Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/04/15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 15th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has no consent of the person in question, and is an infringement of copyright.This photo was uploaded by me, but I have not obtained the consent from the photographer, so please delete it. --Takahashi800C (talk) 23:30, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It turns out that Takahashi 800C doesn't have permission to upload this work to Wikipedia.Please delete this file.--Takahashi800C (talk) 23:20, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please wait without adding duplicate votes to the DR. It will somehow be closed. Patience. --E4024 (talk) 03:47, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I opined for deletion -also- because we had a better version, File:Hidesh ikibi.JPG, which was deleted on a similar DR. In that image we could see the face of the musician. I have no idea if there is a personality issue involved, but if we are not going to delete or keep both, it could be better to delete this one and undelete the other one. IMHO, of course. Taivo? --E4024 (talk) 04:01, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This person has already uploaded a photo for himself. Therefore, the photo I uploaded has not been approved by him and the photographer, so I will request deletion. Here is a photo file he has uploaded for himself. File:Hideshi kibi.jpgThis photo is already used for his own Wikipedia. --Takahashi800C (talk) 04:48, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • This photo is a photo I uploaded without permission and has not obtained permission from him and the photographer.

Therefore, I have requested deletion.I am not hideshi kibi.--Takahashi800C (talk) 05:01, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Please avoid in the future uploading photographs of people without asking them, even if you are the photographer. Many people do not like to see their pics published without their consent. --E4024 (talk) 05:24, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 18:44, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has no consent of the person in question, and is an infringement of copyright. This photo was uploaded by me, but I have not obtained the consent from the photographer, so please delete it. --Takahashi800C (talk) 23:47, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{speedydelete|wrongupload}} Cvchon (talk) 06:20, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination speedied, as filed on day of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 07:49, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

speedydelete|This file has no consent of the person in question, and is an infringement of copyright. Takahashi800C (talk) 09:52, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, here is no copyright violation and consent is not needed, but ... if you like so, then I can delete it. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by João567 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and movie posters. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: All Copyrighted. --Tarawneh (talk) 15:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Re-uploaded with a new nomenclature to become part og the "Uploaded files from the School of music...". Pages that use this audio file are also updated. Thanks! Enricguaus (talk) 16:32, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - the system does not detect a duplicate - if the file name would need to be changed, use {{Rename}} instead. --Jcb (talk) 14:12, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hi, You mentioned "system do not detect duplicate". Right: I changed the codification setup at the .ogg in order to re-upload it! It was my first upload and I didn't know how exactly it works... Right now, its duplicated until it's deleted. Enricguaus (talk) 11:00, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a link to the other file. Jcb (talk) 15:52, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I took a couple of minutes trying to find the duplicate, but was unable to. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 04:07, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, in that case it will be a keep for now. Jcb (talk) 18:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 22:39, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate and deprecated Enricguaus (talk) 12:07, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - don't renominate!. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly not own work. 230×332 px is low for a camera, no EXIF data, the format is png. Looks more like a video still. Brandmeister (talk) 21:20, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does appear to be copyvio off a video that is copyrighted (eg the one used in this article) --Masem (talk) 21:25, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (copyvio). -- Darwin Ahoy! 21:53, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already uploaded file: (c:File:Bangui Shopping District.jpg) Le Petit Chat (talk) 10:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate. --Sanandros (talk) 06:48, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the site where this photo was taken from it was written that this photo belonged to World Chess, where there was no information about license of the site's content. This means that this photo is non-free and was not published under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Thus it must be deleted. Раммон (talk) 13:31, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I don't notice that this photo (only this!) belong to «World Chess» and so is not free. --Brateevsky {talk} 06:14, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per above, with consent of uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:08, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per source. E4024 (talk) 19:30, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. "(CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)" per source; inaccurate license claim; Commons cannot take NC media licenses. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:26, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from a video in CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Incompatible with commons Rhadamante (talk) 21:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Hérisson grognon (talk) 19:12, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

iditokpoo lko;;rdij[tpjujitrop 2601:82:C101:B5F0:19C3:BFBB:52E0:4DD4 21:03, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep nonsense nomination. Josh (talk) 21:14, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:32, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CopyVio ( https://www.instagram.com/p/BuqvsxknCZM/ ) 42.98.137.82 08:23, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 06:14, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CopyVio ( https://www.instagram.com/p/BuqvsxknCZM/ ) 1.64.16.114 16:09, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: previously deleted = speedy. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:36, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Facebook profile pic. No indication of a free license. Abzeronow (talk) 21:52, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This photograph is used all the time online — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abbey Lodge (talk • contribs) 23:45, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Used all the time doesn't mean cc license. If you can show me the basis for this CC license, I'll withdraw this nomination. Abzeronow (talk) 16:58, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, yoinked photo-- 03:22, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Copyright violation of take your pick. There's also other variants/sizes of the image available on the Internet. Highly unlikely to be the work of the uploader, but rather just something found on the Internet. Hammersoft (talk) 22:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- 03:18, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es un montaje creado con fines vandálicos. Garcia90660 (talk) 23:59, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- 03:16, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 17:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 06:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer died in 2006. Source has a NC-ND license so undelete in 2077. Abzeronow (talk) 21:50, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:13, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thejk009 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

(NSFW) - Low resolution pornographic images with no EXIF information, very likely copyvios.

O Still Small Voice of Clam 08:49, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Thejk009 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

(NSFW) - Low resolution pornographic images with no EXIF information, very likely copyvios.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thejk009 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope COM:PENIS

Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie, not uploader's work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:38, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:01, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FABOLOUSDESERTSTORM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Blatant self-promotion of another famous rapper. Commons is not your free web host.

Achim (talk) 19:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:51, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vasylisa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely claim of own work on apparent portraits.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:50, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image, out of wiki scoe Kayser Ahmad (talk) 13:47, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Moheen at 18:02, 20 April 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Selim Shaikh --Krdbot 01:06, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file has an OTRS-xxxxxx from December. Requesting a review of the image for retention. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:14, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellin Beltz: @Corkythehornetfan:
If this photo cannot be used, could someone please help with a substitute where it is used?
It looks to me like a reasonable replacement would be [[File:Kris Kobach Kansas, Secretary of State (13419571233) (1).jpg|thumb|Kris Kobach Kansas, Secretary of State (13419571233) (1)]]. ??? Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 02:51, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:37, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Mitte27 (talk) 16:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Amateur art. Commons is not a web host for personal art work. E4024 (talk) 03:01, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:53, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Amateur art. Commons is not a web host for personal art work. E4024 (talk) 03:02, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:54, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Amateur art. Commons is not a web host for personal art work. E4024 (talk) 03:03, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:54, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from https://recepty.vareni.cz/hrnickova-bezlepkova-babovka/. Harold (talk) 07:44, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:55, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from https://www.knihydobrovsky.cz/peceme-pro-vegany-s-laskou-ale-bez-vajec-668907. Harold (talk) 07:46, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:55, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source indicates CC-BY-NC-ND license, which is not compatible with commons. Lymantria (talk) 09:44, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:52, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Reginaldo-df (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope!

Ras67 (talk) 11:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:55, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF data, unlikely to be own work, found published on-line before upload date. Smooth O (talk) 12:25, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: what is still missing in existing collection of explicit materials? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image for non-wikipedian (per file name) --Alaa :)..! 14:38, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image for non-wikipedian (per file name\caption\description) --Alaa :)..! 14:42, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:53, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:58, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:58, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image for non-wikipedian --Alaa :)..! 16:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:58, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by King5544 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:41, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:58, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uneven angles compared to other SVG in Category:Benzyl alcohol such as File:Alkohol benzylowy.svg DMacks (talk) 05:21, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: it is in use at en.wikibooks, but I am unable to edit that site. So if someone who agrees with my reasoning could do that replacement, it would become unused. DMacks (talk) 05:23, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing the replacement! DMacks (talk) 03:18, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:45, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bioexalhum (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely claim of own works on these tiny headshots of people and a pdf document.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:39, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Bioexalhum (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-resolution images, unlikely to be own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Bioexalhum (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Taken from the internet (google images or elsewhere), not own work, low resolution

Triplecaña (talk) 21:31, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: All copyvios. All deleted. --Majora (talk) 21:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uneven bond thicknesses and line-endings compared to other SVG in Category:Benzyl alcohol such as File:Alkohol benzylowy.svg DMacks (talk) 05:27, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: it is in use at jp.wikibooks, but I am unable to edit that site. So if someone who agrees with my reasoning could do that replacement, it would become unused. DMacks (talk) 05:27, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DMacks: No problem, I have replaced the file so now it is unused & ready for deletion! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:51, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for doing the replacement! DMacks (talk) 03:18, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. --Leyo 10:03, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{BadJPG}}. Have File:Dimethyl-ether-2D-flat.png as replacement DMacks (talk) 05:35, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 10:06, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{BadJPG}} composite of Category:Dimethyl ether and Category:Ethanol, both of which have high-quality images of these chemicals in this style. DMacks (talk) 05:41, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 10:05, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect structure: Na is not covalently bound to the ring. Leyo 14:47, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the structure I don't say that sodium and carbon do covalent bond, despite this, I remade the file with emphasis on the electric charges.Claudio Pistilli (talk) 15:04, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In the struture you exactly and explicitly say that the sodium and carbon are covalently bound. That's what it means when you connect atoms with lines, basic chemistry, right? And it's an electronic contradiction to have them charged and also covalently bound, more basic chemistry. Interestingly, it might be a covalent dimer if you want to talk actual scientifically verifiable information from literature (doi:10.1002/anie.198904761). Yet another example here of the danger of using "pretty" images that imply or state things that do not match actual facts. DMacks (talk) 15:45, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am fully aware of the few uses. --Leyo 20:10, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:51, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 17:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. @SecretName101: note that you can use {{Duplicate}} to tag duplicates for speedy deletion. --bjh21 (talk) 18:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:05, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image copyrighted by Alex Ginsburg Photographics, Germantown, TN Maliepa (talk) 18:12, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:05, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam. Not useful. Ubcule (talk) 21:25, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:04, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Saleh_Abo_Wasel, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:19, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:03, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the site where this photo was taken from it was written that this photo belonged to World Chess, where there was no information about license of the site's content. This means that this photo is non-free and was not published under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Thus it must be deleted. Раммон (talk) 13:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. There is licensing information in the website, in the Terms of Use link at the bottom: [1], and Agon/Worldchess has one of the most absurd restrictive copyright notices ever seen among sports events. In the past, they have shown to be quite litigious regarding their dubious copyright claims (on move transmission/streaming). Fbergo (talk) 14:52, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I don't notice that this photo (only this!) belong to «World Chess» and so is not free. it's a pity than this photo is not made by Russian Chess Federation. :( --Brateevsky {talk} 06:18, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:27, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mor4les9207 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (:es:Braulio Morales).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:05, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Amateur art. Commons is not a web host for personal art work. E4024 (talk) 03:03, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:13, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Amateur art. Commons is not a web host for personal art work. E4024 (talk) 03:04, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:13, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Amateur art. Commons is not a web host for personal art work. E4024 (talk) 03:05, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:13, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Amateur art. Commons is not a web host for personal art work. E4024 (talk) 03:05, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:13, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low resolution, vector version is available GKFXtalk 09:01, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:14, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:15, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Конюков (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Эти выводы не нравятся тем кто сегодня оправдывает фашизм и нацизм и пытается их реабилитировать. На сегодняшний день мои выводы на прямую влияют на государственную политику России и США, так как учитываются при принятии решений.

These conclusions do not like those who today justify fascism and Nazism and are trying to rehabilitate them. Today, my conclusions directly affect the state policy of Russia and the United States, as they are taken into account when making decisions.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Конюков (talk • contribs) 00:54, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

5.44.168.176 00:43, 16 April 2019 (UTC) Конюков (talk) 00:49, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:16, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Конюков (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Здесь расширенная подборка выводов, объясняющих социальные процессы и объясняющих возникновение механизмов истребления больших масс людей. Данные работы расскрывают не соответствии современных теорий развития общества, объективным процессам, в частности описывают ложность теории Абрахама Маслоу, а так же ущербность и ложность идеологических посылов.

Here is an extended selection of conclusions explaining social processes and explaining the emergence of mechanisms for the extermination of large masses of people. These works reveal the incompatibility of modern theories of social development, objective processes, in particular, describe the falsity of the theory of Abraham Maslow, as well as the inferiority and falsity of ideological messages.

5.44.168.176 00:48, 16 April 2019 (UTC) Конюков (talk) 00:50, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:16, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. Requires OTRS. E4024 (talk) 03:44, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:10, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded only to support autobiographical article; uploader now blocked indef. No other use anticipated. General Ization (talk) 16:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:29, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an own work as declared. E4024 (talk) 19:45, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:38, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kgosi Kai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely claims of own work on a bust and two images. Were proper source and author given, it is possible they might be able to be retained.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:15, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kgosi Kai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 11:21, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as nominated. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by P. hynece (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader's request (here) and most likely not own work

AntonierCH (d) 05:33, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request and not own work (unable to find the photographer and get permission according to 2018083110004452. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:50, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The book cover (2019) and the photograph used on it are copyrighted material, very probably property of the publishing company, Otava, not the uploader, and very probably not copyright-free. Mlang.Finn (talk) 16:56, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. This should've been speedied. Strakhov (talk) 22:22, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for outdoor plaques shot obliquely in the US.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:27, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Completely different legal matter, unrelated to freedom of panorama. With no author listed and no copyright notice on the plaque, it wouldn't matter. Binksternet (talk) 20:18, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Binksternet: It is public artwork installed in the US after March 1, 1989 that is not a building. More specifically, the plaque pictured is copyrighted 2013-07-30 by the City of Glendale, California. See Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 21:01, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Again, a plain text plaque is not art. Do you have proof that the City of Glendale holds the copyright to the text in the plaque? If so, that copyright would certainly have been mentioned in the court case Michiko Gingery v. City of Glendale, which determined that a Japanese-American citizen's complaint against the statue had no merit. The court case agrees that the plaque text is from the City of Glendale, based on similar text from a similar Seoul statue, but we can all see it was published without a copyright notice on the plaque, having no author and only a date. Australian women's rights professor Vera Mackie wrote about this monument in Glendale, saying that "the Glendale statue has brought controversy, with Japanese denialists putting pressure on the local government for the removal of the statue." Binksternet (talk) 21:25, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Binksternet: Copyright notice is not necessary any more in the US since March 1, 1989. See also COM:PACUSA#March 1, 1989 to the present and COM:VPC#Plaques. Pinging @Clindberg for comment.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 21:38, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You are still assuming the same protection for a plain text plaque that is provided for a work of art. The work of art is protected, but incidental materials are not, such as the plinth or platform or base, or the descriptive display or didactic plaque describing the art. Binksternet (talk) 23:02, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
None of it is copyrightable really... except the text. And that is protected as a literary work, just as much as an artistic work. Short phrases (short of a sentence) are often not copyrightable, and sometimes you can argue that extremely perfunctory descriptions which are mostly just factual don't exceed the threshold of originality, but it doesn't take much. The photo reproduces that text. Obviously, we are showing it in its public context, so the fair use scope would be rather wide -- probably only very commercial uses would be an issue, if even then. We do struggle with photos like this, but have often decided to delete them. You can make the argument that it is just depicting the words that happen to be there, and thus possibly incidental. On the other hand, it is focusing on the copyrighted text in particular, which would run counter to "incidental" arguments. If someone was selling it -- and the quality of the text could be deemed to enhance the final product -- it would probably be ruled derivative. For U.S. plaques before 1978, the text needed a copyright notice, but since then it's been fuzzier as the permanent public display itself does not constitute publication. I don't always like deleting these, as I don't recall finding an explicit court case on the subject we can point to, but there are historical societies etc. which do claim rights over their historical marker text. I could definitely see, for example, a photo book of all their plaques being ruled derivative. When used as part of documenting just that one subject, it's most likely fair use. It's a difficult area to be sure -- it is OK just because of the way it's used in the Wikipedia article (i.e. fair use) or is the photo inherently "free" no matter what we use make of it? The text is copyrightable certainly, so the question is if there some aspect of a photographic reproduction like this which could protect it from being treated just a copy of the text. Or if the nature of the text (educational and trying to reach as big an audience as possible) would enter the equation. I'm not sure I've run across a lawsuit which would really give us any clarity, and you will find examples of deletions for this type of thing (and probably some keeps as well). This type of thing can be important to show how the public is being educated at the site, but runs squarely into "free" issues which are not clear to say the least. Part of why making a "free encyclopedia" is harder than just an encyclopedia :-) Carl Lindberg (talk) 10:08, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom. Text can constitute public artwork. This image is public artwork installed in the US after March 1, 1989 which is not a building. See Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US. For a very pertinent example... text which in no language at all being copyright, please see File:Kryptos sculptor.jpg wherein the artist granted permission for a low-resolution image of the work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • The above mentioned image (File:Kryptos sculptor.jpg) is about a work of art. Plain text is not art. It is like a logo that consists of letters or simple shapes. If a plaque has some "artistry" in its manufacture, OK, we can talk about a DR, but industrial or artisan's work is not so.  Keep --E4024 (talk) 20:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • So poets should not get a copyright, because it's just text? No, textual stuff can certainly have its own copyright, separate from any sculptural or pictorial aspect. Short phrases (like you normally find in logos) don't qualify, so it's not normally a concern there, but more substantial text can easily be copyrightable. The sculpture you mention above probably has both aspects -- one side just looks like alphabet letters in order repeated, which would not be copyrightable, but the other could have a selection and arrangement copyright even though it's not really words (which can get literary copyrights). The physical shape is pretty simple but the particular curve may give it a copyright. The licenses like PD-text are about the shape of the letters themselves not having a pictorial copyright, when the amount of text itself is not copyrightable, but more substantial text is a completely different matter. As a matter of fact, the author of your example seems to have a copyright registration on the text of that sculpture, but not the visual aspects of the sculpture itself (he has two "text" work regsitrations, not "visual arts", on "Kryptos" [TX0006612228] and "Kryptos text" [TXu001663615]). Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:37, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:50, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an own work and probably OoS, but the main issue is IMHO none of the files of this uploader are own work as declared. E4024 (talk) 19:44, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:11, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of https://www.facebook.com/cheaf/photos/a.1655686651309994/1655686657976660/?type=1&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:39, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:40, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivonnejo04 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:36, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivonnejo04 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparently a fan gallery, however several of these have over printing and sources that are obviously not "own work." The two from Flickr are questionable whether the Flickr uploader had the right to upload, due to one looking like an album cover and the other like a professional portrait - both are smaller than facebook.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:52, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:39, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Metrg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Ghostly overprinting in lower right corner suggests an absence of "own work" on the imagest which are iidentical with slight crop.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:55, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:37, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dina Asa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Artworks without permission from the creator/s via COM:OTRS cannot be retained as they are not "own work".

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:57, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:37, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal-type Flickr file. Out of scope. Hiàn (talk) 21:02, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:36, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Named as album cover, unlikely to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:31, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:34, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RetroColorBand (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Band photos, unlikely own work - also promotional or self-promotional uploads.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:52, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:34, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One-time upload w/o camera EXIF. I see the file in this copyrighted page: https://fancentro.com/anikeekina (What I do not know is how to understand where it was first published, here or there...) E4024 (talk) 03:12, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This picture was Shoot by Peter schönberg alias Hardy Roche, That‘s me. Please use the picture on Wiki, it‘s not a problem about copyrights! ThX — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:8108:1740:2574:C4AC:1F09:CF69:CA85 (talk) 06:06, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Clearly COM:OTRS ticket needed to prove that uploader is indeed the photographer. If OTRS ticket is ever received, then undelete. P 1 9 9   15:24, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art work w/o OTRS or amateur art. E4024 (talk) 03:30, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:24, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for outdoor sculptures in the US.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:23, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:24, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 06:44, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak delete not dupe, nominated file has a fading background. 大诺史 (talk) 14:37, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:28, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshoto from a video, unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 07:57, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:28, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is a derivative of the large portrait in the background, which is unlikely free. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:28, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality chemical drawings. Redundant to others of their category.

GKFXtalk 08:56, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:29, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded by another file Cryptorebel (talk) 09:01, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Siegel-uni-heidelberg.png. P 1 9 9   15:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Bosnia_and_Herzegovina#Freedom_of_panorama Smooth O (talk) 09:14, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:31, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

You say "The work is non-artistic (journalistic, etc.) "??? Ingmar Bergman was undisputed an artist, his work IS art, so it is ridiculous POV to say it is not artistic. 88.78.7.47 09:43, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I thought an individual image from a film would be different. --Årvasbåo (talk) 09:56, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. P 1 9 9   15:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Still from a copyrighted picture. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This website, excluding (...) images (...) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Australia Licence. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:59, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Or if you don't paraphrase the statement: "This website, excluding trademarked logos and images or content noted otherwise..." The template {{GreensAU}} is widely-used for dozens of images from the Australian Greens website—unfortunately the wording of the statement on the website is a bit ambiguous and can be misinterpreted. This image is not "trademarked" or "noted otherwise" by the website. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Huong Truong profile.jpg which you also marked for deletion but was determined to have a compatible license. --Canley (talk) 10:08, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I take that statement to mean that site images are CC BY-SA 2.5 AU unless there's a statement or caption to the contrary ("noted otherwise"). Maybe someone could reach out to them for clarification, if that hasn't already been done. clpo13(talk) 22:27, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: clearly misquoted the copyright statement. P 1 9 9   15:37, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked video: Рамзан Кадыров is not the copyrighted holder. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:25, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Лицензия Creative Commons – Attribution (разрешено повторное использование) don' t lisense? --EgAlb (talk) 17:43, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by A.Savin. 大诺史 (talk) 14:39, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Carlos LLano/MDC © 2015, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:40, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution among copyright violations. I suspect again copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:39, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the Twitter profile pic for the subject. Unlikely the subject took a photograph of himself playing football, and in any case, previously published photos require OTRS verification: https://twitter.com/amosdadet Ytoyoda (talk) 10:53, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:39, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per EXIF, photo belongs to Michael Molloy Photography Ltd Ytoyoda (talk) 10:55, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:39, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 2012, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 11:06, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:39, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misnamed file. DrSwashMC (talk) 11:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   15:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misnamed file. DrSwashMC (talk) 11:16, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   15:40, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amanpreet Wasir (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, last remaining files, PNG files, so probably screenshots, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 12:48, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prithvish.nag (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims, as the uploader appears to be the subject (rather than the photographer) of these photos.

LX (talk, contribs) 12:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:42, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:44, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old chemical structures uploaded by Vchorozopoulos

[edit]

These images all have significant quality problems. The cyclopropanes have bonds of significantly different length and font sizes too small. The oxirene and iodooxirene are distorted and low resolution. The images would be straightforward to recreate correctly if they were needed.

GKFXtalk 14:42, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:45, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Borzhu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:45, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mzaur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:46, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by تلویزیون (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:46, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD at MD. PD? E4024 (talk) 14:55, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:47, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS and of course not an "own work" as declared. E4024 (talk) 14:58, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:48, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely taken from http://www.diena.lt/sites/default/files/styles/940x000/public/media/sportas/atlant-uten_m-9639.jpg?itok=8mWhiigg Ytoyoda (talk) 15:06, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Infrogmation: Sorry, here's the actual source link. The photo credit goes to Vytautas Petriko, not the uploader here, and the article predates the upload here by a couple of years. And it looks like the Commons image is a screenshot based on the EXIF data, so it's possible to show the image at a higher resolution than the original. In any case, it needs an OTRS ticket, since it comes from a third-party source. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:48, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Concur with Ytoyoda per additional info. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:10, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. P 1 9 9   15:50, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old chemical structures uploaded by Vchorozopoulos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Around 2010, Vchorozopoulos uploaded a number of chemical structures, largely of 3- and 4-membered organic rings, with defects in their drawing. The main issue is that the lines used are very fine, and double bonds are close together, while the text size is very large. (There are also a small number of low resolution files.) This makes the images difficult to use in practice in an article.

Many of their images from this period are in use despite their problems, but I have nominated about 60 of the unused images (according to the Global usage count given in VFC) for deletion. These are all simple structures so it is straightforward to re-draw properly them with suitable software if any are ever needed.

GKFXtalk 15:08, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: it appears that a decent proportion of these have since had a better SVG provided which is presumably why they are no longer in use. However not all have been vectorized. GKFXtalk 15:12, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:52, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an own work. As a side note, I think people confuse a "scholar" with anybody preaching about Islam when they find a crowd and happily a microphone and begin to speak. They are not -in most cases- even a "vaiz" (term equivalent to preacher) a case even in which they would not be notable. I would like to emphasize, these wrong categorizations damage the reputation of Commons. If you like "bearded men" so much put them into the cat for "bearded men". If you want to know a scholar, "Elmalılı Hamdi Yazır" shines like a beacon of light; go find him. Delete this dubious PD image of an OoS person please. E4024 (talk) 15:12, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:54, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status, missing permission and EXIF data. The file can be found here. Jianhui67 TC 16:01, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:54, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Uttap Banua (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Permission is needed for these files, as they are taken from social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. Most likely not own work.

Jianhui67 TC 16:07, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:55, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cvchon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 12:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mass flickr uploads. Due to bad qality and blurry images most them are nearly unuseable. Some are private snapshot of unknown people. Please note that for most images a redirect exists because of duplicate uploads.

JuTa 18:19, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:59, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not released. Sterlingchair (talk) 19:18, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   16:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo had been previously published at https://www.gg.ca/en/governor-general/governor-general-julie-payette/official-photo The copyright selected by the uploader does not appear to be compatible with the ones applied by the government of Canada. Please review and close this deletion request if it is or delete if it is not. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:18, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Walter Görlitz. I would like to mention that the official picture on GG site is not the same than the one on Commons. It looks like it's the same, but she doesn't have the same pins, not the same position, not the same scarf, etc.
I've contacted the photographer, Johanie Maheu, and she uploaded the picture herself. Thank you. Best regars, Benoit Rochon (talk) 19:47, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good eyes! It was a quick glance. Feel free to close this deletion request. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:23, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I will. Thank you very much! Benoit Rochon (talk) 20:56, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above, withdrawn. P 1 9 9   16:05, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One time upload, too small. E4024 (talk) 19:33, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:06, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user has several not free files as "own work", please review all their uploads. E4024 (talk) 19:48, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:06, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of https://reseauinternational.net/fuite-apres-fuite-erdogan-etend-son-influence-sur-les-saoudiens/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:05, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mumk dp 5.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:06, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kellylaiyukling (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please note the white overprinting on PH's Concert which reads " Lingxi's work " , neither of these look like "own work."

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:38, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:07, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ghasempourjavid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work, size, subject, overprinting and calligraphy.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: one, per nomination - kept one, per above. P 1 9 9   16:08, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of this photo and I would like for it to be deleted, thank you. João Malho (talk) 12:25, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{Db-author}} João Malho (talk) 12:26, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: This file has been on Commons for three years, and the licence you granted was perpetual and irrevocable. The picture is used on en:Vila Nova de Gaia, so its quality is apparently adequate. --bjh21 (talk) 17:30, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per bjh. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

When I made a series of uplouds of portuguese natural areas I accidently uplouded this picture wich was meant for a personal project about Porto, I would like if possible for it to be removed as a gesture of goodwill even thought I know and understand that you are not required to do so because of the creative commons I uplouded it with. Thank you for your comprehension and kind regards João Malho (talk) 20:46, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: sorry, in use. P 1 9 9   16:09, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Donkey Licenses 1872+

[edit]

These licenses apparently date from the late 1870s. They were nominated for deletion but would they not be free of copyright due to age?

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:08, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree totally with you. They are free of copyright due to their age. The author is unknown.--Ashashyou (talk) 02:45, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: yes, old enough for PD. P 1 9 9   16:11, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vlcongaku (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:28, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vlcongaku (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re photos of photos with no metadata. Dubious own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:09, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, clearly DW. P 1 9 9   16:15, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anrephoto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images credited to a photographer without COM:OTRS permission.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:20, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to believe that credited photographer (Andrey Rebryna ANRE) is not same as uploader(user:Anrephoto). P 1 9 9   16:20, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character + no COM:FOP in Italy. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:33, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:20, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image appears to be identical to https://paris.navi.com/miru/15/, which was published in 2009. As a previously published image, COM:OTRS is needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not the same photo (clearly different sky), but likely taken from the exact same viewpoint. P 1 9 9   16:22, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All six other uploads from the user were taken from https://vortexoffshore.com/ which has an explicit copyright notice at the bottom of every page. This image does not show up in a Google search, is reasonably large, and has EXIF, but it is on the same subject as the others so it requires a closer look. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:58, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not sure where we should take a "closer look". If new evidence of copyvio comes up, renominate. P 1 9 9   16:26, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shliahov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatives of photos and maps with unclear copyright status.

Sealle (talk) 05:44, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:42, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, show contemporary artwork (see https://sehen-und-handeln.ch/fuer-pfarreien-und-kirchgemeinden/hungertuch/), no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 10:33, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was issued in 1970 and under Thai law would enter the public domain in the year 2020, however I uploaded it sooner as a Vietnamese numismatist I know told me that the owner of this website (www.Art-Hanoi.com) might be sick 😷 so this website might not exist next year, so I'm nominating this page for deletion to be undeleted in 2020. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:22, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:00, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was issued in 1970 and under Thai law would enter the public domain in the year 2020, however I uploaded it sooner as a Vietnamese numismatist I know told me that the owner of this website (www.Art-Hanoi.com) might be sick 😷 so this website might not exist next year, so I'm nominating this page for deletion to be undeleted in 2020. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC) Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:08, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was issued in 1970 and under Thai law would enter the public domain in the year 2020, however I uploaded it sooner as a Vietnamese numismatist I know told me that the owner of this website (www.Art-Hanoi.com) might be sick 😷 so this website might not exist next year, so I'm nominating this page for deletion to be undeleted in 2020. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC) Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:08, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was issued in 1970 and under Thai law would enter the public domain in the year 2020, however I uploaded it sooner as a Vietnamese numismatist I know told me that the owner of this website (www.Art-Hanoi.com) might be sick 😷 so this website might not exist next year, so I'm nominating this page for deletion to be undeleted in 2020. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC) Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:08, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was issued in 1970 and under Thai law would enter the public domain in the year 2020, however I uploaded it sooner as a Vietnamese numismatist I know told me that the owner of this website (www.Art-Hanoi.com) might be sick 😷 so this website might not exist next year, so I'm nominating this page for deletion to be undeleted in 2020. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:25, 15 April 2019 (UTC) Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:25, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:08, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was issued in 1970 and under Thai law would enter the public domain in the year 2020, however I uploaded it sooner as a Vietnamese numismatist I know told me that the owner of this website (www.Art-Hanoi.com) might be sick 😷 so this website might not exist next year, so I'm nominating this page for deletion to be undeleted in 2020. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:25, 15 April 2019 (UTC) Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:25, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:08, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was issued in 1970 and under Thai law would enter the public domain in the year 2020, however I uploaded it sooner as a Vietnamese numismatist I know told me that the owner of this website (www.Art-Hanoi.com) might be sick 😷 so this website might not exist next year, so I'm nominating this page for deletion to be undeleted in 2020. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:25, 15 April 2019 (UTC) Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:25, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:08, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was issued in 1970 and under Thai law would enter the public domain in the year 2020, however I uploaded it sooner as a Vietnamese numismatist I know told me that the owner of this website (www.Art-Hanoi.com) might be sick 😷 so this website might not exist next year, so I'm nominating this page for deletion to be undeleted in 2020. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC) Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:08, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was issued in 1970 and under Thai law would enter the public domain in the year 2020, however I uploaded it sooner as a Vietnamese numismatist I know told me that the owner of this website (www.Art-Hanoi.com) might be sick 😷 so this website might not exist next year, so I'm nominating this page for deletion to be undeleted in 2020. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC) Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:08, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was issued in 1970 and under Thai law would enter the public domain in the year 2020, however I uploaded it sooner as a Vietnamese numismatist I know told me that the owner of this website (www.Art-Hanoi.com) might be sick 😷 so this website might not exist next year, so I'm nominating this page for deletion to be undeleted in 2020. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:27, 15 April 2019 (UTC) Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:27, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:09, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was issued in 1970 and under Thai law would enter the public domain in the year 2020, however I uploaded it sooner as a Vietnamese numismatist I know told me that the owner of this website (www.Art-Hanoi.com) might be sick 😷 so this website might not exist next year, so I'm nominating this page for deletion to be undeleted in 2020. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:27, 15 April 2019 (UTC) Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:27, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:09, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was issued in 1970 and under Thai law would enter the public domain in the year 2020, however I uploaded it sooner as a Vietnamese numismatist I know told me that the owner of this website (www.Art-Hanoi.com) might be sick 😷 so this website might not exist next year, so I'm nominating this page for deletion to be undeleted in 2020. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC) Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:09, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was issued in 1970 and under Thai law would enter the public domain in the year 2020, however I uploaded it sooner as a Vietnamese numismatist I know told me that the owner of this website (www.Art-Hanoi.com) might be sick 😷 so this website might not exist next year, so I'm nominating this page for deletion to be undeleted in 2020. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC) Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:09, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was issued in 1970 and under Thai law would enter the public domain in the year 2020, however I uploaded it sooner as a Vietnamese numismatist I know told me that the owner of this website (www.Art-Hanoi.com) might be sick 😷 so this website might not exist next year, so I'm nominating this page for deletion to be undeleted in 2020. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC) Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:09, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was issued in 1970 and under Thai law would enter the public domain in the year 2020, however I uploaded it sooner as a Vietnamese numismatist I know told me that the owner of this website (www.Art-Hanoi.com) might be sick 😷 so this website might not exist next year, so I'm nominating this page for deletion to be undeleted in 2020. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:29, 15 April 2019 (UTC) Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:29, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:09, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was issued in 1970 and under Thai law would enter the public domain in the year 2020, however I uploaded it sooner as a Vietnamese numismatist I know told me that the owner of this website (www.Art-Hanoi.com) might be sick 😷 so this website might not exist next year, so I'm nominating this page for deletion to be undeleted in 2020. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:29, 15 April 2019 (UTC) Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:29, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:09, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. No FOP for outdoor plaques in the US. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Southfield Comfort Woman Plaque.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Glendale Comfort Woman Plaque.jpg.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Completely different legal matter, unrelated to freedom of panorama. With no author listed and no copyright notice on the plaque, it wouldn't matter. Binksternet (talk) 20:17, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Binksternet: It is public artwork installed in the US after March 1, 1989 that is not a building. More specifically, the plaque pictured is copyrighted 2010-10-23 by the County of Bergen, the County Executive, the Board of Chosen Freeholders, and the Borough of Palisades Park, New Jersey. See Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US. Also, this plaque has a drawing of a helmeted Japanese soldier abusing the human rights of one of the "Comfort Women". See also COM:VPC#Plaques (since archived to Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2019/04#Plaques).   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 21:05, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your basis for saying that the plaque is copyrighted is that the plaque is a public work of art such as a painting or statue. But that argument misses the mark – the plaque is an explanatory note accompanying the nearby work of art. Binksternet (talk) 22:54, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom. Text can constitute public artwork. This image is public artwork installed in the US after March 1, 1989 which is not a building. See Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US. For a very pertinent example... text which in no language at all being copyright, please see File:Kryptos sculptor.jpg wherein the artist granted permission for a low-resolution image of the work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If the image just focused on the graphic part of the plague then it may have infringed the copyright of the graphic artwork itself but the image shows the entire structure within the park. It presents an architectural work. "United States copyright law provides an exemption to pictorial representations of architectural works" per Wikilegal/Pictorial Representations Architectural Works. STSC (talk) 16:01, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcb: You close-deleted Commons:Deletion requests/File:Southfield Comfort Woman Plaque.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Glendale Comfort Woman Plaque.jpg, what do you think?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:08, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Binksternet: Ping. - STSC (talk) 15:41, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: both the art and the text are above TOO. Unfortunately there is no applicable FoP in the US. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Smaller duplicate of File:Internal Geneva wheel ani.gif. Please note that all uses need to be replaced prior to deletion. Leyo 14:12, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as duplicate and redirected. P 1 9 9   16:27, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant, low resolution copy of File:Russian Railways Logo.svg. 83.220.238.161 16:08, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: google search. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 17:31, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:31, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FlickreviewR review was not carried out, uploader added a fabricated FlickreviewR tag (as can be seen in the article history). The question we as the community must face is whether we trust that the file was CC-BY licensed at the time it was uploaded or if, under our precautionary principle, we should consider deletion of this file (and all others with the same situation - uploaded by Paris 16 with a faked FlickreviewR tag, and with a change in license post upload) Nick (talk) 19:02, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would also add, having checked Internet Archive, I can find no archive version of the source page on Flickr, but I have been able to ascertain that some other files by Lolowaro974 were CC-BY licensed eg [2]. Nick (talk) 19:04, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, and they were CC-BY as recently as February 2019. I think there's no reason to suspect the license was there at the time of upload, but I've not checked more to say anything about its validity. Nemo 19:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't explain (imo) why it was uploaded with the "flickrbot reviewed" tag already on it...I'll also note that the photo you linked in your last edit is still CC by 2.0, so nothing changed. Praxidicae (talk) 19:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'd also like to note that all the photos in the set that this came from on flickr are either CC by NC 2.0 or All Rights Reserved. It's also very strange that it was uploaded with the reviewed tag, saying that it was reviewed 27 May 2014 but it wasn't uploaded until October 2014.Praxidicae (talk) 19:16, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As noted above, the photographer was using cc-by until recently. I don't know why one would write {{User:FlickreviewR/reviewed-pass|Lolowaro974|https://www.flickr.com/photos/7691436@N06/13721604885|2014-05-27 14:50:18|cc-by-2.0|}} manually. A charitable interpretation is that the user copy and pasted the entire description from a file uploaded earlier, but I'm not sure User:FlickreviewR 2 ever placed such a tag. Nemo 05:23, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, this also applies to the cropped version, File:Notre Dame de Paris from pont de la Tournelle - 2014 (cropped).jpg. DS (talk) 19:22, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, this is very strange. Didn't know it was possible for a user to added a fabricated FlickreviewR tag. // sikander { talk } 🦖 21:44, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. I would probably checked more in depth if it wasn't for the fact that we have numerous alternatives at Category:Notre-Dame de Paris from the southeast. P 1 9 9   16:37, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:Chloroethyne.svg. Line widths and lengths are inconsistent. GKFXtalk 13:22, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:38, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo ocupo en otra página similar Iván Arturo Pérez Negrón Ruiz (talk) 19:27, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   15:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found as early 2017 at http://theunfilteredpodcast.blogspot.com/2017/12/, COM:LL Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:53, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file is in the public domain. The author approved its use many years ago, back in 2014. It was then re-uploaded with a CC0 licence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Constantprogress (talk • contribs) 22:57, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely COM:LL. This will need COM:OTRS ticket to prove that "author approved its use many years ago". P 1 9 9   17:11, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amadouibrahim2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-resolution images, unlikely to be own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:35, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There are two reasons given for the deletion requests here
The first argument is that the images are low resolution. I am not convinced that this should be an argument for deletion, in particular when the pictures come from a country where we have actually little content. Certainly, low resolution images is better than no images at all. For the record, the images were uploaded as part of a school project and are currently used in this page : https://fr.vikidia.org/wiki/Croix_d%27Agadez
The second argument is that it is unlikely to be own work. Indeed, I see different dates on pictures and this might suggest different sources and authorship. I will inquire to Ibrahim. Anthere (talk)
@Anthere: You may but since several uploads by this user are copyvio it's, on the contrary, very likely that other files are not his own work. Second a low-resolution image with no metadata generally denotes a copyright violation, no matter where it comes from. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:30, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I wrote that before I saw the other cases on his talk page. Hence the message I left on your own talk page. I tend to agree with you in those circonstances that those images are very likely copyvios. As I wrote you... I contacted him in private so that he reflects and considers other options (such as using no images at all, or using images already on Commons).
As I briefly explained, he is a facilitator in an educational project involving kids studying in low connectivity conditions (or no connectivity at all). He is the one in charge of retrieving the content produced by the classrooms and uploading it on Vikidia. I am not sure to which extent he was involved in choosing the pictures (though he obviously should not use those copyrighted ones...). So I am using the opportunity to make him understand the situation and figure out how he can fix it. Anthere (talk)
I'd like to point out that... whilst some images are obviously copyvios, other images may not be. I am thinking for example of this one File:Tableau d'une croix d'Agadez au Niger.jpg. It does have some metadata. It is only low resolution if you consider it from the point of view of the owner of a good camera or phone (the kids in this school do not have either). It may have been a picture taken during a school visit to a local museum. Or it may be indeed a copyvio :) Anthere (talk)
Oui, les photos les plus récentes semnlent être OK. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:06, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, all found elsewhere online, except the last file - therefore kept this one. P 1 9 9   16:36, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a derivative work of the sculpture depicted, and hence a copyright violation. This sculpture appears to have been part of What's in your DNA?[3], which was a series of sculptures temporarily exhibited around London. Since these were temporary installations, freedom of panorama doesn't apply, and since the sculpture is the subject of the picture, de minimis doesn't apply either.

One possible escape route is that I think the original artist is Dbfinearts, who made one contribution to English Wikipedia 12 years ago. He might be willing to provide a free licence for the image, having apparently done so for en:File:Sue waiting.jpg. bjh21 (talk) 14:19, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by No1lovesu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No EXIF + PNG format = screencaps. Source video is not given.

Roy17 (talk) 14:56, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"own work" source declaration is dubious. the file description includes the file name en:File:Syrian_Interim_Government_coat_of_arms.svg, which is explicitly understood to be under the copyright of the Syrian National Coalition. The file itself is visually identical to the SVG file. Everything seems to point this toward being a PNG conversion of a copyrighted SVG, which makes it an obvious Copyright Violation. Thespoondragon (talk) 00:43, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:40, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for outdoor plaques shot obliquely in the US.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:30, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yet you cited Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_States#Freedom_of_panorama which says nothing about plaques, making false your apparent quote of it. This plaque contains explanatory text related to the actual work of art at the same site. The plaque is not the work of art. Binksternet (talk) 22:39, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The text is long enough to be copyrighted.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:37, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:40, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Something is not working. I hear nothing. Abraham (talk) 08:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: file seems to be broken. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:20, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:20, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicated Enricguaus (talk) 17:11, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: unclear nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:21, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicated Enricguaus (talk) 17:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: unclear nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:21, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source provides no evidence of original publishing date upon which the claimed license is predicated. — fourthords | =Λ= | 19:15, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Date added per en:Diana Serra Cary. Trijnsteltalk 21:15, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Aye, but there's been no reliable-sourcing of that claim at en-wiki since Mademoiselle Sabina added it 13.1 years ago. — fourthords | =Λ= | 19:07, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: depicted child has clear similarities with other images of the actress, age also fits a pre-1924 date, no reasonable doubt on my part that this is valid. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due to odd light effects at side edges of this image, I suggest it was taken from https://www.haikudeck.com/jfk-part-1-education-presentation-yv8gdlC6i6. However there is also the underlying copyright of the image of Mr. Kennedy who died in 1963. Therefore the image cannot yet be out of copyright via the death of the photographer being over 70 years, and unless some other reason is found to consider this free of copyright it is unable to be retained. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:43, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: underlying image might be PD-US-no-notice, but the photo itself is of a 3D object and potentially still under copyright. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:29, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mojtaba2361 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely claim of own work on this series of people holding awards. Too small, too close, and very different framing on several images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:50, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

are you sure they have problem ? they are All Content by Mehr News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License"..how do you sure that they have problems? i asked my country's admin and he said they are all correct..please remove the tags..Mojtaba2361 (talk) 22:04, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: images where the award was a prominent part of the image, kept the rest. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:32, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restored by Ankry per [4]. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:01, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]