Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/06/05
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
No FoP for 3D sculpture in USA B dash (talk) 03:36, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Darwin Ahoy! 06:12, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Correctfacts1888 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files were initially tagged by Gbawden as no permission (No permission since)
— Racconish 💬 11:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- File name says JeremyRice Photography so thats likely who took them, despite the claim of the new user, whose only uploads were these Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:06, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
This is not perfect Nahin Bin Kaysar (talk) 11:00, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 13:51, 5 Juni 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Non-trivial logo --Krdbot 01:30, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
copyright violation https://twitter.com/gekirock_shop/status/1133187662020370433 そらみみ (talk) 13:41, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 06:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aryu Ayush (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal type photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 12:18, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:07, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aryu Ayush (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful + Copyvio / Uploader is seen in the photos (As per the descriptions and names)
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:27, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:13, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation : http://sergebelloni.fr/ Supertoff (talk) 17:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 18:57, 5 Juni 2019 UTC: Copyright violation : http://sergebelloni.fr/ --Krdbot 01:31, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Bollywood Hungama Copyright
[edit]- File:Alia Bhatt at the promo launch of 'Student of the Year.jpg
- File:Alia Bhatt at PCJ Delhi Couture Week 2012.jpg
- File:Alia Bhatt Starbucks opening.jpg
- File:Alia Bhatt with 'Student Of The Year' teams visit to KBC 6 sets.jpg
- File:SOTY Cast during promotions.jpg
- File:SOTY cast during promotions.jpg
- File:SOTY Cast Starbucks opening.jpg
- File:Student of the Year Trio.jpg
- File:Alia Bhatt at 2 STATES trailer launch.jpg
- File:Alia Bhatt at the DVD launch of 'Highway' (cropped).jpg
- File:Alia Bhatt at the DVD launch of 'Highway'.jpg
- File:Highway launch.jpg
- File:Deepika endorses Yamaha scooters 02.jpg
- File:Deepika endorses Yamaha scooters 03.jpg
- File:Deepika endorses Yamaha scooters 04.jpg
- File:Deepika endorses Yamaha scooters 05.jpg
- File:Deepika endorses Yamaha scooters 06.jpg
- File:Deepika endorses Yamaha scooters 07.jpg
- File:Deepika endorses Yamaha scooters 08.jpg
- File:Deepika endorses Yamaha scooters 09.jpg
- File:Deepika endorses Yamaha scooters 10.jpg
- File:Deepika launches double issue of Women's Health 01.jpg
- File:Deepika launches double issue of Women's Health 02.jpg
- File:Deepika launches double issue of Women's Health 03.jpg
- File:Deepika launches double issue of Women's Health 04.jpg
- File:Deepika launches double issue of Women's Health 05.jpg
- File:Deepika launches double issue of Women's Health 06.jpg
- File:Deepika launches double issue of Women's Health 07.jpg
- File:Deepika launches double issue of Women's Health 08.jpg
- File:Deepika launches double issue of Women's Health 09.jpg
- File:Deepika launches double issue of Women's Health 10.jpg
- File:Deepika on the sets of 'Isi Ka Naam Zindagi' 01.jpg
- File:Deepika on the sets of 'Isi Ka Naam Zindagi' 02.jpg
- File:Deepika on the sets of 'Isi Ka Naam Zindagi' 03.jpg
These pictures are no longer available on Bollywood Hungama. These pictures also needs to be deleted from Commons as Bollywood Hungama has removed all these pictures. Source of these pictures is broken now. --CptViraj (Talk) 07:10, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as nom. --CptViraj (Talk) 07:10, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Keep The CC-BY-SA license is irrevocable. That's why we have a license review. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:31, 6 June 2019 (UTC)- Keep As Yann said. Commons would be pointless if we were depending on the source to stay online. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:08, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
I agree with Yann and Alexis Jazz and i withdraw request. Thanks! --CptViraj (Talk) 09:56, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 11:02, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
I am a guy in this picture. This picture violates my portrait rights. Uploader stalks me. Please delete this picture. 119.196.119.236 00:16, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Please hurry up! Uploader is a racist.(refer to uploader's ID) the one is ongoing stalk Right now.--119.196.119.236 14:16, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - uploader is spamming cross-wiki with this photograph. --Pugilist (talk) 15:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, prank/personal insult image. Uploader blocked. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:46, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:12, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, orphan uncat with false authorship date and copyright claims; duplicate image with proper information already on Commons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:56, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
I own this photo and published it in error. Please remove. Thank you! Music0196 (talk) 02:43, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader mistake; deletion promptly requested by uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:53, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
1939 photograph of her majesty by en:Cecil Beaton. Part of the photo series now held at The Royal Collection Trust (only one [1] has online photo). Unless it's crown copyright (no evidence), it should be 70 years PMA (to 2051). Retired electrician (talk) 07:39, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- In the media.vogue.it it says "© La Presse". I am not sure what it means, and why vogue could publish it, while we cannot. Macuser (talk) 14:10, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Possibly because Vogue is a magazine with a budget to pay for publication rights of copyrighted material? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:05, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted. No evidence of free license. Uploader originally uploaded with specious claim that it was a 2019 photo that they took themselves; false license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:05, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Willians01100 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Shields or blazons not apparently own work of uploader.
- File:Escudo-Caaguazú.png
- File:Escudo de Limpio (Paraguay).png
- File:Villa-Elisa-Escudo.png
- File:Fernando-de-la-Mora-Escudo.png
- File:Mariano-Roque-Alonso-Escudo.png
- File:Municipalidad de Ciudad del Este - Escudo.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:41, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Willians01100 (talk · contribs)
[edit]From file size and metadata transmission numbers, appear to have been copied from Facebook or other online source which applies transmission data to images.
- File:Monumento por la vida.jpg
- File:Ciclovía del Parque Alejo García.jpg
- File:Parque Ñu Guasu Luque.jpg
- File:Costanera de Hernandarias.jpg
- File:Retablo de Ñu Guasu.jpg
- File:Anfiteatro del Lago.jpg
- File:RestoBar San Roque.jpg
- File:Bar San Roque Asunción.jpg
- File:Bordados de ao po'i.jpg
- File:El ñandutí en la vestimenta.jpg
- File:Tobatí es la ciudad de la cerámica.jpg
- File:Termo de tereré forrado en similcuero.jpg
- File:Artesanía cuerina.jpg
- File:Ñandutí Encaje.jpg
- File:Bailarinas paraguayas.jpg
- File:Déjame ser Josefina Plá.jpg
- File:Pohâ ñanâ.jpg
- File:Asado con mandioca.jpg
- File:Chicharõ trenzado.jpg
- File:Reviro y chipa cuerito.jpg
- File:Galleta Cuartel.jpg
- File:Chorizo sanjuanino.jpg
- File:Mermelada de Koserevá.jpg
- File:Kivevé.jpg
- File:Piracaldo.jpg
- File:Termo paraguayo.jpg
- File:Termo paraguayo 2.jpg
- File:Payagua Mascada.jpg
- File:Chipa Guazú.jpg
- File:Mbeju 4 quesos.jpg
- File:Locro paraguayo.jpg
- File:Ao Po'i.jpg
- File:Parque Lineal Senderos.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:46, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Willians01100 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small file sizes, low quality, no metadata.
- File:Museo del barro.jpg
- File:Museo del mueble paraguayo.jpg
- File:Museo Militar Paraguay.jpg
- File:Museo naval Vapor Cue.jpg
- File:Museo del Arte Sacro.jpg
- File:Batalla de Ytororó.jpg
- File:Escalinata Antequera.jpg
- File:Jarra y guampa filigrana.jpg
- File:Ateneo Paraguayo Primera Sede.jpg
- File:Koserevá.png
- File:Queso Paraguay.jpg
- File:Jukysy.png
- File:Jopara.jpg
- File:Chipa123.jpg
- File:Carrulim.png
- File:Madre del Buen Consejo Ypacaraí.jpg
- File:Concepción-Paraguay.jpg
- File:Avenida Perú 3.jpg
- File:Ciudad de Capiatá.jpg
- File:Capiatá.jpg
- File:Escalinata de Presidente Franco.jpg
- File:Basílica de la ciudad de Caacupé.jpg
- File:Ciudad Nueva.jpg
- File:Hernando Arias de Saavedra (Hernandarias).jpg
- File:Museo de Hernandarias.jpg
- File:Represa Acaray.jpg
- File:Monumento de Hernando Arias de Saavedra.jpg
- File:Avenida Canadá - Costanera de Hernandarias.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:50, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: From their recent uploads today involving false EXIF details with files like this and others, it’s clear they cannot be trusted. --1989 (talk) 15:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Error. I don't wanna publish this file with this license Anna Ovcharenko (talk) 20:54, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:40, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Collage of seven images, without source or license for any. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:17, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 15:25, 6 Juni 2019 UTC: Insufficient or doubtful author or license; OTRS validation required (F1) --Krdbot 19:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely own work on the five derivative images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:19, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 15:25, 6 Juni 2019 UTC: Insufficient or doubtful author or license; OTRS validation required (F1) --Krdbot 19:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Facebook size with transmission # in metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 15:25, 6 Juni 2019 UTC: Insufficient or doubtful author or license; OTRS validation required (F1) --Krdbot 19:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely own work on this logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 15:25, 6 Juni 2019 UTC: Insufficient or doubtful author or license; OTRS validation required (F1) --Krdbot 19:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Collage without permissions for the images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:21, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 15:25, 6 Juni 2019 UTC: Insufficient or doubtful author or license; OTRS validation required (F1) --Krdbot 19:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Collage without permissions. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:24, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 15:24, 6 Juni 2019 UTC: Insufficient or doubtful author or license; OTRS validation required (F1) --Krdbot 19:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Derivative works, no permission, very small. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 15:25, 6 Juni 2019 UTC: Insufficient or doubtful author or license; OTRS validation required (F1) --Krdbot 19:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Tiny image, with four drawings, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 15:25, 6 Juni 2019 UTC: Insufficient or doubtful author or license; OTRS validation required (F1) --Krdbot 19:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Tiny image, with four drawings, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 15:25, 6 Juni 2019 UTC: Insufficient or doubtful author or license; OTRS validation required (F1) --Krdbot 19:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Tiny image, with five drawings, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 15:25, 6 Juni 2019 UTC: Insufficient or doubtful author or license; OTRS validation required (F1) --Krdbot 19:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
From size & transmission code looks like it was copied from Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 15:25, 6 Juni 2019 UTC: Insufficient or doubtful author or license; OTRS validation required (F1) --Krdbot 19:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
From size and transmission data in meta, looks like another copy from Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 15:24, 6 Juni 2019 UTC: Insufficient or doubtful author or license; OTRS validation required (F1) --Krdbot 19:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
This is not a true SVG file. It is preferable if a version of this file can be created as a SVG. TextClick (talk) 05:43, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Comment @TextClick: you can make a request at COM:GL/ILL. 大诺史 (talk) 05:59, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment @大诺史: Done. TextClick (talk) 19:05, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Comment I've redrawn it as a vector graphic. Deletion request can be closed. Pbroks13 (talk) 20:00, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept. File has been validated and overwritten by a graphist. 大诺史 (talk) 16:52, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Possible COM:DUPE of File:Women's Stand Up Paddle Surf Women's Marathon ROS19 23-03-2019 (164).jpg, couldn't see any major differences in the images. 大诺史 (talk) 06:09, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept. Other file was deleted instead by Krd under COM:DUPE. 大诺史 (talk) 13:41, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Possible COM:DUPE of File:Women's Stand Up Paddle Surf Women's Marathon ROS19 23-03-2019 (152).jpg, couldn't see any major differences in the images. 大诺史 (talk) 06:10, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept. Other file was deleted instead by Krd under COM:DUPE. 大诺史 (talk) 13:42, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Possible COM:DUPE of File:Women's Stand Up Paddle Surf Women's Marathon ROS19 23-03-2019 (132).jpg, couldn't see any major differences in the images. 大诺史 (talk) 06:12, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept. Other file was deleted instead by Krd under COM:DUPE. 大诺史 (talk) 13:41, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Possible COM:DUPE of File:Women's Stand Up Paddle Surf Women's Marathon ROS19 23-03-2019 (138).jpg, couldn't see any major differences in the images. 大诺史 (talk) 06:12, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept. Other file was deleted instead by Krd under COM:DUPE. 大诺史 (talk) 13:42, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Possible COM:DUPE of File:Women's Stand Up Paddle Surf Women's Marathon ROS19 23-03-2019 (108).jpg, couldn't see any major differences in the images. 大诺史 (talk) 06:12, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept. Other file was deleted instead by Krd under COM:DUPE. 大诺史 (talk) 13:42, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Possible COM:DUPE of File:Women's Stand Up Paddle Surf Women's Marathon ROS19 23-03-2019 (124).jpg, couldn't see any major differences in the images. 大诺史 (talk) 06:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept. Other file was deleted instead by Krd under COM:DUPE. 大诺史 (talk) 13:42, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 11:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:IMG-20190520-WA0005.jpg” under ticket:2019060510003129. -- Geagea (talk) 01:16, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per OTRS. -- Geagea (talk) 01:16, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hmdmtb80e09z236e (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:Mujtaba Ahmed Tin Hmdmtb80e09z236e.jpg
- File:Mujtaba Ahmed Raja.jpg
- File:Ahmed Mujtaba Tin Hmdmtb80e09z236e.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:49, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:12, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
because I can't extract black square Speltdecca (talk) 05:57, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept Problem fixed. 大诺史 (talk) 08:27, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Delete Unused test svg file. I closed the previous DR as the stated problem was fixed. 大诺史 (talk) 08:28, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Pict is used but you can delet if it's best. Cdt, Speltdecca (talk) 17:23, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept. The file is used in fr.wiki. Taivo (talk) 07:35, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
As much as I appreciate that we finally have a good image of the current Roman Catholic Bishop of Reykjavík on Commons, I note that the name of the author in the file's EXIF metadata (Tomasz Lenart) doesn't correspond directly to the uploader's user name (Megatlen). Uploader's own work looks plausible enough, given the existence of metadata, but I think that, as this is Megatlen's first and only contribution so far, and the user has no user page, we need some kind of confirmation of authorship or rights ownership, possibly via OTRS. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:02, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Forgive me, but it does not matter what you think. I hope that you do not expect the author of the photo to have his name from the commons entered in the camera, and not the first and last name? Probably hardly authors of photos give their own real name at Commons. What more: perhaps Tomasz Lenart would not wish you to indicate the connection of his name and nickname. In addition, the author of the photo can use someone else's camera. Do not be so suspicious. Would you be sure of the authorship, if the photo appeared on the Commons under the nickname "Tomasz Lenart" then you would be sure that the person enclosing the file in the commons has copyright?? The owner of the Commons account makes a statement. And it is on his responsibility that the files are in the repository. After all, the files loaded by you do not have your nickname at EXIF meta. So maybe that are not your photos? :)) Jacek555 (talk) 07:56, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Jacek555: I'm very much for privacy and would never make any inappropriate "outing" of other users, but "Megatlen" themselves has uploaded that image with "Tomasz Lenart" in the metadata; and standard procedure here on Commons is it to be suspicious in such cases, because so many people upload images that are not their own. You are quite right, we don't really have proof whether any image uploaded by "Gestumblindi" or by "Jacek555" is really made by that user, but as soon as we have an indication that it might be otherwise, we have to check. Megatlen could also upload the image with redacted EXIF and maybe still confirm that they have the rights via OTRS, and future uploads will be fine. - On a more general note: I really don't like the climate of mistrust we have here on Commons, and of which deletion requests such as this one by me certainly are a part. But this climate has a reason. Every day, we have to delete countless pictures as copyright violations. People just upload tons of stuff they don't have the rights to. This makes it harder for honest uploaders, too. But I can't change it. We must continue trying to keep Commons as reliable a repository of really free content as possible. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:30, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Mega tomasz lenart
- Keep mystery solved - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:38, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Is confirmed by the logo on http://www.tomaszlenart.pl/ btw which says "www.tlenART.pl" and the linked Flickr account at https://www.flickr.com/photos/megatlen/. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:41, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- I've asked the uploader per email for confirmation to OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 18:36, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: why? User:Megatlen was registered in 2006. https://www.flickr.com/people/megatlen/ (registered 2012) is linked from http://www.tomaszlenart.pl/ which I found in the EXIF. I think requiring OTRS for this is just purple crocodile. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:07, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- User:Megatlen was registered in 2017 (on Commons) and this image is his only upload, so far. The user under your Flickr link calls himself "Tommy Lee" (on Flickr) and all his uploads on Flickr are "All rights reserved".
- Though your research was helpful; in this scenario, asking for a direct confirmation (w/o requiring public disclosure) is justified, IMO. --Túrelio (talk) 19:15, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: w:pl:User:Megatlen was registered in 2006. I don't know about you, but I don't think they're psychic. What are you suggesting? Megatlen registered in 2006 as a lucky guess so they could upload a copyvio 13 years later? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:25, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- I'm with Alexis here. This doesn't seem at all likely to be a copyvio, and even if someone feels a need for confirmation, the OTRS process seems excessive here. http://www.tomaszlenart.pl/ has a long list of sites, many of which (e.g. Flickr) are places where he can easily be contacted; if someone really has doubts, just drop him a note to confirm that Megatlen is him. - Jmabel ! talk 22:54, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: you entered 5 tildes instead of 4.
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:09, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: you entered 5 tildes instead of 4.
- I'm with Alexis here. This doesn't seem at all likely to be a copyvio, and even if someone feels a need for confirmation, the OTRS process seems excessive here. http://www.tomaszlenart.pl/ has a long list of sites, many of which (e.g. Flickr) are places where he can easily be contacted; if someone really has doubts, just drop him a note to confirm that Megatlen is him. - Jmabel ! talk 22:54, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: w:pl:User:Megatlen was registered in 2006. I don't know about you, but I don't think they're psychic. What are you suggesting? Megatlen registered in 2006 as a lucky guess so they could upload a copyvio 13 years later? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:25, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: why? User:Megatlen was registered in 2006. https://www.flickr.com/people/megatlen/ (registered 2012) is linked from http://www.tomaszlenart.pl/ which I found in the EXIF. I think requiring OTRS for this is just purple crocodile. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:07, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Let's compare two versions of this story:
- Wikipedia user Megatlen, who registered in 2006, uploads a picture from a guy called Tomasz Lenart, but this Tomasz Lenart opened a flickr account named Megatlen coincidentally in 2012.
- Wikipedia user Megatlen = Tomasz Lenart.
- The coincidence is obviously not convincing. Keep per Alexis Jazz.--Roy17 (talk) 18:13, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, given this evidence, my deletion request can be treated as withdrawn (but must still be closed by a different admin per the rules don't allowing self-closing a DR where discussion took place). Gestumblindi (talk) 18:25, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. — Racconish 💬 07:46, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:05, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:13, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Personal file, out of COM:SCOPE. Vercelas (quæstiones?) 00:21, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:14, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Not educationally useful: horrendous quality Suzukaze-c (talk) 01:12, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:14, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
This is a copyright violation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:42, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, above COM:TOO. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:14, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
I no longer want my image online. Thanks. DarkReading (talk) 01:44, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader request. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:15, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
This seems like an advertisement way out of scope of the project. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:51, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: advertisement; COM:OOS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:15, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
a 2019 low-quality low-resolution png without exif = screencap/copyvio. Roy17 (talk) 02:02, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Saya keberatan dengan usulan penghapusan halaman ini.- Alasan saya: karena photos tersebut merupaakan foto asian games penyemangat untuk pendidikan anak-anak indonesia di kejuaraan asia
foto untuk penyemangat dan pendidikan anak-anak. Dirham Prof (talk) 09:35, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:14, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 20:51, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Not too simple for copyright Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:17, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; transferred on fr.wiki. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:17, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
It is an architectural drawing that is no longer relevant and presents a security risk due to increase in public warnings Dentonbowles (talk) 02:25, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: not used; uploader request. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:19, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Logo used briefly in the videogame Grand Theft Auto V. Not sure if meets threshold of originality. Titore (talk) 02:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: above COM:TOO. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:20, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted poster B dash (talk) 03:27, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (poster is too big). --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:21, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 15:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: again. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted poster B dash (talk) 03:27, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (poster is too big). --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:21, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:52, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted poster B dash (talk) 03:28, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete The purpose of this photo is clearly to show the cartoon; unless the cartoon source can be provided with proof of free license by the cartoon's creator, delete as derivative work. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:58, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (cartoon is the main subject of the picture; cartoon under copyright). --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:21, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
File:President Trump and Vice President Pence Visit the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial (32953801198).jpg
[edit]No FoP for 3D sculpture in USA B dash (talk) 03:33, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, created in 2011. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:23, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
File:President Trump and Vice President Pence Visit the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial (32953801658).jpg
[edit]No FoP for 3D sculpture in USA B dash (talk) 03:33, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Not sure of this is COM:DM or not. This is a marginal case. --219.79.97.37 08:15, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- I'm struggling at #5 and #6 of de minimis, but leaning towards #6. The MLK Memorial is the main part of the photo, since Trump and Pence are very small in the photo so as to illustrate the memorial. Removing the memorial would make the photo still useful, but looks odd. --B dash (talk) 07:18, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: I have removed the sculpture. Sculpture was too big for COM:DM. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:26, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
File:President Trump and Vice President Pence Visit the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial (46777146732).jpg
[edit]No FoP for 3D sculpture in USA B dash (talk) 03:33, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; created in 2011. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:27, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
File:President Trump and Vice President Pence Visit the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial (46777147642).jpg
[edit]No FoP for 3D sculpture in USA B dash (talk) 03:33, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Might be cropped to only show bottom section of the photo with the people. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:00, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; picture cropped. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:28, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D sculpture in USA B dash (talk) 03:35, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:30, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Culturerelay (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam (images were in support of a deleted-as-spam article on en.wp, where this editor is indef-blocked for such behavior).
- File:CR logo 1.jpg
- File:Culture Relay.jpg
- File:Culture Relay logo.jpg
- File:CultureRelayModelWithPics.png
- File:CR logo.jpg
DMacks (talk) 05:36, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:30, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal photo. 大诺史 (talk) 07:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:31, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Inferior version of File:Kaspesky Antivirus logo.png, also missing words at the side. 大诺史 (talk) 08:24, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: not the same image, still used on a lot of articles. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:32, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
test file, out of scope&unused Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 10:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:50, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Antoniorosset (talk · contribs)
[edit]The uploader seems to be the sitter of these photographs, likely out of scope, and taken with a variety of cameras. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Antonio Carlos Rosset Filho uploaded by Antoniorosset and Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2019-04#File:Mr. Antonio Carlos Rosset and the Vice Prime Minister of Russia Mr. Igor Shuvalov.jpg.
- File:Abimaq Conference Leeco Steel Trading Antonio Carlos Rosset Picture 5.jpg
- File:Abimaq Conference Leeco Steel Trading Antonio Carlos Rosset Picture 6.jpg
- File:Abimaq Conference Leeco Steel Trading Antonio Carlos Rosset Picture 4.jpg
- File:Abimaq Conference Leeco Steel Trading Antonio Carlos Rosset Picture 3.jpg
- File:Abimaq Conference Leeco Steel Trading Antonio Carlos Rosset Picture 2.jpg
- File:Abimaq Conference Leeco Steel Trading Antonio Rosset Picture 1.jpg
- File:Mr. Antonio Rosset, Commercial Director Latam, Leeco Steel Trading.jpg
- File:Mr. Antonio Rosset, Commercial Director Leeco Steel Trading.jpg
- File:Mr. Antonio Rosset, Commercial Director Leeco Steel Trading, speaking in the ABIMAQ.jpg
- File:Mr. Antonio Rosset, Commercial Director Latin America, Leeco Steel Trading.jpg
- File:Mr. Antonio Rosset speaking in the Brazilian Association of Equipment - ABIMAQ Sao Paulo, Brazil.jpg
- File:Rosset e Eike Batista 012.jpg
- File:Rosset e Eike Batista 019.jpg
- File:Rosset e Eike Batista 016.jpg
- File:Rosset e Eike Batista 006.jpg
- File:Rosset and Ministry of Agriculture Kazacstan.jpg
- File:LEECO STEEL TRADING - ANTONIO ROSSET CD.jpg
- File:LEECO STEEL TRADING - ANTONIO ROSSET FILHO.jpg
- File:LEECO STEEL TRADING - ANTONIO ROSSET FILHO - COMMERCIAL DIRECTOR.jpg
- File:LEECO STEEL TRADING - ANTONIO ROSSET.jpg
- File:ANTONIO ROSSET FROM LEECO STEEL TRADING AND DEREK.jpg
- File:DINNER IN SHANGHAI - ANTONIO ROSSET LEECO STEEL TRADING.jpg
- File:ANTONIO ROSSET - LEECO STEEL TRADING VISITING BAOSTEEL.jpg
- File:ANTONIO ROSSET FROM LEECO STEEL VISITING BAOSTEEL.jpg
- File:LEECO STEEL - BAOSTEEL ANTONIO ROSSET.jpg
- File:Visiting SHOUGANG CHINA LEECO STEEL AND ANTONIO ROSSET.jpg
- File:Antonio Rosset, Emb. Roberto Azevedo da WTO, Giulio Ermenegildo 001.jpg
- File:07 AMA6269.jpg
- File:Kasaco 1.jpg
— Racconish 💬 06:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:27, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Antoniorosset (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, personal photos, unclear how they are reusable for educational purposes.
- File:Billy and John Purcell.jpg
- File:Leeco Trading Team - China.jpg
- File:Denton, Mr. Xu Ji Ti and Jason.jpg
- File:Leeco Trading - China.jpg
- File:Leeco Trading in China.jpg
- File:Leeco Trading Team.jpg
- File:Exportation of Coffee Rosset2006.jpg
- File:Antonio Carlos Rosset Filho Government of Samara Russia 2004.jpg
- File:Antonio Carlos Rosset Filho receiving a gift from Mr. Alexander Baburin food Minister Moscow 2002.jpg
- File:Antonio Carlos Rosset Filho during a meeting with the Government of Samara Russia 2004.jpg
- File:Agreement Coordinated by Rosset with the mayor of Moscow 2002.jpg
- File:Agreement between the Moscow City Hall and Brazilian Association of Beef coordinated by Antonio Carlos Rosset Filho 2002.jpg
- File:Jason Fredstrom, Dentin Nordhues and Antonio Carlos Rosset - Abimaq.jpg
- File:Jason Fredstrom, Denton Nordhues and Antonio Carlos Rosset Filho - Abimaq.jpg
- File:Antonio Carlos Rosset Filho speechs to Brazilian Association of Equipment.jpg
- File:Antonio Carlos Rosset speaking to the members of the Brazilian Association of Equipment.jpg
- File:Antonio Carlos Rosset Filho, Denton Nordhues and Jason Fredstrom EVP.jpg
- File:Antonio Carlos Rosset in Abimaq.jpg
- File:Denton Nordhues, Jason Fredstrom and Antonio Rosset in a dinner Patria Bank.jpg
- File:Antonio Carlos Rosset Filho, Denton Nordhues and Jason Fredstrom.jpg
- File:Antonio Carlos Rosset Filho at the restaurant Rubayat Figueira.jpg
- File:Jason Fredstrom, EVP, Antonio Rosset, Commercial Director and Denton Nordhues CEO.jpg
- File:Mr. Jason Fredstrom, Mr. Antonio Rosset, Mr. Denton Nordhues.jpg
- File:Antonio Carlos Rosset Filho - Commercial Director Latin America Leeco Trading.jpg
- File:Saturn President.jpg
- File:Rosset with the President of BMG BANK.jpg
- File:Rosset - Brazilian Russian Chamber.jpg
- File:Atletico Mineiro and Corinthians.jpg
- File:Rosset Brazilian Russian.jpg
- File:Barbecue with Hyundai Family in 2014.jpg
- File:AVisita CT.jpg
- File:Hyundai Team.jpg
- File:Rosset and Mohamed.jpg
- File:Rosset and friend Mohamed.jpg
- File:Antonio Carlos Rosset in Egypt.jpg
- File:Antonio Rosset in Egypt.jpg
- File:Rosset e Eike Batista 009.gif
JopkeB (talk) 12:57, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:57, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Theoimed93 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused, out of scope. Per Commons:Categories for discussion/2018/06/Category:Miydu, this user's edits have only consisted of cross-wiki self-promotion. Best to deny.
ℯxplicit 07:06, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:28, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Floralis Genérica
[edit]There is no FOP in Argentina for sculptures. en:Eduardo Catalano died in 2010, so undelete in 2081.
- File:Buenos Aires (6038382796).jpg
- File:Floralis Generica - Eduardo Catalano.JPG
- File:Floralis Generica Buenos Aires.JPG
- File:Floralis Generica Panorama.jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica (5459477121).jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica (5459479981).jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica (5459482915).jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica (5459485015).jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica (5459489463).jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica (5459492191).jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica (5459495097).jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica (5460093850).jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica - Buenos Aires 02.jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica - Buenos Aires.jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica at night.jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica closing at dusk.jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica desde atrás.jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica desde la facultad de dereho.jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica desde lejos.jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica mirando al cielo.jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica Vista lateral.jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica.jpg
- File:From Within The Floralis Genérica.jpg
- File:LQ 275 (5460077476).jpg
- File:Wikimania 2009 Buenos Aires Banner.PNG
russavia (talk) 16:04, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Floralis Genérica
[edit]No FOP in Argentina for sculptures.
- File:Flor de Metal (8746182923).jpg
- File:Flor de Metal, Buenos Aires (6216879456).jpg
- File:Flor de Metal, Buenos Aires (6877459420).jpg
- File:Flor de Metal, Buenos Aires (7084047977).jpg
- File:Flor de Metal, Buenos Aires (8639945118).jpg
russavia (talk) 06:00, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Ymblanter (talk) 22:49, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Floralis Genérica
[edit]For the reasons given above.
- File:Floralis Generica.jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica (8616537187).jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica - 1 (7565433156).jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica - 2 (7565431368).jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica Buenos Aires Argentina 2011.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 17:34, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:25, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Floralis Genérica
[edit]Unclear copyright status + per above rationale: "there is no FOP in Argentina for sculptures. en:Eduardo Catalano died in 2010, so undelete in 2081". In en:Floralis Genérica states (unsourced) that the sculpture was "a gift to the city by the Argentine architect Eduardo Catalano." Despite of needing a source for this, can't say if this "give away" involved also all pending imaginable [copy]rights, enabling the "Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires" ({{CC-AR-GCBA}}) as the possible donee to relicense the work...
- File:Floralis Genérica Buenos Aires, Argentina.jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica on Avenida Figueroa Alcorta, Buenos Aires-1.JPG
- File:Floralis Genérica, Recoleta.jpg
- File:Floralis Genérica.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 08:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Floralis Genérica
[edit]No FoP for 3D works in Argentina.
- File:Buenos Aires - Tigre (Argentina) - panoramio (14).jpg
- File:Buenos Aires - Tigre (Argentina) - panoramio (6).jpg
- File:Buenos Aires - Tigre (Argentina) - panoramio (7).jpg
- File:Buenos Aires - Tigre (Argentina) - panoramio (8).jpg
- File:Buenos Aires- Floralis Generica (33999568536).jpg
- File:Flor común, Buenos Aires, Argentina (2354832165).jpg
- File:Flor común, Buenos Aires, Argentina (2354833015).jpg
- File:Flor común, Buenos Aires, Argentina (2355666560).jpg
- File:Floralis generica - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Rosa - panoramio (3).jpg
B dash (talk) 08:22, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:30, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
No freendom of paronama in Iran B dash (talk) 08:29, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:32, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
No freendom of paronama in Iran B dash (talk) 08:29, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:32, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
No freendom of paronama in Iran B dash (talk) 08:29, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:32, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
No freendom of paronama in Iran B dash (talk) 08:29, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:32, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Milad Tower in 2011
[edit]No freedom of paronama in Iran
- File:Milad Tower in My North Weat View - panoramio.jpg
- File:Moonlight and Milad Tower - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Moonlight and Milad Tower - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Moonlight and Milad Tower - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Moonlight and Milad Tower - panoramio (6).jpg
- File:Moonlight and Milad Tower - panoramio (7).jpg
- File:Moonlight and Milad Tower - panoramio.jpg
- File:برج میلاد - panoramio (6).jpg
B dash (talk) 08:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:34, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Mech is not concerted substitution, but instead there is a tetrahedral intermediate. Fixed in File:EPSPreactionII.svg (see that image's description for cite to literature supporting it) DMacks (talk) 02:15, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 19:11, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 192.168.1.o (talk · contribs)
[edit]Poor quality images of some bug and a blurry coin in a hat, OoS IMO
Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 21:21, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blog de Helena (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work, sole uploads of user and have FB in MD
- File:Helena Estrada durante un encuentro en el exterior.jpg
- File:Helena Estrada y un encuentro junto a otras mujeres.jpg
- File:Helena Estrada.png
- File:Helena Estrada y Macri.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 21:22, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
he subido una foto en lugar de un cuadro por error Vermersvq (talk) 14:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
he subido una foto en lugar de un cuadro por error Vermersvq (talk) 17:57, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion G7. --Strakhov (talk) 21:25, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion G7. --Strakhov (talk) 21:25, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Copyright FIBA. All rights reserved. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 21:32, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Facebook size and quality, no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:19, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 05:08, 14 Juni 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 07:17, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Photo here has had contrast pumped but otherwise indistinguishable from https://www.architecturalrecord.com/articles/14014-moshe-safdies-jewel-changi-airport-in-singapore-opens-to-the-public credited at lower left under photo. IT is possible, our "D.S." is the person credited, but it would appear we need COM:OTRS to be sure. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:20, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 05:08, 14 Juni 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 07:17, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Very low quality photo of an unidentified church, not useful. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:36, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (extremely low quality, would be unusable even if the church were identified). --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:10, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Image with no rational explanation. Only upload by this person and no activity since 2014. Unused file of no obvious use. Malcolma (talk) 08:47, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Google translates the Spanish description as "The shields were not the same, that's another test". So some kind of test upload, I suppose. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Image with no obvious use. Only upload and no other activity by this person. File not in use. Spurious uload? Malcolma (talk) 08:50, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:08, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not clear what this is supposed to depict. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:14, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Too low quality to be within scope. Unusable. Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:11, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Despite its low quality, this image has coordinates and, per description, shows "the final days in the life of the high rise residential block hetherlow tower", so it's a building that doesn't exist anymore and the image has historical value. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:16, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Unexplaied image with no obvious purpose. Only upload by this person and no activity apart from this. Unused Malcolma (talk) 19:26, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:20, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Photographer cannot license the toys depicted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I'm wondering whether there is anything there that rises to the level of copyrightable. Trademarked, certainly, but that's a different matter. - Jmabel ! talk 19:24, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Request @Ellin Beltz: The Face-pillows are in my opinion below the COM:TOO? (Just a circular face with devil-horns and red cicular paint make up on cheek, black cirulcar eyes,...) Otherwise they would be most likely illigal copies of the trademark/copyright-protected Pikachu. The shirts and other stuff is just attachment, which do not mainly contribute to the picture. Therefore I do not shure which toys you are talking about. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 20:50, 5 June 2019 (UTC)- The name of file is "Pikachu Pillows." I think the intent is clear that they are Pikachu. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:36, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: But they are the pillows below COM:TOO? (Pikachu is not thats for shure, but the pillows are in my opinion.) — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 22:39, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Derivatives (f.e. Handdrawing) of Pikachu are not allowed, but cartoons (new creations) are allowed, see Pikachu for examples.
-
Pikachu Pillows.jpg This Deletion request -
Pokemon (31599837283).jpg November 2017 -
070429.ピカチュウジャンボ.JA8957.747-400.jpg July 2007 -
AYAMI MICHELLE-EXPO2016.png July 2016
-
-
TOYOTA ist Pikachu Car.jpg June 2005 -
-
Boeing 747-481, All Nippon Airways - ANA AN0072124.jpg has a OTRS-Number
.jpg)
.jpg)
_in_Pok%C3%A9mon_livery.jpg)
- @Denniss, ShakataGaNai, Namazu-tron, and Haha169: I saw your comments on Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Ana.b747.pokemon.arp.750pix.jpg and I therefore ask you for your expertise/opinion. I know this time it is a slighly different question, because I mainly argue that those pillows are below the Threshold of originality (Spain). — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 06:17, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- The B747 images should be fine with the aircraft as the main object except the close shot which is zoomed onto the characters (making them the main object). I see no problem with the car. --Denniss (talk) 09:27, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Denniss: Sorry for beeing that unclear. This request is only about File:Pikachu Pillows.jpg (first image), the other images are just to illustrate that you can make a new cartoon of an existing copyrighted object, which is not copyright-protected by the original author.
Speedy keep The pillows (not the photo) are {{Pd-shape}} and therfore can't be copyrightable (maybe only trademark-rights) as already said by @Jmabel: . — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 18:36, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Wikimedia shows many derivate examples of this topic. I cannot see any reason why these pillows can violate any copyright. Therefore Keep. -- sarang♥사랑 08:50, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Wikimedia shows many derivate examples of this topic. I cannot see any reason why these pillows can violate any copyright. Therefore
- The B747 images should be fine with the aircraft as the main object except the close shot which is zoomed onto the characters (making them the main object). I see no problem with the car. --Denniss (talk) 09:27, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- @JoKalliauer: I'm not so sure about the pillows. And I don't know what Spanish TOO has to do with it, Pikachu comes from Japan afaik. Miffy is also a rather "simple" character, but absolutely protected by copyright. Balloon Pikachu may be below TOO and is also "liquid", exactly what balloon Pikachu looks like depends on the timing of the photo. (so part of the copyright is with the photographer) On the plane it can be argued we simply want a picture of the plane. So it happens to have Pokemon drawn onto it, we didn't ask for that. I don't believe the Pikachu car can really be seen as a derivative of Pikachu, however, it could be seen as an artwork in its own right. This is a thin line though, see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Graffiti of The Simpsons.
- If you crop this photo to just below Pikachu's eyes (putting the focus on the Pokeball pillows, which I do consider to be below TOO), it'll be fine. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:49, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Yes the airplains/car are a different case COM:DM. However I find Miffy far more complex than this pillows. Miffy has complex lines, so it's copyrightprotected. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 22:01, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:TOYS. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:21, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(14).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(6).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(7).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(8).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Jeff G.: I think we should check several files in Pikachu, some of them might be COM:TOO and others might be COM:DM, but some of them are in my opinion a copyright-violation. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 22:01, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- @JoKalliauer: my opinion btw about TOO in this case (I had to think about it for a while because it is a thin line): if there is a reasonably accurate depiction of Pikachu's face (including ears) or a partially accurate depiction of Pikachu's face and Pikachu's tail is included, I'd consider it above the TOO. That's why I didn't nominate eatable Pikachu (no ears, no tail) or File:Pokemon (31599837283).jpg because the mouth, very typical for Pikachu, is missing and so is the tail. Those cases are right on the edge for me. I won't strongly defend them, but I'm not going to nominate them either. There was also an image that was possibly covered by FoP that I didn't nominate, I only nominated clear-cut cases. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:29, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I do not understand how to use COM:TOYS to distinguishes between above COM:TOO and below COM:TOO, so please quote which sentence. It quotes: "Some toys are also too simple to meet the threshold of originality" and shows it with an obvious example, to illistrate this statement. I uploaded this picture because I know that you can't upload a photo of "Pokémon figures", therfore I uploaded something I consinder below COM:TOO.
- @Alexis Jazz: I would have nominated a little bit more examples (I would consinder Pikachu Fofo.jpg more complex than this pillows here and Pokemon B747 (8377993302) (2).jpg IMHO does not meat COM:DM), but as you said you only nominated clear-cut cases, that's fine for me. Generally I think your COM:TOO-definition above is reasonable, and it's ok for me, but still I would define it slightly differently. I would first ask, if there is a creative achievement (of the object)? If yes then in generall I would consider it as copyright-protected. (except published otherwise) Secondly I would ask if it is an accurate depiction of Pikachu/Pokemon. Depending on the answer there is a copyright of Pikatchu/Pokemon or the copyright of the author of the derivate or both. E.g. in Bat Trang pottery and ceramics village in 2016 03.jpg I would say that the author of the derivative has copyrights on this picture.
- — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 17:47, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- @JoKalliauer: I don't find Pikachu Fofo.jpg a very accurate depiction. No white in the eyes, the red cheeks are buttons whereas in the cartoon I believe they are (mostly) flat and the color is far too dull. Overall, if you removed the red cheeks, it would hardly be recognizable as a Pikachu. The overall complexity is also lower imho: the pillows are printed, sharp lines. I also avoided all vehicles because "However, advertisements and applied art displayed on vehicles such as buses and tramways were found to have a permanent nature by the Federal Court of Justice." (this may not apply always and everywhere, but it's not clear-cut)
- I agree with the pottery. I don't believe the pottery infringes on Pikachu so I didn't include it in the nomination, but the photo is DW of the pottery. Just not DW of Pikachu. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:12, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- @JoKalliauer: I agree with Alexis's judgement about these clear-cut cases being dws of Pikachu imagery which is over COM:TOO Japan. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:30, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I consider it as out of scope, low quality (angle) and according to Alexis's judgement above the Threshold of Originality. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 13:49, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- It's all about the number of elements btw. The ears are below TOO, the mouth is below TOO, the red cheeks are below TOO, the bright yellow color is below TOO, the eyes are below TOO, the overal shape is below TOO, even the tail is below TOO. But combine enough of those elements and the result becomes copyrightable. Exactly where to draw the line isn't easy to determine and even judges may not always agree. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:11, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep the cropped version. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:03, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted, per Alexis, cropped version has educational value and is kept. Taivo (talk) 13:31, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
No es el escudo oficial de Gualda-Guadalajara. Es erróneo y crea confusión 95.61.245.158 19:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Representación de escudo correcta. Se modificará el tipo de flor para que coincida con "flores gualda" (Daarbos86 (talk) 15:00, 17 June 2019 (UTC))
Por que no es el escudo Oficial de dicha población EatimdeGualda (talk) 12:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 12:28, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
The document proposes an unorthodox interpretation of Isaiah Chapter 1 and was placed on the page offering various interpretations for Chapter 1. I see no reason why it should be treated differently than other interpretations that were added by other authors.
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 17:59, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lídia Porcar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Screenshots.
- File:Captura de pantalla de l'Arxiu virtual de memòria local de la Conca de Barberà i la Baixa Segaarra, 2006.png
- File:Captura de pantalla de l'Arxiu virtual de memòria local de la Conca de Barberà i la Baixa Segarra, 2006.png
- File:Arxiu virtual de memòria local de la Conca de Barberà i la Baixa Segarra, 2006.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:21, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lídia Porcar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Fotogrames del vídeo FIRE (Handmade), 2019.jpg
- File:Fire (Handmade). Instal·lació. Escola d'Art de Tortosa. 2019.jpg
- File:Amor vs Pànic.jpg
- File:Cartell de l'exposició La lluita antifranquista i la Transició a la Conca de Barberà. 2011.pdf
- File:Bolic. Assemblatge. 1993.jpg
- File:Amor vs Pànic. 2019.jpg
- File:Espais Indecisos. Laboratori del paisatge.2016.jpg
- File:En el transcurs del temps.jpg
- File:La natura no és sentimental.jpg
,_2019.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._Instal%C2%B7laci%C3%B3._Escola_d%27Art_de_Tortosa._2019.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:11, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:11, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Previously published elsewhere on the web (e.g. [2]), no evidence for permission. HaeB (talk) 05:34, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Please let me know why this is to be deleted ? Thank you— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nat1991 (talk • contribs) 15:01, June 5, 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Nat1991. Please try to remember to sign your talk page posts. You can find out how to do that at en:WP:TILDE. Even though Commons and Wikipedia are technically separate project, much of the software used for both sites runs the same way. As for the photo, it appears to come from Twitter and maybe it used on other websites as well. This means that Commons is going to need verification that the copyright holder of the photo (the copyright holder is typically the person who takes the photo, not the person being photographed) has given their explicit consent for the photo to be uploaded under a free license that Commmons accepts. See COM:L, COM:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS? and COM:OTRS#If you are NOT the copyright holder for more specific details. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:39, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:16, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Already deleted.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:39, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Personal work, not notable or relevant subject (supporter/player). - Fma12 (talk) 22:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamisrezabaranipour (talk · contribs)
[edit]کلیه حقوق متعلق به مرکز پاسخگویی به شبهات فضای مجازی می باشد.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:06, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 21:02, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
- also file:立法委員林滄敏壹週刊登刊道啟事104.01.30-2.jpg
Pages from magazines are usually protected with copyright. OTRS-permission from magazine representative is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 08:08, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Low-re images, no metadata, unlikely to be own works.
- File:ชิตพร กำลังมาก.jpg
- File:ฐาปไพพรรณ ไชยศรี.jpg
- File:พรพรรณ เกิดปราชญ์..jpg
- File:พรพรรณ ชมพู่.jpg
- File:กุลภา เปี่ยมพงษ์สานต์.jpg
- File:แนน ทัดดาว.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:16, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Low-re images, no metadata, unlikely to be own works.
- File:กรรณิการ์ เล็ก.jpg
- File:โมเม ธนัชชา สุขสด.jpg
- File:สโมสรวอลเลย์บอลมหาวิทยาลัยรังสิต.jpg
- File:สโมสรวอลเลย์บอลโอพาร์ท396.jpg
大诺史 (talk) 05:49, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- File:สโมสรวอลเลย์บอลโอพาร์ท396.jpg: Keep Logo of basic geometric shapes and text. In use on th.wikipedia. The other three: Delete --SVTCobra (talk) 01:02, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Low-re images, no metadata, unlikely to be own works
Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:30, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
On behalf of Grngu. This seal is outdated and the office name in the title is incorrect (it is actually "Indiana Attorney General"). I have uploaded File:Seal of the Indiana Attorney General.svg as it's replacement in SVG format with the correct title and updated look. 大诺史 (talk) 08:47, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment See [3]. 大诺史 (talk) 08:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep We do not delete images just because they are out-dated. Fry1989 eh? 16:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- I would say Keep too, but rename to File:Seal of the Indiana Attorney General.jpg. 大诺史 (talk) 13:00, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept. (Renaming might be useful, but that is not a deletion issue.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:04, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
no party ot country stated, out of scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 10:19, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted; orphan without adequate description, no in scope usefulness apparent. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:03, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
most probably copyright violation, see Google Image Search j.budissin+/- 12:46, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Copyviol -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:32, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Picture of an user with no edits outside user space. Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 13:38, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; personal promotion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:07, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --jdx Re: 00:01, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
This is a photo of queen Marie and king Ferdinand I of Romania (proof), not of queen Elisabeth and king Carol I. There is another version of the file with correct name and description, File:1893 - Ferdinand şi Maria ca Principe şiPprincipesă de Coroană.PNG. Yellow Horror (talk) 14:20, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Image is currently in use in Wikipedias. I suggest replacing all uses with the properly titled image first, then deleting as dupe and making image title a redirect. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:11, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- The image is used incorrectly in all the cases, apparently due to its incorrect name and description. There is no need to replace it with an identical image under a different name. On the contrary, it is necessary to remove all existing occurrences in order to avoid misleading readers.--Yellow Horror (talk) 19:49, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per Yellow Horror. --Sealle (talk) 10:28, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
A number of users have over several years produced huge numbers of fake flags and coats of arms for subdivisions of the Dominican Republic and other states. The editor currently active, Santiago RD, has uploaded several hundred such images. They do not respond to any questions about sources. Similar flags have repeatedly been removed, see Commons:Deletion requests/DR Provincial flags, Commons:Deletion requests/DR Hoax flags and Commons:Deletion requests/DR Hoax flags 2. This is a test case for a small batch of such images. Others are found at Category:Flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic, Category:Fictitious flags of the Districts of the Bahamas etc.
- File:Bandera de Baní.png
- File:Bandera de San Pedro de Macoris.png
- File:Bandera de Tábara Arriba.png
- File:Bandera del Distrito Municipal Hato del Yaque.png
- File:Bandera del Distrito Municipal La Canela.png
- File:Bandera del Distrito Municipal San Francisco de Jacagua.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Altamira.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Arenoso.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Azua de Compostela.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Baitoa.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Baní.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Bayaguana.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Boca Chica.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Boca Chica.svg
- File:Bandera del Municipio Bohechío.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Bonao.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Bánica.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Bánica.svg
- File:Bandera del Municipio Cabral.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Cabrera.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Cambita Garabitos.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Castañuelas.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Castillo.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Castillo.svg
- File:Bandera del Municipio Cayetano Germosén.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Cevicos.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Comendador.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Concepción de La Vega.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Constanza.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Constanza.svg
- File:Bandera del Municipio Consuelo.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Cotuí.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Cristóbal.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Cristóbal.svg
- File:Bandera del Municipio Dajabón.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Duvergé.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio El Cercado.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio El Factor.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio El Factor.svg
- File:Bandera del Municipio El Llano.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio El Llano.svg
- File:Bandera del Municipio El Peñón.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio El Pino.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio El Pino.svg
- File:Bandera del Municipio El Valle.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Enriquillo.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Esperanza.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Estebanía.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Eugenio María de Hostos.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Fantino.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Fundación.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Galván.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Gaspar Hernández.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Guananico.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Guayabal.png
- File:Bandera del Municipio Guayacanes.png
TU-nor (talk) 11:28, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- I do not know how real they are. i just did svg GTRus (talk) 14:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- There is a long history of unsourced and presumably hoax flags for sub-national units of the Dominican Republic being added to and deleted from the English Wikipedia and Commons:
- A partial set of flag images uploaded to the English Wikipedia and quickly deleted because of lack of sourcing in 2007
- A partial set of flag images deleted from Commons as "Out of scope, hoax" in 2012.
- A partial set of flag images deleted from Commons becasue of "repeatedly uploaded fake flags/massive spam of fake images" in 2013.
- A partial set of flag images deleted from Commons because of "formerly deleted hoax flags" and Commons:Deletion requests/DR Hoax flags in 2016.
- User: Tu-nor and I have been searching unsuccessfully for sources for these sub-national unit flags, both for the Dominican Republic and for other countries. User:Santiago RD, who uploaded the latest set of flag images, has been registered since 2009, but has never responded to any post on his talk pages, including several requests for sourcing for the flags, on Commons and on the English Wikipedia. - Donald Albury (talk) 16:40, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- There is a long history of unsourced and presumably hoax flags for sub-national units of the Dominican Republic being added to and deleted from the English Wikipedia and Commons:
- Some hours ago Santiago RD has removed the {{delete}} template and the {{fictitious flag}} template from all the flags in this list and moved all of them from Category:Fictitious flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic to Category:Flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic without giving a reason. I hope this deletion request now can be answered quickly, since there are literally hundreds of more similar flags to report as soon as these are "out of the way". --TU-nor (talk) 08:11, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Per hoax. This user also uploaded some hoax flags from Panama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bandera de la Provincia de Panamá.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bandera de la Provincia Panamá.png. He used the IP 216.165.126.93 trying to blank the deletion request. Taichi (talk) 17:34, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:30, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The latest revision is black'n'white but the original (and the cited source website) have it as color. Proposing deletion of this BW one rather than splitting it off to new filename. DMacks (talk) 06:06, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
As uploader of the this file, rather good than to eliminate the image I suggest to revert to the previous version --PancoPinco (talk) 10:02, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: That's a strange discussion. I don't know why PancoPinco wants to conceal the source. Certainly, it would be interesting to keep, under a different file name, the black and white version, which is much better than the other. But if the source is not disclosed it should be deleted. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:23, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: file history splitting done. Ruthven (msg) 13:48, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Current revision is a black'n'white image of a color original, and the sourcing of this revision is vague. Previous revision is color and has clean source indicated. Prosing deletion of this revision rather than splitting it to a new filename. DMacks (talk) 06:11, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
As uploader of the this file, rather good than to eliminate the image I suggest to revert to the previous version --PancoPinco (talk) 10:03, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Should be reverted to earlier version. PancoPinco's black and white of the same painting may be kept in another file. It's two renderings of a 17th century painting in Castle of Beloeil, Public domain. Someone might just go there some time and take a better photograph of the original. :) Henxter (talk) 13:07, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- We don't have a valid source for the black'n'white image. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Claude-Lamoral Ier de Ligne.jpg where same uploader is concealing their source of a different image. DMacks (talk) 09:40, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: history splitting done. Ruthven (msg) 13:53, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото 1980-х годов, фотограф, скорее всего, неизвестен, водяной знак на фото, которое оцифровано в наше время. необходимо обращение в OTRS. Dogad75 (talk) 07:11, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
© GettyImages per EXIF. Josve05a (talk) 18:12, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Also the uploaders other uploads, unfree files taken from random websites uploaded here with wrong license information. Martin H. (talk) 21:25, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
non-free image Lugnuts (talk) 12:17, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:11, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hemant9963 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal photos
Gbawden (talk) 12:26, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Gbawden: as sysop, you can speedy delete such files as COM:CSD#F10. Ruthven (msg) 14:02, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Scope meme Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photo, not an active user, only used to store his photo Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hoppalmihu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Claimed as own work but most have FB MD and at least one credited to TODOROFF LAZAR in exif
- File:A Hoppál Mihály Band koncertje Szóládon, Ízek Versek Madárfütty.jpg
- File:Csukás István és Erdős Virág Szóládon..jpg
- File:A szóládi Ízek Versek Madárfütty fesztivál 2018-ban.jpg
- File:Hoppál Mihály Hunor érintő nélküli basszusgitárjával.jpg
- File:Hoppál Mihály BassPoetry.jpg
- File:HMB és vendégei.jpg
- File:Brahms-1024x1012.jpg
- File:Gabi cover.jpg
- File:Buzás G..jpg
- File:Buzás Gabriella.jpg
- File:Kamlep7.jpg
- File:Nedeczky Júlia és Borzsák Kamilla.jpg
- File:Hoppál Mihály Hunor.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 13:44, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:03, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Silviafantin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused duplicated of File:Fabrizio Palermo .jpg with slightly different crop.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:45, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:49, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:05, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Agència Capture (talk · contribs)
[edit]The three large images are found at https://www.museuly.com/listing/museo-del-perfume-barcelona/. It's likely the three small ones came from there as well.
- File:Media-20170622.jpg
- File:Lacrimatorio.jpg
- File:Media-20170621.jpg
- File:Museudelperfum1.jpg
- File:Museudelperfum2.jpg
- File:Museudelperfum3.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:54, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:06, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Unused smaller size copies of File:Stop bean abuse now original poster.jpg. Original is in use; copies aren't.
- File:Stop bean abuse now original poster no transparent.png
- File:Stop bean abuse now original poster.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:01, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose File:Stop bean abuse now original poster.png has transparency, and is the original poster used in the campain. Put all 3 images side-by-side and you'll see all of them are diffrent (look at the right half). The two listed for deletion are modified. --T2Bean (talk · contribs) 12:34, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- If any, File:Stop bean abuse now original poster.png should be kept with the rest deleted. It is not used on too many pages; it should be easy to change the links. --T2Bean (talk · contribs) 12:34, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose T2Bean makes a good point. --176.126.225.162 12:55, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Strong oppose As per User:T2Bean. They are, in fact, all diffrent if you look closely. --90.240.143.197 14:58, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 14:05, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CécileSiap (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of own work on small file size images.
- File:Le contenu de nos poubelles.png
- File:Mâchefers.jpg
- File:Amager Bakke, Danemark.png
- File:Amager-Bakke, Danemark.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete all as unlicensed upload of third-party files (each cited to a different website). DMacks (talk) 16:45, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per above Triplecaña (talk) 17:10, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:06, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Insufficient information to determine if license applied is correct. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Tiny image unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 16:57, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 16:59, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
not own work, copyvio [4] ☣Banjo tell me 17:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:19, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:50, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:51, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:56, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Uploaded in error Effstop (talk) 14:00, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Uploaded in error Effstop (talk) 19:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)---- Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: Unused image of questionable education value. Mys_721tx (talk) 19:51, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: Unused image of questionable education value. Mys_721tx (talk) 19:51, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 20:40, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:09, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Carlo Bertocci, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:12, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:09, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Carlo Bertocci, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:09, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Carlo Bertocci, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:09, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. A non notable logo. No educational value. Headlock0225 (talk) 22:46, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:10, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Нет источников. Нет достоверности. 109.252.22.24 23:16, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. Ruthven (msg) 14:10, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Нет источников. 109.252.22.24 23:18, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. Ruthven (msg) 14:10, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 11:51, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Secondarywaltz: From whom the permission should come? --Ruthven (msg) 14:12, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: Brianna Westbrook is shown as the author and not the editor who uploaded the image. Secondarywaltz (talk) 14:33, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (@Secondarywaltz: Thanks for the clarification.). Ruthven (msg) 15:32, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kaspersky Lab logos
[edit]COM:DUPE of File:Kasperski.png, In addition, 2 users uploaded 2 different "updated" version of the logo. See File:Kaspersky Lab logo.svg & File:Kaspersky Lab.svg.
大诺史 (talk) 08:26, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:27, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MH-Modares pour (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal images. no user uploads since 2017
Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 11:58, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: whose permission is missing? Not found elsewhere online. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
All three files with copyright statements in EXIF (quoting Volkan Sahingöz / RTC Couplings); likely taken from http://www.rtc-tec.com/products?cat_id=36&p=1 or other manufacturer webpage. Clarification is needed as to copyright status.
- File:RTC-Hydraulics-Monocoupling-103-Series.jpg
- File:Rtc-serie-171.08-gruppe.jpg
- File:Typische Multikupplung mit Hebel M152 von RTC.jpg
Ariadacapo (talk) 12:15, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
All Pictures were taken by me Shngz (talk) for RTC Couplings/RTC Tec Company. You can contact vs@rtc-couplings.com to check, if necessary.
Kind regards Shngz (talk) 07:23, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Shngz: Thank you for your reply, and for the excellent quality of the uploads. Please forward permission through our OTRS system, so that we may keep a permanent record of the copyright licensing information. Thanks! Ariadacapo (talk) 11:29, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete if ever OTRS ticket received. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- Restored per OTRS permission. --Krd 14:43, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hofmann AG (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like images taken from the corporate website, no permission though and no exif
- File:Hofmann Orkan OR 52 Pro.gif
- File:Hofmann MA-150-XG.gif
- File:Hofmann V 3020.gif
- File:Walter Hofmann AG.jpg
- File:Walter Hofmann AG VW Bus.gif
- File:Hofmann Schneidetechnik.png
Gbawden (talk) 13:28, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Buntypratik2u (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful + Permissions missing possible copyvio
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 14:06, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bollywood rockz (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 14:07, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- It shows numbers of students who graduated from ja:習志野市立第七中学校 each year, so it is useful, but the uploader or anyone interested should convert it to wikitext or SVG. Delete.--Roy17 (talk) 11:43, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Ich hatte die Datei für die Fellow-Programm-Abschlussveranstaltung hochgeladen, weil mich Wikimedia darum gebeten hat. Sie kann aber natürlich auch gelöscht werden. NikolasEisentraut (talk) 16:32, 5.6.2019
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saratanveer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BAMIDELE GBEKELEOLUWA IYANUOLUWA G'bams (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Promotional upload from a vision glasses company. Probably all COM:COPYVIOs too.
- File:木九十 x POLLYANNA KEONG.png
- File:Slogan黑-2018最新.png
- File:MUJOSH x 喜茶.jpg
- File:MUJOSH 2018 Campain Image.png
- File:MUJOSH Store.jpg
- File:MUJOSH World Map.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:36, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Collage of blurry images without permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:37, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:37, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:37, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused poor quality crop of image already in Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:39, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:38, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Small, low quality apparently personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:42, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:38, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kabeer ali model (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotion, self-promotion or a fan gallery; all images of same person, but out of copyright, screenshots, COM:DW, etc.
- File:SWOO ARABIC UAE.jpg
- File:Al azizi properties hoarding kabeer ali.jpg
- File:DUBAI ISLAMIC BANK photoshoot Kabeer ali.jpg
- File:Etisalat telecom printshoot kabeer ali.jpg
- File:Cityscape abu dhabi kabeer ali.jpg
- File:CHEVORLET photoshoot kabeer ali.jpg
- File:ADNIC Printshoot Kabeer ali.jpg
- File:DU TELECOM HOARDING KABEER ALI.jpg
- File:RAK BANK HOARDING.jpg
- File:The first group UAE.jpg
- File:HUAWEI P SMART photoshoot.jpg
- File:Union national bank hoarding.jpg
- File:AL HILAL BANK PHOTOSHOOT.jpg
- File:KABEER ALI.jpg
- File:Kabeer 3.jpg
- File:Kabeerali.jpg
- File:GULF NEWSPAPER.jpg
- File:KABEER2.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:45, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Not own work, 1940 postcard according to template. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:53, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:40, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Not own work, copied from a tourism website Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:54, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:40, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:43, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:41, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rkbommanapally (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal image.
- File:Bommanapally ramakrishnareddy.jpg
- File:Bommanapallyramakrishna.jpg
- File:Bommanapally ramakrishna.jpg
- File:Bommanapallyraamkrishna.jpg
- File:New Doc 6 1 (1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mitte27 (talk) 12:28, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rkbommanapally (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:42, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thedevenderpalsingh (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful
- File:Upcoming Punjabi Song "Tayari viyah di".jpg
- File:Devenderpal singh.jpg
- File:Upcoming punjabi song Tayari viyah di.jpg
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:57, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:42, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:57, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:42, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 18:05, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:42, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 18:08, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:42, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 18:09, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unusable (no begin no end) full text see: File:Pistoia sacrario dell esercito brasiliano 5.jpg Adelfrank (talk) 18:42, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- ok, delete it. --Holapaco77 (talk) 19:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Roy17 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 14:57, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- The image is not used and its subjects cannot be identified.--Roy17 (talk) 00:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Roy17: That's not a reason for speedy deletion, and the rationale you gave is wrong. Yann (talk) 09:14, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: Unused image of questionable education value. Mys_721tx (talk) 19:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete for this and Commons:Deletion requests/File:微信图片 20180801135026.jpg.
- I was alerted by their titles, which indicate that they have been processed by w:WeChat. Copyright is in doubt. However, I first requested speedy for all of the uploader's uploads per F10, personal photos. I interpret personal as belonging to oneself; private; not public interest. These two photos of a garden and a dance studio have rather low quality and their locations could hardly be identified. As such, they should be deleted for being out-of-scope and doubtful copyright statuses.--Roy17 (talk) 14:13, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:44, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Roy17 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 14:57, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- The image is not used and its subjects cannot be identified.--Roy17 (talk) 00:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Roy17: That's not a reason for speedy deletion, and the rationale you gave is wrong. Yann (talk) 09:14, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Yann: I do think they qualify F10, personal photos that could not be otherwise useful. Their descriptions are the same as the uploader's other photos that have been deleted. The only difference is the subject depicted, but I think all three remaining images are too obscure to be useful.--Roy17 (talk) 14:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Roy17: No, they do not qualify for F10. These are not "personal photos", which mean selfies and pictures of friends. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:36, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: Unused image of questionable education value. Mys_721tx (talk) 19:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:44, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alvys Ramos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alvys Ramos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo and flags. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:ESCUDO DE LA PROVINCIA DE LOS SANTOS.png
- File:Ciudad de Macaracas bandera.jpg
- File:BANDERA DE MACARACAS.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alvys Ramos (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Ciudad de Macaracas, Panamá.jpg
- File:Parque Comunal el Colmón.jpg
- File:Provincia de Los Santos República de Panamá.jpg
- File:José Luis Jimenez frase.jpg
- File:Símbolos patrios de los santos.jpg
- File:LosSantosPty7 LOS SANTOS PANAMÁ.png
- File:LOSSANTOSPTY7 los antos panama.png
Didym (talk) 17:27, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alvys Ramos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:40, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Obviously not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
מפה חשובה המתארת את נתיב ההפלגה על בסיס מפה חופשית של אפריקה נוצרה על ידי משתמש שגם השתתף בהפלגה. מפה דומה בצורה זו או אחרת מופיעה בכל ההפלגות סיפור הפלגה אינו יכול להיות שלם ללא מפה הדמיון אינו מתאר דבר קודקוד צהוב (talk) 09:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
"An important map describing the voyage on the basis of a free map of Africa was created by a user who also participated in the voyage. A map is similar in one form or another appears on all voyages Vertex (talk) 09:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC) A sailing story can not be complete without a map The imagination does not describe anything":קודקוד צהוב
- Please provide source for map, as it is not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:18, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Source for map is File:AfricaCIA-HiRes.jpg A free map created by the CIA of the United States. קודקוד צהוב (User talk:קודקוד צהוב)
Kept: Info about the source file added. -- Geagea (talk) 13:19, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Does not appear to be own work, from 1970s, more like a military photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 13:15, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Does not appear to be own work, from 1970s, more like a military photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 13:16, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Those 2 pictures are already used on the website cantin.over-blog.com, which isn't free (here and here). Please send an OTRS authorization (see the details in French here). Titlutin (talk) 13:38, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019060510005896 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:00, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:29, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Сомнения в лицензии: фото из личного архива, автор не известен, дата обнародования снимка неизвестна Dogad75 (talk) 19:06, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Those 2 pictures are already used on the website cantin.over-blog.com, which isn't free (here). Please send an OTRS authorization (see the details in French here). Titlutin (talk) 13:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:300_portrait_duo.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2019060510005896. Ruthven (msg) 09:06, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:59, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
What is Oregon government works copyright status? EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BeautyAquia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Tuka Marine Park and Beach Resort.jpg
- File:Before it Ends.jpg
- File:Sunset in Shipyard.jpg
- File:Saltpoint Maasim.jpg
- File:T'boli Falls.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Spaarnestad claims copyright: http://www.spaarnestadphoto.nl/search.pp?showpicture=39726&page=1&pos=1. Also, we have a perfect free replacement: [File:Staatssecretaris van Onderwijs, Kunsten en Wetenschappen JH Grosheide, Bestanddeelnr 915-5887.jpg], probably made at the same photo session. At the same time proof that it cannot fall in PD (1963). Tekstman (talk) 14:44, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Tekstman: this image is part of the image release by Spaarnestad and Nationaal Archief of photos from the ANEFO collection. Nationaal Archief has the rights of the ANEFO collection so can release it, Spaarnestad just supplied the scan. See Commons:Nationaal Archief for more information. Multichill (talk) 15:08, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Source page is marked (C). Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:03, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- The site for which I uploaded the logo, got deletet from the german wikipedia hence the logo can be removed too. (I am the uploader of the file) --DieserGorilla (talk) 15:39, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Please provide permission via OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, "red carpet shot", two look like album cover and the last is a logo.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:12, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Paul_012 (talk) 17:48, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Low-re image of a celebrity, unlikely to be own work.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:39, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:30, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Not own work, see use at http://www.cyprusconferences.org/medicon2016/speakers.html. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Does not appear to be own work, includes drawing. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Promotional gallery of images of Facebook or smaller sizes.
- File:UNE watch face production 5.jpg
- File:UNE watch face production 4.jpg
- File:UNE watch face production 1.jpg
- File:UNE watch face production 2.jpg
- File:UNE watch face production 3.jpg
- File:Boulder Opal Quartz.jpg
- File:TT Pyrite.jpg
- File:Matterhorn Automatic.jpg
- File:Une works automatic movement.jpg
- File:UNE worksä.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:54, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Not apparently own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:00, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by user Cookingmama100
[edit]
Same reasons as here ーŒ̷͠²ð·¨´´̢́̕͘³͏¯̞̗ 【🅱alk】 16:04, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Obviously not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Does not appear to be own work, from 1970s, more like a military photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Does not appear to be own work, from 1970s, more like a military photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work on artwork. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, is award from magazine. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019090810002101 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 14:00, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Cartoonist_of_The_Year_Award.png” under ticket:2019090810002101. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:44, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Screenshot, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Given user's other uploads (one a deleted picture of a recent book cover, the other an image from the same website giving credit to someone else), it seems more likely this was yoinked from a website than photographed by them in the 1940s. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:02, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Copiraithg violation 185.44.10.122 18:23, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no free license at source. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. Only used on a userpage, but this user has no meaningful contributions, only here for self promotion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
duplicate file WhistlerJournal2 (talk) 20:06, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE so will process as duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. Possible copyright violation. Deriviative work. See [5].
大诺史 (talk) 13:24, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 13:09, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ErwinMeier (talk · contribs)
[edit]Some dubious claim of own work. Seems to fail COM:FOP. No FoP for public interiors in Germany.
- File:Westhausen St. Pankratius 04.jpg
- File:Westhausen St. Pankratius 03.jpg
- File:Westhausen St. Pankratius 05.jpg
- File:Westhausen St. Pankratius 02.jpg
- File:Reinholterode St. Petrus 06.jpg
- File:Reinholterode St. Petrus 04.jpg
- File:Reinholterode St. Petrus 05.jpg
- File:Reinholterode St. Petrus 02.jpg
- File:Reinholterode St. Petrus 03.jpg
- File:Neuendorf St. Nikolaus 08.jpg
- File:Neuendorf St. Nikolaus 07.jpg
- File:Neuendorf St. Nikolaus 05.jpg
- File:Neuendorf St. Nikolaus 06.jpg
- File:Neuendorf St. Nikolaus 04.jpg
- File:Neuendorf St. Nikolaus 03.jpg
- File:Günterode St. Georg 04.jpg
- File:Günterode St. Georg 02.jpg
- File:Günterode St. Georg 03.jpg
- File:Günterode St. Georg 05.jpg
- File:Günterode St. Georg 01.jpg
- File:Günterode St. Georg 06.jpg
- File:Dingelstädt St. Gertrud 15.jpg
- File:Dingelstädt St. Gertrud 14.jpg
- File:Dingelstädt St. Gertrud 13.jpg
- File:Dingelstädt St. Gertrud 12.jpg
大诺史 (talk) 13:42, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Die Erlaubnis zum Fotografieren und Veröffentlichen bei Wikipedia wurde beim jeweiligen Hausherrn, dem zuständigen Pfarrer, vorher telefonisch angefragt und eingeholt.--ErwinMeier (talk) 15:57, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- In der Tat unterliegen nur Außenaufnahmen der Panoramafreiheit. Bei Innenaufnahmen kann der Eigentümer die Fotografien erlauben. Es gibt Millionen von Innenaufnahmen von deutschen Kirchen in Wikipedia. Ein Problem wäre, wenn moderne Kunstobjekte inkl. Bleiglasfenster und Glasmalerei abgebildet werden, wenn der Künstler noch nicht vor 70 Jahren gestorben oder der Gegenstand jünger als 100 Jahre ist. Dies liegt aber in keinem Fall vor. Der Löschantrag ist deshalb in allen Fällen abzulehnen. --Wikiwal (talk) 22:34, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Wikiwal: COM:FOP Germany says " Buildings such as museums, public collections, churches, or administrative buildings are not "public" within the meaning of the statute, and thus photographs of works exhibited in their interior do not qualify for s 59(1)". I don't see any permission Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Sollen jetzt Millionen von Innenaufnahmen aus Kirchen gelöscht werden? In der Tat gibt es keine Freiheit für Aufnahmen moderner Kunstwerke oder wenn die Kirche/das Museum Aufnahmen verbieten. Ansonsten gilt de:Panoramafreiheit#Kriterium „öffentlich“:
- "Nicht von der Schrankenbestimmung erfasst sind nach einhelliger Auffassung des Schrifttums Aufnahmen und Darstellungen von Werken in Innenräumen auch von öffentlichen Gebäuden wie Museen, öffentlichen Sammlungen, Kirchen oder Behörden.[1] Dies entspricht der ausdrücklichen Erwägung in der amtlichen Begründung, wonach die „in öffentlichen Museen dauernd ausgestellten Kunstwerke“ nicht privilegiert werden sollten, weil diese „nicht in dem gleichen Maße der Allgemeinheit gewidmet [werden] wie die Werke, die an öffentlichen Plätzen aufgestellt sind.“[2]"
- --Wikiwal (talk) 10:30, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Gbawden: Sorry for answering in German. May I aks: And what's about your own pictures like File:George Museum 2019-06.jpg and File:George Museum 2019-08.jpg etc.? --Wikiwal (talk) 19:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Wikiwal: COM:FOP Germany says " Buildings such as museums, public collections, churches, or administrative buildings are not "public" within the meaning of the statute, and thus photographs of works exhibited in their interior do not qualify for s 59(1)". I don't see any permission Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- ↑ Dreyer in Heidelberger Kommentar Urheberrecht, 4. Auflage 2018, § 59 Rn. 6; von Gamm, Urheberrechtsgesetz, 1968, § 59 Rn. 2; Kirchmaier in Mestmäcker, Urheberrecht, Stand: 55. AL 2011, § 59 Rn. 9; Ulmer, Urheber- und Verlagsrecht, 3. Auflage 1980, S. 332; Vogel in Schricker/Loewenheim, Urheberrecht, 5. Auflage 2017, § 59 Rn. 14 („allgM“); Chirco, Die Panoramafreiheit, 2013, op. cit., S. 133; Ernst, Zur Panoramafreiheit des Urheberrechts, 1998, op. cit., S. 476; Richard Hahn und Thomas Glückstein, Im neuen Licht – das Urheberrecht des Designers. Eine Auswahl von Rechtsfragen nach dem BGH-Urteil „Geburtstagszug“, in: Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, 58, Nr. 5, 2014, S. 380–388, hier S. 387; Riecken, Schutzgüter in der Filmkulisse, 2011, op. cit., S. 103. Wohl auch Obergfell in Büscher/Dittmer/Schiwy, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz, 3. Auflage 2015, § 59 UrhG Rn. 3. Anderer Ansicht Koch, Von dreidimensionalen Vervielfältigungen und schwimmenden Kunstwerken, 2018, op. cit., S. 203 f. (auch auf „Werke in […] Museen“ anwendbar, jedoch dann nicht, wenn der Berechtigte der Öffentlichkeit den Zugang nur unter der Bedingung eröffnet, dass die dort angefertigten Werke nicht vervielfältigt, verbreitet oder öffentlich wiedergegeben werden dürfen).
- ↑ Deutscher Bundestag, 4. Wahlperiode, Drucksache IV/270, p. 76.
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:29, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Work of Brazilian government is in public domain, if created before 1983, but this image is dated 1985. Probably copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:16, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Suspected flickrwashing, account has 4 photos and this one is found here https://www.lb-entertainment.nl/artiest/henk-dissel Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom & COM:PCP. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:16, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Suspected flickrwashing. Flickr account only has 2 visible photos Gbawden (talk) 13:41, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:17, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Appears on several webpage including https://mubi.com/cast/chairun-nissa Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:43, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:17, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Image previously published, it's a crop from the 3rd photo in slideshow at https://www.accio.gencat.cat/ca/accio/agencia/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Also affected File:Entrada ACCIÓ.png which appears to be another from this same series, same company, with the same blurring style. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:51, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:17, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Unclear if realy own work, see Special:Diff/353303031 for details. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 22:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no link to the original paper, no valid source. Ruthven (msg) 16:18, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
obviously from published source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:05, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Info @Ellin Beltz: This picture is extracted from Ventral view of turtle with respiratory muscles.pdf. Please start the deletion-request at the source. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 20:57, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:34, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
On hold Depends if the source is valid see Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ventral_view_of_turtle_with_respiratory_muscles.pdf — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 22:50, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ventral view of turtle with respiratory muscles.pdf. Ruthven (msg) 16:18, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Appears to be a copy from a book, caption, page number, little black line at bottom. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:06, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Info @Ellin Beltz: This picture is extracted from Sumerian figurine.pdf. Also many viewes like Wikimedia do not show the picture, but open https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/81/Sumerian_figurine.pdf in Firefox or Inkscape and you see the image. Therfore please start the deletion-request at the source. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 20:56, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- I disagree, this is a photo, the one you say it's extracted from is a drawing. There is a link to this page from that one, but it's recursive, and no source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:35, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: It is a rasterimage (I would not call it photo), but it is from https://www.dropbox.com/s/vos0gpt8zx8lfi8/Screenshot%202019-06-06%2000.39.48.png, so this Rasterimage is embedded in the Sumerian figurine.pdf. Therfore either the Rasterimage must be removed from Sumerian figurine.pdf with versiondeletion or I don't see the problem with this png. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 22:44, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Sumerian figurine.pdf is a traced version of the photograph from the book page you extracted. That explains why the book page was in there in the first place. Technically the traced image is a derivate work. But being a traced image and the object being too old for copyright protection, the only thing left from the photo is the angle. Nothing more. A 3D-model of the object would be fine. Just a camera angle can't be protected by copyright.
- I assume that the text is protected by copyright, threfore we might should crop this image (and remove the image from the pdf, or delete the pdf)? — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 18:34, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- @JoKalliauer: the photo also needs to be removed. The traced version removes things like lighting choices, but the original photo is copyrightable. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per Alexis — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 19:39, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- @JoKalliauer: the photo also needs to be removed. The traced version removes things like lighting choices, but the original photo is copyrightable. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Obviously not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:40, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:41, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
According to Category:Coins of Ireland, "per Currency:Ireland, Irish coins and bank notes are copyrighted by the Irish Copyright Law of 2000, even if issued before that provision became effective (§200(3)), and the copyright on legal tender is perpetual, i.e. does not expire at all. The act applies to all coins and banknotes issued since 1926 (§200(9)). Therefore, any image of currency which were designed after 1926 will be deleted." And according to the Percy Metcalfe and Halfpenny (Irish pre-decimal coin) articles where the image appears, this coin was designed in 1928 and is therefore subject to copyright and should be deleted. BigrTex (talk) 20:19, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:24, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
According to Category:Coins of Ireland, "per Currency:Ireland, Irish coins and bank notes are copyrighted by the Irish Copyright Law of 2000, even if issued before that provision became effective (§200(3)), and the copyright on legal tender is perpetual, i.e. does not expire at all. The act applies to all coins and banknotes issued since 1926 (§200(9)). Therefore, any image of currency which were designed after 1926 will be deleted." And according to the Percy Metcalfe and Barnyard Collection articles where the image appears, this coin was designed in 1928 and is therefore subject to copyright and should be deleted. BigrTex (talk) 20:21, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:39, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
According to Category:Coins of Ireland, "per Currency:Ireland, Irish coins and bank notes are copyrighted by the Irish Copyright Law of 2000, even if issued before that provision became effective (§200(3)), and the copyright on legal tender is perpetual, i.e. does not expire at all. The act applies to all coins and banknotes issued since 1926 (§200(9)). Therefore, any image of currency which were designed after 1926 will be deleted." And according to the Percy Metcalfe and Barnyard Collection articles where the image appears, this coin was designed in 1928 and is therefore subject to copyright and should be deleted. BigrTex (talk) 20:21, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:38, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
According to Category:Coins of Ireland, "per Currency:Ireland, Irish coins and bank notes are copyrighted by the Irish Copyright Law of 2000, even if issued before that provision became effective (§200(3)), and the copyright on legal tender is perpetual, i.e. does not expire at all. The act applies to all coins and banknotes issued since 1926 (§200(9)). Therefore, any image of currency which were designed after 1926 will be deleted." And according to the Percy Metcalfe and Barnyard Collection articles where the image appears, this coin was designed in 1928 and is therefore subject to copyright and should be deleted. BigrTex (talk) 20:22, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:42, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SangrurUser (talk · contribs)
[edit]Gallery of politicians (and logo) without apparent own work by uploader. Small sizes, if metadata, no two cameras the same, etc.
- File:WhiteHillStudios.png
- File:Amrinder Gill 2019.jpg
- File:The Union Minister for Civil Aviation, Shri Ashok Gajapathi Raju Pusapati inaugurated the first-of-its-kind Aviation Multi Skill Development Centre (MSDC), in Chandigarh (cropped).jpg
- File:Kewal Dhillon with Mandeep Mangat (cropped).jpg
- File:Kewal Dhillon with Mandeep Mangat.jpg
- File:Kewal (cropped).jpg
- File:Jitendra Singh, the Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Information & Broadcasting, Shri Manish Tewari and the Deputy Chief Minister of Punjab, Sardar Sukhbir Singh Badal (cropped).jpg
- File:Parminder Dhindsa.jpg
- File:Ammy Virk 2018.jpg
- File:Jagdeep Sidhu Surkhi Bindi.jpg
- File:Jaskaran Singh Aujla.jpg
- File:Jagdeep Sidhu.jpg
- File:Bikram Singh Majithia.jpg
,_in_Chandigarh_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_for_Information_%26_Broadcasting,_Shri_Manish_Tewari_and_the_Deputy_Chief_Minister_of_Punjab,_Sardar_Sukhbir_Singh_Badal_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Kindly check the licenses, many of the Pictures nominated are i have just cropped. About politicians i can I have many other pictures as my cousin is involved so he has many pictures.SangrurUser (talk) 01:09, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Here are my explanations:
- File:WhiteHillStudios.png, I don’t know what is problem with this image, i have uploaded under PD-logo license. Isn’t it a logo?
- File:Amrinder Gill 2019.jpg, Well, I have no explanation for this. I received this image on my social media handle along with File:Parminder Dhindsa.jpg and File:Ammy Virk 2018.jpg
- All these politicians images are uploaded by Indian government and I cropped and uploaded with help of Croptool in articles missing images
- File:The Union Minister for Civil Aviation, Shri Ashok Gajapathi Raju Pusapati inaugurated the first-of-its-kind Aviation Multi Skill Development Centre (MSDC), in Chandigarh (cropped).jpg
- File:Kewal (cropped).jpg
- File:Jitendra Singh, the Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Information & Broadcasting, Shri Manish Tewari and the Deputy Chief Minister of Punjab, Sardar Sukhbir Singh Badal (cropped).jpg
- File:Bikram Singh Majithia.jpg
- Jagdeep Sidhu met me at Patiala, I have many other pictures related to this
- Mandeep Mangat, in these images is my cousin, he provided me pictures and I think I can say I own these pictures
- SangrurUser, Please read COM:L and have COM:OTRS email sent by your cousin "he provied me pictures", as well as the actual source from which the other files came. They are not, as you say here, your own work, yet you uploaded them as if you hold the copyright. Unless additional information is provided, I think it is clear you don't have the rights to upload these images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:24, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Ellin Beltz, If these pictures aren’t uploaded anywhere, then how could I provide source.SangrurUser (talk) 05:05, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- Ellin Beltz, All above is reasonable but I don’t understand why that logo and the politicians images which are only cropped by me. Why are they nominated?SangrurUser (talk) 05:07, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unlikely to be own work, EXIF data suspicious, even in images claimed to be their own work. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:35, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
According to Category:Coins of Ireland, "per Currency:Ireland, Irish coins and bank notes are copyrighted by the Irish Copyright Law of 2000, even if issued before that provision became effective (§200(3)), and the copyright on legal tender is perpetual, i.e. does not expire at all. The act applies to all coins and banknotes issued since 1926 (§200(9)). Therefore, any image of currency which were designed after 1926 will be deleted." And according to the Percy Metcalfe and Barnyard Collection articles where the image appears, this coin was designed in 1928 and is therefore subject to copyright and should be deleted. BigrTex (talk) 20:22, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
According to Category:Coins of Ireland, "per Currency:Ireland, Irish coins and bank notes are copyrighted by the Irish Copyright Law of 2000, even if issued before that provision became effective (§200(3)), and the copyright on legal tender is perpetual, i.e. does not expire at all. The act applies to all coins and banknotes issued since 1926 (§200(9)). Therefore, any image of currency which were designed after 1926 will be deleted." And according to the Percy Metcalfe and Barnyard Collection articles where the image appears, this coin was designed in 1928 and is therefore subject to copyright and should be deleted. BigrTex (talk) 20:23, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
According to Category:Coins of Ireland, "per Currency:Ireland, Irish coins and bank notes are copyrighted by the Irish Copyright Law of 2000, even if issued before that provision became effective (§200(3)), and the copyright on legal tender is perpetual, i.e. does not expire at all. The act applies to all coins and banknotes issued since 1926 (§200(9)). Therefore, any image of currency which were designed after 1926 will be deleted." And according to the Percy Metcalfe and Barnyard Collection articles where the image appears, this coin was designed in 1928 and is therefore subject to copyright and should be deleted. BigrTex (talk) 20:23, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
According to Category:Coins of Ireland, "per Currency:Ireland, Irish coins and bank notes are copyrighted by the Irish Copyright Law of 2000, even if issued before that provision became effective (§200(3)), and the copyright on legal tender is perpetual, i.e. does not expire at all. The act applies to all coins and banknotes issued since 1926 (§200(9)). Therefore, any image of currency which were designed after 1926 will be deleted." And according to the Percy Metcalfe and Barnyard Collection articles where the image appears, this coin was designed in 1928 and is therefore subject to copyright and should be deleted. BigrTex (talk) 20:24, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
