Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/03/20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 20th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not know it would be publicly visible Kushan1999 (talk) 09:14, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:42, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I will rename it TURBO KIM JINSUB (talk) 01:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted already. --E4024 (talk) 01:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too distorted to be useful. We have plenty better of the subject. Charlesdrakew (talk) 19:26, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep aprox 20 other wikis disagree with you and are using the image. clearly useful Oxyman (talk) 19:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Perspective-corrected version uploaded. If anyone prefers the original in other wikis, they are free to use that. Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:23, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That is a brilliant improvement. Thanks. Did not know that was possible. I withdraw the nomination if that is possible. Probably not.Charlesdrakew (talk) 21:05, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept - Everybody happy, thanks to Rodhullandemu. Withdrawn. --E4024 (talk) 00:11, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://eisenhutverlag.wordpress.com/2010/11/18/neuerscheinung-unter-tage-erzahlungen-von-jorg-sader/ There is an open ticket. Yann (talk) 19:39, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Permission accepted. --Yann (talk) 11:36, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.kulturfalter.de/termine-in-halle/vortraege-lesungen/ There is an open ticket. Yann (talk) 19:39, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand the deletion request. I've sent a ticket to OTRS with the release of the picture by Jörg Sader. Should be no problem. --Derbrauni (talk) 07:13, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS permission received. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 19:20, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Flickr2commons (talk · contribs)

[edit]

License laundering. See this description and the comment (Andrea Booher/FEMA.Mandatory credit/no payment).

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:48, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:37, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because i don't have a problems Kevs Official (talk) 04:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:16, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:28, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashaari90 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and newspapers. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:20, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:13, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Resheku922 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:41, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kaj1976 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:46, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SimpleSimpleSimple (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Richard Mortensen, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:50, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by mistake by me. Please delete. --SimpleSimpleSimple (talk) 22:25, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:42, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake by me. Please delete. SimpleSimpleSimple (talk) 22:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:43, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncategorized cat or gallery. Either categorize it or let us delete the page. This Ilios verginas should also possibly be in here. Who can handle this? (Note: As it was not categorized it was impossible to open a CfD, this is why I opened this DR. Of course the files will not be deleted.) E4024 (talk) 00:50, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Withdrawn. Categorized and no problem left. Thanks User:Achim55. --E4024 (talk) 00:05, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicated by mistake ZidaneHartono (talk) 11:36, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 23:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GGFamilly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scott Pitts the photographer is not the flickr account owner. Did he license this image freely? Leoboudv (talk) 05:02, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Scott Pitts (http://www.scottieimages.com) licensed this image freely in 2013 and gave his permission for non-commercial use of images he created for the production of The Late, Late Show, as long as he was always credited as photographer. (I was one of the graphic designers on that production.)--Raybusmann (talk) 06:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: I'll review this image then. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:16, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: I have reverted my flickr review because the permission was for "permission for Non-commercial use of images." Scott Pitts never authorised commercial use and he is not the flickr account owner Paul Outlaw To give permission, Mr. Pitts must use the COM:OTRS permission including a specific license version and E-mail the permission and a weblink to this image from his E-mail address. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:43, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just contacted Scott Pitts via e-mail. Hope to have this resolved ASAP. If he has any questions about how to proceed, whom can he contact?--Raybusmann (talk) 02:18, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Pitts let us know that he has taken care of the licensing agreement. He forwarded a confirmation with a ticket #.--Raybusmann (talk) 21:00, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 07:06, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c)stefanie fretz, missing permission, https://www.fdp-aarau.ch/. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Due to legal law (swiss copyright law, as well german copyright law) there is a right to "one's own picture". That means the depicted person owns the rights, and in this case he gaves me the permission to use his picture. Therefore is imho no need for permission from the photographer. In this case has the copyright sign no meaning. [https://www.skppsc.ch/de/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/12/rechteigenesbild.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youwiki12 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Youwiki12: Commons doesn't accept permission from third parties so the copyright holder (whoever he/she is) must send a permission via COM:OTRS/de. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarification Patrick. The copyright holder has now sent a permission. [Ticket#2019032310002128]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youwiki12 (talk • contribs) 08:38, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per otrs permission. --Krd 12:30, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not needed 104.238.59.83 22:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jianhui67. This is now closed. Regards, –MJLTalk 19:47, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marina-artkonditer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:18, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:06, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cross-wiki spam. Part of extensive cross-wiki spam campaign by sock ring. Not notable. Hiàn (talk) 01:42, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:08, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://100falcons.wordpress.com/2010/08/27/how-did-they-lift-those-stones/ Ytoyoda (talk) 01:51, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:08, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://rogerdhansen.wordpress.com/2011/07/16/the-roman-aqueduct-in-segovia-spain/ Ytoyoda (talk) 01:53, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:07, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope for Commons. --ghouston (talk) 03:47, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:08, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope ---see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:FANOMEZAN-JANAHARY Anthony.jpg Habertix (talk) 06:41, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:08, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong description. this ribbon is not for the captain mbaye medal. http://dag.un.org/bitstream/handle/11176/400552/2016.18%20Guidelines%20on%20Awarding%20the%20Captain%20Mbaye%20Diagne%20Medal.pdf ΚηœrZupator   09:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The file is in use on es:Resolució 2154 del Consell de Seguretat de les Nacions Unides, ru:Медали ООН, and ru:Диань, Мбайе. Under COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV, it should not be deleted for inaccuracy while it is required by other projects. @Knoerz: If you want to correct the description, you can do so by editing File:UN Captain Mbaye Diagne Medal for Exceptional Courage ribbon.svg. You can also request that it be renamed, or upload a new and more accurate version. --bjh21 (talk) 18:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: I fixed the error with the color (white → yellow). There is no reason to delete. Photo of a real medal. Borodun (talk) 19:50, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, to change the color was the best way. I did not know how to do it. So please forget the deletion request. I will delete it --ΚηœrZupator   20:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:30, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

©Itziar Lorente/Yuppic, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Young jally (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:56, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Victorenoh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:05, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

©2019 Marko T Wramén and Anna W Thorbjörnsson, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is outdated (more than 11 years) and does not reflect the current situation of the Port of Alicante PuertoAlicante (talk) 13:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The file is in use on en:Port of Alicante. If it's good enough for English Wikipedia, it's good enough for Commons. See also COM:INUSE. --bjh21 (talk) 18:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as uploader's own work, but evidently a company logo being used without proper licensing SamHolt6 (talk) 14:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS permission received. --Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:26, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lyphutai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:25, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I dont want my name attached to this image as seen in the image revision history. If we could just delete the name that would be fine by me to. calle_sa (talk) 22:27, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, but I hid the full name. Ruthven (msg) 10:24, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please can we remove the version from "16:54, 26 August 2008", the version comment contains personally identifying information. calle_sa (talk) 14:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:22, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:22, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:21, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:22, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:22, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sylvajoeboy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:23, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:23, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Syed Uzair Ali.jpg. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:23, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; dubious claim of own work. --Gbawden (talk) 06:24, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:24, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tahmidazuwad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; one INUSE kept. --Gbawden (talk) 06:21, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tahmidazuwad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader claim it his work but it is clearly not. It's someone elses work, he uploaded it on flicker and then here on commons. Simply see files metadata. Clearly Commons:Flickrwash. Also see uploader talk page, uploader already warned by User:Yann not to upload copyrighetd material.

আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 17:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:20, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; doubtful claim of own work based on the watermark. --Gbawden (talk) 06:19, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:20, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:20, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:20, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Dw no source since (dw no source since) See UDR. Yann (talk) 18:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:16, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 01:12, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

still out of project scope Didym (talk) 16:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

LTA user's own image, out of scope. E4024 (talk) 13:25, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:04, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Do I recall well having asked our good admins to deal with this kid more effectively? :) Please salt the file name and, yes, also the uploader, at least for some time. E4024 (talk) 19:55, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:15, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private picture; out of scope Poecilotheria36 (talk) 20:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:15, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

broken file Poecilotheria36 (talk) 21:05, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:14, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

broken file Poecilotheria36 (talk) 21:05, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:14, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

objects out of focus, very dark and blurry; there are better pictures of the same plant with better quality in the same category Poecilotheria36 (talk) 21:17, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:13, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NOTUSED & COM:EDUSE: Per talk page, I was originally going to use this as a joke, but I decided against it. Thank you, –MJLTalk 21:20, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Mihai Armas, www.armas.md, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:17, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c)SILVER TONISSON, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:35, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c)SILVER TONISSON, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:36, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry. FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 00:21, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; dubious claim of own work. --Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In scope? IMHO UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 00:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Image of user or friend. DoorOpensCloses (talk) 00:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:55, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesnt look useable Geoffroi 00:39, 20 March 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:56, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

privacy issues Y2b4u3d (talk) 05:58, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:57, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

privacy isues Y2b4u3d (talk) 05:58, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:58, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, in my opinion logo and text spoil the image, it is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:58, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion the file is out of project scope. Should be .svg, if really useful. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:58, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal, vanity photo. Out of scope for Wikipedia/Commons. Oaktree b (talk) 23:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

After Mecanex logo was deleted here due to non-notability, I suspect, that this logo is out of project scope as well. Taivo (talk) 08:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:59, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion eForex is non-notable and the logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:59, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yallamorodougou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal files, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 10:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the Romanian Wikipedia, where the subject's article was deleted in July 2012 via deletion discussion. Out of project scope.

xplicit 10:50, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image without obvious encyclopedic use, outside prospect scope Ytoyoda (talk) 11:08, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely confusing and irrelevant redirect. Should also be indef upload protected after deletion, simply because it's a "default file name" and such shouldn't ever be used. KevTYD (talk) 01:37, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Additional note: Only applies to the redirect, nothing else. KevTYD (talk) 01:39, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Also, it's linked to a copyrighted logo. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:05, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:00, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of non notable entity, out of scope. Yann (talk) 12:21, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:01, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:02, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can be deleted, SVG-logo is available and in use: File:Mercedes-Benz_EQ_logo.svg. Aidepikiw-nick (talk) 14:55, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:02, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:03, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:03, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:31, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:04, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:05, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mijony (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:05, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 19:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:36, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~MOHEEN (keep talking) 10:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Various documents and one logo, not own works. Uncertain copyright, and dubiously in scope.

Yann (talk) 19:44, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:35, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

broken file Poecilotheria36 (talk) 20:20, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:33, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

broken file Poecilotheria36 (talk) 20:31, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:33, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

broken file Poecilotheria36 (talk) 21:04, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:32, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

broken file Poecilotheria36 (talk) 21:04, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:32, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

broken file Poecilotheria36 (talk) 21:04, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:32, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

broken file Poecilotheria36 (talk) 21:05, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:33, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per FBMD... in beginning of special instructions field of metadata, the file comes from Facebook. Uploader has problems with copyright (look his/her talkpage). I suspect again copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:26, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:43, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The monument was completed in 1965 by Laimonis Blumbergs (1919–2014) and Aivars Gulbis (1933–). There is no freedom of panorama in Latvia, permission from the artists is required.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:36, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sharjilrishal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work by user with multiple copyvio uploads on this theme

Ariadacapo (talk) 11:43, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:44, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Isfa8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per Wiklund has to send a permission for a free license via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 11:57, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:45, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the Philippines. According to this website, the sculptures were commissioned by Napoleon Abueva, who died in 2018. Copyright in the Philippines last for 50 years after the death of he author (2018+51=2069).

Howhontanozaz (talk) 14:39, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:45, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:45, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jathinsarang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images.

--ghouston (talk) 04:22, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:52, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jathinsarang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos - out of project scope:

Derivative work containing non-free content:

XXN, 23:03, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:06, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jathinsarang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos and artworks.

~Moheen (keep talking) 22:08, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:33, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jathinsarang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:46, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a gallery. Perhaps one needs a disam page. E4024 (talk) 00:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Changed Category:Geta to a disambiguating one. --Achim (talk) 09:46, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept thanks to Achim. --E4024 (talk) 02:19, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Piotr Biernikowicz , mising permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • była zgoda autora zdjęcia na opublikowanie zdjęcia, ale autor (Piotr Biernikowicz) miał wysłać stosowną zgodę do Commons, jednak tego nie uczynił, dlatego ze zdjęcia ostatecznie zrezygnowano --Pozdrawiam. Keres 40 (dyskusja) 14:28, 20 mar 2019 (CET)

Deleted: If I understand Google's translation correctly, photographer's permisson was expected to be given, but not received. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:31, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Piotr Biernikowicz , mising permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • ta sama sprawa co z Damondem...była zgoda autora zdjęcia na opublikowanie zdjęcia, ale autor (Piotr Biernikowicz) miał wysłać stosowną zgodę do Commons, jednak tego nie uczynił, dlatego ze zdjęcia ostatecznie zrezygnowano...Photographs two for cassation because of not sending consent to commons by Piotr Biernikowicz, who agreed for the publication of the photo for Keres 40. Therefore, the pictures to be deleted were not used in any project. Sorry for the confusion. Greetings. Keres 40 (dyskusja) 18:13, 20 mar 2019 (CET)

Deleted: per discussion. If I understand the uploader's comment correctly, a permission by the photographer was expected, but ultimately not received. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:33, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry picture, not helpful, no identification Poecilotheria36 (talk) 20:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per COM:INUSE - is used in Arab Wikipedia with a caption that Google translates as "A picture of a natural chrysanthemum". --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:27, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of copyrighted video. Appears to be from this video, which does not have a Creative Commons license. Hiàn (talk) 21:51, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by 1989 at 06:35, 1 April 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 12:46, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is actually a portrait of Danil, by Predic, who died in 1953 (at the age of 96!). Sorry, I should have caught that right away. WQUlrich (talk) 05:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:57, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File isn't properly indicated; doesn't look like own work. Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 04:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep I agree that it's not own work, but this image is used in SDNY's official home page introduction of Berman. I have changed the source of this photo to PD-USGov and as such suggest we keep it as it has a proper source. --Daffy123 (talk) 17:01, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Resolved; withdrawn by nominator. --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 17:52, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted cover of an album/single. Rapsar (talk) 06:47, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gregyak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, last remaining files, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 12:17, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fan art by Nintendo Doomdorm64 (talk) 15:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 20:48, 16 April 2019 UTC: Copyright violation that doesn't meet criteria for fan art. Images are direct copies of the official artwork for Cubone and Marowak. --Krdbot 00:38, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Natalia Sergueïevna Gontcharova (d. 1962), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:41, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Natalia Sergueïevna Gontcharova (d. 1962), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:42, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Mikhaïl Fiodorovitch Larionov (d. 1964), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:12, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:44, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have found it in the Supreme Court's website. So I presumed it has public domain permission.--Renzoy16 | (Talk) 15:20, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:56, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:57, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have found it in the Supreme Court's website. So I presumed it has public domain permission.--Renzoy16 | (Talk) 15:21, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Renzoy16: IMO it's a wrong reading of {{PD-PhilippinesPubDoc}}. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:20, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:56, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found as early as 2010 at https://www.flickr.com/photos/convergenciaiunio/4835175452 Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:32, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, so we have 2 more or less respactable sources, which seem to slightly contractdict. I've asked the uploader to contact his source Ajuntament de La Garriga" for confirmation. --Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I think it is very difficult to know exactly if the image is in a free license, I assume it is probably a mistake of the La Garriga municipality website. Probably they do not know well the rights of this image. Thanks for the information! --Docosong (talk) 13:43, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Based on evidence from Flickr, it either belongs to w:Convergència i Unió or Jordi Play the photographer.--Roy17 (talk) 11:07, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:55, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stepro as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: personal rights: flickr-imported out-of-scope-pic of an unknown kid --Stepro (talk) 21:28, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion, as the image was uploaded already in 2012 and is currently in use. Personality rights might be discussed. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:12, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  The only use is on a personal discussion page, using to blame other users. --Stepro (talk) 23:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:56, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David290 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear source and copyright status. File:Beijing New Airport-1.jpg still has a watermark stating (among others) "all rights reserved". Some clear source URL and some evidence of CC licensing is needed here.

Ariadacapo (talk) 10:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ariadacapo: File:Beijing New Airport-1.jpg is already deleted.David290 (talk) 18:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, no permission.--Roy17 (talk) 23:20, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David290 (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

No permission from the artists 张沛坚 or 何婧. 二泉映月, 春到田间 and 平湖秋月 广东音乐 合奏 are phishy too. The three were claimed to be the uploader's own works, but they are similar in style to the other files.

Roy17 (talk) 23:40, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@David290: you can find information for this on Commons:OTRS. Ariadacapo (talk) 10:32, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please point out my mistake if I really made it.廣九直通車 (talk) 10:36, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 UpdateThe permission email for File:春到田间.ogg has been reviewed, and I have approved the email as well.廣九直通車 (talk) 05:50, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Roy17: Sorry about my mistakes, would you make a summary of copyright statuses about all files listed on this deletion request? I am actually not so sure about audio files...廣九直通車 (talk) 12:35, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@廣九直通車: No worries. It might be a common misconception that traditional Chinese music are historical works, but actually many were composed not more than 100 years ago and their composers died in late 20th century. The ones to be deleted are listed above. Here come the ones I tend to support  Keep:

Kept: the files that have OTRS permission confirmed. Deleted the rest. --Majora (talk) 21:12, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David290 (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). Some may fufill COM:BLP.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:01, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In terms of project scope, I think these are OK:
  1. File:Wedding in dongguan 2015.jpg
  2. File:Ayen Ho - 17.png
  3. (wrt the list at special:permalink/357504282) Between (inclusive) File:20190601 150709 A.jpg and File:20190601 160840 A.jpg . These are photos of the two girls in Asian costumes. Keeping all is OK, but selecting some good ones from the batch would be even better.--Roy17 (talk) 17:03, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@大诺史: Some pictures of sea turtles in Huizhou are being moved, will you do a favor to move over those files? David290 (talk) 04:57, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@大诺史: File:Ayen Ho - 17.png is not private photo, it is taken in music activity. David290 (talk) 04:08, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 13:35, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David290 (talk · contribs) 4

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE: COM:HOST.

Mys_721tx (talk) 13:48, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:38, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David290 (talk · contribs) 5

[edit]

The files are images of anime models, in which the original characters is likely to be copyrighted by the producer. As a result, the images are derivative works of copyrighted works, and is likely to be unfree per COM:CB#Comic and action figures.廣九直通車 (talk) 02:53, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David290 (talk · contribs) 6

[edit]

The files are images of billboards of a railway construction site. However, Template:PD-PRC-exempt is not a valid license for files by normal users. Meanwhile China Railway Construction Corporation is not a governmental agency, therefore Template:PD-PRC-exempt is also invalid for the billboards.廣九直通車 (talk) 05:45, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:33, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David290 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Near duplicate of File:CJ750 1953.jpg

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:37, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:28, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David290 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:38, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:59, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If the previous version is (was) not PD it must be deleted and not kept here; this is why I marked the file for "split". I meant "split it so let's see if both are OK"; if not, then we cannot and should not keep a not acceptable version here. E4024 (talk) 12:58, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely! Keep them both and close this DR. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 15:23, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per good news from OTRS agent. I withdraw the nom. --E4024 (talk) 15:26, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the old version, please delete it per this edit by the uploader.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Firstly, -I think for browser reasons- I see two of the same image. Having said that, I opened a DR for the older file, thinking it might have a CR problem. Now that it has been confirmed there is no such issue, we have no reason to delete the file. We need both old and new images of notable subjects. BTW, Jeff G., I know it's a good Samaritan work from your part to open this DR, but I'm sure the interested party could also have been able to do that by themselves, as they have been able to upload several files to Commons and even manage the OTRS procedure.  Keep --E4024 (talk) 17:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Based on timestamps, the originally accepted OTRS ticket was for the older file, with the newer one (that I histsplit and sent to File:Abbashow Swede Sensation.jpg of previously-uncertain (but now confirmed okay) CR status. DMacks (talk) 17:28, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Jeff, being in use or not has no importance at all in this case, as the images both belong to a notable band. Therefore even if someone goes and removes the image from any WP, that has nothing to do with our discussion. --E4024 (talk) 17:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 11:42, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File adds nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images already held covering the same subject. Is of poor or mediocre quality. DoorOpensCloses (talk) 00:12, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:06, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD at the MD. (I guess this was the reason they wanted to delete and rename it before.) E4024 (talk) 00:18, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unintelligible reason. --ŠJů (talk) 00:33, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:08, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as another file candidate to deletion for FBMD at MD. In this one they have cleared that from the MD. E4024 (talk) 00:20, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Erica Nicoli (1452377964589).jpg. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:09, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Single-item gallery or unnecessary cat (intent). E4024 (talk) 00:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:10, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is needless TURBO KIM JINSUB (talk) 00:52, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:11, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anonymous or pseudonymous works are protected in the Philippines for 50 years after publication. According to this sculpture's marker, it was unveiled on May 25, 1980. This means that until January 1, 2031, photos of this work would be derivatives and may need the consent of the author.

Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:26, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message; before I took pictures of the subjects I proceeded to Intramuros Adminstration Office and I was granted permission and even assistance in the photography, respectfully submitted Judgefloro 06:35, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 Delete As per the reasons stated by User talk:Howhontanozaz. Markoolio97 (talk) 09:40, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculptor Peter de Guzman is still alive. The monument was unveiled in 1995. There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines and copyright for sculptures lasts for 50 years after the author's death.

Howhontanozaz (talk) 15:02, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message; before I took pictures of the subjects I proceeded to Intramuros Adminstration Office and I was granted permission and even assistance in the photography, respectfully submitted Judgefloro 06:35, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination - if there is a permission it must be sent to com:OTRS. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:02, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This sculpture's artist, Julie Lluch, is still alive. This sculpture was commissioned by then Manila Mayor Lito Atienza and was unveiled circa 2002[1]. There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines and copyright for sculptures lasts for 50 years after the death of its sculptor.

Howhontanozaz (talk) 15:18, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:03, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(C) J. Luis Rey - reyj@outlook.com E4024 (talk) 01:12, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(C) J. Luis Rey - reyj@outlook.com (Uploader, if you are the photographer you should read and learn our "OTRS" mechanism.) E4024 (talk) 01:14, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Metadata clearly shows this image is copyrighted to a professional photographer, and not available under the license stipulated by the uploader. There's no indication the image is the work of the uploader. Hammersoft (talk) 01:48, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Assemblée nationale. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:56, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and taken from FB from MD. --Gbawden (talk) 13:14, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since). The source web site has " © Universidad de La Rioja" .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This image belongs to the repository of the archives of the Government of La Rioja (Licende CC4.0). This is the link reference: https://ias1.larioja.org/cex/sistemas/cmu/v3/consultaRecursoFicha.jsp?ltcnx=L0200&id=ST9UfxuPYY0%3D --Wikitcher (talk) 13:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I think this can be speedy kept after the link is fixed. Ankry (talk) 13:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment See ticket:2019032010004097. Yann (talk) 10:57, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 13:14, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Belarus Ymblanter (talk) 17:28, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:08, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright F. COTTEREAU/ « SO » https://www.sudouest.fr/2017/10/21/juppe-designe-philippe-comme-la-releve-3881816-2780.php Tiraden (talk) 19:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:08, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears elsewhere on the Internet. Permission needed. Hiàn (talk) 20:18, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; photo by tim webb per exif, not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Single-item gallery. E4024 (talk) 00:43, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 19:59, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer required Gallambria (talk) 09:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --xplicit 12:01, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer required Gallambria (talk) 09:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --xplicit 12:01, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely screen shot. Assorted locales of grainy pictures this user has uploaded is dubious. See related discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by S882019Bagumba (talk) 10:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --xplicit 12:01, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this really De minimis? kahusi (會話) 10:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete 投稿者です。もともとコモンズへのアップロードを想定していない状況で昔に撮ったため、ここへ投稿する上ではまずったなという感じです。入口付近と分かるように撮るとどちらにせよこの大きな絵が写りこんでしまうんですが、さらに左側にはショップがあり、それを含めて俯瞰した状態で撮影するなどもうちょっと構図を思案すべきでした。いろいろとご面倒をおかけしまして大変申し訳ございませんが、削除に同意しておきます。--stck_w (Talk/Edits 12:42, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --xplicit 12:02, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:47, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --xplicit 12:07, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in South Korea. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --xplicit 12:09, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from album cover. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --xplicit 12:10, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I I uploaded the wrong photo. Gilmara Barros de Lima (talk) 17:44, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --xplicit 12:13, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion the license is incorrect and the logo should be deleted as copyright violation. (This is likely Commons record: 11½ years from copyvio detection by @AnonMoos: until deletion.) Taivo (talk) 18:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --xplicit 12:13, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France for artwork. COM:FOP France Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --xplicit 12:14, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is from a document published in 1970, thus obviously still under copyright. Culex (talk) 14:18, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Culex, cette photo fait partie de la revue de la chambre de commerce franco canadienne, et fait partie de la banque numerique du quebec et canada et est libre de droit. Il ny a pas de copyright. Bonne journée. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gascogneverite (talk • contribs) 12:43, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. En effet, ce document est peut-être dans le domaine public au Canada (50 ans), mais pas aux États-Unis (70 ans), durée par défaut appliquée pour les documents stockés sur WikiCommons. Est-il possible de rajouter le lien d'origine vers ce document si celui-ci a été numérisé ? Culex (talk) 13:59, 24 March 2019 (UTC).[reply]

oui, bien sur. Bonne journée.--Gascogneverite (talk) 16:28, 4 April 2019 (UTC) rebonjour, j'ai précisé la source en indiquant la page et le renvoi, si vous avez des suggestions pour améliorer la présentation de la source, je suis preneur.[reply]

merci d'avance. --Gascogneverite (talk) 16:49, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by P199. 大诺史 (talk) 08:58, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was previously published at [1] and judging by the filename it was copied directly from there. This image might be a copyvio. Jarash (talk) 05:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:45, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: google search. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 12:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:45, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: google search. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 12:18, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:44, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture contains sensitive date Poecilotheria36 (talk) 20:42, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:43, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, the user was never an "active participant" at one of the wikimedia projects Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

object of interest out of focus; not a helpful picture Poecilotheria36 (talk) 20:43, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:39, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Benin. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:49, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(transfered) Salut Patrick Rogel, Pouvez-vous nous en dire plus sur les raisons de 'demande de suppression' de cet import? il s'agit d'un travail personnel. Merci, Mah3110 (talk) 18:21, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Mah3110: Oui, il faut l'autorisation de l'auteur de l'oeuvre. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:51, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:47, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am wondering what mean SVG? I want to use the diagram for an article I am writing and thought it would be useful to represent what can be painful to read. I didn't found a model to do diagrams. I speak french so if someone could answer me in french, it would be easier for me to understand and to explain. KingPico 10:46, 20 March 2019 (HAE)
See w:fr:Scalable Vector Graphics. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:36, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:07, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted by Nintendo Doomdorm64 (talk) 15:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep please see Commons:Threshold of originality. L ke (talk) 15:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: the logo is above ToO. Ruthven (msg) 13:07, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even if anonym, not public domain yet in France. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:39, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:08, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a professional photoshoot that has been flickrwashed. The source link and author link are dead, most likely indicating that this it was not the original photographer. There is also no indication that the photo is from the band's record label. 100cellsman (talk) 01:36, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:54, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a professional photoshoot that has been flickrwashed. The source link and author link are dead, most likely indicating that this it was not the original photographer. There is also no indication that the photo is from the band's record label. 100cellsman (talk) 03:57, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:54, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: google search. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 12:17, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:54, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:55, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Numobeer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Gbawden as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Clear copyvios, only uploads of this user

 Keep IMO the uploader is using the same gear (SM-G920F), they seems own work. Regards — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but i don't speak and write english very well; i take this picture and photo personally with my samsung galaxy s6 on motor show of bologne 2016. I want to do this picture free for onlyone. This is my picture that i done, is not of copyright violation. Please don't delete. Check everything, on facebook, web, instagram, this picture are original take by me. I take a photo of my ticket of motor show 2016 tell the truth? --Numobeer (talk) 04:19, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Seems legit to me. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 19:25, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep--Typ932 (talk) 21:32, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 14:12, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, no permission. Yann (talk) 19:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your statement is a guess, but sounds like a statement. The original file was graphically revised and modified by myself.. --Schreibwerkzeug (Schreibwerkzeug) 08:23, 22. Mär. 2019 (CET) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schreibwerkzeug (talk • contribs) 07:23, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: derived work from New York Daily, no permission. Ruthven (msg) 14:13, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author died in 1962, Undelete in 2033. Abzeronow (talk) 20:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:15, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not my own work Bobby Prabawa (talk) 03:17, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you upload it then? Now I began to suspect your other uploads... --E4024 (talk) 01:12, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:28, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If 1950 not public domain yet in France. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:37, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:25, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely that a Flickr user owns the copyright to a Harry Potter drawing. Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:47, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is an original fan art inspired by a character, not a drawing of the book subject to copyright. Suzelfe (talk) 17:02, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: {{Fan art}}. Ruthven (msg) 14:23, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments. The sculptor died in 2009.

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 17:11, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source claims that the image is in the public domain. However, according to this article, the photo came from Shutterstock, which was later re-posted in Instagram. Neither source has verified yet that the photo is in the public domain or CC Zero as claimed. The copy must have been derived and taken from the original version. If possibly unfree, the photo should be deleted on Commons. George Ho (talk) 10:18, 20 March 2019 (UTC); extended, 10:21, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Clearly not the same photo. By comparing the two photos you can see that the specular highlights are in a different place. This is from 2016 and predates the Instagram photo (but even if it were an homage made afterwards, the idea of a brown egg on a white background is insufficiently distinctive to attract copyright protection). -- King of 07:00, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: clearly not the same image!. Ruthven (msg) 16:18, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be "own work". Photo taken in 1938 [2]. Found somewhere in the Web LMLM (talk) 10:52, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: {{PD-Venezuela}}. Ruthven (msg) 16:20, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Cuatro Remos as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: unlikely own workD Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:59, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Confusing copyright informations in EXIF which states copyright holder http://www.fotoluis.tk/ which has copyrighted content. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was uploaded using a rather special license tag that does NOT apply to the image, because it was NOT "published by a legal entity under public law". As the image is apparently German and the person shown lived until 1946, there's a good chance that the author (who is not named) lived beyond 1948, which would mean the image is still protected in Germany. Also, it would still protected in the US because of the URAA. This means the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 12:03, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 20:13, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadGIF}}, replaced by File:Logo_Swede_Sensation.png DMacks (talk) 16:14, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:07, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Chiyako92 as no source (No source since)

A source is indicated, but the link appears to be dead so that the claimed CC BY license cannot be verified. Also see Special:Diff/54178235. clpo13(talk) 16:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Facebook file, no permission. --Yann (talk) 13:07, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Signature on the upper right: not anonym. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The signature seems to be en:Jacques Copeau. Yann (talk) 13:13, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
en:Jacques Copeau is not an illustrator. The signature is the one of fr:Jacques Bonneaud, who died in 1971. It will enter the PD in France in 2042. BrightRaven (talk) 14:05, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:12, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work (the man depicted died in 1936). Data about original publication is needed in order to assert public domain status. Strakhov (talk) 04:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, derivative work, no info on original photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:44, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Chiyako92 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Posted to source as All Rights Reserved. Only free files are allowed on Commons. However, if you look at the licensing link, the poster of the blog has the CC-by-SA-4.0 tag where she has released the rights. TLSuda (talk) 14:20, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The Commons license tag is put in a different blog article than the one where the photos were taken from. I therefore assume that photos from article The Penultimate Mile are under CC-BY, while photos from article Winter Bluebird Day are not. --Chiyako92 (talk) 14:31, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per Chiyako92. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:49, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Chiyako92 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Posted to source as All Rights Reserved. Only free files are allowed on Commons.However, if you look at the licensing link, the poster of the blog has the CC-by-SA-4.0 tag where she has released the rights. TLSuda (talk) 14:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The Commons license tag is put in a different blog article than the one where the photos were taken from. I therefore assume that photos from article The Penultimate Mile are under CC-BY, while photos from article Winter Bluebird Day are not. --Chiyako92 (talk) 14:31, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per Chiyako92. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:48, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professionally taken photo. Declaration that it is user's 'own work' is dubious without other evidence to support it. El cid, el campeador (talk) 17:17, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As a retired journalist I strive for quality. Conner's place of business, Randyland, is publicly accessible. I took his photo there. I was not paid or asked to. If you look at my history I am contributing to topics in Pittsburgh. For example, I recently uploaded a new photo of the Mayor too. Popscreenshot (talk) 18:08, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. Please note that a discussion is currently going on at AFD Here as to if article should be deleted or not and if it meets notability guidelines. I am also concerned as to if the creator is in close connection with subject and if so he/she should disclose this on his talk page. Lapablo (talk) 19:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Article about person on en:W was kept and image is in use. Photo looks of similar quality to other "own work" photos by the uploader; I see no reason to label it "dubious". -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:54, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unsure of the license - digital modification of the exisiting painting Chimneysaffair (talk) 12:57, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I think that restoring the original color does not generate new copyright. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:44, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

近代的な美術品のため Gohachiyasu1214 (talk) 22:39, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's related to ja:笹川良一. Copyright lasts for 50 years by the end of 2018, but 70 years from 2019 onwards. I cant find the exact date this was erected, but I think it's after 1968.--Roy17 (talk) 10:28, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, this sculpture seems to have been created in 1982. See here. --Y.haruo (talk) 19:22, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unsure of the license - digital modification of the exisiting painting. Uploaded by mistake Chimneysaffair (talk) 12:56, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn by nominator. --Majora (talk) 21:32, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superceded by 55 OABr patch 2019.png. Vector version available as well. VileGecko (talk) 19:55, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected to PNG version. --Majora (talk) 04:00, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в лицензии: это не государственный официальный документ, у изображения есть автор или художник, созданный карту и другие элементы рисунка Dogad75 (talk) 15:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Это документ размещён на портале Память Народа владельцем которого является Министерство обороны Российской Федерации. Данный файл является не произведением одного художника, а официальным документом составленным штабом 10-го гвардейского стрелкового корпуса отображающим боевой путь данного корпуса. Если не подходит данная лицензия, то подскажите под какой лицензией размещать файлы с данного сайта. Можно ли использовать лицензию Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International используя шаблон {{mil.ru}}? --Odinn1 (talk) 17:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:14, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this also from "Gavroche" like File:Yervant Tolayan.jpg? I see a Turkish publisher (Aras) as source but as that part in the paper is not in Turkish. I can only read it by Google translate. I have my doubts about the "EU" license as Turkey is not a member of EU yet (and I'm bored of being considered part of EU at occasions, for example when a Spanish club does not want to lose a "foreigner" quota employing a Turkish footballer). You've got one week to find another license (from Turkey perhaps) because I do not want the picture of a person who died -as a victim of Stalinism- back in 1937 to disappear from Commons. E4024 (talk) 15:20, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again (yes I changed my pseudo), sorry for the delay in my answer. I updated the license with a PD-Turkey one, because the photographer is unknown and the picture was taken before 1937 either in Turkey, either in France. Hope it works for you RSVartanian (talk) 16:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC+1)

Kept: RSVartanian's change seems reasonable. Either PD-Turkey or {{PD-Ottoman Empire}}. --Majora (talk) 22:05, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]