Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/04/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Not PD nor needed. E4024 (talk) 15:55, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:25, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Елизавета Георгиевна (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-re images, 3 different cameras, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Сергей Янковский и Кристина Орбакайте.jpg
- File:Сергей Янковский в балетной школе.jpg
- File:Сергей Янковский и Илзе Лиепа.jpg
- File:Сергей Янковский с семьей.jpg
- File:Янковский Сергей.jpg
- File:Серей Янковский в роли Рудольфа Нуреева.jpg
- File:Сергей Янковский на театральной конференции.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:17, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:20, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Exclusiveabhi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out COM:SCOPE, Self-promotional use of userpages, Photos of non-contributor, possible copyvio as uploader is seen in the photos.
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 10:44, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:56, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
This image, presented as a logo, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 22:23, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Fair use material is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons (F2). -- Geagea (talk) 23:08, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0). Besides a selfie so not uploader's work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:52, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:41, 7 April 2019 UTC: Non-free Flickr license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works --Krdbot 13:04, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
ho sbagliato a caricare l'immagine ne ho un'altra migliore Anthos72 (talk) 18:53, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Ho gia iserito questo file Anthos72 (talk) 18:07, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:19, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no license (No license since). However there is a request on the file talk page suggesting it is PD. It is worth allowing extra input on this matter. Green Giant (talk) 16:19, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license. --Jcb (talk) 23:28, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope selfie. Created by sockpuppet of globally locked sockmaster Shaunak Chakraborty as part of extensive cross-wiki spam campaign. Has no place on WMF projects. Hiàn (talk) 16:05, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Delete ‐‐1997kB (talk) 17:27, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:56, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio as per article https://blogs.mediapart.fr/elodie-dapremont-rossi/blog/121117/my-body-my-rules photo 6 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:26, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:13, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
useless resolution Joschi71 (talk) 12:05, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Too small to be educationally useful. No evidence of permission. --Green Giant (talk) 16:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Please delete my user page. Thank you --Khamul1 (talk) 17:39, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: users req to make way for page from meta. --Achim (talk) 18:53, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Spam (article delete in fawiki --Alaa :)..! 17:29, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Movie poster, copyvio. --4nn1l2 (talk) 12:20, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vaokncflgasc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:Paul Nosca holds a 2nd striped bass caught on July 04, 1996.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a 1st striped bass caught on July 04, 1996.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a striped bass caught on April 09, 1995.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a striped bass caught on August 13, 1993.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a striped bass caught on June 29, 1997.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a striped bass caught on July 13, 1997.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a striped bass caught on May 31, 1998.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a striped bass caught on July 20, 1997.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a striped bass caught on January 28, 1991.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds largemouth bass caught in 1966 and 2017.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a largemouth bass caught on September 26, 2016.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a largemouth bass caught on July 17, 1992.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a largemouth bass caught on May 18, 2015.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a largemouth bass caught on July 24, 2009.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a largemouth bass caught on October 4, 2016.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a largemouth bass caught on March 21, 2017.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a largemouth bass caught on May 31, 2012.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a largemouth bass caught on September 8, 1996.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a largemouth bass caught on February 23, 1992.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a largemouth bass caught on May 31, 1998.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a largemouth bass caught on July 15, 1990.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a largemouth bass caught on September 11, 1990.jpg
- File:Paul Nosca holds a largemouth bass caught on April 15, 1985.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:20, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Not really clear. 2605:6001:E7C4:1E00:106B:FDE5:ACD3:B93C 21:50, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - clear enough. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:52, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:45, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
(c) 2013 at source https://www.buildingsofwrexham.co.uk/bridge-st-pen-y-bryn/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:24, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:43, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on these portraits.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:27, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:41, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Image was posted years ago and has never been used. A145GI15I95 (talk) 23:32, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Not necessessary (nor representative). --E4024 (talk) 23:35, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted already. --E4024 (talk) 18:52, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Above mentioned that this file may be a case of possible copyright violation and missing permission information. I have unequivocally published that I am the copyright holder of this work. This is my own work recorded at Nidvala Guttu, Puduvettu, Ujire, Belthangady Taluk Dakshina Kannada on 21 March 2019 and I am releasing this under CC-by-SA 4.
Reason and source were not sited properly, just naively nominated for deletion. I uploaded these files through video2commons tool. Please clarify and let me know the
- Reason
- Source
- How it's copy right violated? for the same, now i am removing the deletion tag. --BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU (talk) 18:39, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:40, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 17:49, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:52, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Photo of a non encylopedic person NMW03 (talk) 18:12, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:52, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Photo of a non-encylopedic person NMW03 (talk) 18:33, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:52, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Photo of a non-encylopedic person NMW03 (talk) 18:33, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:51, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cmoilaurent (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
- File:W9 n.jpg
- File:W8 n.jpg
- File:W7 n.jpg
- File:W4 n.jpg
- File:W6 n.jpg
- File:W5 n.jpg
- File:W3 n.jpg
- File:W2 n.jpg
- File:W1 n.jpg
- File:Laurenttttt.jpg
- File:V5.jpg
- File:V4.jpg
- File:Tttttttee.jpg
- File:V1aza.jpg
- File:V6.jpg
- File:Femmme.jpg
- File:Evolution n.jpg
- File:Jean genet(1).jpg
- File:Avenue n.jpg
- File:Chien2 n.jpg
- File:Noooo n.jpg
- File:Nolove n.jpg
- File:Fufututu.jpg
- File:H1 n.jpg
- File:H2 n.jpg
- File:Vérité n.jpg
- File:Evaaa n.jpg
- File:Oiseau n.jpg
- File:Sos longwy.jpg
- File:Chien2é.jpg
- File:Recoooo.jpg
- File:A1 n.jpg
- File:Chien1 n.jpg
- File:Détresse n.jpg
- File:Lolo n.jpg
- File:Femme n.jpg
- File:Laurent n.jpg
- File:Paysage n.jpg
- File:F4REL(laurent) (1).jpg
- File:Baron2.jpg
- File:Laurent.jpg
- File:F4REL.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:17, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:44, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Unclear what exactly this NBA-logo parody is claiming to be. If it's the "official logo" of something then it may be a copyright violation (although beer die is just a drinking game and seems unlikely to have any "official" branding). If it's one local group's drinking game logo, then nice work but it's outside of COM:SCOPE. Lord Belbury (talk) 19:24, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:43, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
no repository, no educational purpose Triplecaña (talk) 16:51, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Ymblanter at 17:50, 17 April 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Cmoilaurent --Krdbot 00:55, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Clan council (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Kasero Keneth.jpg
- File:Katunku.jpg
- File:Munyole Wilson.jpg
- File:Kanyago.jpg
- File:Kanyago Tabitha.jpg
- File:Mugala Wambui Mariam.jpg
- File:Katunku Jushua Steve.jpg
- File:Nakatunku Naula Mary.jpg
- File:Katunku Steve.jpg
- File:Katunku Joshua.jpg
- File:Katunku Joshua Steve and Wairimu Mariam.jpg
- File:Katunku Joshua Steve.jpg
- File:Kaabya Nicholas family.jpg
- File:Wairimu Mariam and Suwa Sarah.jpg
- File:Suwa Sarah and Wairimu Mariam.jpg
- File:Wairimu Mariam.jpg
- File:Kaabya Nicholas and Nicole.jpg
- File:Gimbo Edith, Kooli Tom, Mwagale Margret.jpg
- File:LOGOSE ROBINA.jpg
- File:KATUNKU J.S & MUZEI WASAZA.jpg
- File:KATUNKU J ON TOP OF BARCLAY'S BANK.jpg
- File:Tereka Sharon.jpg
- File:Happy Simba Clan family.jpg
- File:Katunku Nicholas.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:55, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Muhammad Wahyuda (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:54, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
File uploaded by sockpuppet of locked cross-wiki sockpuppeteer Shaunak Chakraborty. Has no place on our projects, please hold until the corresponding articles are deleted. Hiàn (talk) 15:28, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete ‐‐1997kB (talk) 17:27, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:54, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Latinidades Afrolatinas
[edit]Unused and unhelpful
- File:Latinidades Afrolatinas 2015 (19297454934).jpg
- File:Latinidades Afrolatinas 2015 (19299092043).jpg
- File:Latinidades Afrolatinas 2015 (19299101073).jpg
- File:Latinidades Afrolatinas 2015 (19299101783).jpg
- File:Latinidades Afrolatinas 2015 (19732010048).jpg
- File:Latinidades Afrolatinas 2015 (19732010708).jpg
- File:Latinidades Afrolatinas 2015 (19732050370).jpg
- File:Latinidades Afrolatinas 2015 (19732055290).jpg
- File:Latinidades Afrolatinas 2015 (19732059000).jpg
- File:Latinidades Afrolatinas 2015 (19733378089).jpg
- File:Latinidades Afrolatinas 2015 (19733379209).jpg
- File:Latinidades Afrolatinas 2015 (19733379759).jpg
- File:Latinidades Afrolatinas 2015 (19733382809).jpg
- File:Latinidades Afrolatinas 2015 (19733387589).jpg
- File:Latinidades Afrolatinas 2015 (19733391909).jpg
- File:Latinidades Afrolatinas 2015 (19912499592).jpg
- File:Latinidades Afrolatinas 2015 (19912515482).jpg
- File:Latinidades Afrolatinas 2015 (19920050685).jpg
- File:Latinidades Afrolatinas 2015 (19925143271).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:37, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]I really don't understand the "unhelpful" appointment. Its a set of professional pictures, released by the Brazilian Ministry of Culture (Brazil) in the context of praise our Afro-Latin culture inside a recurring event in Brasília, capital of Brasil. It almost offensive this kind of proposing... :/ Sturm (talk) 18:12, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:33, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted board B dash (talk) 15:59, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Portrait infringement 116.87.128.10 16:02, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- ōRLY? IMHO no complaint from Azuma ⇒ no deletion. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:27, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Fans photographing is NOT prohibited by Melonbooks Taiwan staff. --Solomon203 (talk) 00:26, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
お世話になります。株式会社メロンブックスです。
こちらのURLにアップロードされております画像につきましては、 同人作家であるあずまゆき先生ご本人が台湾「Fancy Frontier 開拓動漫祭」イベントにて弊社主催の サイン会に参加された際に無断で撮影された写真となります。
該当のイベントでは弊社は一切撮影許可を出しておらず、 またサイン会では撮影禁止の貼り紙を掲示しており、 イベントでの規定により参加者は原則取材・撮影を拒否する権利がある認識です。
こちらお手数では御座いますが、無断掲載された画像データの削除希望を申し立てます。
〒170-0013 東京都豊島区東池袋1丁目20-2 池袋ホワイトハウスビル 2階 株式会社メロンブックス第一仕入部同人課/フロマージュ課 TEL: 03-5927-8342 FAX: 03-5927-8943 Email:dojin@melonbooks.co.jp http://www.melonbooks.co.jp — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.35.80.211 (talk) 08:33, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
124.35.80.211 08:33, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep I don't think you can legally stop people from taking someone's picture at a public event. Especially not with a sign that most attendees probably won't see. Maybe by having them sign form saying they won't take photos, but even then it's questionable and there's zero evidence you did it that way. So there's no basis to delete the file. Sorry. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:13, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Japan. Publication does need consent of the subject of the photo. Apperantly, in this case, there is no consent to publish this photo. --Ellywa (talk) 19:59, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Screen shot, original work not cited. The user’s other upload was a Getty Images photo, so not sure we can trust the self-made claim. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:30, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
out of scope. Commons is not the place for biographies. Ronhjones (Talk) 16:06, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:30, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
See COM:TROPHY, 2D image of a likely copyrighted 3D work Ytoyoda (talk) 16:07, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:29, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. Ronhjones (Talk) 16:19, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:28, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 16:52, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:28, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 17:01, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
I think to here is copyright violation, too these files are not in use on any of wikis.
- File:Бојан Читлучанин прослављени Кануиста .jpg
- File:Бојан Читлучанин прослављени Кануиста.jpg
- File:Бојан Читлучанин .jpg
Zoranzoki21 (talk) 17:22, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:16, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:02, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Actor vikash singh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Vikash singh Rajput.jpg
- File:Vikash singh looking.jpg
- File:Vikash singh actor.jpg
- File:Actor Vikash singh cool man.jpg
- File:Vikash singh cool.jpg
- File:Actor Vikash singh.jpg
- File:Vikash singh.jpg
Ies (talk) 06:17, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Actor vikash singh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:01, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:00, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:00, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:00, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:58, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:58, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:37, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:30, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used for self-promotional purposes.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:29, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:29, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:28, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:28, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:28, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:27, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:27, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Waleayantoye (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Wale Ayantoye 04.jpg
- File:Wale Ayantoye 01.jpg
- File:Wale Ayantoye 03.jpg
- File:Wale Ayantoye 02.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:26, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:56, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Donovan 1993 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:56, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support You're absolutely right. It was used and I recently removed it from my user page. Dusti*poke* 04:58, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:55, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Inspireddose (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:Inspireddose.1.jpg
- File:Inspireddose .3.jpg
- File:Inspireddose .4.png
- File:Inspireddose .2.png
- File:Paul S.Sampson.jpg
- File:Paul Saturday Sampson Ceo of Inspireddose.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:54, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
copyvio Painp (talk) 14:20, 6 April 2019 (UTC) copyvio Painp (talk) 14:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- wasn't it your own upload? --Túrelio (talk) 18:22, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Why did you declare "own work" then? Repetition of this attitude may cause headache (warnings etc). --E4024 (talk) 16:13, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:54, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vighnesh joshi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Las imagenes son de Irene Gomez Santos, cual es el criterio que usan para eliminarlas Victor Gomez Santos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victor Gomez Santos (talk • contribs) 00:15, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Victor Gomez Santos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Irene Gomez Santos Les Corts Valencianes por Castellón.jpg
- File:Irene Gomez Santos y AMUINCA.jpg
- File:Irene Gomez Santos.jpg
- File:Victor Gomez Santos 01.jpg
- File:Victor Gomez Santos.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:49, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:49, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Hans Herbert Schweitzer aka Mjölnir (1901-1980) , copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 13:08, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Is there a Polis of Allia? Where? E4024 (talk) 13:26, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:37, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Poor quality Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 13:36, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree, I don't think anyone is gonna use this (ever?).. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 16:16, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:37, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Clearly, a formal PR picture that appears in several places on the web. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 13:41, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:36, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:35, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rickysmithcmrp (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
- File:FRACAS Failure Reporting, Analysis, Corective Action System.pdf
- File:Why People Do Not Understand the P-F Curve.pdf
- File:Alumax Story - Strategy to Achieve World-Class Production through Reliability.pdf
- File:7 Habits of Highly Effective Maintenance Leader.pdf
- File:RACI Chart 03.jpg
- File:RACI Chart 01.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:34, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:33, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:33, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Bruno Hanich (1902-1963), copyright vioalation Mutter Erde (talk) 11:14, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Made a mistake of thinking that the official site allows this still image to be distributed freely. In any case, it's copyrighted and has no permission from the author. Slightlymad 11:15, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 12:03, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
https://www.atleticocandeleda.com/historia
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:37, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:05, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by D-Kuru: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Varos46
Files uploaded by Alexan999Dra (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-re images, no metadata, unlikely to be own work.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:49, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: the first one actually has metadata showing it was taken from Facebook. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Undrgroundthug (talk · contribs)
[edit]https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0084059/mediaviewer/rm2851448064
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:51, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:03, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
“FBMD” in EXIF => Facebook download Ytoyoda (talk) 00:31, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
wird nicht benötigt 2003:F0:D3CC:1A00:108E:761F:2BE8:78F4 07:09, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep multiple in use, one of the real useful pics from this genre, DR is just trolling --Stepro (talk) 07:39, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
this is pornographic material, not suitable and not necessary for education purposes like this article 37.47.131.57 16:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep File was kept by @Gbawden in 2019. File is still multiple in use. Like @Stepro this is one of the real useful pics from this genre. Lukas Beck (talk) 19:42, 25 February 2023 (UTC)- Keep we do have something called "sex education". If you don't want people looking at sexual images, don't call attention to them. Learn about the Streisand Effect, the more you complain, the more eyes on the material. --RAN (talk) 20:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
copyvio : 3rd photo on https://www.b1en1ek.de/arbeiten/performance-aktion/2011-it-s-toasted/ Habertix (talk) 08:10, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Personal selfie. Doesn't have encyclopedic value KCVelaga (talk · mail) 10:10, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
(c)ALEXANDER GLUZ, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:28, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Photo: Alexander Gluz, https://spbdnevnik.ru/news/2019-03-07/valenokgigant-iz-peterburga-popal-v-knigu-rekordov-ginnessa Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:30, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
A previous speedy deletion has been contested, so we need to determine whether this one qualifies as a simple logo or might be copyrighted. De728631 (talk) 12:31, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Keep As was noted in the licence section of the file: "Image consists of text and symbols which are silhouettes of the Indonesian national emblem - which is public domain." This appears to be true according to {{PD-IDGov}}. De728631 (talk) 12:34, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per De728631. Abzeronow (talk) 20:16, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep derivative of Indonesian national emblem.--AldNonUcallin?☎ 13:39, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Kept per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
(c)Martin Dee, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:53, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Diplomação....jpg
- File:Vinicius Roseira.....jpg
- File:Vinicius Roseira ....jpg
- File:Vinicius Roseira..jpg
- File:Vinicius Roseira.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Photo: Alexandr Yatsenko, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:52, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Photo of a non encylopedic person. Look here NMW03 (talk) 18:12, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Photo: JIRI GRULICH, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:40, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
https://www.comedien.ch/comediens/veronique-mermoud/
- File:Véronique Mermoud 02.jpg
- File:Véronique Mermoud 03.jpg
- File:Véronique Mermoud 04.jpg
- File:Véronique Mermoud 01.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:16, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Photo: Shay Cohen Arbel, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:20, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Damaged photos in Category:June 2018 in Lisbon
[edit]Too damaged to be of any use.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:27, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:56, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Depicted person died in 1987 and the photo is likely older. Uploader has problems with copyright and this is his last remaining uploaded photo. Own work is doubtful, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:07, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, no fop, artist died in 1988 Martin Sg. (talk) 08:51, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:00, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Small file, dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 02:03, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- This is photo of Dr. Anil Sapkal. I have uploaded it to attach it to the article Anil Tanaji Sapkal on en.Wikipedia. This article is similar to biography. I want to show how the person looks. That is important information which reader should be made aware of. The photo which I have uploaded is a scanned file of hard copy I have with me. I don't know who clicked it and in which period. I read guidelines on uploading pictures. So to some extent I understand why the concerned has been raised about the picture, but then how can I upload any picture of this person. What is the way out?? @E4024 kindly suggest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by संघर्ष आपटे (talk • contribs) 06:23, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- This small sized pic looks more like taken from the net. Never again upload as "own work" what is not your product. Family albums is a complex issue I am not very familiar with. Surely someone who knows more will help you; if not, the closing admin will leave an explanatory note. Bye. --E4024 (talk) 13:20, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- @E4024 Thanks for the reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by संघर्ष आपटे (talk • contribs) 08:27, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: I read uploader's statement "I don't know who clicked it and in which period" as meaning that they don't know who took this picture, so we can't keep it. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:13, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The Final Horseman (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
- File:Flag of Pine Plains.png
- File:Pine Plains Flag 2.png
- File:Pine Plains Flag.png
- File:Pine Plains Flag 15.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:27, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Not sure if the logo exceed COM:ToO or not. Feel free to discuss B dash (talk) 16:00, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:28, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
عدم سرشناسی Shahnamk (talk) 22:03, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, personal image. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:35, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HorrorcoreListner (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appear to be (C) at source.
- File:L.A.R. - Vom wundersamen Wundersamen.flac
- File:L.A.R. - Chicago.flac
- File:L.A.R. - Geisteskrank Promotrack.ogg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:17, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:29, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
From file size/quality and location, it is likely this is not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:21, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:30, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- Also listing its derivative File:Bandera de Barcelona Sporting Club.jpg
Not the uploader’s own work, though I’m not sure if it exceeds the threshold of originality. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:22, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. Not a contributing user. E4024 (talk) 00:30, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
I couln't find that particular file on the webpage but I doubt anyway that it is licensed freely. Sanandros (talk) 05:34, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Bantayog ng mga Bayani 1
[edit]The subject of the photos is a sculpture by Eduardo Castrillo called the "Inang Bayan Monument". Castrillo died in 2016 and copyright for sculptures in the Philippines lasts for 50 years after its sculptor's death. So until 2067, publication of photos of this monument would need the consent of the author's heirs since they are considered derivatives. There is also no FoP in the Philippines.
- File:Bantayog ng mga Bayani InangBayan Monument Alternativity Anak 1.jpg
- File:Bantayog ng mga Bayani InangBayan Monument Alternativity Anak 2.jpg
- File:Bantayog ng mga Bayani InangBayan Monument Alternativity Anak 3.jpg
- File:Bantayog ng mga Bayani InangBayan Monument Alternativity Low Angle 1.jpg
- File:Bantayog ng mga Bayani InangBayan Monument Alternativity Side 1.jpg
- File:Bantayog ng mga Bayani InangBayan Monument Alternativity Side Wide 1.jpg
- File:Bantayog ng mga Bayani InangBayan Monument Alternativity Wide 1.jpg
- File:FvfBantayog0151 01.JPG
- File:FvfBantayog0151 16.JPG
- File:FvfBantayog0151 17.JPG
- File:FvfBantayog0151 19.JPG
- File:FvfBantayog0151 20.JPG
- File:FvfBantayog0151 21.JPG
- File:FvfBantayog0172 02.JPG
- File:FvfBantayog0172 03.JPG
- File:FvfBantayog0172 05.JPG
- File:FvfBantayog0172 06.JPG
- File:FvfBantayog9991 13.JPG
- File:FvfBantayog9991 14.JPG
- File:FvfBantayog9991 15.JPG
- File:Inang Bayan Monument.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:43, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Good morning from hereat Philippines. Before I took these pictures, I asked permission from the Curator, the Officer in charge who even assisted me in some of the photos, hence, it is respectfully submitted that since all these are now properties of the government and/or Bantayog, this falls within the express exemptions from the coverage of copyright law protection, very sincerely Judgefloro 02:54, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Adding my own input. I obtained specific permission and encouragement to photograph and upload the work, whose copyright belongs to the Bantayog ng mga Bayani Foundation. I can obtain written permission if needed, perhaps with about 2 weeks' lead time. But can someone guide me to a template for the certification that such permission was indeed given? Thanks. - Alternativity (talk) 02:38, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Alternativity: You can check out the Commons OTRS for more details on media licensing. (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS)
- There is also a non-free fair use rationale in Wikipedia which you could check out (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Upload/old) Markoolio97 (talk) 01:45, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Adding my own input. I obtained specific permission and encouragement to photograph and upload the work, whose copyright belongs to the Bantayog ng mga Bayani Foundation. I can obtain written permission if needed, perhaps with about 2 weeks' lead time. But can someone guide me to a template for the certification that such permission was indeed given? Thanks. - Alternativity (talk) 02:38, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- Good morning from hereat Philippines. Before I took these pictures, I asked permission from the Curator, the Officer in charge who even assisted me in some of the photos, hence, it is respectfully submitted that since all these are now properties of the government and/or Bantayog, this falls within the express exemptions from the coverage of copyright law protection, very sincerely Judgefloro 02:54, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Delete As mentioned by User:howhontanozaz, non-free work until entry to public domain in 2067. Markoolio97 (talk) 05:34, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Question Apparently User:Alternativity was a Resident Wikipedian of Bantayog ng mga Bayani for 3 months in 2018. Are there any exceptions for such cases?- Article for reference (https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedian_in_Residence_at_Bantayog_ng_mga_Bayani) Markoolio97 (talk) 06:29, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - the permission must be sent to com:OTRS. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Bantayog ng mga Bayani 2
[edit]https://lakansining.wordpress.com/2020/10/23/quezon-avenue-quezon-city-the-history-and-artists-of-the-bantayog-ng-mga-bayani/ - Artwork No 1: 2008 artwork "Utang Na Labas" - artwork by Jerusalino “Jerry” Villamor Araos (1944-2012). Artwork No. W: 2006 First Quarter Storm Mural by NPAA (Nagkakaisang Progresibong Artista-Arkitekto). No freedom of panorama in the philippines
- File:FvfBantayogngBayani0070 08.JPG
- File:FvfBantayogngBayani0070 12.JPG
- File:FvfBantayogngBayani0070 21.JPG
- File:FvfBantayogngBayani0070 22.JPG
- File:FvfBantayogngBayani0070 23.JPG
- File:FvfBantayogngBayani0070 28.JPG
- File:FvfBantayogngBayani0070 29.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Protected artwork and no FOP in the Philippines for recent work. --Ellywa (talk) 17:28, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 19:05, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 15:48, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
I want to replaceit with other version Orartu (talk) 13:27, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
I want to replace it with another picture. Orartu (talk) 13:28, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Good pic. Please do not open repetitive deletion requests. --E4024 (talk) 03:53, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted courtesy deletion. Uploader asked for deletion minutes after they uploaded the picture. Strakhov (talk) 22:12, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Suspicious Flickr account with missing EXIF informations. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:23, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Ticket:2019050210005723 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:00, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 09:13, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
There is no indication for this video to be CC licensed Eran (talk) 07:34, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ערן as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: reason=There is no indication for this video to be CC licensed|subpage=File:Madison Hu.jpg|year=2019|month=April|day=6 Achim (talk) 21:07, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- As of today CC on youtube. --Achim (talk) 21:08, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- Achim: I didn't notice it initially and asked the upload for details, and after he failed to give it I asked for deletion. Anyway, it seems like it is marked as CC in YouTube, and I withdraw this deletion request. Thanks for the recheck. Eran (talk) 21:20, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:48, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
A previous speedy deletion has been contested, so we need to determine whether this one qualifies as a simple logo or might be copyrighted. De728631 (talk) 12:26, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Keep. Only consists of text and simple number 01. – Flix11 (talk) 13:06, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Well, I think the coloured background of the number might be the problem here. Some might consider it original enough for copyright. De728631 (talk) 13:16, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Colored swirl with the number seems to be an edge case as far as TOO. Weak delete per COM:PCP Abzeronow (talk) 19:11, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. The multicolored background is clearly complex. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per Abzeronow, Taivo, @Kenrick95, and @Moheen, plus Indonesia's inherited TOO law per COM:TOO Netherlands. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:56, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- Restored for more discussion. ~Moheen (keep talking) 15:58, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- Weak delete - The overall design seems complex enough to satisfy the TOO. Kaldari (talk) 02:25, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Well then, I had vectorized the file, I think I had to upload it in Wikipedia.--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 00:38, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: borderline case but deemed original by most people. --VIGNERON (talk) 11:51, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Public record is not the same thing as public domain -- it can create wider fair use rights but it does not cause works to become public domain, copyright-wise, in most cases. Per http://copyright.lib.harvard.edu/states/ohio/ there is really no indication that Ohio government works are public domain, and copyright does seem to be claimed by the state. The usual presumption is that commercial use is excluded. To this point we cannot use the works from state governments unless there is particular language or court rulings that makes things free for any use. I believe just Florida, California, and Massachusetts so far have those. An Ohio court case I think said that public records are fair use as long as they are not used commercially (per the previous link). Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:13, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Fair enough, sorry for my misunderstanding. Mosesintheflesh (talk) 20:46, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per OP. Just here to say that as part of an Ohio Wikimedians User Group project, we've been looking into the status of Ohio government works and came to the same conclusion as Clindberg, that Ohio works are not public domain. The law only mentions public records, but does not explicitly assign anything to the public domain. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 06:54, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, including the only image using it File:Booking photo of James D. Worley.jpg. --JuTa 11:51, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 08:06, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:05, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 08:07, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:05, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 10:45, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 17:43, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blacknet88 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-re images of known people, unlikely to be own work.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:11, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader cannot be trusted. --4nn1l2 (talk) 10:09, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Эта фотография с копирайтом (Фото А. Гаспарян / Пресс-служба ПАО «Ил»/ ТАСС) http://argumenti.ru/economics/2019/04/607811 Alex omen (talk) 10:24, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:48, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
copyright violation ? (No metadata ?) Supporterhéninois (talk) 00:13, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- 43 KB. Maybe the footballer sent it to Superman by WhatsApp. --E4024 (talk) 19:13, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violation. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 12:52, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Фотография взята с сайта russianplane.ru Alex omen (talk) 10:22, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:03, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
(c)Michel CHRISTEN, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:05, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:03, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Small and unused image, out of scope B dash (talk) 05:34, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 14:41, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
I disagree that the logo is below ToO, I think we need a permission from the copyright holder Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:41, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
I have made it myself, but have since made a better picture. ChristiaanPR (talk) 10:40, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:42, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
I have made it myself, but have since made a better picture. ChristiaanPR (talk) 10:40, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:42, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
I have made it myself, but have since made a better picture. ChristiaanPR (talk) 10:40, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, but can you tell me what the new one is? - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 16:12, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Not used, should be SVG if useful. --Yann (talk) 14:43, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:10, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. One is a selfie, the other one is not. So at least one permission is missing. --Yann (talk) 14:44, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Low resolution, taken from Facebook (see EXIF), unlikely to be own work. Sealle (talk) 11:17, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Но эта действительно моя собственная работа, сделанная на мой смартфон. И в фейсбуке я публиковал фото также на своей странице. Какие доказательства мне нужно представить вам, что это моя работа? ДМ (talk) 12:46, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Лучше всего – фото в оригинальном размере и разрешении, с метаданными, которые автоматически создаются камерой смартфона. Или как минимум - любую версию до кадрирования. Sealle (talk) 12:52, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Хм. Я специально убирал лицо, обрезая фото. Ну если так нельзя, может я попробую загрузить фото, которого точно не было нигде? ДМ (talk) 14:40, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Не то чтобы «нельзя», но согласно правилам этого проекта любые обоснованные сомнения в лицензионной чистоте изображений трактуются в сторону удаления (см. COM:PCP/ru). Sealle (talk) 17:57, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Хм. Я специально убирал лицо, обрезая фото. Ну если так нельзя, может я попробую загрузить фото, которого точно не было нигде? ДМ (talk) 14:40, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Лучше всего – фото в оригинальном размере и разрешении, с метаданными, которые автоматически создаются камерой смартфона. Или как минимум - любую версию до кадрирования. Sealle (talk) 12:52, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:45, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work - unclear copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:31, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
I have made it myself, but have since made a better picture. ChristiaanPR (talk) 10:39, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, but what's the better picture? - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 16:13, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- File:Adeeltjeinmagnetischveld04.png, which was deleted. Also related: File:Adeeltjeinmagnetischveld02.jpg. --bdijkstra (overleg) 13:43, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- And now File:Adeeltjeinmagnetischveld04.svg I suppose. --bdijkstra (overleg) 07:50, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unused JPEG graphic, should be SVG if useful. --Yann (talk) 16:32, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
(C) Bernardo Solano, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:32, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:49, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Damaged duplicate of File:Buddha 1950s postcard 2.jpg, not used. It can't be restored, due to the small size. Yann (talk) 12:35, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep File:Buddha 1950s postcard 2.jpg suffers from severe moire problems, this does not, and the damage is not part of main subject. Subject is also historically significant.--BevinKacon (talk) 12:42, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: See above. --Yann (talk) 14:49, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted work by Will Barcellos, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:50, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted work by Will Barcellos, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:05, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:50, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: License fixed. --Yann (talk) 16:33, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
File error, low quality. Better version exists, see File:Poskus rekonstrukcije gradu Krupa med drugo vojno.jpg. Kleeblatt187 (talk) 20:26, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by 1989. --Yann (talk) 14:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The license at the source is CC BY NC 4.0 Leoboudv (talk) 01:32, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- At the time of uploading, it was CC BY, as you can see the photographer indicated in the comments section. Perhaps he changed his photo permissions since then. Now what happens? Thanks! —Hyperik (talk) 15:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Comment On the image page at [1], there's a CC BY-NC notice, but at the bottom-right of the observation page at [2], there's a CC BY notice. Based on that, I think the uploader at iNaturalist only updated the copyright of the observation, not the image, when requested by bouteloua in the comments, as Hyperik points out. clpo13(talk) 22:43, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- I am bouteloua too. Before I upload to Commons, I check the photo license, not the observation license. I am familiar with the difference. —Hyperik (talk) 12:24, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Hyperik: Unfortunately, the photo is still pretty clearly listed as CC-BY-NC. Whether that's a function of iNaturalist's interface, or something else, and no matter how obvious it is to us what the copyright holder's intention is, I think we still need the photo's license to be changed or for Mr. Routledge to confirm the license via OTRS. I was going to delete it myself and leave this as the closing comment, but have decided to let another admin do so if they agree. Delete. Storkk (talk) 12:59, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Storkk. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:20, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Ghaderiayoub (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE: more of a private holiday photo than being about Category:Nasir-ol-molk Mosque.
HyperGaruda (talk) 13:44, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Per this edit at en.wp, this si almost certainly not a free image as claimed but rather copyrighted promotional material uploaded by a self-identified staff account. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:02, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
This image has been released to a Creative Commons license under direction of its author. EMCStaff (talk) 16:54, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Stating that here is not sufficient to release it, I believe you'll need to use Commons:Wikimedia OTRS release generator to verify that an authorized person has released the rights. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:53, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Please send permission via OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 14:08, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Song, promo photos and non-trivial logo. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 14:08, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Marked as copyvio by @Ronhjones: , this is below the TOO in my opinion, so my vote is Keep Fma12 (talk) 16:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 14:09, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Recht am eigenen Bild, the persons on the picture didn' t notice the photographer. Tohma (talk) 17:10, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Photo was taken at a demonstration --GPSLeo (talk) 21:25, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 14:09, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Same series as https://www.facebook.com/sahhara/photos/a.162103477322943/744191725780779/?type=3&theater, photo by Aaman Crane, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:24, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- The picture is mine created by me, you are also referencing my official Facebook page. I use the same editing style for all my images. Misssahhara (talk) 16:08, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
If you want to see proof of full image, I can post it on my official website www.misssahhara.com . Misssahhara (talk) 16:10, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Misssahhara: It's very, very unlikely that you "created" (shot) this image since you are pictured in! The fact that it's on your Facebook page doesn't mean it's "yours" so please have the photographer sending a permission via COM:OTRS or repost it at full resolution with the name of the photographer enclosed in the EXIF. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:45, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- It was my camera, my lighting, my tripod, my flash, my equipment, my trigger remote control. I had help from a makeup artist, hair stylist, and technical set up from a close friend called Aaman. So I am not sure how I can assert anymore that it is me you should be asking and not anyone else, because all rights are mine. I have the raw and highest resolutions and the meta datas of all my images. If you have any queries, ask me, I will gladly publish any proof on my website http://www.misssahhara.com or on my verified http://www.Facebook.com/sahhara page. Misssahhara (talk) 17:52, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Misssahhara: It's very, very unlikely that you "created" (shot) this image since you are pictured in! The fact that it's on your Facebook page doesn't mean it's "yours" so please have the photographer sending a permission via COM:OTRS or repost it at full resolution with the name of the photographer enclosed in the EXIF. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:45, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Misssahhara: Once again, Aaman Cran is a professional photographer and has shot this set of pictures (http://aamancrane.com/images/PHOTOS/B6_SAHHARA_III_fullsize.jpg, http://aamancrane.com/images/PHOTOS/B1_sahhara_fullsize.jpg) as stated in your Facebook account (Hair/MUA: Christine Bateman, Kwabena Asare Bediako , Mel Szabo Directed by: Kristine Kilty Photographer: Aaman Crane Beige Magazine, London UK) before you change it today for "Photographer: By me with the help of Aaman Crane". Besides This image is low-resolution and suggest a copyright violation. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:00, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- With all due respect, you were not at the shoot with me. I will not sound like a broken record and continue repeating myself. I have explained the situation above. I wrote the label on Facebook, I changed it because you were referencing the wrong image anyway. I only used two images for Beige Magazine, there were black and white. I own the rights to every images and likeness I am in before any publishing. I wish you well. Misssahhara (talk) 00:50, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Misssahhara: Once again, Aaman Cran is a professional photographer and has shot this set of pictures (http://aamancrane.com/images/PHOTOS/B6_SAHHARA_III_fullsize.jpg, http://aamancrane.com/images/PHOTOS/B1_sahhara_fullsize.jpg) as stated in your Facebook account (Hair/MUA: Christine Bateman, Kwabena Asare Bediako , Mel Szabo Directed by: Kristine Kilty Photographer: Aaman Crane Beige Magazine, London UK) before you change it today for "Photographer: By me with the help of Aaman Crane". Besides This image is low-resolution and suggest a copyright violation. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:00, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, OTRS-permission from Aaman Crane is needed to restore the photo. Taivo (talk) 17:37, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
not a PD US Navy photo but "COPYRIGHT ©2018 THE BOEING COMPANY ● ALL RIGHTS RESERVED" Marc Lacoste (talk) 06:55, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Keep It's a USN navy photo provided by Boeing (U.S. Navy photo courtesy of The Boeing Co.). Streamline8988 (talk) 07:05, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: See Commons:User:Fæ/email/DoD. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
This is not a US Navy image, but an image by Boeing that the US Navy uses on some of its web pages. There is no reason why not indication that this is in the Public Domain. Rama (talk) 13:17, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Participants may wish to review the previously closed DR nomination. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:51, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: images are free, per User:Fæ/email/DoD. --Ellywa (talk) 19:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Harald Damsleth
[edit]Harald Damsleth (1906-1971), copyright violations
- File:"Med Waffen-SS og Den Norske Legion mot den felles fiende.... Mot bolsjevismen", WWII Nazi poster at Norway's Resistance Museum, Oslo, 2017-11-30 (lightened, stretched version).jpg
- File:"SS-skijegerbataljon Norge", WWII Nazi poster in exhibition at Norway's Resistance Museum in Oslo, photo 2017-11-30 (lightened, stretched version).jpg
- File:"SS-skijegerbataljon Norge", WWII Nazi poster in exhibition at Norway's Resistance Museum in Oslo, photo 2017-11-30.jpg
- File:Cf33137 641 Ja-vi-elsker-frihet-MINUS-FEM SOLKORS (foto Lill-Ann Chepstow-Lusty, 2014) Kulturhistorisk museum, UiO - CC BY-SA 4.0.jpg
- File:Den Norske Legion WWII Nazi poster and Hirden flag at Norway's Resistance Museum in Oslo, photo 2017-11-30 b.jpg
- File:Front mot Bolsjevismen — Hvor star du idag?.jpg
- File:Norwegian WWII Nazi posters and flags (Den Norske Legion, Hirden, NS Kvinneorganisasjon, etc.) at Norway's Resistance Museum in Oslo, photo 2017-11-30 a.jpg
- File:Norwegian WWII Nazi posters and flags (Den Norske Legion, Hirden, NS Kvinneorganisasjon, etc.) at Norway's Resistance Museum in Oslo, photo 2017-11-30 c.jpg
- File:WW2 in Norway. Propaganda poster of Nasjonal Samling by Harald Damsleth 1943. "Kultur-terror"ulture terror"). Exhibition in Justismuseet, Trondheim. 2019-03-14 B.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Kulturhistorisk_museum,_UiO_-_CC_BY-SA_4.0.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_at_Norway%27s_Resistance_Museum_in_Oslo,_photo_2017-11-30_a.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_at_Norway%27s_Resistance_Museum_in_Oslo,_photo_2017-11-30_c.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._Exhibition_in_Justismuseet,_Trondheim._2019-03-14_B.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mutter Erde (talk) 11:45, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:02, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Tem uma formatação que não deveria estar ai ... "Fungos" ... NeivaldoOliveira (talk) 19:18, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:14, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos, book covers and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Barenyi Zamek cover.jpg
- File:Barenyi Sedmedvere cover.jpg
- File:Barenyi Velikahvezda cover.jpg
- File:Barenyi Roman cover.jpg
- File:Barenyi Janka cover.jpg
- File:Barenyi Jarinka cover.jpg
- File:Barenyi Herecka cover.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Several of the files are anonymous works by unknown authors elder than 70 years. According to copyright is usage of anonymous works elder than 70 years free. Photos of persons are mostly copied from old newspapers or magazines, everything is available freely. Covers of old books are my photos of books - it´s information how the book looks, not copyright violation. Everyone could take shot of a building - it´s not copyright violation too. Why not a book? Pleas write concrete problems with files. I can try to complete needed data.
- Sincerely, --DusanH (talk) 14:47, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Correction of licence from CC-BY-4.0 for Anonymous-EU by anonymous works elder then 70 years. --DusanH (talk) 21:49, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- The same problem, we can discuss it at once:
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 23:14, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
File:Subrahmanyan_Chandrasekhar_Exhibition_-_Science_City_-_Kolkata_2011-01-07a.jpg and File:Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar.jpg
[edit]
File:Subrahmanyan_Chandrasekhar_Exhibition_-_Science_City_-_Kolkata_2011-01-07a.jpg is a cutout from File:Subrahmanyan_Chandrasekhar_Exhibition_-_Science_City_-_Kolkata_2011-01-07_9573.JPG showing an unidentified individual at an exhibition.
The image was uploaded as File:Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar.jpg (now a redirect) indicating, that the person is w:en:Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar which is wrong (hint: the image was taken 2011, Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar died in 1995 – see also this rename request). Someone fixed the description but unfortunataly the image was/is still used as a picture of Chandrasekhar on multiple occasions including Wikidata.
The consent of the man shown is not provided. There is no encyclopedic value of cutout showing a random person, see Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful. Therefore I request the deletion.
The redirect should be deleted since the image isn't showing Chandrasekhar and is therefore misleading.
--StYxXx ⊗ 04:17, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use and per Commons:Country specific consent requirements#India. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:38, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio. The design of this card is owned by Lo Scarabeo and is not in the public domain. No devil card survives from any of the Visconti-Sforza decks (if there ever was one). Lo Scarabeo designed this card from scratch. Countakeshi (talk) 04:25, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
=== Ez így van. Az idevonatkozó cikkben ezt le is írtam: https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visconti-Sforza_Tarot - "A 78 lapból négy hiányzik, az Ördög, a Torony, a Kardok 3 és az Érmék Lovagja." Javítom a fájl elnevezését és leírását, új név (New name): Visconti-Sforza Tarot non-original 21.century addition - 15. Devil. A jegyzetben (new notes): Az eredeti kártyasor a 15. Ördög lapot nem tartalmazza, 21. század alkotása, az itt lévő kép részlet a lo Scarabeo kártyagyár Visconti-Sforza kártyasorából. A kép a saját tulajdonom, a saját kártyám. A szabályoknak és a történelemnek megfelelő a kép és a leírás. 1Starfortuna (talk) 09:04, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:39, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio. The design of this card is owned by Lo Scarabeo and is not in the public domain. No tower card survives from any of the Visconti-Sforza deck (if there ever was one). Lo Scarabeo designed this card from scratch. Countakeshi (talk) 04:26, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
=== Ez így van. Az idevonatkozó cikkben ezt le is írtam: https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visconti-Sforza_Tarot - "A 78 lapból négy hiányzik, az Ördög, a Torony, a Kardok 3 és az Érmék Lovagja." Javítom a fájl elnevezését és leírását, új név (New name): Visconti-Sforza Tarot non-original 21.century addition - 16. Tower. A jegyzetben (new notes): Az eredeti kártyasor a 16. Torony lapot nem tartalmazza, 21. század alkotása, az itt lévő kép részlet a lo Scarabeo kártyagyár Visconti-Sforza kártyasorából. A kép a saját tulajdonom, a saját kártyám. Nem indokolt a törlés, mert ez a kártya a "Visconti-Sforza Tarot" nevet viseli éppen úgy, mint a "Pierpont-Morgan Visconti-Sforza Tarot"1Starfortuna (talk) 09:04, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:40, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
No evidence of permission or licence (see en:WP:CONSENT). ian13 (talk) 19:48, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- I notice that another editor removed a valid licence (cc-by-sa-3.0) which I have now restored. My request is therefore modified to lacking evidence of permission to release under such a licence (Wikipedia has set policies of 7 days notification to deal with this, but I don't know of what commons does). ian13 (talk) 19:57, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- The permission is clearly visible on the ambigram.com site: http://www.ambigram.com/ambigram-logo (Ambigram.com logo by Ambigram.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.) RoyLeban (talk) 20:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- Dully noted, although the licence is infact cc-by-sa-3.0-us, so I have corrected the page. This has fulfilled my concerns over permission. ian13 (talk) 22:44, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- The permission is clearly visible on the ambigram.com site: http://www.ambigram.com/ambigram-logo (Ambigram.com logo by Ambigram.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.) RoyLeban (talk) 20:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Kept. ian13 (talk) 22:44, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Description is wrong, extremely low resolution, no author Raison2+ (talk) 11:45, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- How is the description wrong? It looks completely accurate to me.
- The image is not extremely low resolution, it is merely not high resolution, and there are millions of images on Wikipedia that are lower resolution. [NOTE: As a piece of artwork, it is not appropriate to substitute an SVG file created by somebody else, any more than it would be appropriate to "improve" the Mona Lisa by c converting it to an SVG.].
- The author is basically ambigram.com (they are the owner and the people who provided the license), but I believe that the individual who created it for them is Mark Hunter.
- There is a deletionist who has been active on this page with an apparent goal of making this page useless. Please do not be fooled by such shenanigans as removing a license or author information.
- RoyLeban (talk) 00:50, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- The description is wrong because this is not an ambigram of the word "Jaelynn", as simple as this.
- The resolution is 218 × 108 pixels and this is small. We're not talking about converting the Mona Lisa into SVG, just saying this is a work of bad quality.
- The main problem is the author. The links are wrong and ambigram.com is not a author. Wikimedia.org is not a author either. Now the website ambigram.com has moved or has been sold, so it is just used as a redirection. Tomorrow certainly this name will belong to someone else, and this someone should not be considered as the author of this work.
- The previous DR was open and closed by the same person. I think OTRS is necessary here -- Raison2+ (talk) 01:25, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. I've corrected the description. The low resolution is irrelevant because the file is in use on eo:Ambigramo, and so COM:INUSE applies.
Also, it looks like being the only ambigram we've got of the word "ambigram", which seems like a useful thing to have.I've added a link to the Wayback Machine copy of the permission page, which says that the picture should be credited to "ambigram.com", so even if that's no longer a helpful name, it's what the author asked for. As far as I can tell, the logo's author is otherwise anonymous. COM:OTRS is clear that OTRS is not required for pictures first published on a third-party Web site with a CC licence, which this was. --bjh21 (talk) 15:40, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
OK 
Neutral now the links have been fixed with the archive, showing the mention of the licence. However the purpose of this upload seems purely commercial, and Wikimedia warns their users not to use any commercial names of this kind usually. Also this is not the only ambigram of the word ambigram, there are at least 3 other ones here -- Raison2+ (talk) 16:02, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- I'm sorry; I somehow missed File:Ambigram of the word ambigram.png and File:Ambigram.svg. Relevant sentence above struck out. --bjh21 (talk) 16:09, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:44, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
引用元動画にCCライセンスが付いておらず、著作権の侵害にあたるため Wikitwkm (talk) 15:31, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Per http://archive.is/yoV2y, https://imgur.com/a/WeV10yP (HTML code cc-by license info) アーカイブのソースよりCCライセンスが付いていたことが確認できます。--こんせ (talk) 02:24, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: has proper license review. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:46, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
この動画にはCCライセンスが付いておらず、著作権侵害に当たるため Wikitwkm (talk) 15:32, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per archived source page(http://archive.fo/yoV2y) and the html code of source page. cc license is irrevocable. Puramyun31 (talk) 09:07, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: File:Hideya Tawada 20180719.jpg, which was extracted from this was license reviewed by User:User:Chiyako92. This would mean that this was also available und this license. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:49, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chilledude (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work, small file sizes, low quality & no metadata.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:14, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Re the photos "File:Subhas Bhattacharya 3.jpg", "File:Subhas Bhattacharya 2.jpg", "File:Subhas Bhattacharya.jpg", I can confirm they were all taken by me. I am surprised by your throwaway comment "Dubious claim of own work". With regards to your other throwaway comment about poor quality of the photos, a) they were taken on mobile, b) I don't expect to have to submit professional quality photos for an article on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chilledude (talk • contribs) 22:56, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- No metadata, and the other photo uploaded was taken off a television. Are these photos of old photos? Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:50, 19 September 2019 (UTC)