Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/05/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 27th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Atardecer en la Reseva Nacional Natural Nakuk al revés con algulo de 45 grados.jpg

[edit]

"speedy deleted" Julianruizp (talk) 00:06, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I removed five other duplicate nominations for this. Closing as G7. --Majora (talk) 02:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 02:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Las pinturas rupestres de los Nukak.jpg

[edit]

"speedy deleted" Julianruizp (talk) 00:11, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note I removed three duplicate nominations. Closing G7. --Majora (talk) 02:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 02:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Atardecer en la Reserva Nacional Natural Nakuk plana.jpg

[edit]

{{speedydelete|Reason}} Julianruizp (talk) 00:26, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note, I removed a duplicate nomination for this file. Closing as G7. --Majora (talk) 02:45, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 02:45, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Atardecer en la Reseva Nacional Natural Nakuk con banderas de Colombia.jpg

[edit]

{{speedydelete|"author/uploader request"}} Julianruizp (talk) 00:58, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note, I removed a duplicate DR request. Closing as G7. --Majora (talk) 02:47, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 02:47, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vivienda de los Nukak Maku.jpg

[edit]

{{speedydelete|"author/uploader request"}} Julianruizp (talk) 00:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note, I removed a duplicate request for this image. Closing as G7. --Majora (talk) 02:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 02:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Indigena Nukak talando.jpg

[edit]

{{speedydelete|"author/uploader request"}} Julianruizp (talk) 00:56, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note, I removed a duplicate request for this image. Closing as G7. --Majora (talk) 02:50, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 02:50, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Asentamiento de los Nukak Maku.jpg

[edit]

{{speedydelete|"author/uploader request"}} Julianruizp (talk) 00:55, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note, I removed two duplicate requests for this image. Closing as G7. --Majora (talk) 02:51, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 02:52, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Niño Nukak Maku.jpg

[edit]

{{speedydelete|"author/uploader request"}} Julianruizp (talk) 00:52, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note, I removed two duplicate requests for this image. Closing as G7. --Majora (talk) 02:53, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 02:53, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Reserva Nacional Natural Nukak.jpg

[edit]

{{speedydelete|"author/uploader request"}} Julianruizp (talk) 00:46, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 02:54, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pinturas rupestres de los Nukak Maku.jpg

[edit]

{{speedydelete|"author/uploader request"}} Julianruizp (talk) 00:50, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 02:55, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pinturas rupestres en Reserva Nacional Natural Nukak.jpg

[edit]

{{speedydelete|"author/uploader request"}} Julianruizp (talk) 00:51, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 02:55, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Reserva Nacional Natural Nukak Piedra de los nukak.jpg

[edit]

{{speedydelete|"author/uploader request"}} Julianruizp (talk) 00:52, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 02:56, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tarantula muerta en Reserva Nacional Natural Nukak.jpg

[edit]

{{speedydelete|"author/uploader request"}} Julianruizp (talk) 00:53, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 02:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pinturas rupestres de los nukak.jpg

[edit]

{{speedydelete|"author/uploader request"}} Julianruizp (talk) 00:54, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 02:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paisaje de Meandro.jpg

[edit]

{{speedydelete|"author/uploader request"}} Julianruizp (talk) 00:59, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 02:58, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vivienda cerca de Meandro en el Rio Magdalena.jpg

[edit]

{{speedydelete|"author/uploader request"}} Julianruizp (talk) 01:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 02:58, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Colores del atardecer en el parque Nacional Natural de Puracé CON RETOQUES.jpg

[edit]

{{speedydelete|"author/uploader request"}} Julianruizp (talk) 01:03, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 02:59, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Colores del atardecer en el parque Nacional Natural de Puracé.jpg

[edit]

{{speedydelete|"author/uploader request"}} Julianruizp (talk) 01:03, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 03:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Scott 02-2.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since). This is true but the EXIF contains “Creative Commons CC-BY-SA", so I think it is worth giving the uploader a further chance to clarify the license situation. Green Giant (talk) 02:07, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

it's ok now. Pyb (talk) 08:10, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Licensed. --Green Giant (talk) 12:07, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Ginguené 05-2.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since). This is true but the EXIF contains “Creative Commons CC-BY-SA", so I think it is worth giving the uploader a further chance to clarify the license situation. Green Giant (talk) 02:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

it's ok now. Pyb (talk) 08:10, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Licensed. --Green Giant (talk) 12:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Ginguené 04-2.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since). This is true but the EXIF contains “Creative Commons CC-BY-SA", so I think it is worth giving the uploader a further chance to clarify the license situation. Green Giant (talk) 02:09, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

it's ok now. Pyb (talk) 08:09, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Licensed. --Green Giant (talk) 12:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Categorie:Fort Harssens

[edit]

Niet het gewenste resultaat Zandcee (talk) 14:14, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Should have been 'Category'. --Achim (talk) 17:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fort Harssens

[edit]

Niet het gewenste resultaat Zandcee (talk) 14:15, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Empty, author's request. --Achim (talk) 17:16, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Blackmordia.jpg

[edit]

COPYRIGHT VIOLATION(mandatory) The Blackmordia (talk) 16:59, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per request. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:17, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:La vida del cafetero.jpg

[edit]

author/uploader request Julianruizp (talk) 16:54, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 17:01, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edu roses (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:46, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:400001WallstarsTV-XL (6168114819).png

[edit]

advertisement SecretName101 (talk) 05:28, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 06:32, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Badgeperu silver olive.png

[edit]

Unnecessary, another image does the same job Marco M. (talk) 00:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 06:37, 29 Mai 2019 UTC: Unnecessary, another image does the same job --Krdbot 13:44, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:180620 logo Kontur CMYK 300dpi.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by CptViraj as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F2  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:26, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by JuTa. 大诺史 (talk) 15:19, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Badgeperu bronze olive.png

[edit]

Unnecessary, another image does the same job Marco M. (talk) 00:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Jcb at 15:31, 29 Mai 2019 UTC: Unnecessary, another image ("Barnstar Peru Blue.png") does the same job --Krdbot 19:29, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schnellzug Fribourg-Luzern.JPG

[edit]

aktualisierte Version mit Kategorie hochgeladen (schnellzug luzern-fribourg) Cardinal39 (talk) 12:22, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 00:25, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GrSrPromberg01.JPG

[edit]

Bitte löschen wegen Fehler in der Bezeichnung Jost (talk) 20:53, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 23:57, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:4 Chicago, North Shore & Milwaukee Photos by Roger Puta (27638274556).jpg

[edit]

insufficient SecretName101 (talk) 20:17, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Jcb at 22:50, 29 Mai 2019 UTC: PDM --Krdbot 01:29, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CRIP 630 (E6A) in LaSalle Street Station, Chicago, December 1971 (22381540432).jpg

[edit]

insufficient SecretName101 (talk) 23:04, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Jcb at 22:50, 29 Mai 2019 UTC: PDM --Krdbot 01:30, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Agnes Magpale.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation. This appears to have been downloaded from https://www.cebu.gov.ph/legislative/vice-governors-profile/, which states, "Copyright © 2019 . Cebu Provincial Government" RoySmith (talk) 18:05, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RoySmith Reviewing the government website, there's a public domain notice as well as copyright mark on the website. To be on the safe side, please go ahead with the deletion. Verbosmithie (talk) 02:09, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ton1-bot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files are originally tagged with no source given by me, for having no sources given, but was contested by User:Mike Peel. User:Mike Peel also added author information for all these files, without clear evidence that the files are created by User:Ton1-bot or User:Ton1~commonswiki. Therefore authorship information is still unclear, and a deletion request is requested here.


廣九直通車 (talk) 08:34, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Withdrawn by requestor. 大诺史 (talk) 13:05, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Beschaffungsamt-bonn.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by BeschaffungsamtPresse as Speedy (Löschen) and the most recent rationale was: Veraltetes Schild zu sehen --BeschaffungsamtPresse (talk) 12:20, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image (uploaded in 2011) does not qualify for speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:15, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep For historical reasons. An outdated sign is not a valid reason for deletion. Raymond 15:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Not a valid reason. --Achim (talk) 17:18, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: The file is in use on de:Beflaggung öffentlicher Gebäude in Deutschland and Brühler Straße 3 (Q15631258). As such, under COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV it is assumed to be of educational use and should not be deleted for reasons of accuracy. --bjh21 (talk) 12:27, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. per above, especially COM:INUSE. 大诺史 (talk) 13:06, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Www0706 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical drawings and painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

Seems to be manga/comics and movie screenshot.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Historical paintings and photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, not own works. No proper source, no proper license. Taivo (talk) 16:20, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chiesa di Santo Stefano protomartire (Cefalù, PA).jpeg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since). This is true but the Permission field contains “Creative Commons", so I think it is worth giving the uploader a further chance to clarify the license situation. Green Giant (talk) 02:11, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: still no license. --Jcb (talk) 17:26, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by El Stickmeister (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from trophies.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:34, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ECA LOGO (R).626.jpg

[edit]

Copyrighted material, registered trademark, wrong logo ITKnight (talk) 16:07, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:47, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lobo e Akasha.jpg

[edit]

pessoas nao querem imagens divulgadas Bruna Patrícia Gomes Soares (talk) 15:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader asked for the image to be deleted here. I believe this is fit for a courtesy deletion, especially considering how easily replaced it is and its low quality. ArgonSim (talk) 20:38, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:25, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bruna e Carlos - Lobo e Chapeuzinho.jpg

[edit]

pessoas nao querem imagens divulgadas Bruna Patrícia Gomes Soares (talk) 15:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader asked for the image to be deleted here. I believe this is fit for a courtesy deletion, especially considering how easily replaced it is and its low quality. ArgonSim (talk) 20:39, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:25, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rubén Alonso Rosales.jpg

[edit]

Flickr source is "all rights reserved". Photo's copyright status itself is questionable COM:PCP delete unless evidence presented that it is public domain. Abzeronow (talk) 16:30, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:58, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LibyaLibyaLibya.ogg

[edit]

No source. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 19:22, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:23, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Miko Rumahpasal.jpg

[edit]

Please delete image as it is Out of Scope - Self-promotion or vandalism/attack. User page and categories doe not exist. GRDN711 (talk) 00:32, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:OOS, COM:BLP/COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 15:15, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1wallstarstv (6787698814).png

[edit]

not appropriate for commons SecretName101 (talk) 04:58, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:41, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Trans-crotonaldehyde structure.svg

[edit]

Unused, low quality chemical structure; strange gaps between the kinks of the carbon chain. Have File:Structural formula of trans-crotonaldehyde.svg as high-quality replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom. For simple improvements of graphical detail, I think you can just upload a new revision to the same filename. That's simpler than the [1) upload to new filename (figuring out a new linguistic name for the same topic), 2) check for uses of old file and replace all with new file, 3) the whole DR process] process. DMacks (talk) 09:03, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. --Leyo 09:15, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thejk009 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

(NSFW) - Low resolution pornographic images with no EXIF information, very likely copyvios. 

O Still Small Voice of Clam 08:49, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Thejk009 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

(NSFW) - Low resolution pornographic images with no EXIF information, very likely copyvios.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thejk009 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope COM:PENIS

Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nöjesprofilen.pdf

[edit]

Obvious copyright violation Dodger67 (talk) 11:48, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:39, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flora Köln Aussenansicht mit Brunnen.jpg

[edit]

Dateiinformationen sind falsch. KWege (talk) 13:45, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete {{SDG7}}. 大诺史 (talk) 15:18, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 12:39, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flora Köln Terrasse Dank Augusta 1.jpg

[edit]

Bildinformationen nicht korrekt. KWege (talk) 13:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete {{SDG7}}. 大诺史 (talk) 15:18, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 12:39, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soetermans (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No permission in the press kit http://www.kiroogames.com/documents/Kit_press_web_eng.zip nor http://www.kiroogames.com/fr/mentions-legales.html The permission asked to contact@kiroogames.com wasn't obtained nor forwarded to COM:OTRS.

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:40, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ashwani Rana.jpg

[edit]

COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 14:59, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Helen McGregor and Laurent Devriendt.JPG

[edit]

not rightly uploaded, seems invisible to me Pippobuono (talk) 15:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anjali Nair.jpg

[edit]

Copyrighted image belonging to Skylark Pictures as mentioned in the photograph Watermark Jupitus Smart (talk) 19:36, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:11, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anjali Nair.jpg

[edit]

Copyrighted picture. No evidence of being a work of the editor who uploaded it. Was already available on multiple sites before its addition today Jupitus Smart (talk) 15:20, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as above. 大诺史 (talk) 14:56, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:400001WallstarsTV-XL (6171407226).png

[edit]

advertisement SecretName101 (talk) 16:24, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Belagerung der Stadt Frankfurt (Oder) durch die Schweden 1631.png

[edit]

lower quality duplicate of File:Dankaerts-Historis-9291.tif 2.247.240.217 18:59, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK Delete --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 06:31, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MV5BMWE5YjNiOWMtYzRhOS00MzZmLTllNmUtYzIwNWQzM2VhZmVlXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyODM5MjI1OTk@. V1 UY98 CR30,0,67,98 AL .jpg

[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:04, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:OOS, COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 15:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; MV5 indicates it came from IMDB so copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Skyl.jpg

[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:04, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:OOS, COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 15:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Моја жена и ташта.jpg

[edit]

bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 19:07, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:عکس فراز.jpg

[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:OOS, COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 15:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:علیرضا آدیر.jpg

[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:OOS, COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 15:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chiedza Jane Tsiga.jpg

[edit]

bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 19:19, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jerrel Streng.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:OOS, COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 15:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aquatic Center Fun.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:OOS, COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 15:17, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Uniform Ideas.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:06, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:OOS, COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 15:17, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Calanda brauereiturm 1.jpg

[edit]

bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 20:23, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Calanda brauereiturm.jpg

[edit]

bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 20:23, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Janko voiture 01 Official.jpg

[edit]

bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 20:47, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Redirected as duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Macano Designs By-Louena.jpg

[edit]

bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 20:47, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; copyvio anyway per exif. --Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Performer Louena Harmon33y.jpg

[edit]

bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 20:48, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sputla Ramokgopa.jpg

[edit]

© 2019 Kagiso Media Ltd. All rights reserved. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RinoTheNicePlayer.jpg

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image (:it:RinoTheNicePlayer). Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:36, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:OOS, COM:NOTHOST. 大诺史 (talk) 15:18, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BanderaDeCarnota.png

[edit]

File:Bandera de Carnota.svg PNG render with no attribution TFerenczy (talk) 22:30, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1711995421 36ed0b56-27cd-41cc-a75d-3925f9970f5e.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by CptViraj as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G1  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:25, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination ooS, though I don't see a copyright-problem. --Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flora Köln Festsaal .jpg

[edit]

Die Datei ist doppelt vorhanden. Die Datei, die bestehen bleiben soll, enthält weitaus mehr Informationen. KWege (talk) 13:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 09:51, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:From our mother nature.jpg

[edit]

Not educationally useful. Catherine Laurence 13:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused personal photo. --Wdwd (talk) 09:50, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Taregh.n (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seems to be collection of textbooks. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:47, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DigitalSpook.pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:47, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CARRERA DE ARQUITECTURA.pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:46, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Globina.srilanka.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from photo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:45, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Summary lebanese idioms-word 97-2003.pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:45, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ThatGuy2194 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used or used in self-promotional Wikidata items.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ThatGuy2194 17:29, 27 May 2019 (GMT) These are not self-promotional, images are being used to depict an online business that is indexed within the web.

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:43, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:XVFtsSKl.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NeoBarock aktuell.jpg

[edit]

Sie ist kein eigenes Werk von Streifentiger. Das Copyright liegt bei der NeoBarock GbR. 2001:16B8:F3D:4200:55B7:97E:4BFB:74C0 16:11, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

laut Bildbeschreibung ein eigenes Werk von "Streifentiger", hochgeladen am 7. Juni 2016 unter der Lizenz cc 4.0. WikiMaRie behauptet, dies sei eine "Lüge" (Zitat in der Zusammenfassungszeile) und unterstellt somit dem Streifentiger, sich das Bild unrechtmäßig angeeignet (von woher) und verwendet zu haben. Bitte den Vorgang vor diesem Hintergrund überprüfen. Siehe dazu auch die Versionsgeschichte auf dem Artikel de:NeoBarock (Ensemble) und der deswegen dort laufende Editwar. --ArthurMcGill (talk) 08:02, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nachtrag: die auf der Hauptseite des Bildes angegebene Quelle "Sueddeutsche Zeitung" ist von November 2016, wogegen das Bild von Juni 2016 ist, also älter. Das könnte bedeuten, dass die Redaktion das Bild wegen der freien Lizenz aus Commons übernommen hat, was in vielen vergleichbaren Fällen immer wieder vorkommt. Diese Überlegung wäre somit in die Entscheidung mit einzubeziehen. --ArthurMcGill (talk) 11:09, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ich weiß nicht, ob hier Mitglieder des Ensembles mitwirken. Falls ja, dann kann ich ihnen nur einen respektvollen Umgang mit ehemaligen Mitgliedern anraten. Stellen wir uns vor, die Rolling Stones würden nach einem Rauswurf von Mick Jagger versuchen, den Musiker aus der Vita ihrer Band zu tilgen. Das wäre bei WP unmöglich und das hätte auch einen sehr schlechten Stil. Meine Empfehlung an die Rechteinhaber des Fotos mit Herrn Möller: Foto Freigeben. Kleine Nebenbemerkung: hier lesen auf jeden Fall Musikliebhaber aus dem Kölner Umfeld mit. Und es ist nicht ausgeschlossen, daß auch Konzertveranstalter und Dirigenten mal hier reinschauen. Ein „Rosenkrieg“ hier in WP wäre äußerst schlechte Werbung für das Ensemble.
Diese Nachricht habe ich auf der Diskussionsseite des Artikels geschrieben [1]. --Musicologus (talk) 13:53, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Das Foto wird auch noch hier und hier verwendet. Sehr unwahrscheinlich, dass diese professionellen Seiten das Foto ohne Urheberrechtsangabe veröffentlichen (dito die Süddeutsche), d. h. für dieses Foto gibt es einen Rechteinhaber und es hätte hier nie ohne OTRS-Ticket eingestellt werden dürfen. --Horst Gräbner (talk) 14:38, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"unwahrscheinlich" mag ja sein, aber alle zuvor genannten Beispiele sind "nach" dem Hochladetermin des Commonsbildes datiert, könnten also auch den umgekehrten Weg gegangen sein (also dass Streifentiger das Bild gemacht hat und später (vielleicht sogar als ehemaliges Mitglied der Gruppe) dieses dem Ensemble/der Presse zur Verfügung gestellt hat, er selbst aber trotzdem der Fotograf ist). Ich habe kein Problem damit, dass das Bild später ggf. gelöscht werden muss, aber zunächst gilt die "Unschuldsvermutung" für Streifentiger und hier sollen sich zunächst die zuständigen Admins gemäß ihren Regeln und den vorliegenden Argumenten damit auseinandersetzen - auch damit wir für die Zukunft, wenn z. B. das jetzige neuere Bild eines Tages zurückgezogen werden sollte, klare Vorgaben haben. --ArthurMcGill (talk) 15:25, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Aus meiner Sicht gilt beim Urheberrecht nicht die „Unschuldsvermutung“. Bei dieser Frage geht es knallhart um Rechtsfragen und um mögliche Schadensersatzansprüche. Daher schlicht die Umkehrung: Der Uploader hat nachzuweisen, dass er der Rechteinhaber ist, und für diesen Zweck gibt es das OTRS-Ticket, damit Wikimedia auf der sicheren Seite ist. Viele Grüße. --Horst Gräbner (talk) 16:57, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: possible copyright violation, per COM:PCP (single file upload, professional photograph -> need permission via COM:OTRS ). --Wdwd (talk) 09:39, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1GoIowaState-XL (6167995733).png

[edit]

advertisement SecretName101 (talk) 16:25, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (+unused). --Wdwd (talk) 09:11, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PS GOLAY.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. Image is low resolution and file metadata indicate that the original image was taken from Facebook. Original uploader's other upload was also a copyright violation and was taken from Google. —Gazoth (talk) 18:30, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 09:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blason de la Famille Gillion de Roscomont.png

[edit]

Ce ne sont pas les armoiries de la Famille Gillion de Roscomont. Il y a déjà un fichier sur wikimedia concernant le blason et les armoiries de la dynastie des Gillion de Roscomont. Veuillez donc, je vous prie, le supprimer. Theobald de Roscomont (talk) 18:26, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blason de la Famille Gillion de Roscomont.png

[edit]

Ce ne sont plus les armoiries des Gillion de Roscomont 82.241.168.239 20:24, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: This file is used on fr:Armorial des familles de France. Under COM:NPOV, if it's accurate enough for French Wikipedia, it's accurate enough for Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 12:08, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file in use (=in scope). --Wdwd (talk) 09:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blason de la Famille Gillion de Roscomont.png

[edit]

Ce fichier existe déjà sur wikimedia : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blason_de_la_Famille_GILLION_de_ROSCOMONT.jpg James de Roscomont (talk) 12:34, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: (1) Ce fichier est forcément dupliqué entre toutes les versions de Wikipédia et Wikimedia Commons, c'est d'ailleurs indiqué sur cette adresse (" Ce fichier et sa description proviennent de Wikimedia Commons") et (2) le fait que ce blason ne soit plus utilisé ne justifie aucunement sa suppression. (no reason to delete) AntonierCH (d) 18:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: not a duplicate. Ruthven (msg) 22:39, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blason de la Famille Gillion de Roscomont.png

[edit]

This coat of arms is wrong ! This Family has already an original coat of arms. 91.167.187.156 18:12, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: please use Template:Disputed coat of arms if necessary. Ruthven (msg) 22:42, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blason de la Famille Gillion de Roscomont.png

[edit]

Le responsable de la publication de ce fichier droit procéder à l’effacement dans les meilleurs délais et au plus tard dans un délai d’un mois. En cas de réponse insatisfaisante ou d’absence de réponse sous un mois, la CNIL sera saisie. (article 17 du règlement général sur la protection des données- RGPD et droit à l'effacement). Concernant la violation de droit d'auteur, l’atteinte au droit d'auteur désigne, de façon générale, les nuisances portées à la propriété intellectuelle. Aller à l’encontre des intérêts moraux et matériels de l'auteur est ainsi passible d'une action en responsabilité pénale et civile.La personne responsable de cette publication est pénalement responsable car ne détient en aucun cas les droits d'auteur concernant les armoiries de cette famille. Dont acte. 2A01:E0A:1EE:E700:31BF:9C2:D3B7:B923 22:04, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:36, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blason de la Famille Gillion de Roscomont.png

[edit]

Ce ne sont pas les armoiries de la branche GILLION de ROSCOMONT. Voici la version officielle : http://conseil-francais-d-heraldique.com/heraldique-armorial-armoiries.php?ID=858 James de Roscomont (talk) 14:28, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong coat of arms, please delete it as soon as possible James de Roscomont (talk) 19:26, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong coat of arms & copyright infringement Theobald de Roscomont (talk) 16:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blason de la Famille Gillion de Roscomont.png

[edit]

copyright infringement Theobald de Roscomont (talk) 21:29, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blason de la Famille Gillion de Roscomont.png

[edit]

violation de copyright Theobald de Roscomont (talk) 21:30, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blason de la Famille Gillion de Roscomont.png

[edit]

Violation de copyright / Copyright Infrigment !!! Theobald de Roscomont (talk) 21:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blason de la Famille Gillion de Roscomont.png

[edit]

Immediate deletion request - copyright infringement James de Roscomont (talk) 21:38, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural close. See above. --Minoraxtalk 11:38, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marçal de Sas, Incredulitat de sant Tomàs, catedral de València.jpg

[edit]

Corrupted scan, new version has been uploaded WQUlrich (talk) 20:45, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 08:56, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ALCALDE2019GERSON.jpg

[edit]

I think that this image is not free, this seems to be a cropped image of one that appears in https://diariolaregion.com/web/el-cpc-gerson-lecca-garcia-juro-como-alcalde-del-distrito-de-belen/ Ovruni (talk) 21:20, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 08:40, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Twitter Social Icon Circle Color.svg

[edit]

The Twitter bird logo is derived from a non-free logo, which is a kind of derivative wok B dash (talk) 07:50, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:33, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Twitter Social Icon Circle White.svg

[edit]

The Twitter bird logo is derived from a non-free logo, which is a kind of derivative wok B dash (talk) 07:50, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:33, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jake Knott (5116070339).jpg

[edit]

photo credited to a different author SecretName101 (talk) 00:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; uploader request.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:28, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kristen-Bell-HD-Picture.jpg

[edit]

Suspected copyright violation. A higher resolution version was uploaded three years earlier on Imgur. Meta data is minimal, consistent with drive-by internet re-uploads. --Krinkle 02:02, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; no evidence of ownership.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:31, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Male Undressing.jpg

[edit]

Not a good image Four Panes (talk) 03:17, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:31, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:200001-133-XL (6168567740).jpg

[edit]

content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 06:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:34, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:200001-179-XL (6168035541).jpg

[edit]

content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 06:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:34, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Twitter-nicolasrnphoto-web.jpg

[edit]

Screenshot showing COM:PACKAGE of Campbell's soup B dash (talk) 07:56, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:37, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Luise Bernert - Neptun.jpg

[edit]

aus Versehen hochgeladen Luise Bernert (talk) 10:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:CSD#G7 as it's an uploader's request shortly after the image was uploaded (uploader could have used a speedy deletion request for quicker processing). --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:19, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Inwayer Shubhi singh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal photos

Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:50, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Inwayer Shubhi singh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE - see COM:SELFIE

DannyS712 (talk) 02:51, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:50, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ChernovM.jpg

[edit]

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:49, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Richiex (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PENIS

Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:28, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete These are all redundant. I get you need some of these but the ones marked for deletion are parts of other files or him ejactulating which he has at least 50 different files.

 Delete I would not call these "high quality". Worthless, poor quality, out of scope and lacking in educational value. AshFriday (talk) 22:21, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep There aren't too many gif-animations of male masturbation and ejaculation for different purposes. Similar animations have educational value because many of them are widely in use. Images and a video of handjob are used in many national Wikipedias and there is not much media in that category. The quality is over the average that is seen in other similar animations. This kind of mass deletion request without specific reasons reflects only nominator's personal attitudes, it's not argumented how these are out of scope and how they lack educational value in comparison to other similar animations/videos. Richiex (talk) 19:45, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • As stated above, these files are not of sufficient quality to be of realistic educational value. In addition, none of these files are currently in use on any wikimedia project; subsequently, their deletion will not harm any existing mainspace article. Lacking educational value, they are, by definition, out of scope for the project and should therefore be removed under COM:PORN and COM:NUDITY. Commons is not an amateur porn site and should never be used as such. AshFriday (talk) 07:05, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's very rare that files are used in Wikipedias after 9 hours of publishing, it often takes months or years. If this user is concerned of quality and educational value he/she should do thousands of deletion requests across the Wikimedia before commenting here. Richiex (talk) 10:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thousands of files have already been deleted, sometimes within a few hours of uploading, depending on the circumstances. If you wish to share images & animations of your genitalia, I suggest you do so through the blogs posted on your userpage. Commons is not here to promote amateur porn sites: this is made very clear in COM:SPAM, COM:NUDITY and COM:PORN. AshFriday (talk) 05:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        • You have a fixation to claim that I'm using Wikimedia Commons as a porn site. Many of my images and videos are or have been used in Wikipedia projects, so my work here hasn't been useless or lacking educational value. My recent uploads didn't differ from the existing files in the sense of the nature of the content. It's sad that a grown up Wikimedia user expresses strong, personal, biased and omniscient opinions about another user's purposes.

          Wikimedia Commons is not cencored: "Commons will not censor or remove media that users find objectionable or offensive.". Uploaded files have a clear scope of illustrating certain sexual practices and functions. These are subjects written about worldwide in Wikipedias and increasingly with media attached to them.

          If you have something further to say, please use unbiased and valid arguments. Richiex (talk) 07:36, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Keep I don’t believe these files are vulgar or harmful to the public. People will always have an interest in sex and sexuality. The videos by this individual are done with discretion and are tastefully done. He includes extremely informative captions that provide an insightful view into these sexual topics and add an educational element. I actually believe removing videos like his create more harm than good. People will always seek answers to their queries, and his videos provide a supportive, thoughtful answer without the vulgar fictional element pornographic sites use. His videos are an honest and open representation of some very sensitive topics, but I feel he approaches them with a great deal of grace, poise, and honesty that cannot be found on other sites. Please do not remove them. S.Liera (talk) 14:30, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: redundant. See {{Nopenis}}. Kept the video. --Ruthven (msg) 06:54, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Richiex (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:Scope Com:Porn

Pilerk (talk) 03:54, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete These are all redundant. I get you need some of these but the ones marked for deletion are parts of other files or him ejactulating which he has at least 50 different files. Many of the files marked for deletion are purposeless because richiex has uploaded a newer or better file. And also keep in mind none of the ones marked are actually used in more than 1 article. So its not a personal attack. And pilerk kept many others that are useful and educational.
  • We don't block people for placing DRs on out of scope images. If you're demanding "individualized arguments," you should provide a list of the files currently in use. AshFriday (talk) 22:03, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Files in use are automatically within scope so it's nominator's job to check it. It's a strong evidence of a fixation if someone does a mass deletetion request (and if someone votes for it too) without checking individual files first whether they are in use or not. You are claiming that files nominated for deletion are out of scope. It's not nominator's or your decision, it's only a suggestion. You haven't understood the basics. Richiex (talk) 11:23, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. See {{Nopenis}}. Kept severalper Hannoloans. Ruthven (msg) 13:16, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Richiex (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:Scope Com:Porn

Pilerk (talk) 04:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete These are all redundant. I get you need some of these but the ones marked for deletion are parts of other files or him ejactulating which he has at least 50 different files. Many of the files marked for deletion are purposeless. Like why is a pocture of an unzipped fly helpful. Or a pocture of him nude holding a lily pad. Some of these are just showoffs. Keep in mind none of the ones marked are actually used in more than 1 article. So its not a personal attack. And pilerk kept many others that are useful and educational.
  •  Delete Per COM:Scope and Com:Porn. Educationally worthless. AshFriday (talk) 22:18, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Please, block user Pilerk instantly. He/she is just doing mass deletion request basing on his/her personal opinions and messing file pages. Some of these files are in use. In my opinion, every file suggested for deletion should have individualised arguments. Some of these files are very old and have never been problematic before. Richiex (talk) 07:43, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Educational. We don't have videos of using a vibrator with cock and ball rings and tenga eggs. --Hannolans (talk) 21:45, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. See {{Nopenis}}. Kept several per Hannoloans. Ruthven (msg) 13:16, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Richiex (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope COM:Porn

Pilerk (talk) 04:30, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete These are all redundant. I get you need some of these but the ones marked for deletion are parts of other files or him ejactulating which he has at least 50 different files. Many of the files marked for deletion are purposeless because richiex has uploaded a newer or better file. And also keep in mind none of the ones marked are actually used in more than 1 article. So its not a personal attack. And pilerk kept many others that are useful and educational.

Deleted: per nomination. See {{Nopenis}}. Ruthven (msg) 13:17, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Richiex (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, Com:Porn

Pilerk (talk) 04:56, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete These are all redundant. I get you need some of these but the ones marked for deletion are parts of other files or him ejactulating which he has at least 50 different files. Many of the files marked for deletion are purposeless because richiex has uploaded a newer or better file. And also keep in mind none of the ones marked are actually used in more than 1 article. So its not a personal attack. And pilerk kept many others that are useful and educational. He shouldn't be removed. And I'm fine with the account only being created for this deletion. He very likely used the visual file editor which you need to be signed in to use.
  •  Keep per comment directly above. Pilerk should be instant-blocked or taken to checkuser as it's obviously a sock (created just to add more DR to this page). --Denniss (talk) 07:01, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep we need pictures and videos that illustrate sex. Technical quality of this material is good (sound, light, background, filenames, models, privacy). --Hannolans (talk) 18:04, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Educationally worthless. Redundant, out of scope images do not get a free pass simply because they feature human genitalia. AshFriday (talk) 22:24, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Please, block user Pilerk instantly. He/she is just doing mass deletion request basing on his/her personal opinions and messing file pages. Some of these files are in use. In my opinion, every file suggested for deletion should have individualised arguments. There are very old files that have never been problematic before. Richiex (talk) 07:43, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • No, files in use are automatically within scope. It's always personal opinion to say if files not in use are out of scope or not. Wikimedia is not censored. You haven't understood the basics. Richiex (talk) 09:44, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Deleted redundant ones; see {{Nopenis}}. Ruthven (msg) 13:20, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File uploaded by Cuculo2010 (more)

[edit]

Supposed to be "own work", but the uploader said here «Hello, I would like to ask you not to delete the photographs used in the page Paolo Ruffini (actor) because they are photos we hold the copyright of (that was granted to us by the photograph Loris Zambelli and his agency Photomovie), which we would like to use on the web. If you need clarification and/or official documentation feel free to ask. Thanks, Cuculo2010». Although he/she was repeatedly solicited to provide evidence of being allowed to upload the photos, he/she never released any OTRS authorization.
Hints we have:

  • In two pictures that were deleted (File:Up&Down.jpg and File:File:3A3A0301 pag34-35.jpg), the author in the metadata was "Teo Di Biase", but in the first three pictures here listed it's "Loriz T. Zambelli". Cuculo2010 has never stated his/her real name. Zambelli was mentioned in the message above, so he's not Cuculo2010;
  • For the last picture here listed, there's no author in the metadata but the uploader wrote "Author: Gianluca Saragò" and "Source: Picture from Paolo Ruffini's album"
  • The original description of the last picture when uploaded on it.wiki (full description here) includes "copyright holder: Nido del Cuculo" (a group of actors) but the uploader released it in the public domain "as the author". We can't know whether Cuculo2010 is Gianluca Saragò or it's one of the pictures supposedly given by Zambelli's agency --Lombres (talk) 21:56, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: Several authors' artworks published by the uploader without implicit or explicit permission from the creator/s. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 10:00, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HP Scitex's international headquarters in Netanya, Israel.jpg

[edit]

This picture seems to be copied from a certain news article ([2]). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 09:03, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per OTRS. -- Geagea (talk) 23:45, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HP PageWide C500 Press international customer introduction event at HP Scitex's Caesarea site in Israel.jpg

[edit]

This picture seems to be copied as it appears in several places on the web. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 09:05, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per OTRS. -- Geagea (talk) 23:46, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Little River Band 2019.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation, see http://www.thelouisianaweekend.com/what-to-do/little-river-band/ WWGB (talk) 01:18, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Casino was given permission to use this Little River Band promotional photograph by LRB's PR Director. I am assistant to Donna Nolan-Wilson, the PR Director for Little River Band. We have not only been given direct permission to use this photo here at Wikipedia by Wayne Nelson, bass player and lead singer of Little River Band but we are the creator of this promotional photo. This photo should not be deleted. It is NOT A COPYRIGHT VIOLATION and the I am sure that WWGB knows this. You can see that photo on Little River Band's main website at www.LittleRiverBand.com and their fan club at www.LittleRiverBandFanClub.com

{{request edit}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by DinaMoore (talk • contribs) 03:21, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chauniv.png

[edit]

TOO, complex logo. — regards, Revi 01:21, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also no evidence of CC0. — regards, Revi 01:23, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Giff 2.jpg

[edit]

Most likely a government's work Wedjet (talk) 05:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2017 28th Winter Universiade logo.svg

[edit]

This logo is not Public Domain. Yogwi21 (talk) 07:16, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Soweto Derby.jpg

[edit]

Appears to be Facebook image per Metadata, no permission from the copyright holder B dash (talk) 07:54, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:53, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kevin Techakanokboon.jpg

[edit]

According to Exif metadata, author is Spark Photography [3] and copyright holder is ©Susco Media 2014 - all rights reserved 619-717-2322. We don't know who is behind the username "Stefantast", so they need to prove their identity through COM:OTRS. The file was previoulsy deleted, but re-uploaded by the user. 4nn1l2 (talk) 08:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:52, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lalu Manambai Abdul Kadir.jpg

[edit]

Claimed as own work but clearly photo of a photo Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:52, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Screenshot 20190525-193503.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:SCREENSHOT Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Xntehhfjpg-1558711497.jpg

[edit]

A low resolution picture. No metadata. May be a croped version of another original photograph. A clear copyright violation of the original photographer. Also there are lot of oppertunities to get a good photograph of this persion. Suggest to delete from commons. Ranjithsiji (talk) 10:32, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Potap 2019.jpg

[edit]

The artist decided to keep the previous picture Cryptolover1994 (talk) 11:11, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 15:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jacek Bieriezin.jpg

[edit]

It has not been 70 years since the death of the author, the file is definitely not in the public domain. 148.81.20.120 13:21, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:50, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Babaktavajoh1980 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:50, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ansgar Hocke.pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:49, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eyoungstrom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents. Superseded by File:Probability nomogram -- useful for combining probability and new information that changes odds, as used in Evidence-Based Medicine and Evidence-Based Assessment 01.pdf.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is the PDF the best format? If the jpg and png do not render any better in browsers or printing, then fine to delete. I want to have the image still render crisply if a reader downloads and prints as a full page. Thanks very much! Eyoungstrom (talk) 15:28, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:49, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:F1simspain1 1.svg

[edit]

Out of scope - unused file with funny party names that do not exist Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:48, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:F1SimSpain Parliament 2019.svg

[edit]

Out of scope - unused file with funny party names that do not exist Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:48, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Puenteamericano (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art and promo photo. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:47, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A souvenir water bottle at Super Bowl LII, Minneapolis MN (39220710425).jpg

[edit]

Per COM:TOYS B dash (talk) 15:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:46, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Emperor Naruhito and Empress Masako 02.jpg

[edit]

Can't find the image on the source B dash (talk) 15:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read the 宮内庁ホームページ利用規約 and the 皇室の方々の著作物、ご肖像などについて? The web administrator of kunaicho.go.jp (the Imperial Household Agency) says "皇室の方々の著作物、ご肖像" is "別の利用ルールを適用するコンテンツ". Then File:Emperor Naruhito and Empress Masako 02.jpg from kunaicho.go.jp are not accepted in Wikimedia Commons. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 14:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Nnkrkrhhdi. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ahogy ballagtunk.png

[edit]

Because, I, the owner doesn't want it anymore on Wikipedia Commons Tamas2004 (talk) 19:58, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:46, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jake Knott Big Play (7976851686).jpg

[edit]

different author credited in data SecretName101 (talk) 00:14, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It appears author credited may just be the individual commissioned by the publisher.SecretName101 (talk) 02:54, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. And watermark may indicate a screengrab and license laundering. P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:24, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jake Knott gets hand in Doege's face (6295499854).jpg

[edit]

different author credited SecretName101 (talk) 00:14, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. COM:LL. P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:24, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pancho Villa TwittStar (8204189107).jpg

[edit]

Screenshot of non-free content B dash (talk) 07:56, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @B dash: You don't know that! The whole image is upside-down, which renders a lot (if not all of it) de minimis. Only one thing you could argue about, the main photo, depicts Pancho Villa and was taken in 1914. Looking at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Mexico I think {{PD-Mexico}} is incomplete, but that photo appears to be public domain. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:58, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: for now, screenshot is DM. But the main photo is certainly not historic, just an actor re-enacting. If this is COM:LL, then renominate. P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:31, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I was unclear, I meant the main photo on the tablet. (the black and white one, that's from 1914) No LL here that I can see. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:11, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Premium palza evening.jpg

[edit]

Image note said photos by Kafukula, no permission from him/her B dash (talk) 08:11, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:35, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Map of Kurdish-inhabited provinces of Iran, according to a poll in 2010.PNG

[edit]

This file is designed by a Turkish person who clearly spread falsified information. West Azerbaijan is mostly inhabited by Kurds but as you can see with Photoshop or any other photo editor he changed it to %21.7. Unfortunately fascist Turks spread false information all over Wikipedia specially the English version. If you check the English and Persian version you can see the difference. All over West Azerbayjan Kurds are living while Azari Turks are only in few middle and north cities but because government is backing them against Kurds they have power and spread false information about Kurdish population of West Azerbayjan. 2.99.207.114 16:40, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: This file is in use on many Wikipedia articles, from az:Kürdlər to tr:Kürtler. Under COM:NPOV, Commons should not delete files that are used on other projects simply for being inaccurate. This doesn't stop you editing those various Wikipedias, noting the inaccuracies on File:Map of Kurdish-inhabited provinces of Iran, according to a poll in 2010.PNG (linking to a better map would be good), or discussing the matter on File talk:Map of Kurdish-inhabited provinces of Iran, according to a poll in 2010.PNG. --bjh21 (talk) 12:24, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Bjh21. P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:44, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Map of Kurdish-inhabited provinces of Iran, according to a poll in 2010.PNG

[edit]

Die Statistiken dieser Karte sind gefälscht und die Bevölkerung der Provinz West-Aserbaidschan besteht zu 60 % aus کردن ==Summary== {{اطلاعات Hoonets (talk) 18:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply] 

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoonets (talk • contribs) 18:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: File is in use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:39, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Estadio Roberto Bravo Santibáñez.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Carlos yo as Copyvio and the most recent rationale was: Copyright Estadios de Chile. Maybe a question of Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Chile#Freedom_of_panorama. JuTa 17:10, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. The uploader has made a number of dubious claims about authorship and licensing. If this is really their own work, why is the resolution of this rather professional looking aerial photograph so low, and why is there no metadata? And what's with the icon in the lower left-hand corner? Looks like a screenshot rather than the uploader's own work. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:35, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:45, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dragões do Cerrado.jpg

[edit]

File:Dragões do Cerrado.png nominated for deletion by the uploader. Cjp24 (talk) 18:20, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused logo without educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:48, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tokyo Skytree light up in US flag for Trump's visit.jpg

[edit]

The image first post by Japanese PM Shinzō Abe on Twitter at 3:00 am JST 26 May, then it is reposted by Japanese Kantei at 3:24 am JST 219.78.190.66 02:22, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 22:34, 16 July 2019 (UTC) Undeleted per UnDR. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BibliotecaCentralLaPlata.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D artwork in Argentina B dash (talk) 07:59, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 22:37, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jon Worth.jpg

[edit]

Website said CC-BY-NC 4.0 license B dash (talk) 08:06, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the links provided in the description? May I quote? »Need a Creative Commons Licensed image of me to illustrate something? The main photo I use across all channels can be found here – CC-BY-SA License.«  Keep, CC-BY-SA given. --Stefan ■ 20:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Image is correctly licensed, per source. --James F. (talk) 22:36, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:17-VOLEIBOL-logo web-01-2.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by CptViraj as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F2  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:23, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept as PD-textlogo (non-admin closure) -- CptViraj (📧) 03:56, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Monument of Independence of Ukraine in Ternopil.jpg

[edit]

No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 2010. No Permission from the sculptor / architect.

And also

Микола Василечко (talk) 16:23, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:11, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alina Zagitova at the Grand Prix Final 2018 - Awarding ceremony 02.jpg

[edit]

How a 2008 permission may be valid for a 2018 image? Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:09, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alina Zagitova at the European Championships 2019 - Awarding ceremony 01.jpg

[edit]

How a 2008 permission may be valid for a 2018 image? Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:15, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:09, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Post-100-1174145536.jpg

[edit]

It's a derivative work of a 3D object that is uploaded from Internet with no photographer's permission. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:45, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This image is not a photo. This is a drawn image from an official document that falls under the law specified in the justification. Kei (talk) 07:23, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, derivative work whether photo or drawing. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:(1)Castle Cove house where Guider lived 1996.jpg

[edit]

To preserve anomynity of man in photo, who is unrelated to events Sardaka (talk) 08:21, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination unused. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs by Dezső Rozgonyi

[edit]

The photographer was Dezső Rozgonyi. He died at the earliest in 1955 (see here). --Regasterios (talk) 08:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Keith Waite in 1949.gif

[edit]

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Brexit Party logo April 2019.jpg

[edit]

The concept of the threshold of originality is not generally recognised under UK copyright law for almost all logos. ([4]) 194.207.146.167 10:45, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Let's be precise, the guidance says most and not 'almost all. I see rather little in terms of creative input in this logo. Text on a shape of an arrow shows extremely little in terms of creativity[5] while the text doesn't even bother to go beyond one of the most common fonts Helvetica. It looks like created by someone in 2-3 minutes. Given the UK doctrine of the sweat of the brow, I think it's really a borderline case. — kashmīrī 11:07, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Borderline case indeed, but on borderline cases we fall on the side of delete per PCP. --Majora (talk) 03:52, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Change UK Logo 2.png

[edit]

The concept of the threshold of originality is not generally recognised under UK copyright law for almost all logos. ([6]) 194.207.146.167 10:47, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Completely standard fonts are one of the few exceptions to UK sweat of the brow. This is below TOO. --Majora (talk) 03:51, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Change UK Logo 2.png

[edit]

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Independent_Group_for_Change.png ; Newly-created logos of registered political parties with the UK Electoral Commission (which would include the logo) is usually understood as subject to UK copyright. (For the purpose of UK copyright law, the text also forms part of the logo, and not just the symbol.) 194.207.146.167 08:43, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, it was kept before because it is made out of simple texts and shapes and is thus ineligible for copyright. DiegoAma (talk) 00:41, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Our understanding of UK threshold of originality is what was mentioned previously. Please provide evidence in the form of a court decision that shows that simple plain text such as this is copyrightable. --Majora (talk) 00:43, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Independent Group Logo.png

[edit]

The concept of the threshold of originality is not generally recognised under UK copyright law for almost all logos. ([7]) 194.207.146.167 10:48, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Completely standard fonts are one of the few exceptions to UK sweat of the brow. This is below TOO. --Majora (talk) 03:53, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Independent Group Logo.png

[edit]

Original rationale invalid: Here in the UK, a logo which consists of 'simple plain text' only still enjoys copyright. If it is a logo and it is understood 'as such', then it enjoys UK copyright (subject of course to the usual time limit constraints). UK copyright thresholds are really THAT low. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Independent_Group_for_Change.png 194.207.146.167 08:42, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Our understanding of UK threshold of originality is what was mentioned previously. Please provide evidence in the form of a court decision that shows that simple plain text such as this is copyrightable. --Majora (talk) 00:43, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2019-05-17 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0789 LR10 by Stepro.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Stepro as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: COM:SPEEDY General reasons #7, author / uploader request deletion within 7 days

What essentially is "rage tagging" because someone created a crop and linked it back to the original with attribution. Seeing as there is now a crop of the image, deleting this in such a manner seems inappropriate. For more information see Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 77#User:Tm is deleting my DRs again --Majora (talk) 03:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In case my conversation of this into a DR wasn't clear enough,  Keep. The speedy tagging of this image is simple disruption. The images are plainly educational, could be used on a variety of articles, and were released under an irrevocable license. Deleting them because of other issues (again see the ANU thread) would go against our mission. --Majora (talk) 03:52, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete according our rules I need no reason within the first 7 days. This file has to be deleted. --Stepro (talk) 03:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing properly released under a free license has to be deleted. We have refused blanket deletions by individuals tagging their images in such a manner before. You released it under an irrevocalbe license. Doing so means it can be hosted here, in perpetuity, with or without your approval. While we do perform courtesy deletions there is a line that you have crossed here simply because of other issues that are irrelevant to this image. Admins do not have to delete anything that is properly licensed and to delete this image when it is plainly within our mission would be a disservice to Commons. --Majora (talk) 04:03, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Stepro is trying to stop the creation of derivative works by any means necessary. Please for more context see Commons:Deletion requests/User:Stepro/UEFA. He has tried to delete the images that were cropped, under invalid arguments but was stopped and now tries to go around by deleting the originals. Not an good faith move. . And, per COM:SPEEDY General reasons #7, "Original author or uploader requests deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content" it should be kept as it is in use in User:Stepro/gallery and User:Einstein2/Budapest/2019 May 21-31. And this image shows that the derivative was correctly licensed, attributed and sourced. If this image is deleted, then all images with {{User:Stepro/UEFA}} should be deleted, as Stepro is trying to make a De facto no commercial and no derivatives license. Tm (talk) 04:10, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Stepro is right when trying to protect the people he takes pictures of from being bothered with "portraits" made by cropping a picture that was never meant to be a portrait. It's because of crops like this why I myself do not upload quite a lot of otherwise good pictures to Commons anymore to avoid that someone who obviously has no eye for photography and has no respect for the people depicted creates "portraits" that are just bad. --Tsui (talk) 19:04, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Stepro is the author of the files and hence has the right to request speedy deletion within seven days following the guidelines. "Bad quality" is another valid reason for deletion. The croptool should instead be deleted, the outcomes are nearly always terrible and insult the photographer and the person depicted. --Ailura (talk) 13:12, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment @Tm: I'm still puzzeled by your actions. You'd like to get sued by this/those soccer player/s? --Tobias ToMar Maier (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tobias ToMar Maier: Sued why? I´m the one puzzeled by this assertion. Tm (talk) 02:31, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Image was uploaded and taken by Stepro, so why would anyone sue me, unrelated with this file? Tm (talk) 02:32, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Tm: Whoops, my misstake. It's @TheSoccerBoy: 's problem.--Tobias ToMar Maier (talk) 03:13, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've had quite enough of the fear mongering and the incredible biting of another editor here. TheSoccerBoy did nothing wrong. They used a publicly available tool to crop an image that was uploading under a copyright license that allows derivatives. Thousands, no tens of thousands, of images are cropped in such a manner. This is getting ridiculous and needs to stop. First of all {{Personality rights}} is not a commons problem and there isn't even anything wrong with cropping a photo of a person to get a better shot of them. TheSoccerBoy did that to illustrate an article. They did something that fulfills our entire purpose for existing. Telling them to fear lawsuits over such an action is nothing more than a chilling affect on anybody that wants to do the same. Something that is allowed. This has to stop. Leave TheSoccerBoy alone and stop making nonsense comments that they should fear lawsuits. There is no defamation or other personality rights issues that would ever arise from this. So stop. --Majora (talk) 04:07, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Majora: Do you think "{{Personality rights}} is not a commons problem", because of this? Then why do we even care to put the template there in the first place? --Wuselig (talk) 16:19, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Wuselig: Personality rights would be the problem of reusers outside of Wikimedia. Yes, they are redundant to the general disclaimer. We have quite a few other disclaimer templates listed at Category:Non-copyright restriction templates that are redundant to the legal disclaimers listed on all Wikimedia sites. Why we continue to add them? Precedent and ensuring that we are covering all bases for the myriad of differing laws around the world in the hope that any reuser that wants to use the image is aware of any potential issues with it. The general disclaimer then coats that in a, "we aren't lawyers so ask one if you aren't sure" clause to ensure that any missing templates can't be seen as a go ahead of do whatever you want. Our guideline on non-copyright restrictions, COM:NCR, explicitly states that it really isn't our problem, It is up to the reusers of Commons-hosted media to ensure that they do not violate any non-copyright restrictions that apply to the media. It is the reusers problem to ensure that they are following the laws of the country in which they wish to reuse the image. --Majora (talk) 16:54, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The personality rights aren't just a legal issue. It's a matter of respect: 1st for the people depicted and 2nd for the photographers who do their best to provide good pictures to Commons und thus to the public, not to abuse (and that's what I call it when images are badly cropped or similar, even if it isn't done on purpose) the given right to alter images here in a way that results in bad pictures and a bad reputation for the photographers.
Sooner or later it also becomes a problem for Commons, when people (artists, sportspersons ...) start to refuse being photographed for us and organizers no longer hand out accreditations, because they don't trust us (anymore) that we take responsibility for the way we present people with pictures in articles. It already happened. --Tsui (talk) 20:21, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't want your photos mercilessly modified by anyone and everyone, might I suggest a NoDerivs license at Flickr? You can have your photos on Commons or you can control modifications to them, not both.
To avoid a repeat of this situation, perhaps we need a Commons guideline page (if there isn't one already) to explain the attribution opt-out clause of CC licenses [8] and suggest a standard method of requesting it. clpo13(talk) 20:33, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I accept that my images can be modified, but I don't have to like the results.
Nice remark by the way, to tell a photographer who supports our idea of free knowledge and conent with 15000+ images to go elswhere if he dares to voice an opinion. --Tsui (talk) 20:46, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It is not that we want anyone to "go elsewhere". It is just that the opinion expressed is against one of the foundational principles of Commons. If you upload here you agreed to allow others to modify your work here. So let them. Speaking of COM:OWN, Clpo13, that page might be a good place to include such a remedy. --Majora (talk) 20:48, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Die Argumente des Antragstellers sind nachvollziehbar und entsrechen dem Regelwerk. Mutmaßungen über die Motive ungeeignet, um den Fall zu bewerten. --ST ○ 20:58, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
G7 no longer applies at all actually. As the photo is in use on an article. It didn't apply originally either as it was being used as a source for another photo and therefore was in use on Commons. Photos in use automatically eliminate the possibility for G7 which is what this entire DR is about. --Majora (talk) 21:04, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Es wäre nicht das erste mal, dass ein Bild aus einem Artikel entfernt wird. Deine "Argument" läuft ins Leere. --ST ○ 21:33, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The Uploader may demand deletion within seven days if, for example, he has made a mistake in selecting the image.

The Uploader has trusted that this photo will only be used in the context of the sporting situation. You can call that naive, because according to Murphy's law somebody had to come up with the idea to make a terrible crop out of a sports photo - because it is formally allowed. But apparently the uploader was lucky with many thousands of pictures and that didn't happen.

Here we have a *very* unfavourable facial expression, which is simply not suitable for a portrait. Nobody wanted to be represented in such a way in an article.

If the uploader would watch this procedure idly, he would risk annoyance with the photographed athletes and organizers. He (and other Wikipedia photographers) would risk no longer being invited to sports events in the future because the organisers are not prepared to have athletes portrayed in this way. There is a threat of damage to the reputation of our project: "They put disfiguring portraits on the Internet".

With the experience that other users are now ruthlessly making such portrait excerpts from sports photos, responsible photographers will no longer upload images that could cause such a problem. Only images in which a portrait excerpt in no case can violate personal rights or humilate somebody can be uploaded. In this case, the uploader has mistakenly trusted that nobody will make distorting excerpts and can therefore demand deletion within seven days. --Superbass (talk) 13:03, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I agree to the statement for User:Superbass as I take photographs of sports people aswell. I hade the same problem as User:Stepro a few times. Especially cropping from a sports photo "in action" can lead to undesirable results for the depticted person. I always choose photos very carefully and do not want to look the person on it in an ugly situation. --Nicola (talk) 18:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Clear case according to our rules. Nothing to discuss. The image itself has not been in use when Steffen requested its deletion. --Achim (talk) 21:21, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as per User:Superbass--Tobias ToMar Maier (talk) 22:38, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 77#Disruptive DRs by Strepo I think this can be considered withdrawn. Stepro doesn't have rollback back (yet) and there is a DR for crop 1 and 2 now instead of having them actually speedied, but otherwise Stepro got what he proposed. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:11, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete There are some here that argue that Personality Rights are of no issue within our community and should only be applied by users outside our community, while we hold ourselves exempt from such outside infringements by a general disclaimer. Than why should we add a personality rights tag in the first place, if we as a community don't even give a shit about it?
"Although this work is freely licensed or in the public domain, the person(s) shown may have rights that legally restrict certain re-uses unless those depicted consent to such uses. In these cases, a model release or other evidence of consent could protect you from infringement claims. Though not obliged to do so, the uploader may be able to help you to obtain such evidence."
What is so difficult to understand in this wording, that we, within our system can't contact the uploader before we make such a crop, if he might have a better image, or have contact with the person depicted, or if even a bad crop is even needed to illustrate an article, or a list, or whatever, or if the original will do as well? Such a civil approach was not taken. Stepro tried to divert the damage with his right to ask for speedy deletion within our time limit. That right was denied to him, he was even accused of being disruptive. The only disruptiveness I see is the uncivility I see within our Commons Community towards the Concept of Personality Rights. Ideally we should move this discussion to a Meta-level, but for now we have to fix the damage locally. --Wuselig (talk) 10:47, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wuselig: This is no crop and Stepro has accepted the crop of this one. (see the ANU thread) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:11, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: , as I wrote, I consider this a meta-issue. Still I inserted this in all the deletion discussions that I came across in this issue. If I missed any, I would have inserted it there too. Actually it is mainly the crops I am concerned about. If there is consensus between the cropper and the uploader within our community regarding the personality rights issue, than that is exactly the situation I am looking forward to. I am very confident that we can resolve this issue in an amicable way, without resorting to formalities and threats of blocks and revoking rights.--Wuselig (talk) 11:31, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Wuselig: The nominations for the full photos (four of them) I think can be considered withdrawn. (again, see the ANU thread) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:34, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Info No, my suggestion was not accepted, so we have to go the British way ("no deal"). I will not withdraw this DR as long as the bad crop exists. --Stepro (talk) 23:03, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment By calling the crop an "bad crop" and them nominating the source image to deletion you are still, in fact, enforcing an no derivative license, despite your claims. Also file is in use in ca:Pamela Tajonar, en:Pamela Tajonar, es:Pamela Tajonar, wikidata:Q5851513, fr:Discussion utilisateur:NaggoBot/CommonsDR, fr:Projet:Les sans pagEs/Articles manquants par occupation/Footballeuse, fr:Projet:Les sans pagEs/Articles manquants par nationalité/Mexique and it:Progetto:WikiDonne/Voci non presenti in it.wiki/Calciatrici, so in use is in scope. Tm (talk) 03:10, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't talk with you anymore about this topic. In my opinion, your argument is completely wrong, and everything essential has already been written more than enough times. --Stepro (talk) 23:16, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Stepro: And the British will probably either remain or leave without a deal, which is about the stupidest thing they can do. The only points from your suggestion you didn't get were the immediate deletion of one of the crops (it was nominated for deletion and probably will be deleted, just not instantly) and rollback wasn't returned to you automatically. Instead, you were instructed to re-request it at Commons:Requests for rights so another admin could judge it. Looks like you didn't even bother. And please note: even if this photo is deleted, that doesn't automatically mean the crop gets deleted. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:15, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The attempt to have this photo deleted as a result of an undesirable crop being created is a clear attempt to revoke the CC license. Not only was the means to do so inappropriate, it is not legally possible. As COM:CSD reads, speedy deletion exists to "bypass deletion discussions and immediately delete files or pages". However, policy also clearly states that it "does not mean that administrators are compelled to delete them if there are circumstances that provide for a simple better solution." Given the circumstances of this situation, there is no requirement to delete this image by author request. The above points may be worth arguing for deletion of the offending cropped alternative, but not of the original. --ƏXPLICIT 02:14, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 1004 LR10 by Stepro.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Stepro as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: COM:SPEEDY General reasons #7, author / uploader request deletion within 7 days What essentially is "rage tagging" because someone created a crop and linked it back to the original with attribution. Seeing as there is now a crop of the image, deleting this in such a manner seems inappropriate. For more information see COM:ANU#User:Tm is deleting my DRs again --Majora (talk) 03:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC) Also[reply]

In case my conversation of this into a DR wasn't clear enough,  Keep. The speedy tagging of this image is simple disruption. The images are plainly educational, could be used on a variety of articles, and were released under an irrevocable license. Deleting them because of other issues (again see the ANU thread) would go against our mission. --Majora (talk) 03:52, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete according our rules I need no reason within the first 7 days. This file has to be deleted. --Stepro (talk) 03:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing properly released under a free license has to be deleted. We have refused blanket deletions by individuals tagging their images in such a manner before. You released it under an irrevocalbe license. Doing so means it can be hosted here, in perpetuity, with or without your approval. While we do perform courtesy deletions there is a line that you have crossed here simply because of other issues that are irrelevant to this image. Admins do not have to delete anything that is properly licensed and to delete this image when it is plainly within our mission would be a disservice to Commons. --Majora (talk) 04:04, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
G7 is a type of courtesy deletion, not a right. If a photographer accidentally uploaded a photo they didn't mean to share, they can request its deletion and usually that would be granted. Not in this case though, and wikilawyering isn't going to help. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:51, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Stepro is trying to stop the creation of derivative works by any means necessary. Please for more context see Commons:Deletion requests/User:Stepro/UEFA. He has tried to delete the images that were cropped, under invalid arguments but was stopped and now tries to go around by deleting the originals. Not an good faith move. . And, per COM:SPEEDY General reasons #7, "Original author or uploader requests deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content" it should be kept as it is in use in User:Stepro/gallery and User:Einstein2/Budapest/2019 May 21-31. And this image shows that the derivative was correctly licensed, attributed and sourced. If this image is deleted, then all images with {{User:Stepro/UEFA}} should be deleted, as Stepro is trying to make a De facto no commercial and no derivatives license. Tm (talk) 04:11, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I see no reason to grant a courtesy deletion in this case. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:51, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Disruptive DRs by Strepo I think this can be considered withdrawn. Stepro doesn't have rollback back (yet) and there is a DR for crop 1 and 2 now instead of having them actually speedied, but otherwise Stepro got what he proposed. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:05, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete There are some here that argue that Personality Rights are of no issue within our community and should only be applied by users outside our community, while we hold ourselves exempt from such outside infringements by a general disclaimer. Than why should we add a personality rights tag in the first place, if we as a community don't even give a shit about it?
"Although this work is freely licensed or in the public domain, the person(s) shown may have rights that legally restrict certain re-uses unless those depicted consent to such uses. In these cases, a model release or other evidence of consent could protect you from infringement claims. Though not obliged to do so, the uploader may be able to help you to obtain such evidence."
What is so difficult to understand in this wording, that we, within our system can't contact the uploader before we make such a crop, if he might have a better image, or have contact with the person depicted, or if even a bad crop is even needed to illustrate an article, or a list, or whatever, or if the original will do as well? Such a civil approach was not taken. Stepro tried to divert the damage with his right to ask for speedy deletion within our time limit. That right was denied to him, he was even accused of being disruptive. The only disruptiveness I see is the uncivility I see within our Commons Community towards the Concept of Personality Rights. Ideally we should move this discussion to a Meta-level, but for now we have to fix the damage locally. --Wuselig (talk) 10:47, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:2019-05-17 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0789 LR10 by Stepro.jpg. --ƏXPLICIT 02:15, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2019-05-17 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0826 LR10 by Stepro.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Stepro as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: COM:SPEEDY General reasons #7, author / uploader request deletion within 7 days What essentially is "rage tagging" because someone created a crop and linked it back to the original with attribution. Seeing as there is now a crop of the image, deleting this in such a manner seems inappropriate. For more information see COM:ANU#User:Tm is deleting my DRs again --Majora (talk) 03:50, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In case my conversation of this into a DR wasn't clear enough,  Keep. The speedy tagging of this image is simple disruption. The images are plainly educational, could be used on a variety of articles, and were released under an irrevocable license. Deleting them because of other issues (again see the ANU thread) would go against our mission. --Majora (talk) 03:52, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete according our rules I need no reason within the first 7 days. This file has to be deleted. --Stepro (talk) 03:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing properly released under a free license has to be deleted. We have refused blanket deletions by individuals tagging their images in such a manner before. You released it under an irrevocalbe license. Doing so means it can be hosted here, in perpetuity, with or without your approval. While we do perform courtesy deletions there is a line that you have crossed here simply because of other issues that are irrelevant to this image. Admins do not have to delete anything that is properly licensed and to delete this image when it is plainly within our mission would be a disservice to Commons. --Majora (talk) 04:04, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Stepro is trying to stop the creation of derivative works by any means necessary. Please for more context see Commons:Deletion requests/User:Stepro/UEFA. He has tried to delete the images that were cropped, under invalid arguments but was stopped and now tries to go around by deleting the originals. Not an good faith move. . And, per COM:SPEEDY General reasons #7, "Original author or uploader requests deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content" it should be kept as it is in use in User:Stepro/gallery and User:Einstein2/Budapest/2019 May 21-31. And this image shows that the derivative was correctly licensed, attributed and sourced. If this image is deleted, then all images with {{User:Stepro/UEFA}} should be deleted, as Stepro is trying to make a De facto no commercial and no derivatives license. Tm (talk) 04:10, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Question The image is marked as supported by Wikimedia Deutschland. How does it relate to this deletion nomination?
Also, as the image is used as a source for other images, its deletion would be against rules. If there are any doubts concerning license validity, they should be resolved through COM:OTRS. Ankry (talk) 18:47, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
To answer your question: Nothing at all.
And this DR has no link to license validity. --Stepro (talk) 19:07, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. I can't see a reason why this image (and derivative work) should be deleted. In my opinion, with the available info in this case:  Keep. Stepro, could you explain the reason (gladly in plain text) for different DRs and SDs? Do you want to enforce some kind of "CC-ND-license" on your images here?--Wdwd (talk) 20:21, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Wdwd, ich antworte Dir mal auf Deutsch, um Missverständnisse durch Übersetzungsfehler auszuschließen. Es geht mir weder darum, Crops generell zu verbieten, noch darum, irgendwie die freie Lizenz einzuschränken. Mir geht es einzig und allein um Qualität und Rufschädigung.
In Kurz: Es wurden durch den Nutzer "TheSoccerBoy" 8 Crops aus meinen zuletzt hochgeladenen Fußballfotos erstellt. 3 davon finde ich in Ordnung, 5 allerdings durch die sehr starke Ausschnittvergrößerung und/oder die Ausschnittauswahl von zu schlechter Qualität. Daher habe ich auf die betreffenden 5 der 8 Crops Schnelllöschanträge gestellt. Diese wurden abgelehnt (bzw. von einem Nicht-Admin per Editwar entfernt). Daraufhin habe ich mein in der CC-Lizenz garantiertes Recht auf Entfernung meiner Autorenschaft in Anspruch nehmen wollen, und meinen Namen und die Verweise zu den Originalfotos aus den betreffenden 5 Crops entfernt. Auch das wurde per Editwar verweigert. Daher habe ich - um mich vor Rufschädigung zu schützen und mein durch die Lizenz garentiertes Recht in Anspruch zu nehmen - Schnelllöschanträge auf die 4 Originalfotos gestellt. Obwohl diese nach den Regeln durchgeführt hätten werden müssen (da innerhalb von 7 Tagen gestellt), wurde mir auch dies durch den selben Admin Majora verweigert. Das führte dann zu diesen 4 Löschanträgen hier.
Selbstverständlich möchte ich eigentlich diese 4 Fotos nicht löschen lassen, aber durch die Verweigerung, den Bezug zu mir aus den Crops mit miserabler Qualität zu entfernen, sehe ich mich dazu gezwungen. Ich finde das Verhalten von Tm und Majora mir gegenüber inzwischen einfach nur noch unerträglich.
Wenn Du es noch genauer nachlesen möchtest: hier habe ich das Drama aus meiner Sicht dargestellt. Grüße, Stepro (talk) 09:11, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:2019-05-17 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0789 LR10 by Stepro.jpg. --ƏXPLICIT 02:15, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0059 LR10 by Stepro.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Stepro as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: COM:SPEEDY General reasons #7, author / uploader request deletion within 7 days What essentially is "rage tagging" because someone created a crop and linked it back to the original with attribution. Seeing as there is now a crop of the image, deleting this in such a manner seems inappropriate. For more information see COM:ANU#User:Tm is deleting my DRs again --Majora (talk) 03:50, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • In case my conversation of this into a DR wasn't clear enough,  Keep. The speedy tagging of this image is simple disruption. The images are plainly educational, could be used on a variety of articles, and were released under an irrevocable license. Deleting them because of other issues (again see the ANU thread) would go against our mission. --Majora (talk) 03:53, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete according our rules I need no reason within the first 7 days. This file has to be deleted. --Stepro (talk) 03:56, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing properly released under a free license has to be deleted. We have refused blanket deletions by individuals tagging their images in such a manner before. You released it under an irrevocalbe license. Doing so means it can be hosted here, in perpetuity, with or without your approval. While we do perform courtesy deletions there is a line that you have crossed here simply because of other issues that are irrelevant to this image. Admins do not have to delete anything that is properly licensed and to delete this image when it is plainly within our mission would be a disservice to Commons. --Majora (talk) 04:04, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Stepro is trying to stop the creation of derivative works by any means necessary. Please for more context see Commons:Deletion requests/User:Stepro/UEFA. He has tried to delete the images that were cropped, under invalid arguments but was stopped and now tries to go around by deleting the originals. Not an good faith move. . And, per COM:SPEEDY General reasons #7, "Original author or uploader requests deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content" it should be kept as it is in use in User:Stepro/gallery and User:Einstein2/Budapest/2019 May 21-31. And this image shows that the derivative was correctly licensed, attributed and sourced. If this image is deleted, then all images with {{User:Stepro/UEFA}} should be deleted, as Stepro is trying to make a De facto no commercial and no derivatives license. Tm (talk) 04:09, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep +1 Majora: the image is used as a source of another inmages. Ankry (talk) 18:40, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete There are some here that argue that Personality Rights are of no issue within our community and should only be applied by users outside our community, while we hold ourselves exempt from such outside infringements by a general disclaimer. Than why should we add a personality rights tag in the first place, if we as a community don't even give a shit about it?
"Although this work is freely licensed or in the public domain, the person(s) shown may have rights that legally restrict certain re-uses unless those depicted consent to such uses. In these cases, a model release or other evidence of consent could protect you from infringement claims. Though not obliged to do so, the uploader may be able to help you to obtain such evidence."
What is so difficult to understand in this wording, that we, within our system can't contact the uploader before we make such a crop, if he might have a better image, or have contact with the person depicted, or if even a bad crop is even needed to illustrate an article, or a list, or whatever, or if the original will do as well? Such a civil approach was not taken. Stepro tried to divert the damage with his right to ask for speedy deletion within our time limit. That right was denied to him, he was even accused of being disruptive. The only disruptiveness I see is the uncivility I see within our Commons Community towards the Concept of Personality Rights. Ideally we should move this discussion to a Meta-level, but for now we have to fix the damage locally. --Wuselig (talk) 10:47, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:2019-05-17 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0789 LR10 by Stepro.jpg. --ƏXPLICIT 02:16, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/05/27&oldid=370355880"