classmate Tonette Brion ... b) It is utterly different when you go to the field of great dangers, take photos of villages for 4 hours, and travel from Bulacan to Pangasinan or Isabela, Ilocos Sur or Batangas for 16 hours and then sit down to edit and upload vis-a-vis, sitting down and Putting Nominations for Deletions; b) perhaps, the Inclusionary Philosphy of many here is not shared by some, and this is the heart of Commons which is Not Censored; c) It is just on what side of the coin you are, or were, or did change habits as in FOP and Com Spam; d) I am ahead of my time, I am not of this world, and ergo, I leave the matter to the sound discretion of the Commons Community; sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 07:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
* Vide: Category:Groups of children in the Philippines Category:Close-up photographs of children and * Category:Close-up photographs of children eating in the Philippines sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 08:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. These certainly are redundant to the many near-duplicate images already in its category. --P 1 9 9   20:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 12

Another set of redundant and repetitive images of a same subject - Wish FM Bus parked at a mall in Bulacan. Redundant to both File:9723FM Bus of Wish 107.11.jpg and File:9723FM Bus of Wish 107.6.jpg. The judge-uploader has been notified several times to be more selective in choosing which images to be uploaded. Uploading redundant images is leaning towards COM:SPAM as treating Commons as a "cloud / webhost" laden with numerous unused images.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:28, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Category:Wish FM Bus has only 12 photos, Vide very notable articles DWNU Breakthrough and Milestones Productions International; patrickroque01 and Author Julan Shirwod Nueva and Own Author Kindrei with one each; and I only took 9 photos in different area, and mine is at SM Baliwag; but the shots were taken at different angles, since it is very hard to take a complete shot of the entire bus; please take a closer look and the angle by angle photography, there are no look alikes or redundancy; hence, I submit my comment for the sound discretion of Commons as Community ....Judgefloro (talk) 06:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Judgefloro: the angles may be different, but these images are same to each other: these depict the same subject. There is redundancy. You can only tell it's not redundant if the two subjects are different, either the subjects themselves or the location where the subject is situated. For example, one image depicts the bus in Marilao, and the other image depicts the same bus in Cabanatuan (not the same bus in the same spot of Marilao, but in different angle). If you desire images of the same subject at different angles, perhaps two or three is enough. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. Redundancy doesn't make sense when we already have near-duplicate images in its category. --P 1 9 9   20:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 13

In the Philippines, the Safe Spaces Act prohibits "uploading or sharing of one’s photos without consent". (See also this explanation.) There's no indication that the subjects consented to having their photos taken or uploaded here.

List of files

Genericusername57 (talk) 01:49, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • I checked two of these images randomly and that was enough to see that this is yet another BS DR motivated likely by nothing else than spite at the uploader’s place at the top of the chart, regardless of value of the rationale stated: Individual privacy laws are a concern for public candid shots, but when faces take up a dozen blurry pixels that concern is misplaced and being misused as a mere prop in the neverending deletionist war.  Keep all, obviously — if there’s anything here that should be deleted, lets have a proper reason. -- Tuválkin 12:07, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • My input: upon checking several files, it appears there are no issues regarding consent. In particular, the guy at File:9610Cuisine food of Bulacan Baliuag 35.jpg appears to be smiling at the photographer which means he agreed to be photographed. None of the images I check depict persons that are "topless" (is the biker guy here topless? I don't think so). Meaning to say, it is acceptable to host them here (no topless persons shown, as far as within the scope of my review, as I haven't review all files). File:9568Baliuag, Bulacan Province 56.jpg depicts a normal street scene where it is unavoidable to include folks. Lean towards  Keep (but that is per my checking as, I repeat, haven't checked them all). But  Delete File:0452Angat San Roque Santo Cristo Santa Cruz Poblacion 03.jpg as a possible no Philippine FOP violation, and it is accepted here that architecture is a form of artistic work, as long as a degree of hard work is exerted, "irrespective of their mode or form of expression, as well as of their content, quality and purpose." (Sec. 172.2 of RA 8293). Undelete it if FOP is introduced here, maybe next year or around Yuletide season, but not as early as month of fall (as it seems involved stakeholders on potential impacts of FOP are yet to be consulted). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:35, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: Isn't the whole point of the law to prevent harassment in public spaces? A quick ctrl+f for "photo" or "video" seems like the part of the law related to media is in relation to the likelihood of the photo being used for harassment. Because it's not like they banned the use of CCTV (in fact they encourage it). And the whole "uploading or sharing of one’s photos without consent", is that referring to the photos that the victims already possess (like on their phones) or like the photos that others take of them? I recognize that the law is written in a confusing manner, but such a strict interpretation that prevents any persons to appear in videos or photos without explicit consent would mean that news outlets like ANC 247 or Inquirer.net are breaking the law right? — BriefEdits (talk) 23:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept some per discussion above. But deleted many. Some were indeed too personal (like portrait photos of non-notable persons). And as with many of Judgefloro's uploads, they are uncurated: near duplicates, bad compositions, unusable. Also kept File:0452Angat San Roque Santo Cristo Santa Cruz Poblacion 03.jpg because it is a plain box building, nothing really propriety there. --P 1 9 9   14:54, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 14

COM:SPAM and fulfill COM:WEBHOSTing. Commons is not a social media platform where dozens of relatively useless images are being dumped hour by hour. Yet another set of contributions by the now blocked uploader, who is suspected to be w:Florentino Floro.

List of files

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:07, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:44, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 16

All files in Category:Ants of the Philippines eating Bibingka and Puto Bumbong are leaning towards COM:SPAM and COM:WEBHOSTing. Additional contributions by now-blocked uploader. All are COM:NOTUSED.

List of files

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:33, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment there are more such images in most (if not all) of subcats of Category:Ants of the Philippines. Some may be useful, but I cannot review them all as the COM:WEBHOST-type images have intermingled with them. Admins or veteran users' intervention may be needed. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:10, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 18

These images are all near-duplicates of: File:01071jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 04.jpg, File:01071jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 06.jpg, File:0954jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 13.jpg, and File:0954jfManggahan Floodway Sunsets Daang Pasig River Bridge Rosario Weir Flood Gatesfvf 16.jpg, which better show the floodway structure as well as an object attached to it. More COM:WEBHOSTing files.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 20

Violation of Alphabet Inc.'s copyright. While the billboard/announcement may be ineligible for protection as it just contains non-original wording in predictable layout, the map used is not: it is a screenshot of Google Maps. COM:Derivative work as a result.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:27, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. And just a random sign, not particular useful. --P 1 9 9   02:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 21

COM:SPAM and COM:WEBHOST-ing by now-blocked Judgefloro. The following are unused files that oversaturate Category:School children in Bulacan. Redundant to all other images of similar school children of the very same province that is already "over-covered" here on WikiCommons (as opposed to distant provinces away from Bulacan).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:41, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:26, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 24

[edit]

Redundant photos to others found at Category:Cutcot Bridge 1 (Pulilan). COM:NOTUSED, COM:WEBHOST content by now-blocked Judgefloro (talk · contribs).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:48, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:57, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]