Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/05/22
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
speedydelete erreur de ma part en important le fichier}} MMMusic-fr (talk) 09:28, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Per COM:NOTHOST and COM:SELFIE --AldnonymousBicara? 08:06, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Also affected
- File:Christopher Oyebanjo op shooting.jpg
- File:Shootings.jpg
- File:Christopher Oyebanjo.jpg
- File:Streetwear.jpg
Thanks.--AldnonymousBicara? 08:07, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:22, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Reda Kerbouche as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://render.fineartamerica.com/images/rendered/medium/print/images-medium-5/10-cave-painting-south-algeria-george-holton.jpg
Converted by me to regular DR per request by admin colleague, to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:17, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: I requested restoration because the purported source from the copyvio nomination is an entirely different image. Even ignoring the different colouration, the horizontal crack at the bottom, for example, is quite flat in the Commons version, but has a clear upwards slope to the left in the fineartamerica.com version. The images are unambiguously taken from different angles. However, I've now found a matching image here in April 2019 (or even here in May 2016), before Commons upload on May 2019; accordingly, COM:OTRS permission is required. Thank you, @Túrelio: , for indulging me. --Эlcobbola talk 16:00, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tabassum Alam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:The McKelvy Garden- Before and After.jpg
- File:McKelvy entryway 1960.jpg
- File:Eyerman Family at McKelvy.jpg
- File:McKelvy 1983 3.jpg
- File:McKelvy Discussion 3.jpg
- File:Jeffery Edelson ('83), occasional cartoonist and McKelvyite.jpg
- File:Discussion at McKelvy in 1983 2.jpg
- File:The McKelvy Library in 1960.jpg
- File:Discussion at McKelvy.jpg
- File:Discussion at McKelvy in 1973.jpg
- File:McKelvy House Italian Garden and Pool 1900.jpg
- File:McKelvy Family in the Gardens circa 1950s.jpg
- File:McKelvy Exterior 1999.jpg
- File:Studying on the Stairs.jpg
- File:Discussion at McKelvy in 2018 2.jpg
- File:Discussion at McKelvy in 2018.jpg
- File:McKelvy House from the corner of High and Paxinosa.jpg
- File:McKelvy Morning.jpg
- File:Discussion at McKelvy in 2019 4.jpg
- File:Discussion at McKelvy in 2019 3.jpg
- File:Discussion at McKelvy in 2019 2.jpg
- File:McKelvy Holiday Party 2018 copy.jpg
- File:McKelvy Discussion copy.jpg
- File:Discussion at McKelvy in 2019.jpg
- File:Jane shows McKelvy residents how to make dumplings.jpg
- File:Residents sit on the McKelvy porch in 1983.png
- File:McKelvy House in 1962.jpg
- File:Discussion at in McKelvy 1983.png
- File:Discussion at McKelvy in 1973.png
- File:McKelvy Holiday Party.jpg
,_occasional_cartoonist_and_McKelvyite.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:56, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not-free image erroneously uploaded Kingsif (talk) 18:13, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:39, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
ABDULLAHI KARAGAMA Abdullahikaragama (talk) 05:02, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request for recent upload. --Green Giant (talk) 03:43, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope personal images
Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Uploaded for the sole purpose of spamming Wikipedia. (More at en:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of World Of EDM DJ Maneger and elsewhere.) Athaenara (talk) 00:06, 14 May 2019 (UTC) 08:12, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful
- File:Chamupa Chenuka.png
- File:Alov by chamupa unlimited.jpg
- File:Chamupa Unlimited LOGO.jpg
- File:ChamupaUnlimited2019.jpg
- File:Chamupa Unlimited 2019 SL.jpg
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 14:38, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:44, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Gallery only used as promotion by user Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: en:Markdabeast1 has been deleted several times. --Achim (talk) 19:29, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:03, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Lower-res duplicate of File:Sariwon (5063726588).jpg JWilz12345 (talk) 04:44, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: INUSE, will process as Duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
This photo is too old. New photo is already posted. Rakhesh1.jpg. Excell strive (talk) 06:02, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
personal phot + promotional use on enwiki QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 07:34, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Schweiz ist nicht in der EU du GAGU 78.110.141.182 07:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Keep: Pois não, mas quem é que falou na E.U.? Veja-se o uso deste mapa em contexto: en:Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:16, 22 May 2019 (UTC)- Keep: The file is in use on en:Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, so under COM:NPOV it shouldn't be deleted on grounds of accuracy. Also, according to that page, Switzerland does participate in SHARE, so the map is correct. --bjh21 (talk) 17:47, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Debasisnayakdk (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 09:10, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Personal photo Adamgerber80 (talk) 08:03, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Ajmal payami From Chamanpur dbg I am future doctor and indian top most faculti — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajmal payami (talk • contribs) 2018-03-02T17:52:14 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:15, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
out of scope, personal photo, was deleted once already // sikander { talk } 16:52, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:28, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 09:30, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 09:31, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful
- File:Ig;Armyn L. Fane jpg.jpg
- File:Ig;Armyn L. Fane.jpg
- File:Twitter;Armyn L. Fane.jpg
- File:FT;Armyn L. Fane.jpg
- File:Armyn L. Fane.jpg
- File:FB;Armyn L. Fane.jpg
- File:Berkas;Armyn L. Fane.jpg
- File:Rmyn L. Fane.jpg
- File:Screenshot 20190510-010044.jpg
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 09:36, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Headshealthyhair (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising.
- File:Noninvasive Hair Systems for Men.jpg
- File:Noninvasive Fuller Hair Solution.pdf
- File:Noninvasive Fuller Hair Solution.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:11, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:26, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Christopher godson (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:Christopher Oyebanjo op shooting.jpg
- File:Christopher Oyebanjo.jpg
- File:Shootings.jpg
- File:Streetwear.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:23, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Yann. --Gbawden (talk) 10:26, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kiki5408300 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All 3 images are lifted from the subject’s Instagram: https://instagram.com/eduard_ziaziulin?igshid=lknxr49ok3ne
At the very least, they need OTRS tickets to verify authorship.
Ytoyoda (talk) 11:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Unused, cropped version at File:Official Flag of Ambedkar Students' Association.jpg TFerenczy (talk) 11:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:24, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
This redirect should be deleted. The year mentioned here is incorrect. The Dapoorie viaduct was opened in 1858. The Khandala-Poona railway line was opened in 1858. The viaduct falls in this section. This image shows a passenger train on the viaduct which means the viaduct was opened to services at time when image was taken. Hence the image is from either 1858 or later. So a move request was raised and the file was moved to correct name. See https://cr.indianrailways.gov.in/view_section.jsp?lang=0&id=0,6,1191,1192,1394,1396,1418 --Vatsmaxed (talk) 11:52, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom.: Misleading redirect. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:45, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:24, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Screenshots and/or derivative works of non free content. No permission.
- File:André LaMothe 2012.jpg
- File:Xgs avr ss 19.jpg
- File:Xgs avr ss 18.jpg
- File:Xgs avr ss 17.jpg
- File:Xgs avr ss 16.jpg
- File:Xgs pic ss 14.png
- File:Xgs pic ss 05.png
- File:Xgs pic ss 15.jpg
Yann (talk) 14:30, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete all - File:Xgs avr ss 19.jpg, File:Xgs avr ss 18.jpg, File:Xgs avr ss 17.jpg, File:Xgs avr ss 16.jpg, File:Xgs avr ss 01.jpg and File:Xgs pic ss 01.jpg, for example, are all here as of at least 05.2009. Despite Commons upload on 02.2009, it is not credible to believe the company sourced images from the Commons for its official product page. Indeed, username Xgsdev is clearly a permutation of XGS Developer/Delevopment (Xtreme Games LLC is the company XGS AVR 8-Bit Development System is the product), and is name blocked on en.wiki for that reason. This is a quintessential example of requiring COM:OTRS permission to enure Xgsdev is authorized to license on behalf of the company, and not, for example, a merely an employee or fan of the product. Similarly, that a purportedly notable person (w:André LaMothe) would source the profile image used on their company's official site from the Commons is significantly doubtful. Эlcobbola talk 16:01, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per above. I’ve deleted these images before, and they should of stayed that way. -- 1989 (talk) 17:39, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, per what was already stated above. --Túrelio (talk) 19:38, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:23, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
out of scope - Unused image with insufficient identifying data to enable it to be used Cabayi (talk) 15:17, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: INSCOPE - could be used to depict skiers for example. But copyvio - see https://www.talenthouse.com/item/1280845/543b81ce and google image search. --Gbawden (talk) 10:23, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Uploaded for vandalism [1], out of scope TFerenczy (talk) 16:57, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the inconsistent metadata. The uploader claims to have personally created all these images, but the metadata indicates that they were in fact created by several different people.
- File:Rooms Hotel Kazbegi Exterior.jpg – taken on 2016-02-27 with a Nikon D800 by Daniel Mueller
- File:Kitchen Restaurant.jpg – taken on 2016-02-29 with a Nikon D800 by Daniel Mueller
- File:Rooms Hotel Tbilisi.jpg – taken on 2016-02-29 with a Nikon D800 by Daniel Mueller
- File:Rooms Hotel Tbilisi Lounge.jpg – taken on 2016-02-29 with a Nikon D800 by Daniel Mueller
- File:Lolita Bar-Restaurant.jpg – taken on 2016-07-28 with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III by Nick Paniashvili
- File:Fabrika Hostel Lobby.jpg – taken on 2017-10-14 with a Canon EOS 5DS by Giorgi Mamasakhlisi
- File:Fabrika Hostel Lobby 2.jpg – taken on 2017-10-27 with a Canon EOS 5DS by Giorgi Mamasakhlisi
- File:Stamba Hotel Exterior; Merab Kostava Street.jpg – taken on 2018-04-11 with a Nikon D800 by Angus Leadley Brown
- File:Pink Bar.jpg – taken on 2018-05-07 with a Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
- File:Rooms Hotel Kokhta-Mitarbi.jpg – taken on 2018-07-28 with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III by paata.ge
- File:Stamba Hotel Lobby.jpg – taken on 2018-09-06 with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III by Nikoloz Paniashvili
- File:Holiday Inn Restaurant Adjara.jpg – taken on 2018-09-12 with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III
- File:Holiday Inn Tbilisi - Second Floor.jpg – taken on 2018-09-21 with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III
- File:Adjara Restaurant.jpg – taken on 2018-11-08 with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III
- File:Holiday Inn Tbilisi Guestroom.jpg – taken on 2019-01-14 with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III
- File:Holiday Inn Tbilisi Gym.jpg – taken on 2019-02-26 with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III
- File:Holiday Inn Tbilisi Pool.jpg – taken on 2019-05-10 with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III
- File:Ag2 PNG.png – logo of company with no apparent notability. Apparently uploaded for promotional use in en:User:Sakvar g1/sandbox. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. If deemed within scope for some reason and if it is above the threshold of originality required for copyright protection as asserted by the uploader, then verified permission is required.
- File:AG-logo-2.png – Unused logo of company with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. If deemed within scope for some reason and if it is above the threshold of originality required for copyright protection as asserted by the uploader, then verified permission is required.
—LX (talk, contribs) 16:58, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Thanks LX for a very detailed DR. --Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Uploader requested. I did not have a proper source, this image was speculative. I now believe it does not exist. Fry1989 eh? 18:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
wrong copy of File:Arif arriwgari2.png (arabic text issue) — Bukhari (Talk!) 18:48, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Likely not "own work": all inconsistent image sizes and quality, 4 different cameras or no EXIF data, 2 images credited to Martin Rodriguez (File:Milco.jpg and File:Cruzadas del Ministerio Internacional La Cosecha.jpg), and 1 DW (File:Misael Argeñal y su esposa.jpg).
- File:Josué Cover 2019.jpg
- File:Clínica Luz y Vida, San Luis, Santa Bárbara.jpg
- File:Josué Cover y la Miss Honduras Universo - Vanessa Villars.jpg
- File:Claudia Vanessa Figueroa Villars.jpg
- File:Josué Cover e Iroshka Elvir de Nasralla.jpg
- File:Josué Cover - entrevistador.jpg
- File:Cover en la radio.jpg
- File:Josue Journalist Honduras.png
- File:Josué Cover - TEDx.jpg
- File:Campus Televisión.png
- File:Julio Escoto.jpg
- File:Milco.jpg
- File:Cruzadas del Ministerio Internacional La Cosecha.jpg
- File:Antiguo edificio Ministerio La Cosecha.jpg
- File:Ministerio La Cosecha parte trasera.jpg
- File:Ministerio Internacional La Cosecha.jpg
- File:Misael Argeñal líder del Ministerio Internacional La Cosecha.jpg
- File:Misael Argeñal y su esposa.jpg
- File:MisaelArgenal.jpg
- File:Alejandro Chabán.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:19, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
already available here, no differance باسم (talk) 20:09, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE (fr:Selvin delaye).
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:17, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
useless, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:38, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
COM:PENIS, out of scope funplussmart (talk) 21:23, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 22:18, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
square root 123 2001:4898:80E8:0:BE2C:ECF0:2CD4:B8BA 21:34, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:37, 22 May 2019 (UTC)- Speedy keep - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:15, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
portrait/promotional image of a (notable?) individual, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 21:47, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; likely from Insta as well. --Gbawden (talk) 10:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Anyway © Artpit s.r.o. 2016-2017 Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:01, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 10:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- also file:SK Bukit Gelugor's Logo.svg
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:11, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:15, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Bad quality, there are better images on here that can be used. 1989 (talk) 00:29, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Quality is not extremely bad and I can't see exactly the same view in Category:New York City night skylines. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:15, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope personal image, used on a promotional user page that has been tagged for deletion Gbawden (talk) 10:13, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:17, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stefano Rusco (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal photos
Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:21, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:21, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Zinc die casting machine working flowchat.jpg
- File:ZINC DIE CASTING MACHINE WORKING FLOW CHAT.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:21, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:21, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Flores dennis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:21, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:21, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:21, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictional flags of questionable notability.
- File:New Delphia Flag.png
- File:Astain Flag.png
- File:Natlanaiananana.png
- File:Natlin.svg
- File:Natlin2.svg
- File:Natlin flag .svg
- File:FlagofNATLIN.svg
- File:Natlin .png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:41, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Newspaper scan: copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:32, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:40, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Newspaper scan: copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:32, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:34, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Five source images have been deleted, making whole collage copyright violation as well. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:33, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ankitshilu (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful
- File:A boy damaging statue.jpg
- File:Alumni of CEERI pilani.jpg
- File:View of Tilyar lake from Boat.jpg
- File:Anatomy lab in Baba Mast nath university..jpg
- File:Crocodile enclosure signboard along with detailed classification inside Mini zoo..jpg
- File:Rohtak Mini Zoo, offer a structured, fun and hands-on learning environment for kids..jpg
- File:Horse mascot at Tilyar lake complex Inside Mini Zoo..jpg
- File:Antelope enclosure at Mini zoo in Tilyar lake complex.jpg
- File:Crocodile inscription at Mini Zoo.jpg
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 09:19, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: Fully in scope:
- Illustration of vandalism or of disposal of defective mass produced items: File:A boy damaging statue.jpg
- Our only image of Baba Mast Nath University and in use in en:Baba Mast Nath University: File:Anatomy lab in Baba Mast nath university..jpg.
- Our only photos showing visitors of Rohtak Zoo
- File:Crocodile inscription at Mini Zoo.jpg and File:Crocodile enclosure signboard along with detailed classification inside Mini zoo..jpg (pairs of similar photos are otherwise in scope by themselves)
- File:Rohtak Mini Zoo, offer a structured, fun and hands-on learning environment for kids..jpg
- File:View of Tilyar lake from Boat.jpg
- File:Horse mascot at Tilyar lake complex Inside Mini Zoo..jpg
- File:Antelope enclosure at Mini zoo in Tilyar lake complex.jpg
Kept: most kept, some deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 16:08, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Мазаев Ислам (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:AIMG 0386.jpg
- File:IMG COE 0385.jpg
- File:IMGJ 0384.jpg
- File:Hdkk21.jpg
- File:DIMG83.jpg
- File:KSHWSM.jpg
- File:IMG h 87.jpg
- File:IMGH 8545.png
- File:IMGf 8534.png
- File:IMGC 8540.png
- File:IMGV 7736.jpg
- File:IMGT 8430.jpg
- File:IMGl 9494.jpg
- File:IMDG 7702.jpg
- File:IMGh 4.jpg
- File:IMGL 0812.jpg
- File:IMH 5858.jpg
- File:IMH 5675.jpg
- File:WCSF.jpg
- File:IMF 2492.jpg
- File:Ислам Мазаев.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:46, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep this is recognized sportspeople, see https://vk.com/away.php?to=https%3A%2F%2Fm.sherdog.com%2Ffighter%2FIslam-Mazaev-290711&cc_key= .--Kaganer (talk) 14:04, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Kaganer: An entry on a database is not a proof of notability. Besides user has no page on a Wikimedia sister project, especially on the Russian Wikipedia (where he's indef blocked). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:24, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Commons not Wikipedia. "Notability's criteria" from WP is not applicable to Commons. Also indef blocking in WP is insufficient reason for refusal to uploading images here. All files info will be updated soon, all permissions will be sent into OTRS. I'm in the contact with this people. These files may have other problems, but the stated reason is not quite correct. --Kaganer (talk) 14:33, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Kaganer: Please reread COM:SCOPE. "A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose". "An otherwise non-educational file does not acquire educational purpose solely because it is in use on a gallery page or in a category on Commons". Besides "Private image collections, e.g. private party photos, photos of yourself and your friends, your collection of holiday snaps and so on. There are plenty of other projects on the Internet you can use for such a purpose, such as Flickr. Such private image collections do not become educational even if displayed as a gallery on a user page on Commons or elsewhere." --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:43, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: In my opinion, you interpret these phrases is something wrong. The fact that files are not currently being used in other Wikimedia projects does not automatically mean that they should be deleted. First, files can be used outside of Wikimedia projects, and this is an absolutely legitimate use. Secondly, these files are already used to illustrate Wikidata item, and this is again their legitimate use. Thirdly, these files (some of them) are quite obvious educational purpose, as they illustrate the events of the sports life in Russia. Me and you may not be interested in them, but they are interesting and valuable to other people. Fourth, such files uploaded in advance are always very useful for illustrating Wikinews publications. Fifth, these files are quite decent quality, and do not duplicate any other. All this, of course, does not apply to any files at all — but applicable for this set of files.--Kaganer (talk) 21:10, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Are you kidding me @Kaganer: ? You have created a Wikidata entry AFTER this DR is launched! --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:27, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: yes i'm joking. But seriously: what's the difference, in what order? Do you want to challenge the creation of the Wikidata item? Or let's delete these photos, and then upload them again - now they will be uploaded after the creation of the Wikidata item. What will be changed? Let's get back to the initial point - there is no justification for why these photos were nominated for deletion as "personal images". They do not belong to private life - on the contrary, they depict events of socially significant and culturally approved events of public (sports) life. --Kaganer (talk) 15:23, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- By way, "Sherdog ID" is valid external identifier for Wikidata item creation (without relations with any images). Therefore, Commmons category (and these photos) meets the COM:SCOPE as "in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation". --Kaganer (talk) 16:43, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- Patrick thought that “exposing” this would be a gotcha against Kaganer and against the keeping of these photos. I have encountered this situation many times in the past — where while a DR is in progress proponents of keeping a thitherto unused file(s) on scope grounds do add them to a Wikipedia article or some such and get accused of gaming the system. Yet, unless the addition was editorially inaccurate, this is transparently a good thing for the projects as a whole, and only bruises the self esteem of the proponents of non-scope. The opposite action, to remove from use a file one wants to get deleted, isn’t a gotcha move, either: it’s vandalism. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:26, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- Are you kidding me @Kaganer: ? You have created a Wikidata entry AFTER this DR is launched! --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:27, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: In my opinion, you interpret these phrases is something wrong. The fact that files are not currently being used in other Wikimedia projects does not automatically mean that they should be deleted. First, files can be used outside of Wikimedia projects, and this is an absolutely legitimate use. Secondly, these files are already used to illustrate Wikidata item, and this is again their legitimate use. Thirdly, these files (some of them) are quite obvious educational purpose, as they illustrate the events of the sports life in Russia. Me and you may not be interested in them, but they are interesting and valuable to other people. Fourth, such files uploaded in advance are always very useful for illustrating Wikinews publications. Fifth, these files are quite decent quality, and do not duplicate any other. All this, of course, does not apply to any files at all — but applicable for this set of files.--Kaganer (talk) 21:10, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Kaganer: Please reread COM:SCOPE. "A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose". "An otherwise non-educational file does not acquire educational purpose solely because it is in use on a gallery page or in a category on Commons". Besides "Private image collections, e.g. private party photos, photos of yourself and your friends, your collection of holiday snaps and so on. There are plenty of other projects on the Internet you can use for such a purpose, such as Flickr. Such private image collections do not become educational even if displayed as a gallery on a user page on Commons or elsewhere." --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:43, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Commons not Wikipedia. "Notability's criteria" from WP is not applicable to Commons. Also indef blocking in WP is insufficient reason for refusal to uploading images here. All files info will be updated soon, all permissions will be sent into OTRS. I'm in the contact with this people. These files may have other problems, but the stated reason is not quite correct. --Kaganer (talk) 14:33, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Kaganer: An entry on a database is not a proof of notability. Besides user has no page on a Wikimedia sister project, especially on the Russian Wikipedia (where he's indef blocked). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:24, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per Kaganer. It would be good if Patrick Rogel stopped his crusade against one of Wikimedia Commons’ most basic principles. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:37, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Delete orcrop photo File:KSHWSM.jpg, which is a derivative or a photo of unknown copywright status. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:26, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- Crop
done. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:28, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- Crop
ORTS
[edit]
Ticket:2019052410003425 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 10:00, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019052410004022 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 10:00, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019052410004068 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 10:00, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- What’s the point of these ORTS filings? The authorship of these photos was never the question, and a passed OTRS status wouldn’t confer any additional scope value to them. This only increases the burden on the already overloaded OTRS system. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:26, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: There is a wikidata item. --Strakhov (talk) 16:13, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photos
Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright concerns. COM:PRP. COM:OTRS probably needed. --Strakhov (talk) 16:15, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. It is difficult to see any possible use for this image which is in line with Wikimedia Commons purpose. If for any reason someone wants a picture of this web site they will probably go to the web site itself and take a screen shot, rather than coming to Commons and searching for a screen shot that someone has taken and uploaded here. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:05, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Weak keep Well, it's from 2010... it could serve as an example screenshot for an Indian (?) website of that time, becoming more interesting "historically" over time, if it's really free - there seems to be an OTRS permission. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:21, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Gestumblindi. --Strakhov (talk) 16:16, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too distorted to be of use. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:01, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment: …unless someone can make the case that this is a good example of a specific digital photography error/artifact? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:02, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 16:16, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Quite debatable that this is too simple for copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The image is nothing but "西安名吃" inside of a rounded rectangle and "Xi'an Famous Foods" below it, hence {{PD-textlogo}}. Scripts other than Latin, such as Chinese in this case, do not meet the threshold of originality in the United States; File:Bruce Lee Core Symbol US Copyright Office decision.pdf seems relevant. If Xi'an Famous Foods were based in China or Taiwan, then I suppose we'd have to consider whether the Chinese characters are calligraphic or are set in a calligraphic typeface, but fortunately the company is based in New York City. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 04:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: surely less creative than File:JeetKuneDo.svg.--Roy17 (talk) 22:53, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Insufficient source information. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 06:56, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-Uganda}}. Per the Ugandan copyright act of 2006, section 8, when a person creates a work at the direction of the Government the copyright is owned by the Government. Per the author's Wikipedia page, en:George Wilberforce Kakoma, the Government asked the people to submit their own national anthems. That seems like "at the direction of" to me. Per the template, PD-Uganda kicks in 50 years after the first publication for Government works. The anthem was adopted in 1962 per en:Oh Uganda, Land of Beauty therefore it was PD starting in 2013. --Majora (talk) 21:07, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
The performance/recording is by the Slovak Philharmonic and is thus copyrighted by the record label, in this case Marco-Polo - Naxos. Besides, we already have a superior public domain version of this national anthem on the Commons anyway so there's no reason to keep this file copyright aside. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 01:04, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Paja Jovanović died in 1957, Serbia is life+70, PD in 2027 AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:43, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:41, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
I think the stylization of the text on this film poster makes this non-free. Miniapolis 13:43, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; above COM:TOO. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
File uses Yandex Maps with bad liciense, good liciense has OpenStreetMap. See w:ru:Википедия:Примеры неоправданного использования несвободных изображений#1+. 217.117.125.72 15:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:58, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Missing vital information (i.e., source, date of publication, and author. The person in the image died in 2016 according to his Wikipedia article. Officer (talk) 00:47, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:21, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
No source given for the new versions Ytoyoda (talk) 00:56, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:21, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lyonart~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low-res amateur artworks, out of project scope.
- File:Light-dress-zebra-crossing-by-lyonart.jpg
- File:Minotaure posant pour un calendrier S.jpg
- File:Minotaure menace 60x80 S.jpg
- File:Chinese appletree by-lyonart.jpg
- File:Lyonart-selfportrait-as-che.jpg
Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 05:50, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:22, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photo, currently used in a sandbox that i have tagged for deletion Gbawden (talk) 09:33, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:23, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Malcolma as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Very poor quality scan of unused document. Compare with other uploads of Waldmks chomsky (talk · contribs). Maybe the file has still some educational value (maybe not). Taivo (talk) 09:38, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:24, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Tagged PD-Art, but the author (John Rust) is still alive. This is a technical drawing/diagram, which is copyrightable in the US. No evidence the author has released the diagram under a free license. Wikiacc (talk) 20:50, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- The image is in the public domain at https://editorialexpress.com/jrust/nfxp.html — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 150.203.68.28 (talk) 00:21, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- I don't see a statement at that site that the image was released into the public domain. Wikiacc (talk) 00:27, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:26, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
wrong copy of File:Qasim.png — Bukhari (Talk!) 22:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per {{SupersededPNG}}. 大诺史 (talk) 13:36, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:26, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
random, wrong image — Bukhari (Talk!) 22:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 03:26, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Quite debatable that this is too simple for copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I imported this file from en:File:Shake Shack Logo.svg based on the license tag that it had previously been given there. Given the examples at COM:TOO United States, particularly File:Nikken logo US Copyright Office decision.pdf, I think the loops and wavy lines in this logo fail to meet the threshold for originality. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 05:49, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: below TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:38, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Quite debatable that this is too simple for copyright. (blurry arrow shows work) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:30, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: Looks simple enough to me. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 02:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: below TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:38, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Pictures of unknown structure with no camera exif and uploaded by a user who has published copyvios before.
1989 (talk) 09:38, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- The contributor uploaded just 5 files over 2 years, of which this DR targets 3. The account has been inactive since 2014. No evidence of past copyright violations has been set out so far, so the nomination is based on a faulty premise. The structure illustrates HSS, Hollow Structural Sections, during building construction. The uploader may have been connected with the Foolad Machine Company, hence their narrow interests. --Fæ (talk) 14:48, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Examining further, I find a cropped copy of File:سوله شرکت بهروش، شمس آباد.jpg on http://www.hollow-section.com/en/galleryen/souleen#behravesh-rail. Research with TinEye and Google Image searches, shows the same photograph in use on different websites, but in all cases the version that was uploaded to Commons remains the highest resolution version that can be discovered. This supports a good faith presumption that the uploader had access to original images, and probably was the photographer or has a more likely claim to copyright than the websites with lower resolution or cropped versions. I do not find any obvious "smoking gun", or even sufficient "smoke", to demonstrate "significant doubt" as required for COM:PRP to apply. --Fæ (talk) 15:02, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No evidence of copyright violations, as per Fæ. Yann (talk) 14:51, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Note: two of five deletions of Lllidon’s uploads are overturned. Moreover, 1989 did not explain whose rights did File:Navard21.jpg, File:Navard22.jpg, and File:Navard23.jpg infringe. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:09, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Considering it's small resolution with bad quality and no camera exif, COM:PRP is in order. They're most likely have been stock images that's no longer traceable. 1989 (talk) 16:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Discussion of these matters is good. Keep per Fae's analysis. Abzeronow (talk) 16:55, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, per Fæ. Supporting Incnis Mrsi’s implicit call for undeletion. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:35, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - We are not beholden to mere time--even if we were, File:سوله شرکت پارسیان گرافیت.jpg, uploaded 03.2014, was here in 06.2013--and are, in fact, allowed to use common sense related to other measures. All of these images appear on the structural steel manufacturer's official project page. That a corporation would go to the Commons to source images of its own projects, for use on its official site and in official brochures is significantly doubtful. Indeed, the uploader's addition of File:HSS Soule 3200px.jpg on 3. September 2013 was immediately followed by the addition of a link to fooladmachine.com, indicating their contemporaneous knowledge of that source. The purported invocation of good faith above is contrary to the actual policy. We commonly encounter, for example, employees of firms uploading company images under the (mistaken) belief that their mere employment allows them to license on the firm's behalf, that free (gratis) promotional images are the same as libre, etc. They are absolutely acting in good faith, but that intent is not relevant to copyright (as the policy devotes a whole section to explain). This is precisely why we require additional evidence of permission through COM:OTRS to confirm one way or another. Эlcobbola talk 22:27, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Small resolution, poor quality, most likely COM:NETCOPYVIO. See [2].
1989 (talk) 18:02, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- What the page “Copyright© 2014 Fooladmachine.com” can imply about files uploaded in 2012? Keep obviously. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- You know for sure they are the creators of these images and are within project scope? -- 1989 (talk) 18:46, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- In light of https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=اتصال_کانایکسال&oldid=8529036 Lllidon’s authorship is, at least, more plausible than allegations from a guy who lied about authorship himself. Note filename and the Persian inscription on the picture itself. Has Commons too few copyvio-uploading crooks active during last years to make these brawls over uploads from 2012? As for COM:SCOPE – in use by fa.Wikipedia, again. Isn’t a Commons sysop obliged to know what does it entail? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:09, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- I don't recall anyone that hasn't. I forgot while writing the reply it was used. -- 1989 (talk) 19:20, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- In light of https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=اتصال_کانایکسال&oldid=8529036 Lllidon’s authorship is, at least, more plausible than allegations from a guy who lied about authorship himself. Note filename and the Persian inscription on the picture itself. Has Commons too few copyvio-uploading crooks active during last years to make these brawls over uploads from 2012? As for COM:SCOPE – in use by fa.Wikipedia, again. Isn’t a Commons sysop obliged to know what does it entail? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:09, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- You know for sure they are the creators of these images and are within project scope? -- 1989 (talk) 18:46, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - File:ConXL-13.png and File:اتصال ConXL.jpg were uploaded 31. October 2012 and appeared here on 8. November 2012. It is not believable that a structural steel manufacturer 1) decided to source images for its official site from the Commons, 2) decided to copy the style to make more of its own, related images ([3],[4]) and 3) just so happened to do all of that merely a week after their posting to the Commons. As per above, it is very clear these images came from fooladmachine.com and that additional evidence of permission is needed. Эlcobbola talk 22:48, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- The argument IMHO makes no sense. A structural steel manufacturer could decide to source images from a Lllidon’s work – Lllidon could take such commission, or might be the manufacturer’s employee. If Lllidon uploaded their own work to Commons on October 31, then on November 1 it is legally {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}. Any ensuing legal problems for the manufacturer or Lllidon are irrelevant to our proceedings. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:56, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
![[3]](https://web.archive.org/web/20131001092353im_/http://www.fooladmachine.com/Portals/0/images/ConX/12.jpg){kind=link}
![[4]](https://web.archive.org/web/20131001091804im_/http://fooladmachine.com/Portals/0/images/ConX/ConXL-14.png){kind=link}
- Agree that the rationale here is bizarre. In all past cases I can recall where an uploader releases files on Commons and files of a lower resolution later appear on other websites, this is a clear reason to presume that the Commons uploads predate any release elsewhere. To make the bad faith presumption that the uploader/photographer/designer was acting unlawfully by taking action in advance of the use of their photographs or graphics elsewhere, would need more evidence to stick here on Commons than suspicions and allegations without evidence. Once released on Commons, later releases on different licenses on other sites, do not invalidate the original release.
- Keep --Fæ (talk) 07:33, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Elcobbola. Good research!. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:43, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photo, not a valid user, hasn't edited WP since 2017 and commons since 2016 Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:48, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely own work: low resolution, no EXIF, uploader has no other contribution. Wcam (talk) 10:43, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- @P199: How is this not a valid reason for deletion? First of all, numerous images were deleted due to the exact same reason which makes it a really valid reason. Secondly, all the facts that the image is of low resolution, no EXIF, that the uploader has no other contribution amount to significant doubt about the freedom of this image, and per official policy COM:PRP such files should be deleted. If you still believe this file should be kept, further reasons beyond "no valid reason for deletion" is very much welcomed. --Wcam (talk) 22:54, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Wcam: No, "low resolution, no EXIF" has never been a deletion reason. Your link above is not a policy page, nor will you find any such policy. Yes, it has been misused as a reason. Yes, it could be a contributing factor in conjunction with other copyvio reasons. Please provide stronger reasons to back up your suspicion of copyvio, like reverse image search. Regards, --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:24, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope personal images, commons is not a photo album
- File:Mohammad Abid Blogger - .jpg
- File:Mohammad aBID BLOGGER DP.gif
- File:Mohammad Abid Blogger --.gif
- File:Mohammad Abid Blogger.jpg
- File:Mohammad Abid Blogger-.jpg
- File:Muhammad ABid blogger omgabid.jpg
- File:Muhammad Abid Blogger.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:51, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photos
Gbawden (talk) 10:57, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:51, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
contenu non encyclopédique Emanuelzozor (talk) 12:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:52, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Less than 70 years old, unknown photographer. We need a permission from the copyright holder. Yann (talk) 12:45, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- The original photographer transferred the copyright to the previous owner of this photo, which later gifted the photo to me. So I am the current copyright holder for this photo. Which I then uploaded to Wikimedia Commons under a free license. Magnunor (talk) 12:17, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Magnunor: The document owner is not necessarily the copyright owner. Could you please confirm that by email? Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:32, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete if OTRS is ever received. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:53, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
This is virtually a PNG version of File:Flag of the Philippines.svg with no added value seav (talk) 13:06, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:53, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Seems like a duplicate of File:The Ruins Talisay Bacolod in Focus Sept2012.JPG. seav (talk) 13:16, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:54, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:56, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Anyway © Artpit s.r.o. 2016-2017 Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:03, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:57, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, image on clock is derivative of the one at https://thewest.com.au/news/australia/swimming-hero-is-now-a-mentor-ng-ya-370679.amp?usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D credited to West Australian. GRuban (talk) 14:18, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:22, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Most likely images saved from the internet that has been unnoticed for too long.
- File:黑屁股.jpg
- File:瑞獸.jpg
- File:PP HOME.jpg
- File:Ahha3.jpg
- File:Ahha2.jpg
- File:Ahha1.jpg
- File:Ahha4.jpg
1989 (talk) 00:27, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- @1989: respect for using regular deletion this time, instead of Revision of User:ThatBPengineer that I expected. Delete 瑞獸.jpg – certainly derivative off something even if own; note that Special:Log/Maggieo shows two similar deleted files. Keep
Ahhak.jpg and黑屁股.jpg as no convincing evidence of infringement with respect to photos is provided. Please, don’t take ThatBPengineer’s bait further – we already paid him too much attention compared to his value; nobody here is obliged to conduct in-depth investigations upon his clues. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:39, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete all per COM:PCP. Ahha is not gibberish but stands for Ahha電影工作室. All these people are related in the film business. The first two are screenshots from their projects. The uploader had one deleted edit on zhwp which I suspect was a promotional page for the film studio.--Roy17 (talk) 17:33, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The onus is on those advocating retention to provide evidence of permission, not for others to prove infringement (COM:EVID). That notwithstanding, File:黑屁股.jpg appears here in higher resolution (and without quality loss from enlargement), indicating it could not have been first published on Commons. The same is true for File:瑞獸.jpg here. Further, this user explicitly created a copyright-infringing article related to this company on zh.wiki at the time these were uploaded. That alone calls these images into significant doubt, and, indeed, the remainder of the images are a combination of low resolution, lacking in camera EXIF, and appearing on the company's website which states "Copyright © 2011 A-hha Studio. All Rights Reserved." COM:OTRS evidence of permission is required. --Эlcobbola talk 21:04, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Ownership of a Picasso or a Csaky doesn't provide rights of unlimited publication, the work is not PD-70 Goesseln (talk) 19:10, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep unless Sphilbrick revokes the OTRS permission. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:28, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyright ® State of Wisconsin Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:31, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Wisconsin does allow the state to copyright works on behalf of its employees, but it doesn't automatically copyright them. Public records disclosure in Wisconsin has an exception for copyrighted works. http://copyright.lib.harvard.edu/states/wisconsin/ [[user::ericwg|Ericwg]] 13:30, 22 May 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericwg (talk • contribs) 13:31, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Winsconsin is not PD-GOV. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Not in use file, as we have it in SVG - file:IOS 12 logo.svg Ldorfman (talk) 10:56, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:02, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in the Philippines AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:25, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Kennzeichen sichtbar DerBauer2310 (talk) 15:14, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Radialonchamp (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-re images, same series as http://laurentstorch.com/le-changement-dans-tous-ses-etats/, unlikely to be own work.
- File:LaurentStorch-Conférencier-professionnel.jpg
- File:LaurentStorch-Conférencier-Spécialiste-audiovisuel.jpg
- File:LaurentStorch-Conférencier-Professionnel-ExpertdesMédias.jpg
- File:LaurentStorch-Producteur.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:29, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright Island Records and the artist PlayRadioPlay EROY (talk) 20:01, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright Island Records and the artist PlayRadioPlay EROY (talk) 20:01, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Derivative of copyright material; no Freedom of panorama in Nepal MPF (talk) 20:10, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thomas Wallraff (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused artworks : commons is not an art gallery
- File:Hochstatter 02.jpg
- File:KarinHochstatter DS2 FotoWittasek kl 1.jpg
- File:Karin Hochstatter 1998 Salonstück7.jpg
- File:KarinHochstatter DS2 FotoWittasek kl 2.jpg
Pippobuono (talk) 20:48, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment What? Commons hosts a lot of artworks. Being unused is not a reason for deletion. And Hochsttater is a notable artist (at least for de.wiki and for now). Problem here is copyright-related:
- File:Hochstatter 02.jpg (no equivalent, no OTRS)
- File:KarinHochstatter DS2 FotoWittasek kl 1.jpg (no OTRS, 3592 × 1459 px, 285 KB) <==> File:POMP (Karin Hochstatter).jpg (OTRS passed, 448 × 183 px, 34 KB)
- File:Karin Hochstatter 1998 Salonstück7.jpg (no OTRS, 2231 × 1535 px, 419 KB) <==> File:Salonstücke 7.jpg (OTRS passed, 448 × 309 px, 64 KB;)
- File:KarinHochstatter DS2 FotoWittasek kl 2.jpg (no OTRS, 426 × 533 px, 284 KB) <==> File:Salonstücke RELOADED.jpg (OTRS passed, 337 × 420 px, 75 KB)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per strakhov. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in source country and the photo violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 11:48, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:13, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Garuda0001
[edit]- File:Schematic showing basic components and operation of electron beam materials processing.png
- File:Breakdown of the cumulative number of industrial accelerators according to their applications.png
- File:The main nuclear reaction chains for Big Bang nucleosynthesis.jpg
- File:Representative lifetimes of stars as a function of their masses.jpg
- File:Schematic of a synchrotron.jpg
- File:The 2-in-1 structure of the LHC dipole magnets.jpg
These images were all uploaded by User:Garuda0001. All of them have been uploaded with the CC-BY-SA-3.0 license. However, it's unlikely that Garuda0001 is actually the copyright holder of all of these images. They have all been taken from various physics textbooks by various authors. The "Author" field in the description is different for each image, too. I believe this is a copyright violation. JudgeDeadd (talk) 12:56, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also included File:Scheme of nuclear reaction chains for Big Bang nucleosynthesis.svg which is a vector version of one of the above. --Majora (talk) 21:13, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright text from 莆仙方言簡明詞彙 - I am Davidzdh. 19:15, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
and File:The Pride of Wildcat Land Logo.jpg
This logo appears to be on the KSU Bands webpage and, as such, is copyrighted. Even if the Wikipedian is the author of the image, he/she should provide evidence + clarify why the logo should be free and not just a logo lifted from their page/archives. If not free, it should be transferred to the en.wiki with proper Fair Use Rationale(s) applied Buffs (talk) 20:32, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Complex logo over TOO without evidence of permission. --Majora (talk) 03:37, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Quite debatable that this is too simple for copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- I see text and simple geometrical forms so in my opinion this fits PD-textlogo and it is comparable to many other files which are using this [5]Avron (talk) 06:19, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The threshold of originality in the UK is incredibly low. --ƏXPLICIT 01:17, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claims of own work, one has latelierdelaphoto.com in the exif. Only uploads of this user
Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: Uploader is apparently also the model. However, without her input, COM:PRP sadly trumps COM:AGF. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Requires COM:OTRS. --ƏXPLICIT 01:18, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Нет разрешения фотографа на данный снимок Dogad75 (talk) 13:32, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:17, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Нет разрешения фотографа на данное фото Dogad75 (talk) 13:36, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:18, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Нет разрешение фотографа на данное фото Dogad75 (talk) 13:36, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:18, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Dvorec pionerov.jpg
- File:Dubrovin pedagog.jpg
- File:Кубрякова.jpg
- File:Kubrjakova E S.jpg
- File:Stupin A D.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures. Recent installations.
- File:Memorial board of Lev Pontriagin.jpg
- File:Ilja Muromec pamiatnik 2015-05-19.jpg
- File:Ilja-Muromec pamiatnik 2015-05-19+.jpg
- File:Памятник на могиле Матвея Дубровина.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:33, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Modern [and very low-quality, I'd say] paintings, based on old photographs [6] → File:Gulak-Artemovskii Petr Petrovich.jpg, [7] →File:Rizhskii Ivan Stepanovich.jpg, File:Oosipovsk.jpg → File:Osipovskii Timofei Fedorovich.jpg and so on. No authors' permissions.
![[6]](http://myslenedrevo.com.ua/files/MDr/lit/GulakArtPP.jpg){kind=link}
![[7]](http://dic.academic.ru/pictures/wiki/files/73/Ivan_Rizhskiy.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Netushil Ivan Vyacheslavovich.jpg
- File:Bagalej Dmitrij Ivanovich.jpg
- File:Kuplevaskii Nikolai Iosifovich.jpg
- File:Lagermark German Ivanovich.jpg
- File:Alekseenko Mikhail Martynovich.jpg
- File:SHCHelkov Ivan Petrovich.jpg
- File:Cekhanoveckij Grigorij Matveevich.jpg
- File:Pitra Adolf Samoilovich.jpg
- File:Kochetov Vladimir Ioakimovich.jpg
- File:Roslavskii-Petrovskii Aleksandr Petrovich.jpg
- File:Foigt Karl Karlovich.jpg
- File:Paliumbetckii Aleksandr Ivanovich.jpg
- File:Gulak-Artemovskii Petr Petrovich.jpg
- File:Kunitcyn Aleksei Vasilevich.jpg
- File:Pavlovskii Andrei Fedorovich.jpg
- File:Komlishinskii Vasilii Sergeevich.jpg
- File:Ellinskii Nikolai Ivanovich.jpg
- File:Dudrovich Andrei Ivanovich.jpg
- File:Kroneberg Ivan IAkovlevich.jpg
- File:Dzhunkovskii Vasilii IAkovlevich.jpg
- File:Osipovskii Timofei Fedorovich.jpg
- File:Stoikovich Afanasii Ivanovich.jpg
- File:Rizhskii Ivan Stepanovich.jpg
Sealle (talk) 04:24, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:09, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks
- File:Космический ковчег - Сергей Королёв.jpg
- File:Космический ковчег - Никола Тесла.jpg
- File:Космический ковчег - Стивен Хокинг.jpg
- File:Космический ковчег - Илон Маск.jpg
- File:Космический ковчег - Vladimir Guriev.jpg
- File:Космический ковчег - Иоганн Кеплер.jpg
- File:Космический ковчег - Джефф Безос.jpg
- File:Космический ковчег - Ари Штернфельд.jpg
- File:Космический ковчег - Александр Чижевский.jpg
- File:Космический ковчег - Владимир Комаров.jpg
- File:Космический ковчег - Юрий Гагарин.jpg
- File:Космический ковчег - Константин Циолковский.jpg
- File:Космический ковчег - Николай Рерих.jpg
- File:Космический ковчег - Станислав Лем.jpg
- File:Космический ковчег - Нил Армстронг.jpg
- File:Космический ковчег - Николай Фёдоров.jpg
- File:Космический ковчег - Валентина Терешкова.jpg
- File:Космический ковчег - Приглашение.jpg
- File:Космический ковчег - Гай Северин.jpg
- File:Космический ковчег - Галактика Алия.jpg
Dogad75 (talk) 22:56, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- Изображения фрагментов "Звездолёта Овчинникова" сняты в присутствии автора В. А. Овчинникова и с его согласия. Eraevsky (talk) 00:22, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Eraevsky: по правилам проекта Ваших слов об этом недостаточно, разрешение нужно оформить по стандартной процедуре, описанной на странице COM:OTRS/ru. Sealle (talk) 04:27, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Уважаемый @Sealle: ! Я созванивался с В. Овчинниковым и он обещал отправить согласие на использование. Не могли бы вы проследить и сообщить о поступлении этого письма. Если в течение недели не будет от вас вестей, попробую вновь с автором уточнить. Eraevsky (talk) 19:18, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Сам не могу. @НоуФрост: . Sealle (talk) 19:20, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Есть такой. Ticket#2018100510005488. Но @Dogad75: его за собой заблокировал и пока не обработал. НоуФрост (talk) 19:29, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Спасибо! Я написал Dogad75. Eraevsky (talk) 06:19, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- Есть такой. Ticket#2018100510005488. Но @Dogad75: его за собой заблокировал и пока не обработал. НоуФрост (talk) 19:29, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Сам не могу. @НоуФрост: . Sealle (talk) 19:20, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Уважаемый @Sealle: ! Я созванивался с В. Овчинниковым и он обещал отправить согласие на использование. Не могли бы вы проследить и сообщить о поступлении этого письма. Если в течение недели не будет от вас вестей, попробую вновь с автором уточнить. Eraevsky (talk) 19:18, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Eraevsky: по правилам проекта Ваших слов об этом недостаточно, разрешение нужно оформить по стандартной процедуре, описанной на странице COM:OTRS/ru. Sealle (talk) 04:27, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:28, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Undeleted per Ticket#2018100510005488. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:05, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
3D-работы неизвестных фотографов, разрешение на использовании своих работ на свободных лицензиях нет.
- File:Рашет Яков Иванович - Медальон в Царском селе 4.jpg
- File:Рашет Яков Иванович - Медальон в Царском селе 1.jpg
- File:Рашет Яков Иванович - Медальон в Царском селе 2.jpg
- File:Рашет Яков Иванович - Медальон в Царском селе 3.jpg
- File:Михайлов Павел Степанович - Скульптурная группа «Икар и Дедал» в Государственном Русском музее.jpg
- File:Либерих, Николай Иванович - Раненая амазонка (1872).jpg
- File:Либерих, Николай Иванович - Медведь нападает на двух крестьян, собирающих дрова (1865).jpg
- File:Ковшенков Иван Фёдорович - Портрет генерал-майора П. А. Струкова (1858).jpg
- File:Ковшенков Иван Фёдорович - Урядник I дружины Санкт-Петербургского подвижного ополчения в Крымскую войну Ф. П. Матвеев (1855).jpg
- File:Ковшенков Фёдор Иванович - Бюст Великого князя Константина Павловича (1830-е).jpg
- File:Ковшенков Иван Фёдорович - Сидящий гренадёр (1855).jpg
- File:Ковшенков Иван Фёдорович - Скифский воин (1855).jpg
- File:Климченко Константин Михайлович - Портрет Софьи Владимировны Гурко (1840-е).jpg
- File:Климченко Константин Михайлович - Горельеф на левой стороне пьедестала памятника Н. М. Карамзину.jpg
- File:Климченко Константин Михайлович - Портрет Татьяны Алексеевны Гурко, урожденной Корф (1840-е).jpg
- File:Камберлен Иосиф - Река (1809).jpg
- File:Земельгак, Яков Иванович, Шубин Ф. И. - Надгробие П. М. Голицына (1783).jpg
- File:Забелло Пармен Петрович - Памятник А. И. Герцену (1872).jpg
- File:Забелло Пармен Петрович - Нимфа.jpg
- File:Забелло Пармен Петрович - Венера.jpg
- File:Забелло Пармен Петрович - Христос.jpg
- File:Забелло Пармен Петрович - Итальянка (1863).jpg
- File:Жилле Николя-Франсуа - Бюст Марии Фёдоровны.jpg
- File:Наполеон Жак - Торговец мясом.jpg
- File:Теодор Жак -Девушка в национальном костюме.jpg
- File:Теодор Жак - Пётр I.jpg
- File:Ковшенков Иван Фёдорович - Черноморский казак (1856).jpg
- File:Ковшенков Фёдор Иванович - Бюст Императора Александра I (1827).jpg
- File:Бюст императра Александра I (1827).png
- File:Бюст императрицы Елизаветы Алексеевны (1827).png
- File:Ковшенков Фёдор Иванович - Бюст императратрицы и Елизаветы Алексеевны и императора Александра I (1828).jpg
- File:Теодор Жак - Лоточник.jpg
- File:Теодор Жак - Продавец овощей.jpg
- File:Теодор Жак - Кузнец.jpg
- File:Теодор Жак - Кавказский воин в кольчуге.jpg
- File:Теодор Жак - Кавказец.jpg
- File:Теодор Жак - Аллегорическая фигура Невы.jpg
- File:Теодор Жак - Екатерина II.jpg
- File:Теодор Жак - Игрок на балалайке.jpg
- File:Алексеев Василий Владимирович - Медаль В память столетия Императорского Московского Воспитательного дома (1863).jpg
- File:Алексеев Василий Владимирович - Медаль В память освящения Исаакиевского собора в Санкт-Петербурге (1858).jpg
- File:Алексеев Василий Владимирович - Медаль на столетие Московского университета (1855).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Dogad75 (talk) 13:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. — Racconish 💬 15:13, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Every image from http://hm.msu.ru may be found earlier on different websites under an unfree license. So obviously http://hm.msu.ru is not their author and can't relicense them under a CC license. http://hm.msu.ru itself changed their license from 1996–2014 © Факультет ВМК МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова to a CC one before the uploads (2018).
- File:Бочаров Геннадий Алексеевич.jpg, found at https://old.sk.ru/opus/p/mathematical-modeling-2017-speakers.aspx
- File:Вайпан Виктор Алексеевич.jpg, found at https://diplom.edu.pl/kk/pravovoe-regulirovanie-predprinimatelskoy-deyatelnosti-zakonodatelstvom-goroda-moskvy/
- File:Гусев Леонид Владимирович.jpg, found at http://newslab.ru/article/679328
- File:Локшин Александр Александрович.jpg, found at http://club.berkovich-zametki.com/?p=29589
- File:Алисова Татьяна Борисовна (2000-е).jpg
- File:Т. Б. Алисова и А. Л. Локшин.jpg
- File:Алисова Татьяна Борисовна (1940-е).jpg
- File:Соколов Михаил Эдуардович+.jpg
- File:Аветисян Арутюн Ишханович.jpg
- File:Соколов Михаил Эдуардович.jpg
- File:Царенко Сергей Васильевич.jpg
- File:Павликова Елена Петровна.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- May @Eraevsky: explain too where comes the dates (of shooting? of publication?) comes from since, on some files, there's nothing on EXIF? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:21, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Dear Patrick Rogel! All of the above images belong to professors of Moscow State University. The site of the Museum of History of Moscow State University is the official body of Moscow State University. Eraevsky (talk) 18:10, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- That's what I suspected: that the professors provided their regular "own" images (which remains to be proved since they are not the photographers) to the Moscow State University, which placed them under a CC though they have not the right to do so. It's explains why images can be found somewhere else prior of their insertion in http://hm.msu.ru. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:25, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
- Dear colleague! Most of the photographs in question are amateurish, which leads to the conviction that the rights to it belong to the person who is depicted in the photograph and allows its public distribution. In any case, the responsibility for copyright in this case lies with the history site of Moscow University, and not Wikimedia Commons. Eraevsky (talk) 04:55, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Eraevsky, ваши рассуждения находятся далеко за пределами принципов защиты авторского права. У любой фотографии есть автор, и если он письменно не передавал своё исключительное право изображённому, никаких прав у последнего не появляется. Размещая чужие фото без согласия фотографов, МГУ занимается отмыванием лицензии. --VLu (talk) 08:37, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- @VLu: В рассматриваемой нами теме речь идёт о публикации фотографий персоналий (не художественных изображений) и этом случае помимо авторского права фотографа имеются права персоналии на защиту своего изображения. Суть данного права состоит в том, что никто не вправе обнародовать и использовать изображение (фотографию), на которых изображена персоналия без её согласия. В случае изображений с сайтов МГУ подобное согласие было получено с высокой вероятностью в отличие от сайтов, ссылки на которые приведены коллегой Patrick Rogel. Eraevsky (talk) 05:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Dear colleague! Most of the photographs in question are amateurish, which leads to the conviction that the rights to it belong to the person who is depicted in the photograph and allows its public distribution. In any case, the responsibility for copyright in this case lies with the history site of Moscow University, and not Wikimedia Commons. Eraevsky (talk) 04:55, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- "Personality rights" have nothing to do with copyright. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:19, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- @VLu: With the other files uploaded by Eraevsky and put on SD it seems there's enough proofs of copyvio. Last remaining files at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Professors of Moscow State University. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Dear colleagues, given your experience with images, you are probably right, but I do not consider myself entitled to blame any portal for dishonesty solely on the basis that search engines find similar photos on other portals. Eraevsky (talk) 15:59, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for modern artworks except architecture.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Xunks (talk) 17:59, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:15, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
No information about artist or publication date, only that it is from a Swedish newspaper. The artist is in fact w:sv:Hjalmar Eneroth (1869-1964) who at the time of publication worked as illustrator for the Swedish daily Svenska Dagbladet. Published in Svenska Dagbladet on December 11, 1909, page 7. Thuresson (talk) 17:29, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:12, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Almostashreq (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official documents and symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:18, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
porque não quero mais a exibição , pois a imagem ficou ruim RAFAEL PEREIRA ALVES (talk) 17:23, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Processed as a duplicate of File:Cachoeira do Chá, Tapiraí SP.jpg. --Majora (talk) 23:18, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Claimed as {{Anonymous-EU}} but actually the work of Carles Comamala (1887–1976)
- File:FCBarcelona 1936.png
- File:FCBarcelona 1941.png
- File:FCBarcelona 1949.png
- File:FCBarcelona 1960.png
- File:FCBarcelona 1974.png
- File:FCBarcelona 1975.png
- File:FCBarcelona1910.png
- File:FCBarcelona1920.png
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:04, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
The focus of these images is the FC Barcelona crest
- File:2019-05-17 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0639 LR10 by Stepro.jpg
- File:Camp Nou (Barcelona) - 1.jpg
- File:FC Barcelona - panoramio.jpg
- File:FCB emblem on the stadium turf - Barcelona22.jpg
_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ytoyoda (talk) 12:28, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- File:2019-05-17 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0639 LR10 by Stepro.jpg is a picture which I made with an official accreditation by UEFA in the stadium during the Champions League Final. You can read this on description page. --Stepro (talk) 12:56, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Stepro: Right, but when you take a photograph of a copyrighted image, like a club crest, it’s considered a derivative work of the copyrighted element that you photographed. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:03, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Ytoyoda: isn't this covered by COM:FOP Spain? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:19, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- The last three images I mean, I'm not sure about the first. Is that a display/screen? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:25, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: I don’t think any of them fall under FOP, which covers works that are permanently installed. The first one looks like a temporary backdrop (it would be covered by Hungary’s FOP, which is pretty much the same), the second is a carpet that’s placed on the side of the field and the last two are spray-painted on the grass. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Ytoyoda: File:Camp Nou (Barcelona) - 1.jpg (December 2012) is https://goo.gl/maps/4t7JgvkRwnpyiZ4o7. Still there in January 2019: https://goo.gl/maps/6i1DwuDssqeGHFJdA. If you put your carpet on a field for 6+ years with no set end date, that's permanent. No need to nail it down. It is inside the stadium though, and I suspect that's no public place. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:11, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: I stand corrected on the carpet crest. I think the other ones can be considered temporary, even if the grass is painted before every match. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:31, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Ytoyoda: Well actually.. "Even quickly decaying works can thus be "permanent" and therefore be subject to freedom of panorama. Street paintings, ice, sand, or snow sculptures rarely last more than a few days or weeks. If they're left in public space for their natural lifetime, they are considered "permanent" all the same." - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:06, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Thanks. One last question—how do you define a public space? Surely a stadium is a public place, because anyone can buy a ticket and get in, but the photographs appear to be taken from places that are restricted to the public—but still visible on TV and in person. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:34, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Ytoyoda: That's the question. Anyone can also buy a ticket for a museum or movie theater, but in most countries (iirc the UK was a possible exception) those don't count as public places. Partly because those are indoors, maybe theme parks are a better example. I wouldn't put too much weight on whether this particular photo was taken from a restricted spot: the artwork in question can be photographed from several non-restricted areas. If the artwork in question can be photographed from a public place, I'd say it won't matter if you decide to photograph it from another place. For example: if you take a picture of a statue using a drone, I'd say FoP applies to that, assuming you can also take a picture of it from the ground in a public place. But this is my interpretation. I think it would be unreasonable to delete such a drone picture. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:09, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Thanks. One last question—how do you define a public space? Surely a stadium is a public place, because anyone can buy a ticket and get in, but the photographs appear to be taken from places that are restricted to the public—but still visible on TV and in person. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:34, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Ytoyoda: Well actually.. "Even quickly decaying works can thus be "permanent" and therefore be subject to freedom of panorama. Street paintings, ice, sand, or snow sculptures rarely last more than a few days or weeks. If they're left in public space for their natural lifetime, they are considered "permanent" all the same." - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:06, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: I stand corrected on the carpet crest. I think the other ones can be considered temporary, even if the grass is painted before every match. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:31, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Ytoyoda: File:Camp Nou (Barcelona) - 1.jpg (December 2012) is https://goo.gl/maps/4t7JgvkRwnpyiZ4o7. Still there in January 2019: https://goo.gl/maps/6i1DwuDssqeGHFJdA. If you put your carpet on a field for 6+ years with no set end date, that's permanent. No need to nail it down. It is inside the stadium though, and I suspect that's no public place. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:11, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: I don’t think any of them fall under FOP, which covers works that are permanently installed. The first one looks like a temporary backdrop (it would be covered by Hungary’s FOP, which is pretty much the same), the second is a carpet that’s placed on the side of the field and the last two are spray-painted on the grass. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Stepro: Right, but when you take a photograph of a copyrighted image, like a club crest, it’s considered a derivative work of the copyrighted element that you photographed. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:03, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, of course it is a "derivative work of a copyrighted element", that's why I needed (and had) a permission to take there pictures. To answer an other question: This was a design element in the stadium, not a screen.
- The media officer of FCB stood beside me during picturing it, btw. --Stepro (talk) 20:26, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Stepro: I’m guessing the permission was for the photography, not to assign a copy-left license to the brand identity of a global sporting entity. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:31, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear FOP situation for the last three photos, first photo is a clear derivative work. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:09, 29 October 2019 (UTC)